Deep Sky Challenge
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Faces of Stars
Resolving the Faces of Stars estled among the venerable telescope domes on Mount Wilson, a mile-high peak overlooking Los Angeles, is the highest- resolution optical instrument in the world. Inside several hundred meters of evacuated pipe, beams of star- light from six 1-meter (39-inch) telescopes converge on a central fa- cility to be matched up light wave for light wave. The result allows measurements of details as small as a thousandth of an arcsecond wide — the apparent size of a penny in Los Angeles seen from At- lanta. Georgia State University’s Center for High Angular Resolu- tion Astronomy (CHARA) built and runs the instrument under the directorship of Harold McAlister. The CHARA Array is currently Nthe largest of several new installations around the world applying 21st-century technology to an old idea: optical interferometry. The concept of interferometry predates photographic fi lm, but astronomers didn’t really put it into practice until the early 1920s (see “Milestones in Optical Interferometry,” page 44). Now, nearly a century later, technology is catching up with theory. Astronomers are using a new breed of giant interferometers to measure some of ERIC SIMISON / SEA WEST ENTERPRISES SIMISON / SEA WEST ERIC the most diffi cult fundamental parameters in stellar astrophysics, in By David H. Berger, The CHARA Array particular the sizes and shapes of stars (S&T: May 2003, page 30). is one of several These parameters are most easily studied for the nearest and Jason P. Aufdenberg, facilities on Mount brightest stars, those dear to skygazers’ hearts. The CHARA Array and Nils H. -
Filter Performance Comparisons for Some Common Nebulae
Filter Performance Comparisons For Some Common Nebulae By Dave Knisely Light Pollution and various “nebula” filters have been around since the late 1970’s, and amateurs have been using them ever since to bring out detail (and even some objects) which were difficult to impossible to see before in modest apertures. When I started using them in the early 1980’s, specific information about which filter might work on a given object (or even whether certain filters were useful at all) was often hard to come by. Even those accounts that were available often had incomplete or inaccurate information. Getting some observational experience with the Lumicon line of filters helped, but there were still some unanswered questions. I wondered how the various filters would rank on- average against each other for a large number of objects, and whether there was a “best overall” filter. In particular, I also wondered if the much-maligned H-Beta filter was useful on more objects than the two or three targets most often mentioned in publications. In the summer of 1999, I decided to begin some more comprehensive observations to try and answer these questions and determine how to best use these filters overall. I formulated a basic survey covering a moderate number of emission and planetary nebulae to obtain some statistics on filter performance to try to address the following questions: 1. How do the various filter types compare as to what (on average) they show on a given nebula? 2. Is there one overall “best” nebula filter which will work on the largest number of objects? 3. -
Careful Measurements Reveal That the Earth Has a Slight Difference in Its Dimensions
Careful measurements reveal that the earth has a slight difference in its dimensions EUREKA!!! COPY EARTH’S SHAPE? •The shape of the earth is technically called an OBLATE SPHEROID: •Slightly flattened at the poles and bulging in the middle(equator) EXAGGERATED PICTURE! COPY BUT….. IT LOOKS PERFECTLY ROUND TO US! OBLATE SPHEROID check this out!!! IT’S DRILL TIME!!!!! Polar Equatorial Circumference Circumference Polar Equatorial diameter Diameter Actual Numbers • Polar diameter • Equatorial diameter = 12,714km = 12,757km (7882mi) (7909mi) • Polar • Equatorial Circumference Circumference = 40,076km = 40,006km (24,847mi) (24,804mi) MODEL COPY •A MODEL is a way of representing the properties of some object – (Drawing, diagram, graph, chart, photo, table) Evidence for the Earth’s Shape: • 1. Altitude of Polaris • 2. Gravity Measurements • 3. “Sinking” ships • 4. Lunar Eclipses * POLARIS= NORTH STAR NORTH POLE Earth’s AXIS of Rotation Geographic Poles SOUTH POLE WHAT ABOUT THE SOUTH POLE? • At the present time, Polaris is the pole star in the northern direction. Sigma Octantis is the closest star to the south celestial pole, but it is too faint to serve as a useful pole star. The Southern Cross constellation functions as an approximate southern pole constellation. Some people travel to the equator in order to be able to see both Polaris and the Southern cross. Pointer Stars! POLARIS Polaris is found in the little dipper!! COPY COPY Detailed Evidence for the Earth’s Shape COPY 1. Altitude of Polaris: The altitude is the ANGLE above the horizon Polaris is directly over the North Pole (Fixed Star) Your LATITUDE (degrees North or South of equator) equals ALTITUDE of POLARIS! 90O 30O 0O Person standing at 30ON POLARIS 90O 45O 0O 2. -
Successful Observing Sessions HOWL-EEN FUN Kepler’S Supernova Remnant Harvard’S Plate Project and Women Computers
Published by the Astronomical League Vol. 69, No. 4 September 2017 Successful Observing Sessions HOWL-EEN FUN Kepler’s Supernova Remnant Harvard’s Plate Project and Women Computers T HE ASTRONOMICAL LEAGUE 1 he 1,396th entry in John the way to HR 8281, is the Dreyer’s Index Catalogue of Elephant’s Trunk Nebula. The T Nebulae and Clusters of left (east) edge of the trunk Stars is associated with a DEEP-SKY OBJECTS contains bright, hot, young galactic star cluster contained stars, emission nebulae, within a large region of faint reflection nebulae, and dark nebulosity, and a smaller region THE ELEPHANT’S TRUNK NEBULA nebulae worth exploring with an within it called the Elephant’s 8-inch or larger telescope. Trunk Nebula. In general, this By Dr. James R. Dire, Kauai Educational Association for Science & Astronomy Other features that are an entire region is absolute must to referred to by the check out in IC pachyderm 1396 are the proboscis phrase. many dark IC 1396 resides nebulae. Probably in the constellation the best is Cepheus and is Barnard 161. This located 2,400 light- dark nebula is years from Earth. located 15 To find IC 1396, arcminutes north start at Alpha of SAO 33652. Cephei, a.k.a. The nebula Alderamin, and go measures 5 by 2.5 five degrees arcminutes in southeast to the size. The nebula is fourth-magnitude very dark. Myriad red star Mu Cephei. Milky Way stars Mu Cephei goes by surround the the Arabic name nebula, but none Erakis. It is also can be seen in called Herschel’s this small patch of Garnet Star, after the sky. -
Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory a Autumn Observing Notes
Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory A Autumn Observing Notes Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory PUBLIC OBSERVING – Autumn Tour of the Sky with the Naked Eye CASSIOPEIA Look for the ‘W’ 4 shape 3 Polaris URSA MINOR Notice how the constellations swing around Polaris during the night Pherkad Kochab Is Kochab orange compared 2 to Polaris? Pointers Is Dubhe Dubhe yellowish compared to Merak? 1 Merak THE PLOUGH Figure 1: Sketch of the northern sky in autumn. © Rob Peeling, CaDAS, 2007 version 1.2 Wynyard Planetarium & Observatory PUBLIC OBSERVING – Autumn North 1. On leaving the planetarium, turn around and look northwards over the roof of the building. Close to the horizon is a group of stars like the outline of a saucepan with the handle stretching to your left. This is the Plough (also called the Big Dipper) and is part of the constellation Ursa Major, the Great Bear. The two right-hand stars are called the Pointers. Can you tell that the higher of the two, Dubhe is slightly yellowish compared to the lower, Merak? Check with binoculars. Not all stars are white. The colour shows that Dubhe is cooler than Merak in the same way that red-hot is cooler than white- hot. 2. Use the Pointers to guide you upwards to the next bright star. This is Polaris, the Pole (or North) Star. Note that it is not the brightest star in the sky, a common misconception. Below and to the left are two prominent but fainter stars. These are Kochab and Pherkad, the Guardians of the Pole. Look carefully and you will notice that Kochab is slightly orange when compared to Polaris. -
Proceedings of SPIE - the International Society for Optical Engineering
Review and scientific prospects of high- contrast optical stellar interferometry Item Type Proceedings; text Authors Defrère, D.; Absil, O.; Berger, J.-P.; Danchi, W.C.; Dandumont, C.; Eisenhauer, F.; Ertel, S.; Gardner, T.; Glauser, A.; Hinz, P.; Ireland, M.; Kammerer, J.; Kraus, S.; Labadie, L.; Lacour, S.; Laugier, R.; Loicq, J.; Martin, G.; Martinache, F.; Martinod, M.A.; Mennesson, B.; Monnier, J.; Norris, B.; Nowak, M.; Pott, J.U.; Quanz, S.P.; Serabyn, E.; Stone, J.; Tuthill, P.; Woillez, J. Citation Defrère, D., Absil, O., Berger, J. P., Danchi, W. C., Dandumont, C., Eisenhauer, F., ... & Woillez, J. (2020, December). Review and scientific prospects of high-contrast optical stellar interferometry. In Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging VII (Vol. 11446, p. 114461J). International Society for Optics and Photonics. DOI 10.1117/12.2561505 Publisher SPIE Journal Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering Rights Copyright © 2020 SPIE. Download date 26/09/2021 05:12:08 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/660530 PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE SPIEDigitalLibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie Review and scientific prospects of high-contrast optical stellar interferometry Defrère, D., Absil, O., Berger, J.-P., Danchi, W. C., Dandumont, C., et al. D. Defrère, O. Absil, J.-P. Berger, W. C. Danchi, C. Dandumont, F. Eisenhauer, S. Ertel, T. Gardner, A. Glauser, P. Hinz, M. Ireland, J. Kammerer, S. Kraus, L. Labadie, S. Lacour, R. Laugier, J. Loicq, G. Martin, F. Martinache, M. A. Martinod, B. Mennesson, J. Monnier, B. Norris, M. -
Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium
Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium Ralf S. Klessen and Simon C. O. Glover Abstract Interstellar space is filled with a dilute mixture of charged particles, atoms, molecules and dust grains, called the interstellar medium (ISM). Understand- ing its physical properties and dynamical behavior is of pivotal importance to many areas of astronomy and astrophysics. Galaxy formation and evolu- tion, the formation of stars, cosmic nucleosynthesis, the origin of large com- plex, prebiotic molecules and the abundance, structure and growth of dust grains which constitute the fundamental building blocks of planets, all these processes are intimately coupled to the physics of the interstellar medium. However, despite its importance, its structure and evolution is still not fully understood. Observations reveal that the interstellar medium is highly tur- bulent, consists of different chemical phases, and is characterized by complex structure on all resolvable spatial and temporal scales. Our current numerical and theoretical models describe it as a strongly coupled system that is far from equilibrium and where the different components are intricately linked to- gether by complex feedback loops. Describing the interstellar medium is truly a multi-scale and multi-physics problem. In these lecture notes we introduce the microphysics necessary to better understand the interstellar medium. We review the relations between large-scale and small-scale dynamics, we con- sider turbulence as one of the key drivers of galactic evolution, and we review the physical processes that lead to the formation of dense molecular clouds and that govern stellar birth in their interior. Universität Heidelberg, Zentrum für Astronomie, Institut für Theoretische Astrophysik, Albert-Ueberle-Straße 2, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 1 Contents Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium ............... -
GTO Keypad Manual, V5.001
ASTRO-PHYSICS GTO KEYPAD Version v5.xxx Please read the manual even if you are familiar with previous keypad versions Flash RAM Updates Keypad Java updates can be accomplished through the Internet. Check our web site www.astro-physics.com/software-updates/ November 11, 2020 ASTRO-PHYSICS KEYPAD MANUAL FOR MACH2GTO Version 5.xxx November 11, 2020 ABOUT THIS MANUAL 4 REQUIREMENTS 5 What Mount Control Box Do I Need? 5 Can I Upgrade My Present Keypad? 5 GTO KEYPAD 6 Layout and Buttons of the Keypad 6 Vacuum Fluorescent Display 6 N-S-E-W Directional Buttons 6 STOP Button 6 <PREV and NEXT> Buttons 7 Number Buttons 7 GOTO Button 7 ± Button 7 MENU / ESC Button 7 RECAL and NEXT> Buttons Pressed Simultaneously 7 ENT Button 7 Retractable Hanger 7 Keypad Protector 8 Keypad Care and Warranty 8 Warranty 8 Keypad Battery for 512K Memory Boards 8 Cleaning Red Keypad Display 8 Temperature Ratings 8 Environmental Recommendation 8 GETTING STARTED – DO THIS AT HOME, IF POSSIBLE 9 Set Up your Mount and Cable Connections 9 Gather Basic Information 9 Enter Your Location, Time and Date 9 Set Up Your Mount in the Field 10 Polar Alignment 10 Mach2GTO Daytime Alignment Routine 10 KEYPAD START UP SEQUENCE FOR NEW SETUPS OR SETUP IN NEW LOCATION 11 Assemble Your Mount 11 Startup Sequence 11 Location 11 Select Existing Location 11 Set Up New Location 11 Date and Time 12 Additional Information 12 KEYPAD START UP SEQUENCE FOR MOUNTS USED AT THE SAME LOCATION WITHOUT A COMPUTER 13 KEYPAD START UP SEQUENCE FOR COMPUTER CONTROLLED MOUNTS 14 1 OBJECTS MENU – HAVE SOME FUN! -
Observing List
day month year Epoch 2000 local clock time: 2.00 Observing List for 24 7 2019 RA DEC alt az Constellation object mag A mag B Separation description hr min deg min 39 64 Andromeda Gamma Andromedae (*266) 2.3 5.5 9.8 yellow & blue green double star 2 3.9 42 19 51 85 Andromeda Pi Andromedae 4.4 8.6 35.9 bright white & faint blue 0 36.9 33 43 51 66 Andromeda STF 79 (Struve) 6 7 7.8 bluish pair 1 0.1 44 42 36 67 Andromeda 59 Andromedae 6.5 7 16.6 neat pair, both greenish blue 2 10.9 39 2 67 77 Andromeda NGC 7662 (The Blue Snowball) planetary nebula, fairly bright & slightly elongated 23 25.9 42 32.1 53 73 Andromeda M31 (Andromeda Galaxy) large sprial arm galaxy like the Milky Way 0 42.7 41 16 53 74 Andromeda M32 satellite galaxy of Andromeda Galaxy 0 42.7 40 52 53 72 Andromeda M110 (NGC205) satellite galaxy of Andromeda Galaxy 0 40.4 41 41 38 70 Andromeda NGC752 large open cluster of 60 stars 1 57.8 37 41 36 62 Andromeda NGC891 edge on galaxy, needle-like in appearance 2 22.6 42 21 67 81 Andromeda NGC7640 elongated galaxy with mottled halo 23 22.1 40 51 66 60 Andromeda NGC7686 open cluster of 20 stars 23 30.2 49 8 46 155 Aquarius 55 Aquarii, Zeta 4.3 4.5 2.1 close, elegant pair of yellow stars 22 28.8 0 -1 29 147 Aquarius 94 Aquarii 5.3 7.3 12.7 pale rose & emerald 23 19.1 -13 28 21 143 Aquarius 107 Aquarii 5.7 6.7 6.6 yellow-white & bluish-white 23 46 -18 41 36 188 Aquarius M72 globular cluster 20 53.5 -12 32 36 187 Aquarius M73 Y-shaped asterism of 4 stars 20 59 -12 38 33 145 Aquarius NGC7606 Galaxy 23 19.1 -8 29 37 185 Aquarius NGC7009 -
Observing List
day month year Epoch 2000 local clock time: 4.00 Observing List for 24 7 2019 RA DEC alt az Constellation object mag A mag B Separation description hr min deg min 60 75 Andromeda Gamma Andromedae (*266) 2.3 5.5 9.8 yellow & blue green double star 2 3.9 42 19 73 111 Andromeda Pi Andromedae 4.4 8.6 35.9 bright white & faint blue 0 36.9 33 43 72 71 Andromeda STF 79 (Struve) 6 7 7.8 bluish pair 1 0.1 44 42 58 80 Andromeda 59 Andromedae 6.5 7 16.6 neat pair, both greenish blue 2 10.9 39 2 89 34 Andromeda NGC 7662 (The Blue Snowball) planetary nebula, fairly bright & slightly elongated 23 25.9 42 32.1 75 84 Andromeda M31 (Andromeda Galaxy) large sprial arm galaxy like the Milky Way 0 42.7 41 16 75 85 Andromeda M32 satellite galaxy of Andromeda Galaxy 0 42.7 40 52 75 82 Andromeda M110 (NGC205) satellite galaxy of Andromeda Galaxy 0 40.4 41 41 60 84 Andromeda NGC752 large open cluster of 60 stars 1 57.8 37 41 57 73 Andromeda NGC891 edge on galaxy, needle-like in appearance 2 22.6 42 21 89 173 Andromeda NGC7640 elongated galaxy with mottled halo 23 22.1 40 51 82 10 Andromeda NGC7686 open cluster of 20 stars 23 30.2 49 8 47 200 Aquarius 55 Aquarii, Zeta 4.3 4.5 2.1 close, elegant pair of yellow stars 22 28.8 0 -1 35 181 Aquarius 94 Aquarii 5.3 7.3 12.7 pale rose & emerald 23 19.1 -13 28 30 173 Aquarius 107 Aquarii 5.7 6.7 6.6 yellow-white & bluish-white 23 46 -18 41 26 221 Aquarius M72 globular cluster 20 53.5 -12 32 27 220 Aquarius M73 Y-shaped asterism of 4 stars 20 59 -12 38 40 181 Aquarius NGC7606 Galaxy 23 19.1 -8 29 28 219 Aquarius NGC7009 -
'Signalling to Mars' to Making Variable Star Observations - a New Observer's Story Janet Simpson
FROM 'SIGNALLING TO MARS' TO MAKING VARIABLE STAR OBSERVATIONS - A NEW OBSERVER'S STORY JANET SIMPSON My interest in astronomy which started with Dick and signaling Mars in Arthur Ransome's Winter Holiday, was further fed by my friendship with Margaret Evershed, the second wife of the astronomer John Evershed (1864-1956), and, related to Astronomy, a year's passion with Geology at school. It lay dormant through years of Art College and bringing up a family, until a chance siting of astronomy telescopes in a photography shop was followed, soon after, by the purchase of an ETX 90 EC; I also joined the Southampton Astronomical Society (both helpful and inspiring). I struggled to point the ETX in the right direction, catching a fleeting glimpse of Saturn. It was much easier to find objects with binoculars. I often just searched the night sky with my bird-watching 8.5x44s, and planisphere, learning my way around. I tried with varying success to use the setting circles. I was thrilled to find the Andromeda galaxy, and something very faint and fuzzy in Virgo, and followed the comet Ikea-Zhang on clear nights. I started chopping down trees in the garden to open out the sky. From the start I had decided that I was most interested in Deep Sky objects. A breakthrough came with a copy of Penningtons Year round Messier Marathon and a Telrad finder. As yet, I have not had such success finding things even with my 10" LXD55 GoTo, admittedly in storage for most of this year due to our move from the New Forest to the shore of Loch Fyne, Scotland. -
Oregon Star Party Advanced Observing List
Welcome to the OSP Advanced Observing List In a sincere attempt to lure more of you into trying the Advanced List, each object has a page telling you what it is, why it’s interesting to observe, and the minimum size telescope you might need to see it. I’ve included coordinates, the constellation each object is located in, and either a chart or photo (or both) showing what the object looks like and how it’s situated in the sky. All you have to do is observe and enjoy the challenge. Stretch your skill and imagination - see something new, something unimaginably old, something unexpected Even though this is a challenging list, you don’t need 20 years of observing experience or a 20 inch telescope to be successful – although in some cases that will help. The only way to see these cool objects for yourself is to give them a go. Howard Banich, The minimum aperture listed for each object is a rough estimate. The idea is to Chuck Dethloff and show approximately what size telescope might be needed to successfully observe Matt Vartanian that particular object. The range is 3 to 28 inches. collaborated on this The visibility of each object assumes decently good OSP observing conditions. year’s list. Requirements to receive a certificate 1. There are 14 objects to choose from. Descriptive notes and/or sketches that clearly show you observed 10 objects are needed to receive the observing certificate. For instance, you can mark up these photos and charts with lines and arrows, and add a few notes describing what you saw.