DOCSLIB.ORG

Berlin 15 April 2005 Transcript

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

r~ ' ST .. fI' .................... Yale-UN OralOral HistoryHistory Interview with MikeMike BerlinBerlin April 15,15, 20020055 New YorYorkk Interviewer: Jameslames SutterliSutterlinn YALE -UNITED NATIONS ORAL HISTORY PROJECPROJECTT MIKE BERLIBERLINN APRIL 15, 20052005,, UNITED NATIONS, NEW YORYORKK INTERVIEWER- JAMES SUTTERLISUTTERLINN TABLE OF CONTENTS Aime, JJean-Claude.ean-Claude. 20 Arafat, Yasser. 11 Archbishop Makarios III. • 7 Baker, JJames.ames. • 7 Bork, Robert. 4 Bunche, Ralphe Johnson . 7 Bush, George Herbert Walker (President of the United States of 14, 16 America: 1989-1993). • .Cordovez, Diego. 3,20 ·Cyprus.-Cyprus. • 3,9 De Soto, Alvaro. • 19,20 Denktash, Rauf. • 3 El Salvador. • 18 Falklands Crisis. • 13 Finger, Max (Fanner(Fonner Ambassador of the United States of America to 1,6, 7 the United Nations). • Fredrick, Pauline. • 9 Gorbachev, Mikhail Sergevich (President of the leader ofthe Soviet 3 Union: 1985-1991). Gromyko, Andrei Andreyevich . 10 Guiliani, Francois. 11,12,13 Hume,Burne, Cameron. • 6 Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988). • 16 Jakobson, Max. .. 2 Jhabvala, Darius. .. Jonah,Jonah, James.James. .. 55 Kekkonen, Drho.Urho. • 22 Kilometer 101. .. 5 Kissinger, Henry. .. 3,4,5,7,9,20 Koh, TommyTommy.. 77 Lake, Tony. .. 77 Lesiovsky, Victor. .. 22 Malik, Jacob. • 4 Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. .. 9, 10 Nassif,Nassif, Ramses. • 11 Nicaragua. .. 17,17, 1818 Nixon, Richard (President ofthethe United States: 1969-1974) •• 44 Papandreou, Andreas. .. 3 .Pardo, Arvid. • 11 . Perez de Cuellar,Cu611ar, Javier(Secretary-GeneralJavier(Secretary-Genera1 ofthethe United NationsNations:: 3, 11, 12,12, 13, 14,14, 15, 15, 1982-1991). .. 16,16, 17, 18,18, 1919 Powell, Bill. •. 1111 Reagan, RonaldRona1d (President of the United States of America: 19811981­­ 15, 17 1989). ROsenstock, Bob. .. 6 Saturday Night Massacre (October 20, 1973). •• 4 Sherry, George. .. 6,206,20 Sonnenfeld, Hal. .. 77 Suez Canal Crisis. .. 5 U Thant, Maha Thray Sithu (Secretary-General ofthethe United NationsNations:: 10 1961-1971).1961-1971). .. United Nations Emergency Force IIII (U1~E(U1,{EFF II).11). •. 4,5,64,5,6 ." Urquhart, Sir Brian (Former Under-Secretary-GeneralUnder-Secretary-Genera1 ofofthe the United 4,5,6,4, 5,6, 13,2013, 20 Nations). .. Vance, Cyrus. 7 Waldheim, Kurt(Secretary-GeneraloftheKurt(Secretary-General of the United Nations: 1972-1981) 2,4,8,10,112,4,8, 10,11 Yitzhak, Shamir (Former Prime Minister ofIsrael).oflsrael). 10 YaLe-UnitedYale-United Nations Oral HistorHistoryy InterviewInterview with Mike BerliBerlinn April 15, 20020055 United Nations, New York City, New YorYorkk Interviewer:Interviewer: Jameslames SutterliSutterlinn James Sutterlin: Thank you very much, Mike, forfor agreeing toto participate inin this project. If II can, I'dI'd likelike toto begin by asking you toto discuss a little bit about how well you were prepared toto taketake over thethe assignment here at thethe United Nations as a correspondent, II believe inin 1967? Mike Berlin: r carnecametoto thethe United Nations on May 3131stst 1967. II was totallytotally unprepared.. ..I I was supposedsupposed toto go out toto Riker's Island, which isis thethe Municipal Prison inin New York City, and do a feature story about thethe first drug program inin a municipal prison, drug treatmenttreatment program. They called me at my home and said don't go there,there, go toto thethe United Nations, our UN man isis sick today.today. So II came toto UN Headquarters not even knowing where thethe men's roomroom was, or unfortunately, not having readread thethe firstfirst 12 pages of thethe New York Times ininthethe preceding couple ofyears because II had focusedfocused on domestic news and was totallytotally unaware thatthat therethere was about toto be a war inin thethe Middle-East. I ranran intointo 2 people who were absolutely essential toto me inin thosethose firstfirst days, one was DanusDmus IhabvalaJhabvala who was an Indian,Indian, a Parsi and was at thatthat timetime thethe UN Bureau Chief ..for thetheBoston GLobe.Globe. Previously I had known him because he was thethe UN Bureau Chief foi'for thethe New York Herald Tribune, which II worked forfor when he was therethere .. covering thethe UN forfor them.them. He was very kind toto me, he became my mentor at thethe UN and toldtold me what toto looklook forfor~~ what toto ask about, who toto speak with and who all thesethese people were thatthat I should be approaching. The second person was Max Finger, who was one of thethe American ambassadors, whom II bumped intointo at thethe press releaserelease rackrack thatthat firstfirst day, doing something about definition of aggression, which he was on a committee thatthat was tryingtrying toto negotiate a definition of aggression. He was very kind toto me and would always Looklook out forfor me and when he saw reportersreporters therethere and ask me if!if! understood what was going on. With people Like that,that, therethere were many people of a similar disposition thatthat I encountered here, I was able toto Learnlearn quickly on thethe jobjob and not make tootoo much a fooLfool of myself writing about thethe war thatthat began several days later.later. JS: Well thilt's precisely what II wanted toto ask next. What were your main reportinreportingg responsibilitiesresponsibilities so toto speakspeak?? ME: Well II came here forfor thethe New York Post, which was thenthen a serious, liberalliberal newspaper with real news inin itit and a very small staff which was very thinlythinly spread. So I became thethe internationalinternational news staff of thethe New York Post. They had no correspondents abroad on staff. They had one person inin Washington who didn't cover State Department or internationalinternational affairs. So fromfrom UN Headquarters II was writing reactionreaction stories about various events thatthat tooktook place abroad, using as my base thethe UN and thethe contacts ii could have throughthrough thethe UN with representativesrepresentatives ofvarious governments 1 involvedinvolved inin thosethose internationalinternational thingsthings thatthat we did not have staff out covering inin thethe field. JS: And thatthat worked from here inin New York? MB: ItIt worked toto a degree inin thethe sense thatthat theythey used wire services for breaking news and theythey used me for thethe analytical pieces and thethe background and second day stories about what itit all means and why itit happens, how thethe Americans are going toto react toto this,this, how thethe Russians are going toto react toto this,this, and stories of thatthat kind. So very often thethe Associated Press would have thethe leadlead story and II would have a secondary story on a largelarge internationalinternational event thatthat was takingtaking place. IS: Had you known about Kurt Waldheim before you came here or anything about him as Secretary-General or was thatthat also tabulatabula rosa? ..MB: II knew him of course because since II came inin '67,'67, he was thethe Austrian ambassador at one point and thenthen Foreign Minister before he became Secretary-General and II covered very intensivelyintensively thethe election campaign for Secretary-General as a reporter here. I remember thethe chief Soviet KGB operative at thethe UN Victor Lesiovsky tellingtelling myself and 2 other journalistsjournalists inin thethe Delegates Lounge, we will never allow a Finnish candidate named Max Jakobson toto become Secretary-General even ifif thethe President of Finland Urho Kekkonen gets down on his knees inin Red Square. He said itit and we all went with that;that; itit was public; itit was quite clear at thatthat point thenthen thatthat Waldheim would be thethe victor. We ha.d, ~ourtes~ourtesyy of thethe United Nations, a press release with his biography, which said ..thatthat he was injuredinjured on thethe Soviet front early inin thethe war and spent thethe rest of thethe war years as a lawlaw student inin Vienna. We didn't challenge it,it, nobody thoughtthought toto challenge it.it. ItIt was his malleability inin dealing with thethe big powers thatthat was a controversial aspect ofhischaiacter whenWhen he was running for Secretary-General. We all wrote at thethe timetime thatthat thatthat was what endeared him toto thethe big powers. JS: Even then?then? MB: Even then,then, even before he tooktook thethe office. We knew, we were told thatthat theythey likedliked him because he would be malleable and not make troubletrouble for them.them. IS: And did you find thatthat he made himself available toto thethe press fairly early inin his tenure?tenure? MB: He was available toto thethe press and he was much more available toto me when, starting in1973,in1973, I also became thethe part-time correspondent at thethe United Nations for thethe W~shingtoW~shingtonn Post, and thenthen of course he would seek me out and occasionally ask me toto come upstairs for an exclusive interviewinterview on-the-record. I had no need toto speak with him off-the-record. The problem was inin his press conferences and his interviews,interviews, he seldom produced anything worth writing about. As I said at this conference we attended yesterday, very often I had troubletrouble even writing notes inin my notebook about what he was tellingtelling me, which was justjust thethe most obvious information thatthat was perfectly available and had no insightinsight or exclusivity toto it.it. He was available but not of much use 2 journalistically.joumalistically. JS: He was involved in a number of the so-called crises that were going on at that time. He did make an effort to bring about, not being the first or the last, a settlement of Cyprus. Was there any particular press briefing or background briefing or anything else done about Cyprus in those years? MB: In those years if you wanted to find out about Cyprus you would go speak to George Sherry who was the Cyprus man among the peacekeepers. He was, to an extent available, he would sit and have lunch with us in the UNCA Club all the time and talk most entertainingly about his days as an interpreter, which is what he started out here at the United Nations as.
Recommended publications

  • The Common Heritage Ofmankind from the Law Ofthe Sea to the Human Genome and Cyberspace

    The Common Heritage ofMankind From the Law ofthe Sea to the Human Genome and Cyberspace Jean Buttigieg Abstract Since Arvid Pardo addressed the UN General Assembly in 1967 and proposed to declare the deep seabed and ocean floor the common heritage of mankind, the need has been felt to adapt the concept of common heritage to the human genome and the internet. This paper is intended to demonstrate that the concept ofa common heritage ofmankind is the ideal jacket to fit the hu­ man genome and cyberspace as a mode ofinternational govern­ ance in the interests ofall humankind. The last part ofthe paper discusses Father Peter Serracino Inglott's vision for Malta as a promotional centre for Open Source systems. KEYWOKDS: adaptation, Arvid Pardo, common heritage ofmankind, cyberspace, Father Peter Serracino lnglott, human genome Arvid Pardo and the Race to Grab the Bounties ofthe Deep Seabed The concept ofthe common heritage of mankind has been the subject ofin­ tense debate in international circles since November 1967, when Arvid Pardo first proposed that the bounties of the deep seabed should be protected and regulated by a new kind ofregime that was as much innovative in character as it was revolutionary in its legal implications. ' Pardo's proposal was different from the traditional schemes ofsovereignty and freedom that applied to ter­ ritorial sea and the high seas, respectively. The common heritage of mankind was to be a new form ofcommon ownership - in a word, an alternative to the classical Roman Law concept of res communis, rather than a contemporary Tullio Scovazzi, The Concept of Common Heritage ofMankind and the Resources of the Seabed Beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction, 1-21.
  • Title Items-In-Secretary-General's Statements - X, 29 September 1965 29 December 1965

    Title Items-In-Secretary-General's Statements - X, 29 September 1965 29 December 1965

    UN Secretariat Item Scan - Barcode - Record Title Page 18 Date 22/05/2006 Time 4:29:40 PM S-0886-0004-01-00001 Expanded Number S-0886-0004-01 -00001 Title items-in-Secretary-General's statements - X, 29 September 1965 29 December 1965 Date Created 29/09/1965 Record Type Archival Item Container S-0886-fl004: United Nations Documents of the Secretary-General: U Thanf. Secretary-General's Statements Print Name of Person Submit Image Signature of Person Submit 29 September 1965 - 29 December 1965 VOLUME X - SECRETARY-GENERAL STATEMENTS No. DATE SYMBOL 790. SG message to President of the Philippines 29 September 1965 SG/SM/371 791- SG letter to Permanent Representative of Zambia 30 September 1965 SG/SM/372 792. UK note to SG on costs of peace-keeping force in Cyprus 1 October 1965 SG/SM/373 793. SG statement of welcome on 4 October to His Holiness Pope Paul VI k October 1965 SG/SM/374 794. Malaysian letter to SG on costs of peace-keeping force in Cyprus 5 October 1965 SG/SM/375 795. Text of cables between Pope Paul VI and the SG 5 October 1965 SG/SM/376 796. Greece and Uganda make voluntary contribu- tions to United Nations 5 October 1965 SG/1666 797. Liberia makes voluntary contribution to help UN solve its financial difficulties 7 October 1965 SG/1667 798. SG statement at General Assembly on 11 Oct. 11 October 1965 SG/SM/377 799- SG statement on budget estimates for 1965, 1966 12 October 1965 SG/SM/378 800.
  • The Cultural Ecology of Elisabeth Mann Borgese

    The Cultural Ecology of Elisabeth Mann Borgese

    NARRATIVES OF NATURE AND CULTURE: THE CULTURAL ECOLOGY OF ELISABETH MANN BORGESE by Julia Poertner Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia March 2020 © Copyright by Julia Poertner, 2020 TO MY PARENTS. MEINEN ELTERN. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………………... v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED ………………………………………………………….. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………………………….. vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………… 1 1.1 Thesis ………………………………………………………………... 1 1.2 Methodology and Outline ………………………………………….. 27 1.3 State of Research ……....…………………………………………... 32 1.4 Background ……………………………………………………….... 36 CHAPTER 2: NARRATIVES OF NATURE AND CULTURE …………………………………... 54 2.1 Between a Mythological Past and a Scientific Future ……………………. 54 2.1.1 Biographical Background ………………………………………... 54 2.1.2 “Culture is Part of Nature in Any Case”: Cultural Evolution ……. 63 2.1.3 Ascent of Woman ………………………………….……………… 81 2.1.4 The Language Barrier: Beasts and Men …….…………………… 97 2.2 Dark Fiction: Futuristic Pessimism …………………………………….. 111 2.2.1 “To Whom It May Concern” ………………….………………… 121 2.2.2 “The Immortal Fish” ………………………………………….…. 123 2.2.3 “Delphi Revisited” ……………………………………….……… 127 2.2.4 “Birdpeople” …………………………………………….………. 130 CHAPTER 3: UTOPIAN OPTIMISM: THE OCEAN AS A LABORATORY FOR A NEW WORLD ORDER ……………………………………………….…………….……… 135 3.1 Historical Background …………………………………………………. 135 3.1.1 Competing Narratives: The Common Heritage of Mankind and Sustainable Development ……………………………………….. 135 3.1.2 Ocean Frontiers and Chairworm & Supershark ………………... 175 3.1.3 Arvid Pardo’s Tale of the Deep Sea …………………………….. 184 3.2 Elisabeth Mann Borgese’s Cultural Ecology ………………………….. 207 iii 3.2.1 Law: From the Deep Seabed via Ocean Space towards World Communities ……………………………………………………. 207 3.2.2 Economics ………………………………………………………. 244 3.2.3 Science and Education: The Need for Interdisciplinarity ……….
  • Don't Resurrect the Law of the Sea Treaty

    Don't Resurrect the Law of the Sea Treaty

    No. 552 October 13, 2005 Routing Don’t Resurrect the Law of the Sea Treaty by Doug Bandow Executive Summary For more than 20 years, the United States has the treaty governing seabed mining. The provi- refused to become a party to the Law of the Sea sions of Section XI may have the effect of forever Treaty. Advocates of the treaty, a comprehensive discouraging such operations, even where there measure governing navigational rights on the sea might be huge benefits. Regulations are to be and mineral rights on the seabed, claimed that U.S. administered through a complicated system of failure to join the convention would result in chaos committees and agencies within the International on the high seas. It has not. Very few Americans Seabed Authority, a creation of the United know anything about the treaty, and even advo- Nations that has ultimate jurisdiction over the cates are hard-pressed to explain how the United agreement. States would benefit from its adoption. Funding for the ISA, and for enforcement of A round of changes to the document won the the LOST, would flow disproportionately from support of the Clinton administration, which the United States. The ISA’s current budget is signed the treaty in 1994, but those changes modest, but the revised agreement changed none failed to attract sufficient support from the of the underlying institutional incentives that bias Senate. The LOST has languished unratified for virtually every international organization, most more than 10 years. obviously the UN itself, toward extravagance. The logjam appears to have broken, with Some supporters of the treaty insist that the prominent Republicans, and the president him- LOST is essential to establishing the rule of law self, signaling support for ratification.
  • The Common Heri ... Vironmental Governance.Pdf

    The Common Heri ... Vironmental Governance.Pdf

    WORKSHOP IN POLITICAL TOEOF. AND POLICY ANALYSIS 513 NORTH PARK INDIANA UNIVERSITY Fourth Annual Common Property Conf ererteh=Ha'^GCMWSTONMr'x Jl_ '.. INDIAN, _ -„., A-, 47406-3, ,,..r1 IASCP rV^-!'- V-^ - Common Property in Ecosystems Under Stress THE COMMON HERITAGE OF MANKIND AND GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE Peter B. Payoyo With the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD)1 now in place2 to recommend measures for the implementation of Agenda 21,3 the global project of "sustainable development" will enter a new phase of consolidation. Considering the poor performance and unsatisfactory follow-up action of governments one year after the 1992 Earth Summit4 the CSD embarks on its tasks with expected high hopes but amidst widespread pessimism about the possibilities of a truly global partnership in overcoming serious environmental problems facing humanity. It is of course reasonable not to expect too much from the CSD in terms of effecting desired changes in the global political and natural environment for sustainable development. Notwithstanding its broad substantive mandate, the CSD is ill-equipped to implement its decisions, and the move to locate it in the UN Economic and 1 Chapter 38 of AGENDA 21 adopted by UNCED, UN Doc. A/CONF.151/4. 14 June 1992. 2 The CSD, a high-level 53-member group of state representatives elected by the UN ECOSOC, had its first meeting on June 14, 1993. 3 UN Doc. A/C.2/47/L.61 on Institutional Arrangements to follow up the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, esp. par. 3. 4 A year since Rio, and little sign of Earth's gain THE GLOBE AND MAIL, June 7, 1993.
  • Asdfgeneral Assembly

    Asdfgeneral Assembly

    United Nations A/67/PV.49 General Assembly Offi cial Records asdfSixty-seventh session 49 th plenary meeting Monday, 10 December 2012, 10 a.m. New York President : Mr. Jeremić . (Serbia) In the absence of the President, Mr. Charles needed. In that respect, the General Assembly was (Trinidad and Tobago), Vice-President, took the able to perform one of its main functions, under Chair. Article 13 of the Charter, in ‘encouraging the progressive development of international law and The meeting was called to order at 10.15 a.m. its codification’. “It was the Permanent Representative of Malta, Agenda item 75 (continued ) the late Ambassador Arvid Pardo, who is considered Oceans and the law of the sea the founding father of UNCLOS and who proposed, in this very Hall in 1967, a comprehensive treaty Commemoration of the thirtieth anniversary to ensure the peaceful use and exploitation of of the opening for signature of the the world’s oceans. His impassioned and lyrical United Nations Convention on the Law of speech lasted from morning well into the afternoon the Sea on a day in November, 45 years ago. It included The Acting President : Members are reminded these memorable words describing man’s close that, in accordance with resolution 67/5, the debate on relationship to the sea: agenda item 75 and its sub-items (a) and (b) is scheduled ‘The dark oceans were the womb of life: to take place tomorrow, 11 December 2012. I should from the protecting oceans life emerged. We also like to remind participants that statements in the still bear in our bodies — in our blood, in the commemoration should be limited to 10 minutes, as salty bitterness of our tears — the marks of stipulated in the same resolution.
  • The Future Relationship Between Small States and the United Nations

    The Future Relationship Between Small States and the United Nations

    The Future Relationship Between Small States and the United Nations Report of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Structures, Committee on United Nations Affairs, ABA SECTION ON INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW * Introduction i The Secretary-General of the United Nations recently suggested that the competent organs of the Organization undertake a thorough and comprehensive study of the criteria for membership in the U.N. with a view to laying down limitations on full membership while also defining other forms of association which would benefit both the Or- ganization and those states "which have been referred to as 'micro-states', entities which are especially small in area, population, and human and economic resources, and which are now emerging as independent states." 1 Ambassador Arthur J. Goldberg, United States Representative to the United Nations, in a letter to the President of the Security Council dated December 13, 1967, joined in the suggestion made by the Secre- tary-General and expressed the belief that examination of the consider- ations presented by the Secretary-General is most likely to be fruitful if it is made in terms of general principles and procedures.' Although no formal action has been taken by the United Nations, the matter is understood to be under consideration. The purpose of this report is to review the principal considerations involved in the suggestion made by the Secretary-General. ii The structure of the world community continues to be characterized chiefly by the existence of territorially organized units, states, equal in * This is an abridged version of the report submitted to the Council of the Section on August 3, 1968.
  • Ideological Rigidity Vs. Political Reality: a Critique of Reagan's Policy on the Law of the Sea

    Ideological Rigidity Vs. Political Reality: a Critique of Reagan's Policy on the Law of the Sea

    Ideological Rigidity vs. Political Reality: A Critique of Reagan's Policy on the Law of the Sea D. Brian Hufford* "[T]he deep seas and ocean bottoms are, and remain, the legacy of all human beings." ' These words spoken by President Lyndon Johnson in 1966 foreshadowed an international movement to protect the oceans. Sixteen years later the movement culminated in a comprehensive Con- vention on the Law of the Sea-a treaty grounded upon the principle that oceans beyond the limits of national jurisdiction are the "common '2 heritage of mankind." Despite nearly two decades of United States support for the "common heritage" principle, and the efforts behind the Convention, the Reagan Administration rejected the treaty in 1982.3 The following year the Pres- ident initiated his unilateral ocean policy with a Proclamation and an adjoining statement calling for the establishment of a 200-mile Exclu- sive Economic Zone and reiterating his view that deep seabed mining is a high seas freedom.4 Defending the rejection of the Convention, Rea- gan's ambassador to the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) declared: "[T]he political, economic and ideological as- sumptions which underlay the treaty are essentially antithetical to American values [and promote] a thinly disguised world collectivism."'5 * B.A., 1980, M.U.A., 1982, Wichita State University; J.D. Candidate, Yale Law School, 1985. 1. Remarks at the Commissioning of the Research Ship Oceanographer, 2 PUB. PAPERS LYNDON B. JOHNSON 722, at 724 (July 13, 1966). 2. The phrase "the common heritage of mankind" was first applied to the oceans by Ambassador Arvid Pardo of Malta, in his famous speech before the United Nations on Au- gust 17, 1967.
  • Arvid Pardo Attended the Collegio Arly Quality Was Needed

    Arvid Pardo Attended the Collegio Arly Quality Was Needed

    flavor and dynamic to our work to- intense scholarly correspondences, Area and its resources are the com- gether, in which we never disagreed together with a fundamental opti- mon heritage of mankind." on substance, despite our very dif- mism and generosity toward others, The acceptance of this key provi- ferent starting points. We became enabled him to live the life of a sion of the 1982 treaty followed Am- concerned with the original context scholar rather than a "professional," bassador Pardo's continuing and of Weber's own quite radical think- and served as a reminder that the dedicated effort to obtain an over- ing on these topics and with the university could still mean what it whelmingly favorable vote for U.N. puzzle of his own sources and con- meant for Newman. His classes General Assembly Resolution 2749 text, but also with the peculiar his- were a model of Socratic dialogue, (XXV) on December 17, 1970. As tory of its reception, critique, and and he was loved by his students. the Maltese representative during transformation. The reception his- His Aristotelean sense of virtuous the early law of the sea negotiations, tory we treated in our first Weber action led him to seek out occasions where he was able to enlist the sup- book, the contextual study we de- for political action in which, to use a port of developing countries, as well tailed in our second. Studying con- Weberian phrase, compromises with as to still many of the concerns of text and, indeed, getting a feel for the devil were unnecessary.
  • The Common Heritage of Mankind: Past, Present, and Future

    The Common Heritage of Mankind: Past, Present, and Future

    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 40 Number 1 40th Anniversary Edition Article 24 April 2020 The Common Heritage of Mankind: Past, Present, and Future John E. Noyes Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation John E. Noyes, The Common Heritage of Mankind: Past, Present, and Future, 40 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 447 (2011). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Denver Sturm College of Law at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],dig- [email protected]. THE COMMON HERITAGE OF MANKIND: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE JOHN E. NOYES* I. INTRODUCTION The international community has developed several different types of legal regimes to govern natural resources. In general terms, these include: * according states exclusive permanent sovereignty over natural resources, a system associated with territoriality; * sharing resources, as in the cases of international rivers and migratory species; * recognizing common property rights, as in the case of the high seas, where no one user has exclusive rights to resources and no one can exclude others from exploiting them, but capturing resources results in exclusive property rights; and * recognizing property as the common heritage of mankind - or, to use a more contemporary phrase, the common heritage of humankind (CH) - whereby all manage resources and share in the rewards of exploiting them, even if they are not able to participate in that exploitation.
  • Friends Newsletter No. 47, December 2009

    Friends Newsletter No. 47, December 2009

    FRIENDS NEWSLETTER No. 47 December 2009 Contents Page EDITORIAL .................................................................................................................... 1 RECEPTIONS FOR FORMER OFFICIALS .............................................................. 3 TO TALK OF MANY THINGS, by Aamir Ali............................................................. 4 THE 90 th ANNIVERSARY REUNION , by Jack Martin............................................... 7 VISIT TO THE WTO BUILDING , by Fiona Rolian.................................................... 13 REMEMBRANCE OF THINGS PAST ........................................................................ 16-20 Dr. Guido Pardo (1874-1922): first ILO staff member to die in service, by Mary Bagazinski.......................................................................... 16 The ILO’s “Second” Nobel Peace Prize , by Jaci Eisenberg...................................... 19 WILFRED JENKS .......................................................................................................... 21-26 Speeches made at the memorial ceremony, 14 July 2009 ........................................ 21 GALLIMAUFRY ............................................................................................................ 27-35 Corazon Aquino, icon of democracy and ILO principles, by Gert Gust................. 27 International Society for Better Tomorrows (ISBET): a candid retrospection , by Darshan Khanna.......................................................................... 30 ILO
  • Why Catholic Universities Should Engage International Law

    Why Catholic Universities Should Engage International Law

    Why Catholic Universities Should Engage International Law William P. George, Ph.D. Abstract This article argues that Catholic universities should vigorously engage inter- national law for at least three reasons. First, international law is an indispens- able dialogue partner for Catholic Social Teaching (CST). Since CST belongs in Catholic higher education, so too does international law. Second, in numerous ways and on a global scale, international law raises the very questions of unity and diversity (disciplinary, perspectival, religious, and cultural) that Catholic universities, as universities, can and must address. Third, given its secular character, international law challenges Catholic universities, as Catholic, to engage, without sacrifi ce of faith-informed intellectual commitments, what Charles Taylor calls “a secular age.” There are many compelling reasons why Catholic universities1 should emphasize Catholic Social Teaching (CST)2 and the critical is- sues with which it deals. I will not make that case here. Rather, I wish to advance a correlative educational principle and goal, namely, that Catholic universities should commit themselves to an increasingly vig- orous engagement of international law. It is fi tting that Catholic univer- sities emphasize international law for at least three reasons, each of which provides a major section heading for the pages below. William George is Associate Professor of Theology and the Director of the undergradu- ate core curriculum, Dominican University, River Forest, IL. 1 Here “universities” is meant to include colleges (in the American sense) as well. This matches the inclusive way in which Ex corde Ecclesiae uses the term. 2 This term is to be construed in the widest sense to include “Catholic social thought” and “social Catholicism.” CST thus comprises not only modern Catholic Social Teaching but also the range of thought and movements related to that teaching.