DOCSLIB.ORG

Alice M. Miller, Mindy J. Roseman and Corey Friedman

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alice M. Miller, Mindy J. Roseman and Corey Friedman SEXUAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS : UNITED STATES & CANADA Alice M. Miller, Mindy J. Roseman and Corey Friedman This document is a Working Paper, commissioned by the WHO (World Health Organization, Geneva) and completed in 2010. ICHRP has not edited it and is not responsible, for its accuracy or for the views and opinions expressed. ICHRP welcomes the re-use, re-publication and re-distribution of this paper appropriately cited. I)I)I) METHODOLOGMETHODOLOGYYYY ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ..................................... 666 1)1)1) U.S. and Canadian Sources ................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................... ......... 666 II)II)II) INTRODUCTION TO THE LEGAL SYSTEMS OF THE UNITED STASTATESTES AND CANADA ............................ 777 1)1)1) The Shared Legal History of the United States andand CCanadaanada ...................................................................................................................... 777 2)2)2) U.S. Federalism ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ............................... 777 3)3)3) Canadian Federalism ................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. ................. 888 4)4)4) The U.S. and International Law ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................ ......... 999 5)5)5) Canada and International Law ................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................... ...... 111111 A) International Adjudication of Canadian Law ............................................................................. 12 III)III)III) EQUALITY AND NONDISCRIMINATION AS IT IS RELEVANTRELEVANT TO SEXUALITY AND SEXUAL HEALTH ...... 131313 1)1)1) Section Introduction: an International PerspectivePerspective on Discrimination and Sexual Health ................ 131313 2)2)2) Prohibition on Discrimination by the Government ...................................................................................................................................................................... ...... 151515 A) Non-discrimination in the Canadian Charter of Rights ............................................................. 15 B) Non-discrimination in the U.S. Constitution ............................................................................. 15 3)3)3) Protections Against Discrimination by Private ActorActorss ................................................................................................................................................................. ... 161616 A) The Canadian Human Rights Act .............................................................................................. 16 B) Human Rights Laws in the Canadian Provinces ......................................................................... 17 C) Federal Law, Including Title VII Protections Based on Race, Color, Religion, Sex, and National Origin .............................................................................................................................................. 17 D) Employment Discrimination: an Example of Robust Anti-Discrimination Law in the U.S. and Canada ............................................................................................................................................ 19 E) Employment Discrimination: Openly Discriminatory Practices in the Workplace......................... 19 F) Employment Discrimination, Disparate Treatment, and Neutral Policies with Discriminatory Effects ............................................................................................................................................. 20 4)4)4) Pregnancy Discrimination ................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... ........ 222222 1 5)5)5) Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity DiscriminatiDiscriminationon ............................................................................................................................ 232323 A) Canadian Provincial and Charter Prohibitions on Sexual Orientation Discrimination .................. 23 B) Gender Identity Discrimination in Canada ................................................................................ 24 C) Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination in the U.S. ............................................ 25 6)6)6) Marital Status Discrimination ................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................ ......... 262626 7)7)7) Access to Health Services and Information for Specific Populations .......................................................................................... 272727 A) Incarcerated People’s Access to Contraception and Abortion .................................................... 27 B) Disability ................................................................................................................................. 27 C) Refugees: a Canadian Example ................................................................................................ 27 8)8)8) Mandatory HIV Testing ................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................... ............ 282828 9)9)9) Access to Adoption (Same Sex Couples, Marital Status)Status) ............................................................................................................................ 282828 10) Access to InIn----vitrovitro fertilization (IVF)/Assisted reproduction tectechnologieshnologies (ART) ........................ 292929 11) SameSame----SexSex Marriage ................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................... ............. 313131 A) Same Sex Marriage in Canada .................................................................................................. 31 B) Same-Sex Marriage in the United States ................................................................................... 31 C) Marriage Alternatives in the United States ................................................................................ 32 12) Asylum Law and Persecution Based on “a ParticularParticular Social Group” .................................................................................... 333333 A) Sexual Orientation as a Particular Social Group ........................................................................ 34 B) People Who Violate Gender Norms as Members of Particular Social Group ................................ 34 C) Women as a Particular Social Group: a Canadian Example ........................................................ 35 D) Persecution by Non-State Actors and Domestic Violence .......................................................... 36 IV)IV)IV) DECRIMINALIZATION OF SEXUALITY AND SEXUAL ACTIVITIEACTIVITIESS ............................................................................................................ 383838 1)1)1) Section Introduction: an International PerspectivePerspective on Decriminalization of Sexual Activities .......... 383838 2)2)2) Decriminalization of SameSame----SexSex Conduct and Other Consensual Sexual Acts in CanCanadaada ................. 414141 3)3)3) Age of Consent in Canada ................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................... ....... 414141 4)4)4) Decriminalization of SameSame----SexSex Conduct in the United States ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • " We Are Family?": the Struggle for Same-Sex Spousal Recognition In
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be fmrn any type of computer printer, The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reprodudion. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e-g., maps, drawings, &arb) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to tight in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6' x 9" black and Mite photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustratims appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell 8 Howell Information and Leaning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 "WE ARE FAMILY'?": THE STRUGGLE FOR SAME-SEX SPOUSAL RECOGNITION IN ONTARIO AND THE CONUNDRUM OF "FAMILY" lMichelIe Kelly Owen A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto Copyright by Michelle Kelly Owen 1999 National Library Bibliothiique nationale l*B of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services sewices bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395.
    [Show full text]
  • Should Rape Shield Laws Bar Proof That the Alleged Victim Has Made Similar, False Rape Accusations in the Past?: Fair Symmetry with the Rape Sword Laws Edward J
    The University of the Pacific Law Review Volume 47 Issue 4 Symposium: Sex Crimes & Offenses in an Era Article 9 of Reform 1-1-2016 Should Rape Shield Laws Bar Proof that the Alleged Victim Has Made Similar, False Rape Accusations in the Past?: Fair Symmetry With the Rape Sword Laws Edward J. Imwinkelried University of California, Davis Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uoplawreview Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Edward J. Imwinkelried, Should Rape Shield Laws Bar Proof that the Alleged Victim Has Made Similar, False Rape Accusations in the Past?: Fair Symmetry With the Rape Sword Laws, 47 U. Pac. L. Rev. 709 (2017). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uoplawreview/vol47/iss4/9 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Law Reviews at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The nivU ersity of the Pacific Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Should Rape Shield Laws Bar Proof that the Alleged Victim Has Made Similar, False Rape Accusations in the Past?: Fair Symmetry With the Rape Sword Laws Edward J. Imwinkelried* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 710 II. A DESCRIPTION OF THE PRINCIPAL THEORIES THAT DEFENSE COUNSEL HAVE USED TO ATTACK THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF APPLICATIONS OF THE RAPE SHIELD LAWS EXCLUDING EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE ............... 718 A. Theories that Have Garnered Little or No Legislative or Judicial Support .................................................................................................. 718 B. Theories that Are So Strong that Legislatures Have Recognized the Theories by Codifying Them in Their Rape Shield Statutes .................
    [Show full text]
  • Case: 4:11-Cv-00454-DCN Doc #: 40 Filed: 03/28/14 1 of 46. Pageid
    Case: 4:11-cv-00454-DCN Doc #: 40 Filed: 03/28/14 1 of 46. PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JOHN E. WOLFF, JR., ) CASE NO. 4:11-cv-0454 ) Petitioner, ) JUDGE NUGENT ) v. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE VECCHIARELLI ) TERRY TIBBALS, ) ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Respondent. ) This matter is before the magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 72.2(b)(2). Before the court is the petition of John E. Wolff, Jr., (“Petitioner”) for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is in the custody of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction pursuant to journal entry of sentence in the case of State of Ohio vs. Wolff, Case No. 06-CR-978 (Mahoning County Aug. 29, 2007). (Doc. No. 23-10.) For the reasons set forth below, it is recommended that the petition be dismissed with prejudice. I. Relevant Factual Background The state appellate court that reviewed Petitioner’s conviction and sentence recited the following facts: On September 14, 2006, Wolff was indicted on ten counts of rape, in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b)(B), special felony (Counts 1-10); three counts of rape, in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(2)(B), 1st degree felony (Counts 11-13); five counts of gross sexual imposition, in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(4)(B), 3rd degree felony (Counts 14-18); and two counts of gross sexual imposition, in violation of R.C. Case: 4:11-cv-00454-DCN Doc #: 40 Filed: 03/28/14 2 of 46.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of in Re Marriage Cases (2010), Available At
    Santa Clara Law Santa Clara Law Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 6-1-2010 Six Cases in Search of a Decision: The tS ory of In re Marriage Cases Jean C. Love Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected] Patricia A. Cain Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs Part of the Law Commons Automated Citation Jean C. Love and Patricia A. Cain, Six Cases in Search of a Decision: The Story of In re Marriage Cases (2010), Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/617 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Six Cases in Search of a Decision: The Story of In re Marriage Cases Patricia A. Cain and Jean C. Love ―Whatever is a reality today, whatever you touch and believe in and that seems real for you today, is going to be — like the reality of yesterday — an illusion tomorrow.‖1 On May 15, 2008, the Supreme Court of California handed down its decision in the much awaited litigation officially known as In re Marriage Cases.2 The case was actually a consolidation of six individual cases, all raising the same issue: Is denial of marriage to same-sex couples valid under the California Constitution? These six cases, as with Pirandello‘s six characters in search of an author, took center stage for a time, not in a real theater, but rather in the evolving drama over extending equal marriage rights to gay men and lesbians.
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimate Concern: the Assault on the Concept of Rape
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Via Sapientiae: The Institutional Repository at DePaul University DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 9-2013 Legitimate concern: the assault on the concept of rape Matthew David Burgess DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Burgess, Matthew David, "Legitimate concern: the assault on the concept of rape" (2013). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 153. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/153 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Legitimate Concern: The Assault on the Concept of Rape A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Matthew David Burgess June 2013 Women’s and Gender Studies College of Liberal Arts and Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois 1 Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….3 A Brief Legal History of Rape………………………………………………………………….....6 -Rape Law in the United States Prior to 1800…………………………………………….7 -The WCTU and
    [Show full text]
  • Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah? Robert Wintemute
    Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law Volume 20 | Issue 2 Article 12 3-1-2006 Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah? Robert Wintemute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert Wintemute, Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah?, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 527 (2006). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl/vol20/iss2/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah? Robert Wintemute∗ Attempts to amend constitutions so as to make legal1 marriage impossible for same-sex couples are futile. Amendments of this kind are nothing more than temporary “legal dikes” designed to create “legal islands” in which a heterosexual majority can continue to discriminate against a lesbian and gay minority in relation to access to legal marriage. These amendments seek to strip the gay and lesbian minority of any possibility of seeking protection against such discrimination from either the legislature or the courts. Where such amendments have been adopted, they will eventually be repealed or invalidated, because the “incoming tide,” i.e., the long-term international trend, will eventually bring full legal equality to our fellow human beings who happen to be lesbian and gay individuals, or members of same-sex couples, with or without children.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerabilities Relevant for Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children
    TRAUMA, VIOLENCE, & ABUSE 1-13 ª The Author(s) 2019 Vulnerabilities Relevant for Commercial Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions Sexual Exploitation of Children/Domestic DOI: 10.1177/1524838018821956 Minor Sex Trafficking: A Systematic Review journals.sagepub.com/home/tva of Risk Factors Hannabeth Franchino-Olsen1 Abstract The commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC) and domestic minor sex trafficking (DMST) occur across the United States, violating the rights and health of far too many children and youth. Adequate prevention efforts should seek to understand the factors that make minors vulnerable to sexual exploitation in order to properly design programs to prevent victimization. This review presents the identified risk factors collected via a systematic literature review. Following full-text review, 15 studies were selected for inclusion by meeting the following criteria: original quantitative or qualitative research studies published in English from January 2010 to September 2017 with titles or abstracts that indicated a focus on the risk factors, vulnerabilities, or statistics of CSEC/DMST and a domestic focus on CSEC/DMST (for U.S.-based journals) with findings that did not combine associations between minors and adults in the study. Relevant risk factors and vulnerabilities found in this review include child abuse and maltreatment, caregiver strain, running away or being thrown away, substance use, peer influence, witnessing family violence or criminality, poverty or material need, difficulty in school, conflict with parents, poor mental health or view of self, involvement in child protective services, involvement in juvenile detention or delinquency, early substance use, and prior rape or adolescent sexual victimization. Keywords domestic minor sex trafficking, commercial sexual exploitation of children, gender-based violence, risk factors, vulnerabilities, prevention Purpose of This Review exploitation (Gerassi, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Homelessness, Survival Sex and Human Trafficking: As Experienced by the Youth of Covenant House New York
    Homelessness, Survival Sex and Human Trafficking: As Experienced by the Youth of Covenant House New York May 2013 Jayne Bigelsen, Director Anti-Human Trafficking Initiatives, Covenant House New York*: Stefanie Vuotto, Fordham University: Tool Development and Validation Project Coordinators: Kimberly Addison, Sara Trongone and Kate Tully Research Assistants/Legal Advisors: Tiffany Anderson, Jacquelyn Bradford, Olivia Brown, Carolyn Collantes, Sharon Dhillon, Leslie Feigenbaum, Laura Ferro, Andrea Laidman, Matthew Jamison, Laura Matthews-Jolly, Gregory Meves, Lucas Morgan, Lauren Radebaugh, Kari Rotkin, Samantha Schulman, Claire Sheehan, Jenn Strashnick, Caroline Valvardi. With a special thanks to Skadden Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and Affiliates for their financial support and to the Covenant House New York staff who made this report possible. And our heartfelt thanks go to the almost 200 Covenant House New York youth who shared their stories with us. *For questions on the use of the trafficking screening tool discussed in this report or anything else related to the substance of the study, please contact study author, Jayne Bigelsen at [email protected] Table of Contents: Executive Summary . 5 Introduction . 5 Key Findings . 6 Terminology . 7 Objectives/Method . 8 Results and Discussion . 10 Compelled Sex Trafficking . 10 Survival Sex . 11 Relationship between Sex Trafficking and Survival Sex . 12 Labor Trafficking . 13 Contributing Factors . 14 Average Age of Entry into Commercial Sexual Activity . 16 Transgender and Gay Youth . 16 Development and Use of the Trafficking Assessment Tool . 17 Implications for Policy and Practice . 19 Conclusion . 21 Appendix: Trafficking Screening Tool . 22 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction In recent years, the plight of human trafficking victims has received a great deal of attention among legislators, social service providers and the popular press.
    [Show full text]
  • Mothering and Work/ Mothering As Work
    A YORK UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION MOTHERING AND WORK/ MOTHERING AS WORK Fallminter 2004 Volume6, Number 2 $15 Featuring articles by JaneMaree Maher, Debra Langan, Lorna Turnbull, Merlinda Weinberg, Alice Home, Naomi Bromberg Bar-Yam, Chris Bobel, Kate Connolly, Maryanne Dever and Lise Saugeres, Corinne Rusch-Drutz, Orit Avishai, Susan Schalge, Kelly C. Walter Carney and many more ... Mothering and Work/ Mothering as Work FalVWinter 2004 Volume 6, Number 2 Founding Editor and Editor-in-Chief Andrea O'Reilly Advisory Board Patricia Bell-Scott, Mary Kay Blakely, Paula Caplan, Patrice DiQuinzio, Miriam Edelson, Miriam Johnson, Carolyn Mitchell, Joanna Radbord, Sara Ruddick, Lori Saint-Martin Literary Editor Rishma Dunlop Book Review Editor Ruth Panofsb Managing Editor Cheryl Dobinson Guest Editorial Board Katherine Bischoping Deborah Davidson Debra Langan Andrea O'Reilly Production Editor Luciana Ricciutelli Proofreader Randy Chase Association for Research on Mothering Atkinson Faculty of Liberal and Professional Studies, 726 Atkinson, York University 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 Tel: (416) 736-2100 ext. 60366 Email: [email protected]; Website: www.yorku.ca~crm TheJournal of the Association for Research on Mothering (ISSN 1488-0989) is published by The Association for Research on Mothering (ARM) The Association for Research on Mothering (ARM)is the first feminist organization devoted specifically to the topics of mothering and motherhood. ARM is an association of scholars, writers, activists, policy makers, educators, parents, and artists. ARM is housed at Atkinson College, York University, Toronto, Ontario. Our mandate is to provide a forum for the discussion and dissemination of feminist, academic, and community grassroots research, theory, and praxis on mothering and motherhood.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples in Europe and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights
    83 The Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples in Europe and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights Jens M. Scherpe1 I. Introduction – It’s Been a Long Road... The legal regulation of family relationships same-sex couples in an increasing number has long been formulated around a “tradi- of jurisdictions, and in others, a form of reg- tional” notion of the family as a unit com- istered partnership is available or de facto prising a heterosexual married couple who relationships of same-sex couples are rec- conceive children within wedlock. This has ognised. But even in Europe, particularly in resulted in the protection mechanisms of the Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, there law focusing on such family units, with other are still many jurisdictions where there is no family forms such as, for example, same-sex legal recognition of same-sex relationships. couples, unmarried couples, couples who are However, in Schalk and Kopf v Austria2 the unable to conceive naturally and single par- European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ents failing to have their family relationships recognised that same-sex couples enjoy the adequately recognised and protected in law. right to “respect for family life” protected This often included, at least initially, not rec- by Article 8 of the ECHR, and this article ar- ognising “non-traditional” families’ rights to gues that this mandates some form of legal respect for their family life under Article 8 of recognition of same-sex relationships by all the Convention for the Protection of Human contracting states of the ECHR and paves Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR).
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Thesis Entitled “A White Wedding? the Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada”, Under the Supervision of Dr
    A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada by Suzanne Judith Lenon A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto © Copyright by Suzanne Judith Lenon (2008) A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada Doctor of Philosophy, 2008 Suzanne Judith Lenon Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education University of Toronto Abstract In A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage, I examine the inter-locking relations of power that constitute the lesbian/gay subject recognized by the Canadian nation-state as deserving of access to civil marriage. Through analysis of legal documents, Parliamentary and Senate debates, and interviews with lawyers, I argue that this lesbian/gay subject achieves intelligibility in the law by trading in on and shoring up the terms of racialized neo-liberal citizenship. I also argue that the victory of same-sex marriage is implicated in reproducing and securing a racialized Canadian national identity as well as a racialized civilizational logic, where “gay rights” are the newest manifestation of the modernity of the “West” in a post-9/11 historical context. By centring a critical race/queer conceptual framework, this research project follows the discursive practices of respectability, freedom and civility that circulate both widely and deeply in this legal struggle. I contend that in order to successfully shed its historical markers of degeneracy, the lesbian/gay subject must be constituted not as a sexed citizen but rather as a neoliberal citizen, one who is intimately tied to notions of privacy, property, autonomy and freedom of choice, and hence one who is racialized as white.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada-SOGI Legislation Country Report-2013
    CANADA/ONTARIO – SOGI LEGISLATION COUNTRY REPORT PRODUCED: DECEMBER 2012 Please note: This document was prepared by law students and highlights publicly- accessible information about legislation available at the time it was prepared. It is not exhaustive, nor is it updated on a regular basis. The information provided here is not a substitute for legal advice or legal assistance, and the International Human Rights program at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law cannot provide such advice or assistance. Summary Jurisdiction in Canada is divided between Federal and Provincial levels of government. The examples of Ontario legislation provided are illustrative, and not necessarily representative of Provincial legislation across the country. Federal Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms lists a number of prohibited grounds of discrimination (section 15(1): “every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability”). While section 15 does not explicitly include sexual orientation, the Supreme Court of Canada has held that sexual orientation is an “analogous ground” akin to the enumerated ones (Egan v Canada [1995] 2 SCR 513). “Sexual orientation” is explicitly listed as a prohibited ground of discrimination under federal human rights legislation (Canadian Human Rights Act). Speech that wilfully promotes hatred based on sexual orientation is criminalized (Criminal Code). Proof that an offence was motivated by bias based on sexual orientation is an aggravating factor at sentencing (Criminal Code).
    [Show full text]