DOCSLIB.ORG

Frenzy | Therese Shechter | Page 1 of 5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Frenzy | Therese Shechter | Page 1 of 5 Frenzy | Therese Shechter | Page 1 of 5 Frenzy by Therese Shechter My paper on The 39 Steps, the first I wrote for this course, includes the sentiment that “I feel a bit predisposed to judge [Hitchcock's] treatment of gender in a negative way, so one of my goals this term will be to get a fuller understanding and appreciation of Hitchcock's women and not just be appalled at the sexism and violence his characters endure” (Shechter, 1). These sentiments were inspired by my negative reaction to Hannay's physical abuse of Pamela–dragging her handcuffed across the moors, yelling at her, insulting her, choking her. In that same paper I referenced to an article that declared the film might be the most misogynistic that Hitchcock ever made. Those were more innocent days. Little did I know what was to come with our final film, Frenzy (Shechter, 3). In class, we have often discussed how Hitchcock likes to play with the seductive nature of voyeurism, our interest in 'watching,' in treating murder as entertainment. The opening scene in Frenzy certainly establishes that tone, with a naked women strangled with a necktie washing up on the banks of the Thames in the middle of a public ceremony. And this enjoyment of onscreen murder–sexualized murder, in fact–is echoed by the two anonymous gents in the pub, who discuss whether the latest series of sex murders might increase tourism, a jolly good thing for London, I assume. It's not just the characters in the film getting a kick out of this. Vincent Canby's review of the film includes the astonishing line “Frenzy is the first good movie about a sex murderer since Psycho.” and Stanley Kauffman writes about 'the razzle-dazzle murder editing...this time dealing with rape and strangling” (Allen, 30). I admit that I've also marveled at Hitchcock's skill in depicting murders in ways that are creative and meaningful to the story–and yes, sometimes gorgeous. The reflection we see in Miriam's glasses as Bruno strangles her in Strangers on a Train comes to mind as a particularly powerful Frenzy | Therese Shechter | Page 2 of 5 combination of visual storytelling techniques. But in Frenzy, from the first naked woman in the Thames to the last victim in Rusk's bed, I felt repulsed by a nasty perversity that pervaded the film. My initial understanding of this reaction was that Hitchcock was forcing us to endure a deeply disturbing series of crimes as a challenge to consider why we find voyeurism so entertaining. You want to see what a rape and murder look like? You want to see someone die terrified? You want to see a dead body? Here you go! By taking murder from stylized abstraction to technicolor reality, Hitchcock makes us sit with it, forcing to us to really look at the horror of it. Tongues hanging out, finger bones snapped, the desperate fear in a sympathetic victim's eyes when she knows she is about to die. Perhaps that's a more honest way of dealing with death than artistically reflecting it in a pair of glasses. However, after some reflection if feels more like Hitchcock is simply getting off on it, and he presumes we must be as well. While I sit disturbed and disgusted, he's enjoying himself–along with Canby and Kauffman. The fact that this violence is sexualized makes it even more difficult to watch. Jeanne Thomas Allen writes about the many male rape fantasies being played out in the murder of Brenda Blaney. When Rusk enters her office, she is putting on makeup, offering “the 'women are always asking for it' male erotic fantasy that provides the rationale for male aggression.” During the rape her body is objectified, shown as a crude sequence of parts, ripe for the picking just like the apple Rusk grabs from her desk and eats. When she asks to remove her own clothing to get back a bit of control, she acts in a way that is more commonly seen as damning evidence that the victim was complicit in the act. And finally, Allen describes the lighting as becoming more soft and 'romantic' as he rapes her while she quietly says a prayer (33). While this is the only graphic rape and murder sequence, Rusk's ride in the back of a potato Frenzy | Therese Shechter | Page 3 of 5 truck is also disturbing in that it seems to be a collection of corpse sight gags. I can't find the humor in Babs, a good woman we have grown fond of, reduced to a collection of limbs sticking out of a burlap bag and then and then flying out of the truck onto the street. In a final insult, Hitchcock uses his considerable directorial skills to relocate our sympathies to Rusk, manipulating the audience into rooting for the successful retrieval of his tie pin. It makes me wonder why I am so delighted by Bruno Antony's progress through Strangers on a Train, and so repulsed by Rusk's in Frenzy. In watching previous films in this class, I've asked myself whether Hitchcock's female characters, despite being treated badly, have a point of view they are allowed to express. Do they move the plot forward by the things they do, or by the things done to them? The answer has provided me with important insights into their unfolding narratives, and the ways their situation illuminates Hitchcock's larger messages. But as hard as I try, I can't find that here. In fact, I feel empathy with the female characters simply because they are so badly used. Brenda Blaney dares to be more successful and prosperous than her loser of an ex-husband. Her secretary is some kind of nosey sexless prig, their client large and overbearing. The wife of Blaney's sympathetic army buddy is a suspicious shrew. The women walking down the street are indifferent to screams coming out of Brenda Blaney's office. And even the kind detective's wife is serving him a succession of French dishes, each more disgusting than the last. The food was almost as disgusting to look at as the dead bodies, with Hitchcock mining the humor to be found there amid the revulsion. Only Babs is kind and she still gets killed along with the anonymous woman found in Rusk's apartment (Allen, 36). For me, Frenzy is the type of film where even understanding all the skill and style involved can't make it any more palatable. In fact it can make it worse, by hiding its reprehensible nature Frenzy | Therese Shechter | Page 4 of 5 behind impeccable editing or cinematography, and spawning countless essays on the number of seconds spent on Brenda's dead and contorted face without once questioning the gender dynamics underlying the scene. As Allen writes, “Hitchcock films are sometimes clever, witty and intelligent. They are also profoundly hostile to women or reinforce their subjugation” (37). I've been so fortunate in this class to get to study Hitchcock's massive genius alongside his equally massive set of issues. I discovered new gems, such as The Lady Vanishes, as well as found new appreciation for films like the breathtaking The Birds. I doubt I'll ever watch Frenzy again, but it's always helpful to understand what you really hate–and why–so you can also understand what you really love. Frenzy | Therese Shechter | Page 5 of 5 WORKS CITED Shechter, Therese. "The 39 Steps." Class paper for The Films of Alfred Hitchcock, Empire State College, 2016. Allen, Jeanne Thomas. “The Representation of Violence to Women: Hitchcock's "Frenzy".” Film Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 3, 1985, pp. 30–38., doi:10.1525/fq.1985.38.3.04a00060. Accessed 13 Apr. 2017. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LYNNE MACEDO Auteur and Author: a Comparison of the Works of Alfred Hitchcock and VS Naipaul
    EnterText 1.3 LYNNE MACEDO Auteur and Author: A Comparison of the Works of Alfred Hitchcock and V. S. Naipaul At first glance, the subjects under scrutiny may appear to have little in common with each other. A great deal has been written separately about the works of both Alfred Hitchcock and V. S. Naipaul, but the objective of this article is to show how numerous parallels can be drawn between many of the recurrent ideas and issues that occur within their respective works. Whilst Naipaul refers to the cinema in many of his novels and short stories, his most sustained usage of the filmic medium is to be found in the 1971 work In a Free State. In this particular book, the films to which Naipaul makes repeated, explicit reference are primarily those of the film director Alfred Hitchcock. Furthermore, a detailed textual analysis shows that similarities exist between the thematic preoccupations that have informed the output of both men throughout much of their lengthy careers. As this article will demonstrate, the decision to contrast the works of these two men has, therefore, been far from arbitrary. Naipaul’s attraction to the world of cinema can be traced back to his childhood in Trinidad, an island where Hollywood films remained the predominant viewing fare throughout most of his formative years.1 The writer’s own comments in the “Trinidad” section of The Middle Passage bear this out: “Nearly all the films shown, apart from those in the first-run cinemas, are American and old. Favourites were shown again and Lynne Macedo: Alfred Hitchcock and V.
    [Show full text]
  • "Sounds Like a Spy Story": the Espionage Thrillers of Alfred
    University of Mary Washington Eagle Scholar Student Research Submissions 4-29-2016 "Sounds Like a Spy Story": The Espionage Thrillers of Alfred Hitchcock in Twentieth-Century English and American Society, from The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934) to Topaz (1969) Kimberly M. Humphries Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Humphries, Kimberly M., ""Sounds Like a Spy Story": The Espionage Thrillers of Alfred Hitchcock in Twentieth-Century English and American Society, from The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934) to Topaz (1969)" (2016). Student Research Submissions. 47. https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research/47 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by Eagle Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Research Submissions by an authorized administrator of Eagle Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "SOUNDS LIKE A SPY STORY": THE ESPIONAGE THRILLERS OF ALFRED HITCHCOCK IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY ENGLISH AND AMERICAN SOCIETY, FROM THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH (1934) TO TOPAZ (1969) An honors paper submitted to the Department of History and American Studies of the University of Mary Washington in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Departmental Honors Kimberly M Humphries April 2016 By signing your name below, you affirm that this work is the complete and final version of your paper submitted in partial fulfillment of a degree from the University of Mary Washington. You affirm the University of Mary Washington honor pledge: "I hereby declare upon my word of honor that I have neither given nor received unauthorized help on this work." Kimberly M.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitchcock's Appetites
    McKittrick, Casey. "The pleasures and pangs of Hitchcockian consumption." Hitchcock’s Appetites: The corpulent plots of desire and dread. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. 65–99. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 28 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781501311642.0007>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 28 September 2021, 16:41 UTC. Copyright © Casey McKittrick 2016. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 3 The pleasures and pangs of Hitchcockian consumption People say, “ Why don ’ t you make more costume pictures? ” Nobody in a costume picture ever goes to the toilet. That means, it ’ s not possible to get any detail into it. People say, “ Why don ’ t you make a western? ” My answer is, I don ’ t know how much a loaf of bread costs in a western. I ’ ve never seen anybody buy chaps or being measured or buying a 10 gallon hat. This is sometimes where the drama comes from for me. 1 y 1942, Hitchcock had acquired his legendary moniker the “ Master of BSuspense. ” The nickname proved more accurate and durable than the title David O. Selznick had tried to confer on him— “ the Master of Melodrama ” — a year earlier, after Rebecca ’ s release. In a fi fty-four-feature career, he deviated only occasionally from his tried and true suspense fi lm, with the exceptions of his early British assignments, the horror fi lms Psycho and The Birds , the splendid, darkly comic The Trouble with Harry , and the romantic comedy Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Strangers No More: The Initial Hitchcock Murder Vlad DIMA Union College, [email protected] Special Issue: 1 (2011) | ISSN 2158-8724 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cinej.2011.1 | http://cinej.pitt.edu Abstract This article analyzes the various levels of violence and graphic detail in the initial Hitchcock murder scenes. Through a detailed close reading of these scenes from Blackmail, Strangers on a Train, and Frenzy, I expose the different and increasing levels of intensity at which sadism functions throughout Hitchcock’s career, and I suggest that the audience is stuck at a one-stage sadistic level as opposed to the typical Freudian model. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. Strangers no More: The Initial Hitchcock Murder If we compare murder scenes from distinct periods in Alfred Hitchcock’s oeuvre, we find a sharp gradation in the intensity of visual depiction from the first talkie, Blackmail (1929), to Strangers on a Train (1951), and to his penultimate film, Frenzy (1972), which essentially marks the end of the director’s career.1 We go from a long shot of curtains that hide the murder in the first film, to a paradoxical close-up of glasses with a small vignette reflection of the murder in the second, and we end with close-ups of the actual people, both the victim and the aggressor, in the third film.
    [Show full text]
  • Gone with the Wind and the Imagined Geographies of the American South Taulby H. Edmondson Dissertation Submitt
    The Wind Goes On: Gone with the Wind and the Imagined Geographies of the American South Taulby H. Edmondson Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Social, Political, Ethical, and Cultural Thought Emily M. Satterwhite, Co-Chair David P. Cline, Co-Chair Marian B. Mollin Scott G. Nelson February 13, 2018 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Gone with the Wind, Mass Media and History, US South, Slavery, Civil War, Reconstruction, African American History, Memory, Race Relations, Whiteness, Nationalism, Tourism, Audiences Copyright: Taulby H. Edmondson 2018 The Wind Goes On: Gone with the Wind and the Imagined Geographies of the American South Taulby H. Edmondson ABSTRACT Published in 1936, Margaret Mitchell’s Gone with the Wind achieved massive literary success before being adapted into a motion picture of the same name in 1939. The novel and film have amassed numerous accolades, inspired frequent reissues, and sustained mass popularity. This dissertation analyzes evidence of audience reception in order to assess the effects of Gone with the Wind’s version of Lost Cause collective memory on the construction of the Old South, Civil War, and Lost Cause in the American imagination from 1936 to 2016. By utilizing the concept of prosthetic memory in conjunction with older, still-existing forms of collective cultural memory, Gone with the Wind is framed as a newly theorized mass cultural phenomenon that perpetuates Lost Cause historical narratives by reaching those who not only identify closely with it, but also by informing what nonidentifying consumers seeking historical authenticity think about the Old South and Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to One of These Episodes, Hitchcock Informs the Audi- Ence That the Music Is Written Fi Rst, Then the Images and Story Are Found to Fi T It
    1 I n t r o d u c t i o n K . J . D o n n e l l y a n d S t e v e n R a w l e or a decade from 1955, Alfred Hitchcock worked almost exclusively with F one composer: Bernard Herrmann. From Th e Trouble with Harry (1955) to the bitter spat surrounding Torn Curtain (1966), the partnership gave us some of cinema’s most memorable musical moments, taught us to stay out of the shower, away from heights and never to spend time in corn fi elds. Consequently, fascina- tion with their work and relationship endures fi ft y years later. Th is book brings together new work and new perspectives on the relationship between Hitchcock and Herrmann. Featuring chapters by leading scholars of Hitchcock’s work, the volume examines the working relationship between the two and the contribu- tion that Herrmann’s work brings to Hitchcock’s idiom, as well as expanding our understanding of how music fi ts into that body of work. Th e goal of these analyses is to explore approaches to sound, music, collaborative authorship and the dis- tinctive contribution that Herrmann brought to Hitchcock’s fi lms. Consequently, the book examines these key works, with particular focus on what Elisabeth Weis ( 1982 : 136) called ‘the extrasubjective fi lms’ – Vertigo (1958), Psycho (1960), Th e Birds (1963) – and explores Herrmann’s palpable role in shaping the sonic and musical landscape of Hitchcock’s work, which, the volume argues, has a consider- able transformative eff ect on how we understand Hitchcock’s authorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Psycho INDIANA UNIVERSITY PRESS FILMGUIDE SERIES Harry Geduld and Ronald Gottesman, General Editors Filmguide to Psycho
    Filmguide. to Psycho INDIANA UNIVERSITY PRESS FILMGUIDE SERIES Harry Geduld and Ronald Gottesman, General Editors Filmguide to Psycho JAMES NAREMORE INDIANA UNIVERSITY PRESS Bloomington London Copyright© 1973 by Indiana University Press All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Association of American University Presses Resolution on Permissions constitutes the only exception to this prohibition. Published in Canada by Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Don Mills, Ontario Library of Congress catalog card number: 72-88636 ISBN: 0-253-39307-8 cl. 0-253-39308-6 pa. Manufactured in. the United States of America 2 3 4 5 6 80 79 78 77 76 For Jay, who likes horror movies I would like to thank Harry Geduld and Ron Gottesman for giving me this opportunity. My thanks also to Murray Sperber and Charles Eckert, who spent hours talking with me about Psycho. J,N, contents 1 Credits 3 2 Outline 5 3 Aesthetics of Repression 9 4 The Production 19 5 Analysis 25 6 Summary Critique 72 A Hitchcock Filmography 81 Selected Bibliography 83 Rental Sources 87 vii -- Filmguide to Psycho ---- 1 . credits PSYCHO Paramount Pictures, 1960 Producer: Alfred Hitchcock Direction Alfred Hitchcock Screenplay Joseph Stephano, from the novel by Robert Bloch Photography John L. Russell, A.s.c. Special EfJects Clarence Champagne Art Direction Joseph Hurley, Robert Clatworthy Sets George Milo Music Bernard Herrmann Sound Engineering Waldon Watson, William Russell Title Design Saul Bass Editing George Tomasini Assistant Director Hilton Green Costumes Helen Colvig Time 109 minutes Filmed in Hollywood, partly on the lots of the old Universal Stu­ dios.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Julie Elizabeth Peterson 2012
    Copyright by Julie Elizabeth Peterson 2012 The Thesis Committee for Julie Elizabeth Peterson Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Hitchcock and Humor: a Study in Collaborative Authorship APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Janet Staiger Thomas G. Schatz Hitchcock and Humor: a Study in Collaborative Authorship by Julie Elizabeth Peterson, B.A., B.S. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2012 Dedication I dedicate this thesis to all those who attempt to negotiate their sense of humor with others: a most tedious, time consuming, noble, and rewarding task. Alfred Hitchcock continued his negotiations for over five decades, and for his efforts, film studies found a touch of much needed tongue-in-cheek. Acknowledgements I first discovered my love of classical Hollywood cinema when I moved to Austin, Texas in 2003 to pursue my bachelor’s in Radio-Television-Film at the University of Texas. Here, I discovered that not only were black and white films far from naïve and unsophisticated, but that it was still possible to view these films on a big screen, in 30mm, with a full audience in attendance: the Paramount, the Alamo Drafthouse, and the Dobie provided excellent programming for an aspiring cinephile year round. Next, I became aware that not only were older films amazing and physically accessible, but that legitimate careers in programming, preserving, studying and teaching classical films existed.
    [Show full text]
  • Something Rotten in Alfred Hitchcock's Frenzy
    The Murderer in the Garden: Something Rotten in Alfred Hitchcock’s Frenzy K. Brenna Wardell In 1733, the English artist William Hogarth completed a series of paintings titled A Rake’s Progress, a sequel to his previous series, A Harlot’s Progress (1731–32). In A Rake’s Progress, Hogarth dramatizes the misadventures of young Tom Rakewell, who loses his money, health, and sanity in London. In the third painting, as Rakewell’s downward “progress” becomes explicit, Hogarth shows him in a tavern, his body drunkenly splayed over a chair while a prostitute expertly steals from him. The painting’s mise-en-scène conveys not only Rakewell’s individual dissolution but general chaos and decay, from the broken crockery, discarded clothing, and quarrelling customers to the marks on many of the women’s faces— possibly beauty spots, but also potential indications of venereal disease, as Jenny Uglow has argued, thereby foreshadowing Rakewell’s future of disease and madness (252-253). In the background a prankster sets fre to a map of the world—her act hinting at universal destruction. That the tavern pictured was a real location—the Rose Tavern in London’s Covent Garden—created an immediate jolt of reality for viewers of A Rake’s Progress while reinforcing Rakewell’s danger: the Rose, and Covent Garden as a whole, was infamous for vice and criminal activity. The Garden’s long, diverse history suffuses the Rose painting—a history including serving as a convent garden, fashionable residence, center of a fruit and vegetable market, and the locale of entertainments from theatres to brothels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of Proximity : Hitchcock's Cinema of Claustrophobia
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1988 The dynamics of proximity : Hitchcock's cinema of claustrophobia Scott Edward Peeler University of the Pacific Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds Part of the Film Production Commons, History Commons, Other Film and Media Studies Commons, and the Visual Studies Commons Recommended Citation Peeler, Scott Edward. (1988). The dynamics of proximity : Hitchcock's cinema of claustrophobia. University of the Pacific, Thesis. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/2151 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DYNAMICS OF PROXIMITY: HITCHCOCK'S CINEMA OF CLAUSTROPHOBIA by Scott E. Peeler An Essay Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of the Pacific In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts February 1988 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my corr~ittee members, Drs. Louis H. Leiter, Diane M. Borden, and Robert T. Knighton, for devoting their valuable time, knowledge, and especially enthusiasm to the creation and revision of this essay and its critical perspective. I would also like to thank Judith Peeler and Bruce Crowell for their much needed encouragement. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION. 1 I. CLAUSTROM AS WORLD. 3 II. CLAUSTROM AS HOME 7 I I I. CLAUSTROM AS PSYCHE 12 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Tom Cohen 2005: Hitchcock’S Cryptonymies
    Tom Cohen 2005: Hitchcock’s Cryptonymies. Volume I. Secret Agents. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P. 284 pp. ISBN: 0-8166-4206-0; ISBN -13: 978-0-8166-4206-9 Tom Cohen 2005: Hitchcock’s Cryptonymies. Volume II. War Machines. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P. 300 pp. ISBN: 0-8166-4171-4; ISBN -13: 978-0-8166-4171-0 Rosa María Díez Cobo Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (Argentina) [email protected] A panoramic shot of the city of London ominously turns to focalise a crowd that, on the banks of the river Thames, attends an improvised electoral speech. The attention of the audience is violently perturbed when a young lady’s nude corpse appears floating on the waters. The cause of murder: strangulation. The weapon: a tie around the deceased’s neck. This brief summary corresponds to the initial scenes of Hitchcock’s penultimate feature film, Frenzy (1973). All the elements that orchestrate the grisly cadence of this opening will be perfectly identifiable for anyone well acquainted with the British director’s filmography. Thus, as François Truffaut accurately pointed out to Hitchcock during one of their encounters: “Frenzy is the combination of two series of films: those in which Hitchcock invites us to follow a murderer’s itinerary: Shadow of a Doubt, Stage Fright, Dial M for Murder and Psycho, and those in which the torments of an innocent wrongly accused of a crime are described: The Thirty-Nine Steps, ‘I Confess’, The Wrong Man and North by Northwest” (1984: 321). Indeed, Frenzy acts as a sort of epitaphic film that integrates Hitchcock’s favourite signatures and motifs coined in his silent films and recurrently revisited in subsequent cinematic productions.
    [Show full text]
  • MOVIES Revised 04/11/2019 12 YEARS a SLAVE: (2013) 134 Minutes
    MOVIES Revised 04/11/2019 12 YEARS A SLAVE: (2013) 134 minutes. Chiwetel Ejiofor, Michael Fassbender. Based on the true story of Solomon Northup. In 1841, Northup, an accomplished, free citizen of New York, is kidnapped and sold into slavery. Stripped of his identity and deprived of all dignity, Northup is ultimately purchased by ruthless plantation owner Edwin Epps and must find the strength within to survive. DVD ABSENCE OF MALICE: (1981) 116 minutes. Paul Newman, Sally Field. A labor leader disappears. The prosecutor leaks false information about a businessman (Newman), whose father was a gangster, to a reporter (Fields) in the hopes of pressuring the businessman into providing information. DVD ABSOLUTE POWER: (1997) 121 minutes. Clint Eastwood, Gene Hackman, Ed Harris. The President believes that everything he does is beyond reproach, including an affair or two. That leads to murder and everyone around him is involved. There is only one witness, a thief named Luther Whitney. They are sure he'll talk, but when? DVD THE ACCUSED: (1988) 106 minutes. Jodie Foster, Kelly McGillis. District Attorney (McGillis) encourages rape victim (Foster) to press charges. The film focuses on the legal system's treatment of the crime and its victim. Jodie Foster won an Oscar for her performance. DVD ADAM'S RIB: (1949) 101 minutes. Spencer Tracy, Katherine Hepburn. Though married, D.A. (Tracy) and defense counsel (Hepburn) square off in a case involving a woman who shot her cheating husband. B & W. DVD ADVISE AND CONSENT: (1962) 142 minutes. Henry Fonda, Charles Laughton, Walter Pidgeon. Charles Laughton's last performance, the film provides a behind-the-scenes view of the Washington political machine, full of shady characters.
    [Show full text]