__ SClc~ FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
PHASE I INITIAL SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT AND [TIER CLASSIFICATION
FIREWORKS I (FORMER NATIONAL FIREWORKS FACILITY) HANOVER, MA Rl N: 4-0090
(October 1907 (Rev. 0)
Prepired I or
iTe I ireworks Site Joint Defense Group
Prepared By
Foter \\ heeler IEironimiental Corporation ioNtonl, MA
i( ,t , I I )-, l FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
PHASE I INITIAL SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT AND TIER CLASSIFICATION
FIREWORKS I (FORMER NATIONAL FIREWORKS FACILITY) HANOVER, MA RTN: 4-0090
October 1997 (Rev. 0)
Prepared For
The Fireworks Site Joint Defense Group
Prepared By
Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation Boston. MA
470 ATLANTIC AVENUE, BOSTON, MA 02210 TEL: 617-457-8200 FAx: 617-457-8498 PHASE I INITIAL SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT AND TIER CLASSIFICATION
FIREWORKS I (FORMER NATIONAL FIREWORKS FACILITY) HANOVER, MA RTN: 4-0090
October 1997 (Rev. 0)
Prepared For
The Fireworks Site Joint Defense Group
Prepared By
Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation Boston, MA
0T7-209 10116/97 TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUM M ARY ...... E-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE...... 1-1 2.0 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION ...... 2-1 2.1 Site Location...... 2-1 2.2 Site History...... 2-3 2.3 Current Site Description and Uses ...... :...... 2-4 2.4 Natural Resources ...... 2-4 2.5 Surrounding Areas Description and Uses ...... 2-4 2.6 Release History ...... :...... 2-5 2.7 Oil and Hazardous M aterial Use and Storage History...... 2-5 2.7.1 Federal Data Bases...... 2-5 2.7.1.1 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information (CERCLIS) ...... 2-5 2.7.1.2 National Priorities List (NPL) ...... 2-6 2.7.1.3 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act Information System - Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (RCRA-TSD)...... 2-6 2.7.1.4 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act Information System - Generators (RCRA-GEN)...... 2-6 2.7.1.5 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act Information System - Corrective Actions (RCRA-COR)...... 2-7 2.7.1.6 Toxic Release Inventory (TRIS) Database ...... 2-7 2.7.1.7 Environmental Response Notification Site (ERNS)...... 2-7 2.7.2 Commonwealth of M assachusetts...... 2-8 2.7.2.1 Massachusetts List of Confirmed Disposal Sites (SITES)...... 2-8 2.7.2.2 M assachusetts Spills List (SPILLS) ...... 2-8 2.7.3 Local...... 2-9 2.7.3.1 Fire Department ...... 2-10 2.7.3.2 Board of Health...... 2-10 2.8 W aste M anagement History...... 2-10 2.9 Environmental Perm its and Compliance History ...... 2-11 2.10 Potentially Responsible Parties...... 2-11 3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION PROGRAM ...... 3-1 3.1 Site Geology and Hydrogeological Characteristics ...... 3-1 3.2 Ordnance and Explosive W astes...... 3-1 3.3 Nature and Extent of Contam ination ...... 3-7 3.3.1 Laboratory Analyses ...... 3-8 3.3.2 Soil Analyses...... 3-8 3.3.2.1 M ercury and Lead Analyses ...... 3-8 3.3.2.2 Other M etals ...... 3-18 3.3.2.3 Explosives Analyses ...... 3-18 3.3.2.4 Organic Analyses ...... 3-H8 3.3.3 Groundwater Analyses ...... 3-19 3.3.3.1 M etals Analyses ...... 3-19 3.3.3.2 Explosives Analyses ...... 3-19 3.3.3.3 Organic Analyses ...... 3-19 3.3.4 Sediment and Surface W ater Data ...... 3-21
0T97-209 10/16m7 4.0 MIGRATION PATHWAYS AND EXPOSURE POTENTIAL...... 4-1 4.1 Potential M igration Pathw ays ...... 4-1 4.2 Potential Exposure Points ...... 4-2 4.3 Potential R eceptors...... 4-3 4.3.1 H um an R eceptors ...... 4-3 4.3.2 Environmental Receptors ...... :...... 4-3 5.0 CONCLUSION AND TIER CLASSIFICATION ...... 5-1 5.1 Evaluation of Immediate Response Action...... 5-1 5.2 T ier C lassification ...... 5-1 5 .3 C on clusio ns ...... 5-1 6.0 L IM IT A T ION S ...... 6-1 7.0 RE F E R EN C ES ...... 7-1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1a Field Data Summary for the Waste Burn Pit ...... 3-10 Table 3-1b Field Data Summary for the Demolition Pit ...... 3-11 Table 3-1c Field Data Summary for the Building 307 Area ...... 3-13 Table 3-1d Field Data Summary for the Fox Island Area...... 3-14 Table 3-le Field Data Summary for the Building 80 Area...... 3-15 Table 3-2a Field Screening and Laboratory Mercury Results ...... 3-16 Table 3-2b Field Screening and Laboratory Lead Results ...... 3-17 Table 3-3 Detected Organic Concentrations in the Demolition Pit...... 3-19 Table 3-4 Groundwater Data Summary...... 3-20 Table 3-5 Summary of Mercury and Lead in Sediment Data ...... 3-22 Table 3-6 Summary of Mercury and Lead in Surface Water Data...... 3-22
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure I Site L ocation M ap ...... 2-2 Figure 2 Phase I Investigation Location...... Attached Plate Figure 3 Fox Island Area Sampling Location Sketch ...... 3-2 Figure 4 Building 80 Area Sampling Location Sketch ...... 3-3 Figure 5 Building 307 Area Sampling Location Sketch ...... 3-4 Figure 6 Waste Burn Pit Area Sampling Location Sketch ...... 3-5 Figure 7 Demolition Pit Area Sampling Location Sketch...... 3-6
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Boring Logs and Well Completion Diagrams Appendix B Analytical Data Summary Tables Appendix C MADEP Hanover, Factory Pond Results Appendix D Tier Classification Appendix E Laboratory Data Reports
0T97.209 i 10/16/97 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report presents the results of an investigation at the Fireworks Site (RTN #4-0090), located in Hanover, Massachusetts to support Tier Classification and completion of the Phase I Initial Site Investigation portion of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP), 310 CMR 40.0000 et seq. The work was performed by Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation (Foster Wheeler) on behalf of the Fireworks Site Joint Defense Group.
Historical activities at the Site included the commercial manufacture of civilian fireworks and the research, development and manufacture of munitions and pyrotechnics for the United States Government. Lead, mercury, and some organic solvents, among other chemicals, were used in munitions manufacturing processes and research and development. The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) has conducted surface water, sediment, and fish tissue sampling for mercury, lead, and other metals in portions of the streams, ponds, and wetlands surrounding the Site and brought the Site into the MCP process. This Phase I investigation focused on several areas of concern identified by MADEP to provide sufficient data to be used in conjunction with data from previous investigations to Tier Classify the Site. Thus, if additional data are required, such as detailed groundwater flow direction to evaluate migration pathways, the data needs and subsequent environmental investigations will be defined and conducted during subsequent phases of work.
A field investigation was performed in accordance with the July 1997 Scope of Work (Rev. 0). Both soil and groundwater samples were collected. Hand augers and shallow soil borings were advanced in the five target area and soil samples collected for analysis. Samples were screened in the field for lead and mercury using x-ray fluorescence instrumentation and selected samples were sent to a laboratory for confirmatory analyses. There was very good correspondence between field and laboratory analytical results. Soil samples from each of the five target areas were also analyzed at the laboratory for Target Analyte List metals and one soil sample from the Demolition Pit Area analyzed for Target Compound List organics. Field screening for explosives was also conducted and confirmatory laboratory analysis of selected samples indicated no presence of explosives in the collected samples.
Five groundwater monitoring wells, one in each target area, were completed in selected soil borings. Groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for Target Compound List organics, Target Analyte List metals and explosives. No surface water or sediment samples were collected in this investigation; samples data collected previously by MADEP were used in this assessment.
Five principal migration pathways of potential concern were identified for contaminants at the Fireworks Site in the following media: soil, groundwater, surface water, sediments and air. Several potential exposure points have been identified and include: surface soils present primarily in the Demolition Pit and Waste Burn Pit areas, sediments in the Drinkwater River system, and surface waters, including wetland areas adjacent to the Demolition Pit.
Both human and environmental potential receptors were identified. Potential human receptors include on-site employees, visitors, and trespassers that may be exposed to dermal contact with soil in unpaved portions of the Site. Trespassers and recreational users of the open areas in the southern portion of the Site may be exposed to contaminants in soils, while recreational users of the Site ponds and waterways would be exposed to contaminants in fish or via direct contact with sediments. Environmental receptors at the Site include the wetlands, rivers and ponds with their associated biota that receive metals and organics conveyed by surface water run off or groundwater discharge. Of primary concern is the effect of metals on sediment dwelling organisms and subsequent biological uptake of these metals by fish in the Drinkwater River system. 0197209 E-1 10/16/97 Based on a review of the available data and the information obtained in the Phase I investigation, there does not appear to be a condition that requires an Immediate Response Action (IRA). The Site does not meet any of the criteria outlined in 310 CMR 40.0412 used to evaluate the need for an IRA. Additionally, no releases were identified that required "2 Hour" or "72 Hour" notification as determined by 310 CMR 40.031 1 through 40.0314.
The Site was ranked using the groundwater and soil data as well as the previously collected MADEP data for surface water, sediments, and fish tissue. Based on the above data, the Site scores 616 points and is classified as a Tier IA site.
jl
0197-209 E-2 10/I6/97 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
This report presents the results of an investigation at the Fireworks Site (RTN #4-0090), located in Hanover, Massachusetts to support Tier Classification and completion of the Phase I Initial Site Investigation portion of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP), 310 CMR 40.0000 et seq. The work was performed by Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation (Foster Wheeler) on behalf of the Fireworks Site Joint Defense Group.
Historical activities at the Site included the commercial manufacture of civilian fireworks and the research, development and manufacture of munitions and pryotechnics for the United States Government between approximately 1907 and 1970. Lead, mercury, and some organic solvents, among other chemicals, were used in certain manufacturing processes and research and development during the facility's operational lifetime. The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) has conducted surface water, sediment, and fish tissue sampling for mercury, lead, and other metals in portions of the streams, ponds, and wetlands surrounding the Site and brought the Site into the MCP process. The intent of Foster Wheeler's investigation was to focus on several areas of concern identified by MADEP, provide sufficient data to be used in conjunction with data from previous investigations to Tier Classify the Site and, if appropriate following the Tier Classification, provide the means to focus subsequent investigatory activities in establishing separate Release Tracking Notification (RTNs) for dissimilar and/or discrete portions of the Site. Thus, if additional data are required, such as detailed groundwater flow direction to determine potential migration pathways, the data needs and subsequent environmental investigations will be defined and conducted during subsequent phases of work.
This report is organized into seven sections: this introduction is the first section, followed by general site information in the second section. The third section summarizes general site geology and presents the results of a field investigation. The fourth section discusses migration pathways and exposure potential while the fifth section presents conclusions and the Tier Classification for the Site. The sixth and seventh sections contain limitations and a listing of the references used for this report, respectively.
o07.209 1-1 10/16/97 2.0 GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
The following general information pertains to the Site:
MADEP RTN: 4-0090 EPA CERCLIS: MAD980908842 Latitude: 42*06'16" (approximate center of Site) Longitude: 70*52'42" (approximate center of Site) UTM: 344685 m E, 4662895 m N in Zone 19 Zip Code: 02339
The remainder of this section describes the general Site location, the areas investigated, and a brief history of past and current uses.
2.1 Site Location
The Site is defined as approximately 240 acres of property generally located between King and Winter Streets in the Town of Hanover, Plymouth County in Massachusetts. A USGS map showing the location of the Site is included as Figure 1. The Site is bounded on the east by Winter Street and the Site security fence, on the west by King Street and the Drinkwater River wetland, on the north by First Street, and on the south by Factory Pond. The Drinkwater River and Torrey Brook, located on the Site, flow generally south/south west toward Lily Pond and Factory Pond, also located within the site boundary. Factory Pond discharges to the Indian Head River which flows eastward to the North River (NUS, 1986). The Site is owned by over 20 different entities including the Town of Hanover. For the purposes of this investigation, the Disposal Site boundary is considered to be the same as the perimeter property boundaries with the southern boundary extended to the southern shore of Factory Pond.
A more detailed site map is included as Figure 2 (see attached plate). For this investigation the Site was subdivided into five general areas based on the past uses of the Site, and their location with respect to environmentally sensitive areas or migration pathways. The five areas are delineated on Figure 2 and further described below.
Fox Island Area
The Fox Island Area lies in the northeastern part of the Fireworks Site in an area including or proximate to former explosives/munitions manufacturing operations. Mercury was reported at an elevated level in a sediment sample collected by MADEP from the Drinkwater River in the vicinity of the Fourth Street bridge. Lead azide, lead thiocyanate, mercury fulminate, various solvents, and explosives were used in the mixing or manufacturing of tracer ammunition, primer compounds, squibs, flare mixes, and other explosives. Fox Island also served as a manufacturing area for land mines (Kent, 1997; Osborne, 1997; Wolfert, 1997). Soils in this general area may be possible sources of lead or mercury.
Building 80 Area (Sixth Street)
The Building 80 Area also lies in the northeastern part of the Site but is south of the Fox Island Area. Mercury was reported in a sediment sample collected by MADEP from this area. The Building 80 Area was used for the production of munitions, possibly including land mines, detonators and incendiary grenades; research and development for TNT replacement explosives; degreasing area for fuse housings and loading area for 20mm shell propellant (Kent, 1997, Wolfert, 1997). Possible contaminant concerns o97.209 2-1 10/16/97 Source: USGS 7.5 Min Topographic Maps; Whitman, MA, 1977, and Honover, MA 1978. associated with former manufacturing processes in this area include lead (from lead azide), mercury, explosives, and volatile organics including trichloroethylene.
Building 307 Area
The Building 307 Area lies toward the southern end of the principal manufacturing area that occupies the northern portion of the Site. This manufacturing area is bounded to the north and west by the Drinkwater River. Mercury was reported in a sediment sample collected by MADEP from the Drinkwater River north of this location. Building 307 is believed to have been the site of past manufacturing operations, including the machining of HMX explosive, production of flares, primers and detonators, assembly of 20mm shells, loading of tetryl pellets and degreasing of projectiles. Possible contaminants of concern include explosives, trichloroethylene, and metals.
Waste Burn Pit Area
Available information indicates that the Waste Burn Pit Area at the southern end of the Site was used as a disposal/destruction area during pyrotechnics and/or munitions manufacturing. Waste materials, possibly anti-personnel mine (APERs) manufacturing wastes and off-spec or raw material were apparently destroyed by open combustion (Pierce, 1996; Kent, 1996). Waste materials may contain lead, mercury, and possibly explosive residues. Given its close proximity to Factory Pond, this area is of concern as a possible source for metals contamination to the pond and adjacent waterways. However, the exact location of the pits in the area is somewhat uncertain.
Demolition Area Pit
This area is also located at the southern end of the Site. Available information indicates that this area was used for the demolition of off-spec and excess munitions and materials (Osborne, 1996). Other site information indicates the Demolition Area Pit and surrounding area may have received waste materials from off-site facilities for disposal in addition to wastes from on-site activities. Information indicates that drummed laboratory wastes, apparently including a variety of chemicals and solvents, might have been deposited in this general area (Pierce, 1996). Many drums were removed from the Site during an EPA removal action conducted in 1989.
2.2 Site History
Activities at the Site began as early as 1907 when National Fireworks Manufacturing Corporation began the commercial manufacture of fireworks for civilian use. During World War I, the company produced military munitions under the direction of the War Department. In 1924, National Fireworks Manufacturing Corporation became National Fireworks, Inc. During the 1930s, munitions production began to accelerate at the Site. At the onset of World War II, the Site was devoted exclusively to fulfilling military contracts initially for the British Government under the Lend-Lease Program and then solely for the U.S. Government. During the war, production facilities operated 24 hours per day, employed 5,000 persons and were the leading producers of 20mm antiaircraft shells. After the war, National Fireworks, Inc. continued production of pyrotechnics and munitions and performed research and development on munitions for the U.S. Government as well as some civilian firework production. A number of different companies operated at the Site until it closed around 1970. Following the facility closure, U.S. military personnel came to the Site and destroyed all government owned raw materials and explosives at the Waste Burn Pit Area (Osborne, 1996). Several years later, the Town of Hanover purchased approximately 130 acres of the Site in the general area of Factory Pond; the Town continues to
0197-209 10/16/97 2-3 maintain the area as a conservation district and has also built the Municipal Garage (Department of Public Works) on this parcel off of Ames Way. The remaining acreage was sold in May 1983 to Drinkwater Investment Corporation; it was subsequently subdivided and portions sold in its present configuration of a multi-tenant, commercial/industrial park.
2.3 Current Site Description and Uses
The Site is a mixed usage site consisting of light industry, numerous abandoned structures in the northern portion and on the streets along the Site perimeter, open fields, dense foliage areas, and wetlands in the southern portion of the Site. Signs of random and indiscriminate dumping of household rubbish, motor vehicles and automotive parts are visible across portions of the Site. An estimated 150 to 175 people work in approximately 30 businesses in the northern portion of the Site. Some of these buildings appear to be seasonally used. The remainder are more than likely heated by oil or possibly electric heat. There are no underground utilities based on DIGSAFE inquiries conducted for the field portion of this investigation. Sewage disposal is by means of subsurface disposal or septic systems; there are no town sewers in the area (Board of Health, 1997). There are no private wells on the Site (NUS, 1986; SEA, 1994) and drinking water comes from the Hanover public water supply wells.
2.4 Natural Resources
A database search by New England DataMap Technology Corporation (1997) of natural resources on the Site including water supply resource areas and areas of critical environmental concern yielded the following results:
* No public water supplies, Zone II areas, Interim Well Head Protection Areas or private wells were identified; * The majority of the area on-site is considered to be a medium yield, potentially productive aquifer; e No Sole Source Aquifers were identified; * No vernal pools were identified; e No habitats of species of special concern or threatened or endangered species were identified; * There is a corridor of protected open space on-site along both sides of Drinkwater River and Factory Pond that includes land owned by the Hanover Conservation Commission; * There is a Fish Consumption Advisory for Factory Pond fish as recommended by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
2.5 Surrounding Areas Description and Uses
The area around the Site is a mixture of a light industrial area (on the north and east sides of the Site) and residential and rural areas surrounding the remainder. Population estimates are 1,632 people within a half-mile radius and 2,014 within a one mile radius of the Site (New England DataMap, 1997 and NUS, 1986). No institutions were observed within 500 feet of the Site. There are several types of natural resources within 500 feet of the Site including surface waters (Drinkwater River and Torrey Brook), and ponds (Forge Pond, Lily Pond and Factory Pond).
oT97-209 2-4 10/16/97 All residents within 500 feet of the Site are served by the public water system (Hanover Board of Health, 1997; Hanson Board of Health, 1997). A residence 1,000 feet northwest of the Site, at 52 King Street, maintains an irrigation well, but it is not used as a potable water source (Hanover Board of Health, 1997).
2.6 Release History
There are few specific records documenting past releases on the Site. It is presumed that there were occasional spills associated with routine handling of materials or local transport of materials on-site. One notable documented spill was the accidental release of approximately 49,000 pounds of freon used to desensitize lead azide during the production of land mines. The exact cause of the spill is not known (e.g., valve release or leak) but the spill occurred on or about July 27, 1966 in the area of Building 85, southwest of the Building 80 area. (Department of Defense, 1966; Kent, 1997). In addition, releases may be associated with the explosions that occurred during manufacturing operations on-site (Clark, 1996; Osborne, 1997). It is unclear what mitigation measures were taken as a result of these incidents.
2.7 Oil and Hazardous Material Use and Storage History
An attempt was made to identify records of oil and hazardous material (OHM) use on the Site and to locate properties in the vicinity of the Site where releases or threats of releases of hazardous materials may have occurred. Based on depositions and affidavits from former employees at the Site, raw products used in the manufacture of munitions included lead azide, freon, mercury fulminate, aluminum fulminate, butyl acetone, amyl acetate, gun powder, lithium chloride, MEX, RDX, phosphorous, magnesium, sodium stifnate, tetryl and possibly other solvents (Kent, 1996; Osborne, 1996; Pierce, 1996). Other materials believed to be used included silver fulminate, lead thiocyanate, PETN (Osborne, 1996); acetic acid, black powder, TNT, C-4, chlorothene (sic), comp-B, solox, and trichlorethylene (Kent, 1997; Traniello, 1996). Former employee affidavits and depositions indicate a history of disposal of off-spec munitions and production wastes in the southern portion of the Site.
A search of available environmental records was conducted using DataMap Technology Corporation (1997). A summary of the findings are grouped below by category. Note that the estimated distances from the Site are calculated from an approximate center point on the Site for consistency in the data base search; actual distances from a site boundary may be different.
2.7.1 Federal Data Bases
2.7.1.1 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information (CERCLIS)
The CERCLIS database is a comprehensive list of known or suspected uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites. These sites have either been investigated, or are currently under investigations by the federal EPA for the release or threat of release of hazardous substances. Once a site is placed in CERCLIS, it may be subjected to several levels of review and evaluation and ultimately placed on the National Priorities List. As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned" (NFRAP) have been removed from the CERCLIS database. The agency release date for CERCLIS was August 15, 1997. The ASTM recommended minimum search distance for the CERCLIS list is one-half mile.
The Fireworks property and another property, National Fireworks II - Sevigny Candy were the only two CERCLIS sites found in the data base within the search area.
0197209 2-5 10/16/97 2.7.1.2 National Priorities List (NPL)
The NPL report, also known as the Superfund List, is an EPA listing of uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites. The list is primarily based upon a score which the site receives from the EPA's Hazardous Ranking System. These sites are targeted for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund Act. The agency release date for NPL was August 15, 1997. The ASTM recommended minimum search distance for the site list is one mile.
Neither the Fireworks property nor any sites within one mile are listed as an NPL site.
2.7.1.3 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act Information System - Treatment, Storage, and -Disposal Facilities (RCRA-TSD)
The RCRA-TSD report contains information pertaining to facilities, which either treat, store or dispose of hazardous waste. Information pertaining to the status of the facilities tracked -by the RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System (RAATS August 1997) is included in the RCRA-TSD report. The ASTM recommended minimum search distance for the RCRA-TSD site list is one mile..
Neither the Fireworks property nor any sites within one mile were listed as a RCRA-TSD site.
2.7.1.4 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act Information System - Generators (RCRA-GEN)
The RCRA-GEN report contains information pertaining to facilities which generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste per month (very small generator), between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month (small generator), more than 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month (large generator) or meet other applicable requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Information pertaining to the status of sites'tracked by the RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System (RAATS, updated August 1997) is included in this report. . The ASTM recommends that the RCRA generator list be reviewed for the target property and adjoining properties only.
Five sites show up as RCRA generator sites; two are owned by Cri-Tech and one of these properties is considered a large generator. The other properties identified in the data base are either small or very small quantity generators. The following is a summary of the sites within one mile along with their distance and direction from the Fireworks property.
0197.209 10/16197 2-6 RCRA-GEN LISTING
DISTANCE/ FACILITY NAME ADDRESS DIRECTION Cri-Tech 149 King St., Hanover 0.63 MI/NE (large generator) Cri-Tech Winter Street, Hanover 0.62 MI/NE (small generator) Gem Gravure 112 School St., Hanover 0.72 MI/NW (very small generator) CH Auto Service 204 King St. Hanover 0.53 MI/NW (very small generator) Crawford Products Inc. 301 Winter St., Hanover 0.22 MI/NE (very small generator) -
2.7.1.5 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act Information System - Corrective Actions (RCRA-COR)
The RCRA-COR report contains information pertaining to facilities with ongoing RCRA corrective actions. The update to this database was August 15, 1997.
Neither the Fireworks property nor any sites within one mile were listed as undergoing any RCRA corrective action measures.
2.7.1.6 Toxic Release Inventory (TRIS) Database
TRIS is a national computer database system that stores information on all facilities that manufacture, produce or import toxic chemicals in excess of 25,000 pounds per year. The agency release date for TRIS was June 17, 1997. ASTM recommends that the TRIS list be reviewed for the target property only.
The Fireworks Site is not listed in the TRIS database.
2.7.1.7 Environmental Response Notification Site (ERNS)
ERNS is a national computer database system that is used to store information on the sudden and/or accidental release of hazardous substances, including petroleum, into the environment. The ERNS reporting system contains preliminary information on specific releases, including the spill location, the substance released, and the responsible party. The agency release date for ERNS was August 15, 1997.
The Fireworks Site is not listed in the ERNS database.
0197-209 2-7 10/16197 2.7.2 Commonwealth of Massachusetts
2.7.2.1 Massachusetts List of Confirmed Disposal Sites (SITES)
The Massachusetts List of Confirmed Disposal Sites and Locations to be Investigated contains information concerning sites that are deemed hazardous by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. The report consists of five sections: Confirmed Disposal Sites; Remedial Action Sites; Locations To Be Investigated; Waiver Sites; and Deleted Sites. The agency release date for SITES was July,24, 1997. The ASTM recommended minimum search distance for the Massachusetts SITES list is one mile.
Six (6) sites within one mile are listed, including the Fireworks Site. The following is a summary of these sites with their release tracking numbers, investigation status, address, and (computer search) distance and direction from the Fireworks Site.
SITES LISTING
DISTANCE/ FACILITY NAME ADDRESS DIRECTION PRODUCT Fireworks I Forge Pond Industrial Subject site of Hazardous Waste 4-0000090 (Phase I) Park, Hanover this report 1987 Arcata Graphics Halliday Circuit St., Hanover 0.90 MI/NE Chemical Ink 4-0010457 (Transition) No date Cri-Tech 149 King St., Hanover 0.63 MI/NW #2 Fuel Oil 4-001130 (LTBI) 1991 No Significant Risk Fireworks II/Sevigny West Side, King St., 0.18 MI/NW Hazardous Waste Candy Hanover 1987 4-0000091 (LTBI Preliminary Assessment) Peterson & Nash, Inc. 219 Winter St., Hanover 0.28 MI/NE Cutting Oil in 4-0000426 Leaching System (Class A-2 Remedial 1988 Action Outcome) SRC Medical Inc. 176 King St., Hanover 0.54 MI/NW Hazardous Waste 4-0010388 (L Phase I) 1 1 1986
2.7.2.2 Massachusetts Spills List (SPILLS)
The Massachusetts Spills List is a list of all oil and hazardous materials releases reported to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Emergency Response Bureau. It should be noted that the Massachusetts Spills List includes LUST sites as well as miscellaneous spills. The agency release date for SPILLS sites was July 24, 1997. The ASTM recommended search distance for the Massachusetts Spills List is one-quarter mile.
017.209 2-8 10/16/97 The Fireworks Site is not on the SPILLS list but eleven other sites within one-quarter mile of a boundary are listed. The following is a summary of these sites with their spill or release tracking numbers, address, and (computer search) distance and direction from the Fireworks Site. Where applicable, findings of no significant risk are noted. Note that the Cri-Tech spill appears to be one spill but is reported as having two separate spill IDs.
SPILLS LISTING
DISTANCE/ FACILITY NAME ADDRESS DIRECTION PRODUCT Cri-Tech Inc. Winter St. 0.62 MI/NE UST #2 fuel oil S88-0789 Hanover, MA (within site) No significant risk Cri-Tech Inc. Winter St. 0.62 MI/NE UST # 2 fuel oil S88-0747 Hanover, MA (within site) No significant risk Industry Industrial Way 0.55 MI/NW UST # 2 fuel oil S89-0054 Hanover, MA (within site) No significant risk Residential Home 313 King St., 0.39 MI/NW Heating oil 4-0010388 UST Hanover No significant risk Industrial Property King St. Industrial Within 0.25 MI Tank removal - # 2 fuel oil S92-0453 Park, Hanover (within site) No significant risk Auto Body Shop Fire King St. Industrial Within 0.25 MI Auto body repair fluid S-91-0193 Park, Hanover (within site) No significant risk King St. Industrial King St. Industrial not recorded UST fuel oil Park Park (within site) No further information S89-0017 Hanover, MA Unrecorded King St. not recorded UST # 2 fuel oil S89-0561 Hanover, MA No significant risk Unrecorded King St. not recorded AST # 2 fuel oil S89-0090 Hanover, MA No significant risk Unrecorded King St. not recorded UST # 2 fuel oil S89-0651 Hanover, MA No significant risk HAPCO 353 Circuit St. 0.91 MI/NE Vat with Dipropylene S92-0848 Hanover, MA glycol dibenzene No significant risk
2.7.3 Loal
Information pertaining to a possible release of Oil and Hazardous Materials (OHM) or the storage of OHM at Fireworks Site was investigated at the local level included the Fire Department and Health Department records.
OT97-209 10/16/97 2-9 2.7.3.1 Fire Department
An electronic file search of Fire Department files for underground storage tanks in the indicated area yielded five (5) locations with UST listings. These sites are listed below.
UST LISTING
DISTANCE/ FACILITY NAME ADDRESS DIRECTION PRODUCT Gem Gravure Co. Inc. 112 School St., Hanover 0.70 MI/NW Printing fluids 0-013347 (Registered) (toluol, MIBK, MEK) P.A. Landers, Inc. 24 Factory Pond Rd., 0.22 MI/SE Diesel 0-013335 (Registered) Hanover (within site) Wes-Pine Millwork, Inc. 176 King St., Hanover 0.56 NW Diesel 0-030118 (Registered) DPW Highway Garage 229 Ames Way, Hanover 0.20 MI/SE Diesel 0-334460 (UST) (within site) DPW Highway Garage 229 Ames Way, Hanover 0.20 MI/SE Gasoline 0-000365 (Registered) (within site)
Underground storage tanks have been removed from the Fireworks Site. A 5,000 gallon UST was removed in 1987 from a property at 74 Industrial Way (SEA, 1994). Three (3) 1,500 gallon tanks and one (1) 3,000 gallon tank were removed in 1989 from the S&D Rubber portion of the Site (SEA, 1993).
2.7.3.2 Board of Health
There are no violations or open complaints on file for the Site at the Health Department (Board of Health, 1997).
2.8 Waste Management History
Much of the waste management history of the Site comes from deposition testimony and affidavits of former employees (Pierce, 1996; Osborne, 1996 & 1997; Kent, 1996 & 1997; Traniello, 1996; Wolfert, 1996 & 1997). Waste materials were stored in various locations across the Site prior to disposal. Wastewater from the processing of tetryl was disposed through drains from Building 307 into the adjoining wetlands area during the World War 11 era (Kent, 1997; Osborne, 1997). Sanitary waste was disposed in either cesspools or septic systems throughout the facility; these were occasionally pumped and the waste was disposed in the southern end of the Site (Kent, 1997). All other waste, including general waste, floor sweepings, lead azide, mercury fulminate, freon and solvents were disposed by dumping, burning, burying or exploding in both the Waste Burn Area and the Demolition Pit Area, which are both in the southern end of the Site to the east of Factory Pond. Lead azide and explosive devices containing lead azide may have been disposed of by detonation in Factory Pond (Kent, 1997).
OT97-209 10/16/97 2-10g 2.9 Environmental Permits and Compliance History
The EPA evaluated the Site pursuant to the Hazard Ranking System in 1984 and determined that the Site should not be added to the National Priority List. The EPA then conducted a Remedial Site Assessment in 1986 and required the Susquehanna Corporation to investigate the southern portion of the Site and implement a removal action. The removal action was completed in 1989 and focused on a large number of drums that were scattered across the Site as well as locally contaminated soils. Contaminants cited during the removal action included trichloroethylene, trichlorofluoromethane, toluene, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, xylene, freon, corrosives, uranium and thorium.
In the early 1990s a number of fish studies were conducted throughout Massachusetts and in 1993 mercury was found in some fish taken from Factory Pond and in certain downstream locations. Consumption of fish from the ponds on-site and from the downstream portions of the Drinkwater and Indian Head River systems has since been banned. In 1995, the MADEP analyzed sediments from Forge Pond, Factory Pond and some streams on-site for mercury, which was found in most samples at varying concentrations, and lead, which was found in some samples in varying concentrations.
In October 1995, MADEP issued Notices of Responsibility (NORs) to several firms listed as potentially responsible parties and gave them until October 20, 1996 to complete the Phase I Investigation and Tier Classification report. The NOR cited lead and mercury as contaminants of concern. Several of the potentially responsible parties comprising the Fireworkes Site Joint Defense group conducted intensive historical research and a record search to identify the level of government involvement at the Site and were granted an extension to October 20, 1997 to complete the Phase I Investigation.
No records for state or federal environmental permits issued to National Fireworks, Inc. or subsequent site operators producing munitions or pyrotechnics were found in electronic data bases.
2.10 Potentially Responsible Parties
A NOR was issued by MADEP on October 20, 1995 to Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, National Coating Corporation, Susquehanna Corporation and the U.S. Department of Defense based on their alleged status as either owners, operators, generators, transporters or disposers or successors to former site owners operators, generators, transporters or disposers. The first three entities, while not admitting liability, have formed the Fireworks Site Joint Defense Group, an unincorporated association to respond to the NOR issued by MADEP. This report and the investigation were undertaken and funded by the Fireworks Site Joint Defense Group and no support or assistance were provided by either Susquehanna Corporation or the Department of Defense.
097-209 2-1 1 10/16/97 3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION PROGRAM
A field investigation was performed between July 14 through July 22, 1997, in accordance with the Scope of Work for a Phase I Investigation and Tier Classification, July 1997 (Rev. 0). This section summarizes the geological and chemical sampling activities undertaken during the investigation.
3.1 Site Geology and Hydrogeological Characteristics
The Fireworks Site is located in the southeastern coastal plain of Massachusetts. This area is characterized by glacial outwash and ice contact deposits overlying a basal or lodgement till above bedrock. Commonly, the upper portion of this bedrock is fractured or weathered. The topography is relatively flat with some localized relief. There are numerous water courses and wetlands across the Site.
More than 25 shallow borings were advanced on-site using hand augers or a drilling rig with a split spoon sampler. Boring locations are shown in sampling location sketches in Figures 3 through 7. Borings advanced on-site were generally in fine to coarse sand, with silt or gravel in selected intervals (see Boring Logs in Appendix A). No borings were completed to bedrock. Groundwater was generally encountered between 2 to 4 feet below ground surface. Five borings were completed. as shallow groundwater monitoring wells with screens intersecting the phreatic surface. All soils were screened with a photoionization detector and no samples exhibited volatile organic vapors above background.
Overburden thickness in the area ranges from 0 to 25 feet and is noted as capable of groundwater yields between 10 and 100 gallons per minute (gpm) (New England DataMap Technology Corp., 1997; NUS, 1986). Depth to bedrock in the area is variable and generally ranges from 25 to 35 feet below ground surface based on a limited number of well logs from the area (Williams, et al., 1975). Although bedrock was not reached during the boring program, examination of the Massachusetts State Geological Map (Zen, 1983) indicates bedrock consisting primarily of two formations - the Dedham granite and the Rhode Island Formation of the Narragansett Basin. The Dedham granite is a greenish gray equigranular granite and the Rhode Island Formation is a sandstone shale and graywacke conglomerate (NUS, 1986).
The regional groundwater flow direction is expected to be north to south. The Drinkwater River and Factory Pond probably act as groundwater discharge areas, therefore, localized groundwater flow and advective migration would be expected to be perpendicular to these water bodies. No groundwater potentiometric map was constructed based on the large distances between the five monitoring wells installed and the expected localized flow directions. The aquifer is expected to be rather transmissive based on the sands encountered during drilling and the rapid recharge of the monitoring wells during development.
3.2 Ordnance and Explosive Wastes
During the site investigation Ordnance and Explosive Wastes (OEW) were found in the general vicinity of the Demolition Pit Area and included the following items:
e 4 lb. therm ite magnesium fire bomb remnants * 20 mm projectile a Detonator carrier a 20 mm cartridge case (expended) * Bellows squib (expended) * 0.50 caliber rounds (expended)
0197-209 3-1I 10/16/97 IFz
s o
0
z 0 C
-:0 D
LA- :2U
i xz 0n
CL 0
t C Iz
DRINKWATER RIVER
r-- -
LI - a 0 J
|0 1 00 -40
- o - - I IO I0 I 0
g2
0 * I g0
z5 w + e 0 0z Li 05 -J 0 C0 -D
L L
0 00 Cm m DPW SHED DPW GARAGE 1 F TRE A307AL3 A307WL2 I A307BL3 z In C-, = Lii Li. '- 0 GAS PUMPS I Ina GRAVEL K BAYS NOT TO SCALE A307BL1 BOULDER PILE LOGS STUMPS & 4 LOGS FIGURE 5 PHASE I SAMPLING LOCATIONS-FIREWORKS SITE MONITORING WELL BORING LOCATION A80WL3 HANOVER, MASSACHUSETTS TEST BORING LOCATION A80BLS BUILDING 307 AREA Q HAND AUGER LOCATION ABOAL6 SAMPLING LOCATION SKETCH PRESUMED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION CADDFILE: HAN006.DWG N BRANCHES CATTALS OVER ROAD FACTORY POND WBAL3 WBAL1 WBAL7 WBBL1 WOOD.TIRES, CAR TIRES e WBAL8 4eWBAL2 WBBL2 WBAL12 N A WBAL1 1 WBAL10 WBBL11I WBAL9 WBWL9 WBAL4 WBAL6 WBBL6 WBAL5 FORMER SITE ROADS NOT TO SCALE v 4 MONITORING WELL BORING LOCATION FIWL2 FIGURE 6 0 TEST BORING LOCATION PHASE I SAMPLIG LOCATIONS-FIREWORKS SITE FIBL4 HANOVER, MASSACHUSETTS HAND AUGER LOCATION FIAL7 WASTE BURN PIT AREA -- Ol PRESUMED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION SAMPLING LOCATION SKETCH FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION CADDFILE: HAN004.DWG TREE LINE N QDPAL1 1 NDPBL13 DECAYED DRUMS & METAL REFUSE DPAL1 0 Q DEMO PIT DPAL1 DPBL1 DPAL12 \DPBL12 Q \ DPAL15 SHINGLES \ DPAL-4 WBWL4 Q DPAL5 DPAL14 HILL DRAINAGE AREA WE T L A ND DP A L 9 DP AL 1 Q DPAL3 DPAL8PADPAL8 DL IQDAL3 DPALBADPAP ALAS DPALS Q HILL DPAL7 NOT TO SCALE DPAL2 MONITORING WELL BORING LOCATION FIGURE 7 ABOWL3 0 TEST BORING LOCATION PHASE I SAMPLING LOCATIONS-FIREWORKS SITE A80BL5 HANOVER, MASSACHUSETTS A8DAL6 HAND AUGER LOCATION DEMOLITION PIT AREA - PRESUMED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION SAMPLING LOCATION SKETCH :_ FOSTER WTEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION CADDFILE: HANOB.DWG * Grenade fuse for either MK2 hand grenade or smoke grenade (expended) e Para flare remnants e Fuse remnants * VT fuse and booster remnant (previously exploded) e Point detonating fuse remnants for 60 mm shell During soil borings in the Waste Burn Pit Area, an explosive booster remnant with serial numbers and an arming device for a water mine were uncovered. On July 17, 1997 Foster Wheeler personnel discovered approximately 50 "live" electroexplosive devices in the Demolition Pit Area. The Hanover Fire Department was notified and responded to the Site. The area was secured and the rounds were collected and disposed of by the Massachusetts State Police bomb squad. 3.3 Nature and Extent of Contamination This section summarizes the analytical results of the field investigation program. Included are results for the field chemistry screening program for surface and subsurface soils as well as the confirmatory laboratory analytical program for soils. Also included are the results of laboratory analyses of site groundwater samples. Summary analytical data tables are presented in this section with the more complete analytical data set included in Appendix B. In the following discussion, analytical results are segregated into their respective environmental matrices and the respective classes of chemical constituents under investigation. The following sample designation system was used to identify samples collected during the sampling program: Target Area: F . Fox Island A80 Building 80 Area A307 Building 307 Area WB Waste Burn Pit Area DP Demolition Pit Area MWxx Monitoring Well, where xx designates the well ID Each boring or hand auger location was recorded sequentially. Sample Type: BL Soil boring samples (not completed as monitoring wells) WL Soil samples from monitoring well borings MW Groundwater samples AL Hand auger samples Sample Depth was recorded in parentheses (top - bottom) in feet. QC Identifier: D Field duplicate TB Trip blank EB Equipment blank MS/MSD Sample to be used as the MS/MSD or spike and duplicate for inorganics 01m7-209 3-7 10/16/97 QC samples not associated with physical locations are referenced by the date collected (i.e., TB071797 is a trip blank collected on July 17, 1997). For example, FI-BL05(2-4)D is a duplicate soil sample collected from Fox Island boring #5, from 2 - 4 feet deep. Note that results reported as parts per million or ppm for soils or sediments are equivalent to mg/kg units. Results for groundwater reported in parts per billion or ppb are equivalent to pg/I units. 3.3.1 Laboratory Analyses All laboratory analyses were performed by ITS/Aquatec (formerly Inchcape/Aquatec) of Burlington, Vermont. The laboratory used the following analytical methods for samples from the Fireworks Site: ' EPA Analysis Reference Method Lead 6010 Mercury 7471/7470 TAL Metals 6010/7000 series Explosives 8330 Volatile Organics 8260 Semivolatiles 8270 Pesticides/PCBs 8080 Nitrate/nitrite 353.1 TPH-GC Modified 8015 In addition, the SVOC laboratory analysis included a library search of unknown peaks for Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs). TICs are a qualitative indication that a compound is present although the actual concentration cannot be determined without additional analysis. The TCL/TAL analyte lists comprise a significant majority of the Appendix IX (40 CFR 264) list and include contaminants commonly used in industries and typically identified on hazardous waste sites. These analyte lists with the TICs were chosen as a cost effective alternative to the complete Appendix IX list. 3.3.2 Soil Analyses This section summarizes the results of the field screening and laboratory analysis programs for soils. As noted above, the results are discussed in terms of the various chemical constituent classes which were analyzed. It should be noted that the field screening program was implemented to maximize the efficiency of the field program by focusing the selection of samples to be sent for more rigorous confirmatory laboratory analyses. 3.3.2.1 Mercury and Lead Analyses The field and laboratory analytical programs for metals in soils focused on the analysis, of lead and mercury as the two principal constituents of possible concern. 0M7-209 10116/97 3-8 Field XRF Screening Data for Lead and Mercurv The field soil analytical program emphasized the use of x-ray fluorescence (XRF) techniques to screen for the possible presence of lead and mercury in Site soils. The results of this screening program are included in Table 3-1. It should be noted that XRF is a screening technique whose accuracy and sensitivity may differ from laboratory results due to differences in analytical methods (including sample preparation) and their associated sensitivities. The lead and mercury XRF screening results in Table 3-1 are presented as parts per million (ppm). It should also be noted that, in accordance with XRF screening protocols, analytical results which exceed 5 times (5x) the standard deviation value are reported as positive values. Data which range from 3x to 5x the standard deviation are reported as estimated values (J). Results which are less than 3x the standard deviation have been reported as less than the maximum sample concentration that was found to fail the 3x standard deviation criteria. For mercury, results over 60 ppm are generally reported as positive values (approximate reporting limit). Results from 25 to 60 ppm are reported as estimated values and results less than 25 ppm are reported as non-detects. For lead, results greater than approximately 30 ppm are reported as positive values, results between 18 and 30 ppm as estimated values, and results below 18 ppm as non-detects. Again, it should be noted that when lead or mercury values are reported as "less than" (<) values, it does not mean that the element is not present in that sample. Rather, it means that the level was too low to be reliably quantitated by XRF screening methods. For comparison purposes, MADEP default background concentrations for lead and mercury are 99 ppm and 0.3 ppm, respectively. Overall, the field screening soil XRF results for lead and mercury vary with location across the Fireworks Site. As indicated in Table 3-1, for many areas of the Site, soil mercury concentrations were below levels which could be reliably detected by the XRF instrument. Mercury was not detected in screening samples from the Waste Burn Pit area, Building 307 area, or the Building 80 area. Mercury was detected in only one sample at relatively low levels in the Fox Island Area. In only one area, the Demolition Pit Area, were elevated soil mercury levels frequently observed. In this area of the Site, mercury levels in several soil samples exceeded 100 ppm. The maximum observed concentration was 1134 ppm found in a shallow subsurface sample. Within the Demolition Pit, the XRF results do not indicate a clearly defined distribution of mercury. Elevated mercury levels were found in both surface (0-1 ft.) and at various subsurface sample depths (1-5 ft.) XRF screening results indicate that lead appears to be more widely distributed across the Site than mercury. Trace to low levels of lead were detected in all five of the site areas examined. This is consistent with the fact that lead is a naturally occurring metal in most soils. However, somewhat elevated levels of lead were detected in several samples from the Demolition Pit which had concentrations ranging up to 679 ppm. The highest levels of lead were observed in samples from the Waste Burn Pit. In this area, lead concentrations in several samples exceeded 100 ppm with a maximum observed concentration of 3401 ppm in one shallow subsurface soil sample. In addition, elevated lead levels were noted at several different locations across the Waste Burn Pit area. In neither the Demolition Pit nor the Waste Burn Pit do soil lead concentrations show clearly defined distributions within the top five feet of soil. oT97-209 10/16/97 3-9 Table 3-la Field Data Summary for the Waste Burn Pit Date Analyzed Sample ID Depth Mercury Lead (feet) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) 7/15/97 WBALI 0-0.5 <25 502 7/16/97 WBBLI 1-3 <25 144 7/16/97 WBBLI 3-5 <25 30 7/15/97 WBAL2 0-0.5 <25 1507 7/16/97 WBBL2 1-3 <25 <18 7/16/97 WBBL2 3-5 <25 <18 WBAL3 NA NA 7/15/97 WBAL4 0-1 <25 <18 7/15/97 WBAL5 0-1 <25 49 7/17/97 WBBL6 0-1 <25 426 7/17/97 WBBL6 1-3 <25 374 7/17/97 WBBL6 3-5 <25 154 7/15/97 WBAL7 0-1 <25 58 7/22/97 WBAL8A 0-1 <25 909 7/15/97 WBAL8 0-1 <25 470 7/15/97 WBAL9 0-1 <25 405 7/15/97 WBAL9 1-2 <25 3391 7/16/97 WBWL9 1-3 <25 328 7/16/97 WBWL9 3-5 <25 60 7/17/97 WBWL9 5-7 <25 <18 7/16/97 WBWL9 7-9 <25 <18 7/17/97 WBWL9 9-11 <25 19 1 7/15/97 WBALI0 0-1 <25 474 7/15/97 WBALIl 0-1 <25 1583 7/17/97 WBBLII 1-3 <25 3401 7/17/97 WBBL1 3-5 <25 <18 7/22/97 WBAL12 0-1 <25 2164 NA = Sample not taken or site not applicable. O097-209 10/16/97 Table 3-1b Field Data Summary for the Demolition Pit Date Analyzed Sample ID Depth Mercury Lead (feet) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) 7/15/97 DPALI 0-0.5 66 99 7/17/97 DPAL1 0-1 242 122 7/17/97 DPALI-dup 0-1 246 122 7/17/97 DPBLI 1-3 167 117 7/17/97 DPBLI 3-5 325 179 7/15/97 DPAL2 0-0.5 162 278 7/15/97 DPAL3 0-0.5 54 188 - 7/16/97 DPAL4 0-1 200 255 7/17/97 DPW4 1-3 508 205 7/17/97 DPWL4 3-5 502 275 7/17/97 DPWL4-dup 3-5 460 292 7/17/97 DPWL4 5-7 <25 <18 7/17/97 DPWL4 7-9 68 <18 7/17/97 DPWL4 9-11 <25 <18 7/17/97 DPWL4 11-13 <25 <18 7/20/97 DPWL4-D 11-13 <25 <18 7/16/97 DPAL5 0-1 103 286 7/16/97 DPAL6 0-1 118 255 7/22/97 DPAL6A 0-1 44 J 208 7/17/97 DPBL6 1-3 59 679 7/17/97 DPBL6 3-5 <25 <18 7/17/97 DPBL6 5-7 <25 <18 7/16/97 DPAL7 0-1 <25 200 7/16/97 DPAL8 0-1 81 422 7/16/97 DPAL9 0-1 32 J 274 7/16/97 DPAL9-D 0-1 77 189 7/16/97 DPAL9-dup 0-1 60 204 7/16/97 DPBLIO 0-1 <25 89 7/16/97 DPALII 0-1 <25 57 0197-209 10/16/97 3-l11 Table 3-1b (cont'd) Date Analyzed Sample ID Depth Mercury Lead (feet) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) 7/16/97 DPAL12 0-1 241 244 7/17/97 DPBLI2 1-3 98 170 7/17/97 DPBLI2 3-5 <25 <18. 7/17/97 DPBLI3 1-3 <25 <18 7/17/97 DPBL13 3-5 <25 <18 7/22/97 DPALI4 1-2 1134 123 7/22/97 DPALI5 0-I 51 J 243 7/22/97 DPALI6 0-1 89 241 0 209"7- l10l 6t97 3-12 Table 3-1c Field Data Summary for the Building 307 Area Date Analyzed Sample ID Depth Mercury Lead (feet) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) 7/20/97 A307BLI 0-1 <25 54 7/20/97 A307BLI-D 0-1 <25 40 7/18/97 A307BLI 1-3 <25 39 7/18/97 A307WL2 0-1 <25 38 7/18/97 A307WL2-D 1-3 <25 21 J 7/20/97 A307WL2 1-3 <25 <18 7/20/97 A307WL2 3-5 <25 18 J 7/22/97 A307WL2 3-5 <25 <18 7/18/97 A307WL2 5-7 <25 <18 7/20/97 A307WL2 7-9 <25 <18 7/20/97 A307AL3 0-1 <25 74 7/20/97 A307BL3 1-3 <25 <18 7/20/97 A307BL3 3-5 <25 <18 7/20/97 A307BL4 0-1 <25 30 7/18/97 A307BL4 1-3 <25 22 J 7/20/97 A307BL4 3-5 <25 32 7/18/97 A307AL5 0-1 <25 <18 7/20/97 A307AL6 0-1 <25 27J 0T97-209 3-13 10/16/97 31 Table 3-1d Field Data Summary for the Fox Island Area Date Analyzed Sample ID Depth Mercury Lead (feet) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) 7/21/97 FIBLI 0-1 <25 30 7/21/97 FIBLI 1-3 <25 <18 7/21/97 FIBLI 3-5 <25 <18 7/21/97 FIWL2 0-1 <25 <18 7/21/97 FIWL2-D 0-1 <25 32 7/21/97 FIWL2 1-3 <25 18 J 7/22/97 FIWL2 3-5 <25 <18 7/21/97 FIWL2 5-7 <25 <18 7/21/97 FIWL2 7-9 <25 <18 7/21/97 FIBL3 0-1 <25 23 J 7/21/97 FIBL3 1-3 <25 <18 7/21/97 FIBL3 3-5 <25 <18 7/21/97 FIBL4 0-1 <25 22 J 7/21/97 FIBL4 1-3 <25 <18 7/21/97 FIBL4 3-5 <25 <18 7/21/97 FIBL5 0-1 <25 261 7/21/97 FIBL5 1-3 <25 181 7/21/97 FIBL5 3-5 <25 <18 FIAL6 NA NA 7/21/97 FIAL7 0-1 34 J 31 7/21/97 FIAL8 0-1 <25 29 7/21/97 FIAL9 0-1 <25 87 NA = Sample not taken or site not applicable. OT97-209 10/16/97 3 _1i4 Table 3-le Field Data Summary for the Building 80 Area Date Analyzed Sample ID Depth Mercury Lead . (feet) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) 7/22/97 A8OBLI 0-1 <25 39 7/22/97 A80BLI 1-3 <25 <18 7/22/97 A80BLI 3-5 <25 <18 7/22/97 A80BL2 0-1 <25 <18 7/22/97 A80BL2 1-3 <25 19 J 7/22/97 A80BL2 3-5 <25 <18 7/22/97 A80BL2-dup 3-5 <25 <18 7/22/97 A80WL3 0-1 <25 68 7/22/97 A80WL3 1-3 <25 <18 7/22/97 A80WL3 3-5 <25 47 7/22/97 A80WL3 5-7 <25 <18 7/22/97 A80WL3 7-9 <25 <18 7/22/97 A80BL4 0-1 <25 90 7/22/97 A80BL4 1-3 <25 26 J 7/22/97 A80BL4 3-5 <25 18 J 7/22/97 A80BL5 0-1 <25 87 7/22/97 A80BL5 1-3 <25 30 7/22/97 A80BL5 3-5 <25 45 7/22/97 A80AL6 0-1 <25 128 7/22/97 A80AL7 0-1 <25 124 OT97-209 1O/16197 3-15 Table 3-2a Field Screening and Laboratory Mercury Results Field Hg Laboratory Hg Location Depth (mg/kg) (mg/kg) RPD WBALI 0-0.5 <25 0.1 U NC WBAL2 0-0.5 <25 0.1 U NC WBBL2 1-3 <25 0.03 - NC WBBL2 3-5 <25 0.03 NC WBBL6 1-3 <25 0.11 NC WBAL8 0-1 <25 0.04 NC WBAL8A 0-1 <25 0.02 U NC WBWL9 1-3 <25 0.69 NC WBBLII 1-3 <25 0.89 NC WBAL12 0-1 <25 0.97 NC DPAL2 0-0.5 162 70 79% DPAL3 0-0.5 54 45 18% DPWL4 1-3 508 314 47% DPAL6 0-1 118 83.7 34% DPAL6A 0-1 44 J 44.4 1% DBBL6 1-3 59 85.2 36% DPAL9 0-1 32 J 31 3% DPAL12 1-3 98 83.2 17% DPAL14 1-2 1134 1170 3% DPAL15 0-1 51 J 42.5 18% DPAL16 0-1 89 55 47% A307BL1 1-3 <25 0.05 NC A307WL2 1-3 <25 0.34 NC A307AL3 0-1 <25 0.03 NC A307BL4 3-5 <25 0.003 NC A307AL6 0-1 <25 0.02 U NC FIBLI 0-1 <25 0.32 NC FIBLI 3-5 <25 0.02 U NC FIBL2 0-1 <25 0.62 NC FIWL2-D 0-1 <25 0.68 NC FIWL3 1-3 <25 0.02 U NC FIAL7 0-1 34 J 4.6 152% A80BLI 1-3 <25 0.02 NC A80BLI 3-5 <25 0.2 U NC A80BL4 1-3 <25 4.1 NC A80AL6 0-1 <25 0.28 NC A80AL7 0-I <25 0.1 NC ND = Not detected. NC = Not calculated. NC = RPD not calculated; one or both samples were reported as non-detect. (-) = No split samples analyzed at laboratory. OT97-209 10/16/97 3 _16 Table 3-2b Field Screening and Laboratory Lead Results Field Pb Laboratory Pb Location Depth (mg/kg) (mg/kg) RPD WBALI 0-0.5 502 340 38% WBAL2 0-0.5 1507 1200 23% WBBL2 1-3 <18 9.6 NC WBBL2 3-5 <18 5.2 NC WBBL6 1-3 - - WBAL8 0-1 - WBAL8A 0-1 - - - WBBL9 1-3 328 807 85% WBBLI1 1-3 3401 2280 39% WBAL12 0-1 2164 1280 51% DPAL2 0-0.5 278 220 23% DPAL3 0-0.5 188 142 28% DPWL4 1-3 205 191 7% DPAL6 0-1 -- DPAL6A 0-1 208 190 9% DBBL6 1-3 679 54.2 170% DPAL9 0-1 - - - DPAL12 1-3 170 185 9% DPAL14 1-2 - - - DPAL15 0-1 - DPAL16 0-1 - A307BL1 1-3 - - A307WL2 1-3 <18 11.9 NC A307AL3 0-1 - - - A307BL4 3-5 32 15.3 70% A307AL6 0-1 - - - FIBLI 0-1 - - FIBLI 3-5 <18 4.8 NC FIWL2 0-1 <18 15.5 NC FlWL2-D 0-1 32 19.4 50% FIBL3 1-3 - - FIAL7 0-1 31 11.8 90% A80BLI 1-3 <18 5 NC A80BLI 3-5 - - A80BL4 1-3 - A80AL6 0-1 - - - A80AL7 0-1 124 56.4 75% ND = Not detected. NC = Not calculated. NC = RPD not calculated; one or both samples were reported as non-detect. (-)= No split samples analyzed at laboratory. o97-209 10/16/97 3-17 Laboratorv Mercurv and Lead Analyses Laboratory mercury and lead data is summarized in Table 3-2 and included in Appendix B. Included in Table 3-2 is a comparison of the laboratory results with the counterpart on-site split sample screening results calculated as relative percent differences (RPD). As is indicated, relatively good agreement is observed between on-site screening results and the laboratory confirmatory samples. With respect to mercury, the laboratory data confirms the low on-site screening results reported for all areas except the Demolition Pit Area. Within the Demolition Pit Area, the laboratory mercury data is largely consistent with the range of mercury concentrations suggested by field screening analyses. The maximum reported laboratory mercury concentration is 1170 ppm. Laboratory lead data (Table 3-2b) support the conclusion of the field screening data indicating that lead concentrations in the samples from the Fox Island, Building 80 and Building 307 areas are low. Laboratory results also confirm the presence of somewhat elevated lead concentrations in the Demolition Pit and the Waste Burn Pit areas. However, the maximum laboratory lead concentration observed in the Waste Burn Pit (2280 ppm) is somewhat lower than the corresponding result for the field split screening sample. In several other samples, field lead results were noted to be somewhat higher than corresponding laboratory results. 3.3.2.2 Other Metals In addition to the mercury and lead analyses discussed above, selected site soil samples were submitted for laboratory analyses of Target Analyte List (TAL) metals. A total of 19 samples from the five site areas under investigation were submitted for TAL analyses. Results are presented in Appendix A. As indicated therein, overall metal concentrations are generally low, with only a few more elevated levels observed primarily in Waste Burn Pit samples. These laboratory results are consistent with qualitative observations of field'XRF screening information. Qualitative examination of XRF spectral data did not reveal obvious or persistent indications of high concentrations of other metals (i.e., in addition to lead and mercury) which might be of particular concern. 3.3.2.3 Explosives Analyses Field explosives screening using the Jenkins colorimetric method was conducted for possible organic explosives such as RDX and TNT in soils (see Appendix B-2). Field screening results indicated possible trace levels (approximately I to 10 ppm) of RDX and/or TNT, in some samples. However, laboratory confirmation of selected samples that had displayed "positive" results during field screening determined that explosives were not present in the samples above the reporting limit of 0.1 ppm. Based on these data, the low positive results detected in field screening are considered to be false positives, possibly due to interfering compounds. 3.3.2.4 Organic Analyses Laboratory soil organic analyses were limited to one sample from the Demolition Pit Area. Target Compound List (TCL) organic compounds which were detected are summarized in Table 3-3. Complete organic analytical results are presented in Appendix B. As indicated in Table 3-3, only a few TCL organic compounds were detected in the soil sample. 07-209 10/16/97 3-18 Table 3-3 Detected Organic Concentrations in the Demolition Pit MCP Method I Demolition Pit Parameter S-I Limit (mg/Kg) DPALI4 (1-2) DPAL14 (1-2) -RE Acetone 3 12 B 13 B' Trichloroethylene 0.4 1.5 J 0.84 J Pesticides/PCBs (ug/Kg) 4,4'-DDT 2 13 - Aroclor 1254 2 29 J The acetone result is considered a laboratory contaminant and is not considered indicative of site conditions. -= Sample was not analyzed for noted compounds. 3.3.3 Groundwater Analyses This section summarizes the results of laboratory analyses of groundwater samples from five shallow monitoring wells constructed on-site. As previously noted, one well was constructed in each of the five areas of the Site which were investigated. 3.3.3.1 Metals Analyses Table 3-4 summarizes the results of mercury and lead analyses of the groundwater samples. Results for additional metals are presented in Appendix B. As noted in Table 3-4, groundwater mercury concentrations in most of the groundwater samples were low and less than one part per billion (ppb). However, the concentration observed in the well in the Demolition Pit Area was slightly higher (2.6 ppb). Lead concentrations in the groundwater samples were somewhat higher and ranged from approximately 10 to 129 ppb. The highest lead concentration was observed in the groundwater sample from the Building 307 area. It should again be noted that the groundwater results summarized above reflect total, rather than dissolved metal concentrations. It is expected that measurements of dissolved mercury and lead in groundwater samples from these wells would be less than the reported total metal concentrations. 3.3.3.2 Explosives Analyses Groundwater samples were submitted for laboratory explosives analyses, the results of which are summarized in Table 3-4. As indicated, in only one area, the Demolition Pit, were trace levels of any explosives detected. In this area, trace levels of HMX, RDX, and tetryl were detected in the groundwater sample. 3.3.3.3 Organic Analyses Table 3-4 includes the results of the groundwater organic analyses. Groundwater samples were analyzed for Target Compound List (TCL) volatile organics as well as freon. As indicated in Table 3-4, a few volatile organic compounds were detected in the samples which were analyzed. The particular volatiles detected in other areas varied somewhat from those detected in the Fox Island area. In the Fox Island area, trichloroethylene was the chlorinated volatile detected in the highest concentration (280 ppb). om-209 3_19 10/16/97 00000 < Z Z C666 rq~ D C)~~ 0 0 1 -N c -C. xq - - z Cl -o- '- oof c 6 -o 4) C o C00 Cl Cl en oO Im 0 CI(N-NCI 6 CCo a ~ .a' <- m I .8 .9 -Cu .Co.. 0Q o o66 o a i3 m C) - Cu V x a > Co a -oO .6 -t ( aA.Z, t 0 -2 Li.. C--Crb2W d5 -C.2 . ecu Ina 3 C In . s - I-. -2 2 i.: 3.3.4 Sediment and Surface Water Data This section summarizes the results of sediment and surface water sampling for mercury and lead compiled by MADEP for the Drinkwater River system. The detailed results of the MADEP sediment, surface water, and fish tissue investigation are found in Appendix C. As indicated in Table 3-5, MADEP sediment mercury levels varied widely depending upon the sampling location. Concentrations of less than one ppm mercury were observed at a number of locations both upstream of and within the Fireworks Site area. However, at two locations within the Fireworks Site, concentrations exceeded 100 ppm with a concentration of 840 ppm observed near the 4th Street Bridge. It should be noted that the sediment areas where the highest levels of mercury were observed are upstream from those areas where elevated mercury levels in soils were detected (Demolition Pit Area). MADEP sediment lead levels appear to be generally low (Table 3-5) with most concentrations less than 100 ppm. However, a few elevated lead concentrations were reported near the Demolition Pit Area (496 ppm) with a maximum observed value of 4200 ppm in the Luddam's Ford area. It should be noted that Luddam's Ford is several miles downstream of the Fireworks Site and may be affected by other sources of lead and mercury. The MADEP investigation included analyses of three surface water samples (Table 3-6). Mercury and lead analyses in all three samples were below the respective analytical detection limits. OT97-209 3-21 10/16/97 Table 3-5 Summary of Mercury and Lead in Sediment Data' Sample Location Mercury Lead No. Description2 (mg/kg) (mg/kg) I Drinkwater North of 139 0.065 17 2 Drinkwater South of Confluence of Cushing Rock 0.046 26 at Railroad Crossing 3 French Stream at Hanover/Rockland Line 0.103 - 23 4 Forge Pond North < MDL 15 5 Forge Pond East 0.445 29 6 Forge Pond South < MDL 10 7 Drinkwater River at D Street 198 79 8 End of Channel 0.165 < MDL 9 5th Street Bridge over Drinkwater River 14 149 10 4th Street Bridge over Drinkwater River 840 161 I1 Indian Head at Cross Street/State Street Bridge 0.242 < MDL 12 Luddam's Ford 33 4,200 13 Lily Pond 0.173 < MDL 14 At "Cold Waste Dump" -- Factory Pond 0.246 12 15 At Old Bridge Ruins -- Factory Pond 0.160 3.4 16 At location by Demolition Pit Area, 39 496 Wetlands near Factory Pond 17 Factory Pond Dam 0.350 32 Notes: Compiled from: Memorandum from Oscar C. Pancorbo, Director DEP-WES to Jonathan Hobill, DEP-SERO, Lakeville, Hanover, Factory Pond Results, March 24, 1995. Sam ples collected in January 1995. Each location is marked on the attached map within the above-referenced report (found in Appendix C). Table 3-6 Summary of Mercury and Lead in Surface Water Data' Location Mercury Lead Description (mg/I) (mg/) Luddam's Ford < 0.002 < 0.05 Factory Pond < 0.002 < 0.05 Forge Pond <0.002 < 0.05 Note: Compiled from: Memorandum from Oscar C. Pancorbo, Director DEP-WES to Jonathan Hobill, DEP-SERO, Lakeville, Hanover, Factory Pond Results, March 24, 1995. Samples collected in January 1995. oT97-209 3-22 10/16/97 4.0 MIGRATION PATHWAYS AND EXPOSURE POTENTIAL The potential chemical contaminant migration pathways at and within the vicinity of the Fireworks Site were evaluated. The evaluation considered the physical and chemical properties of the- possible contaminants of concern, in conjunction with the environmental matrices found at the Site. 4.1 Potential Migration Pathways Five principal migration pathways of potential concern were identified for contaminants at the Fireworks Site in the-following media: soil; groundwater; surface water; sediments; and air. SQil Surface and subsurface soils at the Site may act as an environmental media through which chemical contaminants may migrate. As previously noted (Section 3.3), during the Phase I program, some contaminants of possible concern (primarily the metals, mercury and lead) were detected in site soils at the surface (0 to I foot) and at shallow subsurface. depths (I - 5 ft.). Depending upon their physical/chemical properties and the environmental conditions, these contaminants might migrate downward as the result of precipitation, infiltration and subsequently leach into underlying groundwater. Alternatively, contaminants sorbed onto these soils might migrate, if the soil particles themselves physically migrate via processes such as either erosion or direct contact with human or animal life. Finally, contaminants that volatilize can migrate directly into the atmosphere and be transported in the vapor phase. It should be noted that, in general, metals are relatively non-volatile, although mercury in the elemental form can volatilize under certain conditions. Given the limited sampling for organic constituents in surface soils, further investigation should be conducted to clarify the extent of organic constituents possibly present in certain site soils (e.g., Waste Burn Pit, and unpaved portions of the Fox Island and Building 80 areas) based on their corresponding detection in site groundwaters. Groundwater Groundwater is a potential migration pathway for chemical contaminants. Contaminants may enter groundwater either directly or through interactions between groundwater and contaminated soils through which the water is flowing. Contaminants in groundwater generally migrate in the direction of groundwater flow. The depths to which contaminants may migrate within groundwater depend, in part, on the direction of groundwater flow and hydraulic gradients, as well as on the physical/chemical properties of the potential contaminant. The concentrations of chemical constituents present in groundwater are strongly influenced by their respective chemical interactions with subsurface soils through which the groundwater migrates. The results of the Phase I groundwater sampling program indicate the presence of some chemical constituents (primarily chlorinated volatile organics and possibly mercury) in shallow groundwaters at certain locations. Concentrations for contaminants detected ranged from 7 to 280 ppb except for freon which was 5,500 ppb in the Waste Burn Pit area. No deep groundwater or bedrock groundwater sampling was conducted during the Phase I program. Further investigation is necessary to clarify the chemical character of site groundwater and to better define the direction(s) of groundwater flow and gradients relative to the surface water bodies at the Site and potential sources of contamination. 0197-209 10/16197 4_-1 Surface Water Chemical contaminants may be transported in surface waters typically either dissolved or suspended as particulates. Contaminants can enter surface water through a number of pathways. Among the most common is by direct contact of precipitation-derived surface water runoff with contaminated soils after storms and during erosion. Subsequently, surficial runoff waters may discharge into.permanent water bodies such as streams or ponds. Alternatively, groundwater containing chemical contaminants may discharge into surface water bodies. No surface water samples were collected during the Phase I investigation. Previous sampling conducted by MADEP (Appendix C), did not detect lead or mercury in selected samples from the Drinkwater River system, which flows through the Site. Additional surface water samples should be collected to confirm the MADEP data. Sediments Sediments associated with surface water bodies can provide a potential migration pathway for chemical contaminants. Chemical contaminants sorbed to soil particles may migrate directly into sediments during erosion, migration, and deposition of surface soil particles. Alternatively, chemical constituents may sorb onto sediments during interactions with overlying surface water or underlying groundwater. Subsequently, sediment particles may migrate with surface water and may also be ingested by biota. No sediment samples from the Drinkwater River system were analyzed during the Phase I investigation. Previous sampling conducted by MADEP (Appendix C), indicated the presence of lead and/or mercury in sediment samples at certain locations along the Drinkwater River system at the Site. Further investigation is necessary to clarify the extent (if any) of the relationship between the metals detected in river system sediments and the metals detected in soils at the Fireworks Site. Air A large portion of the Fireworks Site is unpaved. Hence, the possibility exists that certain volatile chemical constituents, if present, might migrate directly to the atmosphere, although no volatile vapors were detected by PID during field sampling. Alternatively, it is possible that chemical constituents present in Site surface soils might migrate with surface soil particles during wind erosion processes. 4.2 Potential Exposure Points Several potential exposure points have been identified for contaminants at the Fireworks Site. These include the following: surface soils present primarily in the Demolition Pit and Waste Burn Pit areas, sediments in the Drinkwater River system, and surface waters, including wetland areas adjacent to the Demolition Pit. Since much of the Fireworks Site is unpaved, exposure to possible surface soil contaminants through either direct contact or inhalation appears possible. Direct contact appears to be a possible exposure route for lead and mercury in surface soils in the Waste Burn Pit and the Demolition Pit. However, for lead, given its low volatility, exposure by inhalation is unlikely. For mercury, inhalation is also likely to be less important as an exposure route than direct contact in these areas. Sediments in the Drinkwater River system offer possible exposure routes for humans through direct contact and to biota through direct contact and /or ingestion and bioaccumulation. Given the wooded and somewhat isolated nature of the river system at in the Fireworks Site, it appears that the likelihood of direct contact exposure of metals in sediments by humans is limited. However, based upon MADEP OT97-209 10/16197 4-2 data, (Appendix C) it does appear possible that biota in the river system may undergo some exposure to metals in the sediments. In the absence of MADEP sediment criteria, mercury and lead values were compared to Ontario Ministry of Environment Sediment Criteria (Persaud, et al., 1993). Samples collected by-MADEP in the vicinity of the Site exceed the Ministry's severe effect levels of 2.0 ppm and 250 ppm for mercury and lead, respectively. Additional information is necessary to better define the- extent and form of lead and mercury detected in the river sediments. MADEP data do not indicate the presence of mercury and /or lead at significant concentrations in the surface waters of the Drinkwater River system given that all sample results were below the method detection limits. These results suggest that direct contact with or ingestion of surface waters is not likely to be an important exposure route for humans. MADEP has already recognized the potential problem of biological uptake of metals by biota and subsequent ingestion by humans. MADEP and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MADPH) have posted fish consumption advisory signs along the Drinkwater River System and throughout the Fireworks Site. Groundwater, at certain locations on the Fireworks Site, displays some evidence of the presence of volatile organics and other chemical constituents. Based upon initial information gathered in the Phase I investigation, it appears that groundwater from the Site may discharge to the Drinkwater River system as a non-point source. Since some groundwater standards might be exceeded for some contaminants (e.g., trichloroethylene), additional information on groundwater chemistry and hydrology is necessary to fully evaluate possible risks (if any). 4.3 Potential Receptors Several potential receptors, human and environmental, have been identified. 4.3.1 Human Rcftors Potential human receptors include on-site employees, visitors, and trespassers that may be exposed to vapors in unpaved portions of the Site. Trespassers and recreational users of the open areas in the southern portion of the Site may be exposed to contaminants in soils, while recreational users of the Drinkwater River System would be exposed to contaminants in fish or via direct contact with sediments. 4.3.2 Environmental Receptors Environmental receptors at the Site include the wetlands, rivers and ponds with their associated biota that receive metals and organics conveyed by surface water run off or groundwater discharge. Of primary concern is the biological uptake of metals by fish in the Drinkwater River System. oT97-209 4-3 10/16/97 5.0 CONCLUSION AND TIER CLASSIFICATION 5.1 Evaluation of Immediate Response Action Based on a review of the available data and the information obtained in the Phase I investigation, there does not appear to be a condition that would require an Immediate Response Action (IRA). The Site does not meet any of the criteria outlined in 310 CMR 40.0412 used to evaluate the need for an IRA. Additionally, no releases were identified that required "2 Hour" or "72 Hour" notification as determined by 310 CMR 40.0311 thru 40.0314. The State has already posted fish consumption advisory notices along the Drinkwater River. The only situation that did present itself as a need for immediate response was the discovery of "live" electroexplosive devices on-site. This situation was handled immediately - and safely by the Hanover Fire Department and the Massachusetts State Police. 5.2 Tier Classification The Site was numerically ranked using the recently collected field data and available historical data. Soil and groundwater data were utilized from the July 1997 field investigation (Appendix B) while sediment and surface water data came from the January 1995 MADEP sampling (Appendix C). In ranking the Site, the maximum concentration of any single chemical parameter was used, regardless of the location on-site or the data qualifier. Total chromium values were considered to be in the hexavalent (Vl+) state as a worst case. Key points from the ranking score sheet are summarized below: * Mercury levels (840 mg/kg) in one of the Factory Pond sediments collected by MADEP in 1995 were greater than the MADEP S-2 Reportable Concentration for soil (RCS-2) of 60 mg/kg. This comparison was made for scoring purposes only. * Mercury concentrations (0.0026 mg/I) in groundwater at the Demolition Pit area were greater than the MADEP GW-2 Reportable Concentration (RCGW-2) of 0.001 mg/I). * Neither mercury nor lead were detected in surface water based on samples collected by MADEP in 1995. * No OHM was identified in air-based on PID readings collected during the Phase I investigation field work. * A fish consumption advisory was issued for Factory Pond by MADPH. Based on the above data, the Site scored 616 points and was classified as a Tier IA site. 5.3 Conclusions An investigation was performed at the Fireworks Site in Hanover, MA to support Tier Classification and completion of a Phase I Initial Site Investigation. Based on this information the following conclusions are made: * The Fireworks Site is a disposal site as defined by the Massachusetts Contingency Plan. * A portion of the Site has light industrial usage. * Surface waters flow through the Site and adjacent wetlands. 0197209 10/16/97 5-1 * Groundwater is located generally 2 to 4 feet below ground surface and is presumed to discharge to local surface water and wetlands. Groundwater flow direction is assumed to be in a north to south direction regionally, but probably orthogonal to stream flow locally. * Mercury levels (840 mg/kg) and lead levels (496 mg/kg) in some of the Drinkwater River and Factory Pond sediments collected by MADEP were compared to MADEP RCS-2 soil standards for Tier Classification purposes. In the absence of MADEP sediment criteria, these levels were compared to other widely used indices (Persaud, et al., 1993; Jones, et al., 1996) and thus, these sediment levels are expected to impact sediment dwelling organisms and the mercury has a high potential to bioaccumulate and biomagnify. * A fish consumption advisory for Factory Pond was issued by MADPH. * Mercury concentrations (0.0026 mg/I) in groundwater at the Demolition Pit area were greater than the RCGW-2 of 0.001 mg/. * Neither mercury nor lead were detected in surface water in samples collected by MADEP. * No OHM was identified in air during the Phase I investigation field work. * Potential migration pathways were identified for contaminants in soil, sediments and groundwater. Potential exposure points identified in unpaved areas of the Site were: surface soils, primarily in the Demolition Pit and Waste Burn Pit areas; and sediments in the Drinkwater River. Potential receptors for contaminants were identified as on-site employees, trespassers and recreational users, particularly in the southern portion of the Site based on surface soils; and biota in the Drinkwater River based on sediment levels. * "Live" electroexplosive devices were found on-site and disposed of safely by the Hanover Fire Department and the Massachusetts State Police. * No Immediate Response Actions are required at the Site. oT97-209 10/16/97 5-2 6.0 LIMITATIONS This Phase I Initial Site Investigation Report has been prepared for the exclusive use of The Fireworks Joint Defense Group in connection with the Fireworks Site in Hanover, Massachusetts and for submittal to MADEP in conformance with the MCP. The site investigation activities were limited to the above - mentioned site. Additionally, data collected by the MADEP for surface water sediment, and fish tissue were utilized. Consequently, the interpretation of the data collected and the conclusions drawn in this report are limited to the extent of this investigation. The conclusions and recommendations presented above are based solely on the scope of work conducted and the information contained in this report. Foster Wheeler Environmental Corp. has performed this assessment in accordance with generally accepted professional practice using the degree of skill and care exercised for similar projects under similar conditions in the. same locality. Foster Wheeler Environmental Corp. has relied on information provided by The Fireworks Joint Defense Group, regulatory agencies and others in the preparation of this report. The sources of information are included. Foster Wheeler Environmental Corp. has incorporated this information in its report, but assumes no risk or liability associated with errors, omissions or inaccuracies which may exist within such information. o097-209 6-1 10/16/97 7.0 REFERENCES Clark, Robert M., 1996. Affidavit dated December 18, 1996 Department of Defense, 1966. modification of Contract DA28017, AMC-3022(A), August 12, 1966. Jones, D.S., R.N. Hull and G.W. Suter, II. 1996. Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Sediment-Associated Biota. 1996 Revision. Risk Assessment Program, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. Hanover Board of Health, Hanover, MA, 1997. Review of Excel Database by Bianca Hebbel, September 12, 1997. Hanson Board of Health, Hanson, MA, 1997. Telephone Interview with Karen Doucette by Boyd Allen, October 8, 1997. Kent, Edmund H., 1996. Affidavit dated December 18, 1996. Kent, Edmund H., 1997. Deposition dated July 17, 1997. New England DataMap Technology Corporation, 1997. Environment FirstSearchTm Report. Target Property off King Street, Hanover, Massachusetts, September 3. 1997. NUS/FIT, 1986. Hazard Ranking System Score, 1986. Osborne, Byron A., 1996. Affidavit dated December 17, 1996. Osborne, Byron A., 1997. Deposition dated July 21, 1997. Persaud, D., R. Joagumagi and A. Hayton. 1993. Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Quality in Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy. ISBN 0-7729- 9248-7. Pierce, Richard F., 1996. Affidavit dated December 18, 1996. SEA, 1993. Environmental Site Assessment, 96 (now 74) Industrial Way, Hanover, Massachusetts. Prepared by Silva Engineering Associates, September 1, 1993. SEA, 1994. Environmental Site Assessment. Plot 154, Map 60 and Plot 62, Map 68, Hanover, Massachusetts. Prepared by Silva Engineering Associates, March 7, 1994. Traniello, Joseph G., 1996. Affidavit dated December 18, 1996. USGS, 1977 Topographic Map, Whitman, MA Quadrangle. USGS, 1978 Topographic Map, Hanover, MA Quadrangle. 0197-209 10/16/97 7-1 Williams, J.R., Willey, R.E., and Tasker, G.D., 1975. Hydrologic Data of the Coastal Drainage Basins of Southeastern Massachusetts, Weir River, Hingham, to Jones River, Kingston. Massachusetts Hydrogeologic Data Report No. 16, U.S. Geological Survey, Boston, MA. 63p. Wolfert, Hubert H., 1996. Affidavit dated December 17, 1996. Wolfert, Hubert H., 1997. Deposition dated June 24, 1997. Zen, E-an, 1983. Bedrock Geological Map of Massachusetts, sheet one of three. OT97-209 10/16/97 7-2 APPENDIX A Boring Logs and Well Completion Diagrams Fireworks Site Boring Logs Waste Burn Pit Boring: WBBL1 |Date: 7/16197 | Depth| Blow Counts (Recovery PID | Soil Description (feet) (inches) (ppm) 1-3 9-10-14-20 14 0 0-12 inches; light brown, fine to coarse sand, some gravel, iron staining at 7 inches, 12-14 inches; gray silt and fine to coarse sand, trace gravel, medium dense, saturated. 3-5 12-20-23-19 16 0 0-12 inches; same as above, 12-16 inches; dark brown, peat, dense. Boring: WBBL2 Date: 7/16/97 Depth Blow Counts [Recovery PID Soil Description (feet) (inches) (ppm) 1-3 15-12-10-5 16 0 0-6 inches; brown, fine to coarse sand, some fine to coarse gravel, trace silt, 6-16 inches; gray, fine to medium sand, some silt, trace gravel and rock fragments, medium dense, damp. 3-5 9-18-25-16 22 0 0-2 inches; same as above, 2-6 inches; dark brown peat, 6-22 inches; light brown to gray, silt, trace fine sand, firm, moist. Boring: WBWL9 Date: 7/16197 1 Depthf Blow Counts Recovery PID I Soil Description (feet) (inches) I (ppm) I 1-3 6-4-3-4 8 0 light to dark brown, fine to medium sand, gray silt like material at 6 inches, loose, dry. 3-5 5-14-30-35 7 0 dark brown to gray, fine to coarse sand and fine to medium gravel, some rock fragments and silt, dense, saturated. 5-7 28-50-51-55 12 0 rown to gray, fine silty sand, some medium to coarse gravel and rock fragments, very dense. 7-& 70-27-29-18 11 1 brown to gray, fine silty sand, some medium to coarse gravel and rock fragments, very dense. g-11 20-40-76-100/5' 7 0 light brown, fine to coarse sand, some multicolored fine to coarse gravel, very dense. Boring: WBBL11 [Date: 7/16/97 1 Depth Blow Counts Recoveryl PID Soil Description (feet) (inches) (ppm) - I12-16-16-12I 10 0 0-3 inches; ight brown to white, fine to mediumsand, some silIt, 3-10 inches; brown to black stained, fine to medium sand, trace brick fragments, dense, damp. Page 1 Fireworks Site Boring Logs Waste Burn Pit 3-5 6-4-4-4 20 0 0-4 inches; same as above, 4-20 inches; light brown to yellow fine silty sand, loose, moist. Boring: WBBL6 Date: 7116/97 Depth Blow Counts |Recovery PID I Soil Description (feet) |(inches) (ppm) 1-3 7-7-4-5 1 0 dark brown, fine to coarse sand, some silt, medium dense, dry. 3-5 26-40-55-60 4 0 brown to gray, fine to coarse sand, some fine to coarse gravel and rock fragments, very dense, damp. Page 2 Fireworks Site Boring Logs Demolition Pit Boring: DPBL6 |Date: 7116/97 Depth Blow Counts |Recoveryl PID Soil Description (feet) | (inches) | (ppm) 1-3 8-9-9-10 22 0 white to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace silt and coarse sand, medium dense, dry. 3-5 8-7-9-10 20 0 white to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace silt and coarse sand medium dense, dry. 5-7 10-12-12-15 19 0 white to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace silt and coarse sand medium dense, damp. Boring: DPBLI |Date: 7117197 Depth Blow Counts JRecovery PID . Soil Description (feet) (inches) (ppm) 1-3 3-3-2-3 17 0 light brown to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace coarse sand and silt, loose, moist, with iron staining at 15 inches. 3-5 1-1(12)-i 12 0 light brown to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace gravel, coarse sand and silt, very loose, saturated. Boring: DPWL4 |Date: 7/17197 1 Depth Blow Counts |Recovery PID Soil Description (feet) | (inches) (ppm) 1-3 7-10-9-7 20 0 light brown to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, medium dense, dry. 3-5 12-14-25-27 12 0 light brown to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, medium dense, dry. 5-7 11-14-19-26 20 0 light brown to gray, fine to medium sand, some silt, trace fine to coarse gravel, dense, moist at 19 inches. 7-9 25-28-32-30 23 0 light brown to gray, fine to medium sand, some silt, trace fine to coarse gravel, dense, saturated. - brown to gray, fine to medium sand, some silt, trace fine to coarse gravel, dense. 11-13 15-21-5-33 24- 0 ight brown to gray, fine to me diu sand, some silt, trace fine to coarse gravel, dense. Boring: DPBL12 Date: 7117/97 1 Depth Blow Counts IRecovery PID Soil Description (feet) (inches) (ppm) Page 3 Fireworks Site Boring Logs Demolition Pit 1-3 8-11-11-11 20 0 light brown to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace silt, coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, medium dense, dry. 3-5 15-16-21-25 18 0 light brown to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace silt, coarse sand, and fine to coarse gravel, dense, dry. Boring: DPBL13 Date: 7117/97 _ Depth Blow Counts Recovery| PID Soil Description (feet) _ (inches) | (ppm) 1-3 3-1-2-3 14 0 0 to 2 inches; gray, cinders and slag, some silt, 2-14 inches; brown, fine to coarse sand, some silt and rock fragments, loose, dry. 3-5 10-20-27-28 20 0 brown, fine to coarse sand, some silt and rock fragments, dense, dry. Page 4 Fireworks Site Boring Logs Building A307 Boring: A307BLI IDate: 7/18/97 Depth Blow Counts Recovery PID Soil Description (feet) (inches). (ppm) 0-1 10-15 8 0 0 to 2 inches; brown, fine to medium sand and wood chips, 2 to 8 inches; brown, fine to coarse sand, trace fine to coarse gravel and silt, medium dense, dry. 1-3 8-11-20-28 13 0 0 to 10 inches; brown, fine to coarse sand, some fine to coarse gravel, 10 to 13 inches; gray, fine to coarse sand, trace silt, medium dense, moist. 3-5 20-7-9-5 14 0 0 to 3 inches; same as above, 3 to 14 inches; brown, fine silty sand, medium dense, saturated at 13 inches. Boring: A307WL2 !Date: 7/18/97 1 Depth Blow Counts Recovery PID Soil Description (feet) (inches) (ppm) 0-1 1-9 3 1 brown, fine to medium sand, some silt, medium dense, dry. 1-3 24-15-10-21 12 0 0 to 2 inches; same as above, 2-12 inches; brown to red silty fine to medium sand, trace fine to coarse gravel and rock fragments, medium dense, damp. 3-5 31-42-40-53 10 0 gray, fine to coarse sand and multicolored, fine to coarse gravel, some silt and rock fragments, very dense, saturated at 9 inches. 5-7 22-37-38-52 14 0 gray, fine to coarse sand and multicolored, fine to coarse gravel, some silt and rock fragments, very dense. 7-9 24-28-37-37 12 0 gray, fine to coarse sand and multicolored, fine to coarse gravel, some silt and rock fragments, very dense. Boring: A307BL3 Date: 7/18197 - Depth | Blow Counts Recovery PID Soil Description (feet) -(inches)* (ppm) 1- -24-2-- - 14 1 to 5 inches; light brown, fine sand and silt, some rock fragments, black staining at 3 inches, 5 to 14 inches; dark brown to orange, fine sand and silt, dense, dry. 3-5 11-18-25-28 12 0 brown to yellow, fine to medium sand and silt, trace fine gravel, dense, dry. Boring: A307BL4 |Date: 7/18/97 Depth | Blow Counts Recovery PID Soil Description (feet) | | (inches) (ppm) - . -.- . I------ Page 5 Fireworks Site Boring Logs Building A307 1-3 7-7-4-4 6 0 brown, fine to medium sand, some multicolored, fine to coarse gravel, trace silt, medium dense, dry. 3-5 44-9-13 4 0 brown, fine to medium sand, some multicolored, fine to coarse gravel, trace silt, medium dense, dry. Page 6 Fireworks Site Boring Logs Fox Island Boring: FIBLI Date: 7121197 1 Depth Blow Counts Recovery PID Soil Description (feet) (inches) (ppm) 1-3 13-5-3-1 8 0 light brown, fine to coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, loose, damp. 35 6-4-3-1 11 0 light brown, fine to coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, loose, -7_ _saturated at 10 inches. Boring: FlWL2 Date: 7121/97 1 Depth Blow Counts Recovery PID | Soil Description (feet) (inches) (ppm) 1 1-3 10-8-12-7 16 0 light brown, fine to coarse sand, some fine to coarse gravel and silt, trace rock fragments, medium dense, dry. 3-5 5-4-3-5 5 0 light brown to gray, fine silty sand, some medium to coarse sand, trace rock fragments, loose, moist at 4 inches. 5-7 4-3-18-20 24 0- 0-6 inches; brown, fine silty sand, 6-18 inches; brown to gray, sandy silt, firm, 18-24; gray, fine to coarse sand, some fine to coarse gravel and silt, dense, saturated. 7-9 30-41-47-28 12 0 gray to orange, fine to coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, trace silt, very dense. I Boring: FIBL3 jDate: 7121/97 | Depth |Blow Counts Recovery PlD Soil Description (feet) | (inches) I (ppm) 1-3 7-7-7-5 16 0 light brown, fine to coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, medium dense, dry. 3-5 5-5-10-8 10 -0 light brown, fine to coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, medium dense, moist with iron staining at 9 inches. Boring: FIBL4 IDate: 7/21/97 1 Depth Blow Counts Recovery[ PID I Soil Description (feet) | (inches) (ppm) I - - 1-3 19-16-25-27 10 0-3 inhes brown, ine to medium sand, some silt, coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, 3-10; light brown, fine to coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, some silt and rock fragments, dense, dry. 3-5 23-32-25-40 18 IIlght brown, fine to coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, so me silt and rock fragments, dense, moist at 17 inches. Page 7 Fireworks Site Boring Logs Fox Island Boring: FIBLS |Date: 7/21/97 Depth | Blow Counts Recovery PID Soil Description (feet) | -(inches) (ppm) 1-3 26-40-100/5" 13 0 0-3 inches; brown, fine to medium sand, some silt, 3-13 inches; brown to gray, fine to coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, .* some rock and cement fragments, very dense, dry. 3-5 11-9-7-5 15 0 brown to gray, fine to coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, some rock and cement fragments, very dense, dry. Page 8 Fireworks Site Boring Logs Building A80 Boring: ABOBL1 [Date: 7/22/97 Depth [ Blow Counts Recovery PiD Soil Description (feet) (inches) (ppm) 1-3 17-26-8-8 12 0 brown to gray, fine to coarse sand, some rock fragments, trace sift, dense, dry. 3-5 9-6-8-5 14 0 brown to gray, medium to coarse sand, trace fine sand and silt, 1 inch clay lense at 6 inches, medium dense, saturated at 13 inches. Boring: A80BL2 Date: 7/22197 Depth Blow Counts Recovery PID Soil Description (feet) (inches) (ppm) 1-3 5-6-5-5 12 2 light brown, fine to coarse sand, some silt and fine to coarse gravel, medium dense, dry. 3-5 8-8-3-4 17 0 light brown to gray, fine to coarse sand, some silt, trace gravel, medium dense, saturated at 16 inches. Boring: A80WL3 Date: 7/22197 Depth Blow Counts [Recovery PID Soil Description (feet) [(inches) (ppm) 1-3 9-5-6-11 16 1 light brown to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace silt, medium dense, dry. 3-5 13-16-12-12 4 0 light brown to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace silt and rock fragments, medium dense, dry. 5-7 6-13-25-38 12 0 0 to 10 inches; light brown to yellow, fine to medium sand, trace silt and rock fragments, 10-12 inches; gray, fine to coarse gravel, some fine to coarse sand and rock fragments, medium dense, saturated. 7-9 22-13-12-15 18 0 gray, fine to coarse gravel, some fine to coarse sand and rock fragments, medium dense. Boring: A80BL4 Date: 7/22/97 7 Depth Blow Counts Recovery _PID Soil Description (feet) (inches) (ppm)1 1-3 12-10-4-11 18 0 0-6 inches; light brown, fineto coarse sand, some silt and rock fragments, 6 to 18 inches; brown to red, fine silty sand, medium . Jdense, dry. Page 9 Fireworks Site Boring Logs Building A80 3-5 5-6-15-37 17 0 0 to 8 inches; same as above, 8 to 17 inches; brown, fine to coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, some silt, medium dense, saturated at 8 inches. Boring: A80BL5 Date: 7/22197 Depth Blow Counts Recovery PID Soil Description (feet) _ (inches) (ppm) 1-3 22-11-8-6 18 0 0 to 8 inches; light brown to yellow, fine to coarse sand and fine to coarse gravel, 8 to 18 inches; brown, fine to coarse sand, some silt, trace wood fragments, medium dense, dry. 3-5 4-5-35-36 17 0 brown, fine to coarse sand, some silt, trace wood fragments, 2__ medium dense, saturated at 16 inches. Page 10 CASING STICK.UP GROUND SUR FACE ELEV./) m qvOf CEMENT GROUT ELL NUWBER: 2..ffiAIf L OCATION:ZiX -T , RISER STALLED BY: R|LLER: 0nspo 0 IG D EE R SER TYPE:C SER SIZE: SEGAL PC [H RlRICREEN TYPE: Sc CREEN SIZE: S tTER TYPE: M TOTAL ELTYPE: he/nf0n I BORING L =GED BY: JE12 1 DEPTH - CoUUEKTS: 2. ,tr 'Ays7'*n GRAVEL PACK SCREEN ELEV NOTE: DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE o-C-.ttiaoS CASING STICKOP SURFACE ELEV. WELL NUBER: a!4Qt'/ LOCATION: /Aralhn RISER INSTAu.ED BY: DRILLER: $050A' DATE. BORINC DIAMETER: RISER TYPE: RISER Sl SCREEN TYPE: SCREEN SiZ2E/b rio rILTER TYPE:%O 1 / TOTAL SEAL TYPE: /b BORING LOGGED DEPTH BY: 1-.6/cL . cowMENTS: SCREEN NOTE: DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE *1 CASING STICKUP GROUND SURFACE ELEV. __useumssessus CEMENT GROUT WELL NUUBER: O LOCATION: // a RISER INSTAuLED ' BY: //# SEAL DR(I-L1414 2,0'0 DATE: 8GRING OAMETER r SRE- RISER TYPE: P iC RISER SIZE: a . SCREEN TYPE: SCREEN SIZE: / PS/of rILTER TYPE: /ip TOTAL SEAL TYPE: BORING LOCGED BY: DEPTH COMENTS: -/41- - o mg GRAVEL PACK ALLz SCR EEN NOTE: DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE 0Cot1US0 CASING STICK.UP WELL NIJBER: & A LOCATION; H/rie 80M lotY RISER INSTALLED BY Roi DRILLER: O DATE: BORING OLAMETER: RISER TYPE: RISER SIZE: 2 SCREEN TYPE: SCREEN SIZE: 2 ' 1 6t FILTER TYPE: Xo nrt TOTAL SEAL TYPE: binpA,1'e BORING LOCCED BY: DEPTH Y- Cou~S: |11-rioa.yer GRAVEL PACK I SCREEN NOTE: DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE ennu.cos I I I I APPENDIX B Analytical Data Summary Tables I I U I I U I I I I U U I I en (N 0 0 0 0 0 04 C' 'C en 'coo en Cl cc e C( Pen 2'o~ ~ e o N V N V o (N - ~ C en C - Cl en en V 00 - -~ 0 C C S 0 cocdV~en UfloeflenvNtn t;~-.- en en~O~V~CVV~(N 0 ~ in: enooeIen ri -- ~o ~~oCrnOrIen eN en C zzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzz N en o 0 en o C 'C -~ 0 0 0000 -, C(NC.(NONNenc~4In inn N ~~CN~OVON ~~'rno .ONC1r4~en cc 4 o (N en mc cc en-- dVoccic Cl C en I-]cc zzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzz in-. en 0 C encc C -c . <0) E E E EE EE- . - = a .2 E O E -o - e oIZ flC/, -i] z o 11 '0- C- m u o - o .= - o' C C c o O .. CO -I zzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzz C 00 T< -4 zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzz 0) I- C 00 on .5 1 o< - --o00 - r o Co- oCone - - o ono .~tCa~f e C -I~0 zzzzzzzzzzzzzz 00 zzzzz zz Cl C 00 C -e 0) N 0)) 2 U = 0) U 'C 0) C 0L) -c C 0ooo00 c!v~ 2o .v o cO .c'e ( N n~o On Q6 C o0 0- oo- 0 4-i zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Ze- Q~ eN .2 zzzzzzzzzzzzzz 0 z z zzzzzz 0~ 0 -c - Q. d) uLJ S 2--2 u -o - U 0) 0 E o a . > E = EE - F ,~ z E- 114< ) 00 .E s = E . . -. -' ---E0--0Ea~~~ -- o ~ ~ a. E - .= A I 0Q z . - a a u u u~ o oo - uo= . er: 0.. Q 0 0 to ~ V en Cl ~ C *~ VZ~. V .'~rneNen V N 0~ ri V - en oo~.r1~ en Inr 6 IN~- en -4 <~~ ~ - C N ~2 C e Inen o od o n -- o t V -- r 4 0 . 4 Lf . N 4) = U 2 , o .E e 0 , 4) : 22-- 3 1< 2 V ' 00 E~~~ d0 o 0 o'lax ea== -C z C: a~"i~~~ aa. s8 u 88==e23. '-Ca o en 0 0 (N V N (N ene 0 nc o en C N - V 00 (N 6 6 CO t-l cl~ oeno C~ enzooo E < < 06.4CiC < << < < 6n ZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZH d6 La 0 C, -) 0 (N 0 I-) ~NN~enN~0 0 0 x oc n 0' -C V to - . - 00 ~0 0' - xi- 0 00 (N en - 4) ~0 en -- 0 - en en 6 Ca o 0.. o- - - -S 0 E E -V C ) 0 8E e E & DE E a 4) -- E = E C, zo -n Ca Ca a '- =0 .zHZ o' - m uO O 00uO F 2 E >N e 0 z I Appendix B2. On-site Soil Explosive Screening Results Summary. Sample I.D. TNT Concentration RDX Concentration (ppm) (ppm) DPAL6A (0-1) 2.89 FIBLI (1-3) 0.09 0.22 FIWL2 (1-3) 0.03 NA FIWL2 (3-5) 0.09 22.6 FIWL2 (5-7) 0.09 1.29 FIBL3 (1-3) 0.06 0.18 FIBL4 (1-3) 0.3 0.36 FIBL5 (3-5) 0.22 A307W12 (3-5) 2.35 2.26 WBAL8A (0-1). 0.62 A80BL1 (3-5) 0.80 A80BL2 (1-3) 1.07 A80BL2 (3-5) 1.20 A80WL3 (1-3) 0.76 A80BL4 (1-3) 0.36 A80BL5 (1-3) 0.27 A80BL5 (1-3)D 0.31 A307BL1 (0-1) NA A307WL2 (1-3) 2.31 A307WL2 (3-5) 10.1 A307BLI (1-3) 0.84 WBBL9 (1-3) 7.07 WBBL2 (3-5) 0.06 0.71 WBBL 1(3-5) 0.44 WBAL9 (1-2) NA WBBL6 (3-5) 0.12 0.36 DPBL12 (1-3) 0.03 0.27 DPBL12 (3-5) 0.80 DPBLI (1-3) 0.13 DPBLI (3-5) 0.36 DPWL4 (3-5) 0.49 DPBL6 (3-5) 0.71 DPWL4 (1-3) 3.35 0.31 DPBL6 (1-3) 0.44 DPAL12 (0-1) 0.93 NA = Sample would not filter or a color interference was noted and a result could not be measured. -- = A positive response was not detected. Appendix B3. On-site Immunoassay PCB Screening Results for the Demolition Pit. Sample I.D. > 10 ppm Standard DPBLL1 (1-3) No DPBLI (3-5) No DPWL4 (1-3) No DPWL4 (3-5) No DPWL4 (5-7) No DPWL4 (7-9) No - DPWL4 (9-1l) No DPWL4 (11-13) No DPWL4(ll-13)D No DPBL6 (1-3) No DPBL6 (3-5) No DPAL12 (0-1) No DPBL12(1-3) No DPBLI2 (3-5) No rN 0c Sn I-, C- o o o o aa00 ooe .. . 04' Cl 04 C Cl E C, 3 8 44 2E V Eey s s c14-coo1- SSS .5 E o o -. .E' . 0O O ' . ^ < o 0 0 -- 0-- 0 00 00 0 04 . U C -v C e Co Zo0 6 E x0 - C- 3 D DD InC en 0 -. (N -- - o e v - m C-4 LO% 40 1 . 0 InI C'' N 0 Co * r,.l-' q oo - on 5< . o,~oooo 0- LI) - -? LZ2 4) - E 4) C- E EE E rC o C [- - E - ~ E .: a - o e -~ r.- .2 .z oN L o uo u 0b . >'- APPENDIX C MADEP Hanover, Factory Pond Results Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Depjartment of Environmental Protedtion, Senator William X. Wal Experiment Station William F. Weld Trudy S. Cox* SeavMY, E TO: Jonathan Hobill, DEP-SERO, Lakeville FROM: Robert Serabian, Quality Assurance Officer, DEP-WESIRid. THROUGH: Dr. Oscar C. Pancorbo, Director, DEP-W A0) SUBJECT: Hanover, Factory Pond Results DATE: March 24, 1995 Enclosed are the analytical results from Factory Pond, Hanover MA. A total of 17 sediment and 3 water samples were analyzed for mercury and lead. The samples were collected on. 1/30/95 by Jonathan Hobill and Dan Crafton of the BWSC, DEP-Lakeville, and brought to the Wall Experiment Station for analysis. a Water and sediment samples were.collected using grab methods. The sampling event did not require any equipment decontamination. * The data were validated at the Tier II Level, using the EPA Region I Data Validation Guidelines and the 1992 MSCA QAPP. * All 20 samples-were analyzed within EPA-prescribed holding times using EPA-approved methods. * Quality control tests consisted of blank, duplicate, and spike analyses with each respective sample batch. * The sediment samples had mercury and lead values ranging from less than detection -limit to 840 mg/Kg, and less than detection limit to 4,200 mg/Kg (0.42 %), respectively. The three water samples analyzed for mercury and lead had concentrations that were less than the method detection limits for both analytes. * The quality control results for the lab fortified blank (LFB) , lab fortified matrix (LFM), and the quality control sample (QCS) for lead on sample # 95-247 were all within the 80-120 % control limit. The quality control results for the lab fortified blank (LFB) and lab fortified matrix (LFM) for mercury on sample # 95-240 were within the 85-115 % control * Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887 - 1989 * National Historic Civil Engineering Landmark 37 Shattuck Street * Lawrence, Massachusetts 01843 * FAX (508) 688-0352 . Telephone (508) 682-5237 95-240 (70 %) fell outside of the 80-120 % control limit. it is my opinion that the mercury results do not require any data qualification, since the lab fortified blank (LFB) and lab fortified matrix (LFM) were within control limits. e The correct final concentration units were used in generating the final results. * The concentration values were- adjusted to reflect any dilutions, splits, or dry weight factors. If you want assistance with data interpretation or analysis, please contact Dr. Oscar C. Pancorbo at (508) 682-5237. The Wall Experiment Station looks forward to providing analytical expertise to the Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup on future hazardous waste projects. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 SPECIAL ANALYSIS City/Town Hanover Source A Factory Pond Sediment #1 Source B Factory Pond Sediment #2 Collector Hobill/Crafton Source C Factory Pond Sediment #3 Approved 4//1/ Date -4 -C1 5 Conc. Units: mg/Kg, Dry Wt. Basis A B C Sample No.' 95-235 95-236 95-237 Analytical Method Date MDL Analyzed Date of Collection 1/30/95 1/30/95 1/30/95 .n .mg/L Date of Receipt 2/1/95 2/1/95 2/1/95 Mercury 0.065 0.046 0.103 EPA 7471 2/7/95 0.0002 Lead 17 26 23 EPA 6010 2/21/95 0.05 P:j vie \special.862 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 SPECIAL ANALYSIS City/Town Hanover Source A Factory Pond Sediment #4 Source B Factory Pond Sediment #5 Collector Hobill/Crafton Source C Factory Pond Sediment #6 Approved ,/"// Date 2--6~ Conc. Units: mg/Kg, Dry Wt. Basis A B C Sample No. 95-238 95-239 95-240. Analytical Method Date MDL Analyzed Date of Collection 1/30/95 1/30/95 1/30/95 mg/L Date of Receipt 2/1/95 2/1/5 2/1/95 Mercury < MDL 0.445 < MDL EPA 7471 2/7/95 0.0002 Lead 15 29 10 EPA 6010 2/21/95 0.05 :jvie\special.863 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 SPECIAL ANALYSIS City/Town Hanover Source A Factory Pond Sediment #7 Source B Factory Pond Sediment #8 Collector Hobill/Crafton Source C Factory Pond Sediment #9 Approved 2A // Date 3-sZ-5' Conc. Units: mg/Kg, Dry Wt. Basis A B C Sample No. 95-241 95-242 95-243 Analytical Method Date MDL Analyzed Date of Collection 1/30/95 1/30/95 1/30/95 '. mg/L Date of Receipt 2/1/95 . 2/1/95 2/1/95 Mercury 198 0.165 14 EPA 7471 2/16/95 0.0002 Lead 79 < MDL 149 EPA 6010 2/21/95 0.05 P:jvicl\speciaL 864 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 SPECIAL ANALYSIS City/Town Hanover Source A Factorv Pond Sediment #10 Source B Factory Pond Sediment #11 Collector Hobill/Crafton Source C Factory Pond Sediment #12 Approved A/4' Date_._--_-__~ Conc. Units: mg/Kg, Dry Wt. Basis A C Sample No. 95-244 95-245 95-246 Analytical Method Date MDL Analyzed Date of Collection 1/30/95 1/31/95 1/31/95 mg/L Date of Receipt 2/1/95 211/95 2/1/95 Mercury 840 0.242 33 EPA 7471 2116/95 0.0002 Lead 161 < MDL 4200 EPA 6010 2/21/95 0.05 :jvie \special.865 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 SPECIAL ANALYSIS City/l'own Hanover Source A Factory Pond Sediment #13 Source B Factory Pond Sediment #14 Collector Hobill/Crafton Source C Factory Pond Sediment #15 Approved .Ai/ Date -&- Conc. Units: mg/Kg, Dry Wt. Basis A B C MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 SPECIAL ANALYSIS City/Town Hanover Source A Factory Pond Sediment #16 Source B Factory Pond Sediment #17 Collector Hobill/Crafton Source C Approved -A- / Date 3-/-- Conc. Units: mg/Kg, Wt. Basis A B C Sample No. 95-250 95-251 Analytical Method Date MDL Analyzed Date of Collection 1/31/95 1/31/95 mg/L Date of Receipt 2/1/95 2/1/95 Mercury 39 0.350 EPA 7471 2/16/95 0.0002 Lead 496 32 EPA 6010 2/23/95 0.05 P:jviel\special.867 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 SPECIAL ANAIYSIS City/Town Hanover Source A Factory Pond 1W - Luddam's Ford Hobill/Crafton Source B Factory Pond 2W - Factory Pd Collector Source C Factory Pond 3W - Forge Pd Approved A4f4 Date d-r6-L Conc. Units: mg/L A B C Date MDL No. 95-252 95-253 95-254 Analytical Method Sample Analyzed mg/L Date of Collection 1/31/95 1/31/95 1/31/95 Date of Receipt 2/1/95 2/1/95 2/1/95 EPA 7470 2/15/95 0.000: Mercury < MDL < MDL < MDL EPA 6010 2/27/95 0.05 Lead < MDL < MDL < MDL P:jvielspecial.86 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION -Lawrence Experiment Station 1887-1989 QUALITY CONTROL DATA City/fown: Hanover Collector: Hobill/Crafton Remarks: Matrix: Sediment Conc. Units: mg/Kg, Dry Wt. Basis I -I METhOD nfl t,,,Tc.,nnt * II -~--- I.... J..~-' I I. ACRt-ACYV MDL METHOD SAMPLE ANALYTE PRECISION ,i I EID . % RECOVERY mg/L, Sample Duplicate Range LFB QCS LFM 105 86 0.05 EPA 6010 95-247 Pb Approved: ei Date: 3-44-96~ uyaAcC Commonweoth of MOssactuselts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Department of Environmental Protection Senator William X. Wall Experiment Station William F. Weld Trudy S. Cos S.cntaty. EOEA OSY~d 8. Struh a C- MEMORANDUM TO: Massachusetts Department of Public Health Elaine Krueger, DPH, Boston (Certified Mail # P-354 484 410 Other Members of the Interagency Fish Toxics Committee Russ Isaac, DEP, Boston Robert Maietta, DEP, Grafton Carol Rowan-West, DEP, Boston Richard Keller, DFW-FWE, Westboro FROM: Oscar C. Pancorbo, Director, DEA-WE A/ SUBJECT: Release of Fish Toxics Metals Data DATE: .September 11, 1995 Please find attached the validated results for arseniclead,selenium,cadmium in fish samples analyzed at the DEP Division of Environmental Analysis (DEA), Senator William X. Wall Experiment Station (WES) (i.e., laboratory sample numbers 95-2736 thru 95-2745, 95-2747 thru 95-2751, 95-2830 thru 95-2837, 95-3048 thru 95-3058, and 95-3300). Also included are quality control data associated with the analysis of these samples, as well as any fish sample information submitted to us at the time that the samples were delivered to our laboratory. As required in our recently established standard operating procedures (SOPs), these samples were analyzed within the EPA-established holding time of 6 months. If you have any questions about these results, please contact me. Thanks. cc: Ken Hulme, DEA-WES Bob Serabian, DEA-WES P-AOPANCORBFISH-HGI 00035 FS * Lawrence Experiment Station: is87 - 1989 * National Historic Civil Enginering Landmatk 37 Shattuck Street * Lawrenc, Massachust 01843 * FAX (508) 688-0352 e Telephone (508) 682-5237 MASSACHUSETfS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 FISH TISSUE MERCURY ANALYSIS CityfTown Hanover Colllector R. Maietta 1 olumn A Forge Pond (Fgf 95-7, Fgf 95-8, Fgf 95-9) t olumn B Forge Pond (Fgf 95-13Y Column C Forge Pond (Fgf 95-4, Fgf 95-5, Fgf 95-6) r no. Units: mg/kg wet wt. Column A B C ANALYTICAL METHOD DATE ANALYZED MDL Sample No. 95-3049 95-3050 95-3051 .- - (mg/Kg) Collected 8/9/95 8/9/95 8/9/95 Received 8/10/95 8/10/95 8/10/95 Mercury 0.238 0.097 0.275 EPA 245.1 8/22/95 0.020 Remarks: p ,,,cOnttofi~nnmrr2fl Approved/Date AA/ q -'7- I Date Mailed: To DPH (certified)_ -//- S To interagency Committee g -/ f 00036 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 FISH TISSUE MERCURY ANALYSIS City/Town Hanover CoIllector R. Maietta Iolumn A Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-1, Ihf 95-2, 1hf 95-3) I olumn B Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-4, Ihf 95-5, 1hf 95-6) Column C Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-10, Ihf 95-11, 1hf 95-12) nc. Units: mg/kg wet wt. Column A B C ANALYTICAL METHOD DATE ANALYZED MDL Sample No. 95-3048, 95-3052 95-3053 (mg/Kg) Collected 8/9/95 8/9/95 S/9/95 Received 8/10/95 8/10/95 8/10/95 Mercury 1.23 1.52 0.784 EPA 245.1 8/22/95 0.020 Remarks: Approved/Date Date Mailed: To DPH (certified) -//-95 To Interagency Committee // 0003 7 FS MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 FISH TISSUE MERCURY ANALYSIS City/Town Hanover Colllector R. Maietta IColumn A Forge Pond (Fgf 95-1, Fgf 95-2, Fgf 95-3) Column B Forge Pond (Fgf 95-10, Fgf 95-11, Fgf 95-12) 'olumn C nc. Units: mg/kg wet wt. Column A B C ANALYTICAL METHOD DATE ANALYZED MDL Sample No. 95-3054 95-3055 (mg/Kg) Collected 8/9/95 8/9/95 Received 8/10/95 8/10/95 Mercury 0.403 0.380 EPA 245.1 8/22/95 0.020 Remarks: Approved/Date - 929 Date Mailed: To DPH (certified) ) -//~ - t5 To Interagency Committee 9-// -- S 00038 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 FISH TISSUE MERCURY ANALYSIS City/Town Hanover Collfector R. Maietta UColumn A Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-7, Ihf 95-8, 1hf 95-9) Column B Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-13, 1hf 95-14, Ihf 95-15) Column C Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-16, 1hf 95-17, Ihf 95-18) Conc. Units: mg/kg wet wt. Column A B C ANALYTICAL METHOD DATE ANALYZED MDL Sample No. 95-3056 95-3057 95-3058 (mg/Kg) Collected 8/9/95 8/9/95 8/9/95 Received 8/10/95 8/10/95 8/10/95 Mercury 1.29 1.02 0.828 EPA 245.1 8/22/95 0.020 Remarks: Approved/Date Date Mailed: To DPH (certified) / To Interagency Committee -- 00039 FS MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 FISH TISSUE City/Town Hanover I Collector R. Maietta Colun A Forge Pond (Fgf 95-7 Fgf 95-8, Fgf 95-9) IColumn B Forge Pond (Fgf 95-13) Column C Forge Pond (Fgf 95-4, Fgf 95-5, Fgf 95-6) IConc. Units: mg/Kg wet wt. A B C ANALYTICAL METHOD DATE ANALYZED MDL Sample No. 95-3049 95-3050 95-3051 . mg/Kg Collected 8/9/95 8/9/95 8/9/95 Received 8/10/95 8/10/95 8/10/95 Arsenic < MDL < MDL < MDL EPA 200.9 8/17/95 0.040 Lead < MDL < MDL < MDL EPA 200.7 8/22/95 1.00 USelenium 0.066 0.060 0.143 EPA 270.2 8/28/95 . 0.040 Cadmium < MDL < MDL < MDL EPA 200.7 8/22/95 0.20 Remarks: rat ,5 g321 Approved/Date Date mailed: To DPH (certified) 4 q-//- 9 ( To Interagency Committee 00040 ES MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 FISH TISSUE City/Town Hanover Collector R. Maietta Column A Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-1, Ihf 95-2, lhf 95-3) I Column B Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-4, Ihf 95-5, Ihf 95-6) IColumn C Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-10, Ihf 95-11, Ihf 95-12) Conc. Units: mg/Kg wet wt. COLUMN A B C ANALYTICAL METHOD DATE ANALYZED. MDL Sample No. 95-3048 95-3052 95-3053 - mg/Kg Collected ' 8/9/95 8/9/95 8/9/95 Received 8/10/95 8/10/95 8/10/95 Arsenic < MDL < MDL < MDL . EPA 200.9 8/17/95 0.040 Lead < MDL < MDL < MDL EPA 200.7 8/22/95 1.00 Selenium 0.109 0.113 0.198 EPA 270.2 8/28/95 0.040 Cadmium Remarks: P'n .h, 32) Approved/Date 9-//-P. Date mailed: To DPH (certified) -//- { To ineragency Connittee ~// --f 00041 FS MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 FISH TISSUE City/Town Hanover Collector R. Maietta Lolumn A Forge Pond (Fgf 95-1 Fgf 95-2, Fgf 95-3) olumn B Forge Pond (Fgf 95-10, Fgf 95-11, Fgf 95-12) C IColumn Lonc. Units: mg/Kg wet wt. COLUMN A B C ANALYTICAL METHOD DATE ANALYZED MDL Sample No. 95-3054 95-3055 .. - m~g Collected 8/9/95 8/9/95 Received 8/10/95 --8/10/95 Arsenic < MDL < MDL EPA 200.9 8/17/95 0.040 Lead < MDL < MDL EPA 200.7 8/22/95 1.00 Selenium 0.165 0.146 EPA 2702 8/28/95 0.040 *cadiu.. MDL . <.MDL EPA 200.7 8/22/95 020 Remarks: I Fv n'J23 Approved/Date /f4/ 9 -//- f I Date mailed: To DPH (certified) f - // - 9 To Interagency Committee E 9 ( 00042 FS MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station: 1887-1989 FISH TISSUE City/Town Hanover Collector R. Maietta Column A Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-7, Ihf 95-8, Ihf 95-9) 'Column B Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-13 Ihf 95-14, Ihf 95-15) 3Column C Indian Head Impoundment (Ihf 95-16, Ihf 95-17, Ihf 95-18) Conc. Units: mg/Kg wet wt. COLUMN A B C ANALYTICAL METHOD DATE ANALYZED MDL Sample No. 95-3056 95-3057 95-3058 mg/Kg Collected 8/9/95 8/9/95 8/9/95 Received 8/10/95 9/10/95 ______3 9/10/95 ______ *Arsenic 0.194 Lead < MDL < MDL < MDL EPA 200.7 8/22/95 1.00- E Selenium 0.405 0.199 0.144 EPA 270.2 8/28/95 0.040 Cadmium < MDL < MDL < MDL EPA 200.7 8/22/95 0.20 Remarks: Approved/Date .. A 9-//-f9 I Date mailed: To DPH (certified) To Interagency Committee .- 00043 FS MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station 1887-1989 QUALITY CONTROL DATA FISH TISSUE City/Town: Hanover Collector: R. Maietta Remarks: Matrix: Fish 3Conc. Units: mg/Kg wet wt. ACCURACY,% SAMPLE ID ANALYTE PRECISION RECOVERY MDL METHOD Sample Duplicate Range LFB QCS LFM mg/Kg 95-3048 Hg 1.16 1.30 0.14 94 94 115 .0.020 EPA 245.1 :elq\93 Approved/Date /'4q - 2-9f Date mailed: To DPH (certified) -// 9 C To Interagency Committee__-// _ 00044 FS MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station 1887-1989 QUALITY CONTROL DATA FISH TISSUE Iity/Town: Hanover, Indian Head Impoundment Collector: R. Maietta emarks: fatrix: Fish Sonc. Units: mg/Kg wet wt. ACCURACY,% SAMPLE ID ANALYTE PRECISION RECOVERY MDL METHOD 'Sample Duplicate Range LFB QCS LFM mg/Kg 95-3048 As < MDL - - 102 92 80 0.040 EPA 200.9 95-3048 Se 0.109 0.110 0.001 94 95 90 0.040 EPA 270.2 95-3048 Pb < MDL < MDL - 86 104 81 1.00 EPA 200.7 95-3048 Cd < MDL < MDL - 97 93 89 0.20 EPA 200.7 MARKS: Approved/Date lf/i' Date mailed: To DPH (certified) _ 9-'/ 9 (*~ To Interagency Committee 00045 FS MASSACHUSETIS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILLIAM X. WALL EXPERIMENT STATION Lawrence Experiment Station 1887-1989 QUALITY CONTROL DATA FISH TISSUE City/Town: Hanover, Forge Pond Collector: R. Maietta Remarks: Matrix: Fish Conc. Units: mg/Kg wet wt. ACCURACY, % SAMPLE ED ANALYTE PRECISION RECOVERY MDL METHOD Sample Duplicate Range LFB QCS LFM mg/Kg 95-3051 As < MDL < MDL - 102 92 77 0.040 EPA 200.9 95-3051 Se 0.143 0.135 0.008 114 83 104 0.040 EPA 270.2 95-3051 Pb < MDL < MDL - 86 104 98 1.00 EPA 200.7 95-3051 Cd < MDL < MDL - 97 93 99 0.20 EPA 200.7 IREMARKS: 0 ~nd'~ 9~ I Approved/Date "lqA -// -' ) Date mailed: To DPH (certificd)_ To Interagency Committee Z-//- I 00046 FS 0 -.-u -I -- ' eU 9 art (:) es 0 im C-i *lIWw W int L V a, cc ea- 00047 F U% j ,- IRA OOO ' FS i 3~ 01 CV - . . u{ -- - - N - 4- C r4CI an - rv- N -- r-: 1" 00OA FS Summary of January, 1995 Mercury & Lead in Sediment Data' Fireworks Site, West Hanover, Massachusetts Sample No. Location Description2 Mercury, mg/kg Lead, mg/kg 1 Drinkwater North of 139 0.065 17 2 Drinkwater South of Confluence of 0.046 26 Cushing Rock at Railroad Crossing 3 French Stream at Hanover / Rockland Line 0.103 23 4 Forge Pond North < MDL 15 5 Forge Pond East 0.445 29 6 Forge Pond South < MDL 10 7 Drinkwater River after D Street 198 79 8 End of Channel 0.165 < MDL 9 5th Street Bridge over Drinkwater River 14 149 10 4th Street.Bridge over Drinkwater River 840 161 11 Indian Head at Cross Street / State Street 0.242 < MDL Bridge 12 Luddam's Ford 33 4200 13 Lily Pond 0.173 < MDL 14 At "Cold Waste Dump" -- Factory Pond 0.246 . 12 15 At Old Bridge Ruins - Factory Pond 0.160 3.4 16 At location known as "MIT Pit," Wetlands 39 496 near Factory Pond 17 Factory Pond Dam 0.350 32 'Compiled from: Memorandum from Oscar C. Pancorbo, Director DEP-WES to Jonathan Hobill, DEP-SERO, Lakeville, Hanover, Factory Pond Results, March 24, 1995. 'Each location is marked on the attached map. Al., ICYA* * *, ** I .4) ii it 1.144 1111.*t. i *t tiii . SA .* * *. ck * * 5* *..~Nil 'ka a * ,t5*~,~2r 0jq * ~ ~*.* .. -, .rg, n. Q ~.h, 4z; * ~ 1 Th*t 44 '7 .4...... .~~~ . .... ...... 1993 Public Request Fish Toxics Monitoring Surveys Massachusetts Department Of Environmental Protection Office of Watershed Management Robert J. Maietta Environmental Analyst Introduction for fish Beginning in 1992/93, due to an increased -public demand Departments of toxics monitoring data, the Massachusetts Protection (MADEP) , Public Health (MDPH), and Environmental (MDFWELE) Fisheries Wildlife and Environmental Law Enforcement for the public to began the development of a formal protocol fish toxics monitoring surveys of the Commonwealth's request the development waterbodies. The protocol would eventually include A) , of a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (See Attachment B) , and Criteria a Form For Requesting. Fish Testing (See Attachment Attachment C) . Ranking Fish Toxics Testing Requests (See For involved Request forms are available through each of the Agencies MADEP's Office of in the MOU. All requests are sent to the should be noted Watershed 'Management (OWM) in North Grafton. It been fulfilled that while public requests for fish testing had scope of the prior to 1992/93, increased requests beyond the a prioritization resources available to respond to them made protocol necessary. year in February, representatives of the aforementioned Each February meet to prioritize all requests received between agencies year. the previous year and February 1st of the current 1st of (determined Taking into account criteria such as fishing pressure point and non- by MDFWELE) and the presence of known or potential. and/or the point sources of pollution (determined by MADEP each request is categorized. The number of requests requester) and during any given year is determined by the field fulfilled are laboratory resources available for that year. All requesters notified regarding the status of their request and re-application the following year is encouraged. edible The objective of the public request studies is to screen pesticides. fillets of fishes for metals, PCBs, and organochlorine and Routine metals include arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, basis. In selenium. Other metals are addressed on a site specific in fish from order to assess the amount of contamination present trophic groups or habitat types, fish species targeted different Esox include at a minimum; bass Micropterus sp. or chain pickerel column nicrer (predators), yellow perch Perca flavescens (water (benthic invertivores/omnivores), and brown bullhead Ameiurus sp. chosen on feeding omnivores). Additional or substitute species are a site by site basis. total of During the 1992/1993 review period (2/1/92 - 2/1/93) a five requests were received by OWM and, due to the manageable 1993. number of requests, all requested waterbodies were sampled in (See Table 1). Field Methods dates: Waterbodies were sampled by MADEP personnel on the following Waterbody Date Sampling Methods Al Site (Mill Pond) 8/4/93 boat electroshocking Factory Pond 8/27/93 boat electroshocking Billington Sea 9/9/93 boat electroshocking Lake Garfield 9/15/93 boat electroshocking Wellington Brook 10/5/93 backpack electroshocking Boat electroshocking was performed by maneuvering the boat through fish the littoral habitat of each waterbody and dip netting most shocked. Fish collected were stored on board in a live well filled with site water. Fish to be included in the sample were removed from the live well and placed in ice-filled coolers. Live fish which were not part of the sample were released. All fish retained for analysis were prepared later in the day. Backpack electroshocking was performed by placing a portable electrode into a small pool, engaging switch, and dip netting fish. Field Results Electroshocking at the Al Site (Mill Pond) in Westborough resulted in the capture and retention of three largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides, one brown bullhead Ameiurus nebulosus, four yellow bullhead Ameiurus natalis, three black crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus, three yellow perch, and three bluegill Lepomis macrochirus. Electroshocking at Factory Pond resulted in the collection of four largemouth bass,. one brown bullhead, three black crappie, three yellow perch, and five bluegill. Electroshocking at Billington Sea resulted in the collection of four largemouth bass, one white perch Morone americana-, five yellow perch, two chain pickerel, five white sucker Catostomus commersoni, and five bluegill. Large schools of young-of-the-year river herring Alosa sp. were observed but not collected. Electroshocking at Lake Garfield resulted in the collection of five rock bass Ambloplites rupestris, two pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus, three chain pickerel, and six yellow perch. One rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss, and many small yellow perch were observed but not collected. Electroshocking at Wellington Brook resulted in the capture of four common carp Cyprinus caroio. No other species of fish were observed. In most instances large numbers of fish from each species listed were captured and released. Final sample type (individual or composite), size (number of fish in composite), assemblage (size of fish in composite) was determined by the biologists on site. In most cases, fish selected for analysis represented species and sizes desirable by the angling public for sport and/or consumption. Laboratory Methods Fish were returned to the wildlife laboratory at the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife (MDFW) Field Headquarters in Westborough where they were measured, weighed, and notes were taken as to an individual fish's general condition. Species, length, weight, and sample type data can be found in Table 2. Fish were filleted (skin off) on glass cutting boards and prepared for freezing. All equipment used in the filleting process was rinsed in hot water to remove slime, scales, and other fluids such as blood, then re-rinsed twice in deionized water before and/or after each individual fish or composite. Fillets targeted for metals analysis were placed, -in VWR 32 ounce high density polyethylene (HPDE) cups with covers. The opposite fillets were wrapped in aluminum foil for % lipids, PCBs and organochlorine pesticide analysis. In the case of composite samples, two to five fillets from like-sized individuals of the same species were wrapped together in aluminum foil or stored in the single sample container. Samples were tagged and frozen for subsequent delivery to MADEP's Wall Experiment Station (WES). Methods used at WES for metals analysis include a cold vapor method using- a VGA hydride. generator for mercury and Varian 1475 .flame atomic absorption for all remaining metals. PCB/organochlorine pesticide analysis was performed on a gas chromatograph equipped with an electron capture detector. Additional information on analytical techniques used at WES is available from the laboratory. Laboratory Results Cadmium and lead were below detection (Cd <0.30 mg/kg and Pb <1.0 mg/kg) in all samples analyzed. Low concentrations of arsenic (0.03-0.15 mg/kg) and selenium (0.04-0.16 mg/kg) were detected in eight and twenty-six of the thirty-four samples analyzed, respectively. Mean mercury concentration and range by station is listed below. Station . total Hg (mq/kg wet weight) Range (min-max) Al Site (Mill Pond) 0.67 0.07 - 1.9 Factory Pond 1.45 0.27-- 3.09 Billington Sea 0.28 0.04 - 0.66 Lake Garfield 0.32 0.21 - 0.40 Wellington Brook 0.09 0.03 - 0.19 Complete results of the metals analysis and quality assurance/quality control data can be found in Tables 3 and 5, respectively. PCBs were below detection in all samples except for the four common carp from Wellington Brook. These fishes (Wbf93-1 through Wbf93-4) contained PCB Arochlor 1254 concentrations ranging from 0.31 to 0.67 mg/kg wet weight. Pesticides were not detected in any samples except for those from Billington Sea in Plymouth. Trace amounts of DDD were detected in eight of the ten samples from Billington Sea. Concentrations ranged from below detection in a composite of yellow perch (Bsf93-6-10) to 0.012 mg/kg wet weight in an individual largemouth bass (Bsf93-3). Complete results of the PCBs and organochlorine pesticide analysis can be found in Table 4. Discussion As noted in the Introduction, all requests received are prioritized using criteria relating to potential sources of pollution and fishing pressure. During 1993 prioritization was not necessary due to the manageable number of requests. Information on potential pollution sources and fishing pressure was generated regardless of the need for prioritization. Al Site (Mill Pond): This artificial flow augmentation pond was created by damming the headwaters of the Assabet River. While there are no documented point or non-point sources of mercury to this waterbody, mercury concentrations were significant enough to warrant the MDPH to issue a health advisory regarding consumption of fishes from this waterbody (See Attachment D). The health advisory recommends that: " 1. Children under 12, pregnant women and nursing mothers should refrain from consuming any fish from Mill Pond above George H. Nichols Dam in order to prevent exposure of developing fetuses and young children to mercury." and " 2. The general public should refrain from consumption of largemouth bass caught from Mill Pond above George H. Nichols Dam." The present MDPH protocol screens the available data and results in the issuance of a full advisory against consumption (for "sensitive groups" listed above) when any data point equals or exceeds a total mercury trigger level of 0.5 mg/kg. Largemouth bass (3 samples) and black crappie (1 sample) were found to contain greater than 0.5 mg/kg of total mercury. Brown bullhead, yellow bullhead, yellow perch, and bluegill were found to contain less than 0..5 mg/kg of total mercury. A full advisory (by species) is issued for the general public when mercury exceeds 1.0 mg/kg as is the case with the largest of the three bass sampled. While elevated mercury seems to suggest the potential for a nearby pollution source, it should be noted that the mercury concentrations found in fishes from the A-1 Site are consistent with data generated from other "clean" waterbodies located across the Commonwealth. PCBs and organochlorine pesticides were not present in fish from the A-1 site. Factory Pond: Factory Pond is an impoundment of the Drinkwater River in Hanson and Hanover. Its outlet marks the beginning of the Indian Head River. The Pond is located in the headwaters of the North River Drainage Sub-Basin which is the largest drainage within the South Shore Coastal Drainage Basin. Factory Pond receives treated municipal wastewater from the Rockland WWTP via the Drinkwater River. The original request stated that "the site was heavily polluted in the past"; however, it did not cite the nature of that pollution. The pond has apparently.received heavy nutrient loadings from the wastewater treatment plant at some time in the past as evidenced by the presence of extremely heavy algal mats and blooms noted during the 1993 sampling. There were also hundreds of ducks present on the waterbody on the'day of the survey. Total mercury concentrations were extremely elevated in Factory Pond fishes (2 = 1.45 mg/kg wet weight). In June of 1994, the MDPH issued a health advisory which recommends that "The public should refrain from consumption of Factory Pond fish." (See Attachment E).. As a result of the fish toxics monitoring and subsequent issuance of a public health advisory, the DEP Bureau of Waste Site Clean-up (BWSC) began testing river sediments in an effort to locate the source of mercury to this waterbody. It should be noted that there are three sites on the DEP BWSC's List of Locations to be Investigated (BWSC, 1993), which are located in close proximity to Forge Pond in Hanover, which is just upstream from Factory Pond. PCBs and organochlorine pesticides were below detection in all samples collected from Factory Pond. Billington Sea: This large (269 acre), shallow, eutrophic pond is located in Plymouth. The public request listed fish kills as a particular concern and suggested that pesticides and herbicides from cranberry bogs could be the cause of these kills, and a potential source of contaminants to this waterbody. As is evidenced by the data presented in Table 3, metals including mercury (R = 0.28 mg/kg) do not appear to be a problem in this waterbody. The largest bass (Bsf93-1) analyzed was approximately 3 pounds and contained 0.66 mg/kg of total mercury. While the MDPH did not issue an advisory regarding consumption of largemouth bass from the Billington Sea, consumption of large individuals of predatory species such as bass, pickerel, and pike should probably. be avoided. While PCBs and most pesticides and herbicides were below detection, trace levels of DDD were detected in eight of the ten samples analyzed. The highest concentration quantified was 0.012 mg/kg in an individual largemouth bass (Bsf93-3). The United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) has an Action Level of 5.0 mg/kg DDD. Canada has a legal limit of 5.0 mg/kg DDD, as well. Presumably the DDD (metabolite of DDT) is leftover from the days when DDT was still being used as a pesticide. This survey did not attempt to address the question of what might be causing fish kills in Billington Sea. The MDFW suggests that the fish kills which occasionally occur here may be caused by the "overabundance of vegetation". They are probably referring to episodic oxygen depletions resulting from respiration and decay associated with algal blooms. The sources of nutrients which exacerbate such blooms probably include cranberry bogs. and shoreline residences. Lake Garfield: Lake Garfield is a 262 acre stratified lake located in Monterey. The request to sample this lake specifically mentioned mercury as the contaminant of concern. This concern was apparently based upon the facts that mercury has been found in fish from a number of "clean" and/or "reference" sites located across the Commonwealth and that there is an active fishery in this lake, especially during the winter months. Mercury concentrations were low in all samples-analyzed (x = 0.32 mg/kg). A composite of yellow perch (Lgf93-11-13) had the highest total mercury concentration (0.40 mg/kg). This is below the MDPH trigger level of 0.50 mg/kg. The only top level predators collected and analyzed were a composite of chain pickerel (Lgf93-8-10). This sample had a total mercury concentration of 0.32 mg/kg. It should be noted that this sample was composed of sub-legal length fish (<15 inches in length) and that legal length pickerel (>= 15 inches) can be expected to contain higher mercury concentrations. Bass were not collected or observed. Mercury concentrations in Lake Garfield fish appear to be .representative,. of "background" levels. PCBs and organochlorine pesticides were below detection in all samples analyzed. Wellington Brook: The original request to sample this waterbody also included a request to sample Blair Pond in Cambridge. The DEP Division of Water Pollution Control's (DWPC's) Compilation of Lakes, Ponds, Reservoirs and Impoundments (Ackerman and others, 1984) does not list a Blair Pond in Cambridge nor does the DWPC's Inventory of Rivers and Streams (Halliwell and others, 1982) list a Wellington Brook in Belmont. Upon inspection of USGS Quadrangle maps two small ponds and a small stream tributary to Little River in Belmont were located and reconnaisanced. Blair Pond was filled with rich fine silt and organic matter to the point that it was too shallow to be sampled. Wellington Brook was essentially an open sewer with gray water, toilet paper, and fecal matter clearly visible. One pool approximately 1/8 of a mile upstream of the confluence with the Little River was electroshocked and four common carp were collected. Total mercury concentrations were extremely low (x = 0.09 mg/kg) in Wellington Brook carp. Most other metals were near or below detection as well. PCB Arochlor 1254 was detected in all four carp samples analyzed. The average concentration was 0.46 mg/kg with a range of 0.31 - 0.67 mg/kg. The USFDA has an Action Level for PCBs of 2.0 mg/kg. The USEPA (Tetra Tech, 1986) reports legal limits of PCBs in Fish and Fishery Products from other countries which range between 1.0 and 5.0 mg/kg. The MDPH reviewed the data and concluded that no restrictions to fish consumption were needed. Conclusions Public Request Fish Toxic Monitoring Surveys conducted in 1993 have resulted in the issuance of two public health advisories regarding mercury. One of the advisories (Factory Pond) is a full advisory against consumption and may be related to the presence of a waste site. The other (A-1 Site) is a full advisory for sensitive groups (pregnant women, nursing mothers, and children) and a limited advisory for all others which recommends that largemouth bass be avoided. PCBs and organochlorine pesticides do not appear to be a widespread problem. In most instances these substances are below detection in the edible fillets of fishes except where direct discharge of these substances may have occurred such as major rivers which are currently receiving or have received industrial wastewaters in the past. A-1. Site: Posting has occurred and the MDFW has and will be performing creel census which should be able to tell us the effect of posting on the eating habits of sportsmen and women fishing this waterbody. Factory Pond: It is clear that due to the extremely high mercury concentrations in fishes from this waterbody additional fish work needs to be performed in the area. The Interagency Committee has received a request to sample Forge Pond which is located just upstream of Factory Pond. This request will be considered for the 1995 sampling season. Work to help locate potential sources was initiated by DEPs BWSC in 1994 and is ongoing. Billington Sea: Fish consumption does not seem to be a problem in this waterbody; however, it is apparent that nutrients do pose a problem here. The question of what is causing the occasional fish kills remains, but, the MDFW will continue to respond to reports of fish kills to try to determine their cause. Environmental conditions at the time of the kill will help to determine the cause of a specific kill therefore timing is critical. Fish kills need to be reported while they are occurring or soon after as they are observed. Lake Garfield: Located in one of the less developed areas of the state, fish from this lake are probably a good example of "background" conditions. Mercury is present, and probably at concentrations which, although there is no formal advisory, make it wise to avoid eating large specimens of the predatory fishes such as chain pickerel, largemouth bass, and smallmouth bass. These types of data sets, (i.e. those where average size predatory fishes have mercury concentrations just below the MDPH trigger level) exemplify the need for the state to develop general guidance document with regard to fish and contaminants which may bioaccumulate, especially mercury. Wellington Brook: It was obvious that this brook has some very problems. It is receiving raw sewage to such a degree that severe and the brook is gray in color, smells like the influent to a WWTP fish has visible solids problems. Common carp were the only observed and probably are the only ones present. as they are and extremely tolerant of degraded conditions in both water quality While the data suggests that eating fish from this habitat. be waterbody is not a problem, potential contact with water should be a public health concern, as high bacterial levels would inspected. all Fish Toxics Monitoring reports. and memoranda this As with -the report will be forwarded to the Departments involved with Interagency Committee, the individuals representing those Departments, and the individuals requesting work. Additional copies of this report are -available from the Office of Watershed Management, North Grafton, MA 01536. LITERATURE CITED Halliwell D. B., W. A. Kimball, and A. S. Screpetis. 1982. Massachusetts Stream Classification Program Part I: Inventory of Rivers and Streams. Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Boston. Ackerman, M. T., Batiuk, R. A., and Beaudoin, T. M. 1984. Compilation of Lakes, Ponds, Reservoirs, and Impoundments. The Massachusetts Clean Lakes Program. Department of Environmental Quality Engineering, Boston. Massachusetts Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup. 1993. List of OfinEd Disposal Sites and Locations to be Investigated. Department of Environmental Protection, Boston. Tetra Tech Inc. 1986. Guidance Manual for Health Risk Assessment of Chemically Contaminated Seafood. prepared for the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle. TABLE 1 1993 FISH TOXICS MONITORING PUBLIC REQUEST SURVEYS Location of Sampling Stations waterbody Town USGS quadrangle SHREWSBURY, MASS Al Site (Stump Pond) Westborough WHITMAN, MASS Factory Pond Hanover/Hanson MASS Billington Sea Plmouth PLYMOUTH, MONTEREY, MASS Lake Garfield Monterey MASS Wellington Brook Cambridge LEXINGTON, TABLE 2 1993 FISH TOXICS MONITORING PUBLIC REQUEST SURVEYS Species, Length, and weight Data Sample Species Sample Code Code' Type- Length (cm) Weight() A-1 Site Alf93-1 LMB 47.3 1290 1220 Alf93-2 LMB 43.1 510 AlF93-3 LMB 30.6 500 AlF93-4 BB 33.2 290 Alf93-5 YB 27.4 230 Alf 93-6 YB 25.7 180 Alf93-7 YB 22.9 YB 22.7 190 Alf93-8 230 Alf 93-9 BC 25.1 240 Alf93-10 BC 27.3 180 Alf93-11 BC 23.3 YP 24.4 150 Alf93-12 120 Alf93-13 YP 23.6 120 Alf93-14 Yp 22.1 B 17.8 100 Alf93-15 100 Alf93-16 -B 18.4 90 Alf93-17 B 17.6 Factory Pond 1,660 Fpf93-1 SLMB 44.6 780 Fpf93-2 LMB 39.0 560 Fpf93-3 LMB 33.4 560 Fpf93-4 LMB 33.9 600 Fpf93-5 BB 35.7 220 Fpf93-6 BC 24.9 200 Fpf93-7 BC 23.7 160 Fpf93-8 BC 23.6 Fpf 93-9 YP 25.6 240 260 Fpf93-10 YP 26.6 220 Fpft93-1l YP 24.7 Fpf93-12 B 19.8 180 Fpf93-13 B 18.9 140 Fpf93-14 B .19.8 140 140 Fpf93-15 B 19.5 160 Fpf93-16 B 19.6 Billington Sea 1820 Bsf93-1 LMB 46.7 1620 Bsf93-2 LMB 46 .6 1190 Bsf93-3 LMB 43.2 730 Bsf93-4 LMB 37 .1 340 Bsf93-5 WP 29. 1 Bsf93-6 YP 26.6 210 Bsf93-7 YP 24.0 160 Bsf93-8 yP 21.9 130 Bsf93-9 YP 22.7 130 130 Bsf93-10 YP 22.2 TABLE 2 (Continued) Sample Species Sample Code Code' Type- Length (cm) Weight(q) Billington Sea (Continued) Bsf93-11 CP 49.9 840 Bsf93-12 CP 45.1 700 Bsf93-13 WS C 30.8 380 Bsf93-14 WS C 28.2 270 Bsf93-15 WS C 26.9 260 Bsf93-16 WS C 27..7 270 Bsf93-17 WS C 26.0 210 Bsf93-18 B C 24.1 330 Bsf93-19 B. C 21.9 230 Bsf93-20 B C - 20.3 230 Bsf93-21 B C 22.4 220 Bsf93-22 B C 21.4 250 Lake Garfield Lgf93-1 RB 20.3 180 Lgf93-2 RB 19.7 170 Lgf93-3 RB 22.2 200 Lgf93-4 RB 20.1 140 Lgf93-5 RB 20.2 140 Lgf93-6 P 20.4 200 Lgf93-7 P 18.1 140 Lgf93-8 CP 32.8 180 Lgf93-9 CP 33.5 220 Lgf93-10 CP 33.0 200 Lgf93-11 YP 23.3 160 Lgf93-12 'YP 24.2 160 Lgf93-13 yr 25.7 170 Lgf 93-14 YP 22.1 110 Lgf93-15 YP 20.9 100 Lgf93-16 YP 20.9 110 Wellington Brook Wbf 93-1 C I 55.0 2900 Wbf93-2 C I 55.0 2440 Wbf93-3 C I 53.0 2180 Wbf 93-4 C I 50.9 1780 'Species Code. Common Name Scientific Name LMB largemouth bass Microcterus salmoides BB brown bullhead Ameiurus nebulosus YB yellow bullhead Ameiurus natalis BC black crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatis YP yellow perch Perca flavescens B bluegill Lepomis macrochirus WP white perch Morone americana CP chain pickerel Esox niger Ws white sucker Catostomus commersoni C common carp Cvprinus carpio 2sample Type I - individual C - composite ina n WW in iLO- 0 o O a) 000Oo0o00 0 U2 O 0 0 0 0 00 00O O O0 0 V 0 ,4-4 cam 0 V0 0 V C6' m - - V V Oc V V V V V OV V V V V O% 0 N N 0%0%U U 000 0.O OO '0% a C; C 0; in 2: 0% C- m 0O M M N4 OONN-0-40 -0000000O O '-4 '-4 '4 '4 C in V S 0 0 2: VV V V V V V V V V '4 w'4,vwoo in .4 '4in 4 -4 -40000000 0 0, 4J Zm: -2:2:2: 0 0-v0 aCVao00VV V 0 .4 E4 HHHHU Q HHUHUUU 0 Q' m ura ao 2:2:10.0.,. 4 0 i Nn . C. -4 m 0\ 0\ 0 0 f 0 0 .a 4 InEime .0IU I1 M44 mC 4 4 w, 0 , 11 0,4 w, 0,. ro01 I IM---ll--- .0 .* . E . . - - - - a M 4) O04Maa U) VZ00E-400Ev OvV'VZV Q O 0 00O V 000000O O 0 V O V .0 '4 O 'a '4 0.0 0 O00 O00 0 0 0 0 v v O CL 00E ZZZEv v O Z Z Z Z Z. Z E Z VZVZV V V V V V V V V V V V V V V VV WO N 0 t N otf 1 1 Nm 0o; '. e N N - (N N 0.-4 W 0000M 0000000000 OO O 0000 O ; '4 '4 '4 'a 'a 'a '4 '4 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 V U 0 S S S S S S S 0 V V V V .M1 V V V V V V V It 'V 41 -4 w di v 0 -4 C '44 .4 flN 0 OOO '4 '4 *1 it v E.. V0V00Ev v C, V C V O-V V VyOea V V E4 -4 4, -4 C -4 '4 41 -4 04 a I u uuU U H H H H It LI, N vi .. 94 41 -4e *94 41 U Uc0 41 SV3 m uu 04 N N 0 -4 N - N 4~ 0 o en '0o - N (1 in '0 -4 0 -4-4 on en e e en n en Cr e Cr e s 0J -0 a .0.0 x :r 3. TABLE 4 1993 FISH TOXICS MONITORING PUBLIC REQUEST SURVEYS Results of PCB, Organochlorine Pesticide', and % Lipids Analysis Pesticicdes Sample Code Species Code - Sample Type3 % Lipids PCB DDD Al Site 4 Alf93-1 - LMB I 0.07 Factory Pond 0.21 Billington Sea Bsf93-1 LMB I 0.63 Lake Garfield Lqf93-1-5 RB C 0.13 Pesticides Sample Code species code Sample Type3 % Lipids PCB' DDD Wellington Brook Wbf93-1 C I 1.1 0.38 ND wbf93-2 C I 0.90 0.48 ND I 2.1 0.67 ND Wbf93-3 C Wbf93-4 C I 1.5 0.31 ND 'organochlorine pesticides analyzed by ACAC 983.21 Method (i.e., identified and quantified if present in sample): Aldrin, BHC, Lindane, DDD, DDE, DDT, Dieldrin, Endosulfan, Endosulfan sulfate, Endrin, Endrin aldehyde, Heptachlor, Heptachlor epoxide, Methoxychlor, Toxaphene, Chlordane, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, Hexachlorobenzene, and Trifurlin 2See Table 2 'See Table 2 4 'PCB Arochlor 1254 I TABLE 5 1993 FISH TOXICS MONITORING PUBLIC REQUEST SURVEYS Quality Assurance/Quality control Data: Metals Metals Concentrations (mg/kg wet weiaht) Se Sample Code Sample Type As Cd Ha Pb Lgf93-11-13 original Bsf93-l original Wbf93-4 original Fpf93-1 original 0.05 Fpf93-3-4 original 1.25 duplicate 1.23 spike 0.2 spike 6 sample 1.41 % recovery 87 I metal MDL (ma/ka wet weightl arsenic 0.040 cadmium 0.60 mercury 0.02 lead 1.0 selenium 0.040 ATTACHMENT A Interagency Committee on Freshwater Fish Toxics Monitoring and Assessment MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING April 1994 MEMBERSHIP: The Committee is comprised of representatives from the following Departments and programs: o Department of Environmental Protection - Office of Watershed Management (OWM) Division of Water Pollution Control (DWPC) Office of Research and Standards (ORS) Division of Environmental Analysis.(DEA) o Department of Public Health Environmental Toxicology Program (ETP) Physician Education Unit (PEU) Community Assessment Unit (CAU) Environmental Laboratory (EL) o Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Environmental Law Enforcement Division of Fisheries and Wildlife (DFW) INTRODUCTION: The freshwater fish toxics testing efforts of Massachusetts are headed by the MA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)in cooperation with the MA Department of Public Health (DPH), and Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Environmental Law Enforcement (DFWELE). The DPH leads efforts to determine the public health impacts of consuming contaminated fish from various locations. These collaborative efforts ensure the state's ability to conduct limited testing and evaluation of contaminants. in fish tissue for purposes of protecting public health and the environment. This MOU is limited to the freshwater environment. PURPOSE: This Memorandum of Understanding is issued by the Interagency Committee to formalize and communicate its goals, objectives and responsibilities for monitoring and assessing toxic contaminants in freshwater fish in Massachusetts. AUTHORITY: Specific legal mandates do not exist for testing freshwater fish- for toxic contaminants. This work, however, is viewed as desirable by the three agencies relative to their respective authorities and mandates, including but not limited to, protecting public health, controlling toxic substances in the environment and protecting wildlife resources. This-committee does not have responsibility to direct testing of fish for contaminants at hazardous material sites, but does participate in the process as part of the Superfund programs. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the MOU is to establish a formal interagency mechanism to facilitate the communication, coordination and dissemination of information pertaining to contaminants in freshwater fish. The objectives of the fish monitoring efforts are described below. Monitoring and assessment activities are planned annually and are based on the agencies' respective available resources. Therefore, in any given year, the scope of the monitoring and assessment efforts may or may not fulfill some or all of the following objectives. o To determine the public health impacts from human consumption of contaminated fish species from various freshwater bodies in the Commonwealth. o To develop appropriate technical support documents and public health advisories. o To develop outreach strategies and environmental education programs for health care professionals, local health agencies and the potentially exposed target populations. o To coordinate posting efforts with appropriate local, state and federal agencies. o To provide information useful in managing and controlling toxic pollutants. o To provide fish monitoring data for use as part of the overall assessment of the health of ecosystems. o To respond to public requests for fish testing through a standardized questionnaire and ranking process to identify priority sites to be tested. o To establish and maintain a statewide toxics-in-fish data base for use by state and federal agencies, research and educational institutions and other interested parties. o To conduct research and development projects to enhance fish monitoring activities and the overall health of the fish populations and associated ecosystems of the Commonwealth. RESPONSIBILITIES: Each of the three agencies named in this MOU have responsibilities unique to its mission. Specific responsibilities that relate to current activities are described below: o All members of the Interagency Committee participate in the overall planning of the Massachusetts fish toxics program, including the prioritization of testing sites, publication of fish toxics data and their use in assessing the health of ecosystems in Massachusetts. o The Director of the Office of Research and Standards chairs and coordinates the activities of the Interagency Committee. o DPH-ETP will formalize a protocol for evaluating the public health risks of consuming contaminated fish. DEP- ORS will work closely with DPH on this protocol to ensure that DEP's risk analysis program is considered. o DPH-ETP will develop a standard interim protocol for development of fish advisories by Spring of 1994. DPH is responsible for decisions regarding the need for public health advisories and for implementing them. & o DPH-ETP in conjunction with DPH-CAU will identify notify human populations whose health may be affected due to consumption of contaminated fish. 0. DPH-ETP in conjunction with DPH-PEU will provide relevant health information to health professionals (Boards of Health, medical community, etc.) and the public regarding potential hazards related to consumption of contaminated fish. o DEP-OWM will plan and conduct annual fish sampling efforts in conjunction with DFWELE-DFW. DEP-OWM will collect and prepare fish samples, manage data and report results to the committee. o DEP-OWM will utilize monitoring results for decisions on NPDES permits, for managing nonpoint pollution sources and to provide information for the Chapter 21E site discovery program in cases where oil and hazardous material contaminant levels are found in fish. o DEP-DWPC will use monitoring results for determining compliance with Surface Water Quality Criteria and water use impairments. o DFW is responsible for managing and regulating fishing as well as protecting, maintaining, and restorating the Commonwealth's freshwater fish populations. o DEP-DEA provides QA/QC technical support to the OWM and the Interagency Committee dealing with fish sampling and sample management. o DEP-DEA analyzes fish and related samples'for toxic chemicals and other contaminants, and provides the validated data to the OWM and the Interagency Committee. DPH-EL will provide review and comment on analytical laboratory issues. o In cooperation with the OWM and the Interagency Committee, DEP DEA & ORS conduct and publish research dealing with the development and improvement of methods for the analysis of toxic and other contaminants in fish and other aquatic organisms; this includes evaluation of methods for assessing the exposure of fish populations to toxicants (e.g., approaches involving biomarkers and toxicity testing). o DEP-DEA & ORS advise the OWM and the Interagency Committee on all matters related to the laboratory analysis of fish samples. MEETINGS: Meetings are scheduled as needed. Meetings in the Fall and early Winter months generally focus on planning annual sampling activities. Spring meetings generally focus on the evaluations of laboratory analyses and appropriate agency responses. This MOU will be reviewed and revised as necessary on an annual basis. The following signatures indicate that the three participating agencies view their work duties as set forth in this Memorandum of Understanding as being part of their respective responsibilities for controlling toxic contaminants in the environment, protecting the public health and protecting wildlife resources. 1 V3 /2 Tom Powers Acting Commissioner Department of Environmental Protection DdidM-ll lwy u gan Commissioner Department of Public Health Wayne F. /NacCallum .Director Division of Fisheries & Wildlife Department of Wildlife & Environmental Law Enforcement ATTACHMENT B FORM FOR REQUESTING FISH TESTING of the will be reviewed by representatives The following information and Fisheries and of Environmental Protection, Public Health, Departments need for the state to conduct Wildlife to reach a decision regarding the answer these questions to the extent freshwater fish toxics testing. Please possible. 1. NAME OF THE POND/LAKE RIVER: 2. LOCATION (city/town) : NECESSARY?: 3 WHY DO YOU THINK THAT TESTING IS PLEASE STATE WHAT 4. IF KNOW, WHAT TYPE OF TESTING IS REQUESTED? CHEMICAL(s) AND ANY OTHER PARAMETERS: HAS BEEN DONE AT THIS LOCATION? DO YOU KNOW OF ANY PRIVATE TESTING THAT 5. THE QUALITY ASSURANCE AND IF SO, PLEASE SUBMIT THE RESULTS, INCLUDING CONTROL DATA: (PLEASE CHECK ONE).: 6. DO YOU AND YOUR FAMILY FISH AT THIS LOCATION? YES NO FAMILY CONSUME OVER THE ESTIMATE HOW MANY FISH MEALS YOU AND YOUR 7. PLEASE (PLEASE CHECK ONE) : COURSE OF A YEAR OF FISH CAUGHT AT THIS LOCATION?' 2-4 MEALS A MONTH 0 __ ONE (1) MEAL A MONTH _ MORE THAN FOUR (4) MEALS A MONTH _ 8. WHAT KIND OF FISH DO YOU EAT FROM THIS LOCATION?: ( (Continued) FORM FOR REQUESTING FISH TESTING YOU THINK MIGHT BE USEFUL IN PLEASE NOTE BELOW ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 9. A KNOWN OR SUSPECTED POLLUTIONS REVIEWING THIS REQUEST (EXAMPLE: SOURCE(S): mi . = YOUR NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: We provide us with the above information. Thank you for taking the time to will respond to you as soon as possible. will consider your request and OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 40 INSTITUTE ROAD N. GRAFTON, MA 01536-1839 ATTACHMENT C TOXICS TESTING REQUESTS CRITERIA FOR RANKING FISH toxics and ranking requested fish Criteria for evaluating that the for the purpose of ensuring have been developed situations studies efforts are aimed at the fish toxics testing and the state's protecting public health are most critical for the that' to prioritizing state efforts, environment. In. addition studies will provide that all requested criteria and ranking scheme be evaluated consistently. of four study will fall into one A requested fish testing A is the highest priority and categories, where Category possible Table 1 is followed by specific category D is the lowest. I used. definitions of the criteria TABLE 1 CATEGORY A and 1. The location is heavily-fished, a potential for 2. Have strong evidence which indicates fish contamination. CATEGORY B and The location is moderately-fished, B1 1. a potential for 2. Have strong evidence which indicates fish contamination. and B2 1. The location is heavily-fished, a potential for 2. Have some evidence which indicates fish contamination. CATEGORY C and 1. The location is lightly-fished,. Cl a potential for 2. Have strong evidence which indicates fish contamination. and C2 1. The location is moderately-fished, a potential for 2. Have some evidence which indicates fish contamination. and 1. The location is heavily-fished, C3 a potential for fish 2. Have no evidence which indicates contamination. CATEGORY D and Dl 1. The location is lightly-fished, indicates a potential for 2. Have some or no evidence which fish contamination. and D2 1. The location is moderately-fished, potential for 2. Have no evidence which indicates a fish contamination. &reca&'c ~z~zha & irmzJv 0r0cnr*/o t&ofat4 William F. Weld Govemor Charles 0. Baker Seaetary David H. Mulligan Commissioner PUBLIC HEALTH FISH CONSUMPTION ADVISORY: Mill Pond above George H. Nichols Dam (Al Site Pond) The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) has reviewed fish toxics data generated by the Department of Environmental Protection for Mill Pond above George H. Nichols Dam (also known as Al Site Pond). Elevated levels of mercury were detected in fish caught from this site. While the average mercury concentration for all Mill Pond fish above George H. Nichols Dam was within the Federal Food and Drug Administration Action Level of 1 mg/kg, the average mercury concentrations in largemouth bass exceeded that value. Mercury may accumulate in individuals who frequently eat fish contaminated with mercury thus leading to an increased risk of health effects. Fetuses and children are particularly sensitive to the effects mercury has on the nervous system. Because of health concerns associated with exposure to mercury, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health offers the following recommendations: RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Children under 12, pregnant women and nursing mothers should refrain from consuming any fish from Mill Pond above George HI Nichols Dam in order to prevent exposure of developing fetuses and young children to mercury. 2. The general public should refrain from consumption of largemouth bass caught from Mill Pond above George H. Nichols Dam. For more information, contact: Massachusetts Department Public Health/ Bureau of Environmental Health'Assessment (617) 727-7170 June 1994 WARNING MILL POND FISH (Above the George H. Nichols Dam) Fish Contaminated with Mercury Mothers Children under 12, Pregnant Women-and Nursing DO NOT EAT FISH All Other People: DO NOT EAT LARGEMOUTH BASS For More Information, contact: 617-727-7170 Massachusetts Department of Public Health: June 1994 ATTACHMENT E ~o6onzo0nw -morzac~aset William F. Wek 02// Governor Charles D. Baker Secretary Oavid H. Mulligan Commissioner PUBLIC HEALTH FISH CONSUMPTION ADVISORY: Factory Pond The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) has reviewed fish toxics data generated by the Department of Environmental Protection for Factory Pond. Elevated levels of mercury were detected in fish caught from Factory Pond. the The average mercury concentration for all Factory Pond fish sampled exceeds Federal Food and Drug Administration Action Level of 1 mg/kg. Mercury may accumulate in individuals who frequently eat fish contaminated with mercury thus leading to an increased risk of health effects. Fetuses and children are particularly sensitive to the effects mercury has on the nervous system. Because of health concerns associated with exposure to mercury, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health offeri the following recommendation: RECOMMENDATION The public should refrain from consumption of Factory Pond fish. For more information, contact: Massachusetts Department of Public Health/ Bureau of Environmental Health Assessment (617) 727-7170 June 24, 1994 Gn with Mercury Fish contaminated FISH DO NOT EAT 617--7277170 onta ic Health: More informaton.n Of Pub l For Department Massachusets I I FACTORY POND FISH Fish Contaminated with Mercury DO NOT EAT FISH For More Information, contact: Massachusetts Department of Public Health: 617-727-7170 une APPENDIX D Tier Classification 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT rOF ENVURONMENTAL PROTECT10N -kETS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTCTION Buicau of Wase Site Cleanup NUMERICAL RANKING SYSTEM SCORESNIEET (310 CM 401511) F DEPp ION CLA Ni DISPOSAL SITE SCORE Initial $obmina RIII IV V VI TOTAL .posa Ste ThrCtessiticadono WmEth Cauzry, (Ti"r i Only) J L) Jf c DISOSA,...... C. DISPOSAL SITE INFORMA TION VFD;.o. Sto dassided Ties I b1coas k isd vitbin the lxamdAie of a Zme 11or Initerin 0ion Am and gmmdaer Wellhead Yes. No. conutrai equal or ezcced RQ3W-1 Wthe time Mto 310 CMR 40.0520(2X.).? of Tier Q.ssificati. * Disas dussidad r I because n Im Minead i ptaea at i of Tier Clifii t to 310 CMR 40.0520(2.)()?1 Ye No de,the pain r and pmalrio. dprjiiyi-s. I han psodally cmnpld this Nwnoraj Raking Sysaa, Srtsbct, and hthe uorsion OSutied inis ota have penonaly euasifned and tn rao t4 ndiodng anyand aQ4oacments iCa'nnpying this subsicaL and (1) abesandamd of ar in 309 CMR inmy proftional opinio and judgmnat 4,02(1). (ii) tho a.$icble pov4sos of 309 CR 4.02() and (3). b a nay knowledgc. inaanti bif, ad (di) eN proviaion. of 309 CMR 4.03(5). to dis Sctnseet -a de.lqoad in acoran with the applicle a.. "h thai 'nt pc=ai peici. M c. 2IE and 31 Cd R l40.ocL includiag. but voi limited w. paribe * I'ment. if a ii inforans. -wd I know to a false. i 7av7' < Cornpany Name Telephpc. Number espotuiNe Parry. or Oher Perion who will provide cetificadon in azordanc with 3101 CIR 40.00CP. (Efect. 2/1/95)} 310 CNR - 1761 ii B T WF1 ' I0 17 [TX XRI I I ..... 310 CMR DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 40.1511 (Continued) D3. EXPOSURE PATHWAYS lI- EXPOSURE PATHWAYS Score according to 40J512 - EAposure Pathwy Designation Criia DESIGNATION MEDIA NONE or EVIDENCE OF POTENT1AL LIlKELY OR NOT CONTAMINATION EXPOSURE CONFIRMED APPUCA.BLE PATHWAY EXPOSURE PATHWAY A. SOIL (Indude. Sedmen) 0 Is 305 ISO B. GROUNDWATER 0 100 ISO C. SURFACE WATER (Includes Wetlands) 0 20 100 So D. AIR 15 100200 Noe: Som only the highest value for each media, i.e., score None or Not Apiable or Evidena of Coo-minaton or Potential Eposum Pathway or Likely or Cofined Exposure Pathway. 11. (A - D) Sunumary Radornoi for Secdon II A - D VaLa mad Phase I Repon Refereces N4.Aneof OHM SrCes f -rl 2/ 2i,3--,^ A. 1 //r B. C. D.E.TTA:(4<70 Ch9cif Si4 A/ V heies4tb / 4 roa 3I umS OHM SOURCES Nwnbet of OHM SourvcS SECTION!!1 SCORE (A. + B. ,C.. D. + E.) B. C. D. E. TOTAL (15 - 72) O~Chcrb.i Soaks VI hb r4 u"e Woamd the a r Ice thm Seios ofit NRS. /13/95 (Effective 2/1/95) 3 10 CMR - 1752 310 CMR: DEPARTMNT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 40.1511 (Continued) Ill. DISPOSAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS III.A. OHM TOXICITY SCORE Highest OHM Tosicity Score From Table 111A. or Worksheet 1114I.on Fo~lo.ing Pages. Tomiciy Scom (1 - 80) OHM Sored: Concoration and Modia : 1 z Af t III.B. MULTIPLE OHMs Mot Thn One OHM With an OHM Toicity Sore of k 30 No Yes 0 t3 III.C. OHM MOBILITY and PERSISTENCE Score according to 401514 - OHM Mobiliy and Persisence OHM Scored: Score (0 - 50) IH.D. DISPOSAL SITE HYDROGEOLOGY Score according so 402515 - Soil Permeability DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER SOIL PERMEABILITY (infeet) LOw Medimn High > 25 2 4 8 10.1-25 4 8 12 5.1- 102 12 16 0-5 12 20 SECTION III SCORE (A + B + C. D) A. B. C. D. TOTAL (3.- 180) 41 s a tI o e I / Check here if Sectio V] has been used to amend the score for this Section of teNRS. /13/95 (Effective 2/1/95) 3 10 CMR - 1753 310 CMR- DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION I 40.1511 (Continued) Table III.A. OHM TOXICITY SCORE I CONCENTRATION (soil/sediment g/g: urface/groundwauer pg/I) S9 100- 999 1.000 - 9.999 10.010 - 100.000 > 100.000 NAPL NAPL I _NAPL < 0.5' 0.5" - 12> 12' I ,iesr 25 35 45 55 6 5 75 I Camim30 40 50 Chbz 5 525 35 45 55 65 I C 2.304...... I W Chroamium VI 7 10 20 30 40 50 I Cyanide I.1Dilmehee 5 15 25 35 yhtrnenene 01000 450 0" 5 15 25 - 35 45 -N I 55 .65 ,CEthyene ola Oil'5 Gasoline (virgin produd) 10 20 I 30 40 50 60 70 Mercury //170 20 I 30 (4050 60 70 so Mcthyl Ethyl Ketone 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 I 1-D eh ortetyhe 120300 50 60 70 NickeEhenebrm 1 9 5 25 35 I 20 30 40 456 70 . 80 PAlHs 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 U ~i~i$zz$~LS&+N < 7N:K3Q2-N ~.4.7 0 40 50 60 70 g0 Tetrachloroehylene 10 20 140 1 4 50 60 70 -I____m2030 ______40 so 60 I 70 1.1,1 Trichloroethane L 5 5 I 25 1 35 45 55 ... 65 55.I 65 A45ezIw6- / A< Cswfd'nC 1/13/95 (Effeedve 2/1/95) 310 CMR - 1754 * 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVONMEWNTAL PROTECTION Ic I I- I: A I I 0 N / I P41/ 16 I I I /-3 I I I I Pe- /r I C I I I 1/13/95 (Effecdive 2/1/95) 310 CMR - 1755 I 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 40.1511 (Continued) Use Worktheet Ml/AJ. o detemine the OHJM Taxicity Score for OHkM not listed in Table 40 l1A. See .1513 for Hman Health-Based Toxicity VaLua for each OHM. Worksheet I A1 OHM TOXICITY SCORE CONCDTRA70N HUMAN HEALTH-BASED Use pglj for Soil ad pgfl for Surface Water and Grundwater TOXICITY VALUE 5 99 100-999 1,000 - 9.999 10.000- 100.000 > 100.000 NAPL NAPL NAPL < 0.5" 0.5' - 12" > 12" <5 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 5 319 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 20-29 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 30.-39 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 40-50 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 111A. OHM and Concenanions Used in Section lilA.l. OHM - Human Conceoion Concnmaia OHM HeaMh-Baed (Soil - pg/s) (Water - pgA) Toxicity Toxicity Value Score eCA /aZ )5C IFS . __ _ _ /3j rt t 0______ .>> A s--X //-/ a. _ _ _ I v 'a _ _ _ar_? _ _ r _ _ _ a ______ 1 /13/95 (Effective 2/1/95) 310 CMR - 1756 I 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 40.1511 (Continued) IV. HUMAN POPULATION AND LAND USES V.A. HUMAN POPULATION Resdential Popultion None 1.99 100-999 2:1.000 Within H Mile 0 5 10 I Institutions None One or Mom Within 500 feet 00 10 On-Site Workers None 1.99 100-999 21,000 0 5j5 IV.B. AQUIFERS Sale Source Aquifer No Yes Name- 25 Potentially Productive Aquifer No Mediun or High 0 IV.C - WATER USE Proximity of Disposal Site to Not Applicable (NA) Zone A Zone II. WPA. Or Public Drinking Water Supply Source SW Intake 5 400' 0 20 50 Persons Served by Public Drinking Water Supply NA 25 -.999 1,000 - 4.999 5.000 - 49,999 2 50.000 5 10 20 25 . Private Water Supplies Within 500 Feet None Commercial Agricutue Drinking Industrial Residential Food Processing (Not Ingetd) - 10 - 5 25 Alternative Public Water Supply Available Yes No (Viable Public Water Supply in Disposal Site Commwsity -- and Public Water Connection 5 500 Feet from Site) 0 25 SECTION IV SCORE (A + B+ C) A. B. C. TOTAL (0 -205) heck here if Section VI has been used to amend the score for this Section of the NRS. 1/13/95 (Effective 2/1/95) 310 CMR - 1757 310 CMR: DEPARTMENTOF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 1 40.1511 (Continued) V. ECOLOGICAL POPULATION i V.A. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE AREAS RESOURCE LOCATION Am of Critical Environectal Concern > 500' fomm Site 5 500' fron Site On-ie (0020 30 Species of Special Concer. > 500' [mm Site On-Sie or S 500' from Habitat Threatened or Endangered Species Habita0 Wetlands, Cerified Vernal Pool, or > 100' from Site 5 100' frm Site On-Sie Outstanding Resouroc Water 0 20 Fish Habits > 500' fron Site 5 500' front Site On-Site 0 20 Protcted Opent Space > 500' immu Site 5 500' front Site - On-Site ...... ns~nswc 0 20' SCORE SECTION V.B. ONLY IF SECTION V.A. SCORE IS Z 30. V.B. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICITY SCORE Highest Environnental Taxicity Score Fron Table V.B. or Worksheer V.B.1. on Following Pages. OHM Sored: Toxicity Score (I - 35) Concenttion and Medi7 (/ r / SECTION V. SCORE (A. + B.) A. B. TOTAL (0 - 185) ?c hso UO~eche if ectin VIhas bten wsed to amtend the sem for tis Section of the NRS.5 /13/95 (Effective 2//95) 3 10 CMR - 1758 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 540.1511 (Continued) J 1/39 1 7a- 6 (Effective 2/1/95) 310 CMR - 1759 U 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Table I V.D. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICITY SCORE g4) OHM CONCENTRATION (soiledimmt: p: surfaelroundwater I < 1 1-99 100 -999 1.000 -9.999 2 10.000 Vinyl Chlodrde * 5 10 20 225 XIyltV I 15 20 Zinc C 5 10 20 I * Score dejived by dfault mcthods 40.1516(2). I I I I I I U I I I I I I13/95 . (Effective 2/1/95) 310 CMR - 1760 I 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Usi Worjsh ee VS.!. to E40.1511 (Continued) determine Enimnmenal Toxicity Scornfor OHM at listed in Table V.D. See 40.1516for Enviromenal Taxicity Vdlws for each OHM. Worksheet V.B.1 ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICITY SCORE CONCENAI70N ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICITY VALUE Use pg/g for Soil and pg/I for Surface Water or Groundwaer < 1 1-99 100.999 1.000 - 9.900 .10.000 10 0 1 5 10 15 20. I 5 10 15 20 30 5 10 /f' 20 25 40 10 15 20 25 30 50 15 20 25 30 35 VS3.). OH M and Concen adons Used in Section VS.I. OHM Enviromtmul Contraion Concnrion Environmenta Toxicity Value (Soil - pg/g) (Wawer - pg/i) Toxicity Score C/S 1-2 ,CbeeOt 4. A~ e 3C2.tls-47. L. *1 2C~a~242Q Z (Effective 2/l/95) 310 CMR - 1762 310 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION a 40.1511 (Continued) VI. MITIGATING DISPOSAL SITE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS i VI. MITIGATING DISPOSAL SITE-SPECDIlC CONDITIONS Disposal site-specific conditions that wamnt amending the site scom. Changes directly related to NRS Sections or Subsection scores may not reduce the scom mor than the mevant subscuion value assigned for the disposal site in that subsection. Section VI must reference specific pages of the Phase Seaion VJ may I. not exceed ±50 Points and may be scored only in 5-point inrmmens. Attach additional pages as necessary. Score 'isposal Site Score Amendment (Not to Exceed SO5Points) 3/95 (Effecdve 2/1/95) 310 CMR - 1763 APPENDIX E Laboratory Data Reports U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET A307AL301 Contract: 97021 I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL. Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337695 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 96.9 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q0 M 7429-90 -5 Aluminum- NR 7440-36-0 Antimony_ NR 7440-38-2. Arsenic_ NR 7440-39-3 Barium- NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium NR 7440-70-2 Calcium_ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium_ NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt NR 7440-50-8 Copper NR 7439-89-6 IIron NR 7439-92-1 Lead- NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.03 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel_ NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium_ NR 7440-22-4 Silver_ NR 7440-23-5 Sodium_ NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 000014 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET A307AL601 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL_ Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 EMatrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 337690 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 88.5 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte ConcentrationIC Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ 3270 P- 7440-36-0 Antimony_ 0.77 P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 1.7 P 7440-39-3 Barium_ 37.0 P- 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.13 B P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium_ 0.03 U P 7440-70-2 Calcium_ 662 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium- 3.9 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt~ 2.6 B P_ 7440-50-8 Copper 7.4 P_ 7439-29-6 Iron 5890 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead_ 13.2 P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1230 P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 131 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.02 U CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 4.1 U P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 199 B P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium 0.27 P- 7440-22-4 Silver 0.23 U P 7440-23-5 Sodium___ 29.2 U U P_ 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.35 P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium 8.0 P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc 24.3 E P Cyanide__ NR IColor Before: BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: COARSE Color After: YELLOW _ Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2.1 000015 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. ORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE A307BL113 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL. Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCNVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337696 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 92.1 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum NR 7440-36-0 Antimony_ NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic__ NR 7440-39-3 Barium_ NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium__ NR 7440-70-2 Calcium__ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt__ NR 7440-50-8 Copper___ NR 7439-89-6 Iron NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium - NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury 0.05 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- NR 7440-09-7 Potassium - NR 7782-49-2 Selenium NR 7440-22-4 Silver_ NR 7440-23-5 Sodium_ NR 7440-28-0 Thallium._ NR 7440 62-2 Vanadium_ NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide _ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 000016 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 . EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET A307BL435 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL _ Contract: 97021 - I Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337694 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 73.8 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte |Concentration|C M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ 33900 7440-36-0 Antimony_ 0.60 P- 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 6.8 P 7440-39-3 Barium-- 35.8 P 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.58 P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium- 0.04 U P 7440-70-2 Calcium_ 2460 P 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 34.5 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ 6.0 P_ 7440-50-8 Copper_ 28.5 P_ 7439-.89-6 Iron_ 12600 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead_ 15.3 P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1750 P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 345 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.03 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel_ 6.0 P 7440-09-7 Potassium 365 P 7782-49-2 Selenium 0.56 P 7440-22-4 Silver_ 0.24 P_ 7440-23-5 Sodium_ -31.4 P_ 7440-28-0 Thallium- 0.41 7440-62-2 P_ Vanadium_ 27.7 P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 36.1 P Cyanide NR I Color Before: BROWN_ Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: YELLOW Clarity After: CLEAR_ Artifacts: YES Comments: STONES WERE PRESENTINTHESAMPLE. FORM I - IN ILMO2 .1 000017 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE A307WL213 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 I Matrix (soil/water): SOIL. Lab Sample ID: 337693 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 85.1 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ 11900 7440-36-0 Antimony 0.51 P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 2.0 P_ 7440-39-3 Barium- 350 P- 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.22 P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium_ 0.04 P 7440-70-2 Calcium- 2550 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium_ - 11.3 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ 4.6 P_ 7440-50-8 Copper 5.6 P_ 7439-'89-6 Iron_ 12100 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead- 11.9 P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1460 P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 117 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.34 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel_ 5.5 P_ 7440-09-7 Potassium 233 P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 0.66 P_ 7440-22-4 Silver_ 0.29 P_ 7440-23-5 Sodium_ 37.6 P- 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.45 P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 17.6 P 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 24.8 EB P Cyanide_ NR Color Before: 'BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: COARSE Color After: YELLOW Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: YES Comments: ROOTSWERE PRESENTIN_THESAMPLE. FORM I - IN LM02.01 000018 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE ASOAL601 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 I Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337709 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 94.7 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q IM 7429-90-5 Aluminum- NR 7440 36-0 Antimony_ NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic- NR 7440-39-3 Barium_ NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium- NR 7440-70-2 Calcium- NR 7440-47-3 Chromium_ NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt- NR 7440-50-8 Copper_ NR 7439-89-6 Iron_ NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.28 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium_ NR 7440-22-4 Silver- NR 7440-23-5 Sodium_ . NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ NR 7440-66-6 Zinc NR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2 . 000019 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE A80AL701 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337707 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 98-1 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ 3350 _ P_ 7440'-36-0 - Antimony_ 0.70 B P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 1.8 P_ 7440-39-3 Barium_ 30.3 P 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.12 B P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium 0.12 B P_ 7440-70-2 Calcium_ 576 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 6.7 _ P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ 3.0B P_ 7440-50-8 Copper 18.3 _ P_ 7439-89-6 Iron_ 7580 _ P_ 7439-92-1 Lead_ 56.4 _ P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1160 _ P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 123 _ P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.11 _ CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 5.6 P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 221 B P. 7782-49-2 Selenium 0.39 B P_ 7440-22-4 Silver_ 0.22 U p 7440-23-5 Sodium_ 28.8 U P 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.34 U P 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 10.9 _ P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 66.4 _ _ P Cyanide_ NR Color Before: BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: FINE Color After: YELLOW Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: YES Comments: SMALLSTONESWEREPRESENTINTHESAMPLE. FORM I - IN ILM022.1 000020 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET A8OBL113 Contract: 97021 I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL______Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337711 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 95.6 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration Q M 7429-90-5 Alumninum_ 3690 7440>36-0 Antimony_ 0.88 P- 7440-38-2 Arsenic 3.0 P- 7440-39-3 Barium_ 21.1 P 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.17 P 7440-43-9 Cadmium 0.04 P_ 7440-70-2 Calcium__ 433 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 5.6 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt- -2.3 P_ 7440-50-8 Copper_ 5.2 P_ 7439-89-6 Iron 6790 P_ 7439 92-1 Lead_ 5.0: P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1030 P 7439-96-5 Manganese 131 P 7439-97-6 Mercury 0.02 CVP_ 7440-02-0 Nickel- 3.6 P_ 7440-09-7 Potassium 713 P^ 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 0.27 P_ 7440-22-4 Silver 0.23 P_ 7440-23-5 Sodium_ 29.8 S P_ 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.35 P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium- 7.5 P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 23.8 PN Cyanide_ NR Color Before: BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: MEDIUM Color After: YELLOW Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: Comments: SMALLSTONESWEREPRESENT_ FORM I - IN ILMO2 . 1 000021 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE A80BL113D Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337712 Level (low/med): LOW_ Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 94.7 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ 5220 P_ 7440-36-0 Antimony_ 0.32 B P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 2.0 P_ 7440-39-3 Barium- 17.6 P_ 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.17 B P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium- 0.03 U P_ 7440-70-2 Calcium_ 434 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 6.8 P 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ 3.2 P 7440-50-8 Copper 5.9 P 7439-89-6 Iron_ 8600 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead_ 4.2 P 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1420 P 7439-96-5 Manganese 170 7439-97-6 Mercury 0.02 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 5.5 P_ 7440-09-7 Potassium 595 U P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium 0.24 U P_ 7440-22-4 Silver- 0.20 U P_ U 7440-23-5 Sodium- 26.1 P_ U 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.31 P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 8.9 P 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 24.3 E P Cyanide_ NR Color Before: BROWN_ Clarity Before: Texture: MEDIIU Color After: YELLOW_ Clarity After: CLEAR_ Artifacts: YES Comments: SMALLSTONES WEREPRESENTINTHESAMPLE. FORM I - IN ILMO2.1 000022 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET A80BL135 Contract: 97021 I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL_ Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water) : SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337708 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 85.5 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte |Concentration|C Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ NR 7440- 36-0 Antimony_ NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ NR 7440-39-3 Barium_ NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium__ NR 7440-70-2 Calcium NR 7440-47-3 Chromium' NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ NR 7440-50-8 Copper NR 7439 -89-6 Iron NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.02 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium- NR 7440-22-4 Silver_ NR 7440-23-5 Sodium NR 7440-28-0 Thallium NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 00002 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET A80BL413 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL_ Contract: 97021 ______ Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337710 ILevel (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 78.1 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum. NR 74402:-36-0 Antimony_ NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic NR 7440-39-3 Barium_ NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium_ NR 7440-70-2 Calcium_ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt- NR 7440-50-8 Copper_ NR 7439 -89- 6 Iron NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 4.1 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium_ NR 7440-22-4 Silver- NR 7440-23-5 Sodium_ NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2.1 21)0024 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE DPAL1412 Lab Name: ITS-ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 337687 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 94.8 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ 7440-36-0 Antimony_ NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ NR 7440-39-3 Barium- NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium- NR 7440-70-2 Calcium_ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium_ NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ NR 7440-50-8 Copper NR 7439-.89-6 Iron_ NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 1170 7440-02-0 Nickel- NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium_ NR 7440-22-4 Silver- NR 7440-23-5 Sodium NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium- NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_-_ NR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 00002C U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. II INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE DPAL1501 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337697 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 94.4 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q0 M 7429-90-5 Aluminum- NR 7440-36-0 Antimony_ NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ NR 7440-39-3 Barium- NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium- NR 7440-70-2 Calcium_ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium_ NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ NR 7440-50-8 Copper NR 7439-89-6 Iron_ NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 42.5 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel_ NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium_ NR 7440-22-4 Silver_ NR 7440-23-5 Sodium_ NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 000026 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET IDPAL1601 I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL_ Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337698 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 95.1 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ NR 7440136-0 Antimony- NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ NR 7440-39-3 Barium- NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium_ NR 7440-70-2 Calcium_ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium_ NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt- NR 7440-50-8 Copper NR 7439-89-6 Iron . NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 55.0 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium- NR 7440-22-4 Silver; NR 7440-23-5 Sodium NR 7440-28-0 Thallium NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2 .1 000027 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET DPAL6 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL_ Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337521 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/21/97 % Solids: 84.4 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ NR 7440-36-0 Antimony NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic__ NR 7440-39-3 Barium NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium__ NR 7440-70-2 Calcium__ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium- NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ NR 7440-50-8 Copper NR 7439-89-6 Iron_ NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury 83.7 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel_ NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium_ NR 7440-22-4 Silver__ NR 7440-23-5 Sodium NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ NR ||Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 0oo2S U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET DPAL6A01 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 I Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337689 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 93.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum 3720 P- 7440'36-0 Antimony_ 2.0 B P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic 1.6 P- 7440-39-3 Barium 9.9 B P_ 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.13 B P 7440-43-9 Cadmium 0.04 U 7440-70-2 Calcium 522 PP_ 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 5.4 7440-48-4 Cobalt 3.0 B P- 7440-50-8 Copper_ 75.7 P_P- 7439-89-6 Iron 6580 P_ 7439- 92- 1 Lead 190 _ P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1220 7439-96-5 Manganese 130 P- 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 44.4 _ CV 7440-02-0 Nickel 9.7 P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 277 B P 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 0.30 U 7440-22-4 Silver 0.25 U P 7440-23-5 Sodium 32.5 U P- 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.39 U P_P- 7440-62-2 Vanadium 8.4 7440-66-6 Zinc 21.5 -E- P_ Cyanide_ NR Color Before: BROWN_ Clarity Before: Texture: MEDIUM Color After: YELLOW Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: Comments FORM I - IN ILMO2 .1 C'02S U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET DPAL9 Contract: 97021 ______I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL_ Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 I Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337522 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/21/97 % Solids: 93.2 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte 1ConcentrationI C Q M 7429-.90-5 Aluminum_ 7440-36-0 Antimony_ NRl 7440-38-2 Arsenic__ NR 7440-39-3 Barium- NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium__ NR 7440-70-2 Calcium__ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium_ NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt- NR 7440-50-8 Copper_ NR 7439-89-6 Iron_ NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 31.0 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium- NR 7440-22-4 Silver NR 7440-23-5 Sodium_ NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ NR * Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2 .1 000030 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET DPBL12 Contract: 97021 I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL. Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337530 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/21/97 % Solids: 96.6 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte ConcentrationlIC M 7429-90- 5 Aluminum_ 2780 P 7440-236-0 Antimony_ 3.6 P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 1.4 P_ 7440-39-3 Barium 13.5 B P_ 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.12 B P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium_ 0.50 P_ 7440-70-2 Calcium- 439 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 3.7 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ 2.1 P_ 7440-50-8 Copper 753 P_ 7439- 89-6 Iron_ 5770 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead- 185 P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 980 P- 7439-96-5 Manganese 90.7 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 83.2 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 4.1 P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 222 B P- 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 0.29 U P_ 7440-22-4 Silver_ 0.24 U P- 7440-23-5 Sodium_ 31.3 U P- 7440-28-0 Thallium 0.37 U P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium' 6.8 P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 43.6 E- P_ Cyanide_ NR Color Before: -BROWN____ Clarity Before: Texture: MEDIUM. Color After: YELLOW_ Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 000031 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 - EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET DPBL6 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337524 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/21/97 % Solids: 85.3 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration -C Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum- 4850 P 7440-36-0 Antimony_ 3.7 B P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 2.0 P_ 7440-39-3 Barium_ 18.2 B P_ 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.16 B P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium- 0.04 U P_ 7440-70-2 Calcium~_ 1120 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 7.1 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ 5.4 P_ 7440-50-8 Copper 21.0 P_ 7439 '89-6 Iron_ 8830 P 7439-92-1 Lead_ 54.2 P 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1560 P- 7439-96-5 Manganese 185 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 85.2 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel_ 7.7 P_ 7440-09-7 Potassium 296 B P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 0.29 U P_ 7440-22-4 Silver 0.25 U P~ 7440-23-5 Sodium_ 31.8 U P- 7440-28-0 Thallium 0.38 U P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 13.3 P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 41.6 EB P~ Cyanide_ NR Color Before: -BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: MEDIUM Color After: YELLOW_ Clarity After: CLEAR_ Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2 .1 000032 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET DPWL4 I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 337529 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/21/97 % Solids: 95.5 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte IConcentrationlC[ Q M 7429,-90-5 Aluminum_ 3850 P 7440K36-0 Antimony 3.9 P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 1.6 P_ 7440-39-3 Barium- 10.4 B P_ 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.14: B P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium 0.03 U P_ 7440-70-2 Calcium_ 366 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 5.4 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt- 2.5 P~ 7440-50-8 Copper___ 182 7439-89-6 Iron 6750 P- 7439-92-1 Lead_ 191 P- 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1120 P- 7439-96-5 Manganese 98.3 7439-97-6 Mercury 314 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel 5.4 P 7440-09-7 Potassium 238 P- 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 0.23 P- 7440-22-4 Silver- 0.16 P- 7440-23-5 Sodium 21.1 P 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.25 P- 7440-62-2 Vanadium- 7.8 P 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 28.6 E P Cyanide_ NR Color Before: BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: COARSE Color After: ' YELLOW Clarity After: CLEAR_ Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 00O33 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE FIAL701 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL -Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 337700 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 97.3 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429-.90-5 Aluminum 4430 P- 7446:36-0 Antimony 4.5 B P 7440-38-2 Arsenic 1.6 P 7440-39-3 Barium 17.8 P- 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.09 B P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium 0.03 U P 7440-70-2 Calcium- 730 P- 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 5.8 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt 3.6 B P_ 7440-50-8 Copper 4.5 _ P_ 7439.-89-6 Iron-- 7640 _ P_ 7439-92-1 Lead- 11.8 P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1860 P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 208 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 4.6 _ CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 5.3 P_ 7440-09-7 Potassium 456 P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium- 0.33 B P_ 7440-22-4 Silver- 0.22 U P 7440-23-5 Sodium 28.3 U P 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.34 U P- 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 10.3 _ P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc 26.3 E P Cyanide_ _ NR Color Before: - BROWN_ Clarity Before: Texture: COARSE Color After: YELLOW Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2.1 000035 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET FIBL101 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL_ Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337703 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 97.3 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q0 M 7429.-90-5 Aluminum- NR 7440-36-0 Antimony_ NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic__ NR 7440-39-3 Barium- NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium__ NR 7440-70-2 Calcium__ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium_ NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ NR 7440-50-8 Copper NR 7439-89-6 Iron_ NR 7439-92-1 Lead- NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.32 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium_ NR 7440-22-4 Silver NR 7440-23-5 Sodium- NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2 .1 000036 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET FIBL135 I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENT'AL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337701 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 91.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : MG/KG CAS No. Analyte ConcentrationIC Q M 7429,-9 0-5 Aluminum- 3120 I! 7440-~36-0 Antimony_ 0.22 B ip 7440-38-2 Arsenic 1.1 P- 7440-39-3 Barium 14.3 B P- 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.12 B P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium_ 0.03 U P 7440-70-2 Calcium_ 614 P- 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 5.0 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ 2.2 P 7440-50-8 Copper 5.5 P_ 7439789-6 Iron- 6840 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead_ 4.8 P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1230 _ P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 158 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury 0.02 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 3.6 P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 359 U P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 0.25 P U 7440-22-4 Silver_ P~ 0.21 U 7440-23-5 Sodium_ 26.6 P U 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.32 U P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium- 6.2 P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 20.1 E P Cyanide_ NR Color Before: 'BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: COARSE Color After: YELLOW_ Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 000037 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET . I FI BL313I I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337702 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 97.4 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ NR 7446-36-0 Antimony NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic__ NR 7440-39-3 Barium_ NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium__ NR 7440-70-2 Calcium__ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium_ NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ NR 7440-50-8 Copper NR 7439-89-6 Iron_ NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.02 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium NR 7440-22-4 Silver NR 7440-23-5 Sodium_ NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 'NP 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FOM I - IN ILMO2. 1 C00038 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE FIWL201 I Lab Name: ITS-ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCRVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 337704 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 96.1 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ 6750 P~ 7440-36-0 Antimony_ 0.86 P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 2.5 P- 7440-39-3 Barium_ 22.4 P 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.16 P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium_ 0.04 P- 7440-70-2 Calcium_ 1460 P- 7440-47-3 Chromium 6.1 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt- 6.3 P 7440-50-8 Copper 10.1 P 7439- 89-6 Iron_ 11700 7439-92-1 Lead_ 15.5 P 7439-95-4 Magnesium 2780 P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 247 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury- 0.62 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel_ 7.1 P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 656 P- 7782-49-2 Selenium- 0.30 P 7440-22-4 Silver_ 0.25 P 7440-23-5 Sodium___ 32.1 P_ 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.38 'P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 16.3 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 36.8 E P Cyanide_ NR Color Before: BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: COARSE Color After: YELLOW Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: YES Comments: * ROOTSWERE PRESENTIN THESAMPLE FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 000039 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. ORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET FIWL201D Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 IMatrix (soil/water) : SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337705 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 - Solids: 96.4 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429,-90-5 Aluminum_ 6640 7440--36-0 Antimony_ 1.6 B P_P- 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 3.3 P_ 7440-39-3 Barium_ 22.9 P 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.20 B P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium_ 0.04 U P- 7440-70-2 Calcium_ 670 P 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 9.5 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ 5.6 P 7440-50-8 Copper 11.4 P_ 7439-.89-6 Iron_ 11600 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead- 19.4 P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 2130 P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 217 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury 0.68 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 8.7 P_ 7440-09-7 Potassium 446 B P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 0.31 B P_ 7440-22-4 Silver_~_ 0.24 U P 7440-23-5 Sodium_ 31.4 U P 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.37 U P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 16.8 P 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 32.5 E P Cyanide_ NR Color Before: - BROWN_ Clarity Before: Texture: COARSE Color After: YELLOW___ Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: YES Comments: ROOTSWEREPRESENTINTHESAMPLE. FORM T - IN ILMO2. 1 000040 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE WBAL1201 I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337692 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 83.6 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429,-90-5 Aluminum 6460 P_ 7440-36-0 Antimony 35.7 P- 7440-38-2 Arsenic 11.7 7440-39-3 Barium_ 1420 P_ 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.13 B P- 7440-43-9 Cadmium 11.2 P- 7440-70-2 Calcium 3880 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium 120 P 7440-48-4 Cobalt 8.0 P- 7440-50-8 Copper_ 650 P- 7439,- 89 - 6 Iron 39900 P- 7439-92-1 Lead- 1280 P- 7439-95-4 Magnesium 4280 P- 7439-96-5 Manganese 433 P- 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.97 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel 202 P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 693 P- 7782-49-2 Selenium- 8.8 P- 7440-22-4 Silver_~ 2.9 7440-23-5 Sodium 379 B P_P- 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.44 U P- 7440-62-2 Vanadium 17.4 7440-66-6 Zinc 3500 E P_ Cyanide__ NN Color Before: BROWN_ Clarity Before: Texture: COARSE Color After: YELLOW_ Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: YES Comments: ROOTSWEREPRESENTINTHESAMPLE. FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 000041 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE WBAL8 I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENT AL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/wat er) : SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337520 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/21/97 % Solids: 88.7 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429.-90-5 Aluminum_ NR 7440--36-0 Antimony_ _. NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic- NR 7440-39-3 Barium- NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium_ NR 7440-70-2 Calcium_ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium_ NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ NR 7440-50-8 Copper_ 0.0 NR 7439789-6 Iron NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- NR 7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium_ NR 7440-22-4 Silver_ NR 7440-23-5 Sodium_ NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2 .1 000042 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET WBAL8AO1 I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL, Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 337691 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Solids: 89.9 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q 74297 90-5 Aluminum_ 7440~-36-0 Antimony NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic__ NR 7440-39-3 Barium- NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium__ NR 7440-70-2 Calcium__ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium_ NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt- NR 7440-50-8 Copper NR 7439-89-6 Iron_ NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.02 U 7440-02-0 Nickel- NR 7440-09-7 Potassium N 7782-49-2 Selenium_ NR 7440-22-4 Silver_ NR 7440-23-5 Sodium NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2 - 1 000043 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE WBBL11I I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENT AL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337525 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/21/97 % Solids: 82.5 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ 8170 P 7440--36-0 Antimony_ 76.7 P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic- 45.9 P_ 7440-39-3 Barium 2510 P_ 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.02 P 7440-43-9 Cadmium_ 34.6 P 7440-70-2 Calcium_ 6990 P 7440-47-3 Chromium_- 43.6 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt- 7.9 P 7440-50-8 Copper 265 P 7439-,89-6 Iron 54900 P- 7439-92-1 Lead 2280 P 7439-95-4 Magnesium 2060 P 7439-96-5 Manganese' 585 P 7439-97-6 Mercury___ 0.89 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 36.5 P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 1100 P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 1.4 P_ 7440-22-4 Silver- 0.77 P 7440-23-5 Sodium 369 P 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.33 P 7440-62-2 Vanadium 17.9 P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc 2210 E P Cyanide_ NR Color Before: LBROWN_ Clarity Before: Texture: COARSE Color After: YELLOW__ Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2 .1 00004( U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE WBBL2 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL_ - Contract: 9.7021 Lab Code: INCRVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337526 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/21/97 % Solids: 90.1 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration IC Q M 7429,90-5 Aluminum_ 8080 P 7 4 4 0~-36-0 Antimony_ 0.51 P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 2.5 P 7440-39-3 Barium- 33.6 P- 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.22 P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium 0.04 U P- 7440-70-2 Calcium- 368 B P- 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 8.8 P 7440-48-4 Cobalt_~_ 4.3 P 7440-50-8 Copper 9.4 P- 7439 89-6 Iron 9860 P 7439-92-1 Lead_ 9.6 P- 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1440 P 7439-96-5 Manganese 167 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.03 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 5.7 P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 329 B P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 0.43 B P 7440-22-4 Silver~_ 0.23 U P~ 7440-23-5 Sodium_ 30.1 U P 7440-28-0 Thallium- 0.36 U P- 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 14.4 P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 21.6 E P Cyanide_ NR IColor Before: BROWN_ Clarity Before: Texture: COARSE Color After: YELLOW_ Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 000045 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. ORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL WBBL2 Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337532 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/21/97 % Solids: 88.9 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration Q M 7429,-90-5 Aluminum 4960 P 7440~-36-0 Antimony- 0.50 7440-38-2 P Arsenic_ 1.5 P |7440-39-3 Barium- 14.6 7440-41-7 P Beryllium 0.21 P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium- 0.04 7440-70-2 P- Calcium- 1050 P- 7440-47-3 Chromium 10.5 7440-48-4 P_ Cobalt___ 4.3 P_ 7440-50-8 Copper 9.7 7439-89-6 Iron_ P_ 6950 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead- 5.2 P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1650 7439-96-5 Manganese P_ 102 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.03 7440-02-0 Nickel- CV 6.1 P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 324 7782-49-2 P_ Selenium 0.35i 7440-22-4 Silver_ P- 0.29 P- 7440-23-5 Sodium 37.4 7440-28-0 P Thallium 0.45 7440-62-2 P Vanadium- 13.1 7440-66-6 Zinc_ P_ 20.9 E Cyanide_ P NI Color Before: BROWN_ Clarity Before: Texture: MEDIUM Color After: YELLOW_ Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: Comments: FORM I I - IN ILMO2.1 U 000046 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE WBBL6 I Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENT AL Contract: 97022 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337523 Level (low/med): LOW__ Date Received: 07/21/97 % Solids: 85.5 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration iC Q IM 7429.90-5 Aluminum_ NR 7440-36-0 Antimony_ NR 7440-38-2 Arsenic__ NR 7440-39-3 Barium- NR 7440-41-7 Beryllium NR 7440-43-9 Cadmium- NR 7440-70-2 Calcium__ NR 7440-47-3 Chromium_ NR 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ NR 7440-50-8 Copper .- NR 7439--89-6 Iron NR 7439-92-1 Lead_ NR 7439-95-4 Magnesium NR 7439-96-5 Manganese NR 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.11 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel_ NR 7440-09-7 Potassium | NR 7782-49-2 Selenium_ NR 7440-22-4 Silver_ NR 7440-23-5 Sodium_ NR 7440-28-0 Thallium_ NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium NR 7440-66-6 Zinc_ NR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: Color After: Clarity After: Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2 .1 00047 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET WBBL9 I Lab Name: ITS-ENVIRONMENTAL_ Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil'/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337531 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/21/97 i Solids: 76.5 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ 8720 7440-~36-0 Antimony_ 6.2 B P_ P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 6.3 P_ 7440-39-3 Barium_ 623 P_ 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.16 B P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium_ 115 P_ 7440-70-2 Calcium- 453 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium- 118 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ 5.0 P 7440-50-8 Copper 105 P_ 743989-6 Iron 24300 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead_ 807 P- 7439-95-4 Magnesium 2370 P 7439-96-5 Manganese 204 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.69 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 20.3 -B P_ 7440-09-7 Potassium 240 P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 0.86 P_ 7440-22-4 Silver_ 0.28 P_ 7440-23-5 Sodium 36.6 P 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 0.44, P 7440-62-2 Vanadium- 17.0 P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 271 PR Cyanide_ NR Color Before: *BROWN____ Clarity Before: Texture: COARSE Color After: YELLOW_ Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN TLMO2 .1 000048 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE EB71897 Lab Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: 337534 Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/21/97 % Solids: 0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : UG/L_ CAS No. Analyte Concentration Q M '7429-.90-5 Aluminum_ 36.8 P- 7440-36-0 Antimony_ 2.8 P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 3.6 P- 7440-39-3 Barium_ 11.5 - P 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.20 P 7440-43-9 Cadmium 0.40 P- 7440-70-2 Calcium_ 375 P- 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 27.1 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt_ 2.0 P- 7440-50-8 Copper 1.7 P- 7439 -89-6 Iron_ 25500 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead_ 2.0 P- 7439-95-4 Magnesium 114 P- 7439-96-5 Manganese 207 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.10 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel-- 31.3 P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 305, P- 7782-49-2 Selenium- 3.1 P_ 7440-22-4 Silver 2.6 P- 7440-23-5 Sodium_ 336 P- 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 4.0 P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 1.2 P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 5,6 P Cyanide_ NR Color Before: -COLORLESS Clarity Before: CLEAR Texture: Color After: COLORLESS Clarity After: CLEAR_ Artifacts: Comments: FORM I - IN ILMO2 .1 000034 FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - DPAL1412 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337687 Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: 0337687V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Moisture: not dec. 4 Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0 Soil Extract Volume: (UL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 75-71-8------Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.2 U 74-87-3------Chloromethane 5.2 U 75-01-4------Vinyl Chloride 5.2 U 74-83-9------Bromomethane 5.2 U 75-00-3------Chloroethane 5.2 U 75-69-4------Trichlorofluoromethane 5.2 U 76-13-1------Freon TF 5.2 U 75-35-4------1,1-Dichloroethene 5.2 U 67-64-1------Acetone 12 B 75-15-0------Carbon Disulfide 5.2 U 75-09-2-c------Methylene Chloride 5.2 U 156-60-5------trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.2 U 540-59-0------1,2-Dichloroethene (totalT 5.2 U 75-34-3------1,1-Dichloroethane 5.2 U 156-59-2------cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.2 U 78-93-3------2-Butanone 10 U 67-66-3------Chloroform 5.2 U 71-55-6------1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.2 U 56-23-5------Carbon Tetrachloride 5.2 U 71-43-2------Benzene 5.2 U 107-06-2------1,2-Dichloroethane 5.2 U 79-01-6------Trichloroethene 1.5 J 78-87-5------1,2-Dichloropropane 5.2 U 75-27-4------Bromodichloromethane 5.2 U 10061-01-5------cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.2 U 108-10-1------4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10 U 108-88-3------Toluene 5.2 U 10061-02-6------trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.2 U 79-00-5------1,1,2-Trichloroethane_ 5.2 U 127-18-4------Tetrachloroethene 5.2 U 591-78-6------2-Hexanone 10 U 124-48-1------Dibromochloromethane 5.2 U 108-90-7------Chlorobenzene 5.2 U FORM I VOA 000084 FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DPAL1412 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337687 Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: 0337687V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Moisture: not dec. 4 Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0 Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 100-41-4------Ethylbenzene 5.2 U 1330-20-7------Xylene (total) 5.2 U 100-42-5------Styrene 5.2 U 75-25-2------Bromoform 5.2 U 79-34-5------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.2 U FORM I VOA 000085 FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. VOLAJT ORGUICS ANALYSIS DATA SHE TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS DPAL1412 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337687 Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: 0337687V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Moisture: not dec. 4 Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0 Soil Extract Volume:_ (uL) Soil -Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: Number TICs found: 4 (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME EST. CONC. Q 1. UNKNOWN 15 J 2. UNKNOWN 16 J 3. UNKNOWN SILOXANE DERIVATIVE 6.9 J 4. 108-70-3 BENZENE, 1,3,5-TRICHLORO- S. 10 NJ 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. FORM I VOA-TIC 000086 FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DPAL1412RE Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab-Sample ID: -338687R1 Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: 0337687I2V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Moisture: not dec. 4 Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0 Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 75-71-8 ------Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.2 74-87-3------Chloromethane 5.2 75-01-4------Vinyl Chloride_ 5.2 74-83-9------Bromomethane 5.2 75-00-3 ------Chloroethane 5.2 75-69-4------Trichlorofluoromethane 5.2 76-13-1------Freon TF_ 5.2 75-35-4------1,1-Dichloroethene 5.2 67-64-1------Acetone_ 13 75-15-0------Carbon Disulfide 5.2 75-09-2------Methylene Chloride_ 5.2 156-60-5------trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene 5.2 540-59-0------1,2-Dichloroethene (totalT_ 5.2 75-34-3------1,1-Dichloroethane 5.2 156-59-2------cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.2 78-93-3------2-Butanone_ 10 67-66-3 ------Chloroform_ 5.2 71-55-6------1,1,1-Trichloroethane_ 5.2 56-23-5------Carbon Tetrachloride_ 5.2 71-43-2------Benzene_ 5.2 107-06-2------1,2-Dichloroethane 5.2 79-01-6------Trichloroethene 0.84 78-87-5------1,2-Dichloropropane 5.2 75-27-4------Bromodichloromethane 5.2 10061-01-5------cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 5.2 108-10-1------4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10 108'-88-3------Toluene 5.2 10061-02-6------trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene 5.2 79-00-5------1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5.2 127-18-4------Tetrachloroethene 5.2 591-78-6------2-Hexanone 10 124-48-1------Dibromochloromethane 5.2 108-90-7------Chlorobenzene_ 5.2 FORM I VOA 000087 FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - DPAL1412RE Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 338687R1 Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: 0337687I2V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received- 07/24/97 % Moisture: not dec. 4 Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0 Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil -Aliquot Volume: _ (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 100-41-4------Ethylbenzene_ 5.2 U 1330-20-7------Xylene (total) 5.2 U 100-42-5------Styrene . 5.2 U 75-25-2------Bromoform 5.2 U 79-34-5------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.2 U FORM I VOA 000088 FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS DPAL1412RE Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 338687R1 Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: 0337687I2V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Moisture: not dec. 4 Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0 Soil Extract Volume:_ (UL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: Number TICs found: 10 (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 1. UNKNOWN 3.09 41 J 2. UNKNOWN SILOXANE DERIVATIVE 16.51 10 J 3. UNKNOWN NAPHTHALENE DERIVATI 19.22 8.1 J 4. 108-70-3 BENZENE, 1,3,5-TRICHLORO- 19.65 8.8 NJ 5. UNKNOWN NAPHTHALENE DERIVATI 19.89 14 J 6. UNKNOWN ALIPHATIC COMPOUND 20.07 24 J- 7. UNKNOWN AROMATIC COMPOUND 20.35 15 J 8. UNKNOWN ALIPHATIC COMPOUND 20.64 27 J 9. UNKNOWN CYCLOALKANE 20.73 23 J - 10. UNKNOWN 21.00 6.3 J 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. - 29. 30. FORM I VOA-TIC 000089 FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DPAL1412 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337687 Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G Lab.File ID: Q337687S Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Moisture: 5 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Extracted:07/25/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 08/06/97 Injection Volume: 2.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y pH: CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 62-75-9 ------N-Nitrosodimethylaine 350 110-86-1------Pyridine 350 62-53-3------Aniline 840 108-95-2 ------Phenol_ 350 111-44-4 ------bis (2-Chloroethyl)Ether_ 350 95-57-8 ------2-Chlorophenol 350 541-73-1 ------1,3-Dichlorobenzene_ 350 106-46-7 ------1,4-Dichlorobenzene_ 350 95-50-1 ------1,2-Dichlorobenzene_ 350 100-51-6------Benzyl Alcohol_ 350 95-48-7 ------2-Methylphenol 350 108-60-1------2,2' -oxybis(i-Chloropropane) 350 106-44-5 ------4-Methylphenol 350 621-64-7 ------N-Nitroso-di -n-propylamine 350 67-72-1 ------Hexachloroethane 350 98-95-3 ------Nitrobenzene 350 78-59-1------Isophorone 350 88-75-5------2-Nitrophenol 350 105-67-9------2,4-Dimethylphenol_ 350 111-91-1 ------bis (2-Chloroethoxy)methane_ 350 65-85-0------Benzoic Acid_ 840 120-83-2 ------2,4 -Dichlorophenol_ 350 120-82-1 ------1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene 350 91-20-3 ------Naphthalene_ 350 106-47-8------4-Chloroaniline 350 87-68-3 ------Hexachlorobutadiene 350 59-50-7------4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 350 91-57-6 ------2 -Methylnaphthalene_ 350 77-47-4 ------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene_ 350 88-06-2------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol_ 350 95-95-4------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol_ 840 91-58-7 ------2-Chloronaphthalene 350 88-74-4 ------2-Nitroaniline 840 FORM I SV 000122 FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DPAL1412 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337687 Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: Q337687S Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Moisture: 5 decanted: (YIN) N Date Extracted:07/25/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 08/06/97 Injection Volume: 2.0(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (YIN) Y pH: CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 131-11-3 ------Dimethylphthalate 350 U 208-96-8 ------Acenaphthylene 350 U 606-20-2------2,6-Dinitrotoluene - 350 U 99-09-2------3-Nitroaniline 840 U 83-32-9------Acenaphthene 350 U 51-28-5 ------2,4-Dinitrophenol 840 U 132-64-9------Dibenzofuran 350 U 100-02-7------4-Nitrophenol 840 U 121-14-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 350 U 84-66-2------Diethylphthalate 350 U 86-73-7------Fluorene 350 U 7005-72-3 ------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether__ 350 U 100-01-6------4-Nitroaniline 840 U 534-52-1------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol._ 840 U 86-30-6------N-nitrosodiphenylamine_(1)_ 350 U 103-33-3------Azobenzene 350 U 101-55-3------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ 350 U 118-74-1------Hexachlorobenzene 350 U 87-86-5 ------Pentachlorophenol 840 U 85-01-8------Phenanthrene 350 U 120-12-7------Anthracene 350 U 86-74-8------Carbazole 350 U 84-74-2------Di-n-butylphthalate 350 U 206-44-0------Fluoranthene 350 U 92-87-5------Benzidine 840 U 129-00-0------Pyrene 350 U 85-68-7 ------Butylbenzylphthalate 350 U 56-55-3 ------Benzo(a)anthracene 350 U 91-94-1------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 350 U 218-01-9------Chrysene 350 U 117-81-7 ------bis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate_ 350 U 117-84-0------Di-n-octylphthalate 350 U 205-99-2 ------Benzo(b)fluoranthene 350 U (1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV 000123 FORM 1 SEMIVOLATILE ENSERC SAMPLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET NO. Lab Name: ITS DPAL1412 ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337687 Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: Q337687S Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Moisture: 5 decanted: (YIN) N Date Extracted:07/25/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 08/06/97 Injection Volume: 2.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 207-08-9 ------Benzo(k) fluoranthene_ 50-32-8------Benzo(a)pyrene_ 350 U 193-39-5------Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 350 U 53-70-3 ------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 350 U 191-24-2 ------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 350 U 350 U FORM I SV 000124 U FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET I TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS DPAL1412 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337687 Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: Q337687S Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/24/97 % Moisture: 5 decanted: (YIN) N Date Extracted:07/25/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 08/06/97 Injection Volume: 2.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) Y CONCENTRATION Number TICs UNITS: found: 5 (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 1. 123-42-2 2-PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-MET 5.66 2. UNKNOWN 4900 NAJB 3. 24.44 290 J UNKNOWN POLYTERPENE DERIVATI 24.85 4. UNKNOWN 300 J 26.69 360 5. UNKNOWN JB 6. 26.77 300 J 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. FORM I SV-TIC 000125 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. PESTICIDE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DPAL1412 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337687 Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: % Moisture: 5 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 07/24/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC Date Extracted:07/25/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10 (mL) Date Analyzed: 08/08/97 Injection Volume: 1.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (YIN) Y pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (YIN) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 319-84-6------alpha-BHC 1.8 U 319-85-7------beta-BHC 1.8 U 319-86-8------delta-BHC 1.8 U 58-89-9------gamma-BHC (Lindane) 1.8 76-44-8------Heptachlor U 1.8 U 309-00-2------Aldrin 1.8 U 1024-57-3------Heptachlor epoxide_ 1.8 U 959-98-8------Endosulfan I 1.8 60-57-12------Dieldrin U 3.6 U 72-55-9------4,4'-DDE 3.6 U 72-20-8------Endrin 3.6 U 33213-65-9------Endosulfan II .72-54-8------4,4'-DDD 3.6 U 3.6 U 1031-07-8------Endosulfan sulfate 3.6 50-29-3------4,4'-DDT_ U 13 72-43-5------Methoxychlor 53494-70-5------Endrin 18 U ketone_ 3.6 U 7421-36-3------Endrin aldehyde_ 12789-03-6------Chlordane 3.6 U 18 8001-35-2------Toxaphene U 12674-11-2------Aroclor-1016 180 U 11104-28-2------Aroclor-1221 18 U 1114-16-5------Aroclor-1232 18 U 53469-21-9------Aroclor-1242 18 U 18 12672-29-6------Aroclor-1248 U 11097-69-1------Aroclor-1254 18 U 11096-82-5------Aroclor-1260 29 P 18 U FORM I PEST 0001 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. EXPLOSIVES ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET A307WL235 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337688 Sample wt/vol: 2.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: % Moisture: 0 decanted: (Y/N) N Date: Received: 07/24/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) OTHER Date Extracted:07/28/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 20 (ml) Date Analyzed: 08/04/97 Injection Volume: 100.0 (UL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (YIN) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 2691-41-0 ------HMX 120 121-82-4 ------RDX 120 99-35-4------1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 120 99-65-0------1,3-Dinitrobenzene . 120 479,45-8------Tetryl 120 98-95-3 ------Nitrobenzene 120 118-96-7 ------2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 120 1946-51-0 ------4-Amino-2, 6-dinitrotoluene 120 35572-78-2------2-Amino-4, 6-dinitrotoluene 120 121-14-2 ------2,6-Dinitrotoluene_ 120 606-20-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 120 88-72-2------2-Nitrotoluene 120 99-99-0------4-Nitrotoluene 120 99-08-1------3-Nitrotoluene 120 FORM I EXPLOSIVES 000144 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. EXPLOSIVES ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET A80BL235 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337706 Sample wt/vol: 2.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: % Moisture: 0 .decanted: (YIN) N - 'Date Received: 07/24/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Soric) OTHER Date Extracted:07/28/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 20 (ml) Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 Injection Volume: 100.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N Sulfur Cleanup: (YIN) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 2691-41-0------HMX 120 U 121-82-4------RDX 120 U 99-35-4------1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 120 U 99-65-0------1,3-Dinitrobenzene_ 120 U 479-4-5-8------Tetryl 120 U 98-95-3------Nitrobenzene_ 120 U 118-96-7------2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 120 U 1946-51-0------4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene 120 U 35572-78z2------2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene 120 U 121-14-2 ------2,6-Dinitrotoluene_ 120 U 606-20-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 120 U 88-72-2------2-Nitrotoluene 120 U 99-99-0------4-Nitrotoluene 120 U 99-08-1------3-Nitrotoluene 120 U FORM I EXPLOSIVES 000145 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. EXPLOSIVES ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - DPAL14 12 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 D 1,1412 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337687 Sample wt/vol: 2.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: % Moisture: 0 decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 07/24/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) OTHER -Date Extracted:07/28/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 20(ml) Date Analyzed: 08/04/97 Injection Volume: 100.0(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) - UG/KG Q 2691-41-0------HMX 120 U 121-82-4------RDX 120 U 99-35-4------1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 120 U 99-65-0------1,3-Dinitrobenzene 120 U 479-45-8------Tetryl 120 U 98-95-3------Nitrobenzene _ 120 U 118-96-7------2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 120 U 1946-51-0------4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene 120 U 35572-78-2------2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene 120 U 121-14-2 ------2,6-Dinitrotoluene_ 120 U 606-20-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 120 U 88-72-2------2-Nitrotoluene 120 U 99-99-0------4-Nitrotoluene 120 U 99-08-1------3-Nitrotoluene 120 U FORM I EXPLOSIVES 000146 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. EXPLOSIVES ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - FIWL235 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Con tract: 97021 FIWL235 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337699 Sample wt/vol: 2.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: % Moisture: 0 . decanted: (Y/N) N Date Received: 07/24/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) OTHER Date Extracted:07/28/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 20(ml) Date Analyzed: 08/04/97 Injection Volume: 100.0(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 2691-41-0------HMX 120 U 121-82-4------RDX 120 U 99-35-4 ------1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 120 U 99-65-0------1,3-Dinitrobenzene 120 U 479-45-8------Tetryl 120 U 98-95-3------Nitrobenzene_ 120 U 118-96-7------2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 120 U 1946-51-0------4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene_ 120 U 35572-78-2------2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene 120 U 121-14-2------2,6-Dinitrotoluene 120 U 606-20-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 120 U 88-72-2------2-Nitrotoluene 120 U 99-99-0------4-Nitrotoluene - 120 U 99-08-1------3-Nitrotoluene 120 U FORM I EXPLOSIVES 000147 PORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. EXPLOSIVES ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET WBAL8AO1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : SDG No.: 65898 Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 337691 Sample wt/vol: 2.0 (9/mL) G Lab File ID: % Moisture: 0 decanted: (YIN) N Date Received: 07/24/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) OTHER Date Extracted:07/28/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 20 (ml) Date Analyzed: 08/04/97 Injection Volume: 100.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (YIN) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (YIN) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q 2691-41-0------HMX 120 121-82-4------RDX 120 99-35-4------1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 120 99-65-0------1,3-Dinitrobenzene 120 479-45-8------Tetryl 120 98-95-3------Nitrobenzene_ 120 118-96-7------2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene_ 120 1946-51-0------4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene 120 35572-7872------2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene 120 121-14-2------2,6-Dinitrotoluene 120 606-20-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 120 88-72-2------2-Nitrotoluene 120 99-99-0------4-Nitrotoluene 120 99-08-1------3-Nitrotoluene 120 =ORM1 I EXP LOSIVES 000148 55 South Park Drive Services Colchester. VT 05446 EnvironmentalIntertek Testing Laboratories Analytical Report Date 08/19/97 Foster Wheeler Environmental ETR Number 66008 470 Atlantic Avenue Project No.: 97021 Third Floor No. Samples: 7 Boston, MA 02210 Arrived 07/31/97 P.O. Number: 003288 Attention : Helen Douglas Page 1 Case:97021 SDG:66008 Site:Fireworks Standard analyses were performed in accordance with Methods for Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4/79-020, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, or Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. All results are in mg/t unless otherwise noted. Lab No./ Sample Description Method No. Parameter Result 353.2 Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen 338394 FIMW1:07/30/97 (Water) 0.59 338395 FIMW1D:07/30/97 (Water) 0.56 338396 80A-MW1:07/30/97 (Water) 0.08 338397 WBMW1:07/30/97 (Water) 0.02 338398 A307MW1:07/30/97 (Water) 0.01 338399 DPMW1:07/30/97 (Water) 0.41 I - / .1 'v-it Aquatec < Last Page > Submitted By t U"> Aquatec Inc. 000t100 55 South Park [Drive -(Cochesier. VT 15J -2Tel I: ..'-u55-1203 -802-655-1248 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. ORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET A307MW1 I Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 I Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 itrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: 338398 LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 Iel (low/med): Solids: 0.0 I Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L_ CAS No. Analyte Concentration Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum 1 77900 P 7440-36-0 Antimony_ 2.8 P- 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 11.6 P 7440-39-3 Barium- 2670 P 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.20 P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium 4.9 P- 7440-70-2 Calcium 136000 P 7440-47-3 Chromium 54.6 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt 83.7 P 7440-50-8 Copper_ 113 P_ 7439-89-'6 Iron_ 34100 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead_ 129 P 7439-95-4 Magnesium 27400 P 7439-96-5 Manganese 46400 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.28 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel 41.9 P- 7440-09-7 Potassium 40800 P 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 11.1 P 7440-22-4 Silver 2..6 P- 7440-23-5 Sodium 587000 P_ 7440-28-0 Thallium 4.0 P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 59.3 P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc- 97.1 P Cyanide_ NR Before: BROWN Clarity Before: CLOUDY Texture: After: YELLOW___ Clarity After: CLEAR_ Artifacts: rents FORM I - IN ILM02 .1 000010 U.S. EPA - CLP EPA SAMPLE NO. I1 INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET DPMW1 Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 I Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 338399 itrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: 07/31/97 I 1 (low/m ed): LOW Date Received: iolids: _0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L_ CAS No. Analyte ConcentrationIC Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ 2400 P 7440-36-0 Antimony_~ 3.0 B P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic 3.6 U P_ 7440-39-3 Barium 44.4 B P_ 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.20 U P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium 0.55 B P- 7440-70-2 Calcium 2080 B P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 4.8 B P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt 21.8 B P_ 7440-50-8 Copper 24.2 B P_ 7439-89-6 Iron 4240 P_ 7439-92-1 Lead- 35.8 P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 1290 P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 686 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 2.6 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 4.6 P_ 7440-09-7 Potassium 2440 B P- 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 3.1 B P 7440-22-4 Silver 2..6 U P 7440-23-5 Sodium 2260 B P 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 4.0 U 'P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 5.7 B P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc 19.6 B 'P_ Cyanide NR olor Before: COLORLESS Clarity Before: CLEAR Texture: for After: YELLOW___ Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts: rents: FORM I - IN ILM02. 1 000011 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET FIMW1 I Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL_ Contract: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 I Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 atrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: 338394 LOW__ Date Received: 07/31/97 Iel (low/med): Solids: 0.0 I Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L_ CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q0 M Aluminum_ 13900 7429-90-5 P_ 7440-36-0 Antimony_ 2.8 U P_ 7440-38-2 Arsenic_ 39.4 P_ 7440-39-3 Barium- 184 B P 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.20 U P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium 0.40 U P- 7440-70-2 Calcium 11400 P- 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 16.6 _ P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt 42.3 B P- 7440-50-8 Copper- 14.3 B P- 7439- 89-6 Iron - 44400 _ P_ 7439-92-1 Lead_ 14.4 7439-95-4 Magnesium 5110 _ P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 3550 _ P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.42 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 33.4 B P_ 7440-09-7 Potassium 4550 B P 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 5.7 _ 'P- 7440-22-4 Silver 2.6 U 'P 7440-23-5 Sodium 15700 P_ 7440-28-0 Thallium_ 4.0 U P 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 38.5 B P 7440-66-6 Zinc- 47.6 _ P_ Cyanide_ NR olor Before: BROWN_ Clarity Before: CLOUDY Texture: Ior After: YELLOW_ Clarity After: CLEAR_ Artifacts: tments: FORM I - IN ILMO2. 1 000012 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET FIMW1D U Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 66008 ICode: INCHVT Case No.: 97021_ SAS No.: SDG No.: itrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: 338395 1 (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 lids: Conc 0.0 entration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L_ CAS No. Analyte Concentration C Q M Aluminum_ 2770 _ 7429-90-S P_ Antimony_ 2.8 U 7440-36-0 P_ Arsenic 3.6 U 7440-38-2 P_ Barium- 131 B 7440-39-3 P_ 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.20 U 0.40 U P 7440-43-9 Cadmium P_ Calcium 11100 7440-70-2 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 5.1 B 34.7 B P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt P_ 7440-50-8 Copper_ 11.1 B 7439-89-6 Iron 13600 _ P_ 7439-92-1 Lead- 9.6 _ P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 3830 B P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 2780 _ P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.53 _ 29.7 P_ 7440-02-0 Nickel- B P_CV 7440-09-7 Potassium 2270 B P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 3.7 B P_ 7440-22-4 Silver 2.6 U P 7440-23-5 Sodium 15500 P 7440-28-0 Thallium 4.0 U P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 6.1 B P- 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 27.2 _ P_ Cyanide NR Before: BROWN_ Clarity Before: CLOUDY Texture: After: YELLOW_ Clarity After: CLEAR_ Artifacts: Tments: FORM I - IN ILM02 .1 000013 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. ORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEE WBMW1 t Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL_ Contract: 97021 IjCode: INCHVT Case No.:.97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 itrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: 338397 11 (low/med): LOW__ Date Received: 07/31/97 0.0 t lids: Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L_ CAS No. Analyte Concentration Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum 2080 P~ 7440-36-0 Antimony_ 2.8 P 7440-38-2 Arsenic 3.6 P 7440-39-3 Barium- 74.2 P 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.20 P 7440-43-9 Cadmium 5.5 P 7440-70-2 Calcium 5370 P 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 5.2 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt- 7.4 P 7440-50-8 Copper_ 16.5 P_- 7439-89-6 Iron- 2510 P- 7439-92-1 Lead_ 29.1 P_ 7439-95-4 Magnesium 6190 P_ 7439-96-5 Manganese 1370 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.15 B CV 7440-02-0 Nickel 4.5 B P 7440-09-7 Potassium 2150 B P 7782-49-2 Selenium 4.4 B P 7440-22-4 Silver 2.6 U' P 7440-23-5 Sodium 5360 P 7440-28-0 Thallium 4 .0 U P 7440-62-2 Vanadium_ 5.0 B P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 18.5 B P Cyanide__ NR Before: BROWN____ Clarity Before: CLOUDY Texture: After: YELLOW_ Clarity After: CLEAR_ Artifacts: ents: FORM I - IN ILMG2 .1 000014 U.S. EPA - CLP 1 EPA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET 80A-MW1 1 Name: ITSENVIRONMENTAL_ Contract: 97021 | SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 I Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 atrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: 338396 1 (low/m ed): LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 olids: _0.0 Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L_ CAS No. Analyte |ConcentrationIC Q M 7429-90-5 Aluminum_ 81801- P_ 7440-36-0 Antimony_ 2.8 UI P- 7440-38-2 Arsenic 3.6 U P- 7440-39-3 Barium- 360 P_ 7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.20 U P_ 7440-43-9 Cadmium 1.3 B P_ 7440-70-2 Calcium- 9450 P_ 7440-47-3 Chromium_ 9.3 P_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt 51.9 P_ 7440-50-8 Copper 45.4 P_ 7439-89-'6 Iron- 8240 P- 7439-92-1 Lead_ 30.7 P 7439-95-4 Magnesium 3660 P 7439-96-5 Manganese 11400 P_ 7439-97-6 Mercury_ 0.29 CV 7440-02-0 Nickel- 32.2 B P 7440-09-7 Potassium 3600 B P_ 7782-49-2 Selenium_ 5.1 P_ 7440-22-4 Silver- 2.6 U 7440-23-5 Sodium 7400 P_ 7440-28-0 Thallium 4.0 U P_ 7440-62-2 Vanadium- 5.5 B P_ 7440-66-6 Zinc_ 169 P_ Cyanide NRP olor Before: BROWN____ Clarity Before: CLOUDY Texture: jor After: YELLOW___ Clarity After: CLEAR_ Artifacts: rents: FORM I - IN ILMO2 .1 000015 EPA SAMPLE NO. 1A VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET FIMW1 97021 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: SDG No.: 66008 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: Lab Sample ID: 338394 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab File ID: L338394DV Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Date Received: 07/31/97 Level: (low/med) LOW Analyzed: 08/13/97 % Moisture: not dec. - Date Dilution Factor: 13.3 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) Soil Extract Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q U ------Dichlorodifluoromethane 13 75-71-8- 13 U 74-87-3------Chloromethane 13 U 75-01-4------Vinyl Chloride 13 U 74-83-9------Bromomethane 13 U 75-00-3------Chloroethane 13 U 75-69-4------Trichlorofluoromethane_ 25 76-13-1------Freon TF 13 U 75-35-4------1,1-Dichloroethene 67 U 67-64-1------Acetone 13 U 75-15-0 ------Carbon Disulfide 13 U 75-09-2------Methylene Chloride 13 U 156-60-5------trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.1 J 540-59-0------1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 13 U 75-34-3------1,1-Dichloroethane 6.9 J 156-59-2------cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 78-93-3------2-Butanone 67 U 13 67-66-3------Chloroform U 13 J 71-55-6------1,1,1-Trichloroethane 13 U 56-23-5------Carbon Tetrachloride 13 U 71-43-2------Benzene 13 107-06-2------1,2-Dichloroethane U 280 79-01-6------Trichloroethene 13 U 78-87-5------1,2-Dichloropropane 13 U 75-27-4------Bromodichloromethane U 10061-01-S------cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 13 67 U 108-10-1------4-Methyl-2-pentanone 13 U 108-88-3------Toluene 13 U 10061-02-6------trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 13 U 79-00-5------1,1,2-Trichloroethane 13 U 127-18-4------Tetrachloroethene 67 U 591-78-6------2-Hexanone 13 U 124-48-1------Dibromochloromethane 108-90-7------Chlorobenzene 13 U FORM I VOA 3/90 000037 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS )ATA SHEET FI MWl FIMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Cor tract: 97021 No.: 66008 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG ID: 338394 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample L338394DV Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 07/31/97 Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: % Moisture: not dec. -- Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 13.3 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: ( uL) Soil Extract Volume: (UL) Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 100-41-4------Ethylbenzene 13 U 1330-20-7------Xylene (total) 13 U 100-42-5------Styrene 13 U 75-25-2------Bromoform 13 U 79-34-5------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane- 13 U FORM I VOA 3/90 000038 1 E EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS TENTATIVELY FIMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338394 ML, Lab File ID: L338394DV I Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 I% Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 Factor: 13.3 I GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Soil Extract Volume: (UL) Soil Aliquot Volume: _ (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: I Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/L CAS NUMBER- COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. - 19. 20. 21.- 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 000039 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA ,SHEET FIMW1D Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338395 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338395DV Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: not dec. - -Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 13.3 Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 75-71-8------Dichlorodifluoromethane 13 U 74-87-3------Chloromethane 13 U 75-01-4------Vinyl Chloride_ 13 U 74-83-9------Bromomethane 13 U 75-00-3------Chloroethane 13 U 75-69-4------Trichlorofluoromethane 13 U 76-13-1------Freon TF 24 75-35-4------1,1-Dichloroethene_ 13 U 67-64-1------Acetone_ 67 U 75-15-0------Carbon Disulfide 13 U 75-09-2------Methylene Chloride_ 13 U 156-60-5 ------trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 13 U 540-59-0------1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 6.6 J 75-34-3------1,1-Dichloroethane 13 U 156-59-2------cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 6.4 J 78-93-3------2-Butanone 67 U 67-66-3------Chloroform_ 13 U 71-55-6------1,1,1-Trichloroethane_ 12 J 56-23-5------Carbon Tetrachloride. 13: U 71-43-2------Benzene_ 13 U 107-06-2------1,2-Dichloroethane_ 13 U 79-01-6------Trichloroethene 280 78-87-5------1,2-Dichloropropane 13 U 75-27-4------Bromodichloromethane 13 U 10061-01-5------cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 13 U 108-10-1------4-Methyl-2-pentanone 67 U 108-88-3------Toluene 13 U 10061-02-6------trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_ 13 U 79-00-5------1,1,2-Trichloroethane_ 13 U 127-18-4------Tetrachloroethene 13 U 591-78-6------2-Hexanone 67 U 124-48-1------Dibromochloromethane 13 U 108-90-7------Chlorobenzene 13 U FORM I VOA 3/90 000040 NO. 1A EPA SAMPLE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET FIMW1D 97021 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: No. : SDG No.: 66008 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No. : 97021 SAS Lab Sample ID: 338395 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab File ID: L338395DV Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Date Received: 07/31/97 Level: (low/med) LOW Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 % Moisture: not dec. Dilution Factor: 13.3 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) Soil Extract Volume: (uL) " CONCENTRATION UNITS: ug/Kg) UG/L Q CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or 13 U 100-41-4------Ethylbenzene (total) 13 U 1330-20-7------Xylene 13 U 100-42-5------Styrene 13 U 75-25-2------Bromoform 13 U 79-34-5------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane FORM I VOA 3/90 000041 1E EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS FIMW1D . Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 66008 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: - SDG No.: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338395 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338395DV Level: (low/med) LOW . Date Received: 07/31/97 08/13/97 % Moisture: not dec Date Analyzed: 13.3 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: Volume: (UL) Soil Extract Volume:_ (UL) Soil Aliquot CONCENTRATION UNITS: Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/L CONC. Q CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25.- 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 000042 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET F'IMW1DRE FIMW1DRE Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338395R1 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338395D2V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 08/18/97 % Moisture: not dec. - Date Analyzed: 08/18/97 13.3 Column: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/L Q 75-71-8------Dichlorodifluoromethane 13 U 74-87-3------Chloromethane 13 U 75-01-4------Vinyl Chloride 13 U 74-83-9------Bromomethane 13 U 75-00-3------Chloroethane 13 U 75-69-4------Trichlorofluoromethane 13 U 76-13-1------Freon TF 22 75-35-4------1,1-Dichloroethene 13 U 67-64-1------Acetone 67 U 75-15-0------Carbon Disulfide 13 U 75-09-2------Methylene Chloride 13 U 156-60-5------trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 13 U 540-59-0------1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 7 J 75-34-3------1,1-Dichloroethane 13 U 156-59-2------cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7 J 78-93-3------2-Butanone 67 U 67-66-3------Chloroform 13 U 71-55-6------1,1,1-Trichloroethane 13 J 56-23-5------Carbon Tetrachloride 13 U 71-43-2------Benzene 13 U 107-06-2------1,2-Dichloroethane ._13 U 79-01-6------Trichloroethene 260 78-87-5------1,2-Dichloropropane 13 U 75-27-4 ------Bromodichloromethane 13 U 10061-01-5 ------cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 13 U 108-10-1------4-Methyl-2-pentanone 67 U 108-88-3------Toluene 13 U 10061-02-6------trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 13 U 79-00-5------1,1,2-Trichloroethane 13 U 127-18-4------Tetrachloroethene 13 U 591-78-6------2-Hexanone 67 U 124-48-1------Dibromochloromethane 13 U 108-90-7------Chlorobenzene 13 U 100-41-4------Ethylbenzene 13 U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. 000043 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET FIMW1DRE Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338395R1 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338395D2V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 08/18/97 % Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed:. 08/18/97 Column: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 13.3 CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/L Q 1330-20-7------Xylene (total) 13 U 100-42-5------Styrene 13 U 75-25-2------Bromoform 13, U 79-34-5------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 13, U FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev. 000044 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET 80A-MW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338396 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338396DV Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 22.0 Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (UL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 75-71-8------Dichlorodifluoromethane 22 U 74-87-3------Chloromethane 22 U 75-01-4------Vinyl Chloride_ 22 U 74-83-9------Bromomethane 22 U 75-00-3------Chloroethane 22 U 75-69-4------Trichlorofluoromethane 22 U 76-13-1------Freon TF 440 75-35-4------1,1-Dichloroethene- _ 22 U 67-64-1------Acetone_ 110 U 75-15-0------Carbon Disulfide 22 U 75-09-2------Methylene Chloride_ 22 U 156-60-5------trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 22 U 540-59-0------1,2-Dichloroethene (total-) 22 U 75-34-3------1,1-Dichloroethane_ 22 U 156-59-2------cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 22 U 78-93-3------2-Butanone_ 110 U 67-66-3------Chloroform 22 U 71-55-6------1,1,1-Trichloroethane_ 19 J 56-23-5------Carbon Tetrachloride.- 22 U 71-43-2------Benzene_ 22 U 107-06-2------1,2-Dichloroethane_ 22 U 79-01-6------Trichloroethene_ 26 78-87-5------1,2-Dichloropropane_ 22 U 75-27-4------Bromodichloromethane 22 U 10061-01-5------cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 22 U 108-10-1------4-Methyl-2-pentanone 110 U 108-88-3------Toluene 22 U 10061-02-6------trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 22 U 79-00-5------1,1,2-Trichloroethane 22 U 127-18-4------Tetrachloroethene 22 U 591-78-6------2-Hexanone 110 U 124-48-1------Dibromochloromethane 22 U 108-90-7------Chlorobenzene 22 U FORM I VOA 3/90 ngxfA C 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET 80A-MW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 SDG No.: 66008 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No. : 97021 SAS No. : ID: 338396 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample File ID: L338396DV Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab 07/31/97 Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 08/13/97 % Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: 22.0 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Aliquot Volume: (uL) Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil CONCENTRATION UNITS: UG/L - Q CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) 22 U 100-41-4------Ethylbenzene (total) 22 U 1330-20-7------Xylene 22 U 100-42-5------Styrene 22 U 75-25-2------Bromoform 22 U 79-34-5------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ FORM I VOA 3/90 000046 1E EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 80A-MW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No. : 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338396 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338396DV Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 * Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 22.0 Soil Extract Volume:_ (UL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 1======- ====== 1. ______2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. . 14. 15. 16. . 17. 18. - 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. FORM I VOA-TTC 3/90 0 000047r 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET 80A-MW1RE Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338996R1 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338396D2V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 08/18/97 * Moisture: not dec. - Date Analyzed: 08/18/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 22.0 Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 75-71-84------Dichlorodifluoromethane 22 U 74-87-3------Chloromethane 22 U 75-01-4------Vinyl Chloride 22 U 74-83-9------Bromomethane 22 U 75-00-3------Chloroethane 22 U 75-69-4------Trichlorofluoromethane 22 U 76-13-1------Freon TF 330 75-35-4------1, 1-Dichloroethene 22 U 67-64-1------Acetone 110 U 75-15-0------Carbon Disulfide 22 U 75-09-2------Methylene Chloride 22 U 156-60-5------trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 22 U 540-59-0------1,2-Dichloroethene (total) 22 U 75-34-3------1,1-Dichloroethane 22 U 156-59-2------cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 22 U 78-93-3------2-Butanone 110 U 67-66-3------Chloroform 22 U 71-55-6------1,1,1-Trichloroethane 18 J 56-23-5------Carbon Tetrachloride-. 22 U 71-43-2------Benzene 22 U 107-06-2------1,2-Dichloroethane 22 U 79-01-6------Trichloroethene 22 78-87-5------1,2-Dichloropropane 22 U 75-27-4------Bromodichloromethane 22 U 10061-01-5------cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 22 U 108-10-1------4-Methyl-2-pentanone 110 U 108-88-3------Toluene 22 U 10061-02-6------trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 22 U 79-00-5------1,1,2-Trichloroethane_ 22 U 127-18-4------Tetrachloroethene 22 U 591-78-6------2-Hexanone 110 U 124-48-1------Dibromochloromethane 22 U 108-90-7------Chlorobenzene 22 U FORM I VOA 3/90 000048 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET 80A-MW1RE Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 SDG No.: 66008 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : Sample ID: 338996R1 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab File ID: L338396D2V Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab Received: 08/18/97 Level: (low/med) LOW Date Date Analyzed: 08/18/97 % Moisture: not dec. Factor: 22.0 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Volume: (UL) Soil Extract Volume: (UL) Soil Aliquot CONCENTRATION UNITS: UG/L CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) Q.. .22 U 100-41-4'------Ethylbenzene 22 U 1330-20-7------Xylene (total) 100-42-5------Styrene 22 U 22 U 75-25-2------Bromoform 79-34-5------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 22 U FORM I VOA 3/90 000049 1E EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 80A-MW1RE Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338996R1 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338396D2V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 08/18/97 % Moisture: not dec. -- Date Analyzed: 08/18/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 22.0 Soil Extract Volume:_ (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. - 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. - 29. 30. FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 000050 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET WBMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 _ ___ Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338397 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338397DV Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 08/13/97 % Moisture: not dec. - Date Analyzed: GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 220.0 (uL) Soil Extract Volume:_ - (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 75-71-8------Dichlorodifluoromethane 220 U 74-87-3------Chloromethane 220 U 75-01-4------Vinyl Chloride 220 U 74-83-9------Bromomethane 220 U 75-00-3------Chloroethane 220 U 75-69-4------Trichlorofluoromethane .220 U 76-13-1------Freon TF 5500 75-35-4------1,1-Dichloroethene 220 U 67-64-1------Acetone 1100 U 75-15-0------Carbon Disulfide 220 U 75-09-2------Methylene Chloride _ 220 U 156-60-5------trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 220 U 540-59-0------1,2-Dichloroethene (totalT 220 U 75-34-3------1,1-Dichloroethane 220 U 156-59-2------cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 220 U 78-93-3------2-Butanone 1100 U 67-66-3------Chloroform 220 U 71-55-6------1,1,1-Trichloroethane 220 U 56-23-5------Carbon Tetrachloride- 220 U 71-43-2------Benzene 220 U 107-06-2------1,2-Dichloroethane 220 U 79-01-6------Trichloroethene 220 U 78-87-5------1,2-Dichloropropane 220 U 75-27-4------Bromodichloromethane 220 U 10061-01-5------cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 220 U 108-10-1------4-Methyl-2-pentanone 1100 U 108-88-3------Toluene 220 U 10061-02-6------trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 220 U 79-00-5------1,1,2-Trichloroethane 220 U 127-18-4------Tetrachloroethene 220 U 591-78-6------2-Hexanone 1100 U 124-48-1------Dibromochloromethane 220 U 108-90-7------Chlorobenzene 220 U FORM I VOA 3/90 000051 SAMPLE NO. I 1A EPA VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS )ATA SHEET - . WBMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Cortract: 97021 WBMW1 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338397 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338397DV Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: not dec. -- Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 220.0 Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: ( uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 100-41-4------Ethylbenzene 220 U 1330-20-7------Xylene (total) 220 U 100-42-5------Styrene 220 U 75-25-2------Bromoform 220 U 79-34-5------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___ 220 U FORM I VOA 3/90 000052 1E EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS WBMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338397 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338397DV Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 220.0 Soil Extract Volume:_ (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 1. ______2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. - 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. - 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 000053 1A - EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET A307MW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 A307MW1 I Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338398 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338398DV Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: not dec. - Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 2.8 Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: _(uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 75-71-8------Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.8 U 74-87-3------Chloromethane 2.8 U 75-01-4------Vinyl Chloride 2.8 U 2.8 U Bromomethane I74-83-~9------75-00-3------Chloroethane 2.8 U 75-69-4 ------Trichlorofluoromethane 2.8 U 76-13-1------Freon TF 1.5 J 75-35-4------1,1-Dichloroethene 2.8 U 67-64-1------Acetone 14 U 75-15-0---r------Carbon Disulfide 2.8 U 75-09-2------Methylene Chloride 2.8 U 156-60-5------trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.8 U 540-59-0------1,2-Dichloroethene (total)_ 14 75-34-3------1,1-Dichloroethane 2.8 U 156-59-2------cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 14 78-93-3------2-Butanone 14 U 67-66-3------Chloroform 2.8 U 71-55-6------1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.8 U 56-23-5------Carbon Tetrachloride 2.8 U 71-43-2------Benzene 2.8 U 107-06-2------1,2-Dichloroethane 2.8 U 79-01-6------Trichloroethene .60 78-87-5------1,2-Dichloropropane 2.8 U 75-27-4------Bromodichloromethane 2.8 U 10061-01-5------cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.8 U 108-10-1------4-Methyl-2-pentanone 14 U 108-88-3------Toluene 2.8 U 10061-02-6------trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.8 U 79-00-5------1,1,2-Trichloroethane_ 2.8 U 127-18-4------Tetrachloroethene 2.8 U 591-78-6------2-Hexanone 14 U 124-48-1------Dibromochloromethane 2.8 U 108-90-7------Chlorobenzene 2.8 U FORM I VOA 3/90 000054 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET A307MW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 No. : 66008 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : SDG 338398 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 'L338398DV Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: -07/31/97 Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 08/13/97 % Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: Factor: 2.8 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Volume: (uL) Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot CONCENTRATION UNITS: UG/L CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) Q 100-41-4------Ethylbenzene 2.8 U (total) . 2.8 U 1330-20-7------Xylene U 100-42-5------Styrene 2.8 2.8 U 75-25-2------Bromoform U 79-34-5------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8 FORM I VOA 3/90 000055 I 1E EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS A307MW1 . Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338398 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338398DV Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 2.8 Soil Extract Volume:- (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: ___ (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 1. ______2. 3. 4. ______ 5. ______6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90 000056 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DPMW1 DPMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338399 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338399V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: not dec. - Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 I GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0 Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 75-71-8------Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 U 74-87-3------Chloromethane 1.0 U 75-01-4 ------Vinyl Chloride 1.0 U 74-83-9------Bromomethane 1.0 U 75-00-3------Chloroethane 1.0 U 75-69-4------Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 U 76-13-1------Freon TF 1.0 U 75-35-4------1,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 U 67-64-1------Acetone 5.0 U 75-15-0------Carbon Disulfide 1.0 U 75-09-2------Methylene Chloride 1.0 U 156-60-5------trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 U 540-59-0------1,2-Dichloroethene (total) . 1.0 U 75-34-3------1,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 U 156-59-2------cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 U 78-93-3------2-Butanone 5.0 U 67-66-3------Chloroform 1.0 U 71-55-6------1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 U 56-23-5------Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 U 71-43-2------Benzene 1.0 U 107-06-2------1,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 U 79-01-6------Trichloroethene 0.78 J. 78-87-5------1,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 U 75-27-4------Bromodichloromethane 1.0 U 10061-01-5------cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 U 108-10-1------4-Methyl-2-pentanone 5.0 U 108-88-3------Toluene 1.0 U 10061-02-6------trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 U 79-00-5------1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 U 127-18-4------Tetrachloroethene 1.0 U 591-78-6------2-Hexanone 5.0 U 124-48-1------Dibromochloromethane 1.0 U 108-90-7------Chlorobenzene 1.0 FORM I VOA 3/90 000057 1A EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS )ATA SHEET - . DPMW1 __ __ Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Cortract: 97021 _ SDG No.: 66008 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: Sample ID: 338399 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Lab File ID: L338399V Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML 07/31/97 Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: Analyzed: 08/13/97 % Moisture: not dec. -- Date Factor: 1.0 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Volume: (uL) Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 100-41-4------Ethylbenzene 1.0 1330-20-7------Xylene (total) 1.0 100-42-5------Styrene 1.0 75-25-2------Bromoform 1.0 79-34-5------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_ 1.0 FORM I VOA 3/90 000058 I 1E EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS DPMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338399 Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: L338399V Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 08/13/97 GC Column: CAP ID: 0.53 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0 Soil Extract Volume' (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL) CONCENTRATION UNITS: Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 2. 3. 4. 5. 7 8 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27.- 28. 29. 30. i V-A-TIC 3/90 300059 FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DPMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 1 '1 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338399 Sample wt/vol: 980.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: Q338399S Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: decanted: (YIN) _ Date Extracted:08/01/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000(uL) Date Analyzed: 08/06/97 Injection Volume: 2.0(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 U GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 62-75-9------N-Nitrosodimethylamine 10 U 110-86-1------Pyridine 10 U 62-53-3------Aniline 26 U 108-95-2------Phenol 10 U 111-44-4------bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether 10 U 95-57-8------2-Chlorophenol 10 U 541-73-1------1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10 U 106-46-7------1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10 U 95-50-1------1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10 U 100-51-6------Benzyl Alcohol 10 U 95-48-7------2-Methylphenol 10 U 108-60-1------2,2'-oxybis(1-Chloropropane) 10 U 106-44-5------4-Methylphenol 10 U 621-64-7------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 10 U 67-72-1------Hexachloroethane 10 U 98-95-3------Nitrobenzene 10 L 78-59-1------Isophorone 10 U 88-75-5------2-Nitrophenol 10 U 105-67-9------2,4-Dimethylphenol 10 U 111-91-1------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane_ 10 U 65-85-0------Benzoic Acid 26U 120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol 10 U 120-82-1------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10 U 91-20-3------.Naphthalene 10 U 106-47-8------4-Chloroaniline 10 U 87-68-3------Hexachlorobutadiene 10 U 59-50-7------4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 10 U 91-57-6------2-Methylnaphthalene 10 U 77-47-4------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene_ 10 U 88-06-2------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 10 U 95-95-4------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 26 U 91-58-7------2-Chloronaphthalene 10 U 88-74-4------2-Nitroaniline 26 U FORM I SV II 0000,7 FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DPMWI DPMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338399 Sample wt/vol: 980.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: Q338399S Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: decanted: (YIN)__ Date Extracted:08/01/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000(uL) Date Analyzed: 08/06/97 Injection Volume: 2.0(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 131-11-3------Dimethylphthalate 10 U 208-96-8------Acenaphthylene 10 U 606-20-2------2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10 U 99-09-2------3-Nitroaniline 26 U 83-32-9------Acenaphthene 10 U 51-28-5------2,4-Dinitrophenol 26 U 132-64-9------Dibenzofuran 10 U 100-02-7------4-Nitrophenol 26 U 121-14-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 10 U 84-66-2------Diethylphthalate 10 U 86-73-7------Fluorene 10 U 7005-72-3------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 10 U 100-01-6------4-Nitroaniline 26 U 534-52-1------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 26 U 86-30-6------N-nitrbsodiphenylamine (1)_ 10 U 103-33-3------Azobenzene 10 U 101-55-3------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 10 U 118-74-1------Hexachlorobenzene ' 10 U 87-86-5------Pentachlorophenol 26 U 85-01-8------Phenanthrene 10 U 120-12-7------Anthracene 10 U 86-74-8------Carbazole 10 U 84-74-2------Di-n-butylphthalate 10 U 206-44-0------Fluoranthene 10 U 92-87-5------Benzidine 26 U 129-00-0------Pyrene 10 U 85-68-7------Butylbenzylphthalate 10 U 56-55-3------Benzo(a)anthracene 10 U 91-94-1------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 10 U 218-01-9------Chrysene 10 U 117-81-7------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate_ 0.48 J 117-84-0------Di-n-octylphthalate - 10 U 205-99-2------Benzo(b)fluoranthene 10 U 3(1)- Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine FORM I SV I FORM I ENSERC SAMPLE NO. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DPMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338399 Sample wt/vol: 980.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: Q338399S Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Date Extracted:08/01/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 08/06/97 Injection Volume: 2.0 (uL) - Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 207-08-9------Benzo(k)fluoranthene 10 U 50-32-8------Benzo(a)pyrene_ 10 U 193-39-5 ------Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 10 U 53-70-3 ------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 10 U 191-24-2------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 10 U FORM I SV I FORM 1 ENSERC SAMPLE NO. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS DPMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338399 Sample wt/vol: 980.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: Q338399S Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Date Extracted:08/01/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 08/06/97 Injection Volume: 2.0(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: CONCENTRATION UNITS: Number TICs found: 5 (ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/L CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q 1. 123-42-2 2-PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-MET 5.71 4.2 NAJB 2. 301-02-0 9 -OCTADECENAMIDE, (Z) - 19.30 2.5 NJ 3. 85-60-9 PHENOL, 4,4'-BUTYLIDENEBIS[2 21.21 3.6 NJ 4. UNKNOWN 25.71 2.2 J 5. UNKNOWN 27.54 14 J 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. - 27. 28. 29. 30. FORM I SV-TIC 000080 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DPMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338399 Sample wt/vol: 970.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Date Received: 07/31/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF Date Extracted:08/01/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10 (mL) Date Analyzed: 08/09/97 Injection Volume: 1.0(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 319-84-6------alpha-BHC 0.052 U 319-85-7------beta-BHC 0.052 U 319-86-8------delta-BHC 0.052 U 58-89-9------gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.052 U 76-44-8------Heptachlor_ 0.052 U 309-00-2------Aldrin 0.052 U 1024-57-3------Heptachlor epoxide_ 0.052 U 959-98-8------Endosulfan I 0.052 U 60-57-1------Dieldrin 0.10 U 72-55-9------4,4'-DDE 0.10 U 72-20-8------Endrin 0.10 U 33213-65-9------Endosulfan II 0.10 U 72-54-8------4,4'-DDD_ 0.10 U 1031-07-8------Endosulfan sulfate 0.10 U 50-29-3------4,4'-DDT 0.10 U 72-43-5------Methoxychlor 0.52 U 53494-70-5------Endrin ketone_ 0.10 U 7421-36-3------Endrin aldehyde_ 0.10 U 12789-03-6------Chlordane 0.52 U 8001-35-2------Toxaphene 5.2 U 12674-11-2------Aroclor-1016 0.52 U 11104-28-2------Aroclor-1221 0.52 U 1114-16-5------Aroclor-1232 0.52 U 53469-21-9------Aroclor-1242 0.52 U 12672-29-6------Aroclor-1248 0.52 U 11097-69-1------Aroclor-1254 0.52 U 11096-82-5------Aroclor-1260 0.52 U FORM T PEST 0o0093 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. EXPLOSIVES ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET A307MW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338398 Sample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/ml) ML Lab File ID: .. % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Date Received: 07/31/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF Date Extracted:08/04/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10 (ml) Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 Injection Volume: 100.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (YIN) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 2691-41-0------HMX 0.500 121-82-4------RDX 0.500 99-35-4------1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene_ 0.500 99-65-0------1,3-Dinitrobenzene 0.500 479-45-8------Tetryl 0.500 98-95-3------Nitrobenzene_ 0.500 118-96-7------2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene_ 0.500 1946-51-0------4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene 0.500 35572-78-2 ----- 2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene_ 0.500 121-14-2------2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.500 606-20-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.500 88-72-2------2-Nitrotoluene 0.500 99-99-0------4-Nitrotoluene 0.500 99-08-1------3-Nitrotoluene - 0.500 FORM I EXPLOSIVES 11.0093 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. EXPLOSIVES ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET DPMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No. : 97021 SAS No. : SDG No. : 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338399 - Sample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/ml) ML Lab File ID: - % Moisture: decanted: (YIN) Date Received: 07/31/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF Date Extracted:08/04/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10 (ml) Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 Injection Volume: 100.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (YIN) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (YIN) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 2691-41-0------HMX 1.48 121-82-4------RDX 1.99 99-35-4------1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene_ 0.500 U 99-65-0------1,3-Dinitrobenzene 0.500 U 479-45-8------Tetryl 0.645 98-95-3------Nitrobenzene_ 0.500 U 118-96-7------2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene_ 0.500 U 1946-51-0------4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene 0.500 U 35572-78-2------2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene_ 0.500 U 121-14-2------2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.500 U 606-20-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.500 U 88-72-2------2-Nitrotoluene 0.500 U 99-99-0------4-Nitrotoluene 0.500 U 99-08-1------3-Nitrotoluene 0.500 U FORM I EXPLOSIVES 000100 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. EXPLOSIVES ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET FIMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID:. 338394 Sample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/ml) ML Lab File ID: % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Date Received: 07/31/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF Date Extracted: 08/04/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10 (ml) Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 Injection Volume: 100.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N . pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 2691-41-0------HMX 0.500 121-82-4------RDX 0.500 99-35-4------1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 0.500 99-65-0------1,3-Dinitrobenzene_ 0.500 479-45-8------Tetryl 0.500 98-95-3------Nitrobenzene_ 0.500 118-96-7------2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene_ 0.500 1946-51-0------4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene 0.500 35572-78-2----- 2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene_ 0.500 121-14-2------2,6-Dinitrotoluene_ 0.500 606-20-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.500 88-72-2------2-Nitrotoluene 0.500 99-99-0------4-Nitrotoluene 0.500 99-08-1------3-Nitrotoluene 0.500 FORM I EXPLOSIVES 000101 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. EXPLOSIVES ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET FIMW1D Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID:. 338395 Sample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/ml) ML Lab File ID: % Moisture: decanted: (YIN) Date Received: 07/31/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF Date Extracted:08/04/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10 (ml) Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 Injection Volume: 100.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (YIN) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 2691-41-0------HMX 0.500 121-82-4------RDX 0.500 99-35-4------1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene_ 0.500 99-65-0------1,3-Dinitrobenzene_ 0.500 479-45-8------Tetryl 0.500 98-95-3------Nitrobenzene_ 0.500 118-96-7------2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene_ 0.500 1946-51-0------4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene 0.500 35572-78-2------2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene 0.500 121-14-2------2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.500 606-20-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene_ 0.500 88-72-2------2-Nitrotoluene 0.500 99-99-0------4-Nitrotoluene 0.500 99-08-1------3-Nitrotoluene 0.500 FORM I EXPLOSIVES 0001020 I FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. EXPLOSIVES ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET WBMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No. : SDG No. : 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338397 Sample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/ml) ML Lab File ID: - % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Date Received: 07/31/97. Extraction: SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF Date Extracted:08/04/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10 (ml) Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 Injection Volume: 100.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 2691-41-0------HMX 0.500 121-82-4------RDX 0.500 99-35-4------1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene_ 0.500 99-65-0------1,3-Dinitrobenzene_ 0.500 479-45-8------Tetryl 0.500 98-95-3------Nitrobenzene 0.500 118-96-7------2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene 0.500 1946-51-0------4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene 0.500 35572-78-2'------2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene_ 0.500 121-14-2------2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.500 606-20-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.500 88-72-2------2-Nitrotoluene 0.500 99-99-0------4-Nitrotoluene 0.500 99-08-1------3-Nitrotoluene 0.500 FORM I EXPLOSIVES FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. EXPLOSIVES ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET 80A-MW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338396 Sample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/ml) ML Lab File ID: % Moisture: decanted: (YIN) Date Received:_ 07/31/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF Date Extracted:08/04/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 10 (ml) Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 Injection Volume: 100.0 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q 2691-41-0------hMX 0.500 121-82-4------RDX 0.500 99-35-4------1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene_ 0..500 99-65-0------1,3-Dinitrobenzene_ 0.500 479-45-8------Tetryl 0.500 98-95-3------Nitrobenzene_ 0.500 118-96-7------2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene_ 0.500 1946-51-0------4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene 0.500 35572-78-2-----2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene_ 0.500 121-14-2------2,6-Dinitrotoluene_ 0.500 606-20-2------2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.500 88-72-2------2-Nitrotoluene 0.500 99-99-0------4-Nitrotoluene 0.500 99-08-1------3-Nitrotoluene 0.500 FOR:M I EXPLOSIVES 01(, il- - FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. TPH ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATIA SHEET -- A307MW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Conitract: 97021- No.: 66008 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG ID: 338398 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample Sample wt/vol: 950.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: Date Received: 07/31/97 % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N)_ Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF Date Extracted:08/01/97 08/05/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 1(mL) Date Analyzed: 1.0 Injection Volume: 1.0(uL) Dilution Factor: (Y/N) N GPC Cleanup: ' (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) MG/L Q ------Diesel Fuel 0.105 ------Motor Oil 0.526 FORM I TPHI 900110 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. TPH ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET FIMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338394 Sample wt/vol:- 920.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) Date Received: 07/31/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF Date Extracted:08/01/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 1(mL) Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 Injection Volume: 1.0(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH:_ Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N TRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND or ug/Kg) MG/L Q ------Diesel Fuel 0.109 U ------Motor Oil l 0.543 U FORM I TPH 000111. FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. TPH ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET FIMW1D Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Contract: 97021' Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SAS No.: SDG No.: 66008 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 338395 Sample wt/vol: 910.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 07/31/97 % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N)_ Date Received: Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF Date Extracted:08/01/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: l(mL) Date Analyzed: 08/05/97. Injection Volume: 1.0(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 - GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: Sulfur Cleanup: (Y/N) N TRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND or ug/Kg) MG/L Q ------Diesel Fuel_ 0.110 U ------Motor Oil_ 0.549 U FORM I TPH 01)(12 FORM 1 CLIENT SAMPLE NO. TPH ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT)A SHEET WBMW1 Lab Name: ITS ENVIRONMENTAL Co ntract: 97021 * . WBMW1 66008 Lab Code: INCHVT Case No.: 97021 SA S No.: SDG No.: 338397 Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: Sample wt/vol: 960.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: % Moisture: decanted: (YIN) Date Received. 07/31/97 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF Date Extracted:08/01/97 Concentrated Extract Volume: 1 (mL) Date Analyzed: 08/05/97 Injection Volume: - 1.0(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.0 N GPC Cleanup: (YIN) N PH: Sulfur Cleanup: (YIN) CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) MG/L Q ------Diesel Fuel 0.104 U ------Motor Oil 0.629 Z FORM I TPH C ~iJ 0113