Willamette Falls Locks Economic Impact Analysis FINAL REPORT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Willamette Falls Locks Economic Impact Analysis FINAL REPORT Willamette Falls Locks Economic Impact Analysis FINAL REPORT Prepared for Clackamas County Tourism Development Council and Oregon Tourism Commission March 2005 By BST Associates 18414 103rd Ave NE, Suite A Bothell, WA 98011 425-486-7722 voice 425-486-2977 fax [email protected] Willamette Falls Locks Economic Impact Analysis - Final Report Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................. 1 STUDY PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................... 1 FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................................... 2 EXISTING USES & POTENTIAL MARKET OPPORTUNITIES........................................ 3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA.................................................................................................. 3 COMMUNITY PLANS..................................................................................................................... 6 Eugene..................................................................................................................................... 6 Springfield............................................................................................................................... 7 Harrisburg .............................................................................................................................. 8 Corvallis.................................................................................................................................. 8 Albany ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Independence .......................................................................................................................... 9 Salem..................................................................................................................................... 10 Keizer .................................................................................................................................... 10 Newberg ................................................................................................................................11 Wilsonville............................................................................................................................. 11 Canby .................................................................................................................................... 12 West Linn .............................................................................................................................. 12 Oregon City........................................................................................................................... 13 Lake Oswego......................................................................................................................... 13 Milwaukie.............................................................................................................................. 15 Portland ................................................................................................................................15 BST Associates March 2005 Page i Willamette Falls Locks Economic Impact Analysis - Final Report RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF HISTORY AND RECREATION............................................................ 16 Cultural Heritage.................................................................................................................. 16 Recreation............................................................................................................................. 17 LOCK USAGE – HISTORIC AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES.............................................................. 19 Freight................................................................................................................................... 19 Portland General Electric (PGE) ......................................................................................... 22 Construction.......................................................................................................................... 23 Passenger Ferries ................................................................................................................. 24 Passenger Vessels ................................................................................................................. 28 Fishing Charters ................................................................................................................... 29 Recreational Vessels ............................................................................................................. 29 FUTURE USE BY NEW USERS ..................................................................................................... 32 Tourism Potential.................................................................................................................. 32 Overnight Cruising ............................................................................................................... 32 ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ......................................................................................... 35 ANNUAL COSTS ......................................................................................................................... 35 ECONOMIC IMPACTS .................................................................................................................. 36 Projected Usage.................................................................................................................... 36 Economic Impacts................................................................................................................. 37 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 39 HISTORIC STATEMENT OF OREGON CITY ................................................................................... 45 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 45 Native Americans, Early Exploration, Fur Trade and Missions: to 1846............................ 45 Settlement, Statehood and Steampower: 1847 to 1865......................................................... 47 BST Associates March 2005 Page ii Willamette Falls Locks Economic Impact Analysis - Final Report Railroads and Industrial Growth: 1866 to 1883 .................................................................. 47 The Progressive Era: 1884-1913.......................................................................................... 48 The Motor Age: 1914 to 1940............................................................................................... 48 World War II and the Post-War Era: 1941 to 1950 ............................................................. 49 List of Figures Figure 1: Entrance to Willamette Locks ........................................................................................ 4 Figure 2 – Kayaks and Canoes Traveling through Willamette Locks.......................................... 14 Figure 3: Willamette Locks Cargo Trends................................................................................... 19 Figure 4: Paper Mills at Willamette Falls (Blue Heron Paper on Left, West Linn Paper on Right) ............................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 5 – Photo of PGE’s Sullivan Plant at Willamette Falls..................................................... 22 Figure 6: Waterfront Construction at Oregon City...................................................................... 24 Figure 7 – Photo of New Wheatland Ferry................................................................................... 26 Figure 8 – Photo of the Buena Vista Ferry ................................................................................... 27 Figure 9: Recreational Fleet of Boats Over 27’ Long.................................................................. 30 Figure 10: Boating Activity Surveys Willamette River in Clackamas County ........................... 31 Figure 11: Kayaks at the Willamette Locks................................................................................. 31 Figure 12: Erie Canal Charter Boat ............................................................................................. 33 Figure 13 – Boats Traveling through Willamette Locks .............................................................. 36 List of Tables Table 1: Recreational Boating Facilities on the Willamette River Below Willamette Falls & Locks....................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2: Recreational Boating Facilities on the Willamette River Above Willamette Falls & Locks....................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 3 - Recreation Participation Rates for Water Recreation in Oregon and the Willamette BST Associates March
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Oregon Administrative Rules Compilation
    2019 OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES COMPILATION CHAPTER 736 Parks and Recreation Department Published By DENNIS RICHARDSON Secretary of State Copyright 2019 Office of the Secretary of State Rules effective as of January 01, 2019 DIVISION 1 PROCEDURAL RULES 736-001-0000 Notice of Proposed Rules 736-001-0005 Model Rules of Procedure 736-001-0030 Fees for Public Records DIVISION 2 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 736-002-0010 State Park Cooperating Associations 736-002-0015 Working with Donor Organizations 736-002-0020 Criminal Records Checks 736-002-0030 Definitions 736-002-0038 Designated Positions: Authorized Designee and Contact Person 736-002-0042 Criminal Records Check Process 736-002-0050 Preliminary Fitness Determination. 736-002-0052 Hiring or Appointing on a Preliminary Basis 736-002-0058 Final Fitness Determination 736-002-0070 Crimes Considered 736-002-0102 Appealing a Fitness Determination 736-002-0150 Recordkeeping, Confidentiality, and Retention 736-002-0160 Fees DIVISION 3 WILLAMETTE RIVER GREENWAY PLAN 736-003-0005 Willamette River Greenway Plan DIVISION 4 DISTRIBUTION OF ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE FUNDSTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATELY OWNED LANDMANAGERS, ATV CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS 736-004-0005 Purpose of Rule 736-004-0010 Statutory Authority 736-004-0015 Definitions 736-004-0020 ATV Grant Program: Apportionment of Monies 736-004-0025 Grant Application Eligibility and Requirements 736-004-0030 Project Administration 736-004-0035 Establishment of the ATV Advisory Committee 736-004-0045 ATV Operating Permit Agent Application and Privileges 736-004-0060
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Trails Project USP 549: REGIONAL PLANNING and METROPOLITAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT
    The Long Trails Project USP 549: REGIONAL PLANNING and METROPOLITAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning College of Urban and Public Affairs Portland State University Fall, 2012 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 2 II. History of Long Trails and Regional Trail Networks ..................................................................................................... 6 III. Long Trails in Northwestern Oregon...............................................................................................................................20 IV. The Demand for Long Trails-based Recreation ...........................................................................................................36 V. Long Trails and Community Economic Development .............................................................................................52 VI. Long Trails Implementation ...............................................................................................................................................76 I. Introduction and Acknowledgements The Oregon Department of Forestry and the Oregon Parks Team 3: The Demand for trails-base recreation; analysis and Department are currently engaged in a joint assessment of a new critique of SCORP and similar surveys; trails in the context of trail extending from Garibaldi, on the Oregon coast, to the crest other recreational opportunities;
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Constraints Report
    OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS REPORT April 5, 2017 Prepared for the City of Wilsonville Prepared By OBEC Consulting Engineers 5000 Meadows Road, Suite 420 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 503.620.6103 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Project Setting and Constraints .................................................................. 1 Topography ........................................................................................... 1 Transportation Network ........................................................................ 3 Public Roads ..................................................................................... 3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths ............................................................... 3 Railways ........................................................................................... 4 Boating ............................................................................................ 4 Aviation ............................................................................................ 5 Hydraulics, Floodplain, and Floodway .................................................... 5 Utilities ................................................................................................ 5 NWN Gas Line ................................................................................... 5 BPA Transmission Lines ...................................................................... 6 Power and Communications ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Overview
    HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT The following is a brief history of Oregon City. The intent is to provide a general overview, rather than a comprehensive history. Setting Oregon City, the county seat of Clackamas County, is located southeast of Portland on the east side of the Willamette River, just below the falls. Its unique topography includes three terraces, which rise above the river, creating an elevation range from about 50 feet above sea level at the riverbank to more than 250 feet above sea level on the upper terrace. The lowest terrace, on which the earliest development occurred, is only two blocks or three streets wide, but stretches northward from the falls for several blocks. Originally, industry was located primarily at the south end of Main Street nearest the falls, which provided power. Commercial, governmental and social/fraternal entities developed along Main Street north of the industrial area. Religious and educational structures also appeared along Main Street, but tended to be grouped north of the commercial core. Residential structures filled in along Main Street, as well as along the side and cross streets. As the city grew, the commercial, governmental and social/fraternal structures expanded northward first, and with time eastward and westward to the side and cross streets. Before the turn of the century, residential neighborhoods and schools were developing on the bluff. Some commercial development also occurred on this middle terrace, but the business center of the city continued to be situated on the lower terrace. Between the 1930s and 1950s, many of the downtown churches relocated to the bluff as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources
    OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Clackamas County
    EXHIBIT A - Invisible Walls: Housing Discrimination in Clackamas County 94 Table of Contents A Note About This Project ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Class Bios ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Project Introduction and Methods Statement …………………………………………………………………………. 3 Timeline ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Historic Property Deed Research …………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 Metropolitan Setting of the Suburban Zone ………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Community Highlights: - Lake Oswego ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24 - Milwaukie ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 28 - Oregon City ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 34 Land and Conflict: The Genesis of Housing Discrimination in Clackamas County ……………………. 38 Migrant Labor in Oregon: 1958 Snapshot ………………………………………………………………………………. 41 Migrant Labor in Oregon: Valley Migrant League …………………………………………………………………… 43 Chinese in Clackamas County ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 48 Japanese in Clackamas County ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 51 Direct Violence: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 54 - Richardson Family ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 55 - Perry Ellis …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 56 Resistance in Lane County …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 57 John Livingston ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 58 Political Structure: - Zoning in Clackamas County ………………………………………………………………………………………. 59 - Urban Growth Boundary …………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Oswego Lake Watershed Council
    Partner Newsletter Spring 2016 WATERSHED WORKS In this issue: Clackamas River Basin Council Clackamas Soil & Water Conservation District Johnson Creek Watershed Council Molalla River Watch North Clackamas Urban Watersheds Council Oswego Lake Watershed Council Sandy River Basin Watershed Council Tryon Creek Watershed Council Tualatin River Watershed Council Tualatin Soil & Water Conservation District West Multnomah Soil & Water Conservation District Spring, Summer, & Fall 2016 Events Calendar CLACKAMAS RIVER BASIN COUNCIL Clackamas Partnership Teams Up for Salmon Recovery The Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) awarded $137,696 to the Clackamas River Basin Council on behalf of the Clackamas Partnership. The Clackamas River watershed is an incredible resource to our state, providing drinking water to over 10% of the population and a recreation haven for thousands who fish, swim, and raft as well. The river is home to genetic legacy fish species whose historical abundance and its potential for salmon recovery is Coho salmon returning to spawn. recognized nationally for Spring Chinook, coho, and steelhead. With local landowners and community partners, the Clackamas River Basin Council has nearly two decades of proven results transforming the watershed. “The OWEB award will help us achieve greater restoration success as we work together,” says Cheryl McGinnis, Executive Director of the Clackamas River Basin Council. The Clackamas Partnership will develop an enhanced strategic action plan for recovery of listed Clackamas fish populations by addressing degraded water quality, aquatic and riparian habitat, migratory corridor connectivity and fish passage, and invasive species in priority areas. Planning is expected to begin this spring and be completed by July 2017. The Clackamas Partnership includes Clackamas Soil & Water Conservation District, Clackamas Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer COUNTRY Oflove FAIR FOURPLAY • 4 RETURNS
    The OREGON Summer COUNTRY ofLOVE FAIR FOURPLAY • 4 RETURNS ... PULSE • 7 An independent newspaper at the University of Oregon www.dailyemerald.com SINCE 1900 | Volume 108, Issue 3 | Thursday, July 6, 2006 Recent outbreak not mumps Ex-PPPM The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention discovered that the supervisor for Lane County Public Health. “We know mumps is really infectious head files spate of mumps-like illness in Oregon is an unknown new disease and spreads quite quickly and quite easily, and we know it’s a vaccine preventable dis- ease,” she said at a press conference Friday BY RYAN KNUTSON what was previously deemed the mumps EDITOR IN CHIEF afternoon. “The fact that we had seen it in suit against is actually something different that people who had been vaccinated was causing produces similar symptoms. So it turns out that this whole mumps some public health concern. But now we can scare going on in Oregon isn’t actually The different bug that 58 Oregonians say ‘Well okay that’s because the vaccine is mumps after all. — including nine University students and protecting against mumps and this may not University The Oregon Department of Human Ser- 38 people total in Lane County — have be mumps.’” vices announced last week that after ad- been catching is probably better for public She said the mumps vaccine is still Jean Stockard alleges that she ditional testing, the Centers for Disease health though, said Betsy Meredith, commu- Control and Prevention discovered that nicable disease and family planning nursing DISEASE, page 5 was forced to resign as a result of her whistleblowing activities BY RYAN KNUTSON EDITOR IN CHIEF A former department head filed a lawsuit against the Oregon State Board of Higher Edu- cation, the University and nine University ad- ministrators on June 23, alleging the Univer- sity retaliated against her for whistleblowing activities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategic Plan for Improving Water-Based
    A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR IMPROVING WATER-BASED TOURISM IN OREGON’S MT HOOD TERRITORY submitted to The Destination Marketing Organization for Clackamas County 150 Beavercreek Rd, Oregon City, OR www.mthoodterritory.com submitted by TH MARCH 20 2018 STRATEGIC PLAN FOR WATER-BASED TOURISM IN OREGON’S MT HOOD TERRITORY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Water is fun. Nearly everyone has experienced the pleasure of a refreshing dip on a hot summer day, the mist of a waterfall, or the thrill of a cliff jump. Some seek solitude by the edge of a lonely stream, others find excitement in extreme whitewater. Youth splash, teens jump, adults wade, but we all look to water for reprieve from our daily routine. Water recreation gives us a chance to see life differently. We test our skills with a fishing rod or a paddle, we relax on a float, and we use water as a medium to gather family and friends. Oregon’s recreational waters are visited 80 million times annually by people looking to swim, fish, surf, sail, paddle or simply sit by the beach. It seems that water is not only essential to life, but to our happiness. People migrate towards water for fun and Clackamas County has a lot of it. Mt Hood Territory, Clackamas County’s tourism marketing organization, initiated this comprehensive study to determine if its water recreation assets are being used to their greatest economic potential. Are the county’s rivers and lakes attracting visitors and maximizing their enjoyment? Are they being managed and marketed in a sustainable manner to increase water-based recreation? Do they generate overnight stays without degrading the environment or the experience? To answer these questions, the county hired Crane Associates of Burlington Vermont, a consulting firm with 20 years of international and domestic experience in environmental economics and sustainable economic development with a specialty in water-based recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Background and Existing Plans
    12/21/2005 CHAPTER 3 - BACKGROUND AND EXISTING PLANS CHAPTER 3: BACKGROUND AND EXISTING PLANS This section provides an overview of transportation issues compiled from the transportation plans and studies of other jurisdictions and those already in effect for Marion County, and from extensive public involvement through open houses and Technical Advisory Committee and Citizens Review Committee meetings both during the original 1998 TSP process and the current update. In addition, County staff also contributed in identifying transportation issues as part of the planning process. 3.1 REVIEW OF EXISTING PLANS AND STUDIES Transportation studies, system plans, and comprehensive land use plans were collected and reviewed to identify pertinent transportation issues and policy statements. A summary of issues from these plans and studies is provided below. Information considered in the development of the initial 1998 Rural Transportation System Plan (RTSP) is included below in plain text. Information added since the development of the original RTSP is shown in italics. All information collected has been fully considered in the planning efforts of this update. Some jurisdictions’ plans that were included in the 1998 TSP have been superseded by subsequent planning efforts; plans that have been superseded are not included in this update. The purpose of this section is to provide a summary (for reporting purposes only) of planning efforts that have been conducted that would affect the Marion County rural transportation system. We have attempted to accurately represent these plans, but one should review each jurisdiction plan for the full text. The information presented is for reporting purposes only, and Marion County does not necessarily agree with each aspect of each plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Area: Southeast
    PARKS 2020 VISION OUTHEAST Distinctive Features Studio in the Laurelhurst Park annex is a satellite of the Montavilla Community Center. I Aquatic facilities include Sellwood, Mt. Scott, Description: The Southeast sub-area (see map at the Buckman, Montavilla and Creston. end of this section) contains many of the city's older, I established neighborhoods. This area is a patchwork of The Community Music Center is in this sub-area. older, mainly single-family neighborhoods divided by I The Southeast sub-area has three Community linear commercial corridors. The Central Eastside Schools and 45 school sites. Industrial District, which borders the east bank of the I There are lighted baseball stadiums at Willamette, separates some residential neighborhoods Westmoreland and Lents Parks. from the river. Resources and Facilities: Southeast has 898 acres Population – Current and Future: The Southeast of parkland, ranking third in total amount of park sub-area ranks first in population with 154,000 and acreage. Most parks are developed, well distributed, is projected to grow to 157,830 by 2020, an increase in good condition, and can accommodate a range of of 2%. recreational uses. I Southeast has the City’s largest combined acreage DISTRIBUTION OF SUBAREA ACRES BY PARK TYPE of neighborhood and community parks. I Southeast has a variety of habitat parks, including Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge, Tideman Johnson Park, and Johnson Creek Park that are popular sites for hiking, birding, walking, and general recreation use. I This sub-area includes part of the I-205 Bike Trail and about 4.6 miles of the Springwater Corridor, a 195-acre 16.5 mile-long regional trailway that includes many natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Riverbank Design Notebook: Portland, Oregon
    Willamette Riverbank Design Notebook: Portland, Oregon A Tool Designed to Foster Creativity and Innovation in Developing an Urban River’s Edge that Improves Conditions for Fish, Wildlife and People City of Portland, Oregon Bureau of Environmental Services Portland Development Commission GreenWorks, PC Landscape Architecture ClearWater West Fishman Environmental Services, LLC Inter-Fluve, Inc. May 2001 KPFF Consulting Engineers Willamette Riverbank Design Notebook: Portland, Oregon A Tool Designed to Foster Creativity and Innovation in Developing an Urban River’s Edge that Improves Conditions for Fish, Wildlife and People City of Portland, Oregon Bureau of Environmental Services Portland Development Commission GreenWorks PC, Landscape Architecture ClearWater West Fishman Environmental Services, LLC Inter-Fluve, Inc. May 2001 KPFF Consulting Engineers Acknowledgements CITY OF PORTLAND: Portland Development Commission: Michael McElwee Larry Brown Bureau of Environmental Services: Mary Abrams Mike Reed Chris Prescott Jim Middaugh Office of Planning and Development Review: Sallie Edmunds Barb Grover Eric Engstrom CONSULTING DESIGN TEAM: GreenWorks, P.C. Landscape Architecture and Environmental Design: Mike Abbaté David Elkin Liesl Lackaff Jeanette Pritchard Brian Wethington ClearWater West: Martha Mitchell Fishman Environmental Services, LLC: Paul Fishman Inter-Fluve, Inc.: Greg Koonce KPFF Consulting Engineers, Inc.: Andrew Jansky Willamette Riverbank Design Notebook May 2001 GreenWorks, PC • ClearWater West • Fishman Environmental Services • Inter-Fluve • KPFF Consulting Design Notebook Willamette River TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction to the Design Notebook 1 A. Vision 1 B. Audience and Purpose 1 1. User Groups 1 2. Intent of the Notebook 2 C. Background and Context for a Design Notebook 3 1. Overview of the Willamette River Watershed 3 2.
    [Show full text]