Constitution Unit Monitor 75 / July 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Constitution Unit Monitor 75 / July 2020 1 Constitution Unit Monitor 75 / July 2020 COVID-19 has touched almost every aspect of how The constitution under politics is done, and raised new questions about the functioning of some aspects of the UK constitution, as COVID-19 this issue of Monitor sets out. The Coronavirus Bill was As the last issue of Monitor went to press in early March rushed through both chambers of parliament – with the idea that COVID-19 might change everything was consent from the devolved legislatures – in just six days only just dawning. In the subsequent four months, in March. Simultaneously the official ‘lockdown’ was just its impact on politics as well as daily life has been beginning. At the outset this barred most workplaces transformational. Just as the UK hoped to exit one torrid from opening and confined most people – except period of politics dominated by a single issue, a new, when undertaking limited activities – to their homes. still bigger challenge eclipsed it. Brexit has barely The Prime Minister spoke to the nation in a televised featured in the past few months’ political news. Instead, address, and daily Downing Street press conferences Boris Johnson rapidly shifted from the Prime Minister involving ministers and (usually) government scientists who would ‘get Brexit done’ to the one who needed to became the norm, seven days per week. On 6 April Boris steer the nation through a health crisis, and perhaps in Johnson himself was hospitalised with the virus, leaving due course through an economic crisis as well. Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab to deputise (see page 12). Other key ministers and officials – notably including In this edition Johnson’s chief adviser Dominic Cummings – also fell ill. Brexit 2–3 Parties and Politicians 16 At the start of the crisis there was widespread support Parliament 4–8 Nations and Regions 16–19 for the government’s position, within the governing Elections, referendums and International 19–20 party, across the parties and among the devolved democratic engagement 9–12 People on the move 20–21 administrations. Public approval for the government’s Executive 12–14 Constitution Unit news 21–23 Courts and the judiciary 14–15 Bulletin Board 23–24 handling was high, in what political scientists would see Monarchy, church and state 15 as typical of the ‘rally round the flag’ effect often found in national crises. But since that time, tensions have gradually grown. Image above: Boris Johnson Digital Cabinet Meeting (CC BY- NC-ND 2.0) by UK Prime Minister. The Constitution Unit is 25 this year! Click here – to find out more about how we’re celebrating on page 21. 2 | Monitor 75 | Constitution Unit | ISSN 1465–4377 As discussed on page 4, COVID-19 presented a In late June, the Commons agreed new arrangements particular challenge to parliament, which normally brings for handling bullying allegations against MPs following together hundreds of members from across the UK. After the 2018 Cox report – though in part only by defeating an early Easter recess there was cross-party consensus the government’s initial proposals, with opponents even on bringing the Commons back in ‘hybrid’ form, with including former Prime Minister Theresa May (see pages members able to participate remotely. But, while the 7–8). In addition, several pieces of Brexit legislation have Lords has continued such arrangements, virtual working started to progress through their parliamentary stages in the Commons ended amid acrimony in early June – (see page 3). with serious concerns expressed not only by opposition But some other developments have led to legitimate parties, but also by numerous Conservative MPs. concerns. The UK government refused, despite the Many of those same MPs had already been angered by COVID-19 crisis, to seek an extension to the Brexit Johnson’s refusal to sack Dominic Cummings when it transition period before the 30 June deadline, raising emerged that he had broken the lockdown. That moment concerns that the country could leave EU structures was also seen as a turning point in the public’s views of without a trade deal (see page 3). Meanwhile, the Prime the government’s handling of the crisis. Minister and his team appeared to take a significant In a similar way territorial relationships across the further step towards greater political control over the civil UK became more fractious as the crisis proceeded, service, following the resignation of Cabinet Secretary with the devolved governments complaining of poor Mark Sedwill, the fourth senior civil servant to leave communication and consultation, and increasingly taking government since the start of the year (see page 13). their own decisions independent of those in England (see Closer to home, the Constitution Unit is celebrating its page 16). The initial tolerance of last-minute decisions own achievements. First set up by Robert Hazell in 1995, from Downing Street has waned on all sides. Of the its 25th anniversary falls in 2020. We have initially marked more than 100 statutory instruments agreed to respond this with a celebration of 25 key achievements – ranging to the pandemic, very few have received parliamentary from influencing the 1998 devolution referendums to oversight ahead of implementation (see page 5), which promoting women’s representation in politics, informing not only frustrates parliamentarians but risks ill-thought- the ‘Wright committee’ on reform of the House of through policies reaching the statute book. The Downing Commons, spearheading citizens’ assemblies and Street press conferences, which ended on 23 June, making proposals for improving discourse in election and have also caused frustrations that journalists were referendum campaigns. We are encouraging supporters conducting questioning that should arguably have taken to join our celebrations by donating to support our work. place in parliament instead. All of this risks building up In the autumn we will turn to reflections on what has resentments for the future. changed in the UK constitution over the past 25 years. In the meantime, COVID-19 has had profound effects It has been an eventful period, right up until the last. in other spheres. The backlog of cases facing the courts has increased dramatically (see page 14). Labour unveiled its new leader, Keir Starmer, not at a conference but online (see page 16), and some of the autumn party Brexit conferences will now also be held in that format (see page 16). The Brexit negotiations too, which continued with little public attention, have largely taken virtual EU–UK negotiations form (see pages 2–3). Some achievements have been made, notwithstanding The EU–UK future relationship negotiations have the crisis. The government’s Parliamentary made scant progress, hampered by the COVID-19 Constituencies Bill, which legislates to retain the pandemic. The original, ambitious schedule of face- number of Commons seats at 650, and to revise the to-face meetings was initially replaced by four rounds arrangements for boundary reviews, is working its way of week-long video conferences – a sub-optimal through the Commons (see page 9). In May, Climate alternative. Meanwhile, both lead negotiators – David Assembly UK concluded its work, having shifted rapidly Frost and Michel Barnier – had to self-isolate in March online in light of the pandemic (see pages 11–12). after showing symptoms of the virus. Negotiating and 3 agreeing the terms of a complex new relationship in such would not consent to one. The deadline for an extension a short time frame was already immensely difficult; the has now passed; whether an extension can be agreed pandemic has made it seem almost impossible. after the date specified in the Withdrawal Agreement is debatable. Some, such as Jean-Claude Piris, former Director-General of the EU Council’s Legal Services, maintain that the Withdrawal Agreement makes it impossible. Others feel that, if the political will exists, a way can be found. A final agreement by the end of 2020 therefore seems the only show in town. On 12 June the Commission updated its terms of reference to allow for a more intensive timetable of in-person negotiations over the summer. The first round began on 29 June but broke up a day early, with little sign of progress. Expect more weeks of intense negotiating and brinkmanship – and yet more talk of ‘no deal’. Brexit and parliament The UK’s chief Brexit negotiator, David Frost (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) by UK Prime Minister. The transition deadline means that Brexit-related Boris Johnson and European Commission President legislation cannot be postponed. Parliament’s legislative Ursula von der Leyen met virtually in mid-June for a high- and scrutiny work on Brexit has therefore continued, level stock-taking exercise. While they struck a positive even if the media’s attention has understandably been tone, there were no major breakthroughs. Indeed, elsewhere. The Immigration and Social Security Co- significant distance remains on key issues including level ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill and the Trade Bill passed playing field provisions and the governance structures Commons second reading during the chamber’s ‘hybrid’ for the new relationship. Real progress in these areas phase. Both are now in committee – indeed, the claim seems unlikely before the autumn, when EU leaders are that physical public bill committees were needed to deal expected to re-engage seriously with the negotiations with Brexit legislation was one of the main arguments ahead of a summit on 15 October. used by the Leader of the House, Jacob Rees-Mogg, to justify ending the hybrid arrangements (see page The involvement of the EU27 leaders – currently fully 4). Although not wholly convincing, this suggests occupied with the pandemic – will be welcomed in that committee stage of the Environment Bill – last London, where the hope is that they will be more held on 19 March – will soon resume.
Recommended publications
  • Government Response to Justice Select Committee's
    Government response to Justice Select Committee’s opinion on the European Union Data Protection framework proposals January 2013 Government response to Justice Select Committee’s opinion on the European Union Data Protection framework proposals Presented to Parliament by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice by Command of Her Majesty January 2013 Cm 8530 £6.25 © Crown copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] or 020 3334 5408. This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk and on our website at www.justice.gov.uk ISBN: 9780101853026 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2533713 01/13 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Government response to Justice Select Committee’s opinion on the European Union Data Protection framework proposals Contents The approach to reforming the current data protection framework 3 The draft Regulation 5 Arguments for and against a Regulation 5 Impact assessment 6 Impact on the Information
    [Show full text]
  • The Responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Education
    House of Commons Education Committee The Responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Education Oral Evidence Tuesday 24 April 2012 Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State for Education Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 24 April 2012 HC 1786-II Published on 26 June 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £5.50 Education Committee: Evidence Ev 29 Tuesday 24 April 2012 Members present: Mr Graham Stuart (Chair) Alex Cunningham Ian Mearns Damian Hinds Lisa Nandy Charlotte Leslie Craig Whittaker ________________ Examination of Witness Witness: Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State for Education, gave evidence. Q196 Chair: Good morning, Secretary of State. critical. If there is one unifying theme, and I suspect Thank you very much for joining us. Having been Sir Michael would agree, it is that the most effective caught short in our last lesson and now being late for form of school improvement is school to school, peer this one, there were suggestions of detention for to peer, professional to professional. We want to see further questioning, but we are delighted to have you serving head teachers and other school leaders playing with us. If I may, I will start just by asking you about a central role. what the Head of Ofsted told us when he recently gave evidence. He said, “It seems to me there needs Q198 Chair: On that basis, are you disappointed that to be some sort of intermediary layer that finds out so few of the converter academies—the outstanding what is happening on the ground and intervenes and very strong schools that have converted to before it is too late.
    [Show full text]
  • UNISON Values Are Labour Values
    LinkBULLETIN General election 2019 UNISON values are Labour values ‘UNISON values are Labour values, Labour values are UNISON values’ It’s the role of UNISON La- rights as trade unionists are at bour link to take UNISON stake in this election – this is our policies and priorities into chance for real change. the Labour Party. • Labour will ban zero hours This election it’s never been contracts and fix minimum easier. Labour candidates are hours. standing on a platform of invest- ing in public services, extending • Labour will repeal anti-trade public ownership and improving union legislation, including rights at work. the Conservatives’ undemo- cratic Trade Union Act 2016, As Dave Prentis, UNISON and create new rights and General Secretary, put it freedoms for trade unions to “This is a manifesto with with help them win a better deal UNISON’s priorities at it’s for working people. heart”. It’s a manifesto UNISON members helped create and one • Labour will require cancelled that UNISON members can be shifts to be paid and proper proud to vote and campaign for. notice given for changes in Labour Link Scotland have hours. been active in working for our • Labour will give everyone full members who are standing as and equal rights from day Wendy Milne, Scottish Labour Party Candidate for Linlithgow labour candidates across Scot- one at work. and East Falkirk with Richard land. They know that the future • Labour will end bogus Leonard, campaigning for a of our public services and our self-employment. Labour victory. Labour will build a better future abour will make the ing the relevant broadband Service (BBS).
    [Show full text]
  • Of Friday 13 June 2008 Supplement No. 1 Birthday Honours List — United Kingdom
    05-06-2008 13:04:14 [SO] Pag Table: NGSUPP PPSysB Job: 398791 Unit: PAG1 Number 58729 Saturday 14 June 2008 http://www.london-gazette.co.uk B1 [ Richard Gillingwater. (Jun. 14, 2008). C.B.E. Commander of the Order of the British Empire, 2008 Birthday Honours, No. 58729, Supp. No. 1, PDF, p. B7. London Gazette. Reproduced for educationaly purposes only. Fair Use relied upon. ] Registered as a newspaper Published by Authority Established 1665 of Friday 13 June 2008 Supplement No. 1 Birthday Honours List — United Kingdom CENTRAL CHANCERY OF Dr. Philip John Hunter, C.B.E., Chief Schools THE ORDERS OF KNIGHTHOOD Adjudicator. For services to Education. Moir Lockhead, O.B.E., Chief Executive, First Group. St. James’s Palace, London SW1 For services to Transport. 14 June 2008 Professor Andrew James McMichael, F.R.S., Professor of Molecular Medicine and Director, Weatherall The Queen has been graciously pleased, on the occasion Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford. of the Celebration of Her Majesty’s Birthday, to signify For services to Medical Science. her intention of conferring the honour of Knighthood William Moorcroft, Principal, TraVord College. For upon the undermentioned: services to local and national Further Education. William Desmond Sargent, C.B.E., Executive Chair, Better Regulation Executive, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. For services to Knights Bachelor Business. Michael John Snyder. For services to Business and to the City of London Corporation. Paul Robert Stephenson, Q.P.M., Deputy Commissioner, Dr. James Iain Walker Anderson, C.B.E. For public and Metropolitan Police Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA
    Wednesday 11 January 2017 Order Paper No.89: Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA: CHAMBER 11.30am Prayers Afterwards Oral Questions: International Development 12 noon Oral Questions: Prime Minister 12.30pm Urgent Questions, Ministerial Statements (if any) Up to 20 minutes Ten Minute Rule Motion: Guardianship (Missing Persons) (Kevin Hollinrake) Until 7.00pm Opposition Day: NHS and social care funding No debate Statutory Instruments (Motions for approval) No debate Presentation of Public Petitions Until 7.30pm or for Adjournment Debate: A&E provision in Shropshire and Mid Wales half an hour (Daniel Kawczynski) WESTMINSTER HALL 9.30am Pharmacies and integrated healthcare in England 11.00am Asylum seekers and the right to work (The sitting will be suspended from 11.30am to 2.30pm.) 2.30pm Access to justice 4.00pm Musculoskeletal services in Greenwich 4.30pm Funding of the Crown Prosecution Service 2 Wednesday 11 January 2017 OP No.89: Part 1 CONTENTS PART 1: BUSINESS TODAY 3 Chamber 8 Westminster Hall 9 Written Statements 10 Committees meeting today 15 Announcements 17 Further Information PART 2: FUTURE BUSINESS 20 A. Calendar of Business 37 B. Remaining Orders and Notices Notes: Items marked [R] indicates that a Member has declared a relevant interest. Wednesday 11 January 2017 OP No.89: Part 1 BUSINESS TODAY: CHAMBER 3 BUSINESS TODAY: CHAMBER 11.30am Prayers Followed by QUESTIONS Oral Questions to the Secretary of State for International Development 1 Nigel Mills (Amber Valley) What recent assessment she has made of the effectiveness of her Department's work in Tajikistan. (907997) 2 Louise Haigh (Sheffield, Heeley) What assessment she has made of the implications of demolitions in the Occupied Palestinian Territories in 2015-16 for her Department's policies in that region.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Lavery Lab Vir- (Wansbeck) Tual T14 Chris Green Con Phys- (Bolton West) Ical 14 Monday 8 March 2021
    Issued on: 8 March at 12.21pm Call lists for the Chamber Monday 8 March 2021 A list of Members, both virtually and physically pres- ent, selected to ask Oral Questions and to speak in response to Urgent Questions and Ministerial State- ments; and a list of Members both physically and virtually present selected to participate in substantive proceedings. Call lists are compiled and published incrementally as information becomes available. For the most up-to- date information see the parliament website: https:// commonsbusiness.parliament.uk/ CONTENTS 1. Oral Questions to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 3 2. Urgent Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care to make a statement on the Department of Health and Social Care’s recommendations on NHS staff pay 14 2 Monday 8 March 2021 3. Ministerial Statement: Minister of State for Patient Safety, Suicide Prevention and Mental Health on Women’s Health Strategy: Call for Evi- dence 18 4. Budget Debate: Third Day 20 Monday 8 March 2021 3 ORAL QUESTIONS TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS After Prayers Order Member Question Party Vir- Minister tual/ replying Phys- ical 1 + 2 Richard Fuller What assessment Con Phys- Secretary + 3 (North East she has made ical Coffey Bedfordshire) of the effect of the removal of the requirement that Kickstart applicants bid to deliver a mini- mum of 30 jobs on the accessibil- ity of that scheme to a wider range of employers. 2 Peter Gibson What assessment Con Vir- Secretary (Darlington) she has made tual Coffey of the effect of the removal of the requirement that Kickstart applicants bid to deliver a mini- mum of 30 jobs on the accessibil- ity of that scheme to a wider range of employers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Mark Sedwill, Acting Cabinet Secretary and National Security Adviser 5 October 2018, Institute for Government the Public Ch
    Sir Mark Sedwill, Acting Cabinet Secretary and National Security Adviser 5 October 2018, Institute for Government The Public Chairs’ Forum welcomed Sir Mark Sedwill, Acting Cabinet Secretary and National Security Adviser to discuss the current priorities within government and to give members the opportunity to raise any issues of relevance to Arms’-Length Bodies. Sir Mark opened the seminar by emphasising how pleased he was to engage with the Forum and passed on best wishes from Sir Jeremy Heywood. EU exit continues to be the priority in Government. Sir Mark explained that there remains a good chance of a deal being secured, and one which is in the interests of the EU both in terms of goods and services as well as global security. Sir Mark acknowledged the parliamentary challenges ahead. Once the Meaningful Vote is passed, Parliament will have to introduce the EU Withdrawal Agreement Bill swiftly to ensure Royal Assent by 29 March 2019; the next six months are likely to be intense. The next challenge will be how the UK negotiates the implementation phase and future relationship. The pages within the ‘political declaration’ document will need to be transposed into lengthy legal text, and the timetable will be further affected by the European elections in June and the appointment of a new Commission, which would not be in place until the autumn 2019. In the event that a deal is not secured, Sir Mark anticipated that Europe and the UK would be able to establish a good relationship against the wider backdrop of global uncertainty. He touched on US/China relations, challenges with Russia and the ongoing terrorist threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland: Toward a New Settlement? in This Issue
    | THE CONSTITUTION UNIT NEWSLETTER | ISSUE 38 | JANUARY 2008 | MONITOR SCOTLAND: TOWARD A NEW SETTLEMENT? IN THIS ISSUE The constitutional debate in Scotland in the SNP White Paper) with ideas on reconciling continues apace. In the last Monitor we more devolution with a renewal of the UK BRITISH BILL OF RIGHTS 2 reported on the SNP Government’s White union (which mark out a very different agenda). Paper Choosing Scotland’s Future – Especially notable were her ideas on risk-sharing A National Conversation. This set out options through fiscal solidarity across the UK, and those for Scotland’s constitutional future, ranging on guaranteeing rights of ‘social citizenship’ PARTY FUNDING REFORM 2 from further-reaching devolution to the SNP’s across the UK. Emphasising social rights across own preference of independence. jurisdictions suggests a concern to build common purposes – or, put another way, limits to policy EU REFORM TREATY 3 Beyond their commitment to ignore the SNP’s variation – to which risk-sharing and solidarity can ‘national conversation’, the other main parties be put to work in a UK-wide framework. in Scotland were generally silent on Scotland’s PARLIAMENT 3 constitutional options until a speech by the new This is a bold agenda. For it to work much would Labour leader in Scotland, Wendy Alexander, at depend on a willingness in Westminster and the University of Edinburgh on St Andrew’s Day, Whitehall to think creatively about rebalancing DEVOLUTION 5 30 November. This set out a unionist perspective the union. If devolution is to have a stronger on constitutional change; unlike the SNP White UK-wide context, then the devolved institutions Paper, independence was not an option.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA
    The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA Dear Prime Minister, We are writing to you as a group of cross-party parliamentarians to express our grave concern over the contents of US President Donald Trump’s so-called ‘peace plan’ for Israel and the Palestinians. The plan presented on 28 January shows contempt for the rights of the Palestinian people and international law, and provides no realistic basis for a return to negotiations. Instead, it makes peace less likely, and threatens to undermine a fundamental principle of the post-WWII international legal order: the prohibition of annexation and territorial conquest. The long-standing position of the UK is that a negotiated peace settlement must be agreed to achieve a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders, leading to a safe and secure Israel living alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state that has secure and recognised borders, and with Jerusalem as a shared capital of both states. The vision presented by the US administration is one where Palestinians would have none of these: no true shared capital in Jerusalem, no sovereign control of its borders or security, and with Israeli control far beyond the Green Line. As a group of 16 UK charities warned this week: “if implemented [the plan] will lead to the formal annexation of Palestinian land, perpetual Israeli occupation, and the negation of Palestinians’ collective right to self-determination.” It is a plan that the Palestinians have no choice but to reject if they wish to maintain their fundamental rights, but that they will be punished for not accepting.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard Record of the Entire Day in PDF Format. PDF File, 0.95
    Thursday Volume 663 11 July 2019 No. 329 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 11 July 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 423 11 JULY 2019 424 Dr Fox: I would go further than my hon. Friend and House of Commons say that free trade is beneficial for prosperity, stability and security, in the United Kingdom and beyond. The creation of Her Majesty’s trade commissioners is one of Thursday 11 July 2019 the most important elements of the Department for International Trade, and I am passionate about increasing the size of the DIT’s overseas network, including in the The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Commonwealth. Therefore, this morning I am proud to announce the creation of a new HM trade commissioner PRAYERS for Australasia. The post will be a senior civil service 2 director role and will be externally advertised later this year, to attract the best and brightest talent. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Kerry McCarthy (Bristol East) (Lab): To return to the subject of continuity agreements, a number have been put in place but they do not apply to some of our Oral Answers to Questions biggest trading partners. Does the Secretary of State really think that by the end of October we will have a significant number of agreements in place with those International Trade countries with which we do the most trade? The Secretary of State was asked— Dr Fox: Well, 10.7% of our trade is done under EU trade agreements with third countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday 20 April 2021 COMMITTEE of the WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS
    1 SUPPLEMENT TO THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS Tuesday 20 April 2021 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS FINANCE (No. 2) BILL (Clauses 1 to 5; Clauses 6 to 14 and Schedule 1; Clauses 24 to 26; Clause 28; Clause 30 and Schedule 6; Clauses 31 to 33; Clause 36 and Schedule 7; Clause 40; Clause 41; Clause 86; Clauses 87 to 89 and Schedules 16 and 17; Clauses 90 and 91; Clauses 92 to 96 and Schedule 18; Clause 97 and Schedule 19; Clauses 109 to 111 and Schedules 21 and 22; Clause 115 and Schedule 27; Clauses 117 to 121 and Schedules 29 to 32; Clauses 128 to 130; any new Clauses or new Schedules relating to: the impact of any provision on the financial resources of families or to the subject matter of Clauses 1 to 5, 24 to 26, 28, 31 to 33, 40 and 86; the subject matter of Clauses 6 to 14 and Schedule 1; the impact of any provision on regional economic development; tax avoidance or evasion; the subject matter of Clauses 87 to 89 and Schedules 16 and 17 and Clauses 90 and 91; the subject matter of Clauses 92 to 96 and Schedule 18, Clause 97 and Schedule 19 and Clauses 128 to 130) [FIRST AND SECOND DAY] GLOSSARY This document shows the fate of each clause, schedule, amendment and new clause. The following terms are used: Added: New Clause agreed without a vote and added to the Bill. Agreed to: agreed without a vote. Agreed to on division: agreed following a vote.
    [Show full text]
  • The Friends of Reddish South Station Newsletter
    BusinesName The Friends of Reddish South Station Newsletter: Winter 2014 As you can see on the map,(far left) our line is fea- tured, to it’s cur- rent weekly desti- nation, Staly- bridge. Pictured left, current routes for Greater Manchester & beyond, run by There is an under- Northern Rail, including our ‘service’ used line in exis- running to Stalybridge tence that goes into Manchester Victoria, avoiding Guide Bridge, Sta- lybridge and Ashton –u -Lyne going via Ashton Moss which could be used for our proposed, reintro- duced regular passenger service Pictured right the ‘East Manchester Corri- dor, as proposed by The Friends Campaign Group to take us to Manchester Victoria and beyond to the North and Stockport to the South After our meeting with one of the Inside this shortlisted companies for North- issue: ern Rail & Transpennine fran- consultation– in which he has Go-Ahead for a meeting to be chises Arriva Trains, in Septem- presented an excellent busi- scheduled in January 2015 Hallowe’en Folk 2 ber, the Friends of Reddish ness case. and First Group, who are one Train South & Denton Stations of the shortlisted companies Arriva Stakeholder Manager Trampower 3 (FORSADS) campaign group has for the Transpennine Fran- meeting been very active in representing Katherine Miller, and Railfu- chise. our campaign. ture representative Trevor Community rail 4 Bridge were interested in our Railfuture are hoping to hold station adoption We met again with Arriva trains; campaign. We were unusual in further stakeholder days with day a day arranged by Railfuture for that most other groups were Govia & Abellio.
    [Show full text]