Streamflow-HydrographStreamflow-Hydrograph MethodsMethods forfor EstimatingEstimating Ground-WaterGround-Water RechargeRecharge
DennisDennis RisserRisser USGSUSGS NewNew Cumberland,Cumberland, PennsylvaniaPennsylvania GROUNDGROUNDGROUND-WATER--WATERWATER RECHARGERECHARGE
Recharge is the addition of water to the saturated zone.
It is difficult to measure directly. POPULARPOPULAR METHODSMETHODS FORFOR ESTIMATINGESTIMATING GWGW RECHARGERECHARGE
¾Water-Table Rise ¾Water Budget ¾Stream-Hydrograph Recharge WATERWATERWATER-TABLE--TABLETABLE RISERISE
Estimating
ground- WELL water recharge with wells.
WATER TABLE RISE Recharge = Rise x Sy WATERWATER BUDGETBUDGET METHODMETHOD
PPRECIPITATIONPRREECCIPIPITITAATTIOIONN EVAPOTRANSPIRATIONEVEVAPOAPOTTRRAANNSPOSPORRAATTIOIONN 41 IN 202 0IN INCHES 4141 NCHEI NCHEI SS 20 INCHES
STSTREAMFLOWSTRREAMFEAMFLLOOWW 21 IN 2121 INCHE INCHESS SURSFURFACE RU SURFAACCEE RUNONFOFF 8F I8N CIN RUNOFF 8 INCHHEESS
GROUND-WATER INFINFRECHILILTTRRAARGEATTIOIONN 1313 INCHE13 INCHE IN SS STREAMFLOWSTREAMFLOWSTREAMFLOW-HYDROGRAPH--HYDROGRAPHHYDROGRAPH METHODSMETHODS
PPRECIPITATIONPRREECCIPIPITITAATTIOIONN EVAPOTRANSPIRATIONEVEVAPOAPOTTRRAANNSPOSPORRAATTIOIONN 41 IN 202 0IN INCHES 4141 NCHEI NCHEI SS 20 INCHES
STSTREAMFLOWSTRREAMFEAMFLLOOWW 21 IN 2121 INCHE INCHESS SURSFURFACE RU SURFAACCEE RUNONFOFF 8F I8N CIN RUNOFF 8 INCHHEESS
GROUND-WATER INFINFRECHILILTTRRAARGEATTIOIONN 1313 INCHE13 INCHE IN SS ETET FROMFROM GROUNDGROUND WATERWATER
4.6 8AM WELL LN2044
4.7
4.8 9PM
4.9 0 1440 2880 4320 5760 7200 8640 10080 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 DEPTH TO WATER IN FEET DEPTH TO JUNE, 1999 1,6001,600 STREAMFLOWSTREAMFLOW GAGESGAGES STORMSTORM HYDROGRAPHHYDROGRAPH
No direct runoff. Hydrograph reflects discharge from ground water.
End of direct runoff? E G R
Beginning of direct runoff DISCHA
TIME BASEFLOWBASEFLOW SEPARATIONSEPARATION
N days
N= Area0.2
End of Direct Runoff E G R DISCHA
TIME COMPLEXCOMPLEX HYDROGRAPHSHYDROGRAPHS
3000
) 2500 S 2000 (CF E 1500 HARG
C 1000 S
DI 500
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 DAYS AUTOMATEDAUTOMATED BFBF SEPARATIONSEPARATION PARTPART PROGRAMPROGRAM
3000
2500 STREAMFLOW
) BASE FLOW S F
C 2000 ( , E 1500 HARG
C 1000 S DI 500
0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
YEAR 2000 FOURFOUR AUTOMATEDAUTOMATED BASEBASE--FLOWFLOW METHODSMETHODS COMPAREDCOMPARED ATAT ONEONE SITESITE
WE-38
,
E 1968-2001
G
AR
H
S
C
E
E
H
R
C
R
N 13.1 13.1 12.3
I
O
N
W 10.2
I
O
L
F
E
AS
B
HYSEP PART HYSEP HYSEP LOCAL SLIDE FIXED TWOTWO AUTOMATEDAUTOMATED BASEBASEBASE-FLOW--FLOWFLOW METHODSMETHODS COMPAREDCOMPARED ATAT 150150 SITESSITES
30 150 GAGES IN PA 25 N) I 20 ( D O H
T 15 E
M PART = HYSEP
ART 10 P
5
0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 HYSEP LOCAL MIN METHOD (IN) STREAMFLOWSTREAMFLOW--RECESSIONRECESSION-- DISPLACEMENTDISPLACEMENT METHODMETHOD
WATER-TABLE RISE CAUSED BY RECHAGE
Ground-Water Discharge STREAMFLOWSTREAMFLOW--RECESSIONRECESSION-- DISPLACEMENTDISPLACEMENT METHODMETHOD
9Instantaneous Recharge 9Diffuse Areal Recharge 9Idealized Aquifer 9Ground-Water Discharge to Stream 9Negligible Diversions or Regulation STREAMFLOWSTREAMFLOW--RECESSIONRECESSION-- DISPLACEMENTDISPLACEMENT METHODMETHOD STREAM HYDROGRAPH 1000
FS) Tc = .21K Days C
Q2 100 Q1
SCHARGE ( RECH = 2 (Q2-Q1) K
DI K =43 2.306 Days 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 DAY RECHARGERECHARGE ANDAND BASEFLOWBASEFLOW ESTIMATESESTIMATES ---- 150150 STREAMSSTREAMS
35 ) N I 30 y = 1.07x + 1.94
RA ( 2 25 R = 0.95 RO
M 20 O R F , 15 LINE OF EQUIVALENCE E
10
CHARG 5 RE 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 BASE FLOW FROM PART (IN) COMPARISONCOMPARISON OFOF METHODSMETHODS ATAT ONEONE SITESITE
Stream Hydrograph Methods ¾HYSEP ¾PART ¾RORA
Lysimeters Ground-Water Levels Water Budget COMPARISONCOMPARISON OFOF BASEBASE FLOWFLOW ANDAND RECHARGERECHARGE METHODSMETHODS
2525 BASEFLOW RECHARGE 2020 METHODS METHODS
1515
1010
55
00 G S L S R A D L D E R A T DE E E U ANNUAL BASEFLOW OR RECHARGE (IN) ANNUAL BASEFLOW OR RECHARGE C R I X B T O O A L I V E R L P S F E R M L E I T S W A Y G L W EstimatesEstimates of of Ground-Water Ground-Water Re Rechargecharge in in Penns Pennsyylvlvaanniaia bbyy Streamflo Streamfloww-H-Hyyddrographrograph Methods Methods For a description of the methods, click here Select a station from the map below: SELECTSELECT COUNTYCOUNTY OFOF INTERESTINTEREST
SELECT LYCOMING COUNTY FROM MAP LYCOMINGLYCOMING CREEKCREEK WATERSHEDWATERSHED
SELECT LYCOMING CREEK FROM MAP
LAND COVER RECHARGERECHARGE ANDAND BASEFLOWBASEFLOW ESTIMATESESTIMATES FORFOR LYCOMINGLYCOMING CRCR
Available Opt ions Data Deta iled Sta tion Land Use Geolog y Back to Back to state Main Gra phs Tables Information Map Map count y map map Page Mean -An nual Rech arg e Estimates f or Period of Record, in inches From Rece ssion Curve Displa cement (RORA) Method 18.7 From H ydro graph S eparation of Baseflow (PART) Me thod 14.7 Basin Char acteristic s Dra inage Area (square miles) 173 Period of Record Used for Es timating R echarge 1914-20 01 Land Cover (show m ap) (Forest/Agricultur e/Dev elope d/Othe r) as % of Ar ea 85.2/13.9/0.5/0.5 Rock Types (show ma p) (Sandstone and Shale/Carbona te/Crystalline /Unc onsolida ted 100/0/0/0 Sediments) a s % of Are a
TIMETIME SERIESSERIES OFOF ANNUALANNUAL RECHARGERECHARGE ANDAND BASEBASE FLOWFLOW MEANMEANMEAN-MONTHY--MONTHYMONTHY RECHARGERECHARGE LYCOMINGLYCOMING CREEKCREEK MONTHLYMONTHLY RECHARGERECHARGE FORFOR PAPA
5 PRECIPITATION (1971-2000) 4
3 S E H C IN 2 RECHARGE (RORA)
1
0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC SPATIALSPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONDISTRIBUTION OFOF GROUNDGROUND WATERWATER RECHARGERECHARGE
MICHIGAN