DOCSLIB.ORG

Fair and Efficient Pricing in Transport – the Role of Charges and Taxes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fair and Efficient Pricing in Transport – the Role of Charges and Taxes European Commission DG TREN In association with EC DG TAXUD and EC DG ENV FAIR AND EFFICIENT PRICING IN TRANSPORT – THE ROLE OF CHARGES AND TAXES An EU-Wide Review of Transport Charges and Taxes (National) in Commuter and Business Travel plus A World-Wide Review of the Use of Charges and Taxes (Local and Regional) to Fund Public Transport Final Report April 2000 Oscar Faber Open University Amsterdam Free University European Commission DG TREN In association with EC DG TAXUD and EC DG ENV FAIR AND EFFICIENT PRICING IN TRANSPORT – THE ROLE OF CHARGES AND TAXES An EU-Wide Review of Transport Charges and Taxes (National) in Commuter and Business Travel Plus A World-Wide Review of the Use of Charges and Taxes (Local and Regional) to Fund Public Transport Final Report April 2000 Prepared by: …………………………… Approved by: ……………………………… Tone Vanden Branden Howard Blessington Consultant Director Reviewed by: …………………………… (OFT only) Paul Knight Regional Director Job No: 17296TBM Telephone: +44 (0) 121 262 1900 Beaufort House Fax: +44 (0) 121 262 1999 94/96 Newhall Street Reference: Website: http://www.oscarfaber.co.uk Birmingham B3 1PB Date: 07 February 2000 Acknowledgements This report was written by: Paul Knight Oscar Faber, UK Tone Vanden Branden Oscar Faber, UK Stephen Potter Open University, UK Marcus Enoch Open University, UK Barry Ubbels Amsterdam Free University, the Netherlands The authors were supported by a panel of five external experts: Susan Scott Economic and Social Research Institute, Ireland Veli Himanen VTT Technical Research Centre, Finland Sebastian Belz Econex Verkehrsconsult, Germany Jeroen Groenendijk UITP, Belgium Chris Hewett Institute for Public Policy Research, UK The authors are grateful for the assistance provided by: Howard Blessington Oscar Faber, UK Peter Nijkamp Amsterdam Free University, the Netherlands John Whitelegg Eco-Logica, UK Erik Verhoef Amsterdam Free University, the Netherlands Aura Reggiani University of Bologna Finally, Oscar Faber would also like to thank all of the organisations and individuals who contributed to the study with ideas and information. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Study Background 1 1.2 Study Objectives 1 1.3 Policy Background 2 1.4 Report Structure 6 2 Transport Charges and Taxes in the European Union 8 2.1 Introduction 8 2.2 Methodology 8 2.3 Overview of Existing Instruments 10 2.3.1 Introduction 10 2.3.2 Vehicle Taxation 10 2.3.3 Personal income taxation 11 2.3.4 Corporate taxation 12 2.3.5 Tax treatment of public transport services 12 2.4 Country Reviews 12 2.4.1 Austria 12 2.4.2 Belgium 14 2.4.3 Denmark 15 2.4.4 Finland 16 2.4.5 Germany 18 2.4.6 Greece 20 2.4.7 Ireland 21 2.4.8 Italy 23 2.4.9 Luxembourg 23 2.4.10 The Netherlands 24 2.4.11 Portugal 27 2.4.12 Spain 28 2.4.13 Sweden 28 2.4.14 United Kingdom 30 3 Comparative Assessment of Transport Related Charges and Taxes in the European Union 34 3.1 Introduction 34 3.2 Vehicle taxation 34 3.2.1 Overview 34 3.2.2 Comparative Analysis 35 3.2.3 The Impact of Existing Vehicle Taxation in EU Member States 41 3.3 Fiscal Treatment of Commuting 42 3.4 Business travel 45 3.5 Corporate Taxation 47 3.6 Tax treatment of Public Transport Services 47 3.7 Strategic issues 48 3.8 Concluding comments 49 4 Review of Local/Regional Unconventional Charging and Taxation Measures 51 4.1 Introduction 51 4.1.1 Overview 51 4.1.2 ‘Unconventional’ Taxes and Charges and Principles of Taxation 52 4.1.3 ‘Unconventional’ Taxes and Charges and Transport/Environmental Policy 53 4.1.4 Assessing Unconventional Charges and Taxes 55 4.2 Unconventional Charging and Taxation Cases 55 4.2.1 Employer/Employee/Local Income Taxes 55 4.2.2 Property Taxes 56 4.2.3 Development Levies 59 4.2.4 Parking Levies 63 4.2.5 Charging for the use of roadspace 65 4.2.6 Local motoring taxes 68 4.2.7 Cross-Utility Financing 70 4.2.8 Consumption Taxes 72 4.2.9 Other Unconventional Charges 76 4.2.10 Combined Schemes 77 5 Assessment of Local/Regional Unconventional Charging and Taxation Cases 80 5.1 Assessment Criteria 80 5.2 Performance Assessment 81 5.2.1 Overview 81 5.2.2 Employer taxes 81 5.2.3 Property taxes 83 5.2.4 Developer levies 85 5.2.5 Parking charges and fines 86 5.2.6 Charging for the use of road space 88 5.2.7 Local motoring taxes 90 5.2.8 Consumption taxes 93 5.2.9 Cross utility financing 95 5.2.10 Other taxes 96 5.3 Lessons Learnt 98 6 Summary and Conclusions 100 6.1 Introduction 100 6.2 National Transport Related Charges and Taxes in the European Union 100 6.2.1 Overview 100 6.2.2 Existing Transport Charges and Taxes in the European Union 101 6.2.3 Transport Charges and Taxes in the EU – Conclusions 105 6.3 Local/Regional ‘Unconventional’ Charging and Taxation 107 6.3.1 Introduction 107 6.3.2 The Evaluation of Local/Regional Unconventional Charging and Taxation Measures 108 6.3.3 The Efficiency of Unconventional Mechanisms 110 6.3.4 Ear-marking (hypothecation) and efficiency 111 6.3.5 Local/Regional Unconventional Charging and Taxation – Conclusions 112 Tables Table 1.1 Vehicle, Fuel and Traffic Market-Based Incentives 4 Table 2.1 Additional lump sum deductions for commuting costs in Austria 13 Table 2.2 Tax treatment of employer provided commuting benefits in Austria 13 Table 2.3 Rules for reimbursement of business travel expenses 14 Table 2.4 Tax treatment of employer provided commuting benefits in Belgium 15 Table 2.5 Tax treatment of employer provided commuting benefits in Denmark 16 Table 2.6 Tax treatment of employer provided commuting benefits in Finland 17 Table 2.7 Tax treatment of employer provided commuting benefits in Germany 19 Table 2.8 Business Mileage Rates in Ireland 22 Table 2.9 Tax treatment of employer provided commuting benefits in Portugal 27 Table 2.10 Tax treatment of employer provided commuting benefits in Sweden 30 Table 3.1 Summary of vehicle related taxes in EU Member States 35 Table 3.2 VAT Rates on Acquisitions of Motor vehicles 36 Table 3.3 Registration taxes In EU Member States, types of vehicles taxed 36 Table 3.4 Registration and similar taxes applied to passenger cars by Member States 36 Table 3.5 Circulation taxes applied on passenger applied in Member States 39 Table 3.6 Unleaded Petrol Prices and Excise Duties in EU Member States 40 Table 3.7 Diesel Prices and Excise Duties in EU Member States 40 Table 3.8 Business Mileage Rates in the UK 46 Table 3.9 Costs of petrol cars in the UK 46 Table 3.10 Comparison of authorised rates with car costs 46 Table 3.11 Business Mileage Rates in Ireland 47 Table 6.1 Incentives and Disincentives for Sustainable Mobility 101 Table 6.2 Assessment of Transport Taxes in the EU 103 Table 6.3 Unconventional Charging and Taxation Measures 108 Appendices Appendix A – Bibliography and References 1 Introduction 1.1 Study Background Recent European Commission communications have highlighted the need to change the current structure of transport pricing in the European Union with the broad objectives of removing pricing distortions such that users pay a fair price for infrastructure use, taking into account both infrastructure costs and external costs. Pricing distortions occur in both private and public transport and concerns have been expressed regarding the generally ‘blunt’ nature of the public transport subsidies and the lack of clear targeting towards sustainable transport objectives. However, there is a general consensus that sustainable transport policies require the development of better quality and improved capacity public transport systems. Conventional economic instruments, namely operator fare revenues and public subsidies are limited in their ability to send the correct pricing signals to users and, further, tend not to provide sufficient funds to enable enhancements to public transport systems. Consequently, the European Commission is investigating the potential for unconventional forms of charging and taxation to support public transport operations and investments. In addition to raising revenue a key objective of fiscal policy is to bring about a shift in user behaviour that supports the goals of efficiency in transport, equity and sustainability. In this context, the existing transport taxation systems of EU Member States, in particular, the taxation of personal income and fringe benefits and company taxation contain a mixture of contradictory signals that provide both incentives and disincentives for the use of sustainable modes of travel for commuter and business transport. There is, therefore, a need to consider the inter-relationships between general and unconventional taxation systems and how the two types of instruments might be most efficiently employed to support sustainable mobility objectives. 1.2 Study Objectives The more specific objectives of the study were as follows: Part 1 - to provide a detailed world-wide overview of unconventional forms of charging and taxation at local/regional levels where receipts are totally or partly earmarked to support public transport; - to develop an understanding of the circumstances in which such unconventional charges/taxes can be made to work successfully; - to develop recommendations, based on detailed case studies, on the broad applicability of unconventional charging/taxation measures giving specific attention to possible distributional impacts (winners and losers). FISCAL INCENTIVES FOR SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY 1 C:\WINNT\Profiles\gellner\Desktop\Unconventional Taxation final.doc Part 2 - to undertake an analysis and comparison of the incentives and disincentives within European Union Member States’ taxation systems for using public transport, other sustainable modes and the car.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The True Costs of Automobility: External Costs of Cars Overview on Existing Estimates in EU-27
    „Friedrich List“ Faculty of Transport and Traffic Science - Institute of Transport Planning and Road Traffic The True Costs of Automobility: External Costs of Cars Overview on existing estimates in EU-27 TU Dresden Chair of Transport Ecology Prof. Dr. Ing. Udo J. Becker Thilo Becker Julia Gerlach Chair of Transport Ecology_ 01069 Dresden _ Hettnerstr.1 Tel.: +49 (0) 351 463 36566 _www.verkehrsökologie.d e _ mail: info@verkehrsökologie.de 2 External Costs of Car Use in EU-27 CONTENTS 3 1. Introduction, Scope and Approach 5 2. Literature Review 9 2.1. Overview of Existing Studies 9 2.2. Existing Applications of the Internalisation of External Costs Principle 10 3. Methodology to estimate Noise, Air Pollution and Accident Costs 13 3.1. Introduction 13 3.2. Data Sources used in the Report 14 3.3. Specific Methodology for Accidents 15 3.4. Specific Methodology for Air Pollution 18 3.5. Specific Methodology for Noise 20 3.6. Specific Methodology for Up- and Downstream Effects and for “Other Effects” 22 3.7. Our Approach for estimating External Costs of Car Use in EU-27 23 3.8. Accuracy of Estimations 24 4. Methodology for Estimating Climate Change Costs 25 4.1. Methodological Approach: Damage Costs versus Avoidance Costs 25 4.2. State of the Literature – General Avoidance Cost Factors 27 4.3. State of the Literature – Avoidance Costs for specific Transport Measures 28 4.4. Specific Methodology for Climate Costs used in this Report 30 5. External Costs of Car use: Results Section 33 5.1. External Costs by Country 33 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Belgium
    DOING BUSINESS IN BELGIUM CONTENTS 1 – Introduction 3 2 – Business environment 4 3 – Foreign Investment 7 4 – Setting up a Business 9 5 – Labour 17 6 – Taxation 20 7 – Accounting & reporting 29 8 – UHY Representation in Belgium 31 DOING BUSINESS IN BELGIUM 3 1 – INTRODUCTION UHY is an international organisation providing accountancy, business management and consultancy services through financial business centres in over 100 countries throughout the world. Business partners work together through the network to conduct transnational operations for clients as well as offering specialist knowledge and experience within their own national borders. Global specialists in various industry and market sectors are also available for consultation. This detailed report providing key issues and information for investors considering business operations in Belgium has been provided by the office of UHY representatives: UHY-CDP PARTNERS Square de l’Arbalète, 6, B-1170 Brussels Belgium Phone +32 2 663 11 20 Website www.cdp-partners.be Email [email protected] You are welcome to contact Chantal Bollen ([email protected]) for any inquiries you may have. A detailed firm profile for UHY’s representation in Belgium can be found in section 8. Information in the following pages has been updated so that they are effective at the date shown, but inevitably they are both general and subject to change and should be used for guidance only. For specific matters, investors are strongly advised to obtain further information and take professional advice before making any decisions. This publication is current at July 2021. We look forward to helping you doing business in Belgium DOING BUSINESS IN BELGIUM 4 2 – BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT OVERVIEW COUNTRY AND NATION Belgium is a small country (30,528 square kilometres) at the centre of the most significant industrial and urban area in Western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Economic Surveys Belgium February 2020
    OECD Economic Surveys Belgium February 2020 OVERVIEW www.oecd.org/economy/belgium-economic-snapshot/ This Overview is extracted from the Economic Survey of Belgium. The Survey is published on the responsibility of the Economic and Development Review Committee (EDRC) of the OECD, which is charged with the examination of the economic situation of member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. OECD Economic Surveys: Belgium© OECD 2020 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Executive Summary Belgium performs well in many economic and well-being dimensions, but some risks are building up The resilience of public finances should be increased Improving labour market outcomes is key Boosting potential growth requires higher productivity growth 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Belgium performs well in many economic increase vulnerabilities and lower the resilience and well-being dimensions, but some risks of the financial system.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting with American Automobile Association Board (2)” of the Robert T
    The original documents are located in Box 22, folder “WIN Campaign - Meeting with American Automobile Association Board (2)” of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Some items in this folder were not digitized because it contains copyrighted materials. Please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library for access to these materials. Digitized from Box 22 of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library AMERICAN MARCH 1974 r---lfiiDTDRl Thirty-Five Cents A WAGAZIN[ 0' OOIItlllSTIC AND P'ORIIGN TftAVll.. FOR MIN WHO CIUVI. FORMUILY WlSTiftN VlftGIN IA MOTOflll NIWS a motorists' guide to reducing fuel use 25 percent without hardship- to prevent rationing if you're worried enough about gasoline shortages to do something about it you don't even have to meet the problem half way. 25°/o will do. You already hold the key to easing the energy crunch. And to keeping America rolling along during this era of gasoline availability uncertainties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Time of Car Drivers Choosing Route: Evidence from the Stockholm Congestion Charging Trial
    THE VALUE OF TIME OF CAR DRIVERS CHOOSING ROUTE: EVIDENCE FROM THE STOCKHOLM CONGESTION CHARGING TRIAL Maria Börjesson WSP Analysis & Strategy [email protected] Anders Levander WSP Analysis & Strategy Jonas Eliasson WSP Analysis & Strategy Centre for Transport Studies, Royal Institute of Technology [email protected] PRELIMINARY DRAFT 2007-09-15 To be presented at the 2007 European Transport Conference, Leiden, Netherlands. Abstract A crucial parameter when forecasting route choice in networks with road pricing is the assumed value of time for car drivers. This will determine the extent to which drivers are willing to take detours to avoid being charged. The purpose of this paper is to investigate this question using survey data from the Stockholm congestion charging trial. The estimation results in this study can be interpreted in two ways, depending on whether charging costs (at face value) of average marginal driving costs are taken as the relevant travel cost measure. Relative to charging costs, we obtain values of time of 174 kr/h for work trips and 190 kr/h for other trips, and values of distance of 2.19 kr/km for work trips and 2.40 kr/km for other trips. If we instead relate time and charging costs to average marginal driving cost, we get values of time of 127 kr/km for both work trips and other trips. Further, this interpretation means that expenditures for congestion charges are only worth 70% of driving costs. One possible interpretation of this is that 30% of the travellers in this group did not pay the charges out-of-pocket themselves, but had their costs covered by their employers.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Report on Belgium
    NARRATIVE REPORT ON BELGIUM PART 1: NARRATIVE REPORT Rank: 50 of 133 Belgium comes in at number 50 in the 2020 Financial Secrecy Index, with a global scale weight of 1.72 per cent. Belgium has always had How Secretive? 45 a relatively large financial services industry given the size of the country, but recent improvements in financial transparency means it has a relatively low secrecy score of 45, reflecting significant changes over the course of the past decade. Although the use of Belgium as Moderately 0 to 25 a secrecy jurisdiction has declined, there remain issues for domestic secretive tax inspectors accessing Belgian accounts. The country also remains a corporate tax haven. The end of bank secrecy in Belgium? 25 to 50 Bank secrecy was formally introduced in Belgian tax legislation in 1980 but had existed informally for a long time prior to that. The domestic provisions governing bank secrecy (article 318 of the Income Tax Code) prevented the tax administration from investigating the accounts of 50 to 75 non-residents when requested by a foreign administration. The tax administration could only force the bank to release client information when provided with evidence that the bank was an accessory to serious Exceptionally tax fraud. However, in recent years, a number of measures have been secretive 75 to 100 introduced to weaken bank secrecy. In the aftermath of recent financial scandals like the Panama Papers and the Paradise Papers, considerable public pressure emerged calling for increased transparency to ensure fair taxation. Bank secrecy is under attack more than ever. How big? 1.72% When the European Union Savings Tax Directive came into effect in 2005, Belgium initially opted to levy withholding taxes on savings income instead of opting for the EU’s automatic information exchange with the relevant taxpayer’s home jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation of Companies Under Belgian Income Tax Law
    IFA Issue – Articles Eric Osterweil and Marc Quaghebeur* Taxation of Companies under Belgian Income Tax Law This article sets forth the principal features of 2. General Comments Belgium’s income tax system as applied to companies, focusing on selected aspects that With few exceptions, commercial entities that have legal may be of interest to foreign investors. After an personality are subject to the company income tax in introduction and some general comments, Belgium. Thus, entities in the form of a corporation, lim - the article discusses, among other things, ited liability companies and most types of partnerships the computation of a company’s taxable income, are subject to company income taxation. Belgium does the tax rates, withholding taxes and foreign tax not recognize fiscal transparency for any type of com - credits, the general and specific anti-avoidance pany having legal personality except in the case of Eco - rules in Belgian law, the tax treatment of non- nomic Interest Groupings and European Economic resident companies, and Belgian companies in Interest Groupings. international tax planning. Partnerships formed under company law that in other jurisdictions might be transparent for income tax pur - 1. Introduction poses are subject to the company income tax. Their part - ners are taxed only on the distribution of income to This article sets forth the principal features of Belgium’s them. income tax system as applied to companies with empha - sis on selected aspects that may be of interest to foreign Companies that are resident in Belgium are subject to investors. full company income taxation, while non-resident com - panies are generally subject to company income taxation As an EU Member State, Belgium is obliged to comply only on income derived from Belgian sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Costs Any Problems Or Repairs
    TEEN GUIDE moneytalks4teens.org Warranty Information Know what kind of warranty comes with your car.A warranty is a guarantee by the maker or seller to stand behind their product. The warranty pays for repairs to your car.Warranties vary a lot – some warranties cover most repairs, others cover very few repairs.Whatever warranty you get, be sure it’s in writing. New – New cars include a manufacturer’s warranty - never pay for it! Be sure to ask exactly what it covers. They usually offer broad coverage for a minimum of three years or 36,000 miles, which ever comes first. Should I Be Listening? Used – Used cars may or may not be sold with a warranty.Newer used cars may still carry the remaining portion of the manufacturer’s warranty, while others may have a warranty offered by a dealer. As Is – A car sold “as is”comes with no warranty at all.You will be responsible for Car Costs any problems or repairs. What kind of car is right for you? A black Extended – This is a warranty you pay for.Auto dealers offer “extended sports car? A red truck? A silver economy warranties”that extend or expand warranty coverage on both new and used cars. However, because they cost extra and are sold separately, they are more accurately car? Uncle Henry’s old minivan? known as service contracts. Extended warranties are usually expensive so be sure you know what it will cover and what it will cost before you sign up for one.Also, If you are like most people, the biggest check to make sure it does not duplicate coverage you have under your free warranty.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgium Taxation and Investment 2012
    Taxation and Investment in Belgium 2012 Reach, relevance and reliability A publication of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited Contents 1.0 Investment climate 1.1 Business environment 1.2 Currency 1.3 Banking and financing 1.4 Foreign investment 1.5 Tax incentives 1.6 Exchange controls 2.0 Setting up a business 2.1 Principal forms of business entity 2.2 Regulation of business 2.3 Accounting, filing and auditing requirements 3.0 Business taxation 3.1 Overview 3.2 Residence 3.3 Taxable income and rates 3.4 Capital gains taxation 3.5 Double taxation relief 3.6 Anti-avoidance rules 3.7 Administration 3.8 Other taxes on business 4.0 Withholding taxes 4.1 Dividends 4.2 Interest 4.3 Royalties 4.4 Branch remittance tax 4.5 Wage tax/social security contributions 5.0 Indirect taxes 5.1 Value added tax 5.2 Capital tax 5.3 Real estate tax 5.4 Transfer tax 5.5 Stamp duty 5.6 Customs and excise duties 5.7 Environmental taxes 5.8 Other taxes 6.0 Taxes on individuals 6.1 Residence 6.2 Taxable income and rates 6.3 Inheritance and gift tax 6.4 Net wealth tax 6.5 Real property tax 6.6 Social security contributions 6.7 Other taxes 6.8 Compliance 7.0 Labor environment 7.1 Employees’ rights and remuneration 7.2 Wages and benefits 7.3 Termination of employment 7.4 Labor-management relations 7.5 Employment of foreigners 8.0 Deloitte International Tax Source 9.0 Office locations Belgium Taxation and Investment 2012 1.0 Investment climate 1.1 Business environment Belgium is a constitutional monarchy in which ultimate power rests with a bicameral parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexes., URL: Mentation Guidelines.Pdf
    STUDY SUPPORTING THE PHASING OUT OF ENVIRONMENTALLY HARMFUL SUBSIDIES Annexes to Final Report October 2012 Project Number: 07.0307/2011/611259/ENV.F.1 The Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit (IVM) Ecologic Institute Vision on Technology (VITO) ANNEX I: EHS CASES IN EU MEMBER STATES ..................................................................... 4 1 AGRICULTURE ........................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Eligibility criteria for CAP Pillar 1 direct payments in the UK ..................................................... 4 1.2 Reduced fuel excise duty for diesel used in agricultural machinery .......................................... 8 1.3 Subsidies contributing to unsustainable land use and soil sealing in France .......................... 11 2 CLIMATE AN ENERGY ............................................................................................ 19 2.1 Limited liability for nuclear energy producers in Germany ..................................................... 19 2.2 Preferential treatment for the hard coal mining industry in Poland ....................................... 24 2.3 Support for biofuels in Sweden ................................................................................................ 28 2.4 Feed-in tariff for electricity generated by cogeneration in Estonia ......................................... 40 3 FISHERIES ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taxing Energy Use 2019: Country Note – Belgium
    BELGIUM 1 │ Taxing Energy Use 2019: Country Note – Belgium This note explains how Belgium taxes energy use. The note shows the distribution of effective energy tax rates – the sum of fuel excise taxes, explicit carbon taxes, and electricity excise taxes, net of applicable exemptions, rate reductions, and refunds – across all domestic energy use. It also details the country-specific assumptions made when calculating effective energy tax rates and matching tax rates to the corresponding energy base. The note complements the Taxing Energy Use 2019 report that is available at http://oe.cd/TEU2019. The report analyses where OECD and G20 countries stand in deploying energy and carbon taxes, tracks progress made, and makes actionable recommendations on how governments could do better to use taxes to reach environmental and climate goals. The general methodology employed to calculate effective energy tax rates and assign tax rates to the energy base is explained in Chapter 1 of the report. The official energy tax profile for Belgium can be found in Chapter 2 of the report. Chapter 3 additionally shows effective carbon tax rates per tonne of CO2, and presents the corresponding carbon tax profiles for all countries. The report also contains StatLinks to the official data. Structure of energy taxation in Belgium Energy and carbon taxes in Belgium are levied within the framework of the 2003 European Union (EU) Energy Tax Directive, which sets minimum rates for the taxation of energy products in EU member states. Within this framework, as at 1 July 2018, the main taxes on energy use in Belgium are the following: • The Excise Tax (droit d’accise) applies to petrol, diesel, kerosene, LPG and fuel oil;1 • The Special Excise Tax (droit d’accise special) additionally applies to the fuels listed above, as well as to coal and coke products; • The Energy Contribution (cotisation sur l’énergie) also applies to the fuels listed 2 above as well as to natural gas and electricity; Belgium participates in the EU emissions trading system (ETS) (OECD, 2018[1]).
    [Show full text]
  • PKF Doing Business in Belgium
    Business advisers Doing business in Belgium 1 PKF - Doing business in Belgium - Contents Contents Foreword 1 Our services for inward investors 3 Chapter 1 – Introduction 9 • Geography and population 9 • Political environment 9 • Economy 10 • Regulatory environment 11 • Intellectual property 12 • Unfair trade practices 12 • Money laundering and financing of terrorism 13 • Financial and insurance services 13 • Exchange controls 14 • Currency and common financial instruments 14 Chapter 2 – Business structure 17 • Types of business structure 17 • Companies 19 • Foreign companies and foreign investments 20 • Partnerships 21 • Joint ventures 21 • Economic Interest Grouping (EIG) 21 Chapter 3 – Business finance 23 • Equity finance 23 • Loan funding 24 • Incentives and grants 25 PKF - Doing business in Belgium - Contents I Chapter 4 – Accounting 27 • Statutory accounting requirements and principles 27 • Audit requirements and role of auditor 29 Chapter 5 – Taxation 31 a) Overview of taxes within Belgium 31 • Income tax 31 • Personal income tax 32 • Corporate income tax 33 • Value-added tax, customs and excise duties 37 • Other taxes 41 b) Taxation on property / land 43 • Annual real estate withholding tax 43 • Annual income tax 43 • Registration duties 44 • VAT 45 • Registration as a contractor 46 c) Tax implications of a place of business, branch or Belgian company 46 • Legal issues 46 • Income taxes 47 • VAT 49 d) Selling into Belgium 51 • Direct selling from abroad 51 • Selling through a Belgium based agent 53 • Selling through a Belgium based
    [Show full text]