CAREER GUIDE for RESIDENTS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hospital Networks: Perspective from Four Years of the Individual Market Exchanges Mckinsey Center for U.S
Hospital networks: Perspective from four years of the individual market exchanges McKinsey Center for U.S. Health System Reform May 2017 Any use of this material without specific permission of McKinsey & Company is strictly prohibited Key takeaways The proportion of narrowed The trend toward managed Narrowed networks continue to 1 networks continues to rise 2 plan design also continues. In 3 offer price advantages to (53% in 2017, up from 48% in the 2017 silver tier, more than consumers. In the 2017 silver 2014). In the 2017 individual 80% of narrowed network plans, tier, plans with broad networks market, both incumbent carriers and over half of the broad were priced ~18% higher than and new entrants carriers network plans, had managed narrowed network plans offered narrow networks designs predominantly Consumer choice is becoming Consumers who select narrowed In both 2014 and 2015 (most 4 more limited. In 2017, 29% of 5 networks in 2017 may have less 6 recent available data), narrowed QHP-eligible individuals had choice of specialty facilities network plans performed only narrowed network plans (e.g., children’s hospitals) but, in better financially, on average, available to them in the silver the aggregate, have access to than broad network plans did tier (up from 10% in 2014) hospitals with quality ratings similar to those in broad networks Definitions of "narrowed networks" and other specialized terms can be found in the glossary at the end of this document. McKinsey & Company 2 1 The proportion of narrowed networks continues to rise Network breadth by carrier status Ultra-narrow Narrow Tiered Broad N = number of networks1,2 Incumbents are using more narrowed networks New entrants2 primarily used narrowed More than half of networks are narrowed networks in 2017 1,883 1,703 37 2,410 2,782 2,524 1,740 19 21 24 20 18 18 21 25 21 23 25 28 28 4 38 6 5 5 4 4 0 52 47 53 54 53 47 38 2016 2017 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017 Carriers that remained in the market New entrants National view in both years 1 Networks were counted at a state rating area level. -
National Referral Facility State-Of-The-Art Teaching Hospital in Central Haiti Hospital Dr
“For some of us, this hospital is the culmination of a dream dating back a quarter century, and underlines our commitment to the country and people of Haiti, which is 2010 stronger than ever after the earthquake.” – Dr. Paul Farmer Mirebalais National Referral Facility State-of-the-Art Teaching Hospital in Central Haiti Hospital Dr. Paul Farmer, co-founder of PIH, Chair of the Harvard Medical School’s Department of Global Health and Social Medicine and Chief of the Division of Global Health Equity at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, says of the facility, “For some of us, this hospital is the culmination of a dream dating back a quarter century, and underlines our commitment to the country and Mirebalais Hospital Mirebalais Hospital background people of Haiti, which is stronger than ever after National Referral Facility, State-of-the-Art Before the earthquake hit Haiti on January 12, 2010, the town of Mirebalais, located at the intersection of the earthquake. It is also a manifestation of our Teaching Hospital in Central Haiti two main roads in Central Haiti, was the hub of a catchment area with a population of more than 140,000 residents. These two roads have been major thoroughfares for earthquake refugees fleeing Port-au-Prince in integrated model of research, teaching and service, In Haiti, an impoverished country of almost 9 million people with search of new places to call home. Due to its high-traffic location, an estimated 20,000 new residents have the worst basic health indicators and highest rates of extreme and will serve as a site for all three. -
Hospitalists in Teaching Hospitals: Opportunities but Not Without Danger
HospitalistsORIGINALBlackwellEditorials Publishing, ARTICLE Ltd. in Teaching Hospitals: Opportunities but Not Without Danger One thing seems clear: hospitalists do not appear to be have developed or are developing such a “hospitalist-only” going away. After Wachter and Goldman first used the term service. hospitalist to describe a new type of U.S. physician 8 years What about the hospitalist educator’s role within ago,1 the concept of hospital medicine was not warmly teaching hospitals? The study by Kulaga et al.7 in this issue embraced by all.2–4 Even at the 1999 Society of General of the Journal of General Internal Medicine sheds light on Internal Medicine’s 22nd annual meeting in San Francisco, this issue. The authors found that hiring two hospitalist more than a few boos were heard when the topic of hos- educators at their community-based teaching hospital led pitalists came up. Hospital medicine is now one of the fast- to decreased resource utilization and improved resident est growing medical “specialties” in the United States. The education when compared to having private physicians Society of Hospital Medicine, the national organization that manage hospitalized patients.7 Enhanced efficiency due represents hospitalists, boasts upward of 3,500 members. to hospitalists has been demonstrated in several previous The number of want ads in the New England Journal of studies, in both community and academic settings.8 The Medicine and Annals of Internal Medicine for hospitalists finding of an educational benefit for hospitalists in a com- rivals those for primary care-based internists. Medical resi- munity teaching hospital, however, is relatively new. -
The Provision of American Medical Services at Or Via Southampton During WWII
The Provision of D-Day: American Medical Stories Services at or via from Southampton the Walls during WWII During the Maritime Archaeology Trust’s National Lottery Heritage Funded D-Day Stories from the Walls project, volunteers undertook online research into topics and themes linked to D-Day, Southampton, ships and people during the Second World War. Their findings were used to support project outreach and dissemination. This Research Article was undertaken by one of our volunteers and represents many hours of hard and diligent work. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all our amazing volunteers. Every effort has been made to trace the copyright hold-ers and obtain permission to reproduce this material. Please do get in touch with any enquiries or any information relating to any images or the rights holder. The Provision of American Medical Services at or via Southampton during WWII Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Planning for D-Day and Subsequently ............................................................................................. 2 Royal Victoria Hospital, Netley near Southampton ......................................................................... 3 Hospital Trains .................................................................................................................................. 5 Medical Services associated with 14th Port ................................................................................... -
B-170847 Use of Ambulance Trains and Assigned Personnel
r-i I 0 L COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548 B- 170 847 Dear Senator Proxmire : This is our report on the use of ambulance trains and assigned personnel. We made the review in response to your request of September 15, 1970. We plan to make no further distribution of the report un- less copies are specifically requested, and then we shall make distribution only after your agreement has been obtained or public announdement has been made by you concerning the contents of the report. Sincerely yours, Comptroller General of the United States The Honorable William Proxmire United States Senate 50TH ANNIVERSARY 1921- 1971 I I I I I I COMPTROLLERGENERAL'S REPORT TO USE OF AMBULANCE TRAINS AND I I THE HONORABLEWILLIAM PROXMIRE ASSIGNEDPERSONNEL I UNITED STATESSENATE Department of the Army B-170847 I I I I I ------DIGEST I I I I WHYTHE REVIEW WASMADE I I I By letter dated September 15, 1970, Senator William Proxmire requested I the General Accounting Office (GAO) to ascertain the correctness of in- I I formation furnished to him concerning an Army hospital train--the 22d I Medical Ambulance Train--while it was stationed at Walson Army Hospital, I Fort Dix, New I Jersey. (See app. I.) The information concerned the I train's movement, the activities of the medical corpsmen and other per- I so-@ assigned to it, and the cost of the train. I --.I.-A-c_a, 4 ..Cli,_, r,_ __l _ _ -~ I I I FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS I I I The Office of the Surgeon GeneraJ of the Army said that the train was I I activated to transport patients between Walson Army Hospital and Val- I ley Forge General Hospital, Pennsylvania; to give personnel training I and for contingent mo~f~;"~~ff~.&"ij"n-pur- I in ambulance train operations; I -Some personnel at Fort Dix and in the Office of the Surgeon Gen- I mxpressed doubt that the train was intended to be used to transport I I patients to Valley Forge General Hospital (See pp. -
The Evolution of Hospitals from Antiquity to the Renaissance
Acta Theologica Supplementum 7 2005 THE EVOLUTION OF HOSPITALS FROM ANTIQUITY TO THE RENAISSANCE ABSTRACT There is some evidence that a kind of hospital already existed towards the end of the 2nd millennium BC in ancient Mesopotamia. In India the monastic system created by the Buddhist religion led to institutionalised health care facilities as early as the 5th century BC, and with the spread of Buddhism to the east, nursing facilities, the nature and function of which are not known to us, also appeared in Sri Lanka, China and South East Asia. One would expect to find the origin of the hospital in the modern sense of the word in Greece, the birthplace of rational medicine in the 4th century BC, but the Hippocratic doctors paid house-calls, and the temples of Asclepius were vi- sited for incubation sleep and magico-religious treatment. In Roman times the military and slave hospitals were built for a specialised group and not for the public, and were therefore not precursors of the modern hospital. It is to the Christians that one must turn for the origin of the modern hospital. Hospices, originally called xenodochia, ini- tially built to shelter pilgrims and messengers between various bishops, were under Christian control developed into hospitals in the modern sense of the word. In Rome itself, the first hospital was built in the 4th century AD by a wealthy penitent widow, Fabiola. In the early Middle Ages (6th to 10th century), under the influence of the Be- nedictine Order, an infirmary became an established part of every monastery. -
Critical Information Could Your Patients Benefit
To view this email as a web page, go here. September 30, 2018 Critical Information Everything you need to know Could your Patients Benefit from a Medicare Advantage Plan Powered by Hartford HealthCare? Hartford HealthCare and Tufts Health Plan have launched CarePartners of Connecticut, a new health insurance company that brings together the healthcare expertise of HHC with the insurance plan experience of Tufts Health Plan. CarePartners of Connecticut will offer Medicare Advantage plans to eligible beneficiaries, starting with the Open Enrollment period that begins Oct. 15. Recently, Dr. Jim Cardon explained the joint venture and the benefits for patients in an article in Network News. Read the Q&A here. Drs. Yu, Lawrence to Lead Tweeting for CME’s on Breast Cancer Discussion on Oct. 1 We’ve created a new way for you to earn Continuing Medical Education (CME) hours to keep abreast of the latest innovations in healthcare: Tweeting for CME’s. This unique partnership between the Hartford HealthCare Office of Continuing Education and the Planning & Marketing Department allows you to take part in a Twitter chat led by Hartford HealthCare experts and apply for CMEs as a result. "Each onehour chat discusses a deidentified patient case and/or peerreviewed journal article," said Hillary Landry, professional education manager with Hartford HealthCare's Office of Experience, Engagement & Organizational Development. "Participants wishing to earn CMEs would review the case or article in advance, then attend and participate in the chat by providing their insights using a specific Twitter hashtag: #CMEHHC." The next chat takes place tomorrow, Oct. -
Consumer Preferences, Hospital Choices, and Demand-Side Incentives
Consumer Preferences, Hospital Choices, and Demand-side Incentives David I Auerbach, PhD Director of Research, Massachusetts Health Policy Commission Co-authors: Amy Lischko, Susan Koch-Weser, Sarah Hijaz (all of Tufts University School of Medicine) Background § The HPC has consistently found that community hospitals generally provide care of similar quality, at a lower cost, compared to Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) and teaching hospitals § Yet Massachusetts residents use AMCs and teaching hospitals for a high proportion of routine care – In 2014, 42% of Medicare inpatient hospital discharges took place at major teaching hospitals compared to 17% nationwide § Massachusetts has promoted demand-side and supply-side strategies to steer care to more cost-effective settings – Demand-side: e.g., tiered and limited network products – Supply-side: e.g., alternative payment models § Still, the percentage of statewide routine care provided at teaching hospitals continues to rise § The HPC sought a deeper understanding of consumer preferences and what incentives might lead them to seek care in lower-cost, high-quality settings 2 Most community hospitals provide care at a lower cost per discharge, without significant differences in quality Hospital costs per case mix adjusted discharge (CMAD), by cohort On average, community hospital costs are nearly $1,500 less per inpatient stay as Source: HPC analysis of CHIA Hosp. Profiles, 2013 compared to AMCs, Costs per CMAD are not correlated with quality (risk-standardized readmission rates) although -
The Hospitalist Huddle: a 1-Year Experience of Teaching Hospital Medicine Utilizing the Concept of Peer Teaching in Medical Education
Journal name: Advances in Medical Education and Practice Article Designation: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Year: 2017 Volume: 8 Advances in Medical Education and Practice Dovepress Running head verso: Elhassan Running head recto: The Hospitalist Huddle open access to scientific and medical research DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S149450 Open Access Full Text Article ORIGINAL RESEARCH The Hospitalist Huddle: a 1-year experience of teaching Hospital Medicine utilizing the concept of peer teaching in medical education Mohammed Elhassan Background: The relatively new specialty of Hospital Medicine in the USA is one of the fastest growing fields in internal medicine. Academic hospitalists are largely involved in the medical Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, UCSF/ education of postgraduate residents and medical students. Little is known about the effectiveness Fresno Center for Medical Education of peer-to-peer teaching in internal medicine residency training programs and how the medical and Research, Fresno, CA, USA residents perceive its educational value in learning Hospital Medicine. Materials and methods: The Hospitalist Huddle is a weekly educational activity newly established by our Hospitalist Division to facilitate the concept of peer-to-peer teaching. It requires medical residents to teach and educate their peers about the clinical topics related to Hospital Medicine. Faculty hospitalists serve as facilitators during the teaching sessions. A For personal use only. survey disseminated at the end of the first year of its implementation examined the residents’ Video abstract perception of the educational value of this new teaching activity. Results: Most residents reported that they see the Huddle as a useful educational forum which may improve their skills in teaching, create a better educational and learning environ- ment during their inpatient rotation, and improve their understanding of Hospital Medicine. -
Operation Just Cause, the Joint Military Incursion in the Republic Of
1990 - 1999 Students training on the new TAMMIS system (U.S. ArmyPhoto) peration Just Cause, the joint military incursion in the Republic of Panama, continued, although fighting throughout Othe country had subsided. Fort Sam Houston and San Antonio Joint Medical Command were alerted on 19 December to activate their contingency plans for support and prepare to receive large numbers of casualties. BAMC received 43 casualties during the conflict and, fortunately, all injuries were diagnosed as minor. All of FSH played a major role in ensuring soldiers in combat support readiness roles were prepared to respond in whatever capacity necessary. (“Panama: FSH Responds to Major Crisis,” News Leader, 5 Jan 1990) A new “tool” traveled with the 41st Combat Support Hospital during a week of training at Camp Bullis. The new tool was a computer program that became part of the Theater Army Medical Management Informa- tion System (TAMMIS). TAMMIS enhanced health care combat sup- port hospitals by assisting medical personnel in the management and On June 15, a proposal was authorized to commission all warrant offi- accountability of patients and logistics. It had an automated, on-line cers who served as active duty physicians assistants. Awaiting congres- interactive microcomputer system that assisted units by providing ac- sional approval, the legislative change allowed PAs to join the Army curate and timely medical information in blood management, patient Medical Service Corps and to apply constructive service credits when accounting and reporting, supply maintenance, and optical fabrication. converting to commissioning. The change was made in hopes of mak- ing the Army more competitive, and of recruiting and retaining quality (“Computer Program Provides Army with Pertinent Soldier Information,” News Leader, 9 Feb 1990) physician assistants. -
Georgia Trauma System Regionalization Pilot Project Evaluation
Georgia Trauma System Regionalization Pilot Project Evaluation December 2012 Prepared by Public Health Consultants, LLC for the Report approved by the Georgia Trauma Commission on June 18, 2013 Georgia Trauma System Regionalization Pilot Project Evaluation I. Executive Summary……………………………………………………………….1 II. Overview and Context…………………………………………………………….2 III. Evaluation Methodology………………………………………………………….5 IV. Evaluation Results………………………………………………………………...8 V. References………………………………………………………………………..17 Appendices: A. Interview Results by Region a. Region V……………………………………………………………..19 b. Region VI…………………………………………………………….29 c. Region IX…………………………………………………………….38 d. Statewide Stakeholders………………………………………………45 B. Interviewee Names…………………………………………………………..51 C. Interview Questions………………………………………………………….52 D. Glossary……………………………………………………………………...53 I. Executive Summary In 2007, the Georgia Legislature through Senate Bill 60 established the Georgia Trauma Care Network Commission, also known as the Georgia Trauma Commission (GTC). The GTC has the responsibility to establish, maintain and administer a trauma center network and to coordinate the best use of existing trauma facilities in Georgia. 1 Following a Georgia trauma system review by the American College of Surgeons’ Trauma System Consultation Program in January 2009, the GTC identified the need for both a comprehensive state trauma system plan and for a statewide trauma communications system. In 2009, the GTC developed the "Regional Trauma System Planning Framework" and a plan to test that framework through a pilot project ("Pilot Project for Georgia Trauma System Regionalization, White Paper"). The pilot project tested the framework as a regional trauma plan development guide and was the opportunity for the GTC to operationalize the Statewide Trauma Communications Center. In 2011, the pilot project was funded and was implemented in three of the state's 10 EMS regions (Regions V, VI and IX). -
Employee Handbook Can Be Found Under Quick Links on the Intranet
Revised January 2020 INTRODUCTION Welcome to Daviess Community Hospital As an employee of Daviess Community Hospital, whether employed in in the hospital or its physician practices, you now have a very important role in the success of the hospital. Throughout your employment at Daviess Community Hospital, you will be working with the rest of the staff in a team effort to make the hospital a place where patients choose to come for care, where physicians want to practice and where employees want to work. By accepting your new role with a commitment to Daviess Community Hospital values, you will support the hospital’s mission to provide the best heath care services to our patients. At the same time your dedication to Daviess Community Hospital’s values will allow growth and expansion of our services to meet the health care needs of the community, both today and in the future. You should take pride in being a part of Daviess Community Hospital. We are pleased to welcome you as an employee. You are an important member of the staff, carefully selected to work toward the essential goal of providing excellent medical care and friendly service to our patients, visitors and co- workers. This handbook presents an overview of the benefits and working conditions that are part of your employment. Please read it carefully, as it is important to familiarize yourself with your responsibilities as an employee of Daviess Community Hospital. This handbook supersedes all previous handbooks. The information contained in this handbook is not guaranteed and is subject to change. Should you have any questions as to the interpretation of any policies in this manual or regarding other employment matters, please contact your supervisor or the human resources department.