Resettlement Plan Document Stage: Draft Project Number: September 2010

Involuntary Resettlement Assessment and Measures

Tajikistan: CAREC Corridor 3 (Dushanbe- Uzbekistan Border) Improvement Project

Prepared by the Ministry of Transport and Communications, Republic of Tajikistan

The land acquisition and resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM Page No.

Abbreviations and Acronyms vi

Executive Summary ix

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 General 1 1.2 Requirements for LARP Finalization 1 1.3 LARP-related Project Implementation Conditions 2 1.4 Project Road Description 2 1.5 LARP Objectives 4

2.0 BASELINE INFORMATION ON LAND ACQUISTION AND RESETTLEMENT 5 2.1 General 5 2.2 Impacts 5 2.2.1 Impact on Cultivated Land 5 2.2.2 Impact on Residential and Commercial Land 5 2.2.3 Impact on Land for Community and District Government Structures 5 2.2.4 Property Status of Affected Land 6 2.2.5 Impacts on Structures and Buildings 6 2.2.6 Impacts on Annual Crops 7 2.2.7 Impacts on Perennial Crops 8 2.2.8 Business Impacts 8 2.2.9 Employment Impacts 9 2.3 Resettlement Strategy and Relocation needs 9 2.4 Census of Displaced Households/Persons Census 10 2.4.1 Total Displaced Households/Persons 10 2.4.2 Severity of Impacts 10 2.5 Impact on Vulnerable Households 10 2.5.1 Ethnic Composition of AHs 11 2.5.2 Gender 11 2.5.3 Types of Household 11

3.0 SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE PROJECT AREA 12 3.1 General 12 3.2 Socio Economic Details 12 3.2.1 Major Economic Activities 12 3.2.2 Gender 12 3.2.3 Landholding Status 13 3.2.4 Types of Landholding 13 3.2.5 Major Cropping Pattern 13 3.2.6 Average Annual Income 13 3.2.7 Poverty 14 3.2.8 Average Annual Expenditure 14 3.2.9 Possession of Durable Goods 15 3.2.10 Indebtedness 15 3.2.11 Access to Schemes/Benefits 16 i

3.2.12 Access to Health Centres 16 3.2.13 Migration Pattern 17 3.2.14 Place of Migration 17 3.2.15 Occupations of Migrant Workers 17 3.2.16 Trends in Migration 17 3.2.17 Season of Migration 18 3.2.18 Education and Literacy 18 3.2.19 Source of Drinking Water 18 3.2.20 Sanitation Facilities 19 3.2.21 Usage Pattern of Fuel for Cooking 19 3.2.22 Status on Electrification 19 3.2.23 Interior Details of Structure 20 3.3 Socio-economic data relevant to Women 20 3.4 Impact on Indigenous Peoples and Other Social Issues 21

4.0 RESETTLEMENT POLICY, LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ENTITLEMENT 22 4.1 General 22 4.2 Policy and Legal Framework for Land Acquisition and Resettlement 22 4.3 Tajikistan Constitution, law/regulation on land acquisition, resettlement and compensation 22 4.4 ADB Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards 24 4.5 Policy Differences and Reconciliation 27 4.6 Principles Adopted for the Project 28 4.6.1 Types of Land Ownership and Land Use Rights Allocation 28 4.6.2 Eligibility 29 4.6.3 Compensation Entitlements 29 4.7 Approaches and Methodologies for Land Compensation 32 4.7.1 Replacement of Affected land with Alternative land 32 4.7.2 Cash Compensation 32 4.7.3 Agricultural Land 32 4.7.4 Residential/Commercial Land 33

5.0 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 34 5.1 General 34 5.2 Ministry of Transport and Communication (MOTC) 34 5.3 Agency for Land Management, Geodesy and Cartography (ALMGC) 34 5.4 MBTI under the State Unitary Enterprise Housing and Communal Services 35 5.5 The Local Executive State Power in Districts (Hukumats) 35 5.6 Consultants 36 5.7 Other Government Organizations 37

6.0 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 38 6.1 General 38 6.2 Steps for Grievance Redress 38 6.3 Grievance Redress Commitee (GRC) Formation 38

7.0 PUBLIC CONSULTATON, INFORMATION DISSEMINATION AND DISCLOSURE 40 7.1 General 40 7.2 Objective of the Consultation 40 ii

7.3 Methods of Public Consultation 41 7.4 Individual Consultation 41 7.5 Community Consultation 42 7.6 Consultation with NGO 42 7.7 Consultation with Government Officials 42 7.8 Continuation of Public Consultations 43 7.9 Disclosure 43

8.0 LARP PREPARATION, IMPLEMENTATION AND CAPACITY BUILDING 45 8.1 General 45 8.2 LARP Implementation Phase 45 8.3 Monitoring and Evaluation Period 48 8.4 LARP Implementation Schedule 48 8.5 Key Actions 48 8.6 Capacity Building 49

9.0 RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING 52 9.1 General 52 9.2 Sources of Financing 52 9.3 Compensation 52 9.3.1 Allowance for loss of agricultural land use rights 52 9.3.2 Replacement Plot Preparation and Rehabilitation Allowance for loss of Residential/Commercial Land use rights 53 9.3.3 Compensation for structures and improvements 54 9.3.4 Compensation for Annual Crops 55 9.3.5 Compensation for Perennial Crops 56 9.3.6 Compensation for Business Losses 56 9.4 Allowances 57 9.4.1 Severe Impact Allowances 57 9.4.2 Allowances for Vulnerable DPs 57 9.4.3 Resettlement Allowances 57 9.5 Support for LARP Implementation 58 9.5.1 Resettlement Specialists 58 9.5.2 Independent Monitor 58 9.6 Summary of Costs 58

10.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATION 61 10.1 Introduction 61 10.2 Internal Monitoring 61 10.3 External Monitoring 62

iii

LIST OF TABLES

Table A-1: Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts Summary ix Table A-2: Compensation Entitlements Matrix xi Table-1.1: Summary Details of Project Road Sections 3 Table 2.1: Affected Agricultural Land by Cultivation Type 5 Table 2.2: Affected Areas of Residential and Commercial Land 5 Table 2.3: Affected agricultural land areas by ownership type and section 6 Table 2.4: Affected Buildings, Shops, Sheds and Outbuildings 7 Table 2.5: Walls and Fences Affected 7 Table 2.6: Miscellaneous Items Affected 7 Table 2.7: Crops impacts by crop type and area and section 7 Table 2.8: Fruit Trees impacts 8 Table 2.9: Impact on Business 9 Table 2.10: Displaced Households and Persons by Category and Impact 10 Table 2.11: Severity of Impacts 10 Table 2.12: Number of Vulnerable Households 11 Table 3.1: Major Economic Activities of the Household 12 Table 3.2: Male versus women-headed households heads 12 Table 3.3: Landholding Status 13 Table 3.4: Type of Landholding 13 Table 3.5: Major Cropping Pattern 13 Table 3.6: Average Annual Income 14 Table 3.7: Average Annual Expenditure 15 Table 3.8: Possession of Durable Goods 15 Table 3.9: Status of Indebtedness 16 Table 3.10: Availability of Scheme Benefit 16 Table 3.11: Access to Health Center 16 Table 3.12: Distance of the Health Center 16 Table 3.13: Illness during the Past Year 16 Table 3.14: Migration Pattern 17 Table 3.15: Place of Migration 17 Table 3.16: Types of Jobs 17 Table 3.17: Trends of Migration 18 Table 3.18: Season of Migration 18 Table 3.19: Literacy Status 18 Table 3.20: Source of Drinking Water 19 Table 3.21: Types of Toilet 19 Table 3.22: Type of Fuel Use for cooking 19 Table 3.23: Connected to Central Power Supply 19 Table 3.24: Interior Details of Structures 20 Table 3.25: Type of Activities for Women 20 Table 3.26: Women’s Say in Decision Making 20 Table 3.27: Women’s Participation on Different Types of Issue 21 Table 4.1: Comparison of ADB Resettlement Safeguards with Tajikistan Land Code 27 Table 4.2: Compensation Entitlements Matrix 31 Table 8.1: Steps for LAR Activities 45 Table 8.2: Key Tasks for LARP development 48 Table 8.3 Implementation schedule 50

Table 9.1: Allowance for loss of agricultural land use rights 52 Table 9.2 Allowances for loss of Residential/commercial land use rights 54 Table 9.3: Houses, Shops, Sheds and Outbuildings 55 Table 9.4: Walls and Fences 55 Table 9.5 Annual Crop Losses Compensation 55 Table 9.6 Fruit trees Compensation 56 Table 9.7: Types of Business and Compensation 57 Table 9.8: Severe Impact Allowances 57 Table 9.9: Allowances for Vulnerable Households 57 Table 9.10: Allowances for Resettling Households 58 Table 9.11: LARP Budget 59 Table 10.1: Monitoring Indicators 62 Table-A1.1: Summary Details of Various Sections 64 Table A1-2: Principal Quantities of Impacts 65 Table A1-3: Compensation Entitlements Matrix 66 Table A1-4: Basis of Compensation Rate Determination 67 Table A-2: Methods Employed for Consultations 68

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Project Location Map 4 Figure 5: Institutional Arrangements 37 Figure 6: Grievance Redress Mechanism 39

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1: INFORMATION PAMPHLET 64 APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS 68 APPENDIX 3: DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR RESETTLEMENT SPECIALIST UNDER PROJECT SUPERVISION CONSULTANTS 80 APPENDIX 4: DRAFT TOR FOR INDEPENDENT MONITOR (IM) 81 APPENDIX 5: LIST OF AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS 84 APPENDIX 6: DATA PROVIDED BY THE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIONS 118 APPENDIX 7: PUBLIC ADVERTISEMENTS OF ASSET SURVEY CUTOFF DATE. 151

Abbreviations and Acronyms

AF affected family AH affected household ADB Asian Development Bank AIDS acquired immune deficiency syndrome ALMGC Agency for Land Management, Geodesy and Cartography CAREC Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation CC Civil Code of the Republic of Tajikistan DP displaced person DF Dekhan Farm DMS detailed measurement survey EA executing agency FGD focused group discussions Ha Hectare HH Household ID identity cards IM independent monitor Kg Kilogram LAR land acquisition and resettlement LARP land acquisition and resettlement plan LC Land Code of the Republic of Tajikistan LS lump sump M&E monitoring and evaluation MBTI Mezhraion (inter-district) bureau of technical inventory MOTC Ministry of Transport and Communication NGO non government organization PIU project implementation unit PLU primary land users PPTA project preparatory Ttchnical assistance PSA poverty and social assessment RoW right of way Sl serial number SLU secondary land user TJS Tajikistan somoni (currency) ToR Terms of reference

Definition of Terms

Compensation means payment in cash or kind for an asset to be acquired or affected by a project at replacement cost at current market value.

Cut-off-date means the date after which people will NOT be considered eligible for compensation, i.e. they are not included in the list of DPs as defined by the census.

Dekhan Farm means farms, usually midsized, that are legally and physically distinct from household plots, for which full user rights but not ownership is allocated to either individuals or groups. Regulations concerning Dekhan farms in Tajikistan are laid out in the Law No. 48 on Dekhan Farms, dating from 2002.

Detailed measurement survey means the detailed inventory of losses that is completed after detailed design and marking of project boundaries on the ground.

Displaced persons (DPs) means all the people affected by the project through land acquisition, relocation, or loss of incomes and includes any person, household (sometimes referred to as project affected family), firm, or public or private institution. DPs therefore include; i) persons affected directly by the road corridor, right-of-way, tower or pole foundations or construction work area; (ii) persons whose agricultural land or other productive assets such as trees or crops are affected; (iii) persons whose businesses are affected and who might experience loss of income due to the project impact; (iv) persons who lose work/employment as a result of project impact; and (v) people who lose access to community resources/property as a result of the project.

Encroachers mean those people who move into the project area after the cut- off date and are therefore not eligible for compensation or other rehabilitation measures provided by the project.

Entitlement means the range of measures comprising cash or kind compensation, relocation cost, income rehabilitation assistance, transfer assistance, income substitution/business restoration, which are due to DPs, depending on the type, extent and nature of their losses, and which suffice to restore their social and economic base.

Hukumat This is the District administration

Inventory of losses means the pre-appraisal inventory of assets as a preliminary record of assets to be affected or lost as a result of the project

Jamoat This is the Sub-district administration under each District

vii

Land acquisition means the process whereby a person is compelled by a public agency to alienate all or part of the land s/he owns or possesses, to the ownership and possession of that agency, for public purposes, in return for fair compensation.

Non-titled means those who have no recognizable rights or claims to the land that they are occupying and includes people using private or state land without permission, permit or grant, i.e. those people without legal title to land and/or structures occupied or used by them. ADB’s safeguards explicitly states that such people cannot be denied compensation.

Oblast This refers to a Region in Tajikistan

Poor means households falling below the monthly income of TJS 1020/- (per household per month)1.

Presidential Land means land for which use rights have been allocated by Presidential Decree but ownership remains with the state.

Replacement cost means the method of valuing assets to replace the loss at current market value, or its nearest equivalent, and is the amount of cash or equivalent in kind needed to replace an asset in its existing condition, without deduction of transaction costs or for any material salvaged.

Reserve Fund Land means land owned by the state and controlled by the district administration that may be rented, mainly for agricultural use.

Sharecropper means the same as tenant cultivator or tenant farmer, and is a person who cultivates land they do not own for an agreed proportion of the crop or harvest.

Significant impact means 200 people or more will experience major impacts, which are defined as; (i) being physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing ten per cent or more of their productive assets (income generating).

Vulnerable means any people who might suffer disproportionately or face the risk of being marginalized from the effects of resettlement and includes; (i) female-headed households with dependents; (ii) disabled household heads; (iii) poor households (within the meaning given previously); (iv) landless; (v) elderly households with no means of support; (vi) households without security of tenure; (vii) ethnic minorities; and (viii) marginal farmers (with landholding of five acres or less).

1 A poverty line of TJS 181 per month is used. This is derived from the poverty line of US$41 / month provided by the World Bank Country Brief for Tajikistan 2009 and an exchange rate of 4.41 TJS/US$. viii

Executive Summary

This Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) was prepared for the Dushanbe–Tursunzade– Uzbekistan border road section by the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MOTC) as part of the feasibility study under the Technical Assistance2 (TA) of Asian Development Bank (ADB).

A Working Group for land acquisition and resettlement planning, headed by the First Deputy Minister, MOTC, was established in March 2009 to guide LARP preparation and address compensation policy issues. The Working Group has representation from key Government agencies and the Hukumats of Rudaki, Gissar, Shakhrinav and Tursunzade. Representatives from the Hukumats took part in a survey of displaced persons (DPs) and their assets between October and December 2009, and issued notices of cut-off dates relating to registration of affected assets, in November 2009.

The LARP is based on assessed impacts on land and property. Compensation rates and quantities incorporate a factor of safety to ensure that adequate provision will enable DPs to achieve equal or better incomes and living standards after the project.

The project will have a wide range of impacts on land, assets, business and income. A summary is in Table A-1.

Table A-1: Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts Summary Quantity Impacts Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total Affected Households: Agricultural Land (No.) 29 87 26 5 147 Affected Households: Res./Comm. Land (No.) 87 77 65 0 229 2 Agricultural land (m ) 9,400 128,450 42,100 6,570 186,520 Residential/Commercial land (m2) 16,294 11,656 12,046 0 39,996 Land for Community Facilities/structures (m2) 451 383 0 0 833 Houses & Outbuildings (No.) 45 102 136 5 283 Length of Fences and Walls (m) 2,346 2,157 1,823 195 6,521 Structures affected (m2) 4396 3,896 3,246 71 11,609 Number of Business Lost (No.) 12 11 13 0 36 Severely Affected Households (No.) 18 31 7 0 56 Number of Households to be relocated (No.) 2 2 2 - 6 Number of Businesses to be relocated (No.) 4 2 3 9 Vulnerable Households (No.) 87 79 60 2 228 Total affected households (No.) 116 164 91 5 376 Total Affected Persons (No.) 1,028 1,319 705 43 3,095 Descriptions of road sections are illustrated in Table 1.1

Principles. The policy framework for the project is based on the National Laws and Legislation of Republic of Tajikistan, the ADB Safeguards Policy Statement (2009), and Operations Manual F1 Safeguard Policy Statement (2010). The core involuntary resettlement principles for the project are: (i) land acquisition, and other involuntary resettlement impacts will be avoided or minimized by exploring viable alternatives; (ii) where unavoidable, time-bound resettlement plans will be prepared and DPs will be assisted in improving or at least regaining their pre- project standard of living; (iii) consultation with DPs on compensation, disclosure of resettlement

2 ADB. TA 7080–TAJ. Preparing the CAREC Transport Corridor III (Dushanbe–Uzbekistan border) Project ix

information to DPs, and participation of DPs in planning and implementing sub-projects will be ensured; (iv) vulnerable groups will be provided special assistance;3 (v) provision of rehabilitation allowance to DPs losing land use rights and compensation at replacement rates for all acquired assets including non-title holders (e.g., informal dwellers/squatters, and encroachers); (vi) payment of compensation and resettlement assistance will be done prior to the contractor taking physical acquisition of the land and prior to the commencement of any construction activities; (vii) provision of income restoration and rehabilitation; and (viii) establishment of appropriate grievance redress mechanisms.

Displaced Persons and Entitlement. DPs entitled for compensation or at least rehabilitation provisions under the project are (i) DPs with legal titles or traditional land rights who lose land and other assets; (ii) any tenants; (iii) owners of buildings, crops, plants, or other objects attached to the land; and (iv) DPs losing business, income, and salaries. Compensation eligibility is subject to approval of the LARP by the Government. The details of entitlement and compensation packages are given in the Entitlement Matrix. (see Table A1-3)

Executing Agency (EA). MOTC will be the EA with the lead responsibility for civil works, and LARP implementation. The Agency on Land Management, Geography and Cartography is responsible for allocation and registration of new land plots to replace the one withdrawn due to the project, the Ministry of Justice will be responsible for registration of any changes in rights to affected immovable properties, and the Mezhraion (Inter-district) Bureau of Technical Inventory (MBTI) will similarly register any changes on rights to immovable property, and to its physical condition. These agencies according to legislation shall also comprise an ad-hoc committee led by the representatives of each district to define form and size of compensation to the DPs.

Grievance Mechanism. The DPs will have the right to file complaints and/or queries on any aspect of land acquisition compensation, and resettlement. To ensure that grievances are properly addressed, a grievance redress mechanism has been created. First, complaints can be lodged at the MOTC district offices/field level where resolution will be attempted with the involvement of Hukumat and Jamoat officers as the representatives of the AHs. A grievance can be lodged to the Resettlement Working Group Committee at the PIU if it remains unsettled after 30 days. Again, the DP representatives will have the opportunity to mediate between the DPs and MOTC. If no solution is reached within 14 days, the DPs can further submit its case to the appropriate court of law. (see 6.0 Grievance Redress Mechanism, pg 35)

Public Consultation. Consultation events were arranged at various stages of project preparation, namely a screening survey, land census survey, socio-economic survey and targeted consultation meetings with DPs and local stakeholder organizations, government officials and individuals. Most of the people were concerned about their livelihood especially those with shops along the road. It was explained the loss of livelihood will be very minimal. Owners of affected structures expect to receive adequate compensation to build the similar type of structure elsewhere. They also asked to be notified in advance for shifting and building new structures. MOTC representatives assured the DPs that those losing structures and businesses will be compensated.Advance notification will also be provided.to DPs to give them enough lead time to rebuild their structures.

3 Vulnerable groups include poor households and households headed by women. x

To ensure transparency in planning and allow for further active involvement of DPs and other stakeholders, the project information will be disseminated through disclosure of resettlement planning documents distributed to each DP. A copy of the full LARP will be available for public inspection (in Russian and Tajik languages), held at the PIU, and disclosed on the ADB’s website, and the MOTC website.

LARP implementation will be integral to overall project implementation. All activities related to LAR must be planned to ensure that compensation is paid prior to displacement and commencement of civil works. The LARP costs for the project includes eligible compensation and resettlement assistance and related supplementary costs to ensure successful implementation. The cost cited at this stage is an indicative assessment of various losses. The unit cost for land and other assets and particulars in this budget have been derived through rapid field appraisal, consultation with affected families, relevant local authorities and with reference to former practices. In consideration of the need for full census information and finalization of rates, a contingency provision (20% of the total LARP cost) has been allowed to absorb variations from this estimate.

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E). This is essential for time- and cost-efficient implementation of the LARP. LAR tasks under the project will be subjected to both internal and external monitoring. Internal monitoring will be conducted by the PIU under MOTC. External monitoring will be assigned to an Independent Monitor (IM) to be selected by ADB.

Table A-2: Compensation Entitlements Matrix ASSET DISPLACED PERSONS PROPOSED ENTITLEMENTS Agricultural Land: Individual land-use rights An allowance for loss of land use rights in cash equal to 5 years All losses holder of the gross income of the affected annual crops land at market irrespective of rate or to 1 year of gross income of affected fruit trees land at impact severity market rates. Cooperative land holder An allowance for loss of land use rights in cash equal to 5 years of the gross income of the affected land at market rate Residential/ Residential rights holder Provision of alternative land or provision of cash allowance for Commercial Land loss of land use rights equivalent to land lease rates multiplied by 25 years. Houses and All relevant DPs. • Cash compensation at replacement rate for affected Structures structure/other fixed assets free of salvageable materials and transaction costs. All buildings will be compensated in their entirety House/building Renter/leaseholder Rental allowance in the form of 1 to 3 months rent in cash rent Income from All DPs • Crop compensation in cash equal to 1 year of the gross income of Crops affected land at market rate. This shall apply whether the land is fallow, or under cultivation. Income from trees All DPs • Cash compensation for wood trees based on volume of wood • Cash compensation for productive trees based on the net annual harvest from the tree(s) for the number of years taken for replacement tree(s) to reach comparable production Business or All DPs • Business Owner: Cash compensation for lost income up to 1 year’ Employment loss; (including informal settlers) (if income is permanent) or cash compensation for the period of temporary or business interruption (if the loss is temporary). The compensation permanent iis assessed at actual income as per tax declaration or if taxes have not been paid at the maximum non-taxable income. • Permanent worker/employers: Indemnity for lost wages for

ASSET DISPLACED PERSONS PROPOSED ENTITLEMENTS business stoppage of up to 1 year Allowance for severe All severely DPs • Agricultural income: One severe impact allowance equal to the net impacts (More that market value of the harvest from the affected land for 1 year 10% of income loss) (inclusive of winter and summer crop) and in addition to the standard crop compensation . Relocation All relocated DPs Provision of sufficient allowance to cover transport expenses and allowance basic livelihood expenses for the transitional period Communal/ Public Rehabilitation/substitution in kind or cash at replacement cost of assets affected items and rehabilitation of their functions Vulnerable DPs DPs below poverty line and • Employment priority in project-related jobs households headed by • Cash contribution equal to 2 months’ official minimum salary. women.

xii

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 General

1. This Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) has been prepared as part of the feasibility study for the CAREC Corridor 3 (Dushanbe–Uzbekistan border) Improvement Project (the project) by the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MOTC) of Tajikistan, the project Executing Agency (EA). The LARP identifies the Project's impacts and displaced households and people and assesses the needed compensation budgets based on the requirements of Tajikistan law and the ADB requrements on Involuntary Resettlement as embedded in the ADB's Safeguards Policy Statement (2009).

2. A Working Group for land acquisition and resettlement planning was established by MOTC, in March 2009 to establish an appropriate methodology to determine fair compensation for the loss of assets. The Working Group is headed by the first deputy Minister, MOTC and includes representation from the National Management, Geodesy and Mapping Agency, the State Unitary Enterprise “Research and Planning–Surveying Institute; and representatives of the Hukumats of Rudaki, Gissar, Shakhrinav and Tursunzade rayons.

3. Representatives from the Hukumats took part in a survey of displaced persons and their assets between October and December 2009 and issued noticies of cut-off dates relating to registration of affected assets, in November 2009. Copies of these are included in Appendix 7. The Hukumats have listed affected structures, detailing type of structure, materials, and affected area.

4. The LARP has been translated into Russian. A leaflet/pamphlet containing a brief description, eligibility criteria, the entitlement matrix and implementation schedule will be distributed to all AHs and DPs through the representatives of the PIU. (Appendix 1) The LARP is to be finalized and approved by the Government and ADB prior to the project implementation.

1.2 Requirements for LARP Finalization

5. This draft is based on an advanced feasibility design and on impacts data provided by an impacts survey carried out between October and December 2009. The project will be implemented through a ‘design-and-build’ contract. The selected consultants shall assist the PIU in the finalization of the LARP during the design phase of the contract. As a condition to start the civil works phase of the ‘design-and-build’ contract, the LARP will have to be updated based on final design and following a full verification survey covering all impacts and a verification of all compensation rates. In the case of replacement plots for households and shops that do not have sufficient land to rebuild their structures, the final LARP will include an action plan that will provide details on the (i) schedule of relocation and construction of new houses/shops, (ii) location, size, condition, and development requirements of each replacement plot, (iii) budget which includes registration and development of the replacement plots, based on comprehensive and satisfactory consultations to all DPs on methodology and rates employed by the project. The verification surveys and updated valuation will be carried by the District Commissions formed for Rudaki, Gissar, Shakhrinav and Tursunzade for the project with assistance from an international and local resettlement experts.

6. In the absence of land market in Tajikistan, the Working Group has agreed to use on an interim basis for providing rehabilitation allowance for people who lose use-rights to marginal portions of residential and commercial land the existing land lease rate in the project area equivalent to approximately $1,000 per hectare of agricultural land multiplied by 25 years, or a unit cost of $2.5 per m2.4 This rehabilitation allowance amount will be presented to DPs in a wider consultation to determine acceptability of the average price, as well as other aspects of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan. A separate Working Group on Structural Land Reform is currently working on the revision of the Land Code what will recognize ownership of land use rights and the transfer/sale of land use rights and provide the basis for land valuation in the country. MOTC will continue to coordinate with such Working Group to enable the project to adjust the rehabilitation allowance amount for loss of land use rights in case revisions to the Land Code would provide a more appropriate methodology for establishing valuation rates for affected residential/commercial lands. Revisions in the final prices will be reflected in the final LARP as a condition to contracts awards.

1.3 LARP-related Project Implementation Conditions

7. Based on ADB Safeguards requirements and practice, project processing and implementation will be subject to the following conditionalities: • Commencement of Civil Works: Conditional to the satisfactory implementation of the final LARP to be vouched for by a compliance report prepared by the IM.

1.4 Project Road Description

8. The Dushanbe–Tursunzade–Uzbekistan border road traverses the districts, or rayons of Rudaki, Gissar, Shakhrinav, and Tursunzade in this order as the road moves west from Dushanbe down the Gissar valley. The total length of the road is 61.5 kilometers (km). The road heads west, south-west from Dushanbe to the Uzbekistan border in eastern Uzbekistan. It is the main route for road traffic and transported goods to Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan from Dushanbe and the southern regions of Tajikistan including agricultural produce from the Gissar valley. It is the vital trade route for most Tajik imports and exports to and from the port of Bandar Abbas in Iran.

9. Consideration of the mid-point traffic volumes, levels of service and the environment through which the road passes lends to dividing the road into five sections/packages for design and implementation purposes. These road sections are (1) Avicenna Monument to West Gate, (2) West Gate to Gissar Junction, (3) Gissar Junction to Shakhrinav roundabout, (4) Shakhrinav roundabout to Tursunzade Junction and (5) Tursunzade Junction to the Uzbekistan Border. The summary details of various road sections are described in Table-1.1. Project location map is shown in Figure 1.1

4 Current legislation in Tajikistan does not recognize private ownership of land and prohibits the sale of land. However, lease of agricultural lands and sale/rental of buildings and structures is allowed. When a structure/building is sold, the land use right to the residential/commercial land where the structure is situated is transferred to the buyer. 2

Table-1.1: Summary Details of Project Road Sections

Particulars Section-2 Section-3 Section-4 Section-5 Name of the West Gate to Gissar Shakhrinav to Tursunzade to Section Gissar Junction Junction to Tursunzade the Uzbekistan Shakhrinav border Length 13.9 km 20.7 km 10.6 km 11.7 km Type of (four-lane (four-lane (four-lane (two-lane - Construction widening) widening) widening) reconstruction) Name of the 1. Rudaki 1. Gissar 1.Tursunzade 1.Tursunzade Rayons 2.Gissar 2.Shakhrinav Name of 1. Choryakkoron 1.Navobod 1.Qaratogh 1. Gharav Jamoats 2.Khonaqo 2.MirzoRizo 2.Seshanbe 2. Navobod 3.Dehqonobod 3. 1st May 4.Chuzi 5.Sabo 6.Selbur 7.Shakhrinav

10. Summary Impacts. Widening will take place for Section 2 (West Gate to Gissar Junction), Section 3 (Gissar Junction to Shakhrinav) and Section 4 (Shakhrinav to Tursunzade), which will require additional land acquisition and resettlement. Section 5 (Tursunzade to the Uzbekistan border) will comprise rehabilitation and improvement of the existing two lane road, and requires land acquisition and resettlement at certain points. A project location/map is depicted in Figure-1.

Figure 1: Project Location Map

1.5 LARP Objectives

11. Objective. The LARP aims to mitigate all unavoidable negative impacts caused due to the project, to resettle the DPs and restore their livelihoods. The LARP also provides a guideline on implementation of land acquisition through proper compensation and assistance, according to the norms of ADB and the relevant Laws of Tajikistan.

12. Methodology. This LARP was prepared in accordance with the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009), and the legislation related to land acquisition and resettlement in Tajikistan. The preparation of the LARP utilized information obtained on a socio-economic survey carried out between the months of January to April 2009, and preliminary data from additional field work that took place between October and December 2009. Efforts have been made to minimize the impact on land and property during the design by adopting suitable design standards, involving close co-operation with the engineering team.

13. Public Consultation and Due Diligence. The LARP is prepared in consultation with the stakeholders, especially the local people. The assessment of losses and land acquisition is based on the feasibility study. The survey results have been ratified by the district authorities and the local news media covered the proposed projects on several occasions. The cut-off dates for compensation claims were announced by all districts through local newspapers.

2.0 BASELINE INFORMATION ON LAND ACQUISTION AND RESETTLEMENT

2.1 General

14. This chapter covers baseline information of the impacts on land acquisition and resettlement (LAR) from the project. Based on these impacts, compensation and rehabilitation measures were prepared, including the cost estimates.

2.2 Impacts

2.2.1 Impact on Cultivated Land

15. A total of 176 land parcels of cultivated land are expected to be affected. The following sections describe the LAR impact. The total amount of agricultural land to be acquired is estimated at 18.65 Ha. Road sections 3 and 4 require a larger area of land compared to the other sections. Irrigation facilities have been installed on almost all land on both sides of the road (97%). A breakdown of land according to cultivation types is in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1: Affected Agricultural Land by Cultivation Type

Type of Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total Cultivation Area Area Area Area Area Plots Plots Plots Plots Plots (m2) (m2) (m2) (m2) (m2) Annual Crops 9,400 32 95,75092 42,100 31 6,570 5 153,820 160 Orchard 0 0 28,50013 0 0 0 0 28,500 13 Vineyard 0 0 4,2003 0 0 0 0 4,2003 Total 9,400 32 128,550 108 42,100 31 6,570 5 186,520 176

2.2.2 Impact on Residential and Commercial Land

16. Based on data provided by the district administrations, the survey of affected properties and the design road alignment, areas of residential and commercial land to be affected are as shown in Table 2.2. Three households with have crops on a combined area of 255 m2 of residential/commercial land.

Table 2.2: Affected Areas of Residential and Commercial Land Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total Area Plots Area Plots Area Plots Area Plots Area Plots (m2) (m2) (m2) (m2) (m2) 16,294 87 11,656 7712,046 65 0 0 39,996 229

2.2.3 Impact on Land for Community and District Government Structures

17. Portions of six plots (3 plots in Section 2 and 3 plots in Section 3) used as location for community and district government structures will also be affected. The affected portions have a combined area of 833 m2 and include 2 police posts, 1 mosque, 1 cemetery and 2 distict 5

government structures. The police posts and structures from the district-government plots will be rebuilt on the remaining portions of the plots. Only marginal portions of the plots where the mosque and cemetery are located will be affected. In terms of structure, only a portion of the mosque’s wire net and the cemetery’s wall will be affected. No graves will be affected. As discussed with the district hukumats and administrators of these facilities, cost of rebuilding/repairing these community structures will be shouldered by the project.

2.2.4 Property Status of Affected Land

18. Agricultural Land. The ownership types of the affected agricultural plots are (i) collective Dekhan Farms, (ii) individual Dekhan Farms, and (iii) Presidential Land. Dekhan farms are those for which full user rights, but not ownership has been allocated to either individuals (Individual Dekhan Farm) or groups (Collective Dekhan Farm). Presidential land is similar, use rights but not ownership have been allocated, in this case under Presidential decree. Further explanation of each category is provided in the glossary, and further description of the types of land and their legal basis in section 4.3.1 of this report.

19. The ownership type of the affected agricultural plots is individual Dekhan Farms (79) followed by presidential land (57) and collective Dehkan Farms (40). All households with land under these categories have legal land use rights. Types of land use and ownership of agricultural land by section are in Table 2.3.

Table 2.3: Affected agricultural land areas by ownership type and section

Type of ownership Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total

Area (m2) Plots Area (m2) Plots Area (m2) Plots Area (m2) Plots Area (m2) Plots Presidential 1,900 19 2,900 26 3,800 12 0 0 8,600 57 Individual Dekhan Farm 7,500 13 48,450 57 2,418 6 1,410 3 59,778 79 Collective Dekhan Farm 0 0 77,100 25 35,882 13 5,160 2 118,142 40 Total 9,400 32 128,450 108 42,100 31 6,570 5 186,520 176

20. Residential Land. Holders of residential and commercial land have permanent and inheritable use rights, according to articles 11 and 12 of the Land Code. The extents of affected residential and commercial land are in table 2.2 above.

2.2.5 Impacts on Structures and Buildings

21. The project will affect buildings such as residential-commercial buildings, sheds, and building attachments and structures such as walls and fences. A summary of the category and types of affected buildings by type number and affected area for each road section are detailed in table 2.4. The same is done for structures in table 2.5. In addition to buildings and structures the Project will also affect miscellaneous assets such as pumps, ovens, cemented surfaces, retaining wall, gates, tanks and wayer pipes. These impacts are detailed in table 2.6.

Table 2.4: Affected Buildings, Shops, Sheds and Outbuildings Building Section2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total Type No Area Area No Area Area No Area Area No Area Area No Area Area (m2) (m3) (m2) (m3) (m2) (m3) (m2) (m3) (m2) (m3) Buildings 1 173 1 173 (type1) Buildings 14 2,953 11 837 25 3,790 (type 2) Buildings 18 4,398 11 2,223 39 5,808.6 68 12,429 (type 3) Sheds 7 172 25 167 35 2,628.2 67 2,967.2 Outbuildings 20 1,694 51 811 51 4,227.56 122 6,738.6 Building types: 1 = multi- storey; 2 = single floor cement; 3 = single floor bricks Sheds are calculated in m2 , while buildings and out buildings (toilets, barns, etc.) are assessed in cubic meters (m3)

Table 2.5: Walls and Fences Affected Item Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total No. m2 m3 No. m2 m3 No. m2 m3 No. m2 m3 No. m2 m3 Walls 22 467.5 43 870 62 1,177 - 127 2514.5 Fences 24 1,084 50 1,571 51 2,082.46 - 125 4737.46

Table 2.6: Miscellaneous Items Affected Affected Item No. Wells 1 Tanks/pools 2 Ovens 3 Pumps 1 Retaining walls 14 Gates 24 Concrete surfaces 2 Water pipes 3 Pits 1

2.2.6 Impacts on Annual Crops

22. Annual crops are made up of grain, fodder crops and vegetables. Table 2.7 gives the breakdown of affected land by crop type.

Table 2.7: Crops impacts by crop type and area and section Type of Crop Affected Area (m2) Section-2 Section-3 Section-4 Section-5 Total % Wheat 700 90,650 42,100 6,570 140,020 91.0 Lucerne 5,700 745 0 0 6,445 4.2 Onion 0 2,500 0 0 2,500 1.6 Vegetables 2,000 455 0 0 2,455 1.6 Tomatoes 0 1,200 0 0 1,200 0.8 7

Flax 600 0 0 0 600 0.4 Potato 400 200 0 0 600 0.4 Total 9,400 95,750 42,100 6,570 153,820 100.0

2.2.7 Impacts on Perennial Crops

23. As shown in Table 2.1, 28,500 sqm of orchard will be lost in 13 plots and 4,200 sqm of vineyard will be lost in 3 plots. Thirteen cherry trees located in 3 residential plots will also be affected. In the project area, most (approximately 90%) fruit trees in the affected orchards are 5 years and below in age which can be safely replanted to another location. Replanted trees are normally able to continue bearing fruit after a year. The assessment of these impacts based on fruit tree type and vineyards lost are detailed below in table 2.8.

Table 2.8 : Fruit Trees impacts Tree Type Yearly Current Number of yield (kg.) Market Years Number of Trees per tree Value of to Re-grow Product a New Tree per kg (TJS/kg) Section Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total 2

Apple 60 60 - - 120 180 5 3 Cherry 13 100 20 - 133 50 8 2 Small cherry 100 - - - 100 45 6 2 Peach - - 40 - 40 80 5 2 Grapes - - - 4,200 4,200 8,000 2 4 (sqm) kg/ha Note: The 13 cherry trees in section 2 are situated within the affected residential plots of the household. The Other fruit trees are located within the 28,500 sqm of orchards along the road. Most affected trees (90%) can be safely replanted and can resume bearing fruit after a year. However, for newly planted trees, it will take between 2 to 4 years before they bear fruit.

2.2.8 Business Impacts

24. A number of businesses will be lost, mostly shops and restaurants, as a result of loss of buildings. Losses will be permanent in each case. Table 2.9 below gives the number and type of business that will be lost in each road section. Almost of the affected businesses are registered with the district hukumats. Unregistered shops will be assisted in obtaining registration for free, along with other informal businesses along the road.

Table 2.9: Impact on Business Total Number of Businesses Affected Type of business Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total Shop (Food/manufactured goods) 8 2 8 0 18 Café / Canteen 1 3 2 0 6 Butchery 0 0 3 0 3 Fuel station 3 0 0 0 3 Spare parts trade 0 3 0 0 3 Snack food outlet 0 2 0 0 2 Pharmacy 0 1 0 0 1 Total 12 11 13 0 36

2.2.9 Employment Impacts

25. No commercial employees were identified in the project area as the businesses are small scale and operated by their owners.

2.3 Resettlement Strategy and Relocation needs

26. The resettlement strategy devised for this Project is based on the provision of plots or cash compensation for the land lost by the resettlers and on the provison to them of a cash allowance for their resettlement costs.

27. The project resettlement strategy was conceived in such a way as to minimize as much as possible resettlement effects. To fit this principle all DPs that after impact retain enough land to rebuild their house within their property will not be relocated. Only those DPs that after impacts will not have enough space to rebuild their house/shops in their plots will be relocated. Households losing plots used for residential purposes who have no sufficient remaining plot to rebuild their houses will each be provided with 800 m2 of homeplot while those with affected shops will be allocated with plots based on their specific business proposal and requirement. All replacement plots are either adjacent to the affected plots or within 200m away from the affected plots. Likewise, all replacement plots are situated along the road. Expenses related to relocation of utilities, land clearing, land filling, provision of sanitation facilities and land registration will be shouldered by the Project..Households that are provided with homeplots will still retain their use-right on their remaining land which they can use for small-scale road side livelihood activities. A total of 6 households and 9 businesses/shops will have to relocate.

2.4 Census of Displaced Households/Persons Census

2.4.1 Total Displaced Households/Persons

28. A summary of displaced households and persons is tabulated in table 2.10 below.

Table 2.10: Displaced Households and Persons by Category and Impact Category of Impact Number of Displaced HHs Net Number Remarks (x Absolute of DPs impact (Without double type) counting) A. Land A1. Residential / Commercial land 229 229 1,929 A2. Agricultural Land 149 147 1,166 Sub-total (A) 378 376 3,095 B. Crops /Trees B1. Loss of Crop Bearing Land 151 0 - Included in A1 and A2 Sub-total (crops) 151 0 - C. Business/Income Losses C1. Permanent small business 36 0 - Included in A1 losses Sub-Total (C) 43 0 - D. Permanent Structures D1. Residential / Commercial / 237 0 - Included in A1 Community Structures Sub-total (D) 237 0 - E. Total (A+B+C+D) 376 3,095

2.4.2 Severity of Impacts

29. The threshold for severe impacts is 10% of one year’s income. A number of holders of use rights of agricultural land will lose more than 10% of their plot, and are thus deemed to be severely affected. In the case of business losses, displaced households receive a full year’s income and it is therefore assumed that the severity of impact is addressed by that compensation. The number of displaced households by section is given in table 2.11 below.

Table 2.11: Severity of Impacts Number of Households Severity of Impact Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total Loss of agricultural land >10% 18 31 7 0 56

2.5 Impact on Vulnerable Households

30. Vulnerable households are those formed by poor people and /or headed by women. The categorization of poor is based on reported income data collected during the census survey. The poverty line is taken as TJS 180 per month, based on the poverty line given in the World Bank Country Briefing for Tajikistan (2009) of $ 41 per month, and an exchange rate of TJS4.41 per $. The tola number of vulnerable households is 228. A breakdown of the incidence of vulnerable households by section is given in table 2.12.

Table 2.12: Number of Vulnerable Households Number of Affected Households Type of Vulnerability Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total Women Headed only 73 50 46 0 169 Below Poverty Line only 5 18 5 2 30 Both women headed and below poverty line 9 11 9 0 29 Total 87 79 60 2 228

2.5.1 Ethnic Composition of AHs

31. The population of the project area is made up of Tajik and Uzbek people. Out of the affected households, 82.4% are Tajik, 17.3% Uzbek, and 0.4% Kyrgyz..As explained later in paragraph 64 none of these groups fits the ADB definition of Indigenous Peoples.

2.5.2 Gender

32. The total number of DPs is 3,095 persons. Of these, 1,564 are male and 1,531 are female.

2.5.3 Types of Household

33. Most of the households are joint families in nature, where parents and married children live in the same house. In the case of such households, the senior male is usually the nominated head of household, and is the one responsible for receiving and distributing compensation payments.

3.0 SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE PROJECT AREA

3.1 General

34. Socio economic details of the affected households were collected based on a sample survey undertaken between January and April 2009. In addition to the demographic and social data collected during census survey, socio-economic information was collected from DPs through a structured socio-economic questionnaire. At the time of the survey, which preceded preliminary design, 430 households were identified as potentially affected and where interviewed for the socio economic census. After the completion of the feasibility study design the impacts corridor was narrowed and the number of DPs was reduced to 377. The original survey sample, however, was retained as it broadens the survey data base.

3.2 Socio Economic Details

35. The following section deals with various socio economic indicators of the households and the findings of the socio-economic survey.

3.2.1 Major Economic Activities

36. About 26% of the families stated that agriculture is their main economic activity. Business and trade form the main activity for 12% of the households and another 13% depend on white collar jobs, such as work in the Government sector. A further one third of the households (32.3%) reported other activities as their major economic activity. The details are given in table 3.1.

Table 3.1: Major Economic Activities of the Household Major Economic Activities Total No. of Households Percent Agriculture 112 26.0 Agricultural labor 3 0.7 Small enterprise 25 5.8 Government 53 12.3 Business and trading 51 11.9 Transport/taxi 23 5.4 Daily Wage 24 5.6 Others 139 32.3 Total 430 100.0

3.2.2 Gender

37. Among the affected households, sampled population, 15.6% are headed by females.

Table 3.2: Male versus women-headed households heads Ownership Total No. of Households Percent Male headed 319 84.4 Female headed 59 15.6 Total 378 100.0

3.2.3 Landholding Status

38. In the project area, 95% of the households reported that they have land, while the remaining 5% are landless.

Table 3.3: Landholding Status Particulars Number of Households Percent Land Holder Households 406 94.4 Landless Households 24 5.6 Total Households 430 100.00

3.2.4 Types of Landholding

39. The total area of landholdings of the 406 surveyed households is 539.03 hectares (the average landholding is 1.32 hectares). About 94% of the land is cultivable. Average cultivable land holding is 2.76 hectares where as the average uncultivable land holding is 0.64 hectares.

Table 3.4: Type of Landholding Type of Land Total Holding (Hectare) Average Holding (Hectare) Cultivable (irrigated) 463.83 1.29 Cultivable (non-irrigated) 43.71 1.47 Non cultivable (Irrigated) 22.04 0.08 Non cultivable (non Irrigated) 9.52 0.56 Total irrigated land 485.80 1.19 Total non irrigated land 53.23 1.33

3.2.5 Major Cropping Pattern

40. Vegetables and wheat are the major crops being cultivated by households in the project area. About 69% of the households that reported having land cultivate vegetables, and 33% cultivate wheat. Other crops like rice are cultivated by 11% of the households, maize by 10% and cotton is reported by 8% of the households. Cotton is mostly cultivated in the area by fewer, larger concerns.

Table 3.5: Major Cropping Pattern Type of Crop Number of Households % Average yield in kilogram Wheat 142 33.0 1,213.0 Rice 48 11.2 934.3 Maize 43 10.0 2,057.8 Vegetables 296 68.8 735.8 Cotton 33 7.6 4,899.6 Others 75 17.4 221.8

3.2.6 Average Annual Income

41. Agriculture and business contribute the most to the average annual income of the households. The overall average annual income of the households along the project area is TJS10,871.53.

Table 3.6: Average Annual Income Source of Income Average Annual Income in TJS Agriculture 27,798.0 Service 6,964.1 Business 13,217.8 Labour 8,188.9 Professional 6,555.9 Pension 1,661.8 Any other 11,714.3 Total Average 10,871.5

3.2.7 Poverty

42. The average household size is 8 people per household. Based on the poverty line provided by the World Bank for 2009 ($41/month), the annual income required for a household of this size would need to be TJS20,300 for a family to be out of poverty. Based on reported income data provided by individual households during the survey of affected households of October–December 2009, 52% were identified as poor. This is compared to poverty headcount data for the region, available from a State Statistical Committee assessment based on 2000 census data and a living standards survey conducted by the World Bank in 2003,6 which gives the following poverty headcount data for the project districts: Rudaki–40 to 50%; Gissar–20 to 30%; Shakhrinav–30 to 40%; and Tursunzade–30 to 40%. It is likely that many incomes reported by respondents at the time of the survey are approximate, and do not reflect actual household income over the year.

3.2.8 Average Annual Expenditure

43. The total annual average household expenditure is TJS18,562.5 with the main expenditure being incurred for food followed by expenditure on clothing, transportation, agricultural produce, and health.

6 University of Southampton, UK/State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Tajikistan (2005). Socio-Economic Atlas of Tajikistan 2005. 14

Table 3.7: Average Annual Expenditure

Average Annual % to total Type of expenditure Expenditure (TJS) expenditure Food 8,062.60 43.43 Transportation 1,733.75 9.34 Clothing 2,082.98 11.22 Health 1,144.26 6.16 Education 592.87 3.19 Communication 551.39 2.97 Social functions 778.29 4.19 Agriculture (such as seeds, hiring of farm implements etc.) 1,683.94 9.07 Consumption of fuel for household 978.02 5.27 Electric Bill 362.35 1.95 Others 592.06 3.19 Total Average 18,562.51 100.00

3.2.9 Possession of Durable Goods

44. Possession of durable goods differs from each household depending on the nature of the durable goods. At a minimum, most households possess a television and an LPG connection. Refrigerators and radios are owned by nearly half of the households. Computers and air conditioners are possessed by 8% and 11% of the households respectively. About 50% of the households possess a car. In terms of livestock, 63% of the households possess sheep and goats, 29% possess donkeys, 10% possess poultry and only 3.5% have large animals like cows and buffalo.

Table 3.8: Possession of Durable Goods Item Number of Households % Average Possession Radio 206 47.9 1.10 Bicycle 121 28.1 1.15 Television 417 97.0 1.52 L.P.G Connection/ Gas Cylinder 368 85.6 1.31 Computer 34 7.9 1.03 Refrigerator 201 46.8 1.22 Washing Machine 86 20.1 1.07 Motor cycle/Scooter 9 2.1 1.00 Car 216 50.2 1.18 Air Conditioner 46 10.7 1.43 Sheep and Goats 271 63.0 2.33 Poultry 44 10.2 3.68 Donkey 124 28.9 6.90 Large Animals (Cows/Buffalo) 15 3.5 1.21 Total 430 100

3.2.10 Indebtedness

45. Indebtedness among the households in the project affected area is common. About one third of the households stated that they had taken loans in the previous year. The loan has been from different sources for various households’ needs.

Table 3.9: Status of Indebtedness Particulars Number of Households that had taken out loans within the previous year % Yes 140 32.6 No 290 67.4 Total 430 100.0

3.2.11 Access to Schemes/Benefits

46. Few Households avail themselves of government benefit schemes. Only 12 households out of 430 covered during the survey reported that they participate in such schemes or benefits.

Table 3.10: Availability of Scheme Benefit Participate in Government Schemes? Number of Households % Yes 12 2.8 No 418 97.2 Total 430 100.0

3.2.12 Access to Health Centres

About 97% of the households stated that they have easy access to health care centers.

Table 3.11: Access to Health Center Easy access to Health Center Number of Households % Yes 416 96.7 No 14 3.3 Total 430 100.0

47. The average distance from homes to health centers is 3.7 km.

Table 3.12: Distance of the Health Center Distance Number of Households % Within 1 km 142 34.1 1.1 to 2 km 87 20.9 2.1 to 3 km 63 15.2 3.1 to 5 km 44 10.6 5.1 to 10 km 56 13.4 more than 10 km 24 5.8 Total 416 100.0 Average distance 3.7 km

48. About 42% of the surveyed households reported that a household member suffered from major illness during the last one year whereas 58% of the households did not face any major illness.

Table 3.13: Illness during the Past Year Reported Sickness Number of Households % Yes 181 42.1 No 249 57.9 Total 430 100.0

3.2.13 Migration Pattern

49. Temporary migration for work is equally prevalent in the project influence zone. About 43% of the surveyed households reported that the household members seek work away from home.

Table 3.14: Migration Pattern Migration Number of Households % Yes 184 42.8 No 246 57.2 Total 430 100.0

3.2.14 Place of Migration

50. Most workers who work away from home do so outside the country. About 97.3% of the household members migrate out of Tajikistan for work, while only a small percentage of respondents (2.7%) migrate within Tajikistan, but outside their district.

Table 3.15: Place of Migration Place of Migration Number of Households % Outside District 5 2.7 Outside Country 179 97.3 Total 184 100.0

3.2.15 Occupations of Migrant Workers

51. The majority of the respondents migrate as non-agricultural laborers (48.9%) followed by trade and business workers (6.5%) and agricultural laborers (1.7%).

Table 3.16: Types of Jobs Jobs Number of Households % Agricultural laborers 3 1.7 Non agricultural laborers 90 48.9 Trade & business 12 6.5 Others 79 42.9 Total 184 100.0

52. The average household income is TJS1,139.46 per month as reported by the 142 households, where family members migrate for work. The rest of the households were unable to provide any information on the actual income received from members who work away from home.

3.2.16 Trends in Migration

53. Earners from about 45.6% of the household migrate every alternate year in search of work and 31.52% migrate once a year. It was also found that earners from about 18.5% households migrate as and when required to seek job opportunities, and members of a few (3.3%) households migrate once in every three years.

Table 3.17: Trends of Migration Trends Number of Households % Once a year 58 31.5 Twice a year 2 1.1 Every alternative year 84 45.6 Once in every three years 6 3.3 As and when required 34 18.5 Total 184 100.0

3.2.17 Season of Migration

54. Migration between June and August is very high in the project area. Out of 184 households reporting migration by members, 136 households (73.9%) reported migration during this period. Migration rates between April and May and in the winter, between December and February are quite similar in nature, at 11.9% and 14.1% respectively.

Table 3.18: Season of Migration Season Number of Households % Summer (April- May) 22 12.0 Winter (December – February) 26 14.1 Rainy (June –August) 136 73.9 Total 184 100.0

3.2.18 Education and Literacy

55. The total literacy is reported to be 100%. Among respondents, 66% of females attended secondary level education, and nearly 50% of males attended secondary level. Higher education at college/university level is attended by 23% of males, and by 6% of females.

Table 3.19: Literacy Status Male Female Total Education profile No. % No. % No % Pre-school 394 19.4 349 18.6 743 19.0 Primary 167 8.2 171 9.1 338 8.6 Secondary 1,007 49.5 1,240 66.1 2,247 57.5 College/ university 465 22.9 112 6.0 577 14.8 Illiterate 1 0.05 3 0.2 4 0.1 Total 2,034 100.0 1,875 100.0 3,909 100.0

3.2.19 Source of Drinking Water

56. The main source of drinking water is from streams. Out of the 430 surveyed households, it is noted that 166 (39%) of the households use streams. However 15% reported having access to a piped water supply and 6% reported reliance on wells or hand pumps as the source of drinking water.

Table 3.20: Source of Drinking Water Source Number of Households % Piped water supply 66 15.3 Spring 6 1.4 Well 24 5.6 Stream 166 38.6 Others 168 39.1 Total 430 100.0

3.2.20 Sanitation Facilities

57. About 98.6% of the households surveyed possess a latrine, while 1.4% reported that they have a flush toilet.

Table 3.21: Types of Toilet Toilet Number of Households % Flush toilet 6 1.4 Latrine 424 98.6 Total 430 100.0

3.2.21 Usage Pattern of Fuel for Cooking

58. Wood is the major source of fuel being used by the households (98%) for cooking with the remainder of the households using electricity or gas. Most of the households are electrified and have an LPG gas connection, however, fuelwood and crop residues are most commonly used for cooking because of the high price (and low availability) of gas and the high costs of electricity.

Table 3.22: Type of Fuel Use for cooking Types of Fuel Number of Households % Electricity 5 1.1 Wood 423 98.4 Gas 2 0.5 Total 430 100.0

3.2.22 Status on Electrification

59. About 98.4% of the households have access to electrical power, and 1.6% have no power supply.

Table 3.23: Connected to Central Power Supply Whether connected Number of Households % Yes 423 98.4 No 7 1.6 Total 430 100.0

3.2.23 Interior Details of Structure

60. The average number of rooms per structure is 5.5, out of which the average number of heated rooms is 2.3.

Table 3.24: Interior Details of Structures Particulars Total Average Number of rooms in House/Structure 5.5 Average Heated Rooms 2.3

3.3 Socio-economic data relevant to Women

61. Women are primarily involved in household level natural resource based activities such as horticulture, sericulture, and animal husbandry (76%), and about 72% reported household work. About 8% of the women in the surveyed households participate in trade/business work and 6% work as agricultural laborers. On further questioning, it was found 69 (16%) of the respondent households receive income in part from women.

Table 3.25: Type of Activities for Women Activities Number of Households % Allied Activities 328 76.3 Collection and Sale of forest products 12 2.8 Trade & Business 33 7.6 Agricultural Labour 27 6.3 Non Agricultural Labour 6 1.4 HH Industries (Tailoring, Cooking for sales etc) 12 2.8 Service 14 3.2 Household Work 309 71.8 Others 25 5.8 Total 430 100.0

62. Women participate equally in household decision making (99.5%), illustrating an active role of women in the family.

Table 3.26: Women’s Say in Decision Making Issues Number of Households % Yes 428 99.5 No 2 0.5 Total 430 100.0

63. A breakdown of the participation of women in specific issues is given in figure 3.27.

Table 3.27: Women’s Participation on Different Types of Issue Issues Number of Households % Financial matters 424 98.6 Children’s education 427 99.3 Children’s health care 428 99.5 Purchase of assets 425 98.8 Day to day activities 428 99.5 Social functions and marriages 428 99.5 Others 126 29.3

64. The project will pay particular attention to ensure that women are the recipients of the compensation pertaining to their activities and to ensure that women, who are de-facto household heads are clearly listed as beneficiaries of compensation. Women will also be participants in the consultation processes to determine and negotiate compensation entitlements and implement the LARP. Special attention will be given to the impact of resettlement on women and other vulnerable groups during monitoring and evaluation of the LARP. The project will have a positive impact on gender, because the civil works contracts will include provisions to encourage employment of women during implementation, and women will be encouraged to participate in activities to monitor program impacts.

3.4 Impact on Indigenous Peoples and Other Social Issues

65. No impacts on Indigenous Peoples are expected for the project. The project will primarily affect Tajik people who form 82% of the total population followed by the Uzbeks who form 18%. The Uzbek groups have been fully integrated into institutional, cultural, and economic processes in Tajikistan, and they do not display sufficient unique features to classify them as a distinct minority group. Neither group can be considered to be distinguished by a social or cultural identity distinct from the dominant or mainstream society, or by vulnerability to disadvantage by the proposed development. The preparation of an Indigenous Peoples’ Development Plan, is therefore not required, according to the ADB’s Safeguardson Indigenous Peoples.

66. Other vulnerable groups such as women headed households have been well addressed with additional assistance by the project as mentioned in the entitlements. The project will include appropriate measures to mitigate the potential risk of HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections, as well as drug and human trafficking. These measures include raising public awareness raising on these issues. Civil works contracts will include provisions requiring contractors to take measures to protect construction workers from the risks of HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections, and giving construction workers time to be tested or receive treatment. The HIV/AIDS and Migration project, $0.5 million ADB–financed grant, was recently completed. It was designed to mitigate the risks of HIV and sexually-transmitteed infections (STI) in a context characterized by cross-border seasonal migration and human trafficking. Ministry of Health was the executing agency. It has developed an integrated, community-based and gender-responsive approach to the prevention of HIV/AIDS and STIs.

4.0 RESETTLEMENT POLICY, LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ENTITLEMENT

4.1 General

67. The policy framework for the project is based on the Legislation of Republic of Tajikistan, the ADB Safeguards Policy Statement of 2009 and Operations Manual F1 on Safeguards (2010),In the legislation of Tajikistan, there is no special law or policy which regulates the issues of resettlement and/or land acquisition or expropriation of rights to land and immovable property for state or public needs. Moreover, there is no separate law which completely provides norms and mechanisms for the determination of a full, fair, market value of land. The key legislative acts regulating land management relations and the ownership rights to immovable properties in Republic of Tajikistan are the following:

• Constitution of Republic of Tajikistan (1994, as amended in 2003)7 • Land Code (as amended in 2008)8 • Civil Code (as amended in 2007)9 • Regulation “about compensation of losses to the land users and losses of agricultural products” (approved by the Decree of Government of Republic of Tajikistan, 2000. № 515)10

68. The Constitution of the Republic of Tajikistan, the Land Code of the Republic of Tajikistan and the Civil Code of the Republic of Tajikistan are the fundamental laws on which the legislation is based. The applicable Laws, regulations and policies are briefly summarized below. Based on the analysis of the applicable laws and policies and ADB’s Safeguards requirement, project related LAR principles have been adopted.

4.2 Policy and Legal Framework for Land Acquisition and Resettlement

69. The framework for the project is based on the ADB requirements on Resettlement as embedded in the Safeguards Policy Statement (2009) and on the ADB Operations Manual F1 on the Safeguard Policy Statement (2010), the Constitution of the Republic of Tajikistan, and the Land Code of the Republic of Tajikistan. Where differences exist between local law and ADB policies and practices, the resettlement for this project will be resolved in favor of the latter.

4.3 Tajikistan Constitution, law/regulation on land acquisition, resettlement and compensation

70. The Constitution of the Republic of Tajikistan is the main legal document guaranteeing citizen’s rights. Article 13 states “land, bowels of the earth, water, airspace, animal and vegetable kingdoms, and other natural resources are owned by the state, and the state guarantees their effective use in the interests of the people.” Further, Article 12 states “the economy of Tajikistan is based on various forms of ownership. The state will guarantee freedom

7 Constitution, November 6, 1994, as amended on 22 June 2003. 8 Land Code, as amended by N 498 from December 12, 1997., N 746 from May 14_ 1999, N 15 from May 12 2001, N 23 from February 28 , 2004. From 28.07.2006 №199, from 5.01.2008 №357, from 18.06.2008 №405. 9 Civil Code, as amended by August 6, 2001, N 41: May 3 2002 №5, March 1 2005, N 85; April 29, 2006 №180, May 12, 2007.№247). 10 Approved by the Decree of Government of Republic of Tajikistan, December 30, 2000. №515. 22

of economic activity, entrepreneurship, equality of rights, and the protection of all forms of ownership, including private ownership.” The legal basis for state acquisition of private property for public works is outlined in Article 32 which states “…the property of an individual is taken away only on the basis of the law, with the consent of the owner and to meet the requirements of the state and society, and with the state paying full compensation.”

71. Compensation for land withdrawal and other impacts due to public interest projects are regulated also by other legislative acts governing land withdrawal, land allotment and impacts compensation to the citizens are the Land Code RT (LC), the Civil Code RT (CC), and various normative-legal acts. Based on these laws, the withdrawal/allotment of lands and resettlement is based on the following applicable principles:

i. land users have a right to be reimbursed for losses due to withdrawal of right of land use for state and public needs (Article 41,43 LC). ii. at termination of the rights of property then property will be assessed on the basis of its market value (Article 265 CC). iii. land user or user of other registered rights associated with land should be noticed in written about land withdrawal by local land management authority not later than one year before coming land withdrawal procedure (Article 40.LC). iv. If according to International agreements which are recognized by the Republic of Tajikistan other rules are established than those which are specified in the Land Code of the Republic of Tajikistan, so the rules of international agreements will be accepted (Article 105, LC).

72. The LC, 1997 is the core legal document with regards to land acquisition. It has been updated a few times since then, most recently in 2004. Article 2 of LC states that there is no “private ownership of land, “land is an exclusive ownership of the State… [but]... guarantees its effective use in the interests of its citizens. However, in Articles 10-14, the LC outlines land title as being of long-term, short-term, and inherited land use entitlement.

73. Article 24 of LC describes the allocation of land for non-agricultural purposes, and provides that when choosing a suitable location for such land uses, land not suitable for agricultural should be favoured. The same principle is stressed by Article 29 LC, which discourages the use of high-yielding agricultural land for non-agricultural use. However, Article 29 also allows for allocation, and sequestering of agricultural land for “other very important State objects”.

74. Article 31 of LC provides that land acquisition for non-agricultural public purposes is subject to the award of compensation: “terms of allocating land plots to new land users for non- agricultural needs must envisage compensation of all losses related to confiscation of land plots from former land users, as well as compensation of losses in agricultural production.” Article 19 of LC states the rights of land users, including clauses allowing a land use rights holder the “waiving voluntarily land plot” or “indemnifying for [compensating] for losses” as mentioned in Article 41 of LC. This article sets out the basis for compensation: “Fully reimbursed shall be losses, including loss of profit, caused by:

(i) sequestration of land for non-agricultural purposes; (ii) restriction of land users' rights; (iii) deterioration of land quality as the result of activities of other land users.

75. In the case of this project, this could be interpreted as compensation for permanent loss of land use and crops, and complying with (ii) and (iii) above, the need to compensate for temporary use of land and disturbance of cropping patterns for construction purposes.

76. Calculation of the compensation due for land acquisition is contained in Articles 43 and 44, which state “actual prices of equipment and materials as well as prices of assets and other works existing either at the moment of confiscation of a land plot and drafting of the report shall be applied. When calculating losses of agricultural production and forestry, the standard costs for bringing into cultivation virgin lands and improve them so that they reach the maximum level of production obtained on the sequestrated lands shall be applied. Disputes about the amount of compensation for damages caused and losses of agricultural production and forestry shall be settled in court.”

77. The guarantee of land users’ rights is further emphasized in Article 48 which states “confiscation of land plots from natural persons for state and public needs can be made after:

- having been assigned of another equivalent land plot; - having been constructed on a new place of housing, industrial and other structures equivalent in their purpose instead of plots sequestrated, in the established order by enterprises, institutions and organizations for which the land plot was assigned; - having paid full compensation for all other losses, including profit loss. (Article 41 & 42 of LC)

78. Compensation for land, which belongs to the State and is allocated and essentially leased to users by each hukumat, is divided on a 40–60% basis between the hukumat, which will no longer derive an income from taxes and leases for that portion of the land going forward, and the land user, who suffers a reduction in his/her income generating asset. The compensation received by the hukumat is used for the management, construction, and maintenance of local infrastructure. The land user also gets compensation for lost crops based on the average of the 4 years previous to the impact.

4.4 ADB Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards

78. ADB SPS 2009 Safeguard Requirements 2: Involuntary Resettlement aims to avoid involuntary resettlement wherever possible; to minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring project and design alternatives; to enhance, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all displaced persons in real terms relative to pre-project levels; and to improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups. ADB Policy has the following requirements: Compensation, Assistance and Benefits for Displaced Persons (DPs) – Compensate/assist those with formal legal rights to the land lost and those who have claims to lands that are recognized or recognizable under national laws. DPs who have neither formal legal rights nor recognized or recognizable claims to such land are entitled only to compensation for non-land assets. - Compensate for affected lands, structures and other assets and put in place a comprehensive income and livelihood rehabilitation program prior to displacement - Give preference to land-based resettlement strategies for displaced persons whose livelihoods are land-based. Provide physically displaced persons with relocation assistance, secured tenure to relocation land, better housing at resettlement sites with comparable access to employment and production opportunities, and civic infrastructure and community services. 24

- Promptly compensate economically displaced persons for the loss of income or livelihood sources at full replacement cost, and provided other assistance (i.e. access to credit, training, and employment opportunities) to help them improve, or at least restore, their income-earning capacity, production levels, and standards of living to pre-displacement levels. - Provide displaced persons with opportunities to share project benefits in addition to compensation and resettlement assistance. b. Social Impact Assessment - Conduct socioeconomic survey(s) and a census, with appropriate socioeconomic baseline data to identify all persons who will be displaced by the project and to assess the project’s socioeconomic impacts on them. - As part of the social impact assessment, identify individuals and groups who may be differentially or disproportionately affected by the project because of their disadvantaged or vulnerable status. c. Resettlement Planning - A resettlement plan should be based on the social impact assessment and through meaningful consultation with the affected persons if the proposed project will have involuntary resettlement impacts - Ensure that the displaced persons are (i) informed about their options and entitlements pertaining to compensation, relocation, and rehabilitation; (ii) consulted on resettlement options and choices; and (iii) provided with resettlement alternatives. - Pay adequate attention to gender concerns to ensure that both men and women receive adequate and appropriate compensation for their lost property and resettlement assistance, if required, as well as assistance to restore and improve their incomes and living standards. - Analyze and summarize national laws and regulations pertaining to land acquisition, compensation payment, and relocation of affected persons in the resettlement plan; and compare such laws and regulations with ADB’s involuntary resettlement policy principles and requirements. If a gap between the two exists, propose a suitable gap- filling strategy in the resettlement plan in consultation with ADB. - Consider all costs of compensation, relocation, and livelihood rehabilitation as project costs. - Include detailed measures for income restoration and livelihood improvement of displaced persons in the resettlement plan. For vulnerable persons and households, include measures to provide extra assistance so that they can improve their incomes in comparison with pre-project levels. - After the completion of engineering design, prepare a final LARP that (i) adequately addresses all involuntary resettlement issues pertaining to the project, (ii) describes specific mitigation measures that will be taken to address the issues, and (iii) ensures the availability of sufficient resources to address the issues satisfactorily. - Consult with displaced persons identified after the formulation of the final resettlement plan and inform them of their entitlements and relocation options. Supplementary resettlement plan or a revised resettlement plan should be submitted to ADB for review before any contracts are awarded. - Use qualified and experienced experts to prepare the social impact assessment and the resettlement plan. d. Information Disclosure - submit the following documents to ADB for disclosure on ADB’s website: (i) a draft resettlement plan and/or resettlement framework endorsed by the borrower/client before project appraisal; (ii) the final resettlement plan endorsed by the 25

borrower/client; (iii) a new resettlement plan or an updated resettlement plan, and a corrective action plan prepared during project implementation, if any; and (iv) the resettlement monitoring reports. - Provide relevant resettlement information in a timely manner, in an accessible place and in a form and language(s) understandable to affected persons and other stakeholders. For illiterate people, use other suitable communication methods. e. Consultation and Participation - Conduct meaningful consultation with DPs, their host communities, and civil society - Pay particular attention to the need of disadvantaged or vulnerable groups, especially those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, female headed households, women and children, Indigenous Peoples, and those without legal rights to land. f. Grievance Redress Mechanism - establish a responsive, readily accessible and culturally appropriate mechanism to receive and facilitate the resolution of affected persons’ concerns and grievances about physical and economic displacement and other project impacts, paying particular attention to the impacts on vulnerable groups. g. Monitoring and Reporting - monitor and measure the progress of implementation of the resettlement plan. For projects/subprojects with significant LAR impacts, qualified and experienced external experts are retained to verify internal resettlement monitoring information. If any significant involuntary resettlement issues are identified, prepare a corrective action plan to address such issues. Do not proceed with implementing the Project until such planning documents are formulated, disclosed and approved. h. Unanticipated Impacts - If unanticipated involuntary resettlement impacts are found during project implementation, conduct a social impact assessment, update the resettlement plan or formulate a new resettlement plan i. Special Considerations for Indigenous Peoples - avoid physical relocation of Indigenous Peoples that will result in adverse impacts on their identity, culture, and customary livelihoods. If adverse impacts cannot be avoided, formulate a combined Indigenous Peoples plan and resettlement to meet all relevant requirements specified under ADB Safeguard Requirements 3: Indigenous People. j. Negotiated Settlement - acquisition of land and other assets through a negotiated settlement whenever possible is encouraged. - Negotiated settlements that would result in expropriation are subject to third-party validation to ensure that the compensation is based on fair price (replacement cost) of land and/or other assets, and is based on meaningful consultation with DPs.Policy Differences and Reconciliation

79. As per ADB’s Safeguards Policy Statement (2009), important elements of the resettlement policy or this project are: (i) avoid and minimize land acquisition and resettlement impacts; (ii) compensate for lost assets at replacement cost; (iii) livelihood, and income restoration; (iv) assistance for relocation, including provision of relocation sites with appropriate

facilities and services; and (v) assistance for rehabilitation needs to achieve at least the same level of well-being with the project as without it.11

4.5 Policy Differences and Reconciliation

80. A comparison of the above Tajikistan Land Code and ADB policies are summarized in table 4.1. The reconciliation provisions are also detailed below.

Table 4.1: Comparison of ADB Resettlement Safeguards with Tajikistan Land Code ADB Tajikistan Reconciliation provisions Resettlement Requirements Land Code (LC) Provisions DPs are to be informed/consulted on The LC does not provide for consultation. In this project, DPs were consulted on resettlement/ compensation options. options. The RP will be disclosed to them. DPs should be compensated and The LC provides for compensating for This project will provide compensation for assisted, so that their economic and loss of land right, buildings, crops, trees loss of land rights, buildings and crop social future would be generally as and other assets. However, it is not clear losses. Business losses will be also favorable as it would have been in the on how income losses (i.e. business compensated based on taxreturns or if absence of the project. losses) are to be compensated. these are unavailable based on minimum salary. (see entitlements section for details). Land compensation is to be provided The LC mandates only for land x land Land will be compensated either by at replacement rates either in terms of compensation. provision of replacement plot or in cash. land x land or in cash. Due to For Agricultural land replacement cost circumstances of this project will be computed based on the compensation needs to be provided in production value of the affected plot. For cash. residential or /commercial land ( a type of land that does not have intrinsic productive value) replacement cost will be computed based on current lease rate multiplied by 25 years since in Tajikistan there are no official land markets.. (for details seetion 4.7 below) Compensation is to be provided in full The LC mandates compensation at When land for land compensation is not at replacement rates replacement rates through provision of technically feasible (as for this project), land x land. However this is not be the local administrations may give cash case if land is paid in cash as the compensation. This practice will be replacement value (reproduction cost) of adopted for this project. A rehabilitation a plot is shared on a 40—60% proportion allowance for land use rights in cash at between the local government and the replacement rate will be provided to loss. user respectively.

Lack of formal legal title to the land by Compensation is provided only to The issue is not relevant in the case of some affected groups should not be a registered settlers. this project as there are no squatters bar to compensation or rehabilitation. affected. Beside compensation at replacement The Law provides for compensation for all There is basic conformity on the items

11 Rehabilitation measures include restoration of access to public facilities, infrastructure, and services; and to cultural property and common property resources. Measures to mitigate loss of access to cultural sites, public services, water resources, grazing, or forest resources include establishment of access to equivalent and culturally acceptable resources and income-earning opportunities. Such measures must be determined in consultation with affected communities, whose rights might not be formally recognized in national legislation. Where people are seriously affected by the loss of assets, incomes, and employment, compensation solely for lost assets may not be adequate to restore their economic and social base. Such people will be entitled to rehabilitation assistance measures for restoring incomes and living standards.

ADB Tajikistan Reconciliation provisions Resettlement Requirements Land Code (LC) Provisions cost for land, ADB safeguards provide losses. It is specific on this for buildings where the law provides specific also for compensation at replacement and crops but does not detail how trees provisions. As per tree and business cost for houses, crops, trees and and business compensation is to be income losses, a compensation businesses or employment/income carried out. methodology fitting both Tajikistan legal losses. principles and ADB has been adopted.

ADB safeguards provide for The law does not provide for the ADB For the project, these allowances will be rehabilitation allowances for, severe required allowances. provided as per ADB.safeguards impacts, vulnerable DPs and requirements. These items are included relocation. in the project costs.

4.6 Principles Adopted for the Project

The core involuntary resettlement principles for this project are: (i) land acquisition, and other involuntary resettlement impacts will be avoided or minimized exploring all viable alternative project designs; (ii) where unavoidable, time-bound land acquisition and resettlement plans (LARPs) will be prepared and DPs will be assisted in improving or at least regaining their pre- project standard of living; (iii) consultation with DPs on compensation, disclosure of resettlement information to DPs, and participation of DPs in planning and implementing rehabilitation measures will be ensured; (iv) vulnerable groups will be provided special assistance; (v) payment of compensation to APs including non-titled persons (e.g., informal dwellers/squatters, and encroachers) for acquired assets at replacement rates; (vi) payment of compensation and resettlement assistance prior to the contractor taking physical acquisition of the land and prior to the commencement of any construction activities; (vii) provision of income restoration and rehabilitation; and (viii) establishment of appropriate grievance redress

4.6.1 Types of Land Ownership and Land Use Rights Allocation

79. Dekhan Land arose in Tajikistan as a result of the splitting up of large state owned farm enterprises, known as kolkhoz and sovkhoz farms, which were established through much of the former Soviet Union. Sovkhoz farms were run by the state, while kolkhoz farms were a form of co-operative farm, run by a committee of members approved by the state. While stable, they relied on the markets set up and under the soviet system and were considered to lack efficiency. The process of dividing and reallocating land from the sovkhoz and kolkhoz farms started on cessation of the civil war in the late 1990s and the purpose is to place management responsibility directly into the hands of the farmers as an incentive to promote efficiency. Under Dekhan farms, the land remains state property (which cannot be bought or sold), but farmers are granted inheritable land use rights that give complete legal freedom to manage the land as the landholders desire. The state collects taxes and can repossess the land if it believes the land is not being managed properly. There are three types of Dekhan land: individual (the land use certificate is held by an individual), family (the certificate is jointly held) and collective (the certificate details common property shareholders). 12

12 Lerman, Z and Sedik, D. (2008) The Economic Effects of Land Reform in Tajikistan. Report prepared for the European Commission under the EC/FAO Food Security Programme—Phase II: Food Security Information for Action. Rome. 28

80. Presidential land is similar to Dekhan land. It was allocated in small plots to private households in the late 1990s by Presidential Decree. The essential difference between Dekhan and Presidential land is the timing of the decree that released land for small household plots.

81. Reserve Fund land usually includes unused land. It also includes land plots for which land use rights have been abandoned. State reserve land is at the disposal of the district administrations and is rented out or distributed for individual tilling for agricultural purposes. Article 100 of the Land Code says State land stock is reserved for agricultural, industrial, transport and other needs of the national economy.13

4.6.2 Eligibility

82. The DPs entitled to compensation or at least rehabilitation provisions under the project are (i) all DPs losing land and other assets with legal title/traditional land rights including permanent land users of all the types of listed above and lease holders, (ii) any tenants; (iii) owners of buildings, crops, plants, or other objects attached to the land; and (iv) DPs losing business, income, and salaries.

83. The DPs entitled to compensation or at least rehabilitation provisions under the project are (i) all DPs losing land and other assets with legal title/traditional land rights including permanent land users of all the types of listed above and lease holders, (ii) tenants; (iii) owners of buildings, crops, plants, or other objects attached to the land; and (iv) DPs losing business, income, and salaries.

84. Compensation eligibility is limited by an approved cut-off date established at the end of the impact survey on 30 November 2009. Copies of published notices of this date are given in Appendix 7. DPs who settle in the affected areas after the cut-off date will not be eligible for compensation. They, however, will be given sufficient advance notice, requested to vacate premises and to dismantle affected structures prior to project implementation. Their dismantled structures will not be confiscated and they will not pay any fine or suffer any sanction.

4.6.3 Compensation Entitlements

85. The DPs in the project are entitled to various types of compensation and resettlement assistance to help in restoring their livelihoods to the pre-project levels. The combination of compensation measures and resettlement assistance depends on the nature of the lost assets and scope of the project’s impact, including the social and economic vulnerability of the affected persons. All DPs are eligible for compensation and rehabilitation assistance, irrespective of their land ownership status, to ensure that those affected by the project shall be at least as well off, if not better off, than they would have been without the Project. The compensation packages shall reflect replacement costs for all losses (such as land, crops, trees, structures, businesses, incomes, etc.) as detailed below

• Agricultural land impacts. Rehabilitated through the provision of an allowance for loss of land-use right additional to standard crop compensation and equal to: • For permanent land holders: 5 years of yearly gross income of affected annual crops land at market rate or 1 year of yearly gross income of affected fruit trees land.

13 ARD/Checchi Consultants, (2005). Final Report: Legal Infrastructure for a Market Economy Project, translation of Land Code of the Republic of Tajikistan 29

The same allowance will be provided to all land users permanently affected including individual land users, cooperative land users. • For lease holders: same as above

• Residential/commercial land. For holders of land use rights, compensation equivalent to the current land lease rate of $0.1 per m2 in the Project area multiplied by 25 years will be provided. This may be revised during the finalization of the LARP based on the outcome of the ongoing efforts to revise the Land Code and development of methodology for land valuation.

• Houses, buildings and structures. These will be compensated in cash at full replacement cost (cost of materials plus cost of labor plus cost of transport of materials) free of deductions for depreciation, salvaged materials, and transaction costs irrespective of the registration status of the affected item. House compensation is given for the entire building both in the case of full and partial impacts.

• Crop Losses. Crop compensation will be paid by default to all DPs irrespective of their legal status in cash at full market rate for 1 years’ yield. This shall apply whether the land is fallow, or in crop. Crop compensation will be paid both to landowners and tenants based on their specific agreements.

• Loss of Perennial Crops. Reimbursement will be at the full market rate of one year’s production, as assessed by the district administration and agreed with the DPs.

• Loss of Businesses. If business is lost permanently, it will be compensated in cash equal to a 1 year income based on tax declaration or, if unavailable, based on the maximum official non-taxable salary; temporary business losses will be compensated in cash for the business interruption period based on tax declaration or, if unavailable, official minimum salary.

• Business workers and employees. Indemnity for lost wages for the period of business interruption up to a maximum of 1year.

• Severe impact losses. When more than 10% HH income is affected in the case of households engaged primarily in agriculture, the DPs (owners, leaseholders, tenants, and informal settlers) will receive an allowance for severe impacts equal to the market value of a year’s net yield of the land lost, in addition to standard crop compensation.

• Agricultural tenants and workers. Tenants will receive their share of harvest at market rates (if the impact is temporary) plus 1 additional crop compensation (if the land is lost permanently). Agricultural workers, with whose employment will be interrupted, will receive an indemnity in cash corresponding to their salary, in cash and in kind, for the remaining part of the agricultural year, inclusive of both winter and summer crop.

• Relocation Allowances. DPs forced to relocate will receive a relocation subsidy sufficient to cover transport costs and living expenses for 3 months at minimum salary. This subsidy must be more than sufficient to cover transport costs and the average monthly income of an affected HH.

• Community Structures and Public Assets. These will be fully replaced or rehabilitated to achieve their pre-project functions.

• Vulnerable DPs. HHs below the poverty line and women headed HHs will be given employment priority during construction of the project, and for road repair and maintenance jobs after completion. Additionally, they will be paid contribution equal to 2 months’ minimum salary.

86. The above provisions are summarized below.

Table 4.2: Compensation Entitlements Matrix ASSET DISPLACED PERSON PROPOSED ENTITLEMENTS Agricultural Land: All Individual land-use An allowance for loss of land use rights in cash equal to 5 years of losses irrespective of rights holder the gross income of the affected annual crops land at market rate or impact severity to 1 yesr of gross income of affected fruit trees land at market rates. Cooperative land holder An allowance for loss of land use rights in cash equal to 5 years of the gross income of the affected land at market rate Residential/ Commercial Land Residential rights holder Provision of alternative land or rehabilitation cash allowance for loss of land use rights equal to the current land lease rates multiplied by 25 years ($2.5 per m2) Houses and Structures All relevant DPs. • Cash compensation at replacement rate for affected structure/other fixed assets free of salvageable materials and transaction costs. All buildings will be compensated in their entirety House/building rent Renter/leaseholder Rental allowance in the form of 1 to 3 months rent in cash Income from Crops All DPs • Crop compensation in cash equal to 1 year of the gross income of affected land at market rate. This shall apply whether the land is fallow, or under ultivation. Income from trees All DPs • Cash compensation for wood trees based on volume of wood • Cash compensation for productive trees based on the net annual harvest from the tree(s) for the number of years taken for replacement tree(s) to reach comparable production Business or Employment All DPs -Business Owner: Cash compensation for lost income up to 1 year’ (if loss; temporary or (including informal income is permanent) or Cash compensation for the period of business permanent settlers) interruption ( if the loss is temporary). The compensation iis assessed at actual income as per tax declaration or if taxes have not been paid at the maximum non-taxable indome. -Permanent worker/employers: Indemnity for lost wages for business stoppage of up to 1 year Allowance for severe All severely DPs -Agricultural income: One severe impact allowance equal to the net impacts (More that 10% of market value of the harvest from the affected land for 1 year (inclusive of income loss) winter and summer crop) and in addition to the standard crop compensation . Relocation allowance All relocated DPs Provision of sufficient allowance to cover transport expenses and basic livelihood expenses for the transitional period Communal/ Public assets Rehabilitation/substitution in kind or cash at replacement cost of affected items and rehabilitation of their functions Vulnerable DPs DPs below poverty line • Employment priority in project-related jobs and households headed • Cash contribution equal to 2 month’s official minimum salary. by women.

4.7 Approaches and Methodologies for Land Compensation

4.7.1 Replacement of Affected land with Alternative land

87. The method that exists in Tajikistan for land compensation and for which there is a legal basis, is compensation with replacement land, or, land for land. This is the preferred approach by the Government especially in cases where there is an available adjoining or nearby land to the affected plot. The current practice is to alocate a replacement plot of 800 m2 residential land to citizens affected by land acquisition especially those who have lost significant portions of their plots. For plots used for commercial purposes, replacement plots may be provided proportionate to the business requirement of the DP. In the case of road widening however, most use-rights holders lose very narrow strips of land. Practical difficulties therefore arise with regard to re- allocation of new land. Contiguous plots with the affected land are seldom available, and the provision of a small land plot far away from the affected plot may not be economically justified. It has also to be noted that the identification of plots available for redistribution and comparable in productivity/value to the land lost may be difficult and that the elaboration of a land redistribution scheme may be very complicated and costly. This applies not only to agricultural land but more generally also to residential/commercial land. For this Project, households/DPs losing substantial portions of their land and who do not have sufficient remaining land to rebuild their affected structures will be provided with replacement plots adjacent to or nearby their affected plots/structures. Expenses related to relocation of utilities, land clearing, land filling, provision of sanitation facilities and land registration will be shouldered by the Project. Households receiving replacement plot will still maintain their land use right in the remaining portion of their affected plots. In cases where provision of replacement land is impractical for implementation, cash compensation will be provided.

4.7.2 Cash Compensation

87. In Tajikistan there are no explicit legal provisions for the compensation of land rights with cash. To compensate land impacts in cash for the project specific arrangements have been agreed with the Government. These agreements are supported by precedents for specific projects such as the Tajikistan-Afghanistan Border transmission line.

88. In addition and related to the lack of explicit provisions on cash compensation Tajikistan laws and by-laws do not provide any legally accepted methodology to value land. The issue is particularly relevant for what concerns residential/commercial land which can be technically priced only in term of market values. During project preparation several options where considered including payng land at tax rates or requesting independednt assessors to devise an acceptable valuation methodology. The first option was discarded because it would have not fit replacement value; the second was discarded because difficult to apply legally in the context of the project. Most of the independent assessors available in the country focus on mass valuation for taxation purposes and for the establishment of lease payments. Following is a description of the valuation approach to be adopted in the Project for agricultural, residential and commercial land.

4.7.3 Agricultural Land

89. Agricultural land valuation for the Project is based on an assessment of the productivity, or income generation capacity of the affected plots. Valuation is done by taking in consideration

the value of the product of the land for a period sufficiently long to guarantee the APs rehabilitation. The critical point in determining the period is that the level of compensation must be sufficient to re-establish a livelihood. For this LARP, the period selected is 5 years at gross market value (inclusive of inputs and labor) of the yearly produce of annual crops land.14 Such a formula provides a solid capital that the APs can invest to improve the land remaining to them and roughly reflects land replacement cost based on information published on the Internet by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in 2009 (www.kansascityfed.org/RegionalAffairs/ MainStreet/MSE_0609.pdf. Regarding orchard land the period selected is given the much higher productivity 1 year at gross market value. Based on this valuation approach the average value of annual crops land (based on the type and area of affected crop) is TJS2.15/m2 (0.48 $/m2). The average value of orchard land (based on type and area of trees affected) is instead TJS7.16/m2 ($1.62/m2)

4.7.4 Residential/Commercial Land

90. The valuation of this type of land presents particular challenges since residential and commercial land has no intrinsic productive capacity. Some options like compensating this land by valuing it as agricultural land planted with a standard crop and by the replacement value of improvements such as house embankment water supply and electricity supply were considered but were found not satisfying. As an interim measure, it was agreed with the Land Committee that for marginal losses of portions of residential/commercial plots where provisions of replacement land will be impractical, cash compensation will be paid based on the current lease rate for agricultural land in the Project area amounting to $1,000 per hectare multiplied by 25 years15 or a unit rate of $2.5 per m2 subject to acceptability of the DPs during the conduct of wide consultations at the district level.

14 In absence of available market prices for agricultural land, it is difficult to determine whether the land use rights allowances actually correspond to land replacement cost, which is the ADB SPS policy provision ensuring the DP's rehabilitation. For the project, DP rehabilitation is pursued by providing 5 and 1 years of income for annual crops land and perennial crops land, respectively. The methodology used are based on undiscounted gross income (which with productive expenses estimated at 50% of the land annual income is assumed to be the double of the annual profit). These amounts provide the DPs with a capital which can be reinvested on DPs’ remaining land or on other investment opportunities. Considering that all DPs will retain most of their plots and that their livelihood is not threatened, this capital is deemed sufficient to allow for the full rehabilitation of the agricultural land losses caused by the project. 15 The allowances for loss of residential land based on 25 years of rental income. This reflects the average rental income period needed to recover the full value of land in most countries of the world. 33

5.0 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

5.1 General

91. This chapter deals with the various institutions responsible for planning, updating and implementing the LARP. The Ministry of Transport and Communication of the Republic of Tajikistan (MOTC) will be the Executing Agency (EA) having the lead responsibility for road construction, as well as the implementation of this LARP. In addition to MOTC, a number of other departments will play an instrumental role in the design, construction and operation of the project. The Agency on Land Management, Geography and Cartography is responsible for allocation and registration of new land plots, the Ministry of Justice for registration of any changes in rights to affected immovable properties, and the MBTI will similarly register any changes regarding immovable property and on its physical condition. Representatives of these agencies shall also comprise an ad-hoc Committee with representatives of each Rayon (district) to define the form and size of compensation to the affected proprietors. The role of each of these actors is detailed below.

5.2 Ministry of Transport and Communication (MOTC)

92. The exiting Project Implementation Unit (PIU) in MOTC will be acting as the PIU for this project. The PIU is experienced with handling ADB projects and is staffed with various designated engineers who also look after safeguards issues. The PIU has a full time designated resettlement specialist who, with assistance from other designated officials as necessary, will be overviewing and managing the LAR issues during the further development and the implementation of this LARP, including co-ordination of the agencies involved. It is proposed that a Safeguards Unit (with staff to be seconded from Land Committee) will be established to deal with the updating, finalization, and implementation of the LARP and the LAR issues. Capacity building will be provided to the specialists and relevant officials of PIU, on ADB Safeguards and especially on the implementation of the LARP.

5.3 Agency for Land Management, Geodesy and Cartography (ALMGC)

93. The ALMGC is the central government body with executive power for land management16. This Agency, with the state enterprises under it, is responsible to: (i) promote and develop unified state policy in land matters, and the management of government land, (ii) manage survey work including land cadastres, geodesy, aerial imagery and topographic mapping, (iii) control the use and protection of land, geodesy, and further development of the level of government geodetic control, aerial imagery and mapping activities, (iv) undertake government activities on land management, land cadastre, geodetic, aerial imagery, mapping, (v) coordinate scientific research on the study of natural resources using satellite imagery for Government departments; (vi) conduct registration of land use rights and implementation of land reform, (vii) undertake surveying and land plot formation activities, (viii) prepare and issue of Land Use Right Certificates (LURC)17, (viii) register changes of land user, (ix) allocate new land plots, (x) acquire land as required for the state, (xi) survey the land plots, the subject of land use

16 Regulation on Agency on land management, geodesy and cartography under the Government of Republic of Tajikistan, approvedd by the Government Decree from December 28 2006, №613. 17 This is a legal document that verifies the title holding of any parcel of land 34

rights, (xii) develop projects for allocation of land use rights for non-agricultural needs, (xiii) implement land assessment work, soil assessment and economic valuation of land.18

5.4 MBTI under the State Unitary Enterprise Housing and Communal Services

94. The State Unitary Enterprise Housing and Communal Services, with the enterprises under it are the suppliers of public utilities in Tajikistan,19 including 31 Mezhraion (Inter-district) Bureaux of Technical Inventory (MBTI). MBTI is established as a self funding enterprise, operating at district and city levels. It is mainly in charge of technical inventory of immovable property, buildings (houses, constructions, etc). The Government Decree No 513, dated 30 December 1998 provides the following roles for MBTI: (i) technical inventory of private houses and land, buildings, apartments and state companies; (ii) technical inventory and valuation of constructions and structures; (iii) technical inventory of the affected assets (iv) technical inventory of engineering networks; and (v) register the ownership and preparation of an Ownership Certificate of immovable assets.

95. Registration of structures and other objects is conducted to establish ownership rights of houses, buildings and apartments and their registration in cities and villages. MBTI registers immovable properties in a Registration Book, based on land plots, including the following information: (i) Date, (ii) Identification Number in the Register, (iii) address of immoveable property, (iv) owner’s name, (v) shares, (vi) legal documents, (vii) encumbrances, (viii) signature of registering staff member, (ix) remarks. A unique number is applied for buildings and apartments based on postal address: (i) District name, (ii) Block Number, (iii) Street name, (iv) Building Number, (v) Apartment Number. However, the block is different to that used by the ALMGC. MBTI is supposed to update the data about the changes of structure and value of the building every three years, mainly for taxation purposes. MBTI offices have specialists in architecture and construction for each district.

5.5 The Local Executive State Power in Districts (Hukumats)

96. The District Hukumat is the level of administration in cities and districts. It is under the Oblast level and there are Jamoats under the District Hukumats. The Hukumat is led by a chairperson who has a wide range of responsibilities and authorities, including land management, housing and infrastructure, social security, law and order, health care and production. The planning and implementation of any LAR activities related to land and assets is done through the help of Hukumats. This is the local administration having a direct link with the people and most of the small grievances related to allocation amd distribution of land rights. In relation to land and immovable property administration, the Hukumat provides help to concerned departments (land commission/MBTI/PIU etc) for resolving the issues with specific key roles such as allocation of land use rights, and decisions on acquisition of land use rights and allocation of alternate sites for resettlement. An Ad Hoc Commission exists for Land Acquisition/Compensation/Resettlement.

97. For defining the losses of land users at land acquisition for state and public needs or for the temporary occupation of land parcels, there valuation commissions are formed consisting of

18 The Government Decree No. 613, dated 26 December 2006 provides the details of the roles and responsibilities, organizational structure and its associated enterprises. 19 ‘It was established by Government Decree No235, dated 6 June 2001, and has 131 subordinate enterprises, including 31 MBTIs. 35

the following:20 (i) a representative of the district Hukumat, usually the deputy chairman of the district or town, (ii) the head of district agency on land management, geodesy and cartography, (iii) a representative of the district or town office of architecture, (iv) representatives of the water management department, (v) a representative of the district nature protection committee, (vi) representatives of the affected land users, (v) representatives of the enterprises and/or institutions interested in land acquisition, and (vi) representatives of other organizationss as defined by the Hukumat. The commission shall prepare the assessment with an indication of size of due compensation of agricultural losses that shall be approved by the Hukumat. The valuation for buildings and structures are done by MBTI.

98. For addressing land acquisition and resettlement issues associated with major road improvement projects, MOTC has recently formed a Working Group for land acquisition planning (Resettlement Working Group) comprising the following representatives: • First Deputy Minister, MOTC • Acting Deputy Head of Main Department for Road Construction Economy of MOTC. • Head of Cadastre and Land Registration, Land Management, Geodesy and Mapping Agency under the Government of the Republic of Tajikistan • Senior Construction Supervision Inspector, Construction and Architecture Agency under the Republic of Tajikistan • Engineer of IZDP unit, State Unitary Enterprise “Research and Planning - Surveying Institute” • Coordinator for consultants in PIU • Representatives of the Hukumats of Rudaki, Gissar, Shakhrinav and Tursunzade

99. The principal task of this group is to work towards finding an appropriate methodology for assessing fair replacement values for residential and commercial land, and to establish principles and processes for cash compensation payments. The Resettlement Working Group is representative of the various concerned departments related to LAR planning and implementation and by officials at central and local government level. Consultations with the Resettlement Working Group were carried out during the preparation of the LARP, and ADB safeguards was discussed and debated in the context of the project LAR activities in the project.

5.6 Consultants

100. The following Consultants will be involved in LAR tasks: 1. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Specialists: These will include international and local consultants who will manage survey teams to carry out the tasks required for finalizing the LARP and for ensuring compliance before civil works proceed (terms of reference (TOR) included under preparatory procurement and safeguard support services), and during implementation (TOR under project management and construction supervision services). These specialists will be responsible for working with the engineering team and the working group along with PIU staff for carrying out the final impact assessment survey which will be detailed in nature. The LAR will be working closely with the MBTI representatives and with the Hukumats for the valuation of structures and buildings. In case the land for land compensation method is agreed then the consultants under detailed design will be responsible assisting with the preparation of

20 Item 31, Regulation about the order of compensation of losses to the land users, approved by the Government Decree dated December 30, 2000, №515 36

micro plans for land redistribution in respect of individual specific land parcels. TORs for the resettlement specialists are included in the Project Administration Manual (PAM). 2. Independent Monitor (IM). An entity or an individual will be engaged to conduct independent monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the LARP. In the absence of a supervision consultant, the IM will continue to carry out the external monitoring and evaluation for the project. Preliminary discussion has been made with the NGO, “Munis” for their possible role as IM.for the project.

5.7 Other Government Organizations

101. The Ministry of Finance (MOF) will be responsible for allocating the budget for LARP implementation. The budgets for the implementation of the LARP will be provided to MOTC by the MOF following the official approval of the final LARP and after receipt of the formal request from MOTC to MOF for the allocation of budget. An organization structure is depicted in figure 5:

Figure 5: Institutional Arrangements

Asian Development MOTC /Government of Ministry of Finance Bank Tajikistan

Agency on Land Management, Working Group Geodesy and Cartography

MBTI PIU Field Level Staff and the PIU Resettlement

Specialist

Ad hoc Commission for Land Acquisition

Local Executive Independent Monitor Displaced Persons State Power in District (Hukumats)

6.0 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

6.1 General

102. The DPs will have the right to file complaints and/or queries on any aspect of land acquisition compensation, and resettlement. MOTC will ensure that grievances and complaints on any aspect of the land acquisition, compensation, and resettlement are addressed in a timely and satisfactory manner. All possible avenues are made available to DPs to air their grievances. A grievance mechanism will be available to allow an DP appealing against any decision, practice or activity arising from land or other assets assessment, acquisition and compensation. DPs have been fully informed of their rights and of the procedures for addressing complaints whether verbally or in writing during the time of compensation. Care will always be taken to prevent grievances rather than going through a redress process. This will be obtained through careful LAR implementation, by ensuring full participation and consultation with the DPs, and by establishing extensive communication and coordination between the affected communities, the PIU, and local governments in general.

6.2 Steps for Grievance Redress

103. Complaints and grievances will be addressed through the following steps and actions:

i. First, complaints can be lodged at the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) to be established at the district level which will meet at least twice a month to discuss and propose actions on feedbacks and concerns from DPs and other key stakeholders. Efforts will be made to address and resolve complaints raised at the GRC within 30 days. Staff from the MOTC district Office will act as Secretariat for the GRC and will record/monitor and report on the status of complaints received by the GRC. ii. If still unsettled, after 30 days a grievance can then be lodged to Working Group Committee at the PIU central level. Again the elected representatives of the DPs will have the opportunity to mediate in their favour. iii. If no solution is reached within 14 days the DPs can further submit their case to the appropriate court of law.

104. A grievance redress mechanism is depicted in figure 6.

6.3 Grievance Redress Commitee (GRC) Formation

105. A Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) will be established at the rayon level in each district to resolve complaints and grievances informally through community participation. The GRC will be formed with representatives from MOTC/PIU, hakumat, DPs, women DPs (if any), and appropriate local NGOs to allow voices of the affected communities to be heard and ensure a participatory decision-making process. GRC decisions will be on a majority basis and will be publicized among the local communities. Where the complaining parties are not satisfied with the GRC decisions, they can always file their cases in court.

106. GRCs will be established at the rayon level with an office order from the Ministry of Transportation and Communication (MOTC) with provision of 7 members of following composition. 38

Deputy Hukumat, District Government : Convener Representative from the PIU Member Secretary Representative from the district Office of the Cadastre and Land : Member Registration, Land Management, Geodesy and Mapping Agency Representative from the Jamoat within the District : Member Representative of DPs : Member Representative of Women DPs : Member Representative local NGO : Member

Figure 6: Grievance Redress Mechanism

Displaced Persons

Minor Grievances

GRC at the district Grievance level Addressed Major Grievances

PIU Field Level

Staff/Resettlement Specialist Grievance Addressed

Not Addressed

Working Group

Grievance Addressed

Not Addressed Court of Law

7.0 PUBLIC CONSULTATON, INFORMATION DISSEMINATION AND DISCLOSURE

7.1 General

107. Public consultations were carried out at various stages of project preparation especially during preparation of LARP, including a screening survey, a land census survey, a socio- economic survey and targeted consultation meetings with affected people and local stakeholder organizations and individuals. Public consultation is designed to share information on issues related to LAR activities. Consultations were carried out with affected persons, local communities, people’s representatives, government and non-government organizations. It ensured that the affected people and other stakeholders are informed, consulted and allowed to participate actively in the process of road development and preparation of LARP; reducing public resistance to change; helping mitigate and minimize any probable negative impact and bringing in the benefit of the project to the people. Public consultation has also been used as a tool to obtain socio-economic information, public opinion towards proposed project, and on sensitive and critical issues. This has provided information to be used in preliminary design, to minimize adverse social and resettlement impacts.

108. Consultations with all the stakeholders have been carried out during LARP preparation. Consultations carried out in the initial stages covered project design, fixing the alignment based on the resettlement impact, land situation in the project area and general socio-economic activities of the affected people and the findings were recorded. A second round of consultations was held during the census and socio-economic survey. These covered types of ownership, function of the collective farms, availability of alternate land and discussions on involvement of people during the LARP preparation and implementation. Regarding policy, the following points were discussed:

• Rules and Regulations of Tajikistan pertaining to land acquisition and Resettlement; • Requirements of ADB’s Safeguards on Involuntary Resettlement and provisions made under the compensation and rehabilitation policy for the project; • Initial Draft Compensation Policy specially the Entitlement Matrix; • Eligibility of various types of compensation; • Project Assistance to the eligible DPs; • Discussion on how to assess the replacement cost, i.e, unit cost for sample structures, productivity of land etc; • Discussions on implementation of the LARP with due involvement of all stakeholders; • Discussions on how to take forward the grievance and how to address the grievance during LARP implementation.

7.2 Objective of the Consultation

109. The basic objective of consultation is to explore the measures to safeguard the concerns of affected people and the people in the project area as follows:

• Disseminate information to the people about the project in terms of its activities and scope of work; and understand the views and perceptions of the people affected and local communities with reference to acquisition of land or loss of property and its due compensation; • Assessment of road alignment; • Understand views of displaced people on LAR options and gain an understanding of their expectations; • Identify and assess major economic and social information and characteristics of the project area to enable effective social and resettlement planning and its implementation; • Resolve issues related to impacts on community property and their relocation; • Examine DPs’ opinions on health safety issues during the construction period and on potential areas of concern such as the handling of construction waste and other pollution issues. • Identify levels and extent of community participation in project implementation and monitoring; • Establish an understanding for identification of overall developmental goals and benefits of the project; • Disseminate information to government, non-government and public private sector stakeholders and develop an approach for co-ordination with them to ensure their participation and mobilization of support in the process for the successful planning and implementation of the project; • Assess the local people's willingness to get involved with the project; and enumerate the measures to be taken during the implementation of the project.

7.3 Methods of Public Consultation

110. The following methodologies have been used for carrying out public consultations:

• Disseminating information and requesting the stakeholder people and organizations including affected people to attend the public consultation meetings at various sensitive places by involving the local administrations (Hukumats); • Sharing the opinions and preferences of the DPs; • Involving the DPs and all other stakeholders in decision-making including implementation of the LARP; • Walk-through informal group consultation along the road; • Focus group discussions with different groups of affected people including women groups, poor, and disadvantaged community groups; • In-depth individual interviews; • Discussions and interviews with key informants.

7.4 Individual Consultation

111. Individual consultations were made with all households (436) which had family members present during the survey. A door-to-door 100% Census was done by administering a scientific questionnaire in order to know the LAR impact and condition of the DPs. Additionally, socio- economic baseline survey was carried out in the project affected area comprising 430 households.

7.5 Community Consultation

112. Community consultations were held at various locations, especially at 4 locations through focused group discussion which involved both men and women participants. The details of the locations recorded are at: (i) Choryakkoron (Women: 8 and Men:25), (ii) Morteppa (Women: 6 and Men: 17), (iii) Shakhrinav (Women: 10 and Men: 17), (iv) Kommuna (Women: 5 and Men: 9). Community level discussions were held in different areas. The benefits of the project were explained in detail to them. In the process of public consultation and meeting with a number of potential affected people, it is observed that most of the people are concerned about their livelihood issues. The majority fear the loss of the commercial activities which will have a direct impact on their livelihood. However, it is noted that the loss of livelihood will be very minimal and can be well compensated. Almost all of the people welcomed the project expressing their views that this is a project of national importance. A summary of consultations covering the methodology, dates and participants is provided in Appendix 2. The major findings of the consultations held at various locations are summarized as follows.

• People are aware of the project and are willing to render support;

• DPs losing property expect a proper compensation package;

• The owners of affected structures stated that they should receive compensation adequate to build the similar type of structure elsewhere. They stressed that they should get advance notice for shifting and building new structures in new locations prior to the commencement of project construction works;

• Proper measures need to be taken to restore loss of livelihood by displacement;

• Proper safety measures need to be incporporated in the design of road improvements. Measures should focus on installing speed limits, warnings to traffic as providing adequate footpaths;

• People advised that there are archaeological sites or protected place in the area but they are distant from the project road;

• Compensation should be based on a fair assessment;

• DPs requested to be further consulted on project activities;

• Contractors should be advised by the project authority to employ local people.

7.6 Consultation with NGO

113. There is scope for the role of NGOs during the project implementation. The NGO, “Munis” was consulted in order to share the information about the proposed project. It is interested in providing independent monitoring support for the successful implementation of the proposed project with special reference to the resettlement of the displaced people and the proper management of the social and resettlement mitigation measures.

7.7 Consultation with Government Officials

114. The concerned government offices were involved in LARP preparation. They include District Land Committees, Construction and Architecture Departments of the Hukumats, and the MBTI (interdepartmental technical inventory bureau/pricing agency). Other offices consulted include the ALMGC, District Chairmen and First Deputy Chairmen, District Agriculture Departments, Committees on Women and Family Affairs, Jamoats and village councils. These 42

officials represent local, district, and national level government organizations. Additionally, consultations were held with the Working Group Committee. In-house orientation training was provided to the working group committee about the ADB safeguards on Involuntary Resettlement and to address issues related to cash compensation for land loss along with a mechanism for developing a methodology to calculate the replacement cost of land based on the market rate.

7.8 Continuation of Public Consultations

115. Consultations will be continued throughout the project. The effectiveness of resettlement implementation is related to the continuing involvement of those affected by the project. Several additional rounds of consultations with DPs will be required during LARP implementation. Consultations during LARP implementation will involve agreements on compensation, assistance options, entitlement packages and income restoration. The other round of consultations will occur when compensation and assistance are provided and actual resettlement begins. Information disclosure is pursued for effective implementation and timely execution of the LARP. For the benefit of the community in general and DPs in particular, the LARP will be made available at concerned offices of Hukumats, Jamoats for Mahalla leaders and NGOs (if other potential ones are found). For continued consultations, the following steps are envisaged in the project:

• PIU and consultants will organize public meetings and will apprise the communities about the progress in the implementation of resettlement, and social activities.

• PIU will organize public meetings to inform the community about compensation arrangements and amounts to be paid. Regular update of the progress of the resettlement component of the project will be placed for public display at the PIU office and at local Hukumat Office.

• All monitoring and evaluation reports of the LARP components of the project will be disclosed in the same manner as that of the LARP.

• Key features of the entitlements will be disclosed along the project corridor.

• PIU will conduct information dissemination sessions at major intersections and solicit the help of the local community leaders to encourage the participation of the DPs in RP implementation.

• Attempts will be made to ensure that vulnerable groups understand the process and to take their specific needs into account.

7.9 Disclosure

116. To keep more transparency in planning and for further active involvement of the LARP and other stakeholders, project information will be disseminated through disclosure of resettlement planning documents. Each DP will be provided information regarding specific entitlements. Following the finalization of LARP, a leaflet/pamphlet will be prepared and will be translated into Russian and distributed to all the DPs. The pamphlet will specifically cover a brief project description, compensation eligibility and entitlement including the entitlement matrix, schedule of LARP implementation and the compensation rates (see draft pamphlet in Appendix 1). The final LARP will be available to the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) in both English and Russian. The same will be available for the DPs as and when asked for. A copy of the final

LARP will be disclosed in ADB’s website and the same will be disclosed in the web site of MOTC both in English and in Russian.

8.0 LARP PREPARATION, IMPLEMENTATION AND CAPACITY BUILDING

8.1 General

117. The implementation of the LARP will be scheduled according to overall project implementation. All activities related to land acquisition and resettlement must be planned to ensure that compensation is paid prior to displacement and commencement of civil works. Public consultation, internal monitoring and grievance redress will be undertaken intermittently throughout the project duration. However, the schedule is subject to modification depending on the progress of project activities. The project LAR activities are divided in to three broad categories based on the stages of work and process of implementation. The details of activities involved in these three phases are the project preparation phase, the LARP implementation phase and the Monitoring & Evaluation phase.

118. To allow for the effective execution of all LAR related tasks, the services of an International Social/Resettlement Specialist are included in the Terms of Reference for consultants in the Project Administration Manual. These specialists will be responsible for imparting the on-the-job training and guidance to officials. The Working Group for the LAR activities has been consulted and initial training was imparted during the preparation of this LARP. The specialist will give guidance on:

• Principles and procedures of land acquisition as per Tajikistan Laws and ADB’s safeguards on Involuntary Resettlement; • Public consultation and participation; • Entitlements and compensation & assistance disbursement mechanisms; • Grievance redress; and • Monitoring of resettlement operations.

8.2 LARP Implementation Phase

119. Full implementation of the final LARP will be confirmed by a compliance reports. The implementation phase follows various steps in a sequence which includes both the preparation and implantation phase. Detailed steps are described in table 8.1.

Table 8.1: Steps for LAR Activities

Step Action Responsibility

A) LARP PREPARATION PPTA consultant/MOTC 1 Identification of project and finalization of Preliminary Design Identification and Setting up of various institutions such as Land Commission, 2 Working Group , MBTI etc concerned for the LAR planning and implementation PPTA consultant/MOTC including deputation of designated officials in PIU Imparting initial level of training on LAR issues especially ADB’s policy Resettlement Specialists 3 under PPTA consultant/ PIU requirement on Involuntary Resettlement and applicable laws of Tajikistan Preparation of first draft compensation policy including the its provisions for Resettlement Specialists 4 compensation and assistance in the project , especially eligibility and various under PPTA consultant entitlements and discussions with MOTC 45

Step Action Responsibility Resettlement Specialists 5 Initiation of first hand discussion on provision for cash compensation for land loss with PIU and Working Group under PPTA consultant Resettlement Specialists 6 Formation of survey team and imparting training to the survey team on LAR activities especially on data collection through census and socio-economic survey under PPTA consultant Resettlement Specialists Carry out Census and Socio-Economic Survey ( Base Line Information) of under PPTA consultant/ 7 affected people based on the preliminary design available as part of the feasibility designated PIU staff/Local stage level land commission staff/ hukumats

LAR Team under the PPTA 8 Carry out Public consultation consultants

LAR Team under the PPTA 9 Collection of unit rates from buildings and structures from the local MBTI officials consultants

Resettlement Specialists 10 Integrate data from Census and socio-economic data into the LARP. under PPTA consultant

Preparation and submission of LARP to ADB and MOTC for comments and Resettlement Specialists 11 approval under PPTA consultant

B) LARP FINALIZATION - Yet to be done Finalization of design and freezing of final alignment and its Right of Way PIU/ Design/Build 1 demarcated with due approval from MOTC Contractor

Finalization of the compensation policy with due approval from ADB and MOTC PIU/MOTC/Working 2 on the eligibility and entitlement Group/ADB

LAR Team/Project Management and 3 Updating of impacts Supervision Consultants/ Design/ Build Contractor / PIU/Working Group

LAR Team/LAR Team/Project Management 4 Preparation of micro plan for each affected asset and Supervision Consultants/ PIU/Working Group/ Land Commission

LAR Team under Detailed Identification of alternate land parcel and Preparation of land micro land plan for 5 Design/ PIU/Working each affected land in case of land for land compensation Group/Land Commission

LAR Team/Project Management and Supervision Consultants/PIU/Working 6 Valuation of land in case cash for land loss Group/Land Commission/ Independent Valuer if available and authorized by the government

Step Action Responsibility LAR Team under Detailed 7 Public consultation and information sharing on LAR activities Design/PIU/Working Group

LAR Team under Detailed 8 Collection of updated unit cost for the lost assets Design/ PIU/ MBTI/ Working Group

C) LARP IMPLEMENTATION PIU/Working Group through 1 Issuance of Identity Cards to DPs based on the micro plan the help of Hukumats

2 Detailed Schedule for compensation action plan PIU/MOTC/

PIU/Working Group through 3 Distribution of Relocation Notices to DPs the help of Hukumats

PIU/MOTC/Working Group 4 Disbursement of compensation amount (cheque) for Land Compensation through the help of Hukumats

PIU/MOTC/Working Group 5 Disbursement of Cheques for other Compensation & Assistance/ Rehabilitation through the help of Hukumats

PIU/MOTC/Working Group 6 Demolishing/ Relocation of Affected Structures/Assets through the help of Hukumats

External Review of LARP Implementation through submission of a compliance PIU/MOTC though the help 7 report of Independent Monitor

8 Availing no objection from ADB if RP Implementation found satisfactory ADB

9 Notice to proceed for civil works is issued ADB/MOTC

D) POST-IMPLEMENTATION TASKS 1 Independent evaluation of LARP IM

E) CYCLICAL/CONTINUOUS TASKS 1 Internal monitoring. Quarterly reporting to ADB PIU/MOTC

2 External Monitoring. Semi-annual reporting to ADB IM

PIU/MOTC/Working 3 Grievances Redress/Law Suites Group/Court

4 Inter-agency coordination and Communication with DP PIU/MOTC/Working Group

8.3 Monitoring and Evaluation Period

120. Internal monitoring will be the responsibility of the PIU and will start early during the project when implementation of LARP starts and will continue till the completion of the project. Independent monitoring and evaluation will start immediately after the commencement of construction and will be carried out intermittently on a half yearly basis by an Independent Monitor.

8.4 LARP Implementation Schedule

121. A tentative schedule of actions for LARP implementation for the project has been prepared, taking into account the funding arrangements of ADB and the co-financing institutions and the manner in which the two proposed civil works packages are programmed. The initial implementation schedule displayed in Table 8.3 provides for the progression of the LARP actions in a logical and coordinated manner linked to the project specific dates for approval, Grant negotiations and commencement of the civil works. The schedule can be adjusted during final alignment of the design and build project works.

8.5 Key Actions

122. In order to finalize compensation arrangements for affected persons that meet the requirements of ADB resettlement safeguards and Government of Tajikistan law, the development of an inclusive compensation method that will allow affected people to attain the same level or an improved level of well-being as they have without the project will be necessary. The MOTC Working Group was established to determine the appropriate valuations and briefed on ADB resettlement policy. To further the discussions of the working group, and meet the needs of the project, conclusion of compensation methodologies will be required. Proposed bases for methodologies are given in section 0 and the tasks and the outcomes needed are described in table 8.2:

Table 8.2: Key Tasks for LARP development

Task Actions Outcomes needed Examine the feasibility of Identify, with district administrations, extent and location of Conclusion on compensation of affected land that can be prepared for production and then allocated feasibility of methods of land with alternative land to affected persons. compensation of Determine the improvements necessary to land to bring it affected land with into production alternative land, and In respect of land that may be available for re-allocation, detailed procedures for determine potential affected households to whom the land the process of re- can be allocated allocation Where recipients of re-allocated land will incur higher costs in operating the new land, such as increased travel costs to the land and to markets, determine appropriate allowances to make good this increased cost. Finalize a proposed Engage an independent valuer to assess the monetary value A methodology for methodology for the of use rights to agricultural, residential and commercial land. valuation, agreed by valuation of land use rights For agricultural land, determine a basis of valuation, based the Working Group to enable compensation in on the level of compensation required to re-establish monetary terms livelihood.

8.6 Capacity Building

128. As this is the first large scale LARP to be impmented in Tajikistan and as the EA and the local institutions responsible for land acquisition and resettlement have little experience with the ADB resettlement safeguards robust capacity building will be provided during the implementation pf the LARP. This will be done in form of on the job-assistance to be provided by a resettlent officer located at the ADB resident Mission and through the the implementation of a country-wide capacity building program including (i) provision of training; (ii) improvement of governance mechanisms and administration for resettlement, policy alignment, and enhanced LAR procedures, and (iii) improvements of technical instruments for LAR.21

21 ADB. RETA 7433-REG – Mainstreaming Land Acquisition and Resettlement Safeguards in the Central and West Asia Region, 2009 49

Table 8.3: Implementation schedule 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 TASKS N DJFMAMJ J ASONDJ FMAMJ J A SONDJ FMAMJ J ASONDJ FMAMJ LARP PREPARATION Surveys and public consultation Establishment of working group Draft LARP submission to ADB and MOTC. Followup surveys and discussion on compensation policy Submission of revised draft LARP to ADB and MOTC Approval of revised draft LARP by ADB and Government Draft LARP/pamphlet Disclosure Project appraisal Design and build Contract awards signing LARP Finalization Engagement and Mobilization Resettlement Specialists from Supervision Consultants Final verification survey/ determination of plot requirements of affected households/shops final survey of replacement plots compensation rates updates / finalization of action plan for provision of replacement plots / final DP consultation Submission of Final LARP to ADB and MOTC Approval of Final LARP by ADB and Government and disclosure Allocation of LARP funds LARP implementation Hiring of IM Issuance of Identity Cards to DPs Disbursement of compensation for DPS in Section 5 Disbursement of compensation and rehabilitation and development of replacement plots for DPs in Sections 2-4

Demolishing/ Relocation of Affected structures

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 TASKS N DJFMAMJ J ASONDJ FMAMJ J A SONDJ FMAMJ J ASONDJ FMAMJ IM compliance report a. Section 5 b. Sections 2-4

No objection to construction from ADB a. Section 5 b. Sections 2-4 Start of the Civil Work for Section 5

Start of Civil Work for Sections 2-4

OTHER CONTINUOUS ACTIVITIES

Complaints redress and consultation

9.0 RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING 9.1 General

123. This resettlement budget is a preliminary cost estimate to be updated after all compensation provisions including compensation for residential land have been approved. The unit costs for various items and losses have been considered through surveys and consultation with relevant government departments and DPs. The cost estimate includes lost assets compensation, allowances for vulnerable DPs, the cost of services of a registered land valuer and a contingency. Costs will be verified following detailed design.

9.2 Sources of Financing

124. Costs for lost assets compensation and income rehabilitation will be provided as counter-part funds by the Government of Tajikistan. Funds for allowances specifically required by ADB such as severe impacts, vulnerable AH and relocation allowances will be provided under the Grant.

9.3 Compensation

9.3.1 Allowance for loss of agricultural land use rights

125. Compensation to holders of use rights of affected agricultural land is based on the productivity of land based on the type of crop cultivated on the affected land and on the average gross market value (inclusive of inputs and labor) of the crop over the year of impacts. The replacement cost of the land is determined by the following formula: Compensation Amount = Yield per m2 x Area affected x Gross market value of the crop x 5 years (in case of annual crops or wines) or x 1 year in case of perennial crops. 126. Affected areas, yields and crop values have been determined and verified by the district administrations. Compensation values for agricultural areas are given in tables 9.1 and 9.2.

Table 9.1: Allowance for loss of use-rights on agricultural land used as orchards Total Number Productivity Unit Value 1 Average Crop Type22 Area of Trees (Kg/tree) value year crop Compensation (m2) (TJS/kg) (TJS) per m2 (TJS) Fruit Trees Orchard (Apple) 9,120 120 180 5.00 108,000 Orchard (Cherry) 9,120 133 50 8.00 53,200 Orchard (Sm Cherry) 7,410 100 45 6.00 27,000 Orchard (Peach) 2,850 40 80 5.00 16,000 Total 28,500 393 204,200 7.16

22 For Orchard, calculation is based on the number of affected trees situated in the affected orchards with an average annual yield of 180 kg per apple tree, 50 kg per cherry tree, 45 kg per small cherry tree, and 80 kg per peach tree. Moreover, computation for lost income from the orchard is computed for 1 year. 52

Table 9.2: Allowance for loss of use-rights on agricultural land planted with annual crops

Total Productivity Unit Value 1 Value x 5 Average Crop Type23 Area (Kg/ha) value year crop years Compensation (m2) (TJS/kg) (TJS) per m2 (TJS) Annual Crops Wheat 140,020 4,5000.91 57,338.2 286,691 Lucerne 6,445 1,2003.50 2,706.9 13,535 Vineyard 4,200 5,0000.88 1,848.0 9,240 Onion 2,500 4,000 1.25 1,250.0 6,250 Vegetables 2,455 18,750 0.82 3,774.6 18,873 Tomatoes 1,200 1,600 0.70 134.4 672 Flax 600 1200 3.50 252.0 1,260 Potato 600 17,500 0.48 504.0 2,520 Total 158,020 67,808.1 339,040 2.15

9.3.2 Replacement Plot Preparation and Rehabilitation Allowance for loss of Residential/Commercial Land use rights

127. DPs losing land use rights on residential/commercial lands will be compensated either through the allocation of replacement land or provision of cash allowance. Six households and 9 small shops with no sufficient land to re-establish their houses and shops will be provided with replacement plots, while the remaining 215 households/shops will be provided with cash allowance for the loss of land use rights.

a. Preparation of Replacement Plot

128. The 6 households losing residential lands will each receive 800 m2 while those losing plot for their businesses will be provided with replacement plots appropriate to their business requirements (Appendix 5E shows the households that will be provided with replacement plots). Support for the preparation of each replacement plot will be provided to ensure that DPs are able to rebuild their structures and re-establish their households/shops on these new site. Costs related to power supply connection, land filling and clearing and provision of sanitation facilities will be shouldered by the Project.. During the preparation of the detailed design, the PIU, with support from the Design Consultant, will estimate the cost for plot preparation and include in the Project cost. Table 9.3 below shows the estimated cost for the preparation of replacement plots.

23 For Orchard, calculation is based on the average number of 134 fruit trees per hectare in the Project area with an average annual yield of 180 kg per apple tree, 50 kg per cherry tree, 45 kg per small cherry tree, and 80 kg per peach tree. Moreover, computation for lost income from the orchard is computed for 1 year. 53

Table 9.3: Assistance for Preparation of Replacement Plots

Category of DP No. Affected Replacement Plot Estimated Total Area (m2) Cost of Plot Preparation per Plot (TJS) 1. DP without sufficient land to rebuild a. DP losing 6 827 800 m2 residential plot 2,700 16,200 residential plots for each DP (4,800 m2 total)

b. DP losing plot 9 2,747 Plot based on proposal/ 2,700 24,300 for shop (n=9) requirement of DP Total 3,574 40,500 Note: Cost of preparation will be updated based on actual preparation requirement of each replacement plot.

b. Rehabilitation Cash Allowance for Loss of Land Use Right

129. The other households losing a combined total of 36,665 m2 will be provided with cash allowance as rehabilitation assistance for their loss of land use rights. Cash rehabilitation assistance will be based on the current lease rate of $ 0.10 per m2 multiplied by 25 years or a unit rate of $2.5 m2. See table 9.4.

Table 9.4: Allowances for loss of Residential/commercial land use rights

Category of DP Number Affected Area Compensation/ Total TJS (m2) Allowance 2. DP with marginal land loss and has sufficient land to rebuild 214 36,422 $2.5 per m2 91,055

9.3.3 Compensation for structures and improvements

130. Compensation for structures has been determined in respect of each affected structure by a committee comprising of engineers from the district administrations and MBTI for each district. Affected quantities and compensation rates have been determined in respect of each structure, therefore no unut prices are provided below. Tables 9.5 and 9.6 summarize the total quantities and agreed compensation for the affected structures. Details on compensation unit rates for each structure are presented in Appendices 5 and 6.

Table 9.5: Houses, Shops, Sheds and Outbuildings Item Quantity Area affected Areaffected Total TJS (m3) (m3) Buildings type1 1 173.00 82,698 Buildings Type2 26 3,790.00 526,991 Buildings type 3 68 12,429.60 1,637,831 Sheds 67 2,967.20 222,657 Outbuildings 122 6,738.56 958,866 Total 3,429,043

Table 9.6: Walls and Fences Item Quantity Square meters Cubic meters Total TJS Walls 127 2,514.5 302,124 Fences 125 4,737.46 97,946 Total 400,070

131. In addition, a number of miscellaneous structures were identified and valued. These included pumps, ovens and wells, and had a total value of TJS 29,894. The total compensation value for buildilngs, fences and miscellaneous structures is TJS 3,859,007.

9.3.4 Compensation for Annual Crops

132. Compensation for losses of annual crops will be paid in cash at full market rate for 1 year’s yield. Table 9.7 summarizes the total quantities and agreed compensation for the affected crops. Table 9.7: Annual Crop Losses Compensation

Total Area Productivity Unit value Value 1 year crop Crop Type 2 (m ) (Kg x ha) (TJS/kg) (TJS) Wheat 140,020 4,500 0.91 57,338.19 Vegetables 2,455 18,750 0.82 3,774.56 Lucerne 6,445 1,200 3.50 2,706.90 Onion 2,500 4,000 1.25 1,250.00 Potato 600 17,500 0.48 504.00 Flax 600 1,200 3.50 252.00 Tomatoes 1,200 1,600 0.70 134.40 Total 153,820 65,960.05

9.3.5 Compensation for Perennial Crops

133. Fruit trees and vines losses are compensated based on lost income based on the value of annual crop of the tree x the number of years needed to regrow the tree at productive stage.

Table 9.8: Fruit trees Compensation Tree Type Number of Area Yearly Yield x Ha Current Market Value 1 Years to Value x Trees (sqm) yield (kg.) (kg) Value of Product Year Re-grow Years to x tree per kg (TJS/kg) (TJS) Re-grow (TJS) Apple (3-5 years) 108 180 5 somoni 97,200 1 97,200 (6 years up) 12 180 5 somoni 10,800 3 32,400 Cherry (3-5 years) 120 50 8 somoni 48,000 1 48,000 (6 years up) 13 50 8 somoni 5,200 2 10,400 Small cherry (3-5 years) 90 45 6 somoni 24,300 1 24,300 (6 years up) 10 45 6 somoni 2,700 2 5,400 Peach (3-5 years) 36 80 5 somoni 14,400 1 14,400 (6 years up) 4 80 5 somoni 1,600 2 3,200

Grapes 4,200 8,000 2 Sonomi 4 13,340 Total 393 383,600 248,640

9.3.6 Compensation for Business Losses

134. All business losses are deemed permanent and are entitled to cash compensation equal to one year of net income. The assessment of the compensation for DP with tax recors has been based on on the actual yearly income. For DP without tax records the compensation has been given based on one year of the maximum-non taxable salary in Tajikistan (TJS288). The amounts required for each business types losses are given in table 9.9. The amounts combine compensation for DP with tax declaration and DP without tax declaration. The detailed compensation given to each DP is detailed in Appendix 5C.

Table 9.9: Types of Business and Compensation Business Type Number Compensation (TJS) Shops 18 116,389 Cafés / Canteens 6 50,556 Butcher 3 21,000 Fuel stations 3 245,816 Spare parts traders 3 27,900 Snack food outlet 2 14,200 Pharmacy 1 5,000 Total 36 480,861

9.4 Allowances

9.4.1 Severe Impact Allowances

135. Severely impacted households, are deemed to be those that will lose more than 10% of their income source. In the case of business losses, affected households receive a full year’s income and it is therefore assumed that the severity of impact is addressed by that compensation. Severe impact allowances will be payable to DPs losing more 10% or more of their agricultural land. The entitlement of severely impacted DPs consists of (i) a further cash payment equivalent to one year’s crop value (ii) a rehabilitation allowance equal to six months’ minimum salary. The minimum salary is taken as the average monthly wage published by the Government of Tajikistan’s Statistical Agency for 2008, which is TJS231 per month.

Table 9.10: Severe Impact Allowances

Households Sum of value Rehabilitation Allowance (TJS) Total value of severe eligible for severe of 1 yr crop impact allowances (TJS) impacts production Rate Total allowances (TJS) 56 14,190 1,386 77,616 91,806

9.4.2 Allowances for Vulnerable DPs 136. The unit cost for vulnerable DP allowances is based on the two months of the minimum salary, again deemed to be TJS 231 / month. Table 9.11: Allowances for Vulnerable Households

No. of vulnerable households Vulnerable DP Allowance (TJS) Rate Total 228 462 105,336

9.4.3 Resettlement Allowances

137. Among the 6 households that will will need a replacement plot, two will each get 800 sqm of vacant land adjacent to their remaining plot. Four others will each be provided with an 800 m2 of land within 100 to 200 m away from their current plots. All the nine businesses that need to relocate can be provided with a plot along the road adjacent to or very near their current shops. 57

Each relocatee will receive a resettlement allowance of 3 months at minimum salary (TJS231/month). The 4 households who need to relocate to a different plot will be provided with an additional TJS100 for renting a truck. The total cost of this item is TJS10,795.

Table 9.12: Allowances for Resettling Households

Number Resettlement Transporation Total Category of Households and Allowance Allowance Allowance businesses to be provided with During the (TJS) (TJS) replacement plots Transition Period 2 231 TJS per - 1,386 a. households with replacement plots mo x 3 adjacent to their remaining plot months 4 231 TJS per 100 TJS 3,172 b. households with replacement plots within mo x 3 200 meters from their previous plot months 9 231 TJS per - 6,237 c. businesses with replacement plots mo x 3 adjacent to their remaining plot months Total 15 10,795

9.5 Support for LARP Implementation

9.5.1 Resettlement Specialists

138. Provision has been made in the consultancy services for specialist support within a team that will undertake bid preparation, procurement and resettlement services prior to the commencement of construction. Three months of an international specialist and three months of a local resettlement specialist are included in this phase.

139. A further consulting package, providing project management, works supervision and sector governance support includes the provision for an international resettlement specialist for ten months and a local resettlement specialist for nine months.

9.5.2 Independent Monitor

140. Provision has been made in the cost estimates for consulting services for the selection of an independent monitor (by ADB), to verify LARP preparation, monitor LARP implementation and carry out post implementation evaluation.

9.6 Summary of Costs

141. Costs will be revised after detailed design and prior to the implementation. Based on the available the total land acquisition and resettlement cost for the Project is TJS7,004,808. These costs include 20% contingency. The summary costs are provided in table 9.13 while table 9.14 shows the estimated compensation cost per road section.

Table 9.13: LARP Budget

ITEM TOTAL (in TJS) 1. Rehabilitation Assistance for Loss of Land Use Right a. Cash Allowance - agricultural Land 543,240.0 - Residential / Commercial Land 91,055 b. Preparation for allocated residential/commercial plot 40,500 2. Compensation for Structure Losses a. Buildings 3,429,043 b. Walls and Fences 400,070 c. Other structures 29,894 3. Compensation for Crop Losses a. annual crops 65,960 b. perennial crops/fruit trees 248,640 4. Compensation for Businesses Losses 480,861 5. Allowances a. Allowance for Severely Affected DPs 91,806 b. Allowance for Vulnerable DPs 105,336 c. Relocation allowance 10,795

Total compensation Costs 5,537,200

Support Costs 300,000 Total 5,837,200 Contingency20% 1,167,440 Grand Total 7,004,640

Table 9.14: Estimated Compensation Budget Requirement per Road Section

Compensation Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total 1. Rehabilitation Assistance for Loss of Land Use Right a. Cash Allowance - agricultural Land 117,920 301,670 110,200 13,450 543,240.0 - Residential / Commercial Land 35,897 27,785 27,373 91,055 b. Preparation for allocated 16,200 10,800 13,500 40,500 residential/comml plot 2. Compensation for Structure Losses 1,114,649 1,934,373 809,985 3,859,007 3. Compensation for Crop Losses a. annual crops 6,344 39,686 17,240 2,690 65,960 b. perennial crops/ fruit 100,100 108,800 26,500 13,340 248,640 trees 4. Compensation for 318,667 95,177 67,017 - 480,861 Businesses Losses 5. Allowances a. severe impact allowance 27,877 51,094 12,835 - 91,806 b. vulnerable DP allowance 40,194 36,498 27,720 924 105,336 c. relocation allowance 4,258 2,872 3,665 - 10,795 Total compensation Costs 1,782,106 2,608,755 1,115,935 30,404 5,537,200

10.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATION

10.1 Introduction

142. Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) are important activities to ensure proper and timely implementation of LARP on schedule and within the given budget. The purpose of M&E is to provide feedback to all stakeholders on progress made in view of timely and comprehensive implementation of the LARP and to identify problems as early as possible to facilitate well-timed adjustment of implementation arrangements. The objectives are: (i) to ensure that the standard of living of APs are restored or improved; (ii) to ascertain whether activities are progressing as per schedule and that timelines are being met; (iii) to assess if compensation, rehabilitation measures are sufficient; (iv) to identify problems or potential problems; and (v) to identify methods of responding immediately to mitigate problems. LAR tasks under the project will be subjected to both internal and external monitoring. Internal monitoring will be conducted by PIU/MOTC. External monitoring will be assigned to an Independent Monitor (IM) to be hired by MOTC and approved by ADB. The IM will be selected among NGOs, academic Institutions, or consulting firms. An outline Terms of Reference for IM is attached in Appendix 4.

10.2 Internal Monitoring

143. Internal monitoring will be carried out routinely by PIU/MOTC with the help of the resettlement specialists. The results will be communicated to ADB through the quarterly project implementation reports. Indicators for internal monitoring will be those related to process and immediate outputs and results. This information will be collected directly from the PIU and Hukumat to assess the progress and results of LARP implementation, and to adjust the work program, if necessary. The quarterly reports will be incorporated in the standard supervision reports to ADB. Specific monitoring benchmarks will be:

• Information campaign and consultation with DPs; • Status of land acquisition and payments on land compensation; • Compensation for affected structures and other assets; • Relocation of DPs; • Payments for loss of income; • Selection and distribution of replacement land areas; and • Income restoration activities

144. The above information will be collected by PIU which is responsible for monitoring the day-to-day resettlement activities of the project by carrying out the following tasks:

• Review of census information for all DPs; • Consultation and informal interviews with DPs; • In-depth case studies; • Sample survey of DPs; • Key informant interviews; and • Community public meetings.

10.3 External Monitoring

145. External monitoring will be carried out twice a year, and its results communicated to PIU/MOTC and ADB through semi-annual reports. A suitably qualified Independent Monitor (IM) will be appointed. Indicators for External Monitoring tasks will include:

Verification and Monitoring Plan Preparation

• Review of the socio-economic baseline survey information of pre-displaced persons; • Identification and selection of impact indicators; • Consultation with DPs, officials and community leaders as appropriate • Preparation of a Monitoring Plan, detailing how compliance with the LARP will be objectively verified, taking account any proposed phasing of the project.

Compliance Monitoring

• The IM will, on the basis of indicators identified in the Monitoring Plan, assess compliance with the LARP and prepare conclusive reports for the PIU

Evaluation

146. The IM will carry out a post-implementation evaluation of the LARP about a year after completion of its implementation, primarily to find out if the objectives of the LARP have been attained or not. The benchmark data of socioeconomic survey of severely affected DPs conducted during the preparation of the LARP will be used to compare the pre and post project conditions. The IM will recommend appropriate supplemental assistance for the DPs should the outcome of the study show that the objectives of the LARP have not been attained. A broad monitoring matrix comprising the monitoring indicators is given in Table 10.1

Table 10.1: Monitoring Indicators

S. N. LAR Activities Progress Remarks Pre Construction Activities and LAR Activities 1 Assessment of Resettlement impacts due to changes in project design (If required) 2 Preparation/ updating of Resettlement Plan based on changes in project design 3 Approval of updated LARP from ADB 4 Circulation of information leaflet 5 Capacity building of LAR team in PIU/Hukumat 6 Verification of DPs Census list; assessment on compensation and assistance, and readjustment LARP Implementation 1 Payment of Compensation to DPs 2 Disbursement of assistance to title holders 3 Disbursement of special assistance to Vulnerable groups 4 Replacement/ shifting of community property resources

S. N. LAR Activities Progress Remarks Reinstallation of public utilities 6 Records of Grievance Redressal Social Measures during Construction as per Contract Provisions 1 Prohibition of employment or use of children as labour 2 Prohibition of Forced or Compulsory Labour 3 Ensure equal pay for equal work to both men and women 4 Implementation of all statutory provisions on labour like health, safety, welfare, sanitation, and working conditions 5 Maintenance of employment records of workers 6 Awareness Program on HIV/AIDS

APPENDIX 1: INFORMATION PAMPHLET

Dushanbe-Uzbekistan Border Road Project (funded by the Asian Development Bank)

Executing Agency: Ministry of Transport and Communications Expected start of Implementation Spring 2012

(i) Project Description 1. The Dushanbe-Tursunzade-Uzbekistan border road traverses the districts, or rayons of Rudaki, Gissar, Shakhrinav, and Tursunzade in this order as the road moves west from Dushanbe down the Gissar valley. The total length of the road is 61.5 kilometers (km). The road heads west, south-west from Dushanbe to the Uzbekistan border in eastern Uzbekistan. It is the main route for road traffic and transported goods to Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan from Dushanbe and the southern regions of Tajikistan including agricultural produce from the Gissar valley. It is the route for most Tajik imports and exports to and from the port of Bandar Abas in Iran. Consideration of the mid-point traffic volumes, levels of service and the environment through which the road passes lends to dividing the road into five sections/packages for design and implementation purposes. These road sections are (1) Avicenna Monument to West Gate, (2) West Gate to Gissar Junction, (3) Gissar Junction to Shakhrinav roundabout, (4) Shakhrinav roundabout to Tursunzade Junction and (5) Tursunzade Junction to the Uzbekistan Border. The summary details of various road sections are described in table A1.1.

Table-A1.1: Summary Details of Various Sections Particulars Section-1 Section-2 Section-3 Section-4 Section-5 Section Avicenna monument West Gate to Gissar Junction to Shakhrinav to Tursunzade to to West Gate - Gissar Junction Shakhrinav Tursunzade Uzbekistan border Length 4.56 km 13.9 km 20.7 km 10.6 km 11.7 km Construction type (rehabilitation) (four-lane) (four-lane) (four-lane) (two-lane - reconstruction) Rayon name 1.Dushanbe 1. Rudaki 1. Gissar 1.Tursunzade 1.Tursunzade 2.Rudak 2.Gissar 2.Shakhrinav Jamoats name 1.Choryakkoron 1. Choryakkoron 1.Navobod 1.Qaratogh 1. Gharav 2.Khonaqo 2.MirzoRizo 2.Seshanbe 2. Navobod 3.Dehqonobod 3. 1st May 4.Chuzi 5.Sabo 6.Selbur 7.Shakhrinav

2. Section 1 (Avicenna-West Gate) involves the rehabilitation of the existing road and structures. This stretch does not require any widening or additional Right of Way (RoW) hence will not entail any land acquisition and resettlement. Widening will take place for Section 2 (West Gate-Gissar Junction), Section 3 (Gissar Junction-Shakhrinav) and Section 4 (Shakhrinav- Tursunzade), this will require additional land acquisition and resettlement. Section 5 (Tursunzade-Uzbekistan border) will comprise rehabilitation and improvement of the existing two lane road, and requires land acquisition and resettlement at certain points.

3. To compensate and/or rehabilitate these losses the provisions of relevant Tajikistan laws and of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) Policy on Involuntary Resettlement is being adopted. This has included the preparation of a Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) providing data on impacts and affected families and indicating in detail how the impacts will be

compensated or rehabilitated. The LARP in Russian will be available for perusal to anyone interested both at the local and Dushanbe offices of BT.

4. This Leaflet summarizes the LARP provisions and is provided to all the families whose land, houses, trees, crops or other assets and incomes are affected by this project. The objective is to inform them of the compensation and rehabilitation policy included in the LARP and of a few basic modalities of implementation of the Compensation and Rehabilitation

(ii) Principles for Compensation of the Affected Families

Principles for the compensation/rehabilitation of families affected by this project are: • Involuntary resettlement is to be avoided, if unavoidable, minimised with all viable options. • The AF should be compensated and assisted, so that their economic and social future would be generally as favorable as it would have been in the absence of the project. • The AF should be fully informed/consulted in resettlement and compensation options. • Local socio/cultural institutions should be supported / used to the greater extent possible. • Lack of formal legal land title should not be a bar to compensation or rehabilitation. • Compensation will be provided to the AF at full replacement cost of the affected assets free of deductions for salvaged materials, depreciation or fees/taxes. • Particular attention should be paid to AF headed by women and other vulnerable groups, and appropriate assistance provided to help them improve their status. • Land/other compensation/rehabilitation provisions will equally apply to women and men. • Land acquisition and resettlement will be conceived and executed as an integral part of the project and related budgets will be included in project costs. • Compensation will be fully provided prior to ground leveling and demolition.

(iii) Expected Impacts

The road improvements will impact on land and property, affecting a total of 376 households. The principal quantities of the impacts are given in Table A1-2. Table A1-2: Principal Quantities of Impacts Quantity Impacts Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Total Affected Households: Agricultural Land (No.) 29 87 26 5 147 Affected Households: Res./Comm. Land (No.) 87 77 65 0 229 2 Agricultural land (m ) 9,400 128,450 42,100 6,570 186,520 Residential/Commercial land (m2) 16,294 11,656 12,046 0 39,996 Land for Community Facilities/structures (m2) 451 383 0 0 833 Houses & Outbuildings (No.) 45 102 136 5 283 Length of Fences and Walls (m) 2,346 2,157 1,823 195 6,521 Structures affected (m2) 4396 3,896 3,246 71 11,609 Number of Business Lost (No.) 12 11 13 0 36 Severely Affected Households (No.) 18 31 7 0 56 Number of Households to be relocated (No.) 2 2 2 - 6 Number of Businesses to be relocated (No.) 4 2 3 9 Vulnerable Households (No.) 87 79 60 2 228 Total affected households (No.) 116 164 91 5 376 Total Affected Persons (No.) 1,028 1,319 705 43 3,095

4. Compensation Policy

All families residing in affected areas, holding affected assets or incomes before the eligibility cut-off date, to be the final day of the impacts survey will be entitled to compensation for their losses, as per Table A1-3 below.

Table A1-3: Compensation Entitlements Matrix AFFECTED ASSET PROPOSED ENTITLEMENTS PEOPLE Agricultural Land: All Individual land-use An allowance for loss of land use rights in cash equal to 5 losses irrespective of rights holder years of the gross income of the affected annual crops land impact severity at market rate or to 1 yesr of gross income of affected fruit trees land at market rates. Cooperative land An allowance for loss of land use rights in cash equal to 5 holder years of the gross income of the affected land at market rate Residential/ Commercial Residential rights Full compensation via the provision of alternative land or Land holder cash Houses and All relevant APs. • Cash compensation at replacement rate for affected Structures structure/other fixed assets free of salvageable materials and transaction costs. All buildings will be compensated in their entirety House/building rent Renter/leaseholder Rental allowance in the form of 1 to 3 months rent in cash Income from Crops All APs • Crop compensation in cash equal to 1 year of the gross income of affected land at market rate. This shall apply whether the land is fallow, or under ultivation. Income from trees All APs •Cash compensation for wood trees based on volume of wood •Cash compensation for productive trees based on the net annual harvest from the tree(s) for the number of years taken for replacement tree(s) to reach comparable production Business or All APs -Business Owner: Cash compensation for lost income up to 1 Employment loss; (including informal year’ (if income is permanent) or Cash compensation for the temporary or permanent settlers) period of business interruption (if the loss is temporary). The compensation iis assessed at actual income as per tax declaration or if taxes have not been paid at the maximum non- taxable indome. -Permanent worker/employers: Indemnity for lost wages for business stoppage of up to 1 year Allowance for severe All severely APs -Agricultural income: One severe impact allowance equal to the impacts (More that 10% net market value of the harvest from the affected land for 1 year of income loss) (inclusive of winter and summer crop) and in addition to the standard crop compensation . Relocation allowance All relocated APs Provision of sufficient allowance to cover transport expenses and basic livelihood expenses for the transitional period Communal/ Public Rehabilitation/substitution in kind or cash at replacement cost assets of affected items and rehabilitation of their functions Vulnerable APs APs below poverty • Employment priority in project-related jobs line and households • Cash contribution equal to 2 month’s at minimum salary. headed by women.

5. Compensation rates for loss of land use rights, crops and trees and buildings

Table A1-4: Basis of Compensation Rate Determination Type of Loss Basis of Rate Determination Loss of agricultural The rate is determined for each individual property, based on the productivity of land the affected land. The following formula is applied: Yield per m2 x Area affected x Gross market value of the crop x 5 years Loss of Residential To be based on current land lease rate multiplied by 25 years. or Commercial Land Structures All affected structures, including houses, outbuildings, sheds, barns, driveways, pumps, ovens and fountains are individually assessed by engineers and assessors from the District Administrations. Businesses All impacts on businesses are permanent. Compensation will equal the annual income for each business is determined from tax records, or in the absence of tax records, by applying a maximum non taxable salary set at TJS 288 / month Allowance for 1. An additional sum equivalent to the value of crop production for one year for Severely Affected the affected land, and Households 2. A rehabilitation allowance of TJS 1,728 (equal to six months’ maximum salary) Allowance for 1. A transportation allowance of TJS 500, and households to be 2. An assistance allowance of TJS 864 (equal to three months’ maximum salary) relocated Allowance for An allowance of TJS 462 (equal to two months’ maximum salary) vulnerable households

6. Grievance Redress Mechanism A grievance redress mechanism will be established. Complaints & Grievances will be addressed through the following steps and actions: iv. First, complaints can be lodged at the Grievance Review Committee (GRC) at the district Offices where resolution will be attempted with the involvement of Hukumat and Jamoat officers as the elected representatives of the AF. v. If still unsettled after 30 days a grievance can then be lodged to MOTC at central level. Again the elected representatives of the AF will have the opportunity to mediate. vi. If no solution is reached within 14 days the DPs can further submit their case to the appropriate court of law.

Contact Details for Inquiry N Hakimov G.Boronov Project Executive Director, Deputy Executive Director, Project Implementation Unit Project Implementation Unit Telephone No: +992 37 2215673 Telephone No: +992 918 985610 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Address: 14 Ayni Street, Dushanbe, Republic of Address: 14 Ayni Street, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan Tajikistan

Prepared: September 2010

APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS

Various methods used for public consultation and participation with concerned stakeholders are described below: Table A-2: Methods Employed for Consultations Stakeholders Purpose Method City Traffic Police • To collect relevant • Frequent individual meetings with the Department government policy, officials of Traffic Police Department guidelines, priorities on the project, and to seek assistance during the Origin and Destination (O&D) survey. Local Community in • To assess overall social • Consultation and discussion with local the different locations perception about the people at different project locations of the Sub-project importance of project road during reconnaissance walk over survey, area (Rudaki,Gissar, and local people’s cadastral survey, social survey and perceived need for census survey. Shakhrinav, improvement Tursunzade) • To assess the existing • Individual meetings with the officials of District level line operational status of road, respective offices. agencies to verify the land likely to be (Divisional Roads acquired based on preliminary design Office, Land drawings, to carry out Committee, District cadastral survey, to Architect, District collection of data on land, Committee on Women and to collect information on and Family Affairs) alternative livelihood programs and scope. Project affected • To prepare inventory of the • Individual interview of the affected people based on the affected assets and get households by means of a structured preliminary design measurement and conduct questionnaire drawing interview with the affected families about the affected

assets and on the household matters NGOs and other • Assess the level of social • Representatives of local NGOs and other stakeholders at the willingness to be involved in stakeholders including community local level the project activities members were consulted at different sections of the road during field visits by the domestic and international team members in order to assess the overall social perception about the road project and also to assess the level of their willingness to cooperate with the study team.

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OF CONSULTATION MEETINGS

Consultation- 1

Name of the Village:Morteppa Name of the Jamoat:Khonaqoh Name of the District/Rayon:Gissar Number of Participants:23 Male: 17 Female: 6 Date: 28 March 2009 Time:1000 hours

Sl. Name of the Male Occupation No Participant /Female 1 Hakimova Mavjuda Female Chairperson of Munis NGO 2 Hafizov Abdukholiq Male 1st Deputy District chairman 3 Qurbonova Robiya Female Head of Khonaqo Jamoat 4 Sharipov Sodiq Male Head of District Capital construction Department 5 Imomov Bakhtiyor Male farmer 6 Ramazonov Asomiddin Male Farmer 7 Avrodov Tughon Male Farmer 8 Ziyoev Davlat Male Farmer 9 Mirzoeva Sofiya Female Housewife 10 Abdulloev Ismatullo Male Farmer 11 Melikov Abdukarim Male Farmer 12 Azizov Dilshod Male Farmer 13 Salimov Rustam Male Farmer 14 Nurov Rahmatullo Male Farmer 15 Kabirova Gulkhonim Female Farmer 16 Hafizova Khairinisso Female Farmer 17 Sadieva Khushrumoh Female Farmer 18 Abdiev Abdumannon Male Farmer 19 Samuddinov Saidullo Male Farmer 20 Yunusov Sharof Male Driver 21 Ghulomov Salom Male Farmer 22 Qanoatov Shafoat Male Farmer 23 Qurbonov Sharofiddin Male Farmer 24 Mahmadov Musaddir Male Farmer 25 Yusupov Bahrullo Male Farmer 26 Akramov Sodiq Male Farmer 27 Ibronov Hokim Male Farmer

Consultation- 2

Name of the Village: Shakhrinav Name of the Jamoat:Shahraki Shakhrinav Name of the District/Rayon:Shakhrinav Number of Participants:27 Male: 17 Female: 10 Date: 5 March 2009 Time:1000 hours LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Sl. No Name of the Participant Male /Female Occupation 1 Ghairatova Mahbuba Female Head of District Land Committee 2 Ahmadov Komil Male Land Management Specialist 3 Qaraev Tohir Male Head of dairy farm 4 Salimov Shahobiddin Male Head of DF 5 Melikova Rukhsatoy Female Housewife 6 Ashurova Tojinisso Female Housewife 7 Ikromova Muharram Female Farmer 8 Ustoeva Shahlo Female Housewife 9 Kholova Melikoy Female Farmer 10 Salimova Tojinisso Female Farmer 11 Huseynova Muharram Female Farmer 12 Naftulloeva Habiba Female Entrepreneur 13 Nurova Tojinisso Female Farmer 14 Barotov Qosim Male Farmer 15 Safarov Salom Male Farmer 16 Jalilov Tura Male Entrepreneur 17 Aliev Murodali Male Farmer 18 Qosimov Mannon Male Farmer 19 Odinaev Tojiddin Male Farmer 20 Davlatov Said Male Farmer 21 Kholov Azim Male Farmer 22 Roziev Maruf Male Farmer 23 Ochildiev Hakim Male Farmer 24 Khojamov Muhammadi Male Farmer 25 Karomatov Fazliddin Male Farmer 26 Juraev Zikrullo Male Farmer 27 Abdurashidov Abdujalil Male Farmer

Consultation- 3

Name of the Village:Choryakkoron Name of the Jamoat:Choryakkoron Name of the District/Rayon:Rudaki Number of Participants:33 Male: 8 Female: 25 Date: 6 April 2009 Time:1100 hours LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Sl. No Name of the Participant Male /Female Occupation 1 Yusupov Mahmadrahim Male Deputy District Chairman 2 Qaraboev Bahriddin Male Head of Choryakkoron Jamoat 3 Sharipov Kholmahmad Male Land Planning Specialist 4 Norov Azam Male Deputy Head of Jamoat 5 Sheraliev Sadriddin Male Farmer 6 Sulaymonov Olim Male Jamoat Chief Accountant 7 Alieva Sanoat Female Deputy Head of Jamoat 8 Aralova Abrinisso Female Jamoat HR Specialist 9 Barotova Jamila Female Jamoat Secretary 10 Raupova Rano Female Director of Secondary Schooll 11 Mirali Mahmadaliev Male Zafar village/mahalla leader 12 Saidahmadov Siyarsho Male Uchqul village leader 13 Roibov Yoqub Male Teacher 14 Nazarov Faizali Male Head of DF 15 Safaraliev Sherali Male Deputy Mahalla ARmughon 16 Majidov Muzaffar Male Raisi Armughon 17 Nurov Safarali Male Chavliboi Leader 18 Saidov Salim Male Gizhdalobod Leader 19 Qadamova Oliha Female Farmer 20 Soibnazarova Sojida Female Deputat from mahalla 21 Ismoilov Sh Male DF Head 22 Umarov Sattor Male farmer 23 Melikov Dustmurod Male DF 24 Boboev Khudoydod Male Zafar Mahalla leader 25 Niyozov Ibod Male Deputy Zafar leader 26 Khiusaev Rustam Male Ispechak 27 Shukurov Rustam Male Director of secondary school67 28 Shukurov Abdullo Male statistics 29 Siddiqov Hamroh Male Choryakkoron dara leader 30 Naimov Samariddin Male farmer 31 Ruzieva Khadicha Female farmer 32 Rajabova Idimoh Female farmer 33 Najmiddinov Foteh Male farmer

Consultation- 4

Name of the Village: Kommuna Name of the Jamoat: Name of the District/Rayon:Tursunzade Number of Participants: 14 Male: 9 Female: 5 Date: 5 March 2009 Time:1400 hours LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

Sl. No Name of the Participant Male /Female Occupation 1 Nurmatov Urunboy Male First Deputy District Chairman 2 Alieva Tursunoy Female Farmer 3 Homidova Nazarvi Female Farmer 4 Saidov Abduvohid Male Farmer 5 Zaidulloeva Lutfiya Female Farmer 6 Karimov Halim Male Farmer 7 Azizbekov Khudoydod Male Farmer 8 Karimova Sarvarkhon Female Specialist 9 Hikmatova Shoira Female Specialist 10 Bahrullo Male Land Management Specialist 11 Ashurov Safarali Male Farmer 12 Kholov Isroil Male Farmer 13 Shukurov Shukrullo Male Farmer 14 Rajabov Qurbonali Male Farmer

Consultation-5

Name of District/Rayon: Shahrinav Number of Participants: 30 Date: 14 March 2010

Name Position 1 Kurbonov I.I. First Deputy Chairman of the Shahrinav 2 Gayratova M. Chairman of the district land committee 3 Nozimov H. Main architector of the district 4 Qudratov M. Director of the Construction committee 5 Mamataliev R Director Company “Main Construction” 6 Z. Fazliddin Head of the Investment Committee of the district 7 Aminov Abdunosir District resident 8 Bobonazarova Gulbahor District resident 9 Sultonova Melikoy District resident 10 Sobirova Zinnatoy District resident 72

11 Tosheva Ubayda District resident 12 Jalilon Abdugani District resident 13 Rahimova Tuybibi District resident 14 Rahimov Bahodur District resident 15 Zoirov Ahliddin District resident 16 Mukhtorov Abduali District resident 17 Zubaydulloev Ubaydullo District resident 18 Sa’dulloev Chupon District resident 19 Huseynov Saidali District resident 20 Ashuron Rajab District resident 21 Sattorov Ayubjon District resident 22 Barotov Qosim District resident 23 Qurbonov Ikrom District resident 24 Sanginov M. District resident 25 Usmonov A/ District resident 26 Muminov Fattoh District resident 27 Rahimova Mastura District resident 28 Obidova Umirhol District resident 29 Kholikov Hasanjon District resident 30 Davlatov Abdujabbor District resident

Consultation-6

Name of District/Rayon: Gissar Number of Participants: 30 Date: 15 March 2010

Name Position 1 Zinatov Amin District resident 2 Jonmahmadov Ubayd District resident 3 Sherov Sherali District resident 4 Sherov Umedjon District resident 5 Latipov Rahmatullo District resident 6 Ibronov Halim District resident 7 Mansurov Khursand District resident 8 Olimov Rasul District resident 9 Kholov Shamsullo District resident 10 Kholova Kholbibi District resident 11 Zinnatov Muboraksho District resident 12 Olimov Mirali District resident 13 Kobilov Abdusamad District resident 14 Kobilov Malik District resident 15 Zayniddinov Hasan District resident 16 Rahimov Tesha District resident 17 Naimov Said District resident 18 Rahimov Haidullo District resident 19 Jonmahmadov Udayd District resident 73

20 Ismoilov Ne’mat District resident 21 Nazarov Tojiddin District resident 22 Azizov Umarali District resident 23 Kodirov Razok District resident 24 Kodirov Abdusattor District resident 25 Zinatov Amirshoh District resident 26 Mahmadov Yokub District resident 27 Mirzoeva Saybibi District resident 28 Raupov Abdurahmon District resident 29 Kanoatov Shafoat District resident 30 Ibodov Ne’matullo District resident

Consultation-7

Name of District/Rayon: Rudaki Number of Participants: 38 Date: 17 March 2010

Name Position 1 Odinaev Rahmatullo District resident 2 Barotov Davlatmurod District resident 3 Barotov Suhrob District resident 4 Mahmadov Hasan District resident 5 Hamdamov Aslan District resident 6 Komilov Egam District resident 7 Kenjaev Tavarali District resident 8 Mavlonova Safargul District resident 9 Mavlonov Abdurahmon District resident 10 Abdulloev Sulaymon District resident 11 Kenjaev Sherali District resident 12 Kenjaeva Nazokat District resident 13 Karomatov Manuchehr District resident 14 Karomatov Hikmatullo District resident 15 Ashurov Izatullo District resident 16 Subhonov Ne’matullo District resident 17 Sharipov Toshmurod District resident 18 Sharipov Normurod District resident 19 Miraliev Homid District resident 20 Khudoyberdiev Sayfullo District resident 21 Usmonov Bobokalon District resident 22 Khudoyberdiev Khayrullo District resident 23 Khudoyberdiev Abdurahmon District resident 24 Egamov Ismoil District resident 25 Bobonazarov Olohnazar District resident 26 Buzbalaev Fayzullo District resident 27 Abrorov Saykhuja District resident 28 Yorov Sultonmurod District resident 29 Boev Gulmurod District resident 74

30 Madumarov Solehjon District resident 31 Davlatov Abdusalom District resident 32 Naimov Habibullo District resident 33 Amirshoeva Rukiyamoh District resident 34 Naimov Habibullo District resident 35 Amirshoeva Rukiyamoh District resident 36 Odinaeva Gulchehra District resident 37 Azizova Kurbongul District resident 38 Davlatov Murod District resident

Summary of discussions with the representatives from local Hukumats located along the road Dushanbe–Tursunzade–Uzbekistan border with PIU representatives

Meetings with all DPs were held once with the participation of Rayon authority representatives in each districts. Four times in total and the minutes recorded. Additionally, meetings with each Jamoat and each kishlak were held separately without minutes recorded as the meeting was in the field and in total: Rudaki – 5 times, Gissar – 7 times, in Shakhrinav – 5 times, in Tursunzade – 3 times.

Stakeholders Purpose Method Representatives of Rudaki, Evaluate general level of Representatives of local Gissar, Shahrinav, social understanding about Hukumats were advised Tursunzade highway importance under the about the Road Rehabilitation Project as well as to improve Project understanding of local people. Representatives from Jamoat Evaluate general level of Representatives of Jamoats of of Gissar district social understanding about Gissar district highway importance under the Project as well as to improve understanding of local people. Representatives of Jamoat of Evaluate general level of Representatives of Jamoats of Rudaki district social understanding about Rudaki district highway importance under the Project as well as to improve understanding of local people Representatives of Jamoat of Evaluate general level of Representatives of Jamoats of Shahrinav district social understanding about Shahrinav district highway importance under the Project as well as to improve understanding of local people Representatives of Jamoat of Evaluate general level of Representatives of Jamoats of Tursunzade district social understanding about Tursun-zade district highway importance under the Project as well as to improve understanding of local people Population (members of List of affected property Personal interview with Affected Households) along Issues about the price of affected households the Road Dushanbe-Tursun- affected objects zade-Uzbekistan border from ADB Resettlement Policy 75

Rudaki, Gissar, Shahrinav (that the main purpose is the districts and Tursunzade city protection of population needs)

MEETING WITH RESETTLEMENT WORKING GROUP

Date: 7 October 2009 Time: 9:35 -12:05 Place: MOTC Conference Room

1 PIU Mr Hakimov Executive Director 2 Mr Muzaffar Resettlement Specialist 3 Mr Shkrillov 4 Design Institute Mr. Kurod Nasruddin 5 ADB Lanfranco Blanchetti– Resettlement Specialist Ravelli 6 Gia HY Hong Project Team Leader 7 Fraser Thomas John Howse Consultant Team Leader

8 Stephen Eagle Consultant 9 Land Mapping / Mr Qubodov, Dushanbe Cadastrie, State Land Committee 10 Tursunzade Land Mr. Egan Berjiv, Main Tursunzade Committee Engineer 11 Mr Karimov, Engineer, 12 Gissar Ms Soliva, Chief Architect, Gissar

13 Rudaki Mr. Kubov, Architect (Not Rudaki on land committee) 14 Director, Land Committee Rudaki

MEETING WITH RESETTLEMENT WORKING GROUP

Date: 27 August 2010 Time: 9:00 -12:30 Place: TJRM Conference Room

Ref.# Name, Surname Position Location 1. F.Ismatov Deputy Chairman of Rudaki district Hukumat 2. S.Lolayerov Director of Technological Rudaki district Inventory Enterprise 3. H.Burkhonov Senior Architect Rudaki district 4. I.Akhtomov Chairman of Land Rudaki district Committee 5. I.Melikov Engineer of Technological Shahrinav district 76

Inventory Enterprise 6. K.Akhmatov Senior Specialist Land Shakhrinav district Committee 7. Ms.M.Bairatova Chairman of Local Land Shahrinav district Committee 8. H.Nozimov Senior Architect Shahrinav district 9. I.Kurbonov First Deputy Chairman of Shahrinav district Hukumat 10. N.Safarov Deputy Chairman of Tursunzade city Hukumat 11. S.Abdusalami Chairman of Local Land Tursunzade city Committee 12. R.Kalonov Senior Architect Tursunzade city 13 I.Egamberdiev Senior Engineer Tursunzade city Technological Inventory Enterprise 14. D.Khamroev Engineer Technological Tursunzade city Inventory Enterprise 15. H.Boboev Director Technological Gissar district Inventory Enterprise 16. I.Muhtoramov Chairman of Local Land Gissar district Committee 17. A.Hafizov First Deputy Chairman of Gisssar District Hukumat 18. Sh.Rustamov Acting Senior Architect Gissar district ADB 1. Ms.HY Hong Team Leader 2. Mr. Jose Tiburcio Nicolas Resettlement Specialist 3. Ms M Yap Legal counsel PIU MOTC 1. M.Mirzoev Resettlement Specialist 2. Ms.D.Yakubova Translator

Summary of the Meeting 1. The ADB mission (resettlement specialist) described a number of key points in ADB’s Safeguards Policy Statement (2009) focusing on compensation at replacement cost, compensation/assistance even to those without sufficient legal rights to land, and requirement to complete compensation and assistance to displaced persons prior to commencement of civil works.

2. The WG members confirmed their understanding of replacement cost and clarified that the valuation of structures have been revised to remove the depreciation adjustments previously made by the Rayon Commissions.

3. Representatives from the District Commissions clarified that there are only 36 affected businesses (not 43). The operations of the additional 7 businesses earlier mentioned will not be affected. Only auxilliary structures in their plots (i.e. fence, borders) will be affected. Business

activities of these 7 shops are not expected to be disrupted from the civil works. Their compensation will be limited to impacts on structures. Hence, these 7 businesses will no longer be included in the discussion in the LARP section on business losses.

4. On allocation and transfer of land use rights, the WG clarified that the only way a household can have a replacement home plot is through the District Land Committee. Under the current policy and legal environment, cash compensation will not enable households to obtain alternative plot. Plot allocation by the District Land Committee is the only viable option to assist households and shops that need to relocate. However, this will require the issuance of a President decree.

5. PIU clarified that of the 20 households whose residential structures will be affected, 6 households (not 5) will require assistance in obtaining replacement land. These affected households will lose between 15-300 sqm of home plot. Replacement plot to be provided will have an average area of 600 sqm, (based on current practice) even for those losing less than 600 sqm.

6. PIU also explained that there are a number of affected households who have requested their respective hukumats (district governments) to allocate the vacant lot adjacent to their remaining plot as replacement for their affected land. This will be further assessed and reflected into the LARP. Moreover, some households with multiple families (with married children) request for an additional home plot as replacement so that some families can move out and establish their own house.

7. The President is currently considering to provide replacement home plots (with an average size of 600 sqm each) to all the 20 households whose houses will be affected. PIU has submitted the list of these 20 households to the Office of the President. A Presidential Decree is expected to be issued on 2 September 2010.

8. It was clarified that replacement land will have to be of equal value as the affected land. In the case of residential land, the plot should have comparable access to employment and production opportunities, civil infrastructure and community services. Related to this, a field visit will be conducted by the ADB Resettlement Specialist on 30 August 2010 to initially review the potential/proposed replacement plots to be provided to households requiring relocation. The PIU and the Working Group will prepare a location map of the replacement plots.

9. The ADB Project Team Leader shared the result of a recent meeting with staff from the Office of the President on compensation for minor land acquisition. In that meeting, it was recommended that instead of using the terminology "compensation of residential/commercial land", the term "allowance for the loss (termination) of land use right" will be used in order not to violate the principle of State ownership of land as provided in the Constitution. Since land use right is not the same as ownership, an appropriate valuation methodology needs to be made.

10. The ADB proposed methodology of using prices of privately-owned lands in neighboring countries is not acceptable. The government will not have solid ground for adopting the ‘$5.7

per sqm unit price derived from the rapid pricing methodology of privately-owned lands presented by ADB. The only available reference that can be used in the country at the moment is the existing land lease/rental rates in the project area which is currently assessed at $1,000 per hectare annually. By applying a common amortization rate of 25 years, a unit rate of $2.5 per sqm was derived. Reaction/feedback was sought from the WG.

11. PIU responded that the interviews they made to a number of APs on the amount they would be willing to accept as compensation for their loss of residential/commercial land also came out with figures around $2.5.

12. Full fledged wider consultation on $2.5 per sqm will be held in September 2010. ADB staff (Farrukh Nuriddinov) will be present for each meeting for each district.

13. Copies of the revised draft LARP will be shared with the WG for comments and endorsement. Once the LARP is endorsed by the Government and approved by ADB, a summary of the LARP will need to be disseminated among the APs through the distribution of pamphlets.

APPENDIX 3: DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR RESETTLEMENT SPECIALIST UNDER PROJECT MANAGEMETN CONSULTING FIRM

The Consultants will primarily update existing LARP in the detailed design stage and will provide capacity building training on LAR issues to PIU. Specific tasks include:

1. Assist the PIU/MOTC in coordinating all social issues and ensuring that project comply with Government and ADB social safeguards;

2. Adjust and Finalize the LARP based on an updated impact assessment during detailed design stage;

3. Carry out additional survey if required ;

4. Work closely with the PIU/MOTC and with other concerned government agencies for carrying out the survey;

5. Update the cost if required based on the detailed design;

6. Prepare site specific micro plan for shifting of the APs based on the principle of land for land compensation;

7. The Consultants will coordinate and provide assistance to nongovernmental organizations engaged to assist in implementing the LARP;

8. The consultant will be responsible for imparting training (in-house as well as on-the- job) to the PIU resettlement Specialist and also other concerned agencies related to LAR activities. Training will cover the following topics;

i). ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) ii). Principles and procedures of land acquisition; iii). Public consultation and participation; iv). Entitlements and compensation & assistance disbursement mechanisms; v). Grievance redress; vi). Implementation Mechanism of LARP and vii). Monitoring of resettlement operations.

APPENDIX 4: DRAFT TOR FOR INDEPENDENT MONITOR (IM)

A. Objective/Purpose of the Assignment

1. Monitoring is an integral part of land acquisition and resettlement (LAR) process. The agency will be involved in ongoing monitoring of resettlement implementation. The objectives of the Independent Monitor (IM) are to review implementation and assess the (i) achievement of LAR objectives, (ii) changes in living standards and livelihoods and restoration of economic and social base of the displaced persons (DPs), (iii) the effectiveness, impact, and sustainability of entitlements, and (iv) need for further mitigating measures, if any. IM should also enable the executing agency (EA) to make timely decisions on corrective measures needed to implement the land acquisition and resettlement plan (LARP) effectively and learn strategic lessons for future policy formulation and planning.

B. Qualifications

2. The selected organization should be of high professional standing and have a strong track record in the field of social development and resettlement. It should also have a proven record in project monitoring and be able to demonstrate adequate resources.

C. Scope of Work

3. The major tasks expected from the independent monitor are

(i) Review and verify internal monitoring systems and findings. (ii) Conduct independent investigations of project implementation, including the Project Implementation Unit (PIU), local offices, and consultations with village leaders, and affected people, especially women and vulnerable groups. (iii) Prepare independent reports based on monitoring visits. (iv) Suggest major recommendations for remedial actions. (v) Identify lessons learned. (vi) Maintain database of independent surveys. (vii) Suggest remedial actions with time-based outputs. (viii) Certify compliance with requirements of LARP. (ix) Share the major lessons from the process both in terms of success and failure.

D. Detailed Tasks

4. Prior to commencement, prepare a monitoring and evaluation plan giving details on

(i) Aim and scope of monitoring system • Setting up the objectives of monitoring • Defining the monitoring system and monitoring cycle 81

• Defining the scope of monitoring (ii) Monitoring strategy. The general approach to be used to monitor activities and results ensuring participation of all stakeholders, especially women and vulnerable groups. (iii) Project results. A summary of the major project activities, expected results, and the indicators to be used to monitor the progress and achievement of results. (iv) Defining and selecting indicators • Identify key indicators to be monitored • Indicators for each stage of project implementation • Gender-disaggregated indicators • Select only those which are simple, specific, and verifiable (v) Collection and Analysis of Data • Method of data collection • Sampling (20% of displaced persons) • Analysis (vi) Verify the internal monitoring process and reporting by executing agency (EA/MOTC) through field visits and independent investigations. (vii) Assess the extent to which the resettlement plan is being followed and objectives being met. • Institutional arrangements • Adequacy of the Management Information System • Payment of compensation, adequacy of budget, and timeliness of payment • Land readjustments • Consultation and information dissemination • Preparation and adequacy of resettlement sites • House construction • Provision of employment, its adequacy, and income levels • Training • Gender impacts • Rehabilitation of vulnerable groups • Infrastructure repair, relocation, or replacement • Enterprise relocation, compensation, and its adequacy • Transition allowances (viii) Monitor the different stages of the project with specific and need-based framework. (ix) Monitor the quality, effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability of the LAR efforts. (x) Monitor the process undertaken by the Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC) for implementing LARP and develop a framework for process monitoring. (xi) Highlight the major problems being faced and limitations of implementing the LARP and identify corrective measures needed to implement LAR effectively.

E. Methodology

(i) Study the baseline data on income and expenditure, occupational and livelihood patterns, arrangements for use of common property, social organization, leadership patterns, community organizations, and cultural parameters from the available reports. (ii) Identify an appropriate set of indicators for gathering and analyzing information on LAR impacts, the indicators shall include but not be limited to issues such as payment of compensation, relocation, and resettlement assistance, delivery of entitlement packages, restoration of income, and living standards, level of satisfaction by the affected people, and the quality of resettlement operations. (iii) Review results of internal monitoring and verify claims through random checking at the field level to assess whether LAR objectives have been generally met. Involve the affected people and community groups in assessing the impact of resettlement for monitoring and evaluation purposes. (iv) Conduct both individual and community level impact analysis through the use of formal and informal surveys, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, community public meetings, and in-depth case studies of affected people from various social classes (e.g. scheduled caste, scheduled tribes, other backward castes) to assess the impact of resettlement. (v) Identify the strengths and weaknesses of the LARP objectives and approaches, implementation strategies, including institutional issues, and provides suggestions for improvements in future ADB-funded resettlement planning and implementation.

F. Reporting Requirements

The IM is expected to submit to PMU the following deliverables:

(i) An Inception Report and detailed Work Plan including draft outlines for various reports (including Baseline Survey Report, LARP Implementation Review Quarterly Report, LARP Final Compliance Report, Post-LARP implementation evaluation Report), 1 month upon signing of the contract; (ii) Baseline Survey Report (iii) Quarterly LARP Implementation Review Report (iv) LARP Final Compliance Report (v) Post-LARP implementation evaluation Report (1 year after completion of LARP implementation)

APPENDIX 5: LIST OF AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS A. Households Losing Agricultural Land

Road Section 2

Name of Head of Household Household Area Agreed Allowance for Allowance Allowance Total Size Affected annual Loss of Use for for Compensation (Persons) (sq m) crop Rights (TJS) Severely Vulnerable (TJS) value Affected HH (TJS) (TJS) HH (TJS) Rudaki District Asrorov Sharif Асроров Шариф 8 400 168.00 840.00 0.00 0.00 840.00 Davlatov Давлатов 8 300 126.00 630.00 0.00 0.00 Sharifboy Шарифбой 630.00 Egamov Ismoil Эгамов Исмоил 8 1000 420.00 2100.00 0.00 0.00 2100.00 Hojiev Ходжиев Курбонали 8 2600 1092.00 5460.00 0.00 0.00 Qurbonali 5460.00 Jobirov Джибиров Каромат 9 500 309.00 1545.00 0.00 462.00 Karomat 2007.00 Kabirov Zafar Кабиров Зафар 7 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 1002.00 Miraliev Миралиев 7 400 168.00 840.00 0.00 462.00 Mamadzohir Махмадзохир 1302.00 Naimov Наимов Насрулло 6 600 252.00 1260.00 0.00 462.00 Nasrullo 1722.00 Najmiddinov Наджимиддинов 8 400 144.00 720.00 0.00 0.00 Khurshed Хуршед 720.00 Qaraboev Арабоев Садриддин 7 1000 420.00 2100.00 0.00 462.00 2562.00 Sadriddin

Gissar District Akobirov Акобиров Саидамир 6 100 45.60 228.00 0.00 462.00 Saidamir 690.00 Ashurov Ашуров Хасанбек 12 100 134.00 670.00 1520.00 462.00 Hasanbek 2652.00 Ashurov S. Ашуров С. 8 100 185.00 925.00 1571.00 0.00 2496.00 Ashurov Sh. Ашуров Ш 8 100 170.10 850.50 1556.10 0.00 2406.60 Emomova Эмомова Иронби 7 100 164.00 820.00 1550.00 462.00 2832.00 84

Name of Head of Household Household Area Agreed Allowance for Allowance Allowance Total Size Affected annual Loss of Use for for Compensation (Persons) (sq m) crop Rights (TJS) Severely Vulnerable (TJS) value Affected HH (TJS) (TJS) HH (TJS) Ironbi Fozilov Фозилов Ашурали 5 100 150.02 750.12 1536.02 462.00 Ashurali 2748.14 Ghiyosova Гиесова Марзия 7 100 150.02 750.12 1536.02 462.00 Marziya 2748.14 Ibrohimov Ihom Иброхимов Ильхом 7 100 171.90 859.50 1557.90 462.00 2879.40 Ihronov Z. Ихронов З 8 100 170.10 850.50 1556.10 0.00 2406.60 Imonov Имонов Мирзоназар 7 100 175.00 875.00 1561.00 462.00 Mirzonazar 2898.00 Kazakova M. Казакова М. 8 100 180.00 900.00 1566.00 462.00 2928.00 Melikov Amon Меликов Амон 7 100 175.15 875.75 1561.15 462.00 2898.90 Nematov Нематов Каноат 12 100 150.00 750.00 1536.00 462.00 Qanoat 2748.00 Rahmonov Рахмонов Атахуджа 10 100 135.00 675.00 1521.00 462.00 Atakhuja 2658.00 Saidov Саидов Абдуманнон 4 100 190.96 954.80 1576.96 0.00 Abdumannon 2531.76 Sharipova Шарипова Сангиной 11 100 159.75 798.75 1545.75 462.00 Sanginoy 2806.50 Solehov Солехов Набиджон 11 100 170.00 850.00 1556.00 462.00 Nabijon 2868.00 Yahyoev Яхъеев Косым 9 100 136.11 680.55 1522.11 462.00 Qosim 2664.66 Zakirov Nabi Закиров Наби 12 100 162.00 810.00 1548.00 0.00 2358.00 85

Road Section 3 Name of Head of Household Household Area Agreed Allowance Allowance Allowance Total Size Affected annual for Loss of for for Compensation (Persons) (sq m) crop Use Rights Severely Vulnerable (TJS) value (TJS) Affected HH (TJS) (TJS) HH (TJS) Gissar District Abdulloev Абдуллоев 9 700 252.00 1260.00 0.00 462.00 Hikmat Хикмат 1722.00 Ahmadov Азмадов 5 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 Abdurahim Абдурахим 1002.00 Amonov Haqrizo Амонов Накризо 8 2500 900.00 4500.00 0.00 0.00 4500.00 Azimov Ismat Азимов Исмат 4 500 180.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 Azimov Izatullo Азимов 7 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 462.00 Изатулло 2064.00 Azimov Азимов 13 100 40.00 200.00 1426.00 0.00 Nusratullo Нустратулло 1626.00 Achilova Kholbibi Азимова 10 100 40.00 200.00 1426.00 462.00 Холбиби 2088.00 Boboev Abdullo Бобоев Абдулло 7 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 0.00 540.00 Boev Zikriyo Боев Зикрие 12 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 1002.00 Boeva Bunavsha Боева Бунавша. 8 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 1002.00 Chelonov Челонов Хасан 8 100 42.00 210.00 1428.00 0.00 Khasan 1638.00 DF Haidar Mirov ДФ Хайдар 8 2000 800.00 4000.00 0.00 0.00 Миров 4000.00 Dodov Jamolidin Додов 10 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 0.00 Джамолидин 1602.00 Dostieva Fotima Достиева 8 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 Фотима 1002.00 Eshmahmadov Эшмахмадов 6 100 42.00 210.00 1428.00 462.00 Dodarbek Додарбек 2100.00 Fatulloev Kurbon Фатуллоев 8 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 0.00 Курбон. 1602.00 Ghafurov Гафуров 6 100 210.00 1050.00 1596.00 462.00 Bekmurod Бекмурод 3108.00 Hamdamov Хамдамов 8 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 0.00 Akbar Акбар 540.00 86

Name of Head of Household Household Area Agreed Allowance Allowance Allowance Total Size Affected annual for Loss of for for Compensation (Persons) (sq m) crop Use Rights Severely Vulnerable (TJS) value (TJS) Affected HH (TJS) (TJS) HH (TJS) Hasanov Хасанов 4 100 210.00 1050.00 1596.00 462.00 Alimardon Алимардон 3108.00 Hasanov Samad Хасанов Самад 15 100 42.00 210.00 1428.00 462.00 2100.00 Hikmatov Хикматов 4 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 Oyatullo Оятулло 1002.00 Hikmatova Хикматова 15 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 Halima Халима 1002.00 Holov Sulton Холов Султон 6 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 0.00 1602.00 Ibrohimov Ilhom Иброхимов 7 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 Ильхом 1002.00 Independence Фруктовый Сад 8 13000 1040.00 5200.00 0.00 0.00 Fruit Orchard Независимости 5200.00 Jabarova Izatoy Джаборова 8 200 72.00 360.00 0.00 462.00 Изатой 822.00 Jalilov Salom Джалилов 12 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 462.00 Салом 2064.00 Kholmurodov Холмуродов 6 800 288.00 1440.00 0.00 462.00 Rahim Рахим 1902.00 Kurbonov Курбонов 8 200 72.00 360.00 0.00 0.00 Toshali Тошали 360.00 Kurbonova Курбонова 3 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 Zubaida Зубайда 1002.00 Mahmadnazarov Махмадназаров 8 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 0.00 G. Г. 1602.00 Maksudov Anor Максудов Анор 7 100 42.00 210.00 1428.00 0.00 1638.00 Mansurov Мансуров 6 500 836.00 4180.00 2222.00 0.00 Khurshedmurov Хуршедмурод 6402.00 Masurov Zafar Масуров Зафар 8 200 72.00 360.00 0.00 0.00 360.00 Mirov Nasriddin Миров 6 100 42.00 210.00 1428.00 462.00 Насриддин 2100.00 Mirzoev Мирзоев 7 400 144.00 720.00 0.00 462.00 Mirzomurod Мирзомурод 1182.00 Mudinov Nazar Мудинов Назар 6 1000 360.00 1800.00 0.00 0.00 1800.00 87

Name of Head of Household Household Area Agreed Allowance Allowance Allowance Total Size Affected annual for Loss of for for Compensation (Persons) (sq m) crop Use Rights Severely Vulnerable (TJS) value (TJS) Affected HH (TJS) (TJS) HH (TJS) Nematov Nemat Нематов Немат 11 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 1002.00 Nosirova Носирова 8 100 42.00 210.00 1428.00 462.00 Hysniya Хусния 2100.00 Nozimov Saifullo Нозимов 11 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 462.00 Сайфулло 2064.00 Rahimov Рахимов 8 4000 1612.00 8060.00 0.00 0.00 Abdurashid Абдурашид 8060.00 Rahimov Рахимов 11 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 Tojiddin Тоджиддин 1002.00 Rahimova Рахимова 12 300 120.00 600.00 0.00 462.00 Davlatbib Давлатбиби 1062.00 Rajabov Hamza Раджабов 20 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 462.00 Хамза 2064.00 Rasulov Расулов 8 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 Mahmud Махмуд 1002.00 Saidov Janon Саидов Джанон 4 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 0.00 1602.00 Saidova Salima Саидова 8 200 72.00 360.00 0.00 462.00 Салима 822.00 Saifiddinova Сайфиддинова 6 200 72.00 360.00 0.00 462.00 Anorgul Аноргуль 822.00 Saydulloev Сайдуллоев 7 100 11.20 56.00 1397.20 462.00 Bahrullo Бахрулло 1915.20 Sharipov Шарипов 1 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 0.00 Rahmon Рахмон 1602.00 Sharipova Шарипова 11 200 72.00 360.00 0.00 462.00 Fatima Фатима 822.00 Sharipova G Шарипова Г 8 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 1002.00 Sharipova Шарипова 8 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 Gulnora Гульнора 1002.00 Sobirov Ziyorat Собиров Зиерат 8 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 0.00 540.00 Solehova Holesa Солехова 8 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 Холиса 1002.00 Tabarova Altin Табарова Алтын 1 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 1002.00 88

Name of Head of Household Household Area Agreed Allowance Allowance Allowance Total Size Affected annual for Loss of for for Compensation (Persons) (sq m) crop Use Rights Severely Vulnerable (TJS) value (TJS) Affected HH (TJS) (TJS) HH (TJS) Tolibov Ghiyos Толибов Гиез 7 1200 432.00 2160.00 0.00 0.00 2160.00 Umedov Mirzo Умедов Мирзо 10 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 462.00 2064.00 Urokov Khusein Уроков Хусейн 9 300 108.00 540.00 0.00 462.00 1002.00 Usmonova Усмонова 8 200 72.00 360.00 0.00 462.00 Shahri Шахри 822.00 Vatan Кооператив 8 10200 3672.00 18360.00 0.00 0.00 Cooperative Ватан 18360.00 Yusupov Юсупов 6 100 11.20 56.00 1397.20 0.00 Inoyatullo Иноятулло 1453.20 Zaidullaeva Anor Зайдуллаева 8 100 36.00 180.00 1422.00 462.00 Анор 2064.00 Shakhrinav District Ayubov Аюбов 6 20700 5362.00 26810.00 0.00 0.00 Nusratullo Нусратулло 26810.00 Barakatulloi Баракатуллой 2 1000 280.00 1400.00 0.00 0.00 Marufkhuja Маруфхуджа 1400.00 Bobokhonov Бобохонов 13 3000 777.00 3885.00 2163.00 0.00 Umarali Умарали 6048.00 Davlatov Said Давлатов Саид 20 400 112.00 560.00 0.00 0.00 560.00 Eshonqulova Z. Эшонкулова З.. 8 200 52.00 260.00 0.00 462.00 722.00 Hikmatov A. Хикматов А. 8 900 233.00 1165.00 0.00 0.00 1165.00 Isoev Mahkam Исоев Махкам 9 500 129.00 645.00 0.00 462.00 1107.00 Kamolov F. Камолов Ф. 8 8000 2072.00 10360.00 3458.00 0.00 13818.00 Karimov N. Каримов Н. 6 1800 466.00 2330.00 1852.00 0.00 4182.00 Karomatov Кароматов 8 900 252.00 1260.00 0.00 0.00 Ubaydullo Убайдулло 1260.00 Komilova S. Комилова С. 8 300 374.00 1870.00 0.00 462.00 2332.00 Mahmadov Махмадов 7 650 167.00 835.00 0.00 0.00 Fathuddin Фатхуддин 835.00 Mahmadov Махомодов 6 600 154.00 770.00 0.00 462.00 Sadriddin Садриддин 1232.00 Mahmudova L. Махмудова Л. 8 1000 280.00 1400.00 0.00 462.00 1862.00 Ochildiev Hakim Очилдиев 7 500 130.00 650.00 0.00 462.00 1112.00 89

Road Section 4 Name of Head of Household Household Area Agreed Allowance Allowance Allowance Total Size Affected annual for Loss of for Severely for Compensation (Persons) (sq m) crop Use Rights Affected HH Vulnerable (TJS) value (TJS) (TJS) HH (TJS) (TJS) Tursunzade District Abdulhaitov Абдулхаитов 9 500 328.20 1641.00 0.00 0.00 Hakim Хаким 1641.00 Abdulloev Абдуллоев 9 300 249.60 1248.00 0.00 0.00 Uroq Урок 1248.00 Ashurov Ашуров 6 5100 3996.70 19983.50 0.00 0.00 Subhon Субхон 19983.50 Boboev Бобоев 9 3000 1590.00 7950.00 2976.00 0.00 Khurshed Хуршед 10926.00 Boboev Safar Бобоев 9 600 426.40 2132.00 0.00 462.00 Сафар 2594.00 Buriev Буриев 6 300 202.80 1014.00 0.00 462.00 Mamatqul Маматкул 1476.00 Buriev Sulton Буриев 7 200 187.20 936.00 0.00 462.00 Султон 1398.00 DF ”Ghufron” Гуфрон 8 1000 780.00 3900.00 0.00 0.00 3900.00 Haytaliev Хаяталиев 8 300 249.60 1248.00 0.00 0.00 Sayfi Сайфи 1248.00 Hikmatov Хикматов 8 2600 2028.00 10140.00 0.00 0.00 10140.00 Jabborov Джаборов 5 500 390.00 1950.00 0.00 462.00 Karim Карим 2412.00 Khojaev Ходжаев 8 500 390.00 1950.00 0.00 0.00 Fazliddin азлиддин 1950.00 Khollov Холов 8 200 156.00 780.00 0.00 0.00 Mingtut Мингтут 780.00 Mamirov Мамиров 9 7472 5678.72 28393.60 0.00 0.00 Ravshan Равшан 28393.60 Mirzoev Мирзоев 5 800 592.80 2964.00 0.00 462.00 Alijon Алиджон 3426.00 Muminov Муминов 10 200 187.20 936.00 1573.20 462.00 Malik Малик 2971.20 Muzaffarov Музаффаров 8 300 196.40 982.00 1582.40 0.00 2564.40 91

Name of Head of Household Household Area Agreed Allowance Allowance Allowance Total Size Affected annual for Loss of for Severely for Compensation (Persons) (sq m) crop Use Rights Affected HH Vulnerable (TJS) value (TJS) (TJS) HH (TJS) (TJS) Buri Бури Muzaffarov Музаффаров 5 200 153.20 766.00 1539.20 462.00 Nabi Наби 2767.20 Otaboev Отабоев 6 500 390.00 1950.00 1776.00 462.00 Ahtam Ахтам 4188.00 Rajabov Раджабов 7 600 421.20 2106.00 0.00 462.00 Avaz Аваз 2568.00 Rajabova Раджабова 2 300 264.00 1320.00 1650.00 462.00 Khumor Хумор 3432.00 Saidmurodov Саидмуродов 14 18 13.68 68.40 0.00 462.00 Ali Али 530.40 Sanginov Сангинов 4 13310 4531.00 22655.00 0.00 0.00 Rajabali Раджабали 22655.00 Sattorov Сатторов 6 400 352.00 1760.00 1738.00 462.00 Ismat Исмат 3960.00 Sayfulloeva Сайфуллоева 9 1800 1404.00 7020.00 0.00 462.00 Rayhon Райхон 7482.00 Zabirov Tohir Забиров 14 1100 873.60 4368.00 0.00 462.00 Тохир 4830.00

Road Section 5 Name of Head of Household Area Agreed Allowance Allowance Allowance Total Household Size Affected annual for Loss of for Severely for Compensation (Persons) (sq m) crop Use Rights Affected HH Vulnerable (TJS) value (TJS) (TJS) HH (TJS) (TJS) Tursunzade District Akhmedov Ахмедов 7 2340 1778.40 8892.00 0.00 0.00 Khurshed Хуршед 8892.00 Huseynov Хусейнов 5 2820 2143.20 10716.00 0.00 0.00 Qodirjon Кодирджон 10716.00 Madrahimov Мадрахимов 9 210 159.60 798.00 0.00 0.00 Murod Мурод 798.00 Sodiqova Содикова 14 900 684.00 3420.00 0.00 462.00 Tojikhon Тоджикхон 3882.00 Taghoeva Тагоева 8 300 228.00 1140.00 0.00 462.00 Momokhol Момохол 1602.00

B. Households Losing Residential/Commercial Lands, Structures and Buildings

Road Section 2: Rudaki District

Name of Head of Reference HH Size Affected Allowance Houses, Compensation Walls Compensation Allowance Household (No. of Land for Loss of shops, for Loss of and for Loss of for Vulne Persons) Area (m2) Use Rights sheds Building (TJS) Fences Structure rable HH (TJS) and out (m) (TJS) (TJS) bldg

Odinaev Rahmatullo Одинаев 1 6 210.0 replacement 53 82,698.0 0.0 Рахматулло plot (tbd)

Barotov Davlatmurod Баротов 2 19 52.5 replacement 13 1,140.0 462.0 Давлатмурод plot (tbd)

Barotov Suhrob Баротов Сухроб 3 8 176.0 440.0 31 5,385.0 83.0 0.0

Mahmadov Hasan Махмадов Хасан 4 8 45.0 112.5 65 6,832.0 5 2,763.0 462.0

Hamdamov Aslan Хамдамов Аслан 5 14 150.0 375.0 66 5,645.0 12 1,241.26 462.0

Komilov Egam Комилов Эгам 6 13 110.0 275.0 134 16,469.0 29 2,044.0 462.0

Kenjaev Tavarali Кенджаев 7 18 60.0 150.0 147 12,288.0 14 6,265.0 462.0 Таварали

Mavlonova Safargul Мавлонова 8 7 560.0 replacement 122 31,598.0 28 1,609.0 462.0 Сафаргуль plot (tbd)

Mavlonov Мавлонов 9 11 45.0 112.5 41 6,067.0 462.0 Abdurahmon Абдурахмон

Abdulloev Sulaymon Абдуллоев 10 16 125.0 312.5 112 18,859.0 12.5 819.0 0.0 Сулаймон 94

Traffic police post Пост ГАИ 11 386 45,577.0

Kenjaev Sherali Кенджаев Шерали 12 6 384.0 960.0 17 1,703.0 462.0

Kenjaeva Nazokat Кенджаева Назокат 13 11 120.0 300.0 120 25,856.0 462.0

Karomatov Кароматов 14 3 182.0 455.0 158 11,392.7 30 2,270.0 0.0 Manuchehr Манучехр

Karomatov Кароматов 15 9 70.8 177.0 71 16,102.0 462.0 Hikmatullo Хикматулло

Ashurov Izzatullo Ашуров Иззатулло 16 5 480.0 1,200.0 19 2,187.0 462.0

Subhonov Nematullo Субхонов 17 13 600.0 1,500.0 18 2,495.0 25 2,409.0 462.0 Нематулло

Sharipov Toshmurod Шарипов 18 5 64.0 160.0 14 1,444.0 462.0 Тошмурод

Sharipov Normurod Шарипов Нормурод 19 6 287.0 717.5 10 1,674.0 7 1,055.0 462.0

Mosque Мечеть 20 5.6 270.0

Miraliev Homid Миралиев Хомид 21 21 216.0 540.0 68 577.0 462.0

Khudoyberdiev Худойбердиев 22 11 740.0 1,850.0 286 55,796.0 56 5,450.0 0.0 Sayfullo Сайфулло

Usmonov Bobokalon Усмонов 23 12 150.0 375.0 14708.0 53 3,461.0 462.0 95

Бобокалон

Khudoyberdiev Худойбердиев 24 9 80.0 200.0 18 1,053.0 462.0 Khayrullo Хайрулло

Khudoyberdiev Худойбердиев 25 8 120.0 300.0 35 1,283.0 30 1,408.0 462.0 Abdurahmon Абдурахмон

Egamov Ismoil Эгамов Исмоил 26 8 600.0 1,500.0 105 892.0 0.0

Bobonazarov Бобоназаров 27 12 15.0 37.5 4 284.0 462.0 Allohnazar Аллохназар

Buzbalov Fayzullo Бузбалов 28 10 176.0 440.0 50 1,837.0 462.0 Файзулло

Abrorov Saykhuja Аброров Сайхуджа 29 8 176.0 440.0 163 14,374.0 130 4,253.0 0.0

Yorov Sultonmurod Еров Султонмурод 30 7 48.0 120.0 23 923.0 462.0

Boev Gulmurod Боев Гульмурод 31 5 87.5 218.8 45 4,091.0 30 255.0 462.0

Madumarov Solehjon Мадумаров 32 10 238.0 595.0 256 814.0 0.0 Солехджон

Davlatov Abdusalom Давлатов 33 14 120.0 300.0 55 469.0 462.0 Абдусалом

Naimov Habibullo Наимов Хабибулло 34 9 63.0 157.5 18 124.0 462.0 96

Amirshoeva Амиршоева 35 7 168.0 420.0 160 19,915.0 462.0 Ruqiyamoh Рукиямох

Odinaeva Gulchehra Одинаева 36 8 176.0 440.0 321 65,361.0 462.0 Гульчехра

Azizova Qurbongul Азизова 37 12 80.0 200.0 68 577.0 462.0 Курбонгуль

Davlatov Murod Давлатов Мурод 38 1 28.0 70.0 68 9,731.0 0.0

Subtotal: Road Section 2: Rudaki District 7,002.8 15,450.8 462,033.7 1,145.1 47,842.3 12,474.0

Road Section 2: Gissar District

Kholov Shamsullo Холов Шамсулло 1 6 250.0 625.0 58 440.0 462.0

Kholova Kholbibi Холова Холбиби 2 6 585.0 1,462.5 9 1,335.4 462.0

Zinnatov Muboraksho Зиннатов 3 8 176.0 440.0 48 423.6 0.0 Муборакшо 97

Olimov Mirali Олимов Мирали 4 13 27.0 67.5 74 5,719.4.0 0.0

Qobilov Abdusamad Кобилов 5 7 10.0 25.0 86 5,029.0 27 1,951.3 0.0 Абдусамад

Qobilov Malik Кодиров Малик 6 8 176.0 440.0 99 4,308.5 48 774.4 0.0

Zayniddinov Hasan Зайниддинов 7 15 50.0 125.0 75 1,053.0 462.0 Хасан

Rahimov Tesha Рахимов Теша 8 8 200.0 500.0 31 270.0 462.0

Naimov Said Наимов Саид 9 12 400.0 1,000.0 50 2,251.0 60 492.4 462.0

Gissar Rayon Гиссарский Район 10 32,090.2

Rahimov Handullo Рахимов Хандулло 11 7 435.0 1,087.5 32 1,568.3 15 231.6 462.0

Jonmahmadov Ubayd Джонмахмадов 12 6 900.0 replacement 83 36,888.3 6 875.0 462.0 Убайд land (tbd)

Ismoilov Nemat Исмоилов Немат 13 6 720.0 1,800.0 70 37,590.0 35 900.0 0.0

Nazarov Tojiddin Назаров 14 18 176.0 440.0 75 57,843.1 462.0 Тоджиддин

Azizov Umarali Азизов Умарали 15 5 129.5 323.8 97 15,947.0 58 1,741.2 462.0

Qodirov Razzoq Кодиров Раззок 16 and 17 2 99.0 247.5 125.3 18,794.2 83 3,996.4 462.0 98

Qodirov Abdusattor Кодиров 18 13 40.0 100.0 20 45,568.7 462.0 Абдусаттор

Zinnatov Amirshoh Зиннатов Амиршо 19 6 140.0 replacement 38 18,009.4 8 1,218.3 0.0 land (800m2)

Mahmadov Yoqub Махмадов Екуб 20 10 92.0 230.0 20 140.0 462.0

Mirzoeva Saybibi Мирзоева Сайбиби 21 16 180.0 450.0 31 1,200.3 462.0

Raupov Abdurahmon Рауфов 22 6 176.0 440.0 16 143.0 462.0 Абдурахмон

Rauov Abdusattor Рауфов 23 8 225.0 562.5 25 976.0 462.0 Абдусаттор

Qanoatov Shafoat Каноатов Шафоат 24 6 135.0 337.5 30 3,808.0 26 1,593.0 462.0

Ibodob Nematullo Ибодов Нематулло 25 12 40.0 100.0 32 280.0 462.0

Mirova Rafoat Мирова Рафоат 26 10 30.0 75.0 33 2,387.0 20 1,365.0 462.0

Sherov Sherali Шеров Шерали 27 8 150.0 375.0 59 27,180.0 10 1,033.0 462.0

Sherov Amirali Шеров Амирали 28 9 135.0 337.5 141 62,988.0 7 435.6 462.0

Sherov Mirzojon Шеров Мирзоджон 29 2 175.0 437.5 69 24,507.0 0.0

Sherov Umed Шеров Умед 30 4 100.0 250.0 50 22,861.1 0.0 99

Saidov Akram Саидов Акрам 31 14 66.0 165.0 37 2,065.5 42 1,557.0 462.0

Latipov Rahmatullo Латипов 32 7 69.0 172.5 64 11,551.0 7 884.0 462.0 Рахматулло

Yatimov Abdullo Ятимов Абдулло 33 8 84.0 210.0 33 6,462.3 19 1,113.0 462.0

Buriev Haytali Буриев Хаятали 34 20 106.0 265.0 28 2,611.0 462.0

Sattorov Huseyn Сатторов Хусейн 35 12 120.0 300.0 78 6,410.2 462.0

Sattorov Shamsiddin Сатторов 36 13 200.0 500.0 22 17,131.0 1 621.0 462.0 Шамсиддин

Olimov Rasul Олимов Расул 37 9 210.0 525.0 43 3,361.5 48 3,577.2 462.0

Safarov Mutair Сафаров Мутаир 38 7 137.5 343.8 30 1,143.1 462.0

Safarov Mashrab Сафаров Машраб 39 5 168.0 420.0 14 860.2 30 760.0 462.0

Sharipov Sunnat Шарипов Суннат 40 11 108.0 270.0 20 1,332.0 32 920.0 462.0

Sharipov Habibullo Шарипов 41 6 102.0 255.0 46 4,108.0 3 561.0 462.0 Хабибулло

Isoev Sadriddin Исоев Садриддин 42 7 150.0 375.0 59 558.0 462.0

Saidov Rizo Саидов Ризо 43 18 34.0 85.0 18 370.3 462.0

Nabiev Shohiardon Набиев Шохиардон 44 6 210.0 525.0 12 977.0 0.0 100

Imomov Nazar Имомов Назар 45 7 1.7 4.2 63 2,763.0 48 2,081.2 462.0

Bobiev Zafar Бобиев Зафар 46 8 176.0 440.0 146 10,843 39 1,748.6 0.0

Donaeva Zebogul Донаева Зебогуль 47 13 270.0 675.0 116 26,191.4 462.0

Ibronov Hakim 48 49.0 122.5 4 166.4

Ibronov Halim Ибронов Халим 49 2 123.0 replacement 71 22,453.0 7 160.0 462.0 land (800m2)

Sayfiddinov Сайфиддинов 50 9 420.0 1,050.0 77 17,441.0 1 1,042.0 462.0 Muminjon Мумиджон

Khudoynazarov Худойназаров 51 2 380.0 950.0 10 88.0 462.0 Yunus Юнус

Norova Qumri Норова Кумри 52 10 280.0 700.0 55 2,319.0 30 264.0 462.0

Subtotal: Road Section 2: Gissar District 9,415.7 20,631.7 560,702.6 1,232 44,070.4 18,018.0

101

Road Section 3: Gissar District

Rajabov Sadriddin Раджабов 53 11 260.0 650.0 35 103.0 462.0 Садриддин

Qurbonov Abdusalom Курбонов 54 12 204.0 510.0 36 317.0 462.0 Абдусалом

Shodmonova Шодмонова 55 10 210.0 525.0 67 7,201.0 50 1,172.0 462.0 Zaynura Зайнура

Nematov Karomat Нематов Каромат 56 8 176.0 440.0 348 77,150.0 4,830.8 0.0

Miraliev B Миралиев Б 57 10 5.0 12.5 24 9,206.0 0.0

Kenjaev A Кенджаев A 58 8 176.0 440.0 45 2,442.0 0.0

Rahimov A 59 202.0 505.0 1,404.1

Boboev A Бобоев A 60 8 176.0 440.0 92 4,769.0 4 123.0 0.0

Kabirov F Кабиров Ф 61 8 57.0 142.5 15 1,248.0 462.0

Homidov S Хомидов S 62 9 9.0 22.5 93 92,211.0 15 566.0 462.0

Saidov S Саидов S 63 8 176.0 440.0 48 1,235.0 0.0

Huseynov S Хусейнов S 64 15 62.0 155.0 80 2,058.0 462.0

Boev Kh Боев Х 65 9 108.0 270.0 14360.0 33 2,133.0 462.0 102

Traffic police post Пост ГАИ#27 66 270 75,146.4 #27

Sadriddinov A Садриддинов A 67 8 176.0 replacement 148 42,908.0 0.0 land (tbd)

Cemetery Кладбище 68 51 3,651.5

Haydar Mirov Хайдар Миров 69 8 750.0 1,875.0 473 349,915.0 0.0

Iskandarov Искандаров 70 6 80.0 200.0 21 1,490.3 0.0

Mansurov Khursand Мансуров Хурсанд 71 11 225.0 replacement 176 69,891.0 462.0 land (800m2)

Aliev S Алиев S 72 8 36.0 90.0 104 106,018.0 0.0

Sadulloev M Садуллоев M 73 4 100.0 250.0 7 950.3 0.0

Sattorov I Сатторов И. 74 8 115.5 288.8 24 141.0 0.0

Hakimov A Хакимов A 75 8 250.0 625.0 26 1,629.0 14 1,104.0 0.0

Qurbonov A Курбонов A 76 8 176.0 440.0 30 13,809.0 5 1,053.0 0.0

Sadulloev Садуллоев 77 45 684.0 1,710.0 126181,283.0 54 2,133.2 0.0

Bobomurodov Бобомуродов 78 8 12.5 31.3 60 528.3 0.0

Subtotal: Section 3: Gissar District 4,166.0 9,412.5 1,039,688.8 368 20,490.3 3,696.0 103

Road Section 3: Shakhrinav District

Nasriddinov Zulfiqor Насриддинов 1 1 90.0 225.0 18 486.0 0.0 Зульфикор

Vahobov Abdullo Вахобов Абдулло 2 23 80.0 200.0 21 525.0 462.0

Huadov Nematullo Худов 3 8 416.0 1,040.0 14 742.0 0.0

Mihtojev Михтоджев 4 8 16.0 40.0 70 1,050.0 0.0

Hakimov Toshir Хакимов Тошир 5 10 240.0 600.0 144 28,512.0 462.0

Juraev Zikrullo Джураев Зикрулло 6 8 125.0 312.5 16 2,064.0 56 7,680.0 0.0

Mirzoev Rustam Мирзоев Рустам 7 6 220.0 550.0 48 7,848.0 36 540.0 462.0

Mavlonov Doniyor Мавлонов Дониер 8 5 192.0 480.0 48 720.0 0.0

Boboev Nurmahmad Бобоев Нурмахмад 9 9 360.0 900.0 42 630.0 462.0

Alimardonov Bahodur Алимардонов 10 5 180.0 450.0 36 720.0 0.0 Баходур

Salimov Muzaffar Салимов 11 8 200.0 500.0 2 30.0 0.0 Музаффар

Kamolov Fakhriddin Камолов 12 8 172.0 430.0 5 2,580.0 0.0 Фахриддин 104

Nematov Rajab Нематов Раджаб 13 1 175.0 437.5 64 768.0 0.0

Qaraev Tohir Караев Тохир 14 9 420.0 1,050.0 34 972.0 0.0

Muhiddinova Mohira Мухиддинова 15 8 264.0 660.0 58 7,161.0 462.0 Мохира

Barotov Qosim Баротов Косим, R 16 11 48.0 120.0 48 18,720.0 0.0

Chuzi jamoat Джамоат Чузи 17 390.0

Shukurova Sarvar Шукурова Сарвар 18 5 140.0 350.0 14 1,947.0 462.0

Negmatov Daler Негматов Далер 19 5 27.5 68.8 4 516.0 32 6,144.0 462.0

Hanjarov Hamza Ханджаров Хамза 20 1 15.0 37.5 52 10,010.0 0.0

Khushmurodov Aziz Хушмуродов Азиз 21 9 40.0 100.0 64 12,672.0 4 924.0 462.0

Kasirov Abduqahhor Касыров 22 8 50.0 125.0 160 3,504.0 0.0 Абдукаххор

Qodirov Habibullo Кодиров 23 7 37.0 92.5 25 4,466.0 462.0 Хабибулло

Kholov Sanginmurod Холов Сангимурод 24 6 21.5 53.8 19 1,254.0 462.0

Davlatov A Давлатов А 25 8 56.0 140.0 62 1,740.0 462.0

Rahmonov Рахмонов 26 8 70.0 175.0 28 10,920.0 0.0 105

Mahmadullo Махмадулло

Akramov Atokhon Акрамов Атохон 27 7 70.0 175.0 114 1,140.0 462.0

Umronov Salohiddin Умронов 28 8 210.0 525.0 39 585.0 0.0 Салохиддин

Rahimov Pirimqul Рахимов Пиримкул 29 6 114.0 285.0 15 540.0 0.0

Gulov Ghayrat Гулов Гайрат 30 6 40.0 100.0 36 698.4 0.0

Halimov Anvarjon Халимов 31 8 180.0 450.0 5,984.0 46 623.0 0.0 Анварджон

Boboaliev Qurbon Бобоалиев Курбон 32 1 4.0 10.0 11 1,856.0 0.0

Kholboboev Ghaffor Холбобоев 33 1 54.0 135.0 24 8,328.0 0.0 Гаффор

Rahimov Abdughaffor Рахимов 34 8 70.0 175.0 35 13,650.0 462.0 Абдугаффор

Odinaev Ubaydullo Одинаев 35 5 44.0 110.0 61 733.0 0.0 Убайдулло

Rajabov Maruf Раджабов Маруф 36 8 260.0 650.0 61 819.0 0.0

Juraqulov Sherali Джуракулов 37 8 60.0 150.0 2 36.0 0.0 Шерали 106

Saidov Ghaybullo Саидов Гайбулло 38 16 207.0 517.5 75 9,675.0 0.0

Davlatov Malik Давлатов Малик 39 8 80.0 200.0 3 387.0 16 864.0 0.0

Safarova Saodat Сафарова Саодат 40 8 60.0 150.0 12 173.0 462.0

Bafoev Abdurahmon Бафоев 41 6 544.0 1,360.0 88 2,534.4 0.0 Абдурахмон

Ayubov Sadriddin Аюбов Садриддин 42 12 350.0 875.0 76 28,916.0 10 23,400.0 0.0

Kholiqov Bahriddin Холиков 43 8 30.0 75.0 247 306,000.0 38 228.0 0.0 Бахриддин

Jalilov Tura Джалилов Тура 44 10 126.0 replacement 333 129,870.0 462.0 plot (tbd)

Abdulloeva Gulsara Абдуллоева 45 8 51.0 127.5 51 17,697.0 462.0 Гульсара

Sharipov Rahmon Шарипов Рахмон 46 8 200.0 500.0 195 41,862.0 5 26,233.0 462.0

Boronov Ismatullo Боронов 47 8 825.0 2,062.5 400 51,600.0 105 3,623.0 0.0 Исматулло

Abdulloeva Misqol Абдуллоева 48 9 10.0 25.0 9 1,782.0 15 225.0 462.0 Мискол

Boboev Bahrullo Бобоев Бахрулло 49 6 5.0 12.5 28 9,716.0 0.0 107

Mirzoev Hasan Мирзоев Хасан 50 7 30.0 75.0 19 285.0 0.0

Donchik Aleksandr Дончик Александр 51 5 16.0 40.0 28 560.0 462.0

Boboshoev Ahmad Бобошоев Ахмад 52 14 45.0 112.5 10 1,980.0 23 7,969.0 462.0

Qaramirzoeva Orzu Караимрзоева 53 7 15.0 replacement 36 12,492.0 4 1,155.0 462.0 Орзу plot (800m2)

Khojamov Murodali Ходжамов 54 13 66.0 165.0 69 22,995.0 13 745.0 462.0 Муродалли

Subtotal: Section 3 - Shakhrinav District 7,421.0 18,200.0 744,928.0 1,619 129,265.8 10,164.0

Road Section 4: Shakhrinav District

Qurbonova Gulbahor Курбонова 55 4 15.0 37.5 15 5,700.0 462.0 Гульбахор

Qurbonov Ashur Курбонов Ашур 56 11 280.0 replacement 102 38,150.4 6 7,040.0 462.0 plot (800m2) 108

Eshonov Hamroh Эшонов Хамрох 57 8 660.0 1,650.0 25 9,147.6 14 5,660.0 462.0

Aminov Ilhom Аминов Ильхом 58 15 418.0 replacement 186 73,940.0 462.0 plot (tbd)

Roziev Maruf Розиев Маруф 59 14 270.0 675.0 115 49,530.0 2 190.0 462.0

Ashurov Boboqul Ашуров Бобокул 60 15 320.0 800.0 76 12,755.0 14 1,488.0 462.0

Kholova Melikoy Холова Меликой 61 16 200.0 500.0 213 52,496.0 462.0

Roziev Ahliddin Розиев Ахлиддин 62 8 90.0 225.0 17 1,406.0 462.0

Aminov Vali Аминов Вали 63 6 45.0 112.5 14 151.2 462.0

Davlatov Yunus Давлатов Юнус 64 11 243.0 replacement 215 54,155.0 10 764.1 462.0 plot (800m2)

Rahimov Aminjon Рахиомв Аминджон 65 9 440.0 1,100.0 199 102,024.0 47 6,525.0 0.0

Shohimardonov Шохимардонов 66 10 275.0 687.5 83 15,197.0 46 8,272.0 462.0 Olimjon Олимджон

Muzaffarov Umar Музаффаров Умар 67 5 550.0 1,375.0 81 13,312.0 462.0

Rashidov Abduhalim Рашидов 68 10 495.0 1,237.5 61 10,964.0 5 648.8 462.0 Абдухалим

Negmartov Alijon Негматов Алиджон 69 6 640.0 1,600.0 50 6,450.0 96 22,665.0 462.0 109

Yorov Said Еров Саид 70 16 360.0 900.0 489,405.0 37 6,740.0 462.0

Yorova Shamigul Ерова Шамигуль 71 6 360.0 900.0 35 6,930.0 18 5,184.0 462.0

Odinaev Murodali Одинаев Муродали 72 7 312.0 780.0 10 36,088.0 15 3,616.0 462.0

Odinaev Tojiddin Одинаев 73 9 312.0 780.0 85 16,830.0 7 1,696.0 462.0 Тоджиддин

Ustoeva Shahlo Устоева Шахло 74 7 222.0 555.0 25 7,315.0 462.0

Gaafurov Saidhosha 75 2.0 5.0 28 17,360.0

Subtotal: Section 4 Shakhrinav District 6,509.0 13,920.0 530,433.5 373 81,361.6 8,778

Section 4: Tursunzade District

Kholov Isroil Холов Исроил 1 8 61.0 replacement 61 5,600.0 462.0 plot (tbd)

Tojikmatlubot, Тоджикматлубот, 2 8 132.0 330.0 9 500.0 30 500.0 0.0

Huseynov Bakhtiyor Хусейнов Бахтиер 3 4 240.0 600.0 18 500.0 61 1,000.0 0.0

Mirsharipov Mullo Миршарипов 4 8 66.0 165.0 18 1,800.0 462.0 Мулло

Boboev Boborajab Бобоев 5 7 520.0 1,300.0 249 10,900.0 46 2,120.0 462.0 Бобораджаб 110

Bobosaidov Бобосаидов 6 3 160.0 400.0 84 4,200.0 43 1,900.0 0.0 Haitmurod Хаитмурод

Zabirov Tohir Забиров Тохир 7 10 45.0 112.5 50 4,500.0 27 2,500.0 462.0

Muhibulloev Ahmad Мухибуллоев 8 9 46.0 115.0 17 2,300.0 30 2,800.0 462.0 Ахмад

Jumaev Mavjud Джумаев Мавджуд 9 7 30.0 75.0 45 5,100.0 46 4,800.0 0.0

Jalilov Nematullo Джалилов 10 2 64.0 160.0 12 600.0 94 5,000.0 0.0 Нематулло

Ilyasova Zikamo Илясова Зикамо 11 8 52.0 130.0 2 200.0 14 3,300.0 462.0

Ilyasov Nazriddin Илясов Назриддин 12 3 106.0 265.0 19 2,500.0 462.0

Ilyasova Khayriniso Илясова 13 6 53.0 132.5 20 2,400.0 462.0 Хайринисо

Kamolova Khosiyat Камолова Хосият 14 8 100.0 250.0 236 26,400.0 462.0

Kandov Sadridin Кандов Садридин 15 5 108.0 270.0 56 6,800.0 8 550.0 462.0

Zaydulloeva Lutfia Зайдулоева 16 7 290.0 725.0 24 2,900.0 462.0 Лютфия

Karimova Abruniso Кариомва 17 17 125.0 312.5 96 5,300.0 107 6,160.0 462.0 Абдунисо 111

Kamolov Zayniddin Камолов 18 10 45.0 112.5 36 900.0 17 1,400.0 462.0 Зайниддин

Ismatov Huseyn Исматов Хусейн 19 7 60.0 150.0 40 3,500.0 25 500.0 462.0

Ashurov Zarobsho Ашуров Заробшо 20 18 225.0 562.5 24 500.0 7 800.0 462.0

Nurov Muhtado Нуров Мухтадо 21 10 160.0 400.0 68 4,500.0 462.0

Kodirov Kumri Кодиров Кумри 22 7 336.0 840.0 56 1,000.0 462.0

Sherov Abdufatoh Шеров Абдуфатох 23 8 240.0 600.0 88 500.0 0.0

Nazirov Sherali Назиров Шерали 24 3 160.0 400.0 56 600.0 0.0

Mahmudov Tolib Махмудов Толиб 25 8 150.0 375.0 40 600.0 462.0

Obidov Toshmurod Обидов Тошмурод 26 3 63.0 157.5 64 1,200.0 0.0

Sanginov Rajabali Сангинов 27 4 330.0 825.0 36 1,800.0 41 1,800.0 462.0 Раджабали

Rajabov Avazmurod Раджабов 28 6 60.0 150.0 62 600.0 0.0 Авазмурод

Safoev Ahliddin Сафоев Ахлиддин 29 10 63.0 157.5 40 600.0 462.0

Jalolov Umarali Джалолов Умарали 30 7 60.0 150.0 127 10,200.0 6 1,500.0 462.0

Anorov Said Аноров Саид 31 6 70.0 175.0 1328,700.0 10 500.0 0.0 112

Boborajabova Бобораджабова 32 7 20.0 50.0 20 1,800.0 462.0 Khoharkhon Хохархон

Jalolova Adolat Джалолова Адолат 33 3 25.0 62.5 88 5,300.0 20 1,200.0 462.0

Hafizov Abduvohid Хафизов 34 9 35.0 87.5 30 1,800.0 462.0 Абдувохид

Tokhtaeva Yorkinoy Тохтаева Еркиной 35 7 57.5 143.8 86 4,200.0 462.0

Nurov Tolibjon Нуров Толибджон 36 6 38.0 95.0 53 5,250.0 22 1,700.0 0.0

Saidjafarova Саиджафарова 37 7 110.0 275.0 28 1,000.0 462.0 Najofmoh Наджофохмох

Khidirov Akbarali Кидиров Акбарали 38 4 180.0 450.0 90 1,200.0 55 1,200.0 0.0

Boboev Safar Бобоев Сафар 39 14 35.0 87.5 1,700 108 5,500.0 462.0

Jobirov Jomi Джобиров Джоми 40 8 176.0 440.0

Abdulloev Idiboy Абдуллоев Идибой 41 8 68.0 170.0

Komilov Mirzomidin Комилов 42 4 220.0 550.0 178 3,110.0 0.0 Мирзомидин

Nazarov Hotam Назаров Хотам 43 8 176.0 440.0 35 3,500.0 17 3,400.0 0.0

Karomat Каромат 44 1 176.0 440.0 36 1,500.0 0.0 113

Subtotal: Section 4 Tursunzade District 5,536.5 13,688.8 121,150.0 1,645 77,040.0 12,474

C. Households Losing Agricultural Crops on Residential / Commercial Land

The following households have agricultural crops on residential/commercial land. However, their land is to be compensated at the agreed rate for commercial land.

Road Section 2 Name of Head of Household Gissar District Kholov Shamsullo Холов Шамсулло Kholova Kholbibi Холова Холбиби Qobilov Malik Кобилов Малик

D. Households Losing Businesses

Name of Head of Household Business Type Annual Income / Compensation Rate (TJS)

Road Section 2 (Rudaki/Gissar Districts) 1. Davlatov Ibodullo Давлатов Ибодулло Fuel station 68,893 2. Khudoyberdiev Sayfullo Khudoyberdiev Сайфулло Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 3,456 3. Kabirov Zafar Кабиров Зафар Café / Canteen 3,456 114

4. Odinaev Rahmatullo Одинаев Рахматулло Fuel station 71,923 5. Barotov Mavlon Баротов Мавлон Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 3,456 6. Mavlonov Abdurahmon Мавлонов Абдурахмон Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 3,456 7. Abdulloev Sulaymon Абдуллоев Сулаймон Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 15,308 8. Kenjaev Sherali Кенджаев Шерали Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 18,615 9. Kenjaeva Nazokat Кенджаева Назокат Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 3,456 10. Karomatov Hikmatullo Кароматов Хикматулло Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 3,456 11. Karomatov Manuchehr Кароматов Манучехр Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 18,192 12. Shafieva Mavluda Шафиева Мавлюда Fuel station 105,000 Road Section 3 (Gissar/Shakhrinav Districts) 1. Aminov Abdunosir Аминов Абдуносир Spare parts trade 12,000 2. Bobonazarova Gulbahor Бобоназарова Гульбахор Spare parts trade 10,900 3. Sultonova Melikoy Султонова Меликой Café / Canteen 4,800 4. Sobirova Zinatoy Собирова Зинатой Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 1,500 5. Tosheva Ubayda Тошева Убайда Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 8,000 6. Jalilov Abdughani Джалилов Абдугани Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 5,277 7. Rahimova Tuybibi Рахимова Туябиби Pharmacy 5,000 8. Rahimov Bahodur Рахимов Баходур Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 3,200 9. Zoirov Ahliddin Зоиров Ахлиддин Café / Canteen 29,500 10. Mukhtorov Abduali Мукторов Абдулали Butchery 8,000 11. Zubaydov Ubaydullo Зубайдтов Убайдулло Snack food outlet 7,000 Road Section 4 (Shakhrinav/Tursunzade Districts) 1. Sadulloev Chupon Садуллоев Чопон Butchery 6,000 2. Huseynov Saidali Хусейнов Саидали Snack food outlet 7,200 3. Sanginov M Сангинов M Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 5,373 4. Usmonov Azimjon Усмонов Азимжон Spare parts trade 5,000 115

5. Muminov Farrukh Муминов Фаррух Butchery 7,000 6. Rahimova Mastura Рахимова Мастура Café / Canteen 3,000 7. Obidova Umirkhol Обидова Умирхол Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 5,000 8. Kholiqov Hasanjon Холов Хасанжон Café / Canteen 7,300 9. Davlatov Abdujabbor Давлатов Абдуджаббора Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 8,700 10. Barotov Qosim Баротов Косым Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 3,000 11. Qurbonov Ikrom Курбонов Икром Café / Canteen 2,500 12. Ashurov Rajab Ашуров Раджаб Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 4,363 13. Sattorov Ayubjon Сатторов Аюбжон Shop (Food and manufactured goods) 2,581

E. Households and Shops Without Sufficient Remaining Plot and Who will be Provided with Replacement Plot

E1. Shops

Section / Name Ref.No Affected Area Size of Type of business Location and Size of District of the Plot Affected Replacement Plot (m2) Structure (m2) 2 / Rudaki R.Odinaev 1 210 53 Fuel station Adjacent/near the plot 2 / Rudaki D.Barotov 2 52.5 28 Shop (food shop) (specific location and area 2 / Rudaki S.Mavlonova 8 560 100 Shop (auto supply) to be determined based on 2 / Gissar U.Joimahmadov 12 900 12 Shop (food shop) business proposal/ 3 / Gissar A.Sadriddinov 67 176 90 Shop (food shop) requirement) 3 / Shakrinov T.Jalilov 44 126 300 Shop (grocery store) 4 / Shakrinov I.Aminov 58 418 35 Shop (food shop) 4 / Shakrinov U.Davlatov 64 243 6 Shop (household goods) 4 / I. Kholov 1 61 6 Shop (meat stand) Tursunzade

116

E2. Houses

Section / District Name Ref.No Affected Area of Size of Affected Location and Size of Replacement Plot the Plot (m2) Structure (m2) 2 / Gissar Zinnatov Amirshoh 19 140 106.4 800 m2 plot adjacent to remaining portion of the existing plot 2 / Gissar Ibronov Halim 49 72 114.0 800 m2 plot along the highway within 100 m from existing plot 3 / Gissar Mansurov Khursand 71 225 404 800 m2 plot adjacent to remaining portion of the existing plot 3 / Shakhrinav Qaramizoeva Orzu 53 15 36.0 800 m2 plot across the highway within 50m from the existing plot 4 / Shakhrinav Qurbonov Ashur 56 75 84.0 800 m2 plot along the highway within 150 m from the existing plot 4 / Shakhrinav Davlatov Yunus 64 300 74.6 800 m2 plot plot along the highway within 200 m from the existing plot Note: Compensation for structure is based on total area even if the structure is only partially affected.

117

APPENDIX 6: DATA PROVIDED BY THE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIONS DATA ON AGRICULTURAL LAND AND CROP IMPACT

118

Agricultural land / crop impacts Rudaki District

List of affected land users, land area, type of crops and income for 5 years for Choryakkoron jamoat of Rudaki district

# Name of AP Type of land Total Affected Type of Crops per Yield per Yield per Price per Price land land area crops affected hectare affected unit total area (ha) area (kg) area (kg) (TJS) (TJS) (ha) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 Qaraboev Df “Aziz” 2,7 0.10 Lucerne 0,10 1200 12 3.50 420 Sadriddin 2 Egamov Ismoil DF “Bobojon” 2,5 0,10 Lucerne 0,04 1200 48 3.50 420 3 Miraliev Zoir Df “Mirali” 6,0 0,04 Lucerne 0,03 1200 36 3.50 168 4 Kabirov Zafar DF “Ehson” 5,7 0,03 Wheat 0,04 4500 180 0.80 144 5 Naimov Nasrullo DF “Suruf” 0,06 Flax 0,06 252 6 Jobirov Karomat DF “Sobir Jobir” 3 0,05 Potato 0,04 1750 70 1.20 84 Total: Peach 0,01 1040 10.4 5.00 52 7 Davlatov DF “Bobo 1,78 0,03 Lucerne 0,03 1200 36 3.50 126 Sharifboy Sharif” 0,20 1200 240 3.50 840 8 Hojiev Qurbonali DF “Hoji Davlat” 33 0,26 Lucerne 0,26 1200 312 3.50 1,092

9 Asrorov Sharif DF 2 0,04 Lucerne 0,04 1200 48 3.50 168 “Mamadsharif” 10 Najmiddinov DF “Sharifa” 3 0,04 Wheat 0,04 4500 180 0.80 144 Khurshed Grand total: 0,65 0,65 3,910

Chief accountant of the Agricultural Department: Kh.Turaev (signed and stamped) 119

Agricultural land / crop impacts GISSAR DISTRICT

List of affected land users, land area, type of crops and price

List of subsidiary farms (Presidential lands) of Navabod, Gissar district

# Name of AP Type of land Total Affected Type of Crops per Yield per Yield per Price per Price land area land area crop affected hectare affected unit (TJS) total (ha) (ha) area (kg) area (kg) (TJS) 1 Zaidullaeva Anor Presidential 0.10 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 2 Fatulloev Kurbon Presidential 0.10 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 3 Jalilov Salom Presidential 0.10 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 4 Azimov Ismat Presidential 0.10 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 5 Umedov Mirzo Presidential 0.10 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 6 Azimov Nusratullo Presidential 0.08 0.01 Onion 0.01 4000 40 1.0 40 7 Azimov Izatullo Presidential 0.08 0.01 Onion 0.01 4000 40 1.0 40 8 Nozimov Saifullo Presidential 0.08 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 9 Chelonov Khasan Presidential 0.05 0.01 Lucerne 0.01 1200 12 3.50 42 10 Mirov Nasriddin Presidential 0.03 0.01 Lucerne 0.01 1200 12 3.50 42 11 Nosirova Hysniya Presidential 0.03 0.01 Lucerne 0.01 1200 12 3.50 42 12 Maksudov Anor Presidential 0.03 0.01 Lucerne 0.01 1200 12 3.50 42 13 Rajabov Hamza Presidential 0.03 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 14 Eshmahmadov D. Presidential 0.03 0.01 Lucerne 0.01 1200 12 3.50 42 15 Sharipov Rahmon Presidential 0.03 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 16 Hasanov Samad Presidential 0.03 0.01 Lucerne 0.01 1200 12 3.50 42 17 Holov Sulton Presidential 0.03 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 18 Saidov Janon Presidential 0.03 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 19 Dodov Jamolidin Presidential 0.03 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 20 Mahmadnazarov Presidential 0.03 0.01 Wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36 G. 0.20 Total : 764

Head of district land committee Muhtaramov I. (signature)

120

Agricultural land / crop impacts

List of affected Dehkan Farms from Navobod, Gissar district

# Name of AP Type of land Total Affected Type of Crops per Yield per Yield per Price per Price land area land area crop affected area hectare affected unit (TJS) total (ha) (ha) (kg) area (kg) (TJS) 1 Saifiddinova DF Navruz 1.49 0.02 Wheat 0.02 4500 90 0.80 72 Anorgul 2007 2 Sharipova DF Sodikzoda 3.06 0.02 Vineyard 0.02 4500 90 0.80 72 Fatima 3 Masurov Zafar DF ZAfar 2.00 0.02 Wheat 0.02 4500 135 0.80 108 4 Hikmatov DF Mirjalol 2.05 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Oyatullo 5 Sobirov DF Shahboz 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Ziyorat 6 Achilova DF Hukumat 2.05 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Holbibi 7 Nematov DF 1.02 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Nemat Shamsiddin 8 Rahimov DF Tojidin 1.02 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Tojiddin 9 Tabarova Altin DF Altin 1.00 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 10 Usmonova DF Farrukh 1.02 0.02 Wheat 0.02 4500 135 0.80 108 Shahri 11 Jabarova DF Shafoati 2.50 0.02 Wheat 0.02 4500 135 0.80 108 Izatoy 12 Kurbonov DF Nur 2008 1.02 0.02 Wheat 0.02 4500 135 0.80 108 Toshali 13 Saidova DF Said 1.00 0.02 Wheat 0.02 4500 135 0.80 108 Salima 14 Dostieva DF 16 2.03 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Fotima Istikloloyat 15 Rahimova DF Davlatbibi 0.50 0.03 Vegetables 0.03 4000 120 1.00 120 Davlatbib 16 Sharipova G. DF Bahtovar 3.20 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108

121

Agricultural land / crop impacts

# Name of AP Type of land Total Affected Type of Crops per Yield per Yield per Price per Price land area land area crop affected area hectare affected unit (TJS) total (ha) (ha) (kg) area (kg) (TJS) 17 Boeva DF Alimardon 2.05 0.03 Orchard 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Bunavsha 18 Urokov DF Usto 1.00 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Khusein Khusein 19 Boev Zikriyo DF Sharora 1.02 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 20 Kurbonova DF Muhtor 2.03 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Zubaida 21 Solehova DF Faizi 6.00 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Holesa Zammin 2009 22 Ibrohimov Alovidini Ilhom 2.00 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Ilhom 23 DF Haidar 64.54 0.20 Wheat 0.10 onion 4000 400 1.00 400 Mirov 0.04 4000 400 1.00 400 vegetables 0.79 0.06 1200 72 3.50 252 Lucerne Total: 2952

Head of district land committee Muhtaramov I. (signature)

122

Agricultural land / crop impacts

List of affected land users, land area, type of crops and price

List of subsidiary farms (Presidential lands) of Mirzo-Rizo jamoat, Gissar district

# Name of AP Type of land Total Affected Type of Crops per Yield per Yield per Price per Price total land area land area crop affected hectare affected unit (TJS) (TJS) (ha) (ha) area (kg) area (kg) 1 Mansurov Presidential 0.07 0.01 wheat 0.01 4500 45 0.80 36.0 Khurshed 2 Yusupov 0.07 0.01 tomatoes 0.01 1600 160 0.70 112.0 Inoyatullo 3 Ghafurov 0.07 0.01 Potato 0.01 1750 175 1.20 210.0 Bekmurod 4 Saydulloev 0.07 0.01 Tomatoes 0.01 1600 160 0.70 112.0 Bahrullo 5 Hasanov 0.07 0.01 Potato 0.01 1750 175 1.20 210.0 Alimardon Homestead plots 1 Mansurov Homestead 0.12 0.04 Orchard 0.04 4000 160 5.0 800.0 Khursand plot

Head of district land committee Muhtaramov I. (signature)

123

Agricultural land / crop impacts

List of affected Dehkan Farms from Mirzo-Rizo jamoat, Gissar district

# Name of AP Type of land Total Affected Type of Crops per Yield per Yield per Price per Price total land area land area crop affected hectare affected unit (TJS) (TJS) (ha) (ha) area (kg) area (kg) 1 Hikmatova DF “Somon” 3.25 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108.0 Halima 2 Boboev DF “Shahrom” 4.95 0.03 Wheat 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108.0 Abdullo 3 Ahmadov DF “Rohat” 6.3 0.25 0.25 4500 1125 0.80 900 Abdurahim 4 Hamdamov DF “Sarband” 5.0 0.03 0.05 4500 135 0.80 108.0 Akbar 5 Abdulloev DF “Abdullo” 4.09 0.07 0.07 4500 315 0.80 252 Hikm at 6 Mirzoev DF Abubakr 1.80 0.04 0.04 4500 180 0.80 144 Mirzomurod 7 Amonov DF “Amon” 2.07 0.05 0.05 4500 225 0.80 180 Haqrizo 8 Mudinov Nazar DF “Nazar” 5.0 0.10 0.10 4500 450 0.80 360 9 Sharipova DF “Gulnora” 0.91 0.03 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 Gulnora 10 Kholmurodov DF “Shodmon” 4.7 0.08 0.08 4500 360 0.80 288 Rahim 11 Tolibov Ghiyos DF “Mannon” 9.0 0.12 0.12 4500 540 0.80 432 12 Rasulov DF “Barzgar” 0.90 0.03 0.03 4500 135 0.80 108 13 Rahimov DF “Kishmish” 84.0 0.30 vineyard 0.30 5000 1500 1.0 1500 Abdurashid 14 Rahimov DF “Kishmish” 18.0 0.10 Tomatoes 0.10 1600 160 0.70 112 Abdurashid Total: 5716

Head of district Land Committee Muhtaramov I. (signature)

124

Agricultural land / crop impacts

List of affected land users, land area, type of crops and price

# Name of AP Type of land Total Affected Type of Crops per Yield per Yield per Price per Price total land area land area crop affected hectare affected unit (TJS) (TJS) (ha) (ha) area (kg) area (kg) 1 “15 years of LLC 1.30 1.30 Mulberry 178 5.86 1043.08 independence” fruit orchard Cherry 26 45 45 52 2340.00 Trees 149 2 Production Production 1.02 Wheat 4500 45 4590 315.0 cooperative cooperative “Vatan”

Head of district Land Committee Muhtaramov I. (signature)

125

Agricultural land / crop impacts

List of affected land users, land area, type of crops and price

# Name of AP Type of land Total Affected Type of Crops per Yield per Yield per Price per Price land area land area crop affected hectare affected unit (TJS) total (ha) (ha) area (kg) area (kg) (TJS) 1 Akobirov S. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 90 0.30 45.60 2 Fozilov A. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 160 0.94 150.0 3 Yahyoev Q. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 175 0.78 136.0 4 Melikov A. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 152 1.13 175.0 5 Ghiyosova M. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 160 0.94 150.0 6 Sharipova S. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 172 0.90 160.0 7 Imomov M. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 180 1.00 175.0 8 Kazakova M. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 120 1.50 180.0 9 Emomova I. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 100 1.60 164.0 10 Solihov N. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 175 1.00 170.0 11 Rahmonov A. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 140 0.90 135.0 12 Ashurov S. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 170 1.00 185.0 13 Saidkholov A. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 175 1.10 191.0 14 Ashurov H. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 160 0.80 134.0 15 Nematov Q. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 172 0.80 150.0 16 Zabirov Z. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 190 0.80 162.0 17 Ibrohimov I. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 190 0.90 172.0 18 Ashurov Sh. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 180 0.90 170.0 19 Ihronov Z. Presidential 0.06 0.01 vegetables 0.01 190 0.90 170.0 22.0 1 Kholov Sh. Homestead 0.12 0.01 Vegetables 0.01 80 22.00 102.0 plot 2 Kholova Kh. Homestead 0.14 85sqm Vegetables 85sqm 200 1.80 360.0 plot 3 Qobilov Homestead 0.09 70sqm Vegetables 70sqm 180 1.45 262.0 plot Total: 3698

Head of district Land Committee Muhtaramov I. (signature)

126

Agricultural land / crop impacts SHAKHRINAV DISTRICT

Area of affected land plots of the land users in Chuzi jamoat

# Name of land user Type of land Total area of Type of crops Annual market Five year price users (dehkan affected land price (TJS) farms) plots (ha) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1. Barakatulloi Marufkhuja Barakatullo 0.10 Orchard 280 2. Kamolov F. Somoniyon-1100 0.80 Wheat 2072 3. Salimov Shahobiddin Navruz 0.17 Wheat 440 4. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.50 Wheat 1295 5. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.05 Wheat 130 6. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.26 Wheat 673 7. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.09 Orchard 252 8. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.10 Wheat 259 9. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.10 Vineyard 280 10. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.17 Orchard 476 11. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.04 Wheat 104 12. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.20 Orchard 560 13. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.03 Wheat 78 14. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.18 Orchard 504 15. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.30 Wheat 777 16. Salimov Sh. Navruz 0.50 Orchard 1400 17. Soliev A. Soleh-2007 0.10 Wheat 259 18. Sharipov T. Firdavs 0.50 Wheat 1295 Total 4.19 11134

127

Agricultural land / crop impacts

Area of affected land plots of the land users in Selbur jamoat

# Name of land user Type of land Total area of Type of crops Annual market Five year price users (dehkan affected land price (TJS) farms) plots (ha) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1. Zokirov Kh. Bahromiyon 0.06 Wheat 154 2. Davlatov A. Khuja 0.04 Orchard 112 3. Isoeva M. Isozoda 0.05 Wheat 129 4. Hikmatov A. Qiyomiddin 0.09 Wheat 233 5. Ministry of defense of the RT College of the 0.09 Wheat 233 Ministry of Defense of RT 6. Karomatov U. Michurin 0.09 Orchard 252 7. Ochildiev H. Hokim 0.05 Wheat 130 8. Eshonqulova Z. Eshonqul 0.02 Wheat 52 9. Mahmadov S. Hikmat 0.06 Wheat 154 10. Subsidiary farm 0.18 Wheat 466 11. Bobokhonov U. Ravshan-32 0.30 Wheat 777 12. Komilova S. Gulkhumor 0.03 Onion 374 13. Karimov N. Najmiddin 0.10 Wheat 259 14. Taghoymurodov H. Taghoymurod 0.08 Wheat 207 15. Karimov N. Otqamoq 0.08 Wheat 207 16. Ortiqova M. Zarina 0.10 Wheat 259 Total: 1.42 3998

128

Agricultural land / crop impacts

Area of affected land plots of the land users in Sabo jamoat

# Name of land user Type of land Total area of Type of crops Annual market Five year price users (dehkan affected land price (TJS) farms) plots (ha) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1. Ayubov N.N. Pushtimiyona 0.37 Wheat 958 2. Mahmudova L. Laylo-2009 0.10 Orchard 280 3. Ayubov N.N. Pushtimiyona 0.50 Wheat 1295 4. Tursunov A. Kishtgardon 0.04 Orchard 112 5. Ochildiev S. Saydali 0.07 Wheat 181 6. Ayubov N.N. Pushtimiyona 0.45 Wheat 1166 7. Tilloev Sh. Zayniddin 0.50 Wheat 1295 8. Ayubov N.N. Pushtimiyona 0.30 Wheat 777 9. Ayubov N.N. Pushtimiyona 0.45 Wheat 1166 Total: 2.78 7230

Deputy District Chairman A. Fattohov Head of District Agricultural Department D. Pirov Head of District Land Committee M. Ghayratova District Chief Agronomist R. Rahimov

129

Agricultural land / crop impacts TURSUNZADE DISTRICT

Address Name of land user Arable 0.8 d – 2 – 25 Wheat Rice 1 year 5 land 35centner centner TJS TJS years Sqm wheat Rice Yangi-ariq Rajabova Khumor 336 120 84 96 168 264 1320 Sattorov Ismat 448 160 112 128 224352 1760 Muzaffarov Buri 252 88 63 70.4 126196.4 982 Muzaffarov Nabi 196 69 49 55.2 98153.2 766766 Zabirov Tohir 283 100 71 80 142222 1110 Yangi-ariq Khojaev Fazliddin 500 175 125 140 250 390 1950 Askari Surkh Rajabov Daler 168 59 42 47.2 84 131.2 656 Muminov MAlik 240 84 60 67.2 120187.2 936 Mardonov Ashur 240 84 60 67.2 120187.2 936 Rajabov Avaz 372 130 93 104 186290 1450 Kirov Mirzoev Alijon 760 266 190 212.8 380 592.8 2964 Boboev Safar 550 193 136 154.4 272426.4 2130 Abdulloev Uroq 320 112 80 89.6 160249.6 1248 Otaboev Ahtam 500 175 125 140 250390 1950 Buriev Sulton 240 84 60 67.2 120187.2 936 Buriev Mamatqul 260 91 65 72.8 130202.8 1014 Khollov Mingtut 200 70 50 56 100156 780 Haytaliev Sayfi 320 112 80 89.6 160249.6 1248 Jabborov Karim 500 175 125 140 250390 1950 Mamirov Ravshan 7472 5678 Saidmurodov Ali 18 14 Akhmedov Khurshed 2340 1778 Huseynov Qodirjon 2820 2143 Madrahimov Murod 210 160 Sodiqova Tojikhon 900 684 Taghoeva Momokhol 300 228

Yangi-ariq Sanginov Rajabali (DF “Dusti”) 5810 2033.5 1452.5 1626.8 2905 4531 22655

130

Agricultural land / crop impacts

Address Name of land user Arable 0.8 d – 2 – 25 Wheat Rice 1 year 5 land 35centner centner TJS TJS years Sqm wheat Rice Kirov Sanginov Rajabali (DF “Dusti”) 300 105 75 84 150 234 1170 Kommuna Sanginov Rajabali (DF “Dusti”) 2880 1010.8 720 808.6 1440 2248.6 11243 Sanginov Rajabali (DF “Dusti”) 2520 882 630 605.6 1260 1965.6 9828 Kirov Sanginov Rajabali (DF “Dusti”) 1800 630 450 504 900 1404 7020 Yangi-ariq Abdulhaitov Hakim (DF 490 171.5 122.5 137.2 245328.2 1911 “Hokimbobo”) Zabirov Tohir (DF “Zabir”) 1120 392 280 313.6 560 873.6 4368 Kirov Boboev Khurshed (DF “Rustambek”) 3000 1050 750 840 1500 1590 7950 Ashurov Subhon (DF “Valijon 5124 1793.4 1287 1434.7 25623996.7 19984 Ashurov”) Sayfulloeva Rayhon (DF “Amro”) 1800 630 450 504 900 1404 7020 Hikmatov (DF “Bahor – 2005”) 2600 910 650 728 1300 2028 10140

131

DATA ON AFFECTED STRUCTURES

ROAD SECTION 2: RUDAKI DISTRICT

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Odinaev 1 Fuel station C/blocks 11.8x4.5x3=173m3 290.17 82,698.00 Rahmatullo (inclusive Shed C/blocks 13x7.7=101.1m2 of all structures) Tank Metal 8x5x2=89m3 Wall Concrete 16.6x1.0x0.3=11m3 Barotov 2 Wall Brick 12x2.5x0.4=12m3 65.94 791.00 Davlatmurod Gate Timber 4.0x2.5=10m2 34.87 349.00 Barotov Suhrob 3 Shop C/blocks 7x4.4x3.1=95m3 56.70 5,385.00 Concrete area Concrete 5.1x1.3=606m2 12.50 83.00

Mahmadov 4 Barn Brick 13x5x3=195m3 35.04 6,832.00 Hasan Wall Brick 4x2.0x0.4=32m3 65.98 2,111.00 Gate Metal 4.0x2.25=9m2 72.50 652.00 Hamdamov 5 Garage Brick 8.95x4.6x3 32.38 3,999.30 Aslan =123.51m3 Shed 4.5x1.9=8.9m2 36.66 326.00 Shop Brick 4.1x3.85x3=47m3 35.04 1,646.00 Wall Brick 4x2.5x0.2= 2m3 65.98 131.96 Gate Metal 3.6x3.0=10.8m2 72.50 783.00 Komilov Egam 6 House Brick 6.4x4x2.4=74m3 80.37 5,947.00 Shed Brick 6.4x3.5=22.7m2 36.66 832.00 Bath C/blocks 7.2x5x2.1=75m3 48.80 3,660.00 Kitchen C/blocks 7.2x4x2.7=77m3 45.53 3,506.00 Barn C/blocks 7.2x3x2.7=72m3 35.04 2,524.00 Gate Metal 2.0x2.0=4.0m2 72.50 289.00 Wall C/blocks 28x2.0x0.3=16.8m3 104.46 1,755.00 Kenjaev 7 Barn Brick 11x7.3x2.8=224m3 35.04 7,845.00 Tavarali Bathe Brick 3.5x3x2.5=26m3 48.80 1,267.00 Shed Brick 9.15x3.4=31.1m2 36.60 1,140.00 Toilet Brick 3.5x2.55x2.5=22m3 27.27 600.00 Barn Brick 7.75x2.15x2.5=41m3 35.04 1,436.00 Wall Brick 14.45x2.2x0.3=95m3 65.98 6,265.00

132

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Mavlonova 8 Shop and Brick and c/blocks 15.1x6.4x5.6=541m3 56.70 30,675.00 Safargul house Shed C/blocks 5.6x4.5=25.2m2 36.66 923.00 Wall 28x0.25x2.2=15.4m3 104.46 1,609.00 Mavlonov 9 Shop Brick 8.2x5x2.6=107m3 56.70 6,067.00 Abdurahmon Abdulloev 10 Shop C/blocks 11.6x6.5x3.5=264m3 56.70 14,970.00 Sulaymon Barn C/blocks 10.6x3.5x3.0=111m3 35.04 3,889.00 Concrete area Concrete 17x13+1x3.5+

13.3x3.0=65.5m2 12.50 819.00 Traffic police 11 Post building Brick 9.8x5.5+3.6x1.65 x post 2 6.8=386m3

Kenjaev Sherali 12 Shop wall C/blocks 17x0.4x2.4=16.3m3 104.46 1,703.00 Kenjaeva 13 Shop C/blocks 20x6.0x3.8=456m3 56.70 25,856.00 Nazokat Karomatov 14 Guards room C/blocks 3.9x3.0x7.8=33m3 26.69 4,219.70 Manuchehr Shop-shed C/blocks 25.5x6.2 = 158.1 48.99 7,173.00 Wall C/blocks 14.7x0.2x3=8m3 104.26 836.00 Wall RFC 25.5x0.1x2.5=5m3 104.00 521.00 Gate Metal 4.2x3.0=126m2 72.50 913.00 Karomatov 15 Shop C/blocks 11.2x6.35x4=284m2 56.70 16,102.00 Hikmatullo Ashurov 16 Wall C/blocks 18.0x0.4x2=14m3 104.46 1,462.00 Izzatullo Gate Metal 4.0x2.5=10m3 72.50 725.00 Subhonov 17 Shop Brick 5x3.5x2.5=44m3 56.70 2,495.00 Nematullo Gate Metal 4.5x2.6=11.7m2 72.50 842.00 Wall C/blocks 23.5x0.4x1.6=15m3 104.46 1,567.00 Sharipov 18 Wall C/blocks 12.5x0.2x1.7=42m3 104.46 444.00 Toshmurod Gate Metal 4.6x3.0=13.8m2 72.50 1,000.00 Sharipov 19 Shop Brick 3.8x2.7x2.8=27m3 56.70 1,674.00 Normurod Wall Brick 6.4x0.4x2=5m3 65.98 330.00 Gate Metal 4.0x2.5=10m2 72.50 725.00 Majitov (Head 20 Wire net Metal 48x1.0=48m2 5.65 270.00 of mosque)

133

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Miraliev Homid 21 Wire net Metal 68x1.5=102 5.65 577.00 Khudoyberdiev 22 Shop C/blocks 12.4x9.2+28.8x5.8x 56.70 55,796.00 Sayfullo 3.5=984m3 Wall C/blocks 65.5x6.2x2.5=32.8 104.48 3,427.00 Gate Metal 4.3x2.5=10.7m2 72.50 775.00 Concrete area 100m2 12.50 1,248.00

Usmonov 23 Cattle shed Brick 4.25x3.3x2.5=35m3 20.25 708.00 Bobokalon Wall Brick 34x2.5x0.3=25.7m3 104.46 2,685.00 Gate Metal 4.3x2.5=10.7m2 72.50 776.00 Khudoyberdiev 24 Wall Metal 17.0x2.5=42.5m2 5.55 236.00 Khayrullo Gate Metal 4.5x2.5=11.3m2 72.50 817.00 Khudoyberdiev 25 Shed C/block 7.6x4.6=35m2 36.66 1,283.00 Abdurahmon Wall metal 29.4x2.5=73.5m2 5.55 408.00 Gate Metal 4.6x3.0=13.8m2 72.50 1,000.00 Egamov Ismoil 26 Wire net Metal 105x1.5=157.5m2 5.65 892.00 Bobonazarov 27 Wall C/blocks 4.0x2.0x0.25= 2m3 104.46 209.00 Allohnazar Tree 3 pcs 25.00 75.00 Buzbalov 28 Shed Wooden 15.7x3.7 = 50.1m2 36.66 1,837.00 Fayzullo Abrorov 29 Tea house C/blocks 35x3.6=126m3 83.20 10,485.00 Saykhuja Barn Brick 9.1x4.1x3=111m3 35.00 3,889.00 Wall C/blocks 5.8x6x0.2=11.7m3 104.46 1,223.00 Pool Concrete 6.7x3.5=23.4m2 84.60 1,980.00 Wire net Metal 123.7x1.5=185.5m2 5.65 1,050.00 Yorov 30 Wall Brick 23x2x0.3=14m3 65.98 923.00 Sultonmurod Boev Gulmurod 31 Cattle shed Brick 10x4.5x4.5=202m3 20.25 4,091.00 Wire net Metal 30x1.5=45m2 5.65 255.00 Madumarov 32 Wall concrete 204.8x0.25+51.2x 35.30 814.00 Solehjon border 0.45=23m3 Davlatov 33 Wire net metal 55x1.5=82.5m2 5.65 469.00 Abdusalom Naimov 34 Wire net metal 18x1.2=21.6m2 5.65 124.00 Habibullo Amirshoeva 35 House Brick 9.5x6.95x3=198m3 71.80 14,228.00 Ruqiyamoh Kitchen C/blocks 4.5x3x24=32m3 41.40 1,328.00

134

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Barn C/blocks 6.5x4.5x2.4=70m3 35.04 2,453.00 Bath C/blocks 4.5x2.8x2.4=30m3 45.53 1,366.00 Toilet C/blocks 4.5x3.4x2.4=37m3 14.50 540.00 Cherry tree tree 7 pcs Odinaeva 36 House Brick 117.5x5.6=355 156.04 55,395.00 Gulchehra Shed 6.6x2.9=19.1 36.66 700.00 Suppl/room Brick 6.6x2.9x2.8=54 39.86 2,152.00 Cattle shed Brick 17.9x5x2.6=232 20.25 4,695.00 Shed 16.5x4=66 36.66 2,419.00 Cherry tree Tree 4 pcs Azizova 37 Wire net Metal 68x1.5=102 5.65 577.00 Qurbongul Cherry tree Tree 2 pcs Davlatov Murod 38 Workshop C/blocks 13.7x4.4=60.3 44.02 8,497.00 Estacada Concrete 11.2x0.7x2=15.7 78.58 1,234.00 SUBTOTAL: ROAD SECTION 2 - RUDAKI DISTRICT 464,703.96

ROAD SECTION 2: GISSAR DISTRICT Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Kholov 1 Wire net Metal 57.6x1.3=74.9 5.87 439.66 Shamsullo Kholova 2 Wall Clay 8.5x2.5x0.4=8.5 48.40 411.40 Kholbibi Gate Metal 5.0x2.5=12.5 73.92 924.00 Zinnatov 3 Wire net Metal 48.0x1.5=72 5.87 422.64 Muboraksho Olimov Mirali 4 Kitchen Brick 6.0x4.5x2.5=67.5 45.57 3,098.76 Shed Cement 4.5x3.0=13.5 25.72 347.22 Shed 4.5x3.0=13.5 25.72 347.22 Basement Concrete 4.5x4.5x2.5=50.6 39.49 1,998.19 Qobilov 5 Barn/farm Clay 5.4x4x2.1=45.4 29.97 1,360.68 Abdusamad house Barn/farm Clay 4.0x2.3x2.1=19.3 29.97 569.43 house Shed Clay 6.3x4.0=25.2 25.72 648.14 Cattle shed Clay 6.7x4.5x4.0=121 20.25 2,450.25 Wall Metal 26.4x2.1x0.4=22 48.40 1,064.80 Gate 5.0x2.4=12 73.92 887.04 Qobilov Malik 6 Cattle shed Clay 7.5x5x5=187.5 20.25 3,807.00

135

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Shed 6.3x3.1=19.5 25.72 501.54 Wall Clay 16.0x2.5x0.4=16 48.40 774.40 Zayniddinov 7 Wire net Metal 67.4x2.0=-134.8 5.87 791.28 Hasan Wall Clay 7.3x0.35x2.1=5.4 48.40 261.36 Rahimov Tesha 8 Wire net Metal 30.7x1.5=46 5.87 270.02 Naimov Said 9 Shed Clay 14.0x3.6=50.4 43.95 2,215.08 Wire net Metal 60.0x1.5=90 5.87 528.30 “Gisar” 10 Shed Metal 3,422 tons 8.64. 29,579.00 Barn/ Cement 8.0x4.0x2.5=80 31.39 2,511.20 Rahimov 11 Shed Cement Concrete 8.0x4.0=32 49.01 1,568.32 Handullo Wall 15.0x2.5x0.12=4.5 51.44 231.48 Jonmahmadov 12 Shop Cem/blocks 9.4x5.2x3=146.6 231.50 34,030.50 Ubayd Barn Cem/blocks 8.8x3.9x3=103 27.75 2,858.25 Gate Metal 4.7x2.2=10.3 73.92 761.38 Wall Cem/blocks 5.1x0.2x2.2=2.2 51.44 113.17 Ismoilov Nemat 13 Shop (incom- Clay 10.0x7x3.5=245 153.43 37,590.35 plete) Wall Cem/blocks 35x2.5x0.2=17.5 51.44 900.20 Nazarov 14 Part of the tea Clay 12.55x6.0x5=376.5 153.43 57,843.11 Tojiddin house building Azizov Umarali 15 Vet/chemistry Clay 8.2x3.5x3.4=97.6 153.43 15,036.14 Shed Clay 9.0+87 2 x4=35.4 25.72 910.49 Wall Metal 21.0x2.3x0.3=14.5 48.40 701.80 Gate Metal 4.5x2.5=11.2 73.92 827.90 Fence 36.1x1.0=36.1 5.87 211.91 Qodirov 16 Gate Metal 5.1x3.5=17.9 73.92 1,300.99 Razzoq Wall Cem/blocks 81.8x3.2x0.2=52.4 51.44 2,695.46 Qodirov 17 Workshop Bricks 10.2x4x2.65=108 169.90 18,349.20 Razzoq Shed 7.2x2.4=17.3 25.72 444.96 Qodirov 18 Shop Bricks 11.x9.0x3=297 153.43 45,568.71 Abdusattor Zinnatov 19 House Brick 9.5x4x2.8=106.4 169.90 18,009.40 Amirshoh Wall Brick 7.0x2.3x0.4=6.4 104.49 626.94 Gate Metal 3.5x2.3=8 73.92 591.36 Mahmadov 20 Wire net Metal 20.0x1.8=36 3.88 139.68 Yoqub Mirzoeva 21 Wall Clay 31.0x2.1x0.4=26 48.40 1,200.32 Saybibi

136

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Raupov 22 Wire net Metal 16.2x1.5=24.3 5.87 142.64 Abdurahmon Rauov 23 Wire net Metal 23.5x1.5=35.3 5.87 207.21 Abdusattor Gate Metal 4.5x2.3=10.4 73.92 768.77 Qanoatov 24 Barn C/blocks 5.0x2.5x3.2=40 31.39 1,255.60 Shafoat Kitchen C/blocks 5.0x3.5x3.2=56 45.57 2,551.92 Wall C/blocks 25.3x3.2x0.25=20.2 51.44 1,039.09 Gate Metal 3.0x2.5=7.5 73.92 554.40 Ibodob 25 Wire net Metal 31.8x1.5=47.7 5.87 279.99 Nematullo Mirova Rafoat 26 Barn C/blocks 11.0x3.0x2.6=86 27.75 2,386.50 Wall Clay 19x0.35x2.5=16.6 48.40 803.44 Gate Metal 3.3x2.3=7.6 73.92 561.79 Sherov Sherali 27 House Clay 7.0x7.0x3.5=172 153.43 26,389.96

Basement Concrete 4.0x2.5x2.0=20 39.49 789.80 Wall Clay 9.0x2.2x0.4=7.9 48.40 382.36 Gate Metal 4.0x2.2=8.8 73.92 650.49 Sherov Amirali 28 House Clay 16.0x7.0x3.5=392 153.43 60,144.56

Basement Concrete 7.0x4.1x2.5=72 39.49 2,843.28 Wall Clay 7.0x2.5x0.5=9 48.40 435.60 Sherov 29 House Clay 9.0x4.5x3.5=142 153.43 21,787.06 Mirzojon Barn Clay 7.0x4.0x3.5=98 27.75 2,719.50 Sherov Umed 30 House Clay 11.0x4.5x3.0=149 153.43 22,861.07 Saidov Akram 31 Cattle shed Clay 8.1x4.5x3.0=109.3 20.25 2,,065.5 Wall C/blocks 40.5x0.25x2=20.2 51.44 1,039.09 Gate Metal 3.5x2.0=7.0 73.92 517.44 Latipov 32 House Clay 6.6x3.65x2.3=55 153.43 8,438.65 Rahmatullo Kitchen Clay 4.4x3.65x2.3=37 45.57 1,686.09 Bathroom Clay 3.65x2.3x2.3=19 48.81 927.39 Toilet Clay 4.4x3.5x3.5=54 11.54 623.16 Wall Clay 6.3x2.3x0.35=5 48.40 242.00 Gate Metal 3.2x2.20=7 73.92 517.44 Yatimov 33 Barn Clay 5.1x3.7x3.1=59 27.75 1,637.25 Abdullo Shed 3.7x3.7x13.7 =187.6 25.72 4,825.07 Wall Clay 18.0x0.3x2.2=12 48.40 580.80 Gate Metal 3.0x2.4=7.2 73.92 532.22 Buriev Haytali 34 Wall Clay 27.0x0.4x2.7=29.2 48.40 1,413.28

137

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Gate Metal 6.0x2.7=16.2 73.92 1,197.50 Sattorov 35 Barn Clay 20.8x3.5+2.0x1.5+ 27.75 6,410.25 Huseyn 1.5x1.5=231 Sattorov 36 Shop C/blocks 4.7x4.6x3.4=74 231.50 17,131.00 Shamsiddin Gate Metal 3.8x2.2=8.4 73.92 620.93 Olimov Rasul 37 Cattle shed Bricks 8.2x5.2x3.9=166 20.25 3,361.50 Wall Bricks 46.7x0.3x2.1=29 104.49 3,030.21 Gate Metal 3.5x2.1=7.4 73.92 547.01 Safarov Mutair 38 Wall Clay 28.5x0.2x2.0=11.4 48.40 551.76 Gate Metal 4.0x2.0=8.0 73.92 591.36 Safarov 39 Barn Clay 4.0x3.5x2.2=31 27.75 860.25 Mashrab Door Metal 1.0x2.0=2 28.96 57.92 Wall Clay 28.5x0.3x1.7=14.5 48.40 701.80 Sharipov 40 Barn Clay 5.0x4.0x2.4=48 27.75 1,332.00 Sunnat Wall Clay 31.8x0.3x2.0=19 48.40 919.60 Sharipov 41 Barn Clay 6.7x4.5x3.0=90 27.75 2,497.50 Habibullo Bathe Clay 4.5x3.5x2.1=33 48.81 1,610.73 Gate Metal 3.5x2.0=7.0 73.92 517.44 Wall Clay 1.5x0.3x2.0=0.9 48.40 43.56 Isoev Sadriddin 42 Wire net Metal 59.4x1.6=95.0 5.87 557.65 Saidov Rizo 43 Wall C/blocks 18.0x0.2x2.0=7.2 51.43 370.30 Nabiev 44 Gate Metal 6.5x1.5=9.8 73.91 724.32 Shohiardon Gate Metal 18.0x0.12x1.5=3.2 51.43 164.58 Wire net Metal 10.0x1.5=15.0 5.87 88.05 Imomov Nazar 45 Shed 9.0+8.0 43.94 2,763.00 2 X74=62.9 Wall Clay 4.0x0.4x2.7=43 48.40 2,081.20 Bobiev Zafar 46 Shed 14.6x10.0 per ton 8,644.00 10,843.00 Wall Concrete 38.4x0.4x2.2=34 51.43 1,748.62 Donaeva 47 House Brick 9.0x4.75x3.1=133 169.90 22,596.70 Zebogul Shed 2.6x2=5.2 13.57 70.56 Shed 8.7x5.3=46.1 43.94 2,025.63 Cattle shed Clay 5.3x4.1x3.4=74 20.25 1,498.50 Ibronov Hakim 48 Wall Clay 5.30x0.3x1.6=2.6 48.40 125.84 Door Metal 0.9x1.6=1.4 28.96 40.54 Ibronov Halim 49 House Clay 7.0x5.1x3.2=114 153.43 17,491.02 Add/structure Clay 2.1x1.9x2.9=12 153.43 1,841.16

Kitchen Clay 6.6x3.3x2.1=46 45.56 2,095.76

138

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Bathe Clay 3.3x3.0x2.1=21 48.80 1,024.80 Door Timber 0.90x2.0=1.8 28.96 52.13 Wall Clay blocks 5.60x0.2x2.0=2.2 48.40 108.42 Sayfiddinov 50 Barn C/blocks 7.2x4.7x3.0=101 31.39 3,170.39 Muminjon Shop C/blocks 6.5x3.0x3.0=59 231.50 13,658.50 Shed 7.2x3.3=23.8 25.72 612.14 Gate Metal 4.7x3.0=14.1 73.91 1,042.13 Khudoynazarov 51 Wire net Metal 10.0X1.5=15.0 5.87 88.05 Yunus Norova Qumri 52 Barn Clay 5.5x4.0x2.4=53 27.74 1,470.22 Shed 6.0x5.5=33.0 25.72 848.76 Wire net 30.0x1.5=45.0 5.87 264.15

SUBTOTAL: ROAD SECTION 2 - GISSAR DISTRICT 602,703.96

ROAD SECTION 3: GISSAR DISTRICT Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Rajabov 53 Fence Metal 35.0x0.50=17.5 5.87 102.73 Sadriddin Qurbonov 54 Wire net Metal 36.0x1.5=54.0 102.73 316.98 Abdusalom Shodmonova 55 Barn C/blocks 3.85x3.8x2.9=42 28.96 1,216.32 Zaynura Kitchen C/blocks 5.0x3.8x2.9=55 45.56 2,505.80 Bathe C/blocks 3.8x2.5x1.9=18.05 48.80 880.84 Bathe Concrete 3.45x2.2x2.0=15 48.80 732.00 Kitchen C/blocks 4.75x3.45x2.5=41 45.56 1,867.96 Wall Clay block 3.9x0.3x2.0=2.3 51.43 118.29 Wall RFC 3.0x0.15x2.0=0.9 51.43 46.29 Wall Clay block 18.6x0.2x2.0=7.4 48.40 358.16 Wall Timber 24.4x1.6=39.0 16.60 647.40 Nematov 56 House Clay 16.5x5.6x3.0=277 153.43 42,500.11 Karomat Supplem/ Clay 9.6x5.6x3.0=161 29.97 4,825.00 structure Shed Timber 13.5x2.3x3.0=93.15 39.89 3,715.75 Shed Timber 5.25x2.1x3.0=33 39.89 1,316.37 Guest house Clay 6.3x3.7x3.0=70 48.49 3,394.30 Barn Clay 4.1x3.0x3.0=37 29.97 1,108.89 Bathe Clay 6.4x3.0x2.6=50 48.80 2,440.00 Barn Clay 5.0x4.0x3.0=60 300.37 18,022.20

139

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Cattle shed Clay 16.8x4.2x3.0=212 20.25 4,293.00 Shed 4.2x3.4=14.2 25.72 365.22 Miraliev B 57 Workshop Clay block 6.0x4.0x2.5=60 153.43 9,205.80 Kenjaev A 58 Wall Clay block 44.0x0.3x2.0=30 51.43 1,542.90 Gate with door Metal 5.0x2.5=12.5 71.89 898.63 Rahimov A 59 Wall Concrete 44x2.0x0.25 = 51.43 20.55 1,056.89 Gate Metal 5.0x2.5 =13.5 25.72 347.22 Boboev A 60 Wall Clay 10.5x6.5x3.0= 205 20.25 4,151.25 Shed Clay 6.0x4.0=24 25.72 617.28 Wall RFC 4.0x0.3x2.0=2.4 51.43 123.43 Kabirov F 61 Barn Clay 5.0x3.0x3.0=45 27.74 1,248.30 Homidov S 62 Shop Clay block 18.5x5.0x65=601 153.43 92,211.43 Wall Clay block 15.2x0.3x2.5=11 51.43 565.73 Saidov S 63 Shed Clay 16.0x3.0=48 25.72 1,234.56 Huseynov S 64 Shed Clay 20.0x4.0=80 25.72 2,057.60 Boev Kh 65 Shed Clay 4.0x3.5=14 25.72 360.08 Gate Metal 5.0x2.5=12.5 71.89 898.63 Wall Clay block 32x0.3x2.5=24 51.43 1,234.32 Traffic police 66 Post premises Brick 9.0x5.0x6.0=270 post #27 Shed Brick 6.0x5.0=30 Sadriddinov A 67 Shop Clay block 18.0x5.0x3.0=270 153.43 41,426.10 Shed Clay block 18.0x3.2=57.6 25.72 1,481.47 Oromgohov 68 Wall C/blocks 118.0x0.3x2.0=71 51.43 3,651.53 Haydar Mirov 69 Farm House Brick 41.0x10.0x5.0=2,050 169.90 348,295.00 Farm Shed Brick 9.0x7.0=63 25.72 1,620.36 Iskandarov 70 Wall C/blocks 20.0x0.3x2.5=15 51.43 771.45 Gate with door Metal 4.0x2.5=10 71.89 718.90

Mansurov 71 House Clay 19.0x5.6x3.8=404 153.43 61,985.72 Khursand Barn Clay 7.5x5.6x3.5=147 27.74 4,077.78 Kitchen Clay 7.0x4.0x3.0=84 45.56 3,827.04 Aliev S 72 Shop Brick 26.0x4.0x6.0=624 169.90 106,017.60 Sadulloev M 73 Wall C/blocks 6.0x0.3x2.5=4.5 51.43 231.44 Gate Metal 4.0x2.5=10 71.89 718.90 Sattorov I 74 Fence Metal 24.0x1.0=24 5.87 140.88 Hakimov A 75 Cattle shed Clay 4.0x3.5x4=56 20.25 1,134.00 Toilet Clay 4.0x3.0x2.5=30 16.50 495.00 Wall C/blocks 13.0x0.15x2.0=4 51.43 205.72

140

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Gate with door Metal 5.0x2.5=12.5 71.89 898.63 Qurbonov A 76 Shop Clay 6.0x5.0x3.0=90 153.43 13,808.70 Wall C/blocks 4.0x0.3x2.5=3 51.43 154.29 Gate with door Metal 5.0x2.5=12.5 71.89 898.63

Sadulloev 77 Shop Brick 15x7x3.0=332 169.90 56,406.80 Workshop Brick 3.0x7x3.5=735 169.90 124,876.50 Wall C/blocks 53x0.3x1.5=24 51.43 1,234.32 Gate Metal 5.0x2.5=12.5 71.89 898.63 Bobomurodov 78 Fence Metal 60.0x1.5=90 5.87 528.30 SUBTOTAL: ROAD SECTION 3 - GISSAR DISTRICT 985,031.32

ROAD SECTION 3: SHAKHRINAV DISTRICT Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Nasriddinov 1 Fuel station Concrete 18x0.15x0.5=1.35m3 360.00 486.00 Zulfiqor (border)

Vahobov 2 Fence Armature 21x2.5=52.5m2 10.00 525.00 Abdullo Ibodov 3 Eatery (border) Concrete 55x0.25x0.15=2.06m3 360.00 741.60 Nematullo Mihtojev 4 Vehicle repair Wire net 70x1.5=105m2 10.00 1,050.00 workshop (border) Hakimov Toshir 5 Cattle shed Clay, RFC 12x4 = 48m2 198.00 9,504.00

Barn/farm Clay, clay block 24x4 = 96m2 198.00 19,008.00 house Juraev Zikrullo 6 Retaining wall Concrete 56x0.3x1.4=24m3 320.00 7,680.00

Shed Metal 4x4=16m2 129.00 2,064.00 Mirzoev 7 Fence Wire net 36x1.5=54m2 10.00 540.00 Rustam Shed Timber, pipes 4x6=24m2 129.00 3,096.00 Barn Clay, concrete 8x3 = 24m2 198.00 4,752.00 Mavlonov 8 Fence Wire net 48x1.5=72m2 10.00 720.00 Doniyor Boboev 9 Fence Wire net 42x1.5=63m2 10.00 630.00 Nurmahmad Alimardonov 10 Fence Wire net 36x2=72m2 10.00 720.00 Bahodur

141

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Salimov 11 Fence Wire net 2x1.5=3m2 10.00 30.00 Muzaffar Kamolov 12 Shed Timber 5x4=20m2 129.00 2,580.00 Fakhriddin Nematov Rajab 13 Fence Wire net 64x1.2=76.8m2 10.00 768.00 Qaraev Tohir 14 Banner Metal 34x0.4x2=2.7m3 360.00 972.00 Muhiddinova 15 Hospital wall Cement blocks 58x0.2x1.6=18.6m3 385.00 7,161.00 Mohira (governmental) Barotov Qosim 16 Shop Cement blocks 8x6 = 48m2 390.00 18,720.00 (tajikmatlubot) 26x0.7 = 18.2m2 10.00 182.00 Chuzi jamoat 17 Fence Concrete armature 26x0.8 = 20.8m2 10.00 208.00 Shukurova 18 Wall C/blocks 12x0.1x2.5=3.0m3 385.00 1,155.00 Sarvar Barn Clay, concrete 2x2 = 4m2 198.00 792.00 Negmatov 19 Basement Concrete/armature 32x0.5x1.2=19.2m3 320.00 6,144.00 Daler (retaining wall) Shed Timber/c/blocks 4x1=4m2 129.00 516.00

Hanjarov 20 Wall C/blocks 52x0.2x2.5=26m3 385.00 10,010.00 Hamza Khushmurodov 21 Wall C/blocks 4x0.2x3=2.4m3 385.00 924.00 Aziz Barn clay, concrete 16x4 = 64m2 198.00 12,672.00 Kasirov 22 Fuel station Concrete 80x0.2x0.4=6.4m3 360.00 2,304.00 Abduqahhor (border, fence) Fence Wire net 80x1.5=120m2 10.00 1,200.00 Qodirov 23 Wall -fence Concrete, 14x0.4x2=11.2m3 385.00 4,312.00 Habibullo Wire net 11x1.4=15.4m2 10.00 154.00 Kholov 24 Wall Clay, concrete 19x0.25x2.3=10.9m3 115.00 1,253.50 Sanginmurod Davlatov A 25 Border Concrete 32x0.5x0.25=4m2 360.00 1,440.00 Fence Armature 30x1.0=30m2 10.00 300.00 Rahmonov 26 Shop Clay, concrete 7x4 = 28m2 390.00 10,920.00 Mahmadullo Akramov 27 Fence Wire net 114x1=114m2 10.00 1,140.00 Atokhon Umronov 28 Fence Wire net 39x1.5=58.5m2 10.00 585.00 Salohiddin Rahimov 29 Shop (border) Concrete 15x0.2x0.5=1.5m3 360.00 540.00 Pirimqul

142

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Gulov Ghayrat 30 platform, fence Concrete/ 18x0.2x0.4=1.44m3 360.00 518.40 (fuel station) Armature 18x1=18m2 10.00 180.00 Halimov 31 border Concrete 46x0.15x0.25=1.73m3 360.00 622.80 Anvarjon (fuel station) Diesel pump Concrete/armature, 17x0.5x2.2=18.7m3 320.00 5,984.00 equipment Boboaliev 32 Butcher’s Concrete 11x0.35x1.5=5.8m3 320.00 1,856.00 Qurbon shop- retaining wall Kholboboev 33 Bread making Concrete 8x3=24m2 347.00 8,328.00 Ghaffor shop Rahimov 34 Shop Concrete 7x5 = 35m2 390.00 13,650.00 Abdughaffor Odinaev 35 Border (shop, Concrete 61x0.15x0.25=2.29m3 320.00 732.80 Ubaydullo eatery) Rajabov Maruf 36 fence Wire net 50x1.4=70m2 10.00 700.00 (café) Border Concrete 11x0.2x0.15=0.33m3 360.00 118.80 Juraqulov 37 Banner Metal 2x0.2x0.25=0.1m3 360.00 36.00 Sherali Saidov 38 Small eatery RFC, metal 5x15 = 75m2 129.00 9,675.00 Ghaybullo Tajikmatlubot 39 Border Concrete 16X0.3X0.5=2.4m3 360.00 864.00 shop (Davlatov Malik) Shed Metal 3x1=3m2 129.00 387.00 Safarova 40 Banner Metal 12x0.2x0.2=0.48m3 360.00 172.80 Saodat Bafoev 41 Banner Metal 88x0.2x0.4=7.04m3 360.00 2,534.40 Abdurahmon Ayubov 42 “Shakhrinav” Sadriddin Terminal Shed Timber 3.5x4=14m2 129.00 1,806.00 Shed Timber 3.5x4=14m2 129.00 1,806.00 Wall Brick, concrete 100x0.25x2=50m3 385.00 19,250.00 Shop Metal, concrete 10x6 = 60m2 390.00 23,400.00 Eatery Brick 4.7x3 = 14.1 347.00 4,892.70 Sambusa store Clay and brick 3x3 = 9m2 129.00 1,161.00 Kholiqov 43 Trading centre Brick, concrete, 13x19 = 247m2 918.9 306,000.00 Bahriddin armature (inclusive of all structures) Fence 38x0.6 = 22.8m2 10.00 228.00

143

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Jalilov Tura 44 Shop Brick, concrete 18.5x18 = 333m2 390.00 129,870.00 Abdulloeva 45 Small eatery Brick, metal, 3x17 = 51m2 347.00 17,697.00 Gulsara ceramic tale Sharipov 46 Eatery-shed Metal 6.4x4.5 = 28.8m2 347.00 9,993.60 Rahmon Wall Bricks 5.4x14 = 75.6m2 347.00 26,233.20 Butcher’s shop Concrete 3.4x14 = 47.6m2 347.00 16,517.20

Sheds C/blocks, Metal 17x7=119m2 129.00 15,351.00

Boronov 47 Wall RFC 105x0.12x2.5=31.5m3 115.00 3,622.50 Ismatullo Shed (Road C/blocks 50x8.0=400m2 129.00 51,600.00 maintenance unit) Abdulloeva 48 Fence Wire net 15x1.5=22.5m2 10.00 225.00 Misqol Barn Clay/Concrete 3x3 = 9m2 198.00 1,782.00 Boboev 49 Butcher’s shop C/blocks 7x4 = 28m2 347.00 9,716.00 Bahrullo Mirzoev Hasan 50 Fence Wire net 19x1.5 = 28.5m2 10.00 285.00 Donchik 51 Fence Wire net 28x2 = 56m2 10.00 560.00 Aleksandr Boboshoev 52 Wall Clay/concrete 23x0.3x3.0=20.7m3 385.00 7,969.50 Ahmad Barn Clay/concrete 2.5x4 = 10m2 198.00 1,980.00 Qaramirzoeva 53 House Concrete 9x4.0 = 36m2 347.00 12,492.00 Orzu Wall C/blocks 4x0.25x3=3m3 385.00 1,155.00 Khojamov 54 Wall C/blocks 13x0.3x2.5=9.8m3 76.00 744.80 Murodali Shop Clay/brick 6x9 = 54m2 390.00 21,060.00 Shed Timber/Metal 6x2.5=15m2 129.00 1,935.00 SUBTOTAL : ROAD SECTION 3 - SHAKHRINAV DISTRICT 874,191.60

ROAD SECTION 4: SHAKHRINAV DISTRICT Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Qurbonova 55 Carriage Metal/brick 3x5 = 15m2 380.00 5,700.00 Gulbahor Qurbonov 56 House Clay 6.5x13 = 84m2 347.00 29,148.00 Ashur Wall Concrete 22x0.5x2=22m3 320.00 7,040.00 Barn Clay/ 6x3.3 = 19.8m2 198.00 3,920.40 Concrete 22x0.3x2=13.2m3 385.00 5,082.00 Eshonov 57 Wall Concrete 14x0.3x3.5=14.7m3 385.00 5,659.50

144

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Hamroh Cattle shed Clay/concrete 3.5x7.2 = 25.2m2 198.00 4,989.60

Workshop C/blocks/Concrete 6x3.5 = 21m2 198.00 4,158.00

Aminov Ilhom 58 House Clay/c/block 4x6.3 = 25.2m2 620.00 15,624.00 Barber’s shop C/block 6x4 = 24m2 347.00 8,328.00

Shop C/block 7x4 = 28m2 390.00 10,920.00 Shed Metal 14x2.5 = 35m2 390.00 27,300.00 Barn Concrete/ 10x2.6 = 26m2 198.00 5,148.00 Workshop C/block 4x5 = 20m2 331.00 6,620.00 Roziev Maruf 59 Wall Clay/concrete 2.0x0.50x2.5=2.5m3 76.00 190.00 Shop Concrete/ Cement 10x6 = 60m2 644.00 38,640.00

Barn Clay/concrete 10x4 = 40m2 198.00 7,920.00 Basement Concrete 3x5 = 15m2 198.00 2,970.00 Ashurov 60 Wall Clay/concrete 14x0.4x3.5=19.6m3 76.00 1,489.60 Boboqul Shed Timber 4.3x8=34.4m2 129.00 4,437.60 Barn Clay/Concrete 3.5x12 = 42m2 198.00 8,316.00 Kholova 61 Shed Metal 4.8x6=28.8m2 129.00 3,715.20 Melikoy Eatery Timber 4.7x10 = 47m2 198.00 9,306.00 Cattle shed Clay/brick/concrete 6.7x3.4 = 22.8m2 198.00 4,514.40

Barn Clay/brick/concrete 6.6x3.2 = 21.1m2 198.00 4,177.80

Workshop Clay/brick/concrete 10x9.3 = 93m2 331.00 30,783.00

Roziev Ahliddin 62 Wall Clay/Concrete 16.5x0.4x2.8=18.5m3 76.00 1,406.00

Aminov Vali 63 Border Concrete 14x0.2x0.15=0.42m3 360.00 151.20

Davlatov Yunus 64 Wall Concrete 10x0.4x2.5=10m3 76.00 760.00 Shed Brick/concrete 5.5x3.5 = 19.3m2 129.00 2,489.70 Shop Timber 5.5x3 = 16.5m2 390.00 6,435.00 Shed Metal 8.5x2.2=18.7m2 129.00 2,412.30 Cattle shed Concrete 9.5x9.0 = 85.5m2 198.00 16,929.00

House Clay/Concrete 8.2x9.1 = 74.62m2 347.00 25,893.14 Rahimov 65 House Clay/brick/concrete 10.5x14.8 = 155.4m2 620.00 96,348.00 Aminjon Wall Concrete 15.6x2.5x 0.1 =3.9 m3 115.00 448.50 Fence Metal 6x1=6m2 10.00 60.00

145

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Retaining wall Concrete 25x0.5x1.5=18.8m3 320.00 6,016.00

Shed Metal 11x4=44m2 129.00 5,676.00 Shohimardonov 66 Retaining wall Concrete 16x0.5x1.2 = 9.6m3 320.00 3,072.00 Olimjon Shed Timber/metal 5.5x3 = 16.5m2 129.00 2,128.50 Cattle shed Clay/brick/ 16.5x4 = 66m2 198.00 13,068.00 Retaining wall Concrete 30x0.5x1.5=22.5m3 320.00 7,200.00 Muzaffarov 67 Retaining wall Concrete 9x0.5x0.7 = 3.2m3 320.00 1,024.00 Umar Cattle shed Clay/concrete 3x12 =36m2 198.00 7,128.00 Shed Metal 5x8 = 40m2 129.00 5,160.00 Rashidov 68 Retaining wall Concrete 5x0.5x0.8=2m3 320.00 640.00 Abduhalim Shed Metal 5x3=15m2 129.00 1,935.00 Cattle shed Clay/concrete 5.7x8 = 45.6m2 198.00 9,028.80 Pool Concrete 3.5x13 =45.5m2 198.00 9.01 Negmartov 69 Wall Concrete 48x0.4x2.2=42.2m3 320.0013,504.00 Alijon Retaining wall Concrete 28x0.5x2=28m3 320.00 8,960.00 Fence Metal 20x1=20m2 10.00 200.00 Shed Metal 5x10=50m2 129.00 6,450.00 Yorov Said 70 Fence Wire net 17x2=34m2 10.00 340.00 Retaining wall Concrete 20x0.5x2=20m3 320.00 6,400.00 Barn Clay/concrete 4x10 = 40m2 198.00 7,920.00 Cattle shed Clay 2.5x3 = 7.5m2 198.00 1,485.00 Yorova 71 Retaining wall Concrete 18x0.5x1.8=16.2m3 320.00 5,184.00 Shamigul Barn Clay/Concrete 3.5x10 = 35m2 198.00 6,930.00 Odinaev 72 House Clay/concrete 4x26 = 104m2 347.00 36,088.00 Murodali Retaining wall Concrete 15x0.5x1.5=11.3m3 320.00 3,616.00 Odinaev 73 Retaining wall Concrete 7x0.5x1.5=5.3m3 320.00 1,696.00 Tojiddin Barn Clay/Concrete 5x17 = 85m2 198.00 16,830.00 Ustoeva Shahlo 74 Wall C/blocks 25x0.25x3=18.8m3 385.00 7,315.00 Gaafurov 75 House Clay/concrete 7x4 = 28m2 620.00 17,360.00 Saidhosha SUBTOTAL : ROAD SECTION 4 - SHAKHRINAV DISTRICT 611,793.25

ROAD SECTION 4: TURSUNZADE DISTRICT Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Kholov Isroil 1 slaughter area Cement blocks, 9.4x6.50x3.5 = 214 26 5,600.00 concrete m3 Tojikmatlubot, 2 border Concrete 30x0.3x0.8 = 9 m3 56 500.00

146

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Tursunzade fence metal 30x0.3 = 9 m2 56 500.00 District Huseynov 3 Border Concrete, 61x0.3x0.3 = 6 m3 83 500.00 Bakhtiyor fence Metal 61x0.8 = 48.80 m2 20 1,000.00 Mirsharipov 4 Wall Clay, concrete 18x0.5x2.8 = 25 m2 72 1,800.00 Mullo Boboev 5 Wall, Clay, concrete, 15.6x0.5x2.8 = 22 m3 55 1,200.00 Boborajab fence, Metal, 30x1 = 30 m2 31 920.00 Shed Metal, 3x2x3 = 18 m3 56 1,000.00 (vineyard) Barn, Clay, concrete 38x4x2.5 = 380 m3 12 4,500.00 Cattle barn Clay, concrete 7x13x4 = 364 m3 15 5,400.00 Bobosaidov 6 Fence, Metal, wire net 43x2.5 = 105.50m2 11 1,200.00 Haitmurod Sambusa Cement blocks 7x4x3 = 84m3 43 3,600.00 bakery Clay oven Clay, brick 2x2x2 = 8m3 63 500.00 Shed Metal 4x5x3.5 = 70 m3 7 500.00 reservoir (2 Metal 12x3x3.5 =126m3 1 100.00 items) Pipe D-20 mm Metal 30 x 0.20 = 6m2 33 200.00

Zabirov Tohir 7 Wall Cement blocks 27x0.25x2.70 = 18m3 139 2,500.00 Clay blocks Cattle barn 5 x 10 x 2.5 = 125m3 36 4,500.00 Muhibulloev 8 Wall Armored concrete 30x0.12x2.2 = 212 2,800.00 Ahmad 13.20m3 Barn Clay, concrete 5.50x3x2.5 = 41 m3 56 2,300.00 Jumaev Mavjud 9 Wall Cement, concrete 46x0.3x2.7 = 37m3 130 4,800.00

Cattle barn Concrete 9x5x2.70 = 121 m3 42 5,100.00 Jalilov 10 Border Concrete 41x0.15x0.25 = 10m3 60 600.00 Nematullo 3 Wall Cement blocks 12x0.4x3 = 14m 157 2,200.00 Fence Metal 41x1.20 = 49.2m2 45 2,200.00 Shed Metal 3x4x 2.50 = 30m3 20 600.00 Ilyasova 11 Wall Clay, concrete 7x0.4x2.20 = 6m3 83 500.00 Zikamo Concrete – Concrete, metal 7x0.4x0.6 = 2m3 100 200.00 sheet fence Clay, concrete 7x0.20x2.5 = 3m3 67 200.00 3 6.5 x 4 x 3 = 78m 33 2,600.00 Ilyasov 12 Wall Concrete, metal 19 x 0.5 x 3 = 28m3 89 2,500.00 Nazriddin sheet

147

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Ilyasova 13 Wall Concrete, clay 20 x 0.5 x 3 = 30m3 80 2,400.00 Khayriniso Kamolova 14 Room Clay, concrete 10x4.5x3.5 = 157m3 61 9,500.00 Khosiyat Cattle barn Clay, concrete 12.5x6x3 = 225m3 38 8,600.00 Pool Concrete 3x2x1.7 = 10m3 50 500.00 Barn Clay, concrete 14.5x8x2.5 = 290m3 27 7,800.00 Kandov 15 Wall Clay, concrete 7.70x0.5x3 = 12m3 46 550.00 Sadridin Cattle barn Clay, concrete 10x5.60x4.5 = 252m3 27 6,800.00 Zaydulloeva 16 Wall Clay, concrete 24x0.5x3 = 36 m3 81 2,900.00 Lutfia Karimova 17 Wall Clay, concrete 5x0.5x2.80 = 7m3 80 560.00 Abruniso Fence Armored concrete 60x2 = 120m2 13 1,500.00 Shed Metal 12x3x3 = 108m3 5 500.00 (vineyard) Barn Clay, concrete 4x15x3 = 180m3 27 4,800.00 Wall reinforced concrete 42x0.25x1.70 = 18m3 228 4,100.00 Kamolov 18 Wall Clay, concrete 17x0.5x2 = 17m3 82 1,400.00 Zayniddin Shed Clay, concrete 6x6x2.5 = 90m3 10 900.00 (vineyard) Ismatov 19 Fence Wire net 25x2 = 50m2 10 500.00 Huseyn Shed Metal 10x4x2.5 = 100m3 35 3,500.00 (vineyard)

Ashurov 20 Wall Clay, concrete 7x0.5x3 = 10m3 80 800.00 Zarobsho Shed (barn) Clay, concrete, 8x3x3 = 72m3 7 500.00 metal Nurov Muhtado 21 Wall Cement block, 68x0.25x2.20 = 37m3 122 4,500.00 concrete Kodirov Kumri 22 Fence Wire net 56x2 = 112 m2 9 1,000.00 Sherov 23 Border (gas Concrete 88x0.25x0.40 = 9m3 56 500.00 Abdufatoh station) Nazirov Sherali 24 Border (gas Concrete 56x0.15x 0.25 = 2m3 300 600.00 station) Mahmudov 25 Fence (gas Wire net 40x1 = 40 m2 15 600.00 Tolib station) Obidov 26 Eatery border Concrete 32x0.25x 0.30 = 2m3 200 400.00 Toshmurod Fence Metal 32x0.75 = 24m2 33 800.00 Sanginov 27 “Dusti” farm Concrete 72x0.5x2 = 72m3 25 1,800.00 Rajabali office

148

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Wall 41x0.2x0.8 = 70m3 26 1,800.00 Rajabov 28 Fence Wire net 62x1 = 62m2 10 600.00 Avazmurod Safoev Ahliddin 29 Fence Wire net 40x1.5 = 60m2 10 600.00

Jalolov Umarali 30 Wall Concrete 6x0.5x2.5 = 7m3 214 1,500.00 Shed Metal 4x4x4 =64 m3 19 1,200.00 Cattle barn Clay, concrete 16x6x4 = 384m3 20 7,500.00 Barn Clay, concrete 3x3x2.5 = 22m3 45 1,000.00 Shed Wood 3x2x2 = 12 m3 42 500.00 Anorov Said 31 Wall Armored concrete 10x0.1x0.2 = 0.20m3 2500 500.00 Barn Cement blocks, 22x6x3 = 396m3 22 8,700.00 concrete Boborajabova 32 Wall Cement blocks 20x0.3x2.10 = 13m3 138 1,800.00 Khoharkhon Jalolova Adolat 33 Wall Armored concrete 20x0.12x2 = 5m3 240 1,200.00 Shed Armored concrete, 12x5x2 = 120m3 13 1,500.00 metal Barn Brick, concrete 7x4x2.80 = 78m3 49 3,800.00 Hafizov 34 Wall Cement blocks 30x0.25x2 = 15m3 120 1,800.00 Abduvohid Tokhtaeva 35 Shed Metal 20x3.70x3.5 = 259m3 6 1,500.00 Yorkinoy (vineyard) Fence Cement blocks 5.3x2.2x2.2 = 26m3 104 2,700.00 Nurov Tolibjon 36 Wall Clay, concrete 22x0.4x2.7 = 24m3 71 1,700.00 Shed Clay, concrete 3.70x3.2x2.7 = 32m3 20 650.00 Cattle Barn Clay, concrete 12.8x3.2x2.8 =115m3 40 4,600.00 Saidjafarova 37 Fence Metal 14x1.2 = 16.80m2 30 500.00 Najofmoh Wall Concrete 14x0.3x0.7 = 3m3 167 500.00 Khidirov 38 Fence Wire net 55x0.5x2 = 55m3 11 600.00 Akbarali Shed Metal 53x1.7 = 90.10m2 13 1,200.00 (vineyard) Bridge Concrete slab 25x4x4 = 400m3 2 600.00 Boboev Safar 39 Wall Clay 55x0.5x2 = 55m3 75 4,100.00 Fence Wire 53x1.7 = 90.10m2 9 800.00 Shed Concrete, metal 25x4x4 = 400m3 4 1,700.00 (vineyard) Bridge Concrete 3x2.5x1 = 8m3 75 600.00 Jobirov Jomi 40 Security office Metal, concrete 27.20x11x6.8 = (State Property 2035m3 Committee)

149

Owner’s Ref Type of Type of Structure Area Cost per Total cost Name Structure Construction (m2; m3) unit (Somoni) Material (Somoni) Tile of 2006 Abdulloev 41 Security office Concrete, metal 25x8.60x7 =1505m3 Idiboy (Custom) Security office Metal 71x1x3 = 213m3 Well Concrete, metal 14x1x1.3 = 18 m3 Wall 245x0.3x1.5 = 110m3 Komilov 42 Metal border Concrete 110x0.20x 0.25 =6m3 158 950.00 Mirzomidin well foundation Concrete 6x8x0.50 = 24m3 54 1,300.00 Fence Concrete, Metal 60x0.70 = 42.60m2 20 860.00 Nazarov Hotam 43 Wall Cement blocks 17x0.5x3 = 25m3 136 3,400.00 Cement blocks 7x5x3 = 105m3 33 3,500.00 Karomat 44 RC fence Armature 18 x 2 = 36m3 42 1,500.00

SUBTOTAL : ROAD SECTION 4 - TURSUNZADE 198,190.00

150

APPENDIX 7: PUBLIC ADVERTISEMENTS OF ASSET SURVEY CUTOFF DATE.

The following public advertisements were issued:

Newspaper: "Hakikati Shakhrinav"

Date: 28 November 2009

Place of issue: Shakhrinav district

English Translation of Text: The Derivative Enterprise of Technical Registration of the Shakhrinav district is kindly informing the citizens, head of enterprises and farmers which is the vicinity of Dushanbe-Tursunzoda road: the construction of any kind of buildings or tree plantation is not allowed, dated 11 of November 2009. The Government of the Republic of Tajikistan will not invest, if the buildings were constructed or trees were planted after 11 of November 2009.

Newspaper: "Nasimi Ayom"

Date: 12 December 2009

Place of issue: Rudaki district

English Translation of Text: According to the instruction of the Prime-Minister of the Republic of Tajikistan of 20 June 2009, under #52 425 (15-2), to remove the constructed buildings and houses in near by road of Dushanbe -Tursunzoda and necessity of moving the household buildings to other places while reconstruction starts in this road.

For solving these problems, the working group was organized by the chairman of the district under order # 117, dated 28 October 2009.

Mr. S. Boboazimov is appointed as the Head of the working group. The working group for removing the buildings and constructed houses in the road of Dushanbe-Tursunzoda is giving assignments to the government structures.

According to the project the width of the road comes to 23 meters and it will be 4 lane roads.

General Advertisement Issued by PIU:

For the attention of the inhabitants of Rudaki, Gissar, Shahrinaw Distr icts and Tursunzade town, which are located in the roadside of Dushanbe-Tursunzade-border Uzbekistan, this is to inform you that in connection with the rehabilitation of this road, the special committee has identified the

151

damage for household during the realization of Project up to November 28, 2009. Therefore, after November 28, 2009, the construction of all type of structures, tree planting and other is proh ibited in the roadside and in case of unauthorized actions, the damage will not be charged by road construction.

Ministry of Transport and Communications

Project Implementation Unit

152