DOCSLIB.ORG

Snopes Digest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Snopes Digest MEMBERS ONLY Snopes Digest 18 February 2020 • Issue #4 1 Savage Memes, Lunar Dreams What do Charlie Sheen, scammy hook-up sites, and a space start-up have in common? 2 Behind the Snopes How Snopes investigations can affect the feeds of our journalists. 3 In Case You Missed It The most popular and most important stories on Snopes.com lately. 4 Snopes-worthy Reads Good stories we’ve shared amongst ourselves recently. Issue #4 edited by Brandon Echter and Bond Huberman. 1. Savage Memes, Lunar Dreams Last week, Snopes published the results of a two-year investigation that links a network of shady dating websites designed to trap users in recurring subscription charges to the start-up Firefly Aerospace. Improbably, the initial tip that launched this story — spotted by Snopes General Manager Vinny Green (read more about that below) — came from the Facebook pages of celebrities like Cheech and Chong, Snoop Dogg, Charlie Sheen, and Bow Wow. These celebrity profiles promoted lewd, misogynistic, and sometimes pornographic memes that directed users to sign-up pages for fake hook-up sites, which then pushed people to a network of over 200 “niche dating websites” that operate with the same aggressive subscription tactics and use stolen images to compel users to join. These practices, a former Federal Trade Commission investigator told us, may be in violation of U.S. law. Who ultimately profits from this activity? The evidence suggests an elaborate effort was made to conceal ownership details of these dating websites. But using court documents, public business filings, and internet forensics, Senior Writer Alex Kasprak untangled a labyrinthine network of off-shore holding companies. Read the full investigation here. Snopes-tionary Speak like an insider! Each newsletter, we’ll explain a term or piece of fact- checking lingo that we use on the Snopes team. Memevertisements: A portmanteau of “meme” and “advertisements.” Used by our investigative reporters (aka The Dive Team) to reference entertaining, eye-catching, and sometimes NSFW social media posts that not-so-subtly advertise dubious products order to turn a profit off unsuspecting users’ engagement. 2. Behind The Snopes Let’s talk about what’s going on with Snopes: the newsroom, the products, the people, and everything and anything that makes Snopes, Snopes. This week Vinny Green, the general manager of Snopes, explains how investigations can affect our social media experiences. My Facebook feed is sick. It’s got an infection of sorts. The symptoms started a few years ago when I began following certain celebrities who had a habit of sharing very suspicious links to clickbait and fake news. I tipped off the Snopes team and we started digging. Reporter Bethania Palma and I tracked down 29 fake domains that post to verified celebrity pages and published our findings. But within a few months, some celebrity pages found a new tactic for hoodwinking their fans: memevertising. Soon, Senior Writer Alex Kasprak was on the case. We were down the rabbit hole, one that would take us into the dark underbelly of affiliate advertising. The Snopes team sacrifices our own profiles and news feeds — following disreputable and disheartening content producers — so we can try to bust misinformation before it reaches you. Two major Snopes investigations have resulted from this. Imagine what we could accomplish when all of you are helping us. Send us tips here. And in case you were wondering — no, my feed has not yet recovered. Next time, you’ll hear from another member of the Snopes team about a unique aspect of working here that you might find interesting. Do you want us to cover something specific? Write to us here! Web Developer Wanted We’re looking for a talented web developer to help us build the Snopes of the future! Apply or share with anyone who might be interested. Read the Job Description 3. In Case You Missed It The latest news and fact checks on Snopes.com. The new coronavirus outbreak continues to spread and raise international concerns. It has also given rise to countless false rumors, some pernicious and others laughable. The claim that the outbreak was predicted by name in an old episode of “The Simpsons” fell into the latter category. In a theatrical coda to U.S. President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address earlier this month, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi tore a copy of the speech in half, leading Trump supporters to call for her to be prosecuted for the destruction of government property. Did she do anything illegal? Snopes looked at what legal experts have to say on the matter. Rumors about the 2020 U.S. presidential election have continued apace. Last week, for example, Snopes received a flurry of requests to authenticate a newspaper clipping purporting that Democratic presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg was arrested as a teenager for animal abuse. Our investigation led us straight to a run-of-the-mill “fake news generator” website. Another Snopes investigation was prompted by news reports claiming construction of the U.S.-Mexico border wall endangers a Native American burial site in Arizona. Tribal leaders and archaeologists say Monument Hill, part of the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, is indeed the location of such a burial site, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection confirmed that controlled blasting was being done in the area to prepare for construction. If you know who “Uncle Don” was, raise your hand. Folks of a certain age will at least recall hearing stories about the legendary kids’ radio show host, whose broadcasts ran from the late 1920s through the late 1940s. Supposedly, Uncle Don was caught on a live mic at the end of one show saying, “There, that oughta hold the little bastards!” Did he actually make the infamous remark? Read on... Have a story tip? Send it here! Snopesing 101 Fact-check like a pro! Every newsletter, we’ll let you peek behind the curtain and see some of the ways we check shady information so you can check dubious claims yourself. Wonder how we uncovered Max Polyakov’s tangled web of financial holdings? Much of that information came from now-public records like the Paradise Papers, the leaked trove of documents that reveal shell corporations and tax havens of the global elite. We were able to search this by using the Offshore Leak Database from the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). It combines four recent data drops — the Paradise Papers, the Panama Papers, the Offshore Leaks, and the Bahamas Leaks — into one searchable set. Journalists go to great lengths to expose injustice and empower others to discover the truth for themselves. A whistleblower provided German journalist Bastian Obermayer with the over 10 million documents that would later be known as the Panama Papers. With the help of the ICIJ, groundbreaking investigations from the documents forced resignations around the globe. Daphne Caruana Galizia, a journalist who led investigations into the Panama Papers, was assassinated in a car bombing in October 2017. Search the data yourself here. It’s an excellent example of how you can leverage public databases to find the next thread you need to pull. 4. Snopes-worthy Reads What Team Snopes is reading across the web. How to Convince Someone When Facts Fail Michael Shermer, Scientific American On Facebook, Anti-Vaxxers Urged a Mom Not to Give Her Son Tamiflu. He Later Died. Brandy Zadrozny, NBC News A Website Wanted to Restore Trust in the Media. It’s Actually a Political Operation Gabby Deutch, Washington Post Opinion Fox News Internal Document Bashes Pro-Trump Fox Regulars for Spreading ‘Disinformation’ Will Sommer, Maxwell Tani and Andrew Kirell, The Daily Beast How to Stop the Spread of Fake News? Pause for a Moment Oliver Burkeman, The Guardian The Original Renegade Taylor Lorenz, The New York Times Have any recommended reads? Submit them here. The Pets of Snopes It’s true: The Snopes “team” was once just two people and a cat. Twenty- five years later, we have more humans and more cats (and even some dogs) than at our once-humble beginnings. We want you to meet our furry, fact- finding friends because, well, who doesn’t love a cute animal picture? This week, meet Managing Editor Do’s crows! She writes: “My husband and I noticed when we moved into our current home that a couple of crows liked to hang out all day in our backyard. We began feeding them and, lo-and-behold, they started having babies, a new mating pair hanging out every year. This extended family always seems to be within earshot of each other. When I go on walks around the neighborhood, one will sound the ‘Caw!’ alarm (“Food lady on the move!”) before a cloud of crows forms overhead, with the birds silently swooping down from wires to snatch the nuts I’ve tossed on the ground, and then back up to quietly wait for more. The little neighbor boy across the street christened me ‘Crow-Crow Do-Do.’ I think it fits just fine.” We hope you enjoyed this edition of the Snopes Digest. We’ll be releasing them every two weeks, so please add this email address to your white list and keep an eye out on March 3 for the next issue. You can read the previous issue here. Have feedback about this newsletter you want to share with us? Just email us. Thank you for being a Snopes member. Snopes Media Group Inc. 864 Grand Ave #256 San Diego, CA 92109 © 1994 - 2020 by Snopes Media Group Inc. This material may not be reproduced without permission.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Future of Investigative Journalism: Global, Networked and Collaborative
    The Future of Investigative Journalism: Global, Networked and Collaborative Ellen Hume and Susan Abbott March 2017 Note: This report is extracted from our recent evaluation of the Global Investigative Journalism Network (GIJN) for the Adessium Foundation. Ellen Hume would like to thank especially David Kaplan, Susan Abbott, Anya Schiffrin, Ethan Zuckerman, James Hamilton, Tom Rosenstiel, Bruce Shapiro, Marina Guevara Walker and Brant Houston for their insights. 2 1. Overview: The Investigative Media Landscape The internet and DIY communication tools have weakened the commercial mainstream media, and authoritarian political actors in many once-promising democratic regions are compromising public media independence. Fewer journalists were murdered in 2016 than the previous year, but the number of attacks on journalists around the world is “unprecedented,” according to the Index on Censorship.1 Even the United States, once considered the gold standard for press freedom, has a president who maligns the mainstream news media as “enemies of the people.” An unexpectedly bright spot in this media landscape is the growth of local and cross-border investigative journalism, including the emergence of scores of local nonprofit investigative journalism organizations, often populated by veterans seeking honest work after their old organizations have imploded or been captured by political partisans. These journalism “special forces,” who struggle to maintain their independence, are working in dangerous environments, with few stable resources to support them. Despite the dangers and uncertainties, it is an exciting time to be an investigative journalist, thanks to new collaborations and digital tools. These nonprofits are inventing a potent form of massive, cross-border investigative reporting, supported by philanthropy.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee of Inquiry into Money Laundering, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion Public Hearing The Panama papers – Discussion with the investigative journalists behind the revelations 27 September 2016 9h00 - 11h30 (2h30) Paul-Henri Spaak 1A002 Brussels Draft PROGRAMME 09:00 - 09:10 Welcome by the PANA Chair 09:10 - 09:20 Pre-recorded messages from Gerard Ryle and Marina Walker, Directors at the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) [based in Washington DC] Bastian Obermayer, Süddeutsche Zeitung [based in Washington DC] 09:20 - 10:10 Presentations by speakers (all confirmed, at 7 min each) Frederik Obermaier (Süddeutsche Zeitung) (via Skype/ visioconference) Kristof Clerix (Knack magazine, Belgium) Oliver Zihlmann (Sonntagszeitung | Le Matin Dimanche, Switzerland) Julia Stein and Jan Strozyk (Norddeutscher Rundfunk/ NDR, Germany) Minna Knus (MOT, Finnish Broadcasting Company, Finland) 10:30 - 11:25 Discussion with PANA Members 11:25 - 11:30 Conclusions by the PANA Chair Secretariat of the Committee of Inquiry into Money Laundering, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion [email protected] PUBLIC HEARING THE PANAMA PAPERS – DISCUSSION WITH THE INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISTS BEHIND THE REVELATIONS TUESDAY, 27 SEPTEMBER 2016 9.00 - 11.30 Room: Paul-Henri Spaak (1A002) CVS OF THE JOURNALISTS Gerard Ryle Gerard Ryle leads the ICIJ’s headquarters staff in Washington, D.C., as well as overseeing the consortium’s more than 190 member journalists in more than 65 countries. Before joining as the ICIJ’s first non-American director in September 2011, Ryle spent 26 years working as a reporter, investigative reporter and editor in Australia and Ireland, including two decades at The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age newspapers.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACT REPORT a Word from the Founder and Director|
    2017 - 2020 IMPACT REPORT A word from the founder and director| In October 2017 as we were preparing to launch a collaborative " network of journalists dedicated to pursuing and publishing the work of other reporters facing threats, prison or murder, prominent Maltese investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia was horrifically silenced with a car bomb. Her murder was a cruel and stark reminder of how tenuous the free flow of information can be when democratic systems falter. We added Daphne to the sad and long list of journalists whose work Forbidden Stories is committed to continuing. For five months, we coordinated a historic collaboration of 45 journalists from 18 news organizations, aimed at keeping Daphne Caruana Galizia’s stories alive. Her investigations, as a result of this, ended up on the front pages of the world’s most widely-read newspapers. Seventy-four million people heard about the Daphne Project worldwide. Although her killers had hoped to silence her stories, the stories ended up having an echo way further than Malta. LAURENT RICHARD Forbidden Stories' founder Three years later, the journalists of the Daphne Project continue and executive director. to publish new revelations about her murder and pursue the investigations she started. Their explosive role in taking down former Maltese high-ranking government officials confirms that collaboration is the best protection against impunity. 2 2017-2020 Forbidden Stories Impact Report A word from the founder and director| That’s why other broad collaborative On a smaller scale, we have investigations followed. developed rapid response projects. We investigated the circumstances The Green Blood Project, in 2019, pursued behind the murders of Ecuadorian, the stories of reporters in danger for Mexican and Ghanaian journalists; investigating environmental scandals.
    [Show full text]
  • IN AMERICAN POLITICS TODAY, EVEN FACT-CHECKERS ARE VIEWED THROUGH PARTISAN LENSES by David C
    IN AMERICAN POLITICS TODAY, EVEN FACT-CHECKERS ARE VIEWED THROUGH PARTISAN LENSES by David C. Barker, American University What can be done about the “post-truth” era in American politics? Many hope that beefed-up fact-checking by reputable nonpartisan organizations like Fact Checker, PolitiFact, FactCheck.org, and Snopes can equip citizens with the tools needed to identify lies, thus reducing the incentive politicians have to propagate untruths. Unfortunately, as revealed by research I have done with colleagues, fact-checking organizations have not provided a cure-all to misinformation. Fact-checkers cannot prevent the politicization of facts, because they themselves are evaluated through a partisan lens. Partisan Biases and Trust of Fact Checkers in the 2016 Election In May of 2016, just a couple of weeks before the California Democratic primary, my colleagues and I conducted an experiment that exposed a representative sample of Californians to the statement: “Nonpartisan fact-checking organizations like PolitiFact rate controversial candidate statements for truthfulness.” We also exposed one randomized half of the sample to the following statement and image: “Each presidential candidate's current PolitiFact average truthfulness score is placed on the scale below.” The Politifact image validated the mainstream narrative about Donald Trump’s disdain for facts, and also reinforced Bernie Sanders’s tell-it-like-it-is reputation. But it contradicted conventional wisdom by revealing that Clinton had been the most accurate candidate overall (though the difference between the Clinton and Sanders ratings was not statistically significant). What did we expect to find? Some observers presume that Republicans are the most impervious to professional fact-checking.
    [Show full text]
  • Starr Forum: Russia's Information War on America
    MIT Center for Intnl Studies | Starr Forum: Russia’s Information War on America CAROL Welcome everyone. We're delighted that so many people could join us today. Very SAIVETZ: excited that we have such a timely topic to discuss, and we have two experts in the field to discuss it. But before I do that, I'm supposed to tell you that this is an event that is co-sponsored by the Center for International Studies at MIT, the Security Studies program at MIT, and MIT Russia. I should also introduce myself. My name is Carol Saivetz. I'm a senior advisor at the Security Studies program at MIT, and I co-chair a seminar, along with my colleague Elizabeth Wood, whom we will meet after the talk. And we co-chair a seminar series called Focus on Russia. And this is part of that seminar series as well. I couldn't think of a better topic to talk about in the lead-up to the US presidential election, which is now only 40 days away. We've heard so much in 2016 about Russian attempts to influence the election then, and we're hearing again from the CIA and from the intelligence community that Russia is, again, trying to influence who shows up, where people vote. They are mimicking some of Donald Trump's talking points about Joe Biden's strength and intellectual capabilities, et cetera. And we've really brought together two experts in the field. Nina Jankowicz studies the intersection of democracy and technology in central and eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Or Fiction?
    The Ins and Outs of Media Literacy 1 Part 1: Fact or Fiction? Fake News, Alternative Facts, and other False Information By Jeff Rand La Crosse Public Library 2 Goals To give you the knowledge and tools to be a better evaluator of information Make you an agent in the fight against falsehood 3 Ground rules Our focus is knowledge and tools, not individuals You may see words and images that disturb you or do not agree with your point of view No political arguments Agree 4 Historical Context “No one in this world . has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of plain people.” (H. L. Mencken, September 19, 1926) 5 What is happening now and why 6 Shift from “Old” to “New” Media Business/Professional Individual/Social Newspapers Facebook Magazines Twitter Television Websites/blogs Radio 7 News Platforms 8 Who is your news source? Professional? Personal? Educated Trained Experienced Supervised With a code of ethics https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp 9 Social Media & News 10 Facebook & Fake News 11 Veles, Macedonia 12 Filtering Based on: Creates filter bubbles Your location Previous searches Previous clicks Previous purchases Overall popularity 13 Echo chamber effect 14 Repetition theory Coke is the real thing. Coke is the real thing. Coke is the real thing. Coke is the real thing. Coke is the real thing. 15 Our tendencies Filter bubbles: not going outside of your own beliefs Echo chambers: repeating whatever you agree with to the exclusion of everything else Information avoidance: just picking what you agree with and ignoring everything else Satisficing: stopping when the first result agrees with your thinking and not researching further Instant gratification: clicking “Like” and “Share” without thinking (Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Disinformation, and Influence Campaigns on Twitter 'Fake News'
    Disinformation, ‘Fake News’ and Influence Campaigns on Twitter OCTOBER 2018 Matthew Hindman Vlad Barash George Washington University Graphika Contents Executive Summary . 3 Introduction . 7 A Problem Both Old and New . 9 Defining Fake News Outlets . 13 Bots, Trolls and ‘Cyborgs’ on Twitter . 16 Map Methodology . 19 Election Data and Maps . 22 Election Core Map Election Periphery Map Postelection Map Fake Accounts From Russia’s Most Prominent Troll Farm . 33 Disinformation Campaigns on Twitter: Chronotopes . 34 #NoDAPL #WikiLeaks #SpiritCooking #SyriaHoax #SethRich Conclusion . 43 Bibliography . 45 Notes . 55 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study is one of the largest analyses to date on how fake news spread on Twitter both during and after the 2016 election campaign. Using tools and mapping methods from Graphika, a social media intelligence firm, we study more than 10 million tweets from 700,000 Twitter accounts that linked to more than 600 fake and conspiracy news outlets. Crucially, we study fake and con- spiracy news both before and after the election, allowing us to measure how the fake news ecosystem has evolved since November 2016. Much fake news and disinformation is still being spread on Twitter. Consistent with other research, we find more than 6.6 million tweets linking to fake and conspiracy news publishers in the month before the 2016 election. Yet disinformation continues to be a substantial problem postelection, with 4.0 million tweets linking to fake and conspiracy news publishers found in a 30-day period from mid-March to mid-April 2017. Contrary to claims that fake news is a game of “whack-a-mole,” more than 80 percent of the disinformation accounts in our election maps are still active as this report goes to press.
    [Show full text]
  • Following the Money: Lessons from the Panama Papers Part 1
    ARTICLE 3.4 - TRAUTMAN (DO NOT DELETE) 5/14/2017 6:57 AM Following the Money: Lessons from the Panama Papers Part 1: Tip of the Iceberg Lawrence J. Trautman* ABSTRACT Widely known as the “Panama Papers,” the world’s largest whistleblower case to date consists of 11.5 million documents and involves a year-long effort by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists to expose a global pattern of crime and corruption where millions of documents capture heads of state, criminals, and celebrities using secret hideaways in tax havens. Involving the scrutiny of over 400 journalists worldwide, these documents reveal the offshore holdings of at least hundreds of politicians and public officials in over 200 countries. Since these disclosures became public, national security implications already include abrupt regime change and probable future political instability. It appears likely that important revelations obtained from these data will continue to be forthcoming for years to come. Presented here is Part 1 of what may ultimately constitute numerous- installment coverage of this important inquiry into the illicit wealth derived from bribery, corruption, and tax evasion. This article proceeds as follows. First, disclosures regarding the treasure trove of documents * BA, The American University; MBA, The George Washington University; JD, Oklahoma City Univ. School of Law. Mr. Trautman is Assistant Professor of Business Law and Ethics at Western Carolina University, and a past president of the New York and Metropolitan Washington/Baltimore Chapters of the National Association of Corporate Directors. He may be contacted at [email protected]. The author wishes to extend thanks to those at the Winter Conference of the Anti-Corruption Law Interest Group (ASIL) in Miami, January 13–14, 2017 who provided constructive comments to the manuscript, in particular: Eva Anderson; Bruce Bean; Ashleigh Buckett; Anita Cava; Shirleen Chin; Stuart H.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19, Free Speech, Hate Speech: Implications for Journalism Teaching
    COVID-19, FREE SPEECH, NEWS REPORTING 1 Running head: COVID-19, FREE SPEECH, NEWS REPORTING Covid-19, Free Speech, Hate Speech: Implications for Journalism Teaching Jerry Crawford1, Anastasia Kononova2, Mia Moody-Ramirez3 and Carolyn Bronstein4 Abstract The essay stems from conversations and research from AEJMC’s “Recommended EthicaL ProfessionaL Freedom & ResponsibiLity GuideLines.” It is from this perspective that we address the handling of free speech during the Covid-19 pandemic and how threats to free speech, particularly during raciaLLy charged periods, may affect teaching in journaLism and mass communication programs. Further, we discuss instances in which free speech is used during a crisis to contribute to raciaL and ethnic stereotypes and exacerbate sociopoliticaL divisions. We incLude background and context on the pandemic and how the media covered it; implications of misinformation and free speech; sourcing and citizen journaLism; and various types of hate speech. 1 Associate Professor at William Allen White School of Journalism and Mass Communication, The University of Kansas 2 Assistant Professor in the Department of Advertising + Public Relations, Michigan State University 3 Professor in the Department of Journalism, PuBlic Relations & New Media, Baylor University 4 Professor of Media Studies in the College of Communication, DePaul University COVID-19, FREE SPEECH, NEWS REPORTING 2 The year into the current Covid-19 pandemic has brought irreversible changes to the globaL community. This pandemic presents an important opportunity for journaLism and communication educators to consider the interplay among misinformation, free speech, hate speech and cLassroom teaching – whether in-person or virtuaL. The pandemic is not only a heaLth concern, but it is aLso a politicaLLy divisive topic that has been debated from various perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis CONTENTS
    Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................... 1 What Techniques Do Media Manipulators Use? ....... 33 Understanding Media Manipulation ............................ 2 Participatory Culture ........................................... 33 Who is Manipulating the Media? ................................. 4 Networks ............................................................. 34 Internet Trolls ......................................................... 4 Memes ................................................................. 35 Gamergaters .......................................................... 7 Bots ...................................................................... 36 Hate Groups and Ideologues ............................... 9 Strategic Amplification and Framing ................. 38 The Alt-Right ................................................... 9 Why is the Media Vulnerable? .................................... 40 The Manosphere .......................................... 13 Lack of Trust in Media ......................................... 40 Conspiracy Theorists ........................................... 17 Decline of Local News ........................................ 41 Influencers............................................................ 20 The Attention Economy ...................................... 42 Hyper-Partisan News Outlets ............................. 21 What are the Outcomes? ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Snopes Digest
    View in Your Browser MEMBERS ONLY Snopes Digest April 28, 2020 • Issue #9 1 2 Behind the Snopes Doreen Marchionni, vice president of editorial, explains why our investigations share a particular theme. 3 In Case You Missed It The most popular and most important stories on Snopes.com lately. 4 Snopes-worthy Reads Good stories we’ve shared amongst ourselves recently. Issue #9 edited by Brandon Echter and Bond Huberman 1. Misinformation at Scale brandonechter, we here at Snopes have sussed out thousands of dubious claims, some shared innocuously and others pushed for more nefarious reasons. But some of the most puzzling we’ve seen are those distributed by practitioners who know how to make it seem like there’s a crowd where there is none. Whether it’s fake accounts inflating Facebook groups or outlets creating new accounts to get around bans, the use of bots, automation, and impersonation for the sake of fraud is widespread on the internet. It’s called coordinated inauthentic behavior, and you don’t have to look far for examples. In this issue of the Snopes Digest, we’re shining a light on the tactics employed to push political agendas, scam unsuspecting users, and manipulate people — and until the platforms hosting this activity put a stop to it, Snopes will be there to track them down. Stay vigilant, Team Snopes We Want to Hear from You What have you experienced during the coronavirus pandemic? How are you holding up? We want to hear how our readers are living through this crisis. Tell Us Your Story Snopes-tionary Speak like an insider! Each newsletter, we’ll explain a term or piece of fact- checking lingo that we use on the Snopes team.
    [Show full text]
  • FAQ Panama Papers by Frederik Obermaier and Bastian Obermayer
    FAQ Panama Papers By Frederik Obermaier and Bastian Obermayer Investigative work - Could you explain how the Panama Papers information was obtained? Could you explain whether such information is in itself complete or if some information may have been either not obtained/ left out of the leak/ not exposed? In other words, how representative is the data that you refer to in your publications for the “offshore world” in general? Süddeutsche Zeitung obtained the 2,6 terabyte of Panama-Papers-information from an anonymous source calling itself “John Doe”. We do not know which percentage of the internal information of the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca this is. We guess it displays pretty much of their business. Süddeutsche Zeitung, ICIJ and its partners with whose Süddeutsche Zeitung shared the data have reported and are still reporting on cases of public interest. As this is such a big amount of data investigations take time. We are pretty sure that there will still be revelations that are at least in parts based on the Panama-Papers-data. The Panama Papers showed that there is a whole parallel world offshore in which the rich and powerful enjoy the freedom to avoid not just taxes but all kinds of laws they find inconvenient. Let’s face the facts: Hiding the real ownership of companies and thus also bank accounts is not an unique approach of Mossack Fonseca and its clients – it is one of the main reasons of individuals going offshore (with Mossack Fonseca’s help or the help of other providers). - Upon reception of the data, how did you organise your research? How did you select cases to focus on? Every member of the international team that worked (coordinated by the ICIJ) on the Panama Papers had access to the whole dataset.
    [Show full text]