Database Searches Determining Sre Status

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Database Searches Determining Sre Status 8 May 2017 Our ref: 11222-3922-17L_SRE Danielle White Consultant Strategen Environmental Level 1, 50 Subiaco Square Road SUBIACO WA 6008 Dear Danielle, STATE BARRIER FENCE SRE DATABASE SEARCHES (WAM) RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION This document is an addendum to the State Barrier Fence Biological Survey report (Ecoscape 2017) in response to comments received by the OEPA, specifically OEPA comment 14. This document outlines the potential invertebrate Short Range Endemic (SRE) fauna associated with the proposed State Barrier Fence. DATABASE SEARCHES In addition to the previously completed invertebrate fauna database searches (PMST, NatureMap), three database searches were obtained from the Western Australian Museum (WAM) and all threatened species listed under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999 (Commonwealth of Australia 1999), Western Australian Wildlife Conservation (WC) Act 1950 (Government of Western Australia 1950)/ Western Australian Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (BC Act) (Government of Western Australia 2016) and as Priority by DPaW (Department of Parks and Wildlife 2015) were collated. The BC Act parts of which were enacted on 21 September 2016, provides for the conservation, protection and ecologically sustainable use of biodiversity and biodiversity components in Western Australia. The BC Act replaces the WC Act. Some sections of the BC Act have not been proclaimed and are still active under the WC Act. The WAM database search details are listed in the table below. It should be noted that at the time of the database request the WAM was not able to provide an SRE filter on the results. Only the mollusc database search was provided to include SRE species only (potential and confirmed SRE). The other two remaining database searches (crustacean and arachnids) included all records from the search area regardless of the SRE status. Table 1: Database search details Database Custodian Search Details Search Coordinates: -32.907642° 120.864412° WA Museum Arachnida & Myriapoda Database WAM -33.920537° 122.832616° Date: 03/04/2017 -32.305256° 119.394276° WA Museum Crustacea Database WAM -34.241882° 124.007536° Date: 03/04/2017 Search Coordinates: -32.907642° 120.864412° WA Museum Mollusca Database WAM -33.920537° 122.832616° Date: 03/04/2017 DETERMINING SRE STATUS The SRE status of invertebrate fauna is based on categories developed by the WAM and modified by the consultant taxonomists in order to describe the SRE status of WA taxa using the current knowledge of the distribution and biology of each species. The likelihoods are defined in the categories as listed in Table 2. The WAM SRE categories were released in 2013 and have been developed to describe the SRE status of WA taxa and use: (a) unambiguous categories; and (b) explanations of uncertainty. This has been accomplished using a two-tier classification system. In the first tier of classification geographic distribution and taxonomic certainty are the variables used to split taxa into either “Confirmed SREs”, “Widespread (not SREs)”, or “Potential/Likely SREs”. In the second tier of classification, “Potential SREs” are given one or more sub-categories identifying the reasons why they have been identified as a potential SRE taxa. In addition, taxonomists sometimes adapt these categories and incorporate one additional category: “likely SRE” (Table 3). Table 2: WAM SRE categories (2015) Taxonomic Certainty Taxonomic Uncertainty Confirmed SRE Potential/Likely SRE A known distribution of <10 000km2. Patchy sampling has resulted in The taxonomy is well known. incomplete knowledge of the Distribution < 10 000km2 The group is well represented in geographic distribution of the group. collections and/ or via comprehensive We have incomplete taxonomic sampling knowledge. The group is not well represented in Widespread (not an SRE) collections. A known distribution of >10 000km2. This category is most applicable to The taxonomy is well known. Distribution > 10 000km2 situations where there are gaps in our The group is well represented in knowledge of the taxon. collections and/ or via comprehensive Sub-categories for this SRE designation are sampling. outlined below SRE SUB-CATEGORIES If a taxon is determined to be a “Potential SRE”, the following sub-categories will further elucidate this status. A. Data Deficient: There is insufficient data available to determine SRE status. Factors that fall under this category include: Lack of geographic information; Lack of taxonomic information; The group may be poorly represented in collections; and The individuals sampled (e.g. juveniles) may prevent identification to species level. B. Habitat Indicators: It is becoming increasingly clear that habitat data can elucidate SRE status; and Where habitat is known to be associated with SRE taxa and vice versa, it will be noted here. C. Morphology Indicators: A suite of morphological characters are characteristic of SRE taxa; and Where morphological characters are known to be associated with SRE taxa and vice versa, it will be noted here. D. Molecular Evidence: If molecular work has been done on this taxon (or a close relative), it may reveal patterns congruent or incongruent with SRE status. E. Research & Expertise: Previous research and/ or WAM expertise elucidates taxon SRE status; and This category takes into account the expert knowledge held within the WAM. Table 3: SRE categories used SRE category Criteria Typical representatives Confirmed or almost certainly SRE; taxonomy of the group is well known (but not necessarily published); Antichiropus millipedes group well represented in collections, in particular from Confirmed (Paradoxosomatidae); scorpions in the the region in question; high levels of endemism in genus Aops (Urodacidae) documented species; inference is often possible from immature specimens. Taxonomically poorly resolved group; unusual Opiliones in the genus Dampetrus; some morphology for the group (i.e. some form of pseudoscorpions (Synsphyronus) and Likely troglomorphism); often singleton in survey and few, if slaters (Philosciidae); araneomorph spiders any, regional records. in the genus Karaops (Selenopidae) Taxonomically poorly resolved group; often common in certain microhabitats in SRE surveys (i.e. litter dwellers), Many mygalomorph spiders; some Potential but no other regional records; congeners often centipedes (Cryptopidae; Geophilomorpha) widespread. Taxonomically well resolved (but often not published) Many spiders (not mygalomorphs), Widespread/Not and demonstrated wide distribution (i.e. > 10,000 km2) centipedes or some scorpions SRE (Cercophonius sulcatus) All females and juveniles of species that cannot be identified to species level are required to be treated as ‘potential SRE’ under the precautionary principle. In addition, all likely, potential and unknown SREs should be treated as confirmed SREs under the precautionary principle (Section 4a of the Western Australian Environmental Protection Act 1986 [EP Act]) RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A summary of all SRE species recorded in the area (within 100km of the study area) is presented in Table 4. This list excludes all species that are not relevant to the assessments due to their lifestyle (troglobitic and stygobitic species) or occur in habitats that will not be impacted by the State Barrier Fence (marine and freshwater species). The raw output of the database search results is listed in Table 5. The WAM database search for crustaceans did not result in any species of interest. All species were freshwater or marine species and will not be impacted by the proposed corridor. All species identified as potential, likely or confirmed SRE as well as species listed under the WC Act and/or by DPaW are listed in Table 4. A total of 158 species were identified as potential or confirmed SRE as well as species listed under the WC Act and by DPaW: 111 morpho-species of mygalomorph spiders, nine species of pseudoscorpion, 26 millipedes, one soil centipede (geophilomorph), eight scorpions and three molluscs (snails). All females and juveniles of species that cannot be identified to species level are required to be treated as ‘potential SRE’ under the precautionary principle. One mygalomorph spider was identified as likely SRE and one millipede was identified as confirmed SRE. In addition to the SRE species above, two species of plant hopper (Flatidae) and one species of water flea are listed as Priority species by DPaW Priority 1, and one araneomorph spider and nine species of millipede are listed as Schedule 3 under the WC Act. The fact that the database search outputs included all invertebrate species regardless of their SRE status is highly likely to have contributed to the large number of species that are assessed as potential SRE. This is due to the limited public access to species information (e.g. unpublished reports, taxonomic statements) and the lack of taxonomist input on the likelihood of the species to represent an SRE. In addition, the large number of potential SRE species is also due to the low taxonomic resolution resulting from the lack of mature males and/or the fact that most morpho-species were collected from a single location and the distribution of the species is unknown. This is due to the fact that SREs are dominated by invertebrate species, which are historically understudied and in many cases, lack formal descriptions. An extensive, reliable taxonomic evaluation of these species has begun only relatively recently and thus the availability
Recommended publications
  • Five New Species of the Open-Holed Trapdoor Spider Genus Aname
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 35 010–038 (2020) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.35.2020.010-038 Five new species of the open-holed trapdoor spider genus Aname (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Anamidae) from Western Australia, with a revised generic placement for Aname armigera Mark S. Harvey1,2, Karl Gruber2, Mia J. Hillyer1 and Joel A. Huey1,2,3,4 1 Collections and Research, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, Western Australia 6106, Australia. 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia. 3 Adjunct, School of Natural Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027, Australia. 4 Present address: Biologic Environmental Survey, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia. Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The open-holed trapdoor spider genus Aname L. Koch, 1873 is widely distributed throughout Australia, and currently contains 44 named species. Using a combination of morphological and molecular data, we describe fve new species from the Wheatbelt, Mid-west and Goldfelds regions of Western Australia: A. exulans sp. nov., A. lillianae sp. nov., A. mccleeryorum sp. nov., A. phillipae sp. nov. and A. simoneae sp. nov. The female holotype of Aname armigera Rainbow and Pulleine, 1918 from near Mullewa was examined and found to belong to the genus Proshermacha Simon forming the new combination P. armigera (Rainbow and Pulleine, 1918), comb. nov. KEYWORDS: taxonomy, systematics, molecular phylogenetics urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:98828964-6150-465D-B5AE-1480DA0D454E INTRODUCTION Castalanelli, Framenau, Huey and Harvey, 2020, a The open-holed trapdoor spider genus Aname species from Western Australia recently described in L.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is Madagascar Special?
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12578 Why is Madagascar special? The extraordinarily slow evolution of pelican spiders (Araneae, Archaeidae) Hannah M. Wood,1,2 Rosemary G. Gillespie,3 Charles E. Griswold,4 and Peter C. Wainwright1 1Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720 4Entomology Department, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118 Received May 2, 2014 Accepted November 19, 2014 Although Madagascar is an ancient fragment of Gondwana, the majority of taxa studied thus far appear to have reached the island through dispersal from Cenozoic times. Ancient lineages may have experienced a different history compared to more recent Cenozoic arrivals, as such lineages would have encountered geoclimatic shifts over an extended time period. The motivation for this study was to unravel the signature of diversification in an ancient lineage by comparing an area known for major geoclimatic upheavals (Madagascar) versus other areas where the environment has been relatively stable. Archaeid spiders are an ancient paleoendemic group with unusual predatory behaviors and spectacular trophic morphology that likely have been on Madagascar since its isolation. We examined disparities between Madagascan archaeids and their non-Madagascan relatives regarding timing of divergence, rates of trait evolution, and distribution patterns. Results reveal an increased rate of adaptive trait diversification in Madagascan archaeids. Furthermore, geoclimatic events in Madagascar over long periods of time may have facilitated high species richness due to montane refugia and stability, rainforest refugia, and also ecogeographic shifts, allowing for the accumulation of adaptive traits.
    [Show full text]
  • HEXAPODA INSECTA Australia's Faunal Extinction Crisis Submission
    SUPPORTING INFORMATION Table S3 Australian insects and allied invertebrates that have been listed under various conservation schedules, including State/Territory Acts, the EPBC Act and the IUCN Red List, and their occurrence in IBRA regions. Listed species Conservation status Conservation status Conservation status IBRA region (State) (various (EPBC Act 1999) (IUCN Red List 2017) State/Territory Acts) HEXAPODA INSECTA BLATTODEA Panesthia lata Walker, 1868, (Lord Howe Island Endangered PSI (NSW) Wood-feeding Cockroach) (Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016) COLEOPTERA Aulacopris matthewsi Storey, 1986 (Flightless Vulnerable WET (QLD) Dung Beetle) Castiarina insculpta (Carter, 1934) (Miena Jewel Endangered TCH (TAS) Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 Catadromus lacordairei Boisduval , 1835 (Green- Vulnerable FUR, TNM (TAS) lined Ground Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995) Enchymus sp. nov. Pascoe, 1871 (Weldborough Rare (Threatened BEL (TAS) Forest Weevil) Species Protection Act 1995) Goedetrechus mendumae Moore, 1972 (Ida Bay Vulnerable TSR (TAS) Cave Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995) Goedetrechus parallelus Moore, 1972 (Junee- Vulnerable TWE (TAS) Florentine Cave Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995) Hoplogonus bornemisszai Bartolozzi, 1996 Endangered Critically Endangered BEL (TAS) (Bornemissza’s Stag Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 – TAS) Hoplogonus simsoni Parry, 1875 (Simsons Stag Vulnerable Vulnerable BEL, TCH (TAS) Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995) Hoplogonus
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G Short Range Endemic Invertebrate Survey.Pdf
    Appendix G Short Range Endemic Invertebrate Survey (Invertebrate Solutions 2018) Short Range Endemic invertebrate desktop assessment for Lot 102 Farrall Road, Midvale, Western Australia. Report by Invertebrate Solutions for Emerge Associates Pty Ltd on Behalf of Peet Stratton Pty Ltd March 2019 Dr Timothy Moulds Director and Principal Ecologist Invertebrate Solutions PO Box 14 Victoria Park, WA 6979 Australia [email protected] www.invertebratesolutions.com Invertebrate Solutions. (2018). Short Range Endemic invertebrate desktop assessment for Lot 102 Farrall Rd, Midvale, Western Australia. Unpublished report to Emerge Associates on behalf of Peet Stratton Pty Ltd, March 2019. Report Number 2018ISJ11_F01_20190304 Prepared for: Emerge Associates Frontispiece: The tree cricket Pachysaga munggai from the Swan Coastal Plain COPYRIGHT: This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified above, and no representation is made to any third party. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property associated with the document belongs to Invertebrate Solutions and may not be reproduced without written permission of the Client or Invertebrate Solutions. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Invertebrate Solutions. Lot 102 Farrall Rd, Midvale SRE Desktop Assessment Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eg the Short Range-Endemics of the Pilbara Bioregion
    Appendix 3 Supporting Technical Studies Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Prepared for: Covalent Lithium January 2019 Final Report May 2017 Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Bennelongia Pty Ltd 5 Bishop Street Jolimont WA 6014 P: (08) 9285 8722 F: (08) 9285 8811 E: [email protected] ABN: 55 124 110 167 Report Number: 298 Report Version Prepared by Reviewed by Submitted to Client Method Date Draft Anton Mittra Stuart Halse Email 31 May 2017 Final Stuart Halse Email 24 November 17 Final V2 Anton Mittra Email 14 January 2019 BEC_Mt Holland_SRE_final_V2_10i2019.docx This document has been prepared to the requirements of the Client and is for the use by the Client, its agents, and Bennelongia Environmental Consultants. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property associated with the document belongs to Bennelongia Environmental Consultants and may not be reproduced without written permission of the Client or Bennelongia. No liability or responsibility is accepted in respect of any use by a third party or for purposes other than for which the document was commissioned. Bennelongia has not attempted to verify the accuracy and completeness of information supplied by the Client. © Copyright 2015 Bennelongia Pty Ltd. i Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Covalent Lithium proposes to mine lithium at the Earl Grey deposit (the Proposal) approximately 100 km southeast of Southern Cross in Western Australia. This desktop review examines the likelihood that short-range endemic (SRE) invertebrates and listed terrestrial invertebrate species occur in the Proposal area and whether these species are likely to be impacted by proposed development.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix P SRE and Targeted Invertebrate Survey
    SRE and targeted invertebrate survey Phoenix Environmental Sciences, March 2010. Short-range Endemic and Targeted Invertebrate Baseline Surveys for the Roe Highway Extension Project. Unpublished report prepared for South Metro Connect, Perth, WA. ...........................................................................Appendix P SRE and targeted invertebrate survey ........................................................................... Short-range Endemic and Targeted Invertebrate Baseline Surveys for the Roe Highway Extension Project Prepared for South Metro Connect Final Report March 2010 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1 Short-range Endemic and Targeted Invertebrate Baseline Surveys for the Roe Highway Extension Project South Metro Connect Final Report Short-range Endemic and Targeted Invertebrate Baseline Surveys for the Roe Highway Extension Project Prepared for South Metro Connect Final Report Authors: Volker W. Framenau and Conor O’Neill Reviewers: Melanie White and Karen Crews Date: 8 March 2011 Submitted to: Jamie Shaw and Peter Magaro (South Metro Connect) © 2011 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd The information contained in this report is solely for the use of the Client for the purpose in which it has been prepared and Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. Any person or organisation wishing to quote or reproduce any section of this report may only do so with the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd or South Metro Connect. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1/511 Wanneroo Road BALCATTA WA 6023 P: 08 9345 1608 F: 08 6313 0680 E: [email protected] Project code: 942-ROE-AEC-SRE Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd i Short-range Endemic and Targeted Invertebrate Baseline Surveys for the Roe Highway Extension Project South Metro Connect Final Report Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Raven, RJ 1984. a Revision of the Aname Maculata Species Group
    Raven,R. J. 1984.A revision of the Anamemaculata species group(Araneae, Dipluridae) with notes on biogeography.J. ArachnoL,12:177-193. A REVISION OF THE ANAME MA CULA TA SPECIES GROUP (DIPLURIDAE, ARANEAE) WITH NOTES ON BIOGEOGRAPHY Robert1 J. Raven Queensland Museum Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, Queensland ABSTRACT Thespecies of the Anamem¢culata (Hogg) species-group (previously Chenistonia) are revised. The type species, Chenistonlamaculara Hogg, and C trevallynia Hickmanare diagnosed.Five new species: A. caeruleomontana,A. earrhwatchorum,A. hiekmani,A. montanaand A. tropica, are described. Asmost of these species possess a serrula, absent in manyother species of Aname,the groupis of phylo~eneticsignificance. Becausethe groupoccurs in discontinuousmontane talnforests fromnorthern Queensland to Tasmania,it is also of biogeographicinterest. INTRODUCTION The Anamemaculata species group includes someof those species previously included in Chenistonia which Raven (1981) considered monophyletic. Although the species have revised lack a synapomorphythey remain a coherent taxonomicunit. Males of all species have a moderately short embolus on the palp and the first metatarsus is not usually as incrassate as that of the A. pallida species group. Twopreviously described species, Anamemaculata (Hogg) and Anametrevallynia (Hickman), are included in the group present. The male of "Chenistonia tepperi’ Hogg[presumably that described by Rainbow and PuUeine(1918) as Chenistonia major Hoggand placed by Main (1972) in Stanwellia] is being revised by Mainas part of the very complex’Chenistonia tepperi’ species group. MATERIALS AND METHODS All drawings were made with a camera-lucida. Spermathecae were drawn after being cleared in lactic acid. All measurementsare in millimetres except eye measurements which are in ocular micrometerunits.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Revision of the Trans-Bassian Moriomorphine Genus
    ZooKeys 1044: 339–373 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1044.62335 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Systematic revision of the trans-Bassian moriomorphine genus Theprisa Moore (Coleoptera, Carabidae) James K. Liebherr1, Nick Porch2, Matthew Shaw3, Bronte E. Sinclair4, David R. Maddison5 1 Department of Entomology, John H. and Anna B. Comstock Hall, 129 Garden Ave., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2601, USA 2 School of Life & Environmental Sciences & Centre for Integrated Ecology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia 3 South Australian Museum, South Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia 4 Australian National Insect Collection, Building 101, Clunies Ross St., Black Mountain, ACT 2601, Australia 5 Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Corresponding author: James K. Liebherr ([email protected]) Academic editor: Thorsten Assmann | Received 21 December 2020 | Accepted 18 February 2021 | Published 16 June 2021 http://zoobank.org/8264C999-3201-4A3B-B39C-222790AC0192 Citation: Liebherr JK, N Porch, M Shaw, BE Sinclair, DR Maddison (2021) Systematic revision of the trans-Bassian moriomorphine genus Theprisa Moore (Coleoptera, Carabidae). In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JK, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940–2020). ZooKeys 1044: 339–373. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62335 Abstract The Australian genus Theprisa Moore, 1963, is taxonomically revised to comprise five species, two newly described: Theprisa darlingtoniLiebherr & Porch, sp. nov. of Tasmania, and Theprisa otway Liebherr, Porch & Maddison, sp. nov. from the Otway Ranges, Victoria. Two previously described species, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Australian Spiders (Total of 3,935 Species in 677 Genera and 87 Families* by Volker W
    Checklist of Australian Spiders (total of 3,935 species in 677 genera and 87 families* by Volker W. Framenau Version 1.43: Saturday, 17 October 2020 For feedback and corrections please contact: [email protected] *The family Stenochilidae occurs in Australia (Framenau, Baehr, Zborowski 2014) but since no species have been published for this country, this family is currently not listed with any species below. this page: Araneomorphae Agelenidae Oramia Araneomorphae Agelenidae C. L. Koch, 1837 Modern Funnel-web Spiders Oramia Forster, 1964 frequens (Rainbow, 1920) Tegenaria Latreille, 1804 domestica (Clerck, 1758) Amaurobiidae Thorell, 1870 Mesh-web Weavers Dardurus Davies, 1976 agrestis Davies, 1976 nemoralis Davies, 1976 saltuosus Davies, 1976 silvaticus Davies, 1976 spinipes Davies, 1976 tamborinensis Davies, 1976 Daviesa Koçal & Kemal, 2008 gallonae (Davies, 1993) lubinae (Davies, 1993) Oztira Milledge, 2011 affinis (Hickman, 1981) aquilonaria (Davies, 1986) kroombiti Milledge, 2011 summa (Davies, 1986) Storenosoma Hogg, 1900 altum Davies, 1986 bifidum Milledge, 2011 bondi Milledge, 2011 forsteri Milledge, 2011 grayi Milledge, 2011 grossum Milledge, 2011 hoggi (Roewer, 1942) picadilly Milledge, 2011 smithae Milledge, 2011 supernum Davies, 1986 tasmaniensis Milledge, 2011 terraneum Davies, 1986 Page 1 of 100 this page: Araneomorphae Amaurobiidae Storenosoma victoria Milledge, 2011 Tasmabrochus Davies, 2002 cranstoni Davies, 2002 montanus Davies, 2002 turnerae Davies, 2002 Tasmarubrius Davies, 1998 hickmani Davies, 1998 milvinus
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering a Secret World on the South Coast
    Page header?? UNCOVERING A SECRET WORLD ON THE SOUTH COAST Hiding beneath leaf litter and under rocks on the south coast lies a hidden world of spineless animals. Thanks to the tireless work of the South Coast Threatened Invertebrate Group we are getting a better picture of these amazing animals and how best to protect them. by Sarah Comer, Melinda Moir, Mark Harvey and Deon Utber LANDSCOPE 47 he south-west of Western published scientific literature each year Previous page Australia is recognised as one of 34 due to the many species requiring names Main Mark Harvey collecting invertebrates global biodiversity hotspots, and and the few taxonomists available to do at Middle Island off the south coast. T Photo – Sarah Comer/Parks and Wildlife while the flora and vertebrate fauna are the job. The term ‘Linnaean Shortfall’ Bottom The WA pill millipede (Cynotelopus relatively well described, the challenge of describes this bottleneck situation, but notabilis). documenting invertebrate diversity is one doesn’t help to identify which species that has kept the South Coast Threatened might require conservation. This is partly Above A female Zephyrarchaea mainae found Invertebrate Group (SCTIG) members achieved by conducting surveys and at Torndirrup National Park. Photos – Michael Rix/WA Museum busy for nearly 15 years. examining records to determine how restricted species actually are, where UNDERSTANDING THE they occur and, just as importantly, SPINELESS MAJORITY where they do not occur. This lack of To fully comprehend the challenges of knowledge on a species biogeography is Australia and Parks and Wildlife sought to invertebrate conservation it is important referred to as the ‘Wallacean Shortfall’.
    [Show full text]
  • Zt03383p038.Pdf
    Zootaxa 3383: 15–38 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Molecular and morphological characterisation of new species in the trapdoor spider genus Aname (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Nemesiidae) from the Pilbara bioregion of Western Australia FRANCES S. B. HARVEY1, VOLKER W. FRAMENAU2,3,6, JANINE M. WOJCIESZEK3,7, MICHAEL G. RIX2 & MARK S. HARVEY2,3,4,5 1Shenton College, 227 Stubbs Terrace, Shenton Park, Western Australia 6008, Australia 2Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia 3School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia 4 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 49th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192, USA; and California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94103-3009, USA 5Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] 6Current address: Phoenix Environmental Sciences, 1/511 Wanneroo Road, Balcatta, Western Australia 6021, Australia 7Current address: School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia Abstract A study of selected species in the nemesiid spider genus Aname L. Koch, 1873 from the Pilbara bioregion of Western Aus- tralia was undertaken using molecular and morphological techniques. Bayesian and parsimony analyses of mitochondrial sequence data from the Cytochrome c Oxidase subunit I (COI) gene found evidence for four species, confirming our initial morphological examination of adult male specimens. These four species are here described as A. mellosa n.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzroy, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]