DOCSLIB.ORG

In Partial Fulfillment of the Regulations O Colleen Gray, 1993

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Partial Fulfillment of the Regulations O Colleen Gray, 1993 • CA PT 1 VES 1 N CANADA, 1744-1763 A thesis submitted to the Pacul ty of Craduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the regulations for the degree of Masters of the Arts COLLEEN GRAY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY MCGI LL UNIVERS ITV, MONTREAL JUNE, 1993 o Colleen Gray, 1993 • • Captives in Canada, 1744-1763 • 7 • Abstract The captivity narratives have long been recognized as an important literary source. Most recently, scholars have viewed them in terms of their ~thnographic value. Few, however, have considered them vithin the context of the history of New France. This study attampts to drav atten~ion to the richness and diversity of these documents. The chapters, bullt upon the basis of similarities among the narratives, explore different facets of the French colony during the year~ 1744- 1763. Specifically, they discuss techniques of military interrogation, the Québec prison for captives (1745-1747), French-Indian relations and how the vriters of these tales viewed both the var and their enemies. Résumé L'importance des récits de captivité comme genre littéraire est. depuis longtemps reconnue. Plus récemment, les chercheur~ ont exploité ces documents pour leur valeur ethnographique mais, plus rarement, pour leur contribution à l'histoire de la Nouvelle-France. La thèse a pour but d'attirer l'attention sur la richesse et la diversité des informations contenues dans ces récits. En s'appuyant sur la convergence des observations d'un texte à l'autre, elle explore différentes facettes de la colonie française entre 1744 et 1763: les techniques des interrogatoires militaires, la vie dans la prison de Québec (174'-1747) et les relations entre Français et Amérindiens. Le dernier chapitre examine la perception de la guerre et de l'ennemi qui sous-tend les récits . • i i • TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract/Résumé i List of Figures iii Introduction 1 Chapter One - Captive or Friend? , The "Kindness" of the French, 6 Military Interrogation, 12 Captive or Friend?, 16 Chapter Two - The Ouébec Prison, 17~'-1747 18 Chapter Three - The French and the Indian 44 William Pote's Journal, ~7 French-Huron Relations, ~9 Acadian-Huron Relations, '5 The Meaning of the Pote Journal, '9 The Faithful Narrative of Robert Eastburn, 61 French-Iroquois Relations, 62 The Meaning of the Faithful Narrative, 66 Pote and Eastburn, 68 Chapter Four - The Many Faces of 71 Providence Total Providentialism, 7~ Nehemiah Ho., 78 The Reverend Mr. John Norton, 83 The Many Faces of Providence, 86 Conclusion 89 Notes 93 Bibliography 122 • i i i • LIST OF F ICURES 1.1 The Journey of the Reverend Mr. John 8 Norton 2. 1 The Ouébec Pr i son 20 2.2 Profile and Elevation of the Royal 21 Redoubt, by Boisberthelot de Beaucours 2.3 Location of the Royal Redoubt 22 2 • I~ The Stove at the Prison in Ouébec 28 3. 1 The Journey of Captai n li 1 1 iam Pote 48 3.2 The Journey of Robert Eastburn 63 4. 1 Title Page from The Narrative of 75 Nehemiah How 4..2 Title Page from The Redeemed Captive 76 4.3 The Journey of Nehemiah How 79 • • Introduct ion J was initially drawn into an examination of the New England captivity narratives by James Axtell's fine book, The Invasion "ithin. 1 ln particular, his depiction of the many New Eng 1and capt i ve S who, th roughou t the seventeen th and eighteenth centuries, renounced religion, language and culture and settled into the society of New France, seemed to offer a fascinating prospect and inspired me to examine the original narratives. As 1 began to read these documents, however, 1 was struck, as a student of New France, by how many of the narratives, particularly those covering the period 17",4-1763, during the "ar of the Austrian Succession and the Seven Years' \far, focused upon the French colonies in North America. Gradually, the intriguing question of why these New Eng 1an de r s remai ned in New France receded in to the background and the central concern of my pro;ect became: what do the captivity narratives of the period 17",4-1763 reveal to the hi storian about New France? 3. M. Bumstead's article, "'Carried to Canada': Perceptions of the French in British Colonial Captivity Na rra t ive s, 16 90- 1 760" , a ais 0 as k e d t h i s que s t ion. Us i n g these documents, he examined the evolution of the French treatment of their captives from the earliest narratives in the seventeenth century to the Bri t i sh Conquest of Canada. Although Bumstead' s str ict focus upon the New France dimension of the captivity narratives was unique, his use of the documents as primary historlcal sources was part of a larger trend, throughout the 1980s, among many historians. Most worthy of mention in thi s regard are James Axtell 's innovative ethnohistorical studies, The European and the lodian, in particular, his chapter "The 'hite Indians of North America,1I as weil as The Invasion lithin. Both works made liberal use of the narratives, as weil as other • sources, to examine the development of New Bngland and -----------------------------~~ ---- native relations throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth • centuries. 3 Encou raged by such we Il-es tab 1 i shed precedent s, my ta sk appeared initially qui te simple. However, as 1 examined the narratives more closely, 1 began to real Ize that the documents 1 had chosen to utilize appeared in a variety of perplexing and diverse forms which could cali into qu~stion their use as reliable and authentlc primary sources. For example, rnany of the narratives were wrltten in the first person and publ ished immediately after the individuals' particular captivity (category A), often during or after either the lar of the Austrian Succession or the Seven Years' Vlar." Sorne historians have suggested that these particular narratives were published for purposes of war propaganda. 5 Other accounts, diaries written during the period 1744-1763 (category B), discovered and published ln the tate nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, are 50 few that, at first sight, appear to offer a scanty indication of an unedited captivity experience. 6 Many other first person accounts, which were written or dictated by former captives and published long after their captivity experience (category Cl, could have been sub;ect not only to editorial Interference, but also to the vagaries of the former captives' memory.7 And, the fourth category (D), third person accounts of captivities, which were collected and published after 1763 from oral or written sources, posed the possibility that not only could the editor of these collections have imposed his\her bias of a different historical time on the captives' story, but also many of these tales could have, over time, changed in passing from one generation to the next.& Faced with these initial complexities, it appeared that this thesis would, indeed, merely become a justification of the use of these documents as primary historical sources • • However, passing over these narratives, reading and 3 rereadlng them, 1 began to dlscover simllar elements, not • only among the narratives 1 had placed in the same category, but a1so among many of the other narratives regardless of time of publication or the person who .rote, dictated or collected them. A common plcture slo.ly began to emerge - a consistent Impression of certain aspects of the captivity experienee in New France throughout the period 1744-1763. These striking similarities led me to believe that no matter how much the narratives May have been tampered with, were subJect to the vagaries of human memory or oral transmission, one could extract from many of these documents a consistent view of certain aspects of New France. It was on the basis of similarities within the narratives that the chapters of th!s thesis were built. Chapter one approaehes the problem of the kind treatment the Prench appeared to bestow upon many of their captives and, with specifie refer~nee to the narrative of the Reverend Mr. John Norton, places it within the wider context of French military interrogation tactics in colonial North America. Chapter t_o takes advantage of the unique existence of four simultaneous aecounts of the Québec prison for captives (1744-1747) - William Pote, the Reverend Mr. John Norton, Nehemiah How and the Unknown Captive. On the basis of these documents, the chapter attempts to reconstruct varlous tacets of the social history of this little-known prison during the War of the Austrian Succession. Chapter three moves on to address the captives' perceptions of the Freneh-Indian relationship. With a specifie focus on William Pote's Journal and Robert Eastburn's tale, It examines these perceptions not only in the light of contemporary historieal knowledge, but also within the context of the stereotypieal caricature of the French-Indian relationship predominant in eighteenth-century colonial Ameriean publications. And, finally, chapter four discusses the religious quality of • these narratives and explores the rel iglous mentality of 4 Nehemiah How and the Reverend Mr. John Norton, how it shaped • their views, not only of the War of the Austrlan Succession, but also their perception of the French as enemies and captors.~ 1 would like to thank a few indivlduals who gUlded and helped me vith this thesis. Primarily, 1 would like to express mi gratitude ta Prof. Louise Dechêne for offerlng so generously of her rare gift of encouraging creatlvlty, combined with her subtle abillty to lead the wayward traveller of the imaglnation back onto the approprlate academic track. Her advice in cautionlng me, as a flrst-tlme student of primary sources, in the use of these documents vas invaluable, as was her example of high standards and a rigourous approach to history.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Boundaries of Nationality in Mid-18Th Century Nova Scotia*
    GEOFFREY PLANK The Two Majors Cope: The Boundaries of Nationality in Mid-18th Century Nova Scotia* THE 1750S BEGAN OMINOUSLY IN Nova Scotia. In the spring of 1750 a company of French soldiers constructed a fort in a disputed border region on the northern side of the isthmus of Chignecto. The British built a semi-permanent camp only a few hundred yards away. The two armies faced each other nervously, close enough to smell each other's food. In 1754 a similar situation near the Ohio River led to an imperial war. But the empires were not yet ready for war in 1750, and the stand-off at Chignecto lasted five years. i In the early months of the crisis an incident occurred which illustrates many of *' the problems I want to discuss in this essay. On an autumn day in 1750, someone (the identity of this person remains in dispute) approached the British fort waving a white flag. The person wore a powdered wig and the uniform of a French officer. He carried a sword in a sheath by his side. Captain Edward Howe, the commander of the British garrison, responded to the white flag as an invitation to negotiations and went out to greet the man. Then someone, either the man with the flag or a person behind him, shot and killed Captain Howe. According to three near-contemporary accounts of these events, the man in the officer's uniform was not a Frenchman but a Micmac warrior in disguise. He put on the powdered wig and uniform in order to lure Howe out of his fort.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Majors Cope:: the Boundaries of Nationality in Mid-18Th Century Nova Scotia*
    Document generated on 09/23/2021 5:31 p.m. Acadiensis The Two Majors Cope: The Boundaries of Nationality in Mid-18th Century Nova Scotia* Geoffrey Plank Volume 25, Number 2, Spring 1996 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/acad25_2art02 See table of contents Publisher(s) The Department of History of the University of New Brunswick ISSN 0044-5851 (print) 1712-7432 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Plank, G. (1996). The Two Majors Cope:: The Boundaries of Nationality in Mid-18th Century Nova Scotia*. Acadiensis, 25(2), 18–40. All rights reserved © Department of History at the University of New This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit Brunswick, 1996 (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ GEOFFREY PLANK The Two Majors Cope: The Boundaries of Nationality in Mid-18th Century Nova Scotia* THE 1750S BEGAN OMINOUSLY IN Nova Scotia. In the spring of 1750 a company of French soldiers constructed a fort in a disputed border region on the northern side of the isthmus of Chignecto. The British built a semi-permanent camp only a few hundred yards away. The two armies faced each other nervously, close enough to smell each other's food.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Captivity: a Tool in the Battle for Souls and Power
    University of North Carolina at Asheville INDIAN CAPTIVITY: A TOOL IN THE BATTLE FOR SOULS AND POWER A Senior Thesis Submitted to The Faculty of the Department of History In Candidacy for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in History by AVRIL V. DOBBELAER Indian Captivity: A Tool in the Battle for Souls and Power By honoring the ancient Native American tradition of adopting or enslaving their captured adversaries, the French were able to create an effective tool of warfare with which to terrorize their own New England enemies. Between 1665 and 1763, Amerindians, frequently led by French offi- cers, seized at least 1,641 settlers, ‘carrying’ them to Canada where most spent an uncertain future in various Indian missionary settlements.1 Many more, especially women and children, died during the cruel raids or on long marches through ‘wilderness’ conditions. It was no coincidence that such incidents occurred largely during the various French-Indian Wars. By inviting Amerindian partici- pation in such wars, the French could cement their native alliances. By capitalizing on their ene- mies’ innate fear of Indian captivity, they could keep New England’s economy continually off- balance and preoccupied with defense. Ostensibly, these periodic confrontations between France and England were battles for control in North America. Underlying that territorial struggle, how- ever, was a no-less-intensive fight for the saving of souls between two virtual theocracies, Protes- tant New England and Catholic New France. The importance of religious conversion gradually diminished as secularity pervaded both colonies. By the outbreak of Shirley’s War, submitting captives to traditional forms of ceremonial torture or enslavement grew increasingly unacceptable as France adopted New European conven- tions regarding the treatment of prisoners-of-war.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Soldiers in Gorham's Rangers, 1744–1762
    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU History Faculty Scholarship College of Arts and Humanities 9-1-2012 “Savages” in the Service of Empire: Native American Soldiers in Gorham's Rangers, 1744–1762 Brian D. Carroll Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/cahfac_history Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons ✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦ “Savages” in the Service of Empire: Native American Soldiers in Gorham’s Rangers, 1744–1762 brian d. carroll ORHAM’S RANGERS, formed in 1744 as an auxiliary G unit of the Massachusetts provincial army, was an am- phibious strike force that patrolled the coasts, inlets, bays, and rivers of the Canadian Maritimes in modified whaleboats.1 Ini- tially manned by Native Americans from southeastern Mas- sachusetts and commanded by British colonial officers, by its final deployments in the early 1760s, Gorham’s Rangers had become a unit of mostly Anglo-Americans and recent Scots and Irish immigrants who, nonetheless, continued to employ the tactics the unit’s original Indian members had pioneered. For Indian members of the company the cost had been dear; combat fatalities, disease, debilitating wounds and injuries, and years of brutal captivity in French or Indian communities in Canada were common fates. Robert Rogers is widely credited with instituting the Amer- ican ranger tradition and, thus, with establishing, during the French and Indian War (1754–63), a uniquely American style of warfare based in Indian strategies. Dating that innovation to I express my sincerest gratitude to Wayne E. Lee, Geoffrey Plank, and Andrew Pierce for sharing citations, sources, or copies of unpublished work.
    [Show full text]
  • Glimpses of the Past - History of the River St
    Glimpses of the Past - History of the River St. John, A.D. 1604-1784 By Raymond, W. O. (William Odber), 1853-1923 English A Doctrine Publishing Corporation Digital Book This book is indexed by ISYS Web Indexing system to allow the reader find any word or number within the document. * * * * * GLIMPSES OF THE PAST. History of the River St. John A. D. 1604-1784. By Rev. W. O. RAYMOND, LL.D. St. John, N. B. 1905. * * * * * [Illustration: SAMUEL DE CHAMPLAIN. Discoverer of the River St. John. The Father of New France. Born at Brouage in 1567. Died at Quebec, Dec. 25, 1635.] PREFACE. Born and reared upon the banks of the River Saint John, I have always loved it, and have found a charm in the study of everything that pertains to the history of those who have dwelt beside its waters. In connection with the ter-centenary of the discovery of the river by de Monts and Champlain, on the memorable 24th of June, 1604, the chapters which follow were contributed, from time to time, to the Saturday edition of the Saint John Daily Telegraph. With the exception of a few minor corrections and additions, these chapters are reprinted as they originally appeared. Some that were hurriedly written, under pressure of other and more important work, might be revised with advantage. Little attempt at literary excellence has been practicable. I have been guided by an honest desire to get at the facts of history, and in so doing have often quoted the exact language of the writers by whom the facts were first recorded.
    [Show full text]