Appleby Lodge Site, Sywell Road, Wellingborough
Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report
July 2012
Contents
1 Introduction ...... 3 2 Screening and Scoping Exercise ...... 4 3 Location and Site Description ...... 6 4 Description of the Development ...... 8 5 Consideration of Alternatives ...... 10 6 Likely Environmental Effects ...... 11 7 Approach to the EIA ...... 17
Appendices: Appendix 1 – Site Boundary
2
1 Introduction
1.1 Prologis UK is proposing to submit an outline planning application for the development of land at Appleby Lodge, Sywell Road, Wellingborough for a strategic employment park (Use Classes B1(c), B2 and B8) with associated parking, highway infrastructure and landscaping. This site currently comprises of farmland and extends to 65 hectares.
1.2 Having assessed the proposals in the context of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations 2011, it is considered that the project needs to be subject to a process of EIA.
1.3 Prologis have appointed a consultant team to undertake the EIA. The team comprises:
Delta Planning – EIA Co-ordination, Planning Policy and Socio- Economic Impacts
Stephen George and Partners – Masterplanning Architects
Barry Chinn Associates – Landscape Architects and Landscape and Visual Impact
Peter Brett Associates – Traffic and Transport, Ground Conditions, Flood Risk and Drainage, Noise , Vibration and Air Quality
Ecology Solutions- Ecology and Nature Conservation
Prospect Archaeology – Archaeology
1.4 This Scoping Report seeks to identify the likely effects on the environment, the studies necessary to assess them and the level of detail required to enable a planning decision to be made. It is submitted to the Borough Council of Wellingborough to allow for a formal scoping opinion to be issued.
3
2 Screening and Scoping Exercise
Need for an EIA
2.1 The proposed development is for an employment park involving Use Classes B1(c), B2 and B8. The development falls within Schedule 2 of the projects to which the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2011 apply (hereafter referred to as the EIA Regulations).
2.2 Specifically, it can be regarded as falling within Category 10 (Infrastructure Projects), as being both an ‘industrial estate development project’ and an ‘urban development project’. The applicable size threshold for projects in this category is the area of the site exceeding 0.5ha. Further indicative criteria are provided, including:
In relation to ‘Industrial Estates’, paragraph A17 advises that EIA is more likely to be required if the site area of the new development is more than 20 hectares. In considering whether significant effects are likely, particular consideration should be given to the potential for increase in traffic, emissions and noise’.
With regard to ‘Urban Development Projects’ paragraph A18 further advises that EIA is unlikely to be required for the development of land unless the new development is on a significantly greater scale than the previous use, or the types of impact are of markedly different nature or there is a high level of contamination.
2.3 In this instance, the site area significantly exceeds the suggested thresholds. The site is also currently non-urbanised, its current use being agricultural land, such that the development is on a significantly greater scale than the existing use.
2.4 Prologis has therefore concluded that the development proposal should be subject to formal EIA to ensure that all environmental effects are fully considered in the planning process, and that the planning application should be accompanied by an Environmental Statement.
Scoping Exercise
2.5 Schedule 4 of the EIA Regulations outlines the statutory provisions with respect to the content of Environmental Statements. Certain of these provisions are mandatory and are set out in Part II of Schedule 4 as follows:
A description of the development comprising information on the site, design and size of the development;
4
An outline of the main alternatives studied by the applicant and an indication of the main reasons for the choice, taking into account environmental effects; A description of the aspects of the environment likely to be significantly affected by the development; A description of the measures envisaged in order to prevent, reduce and, if possible, offset any significant adverse effects; A non-technical summary An indication of any difficulties encountered in compiling the information required
2.6 In addition, Part 1 of Schedule 4 covers information which, at the discretion of the local planning authority, is required to assess the environmental effects of the development. This may include a description of the aspects of the environment likely to be significantly affected and a description of those effects (including direct/indirect, secondary/cumulative, short, medium and long term, permanent/temporary and positive/negative).
2.7 The remainder of this Scoping Report describes the site and proposed development and identifies the aspects of the environment to be considered in the EIA and the methodology of assessment.
5
3 Site Description and Policy Context
Site and Surroundings
3.1 The application site comprises 65.31 hectares of farmland as identified in the plan attached as Appendix 1. It is located approximately 4 kilometres to the west of Wellingborough Town Centre.
3.2 The site incorporates existing residential properties and farm buildings associated with Appleby Lodge farm. A number of agricultural buildings have been used for businesses including a wedding car hire business, joinery manufacturers and waste management facility. Car boot sales also occur on site. All existing operations will cease and buildings will be demolished as part of the application proposals.
3.3 The site is accessed off Sywell Road which is connected to the Trunk Road network including the A509 and A45.
3.4 Immediately to the east of the site is the Park Farm Industrial Estate. This estate provides modern light industrial units, warehousing and distribution facilities and a health club. Some of the current occupiers include RICOH, House of Fraser, Dunkleys, Homebase, DHL, Booker, Dana, Retco, Mykal, Edel, Nimlok and Cummins and Bannatynes.
3.5 To the north of the site is the Wellingborough Old Grammarians Sports and Social Club at the Memorial Sports field which hosts facilities for football, rugby, tennis and cricket. The site has 47 acres of sports fields and a club house which provides changing facilities, bar and function rooms.
3.6 Land to the south and west of the site incorporates open countryside including existing public footpaths.
Planning Policy Context
3.7 The adopted North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy (CSS) identifies that North Northamptonshire is set to grow significantly in the next 15-20 years. Between 2006 and 2021 it is anticipated that the population will increase from 298,000 to 370,000 and to accommodate that growth some 52,000 new homes will be required. Although these figures are under review the scale of growth will still be significant and the CSS recognises that the area must also attract business investment to generate new jobs and achieve a broad balance between homes and jobs. Failure to do so would result in the area becoming a commuter dormitory. The CSS acknowledges that logistics, storage and distribution remain growth sectors for North Northamptonshire’s business economy.
6
3.8 Following a strategic Employment Land Assessment for Northamptonshire, the Borough Council of Wellingborough published a Site Specific Proposals Development Plan Document Preferred Options in December 2010. This identified the westward extension of Park Farm at Appleby Lodge, Sywell Road as a preferred site for the further development of employment uses.
3.9 In July 2012 the North Northants Joint Planning Unit approved a Core Strategy Review for consultation. This review proposes that a net increase of 28,500 jobs will be sought through a number of measures including prioritising the enhancement of existing employment sites, the regeneration of appropriate previously developed sites, safeguarding existing employment areas, ensuring sufficient high quality new sites are identified. In relation to the distribution of jobs, the review identifies committed and new sites including urban extensions and additional sites. The site at Appleby Lodge is identified as a new additional site to meet the growth required. With regards to sites for Strategic Distribution, the review also notes the need to facilitate the delivery of a mix of jobs and that proposals must provide a maximum of 70% of the total site floorspace for B8 uses with the provision of smaller employment units to unlock complementary employment uses. Strategic Distribution sites need to be located close to existing strategic distribution sites, have good access to the road network, have good access to local labour supply, maximise the use of sustainable design techniques, be in locations which allow 24 hour operations, be in locations that minimise environmental, community and landscape impact and address local operational requirements of HGV parking arising from the development.
7
4 Description of the Development
4.1 The proposed development will comprise employment development within Use Classes B1 (c), B2 and B8, together with associated roads, parking and landscaping.
4.2 The planning application is to be submitted in outline with detailed matters relating to layout, scale, appearance and landscaping reserved for subsequent approval. Details relating to access however, will be submitted for approval at outline stage. Although the detail of how the site will be developed is not yet fully established, the application will be accompanied by the following:
A ‘Development Parameters’ drawing showing separate development zones proposed within the site, and an indication of the minimum and maximum heights and sizes of buildings within each zone
A schedule of development setting out proposed uses and quantum of overall floorspace
A landscape strategy plan
An ‘indicative’ masterplan showing how the site could be developed as currently envisaged by the applicants, and
Full details of the proposed vehicular access
4.3 At this stage the precise quantum of development is not yet established. However, the net developable areas following the provision of infrastructure will provide for approximately 47 hectares of employment land. Total employment floorspace is therefore likely to be in the region of 233,000 sq.m. It is currently envisaged that the development will be split into 3 zones as follows:
Zone A – This will form the eastern part of the site and extends to approximately 22 hectares. It will provide for large units for B8 use with ancillary offices providing in the order of 147,000 sq.m
Zone B – This will form the northern part of the site and extends to approximately 13.5 hectare. It will provide for a broad range of unit sizes and a mixture of B1(c), B2 and B8 uses with ancillary offices. It will provide for up to 65,000 sq.m.
Zone C – This will form the southern part of the site and extends to approximately 11 hectares. It will provide for large or medium sized units for B2 or B8 use totalling in the order of 56,000 sq.m.
4.4 The industrial/distribution buildings will be of a high specification. They will be in the size ranges known to be of interest to occupiers currently in the market.
8
The intention is therefore to bring them forward for development as demand dictates.
4.5 Prior to submission of the application the Parameters drawing, Land Use Schedule and illustrative masterplan will be discussed with the planning authority and statutory consultees. Members of the public will also be consulted on the proposals.
9
5 Consideration of Alternatives
5.1 The alternative employment sites within North Northamptonshire are being considered as part of the Local Development Framework process. The Appleby Lodge site has been identified as a Preferred Option for additional employment development as it is considered to form a natural extension to the Park Farm Industrial Estate on Sywell Road.
5.2 Alternatives will also be considered as part of the EIA process.
10
6 Likely Environmental Effects
6.1 The following section identifies aspects of the environment to be considered in the Environmental Statement. Known baseline conditions, the data required to assess impacts and the scope for any mitigation measures are discussed.
6.2 It is considered that the key issues for this development will be:-
Traffic and Transport
6.3 A Transport Assessment (TA) in accordance with NPPF and other relevant background documents will be produced to describe access arrangements and demonstrate that this complies with relevant standards and can satisfactorily accommodate traffic associated with the development.
6.4 This assessment will also deal with the response of the development proposals to sustainable transport policy and the broad transport and related environmental impacts of the development. The assessment will identify the local traffic impacts of the development on the adjacent network including the nearby A509 and A45 routes. The transport baseline position, relevant impacts and mitigation measures and residual impacts and their significance will be included within the Environmental Impact Assessment.
6.5 The accessibility of the site by sustainable transport modes, including public transport, cycle and by foot will be analysed. Sustainable transport modes will be identified and quantified. The capacity for enhancing non-car borne trips, opportunities for pedestrian access including existing/potential rights of way and opportunities for bus penetration of the site will be considered.
6.6 The full scope of the TA will be agreed between Peter Brett Associates (Prologis’ highways consultant), the Highways Agency and Northamptonshire County Council.
Air Quality
6.7 Existing air quality around the Appleby Lodge site and Park Farm Industrial Estate is influenced by its proximity to the strategic road network.
6.8 The Borough Council of Wellingborough undertakes an annual review and assessment of local air quality as required under the Environment Protection
Act 1995. The main pollutant of concern is nitrogen dioxide (NO2) although there are no Air Quality Management Areas (AQMAs) in Wellingborough, and the nearest diffusion tube monitoring site is approximately 3km from the
proposed development. Monitoring indicates that NO2 concentrations are significantly below Air Quality Strategy Objectives and there is little risk of breaching the objectives. As such, we would not propose additional local air
11
quality monitoring and the suitability of the site for development would not need consideration, as there is no residential development proposed.
6.9 The potential for the proposed development to result in significant effects on air quality relates to the following:
Dust associated with the construction phase; and Changes in traffic flow characteristics associated with the completed phase of the proposed development.
6.10 Construction of the proposed development has the potential to generate dust which may have effects on nearby sensitive receptors. The air quality assessment will therefore include an assessment of the impacts of construction dust in accordance with best practice guidance. The impacts of emissions from construction traffic and machinery are likely to be screened out from detailed consideration.
6.11 The potential for the proposed development to result in effects on air quality relates mainly to the potential for changes in traffic flow and/ or the characteristics of the traffic on the local road network in the completed phase of the proposed development. Therefore, the ES would include an assessment of the effects on existing air quality from road traffic during the operational phase.
6.12 Consultation will be undertaken with the Environmental Health Officers at the Borough Council of Wellingborough to identify any particular issues of concern.
Noise and Vibration
6.13 Existing noise sources around Appleby Lodge are the strategic road network, together with existing industrial uses on the adjacent Park Farm Industrial Estate. There are few, if any, noise or vibration sensitive receptors in the proximity of the site and this will be discussed and agreed with the Borough Council of Wellingborough.
6.14 If any receptors are identified a baseline noise survey will be undertaken to include measurements over a typical 24 hour period to establish existing noise levels at those receptors and an assessment will be carried out to consider the potential noise and vibration impacts from site clearance and construction processes at existing noise-sensitive properties in accordance with the methodology in BS 5228 Noise and Vibration Control on Construction and Open Sites. The construction impact assessment will be qualitative at this outline stage. Noise limits will be sets following the 'ABC Method' described in BS5228. A quantitative assessment may be undertaken once a contractor is appointed and the construction methods are known. Changes in road traffic noise as a result of the development-generated traffic will also be considered and potential effects assessed. Noise from fixed plant and vehicular activity
12
associated with the proposed industrial and distribution development will be considered in accordance with BS4142 Method for Rating industrial noise affecting mixed residential and industrial areas. All assessments will be undertaken in accordance with the principles set out in the relevant sections of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF),
6.15 If required, the assessment will set out outline mitigation measures and residual impacts will be quantified where possible.
Ecology
6.16 The ecological baseline of the site has been assessed through an Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey carried out by Ecology Solutions. During the survey, the presence, or potential presence of protected species was also recorded.
6.17 Investigations have been undertaken into the presence of protected species which are on-going. The previous field survey identified limited potential to support roosting Bats. If Bats are present upon the site, a suitable mitigation strategy will be devised. Natural England will advise the Borough of Wellingborough Council on this matter.
6.18 No evidence of badgers was recorded during the surveys, although the hedgerows and grass margin habitats could offer some limited potential for badgers. The nearest protected mammal was a water vole and this was recorded at Park Farm Industrial Estate at a location approximately 0.75 km east of the application site in 2006.
6.19 Local water bodies were assessed for amphibian species and it is recommended that newt surveys are carried out to ascertain whether Great Crested Newts are present on the application site.
6.20 There is no overriding ecological constraint to the development of the site and there is considerable scope for the incorporation of a range of mitigation and enhancement measures within the proposed development. A number of surveys have been recommended for protected species which will identify whether these groups are present or absent and will guide the recommendations for mitigation and enhancement.
6.21 The full details of the ecology assessment using an extended phase 1 habitat survey will be provided in the Environmental Statement which will outline mitigation measures and residual impacts.
Drainage, Flood Risk and Water Quality
6.22 The proposed development has the potential to impact on the existing foul and surface water drainage networks in and around the site. The assessment of the impact of the development on the existing drainage networks will involve the establishment of the baseline position; the determination of post-
13
development conditions and the establishment of any mitigation measures that may be necessary. The Environment Agency (EA), the Lead Local Flood Authority, the Water and Sewerage Undertaker and the local SuDS Approving Body (SAB) will all be consulted during the assessment.
6.23 As part of the assessment, based on the topographical survey information, the existing natural surface water drainage catchments and outfalls will be identified. The existing greenfield rates of runoff for all natural catchments will be calculated. The Parameters Plan will be used to identify post-development drainage catchments and individual surface water discharge from these will be assigned to the previously identified outfalls. A surface water drainage strategy will be developed to ensure that runoff generated by the proposed development, as far as possible, mimics the natural catchment response to rainfall events. The proposed surface water drainage strategy will make an allowance for increase in rainfall intensities due to climate change.
6.24 The surface water drainage strategy for the site will make use of the principles of sustainable drainage systems (SuDS).
6.25 A NPPF compliant Flood Risk Assessment will be prepared for the site.
6.26 Foul water drainage will be designed in compliance with Sewers for Adoption 6th Edition (March 2006, WRc) and Building Regulations Part H.
6.27 The potential risks to groundwater from hydro carbon pollution associated with on plot re-fuelling, vehicle wash facilities and car parking areas will also be assessed and appropriate mitigation measures identified.
Soils, Geology and Contamination
6.28 Geology and Geomorphology The natural ground conditions on the site comprise a surface layer of topsoil/subsoil overlying a sequence of Glacial Till, the Blisworth Limestone Formation, the interbedded sandstone and limestone of the Rutland Formation and the ironstone of the Northampton Sand Formation.
6.29 The natural geomorphology in the vicinity of the site comprises the valley of the River Nene. The Site itself is situated on the undulating ground to the west of the river valley around the upper parts of the valley of a tributary of the River Nene that flows south through the southern part of the Site.
6.30 There are no designated geological or geomorphological sites or features of conservation value in the area affected by the proposed scheme. Given that the proposed development will have no material change on the geology and geomorphology in the vicinity of the Site, assessment of the impact of the scheme on the geology and geomorphology will be excluded from the proposed Environmental Statement
14
6.31 Mineral Resources The Site does not fall within any Mineral Safeguarding Area in the Northamptonshire Minerals and Waste Development Framework adopted in May 2010. In addition, the Glacial Till present on the Site is not considered to represent a mineral resource of any significant value. On this basis, assessment of the impact of the scheme on mineral resources will be excluded from the proposed Environmental Statement.
6.32 Land Contamination The Site is undeveloped agricultural land with no significant previous development. There are no known sources of contamination or hazardous ground gases within the site and use of the Site for agriculture makes the presence of significant concentrations of potential contaminants or hazardous ground gases unlikely. On this basis, the proposed development is not expected to present a significant risk to sensitive receptors including site workers, site occupiers/neighbours, ground and surface waters, ecology and wildlife, and the built environment. On this basis, an assessment of the indirect effects of the development on human health, the environment and the proposed structures relating to contamination and hazardous ground gases will be excluded from the proposed Environmental Statement.
6.33 Notwithstanding the above assessment, a desk based Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment for the Site will be prepared to identify the geoenvironmental risks in relation to the proposed development in accordance with the requirements of National Planning Policy Framework (DCLoG, 2012).
6.34 The scope of work carried out for this assessment will include a site reconnaissance, review of historical maps and records and identification of potential contaminant sources, pathways and receptors that may be present on the site, together with a qualitative Tier 1 assessment of the risks and hazards associated with existing or potential future contamination and hazardous gases in the ground. In accordance with the requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework (DCLoG, 2012), the assessment will be carried out in accordance with "established procedures" using current UK best practice and guidance as given in British Standard (BS) 10175 (2001), Contaminated Land Report (CLR) 11 (EA, 2004) and NHBC Standards Chapter 4.1 (NHBC, 2011a). The Phase 1 Ground Condition Assessment will be presented within the ES as an appendix.
6.35 Unstable Ground The geology and geomorphological setting of the Site is such that the potential for unstable ground to be present is, in general, very low. On this basis, assessment of the impact of the scheme on ground stability will be excluded from the proposed Environmental Statement.
Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
6.36 There is evidence for Roman activity in Mears Ashby to the south of the site and prehistoric finds are also known locally. Although an initial search of sources has not identified anything from within the site, it lies in an area
15
of archaeological activity and the potential exists for as yet unidentified heritage assets to exist. The EIA will therefore include a heritage assessment which will be scoped and agreed with Northamptonshire County Council Heritage Team. It will include:
A review of national, regional and local archives and sources of information A site visit & walkover survey An historical account of the site’s development The identification of any known heritage assets that may be directly or indirectly affected by the development and an assessment of their significance An assessment of the potential for other heritage assets to exist Recommendations for evaluation and/or mitigation if appropriate
Landscape and Visual Impact
6.37 An assessment of the landscape and visual impacts of the development will be undertaken and the scope of such will be agreed with the Council. In brief, the assessment will:
Describe the baseline conditions, the site and its surroundings covering landscape features, character and quality and review the importance within the existing landscape framework and its sensitivity to change. Establish a visual envelope for the proposed development and identify key sensitive viewpoints with the Council requiring detailed assessment to include photomontages of the proposed development. Identify and evaluate the impacts of the development and provide mitigation strategy Quantify any residual impacts.
Socio-Economic Effects
6.38 The socio-economic benefits of the proposed development will be considered with reference to job creation, skills and training and investment, and on the social fabric of the surrounding area.
16
7 Approach to the Assessment
7.1 The ES will take a topic-based approach, identifying data requirements for assessing environmental effects, outlining baseline conditions and differentiating between construction and operational phase effects. The scope for and effectiveness of mitigating measures will then assessed, concluding with the extent of any residual effects. The ES will then summarise the overall construction and operational effects of the proposed development, the mitigating measures envisaged and the cumulative and residual effects likely to arise.
7.2 The consultant team will identify the nature, scale and significance of impacts within their own disciplines, in terms of positive, neutral and negative effects. In relation to negative effects, the key for EIA is to establish the significance of such impacts and determine what, if any, mitigating measures can be introduced to avoid, reduce or remedy those effects. In cases where mitigating measures are not effective, the EIA will identify any residual impacts and determine their significance. Similarly, the related nature of impacts (i.e. the extent to which they are cumulative) will also be taken into account.
17
Appendix 1
Site Boundary
18
Ref:
Track 1700 Track Guide Vivian's Covert Post Vivian's Covert 2197NORTHAMPTONSHIRE AND BLABY EURO CONST WELLINGBOROUGH CO CONST
SM
117.7m Sports Ground 9 BRUNEL CLOSE
10 12 117.0m 20 Appleby Gate El Sub Sta
Track 21 10 ENTERPRISE COURT
18 1.22m RH FARADAY COURT ED and Ward Bdy
24 to 27 22
NORTH WARD
BM 118.09m 7
6 6 SINCLAIR DRIVE
5
ENTERPRISE COURT 1
1 1
115.8m 3 4
117.7m El Sub Sta EDISON CLOSE Gas Gov SYWELL ROAD Gas Gov
24 El Sub Sta 1 1 Tank Gas Gov NEWTON CLOSE SM
114.9m SM ED and Ward Bdy El Sub Sta
MOONSHINE GAP CR Park Farm Industrial Estate Gas Gov Appleby Lodge FARADAY CLOSE
Edison Court SINCLAIR DRIVE Tanks
MORRIS CLOSE
NEWTON CLOSE
FINEDON ED
5 5
The Bungalow 1 14 El Sub Sta SM 13 Issues SM
MORRIS CLOSE 12 9
Gas LB Gov BAIRD COURT Park Farm
Industrial Estate 4 5
3 MORRIS CLOSE
8 to 9 to 8 16 to 20 to 16
El Sub Sta 11
TCB Mast Chieftan 4 Business CR Park BM 110.94m 1172 El Sub Sta
6
ED & Ward Bdy 7 MORRIS CLOSE
SYWELL ROAD
WHITTLE CLOSE F
Def
Tank
Gas Gov ED & Ward Bdy
5 SYWELL ROAD
El Sub Sta
DAVY CLOSE
Pond WELLINGBOROUGH 1
WB RUTHERFORD DRIVE 4 SHAW CLOSE QUEENSWAY WARD
Gas Gov
0351 NORTHAMPTONSHIRE COUNTY El
ETL Sub Sta ETL
Park Farm Industrial NORTHAMPTONSHIRE AND BLABY EURO CONST Pond Estate
Pond
SHAW CLOSE
Park Farm
Park Farm Industrial Estate Tank Industrial Estate
Cycle Way El Sub Sta
SM SM Pond
Drain
Gas Gov
Cycle Way El Sub Sta
Cycle Way
DARBY CLOSE El Sub Sta
RUTHERFORD DRIVE
1 to 9
11 to 17
Notes: El Sub Sta
To be read in conjunction with relevant consultants drawings.
BOOTH DRIVE O/S Licence Number 100020449 Gas Gov
Cycle Way Application Boundary
Area = 65.32ha/161.41 acres 2 to 20 to 2
Revision:
QUEENSWAY ED 19 to 29 Gas Gov Tank
El Sub Sta
Wilby Hall NORTHAMPTONSHIRE COUNTY WELLINGBOROUGH DISTRICT QUEENSWAY WARD
NORTHAMPTONSHIRE COUNTY WELLINGBOROUGH DISTRICT
Tank
Tank Tank Wilby 5000
(a) 395 Hall NORTHAMPTONSHIRE EURO CONST Def Def RH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE AND BLABY EURO CONST WELLINGBOROUGH CO CONST QUEENSWAY ED QUEENSWAY WARD 391 Gas Gov
375
(a)
389 31 to 35 to 31
QUEENSWAY WARD QUEENSWAY ED 1 Park Farm Industrial Estate
1.22m RH
2
363 6190 355
341 3 353 Corrie's Spinney
RYLE DRIVE El Sub Sta
1 Monkspath Hall Road 331 Solihull, West Midlands B90 4FY
321
329 Gas Gov 323 t: 0121 711 6929 f: 0116 254 1095 Park Farm Industrial Estate 1 ED & Ward Bdy www.stephengeorge.co.uk
Pond Dencora 270 Tk 42 t0 46 2 Business QUEENSWAY ED Park ESS Dencora
El Business Park Sub
Sta 18 3
309 5 303 ESS
BOOTH DRIVE 260
7 99.4m
39 Appleby Lodge Farm
Regent Park 238
295 301 Wellingborough
297
Regent Park 232 PARK FARM WAY EIA Site Identification Plan SHELLEY ROAD
287 RUTHERFORD DRIVE BM 98.71m 2 to 6 188
279 43
285
281 The 97.3m The Drawing status:
Rookery 5
230
133
A5 CAD reference: 10074P002 269
Gas Compound Drawn: BW 257
HUXLEY CLOSE 267 45
259 Team: JN 95.3m
El Sub 218 Sta El Sub Sta Date: 07/2012 3
El 247 Scale: 1:2,500 @ A1 Sub Sta
1 245
CDH 196 231 0 50 100 200 250 Path Project no: Dwg no: Rev: ESS
194 WALLIS CLOSE 6 Metres at scale 1:2,500 92.9m 10074 P002 - This drawing, the works and concepts depicted are copyright of Stephen George & Partners and may not be reproduced or made use of, either directly or indirectly without express written consent. Do not scale off this drawing. All heights, levels, sizes and dimensions to be checked on site before any work is put to hand.