DOCSLIB.ORG

Movement for Special Province of Orissa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Movement for Special Province of Orissa Orissa Review * April - 2006 Movement for Special Province of Orissa Dr. Janmejay Choudhury The British contact with Orissa began in the first had been separated from the Mughal dominion half of the 17th century. Orissa emerged as one and as such from the rest of Orissa. Those areas of the eleven units of British India in the 20th were known as Northern Sarkars under the century.1 From the beginning of the 16th century Muslim rulers of the south. Following the death external aggression became virulent and when the of Aurangzeb when the Mughal Empire began to Surya Vamsa came to an end, Orissa entered into distintegrate, Orissa passed under the rule of the a confused period of internecine struggle. The last virtually independent Nawabs of Bengal. The independent king of Orissa, Mukunda Dev, was Nawabs, however, could not rule for long. killed by one of his feudatory chiefs while engaged Frequest Maratha attack on the dominion of in a prolonged struggle with the Afghan rulers of Alivardi Khan, the Subedar of Bengal, Bihar and Bengal. In 1568, Medieval Orissa lost her Orissa, finally forced him to surrender Orissa to independence. It was one of the last Hindu Raghuji Bhonsla of Nagpur in 1751. The River kingdoms of India to fall to the Muslims. Before Subarnarekha became the new boundary the Afghans could consolidate their power, the between the Maratha dominion of Orissa and Mughals entered the field and in 1592 Mansingh Alibardi's Subah of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. The annexed Orissa to Akbar's empire. By the time northern territories of Orissa beyond the river of Akbar, the territories of Orissa were Subarnarekha thus remained with the Nawab of apportioned into five Sarkars such as Jaleswar, Bengal. The territories which were ceded by Bhadrak, Cuttack, Kalinga Dandapat and Raj Alivardi extended from the river Subarnarekha Mahendri. Those Sarkars were included in the in the north to Chilika lake in South. The truncated subah of Bengal and were generally known as Orissa was under the Maratha possession when Mughalbandi. The hill territories were kept under 2 a separate head in the revenue accounts of the the British conquered it in 1803. empire. Those areas were known as Garjats In the meantime Lord Clive got the diwani whose rulers were recognized as the Mughal of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa in 1765. Orissa in feudatories and paid annual tribute to the the said grant was nothing more than the areas Emperor. Soon after the Settlement of Akbar, the beyond the river Subarnarekha, especially the Sarkar of Raj Mahendri and a portion of the district of Medenapur. The titular Mughal Emperor Sarkar of Kalinga Dandapat were occupied by used the term 'Bengal, Bihar and Orissa' as those the Qutbshahi kings of Golconda. By the time of territories had long formed one administrative unit Jahangir, territories to the south of the lake Chilika in the days of the Great Mughals. At the same 1 Orissa Review * April - 2006 time the Emperor gave the Northern Sarkars as spread of English education raised its voice for inam or free gift to the English.3 It was not, the unification of Oriya speaking areas and to however, until another treaty had been concluded safeguard the legitimate interests of Oriyas and between the English and the Nizam in November preserve and promote the Oriya language and 1766, that the former decided to take actual culture. In 1888, Sir Stafford Northcote, the possession of the Northern Sarkars. The Southern Secretary of State for India, held the view that territories of Orissa including Ganjam came under for the purpose of better administration, the Oriya- the British possession by the end of 1766. Thus speaking areas should be grouped into a single in 1765 -66, the East India Company was at both administrative unit. The problem which agitated the ends of Orissa, but those territories remained the minds of enlightened Oriyas for a long time under two different administrations - the Southern was the amalgamation of Oriya-speaking tracts areas under the Madras Presidency and the into one administrative unit and then the formation northern areas under the Bengal Presidency. of a separate province. It led to an organised Considerable attempts were made by the British movement and a sustained struggle for many years administrators from Clive to Cornwallis to take in a constitutional way to achieve the said possession of the coastal Orissa from the objective. The agitation for amalagamation of Marathas, but without any success. It was left for Oriya-speaking tracts raised and moulded public Lord Wellesly finally to conquer Orissa during the opinion in the Province and helped much for the Second Maratha War. By the Treaty of Deogaon growth of political consciousness of the people in which was concluded on 17 December 1803, the early decades of the 20th century. The first Raghuji Bhonsla II ceded to the East India proposal for unification of scattered Oriya- Company in perpetual sovereignty, the province speaking tracts under single administration came of Cuttack, including the port and District of from raja Baikuntha Nath De of Baleswar and Baleswar.4 Subsequently, 18 Garjat states also Bichitrananda Patnaik of Cuttack in 1875.5They came under their control. Thus, only three district presented a memorandum to the Government in of Balasore, Cuttack and Puri in the coastal region this regard. In November 1888 Sir S.C. Bayley, and 18 Garjats in the hilly tract constituted the the Lieutenant-Governor of Bengal visited Orissa. British Orissa in the 19th century and were under He was presented with a memorial by the 'Utkal the Bengal Presidency. The rest of the Orissa Sabha' of Cuttack and among other things, he Garjats including Sambalpur were placed under was requested to give attention to the problem of the Central Provinces. The dismembered Oriya- uniting the Oriya-speaking territories of Madras, speaking territories remained under different Central Province and Bengal in one administrative jurisdictions for considerable period. unit so that its all round development would be As a result of this dismemberment, the possible. However, the Lieutenant-Governor rejected the proposal outright in his reply to the Oriya-speaking territories virtually became 6 appendages to four provinces-Bengal, Bihar, memorials. Madras and Central Province, being remained as It is curious to note that in July 1895, H.G. linguistic minorties in all these provinces, the Oriyas Cooke, the Commissioner of Orissa, supported felt neglected and dominated by the linguistic the movement for amalagamation of the Oriya- majority, and particularly felt distressed at the speaking tracts. According to Cooke, the areas deliberate efforts of the authorities to abolish Oriya which could be united with the Orissa Division language. The new elite that emerged in Orissa in were : (i) Sambalpur district of the Chatisgarh the later half of the 19th century as result of the Division of the Central Province, (ii) Tributary 2 Orissa Review * April - 2006 States of Patna, Sonepur, Rairakhol, Bamra and a scheme would solve the question of language Kalahandi, and (iii) the whole or part of the once and for all. This change would relieve both Ganjam district with the states of Kimidi and the Central Province and Madras of a trouble- Ghumuser.7 Cooke's arguments for amalgamation some excrescence upon their administrative were based on ethnological and philological system; and it would result in handing over the consideration, but his suggestions were completely Oriya problem to one Government alone on a ignored. Towards the end of the year, Raja scale and with a unity that would admit of its being Baikuntha Nath De of Balasore presented a treated with consistency and efficiency".8 The memorial to Lord Curzon in which he had urged proposals regarding Orissa in Risley Circular was the Governor General to constitute a separate widely supported in different quarters. The administrative unit for all Oriya-speaking Government of Bengal observed : "The proposals territories or to keep them under one provincial are based mainly on the idea that it is desirable to administration of either Bengal, Madras or the unite under one administration all the Oriya- Central Provinces. Thus, by the beginning of the speaking races. The Lieutenant-Governor is able 20th century the constitutional agitation in different from his own experience to give strong support parts of the Oriya-speaking territories had started. to this proposal." The Chief Commissioner of It aroused political consciousness of the people the Central Provinces likewise favoured the union to a great extent and that paved the way for the of the Oriya speaking tracts, and advocated the establishment of a new organisation in the province transfer of Sambalpur and the Feudatory states to spearhead their demands before the British of Sonepur, Bamra, Patna, Kalahandi and authorities. Rairakhol to Orissa. The people of Orissa The Oriya movement, which thus begun in overwhelmingly favoured the creation of a 1903, was the first and pioneering attempt in India separate province to be carved out of all the to create a province on the linguistic basis. In the Oriya-speaking tracts and to be kept under a meantime, Lord Curzon's government was Chief Commissioner. But the scheme was preparing a scheme for some territorial adjustment opposed by Lord Ampthill, the Governor of in the country. It was outlined in the famous Risley Madras, who was not prepared to transfer Circular sent to the Government of Bengal on 3 Ganjam and Vizagapatam areas to Orissa. Sir December 1903. In that document, the problems Andrew Fraser, the then Lieutenant - Governor of the Oriya-speaking tracts and how they of Bengal, subsequently changed his views and affected the administration of the local opposed the transfer of the Oriya areas from the governments were fully discussed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • David Scott in North-East India 1802-1831
    'Its interesting situation between Hindoostan and China, two names with which the civilized world has been long familiar, whilst itself remains nearly unknown, is a striking fact and leaves nothing to be wished, but the means and opportunity for exploring it.' Surveyor-General Blacker to Lord Amherst about Assam, 22 April, 1824. DAVID SCOTT IN NORTH-EAST INDIA 1802-1831 A STUDY IN BRITISH PATERNALISM br NIRODE K. BAROOAH MUNSHIRAM MANOHARLAL, NEW DELHI TO THE MEMORY OF DR. LALIT KUMAR BAROOAH PREFACE IN THE long roll of the East India Company's Bengal civil servants, placed in the North-East Frontier region. the name of David Scott stands out, undoubtably,. - as one of the most fasci- nating. He served the Company in the various capacities on the northern and eastern frontiers of the Bengal Presidency from 1804 to 1831. First coming into prominrnce by his handling of relations with Bhutan, Sikkim, and Tibet during the Nepal war of 1814, Scott was successively concerned with the Garo hills, the Khasi and Jaintia hills and the Brahma- putra valley (along with its eastern frontier) as gent to the Governor-General on the North-East Frontier of Bengal and as Commissioner of Assam. His career in India, where he also died in harness in 1831, at the early age of forty-five, is the subject of this study. The dominant feature in his ideas of administration was Paternalism and hence the sub-title-the justification of which is fully given in the first chapter of the book (along with the importance and need of such a study).
    [Show full text]
  • Migration from Bengal to Arakan During British Rule 1826–1948 Derek Tonkin
    Occasional Paper Series Migration from Bengal to Arakan during British Rule 1826–1948 Derek Tonkin Migration from Bengal to Arakan during British Rule 1826–1948 Derek Tonkin 2019 Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher Brussels This and other publications in TOAEP’s Occasional Paper Series may be openly accessed and downloaded through the web site http://toaep.org, which uses Persistent URLs for all publications it makes available (such PURLs will not be changed). This publication was first published on 6 December 2019. © Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2019 All rights are reserved. You may read, print or download this publication or any part of it from http://www.toaep.org/ for personal use, but you may not in any way charge for its use by others, directly or by reproducing it, storing it in a retrieval system, transmitting it, or utilising it in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, in whole or in part, without the prior permis- sion in writing of the copyright holder. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the copyright holder. You must not circulate this publication in any other cover and you must impose the same condition on any ac- quirer. You must not make this publication or any part of it available on the Internet by any other URL than that on http://www.toaep.org/, without permission of the publisher. ISBN: 978-82-8348-150-1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 2 2. Setting the Scene: The 1911, 1921 and 1931 Censuses of British Burma ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Hungry Bengal: War, Famine, Riots, and the End of Empire 1939-1946
    Hungry Bengal: War, Famine, Riots, and the End of Empire 1939-1946 By Janam Mukherjee A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology and History) In the University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor Barbara D. Metcalf, Chair Emeritus Professor David W. Cohen Associate Professor Stuart Kirsch Associate Professor Christi Merrill 1 "Unknown to me the wounds of the famine of 1943, the barbarities of war, the horror of the communal riots of 1946 were impinging on my style and engraving themselves on it, till there came a time when whatever I did, whether it was chiseling a piece of wood, or burning metal with acid to create a gaping hole, or cutting and tearing with no premeditated design, it would throw up innumerable wounds, bodying forth a single theme - the figures of the deprived, the destitute and the abandoned converging on us from all directions. The first chalk marks of famine that had passed from the fingers to engrave themselves on the heart persist indelibly." 2 Somnath Hore 1 Somnath Hore. "The Holocaust." Sculpture. Indian Writing, October 3, 2006. Web (http://indianwriting.blogsome.com/2006/10/03/somnath-hore/) accessed 04/19/2011. 2 Quoted in N. Sarkar, p. 32 © Janam S. Mukherjee 2011 To my father ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank first and foremost my father, Dr. Kalinath Mukherjee, without whom this work would not have been written. This project began, in fact, as a collaborative effort, which is how it also comes to conclusion. His always gentle, thoughtful and brilliant spirit has been guiding this work since his death in May of 2002 - and this is still our work.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Sikkim
    Chapter 8 Sikkim AC Sinha Sikkim, an Indian State on the Eastern Himalayan ranges, is counted among states with Buddhist followers, which had strong cultural ties with the Tibetan region of the Peoples’ Republic of China. Because of its past feudal history, it was one of the three ‘States’ along with Nepal and Bhutan which were known as ‘the Himalayan Kingdoms’ till 1975, the year of its merger with the Indian Union. It is a small state with 2, 818 sq. m. (7, 096 sq. km.) between 27 deg. 4’ North to 28 deg 7’ North latitude between 80 deg. East 4’ and 88deg. 58’ East longitude. This 113 kilometre long and 64 kilometre wide undulating topography is located above 300 to 7,00 metres above sea level. Its known earliest settlers, the Lepchas, termed it as Neliang, the country of the caverns that gave them shelter. Bhotias, the Tibetan migrants, called it lho’mon, ‘the land of the southern (Himalayan) slop’. As rice plays important part in Buddhist rituals in Tibet, which they used to procure from India, they began calling it ‘Denjong’ (the valley of rice). Folk traditions inform us that it was also the land of mythical ‘Kiratas’ of Indian classics. The people of Kirati origin (Lepcha, Limbu, Rai and possibly Magar) used to marry among themselves in the hoary past. As the saying goes, a newly wedded Limbu bride on her arrival to her groom’s newly constructed house, exclaimed, “Su-khim” -- the new house. This word not only got currency, but also got anglicized into Sikkim (Basnet 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • The British Impact on India, 1700–1900
    WORLD HISTORY: 1750–1914 The British Impact on India, 1700–1900 By Fritz BlaCKWell A military procession in India. Image source: The British Battles Web site at http://www.britishbattles.com/first-sikh-war/ferozeshah.htm. he period 1700 to 1900 saw the beginnings, and the develop- The blurb goes on to state that the video “examines the complex- ment, of the British Empire in India. Empire was not planned, ities, contradictions, and legacies of empire, both positive and nega- Tat least not in the early stages. In a sense, it just happened. The tive.”1 To a degree, such is the intent of this article. Only to a degree, for first British in India came for trade, not territory; they were business- an article this brief on a topic as complex and intricate as the British im- men, not conquerors. It can be argued that they came from a culture pact on India cannot be complete and faces the danger of becoming that was inferior, and a political entity that was weaker, than that into simply an inventory. which they ventured, and they came hat-in-hand. They would not have Trade and Power been viewed as a threat by the Indians—who most certainly would not In 1600, a group of English merchants secured a royal charter for pur- have thought of themselves as “Indian,” at least in any political sense. poses of trading in the East Indies. The Dutch, however, had fairly well National identity was to be established much later, during the Inde- sealed off trade in what is now Indonesia, and the merchants’ company, pendence Movement (which, indeed, was also known as the National- which was to become known as the East India Company (the Com- ist Movement).
    [Show full text]
  • British Motivations Behind Postal Policy and Allocation in Colonial India
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Where the Runners Went: British Motivations Behind Postal Policy and Allocation in Colonial India A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Economics by Sheetal Bharat June 2012 Dissertation Committee: Prof. Susan Carter, Chairperson Prof. Gary Dymski Prof. Anil Deolalikar Prof. Richard Sutch The Dissertation of Sheetal Bharat is approved: ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are several people I want to thank for helping me through the five years of my doctoral studies. I am deeply grateful to Professor Susan Carter and Professor Richard Sutch for taking me with them to conferences in the first year as soon as I expressed an interest in economic history and for drawing out my fledgling interest in the subject through their fascinating classes in the second year. Professor Carter kept me motivated and on track – the help she extended me was more than what I expected and what I deserve. Professor Gary Dymski, in the short while that we interacted, was immensely encouraging. Our discussions on Indian economic history and economics in general were fascinating and brought up many new ideas. Professor Anil Deolalikar gave me a lot of time in spite of his busy schedule and supported me untiringly. My research started with generous data collection grants from the All- University of California Group for Economic History. The opportunity to present at four of their conferences and get honest feedback from stalwarts in the field of economic history did a lot to improve my research and my confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Histories of Penal Transportation: Punishment, Labour and Governance in the British Imperial World, 1788–1939
    Transnational Histories of Penal Transportation: Punishment, Labour and Governance in the British Imperial World, 1788–1939 CLARE ANDERSON From the seventeenth to twentieth centuries, approximately 380,000 transportation convicts journeyed to and around locations across the British Empire. This article explores the scale, reach and significance of these convict flows in the period after 1788, arguing for a transnational history of penal transportation in the Australian colonies and Indian Ocean. It quantifies convict numbers, and maps convict destinations, providing comparative data on their intra-imperial character to construct a new cartography of criminal justice and Empire. Focusing on Asian convict flows, this enables an articulation of the relationship between transportation, population management and repression, as well as other forms of coerced labour migration, including African and Asian enslavement and indenture. The history of penal transportation proposed here thus moves beyond an exploration of its role in the outward metropolitan expansion of Empire, and towards an appreciation of its importance in labour extraction and governance within the larger imperial world. For over three hundred years during the seventeenth to twentieth centuries, around 380,000 transportation convicts journeyed to and around the plantations, penal settlements and penal colonies of the British Empire (Table 1).1 The first early-modern transportations were from Britain and Ireland to the Americas, including Bermuda and the Caribbean islands, which together received around 69,000 convicts. They were often indentured into servitude for fixed terms, and worked on plantations alongside African slaves. The American colonies were closed to convicts following the declaration of Independence in 1776, and for a short time transportation continued to the forts and trading posts of West Africa, which received in total about one thousand convicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreaming of a Golden Bengal: Discontinuities of Place and Identity in South Asia
    Asian Studies Review September 2011, Vol. 35, pp. 373–395 Dreaming of a Golden Bengal: Discontinuities of Place and Identity in South Asia REECE JONES* University of Hawai‘i at Manoa Abstract: This article analyses five different representations of the homeland category ‘‘Bengal’’. The region of Bengal was partitioned twice in the twentieth century and imagined in a multitude of forms at different historical moments. The article describes the conditions that allowed different territories and peoples to crystallise as ‘‘Bengal’’ and ‘‘the Bengalis’’, and investigates why some versions of the Bengali homeland proved durable as others faded away. Rather than asking who is the real Bengali and where is the real Bengal, it investigates how particular identity categories become popularly practised and why particular images of the homeland come to be perceived as true, legitimate and authentic. It concludes that homeland categories are never fixed and finalised, but are rather always in a process of becoming, and are contested, reimagined and redefined as socio-political contexts change. Keywords: Bangladesh, East Pakistan, geography, homeland, identity, India, West Bengal Downloaded by [reece jones] at 14:45 22 August 2011 Introduction: Imagining a Bengali Homeland Amar sonar Bangla, ami tomai bhalobasi: ‘‘My golden Bengal, I love you’’. Rabindranath Tagore, 1906 The independence of Bangladesh in 1971, and the subsequent international recognition of its sovereignty, was a major event in the history of South Asia and the world. During the 40-year period after the end of World War II, the Bangladeshi independence movement was the only successful non-decolonisation secessionist movement worldwide (Buchanan and Moore, 2003).1 Bangladesh’s independence *Correspondence Address: Department of Geography, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, 2424 Maile Way, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Boulton and the Soho Mint Numismatic Circular April 1983 Volume XCI Number 3 P 78
    MATTHEW BOULTON AND THE SOHO MINT: COPPER TO CUSTOMER by SUE TUNGATE A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Modern History College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham October 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Matthew Boulton (1728-1809) is well known as an eighteenth-century industrialist, the founder of Soho Manufactory and the steam-engine business of Boulton and Watt. Less well known are his scientific and technical abilities in the field of metallurgy and coining, and his role in setting up the Soho Mint. The intention of this thesis is to focus on the coining activities of Matthew Boulton from 1787 until 1809, and to examine the key role he played in the modernisation of money. It is the result of an Arts and Humanities Research Council-funded collaboration with Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, where, after examination of their extensive collection of coins, medals, tokens and dies produced at the Soho Mint, .research was used to produce a catalogue.
    [Show full text]
  • History, Institutions and Economic Performance: Tlie Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India
    MIT LIBRARIES lb 3 9080 02527 85 :i Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Boston Library Consortium IVIember Libraries http://www.archive.org/details/historyinstitutiOObane !1 ubW^ 15 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Economics Working Paper Series History, Institutions and Economic Performance: Tlie Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India Abhijit Baneq'ee Lakshmi Iyer Working Paper 02-27 June 2002 Room E52-251 50 Memorial Drive Cambridge, MA 02142 This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network Paper Collection at http://ssrn.com/abstract_ id=xxxxx Slt^Zi MASSACHUSEHS INSTITUTE OFTECHMOLOGY LlD,.^ ICCJ Massachusetts Institute ot Technology Department of Economics Working Paper Series History, Institutions and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India Abhijit Banerjee Lakshmi Iyer Working Paper 02-27 June 2002 Room E52-251 50 Memorial Drive Cambridge, MA 02142 This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network Paper Collection at http://ssrn.com/abstract_.id=xxxxx History, Institutions and Economic Performance: * The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India Abhijit Banerjee ^ Lakshmi Iyer* June 2002 Abstract Do historical institutions have a persistent impact on economic performance? We analyze the colonial institutions set up by the British to collect land revenue in India, and show that differences in historical property rights institutions lead to sustained differences in economic outcomes. Areas in which proprietary rights in land were historically given to landlords have significantly lower agricultural investments, agricultural productivity and investments in public goods in the post-Independence period than areas in which these rights were given to the cul- tivators.
    [Show full text]
  • PAPER 1 DSE-A-1 SEM -5: HISTORY of BENGAL (C.1757-1905) NOTE -1
    PAPER 1 DSE-A-1 SEM -5: HISTORY OF BENGAL (c.1757-1905) VII. PARTITION OF BENGAL 1905: CURZON AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE BLUEPRINT NOTE -1 Lord Curzon's administration has remained famous-and notorious-for its intense activity and veritable cult of efficiency. The net result was the beginning of quite a new phase in the history of Indian nationalism with the struggle against the Partition of Bengal. Curzon's most unpopular measure-the Partition of Bengal-has also aroused the most controversy among historians, with apologists tending to emphasize administrative convenience as its prime motive against contemporary and later nationalist charges of deliberate 'divide and rule'. Down to 1903, administrative considerations were certainly predominant in official circles. The size of the Bengal Presidency had worried many at various times (hence the stray proposals to reduce it going back to the 1860s, the separation of Assam and Sylhet in 1874, and the Assam Chief Commissioner William Ward's proposal in 1896-97 to attach Chittagong Division, Dacca and Mymensingh to his province), and there was an increasing interest in the development of Assam into a more viable province. Ward's proposal was revived by Bengal's new Lt. Governor Andrew Fraser in a note of 28 March 1903, accepted by Curzon in a minute on territorial redistribution in India (1 June 1903), and, suitably edited for public consumption, and announced for the first time in Home Secretary Risley's letter of 3 December 1903. Relief of Bengal and improvement of Assam were the two grounds Offered by Risley in support of the transfer plan.
    [Show full text]
  • The High Court at Calcutta 150 Years : an Overview
    1 2 The High Court at Calcutta 150 Years : An Overview 3 Published by : The Indian Law Institute (West Bengal State Unit) iliwbsu.in Printed by : Ashutosh Lithographic Co. 13, Chidam Mudi Lane Kolkata 700 006 ebook published by : Indic House Pvt. Ltd. 1B, Raja Kalikrishna Lane Kolkata 700 005 www.indichouse.com Special Thanks are due to the Hon'ble Justice Indira Banerjee, Treasurer, Indian Law Institute (WBSU); Mr. Dipak Deb, Barrister-at-Law & Sr. Advocate, Director, ILI (WBSU); Capt. Pallav Banerjee, Advocate, Secretary, ILI (WBSU); and Mr. Pradip Kumar Ghosh, Advocate, without whose supportive and stimulating guidance the ebook would not have been possible. Indira Banerjee J. Dipak Deb Pallav Banerjee Pradip Kumar Ghosh 4 The High Court at Calcutta 150 Years: An Overview तदॆततत- क्षत्रस्थ क्षत्रैयद क्षत्र यद्धर्म: ।౛`& 1B: । 1Bद्धर्म:1Bत्पटैनास्ति।`抜֘टै`抜֘$100 नास्ति ।`抜֘$100000000स्ति`抜֘$1000000000000स्थक्षत्रैयदत । तस्थ क्षत्रै यदर्म:।౛`& 1Bण । ﾴC:\Users\सत धर्म:" ।౛`&ﲧ1Bशैसतेधर्मेण।h अय अभलीयान् भलीयौसमाशयनास्ति।`抜֘$100000000 भलीयान् भलीयौसमाशयसर्म: ।౛`& य राज्ञाज्ञा एवम एवर्म: ।౛`& 1B ।। Law is the King of Kings, far more powerful and rigid than they; nothing can be mightier than Law, by whose aid, as by that of the highest monarch, even the weak may prevail over the strong. Brihadaranyakopanishad 1-4.14 5 Copyright © 2012 All rights reserved by the individual authors of the works. All rights in the compilation with the Members of the Editorial Board. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]