DOCSLIB.ORG

Monument Lab Oct 2018 Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monument Lab Oct 2018 Free OCT 2018 MONUMENT LAB FREE REPORT TO THE CITY #monumentlab www.monumentlab.com s a nation, we are in the midst of a Last year, Monument Lab and our partners stories about the city around the understanding long reckoning over our inherited at Mural Arts conducted a citywide, participatory and experience of power. The difference, however, monuments. research project in Philadelphia. We worked with is that this data is purposely messy, with the fin- Across the country, after twenty leading contemporary artists to install gerprints left on it, collected on handwritten forms. pressure from activists, artists, prototype monuments in public squares and parks, It is not meant to be polished, but instead is open A and students, city governments and opened ten adjacent research labs staffed by for interpretation. The research proposals can be are grappling with questions research teams facilitating dialogue and gathering understood in myriad ways. We share findings here of representation in the monumental landscape. public proposals. The project was driven by a central with a reminder that the data is open and available for The removal of several statues, including those question: What is an appropriate monument for the analysis or possibility beyond these pages. Some of dedicated to Confederate generals and other prob- current city of Philadelphia? Over 250,000 people the proposals could most certainly be implemented lematic figures has garnered attention and created engaged in person, over a million on social media as is and should be. Others could never be built, as a few sites of cultural repair. The memorializing of a platforms, and over 4,500 left their own proposals at they call only for advocacy or redress. Collectively, handful of new figures in some cities adds chapters one of the labs. It was one of the largest participatory they speak to the relationship between the historical to local public histories. However, the untroubled, research projects of its kind in Philadelphia. record and collective and individual memory—and overwhelming status quo fills out the rest of our the urge to demand proper recognition for a broader historical imaginations and civic spaces. We are representative history of the city. haunted by the unresolved matters of the past The Report offers summary findings as an and our inability to adapt, address, and remediate WHAT IS AN attempt to honor and represent the thousands of par- in the present. ticipants who shaped this research. The four broad Since 2012, the Monument Lab team has explored APPROPRIATE areas into which our team grouped these findings questions around public art, asking over twenty include rethinking common knowledge, craving artists and hundreds of thousands of public partic- representation, seeking connection with others, ipants from around the world simple yet profound MONUMENT FOR and reflecting on process and power, though there questions about the history, function, and potential were many brilliant contributions outside these of monuments. The resulting conversations have THE CITY OF categories. This Report serves as an experimental helped engage and drive the public debate about case study and invitation to city government and monuments in Philadelphia and beyond. This partic- PHILADELPHIA? cultural institutions in Philadelphia and other cities. ipatory research has led to dozens of experimental, The proposals recognize that “hidden histories” are temporary “prototype” monuments that have tested not quite hidden. They are discussed, practiced, and the waters for new ways to learn about our past, Now that the research has been transcribed, valued by people all over the city, including in public confront the present, and interact with one another. mapped, and submitted to OpenDataPhilly, this squares and neighborhood parks. The challenge Prototype projects such as Hank Willis Thomas’s All Report to the City, a summary of findings written by is how to listen to those conversations and come Power to All People, Sharon Hayes’s If They Should the Monument Lab curatorial team, offers a reading together to do something about it. Ask, Michelle Ortiz’s Seguimos Caminando (We Keep and reflection on the immense creativity and critical From the research outward to the broader impli- Walking), and other installations by Monument Lab energies demonstrated by public participants, as cations of changing the monumental landscape, we collaborators remind us of the role of social justice well as key findings from an examination of the data. contend as a definitive statement that any approach and solidarity in contemporary monuments. Ad- The field of responses is a stunning, unprecedented to dealing with, debating, or replacing monuments ditionally, the work of Monument Lab has grown glimpse into the historical imagination of Philadel- must consider a period of public imagination and alongside sibling projects and similar efforts in other phians. This was not about what is practical or about inquiry. We have to reckon with our symbols. But we cities, including Paper Monuments in New Orleans, finding a solution ot a particular problem. It was an also must face the systems that perpetuate bias and A Long Walk Home’s Visibility Project in Chicago, exercise in turning to cultural memory as a source of exclusion. and others. democratic action. The ideas that monuments are timeless, that We are pursuing this work at a time when cities We invite serious consideration of this archive they have universal meaning, and that they are are more openly recognizing that the monuments of ideas as a collection of civic data, now available standalone figures in history are truisms that we we have inherited are complex sources of history,, at proposals.monumentlab.com. We recommend believe need to be challenged. Our intent is not to emblems of civic power, and reflections of the that city agencies in Philadelphia and elsewhere take defeat the idea of civic monuments, but to invigorate disparity and despair of our times. No longer stuck in seriously both the ideas offered and the methods of them through new public engagement possibilities time, the concept of the monument is under revision. inquiry: namely, asking participants to ponder the so that future monuments function as constantly Rather than serving as symbols proclaiming the past promises and pitfalls of public space while situated activated sites for critical dialogue, response, and as settled, monuments today conjure a new set of in public space while situated in public space and in experimentation. questions: Who are the figures who have earned status conversation with one another. as heroes of history and what remains unspoken about The data produced through Monument —Paul M. Farber, Ken Lum, and Laurie Allen their lives? How do we carry on given the weight of the Lab, whether viewed in spreadsheets or charts, Monument Lab past? How do we remember and toward what ends? resembles other forms of civic data. It maps the THE RESEARCH PROCESS A detailed look at Monument Lab’s research methods Ø Page 1 RETHINKING COMMON KNOWLEDGE Exploring the range of monumental histories and visions that participants offered about Philadelphia I Page 3 CR AV ING REPRESENTATION Identifying the people and communities who are missing from the city’s current collection of monuments II Page 5 SEEKING CONNECTION WITH OTHERS Recognizing the hope for solidarity across lines of injustice and inequality III Page 9 REFLECTING ON PROCESS AND POWER Turning attention toward the ways that the city’s power is envisioned and engaged by the city’s residents IV Page 11 CLOSING REMARKS Closing statement and key findings V Page 11 Ø THE RESEARCH PROCESS LOCATION Participants were invited to imagine a location for their proposed monument. MONUMENT NAME Participants were invited to title their proposed monument. DESCRIPTION Monument descriptions could take the form of text, illustration, or both. Some gave only a brief impression of what the monument could be, while others sketched out detailed schematics. ZIP CODE Zip codes were used RESEARCH ID to map participants’ Each proposal was assigned a involvement in the project. unique ID number by lab staff for internal tracking AGE Ages were used to analyze generational trends and IDENTIFIER historical memory Participants could optionally share identifying information, should they wish to receive credit or attribution he research process used during respect to their hopes about the stories we honor in themselves are an important outcome of the project. Monument Lab was tested in the the past, the needs of the present moment, and their Thinking together in public about our shared spaces discovery phase of the project expectations and ideals for the future. It was also an is, we believe, a worthy goal in itself. And those who over three weeks at City Hall in invitation to define appropriateness as a matter of chose to do so were invited to write or draw their ideas spring 2015. We posed a single feasibility, ethical or moral imperative, or one’s own on the open form. While technology was certainly T open question and collected creative expression. an important part of the Monument Lab project, we responses from hundreds of It matters who asks the question. We started by wanted the interactions for this exhibition to occur in passersby. The details of this method are worth a hiring a phenomenal team of lab managers who know parks without expensive or complex equipment that brief explanation here, as they speak to the values the city, who believe in public art and engagement, might distance some participants from the question. embedded in the project. The research form offered and who were eager to learn from people throughout And we wanted people to hand their responses over to each participant presents a blank space to those the city and to respect the knowledge that they to another person—to share them in physical space, who opted to participate, and each proposal form received through the proposals.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Our Sports Law Brochure
    ahead ofthegame Sports Law SECTION ROW SEAT 86 H 1 625985297547 Hitting home runs Building Synergies with Renowned Brands for a legendary brand Herrick created the framework Rebuilding the House that Ruth Built and template agreements Game Day Our Sports Law Group rallied Herrick’s that govern advertising, real estate, corporate and tax lawyers promotion and product to structure five separate bond financ- placement rights for stadium Herrick’s Sports Law Group began advising the New York Yankees in the early ings, totaling in excess of $1.5 billion, sponsors. We have also which laid the financial foundation helped the Yankees extend Smooth Ride for Season Ticket Licensees 1990s, right as they began their march into a new era of excellence, both for the new Yankee Stadium. Our their brand by forming Playing musical chairs with tens of thousands cross-disciplinary team also advised on innovative joint ventures for of sports fans is tricky. We co-designed on and off the field. For more than two decades, our lawyers have helped the a number of complex matters related to a wide range of products, with the Yankees a season ticket license world’s most iconic professional sports franchise form innovative joint ventures, the new Yankee Stadium’s lease including the best-selling program for obtaining the rights to seats and construction. New York Yankees cologne. at the new Yankee Stadium. unleash new revenue streams, finance and build the new Yankee Stadium, and maximize the value of the team’s content – all of which have contributed Sparking the Regional to a global brand that’s unparalleled in the history of professional sports.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Kinesiology and Physical Education CAPRFIVE-YEARREVIEW 2007-2008
    Table of Contents Kinesiology and Physical Education CAPRFIVE-YEARREVIEW 2007-2008 Part I - Self-Study Page Title Page ......................................... ................... ......... ..... Background and Overview ...................................................... 2-3 A. Summary of Last Program Review ... .............................. ........ 4-9 B. Curriculum and Student Learning ............... ... ... ..................... 10-14 C. Students, Advising, and Retention ......................................... 15-16 D. Faculty ........................ ... ............................................... 17-18 E. Resources ......... ........................... ................................... 19-20 F. Requirements ......... ..... ................ ... ...... ........... ................ 21 Part II - Plan Title Page ........................... ........................... .- ................... 22 Introduction ......................... .................................. ....... ..... 23-24 Curriculum ........................................................................ 24-28 Students .. ................ ..................... ... ... ... ............................ 28-30 Faculty ............................................................ ................. 30-31 Resources .................. ...................................................... .. 32-34 Budget Concerns .................................................................. 34 Part III- Outside Reviewers' Report Outside Reviewers' Report ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Highlights of Women's History
    Selected Highlights of Women’s History United States & Connecticut 1773 to 2015 The Permanent Commission on the Status of Women omen have made many contributions, large and Wsmall, to the history of our state and our nation. Although their accomplishments are too often left un- recorded, women deserve to take their rightful place in the annals of achievement in politics, science and inven- Our tion, medicine, the armed forces, the arts, athletics, and h philanthropy. 40t While this is by no means a complete history, this book attempts to remedy the obscurity to which too many Year women have been relegated. It presents highlights of Connecticut women’s achievements since 1773, and in- cludes entries from notable moments in women’s history nationally. With this edition, as the PCSW celebrates the 40th anniversary of its founding in 1973, we invite you to explore the many ways women have shaped, and continue to shape, our state. Edited and designed by Christine Palm, Communications Director This project was originally created under the direction of Barbara Potopowitz with assistance from Christa Allard. It was updated on the following dates by PCSW’s interns: January, 2003 by Melissa Griswold, Salem College February, 2004 by Nicole Graf, University of Connecticut February, 2005 by Sarah Hoyle, Trinity College November, 2005 by Elizabeth Silverio, St. Joseph’s College July, 2006 by Allison Bloom, Vassar College August, 2007 by Michelle Hodge, Smith College January, 2013 by Andrea Sanders, University of Connecticut Information contained in this book was culled from many sources, including (but not limited to): The Connecticut Women’s Hall of Fame, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philadelphia Story Learning from a Municipal Wireless Pioneer
    The Philadelphia Story Learning from a Municipal Wireless Pioneer Joshua Breitbart, Author Naveen Lakshmipathy, Appendices Sascha D. Meinrath, Editor NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION 1 The Philadelphia Story Learning from a Municipal Wireless Pioneer Joshua Breitbart, Author Naveen Lakshmipathy, Appendices Sascha D. Meinrath, Editor Washington, DC Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................3 Keys To Successful Municipal Wireless Network Deployment......................................................................4 Welcome To Philadelphia ............................................................................................................................................7 About This Report ..........................................................................................................................................................8 Philadelphia A Case Study..........................................................................................................9 Pilot Project.......................................................................................................................................................................9 The Executive Committee .........................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Singleton-Prather, Anita and Charles Singleton
    Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange Video Collection Gullah Digital Archive 7-23-2012 Singleton-Prather, Anita and Charles Singleton Anita Singleton Prather Charles Dennis Singleton Follow this and additional works at: https://digital.kenyon.edu/gullah_video Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Prather, Anita Singleton and Singleton, Charles Dennis, "Singleton-Prather, Anita and Charles Singleton" (2012). Video Collection. Paper 123. https://digital.kenyon.edu/gullah_video/123 This Video is brought to you for free and open access by the Gullah Digital Archive at Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Video Collection by an authorized administrator of Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gullah Digital Archive Anita Singleton Prather, Charles Dennis Singleton July 23, 2012 St. Helena Island AP: July 23, 2012, Anita Joy Singleton Prather. CS: And my name is Charles Dennis Singleton, and I am Anita Prather’s brother. Unknown: [Off Camera] Can you tell us how long you’ve lived here in the Beaufort area, please? AP: 55 years for me. 57 for [points to Charles]... CD: 57 on me, I’m 57 years old, so. But I didn’t always live here. After I finished high school my heart had a desire to be a boxer. And so, I moved to Atlanta, Georgia, and that’s where I started making that happen, being a boxer in Atlanta, Georgia. And from there, I was in Atlanta from ‘73 to ‘75. While I was there I went to­­what’s the name of that school? DeVry Tech? AP: Mhm.
    [Show full text]
  • Class VIII Induction Ceremony & Reception
    PHILADELPHIA SPORTS HALL OF FAME Legendary Philadelphia sports figures are gathering Thursday November 10, 2011 at the Sheraton Society Hill for the Philadelphia Sports Hall of Fame’s Class VIII Induction Ceremony and Reception. The Hall of Fame’s 8th class includes: Eagles linebacker Bill Bergey , Negro League baseball great Biz Mackey , Phillies lefthander Curt Simmons , basketball star Dawn Staley , NFL Films founder Ed Sabol and son Steve Sabol , Philadelphia Athletics infielder Jimmy Dykes , Yankees manager and Germantown native Joe McCarthy , Sixers center Moses Malone , Flyers defenseman Mark Howe , Tennis and basketball great Ora Washington , Two-time track Olympic gold medalist Ted Meredith , Eagles running back Wilbert Montgomery , scholastic and collegiate basketball coaching legend Speedy Morris , broadcast pioneer Al Meltzer and the world famous Penn Relays . This year’s event returns to the newly remodeled Sheraton Society Hill in Philadelphia. The Induction is preceded by an exciting two hour reception with the Inductees and Philadelphia Sports History as the theme, featuring hors d’oeuvres, cocktails and entrée stations. This is a ONE OF A KIND event!!! CLASS VIII INDUCTION CLASSVIII CEREMONY AND RECEPTION Mix and Mingle with the Legends of Philadelphia Sports! Charles Barkley and Tommy MacDonald – Legendary Chest Bump! Every living inductee is invited back to the annual Induction Ceremony, in order to continue to honor them, as well as have them welcome the newest class of inductees. Also invited are notables from the
    [Show full text]
  • The Epic 1975 Boxing Match Between Muhammad Ali and Smokin' Joe
    D o c u men t : 1 00 8 CC MUHAMMAD ALI - RVUSJ The epic 1975 boxing match between Muhammad Ali and Smokin’ Joe Frazier – the Thriller in Manila – was -1- 0 famously brutal both inside and outside the ring, as a neW 911 documentary shows. Neither man truly recovered, and nor 0 did their friendship. At 64, Frazier shows no signs of forgetting 8- A – but can he ever forgive? 00 8 WORDS ADAM HIGGINBOTHAM PORTRAIT STEFAN RUIZ C - XX COLD AND DARK,THE BIG BUILDING ON of the world, like that of Ali – born Cassius Clay .pdf North Broad Street in Philadelphia is closed now, the in Kentucky – began in the segregated heartland battered blue canvas ring inside empty and unused of the Deep South. Born in 1944, Frazier grew ; for the first time in more than 40 years. On the up on 10 acres of unyielding farmland in rural Pa outside, the boxing glove motifs and the black letters South Carolina, the 11th of 12 children raised in ge that spell out the words ‘Joe Frazier’s Gym’ in cast a six-room house with a tin roof and no running : concrete are partly covered by a ‘For Sale’ banner. water.As a boy, he played dice and cards and taught 1 ‘It’s shut down,’ Frazier tells me,‘and I’m going himself to box, dreaming of being the next Joe ; T to sell it.The highest bidder’s got it.’The gym is Louis. In 1961, at 17, he moved to Philadelphia. r where Frazier trained before becoming World Frazier was taken in by an aunt, and talked im Heavyweight Champion in 1970; later, it would also his way into a job at Cross Brothers, a kosher s be his home: for 23 years he lived alone, upstairs, in slaughterhouse.There, he worked on the killing i z a three-storey loft apartment.
    [Show full text]
  • The People's Champion O
    ABSTRACT WILLIAMS, SHAWN L. B.A. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, 1989 M.A. CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY, 1991 “The People’s Champion”: Folk Heroism and the Oral Artistry of Muhammad Au. Advisor: Professor David F. Dorsey Dissertation dated July 2000 Long after a career that was as much marred by criticism as marked by accomplishment, Muhammad Au receives considerable public acclaim for his athletic accomplishments and his humanitarianism. However, no scholarly attention has been given to this man as a literary force who, through the power of his word, impacted the consciousness of this nation and world. This dissertation examines Ali as an artist operating within the context of African and African American oral literary traditions and will explore the impact of his oratory on the sociopolitical consciousness of this country. The analysis of the oral literature of 1 Muhammad Au, which consists of his lectures, interviews, and poetry, will involve an assessment of those aspects that make it a manifestation of the verbal culture of Africa and African America. Moreover, the study illustrates the degree to which the rhetoric and verse reflects both African American national consciousness (i.e., black nationalism) and African folkioric tradition. In his creation of himself Au utilizes traditional African and African American mythoforms like the trickster, the Badman, and the culture hero. In this respect, Muhammad Au is the only athlete to emerge as an Afrocentric cultural hero. This subject encompasses matter of literature, African American studies, speech communications, and popular culture. 2 “THE PEOPLE’S CHAMPION”: FOLK HEROISM AND THE ORAL ARTISTRY OF MUHAMMAD ALl A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF ARTS IN THE HUMANTITIES BY SHAWN LAMAR WILLIAMS DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH ATLANTA, GEORGIA JULY 2000 © 2000 SHAWN L.
    [Show full text]
  • Fight Year Duration (Mins)
    Fight Year Duration (mins) 1921 Jack Dempsey vs Georges Carpentier (23:10) 1921 23 1932 Max Schmeling vs Mickey Walker (23:17) 1932 23 1933 Primo Carnera vs Jack Sharkey-II (23:15) 1933 23 1933 Max Schmeling vs Max Baer (23:18) 1933 23 1934 Max Baer vs Primo Carnera (24:19) 1934 25 1936 Tony Canzoneri vs Jimmy McLarnin (19:11) 1936 20 1938 James J. Braddock vs Tommy Farr (20:00) 1938 20 1940 Joe Louis vs Arturo Godoy-I (23:09) 1940 23 1940 Max Baer vs Pat Comiskey (10:06) – 15 min 1940 10 1940 Max Baer vs Tony Galento (20:48) 1940 21 1941 Joe Louis vs Billy Conn-I (23:46) 1941 24 1946 Joe Louis vs Billy Conn-II (21:48) 1946 22 1950 Joe Louis vs Ezzard Charles (1:04:45) - 1HR 1950 65 version also available 1950 Sandy Saddler vs Charley Riley (47:21) 1950 47 1951 Rocky Marciano vs Rex Layne (17:10) 1951 17 1951 Joe Louis vs Rocky Marciano (23:55) 1951 24 1951 Kid Gavilan vs Billy Graham-III (47:34) 1951 48 1951 Sugar Ray Robinson vs Jake LaMotta-VI (47:30) 1951 47 1951 Harry “Kid” Matthews vs Danny Nardico (40:00) 1951 40 1951 Harry Matthews vs Bob Murphy (23:11) 1951 23 1951 Joe Louis vs Cesar Brion (43:32) 1951 44 1951 Joey Maxim vs Bob Murphy (47:07) 1951 47 1951 Ezzard Charles vs Joe Walcott-II & III (21:45) 1951 21 1951 Archie Moore vs Jimmy Bivins-V (22:48) 1951 23 1951 Sugar Ray Robinson vs Randy Turpin-II (19:48) 1951 20 1952 Billy Graham vs Joey Giardello-II (22:53) 1952 23 1952 Jake LaMotta vs Eugene Hairston-II (41:15) 1952 41 1952 Rocky Graziano vs Chuck Davey (45:30) 1952 46 1952 Rocky Marciano vs Joe Walcott-I (47:13) 1952
    [Show full text]
  • Green2015-An-Action-Plan-For-The
    Green2015 Advisory Group Conveners and Participating Organizations Michael DiBerardinis, Department of Parks and Recreation Commissioner, co-convener Alan Greenberger, Deputy Mayor for Economic Development, co-convener Amtrak Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future Delaware River Waterfront Corporation Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Fairmount Park Conservancy Fairmount Park Historic Preservation Trust Friends of the Wissahickon Greenspace Alliance Natural Land Trust Neighborhood Gardens Association Next Great City Coalition Office of City Councilman Darrell Clarke Office of Councilwoman Anna Verna Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Environmental Council Pennsylvania Horticultural Society Philadelphia Association of Community Development Corporations Philadelphia City Planning Commission Philadelphia Department of Commerce Philadelphia Department of Licenses and Inspections Philadelphia Department of Public Health Philadelphia Department of Public Property Philadelphia Department of Revenue Philadelphia Housing Authority Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation Philadelphia Office of Housing and Community Development Philadelphia Office of Sustainability Philadelphia Office of Transportation and Utilities Philadelphia Orchard Project Philadelphia Parks Alliance Philadelphia Parks and Recreation Commission Philadelphia Water Department Redevelopment Authority of Philadelphia School District of Philadelphia Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Basketball Award Winners
    WOMEN’S BASKETBALL AWARD WINNERS All-America Teams 2 National Award Winners 15 Coaching Awards 20 Other Honors 22 First Team All-Americans By School 25 First Team Academic All-Americans By School 34 NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship Winners By School 39 ALL-AMERICA TEAMS 1980 Denise Curry, UCLA; Tina Division II Carla Eades, Central Mo.; Gunn, BYU; Pam Kelly, Francine Perry, Quinnipiac; WBCA COACHES’ Louisiana Tech; Nancy Stacey Cunningham, First selected in 1975. Voted on by the Wom en’s Lieberman, Old Dominion; Shippensburg; Claudia Basket ball Coaches Association. Was sponsored Inge Nissen, Old Dominion; Schleyer, Abilene Christian; by Kodak through 2006-07 season and State Jill Rankin, Tennessee; Lorena Legarde, Portland; Farm through 2010-11. Susan Taylor, Valdosta St.; Janice Washington, Valdosta Rosie Walker, SFA; Holly St.; Donna Burks, Dayton; 1975 Carolyn Bush, Wayland Warlick, Tennessee; Lynette Beth Couture, Erskine; Baptist; Marianne Crawford, Woodard, Kansas. Candy Crosby, Northern Ill.; Immaculata; Nancy Dunkle, 1981 Denise Curry, UCLA; Anne Kelli Litsch, Southwestern Cal St. Fullerton; Lusia Donovan, Old Dominion; Okla. Harris, Delta St.; Jan Pam Kelly, Louisiana Tech; Division III Evelyn Oquendo, Salem St.; Irby, William Penn; Ann Kris Kirchner, Rutgers; Kaye Cross, Colby; Sallie Meyers, UCLA; Brenda Carol Menken, Oregon St.; Maxwell, Kean; Page Lutz, Moeller, Wayland Baptist; Cindy Noble, Tennessee; Elizabethtown; Deanna Debbie Oing, Indiana; Sue LaTaunya Pollard, Long Kyle, Wilkes; Laurie Sankey, Rojcewicz, Southern Conn. Beach St.; Bev Smith, Simpson; Eva Marie St.; Susan Yow, Elon. Oregon; Valerie Walker, Pittman, St. Andrews; Lois 1976 Carol Blazejowski, Montclair Cheyney; Lynette Woodard, Salto, New Rochelle; Sally St.; Cindy Brogdon, Mercer; Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Information
    Title information Wars of the Ring Boxing Classics, 1970–2020 By Matthew Bazell Key features • Lavishly illustrated hardback photography coffee-table book – mostly colour images, plus a selection of black and white shots • Features vivid action photos that capture compelling and dramatic moments in fights • Double-page photography spreads and chapter introductions giving an overview of each decade • Showcases some of boxing’s greatest names over a 50-year span, including Muhammad Ali, Joe Frazier, Floyd Mayweather Jr., Canelo Álvarez, Gennady Golovkin, Joe Calzaghe, Carl Froch, Mike Tyson, Lennox Lewis, Nigel Benn, Marvin Hagler, Sugar Ray Leonard, Naseem Hamed and many more • Publicity campaign planned including radio, newspapers, websites, podcasts and magazines Description Wars of the Ring is a pictorial celebration of half a century of unforgettable fights. It commemorates an array of legendary boxing matches held between 1970 and 2020. From the heavyweight tussles of Ali, Frazier and Foreman in the 1970s to the wars waged by Duran, Hearns, Hagler and Leonard in the 80s, to the celebrated British middleweights of the 90s and the rise of current stars Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua, Wars of the Ring takes us on a thrilling journey through some of boxing’s most exhilarating matches, experienced through stunning and dramatic images. Each decade comes with a written overview as key moments from the careers of your favourite boxers come to life – in eye-catching colour and atmospheric black and white. Relive the amazing feats of Muhammad Ali, Joe Frazier, Floyd Mayweather Jr., Canelo Álvarez, Gennady Golovkin, Joe Calzaghe, Carl Froch, Mike Tyson, Lennox Lewis, Nigel Benn, Marvin Hagler, Sugar Ray Leonard, Naseem Hamed and many more.
    [Show full text]