DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Basic Principles in Optics, Wavefront and Wavefront Error

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Basic Principles in Optics, Wavefront and Wavefront Error ReviewReview ofof BasicBasic PrinciplesPrinciples inin Optics,Optics, WavefrontWavefront andand WavefrontWavefront ErrorError Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of California, Berkeley Google my name to find copies of these slides for free use and distribution Geometrical Optics Relationships between pupil size, refractive error and blur Optics of the eye: Depth of Focus 2 mm 4 mm 6 mm Optics of the eye: Depth of Focus Focused behind retina In focus Focused in front of retina 2 mm 4 mm 6 mm Demonstration Role of Pupil Size and Defocus on Retinal Blur Draw a cross like this one on a page. Hold it so close that is it completely out of focus, then squint. You should see the horizontal line become clear. The line becomes clear because you have used your eyelids to make your effective pupil size smaller, thereby reducing the blur due to defocus on the retina image. Only the horizontal line appears clear because you have only reduced the blur in the horizontal direction. ComputationComputation ofof GeometricalGeometrical BlurBlur SizeSize blur[mrad][]blur[minutes]3.44[]DpupilsizemmDpupilsizemm=×=×× where D is the defocus in diopters ApplicationApplication ofof BlurBlur EquationEquation • 1 D defocus, 8 mm pupil produces 27.52 minute blur size ~ 0.5 degrees Physical Optics The Wavefront WhatWhat isis thethe Wavefront?Wavefront? parallel beam = converging beam plane wavefront = spherical wavefront WhatWhat isis thethe Wavefront?Wavefront? parallel beam ideal wavefront = plane wavefront defocused wavefront WhatWhat isis thethe Wavefront?Wavefront? parallel beam ideal wavefront = plane wavefront aberrated beam = irregular wavefront WhatWhat isis thethe Wavefront?Wavefront? diverging beam = aberrated beam spherical wavefront = irregular wavefront ideal wavefront The Wave Aberration WhatWhat isis thethe WaveWave AberrationAberration?? diverging beam = spherical wavefront wave aberration WaveWave Aberration:Aberration: DefocusDefocus Wavefront Aberration 3 2 1 0 -1 mm (superior-inferior) -2 -3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 mm (right-left) WaveWave Aberration:Aberration: ComaComa Wavefront Aberration 3 2 1 0 -1 mm (superior-inferior) -2 -3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 mm (right-left) WaveWave Aberration:Aberration: AllAll TermsTerms Wavefront Aberration 3 2 1 0 -1 mm (superior-inferior) -2 -3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 mm (right-left) Zernike Polynomials WaveWave AberrationAberration ContourContour MapMap 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 mm (superior-inferior) -1.5 -2 -2.5 -2 -1 0 1 2 mm (right-left) BreakdownBreakdown ofof ZernikeZernike TermsTerms Coefficient value (microns) -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 1 2 3 astig. nd 4 defocus 2 order 5 astig. 6 trefoil 7 coma rd 8 coma 3 order 9 trefoil 10 11 12 spherical aberration 4th order Zernike term 13 14 15 16 17 5th order 18 19 20 The Point Spread Function The Point Spread Function, or PSF, is the image that an optical system forms of a point source. The point source is the most fundamental object, and forms the basis for any complex object. The PSF is analogous to the Impulse Response Function in electronics. TheThe PointPoint SpreadSpread FunctionFunction The PSF for a perfect optical system is the Airy disc, which is the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern for a circular pupil. Airy Disc AiryAiry DiskDisk 1.22aλθ⋅= angle subtended at the nodal point wavelength of the light pupil diameteraθλ≡≡≡ θ As the pupil size gets larger, the Airy disc gets smaller. angle subtended at the nodal point wavelength of the light pupil diameter1.22aaθλλθ≡≡≡⋅= 2.5 2 (minutes) 1.5 radius 1 Disk 0.5 Airy 0 PSF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 pupil diameter (mm) PointPoint SpreadSpread FunctionFunction vs.vs. PupilPupil SizeSize 1 mm 2 mm 3 mm 4 mm 5 mm 6 mm 7 mm Small Pupil PointPoint SpreadSpread FunctionFunction vs.vs. PupilPupil SizeSize 1 mm 2 mm 3 mm 4 mm 5 mm 6 mm 7 mm Perfect Eye Typical Eye Larger pupil Resolution Unresolved point sources Rayleigh resolution limit Resolved As the pupil size gets larger, the Airy disc gets smaller. minmin angle subtended at the nodal point wavelength of the light pupil diameter1.22aaθλλθ≡≡≡⋅= 2.5 2 (minutes) 1.5 radius 1 Disk 0.5 Airy 0 PSF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 pupil diameter (mm) Keck telescope: (10 m reflector) About 4500 times better than the eye! Convolution Convolution (,) (,) (,)PSFxyOxyIxy⊗= SimulatedSimulated ImagesImages 20/20 letters 20/40 letters MTF Modulation Transfer Function low medium high object: 100% contrast image 1 contrast 0 spatial frequency MTF:MTF: CutoffCutoff FrequencyFrequency cut-off frequency 57.3cutoffafλ=⋅ 1 mm 1 2 mm 4 mm 6 mm Rule of thumb: cutoff 8 mm frequency increases by ~30 c/d for each mm 0.5 increase in pupil size modulation transfer 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 spatial frequency (c/deg) ModulationModulation TransferTransfer FunctionFunction 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 vertical spatial horizontal spatial -100 0 100 frequency (c/d) c/deg frequency (c/d) PTF Phase Transfer Function low medium high object image 180 0 phase shift -180 spatial frequency PhasePhase TransferTransfer FunctionFunction • Contains information about asymmetry in the PSF • Contains information about contrast reversals (spurious resolution) Relationships Between Wave Aberration, PSF and MTF The PSF is the Fourier Transform (FT) of the pupil function ()2(,),(,)iWxyiiPSFxyFTPxyeπλ−= The MTF is the amplitude component of the FT of the PSF (){},(,)xyiiMTFffAmplitudeFTPSFxy= The PTF is the phase component of the FT of the PSF (){},(,)xyiiPTFffPhaseFTPSFxy= The OTF (MTF and PTF) can also be computed as the autocorrelation of the pupil function Wavefront Aberration Point Spread Function 0.5 0 -0.5 -2 -1 0 1 2 -200 -100 0 100 200 mm (right-left) arcsec Modulation Transfer Function Phase Transfer Function 0.8 0.5 0.6 0 0.4 -0.5 0.2 -100 0 100 -100 0 100 c/deg c/deg Wavefront Aberration Point Spread Function 0.5 0 -0.5 -2 -1 0 1 2 -200 -100 0 100 200 mm (right-left) arcsec Modulation Transfer Function Phase Transfer Function 150 0.8 100 50 0.6 0 0.4 -50 0.2 -100 -150 -100 0 100 -100 0 100 c/deg c/deg Wavefront Aberration Point Spread Function 1.5 1 0.5 0 -0.5 -2 -1 0 1 2 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 mm (right-left) arcsec Modulation Transfer Function Phase Transfer Function 150 0.8 100 50 0.6 0 0.4 -50 0.2 -100 -150 -100 0 100 -100 0 100 c/deg c/deg Conventional Metrics to Define Imagine Quality RootRoot MeanMean SquareSquare ()()()()()21,, pupil area, wave aberration, average wave aberrationRMSWxyWxydxdyAAWxyWxy=−−−−∫∫ RootRoot MeanMean Square:Square: AdvantageAdvantage ofof UsingUsing ZernikesZernikes toto RepresentRepresent thethe WavefrontWavefront ()()()()222220212223.......RMSZZZZ−−=+++ …… trefoil term defocus term astigmatism term astigmatism term StrehlStrehl RatioRatio diffraction-limited PSF Strehl Ratio = eyedlHH Hdl actual PSF Heye ModulationModulation TransferTransfer FunctionFunction 1 0.9 20/20 20/10 0.8 0.7 0.6 Area under the MTF 0.5 contrast 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 50 100 150 spatial frequency (c/deg) MetricsMetrics toto DefineDefine ImageImage QualityQuality Other Metrics Campbell,C.E. (2004). Improving visual function diagnostic metrics with the use of higher-order aberration information from the eye. J.Refract.Surg. 20, S495-S503 Cheng,X., Bradley,A., Hong,X., & Thibos,L. (2003). Relationship between refractive error and monochromatic aberrations of the eye. Optom.Vis.Sci. 80, 43-49. Cheng,X., Bradley,A., & Thibos,L.N. (2004). Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics. J.Vis. 4, 310-321. Guirao,A. & Williams,D.R. (2003). A method to predict refractive errors from wave aberration data. Optom.Vis.Sci. 80, 36-42. Marsack,J.D., Thibos,L.N., & Applegate,R.A. (2003). Scalar metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performanc. J.Vis. 4, 322-328. Sarver,E.J. & Applegate,R.A. (2004). The importance of the phase transfer function to visual function and visual quality metrics. J.Refract.Surg. 20, S504-S507 TypicalTypical ValuesValues forfor WaveWave AberrationAberration Strehl Ratio • Strehl ratios are about 5% for a 5 mm pupil that has been corrected for defocus and astigmatism. • Strehl ratios for small (~ 1 mm) pupils approach 1, but the image quality is poor due to diffraction. TypicalTypical ValuesValues forfor WaveWave AberrationAberration Population Statistics trefoil coma coma trefoil spherical aberration TypicalTypical ValuesValues forfor WaveWave AberrationAberration Change in aberrations with pupil size 1.2 Shack Hartmann Methods Iglesias et al, 1998 Other Methods Navarro et al, 1998 1 Liang et al, 1994 Liang and Williams, 1997 Liang et al, 1997 (microns) 0.8 Walsh et al, 1984 He et al, 1999 Calver et al, 1999 0.6 Calver et al, 1999 Porter et al., 2001 He et al, 2002 aberration 0.4 He et al, 2002 Xu et al, 2003 Paquin et al, 2002 wave 0.2 Paquin et al, 2002 Carkeet et al, 2002 rms Cheng et al, 2004 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 pupil size (mm) TypicalTypical ValuesValues forfor WaveWave AberrationAberration Change in aberrations with age Monochromatic Aberrations as a Function of Age, from Childhood to Advanced Age Isabelle Brunette,1 Juan M. Bueno,2 Mireille Parent,1,3 Habib Hamam,3 and Pierre Simonet3 Other Optical Factors that Degrade Image Quality Retinal Sampling SamplingSampling byby FovealFoveal ConesCones Projected Image Sampled Image 20/20 letter 5 arc minutes SamplingSampling byby FovealFoveal ConesCones Projected Image Sampled Image 20/5 letter 5 arc minutes NyquistNyquist SamplingSampling TheoremTheorem Photoreceptor Sampling >> Spatial Frequency 1 I 0 1 I 0 nearly 100% transmitted Photoreceptor Sampling = 2 x Spatial Frequency 1 I 0 1 I 0 nearly 100% transmitted Photoreceptor Sampling = Spatial Frequency 1 I 0 1 I 0 nothing transmitted Nyquist theorem: The maximum spatial frequency that can be detected is equal to _ of the sampling frequency.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wavefront Decomposition and Propagation Through Complex Models with Analytical Ray Theory and Signal Processing Paul Cristini, Eric De Bazelaire
    Wavefront decomposition and propagation through complex models with analytical ray theory and signal processing Paul Cristini, Eric de Bazelaire To cite this version: Paul Cristini, Eric de Bazelaire. Wavefront decomposition and propagation through complex models with analytical ray theory and signal processing. 2006. hal-00110279 HAL Id: hal-00110279 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00110279 Preprint submitted on 27 Oct 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. March 31, 2006 14:7 WSPC/130-JCA jca_sbrt Journal of Computational Acoustics c IMACS Wavefront decomposition and propagation through complex models with analytical ray theory and signal processing P. CRISTINI CNRS-UMR5212 Laboratoire de Mod´elisation et d'Imagerie en G´eosciences de Pau Universit´e de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour BP 1155, 64013 Pau Cedex, France [email protected] E. De BAZELAIRE 11, Route du bourg 64230 Beyrie-en-B´earn, France [email protected] Received (Day Month Year) Revised (Day Month Year) We present a novel method which can perform the fast computation of the times of arrival of seismic waves which propagate between a source and an array of receivers in a stratified medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Model-Based Wavefront Reconstruction Approaches For
    Submitted by Dipl.-Ing. Victoria Hutterer, BSc. Submitted at Industrial Mathematics Institute Supervisor and First Examiner Univ.-Prof. Dr. Model-based wavefront Ronny Ramlau reconstruction approaches Second Examiner Eric Todd Quinto, Ph.D., Robinson Profes- for pyramid wavefront sensors sor of Mathematics in Adaptive Optics October 2018 Doctoral Thesis to obtain the academic degree of Doktorin der Technischen Wissenschaften in the Doctoral Program Technische Wissenschaften JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ Altenbergerstraße 69 4040 Linz, Osterreich¨ www.jku.at DVR 0093696 Abstract Atmospheric turbulence and diffraction of light result in the blurring of images of celestial objects when they are observed by ground based telescopes. To correct for the distortions caused by wind flow or small varying temperature regions in the at- mosphere, the new generation of Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs) uses Adaptive Optics (AO) techniques. An AO system consists of wavefront sensors, control algo- rithms and deformable mirrors. A wavefront sensor measures incoming distorted wave- fronts, the control algorithm links the wavefront sensor measurements to the mirror actuator commands, and deformable mirrors mechanically correct for the atmospheric aberrations in real-time. Reconstruction of the unknown wavefront from given sensor measurements is an Inverse Problem. Many instruments currently under development for ELT-sized telescopes have pyramid wavefront sensors included as the primary option. For this sensor type, the relation between the intensity of the incoming light and sensor data is non-linear. The high number of correcting elements to be controlled in real-time or the segmented primary mirrors of the ELTs lead to unprecedented challenges when designing the control al- gorithms.
    [Show full text]
  • Megakernels Considered Harmful: Wavefront Path Tracing on Gpus
    Megakernels Considered Harmful: Wavefront Path Tracing on GPUs Samuli Laine Tero Karras Timo Aila NVIDIA∗ Abstract order to handle irregular control flow, some threads are masked out when executing a branch they should not participate in. This in- When programming for GPUs, simply porting a large CPU program curs a performance loss, as masked-out threads are not performing into an equally large GPU kernel is generally not a good approach. useful work. Due to SIMT execution model on GPUs, divergence in control flow carries substantial performance penalties, as does high register us- The second factor is the high-bandwidth, high-latency memory sys- age that lessens the latency-hiding capability that is essential for the tem. The impressive memory bandwidth in modern GPUs comes at high-latency, high-bandwidth memory system of a GPU. In this pa- the expense of a relatively long delay between making a memory per, we implement a path tracer on a GPU using a wavefront formu- request and getting the result. To hide this latency, GPUs are de- lation, avoiding these pitfalls that can be especially prominent when signed to accommodate many more threads than can be executed in using materials that are expensive to evaluate. We compare our per- any given clock cycle, so that whenever a group of threads is wait- formance against the traditional megakernel approach, and demon- ing for a memory request to be served, other threads may be exe- strate that the wavefront formulation is much better suited for real- cuted. The effectiveness of this mechanism, i.e., the latency-hiding world use cases where multiple complex materials are present in capability, is determined by the threads’ resource usage, the most the scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Wavefront Coding Fluorescence Microscopy Using High Aperture Lenses
    Wavefront Coding Fluorescence Microscopy Using High Aperture Lenses Matthew R. Arnison*, Carol J. Cogswelly, Colin J. R. Sheppard*, Peter Törökz * University of Sydney, Australia University of Colorado, U. S. A. y Imperial College, U. K. z 1 Extended Depth of Field Microscopy In recent years live cell fluorescence microscopy has become increasingly important in biological and medical studies. This is largely due to new genetic engineering techniques which allow cell features to grow their own fluorescent markers. A pop- ular example is green fluorescent protein. This avoids the need to stain, and thereby kill, a cell specimen before taking fluorescence images, and thus provides a major new method for observing live cell dynamics. With this new opportunity come new challenges. Because in earlier days the process of staining killed the cells, microscopists could do little additional harm by squashing the preparation to make it flat, thereby making it easier to image with a high resolution, shallow depth of field lens. In modern live cell fluorescence imag- ing, the specimen may be quite thick (in optical terms). Yet a single 2D image per time–step may still be sufficient for many studies, as long as there is a large depth of field as well as high resolution. Light is a scarce resource for live cell fluorescence microscopy. To image rapidly changing specimens the microscopist needs to capture images quickly. One of the chief constraints on imaging speed is the light intensity. Increasing the illumination will result in faster acquisition, but can affect specimen behaviour through heating, or reduce fluorescent intensity through photobleaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic 3: Operation of Simple Lens
    V N I E R U S E I T H Y Modern Optics T O H F G E R D I N B U Topic 3: Operation of Simple Lens Aim: Covers imaging of simple lens using Fresnel Diffraction, resolu- tion limits and basics of aberrations theory. Contents: 1. Phase and Pupil Functions of a lens 2. Image of Axial Point 3. Example of Round Lens 4. Diffraction limit of lens 5. Defocus 6. The Strehl Limit 7. Other Aberrations PTIC D O S G IE R L O P U P P A D E S C P I A S Properties of a Lens -1- Autumn Term R Y TM H ENT of P V N I E R U S E I T H Y Modern Optics T O H F G E R D I N B U Ray Model Simple Ray Optics gives f Image Object u v Imaging properties of 1 1 1 + = u v f The focal length is given by 1 1 1 = (n − 1) + f R1 R2 For Infinite object Phase Shift Ray Optics gives Delta Fn f Lens introduces a path length difference, or PHASE SHIFT. PTIC D O S G IE R L O P U P P A D E S C P I A S Properties of a Lens -2- Autumn Term R Y TM H ENT of P V N I E R U S E I T H Y Modern Optics T O H F G E R D I N B U Phase Function of a Lens δ1 δ2 h R2 R1 n P0 P ∆ 1 With NO lens, Phase Shift between , P0 ! P1 is 2p F = kD where k = l with lens in place, at distance h from optical, F = k0d1 + d2 +n(D − d1 − d2)1 Air Glass @ A which can be arranged to|giv{ze } | {z } F = knD − k(n − 1)(d1 + d2) where d1 and d2 depend on h, the ray height.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Optics: an Introduction Claire E
    1 Adaptive Optics: An Introduction Claire E. Max I. BRIEF OVERVIEW OF ADAPTIVE OPTICS Adaptive optics is a technology that removes aberrations from optical systems, through use of one or more deformable mirrors which change their shape to compensate for the aberrations. In the case of adaptive optics (hereafter AO) for ground-based telescopes, the main application is to remove image blurring due to turbulence in the Earth's atmosphere, so that telescopes on the ground can "see" as clearly as if they were in space. Of course space telescopes have the great advantage that they can obtain images and spectra at wavelengths that are not transmitted by the atmosphere. This has been exploited to great effect in ultra-violet bands, at near-infrared wavelengths that are not in the atmospheric "windows" at J, H, and K bands, and for the mid- and far-infrared. However since it is much more difficult and expensive to launch the largest telescopes into space instead of building them on the ground, a very fruitful synergy has emerged in which images and low-resolution spectra obtained with space telescopes such as HST are followed up by adaptive- optics-equipped ground-based telescopes with larger collecting area. Astronomy is by no means the only application for adaptive optics. Beginning in the late 1990's, AO has been applied with great success to imaging the living human retina (Porter 2006). Many of the most powerful lasers are using AO to correct for thermal distortions in their optics. Recently AO has been applied to biological microscopy and deep-tissue imaging (Kubby 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Huygens Principle; Young Interferometer; Fresnel Diffraction
    Today • Interference – inadequacy of a single intensity measurement to determine the optical field – Michelson interferometer • measuring – distance – index of refraction – Mach-Zehnder interferometer • measuring – wavefront MIT 2.71/2.710 03/30/09 wk8-a- 1 A reminder: phase delay in wave propagation z t t z = 2.875λ phasor due In general, to propagation (path delay) real representation phasor representation MIT 2.71/2.710 03/30/09 wk8-a- 2 Phase delay from a plane wave propagating at angle θ towards a vertical screen path delay increases linearly with x x λ vertical screen (plane of observation) θ z z=fixed (not to scale) Phasor representation: may also be written as: MIT 2.71/2.710 03/30/09 wk8-a- 3 Phase delay from a spherical wave propagating from distance z0 towards a vertical screen x z=z0 path delay increases quadratically with x λ vertical screen (plane of observation) z z=fixed (not to scale) Phasor representation: may also be written as: MIT 2.71/2.710 03/30/09 wk8-a- 4 The significance of phase delays • The intensity of plane and spherical waves, observed on a screen, is very similar so they cannot be reliably discriminated – note that the 1/(x2+y2+z2) intensity variation in the case of the spherical wave is too weak in the paraxial case z>>|x|, |y| so in practice it cannot be measured reliably • In many other cases, the phase of the field carries important information, for example – the “history” of where the field has been through • distance traveled • materials in the path • generally, the “optical path length” is inscribed
    [Show full text]
  • Shack–Hartmann Wavefront Sensor with Array of Phase Coded Masks
    Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor with array of phase coded masks NITIN DUBEY,* RAVI KUMAR, JOSEPH ROSEN School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel *Corresponding author: [email protected] Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors (SHWS) are generally used to measure the wavefront curvature of light beams. Measurement accuracy and the sensitivity of these sensors are important factors for better wavefront sensing. In this study, we demonstrate a new type of SHWS with better measurement accuracy than the regular SHWS. The lenslet array in the regular SHWS is replaced with an array of coded phase masks and the principle of coded aperture correlation holography (COACH) is used for wavefront reconstruction. Sharper correlation peaks achieved by COACH improve the accuracy of the estimated local slopes of the measured wavefront and consequently improve the reconstruction accuracy of the overall wavefront. Experimental results confirm that the proposed method provides a lower mean square wavefront error by one order of magnitude in comparison to the regular SHWS. Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS) was developed for pattern created by illuminating a single CPM with a plane wave. The optical metrology purposes [1] and later has been used in various intensity response in each cell of the array is shifted according to the other fields, such as adaptive optics [2], microscopy [3], retinal average slope of the wavefront in each corresponding cell. Composing imaging [4], and high-power laser systems [5]. Usually, in SHWS a the entire slopes yields a three-dimensional curvature used as an microlens array is used to measure the wavefront local gradients.
    [Show full text]
  • From Scattering to Wavefronts: What’S in Between? Michael Mrochen, Phd
    From Scattering to Wavefronts: What’s in between? Michael Mrochen, PhD Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Institute of Biomedical Engineering IROC Institute for Refractive and Oculoplastic Surgery Zürich Switzerland Foreword • This is a report on a work in progress ! • Geometric-optical methods are used to develop an analytical theory for surface scattering on rough surface sturctures (irregular structures). • Parts of this work are published in: – SPIE Proceedings Ophthalmic Technologies (1998,1999) – Laser Physics 12: 1239-1256 (2002) – Laser Physics 12: 1333-1348 (2002) Clinical observation: Hartmann -Shack and Tscherning wavefront measurements demonstrate an increased background noise when the tearfilm breaks up. Clinical observation: Hartmann -Shack and Tscherning wavefront measurements demonstrate an increased background noise before and after LASIK After LASIK Before LASIK Clinical observation: Some eyes have irregular surface structures that are not reasonably described in terms of modes (Zernike, Taylor, ...) Striae Cornea after complicated LASIK BSCVA: 20/50 decentered measurement Centered measurement Problem ! Clinical observations indicate that there are other sources of optical errors that are not detected or described or measured by the currently used wavefront sensors. -> Visual symptoms do not correlate well with wavefront data in such complicated cases Question ?! What are the optical effects of such irregular structures ? Irregular structures = surface roughness Optical effects of that might detoriate the image quality
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive Dynamic Digital Holography
    Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Beam Control Laboratory Predictive Dynamic Digital Holography Sennan Sulaiman Steve Gibson Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering UCLA [email protected] 1 1 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Beam Control Laboratory Predictive Dynamic Digital Holography Sennan Sulaiman Steve Gibson Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering UCLA [email protected] Thanks to Mark Spencer and Dan Marker AFRL, Kirtland AFB 2 2 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Beam Control Laboratory Motivation • Digital holography has received heightened attention in recent applications: – Optical Tweezing – Adaptive Optics – Wavefront Sensing • Major advantages of digital holography over classical AO: – Fewer optical components required – No wavefront sensing device required (Shack-Hartmann or SRI) – Versatility of processing techniques on both amplitude and phase information • Digital holography drawback: – Iterative numerical wavefront propagation and sharpness metric optimization • Computationally intensive 3 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Beam Control Laboratory Classical Adaptive Optics Optical Beam with Corrected Wavefront Adaptive Image of Wavefront (Phase) Optics Distant Point Source Sensor Algorithm Sharpened (Beacon) Image Adaptive Optics with Wavefront Prediction Optical Beam with Wavefront Corrected Wavefront Adaptive Image of Prediction Wavefront (Phase) Optics Distant Point Source Sensor Adaptive Algorithm Sharpened (Beacon) & Optimal Image Wavefront prediction compensates for loop delays due to sensor readout, processing,
    [Show full text]
  • Wavefront Distortion of the Reflected and Diffracted Beams Produced By
    Lu et al. Vol. 24, No. 3/March 2007/J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 659 Wavefront distortion of the reflected and diffracted beams produced by the thermoelastic deformation of a diffraction grating heated by a Gaussian laser beam Patrick P. Lu, Amber L. Bullington, Peter Beyersdorf,* Stefan Traeger,† and Justin Mansell‡ Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4085, USA Ray Beausoleil HP Laboratories, 13837 175th Place NE, Redmond, Washington 98052-2180, USA Eric K. Gustafson,** Robert L. Byer, and Martin M. Fejer Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4085, USA Received April 20, 2006; revised September 13, 2006; accepted September 18, 2006; posted September 26, 2006 (Doc. ID 70078); published February 14, 2007 It may be advantageous in advanced gravitational-wave detectors to replace conventional beam splitters and Fabry–Perot input mirrors with diffractive elements. In each of these applications, the wavefront distortions produced by the absorption and subsequent heating of the grating can limit the maximum useful optical power. We present data on the wavefront distortions induced in a laser probe beam for both the reflected and dif- fracted beams from a grating that is heated by a Gaussian laser beam and compare these results to a simple theory of the wavefront distortions induced by thermoelastic deformations. © 2007 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: 000.2780, 050.1950, 120.3180, 120.6810. 1. INTRODUCTION that are not optically transparent, thus increasing the list of possible materials available for this application. Many optical systems contain transmissive components In this paper, we present a model for the thermoelastic such as lenses and beam splitters.
    [Show full text]
  • Huygens-Fresnel's Wavefront Tracing in Non-Uniform Media
    12th International Conf. on Mathem.& Num. Aspects of Wave Propag., Karlsruhe (Germany), July 20-24, 2015 Huygens-Fresnel’s wavefront tracing in non-uniform media F.A. Volpe, P.-D. Létourneau, A. Zhao Dept Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics Columbia University, New York, USA 1 Motivation 1: validate unexpected EC full-wave results, and find more, but at ray tracing costs • Faster than full-wave, more informative than ray-tracing (diffraction, scattering, splitting, …) • Not replacing full-wave, but can guide it – (e.g. scan large spaces, select interesting cases) • Might replace ray tracing in real-time? • Full-waves in EC range are rare – >106 cubic wavelength • But found unexpected effects, t.b.c.: – O couples with X at fundamental harmonic – High production of EBWs at UHR – Collisionless damping of EBWs at UHR • Concern for ITER: deposition in wrong place • Fictitious, due to reduced wpe and wce? 2 Motivation 2: test old/new ideas too complicated for analytical treatment and too time-consuming for full-wave • EBWs – Electromagnetic nature – Interband tunneling • oblique propagation, large Larmor radii, non-circular orbits, non-sine-waves – Autoresonance (N||=1 but N100…) – Cherenkov radiation – Nonlinear • Affecting ne and B in which they propagate • Mode Conversions – Must evanescent barrier be thinner than wavelength or skin depth? – Parametric decay – Chaotic trajectories – Auto-interference of coexisting O, X and B – Self-scattering (e.g. of O off ne modulation by X or B) • Generic Wave Physics – Ponderomotive (density pump-out by ECH?) – Beam Broadening due to finite frequency bandwidth – Broadening by Scattering off “blobs” 3 Simple idea: numerically implement Huygens-Fresnel’s principle of diffraction • Huygens construction: “each element of a wavefront may be regarded as the center of a secondary disturbance which gives rise to spherical wavelets".
    [Show full text]