DOCSLIB.ORG

From the Newton's Laws to Motions of the Fluid and Superfluid Vacuum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From the Newton's Laws to Motions of the Fluid and Superfluid Vacuum From the Newton’s laws to motions of the fluid and superfluid vacuum: vortex tubes, rings, and others Valeriy I. Sbitnev∗ B. P. Konstantinov St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC Kurchatov Institute, Gatchina, Leningrad district, 188350, Russia; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA (Dated: August 14, 2018) Owing to three conditions (namely: (a) the velocity is represented by sum of irrotational and solenoidal components; (b) the fluid is barotropic; (c) a bath with the fluid undergoes vertical vibrations) the Navier-Stokes equation admits reduction to the modified Hamilton-Jacobi equation. The modification term is the Bohmian (quantum) potential. This reduction opens possibility to define a complex-valued function, named the wave function, which is a solution of the Schr¨odinger equation. The solenoidal component being added to the momentum operator poses itself as a vector potential by analogy with the magnetic vector potential. The vector potential is represented by the solenoidal velocity multiplied by mass of the fluid element. Vortex tubes, rings, and balls along with the wave function guiding these objects are solutions of this equation. Motion of the vortex balls along the Bohmian trajectories gives a model of droplets moving on the fluid surface. The physical vacuum represents a peculiar superfluid medium. It consists of Bose particle-antiparticle pairs having nonzero masses and the angular momenta because of rotating about the center of the masses. Bundles of the vortex lines can transmit a torque from one rotating classical disk to other. Keywords: Navier-Stokes; Schr¨odinger; Faraday waves; wave function; probability density; inter- ference; droplet; vortex tube; vortex ring; superfluid vacuum I. INTRODUCTION the particle from its source up to a detector along a most optimal path. In this case the wave func- tion plays a more active role. Quantum mechanics beginning with its birth up to present time shows triumphal contribu- It is amazing, confirmation of the de Broglie- tion to many technological areas of human activ- Bohm theory came from the area faraway from ities. As for ontological basis, as ironic as it may quantum mechanics. This is an experiment with sound, different interpretations of quantum me- droplets which bounce on a silicon oil surface chanics, contradicting one another in some sub- at moving through an obstacle containing two tle points, are applied for describing one and the slits [8]. The authors have shown that in the far same physical experiment. The interpretations field an interference pattern arises after passing compete each with other for the sake of clearness of many droplets. It was found that the Faraday of ontological understanding this discipline [14]. waves play a role of the guiding wave for the Two well known interpretations of quantum me- droplets bouncing on the silicon oil surface, a arXiv:1403.3900v2 [physics.flu-dyn] 20 Jun 2014 chanics are the Copenhagen interpretation and bath with which is subjected to small vertical the interpretation based on the de Broglie-Bohm vibrations. theory. Both interpretations have in their foun- Where is truth? In order to answer on this dation the concept of the wave-particle dualism. question, it makes sense to begin from funda- The Copenhagen interpretation gives priority to mentals. Let us begin from the most fundamen- the wave function and its collapse is conditioned tal laws of classical physics. They are three New- by detecting a particle. The wave function de- ton’s laws first published in Mathematical Prin- scribes only a probabilistic position of the par- ciples of Natural Philosophy in 1687 [37]. The ticle in the physical space. In turn, De Broglie- Newton’s laws read: (a) the first law postulates Bohm theory says that the wave function guides existence of inertial reference frames: an object that is at rest will stay at rest unless an external force acts upon it; an object that is in motion ∗Electronic address: [email protected] will not change its velocity unless an external 2 force acts upon it. The inertia is a property of curve lies. This vector characterizes a quantita- the bodies to resist to changing their velocity; tive measure of the vortex motion and it is called (b) the second law states: the net force applied vorticity. Vector product [~v ~ω] is perpendicu- to a body with a mass M is equal to the rate lar to the both vectors ~v and× ~ω. It represents of change of its linear momentum in an inertial the Coriolis acceleration of the body under ro- reference frame tating it around the vector ~ω. In turn, the term v d~v ρM [~ ~ω] represents the Coriolis force acting on F~ = M~a = M ; (1) the fluid× element in the volume ∆V . d t The term (5) entering in the Navier-Stokes (c) the third law states: for every action there is equation is responsible for emergence of vortex an equal and opposite reaction. structures. The vortex tubes, rings, and balls Leonard Euler had generalized Newton’s laws are considered briefly in Sec. 2 The latter objects of motion on deformable bodies that are assumed are good models of the droplets moving on the as a continuum [16, 21]. We rewrite the second fluid surface. In Sec. 3 we transform the Navier- Newton’s law for the case of deformed medium. Stokes to the Schr¨odinger-like equation. The Let us imagine that a volume ∆V contains a fluid transformation is achieved due to introduction medium of the mass M. We divide Eq. (1) by ∆V of a material dependent parameter which substi- and determine the time-dependent mass density tutes the Plank constant. Solutions of the equa- ~ ρM = M/∆V . In this case F is understood as tion disclose interference patterns arising from the force per volume. Then the second law in the motion of the vortex balls along optimal this case takes a form: paths, the Bohmian trajectories, through an ob- v v stacle containing slits. The Schr¨odinger equation ~ dρM ~ d~ dρM F = = ρM + ~v . (2) describing flow of a superfluid medium known as d t d t d t the physical vacuum is considered in Sec. 4. Here The total derivatives in the right side can be we deal with vortex lines which arise due to rota- written down through partial derivatives: tion of the virtual electron-positron pairs. The lines can self-organize into twisted vortex bun- dρM ∂ρM = +(~v )ρM , (3) dles in a rotating cylindrical container. Kinetic d t ∂ t ∇ energy of these vortex bundles is sufficient to be- d~v ∂~v = + (~v )~v. (4) gin to rotate a top disk covering the container. d t ∂ t ∇ Concluding remarks are given in Sec. 5. Eq. (3) equated to zero is seen to be the conti- nuity equation. As for Eq. (4) we may rewrite II. THE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION AND the rightmost term in detail MOTION OF VORTICES v 2 (~v )~v = [~v [ ~v]]. (5) Taking into account the continuity equation ∇ ∇ 2 − × ∇ × let us rewrite Eq. (2) by omitting the rightmost As follows from this formula the first term, mul- term and specify forces which should be in this tiplied by the mass, is gradient of the kinetic equation: energy. It is a force applied to the fluid element ~ ∂~v 2 F for its shifting on the unit of length, δs. The ρM +(~v )~v = P +µ ~v + . (6) ∂ t ∆V second term is acceleration of the fluid element ·∇ ! −∇ ∇ directed perpendicularly to the velocity. Let the The following set of forces is presented in this fluid element move along some curve in 3D space. equation: (i) the first term is the pressure gra- Tangent to the curve in each point refers to ori- dient. It takes place when there is a differ- entation of the body motion. In turn, the vector ence in pressure across a surface; (ii) the sec- ~ω = [ ~v] is orientated perpendicularly to the ond term represents the viscosity of a Newtonian plane,∇ where × an arbitrarily small segment of the fluid (here µ is the dynamic viscosity, its units 3 are N s/m2 = kg/(m s)); (iii) F/~ ∆V is a body 0.3 0.15 force per· unit volume· acting on the fluid. So, we (a) wrote down the Navier-Stokes equation for the 0.2 0.1 m/s viscous incompressible Newtonian fluid [29]. The rad/s term (~v )~v in Eq. (6) can be rewritten in de- 0.1 0.05 , , tail as shown·∇ in Eq. (5). The vector ~ω = [ ~v] ∇ × in Eq. (5), named vorticity, underlies the vortex 0 0 formation. Let us consider the simplest exam- 0 0.5r 1m 1.5 ples. y A. Helmholtz vortices max Let the force F~ be conservative. Then by ap- plying to Eq. (6) the curl we obtain right away the equation for the vorticity: ∂ ~ω +(~ω )~v = ν 2~ω. (7) ∂ t ·∇ ∇ Here ν = µ/ρM is the kinematic viscosity. Its di- mension is [m2/s]. It corresponds to the diffusion coefficient. For that reason the energy stored in min the vortex will dissipate in thermal energy. As a result the vortex, with the lapse of time, will dis- x appear. For supporting the vortex activity, the energy has to be supplied permanently. Trivial FIG. 1: Vortex tube oriented along the axis z: (a) Vorticity solution of Eq. (7) is seen to be ~ω = 0. ω and velocity u of a flow around the center as functions of remoteness from this center. The velocity u vanishes in the We suppose that the fluid is ideal, barotropic, center and tends to zero on infinity. (b) Cross-section of the and the mass forces are conservative [28].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Leonhard Euler: His Life, the Man, and His Works∗
    SIAM REVIEW c 2008 Walter Gautschi Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 3–33 Leonhard Euler: His Life, the Man, and His Works∗ Walter Gautschi† Abstract. On the occasion of the 300th anniversary (on April 15, 2007) of Euler’s birth, an attempt is made to bring Euler’s genius to the attention of a broad segment of the educated public. The three stations of his life—Basel, St. Petersburg, andBerlin—are sketchedandthe principal works identified in more or less chronological order. To convey a flavor of his work andits impact on modernscience, a few of Euler’s memorable contributions are selected anddiscussedinmore detail. Remarks on Euler’s personality, intellect, andcraftsmanship roundout the presentation. Key words. LeonhardEuler, sketch of Euler’s life, works, andpersonality AMS subject classification. 01A50 DOI. 10.1137/070702710 Seh ich die Werke der Meister an, So sehe ich, was sie getan; Betracht ich meine Siebensachen, Seh ich, was ich h¨att sollen machen. –Goethe, Weimar 1814/1815 1. Introduction. It is a virtually impossible task to do justice, in a short span of time and space, to the great genius of Leonhard Euler. All we can do, in this lecture, is to bring across some glimpses of Euler’s incredibly voluminous and diverse work, which today fills 74 massive volumes of the Opera omnia (with two more to come). Nine additional volumes of correspondence are planned and have already appeared in part, and about seven volumes of notebooks and diaries still await editing! We begin in section 2 with a brief outline of Euler’s life, going through the three stations of his life: Basel, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonhard Euler Moriam Yarrow
    Leonhard Euler Moriam Yarrow Euler's Life Leonhard Euler was one of the greatest mathematician and phsysicist of all time for his many contributions to mathematics. His works have inspired and are the foundation for modern mathe- matics. Euler was born in Basel, Switzerland on April 15, 1707 AD by Paul Euler and Marguerite Brucker. He is the oldest of five children. Once, Euler was born his family moved from Basel to Riehen, where most of his childhood took place. From a very young age Euler had a niche for math because his father taught him the subject. At the age of thirteen he was sent to live with his grandmother, where he attended the University of Basel to receive his Master of Philosphy in 1723. While he attended the Universirty of Basel, he studied greek in hebrew to satisfy his father. His father wanted to prepare him for a career in the field of theology in order to become a pastor, but his friend Johann Bernouilli convinced Euler's father to allow his son to pursue a career in mathematics. Bernoulli saw the potentional in Euler after giving him lessons. Euler received a position at the Academy at Saint Petersburg as a professor from his friend, Daniel Bernoulli. He rose through the ranks very quickly. Once Daniel Bernoulli decided to leave his position as the director of the mathmatical department, Euler was promoted. While in Russia, Euler was greeted/ introduced to Christian Goldbach, who sparked Euler's interest in number theory. Euler was a man of many talents because in Russia he was learning russian, executed studies on navigation and ship design, cartography, and an examiner for the military cadet corps.
    [Show full text]
  • Euler and His Work on Infinite Series
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 44, Number 4, October 2007, Pages 515–539 S 0273-0979(07)01175-5 Article electronically published on June 26, 2007 EULER AND HIS WORK ON INFINITE SERIES V. S. VARADARAJAN For the 300th anniversary of Leonhard Euler’s birth Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. Zeta values 3. Divergent series 4. Summation formula 5. Concluding remarks 1. Introduction Leonhard Euler is one of the greatest and most astounding icons in the history of science. His work, dating back to the early eighteenth century, is still with us, very much alive and generating intense interest. Like Shakespeare and Mozart, he has remained fresh and captivating because of his personality as well as his ideas and achievements in mathematics. The reasons for this phenomenon lie in his universality, his uniqueness, and the immense output he left behind in papers, correspondence, diaries, and other memorabilia. Opera Omnia [E], his collected works and correspondence, is still in the process of completion, close to eighty volumes and 31,000+ pages and counting. A volume of brief summaries of his letters runs to several hundred pages. It is hard to comprehend the prodigious energy and creativity of this man who fueled such a monumental output. Even more remarkable, and in stark contrast to men like Newton and Gauss, is the sunny and equable temperament that informed all of his work, his correspondence, and his interactions with other people, both common and scientific. It was often said of him that he did mathematics as other people breathed, effortlessly and continuously.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Euler Integral for the Positive and Negative Factorial
    On the Euler Integral for the positive and negative Factorial Tai-Choon Yoon ∗ and Yina Yoon (Dated: Dec. 13th., 2020) Abstract We reviewed the Euler integral for the factorial, Gauss’ Pi function, Legendre’s gamma function and beta function, and found that gamma function is defective in Γ(0) and Γ( x) − because they are undefined or indefinable. And we came to a conclusion that the definition of a negative factorial, that covers the domain of the negative space, is needed to the Euler integral for the factorial, as well as the Euler Y function and the Euler Z function, that supersede Legendre’s gamma function and beta function. (Subject Class: 05A10, 11S80) A. The positive factorial and the Euler Y function Leonhard Euler (1707–1783) developed a transcendental progression in 1730[1] 1, which is read xedx (1 x)n. (1) Z − f From this, Euler transformed the above by changing e to g for generalization into f x g dx (1 x)n. (2) Z − Whence, Euler set f = 1 and g = 0, and got an integral for the factorial (!) 2, dx ( lx )n, (3) Z − where l represents logarithm . This is called the Euler integral of the second kind 3, and the equation (1) is called the Euler integral of the first kind. 4, 5 Rewriting the formula (3) as follows with limitation of domain for a positive half space, 1 1 n ln dx, n 0. (4) Z0 x ≥ ∗ Electronic address: [email protected] 1 “On Transcendental progressions that is, those whose general terms cannot be given algebraically” by Leonhard Euler p.3 2 ibid.
    [Show full text]
  • Euler-Maclaurin Formula 1 Introduction
    18.704 Seminar in Algebra and Number Theory Fall 2005 Euler-Maclaurin Formula Prof. Victor Kaˇc Kuat Yessenov 1 Introduction Euler-Maclaurin summation formula is an important tool of numerical analysis. Simply put, it gives Pn R n us an estimation of the sum i=0 f(i) through the integral 0 f(t)dt with an error term given by an integral which involves Bernoulli numbers. In the most general form, it can be written as b X Z b 1 f(n) = f(t)dt + (f(b) + f(a)) + (1) 2 n=a a k X bi + (f (i−1)(b) − f (i−1)(a)) − i! i=2 Z b B ({1 − t}) − k f (k)(t)dt a k! where a and b are arbitrary real numbers with difference b − a being a positive integer number, Bn and bn are Bernoulli polynomials and numbers, respectively, and k is any positive integer. The condition we impose on the real function f is that it should have continuous k-th derivative. The symbol {x} for a real number x denotes the fractional part of x. Proof of this theorem using h−calculus is given in the book [Ka] by Victor Kaˇc. In this paper we would like to discuss several applications of this formula. This formula was discovered independently and almost simultaneously by Euler and Maclaurin in the first half of the XVIII-th century. However, neither of them obtained the remainder term Z b Bk({1 − t}) (k) Rk = f (t)dt (2) a k! which is the most essential Both used iterative method of obtaining Bernoulli’s numbers bi, but Maclaurin’s approach was mainly based on geometric structure while Euler used purely analytic ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Euler's Foundations of Differential Calculus in Isabelle
    Exploring Euler’s Foundations of Differential Calculus in Isabelle/HOL using Nonstandard Analysis Jessika Rockel I V N E R U S E I T H Y T O H F G E R D I N B U Master of Science Computer Science School of Informatics University of Edinburgh 2019 Abstract When Euler wrote his ‘Foundations of Differential Calculus’ [5], he did so without a concept of limits or a fixed notion of what constitutes a proof. Yet many of his results still hold up today, and he is often revered for his skillful handling of these matters despite the lack of a rigorous formal framework. Nowadays we not only have a stricter notion of proofs but we also have computer tools that can assist in formal proof development: Interactive theorem provers help users construct formal proofs interactively by verifying individual proof steps and pro- viding automation tools to help find the right rules to prove a given step. In this project we examine the section of Euler’s ‘Foundations of Differential Cal- culus’ dealing with the differentiation of logarithms [5, pp. 100-104]. We retrace his arguments in the interactive theorem prover Isabelle to verify his lines of argument and his conclusions and try to gain some insight into how he came up with them. We are mostly able to follow his general line of reasoning, and we identify a num- ber of hidden assumptions and skipped steps in his proofs. In one case where we cannot reproduce his proof directly we can still validate his conclusions, providing a proof that only uses methods that were available to Euler at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonhard Euler - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 14
    Leonhard Euler - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 14 Leonhard Euler From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Leonhard Euler ( German pronunciation: [l]; English Leonhard Euler approximation, "Oiler" [1] 15 April 1707 – 18 September 1783) was a pioneering Swiss mathematician and physicist. He made important discoveries in fields as diverse as infinitesimal calculus and graph theory. He also introduced much of the modern mathematical terminology and notation, particularly for mathematical analysis, such as the notion of a mathematical function.[2] He is also renowned for his work in mechanics, fluid dynamics, optics, and astronomy. Euler spent most of his adult life in St. Petersburg, Russia, and in Berlin, Prussia. He is considered to be the preeminent mathematician of the 18th century, and one of the greatest of all time. He is also one of the most prolific mathematicians ever; his collected works fill 60–80 quarto volumes. [3] A statement attributed to Pierre-Simon Laplace expresses Euler's influence on mathematics: "Read Euler, read Euler, he is our teacher in all things," which has also been translated as "Read Portrait by Emanuel Handmann 1756(?) Euler, read Euler, he is the master of us all." [4] Born 15 April 1707 Euler was featured on the sixth series of the Swiss 10- Basel, Switzerland franc banknote and on numerous Swiss, German, and Died Russian postage stamps. The asteroid 2002 Euler was 18 September 1783 (aged 76) named in his honor. He is also commemorated by the [OS: 7 September 1783] Lutheran Church on their Calendar of Saints on 24 St. Petersburg, Russia May – he was a devout Christian (and believer in Residence Prussia, Russia biblical inerrancy) who wrote apologetics and argued Switzerland [5] forcefully against the prominent atheists of his time.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is the Gamma Function So As It Is? Detlef Gronau
    1/1 (2003), 43–53 Why is the gamma function so as it is? Detlef Gronau Abstract. This is a historical note on the gamma function Γ. The question is, why is Γ(n) for naturals n equal to (n−1)! and not equal to n! (the factorial function n! = 1·2 · · · n) ? Was A. M. Legendre responsible for this transformation, or was it L. Euler? And, who was the first who gave a representation of the so called Euler gamma function? Key words and phrases: history of mathematics, gamma function. ZDM Subject Classification: 01A55, 39-03, 39B12. 0. Introduction I often asked myself the following question: “Why is Γ(n) = (n 1)! and not Γ(n)= n! ?” (Q) − The standard answer to this question is: Euler1 introduced the gamma func- n 2 tion as an interpolating function for the factorials n!= k=1 k. Legendre intro- duced the notation Γ together with this shift such thatQ Γ(n) = (n 1)! . But it − ain’t necessarily so. As a matter of fact, it was Daniel Bernoulli3 who gave in 1729 the first representation of an interpolating function of the factorials in form of an infinite product, later known as gamma function. 1Leonhard Euler, 15. 4. 1707, Basel – 18.9.˙ 1783, St. Petersburg. 2Adrien Marie Legendre, Paris, 18. 9. 1752 – 9. 1. 1833, Paris. 3Daniel Bernoulli, 8.2.1700, Groningen – 17. 3. 1782, Basel. Copyright c 2003 by University of Debrecen 44 Detlef Gronau Euler who, at that time, stayed together with D. Bernoulli in St. Peters- burg gave a similar representation of this interpolating function.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpts on the Euler-Maclaurin Summation Formula, from Institutiones Calculi Differentialis by Leonhard Euler
    Excerpts on the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula, from Institutiones Calculi Differentialis by Leonhard Euler. Translated by David Pengelley Copyright °c 2000 by David Pengelley (individual educational use only may be made without permission) Leonhard Euler’s book Institutiones Calculi Differentialis (Foundations of Differential Calculus) was published in two parts in 1755 [2, series I, vol. 10], and translated into German in 1790 [3]. There is an English translation of part 1 [4], but not part 2, of the Institutiones. Euler was entranced by infinite series, and a wizard at working with them. A lot of the book is actually devoted to the relationship between differential calculus and infinite series, and in this respect it differs considerably from today’s calculus books. In chapters 5 and 6 of part 2 Euler presents his way of finding sums of series, both finite and infinite, via his discovery of the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula. Here we present translated excerpts from these two chapters of part 2, featuring aspects of Euler’s development and applications of his summation formula. The English translation has been made primarily from the German translation of 1790 [3], with some assistance from Daniel Otero in comparing the resulting English with the Latin original. The excerpts include those in a forthcoming book of annotated original sources, within a chapter on The Bridge Between the Continuous and Discrete. The book chapter follows this theme via sources by Archimedes, Fermat, Pascal, Bernoulli and Euler. For more information see http://math.nmsu.edu/~history. In the spirit of providing pure uninterpreted translation, we have here removed all our annotation and commentary, which along with extensive exercises can be found in the book chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonhard Euler's Elastic Curves Author(S): W
    Leonhard Euler's Elastic Curves Author(s): W. A. Oldfather, C. A. Ellis and Donald M. Brown Source: Isis, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Nov., 1933), pp. 72-160 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/224885 Accessed: 10-07-2015 18:15 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and The History of Science Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Isis. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.138.65.63 on Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:15:50 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions LeonhardEuler's ElasticCurves (De Curvis Elasticis, Additamentum I to his Methodus Inveniendi Lineas Curvas Maximi Minimive Proprietate Gaudentes, Lausanne and Geneva, 1744). Translated and Annotated by W. A. OLDFATHER, C. A. ELLIS, and D. M. BROWN PREFACE In the fall of I920 Mr. CHARLES A. ELLIS, at that time Professor of Structural Engineering in the University of Illinois, called my attention to the famous appendix on elastic curves by LEONHARD EULER, which he felt might well be made available in an English translationto those students of structuralengineering who were interested in the classical treatises which constitute landmarks in the history of this ever increasingly important branch of scientific and technical achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Euler As Physicist Dieter Suisky
    Euler as Physicist Dieter Suisky Euler as Physicist 123 Dr. Dr. Dieter Suisky Humboldt-Universitat¨ zu Berlin Institut fur¨ Physik Newtonstr. 15 12489 Berlin Germany [email protected] ISBN: 978-3-540-74863-2 e-ISBN: 978-3-540-74865-6 DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-74865-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008936484 c Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: WMXDesign GmbH, Heidelberg Printed on acid-free paper 987654321 springer.com Preface In this book the exceptional role of Leonhard Euler in the history of science will be analyzed and emphasized, especially demonstrated for his fundamental contri- butions to physics. Although Euler is famous as the leading mathematician of the 18th century his contributions to physics are as important and rich of new methods and solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Variational Calculus with Mean of (Min, +)-Analysis
    i i “main” — 2018/2/2 — 17:12 — page 385 — #1 i i Tendenciasˆ em Matematica´ Aplicada e Computacional, 18, N. 3 (2017), 385-403 Tema © 2017 Sociedade Brasileira de Matematica´ Aplicada e Computacional www.scielo.br/tema doi: 10.5540/tema.2017.018.03.0385 Complex Variational Calculus with Mean of (min, +)-analysis M. GONDRAN1,A.KENOUFI2* and A. GONDRAN3 Received on November 9, 2016 / Accepted on July 8, 2017 ABSTRACT. One develops a new mathematical tool, the complex (min, +)-analysis which permits to define a new variational calculus analogous to the classical one (Euler-Lagrange and Hamilton Jacobi equa- tions), but which is well-suited for functions defined from Cn to C. We apply this complex variational calculus to Born-Infeld theory of electromagnetism and show why it does not exhibit nonlinear effects. Keywords: Variational Calculus, Lagrangian, Hamiltonian, Action, Euler-Lagrange and Hamilton-Jacobi equations, complex (min, +)-analysis, Maxwell’s equations, Born-Infeld theory. 1 INTRODUCTION As it was said by famous Isaac Newton, Nature likes simplicity. Physicists and mathematicians have tried to express this metaphysic statement through equations: this is the purpose of the Least Action Principle, elaborated in the middle of the 18th century by Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis and Leonhard Euler [5, 6, 8]. This principle leads to the so-called Euler-Lagrange equations set [18], which is the kernel of past and future laws in physics. What is the optimal shape of a house with a fixed volume in order to get a minimal surface which optimizes the heat loss? Eskimos have known the solution of this problem since a long time: it’s the hemisphere.
    [Show full text]