DOCSLIB.ORG

[Math.CT] 4 Jul 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
[Math.CT] 4 Jul 2006 Homology and homotopy in semi-abelian categories Tim Van der Linden Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel, Belgium E-mail address: [email protected] arXiv:math/0607100v1 [math.CT] 4 Jul 2006 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 18G, 55N35, 55P05, 55P10, 18E10; Secondary 20J Introduction The theory of abelian categories proved very useful, providing an axiomatic framework for homology and cohomology of modules over a ring and, in particular, of abelian groups [43, 95, 53, 110]. Out of it (and out of Algebraic Geometry) grew Category Theory. But for many years, a similar categorical framework has been lacking for non-abelian (co)homology, the subject of which includes the categories of groups, rings, Lie algebras etc. The point of this dissertation is that semi- abelian categories (in the sense of Janelidze, M´arki and Tholen [78]) provide a suitable context for the study of non-abelian (co)homology and the corresponding homotopy theory. A semi-abelian category is pointed, Barr exact and Bourn protomodular with binary coproducts [78, 14]. Pointed means that it has a zero object: an initial object that is also terminal. An exact category is regular (finitely complete with pullback-stable regular epimorphisms) and such that any internal equivalence re- lation is a kernel pair [10]. A pointed and regular category is protomodular when the Short Five Lemma holds: For any commutative diagram ker p′ p′ K[p′] 2, 2, E′ 2, 2, B′ u v w K[p] 2, 2, E 2, 2, B ker p p such that p and p′ are regular epimorphisms, u and w being isomorphisms im- plies that v is an isomorphism [18]. Examples include all abelian categories; all varieties of Ω-groups (i.e., varieties of universal algebras with a unique constant and an underlying group structure [68]), in particular the categories of groups, non-unitary rings, Lie algebras, commutative algebras [14], crossed modules and precrossed modules [74]; internal versions of such varieties in an exact category [78]; Heyting semilattices [85]; compact Hausdorff (profinite) groups (or semi-abelian al- gebras) [15, 14], non-unital C∗ algebras [63] and Heyting algebras [19, 78]; the dual of the category of pointed objects in any topos, in particular the dual of the category of pointed sets [78]. In any semi-abelian category, the fundamental diagram lemmas, such as the Short Five Lemma, the 3 × 3 Lemma, the Snake Lemma [21] and Noether’s Iso- morphism Theorems [14] hold. Moreover, there is a satisfactory notion of homology of chain complexes: Any short exact sequence of proper chain complexes induces a long exact homology sequence [51]. It is hardly surprising that such a context would prove suitable for further de- velopment of non-abelian (co)homology. With this dissertation we provide some i ii INTRODUCTION additional evidence. We consider homology of simplicial objects and internal cat- egories, and cotriple (co)homology in the sense of Barr and Beck [9]. Using tech- niques from commutator theory [104, 72, 99, 75, 22, 28, 29] and the theory of Baer invariants [54, 93, 55, 50], we obtain a general version of Hopf’s For- mula [70] and the Stallings-Stammbach Sequence [105, 106] in homology—and their cohomological counterparts, in particular the Hochschild-Serre sequence [65]. We recover results, well-known in the case of groups and Lie algebras: e.g., the fact that the second cohomology group classifies central extensions. And although ho- motopy theory of chain complexes seems to be problematic, Quillen model category structures for simplicial objects and internal categories exist that are compatible with these notions of homology [49, 109]. * * * Chapter 1. Throughout the text, we shall attempt to formulate all results in their “optimal” categorical context. Sometimes this optimal context is the most general one; sometimes it is where most technical problems disappear. (It is, however, always possible to replace the conditions on a category A by “semi-abelian with enough projectives”, unless it is explicitly mentioned that we need “semi-abelian and monadic over Set”, and most of the time “semi-abelian” is sufficient.) In the first chapter we give an overview of the relevant categorical struc- tures: quasi-pointed and pointed, unital and strongly unital, regular and Barr exact, Mal’tsev, Bourn protomodular, sequentiable and homological, and semi-abelian cat- egories. This is what we shall loosely refer to as the “semi-abelian” context. We give examples and counterexamples, fix notations and conventions. We add those (sometimes rather technical) properties that are essential to making the theory work. Chapter 2. In Chapter 2 we extend the notion of chain complex to the semi-abelian context. As soon as the ambient category is quasi-pointed, exact and protomodular, homology of proper chain complexes—those with boundary operators of which the image is a kernel—is well-behaved: It characterizes exactness. Also, in this case, the two dual definitions of homology (see Definition 2.1.4) coincide. A short exact sequence of proper chain complexes induces a long exact homology sequence. We show that the Moore complex of a simplicial object A in a quasi-pointed exact Mal’tsev category A is always proper; this is the positively graded chain + complex N(A) ∈ PCh A defined by N0A = A0, n−1 NnA = K[∂i : An 2, An−1] i=0 \ ◦ and with boundary operators dn = ∂n i ker ∂i : NnA 2, Nn−1A, for n ≥ 1. When, moreover, A is protomodular, the normalization functor T N : SA 2, PCh+A is exact; hence a short exact sequence of simplicial objects induces a long exact homology sequence. To show this, we use the result that in a regular Mal’tsev category, every simplicial object is Kan [38], and every regular epimorphism of simplicial objects is a Kan fibration. These facts also lead to a proof of Dominique Bourn’s conjecture that for n ≥ 1, the homology objects HnA of a simplicial object A are abelian. INTRODUCTION iii Chapter 3. Extending the work of Fr¨ohlich, Lue and Furtado-Coelho, in Chap- ter 3, we study the theory of Baer invariants in the semi-abelian context. Briefly, this theory concerns expressions in terms of a presentation of an object that are independent of the chosen presentation. For instance, presenting a group G as a quotient F/R of a free group F and a “group of relations” R, [F, F ] R ∩ [F, F ] and [R, F ] [R, F ] are such expressions. Formally, a presentation p: A0 2, 2, A of an object A in a category A is a regular epimorphism. (In a sequentiable category, the kernel ker p: A1 2, 2, A0 of p exists, and then A is equal to the quotient A0/A1.) The category PrA is the full subcategory, determined by the presentations in A, of the category Fun(2, A) of arrows in A. A Baer invariant is a functor B : PrA 2, A that makes homotopic morphisms of presentations equal: Such are (f0,f) and (g0,g): p 2, q f0 A0 2, B0 g0 p q f A 2, B g 2, satisfying f = g. Baer invariants may be constructed from subfunctors of the identity functor of A. For instance, under the right circumstances, a subfunctor V of 1A induces functors PrA 2, A that map a presentation p: A0 2, A to K[p] ∩ V p V p 0 or 0 . V1p K[p] ∩ V0p Choosing, for every object A, a projective presentation p (i.e., with A0 projective), these Baer invariants induce functors A 2, A, which are respectively denoted by ∆V and ∇V . Ideally, A is an exact and sequentiable category and V is a proper subfunctor of 1A that preserves regular epimorphisms: i.e., V is a Birkhoff subfunctor of A. Birkhoff subfunctors correspond bijectively to Birkhoff subcategories in the sense of Janelidze and Kelly [75]: full and reflective, and closed in A under subobjects and regular quotients. Given a Birkhoff subcategory B, the functor V is the kernel of the unit of the adjunction. As a leading example, there is always the subcategory AbA of all abelian objects of A. In this case, one interprets a value V (A) of V as a commutator [A, A]. Baer invariants give rise to exact sequences. For instance, Theorem 3.3.10 states that, given an exact and sequentiable category with enough projectives A, and a Birkhoff subfunctor V of A, any short exact sequence f 0 2, K 2, 2, A 2, B 2, 1 in A induces, in a natural way, an exact sequence ∆V f Uf ∆V (A) ∆V (B) K U(A) U(B) 2, 2, V1f 2, 2, 2, 1. iv INTRODUCTION The symbol V1f that occurs in this sequence can be interpreted as a commutator [K, A] of K with A, relative to V . We relate it to existing notions in the field of categorical commutator theory and the theory of central extensions in the follow- ing manner. In the case of abelianization, the commutator V1 may be described entirely in terms of Smith’s commutator of equivalence relations [104], and the corresponding notion of central extension coincides with the ones considered by Smith [104] and Huq [72]. Relative to an arbitrary Birkhoff subcategory—not just the full subcategory of all abelian objects—the central extensions are the same as those introduced by Janelidze and Kelly [75]. Finally we propose a notion of nilpotency, relative to any Birkhoff subcategory of a semi-abelian category. An object is nilpotent if and only if is lower central series reaches zero (Corollary 3.5.6), and the objects of a given nilpotency class form a Birkhoff subcategory (Proposition 3.5.8).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diagram Chasing in Abelian Categories
    Diagram Chasing in Abelian Categories Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In applications of the theory of homological algebra, results such as the Five Lemma are crucial. For abelian groups this result is proved by diagram chasing, a procedure not immediately available in a general abelian category. However, we can still prove the desired results by embedding our abelian category in the category of abelian groups. All of this material is taken from Mitchell’s book on category theory [Mit65]. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Desired results ...................................... 1 2 Walks in Abelian Categories 3 2.1 Diagram chasing ..................................... 6 1 Introduction For our conventions regarding categories the reader is directed to our Abelian Categories (AC) notes. In particular recall that an embedding is a faithful functor which takes distinct objects to distinct objects. Theorem 1. Any small abelian category A has an exact embedding into the category of abelian groups. Proof. See [Mit65] Chapter 4, Theorem 2.6. Lemma 2. Let A be an abelian category and S ⊆ A a nonempty set of objects. There is a full small abelian subcategory B of A containing S. Proof. See [Mit65] Chapter 4, Lemma 2.7. Combining results II 6.7 and II 7.1 of [Mit65] we have Lemma 3. Let A be an abelian category, T : A −→ Ab an exact embedding. Then T preserves and reflects monomorphisms, epimorphisms, commutative diagrams, limits and colimits of finite diagrams, and exact sequences. 1.1 Desired results In the category of abelian groups, diagram chasing arguments are usually used either to establish a property (such as surjectivity) of a certain morphism, or to construct a new morphism between known objects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freyd-Mitchell Embedding Theorem States the Existence of a Ring R and an Exact Full Embedding a Ñ R-Mod, R-Mod Being the Category of Left Modules Over R
    The Freyd-Mitchell Embedding Theorem Arnold Tan Junhan Michaelmas 2018 Mini Projects: Homological Algebra arXiv:1901.08591v1 [math.CT] 23 Jan 2019 University of Oxford MFoCS Homological Algebra Contents 1 Abstract 1 2 Basics on abelian categories 1 3 Additives and representables 6 4 A special case of Freyd-Mitchell 10 5 Functor categories 12 6 Injective Envelopes 14 7 The Embedding Theorem 18 1 Abstract Given a small abelian category A, the Freyd-Mitchell embedding theorem states the existence of a ring R and an exact full embedding A Ñ R-Mod, R-Mod being the category of left modules over R. This theorem is useful as it allows one to prove general results about abelian categories within the context of R-modules. The goal of this report is to flesh out the proof of the embedding theorem. We shall follow closely the material and approach presented in Freyd (1964). This means we will encounter such concepts as projective generators, injective cogenerators, the Yoneda embedding, injective envelopes, Grothendieck categories, subcategories of mono objects and subcategories of absolutely pure objects. This approach is summarised as follows: • the functor category rA, Abs is abelian and has injective envelopes. • in fact, the same holds for the full subcategory LpAq of left-exact functors. • LpAqop has some nice properties: it is cocomplete and has a projective generator. • such a category embeds into R-Mod for some ring R. • in turn, A embeds into such a category. 2 Basics on abelian categories Fix some category C. Let us say that a monic A Ñ B is contained in another monic A1 Ñ B if there is a map A Ñ A1 making the diagram A B commute.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagram Chasing in Abelian Categories
    Diagram Chasing in Abelian Categories Toni Annala Contents 1 Overview 2 2 Abelian Categories 3 2.1 Denition and basic properties . .3 2.2 Subobjects and quotient objects . .6 2.3 The image and inverse image functors . 11 2.4 Exact sequences and diagram chasing . 16 1 Chapter 1 Overview This is a short note, intended only for personal use, where I x diagram chasing in general abelian categories. I didn't want to take the Freyd-Mitchell embedding theorem for granted, and I didn't like the style of the Freyd's book on the topic. Therefore I had to do something else. As this was intended only for personal use, and as I decided to include this to the application quite late, I haven't touched anything in chapter 2. Some vague references to Freyd's book are made in the passing, they mean the book Abelian Categories by Peter Freyd. How diagram chasing is xed then? The main idea is to chase subobjects instead of elements. The sections 2.1 and 2.2 contain many standard statements about abelian categories, proved perhaps in a nonstandard way. In section 2.3 we dene the image and inverse image functors, which let us transfer subobjects via a morphism of objects. The most important theorem in this section is probably 2.3.11, which states that for a subobject U of X, and a morphism f : X ! Y , we have ff −1U = U \ imf. Some other results are useful as well, for example 2.3.2, which says that the image functor associated to a monic morphism is injective.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake Lemma - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Snake lemma - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_lemma Snake lemma From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The snake lemma is a tool used in mathematics, particularly homological algebra, to construct long exact sequences. The snake lemma is valid in every abelian category and is a crucial tool in homological algebra and its applications, for instance in algebraic topology. Homomorphisms constructed with its help are generally called connecting homomorphisms. Contents 1 Statement 2 Explanation of the name 3 Construction of the maps 4 Naturality 5 In popular culture 6 See also 7 References 8 External links Statement In an abelian category (such as the category of abelian groups or the category of vector spaces over a given field), consider a commutative diagram: where the rows are exact sequences and 0 is the zero object. Then there is an exact sequence relating the kernels and cokernels of a, b, and c: Furthermore, if the morphism f is a monomorphism, then so is the morphism ker a → ker b, and if g' is an epimorphism, then so is coker b → coker c. Explanation of the name To see where the snake lemma gets its name, expand the diagram above as follows: 1 of 4 28/11/2012 01:58 Snake lemma - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_lemma and then note that the exact sequence that is the conclusion of the lemma can be drawn on this expanded diagram in the reversed "S" shape of a slithering snake. Construction of the maps The maps between the kernels and the maps between the cokernels are induced in a natural manner by the given (horizontal) maps because of the diagram's commutativity.
    [Show full text]
  • Categorical-Algebraic Methods in Group Cohomology
    Categorical-algebraic methods in group cohomology Tim Van der Linden Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique–FNRS Université catholique de Louvain 20th of July 2017 | Vancouver | CT2017 § My concrete aim: to understand (co)homology of groups. § Several aspects: § general categorical versions of known results; § problems leading to further development of categorical algebra; § categorical methods leading to new results for groups. Today, I would like to § explain how the concept of a higher central extension unifies the interpretations of homology and cohomology; § give an overview of some categorical-algebraic methods used for this aim. This is joint work with many people, done over the last 15 years. Group cohomology via categorical algebra In my work I mainly develop and apply categorical algebra in its interactions with homology theory. § Several aspects: § general categorical versions of known results; § problems leading to further development of categorical algebra; § categorical methods leading to new results for groups. Today, I would like to § explain how the concept of a higher central extension unifies the interpretations of homology and cohomology; § give an overview of some categorical-algebraic methods used for this aim. This is joint work with many people, done over the last 15 years. Group cohomology via categorical algebra In my work I mainly develop and apply categorical algebra in its interactions with homology theory. § My concrete aim: to understand (co)homology of groups. Today, I would like to § explain how the concept of a higher central extension unifies the interpretations of homology and cohomology; § give an overview of some categorical-algebraic methods used for this aim. This is joint work with many people, done over the last 15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Weakly Exact Categories and the Snake Lemma 3
    WEAKLY EXACT CATEGORIES AND THE SNAKE LEMMA AMIR JAFARI Abstract. We generalize the notion of an exact category and introduce weakly exact categories. A proof of the snake lemma in this general setting is given. Some applications are given to illustrate how one can do homological algebra in a weakly exact category. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Weakly Exact Category 3 3. The Snake Lemma 4 4. The3 × 3 Lemma 6 5. Examples 8 6. Applications 10 7. Additive Weakly Exact Categories 12 References 14 1. Introduction Short and long exact sequences are among the most fundamental concepts in mathematics. The definition of an exact sequence is based on kernel and cokernel, which can be defined for any category with a zero object 0, i.e. an object that is both initial and final. In such a category, kernel and cokernel are equalizer and coequalizer of: f A // B . 0 arXiv:0901.2372v1 [math.CT] 16 Jan 2009 Kernel and cokernel do not need to exist in general, but by definition if they exist, they are unique up to a unique isomorphism. As is the case for any equalizer and coequalizer, kernel is monomorphism and cokernel is epimorphism. In an abelian category the converse is also true: any monomorphism is a kernel and any epimor- phism is a cokernel. In fact any morphism A → B factors as A → I → B with A → I a cokernel and I → B a kernel. This factorization property for a cate- gory with a zero object is so important that together with the existence of finite products, imply that the category is abelian (see 1.597 of [FS]).
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on Homological Algebra
    A Primer on Homological Algebra Henry Y. Chan July 12, 2013 1 Modules For people who have taken the algebra sequence, you can pretty much skip the first section... Before telling you what a module is, you probably should know what a ring is... Definition 1.1. A ring is a set R with two operations + and ∗ and two identities 0 and 1 such that 1. (R; +; 0) is an abelian group. 2. (Associativity) (x ∗ y) ∗ z = x ∗ (y ∗ z), for all x; y; z 2 R. 3. (Multiplicative Identity) x ∗ 1 = 1 ∗ x = x, for all x 2 R. 4. (Left Distributivity) x ∗ (y + z) = x ∗ y + x ∗ z, for all x; y; z 2 R. 5. (Right Distributivity) (x + y) ∗ z = x ∗ z + y ∗ z, for all x; y; z 2 R. A ring is commutative if ∗ is commutative. Note that multiplicative inverses do not have to exist! Example 1.2. 1. Z; Q; R; C with the standard addition, the standard multiplication, 0, and 1. 2. Z=nZ with addition and multiplication modulo n, 0, and 1. 3. R [x], the set of all polynomials with coefficients in R, where R is a ring, with the standard polynomial addition and multiplication. 4. Mn×n, the set of all n-by-n matrices, with matrix addition and multiplication, 0n, and In. For convenience, from now on we only consider commutative rings. Definition 1.3. Assume (R; +R; ∗R; 0R; 1R) is a commutative ring. A R-module is an abelian group (M; +M ; 0M ) with an operation · : R × M ! M such that 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Homological Algebra Lecture 3
    Homological Algebra Lecture 3 Richard Crew Summer 2021 Richard Crew Homological Algebra Lecture 3 Summer 2021 1 / 21 Exactness in Abelian Categories Suppose A is an abelian category. We now try to formulate what it means for a sequence g X −!f Y −! Z (1) to be exact. First of all we require that gf = 0. When it is, f factors through the kernel of g: X ! Ker(g) ! Y But the composite Ker(f ) ! X ! Ker(g) ! Y is 0 and Ker(g) ! Y is a monomorphism, so Ker(f ) ! X ! Ker(g) is 0. Therefore f factors Richard Crew Homological Algebra Lecture 3 Summer 2021 2 / 21 X ! Im(f ) ! Ker(g) ! Y : Since Im(f ) ! Y is a monomorphism, Im(f ) ! Ker(g) is a monomorphism as well. Definition A sequence g X −!f Y −! Z is exact if gf = 0 and the canonical monomorphism Im(f ) ! Ker(g) is an isomorphism. Richard Crew Homological Algebra Lecture 3 Summer 2021 3 / 21 We need the following lemma for the next proposition: Lemma Suppose f : X ! Z and g : Y ! Z are morphisms in a category C which has fibered products, and suppose i : Z ! Z 0 is a monomorphism. Set f 0 = if : X ! Z 0 and g 0 = ig : Y ! Z 0. The canonical morphism X ×Z Y ! X ×Z 0 Y is an isomorphism. Proof: The canonical morphism comes from applying the universal property of the fibered product to the diagram p2 X ×Z Y / Y p1 g f g 0 X / Z i f 0 , Z 0 Richard Crew Homological Algebra Lecture 3 Summer 2021 4 / 21 The universal property of X ×Z Y is that the set of morphisms T ! X ×Z Y is in a functorial bijection with the set of pairs of morphisms a : T ! X and b : T ! Y such that fa = gb.
    [Show full text]
  • Matemaattis-Luonnontieteellinen Matematiikan Ja Tilastotieteen Laitos Joni Leino on Mitchell's Embedding Theorem of Small Abel
    HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO — HELSINGFORS UNIVERSITET — UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI Tiedekunta/Osasto — Fakultet/Sektion — Faculty Laitos — Institution — Department Matemaattis-luonnontieteellinen Matematiikan ja tilastotieteen laitos Tekijä — Författare — Author Joni Leino Työn nimi — Arbetets titel — Title On Mitchell’s embedding theorem of small abelian categories and some of its corollaries Oppiaine — Läroämne — Subject Matematiikka Työn laji — Arbetets art — Level Aika — Datum — Month and year Sivumäärä — Sidoantal — Number of pages Pro gradu -tutkielma Kesäkuu 2018 64 s. Tiivistelmä — Referat — Abstract Abelian categories provide an abstract generalization of the category of modules over a unitary ring. An embedding theorem by Mitchell shows that one can, whenever an abelian category is sufficiently small, find a unitary ring such that the given category may be embedded in the category of left modules over this ring. An interesting consequence of this theorem is that one can use it to generalize all diagrammatic lemmas (where the conditions and claims can be formulated by exactness and commutativity) true for all module categories to all abelian categories. The goal of this paper is to prove the embedding theorem, and then derive some of its corollaries. We start from the very basics by defining categories and their properties, and then we start con- structing the theory of abelian categories. After that, we prove several results concerning functors, "homomorphisms" of categories, such as the Yoneda lemma. Finally, we introduce the concept of a Grothendieck category, the properties of which will be used to prove the main theorem. The final chapter contains the tools in generalizing diagrammatic results, a weaker but more general version of the embedding theorem, and a way to assign topological spaces to abelian categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on Homological Algebra
    Lectures on Homological Algebra Weizhe Zheng Morningside Center of Mathematics Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190, China University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Email: [email protected] Contents 1 Categories and functors 1 1.1 Categories . 1 1.2 Functors . 3 1.3 Universal constructions . 7 1.4 Adjunction . 11 1.5 Additive categories . 16 1.6 Abelian categories . 21 1.7 Projective and injective objects . 30 1.8 Projective and injective modules . 32 2 Derived categories and derived functors 41 2.1 Complexes . 41 2.2 Homotopy category, triangulated categories . 47 2.3 Localization of categories . 56 2.4 Derived categories . 61 2.5 Extensions . 70 2.6 Derived functors . 78 2.7 Double complexes, derived Hom ..................... 83 2.8 Flat modules, derived tensor product . 88 2.9 Homology and cohomology of groups . 98 2.10 Spectral objects and spectral sequences . 101 Summary of properties of rings and modules 105 iii iv CONTENTS Chapter 1 Categories and functors Very rough historical sketch Homological algebra studies derived functors between • categories of modules (since the 1940s, culminating in the 1956 book by Cartan and Eilenberg [CE]); • abelian categories (Grothendieck’s 1957 T¯ohokuarticle [G]); and • derived categories (Verdier’s 1963 notes [V1] and 1967 thesis of doctorat d’État [V2] following ideas of Grothendieck). 1.1 Categories Definition 1.1.1. A category C consists of a set of objects Ob(C), a set of morphisms Hom(X, Y ) for every pair of objects (X, Y ) of C, and a composition law, namely a map Hom(X, Y ) × Hom(Y, Z) → Hom(X, Z), denoted by (f, g) 7→ gf (or g ◦ f), for every triple of objects (X, Y, Z) of C.
    [Show full text]
  • An Axiomatic Survey of Diagram Lemmas for Non-Abelian Group-Like Structures
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Journal of Algebra 370 (2012) 387–401 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Algebra www.elsevier.com/locate/jalgebra An axiomatic survey of diagram lemmas for non-abelian group-like structures Zurab Janelidze 1 Mathematics Division, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa article info abstract Article history: It is well known that diagram lemmas for abelian groups (and Received 20 December 2011 more generally in abelian categories) used in algebraic topology, Availableonline21August2012 can be suitably extended to “non-abelian” structures such as Communicated by Michel Van den Bergh groups, rings, loops, etc. Moreover, they are equivalent to properties which arise in the axiomatic study of these structures. For the five Keywords: Exact sequence lemma this is well known, and in the present paper we establish Snake lemma this for the snake lemma and the 3 × 3lemma,which,when 3 × 3 lemma suitably formulated, turn out to be equivalent to each other for Diagram chasing all (pointed) algebraic structures, and also in general categories Ideal determined variety of a special type. In particular, we show that among varieties Normal category of universal algebras, they are satisfied precisely in the so-called Subtractive category (pointed) ideal determined varieties. Subtraction © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction In this paper we explore a connection between classical diagram lemmas of homological algebra and properties encountered in categorical and universal algebra, which arise there in the axiomatic study of “group-like” structures such as groups, rings, modules, algebras, topological groups, loops, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Five Lemma for Banach Spaces
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 65, Number 1, July 1977 THE FIVE LEMMA FOR BANACH SPACES A. J. PRYDE Abstract. We prove a version of the five lemma which is useful for the study of boundary value problems for partial differential equations. The results are given in the category % of Banach spaces and bounded linear operators, and all conditions are stated modulo an arbitrary ideal of 9>.We also show that the results are valid in more general categories. 1. Introduction. The five lemma for homomorphisms of abelian groups (Spanier [4, Lemma 4.5.11]) can be divided into two parts, one concluding that a map is a monomorphism and the other that it is an epimorphism. If the groups are taken to be Banach spaces and the homomorphisms are bounded linear operators, then, by the closed graph theorem, the isomorphisms of abelian groups are isomorphisms of Banach spaces. Similarly, an epimorphism whose kernel has a closed complement (as in the case, for example, when the domain space is a Hubert space) is an operator with a bounded right inverse. However, apart from those with closed complemented range, monomorphisms are not operators with bounded left inverses. This fact restricts the possible applications of the standard five lemma. In this paper we prove a version of the five lemma for bounded linear operators between Banach spaces; with epimorphisms and monomorphisms replaced, respectively, by operators with bounded right and left inverses modulo any given ideal of bounded linear operators. Further, the conditions of exactness and commutativity are only required modulo the ideal.
    [Show full text]