The Consequences of Mr Keynes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Consequences of Mr Keynes The Consequences of Mr Keynes J. M. BUCHANAN JOHN BURTON R. E. WAGNEI HOBART PAPER 71 Second Impression £1.50 The Consequences of Mr Keynes J. M. BUCHANAN JOHN BURTON R. E. WAGNER S3I»i^H|D0 DO BMW mmmmmm **^nnEQ W^- ^^3^__~~^=Sfed_L____!^^ ;^ HOBART PAPER 78 Second Impression £1.50 INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS The Institute was formed in 1957 as a research and educational trust that specialises in the study of markets and pricing systems as technical devices for registering preferences and apportioning resources. Micro-economic analysis forms the kernel of econ­ omics and is relevant and illuminating in both government and private sectors, in collectivist as well as in individualist societies. Where the macro-economic method is used its results are verified and interpreted in the light of micro-economic significance. The Institute's work is assisted by an advisory council which includes: Professor Armen A Alchian Professor Alan T Peacock Professor J M Buchanan G J Ponsonby Colin Clark Professor A R Prest Professor R H Coase Professor H B Rose Professor Malcolm R Fisher George Schwartz Professor T W Hutchison Henry Smith Graham Hutton Professor A A Walters Professor Dennis Lees Professor Jack Wiseman Professor E Victor Morgan Professor B S Yamey The Institute is a company limited by guarantee, controlled by Managing Trustees. It is independent ofany political party or group and financed by sales of publications and by voluntary contributions from individuals, organisations and companies. General Director Ralph Harris Editorial Director Arthur Seldon Deputy Director John B Wood Assistant to Directors Publications Manager Joan Culverwell Michael Solly Librarian Kenneth Smith Hobart Papers published by the Institute are listed on page 94. Details of other publications are available from: THE INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS 2 Lord North Street, Westminster, London SWiP 3LB Telephone: 01-799 3745 The Consequences of Mr Keynes An analysis of the misuse of economic theory for political profiteering, with proposals for constitutional disciplines JAMES M. BUCHANAN University Professor of Economics and Director ofthe Center for Study of Public Choice, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia RICHARD E. WAGNER Professor of Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University JOHN BURTON Principal Lecturer in Economics, Kingston Polytechnic Second Impression Published by THE INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS 1978 First published April igy8 Second Impression March 1979 © THE INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, 1978 All rights reserved ISSN 0073-2818 ISBN 0-255 36110-6 Printed in Great Britain by GORON PRO-PRINT CO LTD 6 Marlborough Road, Churchill Industrial Estate, Lancing, Sussex Text set in 'Monotype' Baskerville CONTENTS PREFACE Arthur Seldon 7 THE AUTHORS IO SIGNIFICANCE: The importance of the proposals for the British Reader between pp. 45-46 PART I: DEMOCRACY AND KEYNESIAN CONSTITUTIONS: POLITICAL BIASES AND ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES I I James M. Buchanan and Richard E. Wagner A. Visions ofthe Economic Order: Classical and Keynesian 13 From Classical stability to Keynesian instability 13 B. The Idealised Environment for Keynesian Economic Policy 14 Keynes's defective assumptions 16 C. Keynesian Presuppositions, Democratic Politics, and Economic Policy 18 Market and political competition: similarities and essential differences 18 Budgets: political gains and losses 19 (i) Budget surpluses and democratic politics 20 (ii) Budget deficits and democratic politics 22 (iii) Keynesian economics in political democracy 23 D. The Destructive, Self-fulfilling Character of the Keynesian Political Biases 24 Hayek's analysis of the impact of inflation 26 E. Conclusion 27 PART II: KEYNES'S LEGACY TO GREAT BRITAIN: 'FOLLY IN A GREAT KINGDOM' 29 John Burton A. Britain's Changing Fiscal History 31 The pre-Keynesian budgetary record 31 The Keynesian budgetary record 33 The displacement hypothesis 35 [3] B. The Pre-Keynesian British Fiscal Constitution 36 The conventions of the fiscal constitution in 19th-century Britain 37 The cohesion and functioning of the British 19th-century fiscal constitution 39 The establishment ofthe balanced-budget rule in 19th-century Britain 41 The pressures towards excessive expenditure and deficit finance in the 19th century 44 C. The Presuppositions of John Maynard Keynes 47 (1) 'The public interest' 47 (2) The philosopher-king hypothesis ofthe British ruling elite 48 (3) The elite's power of persuasion 49 The Bloomsbury View 49 The dentist model of the economic adviser 50 D. The Keynesian British Fiscal Constitution—in Theory 51 (i) Meade 52 (ii) Dalton 53 (iii) Kaldor 54 Conclusion 55 E. The Keynesian British Fiscal Constitution—in Reality 56 Keynesian presuppositions v. Whitehall/ Westminster realpolitik 57 F. The Failure of Remedial Measures 61 Plowden and PESC, 1961: an attempt at reform 61 The crisis measures of 1976 67 A conversion ofthe policy-makers? 69 An evaluation of the prospects 70 The November 1977 'reflation' 72 G. Conclusion: 'Folly in a Great Kingdom' 73 PART III: CONSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS FOR FISCAL CONTROL 77 J. M. Buchanan, J. Burton and R. E. Wagner A. Fatalism v. Reform 79 Force the helmsman to stop fiddling with the tiller? 80 [4] B. Concrete Proposals for the Reform of the British Fiscal-Monetary Constitution 81 i. A combined budget statement 81 2. Re-adopt the balanced-budget principle 81 3. Automatic adjustment towards budget balance 82 4. Orderly transition to full implementation 83 5. Waiver in national emergency 83 6. Conditions for monetary stability 83 C. Unfounded Fears 84 QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION 87 FURTHER READING 88 TABLES I. The pre-Keynesian British budgetary record, selected years, 1790-1935 32 II. The Keynesian British budgetary record, annual figures, 1946-76 34 III. The 'hump effect': PESC projections ofthe rate of growth of government expenditure, 1970-71 to 1979-80 65 [5] PREFACE The Hobart Papers are intended to contribute a stream of authoritative, independent and lucid analyses to the under­ standing and application of economics to private and govern­ ment activity. Their characteristic theme has been the optimum use of scarce resources and the extent to which it can best be achieved in markets within an appropriate framework of laws and institutions or, where markets cannot work or have dis­ proportionate defects, by better methods with relative advan­ tages or less decisive defects. Since the alternative to the market is in practice the state, and both are imperfect, the choice between them is made on the judgement of the comparative consequences of market failure and government failure. Markets have to work in an environment of laws and insti­ tutions; laws are made by government, and institutions are largely shaped by it. The most important part of this environ­ ment has long been thought to be in the realm of money and taxes. The provision ofa monetary system to facilitate exchange in the market, the creation of a structure of taxes to finance government with the least possible adverse effect on effort and enterprise, and, not least, matching government income with expenditure in its budget have all been thought to be funda­ mental tasks of government. The purpose of government was thought to be to do what was necessary to help the economic system in which men come together as buyers and sellers to work as smoothly as possible and no more, apart from the direct provision of 'public goods' that could not be supplied in the market. Forty years ago this notion ofthe function of government was contested by J. M. Keynes, who claimed that the economic system required more from government than the creation ofthe framework of laws and institutions because it would settle down into a state in which less than all resources were employed. He taught that government would have to undertake the new function of using its budget to run not only its own activities, but also to maintain the whole economic system in full employment by off-setting its fluctuations with opposite fluctuations in budgetary expansion or contraction of money and credit. He contended that only in this way would it be possible to main­ tain an otherwise freely working economic system in a more or less stable condition without disturbing fluctuations. [7] This diagnosis ofthe working ofthe economic system and the remedy for its supposed instability was questioned from the very beginning by economists whose doubts were not paid much attention,1 perhaps because the Keynesian revolution of 1936 was soon followed by six years of war, by 10 years of recovery from war, and by a further decade in which the Keynesian prescription seemed to have worked in maintaining full em­ ployment, a more or less steady though not spectacular rate of growth, and what now seems to be only very modest inflation. In recent years the Keynesian economic diagnosis has come under increasing criticism and is now accepted by fewer econ­ omists and rejected by more than at any time since its origin. Hobart Paper 78 presents a new critique of Keynes. It is concerned not so much with the accuracy of his economics as with the realism of his politics. Its subject is not whether Keynes was right as a technical economist in establishing the instability and inherent under-employment of the market economy, but whether the instrument he devised to make it stable, budget deficits, could be used by politicians in representative democ­ racy to serve the purpose he intended. Even a technically per­ fect solution devised by economists may be damaging if it exposes them to irresistible importunities and sectional pressures to misuse it. Keynes 'turned the politicians loose' (Part I, p. 27): he gave them the excuse to overspend, overborrow and create money; and they have run amok. This is the critique of Keynesianism made by Professors J. M. Buchanan and Richard E. Wagner ofthe USA in Part I of this Hobart Paper. Their argument is adapted to illuminate the post­ war history of British economic pohcy by John Burton in Part II.
Recommended publications
  • Studies A13 : Report of the Study Group on the Role of Public Finance
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES studies Report of the study group on the role of public finance in European integration Volume I : General Report ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SERIES - 1977 A13 This report examines a main — but until now largely neglected — aspect of economic integration, namely the role of public finance. In so doing, it goes beyond the more familiar terrain of free trade and monetary inte• gration. A major part of the work of the Study Group has been a thorough study of public finance in various federations and unitary states. Financial relation• ships between levels of government and the economic effects of public finance on regions within countries merited special attention. Based on this analysis, the theoretical literature on "fiscal federalism" and given the political will for further economic integration (falling short, however, of monetary union), certain changes in Community expen• ditures and revenues during the "pre-federal integration" phase are sug• gested, particularly extension of expenditures on structural, cyclical, employment and regional policies through more participation in regional policy aid, and in labour market policies, a Community unemployment fund, a limited budget equalisation scheme, cyclical grants to local or regional governments and a conjunctural convergence facility. The net cost of these suggestions would lead to a rise in the Community budget from its present 0.7 % to around 2-2 V2 % of Community GDP. For more ambitious plans the Community budget would have to be extended by far more to provide sufficient geographical equalisation of productivity and living standards together with cushioning of temporary fluctuations, in the absence of which, monetary union in particular would be unattainable.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics 230A Public Sector Microeconomics
    University of California, Berkeley Professor Alan Auerbach Department of Economics 525 Evans Hall Fall 2005 3-0711; auerbach@econ ECONOMICS 230A PUBLIC SECTOR MICROECONOMICS This is the first of two courses in the Public Economics sequence. It will cover core material on taxation, public expenditures and public choice, and conclude with a consideration of the effects of capital income taxation on the behavior of households and firms. Economics 230B, the second semester in the sequence, will extend the discussion of optimal income taxation and consider more fully the behavioral effects of government policy and the institutional characteristics of important U.S. federal taxes and expenditure programs Class meetings: Tuesdays 9-11, 639 Evans Hall Office hours: Mondays, 10:00-11:30, and by appointment Prerequisites: This course should normally be taken after the completion of first-year Ph. D. courses in economic theory and econometrics. Requirements: Problem sets (2) - 30% Paper (5 page review) - 20% Final examination - 50% There is no required textbook for this course. All starred readings below are required and are either included in the course reader or, where noted, available on the web. Non-starred material will be useful for further reading on topics of interest and preparation for the public economics field examination. The following texts and collections, selections from which appear on the reading list, are also useful for background reference: A. Atkinson and J. Stiglitz, Lectures on Public Economics, McGraw-Hill (1980) A. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, eds., Handbook of Public Economics, North-Holland, vol. 1 (1985), vol. 2 (1987), vol. 3 (2002) and vol.
    [Show full text]
  • UQFL87 Colin Clark Papers
    FRYER LIBRARY Manuscript Finding Aid UQFL87 Colin Clark Papers Size 36 boxes Contents Correspondence; own publications and writings; book reviews; newspaper cuttings; slides; index cards. Collection reflects interests and involvement in politics, agriculture, economics, economic policy, demography, public finance, international data, religion and ancient history. Correspondence includes letters to and from John Maynard Keynes and B.A. Santamaria. Collection also includes photocopies of papers in Colin Clark Collection, Brasenose College, Oxford. Date range 1907 to 1986 (bulk of collection 1931 to 1986) Biography Colin Clark was born on 2 November 1905 in London. He was educated at Winchester College and Oxford and Cambridge Universities. He graduated first in chemistry and then in economics. He described himself as ‘an academic economist with a considerable international reputation.’ He was a prodigious author of economic texts, articles and papers. He was an economic adviser to various governments in the United Kingdom, India and Australia. From 1938 to 1953 he advised the Treasury Department of the Queensland Government. In 1978, he joined the Economics Department of the University of Queensland as a research consultant, where he remained for eleven years. His memory has been perpetuated in the annual Colin Clark Memorial Lecture at the University of Queensland. Notes Unrestricted access Index to collection See also Box 22B Code Description Box no. PO Politics Australia 1A Wentworth Politics: Wentworth RE Incomes 1B S [Service Industries] 1B James Clark letterbook 1907 to 1909 2A R Religion 2B PU Public Finance 2B ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Last updated: 23/03/2021 © University of Queensland 1 FRYER LIBRARY Manuscript Finding Aid Code Description Box no.
    [Show full text]
  • Conroy-OAC-Working-Paper-13.Pdf
    OAC PRESS Working Papers Series #13 ISSN 2045-5763 (Print) Intimations of the ‘Informal Economy’ In the Work of Henry Mayhew, P T Bauer and Richard Salisbury John D Conroy1 Australia National University © 2011 John D Conroy Open Anthropology Cooperative Press www.openanthcoop.net/press This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attributio-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 1John Conroy is an economist, not entirely unreconstructed although he still calls himself a ‘development economist’. He spent the 1970s in Papua New Guinea, finishing as Director of the PNG Institute of Applied Social and Economic Research. After six years in Indonesia, during the 1980s, he ran the Foundation for Development Cooperation through the 1990s, specializing in microfinance and ‘financial inclusion’. He abandoned that field in disgust after its invasion by private equity and is now a visiting fellow at the Crawford School of Economics and Government at the Australian National University. 1 Abstract This paper considers the idea of informality in market exchange, as introduced into the economic development literature by Keith Hart in the 1970s. In addition to Hart (1971, 1973) it will discuss three writers who may be considered his intellectual forerunners. Each, to a greater or less degree, anticipated the idea of informal economic activity and described it in a particular historical period and place. They are the mid-Victorian journalist Henry Mayhew (London, c.1850), the libertarian economist P. T. Bauer (British West Africa, c.1948) and the economic anthropologist R.
    [Show full text]
  • Yr 13 Economics
    A2 Ec 9ECO 4.5.1 Yr 13 Economics Theme 4: A global perspective Section 4.5: Role of the state in the macro-economy 4.5.1 Public expenditure Distinction between capital expenditure, current expenditure and transfer payments Reasons for the changing size and composition of public expenditure in a global context Significance of differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP on: Productivity and growth Living standards Crowding out Level of taxation Equality The specification: Theme 4 – A global perspective Role of the state in the macro-economy Current, capital expenditure and transfers Total government spending is equal to current expenditure plus capital expenditure Current government expenditure Capital government expenditure General government final consumption Sending on investment goods Spending on goods and services that will o o Spending on goods and services be consumed in the short term that will be consumed over a . Examples are: teachers’ wages ; grit period longer than one year used to de-ice roads in winter, etc . Examples are: new motorways, new schools, hospitals etc Transfer payments o Payments for which there is no corresponding output (so therefore not included in GDP) . Examples are: welfare payments made to individuals; contributions to the EU Debt interest o Interest paid on the National Debt by the government Fiscal deficits: the good and the bad When governments spend more than they receive in tax and other revenues, they incur a budget or “fiscal” deficit. Some deficits are more problematic
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Composition of Public Expenditure Matter to Economic Growth for Kenya?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online) Vol.3, No.3, 2012 Does The Composition of Public Expenditure matter to Economic Growth for Kenya? John Mudaki * Warren Masaviru School of Business and Economics, Moi University P.O Box 39 -30100, Eldoret, Kenya Tel: +254 0722 426 863 *E -mail: mudakijohn @gmail.com Abstract There is often controversy and debate on the most appropriate way of allocating public funds in Kenya, necessitating the need to investigate the effect of the composition of public expenditure on economic growth. This study investigated the impact of public spending on education, health, economic affairs, defense, agriculture, transport and communication on economic growth with data spanning from 1972 to 2008. The data was differenced to make it stationary then linearized for estimation using ordinary least squares. The findings showed that expenditure on education was a highly significant determinant of economic growth while expenditure on economic affairs, transport and communication were also significant albeit weakly. In contrast, expenditure on agriculture was found to have a significant though negative impact on economic growth. Outlays on health and defence were all found to be insignificant determinants of economic growth. The findings did not conform to apriori expectations. Keywords: Economic Growth, Public Expenditure, 1.0 Introduction In recent times Kenya has experienced numerous strikes from public servants agitating for more pay alongside higher revenue allocations.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Sanitation Sector Public Expenditure Reviews—Selected Case Studies
    1818 H Street, NW Water Papers Washington, DC 20433 Water Papers Public Disclosure Authorized June 2012 Public Disclosure Authorized GUIDANCE NOTE Public Expenditure Review from the Perspective of the Water and Sanitation Sector Seema Manghee and Caroline van den Berg Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................vii CONTACT INFORMATION ............................................................................. viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................. ix CHAPTER 1. PURPOSE AND PRACTICE OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEWS .......................... 1 Objective ........................................................................................... 1 Why Public Expenditure Analysis in Water Supply and Sanitation is Important ........................ 1 Purpose of a Public Expenditure Review ............................................................. 2 Characteristics of Public Expenditure in the Water Supply and Sanitation Sector ..................... 4 Institutional Features of the Water and Sanitation Sector ............................................. 5 CHAPTER 2. GUIDANCE FOR CONDUCTING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEWS ........................ 7 Identification and Preparation ....................................................................... 7 Contents and Minimum
    [Show full text]
  • Can the Rise of the Educated Class Explain the Revival of Protectionism?
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 12949 Unintended Consequences: Can the Rise of the Educated Class Explain the Revival of Protectionism? Paolo E. Giordani Fabio Mariani JANUARY 2020 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 12949 Unintended Consequences: Can the Rise of the Educated Class Explain the Revival of Protectionism? Paolo E. Giordani LUISS University Fabio Mariani IRES/LIDAM, UCLouvain and IZA JANUARY 2020 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. ISSN: 2365-9793 IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 12949 JANUARY 2020 ABSTRACT Unintended Consequences: Can the Rise of the Educated Class Explain the Revival of Protectionism?* This paper provides a rationale for the revival of protectionism, based on the rise of the educated class.
    [Show full text]
  • Precept 9. Efficiency and Equity of Public Spending
    Precept 9. Efficiency and equity of public spending Technical Guide 1. Introduction: Objectives, Trade-offs and General Principles A good test of success in improving public spending is what happens to growth rates once a resource boom ends. Following the previous boom, growth rates in resource- rich countries collapsed, suggesting that the windfalls were not effectively harnessed. It does not have to be this way. Mauritius used to be a low-income country dependent upon the export of sugar. In the mid-1970s it gained a brief windfall from a global sugar boom and succeeded in converting part of the savings into investment for diversification. This helped to lay the foundations for the country’s transformation (Greenaway and Lamusse, 1999). The government of Malaysia did the same with savings from the commodity boom of the late 1970s. Its diversification into light manufacturing, through the creation of the industrial cluster in Penang, has transformed the economy (Yusof, 2009). In Uganda, the brief coffee boom of the mid-1990s financed and stimulated private investment in transport equipment. This helped to integrate rural and urban markets and contributed to sustaining growth beyond the boom (Reinikka and Collier, 1999). This Precept first outlines the objectives, trade-offs and general principles involved in increasing the efficiency and equity of public spending. It then describes the process of public project management, feasible ways to reduce the cost of public capital good provision, using public investment to encourage private investment, and finally, problems associated with recurrent public spending. Objectives The central task facing the government is to raise the capacity for effective spending.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Public Expenditure in Economic Growth: Econometric Evidence from Kosovo 2002–2015
    Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management ISSN: 2255-9671 (online) 2018, 6, 74–87 doi: 10. 2478/bjreecm-2018-0006 http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bjreecm ROLE OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURE IN ECONOMIC GROWTH: ECONOMETRIC EVIDENCE FROM KOSOVO 2002–2015 Lekë PULA1, Alban ELSHANI2 1, 2 University of Prishtina, Prishtina, Kosovo Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The aim of the study is to examine the impact of public expenditure on economic growth of Kosovo. Time series data span for the period of time 2002–2015. The structure of the econometric model is built on Keynesian theories and endogenous growth model. The model estimation is performed only after implementing the Augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) Unit Root test to estimate if time series are stationary. Several tests have been implemented to determine model validity. The model has met all the assumptions of statistical tests: error term residuals have a normal distribution (Jarque–Bera test), there is no auto-correlation between variables (Breusch–Godfrey Serial test), and error variances are constant, known as the principle of homoscedasticity (Breusch– Pagan–Godfrey test). Gross domestic product is used as a dependent variable in the model, while public expenditure (G), foreign direct investment (FDI), export (EXP) and total budget revenue (TrTax) are used as the endogenous variables. The study results have revealed that there is a positive and statistically significant effect of public expenditures and exports on economic growth. Total budget revenue has a positive impact on economic growth but this has not been proved to be statistically significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Public Expenditure Growth on Infrastructure in Lesotho
    Analysis of Public Expenditure Growth on Infrastructure in Lesotho Senei Solomon Molapo Programme Manager Fiscal Policy and Financial Programming MEFMI, 9 Earls Road, Alexandra Park, P.O. Box A1419, Harare, Zimbabwe Corresponding author: (Senei Molapo) [email protected] ABSTRACT This study expanded the line of research in evaluating the effect of factors related to the growth of government expenditure on infrastructure with the use of the Engle and Granger (1987) approach using annual time series data from 1980 to 2014 in Lesotho. This approach provides a direct test of the economic theory and enables utilization of the estimated long-run parameters into the estimation of the short-run disequilibrium relation. The residual test showed that there is a stable long-run relationship among the variables. The government revenue, grants and loans play a significant role in determining growth of government spending in Lesotho. There is no evidence of association between growth of government spending on infrastructure and external reserves both in the long –run and short-run. The absence of this trade off can lead to accumulation of reserves above the optimal level. An increase in the allocation of government resources to capital expenditure will boost the country’s economic growth and development. Keywords: infrastructure, government, grant, revenue, cointegration 1 1. Introduction The investment in infrastructure is considerably important in the context of planning and economic development as it throws light to the capital base of an economy and subsequent changes in the modes and capacity of production. For growth potential of the economy, adequate policy measures are required for resources mobilization and allocation (Barro 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Public Expenditure
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: National Economic Planning Volume Author/Editor: Max F. Millikan, editor Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-310-7 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/mill67-1 Conference Date: Publication Date: 1967 Chapter Title: Planning Public Expenditure Chapter Author(s): W. Arthur Lewis Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1423 Chapter pages in book: (p. 201 - 229) Planning Public Expenditure W. ARTHUR LEWIS PRINCETON UNIVERSITY The welfare economist is at his happiest with a model economy where all goods can be produced at constant or rising cost for sale to individual consumers. He can then operate with the proposition that each con- sumer should have as much of any good as he is willing to pay for. This is a crude formulation of a principle which has been subjected to much mathematical refinement. At sophomore level we teach it in the form that marginal rates of substitution must equal marginal rates of product transformation. At higher levels we modify this to take account of indivisibiities, of the interdependence of consumer preferences, or of the interrelationship between demand and income distribution; and in so doing, deprive the proposition of most of its logical foundation. But having completed these theoretical exercises, economists usually return to this proposition in their advisory work because they have nothing bet- ter to offer. The economic theory of public policy begins where production by private entrepreneurs in response to market demands would not, in the absence of public intervention, yield the right allocation of.
    [Show full text]