ET 49 & 50 First 21 Pages H.L.17

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ET 49 & 50 First 21 Pages H.L.17 FOR PUBLIC BENEFIT Churches cared for by Trusts Edited by Trevor Cooper Ecclesiology Today . Issues 49 & 50 . July 2014 ET 49 & 50 First 21 pages H.L.17 29/8/14 08:39 Page 1 FOR PUBLIC BENEFIT Churches cared for by Trusts ET 49 & 50 First 21 pages H.L.17 29/8/14 08:39 Page 2 ET 49 & 50 First 21 pages H.L.17 29/8/14 08:39 Page 3 FOR PUBLIC BENEFIT Churches cared for by Trusts Edited by Trevor Cooper Ecclesiology Today . Issues 49 & 50 . 2014 ET 49 & 50 First 21 pages H.L.17 29/8/14 08:39 Page 4 © Copyright the authors and photographers 2014.All rights reserved. ISSN: 1460-4213 ISBN: 978-0-946823-25-3 Published 2014 by the Ecclesiological Society c/o The Society of Antiquaries of London Burlington House Piccadilly London WIV 0HS The Ecclesiological Society is a registered charity. Charity No. 210501. www.ecclsoc.org The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent those of the Ecclesiological Society or its officers. ET 49 & 50 First 21 pages H.L.17 29/8/14 08:39 Page 5 Ecclesiology Today C ontents Journal of the Ecclesiological Society Chairman’s letter 3 1 Introduction: the what and why of Church Trusts 5 Appendix: Single-building Trusts not otherwise described 15 Part 1: MULTI-BUILDING TRUSTS 2 The work of the The Churches Conservation Trust by Crispin Truman 18 3 The Friends of Friendless churches by Matthew Saunders 36 4 Ipswich Historic Churches Trust: a personal view by Trevor Cooper 52 5 Norfolk Churches Trust by Trevor Cooper 64 6 The Norwich Historic Churches Trust by Nicholas Groves 70 7 The Scottish Redundant Churches Trust by Victoria Collison-Owen 84 8 Addoldai Cymru – the Welsh Religious Buildings Trust by Neil Sumner and Gruff Owen 96 9 The Historic Chapels Trust by Roland Jeffery 106 Part 2: SINGLE-BUILDING TRUSTS, ETC Where no author is shown, the article is written by the editor 10 Barlaston Old Church, Staffordshire by James Hall 116 11 The Puritan Chapel, Bramhope, near Leeds by Clive Fox 118 12 Brampton Old Church, Brampton, Cumbria Issues 49 & 50 for by Robert Allan 122 December 2013 & July 2014 13 The Horsefair project at the New Room, Bristol published September 2014 by Gary Best 126 ET 49 & 50 First 21 pages H.L.17 29/8/14 08:39 Page 6 14 The Coombe Keynes Trust, Coombe Keynes, Dorset by Peter Brachi 132 15 Fernham Village Trust, Oxfordshire by Becky Payne 136 16 The sometimes unhappy story of Fordham St Mary, Norfolk by Robert Walker 142 17 Ickworth Church Conservation Trust 146 18 The Melton Old Church Society 154 19 VIEWPOINT: St Andrew’s, Mickfield, Suffolk by Mark Wright 158 20 St Mary’s, No Mans Heath,Warwickshire by Anne Barney 166 21 Plumpton, Northamptonshire by William Sitwell 170 22 St Mary’s, Rokeby, Co. Durham by Sir Andrew Morritt 174 23 St Thomas’s church, Ryde, Isle of Wight: the story so far 178 24 The Friends of St Peter’s, Sibton, Suffolk 182 25 St Margaret’s Chapel of Ease Trust, Southolt, Suffolk by Carolyn Evans 188 26 St James’s church,Warter,Yorkshire 194 27 St Nicholas’s,Wattisham, Suffolk by David Cooper 198 28 Yarpole Community Project, within St Leonard’s, Yarpole, Herefordshire 202 Part 3: IDEAS, DEVELOPMENTS, STATEMENTS 29 Church Trusts and the Cathedral and Church Buildings Division of the Church of England by Gabriel Byng 211 30 Pilgrim churches: a possibility for the Church in Wales by Alex Glanville 215 31 Diocesan Trust churches: an innovative scheme from the Diocese of Norwich 219 32 Festival churches: a step towards sustainable rural ministry into the future by Anna Norman-Walker 221 33 Four imaginary case studies, set in the future by Trevor Cooper 224 34 Heritage Lottery Fund Grants for Places of Worship: eligibility of churches looked after by charitable Trusts 228 35 The Listed Places of Worship Grant Scheme 229 OBITUARY & BOOK REVIEWS OBITUARY:The Revd Dr Michael Peel (1931–2014) 231 Book Reviews 233 ET 49 & 50 First 21 pages H.L.17 29/8/14 08:39 Page 7 Chairman’s letter Dear Fellow Member Here is a jumbo volume of Ecclesiology Today, being the joint edition for December 2013 and July 2014.With this publication we have virtually caught up with our production cycle.The next edition will be dated December 2014, and we will do our best to keep to tempo and mail it to you in December or January. This volume is devoted to church buildings owned or otherwise cared for by Trusts. It concentrates on churches which have not been converted for an alternative full-time use. Instead, these buildings have their interiors kept more or less intact, because someone, somewhere thinks they are worth keeping as they are, for public benefit. There are a good number of such buildings: at least 435 Church of England churches alone are looked after in this way, and an unknown number of churches and chapels of other denominations and countries – an estimated 80 or more Church of Scotland churches, for example are cared for by single-building Trusts. So these Trusts are looking after a significant proportion of our ecclesiastical heritage, and that proportion will grow in future. There is enormous variety in this volume, both as regards the church buildings, and the groups looking after them, and we are grateful to the more than twenty authors who have contributed. I hope that you find something here to interest you. Perhaps, like me, you will emerge with a new respect for these Trusts, and the entrepreneurial, dogged and devoted spirit that shines through so many of their stories. I would be very grateful to be notified of additional single-building church and chapel Trusts in England and Wales, using the contact address at the rear of this volume. v v v While this volume was in preparation, we heard the sad news of the death of the Revd Dr Michael Peel, the previous but one Chairman of Council. I did not know Michael well, but was always impressed with both his natural courtesy and deep knowledge of matters ecclesiological. I am pleased that Paul Velluet, who followed Michael as Chairman of Council, has been able to write a brief obituary to put on record something of Michael’s life and work. Our sympathies go to his wife and family in their loss. Trevor Cooper Chairman of Council 3 ET 49 & 50 First 21 pages H.L.17 29/8/14 08:39 Page 8 ET 49 & 50 First 21 pages H.L.17 29/8/14 08:39 Page 5 Introduction: the what and why of Church Trusts THIS VOLUME CONCENTRATES on churches cared for by Trevor Cooper charitable Trusts, where the Trust has full repairing responsibility for the building, and the purpose of the Trust is the long-term preservation of the building for public benefit. Hundreds of historic church and chapel buildings no longer needed for worship are already cared for by Trusts (see Table 1, overleaf). Over the coming years it is likely that fewer church buildings will be needed for regular worship and Trusts are likely to take over the care of some of the more historic ones. In addition, as discussed later, Trusts may have a role looking after churches which are not being closed. So we need to ask, how well does the Trust model work? What does it mean for the buildings? Where does the money come from? Are these Trusts sustainable? Is this a model which deserves to be rolled out more widely? As will become clear, I believe that the answers are broadly positive.The model most certainly can work, and often does. But there are issues, some of them systemic, which need to be borne in mind. This introduction attempts to pull out some of the themes emerging from the individual chapters in this volume.After a brief survey of the types and numbers of Trusts, I will discuss single- building Trusts looking after closed churches, then look more briefly at multi-building Trusts, and will finally discuss whether Trusts might look after churches which are still open. A quick word about scope.All specialist multi-building Trusts are included. Amongst the single-building Trusts, I have concentrated on Trusts looking after Church of England buildings in a ‘quiet’ way, a term explained later.Within these, a few estate churches are included (chapters 10 and 22), though I have not made any particular effort to track them down. I have excluded ruins, and proprietary and private chapels. I have somewhat regretfully excluded buildings owned by the National Trust or English Heritage, and also those which have been physically moved to a museum; regretfully, as they may well have something to teach us about interpreting these buildings to visitors. Types and numbers The Trusts fall into two types. The first is multi-building Trusts, each of which cares for a number of closed churches or chapels. They are described in Part 1 of the volume. Between them these multi-building Trusts look after some 455 churches and chapels of all denominations, across Great Britain (Table 1). The second type is the single-building Trust, a local (often a 5 ET 49 & 50 First 21 pages H.L.17 29/8/14 08:39 Page 6 ECCLESIOLOGY TODAY 49 & 50 · 2014 Table 1: Number of churches and chapels looked after by charitable Trusts in England and Wales England Wales Scotland CofE Free, Anglican Free, Anglican Free, RC, etc RC, etc RC, etc The Churches Conservation Trust 343 Friends of Friendless Churches 18 5 21 Ipswich Historic Churches Trust 4 Norfolk Churches Trust 12 1 Norwich Historic Churches Trust 18 Scottish Redundant Churches Trust 1 6 Welsh Religious Buildings Trust 6 The Historic Chapels Trust 20 Total 395 26 21 6 1 6 Single-building Trusts 40+ 5+ 5+ 2+ ? 80–100 (‘Quiet’ buildings: see note) CofE = Church of England; Free = Free Churches; RC = Roman Catholic.
Recommended publications
  • Newsletter 66 September 2017
    THE CHAPELS SOCIETY Newsletter 66 September 2017 The modest Gothic exterior of Scholes Friends Meeting House [photograph copyright Roger Holden] I S S N 1357–3276 ADDRESS BOOK The Chapels Society: registered charity number 1014207 Website: http://www.chapelssociety.org.uk President: Tim Grass, 1 Thornhill Close, Ramsey, Isle of Man IM8 3LA; e-mail: [email protected]; phone: 01624 819619 (also enquiries about visits) Secretary: Moira Ackers, 1 Valley Road, Loughborough, Leics LE11 3PX; e-mail: [email protected] (for general correspondence and website) Treasurer: Jean West, 172 Plaw Hatch Close, Bishop’s Stortford CM23 5BJ Visits Secretary: position continues in abeyance Membership Secretary: Paul Gardner, 1 Sunderland Close, Borstal, Rochester ME1 3AS; e-mail: [email protected] Casework Officer: Michael Atkinson, 47 Kitchener Terrace, North Shields NE30 2HH; e-mail: [email protected] Editor: Chris Skidmore, 46 Princes Drive, Skipton BD23 1HL; e-mail: [email protected]; phone: 01756 790056 (correspondence re the Newsletter and other Society publications). Copy for the next (January 2018) Newsletter needs to reach the Editor by 30 November 2017, please. NOTICEBOARD CHAPELS SOCIETY EVENTS 30 September 2017 Conference (jointly with the Ecclesiological Society) on the architecture of less-well-studied denominations at the St Alban centre, London. 28 October 2017 Bristol visit (David Dawson & Stephen Duckworth) EDITORIAL This Newsletter will go out with details of our visit to Bristol and Kingswood, including to the refurbished New Room, in October. Our visits programme for next year is not yet finalised but we expect to have visits to Birmingham, probably concentrating on Bournville, in the spring and to West Sussex in the autumn.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance (Incorporated)
    Registered number: 00239561 Charity number: 1107827 The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance (Incorporated) Annual Report and Financial Statements For the year ended 31 December 2015 The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance (Incorporated) (A company limited by guarantee) Contents Page Reference and administrative details of the charity, its trustees and advisers 1 - 2 Chairman's statement 3 Trustees' report 4 - 20 Independent auditors' report 21 - 22 Consolidated statement of financial activities 23 Consolidated income and expenditure account 24 Consolidated balance sheet 25 Company balance sheet 26 Consolidated cash flow statement 27 Notes to the financial statements 28 - 61 The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance (Incorporated) (A company limited by guarantee) Reference and Administrative Details of the Company, its Trustees and Advisers For the year ended 31 December 2015 President The Bishop of Lichfield, (Vacant from 1 October 2015) Chair Mr J T Naylor Vice Chair The Archdeacon of Stoke upon Trent Ex-Officio The Bishop of Shrewsbury The Bishop of Stafford The Bishop of Wolverhampton The Dean of Lichfield The Archdeacon of Lichfield The Archdeacon of Salop The Archdeacon of Stoke upon Trent The Archdeacon of Walsall (appointed 1 January 2015) The Revd Preb J Allan RD Mr J Wilson Dr A Primrose Elected The Revd P Cansdale The Revd J Cody (appointed 1 February 2016) The Revd Preb P Daniel (resigned 31 August 2015) The Revd M Kinder (resigned 31 August 2015) The Revd M Last (appointed 1 September 2015) The Revd B Leathers (resigned 31 August
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Houses of Leyton and Leytonstone
    The Great Houses of Leyton and Leytonstone Leyton House and the Walthamstow Slip Leyton & Leytonstone Historical Society 1 Leyton House and the Walthamstow Slip Number 3 in The Great Houses of Leyton and Leytonstone Series Occasional Publication No 7 The author would like to acknowledge the help and assistance of David Boote. Published in 2007 by Leyton & Leytonstone Historical Society 27 The Croft Friday Hill London E4 6EZ Website : www/leytonhistorysociety.org.uk printed in 2016 by Parchments of Oxford www.parchmentuk.com Author’s Note I had hoped to be able to refer to a report of an excavation carried out by English Heritage on the site of Leyton House in 1993. It was conducted under the auspices of the Newham Museum Service. This report was held by the Passmore Edwards Museum, but as the museum was closed some years ago I have been unable to see this document. 2 Leyton House Of all the great houses of Leyton, the very one named after the village of Low Leyton seems to be the least known, historically speaking, yet it has a rich history. The Leyton historian John Kennedy, writing in 1894, had little to say: The grounds of Etloe House join those of Leyton House, an old mansion built of red bricks, the characteristic of most Leyton houses of the olden times. The date of the building is uncertain, but it may be presumed that it was built some time early in the eighteenth century, perhaps even earlier1. The last house to have occupied the site was known alternatively as Leyton House, Park House2 or St Agnes’s Orphanage.
    [Show full text]
  • St Mary's Church, Sandbach
    A SHORT HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION OF ST. MARY'S CHURCH SANDBACH, CHESHIRE JOHN MINSHULL PUBLISHED BY ST. MARY'S PAROCHIAL CHURCH COUNCIL SANDBACH, CHESHIRE FIRST PUBLISHED IN JUNE 1974 REPRINTED IN AUGUST 1978 REVISED IN JUNE 1990 © ST. MARY'S PAROCHIAL CHURCH COUNCIL ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author acknowledges the valuable assistance given by: L. MASSEY, ARIBA, AMTPI, by way of old documents and in checking the proofs ; a large number of parishioners of long standing for information about characters and special events ; the Church Officials for putting up with continual requests for old documents and ledgers. The photographs on pages 20 and 22 were taken by R. P. Lewis, Sandbach. The artist of the etching on page 5 is unknown. Other photographs taken by the author. Any profits from the sale of this booklet, after paying printing expenses, will be passed into the Church funds. PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY JOHNSONS OF NANTWICH LTD. NANTWICH, CHESHIRE. FOREWORD Dear Friends I was glad when they said to me "Let us go to the house of the Lord". So wrote the psalmist as he approached the Temple of Jerusalem almost 3000 years ago. The words express the joy and anticipation he felt as he drew near to that great building that witnessed in his day to the existence and reality of God. A Church on the site of St. Mary's has witnessed silently to the same reality of God for over 1000 years. The tower pointing majestically upwards challenges us to believe that life means more than the ordinary and often sad events of everyday.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Provided Schooling for Working Class Children
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROVIDED SCHOOLING FOR WORKING CIASS CHILDREN IN BIRMINGHAM 1781-1851 Michael Brian Frost Submitted for the degree of Laster of Letters School of History, Faculty of Arts, University of Birmingham, 1978. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. SYNOPSIS This thesis considers the development of 'provided 1 schooling for working class children in Birmingham between 1781 and 1851. The opening chapters critically examine the available statistical evidence for schooling provision in this period, suggesting how the standard statistical information may be augmented, and then presenting a detailed chronology of schooling provision and use. The third chapter is a detailed survey of the men who were controlling and organizing schooling during the period in question. This survey has been made in order that a more informed examination of the trends in schooling shown by the chronology may be attempted. The period 1781-1851 is divided into three roughly equal periods, each of which parallels a major initiative in working class schooling; 1781-1804 and the growth of Sunday schools, 1805-1828 and the development of mass day schooling through monitorial schools, and 1829- 1851 and the major expansion of day schooling.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED and PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHES of MANITOBA an Architectural History Theme Study
    UNITED AND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHES OF MANITOBA An Architectural History Theme Study Neil Bingham Historic Resources Branch On the cover: Illustration for a church. Published in the Reverend James Robertson's Presbyterian Church and Manse Building Fund -Manitoba and the Northwest Report, 1886. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .............................................................................................. 1 THE DENOMINIATIONS ....................................................................... 2 THE BUILDINGS ................................................................................... 11 Early Settlement: 1812-1880 ...................................................... 12 Establishment: 1881-1899 .......................................................... 18 Consolidation: 1900-1924 ........................................................... 35 Modern: 1945-Present ................................................................ 49 PREFACE This booklet has been adapted from a larger publication developed in 1987 by the Historic Resources Branch of Manitoba Culture, Heritage and Tourism. That report, A Study of the Church Buildings of the Congregational, Methodist, Presbyterian and United Churches o Canada, should still be available in public libraries. That original study was intended to assist interested Church authorities to gain a better understanding of their architectural heritage, and thus to undertake better educational, tourism, designation and conservation programs. To that end, this original work also contained a
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Buildings in Transition
    DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Religious buildings in transition An international comparison Henrik Lindblad & Eva Löfgren 2016 Translated into English by Ingrid Greenhow 5 January 2018. 1 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Background, purpose and aims ................................................................................................................................ 4 Material and method ............................................................................................................................................... 4 The concept of secularism and World Value Survey ................................................................................................ 5 Global organizations, reports and policies ............................................................................................................... 6 International Religious Freedom Report .............................................................................................................. 6 UNESCO, ICCROM, ICOMOS ................................................................................................................................. 6 European Organizations ........................................................................................................................................... 8 The Council of Europe and the EU.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of Parliament Online
    THE HISTORY OF PARLIAMENT TRUST Review of activities in the year 2011-12 July 2012 - 1 - Objectives and Activities of the History of Parliament Trust The History of Parliament is a major academic project to create a scholarly reference work describing the members, constituencies and activities of the Parliament of England and the United Kingdom. The volumes either published or in preparation cover the House of Commons from 1386 to 1868 and the House of Lords from 1660 to 1832. They are widely regarded as an unparalleled source for British political, social and local history. The volumes consist of detailed studies of elections and electoral politics in each constituency, and of closely researched accounts of the lives of everyone who was elected to Parliament in the period, together with surveys drawing out the themes and discoveries of the research and adding information on the operation of Parliament as an institution. The History has published 21,420 biographies and 2,831 constituency surveys in ten sets of volumes (41 volumes in all). They deal with 1386-1421, 1509-1558, 1558-1603, 1604-29, 1660-1690, 1690-1715, 1715-1754, 1754-1790, 1790-1820 and 1820-32. All of these volumes save those most recently published (1604-29) are now available on www.historyofparliamentonline.org . The History’s staff of professional historians is currently researching the House of Commons in the periods 1422-1504, 1640-1660, and 1832-1868, and the House of Lords in the periods 1603-60 and 1660-1832. The three Commons projects currently in progress will contain a further 7,251 biographies of members of the House of Commons and 861 constituency surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Themes in British Painting 1815 - 1914
    / Military Themes in British Painting 1815 - 1914. Joan Winifred Martin Hichberger. Submission fcr PhD. University College, London. 1985 1 Abstract. Joan Winifred Martin Hichberger. Military Themes in British Painting 1815-1914. This thesis examines the treatment of the Bzitish Army and military themes, in painting, during the period 1815- 1914. All the works discussed were exhibited at the Royal Academy, which, although it underwent modifications in status, remained the nearest equivalent to a State Institution for Art in Britain. All the paintings shown there were painted with the knowledge that they were to be seen by the controllers of the Academy and the dominant classes of society. It will be inferred then, that the paintings shown there may be taken to have been acceptable to ruling class ideologies, and are therefore instructive of "official" attitudes to military art. Representations of the contemporary Army, in this period, fell into two main catagories - battle paintings and genre depictions of soldiers. Chapters one to three survey battle paintings; studying the relation of this genre to the Academy; the relative popularity of the genre and the career patterns of its practioners. The critical reception of battle pictures at the Academy and certain important public competitions will be noted and considered in the context of contemporary ideologies about art and about the Army and its men. Chapter four discusses the vital concept of "heroism" and its treatment in English military art. In particular, the reasons for the popularity of certain military figures above their peers, in academic art, will be explored. It will be argued that the process of "hero-making" in art was not determined by professional success alone, but was often the result of the intervention of patrons, publicists and pressure groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Chapels Trust- Growing, Engaging, and Sustaining Wellbeing- Digital Project
    Historic Chapels Trust- Growing, Engaging, and Sustaining Wellbeing- Digital Project CONTENTS Consultant’s Appointment Brief- November 2020 ................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 The Historic Chapels Trust- background Information ............................................................................................. 3 Background to the Digital Project ........................................................................................................................... 3 Vision and Long-term Outcomes ............................................................................................................................ 4 Key Deliverables, Aims and Objectives of the Project ............................................................................................ 5 Evaluation of Deliverables ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Contract Management ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Project Timeline and payment schedule ................................................................................................................ 8 Award Criteria ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bothenhampton Church Plan
    BOTHENHAMPTON HOLY TRINITY OLD CHURCH MARCH 2021 CHURCH PLAN Part A - Current Report Part B - Survey Results of our open survey conducted in Summer and Autumn 2020, canvassing all community contacts for their reaction to Part A. The survey remains open and available at this location. Please feel free to repeat your survey response or complete the survey for the first time. Part C - Community Recommendations Minutes of any community meetings held to discuss the information available in other parts of the Church Plan. Part D - Action Plan Details of any actions agreed through Community Recommendations, assigned to community participants, Churches Conservation Trust staff, or to the Churches Conservation Trust Local Community Officer specifically. Part A - Current Report Church Introduction & Statement of Significance Holy Trinity Old Church in Bothenhampton, Dorset, England was built in the 13th or 14th century. It is recorded in the National Heritage List for England as a designated Grade I listed building, and is now a redundant church in the care of the Churches Conservation Trust. It was declared redundant on 1 April 1971, and was vested in the Trust on 23 October 1972. The church was built in the 13thor 14th century. The chancel and the 15th century tower are the only parts of this mediaeval parish church to survive. In the 1880s the nave was demolished and the new Holy Trinity Church was built in the village by Edward Schroeder Prior. The old church continued to be used as a mortuary chapel until 1971. Subsequently, the chancel was used as a mortuary chapel. In 1971, the dilapidated state of the church lead to it being formally declared redundant and in 1972 it became the responsibility of the Redundant Churches Fund, which became the Churches Conservation Trust.
    [Show full text]