DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Turkana Wind Power Project - Kenya Ornithological and Bat Surveys

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Turkana Wind Power Project - Kenya Ornithological and Bat Surveys Lake Turkana Wind Power Project - Kenya Ornithological and Bat Surveys Interim Report July 2011 Prepared for Aldwych International & LTWP Lake Turkana Wind Project Ornithological and Bat Surveys – Interim Report Revision Schedule D132282 July 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 6th May 2011 DRAFT Kevin Du Rose David Broughton Russell Foxwell Ornithologist Senior Ecologist Associate Director Mike Padfield Senior Ecologist 02 21st July DRAFTv2 Kevin Du Rose David Broughton Russell Foxwell 2011 Ornithologist Senior Ecologist Associate Director Mike Padfield Senior Ecologist 03 28th July FINAL Kevin Du Rose David Broughton Russell Foxwell 2011 Ornithologist Senior Ecologist Associate Director Mike Padfield Senior Ecologist URS Scott Wilson Ltd Meridian House 1 Meridian Way Norwich Norfolk NR7 0TA Tel. 01603 706 420 Fax. 01603 706 421 www.urs-scottwilson.com Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd (“URS Scott Wilson”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the Client in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS Scott Wilson. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS Scott Wilson in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken during 2010 and 2011 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. URS Scott Wilson disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to URS Scott Wilson’s attention after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. URS Scott Wilson specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report. Copyright © This Report is the copyright of URS Scott Wilson Ltd. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. Lake Turkana Wind Project Ornithological and Bat Surveys – Interim Report Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................1 2 Ornithological Surveys .................................................................... 4 2.1 Methods............................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Results ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Transect survey October 2010 to April 2011.................................................................... 9 2.4 Discussion ......................................................................................................................11 2.5 Initial Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................... 13 3 Bat Surveys..................................................................................... 15 3.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Methods.......................................................................................................................... 15 3.3 Results ........................................................................................................................... 17 3.4 Discussion ......................................................................................................................18 3.5 Conclusions and Recommendations.............................................................................. 18 4 Overall Initial Conclusions ............................................................ 20 Appendices................................................................................................ 21 Appendix 1 - Vantage Point Locations, Method and Recording Forms........................................ 21 Appendix 2 - Target species flights recorded at each vantage point from October 2010 to April 2011 ....................................................................................................................... 28 Appendix 3 - Total number of bird registrations for all target species recorded during the transect counts conducted from October 2010 to April 2011 ......................................... 31 Appendix 4 – IUCN Red List status of target species recorded on site........................................ 33 Appendix 5 – Bat Survey Results March 2011............................................................................. 34 Appendix 6 – Draft Ornithology and Bat Monitoring Methodology ............................................... 38 Lake Turkana Wind Project Ornithological and Bat Surveys – Interim Report 1 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.1.1 The proposed Lake Turkana Wind Power Project (LTWP) is situated in the Marsabit district of northwest Kenya (see Figure 1). The project aims to provide 300MW of wind energy for the national grid, via a series of 365 wind turbines. In addition to the turbines associated infrastructure will include turbine connection cables, improved access roads and workers village. 1.1.2 The wind farm will be positioned within an overall project site of 40,000 acres (162km2), with the turbines located at a distance of around 7km to the east of Lake Turkana itself. 1.1.3 An Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for the wind farm development has been undertaken by others, formally approved and an EIA license was issued in July 2009. It was recommended that a one-year programme of ornithological surveys be carried out to validate the conclusions of the ESIA prepared for the Project. 1.1.4 LTWP commissioned URS Scott Wilson to carry out a review (the ‘Review1’) of the Project and the relevant project submissions, against the environmental and social requirements of the IFC Performance Standards. URS Scott Wilson was also commissioned to design and manage the ornithological surveys. 1.1.5 The ornithological survey method is based on best practice methods and was prepared following a reconnaissance survey and discussions with the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) and the National Museums of Kenya (NMK). 1.1.6 The surveys commenced in October 2010 using a team of ornithologists from the NMK. The surveys are conducted on a monthly basis over a twelve month period, including additional survey effort in the two migration periods of Autumn and Spring, which coincide with the months of October/November 2010 and March/April 2011. 1.1.7 An initial Progress Report was issued in December 2010, presenting a summary of the initial results arising from the first two months of survey, October and November 2010. 1.1.8 This Interim Report presents a summary of the combined initial results arising from the first seven month’s survey (October 2010 to April 2011) including both the autumn and spring migration periods and an additional raptor flight line survey at one Vantage Point (VP8). The surveys in May and June 2011 have been undertaken, but have not yet been analysed. The full analysis of potential for bird strike from wind turbines will be modelled on the basis of a more complete data set (one year). The purpose of this report is to present the findings of the surveys to-date, including initial recommendations and conclusions, which might affect the project process. This includes draft operational monitoring recommendations. 1.1.9 Whilst not a specific requirement for approval of the EIA for the wind farm, it was recommended in the Review that further investigation of the bats using the site be carried out to determine potential impacts to bats from the project. The survey involved a week of surveys undertaken in March 2011 using bat specialists from the NMK and URS Scott Wilson. 1 Scott Wilson (May 2011) Lake Turkana Wind Power Project, Kenya, IFC Performance Standards on Social & Environmental Sustainability: Project Review Ornithological and Bat Surveys July 2011 1 Lake Turkana
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Raptor Road Survey of Northern Kenya 2–15 May 2016
    Raptor Road Survey of northern Kenya 2–15 May 2016 Darcy Ogada, Martin Odino, Peter Wairasho and Benson Mugambi 1 Summary Given the rapid development of northern Kenya and the number of large-scale infrastructure projects that are planned for this region, we undertook a two-week road survey to document raptors in this little-studied region. A team of four observers recorded all raptors seen during road transects over 2356 km in the areas of eastern Lake Turkana, Illeret, Huri Hills, Forolle, Moyale, Marsabit and Laisamis. Given how little is known about the biodiversity in this region we also recorded observations of large mammals, reptiles and non-raptorial birds. Our surveys were conducted immediately after one of the heaviest rainy periods in this region in recent memory. We recorded 770 raptors for an average of 33 raptors/100 km. We recorded 31 species, which included two Palaearctic migrants, Black Kite (Milvus migrans) and Montagu’s Harrier, despite our survey falling outside of the typical migratory period. The most abundant raptors were Rüppell’s Vultures followed by Eastern Pale Chanting Goshawk, Hooded Vulture and Yellow-billed Kite (M. migrans parasitus). Two species expected to be seen, but that were not recorded were White-headed Vulture and Secretarybird. In general, vultures were seen throughout the region. The most important areas for raptors were Marsabit National Park, followed by the area from Huri Hills to Forolle and the area south of Marsabit Town reaching to Ololokwe. There was a surprising dearth of large mammals, particularly in Sibiloi and Marsabit National parks, which likely has implications for raptor populations.
    [Show full text]
  • First Records of Bats from the Alatish National Park, North-Western Ethiopia
    Lynx, n. s. (Praha), 47: 51–69 (2016). ISSN 0024-7774 (print), 1804-6460 (online) First records of bats from the Alatish National Park, north-western Ethiopia (Chiroptera) První nálezy netopýrů v Národním parku Alatiš, severozápadní Ethiopie (Chiroptera) Первые сведения о рукокрылых национального парка Алатиш, Северо-западная Эфиопия (Chiroptera) Sergei V. KRUSKOP1, Petr BENDA2,3, Denis A. VASENKOV4 & Leonid A. LAVRENCHENKO4 1 Zoological Museum of Moscow State University, Ul. Bolshaya Nikitskaya 2, Moscow 125009, Russia; [email protected] 2 Department of Zoology, National Museum (Natural History), Václavské nám. 68, CZ–115 79 Praha 1, Czech Republic; [email protected] 3 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ–128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic 4 A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, Leninskii pr. 33, Moscow 119071, Russia; [email protected]; [email protected] received on 10 October 2016 Abstract. The paper presents results of a first attempt to survey bats of the Alatish National Park (north- western Ethiopia). Twenty-one bat species belonging to eight families and twelve genera were documen- ted for the first time in the Park, at least two bat species (Hipposideros abae, Pipistrellus nanulus) were found new for the fauna of Ethiopia. The Alatish National Park is an area of high conservation value due to its high bat species diversity and a complex structure of the fauna including elements with various zoogeographic affinities. Key words. Bats, Alatish National Park, Ethiopia, Hipposideros abae, Pipistrellus nanulus, Neoromicia, new records. INTRODUCTION The vast lowlands, lying west of the Ethiopian highlands, represent an area of high biological diversity (YALDEN et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding in Somaliland, November 2019
    Birding in Somaliland, November 2019 By Enrico Leonardi [email protected] I visited Somaliland for work between 3rd and 15th November 2019. I spent several days in Hargeisa, shuffling between the Hotel Ambassador and the UNICEF Office located on the high plateau not far from the airport. I managed to do some birding in the garden of the hotel and spotted few additional species during the drives to/from the office. Between 6th and 11th November, I went on a field trip to Tog Wajaale, Boroma and Lughaya, stopping at several small villages and hamlets for work reasons. I managed to do some birding early in the mornings and in between meetings and project visits. Lughaya, a small town (~6-8,000 pp.) on the Aden Gulf coast, is bordered on the east and the west by two brackish water lagoons. A small military garrison is located close to the western lagoon, which makes the place far from ideal for birding, as jittery soldiers consider binoculars as suspicious equipment. However, I managed to spend about one hour birding part of the eastern lagoon and the beach separating it from the ocean, with some nice records. A large (several hundred birds) terns and gulls roost was present on the far side of the lagoon, but without a spotting scope it was impossible to investigate it thoroughly. Finally, following the advice of the always resourceful and helpful Bram Piot (merci!), I managed to organize a daily excursion to the Tuuyo plain with Abdi Jama. We left at 5:45am and with several stops along the road, we reached Tuuyo plain around 1pm; indeed a very long road.
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Bats and Terrestrial Small Mammals from the Seli River in Sierra Leone Before the Construction of a Hydroelectric Dam
    Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e34754 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e34754 Research Article New records of bats and terrestrial small mammals from the Seli River in Sierra Leone before the construction of a hydroelectric dam Natalie Weber‡, Ricarda Wistuba§§, Jonas J Astrin , Jan Decher§ ‡ Independent Research Consultant, Fuerth, Germany § ZFMK, Bonn, Germany Corresponding author: Natalie Weber ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ricardo Moratelli Received: 21 Mar 2019 | Accepted: 23 May 2019 | Published: 18 Jun 2019 Citation: Weber N, Wistuba R, Astrin J, Decher J (2019) New records of bats and terrestrial small mammals from the Seli River in Sierra Leone before the construction of a hydroelectric dam. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e34754. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e34754 Abstract Sierra Leone is situated at the western edge of the Upper Guinean Forests in West Africa, a recognised biodiversity hotspot which is increasingly threatened by habitat degradation and loss through anthropogenic impacts. The small mammal fauna of Sierra Leone is poorly documented, although bats and rodents account for the majority of mammalian diversity. Based on morphological, genetic and echolocation data, we recorded 30 bat (Chiroptera), three shrew (Soricomorpha) and eleven rodent (Rodentia) species at the Seli River in the north of the country in 2014 and 2016, during a baseline study for the Bumbuna Phase II hydroelectric project. In 2016, 15 bat species were additionally documented at the western fringe of the Loma Mountains, a recently established national park and biodiversity offset for the Bumbuna Phase I dam. Three bat species were recorded for the first time in Sierra Leone, raising the total number for the country to 61.
    [Show full text]
  • Syringeal Morphology and the Phylogeny of the Falconidae’
    The Condor 96:127-140 Q The Cooper Ornithological Society 1994 SYRINGEAL MORPHOLOGY AND THE PHYLOGENY OF THE FALCONIDAE’ CAROLES.GRIFFITHS Departmentof Ornithology,American Museum of NaturalHistory and Departmentef Biology, City Collegeof City Universityof New York, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY 10024 Abstract. Variation in syringealmorphology was studied to resolve the relationshipsof representativesof all of the recognized genera of falcons, falconets, pygmy falcons, and caracarasin the family Falconidae. The phylogenyderived from thesedata establishesthree major cladeswithin the family: (1) the Polyborinae, containingDaptrius, Polyborus, Milvago and Phalcoboenus,the four genera of caracaras;(2) the Falconinae, consistingof the genus Falco, Polihierax (pygmy falcons),Spiziapteryx and Microhierax (falconets)and Herpetothe- res (Laughing Falcon); and (3) the genus Micrastur(forest falcons) comprising the third, basal clade. Two genera, Daptriusand Polihierax,are found to be polyphyletic. The phy- logeny inferred from these syringealdata do not support the current division of the family into two subfamilies. Key words: Falconidae;phylogeny; systematics; syrinx; falcons; caracaras. INTRODUCTION 1. The Polyborinae. This includes seven gen- Phylogenetic relationships form the basis for re- era: Daptrius, Milvago, Polyborus and Phalco- searchin comparative and evolutionary biology boenus(the caracaras),Micrastur (forest falcons), (Page1 and Harvey 1988, Gittleman and Luh Herpetotheres(Laughing Falcon) and Spiziapter- 1992). Patterns drawn from cladogramsprovide yx (Spot-winged Falconet). the blueprints for understanding biodiversity, 2. The Falconinae. This includes three genera: biogeography,behavior, and parasite-hostcospe- Falco, Polihierax (pygmy falcons) and Micro- ciation (Vane-Wright et al. 199 1, Mayden 1988, hierax (falconets). Page 1988, Coddington 1988) and are one of the Inclusion of the caracarasin the Polyborinae key ingredients for planning conservation strat- is not questioned (Sharpe 1874, Swann 1922, egies(Erwin 199 1, May 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 by Bram Piot
    Birding in and around Hargeisa, Somaliland, December 2010 by Bram Piot From December 10 to 17 I stayed in Hargeisa for my work with PSI, a public health NGO that recently established an office in Somaliland. For Saturday 11th I had organised a day out birding with Abdi Jama from NatureSomaliland, who had also guided three groups earlier this year – the first commercial birding tours to visit Somaliland. Our day trip took us east of Hargeisa through thorn bush, acacia woodland, rocky plains and wadis all the way to the vast Tuuyo plain (see map 1). Several very productive stops were made along the first 20 kilometers of the trip; Tuuyo plain was explored in the early afternoon so the birds there was not very active – e.g. none of the larks were singing, but this may also be because it is non-breeding season for most species. Our late lunch stop to the north of Shaarub village proved to be a good spot, but a long drive back to Hargeisa prevented us from fully exploring this area or the plains that we crossed further to the north (Qoryale for example looked pretty good). On hindsight, it probably would have been more efficient (less driving, more birding!) to drive back the way we came, rather than doing the long loop towards the Hargeisa-Berbera tarmac road. Total trip distance was about 280 km. Nearly 100 species were recorded during this day trip, with personal highlights including 3 species of Bustard (Little Brown, Heuglin’s, Buff-crested), several confiding Somali and Double- banded Coursers, a Greyish Eagle-Owl, 6 lark species including the endemic Lesser Hoopoe and Sharpe’s Larks, an Arabian Warbler, several Golden-breasted Starlings, a Three-streaked Tchagra, Rosy-patched Bush-shrikes, Somali Wheatears, Somali Bee-eaters, a group of Scaly Chatterers, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • An Update of Wallacels Zoogeographic Regions of the World
    REPORTS To examine the temporal profile of ChC produc- specification of a distinct, and probably the last, 3. G. A. Ascoli et al., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 557 (2008). tion and their correlation to laminar deployment, cohort in this lineage—the ChCs. 4. J. Szentágothai, M. A. Arbib, Neurosci. Res. Program Bull. 12, 305 (1974). we injected a single pulse of BrdU into pregnant A recent study demonstrated that progeni- CreER 5. P. Somogyi, Brain Res. 136, 345 (1977). Nkx2.1 ;Ai9 females at successive days be- tors below the ventral wall of the lateral ventricle 6. L. Sussel, O. Marin, S. Kimura, J. L. Rubenstein, tween E15 and P1 to label mitotic progenitors, (i.e., VGZ) of human infants give rise to a medial Development 126, 3359 (1999). each paired with a pulse of tamoxifen at E17 to migratory stream destined to the ventral mPFC 7. S. J. Butt et al., Neuron 59, 722 (2008). + 18 8. H. Taniguchi et al., Neuron 71, 995 (2011). label NKX2.1 cells (Fig. 3A). We first quanti- ( ). Despite species differences in the develop- 9. L. Madisen et al., Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133 (2010). fied the fraction of L2 ChCs (identified by mor- mental timing of corticogenesis, this study and 10. J. Szabadics et al., Science 311, 233 (2006). + phology) in mPFC that were also BrdU+. Although our findings raise the possibility that the NKX2.1 11. A. Woodruff, Q. Xu, S. A. Anderson, R. Yuste, Front. there was ChC production by E15, consistent progenitors in VGZ and their extended neurogenesis Neural Circuits 3, 15 (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Systematics and Evolution of Kestrels
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47062-9 — The Kestrel David Costantini , Giacomo Dell'Omo Excerpt More Information 1 Systematics and Evolution of Kestrels 1.1 Chapter Summary The family Falconidae constitutes a group of small to medium-sized diurnal raptors whose monophyly is strongly supported. Kestrels are included in the subfamily Falconinae. There are at least 13 species that belong to the kestrel group, but recent genetic studies suggest that the number of kestrel species might be larger, possibly 16. The paleontological and molecular evidence is congruent in suggesting an evolutionary radiation of kestrels from the Late Miocene (4.0–9.8 million years ago) through the Early Pleistocene. However, the geographic area where kestrels originated and dispersed from is unclear. 1.2 Diversification of Falcons The Falconidae is a monophyletic family of diurnal birds of prey that occupy a wide variety of ecological niches and geographic regions (White et al., 1994). Three subfamilies are currently recognised and their validity is supported by both molecular and morphological data (Griffiths, 1999; Griffiths et al., 2004; Fuchs et al., 2012, 2015): (i) Falconinae (falcons, falconets and kestrels), (ii) Herpetotherinae (forest falcons Micrastur sp. and laughing falcon Herpetotheres cachinnans) and (iii) Polyborinae (caracaras) (Figure 1.1). Dickinson (2003) has recognised 11 genera and 64 species of Falconidae, but figures can vary slightly across authors. Both the Herpetotherinae and the Polyborinae occur only in the New World, while the Falconinae (the subfamily to which kestrels belong) are widespread across both the New and Old World with 46 species, 40 of which belong to the genus Falco (Fuchs et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status of Falcon Populations in Saudi Arabia Albara M
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Theses and Dissertations 2016 Current Status of Falcon Populations in Saudi Arabia Albara M. Binothman South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Ornithology Commons Recommended Citation Binothman, Albara M., "Current Status of Falcon Populations in Saudi Arabia" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 976. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/976 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CURRENT STATUS OF FALCON POPULATIONS IN SAUDI ARABIA BY ALBARA M. BINOTHMAN A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Major in Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University 2016 ii CURRENT STATUS OF FALCON POPULATIONS IN SAUDI ARABIA This thesis is approved as a creditable and independent investigation by a candidate for the Master of Science in Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences degree and is acceptable for meeting the thesis requirements for this degree. Acceptance of this does not imply that the conclusions reached by the candidate are necessarily the conclusions of the major department. _______________________________________ Troy W. Grovenburg, Ph.D Date Thesis Advisor _______________________________________ Michele R. Dudash. Ph.D. Date Head.
    [Show full text]