Snowmass Ski Trail Enhancements and High Alpine Lift Replacement Environmental Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Snowmass Ski Trail Enhancements and High Alpine Lift Replacement Environmental Assessment SNOWMASS SKI AREA SNOWMASS SKI TRAIL ENHANCEMENTS AND HIGH ALPINE LIFT REPLACEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DECEMBER 2014 USDA Forest Service White River National Forest Aspen-Sopris Ranger District The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. SNOWMASS SKI AREA SNOWMASS SKI TRAIL ENHANCEMENTS AND HIGH ALPINE LIFT REPLACEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Proposed Action: Responsible Official: Further Information: Snowmass Ski Area Scott Fitzwilliams Scott Kaden, Project Leader Forest Supervisor Aspen-Sopris Ranger District White River National Forest 620 Main Street Location: Glenwood Springs, CO Carbondale, CO 81623 White River National Forest [email protected] Pitkin County, Colorado (970) 963-2266 x3127 Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Aspen-Sopris Ranger District White River National Forest Pitkin County, Colorado Abstract: This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared to analyze a proposal for Snowmass Ski Area (Snowmass) to replace and realign the High Alpine lift, install snowmaking on Green Cabin and Trestle trails, perform six glading projects across 84 acres of terrain, and develop two new ski trails designed to improve skier circulation across the ski area. The proposed projects are within the existing Snowmass special use permit (SUP) area and are identified in the Snowmass Mountain Master Plan 2014 Addendum. Snowmass is located on the White River National Forest in Pitkin County, Colorado and operates in accordance with the terms and conditions of a SUP issued by the US Forest Service. This EA discusses the Purpose and Need for the proposal; the process used to identify and develop alternatives; potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of implementing the No Action Alternative (Alternative 1) and Alternative 2; and proposed project design criteria to minimize resource impacts. Following review of public and agency comments on this EA, the Forest Supervisor will make a final determination as to which alternative best serves the public interest on National Forest System lands. The Selected Alternative can be a modification of alternatives presented. Important Notice: Only those who submit timely and specific written comments will have eligibility to file an objection under 36 CFR §218.8. For objection eligibility, each individual or representative from each entity submitting timely and specific written comments must either sign the comment or verify identity upon request. Individuals and organizations wishing to be eligible to object must meet the information requirements in 36 CFR §218.25(a)(3). Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who comment, will become part of the public record for this project and will be subject to review pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. Comment Period: Specific written comments on the proposed project will be accepted for 30 calendar days following publication of the Legal Notice in the Glenwood Springs Post Independent. The publication date in the newspaper of record is the exclusive means for calculating the comment period. The regulations prohibit extending the length of the comment period. Written comments must be submitted via mail, fax, electronically, or in person (Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding holidays) to: Scott Fitzwilliams, c/o Scott Kaden, Project Leader, 620 Main Street, Carbondale, CO 81623, FAX: (970) 963-1012. Electronic comments including attachments can be submitted to https://cara.ecosystem-management.org/Public/CommentInput?Project=44643. Table of Contents Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE AND NEED .................................................................................................................. 1-1 A. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1-1 B. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 1-2 C. PURPOSE AND NEED OF THE PROPOSED ACTION .......................................................................... 1-2 D. SCOPE OF ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 1-3 E. INTERAGENCY COORDINATION ..................................................................................................... 1-4 F. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES .............................................................. 1-4 The Human Environment................................................................................................................... 1-5 The Biological Environment .............................................................................................................. 1-5 G. ISSUES/RESOURCES ELIMINATED FROM FURTHER ANALYSIS ..................................................... 1-8 H. CONSISTENCY WITH FOREST SERVICE POLICY ............................................................................. 1-8 Land and Resource Management Plan Consistency ......................................................................... 1-8 Forest Service Management Direction .............................................................................................. 1-9 I. RELATIONSHIP TO PREVIOUS ANALYSES AND APPROVALS .......................................................... 1-9 J. DECISION TO BE MADE ................................................................................................................. 1-9 K. OTHER NECESSARY PERMITS, LICENSES, ENTITLEMENTS AND/OR CONSULTATION ................ 1-10 2. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................ 2-1 A. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 2-1 B. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED IN DETAIL ...................................................................................... 2-1 Alternative 1 – No Action .................................................................................................................. 2-1 Alternative 2 – The Proposed Action ................................................................................................ 2-1 Alternatives and Design Components Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis .............. 2-5 Alternative Comparison Matrix ......................................................................................................... 2-7 C. SUMMARY COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES BY ALTERNATIVE ................... 2-8 D. PROJECT DESIGN CRITERIA ......................................................................................................... 2-16 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ..................... 3-1 A. RECREATION ................................................................................................................................. 3-4 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 3-4 Affected Environment ........................................................................................................................ 3-4 Direct and Indirect Environmental Consequences ............................................................................ 3-6 Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................................................. 3-8 Irreversible and Irretrievable commitment of Resources ................................................................ 3-10 B. SCENERY ..................................................................................................................................... 3-11 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 3-11 Management of the Scenic Environment on National Forest System Lands ................................... 3-11 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 3-14 Direct and Indirect Environmental Consequences .......................................................................... 3-15 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................................................... 3-16 Irreversible and Irretrievable commitment of Resources ................................................................ 3-18 C. VEGETATION
Recommended publications
  • Emergency Preparedness and Evacuation Plan
    Squaw Valley Real Estate, LLC Emergency Preparedness and Evacuation Plan THE VILLAGE AT SQUAW VALLEY 6/28/2016 This Emergency Preparedness and Evacuation Plan (EPEP) has been prepared for The Village at Squaw Valley Specific Plan (VSVSP) project under the supervision of Placer County and in coordination with Pete Hnat, Chief Executive Officer, Emergency Management Consultants. The focus of the EPEP is primarily on emergency preparedness and evacuation protocols as related to emergency events, such as fire. However, other hazards are addressed as well, including avalanche, seismic and flood protection measures. Emergency Preparedness and Evacuation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 4 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Project Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.3.1 Location .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3.2 Project Description ................................................................................................................ 6 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1922 Elizabeth T
    co.rYRIG HT, 192' The Moootainetro !scot1oror,d The MOUNTAINEER VOLUME FIFTEEN Number One D EC E M BER 15, 1 9 2 2 ffiount Adams, ffiount St. Helens and the (!oat Rocks I ncoq)Ora,tecl 1913 Organized 190!i EDITORlAL ST AitF 1922 Elizabeth T. Kirk,vood, Eclttor Margaret W. Hazard, Associate Editor· Fairman B. L�e, Publication Manager Arthur L. Loveless Effie L. Chapman Subsc1·iption Price. $2.00 per year. Annual ·(onl�') Se,·ent�·-Five Cents. Published by The Mountaineers lncorJ,orated Seattle, Washington Enlerecl as second-class matter December 15, 19t0. at the Post Office . at . eattle, "\Yash., under the .-\0t of March 3. 1879. .... I MOUNT ADAMS lllobcl Furrs AND REFLEC'rION POOL .. <§rtttings from Aristibes (. Jhoutribes Author of "ll3ith the <6obs on lltount ®l!!mµus" �. • � J� �·,,. ., .. e,..:,L....._d.L.. F_,,,.... cL.. ��-_, _..__ f.. pt",- 1-� r�._ '-';a_ ..ll.-�· t'� 1- tt.. �ti.. ..._.._....L- -.L.--e-- a';. ��c..L. 41- �. C4v(, � � �·,,-- �JL.,�f w/U. J/,--«---fi:( -A- -tr·�� �, : 'JJ! -, Y .,..._, e� .,...,____,� � � t-..__., ,..._ -u..,·,- .,..,_, ;-:.. � --r J /-e,-i L,J i-.,( '"'; 1..........,.- e..r- ,';z__ /-t.-.--,r� ;.,-.,.....__ � � ..-...,.,-<. ,.,.f--· :tL. ��- ''F.....- ,',L � .,.__ � 'f- f-� --"- ��7 � �. � �;')'... f ><- -a.c__ c/ � r v-f'.fl,'7'71.. I /!,,-e..-,K-// ,l...,"4/YL... t:l,._ c.J.� J..,_-...A 'f ',y-r/� �- lL.. ��•-/IC,/ ,V l j I '/ ;· , CONTENTS i Page Greetings .......................................................................tlristicles }!}, Phoiitricles ........ r The Mount Adams, Mount St. Helens, and the Goat Rocks Outing .......................................... B1/.ith Page Bennett 9 1 Selected References from Preceding Mount Adams and Mount St.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
    Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
    [Show full text]
  • How to Travel to Aspen Highlands by Bus to Catch the Maroon Bells Shuttle
    HOW TO TRAVEL TO ASPEN HIGHLANDS BY BUS TO CATCH THE MAROON BELLS SHUTTLE BEFORE YOUR TRIP Make a Maroon Bells Shuttle reservation in advance at www.aspenchamber.org/maroon-bells Make sure you have your shuttle reservation when you arrive. Save it to your phone or print it and bring it with you. DIRECTIONS FOR TRAVELING TO ASPEN HIGHLANDS... FROM ASPEN Downtown Aspen/Rubey Park Transit Center TO Aspen Highlands The FREE CM Castle/Maroon bus provides service from Downtown Aspen to Maroon Creek Road serving Aspen Highlands. CM-Castle/Maroon buses depart Rubey Park Transit Center at :00, :20 & :40 past each hour. And departs Castle Ridge at :07, :27 & :47 past each hour. Plan for a 15-20 minute trip to arrive at Aspen Highlands. FROM SNOWMASS VILLAGE Snowmass Mall/Base Village/ Brush Creek Road TO Aspen Highlands From Snowmass Village take any FREE SM-Brush Creek Park & Ride bus. Buses depart Snowmass Village Mall at :00, :15, :30 and :45 after the hour. Once at the Brush Creek Park & Ride, transfer to any BRT ASPEN or L ASPEN bus. Once you are aboard a BRT ASPEN or L ASPEN bus, follow the steps listed below for transferring at the ROUNDABOUT or 8TH STREET bus stops. Plan for a 30-40 minute trip to arrive at Aspen Highlands. FROM DOWN VALLEY Glenwood Springs/Carbondale/El Jebel/Basalt TO Aspen Highlands From any bus stop down valley catch a L ASPEN or BRT ASPEN bus. PLAN YOUR TRIP One transfer to a Castle/Maroon bus is required to get to Aspen Highlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Pikes Peak 1911 1923 2 William F. Ervin (#1 & #2 Tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 3 Albert Ellingwood 4 Mary Cronin Longs Peak 1921 9 1934 5 Carl Melzer 1937 6 Robert B
    EVERYONE WHO HAS COMPLETED THE COLORADO FOURTEENERS (By Year of Completion) 1 Carl Blaurock (#1 & #2 tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 2 William F. Ervin (#1 & #2 tie) Pikes Peak 1911 1923 3 Albert Ellingwood 4 Mary Cronin Longs Peak 1921 9 1934 5 Carl Melzer 1937 6 Robert B. Melzer 1937 7 Elwyn Arps Eolus, Mt. 1920 7 1938 8 Joe Merhar Pyramid Peak 8 1938 9 O. P. Settles Longs Peak 1927 7 1939 10 Harry Standley Elbert, Mt. 1923 9 1939 11 Whitney M. Borland Pikes Peak 6 1941 12 Vera DeVries Longs Peak 1936 Kit Carson Peak 8 1941 13 Robert M. Ormes Pikes Peak Capitol Peak 8 1941 14 Jack Graham 9 1941 15 John Ambler 9 1943 16 Paul Gorham Pikes Peak 1926 8 1944 17 Ruth Gorham Grays Peak 1933 8 1944 18 Henry Buchtel Longs Peak 1946 19 Herb Hollister Longs Peak 1927 7 1947 20 Roy Murchison Longs Peak 1908 8 1947 21 Evelyn Runnette Longs Peak 1931 Uncompahgre Peak 9 1947 22 Marian Rymer Longs Peak 1926 Crestones 9 1948 23 Charles Rymer Longs Peak 1927 Crestones 9 1948 24 Nancy E. Nones (Perkins) Quandary 1937 Eolus, Mt. 9 1948 25 John Spradley Longs Peak 1943 7 1949 26 Eliot Moses Longs Peak 1921 7 1949 27 Elizabeth S. Cowles Lincoln, Mt. 9 1932 Wetterhorn Peak 9 1949 28 Dorothy Swartz Crestones 8 1950 29 Robert Swartz Bross, Mt. 1941 Crestones 8 1950 30 Ted Cooper Longs Peak 8 1950 31 Stirling Cooper Longs Peak 8 1950 32 Harold Brewer Longs Peak 1937 El Diente 9 1950 33 Wilbur F.
    [Show full text]
  • Almostheaven-Winter.Pdf
    Who says only kids have snow days? Explore the fresh powder on skis, snowboard, tube, sled or snowshoes. Then warm up with a cozy cabin retreat, or sink into a luxurious spa getaway. From the jingle bells to the candy hearts, the West Virginia snowfall evokes childlike excitement all season long. So much to discover! Here’s your pocket guide to the best of winter in the mountains: your insider advice on the best mountain slopes, winter play and events. Get the full list of WV’s Winter finest at GoToWV.com/winter. TABLE OF CONTENTS Mountain Winter Wonderlands..........................2 Winter Bests..............................................................10 Your Sticker Collection.........................................18 1 WEST VIRGINIA’S Wonderlands Mountain Winter MOUNTAIN WINTER Snowshoe WONDERLANDS SNOWSHOE, WV Don’t forget to gather all 6 WV winter stickers as you explore! Keep track of WINTER ACTIVITIES the ones you find on page 18. Downhill Skiing Snowboarding Tubing Terrain Parks Snowmobiling Off-Road Tours The most scenic ski resort is also the largest. Settle OGLEBAY into Snowshoe Mountain for Olympian-designed trails, terrain parks for diferent skill levels, backcountry terrain and more. ALPINE LAKE KIDS FUN Kids can ski free, play in the Big Top (with an BLACKWATER FALLS arcade, climbing walls and more) or swim in the CANAAN VALLEY TIMBERLINE outdoor pool and waterslide— yes, even in winter! WHITE GRASS VILLAGE Dine at any one of 12 restaurants and cafés before SNOWSHOE strolling the shops, including a local artisan market. ELK RIVER TOURING CENTER SPECIAL EVENTS From extreme races and gear demos to concerts, festivals and weekend retreats, there’s always something on the calendar.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Mont-Tremblant Is Among the Elite Eastern North American Ski Resorts
    #SKI #CANADA Go play outside In cultural Québec’s outdoor playground, Mont-Tremblant is among the elite Eastern North American ski resorts. By Crai Bower oreal forests may circle the globe, but they’re suitable for framing in Québec, Canada – home to le voyageur, sugar on Bsnow and caribou, the legendary warm-me- up concocted from red wine, whiskey and maple syrup. The Québécois embrace winter the way most of us revel in summer, by spending as much time as possible outdoors, regardless of persistent snowfall and, especially, frigid temperatures. Settled within the Laurentian Mountains at the edge of Mont-Tremblant National Park, Mont-Tremblant Resort has celebrated all things winter for 80 years, with no signs of going inside. From a winter via ferrata to village sleigh rides, your roster of outside activities appears infinite. On slope, the second oldest ski resort in North America continues to receive reliable snow – 615cm in 2018-19! There are 755-skiable acres across 101-named runs that also place Tremblant among the elite Eastern North American ski resorts. The Alterra Mountain Company ownership group recently committed US$17 million to on- and off-piste improvements. A new high-speed quad now whisks you away to the popular North Side area. And, because North Americans are nuts for glade/tree skiing, Tremblant added five new glade runs over a 20-hectare area in the advanced Edge area. Alterra also expanded the primary base lodge, Le Grand Manitou, adding 400 more seats and redesigning the food service area. La Fourchette du Daible, the North Side lodge, is also larger and much improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowmass Falls Ranch Brochure with Maps.Pdf
    SNOWMASS FALLS RANCH THE ULTIMATE MOUNTAIN ESCAPE BREATHTAKING SCENERY AN AWE-INSPIRING VALLEY nestled at the base of towering mountain peaks, highlighted by waterfalls, meadows, aspen groves and conifer forests. This is an idyllic setting where tumbling streams converge and timbered hillsides give way to verdant meadows. Local landmark Mount Daly dominates the view from the ranch headquarters. A fortuitous bend in the valley brings additional peaks into view, including Clark Peak and Snowmass Mountain. It is an incredible setting for a multitude of activities - fishing, hunting, riding, hiking, ranching, entertaining, or just relaxing. BACKYARD WILDERNESS FOR ITS FORTUNATE OWNERS, the ranch is a gateway to the surrounding Maroon Bells– Snowmass Wilderness. This 181,535-acre wilderness area has over 100 miles of trails and 6 of Colorado’s peaks over 14,000 feet, accessible right from the property. There are no roads or vehicles allowed in the wilderness, it is open to foot and horse travel only. This is not only an enormous playground, but serves to protect and buffer the ranch from the outside world. UNMATCHED LOCATION ASPEN / SNOWMASS LOCALE SNOWMASS FALLS RANCH DETAILS THIS UNIQUE PROPERTY is only minutes from Snowmass and • The top summer and winter resort • County Road ends at the 650± deeded Aspen, yet is worlds away. destination in the world acre property So unexpected that such a beautiful valley exists so close • The town of Aspen is nine miles due • Diverse setting of meadows, aspens, to the extensive development east of the property and conifer forests that has occurred in the area, yet remains pristine and • Snowmass ski slopes are only half a • Bisected by multiple creeks with untouched today.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Maine Skiing New England Ski Museum in Preparation for 2015 Annual Exhibit
    Timeline of Maine Skiing New England Ski Museum In preparation for 2015 Annual Exhibit Mid 1800s: “…the Maine legislature sought to populate the vast forests of northern Maine. It offered free land to anyone who would take up the challenge of homesteading in this wilderness. ...Widgery Thomas, state legislator and ex-Ambassador to Sweden…suggested that the offer of free land be made to people in Sweden. In May, 1870 Thomas sailed for Sweden to offer 100 acres of land to any Swede willing to settle in Maine. Certificates of character were required. Thomas himself had to approve each recruit.” Glenn Parkinson, First Tracks: Stories from Maine’s Skiing Heritage . (Portland: Ski Maine, 1995), 4. March 1869: “In March 1869 the state resolved “to promote the settlement of the public and other lands” by appointing three commissioners of settlement. William Widgery Thomas, Jr., one of the commissioners, had extensive diplomatic experience as ambassador to Sweden for Presidents Arthur and Harrison. Thomas had lived among the Swedes for years and was impressed with their hardy quality. He returned to the United States convinced that Swedes would make just the right sort of settlers for Maine. When Thomas became consul in Goteborg (Gothenburg), he made immediate plans for encouraging Swedes to emigrate to America.” E. John B. Allen, “”Skeeing” in Maine: The Early Years, 1870s to 1920s”, Maine Historical Society Quarterly , 30, 3 & 4, Winter, Spring 1991, 149. July 23, 1870 "Widgery Thomas and his group of 22 men, 11 women and 18 children arrived at a site in the woods north of Caribou.
    [Show full text]
  • Master's Project: an Ecological Assessment of Backcountry Ski Trails at Bolton Backcountry in Bolton, VT
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Rubenstein School Masters Project Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Publications Resources 2015 Master's Project: An Ecological Assessment of Backcountry Ski Trails at Bolton Backcountry in Bolton, VT Kathryn T. Wrigley University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/rsmpp Part of the Forest Management Commons Recommended Citation Wrigley, Kathryn T., "Master's Project: An Ecological Assessment of Backcountry Ski Trails at Bolton Backcountry in Bolton, VT" (2015). Rubenstein School Masters Project Publications. 8. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/rsmpp/8 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Rubenstein School Masters Project Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Master's Project: An Ecological Assessment of Gladed Ski Trails at Bolton Backcountry in Bolton, Vermont Kathryn Wrigley Ecological Planning Program Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Vermont May 2015 ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF BOLTON BACKCOUNTRY 1 Table of Contents 1. List of Figures and Tables 3 2. List of Appendices 4 3. Executive Summary 5 4. Introduction to the Ecological Assessment 7 5. Landscape Context 10 6. Methods 11 7. Vegetation Results 14 8. Wildlife Habitat Suitability Results 5.1 Black Bear (Ursus americanus) 20 5.2 Birds 21 5.2a Canada warbler (Wilsonia candensis) 22 5.2b Black-throated blue warbler (Dendroica caerulescens) 23 5.2c Scarlet tanager (Piranga olivacea) 24 5.2d Discussion 25 8.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Snowmass Master Development Plan
    MASTER DEVELOPMENT 2015 PLAN July 2015 MASTER DEVELOPMENT 2015 PLAN July 2015 ACCEPTED BY:Y: Scott FitzwilliamsFitzwilliams FForestorest SupervisoSupervisorr White River National Forest DATE:E: PREPARED BY: CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION I-1 A. LOCATION I-2 B. LAND OWNERSHIP I-2 C. CURRENT RESORT OPERATIONS SUMMARY I-2 1. Winter I-3 2. Summer I-4 D. BACKGROUND I-4 1. Chronology of Development I-5 E. ABSTRACT OF PLANNED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN I-5 1. Winter I-5 2. Summer I-6 F. PAST PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION I-6 G. VISION AND DESIGN PHILOSOPHY I-7 H. STATEMENT OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES I-8 1. Winter I-8 2. Summer I-8 I. ACCEPTANCE BY THE FOREST SERVICE I-9 J. PUBLIC/MUNICIPAL REVIEW I-9 II. DESIGN CRITERIA II-1 A. DESTINATION RESORTS II-1 B. REGIONAL DESTINATION RESORTS II-1 C. NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL DESTINATION RESORTS II-2 D. BASE AREA DESIGN II-2 E. MOUNTAIN DESIGN II-3 1. Trail Design II-3 2015 Master Development Plan i 2. Lift Design II-4 3. On-Mountain Guest Services II-4 F. CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN II-4 G. BALANCE OF FACILITIES II-5 H. MULTI-SEASON RECREATION ACTIVITIES II-5 III. SITE INVENTORY III-1 A. TOPOGRAPHY AT SNOWMASS III-1 B. SLOPE GRADIENTS AT SNOWMASS III-1 C. SOLAR ASPECT AT SNOWMASS III-2 IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS IV-1 A. SUMMARY OF THE EXISTING GUEST EXPERIENCE IV-1 B. EXISTING LIFT NETWORK IV-2 C. EXISTING TERRAIN NETWORK IV-4 1. Terrain Variety IV-4 2.
    [Show full text]