DOCSLIB.ORG

THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES RIGHTS ACT (IPRA) of 1997 an IP Human Rights Based Policing Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES RIGHTS ACT (IPRA) of 1997 an IP Human Rights Based Policing Framework An introduction to THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES RIGHTS ACT (IPRA) of 1997 An IP Human Rights Based Policing Framework Presented by: DAHLIALYN D DAIT-CAWED,MNSA Chief, Human Rights Division OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) References Dait-Cawed, Dahlialyn D.2011.The Clash of Philippine Land Laws: An Indigenous Peoples Perspective, Unpublished Thesis, National Defense College of the Philippines, Camp Aguinaldo, Quezon City http//:www.un.org Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997 The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples International Labour Organization Convention 169 HB 659 by Sitti Djalla A Turabin-Hataman „An Act Prohibiting Discrimination Against Persons on Account of Ethnic Origin and/or religious Belief QRU -Central 5th Commission Report, 2013 A Brief on Complaints on Indigenous Peoples Rights Violations (IPRVs), 15 February 2013 OBJECTIVES OF THE SESSION To enable participants to understand contexts of indigenous peoples/cultural communities IPs/ICCs); To understand the IPRA or Republic Act 8371 as an IP human rights policy framework; To enable participants to understand that IP rights are human rights; To understand issues affecting IP/ICCs towards an IP sensitive community policing; For participants to be advocates of IP rights As newly designated HRDOs… WHAT WILL YOU DO FIRST??? WHAT WILL YOU DO SECOND??? WHAT WILL YOU DO NEXT??? OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION I. WHO ARE THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES - discrimination - Peace/armed conflict - Human security - development II. THE IPRA: AN IP HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY FRAMEWORK IV. REALITIES ON THE GROUND IV. SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS (Chapter II, Sec. 3 (h) IPRA) refer to a group of people or homogenous societies identified by self-ascription and ascription by others, who have continuously lived as organized community on communally bounded and defined territory, and who have, under claims of ownership, since time immemorial, occupied, possessed and utilized such territories. 110 Ethno-linguistic groups estimated population of 14 million 16% of PH population Indigenous Peoples of the Philippines REGION II, CARABALLO CORDILLERA & REGION I MOUNTAINS Bontoc; Balangao, Isneg, Agta, Kalanguya, Bugkalot, Isinai, REGION III & REST OF Tinguian,, Kankanaey Gaddang , Aggay , Dumagat , LUZON/SIERRA MADRE Kalanguya, Karao, lbaloi, lbanag, Itawis, lvatan, Yogad, etc. MOUNTAINS Ayangan, lfugao, Tuwali, (RIII, RIV & RV) Kalinga, Bago, Applai, etc. Aeta, Negrito. Abelling, Agta, Dumagat, ISLAND GROUPS Remontado, Bugkalot, (RVI & R VII) Cimaron, Kabihug, Agutaynon, Tagbanua, Tabangnon, Abiyan, Dagayanen, Tao't Bato, (Aeta), Isarog, ltom, etc. Batak,Pala’wan Molbog, Iraya Mangyan, Hanunuo Mangyan, Alangan Mangyan, Buhid Mangyan, Tadyawan SOUTHERN & EASTERN Mangyan, Batangan MINDANAO Mangyan, Gubatnon (RXI & RXIII) Mangyan, Ratagnon Manobo, Mandaya, Mangyan, Ati, Cuyunon, Mansaka, Dibabawon, Sulod/Bukidnon, Magahat Banwaon. Bagobo, Ubo Korolanos, Ata, Bukidnon, Manobo, Tagakaolo, Escaya, Badjao, etc. Talaingod, Langilan, Mamanwa, Higaonon, Blaan, T'boli, Kalagan, NORTHERN & WESTERN Tagabawa, MINDANAO (RIX & RX) Mangguangan, Manobo, Subanen, Tigwahanon, Sangil, Arumanen Manobo, Arakan Agusan Manobo, etc. Manobo, Teduray, Dibabawon, Banwaon, Bagobo, Ubo Manobo, CENTRAL MINDANAO (RXII) Tagakaolo, Talaingod,, Aromanon, Tiruray, Bagobo, Langilan, Mamanwa, Ubo Manobo, Higaonon, Higaonon, Blaan, T'boli, Subanen, Iranon, B‟laan, Kalagan, Tagabawa, Lambangian, etc. Manobo Blit, Matigsalog, Tigwahanon, Tagabawa, Sangil, etc. 8 . 110 Ethnolinguistic Groups . 14 M IP POPULATION (16%) . 7 .7 M HAS. (25.84%) THEN… & NOW… A deep-rooted history of discrimination , marginalization & continuing till the present called by various names & handled by different agencies (1901 to present) Non-participation & exclusion in local & national plans (Top –Down Approach; no agenda in national plans) Invisible in PH census (uncounted & an accounted) Devt aggression ( inaccessibility of services; extractive industries) I. WHO ARE THE IPs/ICCs? IPs/ICCs: PEOPLES CALLED BY VARIOUS NAMES 1901: Bureau of Non-Christian Tribes (PCA 253) under the Dept of Interior 1902: Bureau of Ethnological Survey for the Phil Islands vice DOI 1957: Comm on National Integration (non-christian Filipinos) RA 1888 1972: Pres‟l Assistance on National Minorities (PANAMIN) 1984: Office for Muslim Affairs & Cultural Communities (OMACC) 1987: OSCC; ONCC & OMA 1997: National Comm on Indigenous Peoples (merger of OSCC & ONCC) 2007; National Comm on Muslim Filipinos Struggle 4 SD I. WHO ARE THE IPs/ICCs? IPs/ICCs: STRUGGLE TO SELF-DETERMINATION 1950s: WB Chico Dam Project/ 70s Macliing Dulag rise of insurgency 1993: WB OP Guide for IPs 1997: IPRA IPRA as response; definitions I. WHO ARE THE IPs/ICCs? IPs/ICCs: STRUGGLE TO SELF-DETERMINATION Native Title (CADT) Customary Laws ( leadership & justice systems) Ancestral Domains/territories/homelands & people Indigenous Knowledge Systems & Practices (IKSP) Indigenous Political Structure (IPS) Cultural Integrity definitions Spirit of the Law (IPRA) “An act to recognize, protect and promote the rights of indigenous cultural communities/indigenous people, creating a National Commission of Indigenous Peoples, establishing implementing mechanisms, appropriating funds therefor, and for other purposes” (thus rights based approach framework) Pre-IPRA Issuances 1990: Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Special Order Number 31 (SO 31). CSTFAL was created. 1993:Secretary Angel C. Alcala of the DENR, issued Administrative Order Number 2 (DAO 2). Rules and Regulations for the Identification, Delineation and Recognition of Ancestral Land and Domain Claims. What is social justice? Equality under the law What is social justice? “Those who have less in life should have more in law” Recognition of IP Rights Century Old Struggle Treaty of Paris (10 December 1898) Philippines was ceded to US for $20M Lapulapu Discovery vs. Conquest Points to Ponder Regalian Doctrine “The King owns Native Title Doctrine everything” “Time immemorial Possession” Regalian Doctrine All lands of the public domain, waters, minerals, coal, petroleum, and other mineral oils, all forces of potential energy, fisheries, forests or timber, wildlife, flora and fauna, and other natural resources are owned by the State. Native Title Doctrine The State, subject to the provisions of this Constitution and national development policies and programs, shall protect the rights of indigenous cultural communities to their ancestral lands to ensure their economic, social, and cultural well-being. The Congress may provide for the applicability of customary laws governing property rights or relations in determining the ownership and extent of ancestral domain. [Section 5 Article XII, Philippine Constitution] Definition of Native Title Refers to pre-conquest rights to lands and domains which, as far back as memory reaches, have been held under a claim of private ownership by ICCs/IPs, have never been public lands and are thus indisputably presumed to have been held that way since before the Spanish Conquest [Par. l, Section 3, RA 8371] Cariño v. Insular Government: 72 Phil 935; 212 US 449 “[N]o one, we suppose, would deny that, so far as consistent with paramount necessities, our first object in the internal administration of the islands is to do justice to the natives, not to exploit their country for private gain… The same statute made a bill of rights, embodying the safeguards of the Constitution, and, like the Constitution, extends those safeguards to all. It provides that "no law shall be enacted in said islands which shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, or deny to any person therein the equal protection of the laws." (See. 5.) Cariño v. Insular Government: 72 Phil 935; 212 US 449 In the light of the declaration that we have quoted from section 12, it is hard to believe that the United States was ready to declare in the next breath that "any person" did not embrace the inhabitants of Benguet, or that it meant by "property" only that which had become such by ceremonies of which presumably a large part of the inhabitants never had heard, and that it proposed to treat as public land what they, by native custom and by long association, one of the profoundest factors in human thought,--regarded as their own.” IPRA dtails II. THE IPRA: AN IP HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY FRAMEWORK Republic Act 8371 Indigenous Peoples Rights Act -Landmark legislation to: - Correct Historical Injustice - Enforce Constitutional Mandates - Observe International HRts norms/standards Intl strds vis ipra Source: NCIP IPRA is based on int’l HRts standards among others ICESCR-1966 Cedaw-1979 1974 ICERD-1965 1981 1967 Crc-1989 CRPD Cat-1984 1990 1986 2008 ICCPR-1966 cmw-1990 ilo 169 1995 1989 undrip Ipra & UN policies II. THE IPRA: AN IP HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY FRAMEWORK SIMILARITIES of IPRA with UN policies SELF-DETERMINATION INDIVIDUAL & COLLECTIVE RIGHTS LAND & RESOURCES IDENTITY & UNIQUE INSTITUTIONS, CULTURE & PRACTICES DEVELOPMENT IN THEIR OWN ASPIRATIONS & AT THEIR OWN PACE NON-DISCRIMINATION SOCIAL, ECO, POL, CULTURAL, CIVIL RIGHTS IPRA dtails Source: NCIP THE IPRA: An IP human rts framework • 13 CHAPTERS • 83 SECTIONS • Signed by former PFVR on Oct 29/1997 • 10 yrs after ‘87 Consti 5 pillars 5 PILLARS of THE IPRA Four Bundles of Right 1. Rights to Ancestral Lands & Domains 2. Right to Self-Governance and Empowerment 3. Right to Social Justice and Human Rights 4. Right to Cultural
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adaptation and Coping Strategies of the Mangyan in Oriental
    Ecosystems & Development Journal 5(2): 27‐34 April 2015 ISSN 2012‐3612 ABSTRACT The study was conducted to determine the adaptation and Adaptation and Coping coping strategies of the Mangyan in Oriental Mindoro, Philippines towards climate change-related occurrences. Strategies of the Mangyan in Specifically, it aimed to: 1. characterize the respondents; 2. determine the respondents’ perceived effects of climate change- Oriental Mindoro, Philippines related occurrences to them and their families; 3. discuss the internal and external factors affecting their resiliency to these Towards Climate Change- occurrences; and 4. formulate recommendations to address the concerns of these occurrences to their communities. Adaptation Related Occurrences and coping strategies of the Mangyan, local government interventions based on RA 9729 (Climate Change Act) and RA 1021 (Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction Management Plan Gil Andrie T. Valera1 and Emilia S. Visco2 Act), are considered internal and external factors that contribute to the Mangyan communities’ resiliency to the occurrences. INTRODUCTION The Mangyan have developed internal adaptation and coping The Philippines is the third most disaster-prone country in the strategies that would hopefully make them build resilient world, next to Tonga and Vanuatu. This is due to the country’s communities. This was evident in the way they wear their high exposure to natural calamities (The World Disaster Report, clothes, build their houses, find their source of livelihood, 2012). Of the top three at risk however, the Philippines had the practice their ancestral faith and their decision to stay or not in best rating on adaptation measures, with scores similar to their respective communities. However, some adaptation Malaysia and Thailand (Philippines Daily Inquirer, 10/15/2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusion and Cultural Preservation for the Ifugao People
    421 Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, Vol.2 No. 2 December 2018. pp. 421-447 doi: 10.19184/jseahr.v2i2.8232 © University of Jember & Indonesian Consortium for Human Rights Lecturers Inclusion and Cultural Preservation for the Ifugao People Ellisiah U. Jocson Managing Director, OneLife Foundation Inc. (OLFI), M.A.Ed Candidate, University of the Philippines, Diliman Abstract This study seeks to offer insight into the paradox between two ideologies that are currently being promoted in Philippine society and identify the relationship of both towards the indigenous community of the Ifugao in the country. Inclusion is a growing trend in many areas, such as education, business, and development. However, there is ambiguity in terms of educating and promoting inclusion for indigenous groups, particularly in the Philippines. Mandates to promote cultural preservation also present limits to the ability of indigenous people to partake in the cultures of mainstream society. The Ifugao, together with other indigenous tribes in the Philippines, are at a state of disadvantage due to the discrepancies between the rights that they receive relative to the more urbanized areas of the country. The desire to preserve the Ifugao culture and to become inclusive in delivering equal rights and services create divided vantages that seem to present a rift and dilemma deciding which ideology to promulgate. Apart from these imbalances, the stance of the Ifugao regarding this matter is unclear, particularly if they observe and follow a central principle. Given that the notion of inclusion is to accommodate everyone regardless of “race, gender, disability, ethnicity, social class, and religion,” it is highly imperative to provide clarity to this issue and identify what actions to take.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality of Opportunities Among Ethnic Groups in the Philippines Celia M
    Philippine Institute for Development Studies Surian sa mga Pag-aaral Pangkaunlaran ng Pilipinas Inequality of Opportunities Among Ethnic Groups in the Philippines Celia M. Reyes, Christian D. Mina and Ronina D. Asis DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES NO. 2017-42 The PIDS Discussion Paper Series constitutes studies that are preliminary and subject to further revisions. They are being circulated in a limited number of copies only for purposes of soliciting comments and suggestions for further refinements. The studies under the Series are unedited and unreviewed. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute. Not for quotation without permission from the author(s) and the Institute. December 2017 For comments, suggestions or further inquiries please contact: The Research Information Department, Philippine Institute for Development Studies 18th Floor, Three Cyberpod Centris – North Tower, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, 1100 Quezon City, Philippines Tel Nos: (63-2) 3721291 and 3721292; E-mail: [email protected] Or visit our website at https://www.pids.gov.ph Inequality of opportunities among ethnic groups in the Philippines Celia M. Reyes, Christian D. Mina and Ronina D. Asis. Abstract This paper contributes to the scant body of literature on inequalities among and within ethnic groups in the Philippines by examining both the vertical and horizontal measures in terms of opportunities in accessing basic services such as education, electricity, safe water, and sanitation. The study also provides a glimpse of the patterns of inequality in Mindanao. The results show that there are significant inequalities in opportunities in accessing basic services within and among ethnic groups in the Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Indigenous Languages for Development: the Philippine Experience
    4 Indigenous languages for development: the Philippine experience Nestor Castro Philippine languages The Philippines is an archipelago composed of 7,107 islands with a population of 75 million people. Because of its archipelagic character, there are more than a hundred languages in the Philippines. The Summer Institute of Linguistics identified at least 151 languages in the country. Except for one Creole language, Chavacano, all of these languages belong to the Western Malaya-Polynesian subfamily of the Austronesian languages. These languages are further classified as belonging to the following language groups: Northern Philippine (70 languages), Central Philippine (46languages), Southern Philippine (22languages), Sarna Bajaw (?languages), Southern Mindanao (5languages), and Sulawesi Sangil (1 language). Despite this big number, only eight of these languages make up 85 percent of the entire Philippine population. These are Tagalog, Sugbuhanon, Iloko, Pangasinan, Hiligaynon, Bikol, Kapampangan, and Waray. Native speakers of these eight languages comprise the ethnic majority of the country, i.e. the lowland Christian Filipinos. Tagalog is the language spoken in Manila, the national capital, and the outlying provinces. Because of its strategic position, it has been designated as the national language since the establishment of the Philippine Commonwealth in 1935. While the 1987 Philippine Constitution mandated that the national language is 'Filipino', this is based on the Manila dialect of Tagalog. Minority languages The remaining 15 percent of the population are further divided into 143 language groups. Since ethnic identity, especially in the Philippines, is largely defined by language, the speakers of these 143 languages comprise the ethnic minorities of the country. These ethnic minorities can further be classified into two distinct groups: the Bangsa Moro, found in southern Philippines, and the 'indigenous peoples', who are scattered in the relatively isolated areas of the archipelago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lumad Equation 6
    KêtindêgISSN 2345-8461 Volume 3 Issue 2 * January, 2015 *56pages An official publication of the IPDEV Project, Empowering Indigenous Peoples in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao WHAT’S INSIDE? 3 - The Lumad equation 6 - Soldiers plant trees for IPs 8 - 2014 State of the IP Address 11 - Does the BBL offer more than the IPRA? 14 - Celebration, Solidarity & Hope 17 - Group eyes IPs’ peace agenda 18 - Already hurt and confused 20 - Awards for awesome wards 26 - Reliving and enriching Sulagad 28 - A return to those old ideal ways 30 - Festival in the truest sense 32 - Who are protecting the IP children and youth in the ARMM? 38 - Mining equates to IPs’ extinction 43 - “Don’t leave us” 44 - Prayer and ritual on World IP Day 50 - 10th Project Sounding Board 51 - Salamat po! Development Consultants Inc. D E V C O N THIS PROJECT IS SUPPORTED Recognition of the Rights of the Indigenous Peoples in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao for BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Empowerment and Sustainable Development (IPDEV) is a project implemented by the consortium: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung e.V., Institute for Autonomy and Governance (IAG) and DEVCON Development Consultants Inc. Kêtindêg, in Teduray roughly means standing up for something, making one be seen and be felt among the many. The word is not far from the Cebuano, Tagalog or Maguindanao variations of tindog, tindig and tindeg respectively. It is a fitting title for a The Lumad regular publication that attempts to capture the experiences gathered in this journey of recognizing the rights of the Lumad in the ARMM.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangyan Is a Generic Name for All the Ethnic Groups in Min- Doro; and the Term Hanunoo Is a Name Given to a Mangyan Group Geogra
    THE AMBAHAN: A MANGYAN-HANUNOO POETIC FORM~': ANTONIO POSTJ\1A Mangyan is a generic name for all the ethnic groups in Min­ doro; and the term Hanunoo is a name given to a Mangyan group geographically located in southeastern part of the Island of Min­ doro. Concerning this term Mangyan (already known to the early Spanish missionaries), it might be an interesting point of specula­ tion if there is any connection with the name "Ti-ngyan" applied to the ethnic groups in the province of Abra. According to Harold C. Conklin! there are at least ten differ­ ent sub-tribes of the Mangyan, each with a different language, dif­ ferent customs, manners and traditions, etc. They are found all over the island, but dwell in the mountains, having been driven away from their former habitation along the coast by Christian settlers. The territory covered by the Mangyan-Hanunoo approximates the area about 800 square kilometers, within the municipalities of Mansalay, San Pedro (formerly Bulalakao) and part of San Jose in Occidental Mindoro. The Hanunoo-Mangyan have an estimated total population of 7,000 to 8}OOO inhabitants living scattered all over the area. These are a group that have kept their own cus­ toms and traditions generally free from the outside influences of material and spiritual character. At the same time they might be *The present paper was prepared upon the invitation of Dr. Juan R. Francisco, who spent a few months.. with the Mangyans last year study­ ing their system of writing. It must be put on record here that Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 110 Ethnolinguistic Groups Found in Ethnographic Regions Igorot of The
    110 ethnolinguistic groups found in ethnographic regions Within each are smaller groups based on tribal Igorot of the Cordillera affiliation, language, or geographic reference, Dumagat of the Sierra like the Madre mountain range Ayangan of Ifugao Ayta (Aeta) of Central Luzon Hanunuo Mangyan in Mangyan of Mindoro Mindoro Tumanduk of Panay Agusanon Manobo of Agusan del Sur Lumad of Mindanao Source: (NCIP) The Philippines Factsheet | 1 Our Numbers Count Indigenous Peoples: 12%-17% (12.5M-17.8M) Population 2017 national population of ethnolinguistic groups are identified as indigenous 104,733,524* peoples 110 Source: NCIP * Based on estimates from the http://countrymeters.info/en/Philippines#population_2017 as of 01 January 2018. million ancestral domain holders are in 221 territories delineated under Certificates of Our Territories 1.2 Ancestral Domain Titles (CADT) Philippine Territory: 30M hectares 26% Indigenous Peoples are found in: Indigenous Peoples Ancestral Domain 61% MINDANAO 33% CORDILLERA 2011 (NCIP) ADMINISTRATIVE REGION 5.4 million hectares out of the 7.7 SCATTERED IN THE OTHER million hectares DIFFERENT PROVINCES OF THE COUNTRY delineated by the government as of 6% 2018 Source: NCIP Source: NCIP, 2009 sites in Mindanao, late registration starting 2012 benefited more than 2016 4.5 million hectares 4.5 million are 9,000 indigenous peoples by mid-2016 of land are currently covered by pending (UNFPA) showing the under-reporting 5 of births of indigenous children covered by Certificate applications for CADT of Ancestral Domain Titles (CADT) 2 | The Philippines Factsheet Issuances from the Department 1987 Constitution of Education: Sec. 5 Department Orders (DO): DO 62, s.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance and Leadership of the Palaw'an Tribe of Palawan
    Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences | Vol. 1, No. 5 | November 2014 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Governance and Leadership of the Palaw’an Tribe of Palawan, Philippines DAVID R. PEREZ, Ph.D. Western Philippines University, Puerto Princesa Campus, Sta. Monica, Puerto Princesa City [email protected] Date Received: October 15, 2014, Date Revised: October 25, 2014 Abstract - This study dealt with the governance and Anthropologists believe that Sabah, Malaysia and leadership of the Palaw’an Tribe of Palawan. The Palawan may have been connected by a large-bridge at respondents of the study were the 115 tribal leaders some time in history. The theory is that the Palaw’an who assumed leadership in their community. This study tribe walked across the bridge and became the first employed historical, descriptive, quantitative and settlers of the Philippines. In ancient times, the qualitative research methods. The study revealed that Palaw’an tribe lived in caves. almost all of the respondents are pure-blooded As cited earlier, Palaw’an has leaders who assumed palaw’an, males, married, elementary level, farming as to have unique characteristics. They show leadership the basic source of living and ages 60 to 65 years old. that guides the followers. What these characteristics are, They were selected foremost by means of hereditary how they become leaders, their kind of leadership, how attribute. The criteria in selecting leader include the they lead their members were variables that were knowledge of customary law, prove his worth, integrity looked into in this study. and have strong sense of justice, professed the value of If there are leaders there are also followers because being equal and fair, respect for the deity and in not everyone can be captains.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    0 SITUATION ANALYSIS Children in Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao FINAL DRAFT 1 Note on the Geographic Focus of the Report This Situation Analysis of Children in BARMM is a UNICEF contribution to knowledge on the situation of children in the Philippines. It follows the recent publication of the Government- UNICEF report on the national Situation Analysis of Children in the Philippines. The report was prepared by UNICEF in consultation with the Regional Government of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM). While the data was collected under the Regional Government of ARMM during 2017, the analysis does not change significantly under the new BARMM geographic area and highlights significant multi-dimensional bottlenecks in the delivery of and access to key social services. The report shows that outcomes for children are significantly worse for children and highlights the need for additional and accelerated support within BARMM, if the Philippines is to reach the SDG targets. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. UNICEF encourages dissemination of its information, data and analysis, this report may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to UNICEF Philippines, 14th Floor. North Tower Rockwell Business Centre Sheridan, United Street, Greenfields District, Mandalyuong City 1550, Philippines email: [email protected] Coram International @ Coram Children’s Legal Centre (CCLC) 2017 Commissioned by: UNICEF Philippines Cover Image: Shehzad Noorani/UNICEF Philippines 0 © United Nations Children’s Fund, Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • KATRIBU Special-Report on Ips and COVID-19
    Special Report June, 2020 Phil. IPs amidst Covid-19 pandemic: From north to south Indigenous Peoples are battling against discrimination, militarization and worsening human rights situation Executive Summary: I ndigenous Peoples in the Philippines approximately Likewise, government and private business interests have comprise 15 million of the country‟s 108 million popu- seized the opportunities provided by health crisis situa- lation. Indigenous peoples are composed of more than tions to further encroach on the lands and territories of 100 groups and are located in 50 of the country‟s 78 IPs. The joint proposal of the Department of Agriculture provinces. They inhabit more than five million hectares (DA) and National Commission on Indigenous Peoples of ancestral lands of the country‟s total landmass of 30 (NCIP). To undertake the „Plant, Plant, Plant‟ program is million hectares. maliciously using the crisis to land grab remaining ances- tral lands of the Lumad in Mindanao, while operations of Months into the crisis brought about by Covid-19 pan- destructive and exploitative projects continue unabatedly demic, the situation of the Indigenous Peoples, from amidst Covid-19 pandemic. north to south is slowly coming to light with the reports coming from different indigenous organizations and These realities on the ground are consequences of the communities. As the Enhanced Community Quarantine utter of the national government to draw up a prompt and (ECQ) was declared nationwide, the 15 million Indige- comprehensive plan to manage the health crisis and im- nous Peoples (IPs), in the country are facing particularly pact on the socio-economic well-being of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Yam (Dioscorea Alata) Varieties Grown by the Ethno-Linguistic Groups in Northern Philippines
    Benguet State University Research Journal (BRJ) April-August 2016, 76: 93- 102 Copyright 2016, Benguet State University Greater Yam (Dioscorea alata) Varieties Grown by the Ethno-linguistic Groups in Northern Philippines Grace S. Backian, Betty T. Gayao and Dalen T. Meldoz Northern Philippines Rootcrops Research and Training Center Benguet State University ABSTRACT This study was done to document indigenous greater yam varieties and wild yam species among the Aeta, Bago, Biga-Kalinga, Bugkalot, Buhid-Mangyan, Ibaloi, Isneg, Ivatan, Iyattuka, Kalanguya, Kankana-ey, Applai-Kankana-ey, Tingguian and two other major groups, the Kapampangans and Ilocanos. Economic, environmental and climatic conditions are changing diets and livelihoods such that indigenous greater yam varieties are at risk of disappearing, hence this documentation. Secondary data, interview, workshops and field observations were used to document information. Seventy-seven indigenous greater yam varieties were known, grown and utilized within the farming communities of 169 farmer respondents from selected ethno-linguistic groups in Northern Philippines. Fifty-one were commonly planted, 24 were planted less and five have already been lost.The Ivatans named the highest number with 18 varieties while the Kankana-eys of Benguet were able to name only one variety. The 18 wild species were gathered from the forest (bakir/ kabakiran) only in times of food and feed scarcity. The two major groups - the Kapampangans and Ilocanos are not familiar with greater yam varieties as these are mostly planted by their Aeta neighbors. Tuber shape and flesh color were the characteristics of the indigenous greater yam varieties that the ethno-lingistic groups could easily mention.
    [Show full text]
  • Data on Population and Language (National)
    I DATA ON POPULATION AND LANGUAGE (NATIONAL) 1 II. DATA ON CADTs (NATIONAL) Approved CADTs per region, land area and number of IP holders CORDILLERA ADMINISTRATIVE REGION (CAR) No. of CADTs Awarded: 26 Land Area (hectares): 404,730.6150 REGION 2 No. of IP Holders: 288,231 No. of CADTs Awarded: 12 Land Area (hectares): 1,041,570.5695 No. of IP Holders: 77,997 REGION 1 No. of CADTs Awarded: 8 Land Area (hectares): 50,960.5500 No. of IP Holders: 28,573 NUMBER LAND AREA NO.of IP REGION of CADTS (Hectares) HOLDERS AWARDED Luzon 100 2,680,220.2982 520,700 Visayas 10 56,452.6804 13,759 Mindanao 133 2,999,220.1346 749,960 REGION 3 TOTAL 243 5,735,893.1072 1,314,419 No. of CADTs Awarded: 18 Land Area (hectares): 190,494.2857 No. of IP Holders: 27,981 REGION 4 No. of CADTs Awarded: 26 REGION 10 Land Area (hectares): 946,756.7762 No. of CADTs Awarded: 27 No. of IP Holders: 73,699 Land Area (hectares): 347,999.3399 No. of IP Holders: 86,218 REGION 5 No. of CADTs Awarded: 10 REGION 11 Land Area (hectares): 45,707.5018 No. of CADTs Awarded: 33 No. of IP Holders: 24,219 Land Area (hectares): 1,126,468.5178 No. of IP Holders: 292,539 REGIONS 6 & 7 No. of CADTs Awarded: 10 Land Area (hectares): 56,452.6804 No. of IP Holders: 13,759 REGION 9 No. of CADTs Awarded: 13 Land Area (hectares): 208,825.2774 No. of IP Holders: 54,107 REGION 13 No.
    [Show full text]