DOCSLIB.ORG

2030 Plan and Implementation Framework Executive Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO 2030 Plan and Implementation Framework Executive Summary A Community Workbook For Implementation Partners Community COMPASS Report Number 17 Public Discussion Draft - Version 1 November 2004 Abstract Context Title: COMMUNITY COMPASS COMPONENTS 2030 Plan and Implementation Framework: 1 Vision A Community Workbook For (What do we want?) Implementation Partners 2 Initiatives (Community COMPASS (What strategies Report No. 17) should we consider?) The Planning Partnership Community COMPASS 3 Indicators Subject: (What should we measure?) is a collaborative initiative (Hamilton County’s Com- A comprehensive master plan of the Hamilton County Re- prehensive Master Plan and 4 Trends gional Planning Commission. Strategies) is a long-range and related implementation (Where have we been?) The Partnership – open to all plan that seeks to address mu- strategies for Hamilton County, Ohio 5 Projections political jurisdictions in the tual goals related to physical, (Where are we headed?) county and to affi liate mem- economic, and social issues Date: 6 Research bers in the public, private and among the 49 communities (What's the story civic sectors – is an advisory within Hamilton County. November 2004 behind the trend?) board that works to harness Through a collective shared the collective energy and vi- vision for the future based Synopsis: 7 Partners (Who can help?) sion of its members to effec- on the wishes and dreams of This plan and implementation tively plan for the future of our thousands of citizens, Hamil- framework is a community 8 Strategic Plans (What can we do that works?) county. Rather than engaging ton County now has direction workbook for implementa- in the Planning Commission’s to chart its course into the 21st tion partners -- local govern- 9 Action Plans short-range functions such as century. ments, business, non-profit (How do we make it happen?) zoning reviews, the Plan- organizations and the citizens ning Partnership takes a In developing a broad vi- 10 Performance Measures of Hamilton County. As an (Are actions making a long-range, comprehensive sion with broad support, initial public discussion docu- difference?) approach to planning, work- Community COMPASS ment, it identifi es emergent ing to build a community that will help ensure that trends consensus on: works for families, for busi- are anticipated, challenges nesses and for the region. The are addressed, priorities are • The Vision for Hamilton Partnership firmly believes focused, and our collective County’s Future, that collaboration is the key future is planned and achieved • Initiatives and strategies, to a positive, competitive and strategically over the next 20 • Key indicators for successful future for Hamilton to 30 years. Through an in- measuring progress, County. depth analysis of all aspects • Implementation of the County, the multi-year campaigns, and Visit planningpartnership.org process will result in a com- and communitycompass.org prehensive plan. • Concept plans for land for more information. use, transportation, and greenspace. Source of Copies: Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission 138 East Court Street Room 807 Cincinnati, OH 45202 513-946-4500 www.hamilton-co.org/hcrpc 2030 PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK Table of Contents Awards ..........................................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ v Foreword.................................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1-1 2. Vision, Initiatives, Strategies and Implementation Status The Vision for Hamilton County's Future.......................................................................2-1 Initiatives and Strategies - Implementation Status..........................................................2-7 Implementation Actions by HCRPC / Planning Partnership (By Vision Element and Implementation Campaign)................................................2-37 Potential Implementation Partners (By Vision Element)..................................................................................................2-41 3. Policy Plan Introduction.....................................................................................................................3-1 4. 2030 Concept Plans for Countywide Systems Introduction.....................................................................................................................4-1 Land Use Concept Plan...................................................................................................4-3 Transportation Concept Plan...........................................................................................4-5 Greenspace Concept Plan ...............................................................................................4-7 5. Implementation Campaigns Introduction.....................................................................................................................5-1 High Priority Initiatives ..................................................................................................5-2 Campaign to Assure Economic Prosperity .....................................................................5-7 Campaign to Build Collaborative Decision Making.....................................................5-17 Campaign to Embrace Diversity and Equity ................................................................5-27 Campaign to Balance Development and the Environment...........................................5-39 6. Performance Development: Milestones, Products, and Schedule Evaluation and Performance Development ....................................................................6-1 Milestones, Products and Schedule.................................................................................6-5 Appendices Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms......................................................................................... A1 Appendix 2: Community COMPASS Process .................................................................. A2 Appendix 3: Local Jurisdictional Plans............................................................................. A3 Appendix 4: Multi-Jurisdictional Plans............................................................................. A4 Appendix 5: Countywide Plans......................................................................................... A5 Appendix 6: State and Regional Plans .............................................................................. A6 Appendix 7: Alignment with OKI ..................................................................................... A7 Appendix 8: Indicators: Community COMPASS State of the County.............................. A8 Appendix 9: Benchmarks for Progress.............................................................................. A9 Appendix 10: Sustainable Cincinnati Indicators .............................................................. A10 Appendix 11: United Way State of the Community Indicators.........................................A11 Appendix 12: Smart Growth Principles for Communities ............................................... A12 Appendix 13: Hamilton County Treasures ....................................................................... A13 Appendix 14: Community COMPASS Publications......................................................... A14 COMMUNITY COMPASS i ii HAMILTON COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION / PLANNING PARTNERSHIP HAMILTON COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION / PLANNING PARTNERSHIP Recent Awards International Awards Award Performance Area Awarded By 2004 Program Excellence Consensus Building and International City/County Award for Citizen Community Decision Management Association Involvement Making – The Community (ICMA) COMPASS Process National Awards Award Performance Area Awarded By 2004 Award of Excellence Community COMPASS National Association of for Citizen Education State of the County Report County Information Offi cers Projects Series (NACIO) 2004 Award of Excellence Community COMPASS: National Association of for Brochures The Vision for Hamilton County Information Offi cers County’s Future (NACIO) 2004 Achievement Award for Community COMPASS: National Association of Innovative Programs The Community Results Counties (NACo) Accountability Framework 2004 Achievement Award for Community COMPASS National Association of Innovative Programs Research Report: Hamilton Counties (NACo) County’s Comparative and Competitive Advantages 2004 Award of Excellence Community COMPASS National Association of for Writing Report: Mired in the County Information Offi cers Inertia of Sprawl (NACIO) 2004 Achievement Award for The Planning Partnership: National Association of Innovative Programs Community Organizing County Information Offi cers for Collaborative Planning (NACIO) and Implementation 2004 Achievement Award for The Planning Partnership's National Association of Innovative Programs Certifi ed Planning Counties (NACo) Commisioners' Program 2004 Award of Excellence The Planning Partnership National Association of for Annual Reports Annual Report, 2003 County Information Offi cers (NACIO) 2004 Award of Excellence The Planning Partnership
Recommended publications
  • In the Sijpreme Coijrt of Ohio Sta7'f

    In the Sijpreme Coijrt of Ohio Sta7'f

    IN THE SIJPREME COIJRT OF OHIO STA7'F: EX REL. THE HAMIL'I'ON COUNTY BOARI) OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 138 East Court Street, Rooin 603 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, Relator, HAMILTONC.OUNTY CO[JR'F OT ORIGINAL ACTION IN PROIHi3ITI®N COMMON PLEAS 1000 Main Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and IION. JOHN ANDREW WEST 1000 Main Strcct Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and HON. KIM WILSON BURKE 1000 Main Street Ciricimiati, Ohio 45202, and HON. LTIIIVA M. COOPEIZ 1000 Main Street Cincinnati, C)hio 45202, and IION. DENNIS S. HELMICIC 1000 Main Strcet Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and HON. CHARLES.L KUBICKI, JR. 1000 Main Street Cincirrnati, Ohio 45202, and HON. JODY M. LUEBBERS 1000 Main Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and HON. STEVEN E. MARTIN 1000 Main Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and HON. BETH A. MYERS 1000 Main Street Cincinnati, Oiiio 45202, and HON. NORBER'I'A. NADF,L 1000 Main Sti-eet Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and HON. ROBERT P. RUC;HLMAN 1000 Main Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, and HON. RALPH E. WINKLER 1000 Main Street Cincirrnati, Ohio 45202, HON. ROBERT C. WINKLER 1000 Main Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, Rcspondents. COMPLAINT FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION David A. Pepper (0071739) (Counsel oP Reeord) "I'odd S. Portmie (0015748) 138 Fast Court Street, Room 603 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 "1'elephone: (513) 946-4401 Facsimile: (513) 946-4446 david.pepper(a^,hami I ton-co.org [email protected] Attomeys for Relator, The Hannilton County Board of County Commissioners 1. NATURE OF THE ACTION. 1. '1'his is an original action for a writ of prohibition.
  • Congressional Directory OHIO

    Congressional Directory OHIO

    204 Congressional Directory OHIO REPRESENTATIVES FIRST DISTRICT STEVE DRIEHAUS, Democrat, of Cincinnati, OH; born in Cincinnati, June 24, 1966; edu- cation: graduated Elder High School, Cincinnati, OH, 1984; B.A., Miami University, Oxford, OH, 1988; M.P.A., Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 1995; professional: Ohio House of Representatives, 2001–09; Ohio House Minority Whip, 2005–08; Peace Corps volunteer, Senegal, 1988–90; married: Lucienne Driehaus, 1991; children: Alex, Claire, and Jack; commit- tees: Financial Services, Oversight and Government Reform; elected to the 111th Congress on November 4, 2008. Office Listings http://www.driehaus.house.gov 408 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 .................................... (202) 225–2216 Chief of Staff.—Greg Mecher. FAX: 225–3012 Legislative Director.—Sarah Curtis. Press Secretary.—Tim Mulvey. Scheduler / Executive Assistant.—Heidi Black. Carew Tower, 441 Vine Street, Room 3003, Cincinnati, OH 45202 ......................... (513) 684–2723 District Director.—Steve Brinker. FAX: 421–8722 Counties: BUTLER (part), HAMILTON (part). Population (2000), 630,730. ZIP Codes: 45001–02, 45013–14, 45030, 45033, 45040–41, 45051–54, 45056, 45070, 45201–21, 45223–25, 45229, 45231–34, 45236–41, 45246–48, 45250–53, 45258, 45262–64, 45267–71, 45273–74, 45277, 45280, 45296, 45298–99 *** SECOND DISTRICT JEAN SCHMIDT, Republican, of Miami Township; born in Cincinnati, OH, November 29th; education: B.A., University of Cincinnati, 1974; professional: Miami Township Trustee, 1989– 2000; Ohio House of Representatives, 2000–04; president, Right to Life of Greater Cincinnati, 2004–05; religion: Catholic; married: Peter; children: Emilie; co-chair, Congressional Pro-Life Women’s Caucus; committees: Agriculture; Transportation and Infrastructure; elected to the 109th Congress by special election on August 5, 2005; reelected to each succeeding Congress.
  • Who Rules Cincinnati?

    Who Rules Cincinnati?

    Who Rules Cincinnati? A Study of Cincinnati’s Economic Power Structure And its Impact on Communities and People By Dan La Botz Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Published by Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Copyright ©2008 by Dan La Botz Table of Contents Summary......................................................................................................... 1 Preface.............................................................................................................4 Introduction.................................................................................................... 7 Part I - Corporate Power in Cincinnati.........................................................15 Part II - Corporate Power in the Media and Politics.....................................44 Part III - Corporate Power, Social Classes, and Communities......................55 Part IV - Cincinnati: One Hundred Years of Corporate Power.....................69 Discussion..................................................................................................... 85 Bibliography.................................................................................................. 91 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................96 About the Author...........................................................................................97 Summary This investigation into Cincinnati’s power structure finds that a handful of national and multinational corporations dominate
  • Campaign Finance Reform Jurisprudence Under the Roberts Court

    Campaign Finance Reform Jurisprudence Under the Roberts Court

    Stare Indecisis: Campaign Finance Reform Jurisprudence under the Roberts Court By Andrew Leiendecker Advisor: Professor Chris Edelson, School of Public Affairs For University Honors Spring 2014 Abstract: The following research paper consists of a detailed examination of the Supreme Court’s campaign finance reform jurisprudence under the leadership of Chief Justice John Roberts. This paper examines the holdings and implications of seven primary cases: Randall v. Sorrell (2006), FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life (2007), Davis v. FEC (2008), Citizens United v. FEC (2010), Arizona Free Enterprise Club PAC v. Bennett (2011), McCutcheon v. FEC (2014), and the forthcoming Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus (2014). Examining these cases three overarching problems emerge. First, the Court must reexamine and expand their definition of corruption as applied to campaign finance activities. Second, the Court has severely departed from the pre-Roberts standard (illustrated in Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce and Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC) of legislative deference on issues of campaign finance. And third, the Roberts Court’s conservative majority appears to be growing more and more comfortable with reversing or ignoring precedential campaign finance cases, including Austin, Nixon, McConnell v. FEC, and even Buckley v. Valeo. This has allowed for a dramatic reduction in the amount of campaign finance regulation in American elections, resulting in an empowering of wealthy individuals, candidates, and corporations to dominate an election cycle at the expense of the voices of everyday Americans, which threatens to undermine the public’s continued faith in our democratic process and the reputation of the Supreme Court itself.
  • 01.28.2020-Council-Minutes.Pdf

    01.28.2020-Council-Minutes.Pdf

    Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance/Attendance The January 28, meeting of the Newtown Village Council was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Mark Kobasuk, who led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Council Members: Don Carroll (Vice Mayor) Solicitor: Emily Supinger (not present) Daryl Zornes Fiscal Officer: Keri Everett (not present) Chuck Short Assistant to Mayor: Becky Fairley Curt Tiettmeyer Terry Fairley Sarah Williams APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES: Mr. Short made a motion to approve the regularly scheduled 01.14.2020 Council Minutes. Mr. Zornes seconded the motion. All Aye. Motion Carried. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: Chris Jones, PACE Financial – Residential PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) Last year, the Village established an energy special improvement district (ESID), which allows for commercial entities in the Village to obtain financing for energy improvements on their property. This allows the costs to be financed through a special assessment against the property. Gardner Publications, located in Newtown, first petitioned to create the ESID, which approved basically the Commercial Plan (Commercial PACE). The Village is currently in the same Energy SID (ESID), referred to as the Eastern Communities ESID, along with Anderson Township. Commercial property owners would come before the ESID for approval of their project, then come before Council for approval or leveling of the special assessment, if they want to use PACE financing. The ESID (Energy Special Improvement District) did approve the residential plan, which allows each of the local governments to then approve the Residential PACE program. Residential PACE allows homeowners to finance energy efficiency, renewable energy and other eligible improvements on their homes using private sources of capital.
  • OPTIONS ANALYSIS SEPTEMBER 2013 TABLE of CONTENTS

    OPTIONS ANALYSIS SEPTEMBER 2013 TABLE of CONTENTS

    BRENT SPENCE BRIDGE PROJECT OPTIONS ANALYSIS SEPTEMBER 2013 TABLE of CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 1 CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AND LIFECYCLE COSTS ............................. 2 TRAFFIC & REVENUE .............................................................................................................. 3 RISK ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................ 3 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 4 QUALITATIVE CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................ 4 NEXT STEPS ............................................................................................................................ 7 1. PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 8 1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVE ......................................................................................................... 8 1.1.1 STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND ADMINISTRATION ......................................................................... 8 1.1.2 THE BI-STATE MANAGEMENT TEAM’S PROJECT GOALS........................................................... 8 1.1.3 PROJECT COSTS ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.4 CONSIDERATION
  • Entire Issue (PDF)

    Entire Issue (PDF)

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 157 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2011 No. 20 Senate The Senate was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Thursday, February 10, 2011, at 4 p.m. House of Representatives WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2011 The House met at 10 a.m. and was to our kids and our grandkids and sidies in the agriculture bill for five called to order by the Speaker pro tem- won’t be paid off over 30 years. Some of crops grown in eight States that are in pore (Mr. WEBSTER). this debt will weigh upon the country. surplus and paying people not to grow f But the question is, how do we get things. That’s off-limits. That’s man- there? The deficit this year will be $1.5 datory spending. That can’t be consid- DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO trillion, an unimaginable amount of ered for cuts, paying people to not TEMPORE money, borrowed, a lot of it from grow things. We can’t do away with The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- China, and that is just virtually that. We’re going to borrow the money fore the House the following commu- unfathomable. so they can get paid to not grow nication from the Speaker: Now, they’re going to dink around es- things. sentially and pretend they’re doing WASHINGTON, DC, All right. Well, how about the oil February 9, 2011.
  • 13-193 Susan B. Anthony List V. Driehaus

    13-193 Susan B. Anthony List V. Driehaus

    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2013 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST ET AL. v. DRIEHAUS ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 13–193. Argued April 22, 2014—Decided June 16, 2014 Respondent Driehaus, a former Congressman, filed a complaint with the Ohio Elections Commission alleging that petitioner Susan B. An- thony List (SBA) violated an Ohio law that criminalizes certain false statements made during the course of a political campaign. Specifi- cally, Driehaus alleged that SBA violated the law when it stated that his vote for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was a vote in favor of “taxpayer funded abortion.” After Driehaus lost his re-election bid, the complaint was dismissed, but SBA contin- ued to pursue a separate suit in Federal District Court challenging the law on First Amendment grounds. Petitioner Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes (COAST) also filed a First Amendment challenge to the Ohio law, alleging that it had planned to disseminate materials presenting a similar message but refrained due to the proceedings against SBA. The District Court consolidated the two lawsuits and dismissed them as nonjusticiable, concluding that neither suit presented a sufficiently concrete injury for purposes of standing or ripeness.
  • Annual Report 2018

    Annual Report 2018

    IMPACT 2018REPORT BE THANY h o use services Increased Need … Increased Response SHELTER SHELTER 1 2 FAIRMOUNT WESTWOOD SHELTER SHELTER 3 4 WESTWOOD COLLEGE HILL NEW SHELTER 5 BOND HILL DEAR BETHANY HOUSE FRIENDS, It is with pride and gratitude that we share our 2018 Impact Report. Pride because of the impact we made in the lives of thousands of people this past year and gratitude because so many of YOU — individuals and families, foundations and organizations, small and large companies — stepped up to shelter our city’s most vulnerable and to close the gap in funding caused by the increased number of homeless families at our doors. Robert J. Inkrot Susan S. Schiller 2018 was a year unlike any other in our 36-year history — it was a year of increased need demanding increased response. Our four shelters were overflowing beginning in January, and Bethany House responded to the need by placing families in hotel rooms. By May, we had already sheltered a record number of families, and we were fearful of even more families arriving when the summer spike in family homelessness would begin, as it does every June. The unprecedented increase in the number of families seeking shelter required rental of a fifth shelter facility. In June of 2018, an empty group home on the property of St. Aloysius in Bond Hill became our fifth shelter, replacing the hotel beds. Our families are now scattered among five shelters in South Fairmount, Westwood, College Hill and Bond Hill. 2018 ended with the purchase of property on which to build a new facility, which will consolidate our seven buildings.
  • STANDING COMMITTEES of the HOUSE Agriculture

    STANDING COMMITTEES of the HOUSE Agriculture

    STANDING COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE [Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Resident Commissioner and Delegates in boldface] [Room numbers beginning with H are in the Capitol, with CHOB in the Cannon House Office Building, with LHOB in the Longworth House Office Building, with RHOB in the Rayburn House Office Building, with H1 in O’Neill House Office Building, and with H2 in the Ford House Office Building] Agriculture 1301 Longworth House Office Building, phone 225–2171, fax 225–8510 http://agriculture.house.gov meets first Wednesday of each month Collin C. Peterson, of Minnesota, Chair Tim Holden, of Pennsylvania. Frank D. Lucas, of Oklahoma. Mike McIntyre, of North Carolina. Bob Goodlatte, of Virginia. Leonard L. Boswell, of Iowa. Jerry Moran, of Kansas. Joe Baca, of California. Timothy V. Johnson, of Illinois. Dennis A. Cardoza, of California. Sam Graves, of Missouri. David Scott, of Georgia. Mike Rogers, of Alabama. Jim Marshall, of Georgia. Steve King, of Iowa. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, of South Dakota. Randy Neugebauer, of Texas. Henry Cuellar, of Texas. K. Michael Conaway, of Texas. Jim Costa, of California. Jeff Fortenberry, of Nebraska. Brad Ellsworth, of Indiana. Jean Schmidt, of Ohio. Timothy J. Walz, of Minnesota. Adrian Smith, of Nebraska. Steve Kagen, of Wisconsin. Robert E. Latta, of Ohio. Kurt Schrader, of Oregon. David P. Roe, of Tennessee. Deborah L. Halvorson, of Illinois. Blaine Luetkemeyer, of Missouri. Kathleen A. Dahlkemper, of Pennsylvania. Glenn Thompson, of Pennsylvania. Eric J. J. Massa, of New York. Bill Cassidy, of Louisiana. Bobby Bright, of Alabama. Cynthia M. Lummis, of Wyoming. Betsy Markey, of Colorado.
  • Midwest: Can Recent Democratic Gains Hold?

    Midwest: Can Recent Democratic Gains Hold?

    COVER STORY Midwest: Can Recent Democratic Gains Hold? The Midwest’s part in the “reverse realignment” — the Democrats’ answer in the North to the Republicans’ political takeover of the South — has been essential to building the current House Already running in the Sept. 14 primary are contractor majority. A number of recently elected Democrats in this region have taken root, but others Reid Ribble, county officials Andy Williams and Marc appear vulnerable: Two Ohio freshmen face rematches currently rated as tossups, as is an open Savard, state Rep. Roger Roth, physician Marc Trager, seat in Kansas. But the party isn’t only on defense, with bids for a GOP-held open seat outside and ex-state Rep. Terri McCormick. Chicago and to oust Minnesota’s conservative firebrand Michele Bachmann atop their wish list. LEAN REPUBLICAN TOSSUPS seat by 7 points in 2006 and 5 points in 2008. His chal- MINNESOTA 3 — Erik Paulsen, R KANSAS 3 — Open (Dennis Moore, D, retiring) lenger both times, marketing executive Dan Seals, is 2008: Paulsen 48%, Ashwin Madia (D) 41% 2008: Moore 56%, Nick Jordan (R) 40% trying again, but faces opposition from state Rep. Julie Paulsen, a one-time state House majority leader, was Hamos and civil rights lawyer Elliot Richardson. The Democrats knew they’d have to fight for this suburban elected two years ago upon the retirement of his mentor, primary is Feb. 2. Wealthy businessman Dick Green and Kansas City-area swing seat whenever the centrist Jim Ramstad, defying Democrats who thought the state Rep. Elizabeth Coulson lead the Republican field.
  • Statistics Congressional Election

    Statistics Congressional Election

    STATISTICS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 2, 2010 SHOWING THE VOTE CAST FOR EACH NOMINEE FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR, REPRESENTATIVE, AND DELEGATE TO THE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS, TOGETHER WITH A RECAPITULATION THEREOF COMPILED FROM OFFICIAL SOURCES BY KAREN L. HAAS CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES http://clerk.house.gov (Corrected to June 3, 2011) WASHINGTON : 2011 STATISTICS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 2, 2010 (Number which precedes name of candidate designates Congressional District.) ALABAMA FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR Richard C. Shelby, Republican ................................................................. 968,181 William G. Barnes, Democrat ................................................................... 515,619 Write-in ....................................................................................................... 1,699 FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE 1. Jo Bonner, Republican .............................................................................. 129,063 David Walter, Constitution Party of Alabama ........................................ 26,357 Write-in ....................................................................................................... 861 2. Martha Roby, Republican .......................................................................... 111,645 Bobby Bright, Democrat ............................................................................ 106,865 Write-in ......................................................................................................