3 June 2014 Time: 10.00 Am Venue: Council Chamber Ground Floor Civic Administration Building Lyndon Road East Hastings

Civic Administration Building Lyndon Road East, Hastings Phone: (06) 871 5000 Fax: (06) 871 5100 WWW.hastingsdc.govt.nz

OPEN

A G E N D A

COUNCIL MEETING

Meeting Date: Tuesday, 3 June 2014 Time: 10.00 am Venue: Council Chamber Ground Floor Civic Administration Building Lyndon Road East Hastings

Council Members Chair: Mayor Yule Councillors Bowers (Deputy Mayor), Bradshaw, Dixon, Hazlehurst, Heaps, Kerr, Lester, Lyons, Nixon, O’Keefe, Pierce, Poulain, Roil and Watkins

Officer Responsible Chief Executive – Mr R McLeod

Council Secretary Democratic Support Manager – Mr R Palmer (Extn 5018)

CG-13-1-408

TRIM File No. CG-13-1-408

HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL

COUNCIL MEETING

TUESDAY, 3 JUNE 2014

VENUE: Council Chamber Ground Floor Civic Administration Building Lyndon Road East Hastings TIME: 10.00 am

A G E N D A

1. Prayer

2. Apologies & Leave of Absence

At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.

Leave of Absence had previously been granted to Councillor Lester

3. Conflict of Interest Members need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as a Member of the Council and any private or other external interest they might have. This note is provided as a reminder to Members to scan the agenda and assess their own private interests and identify where they may have a pecuniary or other conflict of interest, or where there may be perceptions of conflict of interest. If a Member feels they do have a conflict of interest, they should publicly declare that at the start of the relevant item of business and withdraw from participating in the meeting. If a Member thinks they may have a conflict of interest, they can seek advice from the Chief Executive or Group Manager Corporate & Customer Services (preferably before the meeting). It is noted that while Members can seek advice and discuss these matters, the final decision as to whether a conflict exists rests with the member.

4. Confirmation of Minutes

There are no minutes to confirm.

5. Submissions to Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 5

TRIM File No. CG-13-1-408

6. Annual Plan Submissions - Officer's Comments 9

7. Financial Report for the 9 months ended 31 March 2014 55

8. Hawkes Bay Opera House Funding Arrangements 171

9. Summary of Recommendations from the HDC Maori Joint Committee Meeting held on 14 May 2014 185

10. 2014/15 Annual Plan Submissions - Rating Policy 187

11. Additional Business Items

12. Extraordinary Business Items

13. Recommendation to Exclude the Public from Items 14 and 15 197

14. Hawke's Bay Airport Limited - Appointment of Directors

15. Summary of Recommendations from the Audit and Risk Subcommittee Meeting Held 13 May 2014

Council 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.1 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 SUBJECT: FROM: MEETING DATE: TO: REPORT Ref: File

3/06/2014

14/574 ii) i) Accompanying these are two other volumes; each are provided in three separate volumes, Agenda parts 1, 2 and 3. The individual submissions together with the Officer’s Comments relating to SITUATION CURRENT received. the Local Government Act 2002. A total of 224 submissions have been been the subject of community consultation through notification required by The Council’s Draft Annual Plan was adopted on 20 March 2014 andhas BACKGROUND June 2014. to enable the Annual Plan to be completed for final Council adoption This report concludes by making a number of recommendations in section 4.0 regard to consultation and decision making. to fulfil The objective of this decision relevant to the purpose of Local Government is effective and appropriate to present and anticipated future circumstances. quality means infrastructure, services andperformance that are efficient and a way that is most cost infrastructure, local public services, andperformance of regulatoryfunctions in to meet the current and future needs of communities for good quality local prescribed bySection ofthe 10 LocalGovernment Act 2002. That purposeis The Council is required to give effect to the purpose of local government as 2002 requiring Council to have an Annual Plan adopted by 30June 2014. iss This June 2014. obtain the Draft Annual Plan and Draft Development Contributions Policy andto The purpose of this report is to inform the Council on submissions received to SUMMARY

received in respect of the specific issues some of which were raised for comments relating to each matter. These are the submissions Volume 2contains the generic submissions together with the Officer’s Review Volume 1contains the submissions received in respect of the Rating decisions incorporationfor into the final plan for Council adoption on 26

l the statutory requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in ue arises from legislative provisionswithin the Local Government Act

COUNCIL SUBMISSIONS TO DRAFT MANAGER STRATEGY TUESDAY JUNE 3 2014 LEX VERHOEVEN

– effective for households Good and businesses. Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

ANNUAL PLAN 2014/15 PLAN ANNUAL

on 26 on

Page Page

Item 5

Page

ing.

Hotel Proposal, Water Fluoridation, Water Fluoridation, Proposal, Hotel

was undertaken using standard industry industry standard using undertaken was

The survey included an embedded version version embedded an included survey The Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

n is the first matter to be placed in front of the Citizens Citizens the of front in be placed to matter first the is n

cycling, Development Contributions,, Willowpark Street Street Willowpark Contributions,, Development cycling, - stioned. sultation; i.e. Clifton Coastal Erosion, Haumoana Coastal Erosion, Erosion, Coastal Haumoana Erosion, Coastal Clifton i.e. sultation; Extension of Havelock North Domain Domain North Havelock of Extension Proposal) Hotel (CBD CBD Vibrant for a Initiatives Sale and Development of Sylvan Road Netball Courts Netball Road Sylvan of Development and Sale Rural Re Fees. and Bylaws Control Dog and Trees, ich wh had development for the support strong was there whilst That date, to infrastructure and cycling walking on undertaken been any was there whether on commented members panel numerous network, to the extension for additional need immediate further was Road on Havelock pathway side southern the particularly que con Middle Extension, Domain North Havelock Courts, Netball Road Sylvan Road Cycleway, CBD Initiatives –

. . . . summary report provided by Public Voice Ltd of the 533 responses to the the to responses 533 the of Ltd Voice Public by provided report summary Citizen Panel survey is attached. survey Panel Citizen The Rural Community Board meets on 29 May 2014 to consider rural rural consider to 2014 May 29 on meets Board Community Rural The with meeting Council 3 June the at Council update will Officers submissions. meet Board Community Rural the from arise that points any of analysis preliminary a undertaken and met have Party Working Rating The meeting. Council 3 June the to back report will and submissions related rates CITIZENS PANEL newly its for recruited Council the May 8 to April 28 period the During of administration ongoing and construction The Panel. Citizens constructed from independent totally is company a research by provided is panel the panel the of formation The Council. gender, age, of terms (in makeup and sixe sampling to regard in practice best who participants 1059 at sits panel selected randomly The etc). location basis. voluntary a on on issues engage The draft Annual Pla more and formal other the supplement to intended is It feedback. for Panel and facilities and services plans, on its receives Council the feedback informal programme. work Council wider the were members panel which newsletter Plan Annual Draft Council’s the of the completing to prior so) done already not had they (if read to encouraged members panel some plan, the in proposals the of some For survey. a hence view, their to committing before detail more wanting on commented response. undecided high relatively notable most the areas other in comment provided also Panel Citizen The being: In addition a number of open ended questions resulted in considerable written written considerable in resulted questions ended open of number a addition In and comments those reviewed have Officers members. panel from feedback of Officer Summary the within themes key any appropriate as included proposals: following for the Comments 14/574

3/06/2014

Council 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.9 File Ref: 3.8

Item 5 Council report. this for attachments no are There Attachments: . Ref: File R ECOMMENDATIONS

3/06/2014

14/574 F) E) D) C) B) A)

. . .

decisions made during the course of this duringmeeting. made course the decisions forthe appropriate is discretion, its in considers, Council have been observed in such a manner that the Hastings District GovernmentAct 2002, that t Local of (3) the 82 of Section resolves, terms in Council the That asappropriate. by officers brought forward noted be and structure Committee throughthe by Council the is the That comments as amended by the Council at this meeting. onthe based offers officer explanation submissions toand the responses in decisions of anyCouncil advise submissions, their attachedbe received. comments officer and and verbalsubmissions the That written DraftAnnual Plan 2014/15 ” That That Policy. Contributions Development and 2014/15 Annual Plan into the incorporated be this at Council meeting made and amendments decisions the That Strategy of the report the That Manager numerous panel memberswere areas of Economic, Social Development and Youth initiatives, however Strong support was received for Council taking aleadership role in the panel members due to their locality in the district. should also be noted that this question was not applicable to many proposed recycling sites andthe travel time for rural residents. It some of it was conditional on knowing more about the locations for the Good support for the rural recycling initiative was received; however agencies. particularly the use of ratepayer funds and the overlap with other officers forward replies to all submitters that thank them for

sues raised in submissions that require further action

AND R

EASONS

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

dated dated

he principles set out in that section section that out in set principles he cautious on the extent of that role, 3/06/2014 5

titled titled e received.

“

Submissions to Submissions

Page Page 7

Item 5

Council 1 Attachments: 2.0 1.1 1.0 SUBJECT: FROM: MEETING DATE: TO: REPORT Ref: File

Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Annual Draft Comments Officer

3/06/2014

14/573 A) RECOMMENDATION the Council. Comments onthe submissions received to the 2014/15 Annual Plan before The purpose of this report is place the document containing the Officer’s SUMMARY

received. Plan Submissions - Submissions Plan Manager Support Democratic the of report the That

COUNCIL ANNUAL PLAN SUBMISSI M SUPPORT DEMOCRATIC TUESDAY JUNE 3 2014 PALMER RICHARD

Officer's Comments Officer's Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

CP ONS ONS 6 ANAGER

- 01 - - 02 OFFICER'S COMMENTS - 14 ” -

100

dated dated

titled titled 3/06/2014

“ Annual Page Page

be be

Item 6

Page

ld Kaijser ld Kaijser (190)

David Ashby (155) (155) Ashby David (157) Logan Tom Renton (158) Iain (159) Erica Caro (160) Beamish Penelope (162) Mossman David (163) Alan Dickenson (166) Boaler H & G (170) Philip Horn (173) Symons Margaret TrustTumuhau (174) (183) Kupa Daveen (187) Tod Ann Arno Fiona (219) Goodin Paul (220) Harris (221) Breeze Wayne (222) Breeze Wayne Barbara Bruce (217) Bruce Barbara T Corbin (191) Brent Treacher (192) (215) Elliot Martin Trevor (195)Trevor Aitcheson (197) Small Megan (200) Small Michael (202) Moy Stephen Alan (204) Boult (206) Sweet Wayne

(70)

Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS Hugh Findlay (67) (67) Findlay Hugh (68) Peterson Michael Bingley Noel (71) Bull Jack (76) Hill A & C (80) Armstrong Robert (81) Eyssen M Van (82) M Walker & D (84) Mist James Carolyne Kelly (85) Lynette Gentry (86) (87) Lynette Blackburn (98) Beamish Josephine (99) Smith Douglas (100) Beamish Simon (103) J & R Anderson (105) Bill Shaw (106) Rae Matches (108) Paaymans H M & (114) Peterson Amanda Stanley Pship (117) Philip Mardon (122) (124) Kenrick Victoria (126) Menneer Erika R & L Baylis (128) (129) Dimock Kathie (130) Graham Janice (135) Langley Lizzie (153) Colin Lindsay

Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Officer) Financial (Chief Gray Tony

-Thomas (29) (29) -Thomas t Davis (39) Edward Hamilton (7) (7) Hamilton Edward MillsBronwyn (8) (10) Ken McLanachan David (12) Chambers (15) Luki Kasey Dianne (16) Taylor (42) Fenton Sparling G (43) Wezel Carl Dalton (47) Boyd JamiesonTerry (48) Mike Purchas (17) Mike Purchas (18) Milner Faye (19) Hickson Craig (20) Appleby Trevor HislopDave (21) David Barry (25) K Rittson Susan (30) Allen (32) Ross Denton (33) Keane Barry (34) MacDonald Maria Rober (51) McKenzie Stuart Beattie (52) Ian (54) Durney Terrence (60) Lambert Yvonne (61) Janine Candy (64) Jan Daffern SECTION ONE: GENERIC TOPICS RATES – POLICY CHANGES Responsible: Officer Please policy. rating to changes on views their outline submitters of range A Party. Working Review Rating the from analysis and report attached to refer COUNCIL MEETING COMMENCING 03 JUNE 2014

OFFICER COMMENTS ON SUBMISSIONSTO DRAFT 2014/15PLAN ANNUAL SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council (Walking onWater) Redstone (37)Anne BridgemanJohn (45) (Clifton Reserve Society) ThomasDionne (203) (Clifton Marine Club) HursthousePaul (134) Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

refinement of acoastal protection solution. Officers Responsible: EROSION COASTAL HAUMOANA resolved.are Council is not in a position to support this submission until both of these issues revetment. potentialincreaseto du the provision of access; and (b) Hawkes Bay Regional Council regarding the Clifton Marine Club should liaise directly with (a) Angus Gordon regarding the The advice given at this meeting was that the Clifton Reserve Society and the This decision was discussed with representatives of both clubs on 13 May. seas and release ofthe Komar on report sea level rise. further erosion of the unprotected portion of the access road in April in heavy This matter was discussed with Council at its meeting 6 in May, following the boatto ramp. believe wall the has proven successful by halting erosion and securing access the December 2013 by an additional 55m, protect to the entire accessway. support of Council and the HBRC extend to revetmethe CliftonThe Reserve Society the and Clifton (203) Marine Club (134) request the secure boat ramp and campground access. The submitters requests the extension of aprotection wall of 55metres north to Officer Comments: Mike Maguire (Group Manager:Corporate Customer and Services) EROSION COASTAL CLIFTON to the community; the to policies, planning what and physical and/or works are associated with urban development adjacent coastand onland the affordabilityto term, takingaccount into hazards the it that will exposedpressure be to, strategyThe determine will adesired form Hawke’s the for Bay long the in coast management and/ormitigation of identified risks. proposed Regional Coastal Strategy also consider will options range a of for the In to response predictions of Professorthe Paul Komar report change. erosion, sea inundation and predicted the effects of sea level rise and climate A strategic ‘whole of coast approach’ required is address to issues such as coastal Global Officer Comments: Council could offer by way support. of requirement to use private land maintain to access, that there was little more that givendecided that the likelihood occurringof and quan proposed.proposedbeen The strategy identifyandwill hazards potential their beto developed by HBRC, HDC, NCC, mana whenua otherand stakeholders has The submitter requests of Council anongoing working relationship on the Climate Change and Barrier Beach Responses” aregional wide strategy,

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda current context thecurrent of consenting environment the and and Regulatory Services) Planning Manager: (Group O’Shaughnessy John

OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER ration of theof resourceextentration consentfor the the of tify the risks associated with hazards. The 6

At this meeting itwas nt that was built in “Hawke’s Bay Attachment 1

Page Page

They They 11

- -

Attachment 1 Item 6

Page

ional space. ional

s purchased from either either from s purchased

Kim Salamonson (104) (104) Salamonson Kim (107) Walsh Vaughan (109) Freeman Adrian TaylorTrevor (110) Derek Burns (113) (131) Paula O’Boyle Austin (132) Raymond Wood (133) Rosemary (189) Lythgoe Tony Cheryl (194) Andrew (199) Hill Rebecca (201) Athena Galyer (223) O’Leary Michael 6

Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS ision. ision.

Bruce Allan (Strategic Financial Advisor) Financial (Strategic Allan Bruce Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

ext. Noisy power substation. A buffer zone of at least 20 metres has been been has 20 metres least at of buffer zone A power substation. Noisy the Beatson or Moriarty Families between 1899 and 1988. and 1988. 1899 Families between Moriarty or the Beatson space in green Reduction that any indicate engineers Council with Discussions to flooding. Prone levels. Council to normal be mitigated can potential flooding A few submissions made reference to the land been gifted to Council to Council gifted been land the to reference made submissions few A suggests Officers by undertaken Research Family. the Popperwell from that all thewa land for identified development • • • • • • • Marie Greaney (75) Greaney Marie Mapson (78) Ivan (79) Harris Christine (92) Deborah Richardson (95) Adema C & B (97) Fitzgerald Jane Glynn (74) Glynn Burtenshaw Craig Murray (24) (40) Hall Trevor Peter MacCallum (44) (46) Pearce Jenny (69) Wallace Annette (72) Maclaren Olivia Philip Thompson (73)

Officer Comments: Officer will be better placed to address coastal hazard issues at Haumoana in the wider wider the in at Haumoana issues hazard coastal address to placed better be will cont strategic SYLVAN ROAD NETBALL COURTS Responsible: Officers required to achieve that v that achieve to required to further sense little makes it done been has development strategic the Until (WOW) Water on Walking and Council project. groyne Haumoana the advance 26 written submissions have been received in response to Council’s proposal to to proposal to Council’s in response received been have submissions 26 written Netball Road Courts. Sylvan the old or develop selland development residential to any opposed strongly are (24) submitters the of Most the prefer would they that is submitters the from view general the and site this on land to intobe andretained a converted accessible recreat new land: the retaining for reasons given are The following

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

deficiencies andne future eds of specific communities. analyse to Its current is future and space open purpose demand identify to and reserve land resources and the need for additional land to meet future growth. Strategy. Some have noted submitters the that proposal contradictory is Reserves the to Reserves Strategy land. this of opposessale improve any Trustsafety. would The serve to link both the northern, southern and western borders of the park and Akina. have notedThe Trust opening that Windsor partof Pa up this major green space that serves 3 large Hastings Suburbs ofParkvale, Mayfair and The landmarks Trust have also submitted and have noted Windsorthat Park is a including: Submitters have made anumber ofsuggestions for alternative uses of this site gone forever. is gone, it is once land the that is landthis of The general view of numbera of submitters who are opposed potentialto the sale

...... • • • • • Croquet Courts Make courts available for junior netball Swimming Pool Incorporating the withincourts Splash Planet A play area for children An off-lead area for dogs Passive green space BBQ with area landscaped incorporated into the proposed development area. land beingland used for recreational purposes. any development woulddevalue their properties when compared to the submitters reside directly adjacent to the Netball Courts and believe that Devalue properties currently backing Courts. the onto A number of accommodate development this in part of the network. that there is sufficient capacity within the Council networks to Impact onwastewater and stormwater. Council engineers have indicated Parks –Cornwall, Frimley Flaxmereand Proposal not consistentis developmentswith at other Hastingsmajor developmenttakesplace. the if heritagelost would this be part of Windsor Park landscape forming ofthe part spatial design elements, and town houses designed by the Late John Scott were designed with the A number submitters of havementioned that the architecturally designed Park. park, large a area inaccessible,is with Splash Planet and Holiday the A number submitters of have that noted although Windsor Park a is large

The ReservesThe Strategy adopted by 2006 Council in identifies existing

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER

gardens 6

Attachment 1 rk would would rk Page Page 13

Attachment 1 Item 6

Page at 30 June

Proposal for the Regional Sports Park in Park Sports theProposal for Regional 6 Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS at the proposal to sell this land undermines the District District the undermines land this sell to proposal the at Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Park, this figure is now 130.3ha, equating to 4.22ha/1000 people (based (based people to 4.22ha/1000 equating 130.3ha, now is figure this Park, Provision of additional sports fields fields sports additional of Provision Converting the land into Open Space Space Open into land the Converting Discussions with Hastings Netball regarding a requirement for Junior Junior for requirement a regarding Netball Hastings with Discussions Netball ons, ofons, occasi has on a been number consulted community The netball The original Statement of of Statement The original most recently in 2012 as to any future need from a netball perspective perspective a netball from future need any to 2012 as in recently most April/May 2008 which signalled the use of asset sales (specifically the the (specifically sales asset of the use signalled which 2008 April/May Park Sports the for source a funding as site) Netball Road Sylvan development. • • • • • . . . . neighbourhood reserve provision within 500m from residential properties. properties. residential from 500m within provision reserve neighbourhood commended in the Reserves Strategy. In addition, the area surrounding surrounding area the addition, In Strategy. in Reserves the commended to Play Strategy. Play out to and Coming Review Consultation the Annual through undertaken consultation that the indicated has submitter One this on public opinion Obtaining inadequate. been has thisproposal forPlan following: the involved matter has In considering the options available to Council for this site, all practicable all practicable this site, for Council to available options the considering In including: to Council, presented and considered options were Council of a number of light in considered were these options of The assessment Facilities Ground Sports Strategy, the Reserves including strategies and plans re is not the proposal therefore area, deficit identified an is within not Park Windsor Strategy. of the Reserves aims the to contrary considered Plan District th has noted submitter One General zoned land the have to process separate a be however will There Plan. be that would and Plan District theto Proposed a variation through Residential discussion. this undertake to process the appropriate Assessment Option 2006 of 29,350. The Strategy recommended that additional land be acquired to to acquired be land thatadditional recommended Strategy The 29,350. 2006 of in acquisition recommended it addition, In 4ha/1000. least at to level this raise gaps significant were there where Mayfair, and Akina of areas deficit the current in the of and acquisition Park, Nelson sale of the into taking account Today, Whenua and Square Landmarks Park, Nelson William Park, Sports Regional Takoha of 30,843). population on a 2013 the would reduce facility court 1.797ha netball of the proposed Removal minimum the 4ha above still is which 4.17ha/1000, or to128.5ha, provision The 2006 Reserve Strategy identified that reserve provision within Hastings was was Hastings within provision reserve that identified Strategy Reserve 2006 The people. to 3.26ha/1000 95.6ha, equivalent only with for provided poorly Population Resident Zealand New Statistics on based was figure This

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

15% of15% the Citizen Panel respondents disagree with the purchase and a further Percival Road. for things such as additional shelter at netballthe courts or improved access on park sports the into fu invest or rther parkdebt eitherrepay sports to used funds development should encouraged.be wasThere also strong a desire seeto the A number comments of noted morethat inner city living was desirable and this courtsthe at sylvan Road. modern facilities developed Regional the at Sports Park repla majority comments of agreeing with developmentthe of land duethe to the The reasons for support being similar to those identified by Council, with the outlined Annual in the Plan by Citizen the Panel. In the above,to addition was there majority support for(59%) proposalthe as Citizen Panel viewsrange of on the matter within the community. 2014/15 Draft Annual Plan, and that feedback makes evident it that there are a SylvanThe Road proposal one the is of most submitted onissues within the have taken the opportunity present to viewstheir verbally Council. to gives opportunity the community for views heard, be to number a of submitters special consultative proc inform Council and to assist with its decision making process. In officers the view the above has led to considerable feedback being received to with proposalthe are: are undecided.25%

. . . . • • • • of Hastings District citizens. Council’s Citizen– Panel contained Draft with the Plan)Annual has also been sought via the publicWider opinion on proposal the (along other with matters referredabove. to along with a reference to this in the Draft Annual Plan newsletter relevant to this matter. – proximity to the former Netball facility prior to this Annual Plan process A developed factsheet on the proposal was posted onthe Council web Road proposal distributed to 25,000households A summary Plan Draft Annual including the of feature a onthe Sylvan A direct mail drop to approximately 50 affected properties within close The impact on the Scott designedJohn townhouses considered a long way from Park Windsor Transport and accessibility issues with the Sports Park which is Develop for more recreational activities including facilities for families. Desire to see it redevelop into more green space includingdetails on the Dis

The generalThe concerns raised bypondent’s res who disagree

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda edure as required under Localthe Government Act 2002

OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER

a randomly independently and sample selected 6

trict Plansubmissiontrict processwhich also is

cing the needcing the for Attachment 1 The use of the the of use The Page Page site site 15

Attachment 1 Item 6

Page should be be should

tivity

pect to the process followed, any any theto process followed, pect

6 Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS Stuart (Parks Planning and (Parks Development Stuart Rachel Manager) Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

y, Officers have spoken to the lawyer for St Columba’s Columba’s for St lawyer to the spoken have Officers y, submitters would prefer that the land be leased rather than sold to to sold than rather leased be land the that prefer would submitters Ability Ability to land in forsecure public ownership greenspace taken when the opportunity presents itself itself presents the opportunity when taken Improved recreational opportunities opportunities recreational Improved Domain the of integral part be an to environs and its Church users park for provision carparking Improved Improved open space and visual connections from the Domain to the the Domain from open visual space connections and Improved perpetuity in retained Centre Village connec and accessibility linkages, pedestrian Improved

• • • • • • • • • that they would not support a lease arrangement with Council over the land.the over with Council arrangement a lease support would not that they Council. This was considered by Council at its meeting on 30 January 2014, 2014, on 30 January Council its meeting at by ThisCouncil. considered was party a third land from leasing of uncertainties the given that decided it where option a viable not was this that Domain Waimarama the with learnt lessons and identified have themselves Trustees the Property addition In for consideration. Officer Comments: Officer 8 submissions have been received in support of the purchase of the St Columba’s Columba’s the of St purchase the of support in received been have 8 submissions the in Officers by identified as reasons similar for purchase the support All land. with agreement ainto conditional enter to its decision in and Council Fact Sheet, These include: Board. the Church against and 4 abstentions. The Sale and Purchase Agreement has now been been now has Agreement Purchase The and Sale abstentions. 4 and against in Trustees Property Church the with and Clerk, Presbytery the by signed off. final sign awaiting Wellington below: are addressed objection for matters Other Several they should direct their concerns to the Church organisation. The issue for for The issue organisation. Church the to concerns their direct should they of benefit the the for land to purchase it wishes iswhether consider toCouncil been has process correct that the assume must It ratepayers. and the community is not the theIt for role of land Council sale. offering the in vendor followed by been has that no evidence given especially allegations, these orto verify question opposition. in submitters those by produced for clarit However, that confirmed Trustees have Property Church the that verified has who Church, that Title, Land or Gift, of Deed the on conditions or caveats no are there res With be sold. to land gifted the prevents following Trustees, Property Church the Presbyterian by be authorised must sale with 2013, March 16 Sunday on held was This vote congregation. the by avote 5 voted in voted support, 77 members present those Of present. 119 members All submissions in opposition question the legitimacy of the sale and the process process and the of sale the legitimacy the question opposition in All submissions should and St Columba’s to internal These matters are the Church. followed by members, Columba’s St are objectors the of any If Council. by addressed not be HAVELOCK NORTH DOMAIN EXTENSION Responsible: Officers

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council Drew Broadley (26) Jill Thomsen (27) Peter MacCallum (44) (62) Gray William (151) Mueller Graeme Malcolm Eves (3) Eves Malcolm Watkins (9) Bronwyn Johanna King (28) (36) Padfield David (41) Stewart Jim (125) Slade Derek Murray Wood (136) (138) Jo McGlashan (161) Ahsam Bernadette (177) Kevin Rose (181) Haliburton Beatrice (182) Haliburton James (208) Sanders Heather

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

similar to those identified by Council. To To avoid possible conflicts interest, of it is proposed ifthat Council resolv treeThehasmost recently been assessed asa Two submitters support the purchase on the provision that the Blue Gum Tree is 0.17%of and net annual cost to the ratepayer of $100,620. basedis oncurrent market value of $1,080,000, which equates to a rating impact marketcurrent value, which negotiation. formedbasisfor purchase the price The CouncilBoth and the Church Board obtained separate registered valuations of One submitter questions whether current a market been has carried out. valuation theOncea reserve, land is then the Two submitters also question the legitimacy of are undecided.are 13% of Citizen Panel respondents disagree with the purchase and a further 25% outlined in the Annual Plan by the Citizen Panel. In the above,to addition was there majority support for(63%) proposalthe as Citizen Panel notify its notifyintention its purchase to the land, wouldthis include the retention of the for the on- areathe beneath trees’. the the of land purchase wouldplaceresponsibility The concerns. withcommunityconsult the based tree onsafety the of long term onthe future arboriculture care of the fortree 2 years only, before time which will Council residents. petitionof a Council resolved contribute to $2,000/annum towards April 2012, following a request by the Church to remove protected its status, and beto purchased. futureThe ofthis tree was discussed ameeting at ofCouncil i retained. The protected Blue Gum located is tree within the land area proposed enhanced with a condition that requires the Church and Purchase Agreement includes conditions that the land upon purchase be perpetuity, are and concerned future that Councils may the land. The Sale sell Management Plan for the Domain, the land (and if the secured tree) is publicin the wouldtree discussedbe with the community in the preparation of Reserve a tree as per the requirements of the District Plan. Consideration of the future of within the Domain, and limit the potential of the Plunket building. This would potentially preclude the ability to locate additional play facilities responsible ensuringfor underneath the that land r forpotential any minimised. limbIn is future drop addition, Council wouldbe legislative protection over this land. revocation process was to take place. Council cannot provide any further vested under Reservesthe Act 1977. dangerous shouldand be removed others while value its retention. ownership. Two Citizen Panel members commented that they believe the tree is would followed, shouldbe future a Council wish try to status,change and the which . . That otherThat parts of the district may have higherpriority a be legitimate use of the land commercialThat developmenta benefitHave is to lock North wouldand (under current legalisation) require public consultation. goingmaintenance of the tree with Council, to ensure that the

The generalThe concerns raised by respondents are:

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER Reserves Act process for revocation needs to

‘moderate level risk to the users of The reasonssupportThe for being the land being protected in emain largely undeveloped.

first right of refusal if a

Attachment 1

This is further Page Page es to 17

Attachment 1 Item 6

18 oute Page

road pathway road pathway road lime sand sand lime road road This path. - road. There are more more are There road. pedestrians and cyclists cyclists and pedestrians

6 at the creation of recreational routes are not its its not are routes recreational of creation the at Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer

OFFICER COMMENTS Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Manager) Pannu (Transportation Jag

ery. The route was also considered by Council’s Cycle Strategy Strategy Cycle Council’s by considered also was route The ery. resident has offered to contribute towards the cost of creating an off an off thetowards of cost creating contribute to hasresident offered

That the Domain is large enough as it is and would rather see more more see rather would and is as it enough large is the Domain That instead facilities The value for money spend on such a small piece of reserve reserve of piece a small such on spend for money value The . . . . rsections is high priority. The cost of constructing a 1.1km off a 1.1km constructing of The cost priority. high is rsections ed limit to 80 km/h. There is, however, a wide berm available between the the available between awide berm There however, is, to 80 km/h. ed limit Officer Comments: Officer The submitters express safety concerns on Middle Road. Middle on concerns safety express submitters The

pathway on this section is estimated to be $25,000, which would address some some which would address toestimated be $25,000, is on this section pathway to is required investigation concerns. Further (but the all) of submission not remains true as far as the intersection with Iona and Gilpin Roads, a distance of of a distance Roads, Gilpin and Iona with intersection the as as far true remains drainage. with issues minor and only with few obstructions 1.1 km, - an off for area available the intersection, Road Iona the After necessary be likely would landowners with discussions and considerably varies the and a path between separation some to provide which would drainage, including the this section of route, along issues significant estimated. be could construction of cost the before investigation further need Road Iona and Breadalbane between section the that believe Officers inte which formed a loop down Middle Road, and continuing down School Road Road School down and continuing Middle Road, a loopdown which formed of Part the time. the routes at priority of higher in favour rejected butGroup of aim the with NZTA by subsidized is project iWay the that was this for reason and th traffic, reducing commuter felt also was It routes). commuter with coincide they (unless objective primary high. too be to likely was loop complete the creating of cost the that for demand existing is there that is acknowledged It raises provision footpath current is no there fact the that and Road, Middle along limit speed the Road, Breadelbane with intersection the after Shortly risks. safety with no width is 3m The carriageway 100 km/h. on Middle becomes Road the on or pedestrians cyclists overtaking for space little is very there so shoulder, for clearance “1.5m” of a number installed already has Council However road. the to reduce plans no currently are There this route. along signs advisory cyclists spe - off an for suitable be would which line fence the and edge road However, the section from Breadalbane Road onwards has no footpath on either either on footpath no has onwards Road Breadalbane from section the However, from year the last over of comments a number received have officers and side, of risks who of the people this safety number about given the concerned people use One it. of schoolchildren number the citing Road, as far Iona as sandpathway road lime who use this regularly. section r a recreational suggesting residents by approached 2013 Council was In that suggested was It Road. Georges St using North Havelock to returning before visiting families including for cyclists, route recreational a popular isalready this Gall Birdwoods MIDDLE ROAD CYCLEWAY Officers Responsible: cycling and walking iWay the original part to be of planned was Road Middle on RoadPalmerst as will far as soon CBD the between section the and network, bays parking creating work The recent sides. both on lanes cycle with marked be road required provide the to roadsintended is and Exmoor Lucknow between reseal the planned following marked be then will lanes cycle The these. for width of the road.

(55) (55) SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council Kaine Wilson (53) Matt Dixon (56) (56) Matt Dixon (57) Ritchie Rachel Greg Morgan (50) Apatu Maree (58) Fiona Hosford Grainne King (59) (63) Ashby Liz Bettina (101) Driscoll Barb (150) Hansen (171) Coltart Will (216) Brookfield P & B (154) Werff Van Der Helen (164) Macmillan Kate

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Mary Green (156) Peter Snelling (127) Angela Hair (49) (44) MacCallum Peter NobleValerie (35) David Padfield (31) Jenny Blok (14) Bronwyn (9)Watkins Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

public facilitiespublic for accessing water hasthat not had the addition of fluoride at its are undecided.24% of23% Citizen Panel respondents disagree with Council investment and furthera PlanAnnual by the Citizen Panel. There was smalla majority support(53%) for the proposal as outlined in the Citizen Panel House strengthening. making take into account its own financial and investment capacity in this decision Council and sufficient funding from credible partners. In Council will addition Any investment will subject to a detailed business case requiring approval by needed and jobs economic activity. opportunity This has now arisen. infrastructureof has that lackingbeen some for time.It providemuch will international hotel. An international quality is hotel considered essential an piece have over years the taken to steps CBDThe Hotel project is part of Council’s initiatives for avibrant CBD. Council ofA range submitters outline their views on CBDthe proposal.hotel Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: – INITIATIVES CBD proposed route between Iona School and Road intersections. determine cost o the meeting on27 May 2014. The recommendation of officers is that facilities be WorksThe & Officer Responsible: FLUORIDATION WATER investment partners. on the basis of a sound business case, with no ratepayer risk and credible proposal. A number panel members of commented on the lack detail surrounding of the The submitters raise concerns over water fluoridation. similar to those identified by Council. Officer Comments: . . . . . this That if this was commercially viable, private inves itself openitself to financial risk CouncilsThat should facilitate the planning aspects but should not leave Hastings by pulling away customers That there may be adetrimental effect on other smaller hotels in process taking into account other investment priorities such as Opera the wider communitywider benefits CouncilThat funds would betterbe directed on community projects with That it would not achieve the necessary occupancy rates A number of otherpanel members qua

Services CommitteeServices will consider a on report the provision of

The generalThe concerns raised by respondents are: Tony Gray (Chief Financial Officer)

f extendingf along path this remaining the 1.2km the of Agenda Item: Item: Agenda PROPOSAL HOTEL Brett Chapman (Water Services Manager) OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER

The reasons for supporting the pro 6

enhance CBD the including attracting an

lified support for the proposal the lifiedsupport for

tors would leadingbe

Attachment 1

posal being

Page Page 19

Attachment 1 Item 6

20 Page

6 nto rural communities. The Waste Minimisation Minimisation Waste The communities. rural nto Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer t/ Warren St intersection and at Frimley Park. No No Park. at Frimley and intersection St t/ Warren OFFICER COMMENTS

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Officer) Financial (Chief Gray Tony Manager) Services Data and (Waste Jarvis Martin

is envisaged that a permanent recycling facility in Havelock North North Havelock in facility recycling a permanent that envisaged is supportive of the rural recycling proposal however the submitter raised raised submitter the however proposal rural recycling the of supportive

ecommending that the facilities are retained in Tutira and Maraekakaho and and Maraekakaho and in Tutira are retained that the facilities ecommending 62 William Gray William 62 with associated the costs to recover councils enable contributions Development Sherenden/Taihape Road and Waimarama communities. Officers will work with with work will Officers communities. Waimarama and Road Sherenden/Taihape the surrounding inform and location an appropriate to establish local residents ofservice. the community DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS Responsible: Officer Development of Council’s in respect views of range a express submitters The Policy. Contributions Team also had contact directly with four individuals in support of the proposal, support of the in also proposal, with individuals had contact four Team directly communities. Waimarama and Pohue Te the in especially who North Havelock McCallum, Mr Peter from was submission remaining The is trialled container recycling glass of the usability and access the around concerns test the to six pastthe months for trialled been has This container at Place. Martin design it and would designed and provide full access tobe specifically all residents. and Maraekakaho at facilities recycling rural the that recommending are Officers TePohue, the at constructed are facilities new and permanent made are Tutira Comments: Officer Hastings District. Hastings Maraekakaho, at one atSherenden, facility a of support in were four these, Of three representing was submission Pohue Pohue. The Tutiraone and Te at one at properties. neighbouring recycling, rural of in support was submission Farmers Federated The HB r charge. $7 the of supportive was The submission elsewhere. expanded supportive the balance on were survey Panel Citizen in the received Comments i facilities recycling of extending RURAL RECYCLING Responsible: Officer within proposed as service recycling rural the for support express submitters The locations. various on suggestions make and Plan, Annual the Draft the on the public commenting from were received Nine submissions formal the of areas rural the across facilities recycling permanent to establish proposal installed at theS Eastbourne potable of an adequate, lack the to due North Havelock in proposed is facility supply. source Officer Comments: Officer

(38) (38)

(89) Jones Jones - SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council John Craven John (94) Roil Taylor Andrew (112) the(Surveying Bay) William Gray (62) Gray William Surveyors) of Institute (NZ (176) Colin Shanley Sue Read Sue Rowan Plater (6) (11) Ormond Arthur (22) McMillan Jeanette Marcus Ormond (4) (4) Marcus Ormond Tori Thomas (5)

Peter MacCallum (44) Jo Hicks (66)

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council (192) TreacherBrent Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

will be will be incorporated in theof requirement for contributiona on any boundary adjustment application policy clarity. for Minorchanges onpage referredto the 23,and 19and removal Officers agree make to minor some changes its to development contributions however Officers did not support the other changes the submitter recommended. considered by council. An amendment was made in relation to unit titles, The submitter raised number a points of in their submission year last which were Andrew Taylor 112 proposed 2014/15 contributions policy. subjectwere to thorougha review recently which filteredhas through to the catchment was supported. fully recovering infrastructure the costs from those developing within each discussed. The quantum contributions of in Irongate and Omahu Industrial wereareas also Napie Hastings District appears comparable with other like sized councils including policy revisions. The level contributions of charged for infill an subdivision in although greatera disaggregation of costs may outcome an be explored in future currentthe policy has agoodbalance oflocal anddistrictwide catchments catchments the of and level contributions for development. infill Officers believe Council workshops have held been previously and discussed issues around No Roil 94 John to implement the other ch amendment an and unit titles. to relation made However in declined was Council addressed. The submitter highlights that anumber of issues raised previously were not No Craven 89 John boundary consents fees orany physical cost of getting the services the to property revisions. policy through greater disaggregation may outcome an be explored in future comparable with other like sized councils including Napier. Changes to the infrastructure. The level of contributions charged in Hastings District appears growth a in andfair equitable manner from those causing the 176 Colin Shanley contributions policy are appropriate. credit that has lapsed and believe the situations for arefun previously assessed been and paid. Officers do not support the refund of any Communityfor Infrastructure as no financial contribution for activitythis has Credits are provided for these activities under example 6. No credit is provided Wastewater and Stormwater were charged at the time of subdivision. development levy policy, levies covering Roading, Parks and Reserves, Water, contri Council not is permitted to assess development contributions were afinancial building consent being lodged onthat site. through boundarythe adjustment, a contribution will now apply upon any have involved stakeholdergroups throughout design the Costs process. cost and bution has previously been assessed for that activity. Under the r.

. .

No changesrecommended were stage this philosophy at the and of he developmenthe contribution charged is independent of any resource These recommended changes were considered by Council last year

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda to to the 2014/15 policy. Where avacant site is created anges recommended. Officers believe policy the clear is and transparent and OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER 6

d covered in the Attachment 1 need for thatneed Page Page 21

Attachment 1 Item 6

22 ing Page The level of The level of ose developing within ome other renewal tasks

t Development later in the year. the year. in later t Development her like sized councils including including like sized councils her

6 Council is well placed to facilitate growth for a a for growth facilitate to placed well is Council Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer

ood balance of local and district wide catchments catchments wide district and of local ood balance OFFICER COMMENTS like sized councils including Napier. Changes to the the to Changes Napier. including councils sized like Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Manager) Property and (Parks Hosford Colin

y 75% of the residents in the street. Officers have some sympathy sympathy some have Officers street. the in residents the of 75% y No changes were recommended at this stage and the philosophy of of and the at philosophy this stage were changes recommended No Treacher

The submitters request the removal of large street trees on Willow Park South South Park Willow on trees street large of removal the request submitters The species. an alternative with and replacement characteristics environmental negative trees display existing The policy. removal cracking. causing footpath including assets Council on other impacting and are 14/15. in replacement and removal torecommend comfortable are Officers defer could it cases previous follow to the of mind were Council if Conversely Distric to report full a until making decision the for The estimate work. renewal as tree out carried are these projects Typically for the could that is this sum be the earmarked $25,000 and officers advise work s This would mean year. in the financial early task 14/15 Officer Comments: Officer grow the on the public from calls received intermittently have Officers of in Lyell removal the approved recently Council that trees as the same the are Street. up makes on thisissue, this number been made have While 16 submissions approximatel tree the of criteria the with meets request the believe and the residents with budget. fit within to delayed to be need might 194 Brent those from growth from costs associated the isrecover to philosophy Council thatinfrastructure. forthe need and causing developing appears District Hastings in subdivision infill an for charged contributions other with comparable future in explored be an outcome may disaggregation greater through policy revisions. WILLOWPARK STREET TREES Responsible: Officer Napier. also areas were Industrial Omahu and Irongate in of contributions The quantum discussed. th from costs the infrastructure recovering fully recovering supported. was catchment each industry. of types ofrange different for matter a is which Group Force Task a develop to request the note Officers council consideration. South. Road The alder trees trees 34 street on Willowpark by nuisance caused Council workshops have been held previously and discussed issues around around issues discussed and previously been held have workshops Council believe Officers infill development. for contributions level and of the catchments a g has policy the current future in explored bean outcome may costs of disaggregation a greater although in subdivision aninfill for charged of contributions Thelevel revisions. policy ot with comparable appears District Hastings

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council J & L McIntyre (116) (116) McIntyre J L & (119) Wilson Anne Caroline Wahl (120) John Norris (121) (121) John Norris (123) Chris Lang (139)Maree Minogue Wendy Wendy (140) Orchard Jacqui (141) Bishop (143) Thomson & A I (144) Scott Warwick (145) Curley B & I (146) Abrehamsen Chris Beverley McMurtrie (142) McMurtrie Beverley (147) Doggett Margaret T J& (148) Feather Kelly Daniel (149)

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Credit) Social for (Democrats Heather Smith (1) (212) Geniene Taft (211)Conlon Kerry Wayne Bradshaw (209) Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: individual co Officers believe the issues raised by the submitter are out of the influence of any works. taxation,relating to GST on ratesandinterest essentialfree loans for capital The Taxes, GST on Rates and Capital Funding Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: SUBMISSIONS OTHER TWO: SECTION remainder are registered undereither reduced theRural SOPor fee. March only that of 28% dogs registered under are Full fee. Urban the The Councillorswill be aware fromdogthecontrol fees settingreport received in If the Council wishes to align with the fees structure for Napier City, it is Currently, Napier subsidises the dog registration fee by Hastings 25%. currently The request would require asignificant change the to way current the that fees The submitters request the alignment dogof control bylaws, fees andcharges Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: ANDFEES BYLAWS CONTROL DOG any general support within Hastingsthe District for achange. Authorities utilise STVthe system and this in regard officers are not aware of electorsa poll for require to a change STV the to system. Ve post system. Local The Electoral Act enables citizens via ademand from 5%of current policy undertakeThe to Council is past the the by elections of first the system for all Local Government. The submitter requests Council advocate for the Single Transferable Vote (STV GovernmentLocal Voting System has a 10% 10% a has input. Whilst are otherdrivers there in termson- of across Napier City, Hastings District and Central HB. 25% would25% require ratinga input of $225,000. current 10%the input equates approximatelyto $90,000Increasing PA. to this recommended a that proper financial impact assessment be carried out. Note that rating input. operational differences, the dif fees’ Control section from General the Rate. and, set,are particular,in anincrease sub level the in of

submitter requests Council support and lobby for anumber of proposals

uncil best and directed to Central Government.

Tony Gray (Chief Financial Officer) Evans Phil (Community Safety Manager) Agenda Item: Item: Agenda Customer Services) Mike Maguire (Group ManagerCorporate and OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER

6 ference fundamentally is tied the to level of

sidy provided to the Dog

Attachment 1

ry few Local Local few ry costs andcosts Page Page 23

) Attachment 1 Item 6 -

24 The Page and In relation to to relation In store in the Mall, Mall, in the store

term process which involves involves which process term -

a well in place has also Council

6 s group represents the interests, perspectives perspectives the interests, represents s group Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS d enterprise to our CBD. Recent examples of new of new Recent examples CBD. to our d enterprise Customer Services) Customer Manager Dennis Morganand (Group Strategy Development) Mike Maguire (Group Manager Corporate Corporate Manager (Group Maguire Mike Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

ncil’s Positive Ageing Strategy is a vehicle to achieve this in an an this in is a to achieve vehicle Strategy Ageing Positive ncil’s

Officers stress that this this is that a long stress Officers – – tothis with submission regard comments specific any do not have The Cou - Vibrancy Vibrancy - quires a mufti faceted and sustained response from many parties, both public public both parties, many from response sustained and faceted mufti a quires Council direction as to a desire to address the matter is sought. is matter the address to a desire to as direction Council Officer Comments: Officer Officer Comments: Officer Officer Responsible: Officer Officer Responsible: Officer

such as the Hastings City Business Association actively work to grow and and to grow work actively Association Business City the Hastings as such an business new establish home the Farmers of old upgrade include investment CBD the to CBD, people bring to or helped, help, will have initiatives All of these a Over andinvestment. in further turn attract localeconomy the fuel which will business new with repopulated and be rejuvenated will of the years City number enterprise. and this result, a as therefore externalities; many by influenced is and parties many dynamic, a compact, be will result the end However, to eventuate. time will take CBD.vibrant, people orientated integrated and comprehensive manner. comprehensive and integrated (DRG). Group References Disability functioning and established thi processes, and policies Council to Council guide and is to support focus core Group’s Reference Disability society in full participation barriersand enable remove CBD the of sprawl the vacancies, shop regarding observations the to regards With importance the recognised has Council mall. a shopping for need and the CBD, aspiration This place. people active and a vibrant is that a CBD of establishing re agencies and Council District The Hastings of years. a number over private, and building Board old Power and Kmart Complex, of Cinema the redevelopment Kiwibank. of arrival and impending Needs of Senior and Disabled People Disabled and Senior of Needs of to senior the needs consideration gives Council that requests The submitter provision. facility and its planning in people and disabled / Disabled Aging in the of seniors wellbeing the support it best can how considers actively Council their enables that life enjoyable and a fulfilling live can they that so community that in and ways they community; the both economy participation in active choose. with disabilities. living our within community andof expertise people Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations (TPP) Partnership Pacific Trans a of to adoption the consideration give Council the requests The submitter Partnership Pacific the Trans of inrespect concerns outlining resolution negotiation. Officers

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council Janice Britten (13) Britten Janice Greg Rzesniowiecki (2) Rzesniowiecki Greg (Renewables)

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council (Motel Association) MichaelBaines (23) Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: Councils funding policies are based on the requirements of the Local business sector. The submitter comments on the costs Charges for services to small and medium business sector pools intended for swimming or similar activity. proposed changes the includes Act to explicit an provision limiting fencing to Employment is proposed it and thethat legislation be amended. will The legislationThis been has reviewed by Ministry Business, the Innovation of and waterfeatures unless theya Swimming 1987. Pools doesThe Act not require fencing swimming of or pools legislation controlling the fencing of swimming pools is the Fencing of The depth of centralthe city water feature 275mmis itsat deepest. The current swimming pools onprivate property have beto fenced. submitterThe askswhycentral the city water feature not fencedwhen is Fencing of the Central City Water Feature Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: key retail and service attractors. mobility impaired is available within the CBD particularly in close proximity to seating. The sa seating, we welcome any specific feedback ofareas warranting additional endeavour to consult with wide a range groups of on matters such as public around areas ofheavy pedestrian movement and people activity. While we seatingpublic is appropriately located in and around the approach publicto space planning is to ensure that street furniture, including The comments around providing suitable public seating are noted. Council’s CBD Officer Responsible: significant. where ac division the separatea use under council policy. Furthermore Council may a rating consider They will attract additional uniform and targeted rates asthey would be consider acc Council applies its general rate differential on a predominant use basis so significance of the impacts, changes the were introduced over aperiod of 8 years. commercial sector to the residential and Hort/Farming Due sectors. to the of the general rate differentials which saw a general shift to those who benefit from the services provided. This included a thorough review fair and equitable aspractical ensure to ratesthe and other fees and charges relate considerable resources over years the ensure its rating policies and systems as are Government Act and the Local Government Rating Act. Council has invested ommodation provided as a secondary activity will not be rated commercial. -

Public seatingPublic Parking and

me applies to ensuring a suitable provision of parking for the

Tony Gray (Chief Financial Officer)

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda Regul and Planning Manager (Group O’Shaughnessy John John O’Shaughnessy (Group Manager Planning and Planning Manager (Group O’Shaughnessy John commodation provided as secondary a activity is OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER re deeperre than 400mm. atory

of of doing business for the small and medium

CBD, particularly in ratesin fromthe Attachment 1 Page Page 25

Attachment 1 Item 6

Page area for for area

playground, either side of the the of side either playground, aspects of motel accommodation accommodation of motel aspects vironmentally responsive surface surface responsive vironmentally

6 The day to day maintenance of the area is area of the maintenance to day day The Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS Road marking is programmed for early July and will be July for is and be early will programmed Road marking Regulatory

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: – Manager) Property and (Parks Hosford Colin

nt areas where Council does have decision making discretion discretion making decision have does Council where areas nt

Road marking marking Road While the surface was resealed last year, vehicles are driving off the the off driving are vehicles year, last resealed was surface the While the of degradation is This causing hump. speed the avoid to surface of a couple install will officers condition, worsening a avoid To berm. the around those ropereplicating bollards, is cost This accessway. sealed the on traffic keep help to bumps, speed budget. existing the within be achieved can and $2000 approximately Campervan parking – parking Campervan improved surface all year round. Should funding be available, officers available, officers be funding round. Should surface all year improved en laying a more recommend would parking extended An Pavers. Grass or Permathene blocks as Gobi such allocation is $75,000. There no funding approximately cost area would in the to budget cover this request. undertaken by the Maintenance Group but the popularity of the of popularity the but Group Maintenance the by undertaken area. sealed the of extending desirability the highlighted has campervans an provide would surface hard of form the some that agree Officers

3) 2) 2) 1) 1)

area in Clive Enhancements area the Clive in enhancements where areas of number a outlines submitter The desirable. are The two significa currently is Plan District Council’s system. rating and Plan District its in are Proposed the under apply rules and types accommodation and what review under the by addressed be will matters these on decisions The discussed. be will Plan 2014. in later Committee Review Plan District Act Building the it be whether implements Council that legislation of areas all In responsibilities. their by defined care of duty a has Council regulation, or health different how that define provisions and regulations the usually it is However decisions. local Council not are these and treated, are accommodation oftypes accommodation providers.accommodation by imposed regulations of and fairness equity the questions The submitter for required those to relative providers accommodations commercial on Council providers. accommodation certain residential various regulates which framework legal The in a role has Council which those categories; two into divided be can the Acts as Building (such and other regulations, its Plan District formulating, government. central by set are which Act), decision policy has Council assumes and up these roles mixes This submission legislation. health various and Building the in matters over discretion making Officer Comments: Officer residential versus Commercial for Standards and Regulations Regimes, Safety Therefore to amend this legislation the Motel Association needs to communicate to communicate needs the to this legislation Motel Therefore Association amend government. to central their views Officer Comments:Officer Officer Responsible: Officer

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council Tony Loversuch (65) (65) Loversuch Tony

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: further discussions. submission to the NZ Transport Agency for their consideration and subsequent sections o management intersection operationthe and immediately of and its adjoining managed NZ bythe Agency Transport who has responsibilityfull for the The intersection of School Road with Highway State Road Clive, 2,Main is required repairsfootpath The submitter outlines safety concerns on the School Road intersection and RoadSchool Intersection and Clive Dairy Footpath 7) ) Donation box campersfor – Officers will investigate the current situation 6) 5) 4) 8) and District wide promotion. planned to be installed thein current year as part of the improved signage Plan) includes banners for Clive. Officers can advise that some are upgrading flaginfrastructure (with $100,000 included Annual this in Flags Clive Entrance Signs – Riverside area alongside the boat ramp - work $5000. is an all year round central Clive attraction. The estimate undertake to this – lighting Tree undertake the request out of existing budgets. ascertainto as whetherto abetter location is available and so,if will will beand undertaken in June under existing budgets. stop the bank already offers good walking safe opportunities. 250metres of Council owned reserve. Arguably existingan walkway on would require an additional allocation of $75,000 to cover only the a While boardwalk would be attractive an addition along river the edge it period. Debris would also collect on the framing during highertides. estuaries, but the level of the Clive river fluctuates greatly over a12 hr range tidal the Boardwalk concept- mind set aside to additionalan $20,000. undertaken be could improve to recreation this area if Council the was of additional picnic ta policy to locate is them conjunction in with playgrounds. Some area wellis treed and while ashade sail would be nice have,to Council’s regressing the area for recreation or picnic usage. Officers note that this continue the existing bollard fence, addiand this area would benefit frommake a undertaken f side roadsf (School Road). will the Officers copy forward this of – Officers support this request and advise that proposal the for

as when and required in the future under existing budgets.

Jag (TransportationPannu Manager)

Officers can seethe merit in this proposal as willit create Agenda Item: Item: Agenda of the Clive River. It better is suited to areas such as opposite Clivethe Dairy. OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER bles and enhancements, including tidy up, jetty a Officers believe this may well be impractical due to the cl the 6

eaning signs ofthe already is programmed - over and can support the request to Officers agree that aesthetically

ng some and topsoil Attachment 1 Page Page

Attachment 1 Item 6

28 Page

6 Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer an be given where some reasonable and justifiable justifiable and reasonable some where given be an OFFICER COMMENTS Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Arterial project net cost is currently estimated at at estimated currently is cost net project Arterial

Manager) Safety (Community Phil Evans Manager) Pannu (Transportation Jag Manager) Property and (Parks Hosford Colin Manager) Pannu (Transportation Jag

ways, 2000 shrubs were planted along the track/stream edge at at edge the track/stream along planted were shrubs 2000 ways, -

fronting shops on both sides of State Highway 2 including opposite opposite including 2 Highway State of sides both on shops fronting

All Clive footpaths were upgraded under the 3 year renewal/repair programme. programme. renewal/repair year 3 the under upgraded were footpaths Clive All footpaths All with conjunction in programme this under included were the Dairy inspection An CBD. Clive the of front in out carried work beautification/upgrade arethere that no issues confirmed has with footpaths of the the footpaths in this area. retail Officer Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer Officer Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer Bus Shelters Bus Responsible: Officer iway network. the along Whakatu in plantings As part of the i the time the at and project driven a community primarily was This Whakatu. for cost annual The estimated for. budgeted not was maintain cost to discretionary no has budget maintenance Parks The is $5000. maintenance is to allowance and this work be if carried funding thenspending out additional local to that assistance advise also can Officers made. be should provision bees c working community is sought. assistance Responsible: Officer Fees Dog dog the in expenditure versus income the on information requests The submitter control activity. This has information provided to thebeen submitter. Comments: Officer Plantings Iway native maintaining of cost the with to assist funding requests The submitter Comments: Officer (estimated at net cost of $4.8M) which will be 100% funded by the New Zealand Zealand the New by funded be 100% will which $4.8M) of cost net at (estimated will ($14.95M) cost the project The of net (NZTA). balance Agency Transport (39%). District Council the Hastings and (61%) NZTA the be between shared include the NZTA 100% doesThe in draft plan not quoted the annual figure to NZTA. project belonging Highway a State is which cost the part of funded meeting. June its 26 at the project consider The further will Council Road Arterial Whakatu Road. Arterial the of Whakatu the cost on comments The submitter TheWhakatu total Road SH2/Napier roundabout at legged the 5 includes This $19.75Million.

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council Des Ratima (88) Ratima Des Brian (83) Fulford

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council (Sports Park Hawkes Bay) Jock MacKintosh (90) Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

facilityat the SportsPark. The submitter outlines a proposal for the development of an outdoor aquatics Regional Sports Park Development be considered aspart of this review. on any changes in 2015the RatingThe policythe onthe remission postponementand of rates on Maori freehold land. reviewed every 6 years using special the consultative procedure. This includes Local GovernmentThe (2002) Act requires rating numberof a be policies to arewhich more commonly know The submitter seeks the removal of any form of rates on Maori reservations Rate Remission on Maori land Reservation / partofas previous Long Term Annual and Plan Planning processes. this activity anetwork at level. Council have previously considered this request currently suggest for to officers possible Council that confidentlycould in invest Unfortunately given t supporting school transportroutes. for the fund infrastructure dueroutes, continuousto change, there is no commitment from ministry the to longevity any of the of current services and given the confidence lack of in the The Ministry date have to unable been to provide any certainty re transport service delivered by Ministry the Education. of transportpublicextend the service private into Whakatu.School transport a is transport. The Hawkes Bay R Council Public Transport Service, however provisionthis excludes school related Transport Infrastructure required for supporting the Hawkes Bay Regional CouncilThe has made annual provision within Longthe for Term Public Plan Whakatu.in The submitter seeks Council funding to support the installation 3bus of shelters Canoe Polo to use the HDC network. Pool outdoor aquatic facility at the Sports Park wouldcompletely replace the need for HDC network pool may difficult be backto It fill. is not expected that the week where usage is typically low, therefore any loss of canoe polo from the revenue per annum fromPolo usersCanoe generallyand at times of daythe and users. Currently HDC the network Pool generates estimatedan $70,000 of facility which means generati breakeven this with ablebe to expect to Trustssubmissionnotes theythat The Regional Sports Park there anwill be impact on the Pool network. OfficersWhile are supportive of outdooran aquatic facility development at the Officer Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer Comments: Officer Responsible:

review Working review dothis partywill during 2014/15 consult and

Tony Gray (Chief Financial Officer) he lack ofconfidence presented by Ministry,the not is it Agenda Item: Item: Agenda Bruce Allen (Strategic Financial Advisor) Financial (Strategic Allen Bruce

OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER - 25 Long Term Plan. views ofThe the submitter will ng income up of aboutto $50,000 per annum from egional Councilegional does not have any plans current to n as Marae.as n

Attachment 1

garding the the garding Page Page 29

Attachment 1 Item 6

30 s for Page 2014 Annual Plan ‘Our ‘Our 2014 Annual Plan -

of Local Government to achieve to achieve Government Local of

and questions the basis for those costs. the for basis costs. those and questions

6 2022 (LTP) sets ‘Our Vision the which out for from those developing within each catchment catchment within each developing those from Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS

Local Public Services’. This sets out the current and and the current sets out This Services’. Public Local design and cost process. The submitter noted the cost thecost noted submitter The process. and cost design Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

f fully recovering the infrastructure costs associated with with associated costs the infrastructure recovering f fully Officer) Financial (Chief Gray Tony

lows:

Community Outcomes – Community development. youth including social priorities and development economic Local Public Services are contained within its 2013 its within contained are Services Public Local and old, in people young the help of needs meet which public services “Local households. and businesses and locals, need, visitors a business, building and attracting ‘supporting includes need future Current and jobresilient and rich local economy. with is also consistent activities development in economic Involvement 2012- Plan Term Long Council’s The proposal is consistent with the purpose the with consistent is The proposal Hastings the of needs future and current the to achieve aim which outcomes public services local local infrastructure, quality for good District Community Outcome Community Council’s functions. regulatory of and performance public local of provision to the in relation the of District needs future anticipated fol as services Future’ gefits packa assistance financial economic proposed the how asks submitter The Local the of 2 part the 2 of part sub under and powers functions Council’s within and the Authority Local the ofrole the in particular Actand 20012 Government emphasis on the of provision core services. contributions for Omahu and Irongate and Omahu for contributions other and Policy Incentives Financial the of respect in raised also are Questions Plan. Annual Draft the in outlined initiatives new Officer Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer Public opinion on these matters has been tested via the Citizen Panel which which Panel thevia Citizen tested been mattershas these on opinion Public Other New Initiatives New Other security, CBD on centre Plan the Annual within focus enhanced of Areas those ring fenced developments fenced ring those supported. was stakeholder involved have and transparent and is clear policy the believe Officers thegroups throughout 2014/15 to proposed the through filtered has which council by undertaken review policy. contributions Policy Incentives Financial The submitter raises concerns in respect of the quantum of development of quantum of in the development respect The raises concerns submitter and Irongate Omahu Contributions Development of a range issues discussing last 12 months the in held were workshops Council in Irongate of the contributions level including contributions around development stage at that recommended were changes No catchments. Industrial Omahu and o and the philosophy Development Contributions Contributions Development

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council

Kevin & Karen Bayley (91) Bayley Karen & Kevin

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Saving Club) (Waimarama Surf Life James Lavery (96) Club) BennelongBike Mountain (HB Adventure Race / TimWilkins (93) Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

note that the plan may some need amendment ensure to coastal hazards are worksThese are not currently budgeted in Councils work programme. Havelock North village, and those that link existing reserves. particular in the opportunity connectWaimarama to Road with MataPeTe Some proposed routes also usefuloffer linkages to ofparts the existing network, allowing the network attract to a wider range ofusers. also offer more variety for rec Hawkes Bay, not just to locals but also to visitors to the region. in network cycling and walking the to addition significant very a become Officers agree individualsthe involved. someof Officers are currently investigating the proposed pathways, and have met with currently have $24,500 towards the project.$24,500 towards the currentlyhave They remainder. the raise fund $50,000from Theyto intend requestCouncil. proposal.the ClubThe estimates whole the structure costwill $150,000 they and through at the developed planning phase. brought be backto the Domain to thesedetails that can in worked note be but addition Hastingsin to Council District consents. Officers probably it feel needs avoided orminimised. This will require Hawkes Bay Regional Council consent value look but appropriate givene coastal th forces at play, officers guardedly tower and servicethe it provides. threatseaward from erosion. showingtower is signs of advanced deterioration andfoundations its are under replacement with a purpose built replacement tower viewing deck. The existing Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: shows high for rates approval shows The Club haveThe forwarded concept their plans for redevelopment onface which cyclewaysand public betweenTe Mata Peak networks The submitter requests funding of $100,000 with assist developingto cycle competing priorities. to exist currently assist so request the needs to considered be alongside other suppor Officers feel the oflevel community commitment benefitand is high wouldand The key issue before Council to decide whether it wishes to financially support While While the Club owns the tower, historically, the HBC Council has supported the The WSLSC funding assist the to removal request in existing of the tower andits t t the request for what amounts to a third of the project cost. No funds that, basedthat, on the proposed routes, the paths have the potential to

Colin Colin Hosford (Parks and Property Manager) Jag (TransportationPannu Manager) Agenda Item: Item: Agenda OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER

Council focus thesein areas.

reational routes than currently is available, 6

The paths would would paths The Attachment 1

Page Page ak and and ak 31

Attachment 1 Item 6

32 ovide would

Page

The paths

(Water Services Manager) Services (Water

6 (Transportation Manager) Manager) (Transportation Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer connect Waimarama Road with Te Mata Peak and and Peak Te Mata with Road Waimarama connect Whakatu OFFICER COMMENTS - - Brett Chapman Jag Pannu Agenda Item: Agenda Item: ever, when the Clive River is in flood, stormwater service service stormwater flood, is in River the Clive when ever,

a pump station. a pump

involved. individuals included in the 2014/15 Annual Plan budgets to construct a stormwater pump pump stormwater a construct to budgets Annual Plan 2014/15 the in included ovision of a gravity stormwater system to improve services and reduce the the reduce and services to improve system stormwater of a gravity ovision stormwater detention options in the Whakatu West area as a result of questions questions of a result as area West Whakatu the in options detention stormwater land lying the low to fill in seeking were who Ltd Tanneries Lowe Graeme from stormwater services at those times when the gravity system is compromised. is compromised. system the gravity when times those at services stormwater this that agreed 2006 who in participants the scheme by adopted not 2 was Stage that might level a reached development when time a until deferred be could trigger the need for not has development of level the but budget Plan Community Council Term been reprogrammed and has it initiated subsequently to this project be required to 2019/20. pr Stormwater area. industrial in Whakatu land the flood to for stormwater potential to stormwater conveys which pipeline a gravity into discharged and collected is How River. the Clive is disrupted and backs up in the system and onto the land within the industrial industrial theland the within and onto up in the system and backs is disrupted inception. to the area, as it prior did schemes opportunities within Te Mata Park. Park. Mata Te within opportunities Whakatu industrial area. area. industrial Whakatu be land. their within ponding stormwater to mitigate Whakatu instation due to flood in the pipeline levels gravity is ofreduced the existing the capacity River. Clive Officer Responsible: Officer Officer Comments: Officer Officer Responsible: Officer Stage 2 includes the construction of a stormwater pump station to pr station pump a stormwater of construction the includes 2 Stage Long thein 2011/12 proposed was $1.8M of budget a preliminary time, At that station and assesspump to undertaken was an2013, investigation May In The Whakatu stormwater scheme consists of two stages. Stage 1 included the the included 1 Stage stages. two of consists scheme stormwater Whakatu The Management Stormwater in the infrastructure of stormwater in respect concerns raises The submitter funding that Ltd requests Tanneries Lowe of Graeme behalf on Thesubmission when events rainfall in of stormwater ponding to is subject question in The land Officers are currently investigating the proposed pathways, and have met with with met have and pathways, proposed the investigating currently are Officers of the some to potential the have paths the routes, proposed on the that, based agree Officers become a very significant additionto the walking and cyclingnetwork in region. the to visitors to also but locals to just not Bay, Hawkes available, is currently than routes recreational for variety more offer also of users. range a wider to attract network the allowing network, existing the parts of to linkages offeruseful also routes proposed Some into theparticular opportunity reserves. existing link that those and village, North Havelock programme. work Councils in budgeted currently not are These works The submitter requests funding of $50,000 for further development of cycling cycling of development further for $50,000 of funding requests The submitter Officer Comments: Officer

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council (Surveying the(Surveying Bay) Andrew Taylor Taylor Andrew (111) (Te Mata Park Trust) Park Mata (Te Bruno Chambers (102) Bruno Chambers

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

The alternativeThe is for the developer to construct own their pump station Council wouldneed undertake to evaluation further of pump a proposal station in roughInitial costs order for combined a pump station$1.0M range between and The cost for each component would then be apportioned on the basis of this The Stage 2 pump station was never intended to cater for the effects of filling as T The submitter is claiming Council that is responsible providingfor pump a A pump would station offset flooding effects caused as result a of filling the low Ther conjunction with the WhakatuWestscheme gauge participants to whether there developer would bear this portion of the cost alone. with$3.6M significant a proportion relating land mitigation of filling. to The landof being filled and the amount storage of as lost a result of g. fillin lying and land the sizeof the pump station (and cost) is proportional to the extent development are avoided, remedied mitigated. or risk. RMAThe and Districtthe Plan generally require that the adverse effects of increase the level of flooding otherproperties onto subjecting them greater a to that is subject to storm the partiesthe as how to the costs will be apportioned. still remains the most desirable outcome but this will require agreement between inefficient from operationalan and cost perspective. A jointly developed project separately from Stage the 2 proposal however o work it will if only benefit the submitter’s development proposal. exteand through Targeted a addition Rate. pumpThe a of will increase the station rate was support for such aproposal. Many still are paying off Stagethe 1 costs design and the extent of filling, could and be staged as development occurs. storage from filling. design could c proposed by submitter the however possible it is combined a that pump station opting Stage for the 1development only. CliveRiver. Thisariskisthat exis the ting scheme participants accepted when gravity system as discharge would not be impacted by high river levels the in station would however provide an additional level of protection over Stagethe 1 5year up design.flows the to threshold This not has yetreached. been pumpThe when it reaches a point where the gravity system no is longer able conveyto derivedrunoff from development the of land (buildings hardstand and areas) incorrect.is property such thethat ponding will area no longer be required. assumptionThis station (Stage 2 option) that will allow the landowner to infill and develop the consult on adetailed proposal. budgetcurrent is suggested enable to projectthis to developed be and then to progress$150,000 sufficientofamount to work. thisAn addition the in to bringing forward additional funds from proposed the Long Term (2019/20) Plan remains unspent. Advancing detailed design full require a project to will this he Stagehe 2pump only intended is serviceto station additional the stormwater e is $150,000 in the 2013/14 capital works budget for Whakatu which nd the repayment period so there may be areluctance advanceto this

ater for both components i.e. development and flows loss of

water ponding. Theeffect of filling would the land be to Agenda Item: Item: Agenda OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER

fficers believethatwould this be

Attachment 1 Page Page 33

Attachment 1 Item 6

34 Page

inspection cycle is in place to ensure to cycle is in place ensure inspection has been reviewed by the Ministry of of Ministry the by reviewed been has developed a Community Plan under a a Plan under Community a developed

6 years. Extending the current swimming pool swimming current the Extending years. - Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer

the submission, with the exception of crime, are are crime, of exception the with submission, the OFFICER COMMENTS

recently started inspecting swimming pools toensure swimming inspecting started recently

Dennis Morgan Manager: (Group and Strategy Development) Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Manager) Consents (Building Hart Malcolm

Akina inspection cycle. The reThe - cycle. inspection Review of the Camberley Community Plan Community Camberley of the Review A Waipatu Marae based community plan community based Marae Waipatu A A Rural Community Plan RuralA Community • • • • • • pools no less than once every 5 every once than no less pools new when be considered could 3 to 5 years from cycle inspection safety is implemented. legislation of Swimming Pools 1987. This legislation legislation This 1987. Pools Swimming of will legislation the that andis it proposed Employment and Innovation Business, be amended.

Officer Comments: Officer Officer Responsible: Officer infrastructure related and can be assessed by relevant teams within council as a a as council within teams relevant by assessed be can and related infrastructure duties. normal of matter Recently the Council has reviewed the Flaxmere Community Plan and developed developed and Plan Community the Flaxmere reviewed has theCouncil Recently Anderson and Awanga Haumoana/Te Waimarama, for plans community new in Council to be presented Plan will Community North Havelock draft A Park. has community Whakatu the and July Kokori. Te Puni with has that Council contract include: plans community possible Other by identified The issues Community Plan - Plan - Community area. Akina the for plan a community of development the requests The submitter thatthe proposes submitter the whether to as the submission from unclear was It Plan or the to Community Council adopt attached the “draft” an develop Akina submission. pool fencing continues to comply with the legislation. withlegislation. the to comply continues fencing pool has Council City Napier swimming to reinspect Council requires that a proposal includes The review The submitter outlines concerns regarding the cost of the pool inspection service. inspection pool the of cost the regarding concerns outlines submitter The enable to in 2003/04 commenced programme pool safety swimming Council’s Pools of Swimming theFencing obligations under itsstatutory toCouncil meet benefit:10% private 90% is the programme for policy funding The Act 1987. rate targeted based an annual is by funded component The private public benefit. - re year a three on The rate annum. per $31.50 rate of a targeted with commenced The progamme proposed is and pressures inflationary with pace keep to then since increased has $46.00. to to increase service. this for imposed is charge annual no however fenced, properly are they pools is of the swimming Fencing the fencing controlling The legislation current Swimming Pool Safety Rate Safety Pool Swimming Officer Responsible: Officer Officer Comments:Officer

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council Anne Wilson (115) (115) Wilson Anne Amanda Peterson (114) (114) Peterson Amanda

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council (SPCA) ArcusSharon (137) StewartMoira (118) Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

in sealin coat to be applied in 2014/2015. The smaller chip size will assist g in Urbanthe areas. The sections are programmed a for second coat Grade 4/6 Rack Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: Council has no Council has statutory roleto the play control in strayof cats.Unlike dog submitterThe requests Stray cat population parksthe team spring, in from budgets. existing certainly benefit from a weed spray under and sow, which can undertakenbe by hasrate been poor which has led to additional weed growth. The lawn would Officers have undertaken an inspection ofthe berm and note that the grass strike frontage. lawn her of submitter respect concernsin raises The MasseyStreet lawn frontage Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: have no been previous complaints regarding existing berms this in road. a reduction in tyre noise once full chip embedment has been achieved. There of Grade 3/5 Rack These sections of Massey Street were seal reconstructed coat in 2010 and afirst The submitter raises concerns about the Massey Street road surface. MasseyStreet road surface consideration alongside other priorities. organisations. The suggestion for communitya Akinaplan for warrants identified may led the fromschools local best be within other and community consulted about the idea of Akina an community plan. Some the of opportunities fromIt clear not submission how is many the groups people local and have been Given the protectionlack of and noclear mandate afforded by legislation, This Council ceased the practise of supplying cat cages the to public last year. Various Councils do carry out some level of assistance with the control of feral action planaction respectin of stray cats. Counci control (carried out under the Dog Control Act 1996), any activity carried out by cats this at time. Officers do not recommend Council that become involved the in control of stray Port. City provides funding the SPCA local to to control feral cats in aroundand the management strategy. Hamilton provides cat cages to residents for a fee. Napier cats; for example Gisborne District Council includes feral cats under their p being recovered from owners.

l wouldl have to be funded through the General Rate rather than costs

- in applied.in This seal is standard practice for 1st coat seals in

Phil Evans Phil (Community Safety Manager) Jag (TransportationPannu Manager) Colin Colin Hosford (Parks and Property Manager) Council to setup aworking party and to develop an Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER

Attachment 1

Page Page iving

35 est est

- Attachment 1 Item 6

36 Page

the Whakatu Industrial the Whakatu

u residential area by reducing by area residential u

Hastings Expressway for the road road the for Expressway - Hastings

6 (Transportation Manager) Manager) (Transportation Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS enhance and improve the safety and efficiency of the the of the and efficiency safety improve enhance and Jag Pannu Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Arterial project net cost is currently estimated at at estimated currently is cost net project Arterial

“…

Officer) Financial (Chief Gray Tony

Enhance the safety of the Whakat it.” freight through movements Promote the use the the use of Promote Napier between vehicles and freight of transport of Napier; Port the Area and Havelock between access safe and efficient convenient, Provide north and Napier’s Airport Napier/Hastings the North and and areas; residential and employment western Provide convenient, efficient and safe access for freight freight for access safe and efficient convenient, Provide Area; Industrial Whakatu the from and to movements Improve accessibility for individuals and businesses and support and businesses and individuals for accessibility Improve productivity; and growth economic i Road with a view to achieving the overall objectives of the the of objectives overall the achieving to a view with i Road • • • • • • • • • • tter makes a number of observations about the policy and appears to to appears and policy the about of observations a number makes tter quiry by design exercise clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of the the of effectiveness the demonstrated clearly exercise design by quiry transport network of the district and region so as to: to: so as region districtthe and of network transport could be managed on a collective regional basis by a wholly transparent and and transparent a wholly by basis regional collective on a managed be could body. independent option was found to be the best in achieving them. It also carries the highest highest the also carries It them. in achieving best the to be found was option (BCR). ratio cost benefit Responsible: Officer Policy Incentives Financial and Initiatives Development Economic urges and development on economic focus enhanced the supports The submitter matters. on these approach a regional The submi activity this that suggested has submitter The policy. general the of supportive be All options have been assessed against these objectives. The recommended recommended The objectives. these against assessed been have options All Comments: Officer Theen the following out carried were designs which further on option, recommended acceptance. Council’s North SH2 between link strategic a provides (WAL) Link Arterial TheWhakatu and Pakowha to: which are WAL, The submitter comments on the cost and alignment of the Whakatu Arterial Arterial Whakatu the of alignment and cost on the comments The submitter Road. TheWhakatu total Road SH2/Napier roundabout at legged the 5 includes This $19.75Million. Zealand the New by funded be 100% will which $4.8M) of cost net at (estimated will ($14.95M) cost the project The of net (NZTA). balance Agency Transport (39%). District Council the Hastings and (61%) NZTA the be between shared include the NZTA 100% doesThe in draft plan not quoted the annual figure to NZTA. project belonging Highway a State is which cost the part of funded Whakatu Arterial Road Arterial Whakatu Officer Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council Dianne Vesty Dianne Vesty (152) Fruitgrowers) (HB

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council (Landmarks Trust) (165) Barry Joyce Bernadette Ahsam (161) Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

Officers Responsible: Façade Enhancement Scheme Enhancement Scheme, Street AsAwards and Lighting Up Stoneycroft project The submitter asks for consideration additional of funding for the Façade projects in an integrated manner. Square, Hotel, a HBOH other and CBD projects, Council is approaching these Because of the synergetic relationship between the redevelopment of Civic House strengthening initiatives and within Civic Square. making process taking into account other investment priorities such as Opera the take into account its own financial and investment capacity in this decision Council and sufficient funding from credible partners. In Council will addition Any investment will subject to a detailed business case requiring approval by neededand economic jobs activity. infrastructureof has that lackingbeen some for time.It providemuch will international hotel. An international quality is hotel considered essential an piece have over the CBDThe Hotel project is part of Council’s initiatives for avibrant CBD. Council proposals.hotel The submitter comments on the relative merits of the Civic Square and CBD Civic Square and Hotel formatter Council consideration. recommendations to Council. A regional approach as outlined is a governance proces The be enhanced,be with estimated an grantcontribution from $117,000 of Council In 2012 Officers identified 38 priority buildings within the CBD that have yet to While annualthe allocation fluctuated, has the current allocation is $22,000. commercialthe areas Hastings. provides grant assistance for the painting and enhancement ofbuilding facades in Council’spart of ong Council has operated the FES since September 1993 and was originally set up as limiting progress.budget CBDthe can attributedbe this to scheme, it is under constant pressure, with the leasees of CBD buildings. While p produce a wintotal - Façadethe Enhancement Scheme. They state that scheme the continues to The Landmarks Trust requests the allocation of anadditional $10,000 towards Officer Comments: Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: s proposed transparentis and objective with astaff committee making years taken to steps enhance CBD the including attracting an

oing commitment to the revitalisation of the inner city. It win outcome for Council, residents and ownersthe and Officer) Financial Tony Gray (Chief Agenda Item: Item: Agenda Manager) Stuart Development and (Parks Planning Rachel

OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER

This opportunity This has now arisen. art of the revitalisation of the art andbeautification of 6

Attachment 1 Page Page 37

Attachment 1 Item 6

38 Page

6 Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS ial for Stoneycroft to be lit at night. This was in in was This night. at lit to be Stoneycroft for ial

Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

ced streetscape, and would be a 6 year programme within the the within programme year 6 a be would and streetscape, ced ycroft’

stance to the Sign Incentive Scheme, which encourages tenants tenants encourages which Scheme, Incentive Sign the to stance

al and advertising, which was largely met within existing budgets of the the of budgets existing within met largely which was and advertising, al ards’ that were successfully held last year. year. last held successfully were that ards’ ght using the car park; (2) provide building and site security; and (3) improve and (3) and sitesecurity; improve the provide building using park; (2) car ght The submitter requests financial support for 2015 Anzac Day Gallipoli centenary centenary Gallipoli Day Anzac 2015 for support financial requests The submitter determination. Council for This a matter is andservice. commemoration Council has previously authorised expenditure of up to $10,000 as a contribution a contribution $10,000 as to up of expenditure authorised previously hasCouncil event the2015 of significance the Given commemorations. Day Anzac towards contribution. level of wish a to greater consider may Council

it reported was meeting, Group Advisory Landmarks 2013 At its 20 September Electronic Innovative from Newport Denis with contact in been had officers that of with Building in the the Hastings, TSB involved was lighting who Designs with regard to the potent work proposed The night. at facility the of users of concerns safety to response The park. car the and trees two building, main the of lighting the involve would be would features heritage so its onto building the light cast warm concept would the Expressway. and Road Omahu from visible the of supportive are Officers $25,000. is project total the of estimate cost A at thefacility of users of safety the enhance (1) will: it as initiative funding seed ni night. at features heritage its highlight and building, the of amenity the gaming trusts towards the Awards Ceremony in the Hawkes Bay Opera House. House. Opera Bay in the Hawkes Ceremony Awards the trusts towards gaming in printing cost administration significant a required also however The awards materi assist to allocation additional an support would Officers Team. Asset Parks led community this support to wish Council should activities with promotional project. up Stone Lighting the towards contribution of $10,000 allocation the requests Trust The Landmarks Stoneycroft. of lighting An additional $10,000 per annum would enable Officers to proactively work work proactively to would enable Officers annum per additional $10,000 An would quickly. It more process upgrade progress the owners and with building assi also provide of character architectural the with keeping in more signage unsightly replace to the buildings. Street As Awards As ‘Street the towards $10,000 of allocation the requests Trust The Landmarks Aw entries 70 over with success, a resounding were Awards As Street the year Last the Silver and Sponsor) Tremains (Gold from in Sponsorship year. its first Warehousing Tomoana Terstappen, Resene, Riks Timbers, Tumu of Sponsors local raised also was from Funding prizes. towards raised $9,000 and Gemco (including Colour Scheme Fees). Completion of these 38 buildings would see a a see would 38 buildings these of Completion Fees). Scheme Colour (including enhan and complete current budget allocation. allocation. budget current

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council (Hastings Returned and Returned (Hastings Association) Services Neil Murphy Neil(167) Murphy

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council EquipmentHustler Ltd (172) (Sport HB) StoneColin (169) Society (Cancer Jocelyn Cowan (168) Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

HB)

Officers Responsible: within the design of planned facilities is also called for. SplashPark Pad.audits Theuse shade of andprioritising considerations shade permanentone shade structure either at William Nelson ParkCornwall the or protectto the community from ultraviolet radiation and seeks the installation The submitter reinforces points made in earlier submissions to Council on ways Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: the benefitsthe of the specific events. additional funding underwrite to regional events on an adhoc Council has considered requestthis previously and open were to allocating underwrite fund for regional events. The submitter urges Council workwithto other stakeholders in establishing an Events Fund includepermanent a shade structurepart design.of the as pla proposedyground new The Splash and Pad Havelockat Domain North will Splash would Pad,this be Officers recommendation address to first.this NB: $30,000 to achieve either one. Given the amount of time children spend on the If was Council minded to allow this submission, wouldit need to allocate natural shade and education programmes. Itthis. is for this reason Councilthat has pastin the preferred the provision of areas would be beneficial, however there is a relatively high associated cost with Splash Pad. Officers consider that a permanent structure over either of these play structure, in one of two priority areas: William Nelson Park or the Cornwall Park submissionThis also requests funding provision for the of permanenta shade shade trees within the playgrounds of the District. Park. $7,000is also identified 14/15 in Annualthe Plan for the umbrellas have been provided in both Havelock North and at William Nelson Districtwithin the now have sunsmart smokefree and information signs and Following the submission made by Cancer the Society last year, all playgrounds those ring fenced developments philosophy the and fully of infrastructure recovering costs the associated with and OmahuIndustrial catchments. No changes were recommended that at stage developmentaround contributions including level contributions the of Irongate in Council workshops were held in the 12months last discussing issues range a of and Omahu Industrial areas. submittercontributionsdevelopment questionsThe theIrongate the applicable to Development Contributions Officer Comments: Officer Comments: Officer Responsible:

Tony Gray (Chief Financial Officer)

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda Manager) Stuart Development and (Parks Planning Rachel and Facilities) and Alice Heather (Group Manager Community Services OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER

from those developing each within catchment

basis, depending on Attachment 1

planting of Page Page 39 of of

Attachment 1 Item 6

Page

assistance package fits fits package assistance

2014 Annual Plan ‘Our ‘Our 2014 AnnualPlan -

6 2022 (LTP) sets ‘Our Vision the which out for Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS Local Public Services’. This sets out the current and and the current sets out This Services’. Public Local Brett Chapman (Water Services Manager) Services (Water Chapman Brett Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

consistent with the purpose of Local Government to achieve to achieve Government Local of purpose the with consistent

ted.

with is also consistent activities development in economic Involvement 2012- Plan Term Long Council’s Future’ : development. youth including social priorities and development economic areas. in these focus Council for rates approval high shows within Council’s functions and powers under sub part 2 of the part 2 of the Local Local the of 2 part the 2 of part sub under and powers functions Council’s within and the Authority Local the of role the in particular Actand 20012 Government emphasis on the of provision core services. is The proposal Hastings the of needs future and current the to achieve aim which outcomes public services local local infrastructure, quality for good District Community for Outcomes Community Council’s functions. regulatory of and performance 2013 its within contained are Services Public Local public local of provision to the in relation the of District needs future anticipated follows: as services and old, in people young the help of needs meet which public services “Local households. and businesses and locals, need, visitors a business, building and attracting ‘supporting includes need future Current and job and rich local economy. resilient The submitter asks how the proposal economic financial economic proposal the how asks The submitter Outcomes – Community No Officer comments supplied. This is a matter for Council determination. Council for a matter is This supplied. comments Officer No Officer Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer HDC has no jurisdiction over wastewater discharges from Waipawa and and Waipawa from discharges wastewater over jurisdiction no has HDC Regional and HB holder consent as CHBDC for matters are These Waipukurau. HB. of Film operations the support to assistance financial requests The submitter HB Central HB. central in discharges sewage of respect in concerns highlights submitter The Areas of enhanced focus within the Annual Plan centre on CBD security, security, CBD on centre Plan the Annual within focus enhanced of Areas which Panel thevia Citizen tested been mattershas these on opinion Public review undertaken by council which has filtered through to the proposed 2014/15 2014/15 toproposed the through filtered has which council by undertaken review nscontributio policy. initiatives New and Initiatives Development Economic of inclusion the and policy incentives financial the questions The submitter initiatives. new as plan the within categorised expenditure was suppor was stakeholder involved have and transparent and is clear policy the believe Officers thecost noted submitter The process. and cost thedesign throughout groups

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council (178) Williams Derek Tessa Tylee (175) Tylee Tessa (Film HB)

Attachment 1 Item 6 (Bay CityRollers) Council (FriendsLibrary) the of Peach (180)Richard - Vernik Eve Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER Taafee (179) Taafee

Officers Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: There are significant facility with this other club. off Council.land They supportthe submission, and happy are share the to Officers havemet with the Hastings Skating Club whoown rink the but lease the Park,Nelson here, with a cost estimate of $20,000. Angus confident that he can replicate quality the surface ofthe at William requirementsthe the has of Bay This proven successful, with City Rollers. polishedtrialofthe aarea existing see couldsurface be improved it if to meet to Angus MacMillan Concrete (who constructed the William Nelson Skat Currently group the use facilities at Rodney Green Centennial Hall and Pettigrew The BayCity Rollers have members, 60active andare looking for facilities in Re wastewater systems. HDC not does manage compliance in relation dischargesto to land from on- secondary treatmentapproved listed systems. The submitter requests universal compliance of all onsite wastewater disposal to Onsite Wastewater Systems Council as the consent authority. (This is attached on the last page) days perweek all at libraries to assist Councillors in considering this request. Officers have providedinformation onthe extending cost of library hours two nights per week. The submitter urges Council extendall to opening hourslibrary 8pm twotill Libraries The costsof undertaking work this ($20,000) are not included in current budgets. Officer Comments: venue during summer the months, if the surface was improved. rink at Windsor Park meets size the requirements, and could be used as atraining Centre; however surfacethe unsui is Indoor only Hastings Arena option the in Green Napier. The in is Sports Hastings that could accommodate a full size roller derby track. children before they are confident enough use to William will Park; (3) Nelson it of this area which is currently an eyesore apremierin park. suitable indoor venue; (4) increased use will improve the s provide Hastingsa venue for growinga sporting club, given the absence of a provide aflatconcrete surface asalearnto different roller sporting groups membersand the of community; will (2) it encourage the increased use of this tired and worn facility by anumber of - surface surface Windsor Park Skating Rink

benefits to be gained in makingthis investment: (1) it will

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda Manager) Stuart Development and (Parks Planning Rachel and Facilities) and Alice Heather (Group OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER

6 table for rolleroutdoor sports. The skating

scooter and skate facility for small Manager Community Services

urveillance and safety

Attachment 1 epark) has has epark) Page Page site site 41

Attachment 1 Item 6

42 ich Page

rage visitor numbers numbers rage visitor 71,000 71,000 350,000 129,000 129,000 important environmental important environmental

Ave

back in to) part or full time time full or part to) in back To be able to effect this change, change, this to effect able beTo

6 Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer for youth. Evening and weekend hours at the library hours at and library weekend the for Evening youth. OFFICER COMMENTS

Alice Heather (Group Manager Community Services Services Community Manager (Group Heather Alice and Facilities) Mike Maguire (Group Manager Corporate and Corporate Manager (Group Maguire Mike Services) Customer Dennis Morgan (Group Manager Strategy Manager Dennis Morganand (Group Strategy Development) Agenda Item: Agenda Item: supports the Economic Financial Incentive Policy and and Incentive Policy Financial the Economic supports

Havelock North Havelock Hastings Flaxmere

Officer Comments: Officer Officer Comments: Officer Officers Responsible: Officers Permanent Accommodation Accommodation Permanent thfor home a permanent to find together the to work need signals The submitter legislation would need to change so that plots are sold on limited tenure, rather rather tenure, on limited sold are plots so that to change need would legislation the case. as is currently tenure, than perpetual wh to cremation, relation in choices of range a provide currently does Council Responsible: Officers Burial Options Burial Options burial options. sustainable of development the promotes submitter The is there that in cemeteries sustainable for allow not does legislation current The as is burials, unrelated to further for be for reused cemeteries no opportunity other countries. some practice in common burial. than practice hungry” “land less is a Economic Development Financial Incentives Policy. Incentives Financial Development Economic that submits it SHBT by sustainability environmental to include would like to it see strengthened jobs who lessthan but 50 create that businesses ‘green’ sustainable including to contribute that products or services produce outcomes. accordingly. amended be can policy the then proposal a such supports Council If The other benefit of more late nights is that this is an area in which we increase increase we in which area an is this is that late nights more of benefit The other opportunities employment people. of young number a for opportunity employment time part a already are of but is way a tangible the benefits community, only the not hours Increasing peoplepeople to (or in young older supporting employment. Equity has been raised as an issue by the submitters. the by issue an as raised been has Equity follows” as are years financial two last the for libraries the for Officer Comments: Officer Officer Responsible: Officer

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council Terry Kelly (184) (184) Kelly Terry Trust) HB (Sustaining

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council MagdalinosNic (185) Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: Since Since council introduced its development contribution policy in July 2007,the Development Contributions provide mostbenefit. Targeted ratesgenerallyare applied specific where a service is general programmes and services to those groups of ratepayers who receive the and legitimate method of distributing costs incurred in delivering Councils reviewing rating differentials and have come view to that it is a fai The Rating Review Working Party and Council has invested considerable time in replaces them with targeted rates. The services and provide to for enhanced services to meet community needs. significant savings from efficiencies which have been used maintain to existing As outlined in the draft 2014/15 Annual Plan Council has demonstrated significantly below t The rate increases aboveis CPI the increase thefor preceding 12 months but cost the doingof business Hastings in and development defer investment. and The submitter is concerned proposedthe that rate 2.7%increase of will toadd (interestand repayment) includedis of activities cost the in service and and activities acost in effective way households to and business. The cost ofdebt provisions the of Local Government ensureit delivers services its (2002) Act that generalare in nature in many areas.Council does in accor The submitter’s comments, representing the Property Council for New Zealand andrating development contributions. The submitter raises various points respect in of Council’s finances, differential Council Finances, Differential Rating Development and Contributions work. that Environment in included be Centrecould the for options for the development of Community a Hub – DistrictThe Development Committee has requested Officers that examine the Environment Centre. Officers believe the current policy has agood balance of local and district wide Council currently collects contributions very ona narrow activities range of Officers have not previou Council continues work to closely developers with with servicing to regards a of

amend policy its where required. monitor the outcomes of the Local Government Act Amendment Bill(No and3) under its Community Infrastructure contribution. Officers will continue to property. cost per HUE has risen by 7% just for an urban property and 12% for arural opportunities whereopportunities appropriate. development and the potentia required. contributions of level believe required donot and amendmentpolicy an the is to submitters suggest also that Council eliminates rating differentials and d to a particular group ratepayers. particularof a d to

he Localhe Government Cost index.

Tony Gray (Chief Financial Officer) Agenda Item: Item: Agenda sly with approached been thecertainty issueof onthe OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER l for upsizing of infrastructure and will explore explore will and infrastructure of upsizing for l

the provisionthe of a “home” dance withdance the Attachment 1 r and equitable and r s

Page Page 43

Attachment 1 Item 6

44 Page

Road was one one was Road

road path, but is is but road path, -

Turn trust refers to the Social Turn trust to Social refers the -Turn Trust has linkages with with linkages has Trust -Turn - road cycle lanes along Kirkwood Kirkwood lanes along road cycle

6 se this decision will be revisited. be will decision this se Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS Dennis Morgan (Group Manager Strategy Manager Dennis Morganand Strategy (Group Development) Agenda Item: Agenda Item: and Omahu Flaxmere between pathway road

- Turn Trust suggests an additional key component be added: be added: component key Turn an additional Trust suggests

- space in some places, and also because of low traffic volumes on on volumes traffic low of because also and places, some in space

s in a fair, equitable and transparent manner. A greater greater A manner. transparent and equitable a fair, s in making provision of cycle facilities more difficult. However we will will we However difficult. more facilities of cycle provision making ate current demand and possible future provision. provision. future and possible demand ate current Council, Council, and comments on in some respect ofmatters particular the Flaxmere community The submitter outlines areas where work of the U the of work where areas outlines submitter The catchments, which enables council to pass the cost of growth on to those those to on growth of cost the topass council enables which catchments, beneficiarie revisions. future in explored be an outcome may of cost disaggregation Walking Cycling and Development and Youth Priorities Section of the Annual Plan. Under (2) Youth Youth (2) Under Plan. the of Annual Section Priorities and Youth Development the U Development, We see the link between Flaxmere and Hastings along Omahu Road as a very very a as Road Omahu along Hastings and Flaxmere between link the We see of appropriate lack the believe and cyclists, and for walkers one important therefore We are obstacle. are a significant expressway the on facilities crossing working now with NZTA to provide a pedestrian/cyclist overbridge across SH50 in find people many difficulties the address This should Road. on Omahu (if and stage, the design in is currently bridge This the expressway. crossing in 2015. for construction due is NZTA) by approved Youth Development Social of the Apatu, CE Ana U from Thesubmission Kirkwood leading to questions about the need to add cycle lanes. There is a cycle lanes. There a is add to need questions to the leading about Kirkwood extended be will on SH50 currently trails cycle recreational thatthe possibility ca in which Omahu, down further or Chatham using Road with Flaxmere link Omahu to exist also Opportunities off an for space available has Henderson Roads. Henderson Chathamtime. this at benefit much add to Road Wilson to close too probably north road the but to the south, marked lanes cycle existing has already Road its along areas industrial and rural of residential, mix a is Road Omahu towards length – investig Officers agrees that walking and cycling has huge potential to increase in in increase to potential huge has cycling and walking that agrees Officers to help locally of areas innumber a is working project iWay the and Flaxmere, this. achieve off Road The Wilson of lack to due postponed These were plans Road. to Omahu leading Road, road available Walking and Cycling, Social Development, Youth and Flaxmere Priorities Priorities Flaxmere and Youth Social Development, and Cycling, Walking

Officer Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer that “Flaxmere Young People be a priority”. The Council’s Supporting Social Social Supporting The Council’s priority”. a be People Young that “Flaxmere has The Council a focus. as people lists young Framework Strategy Wellbeing of the first major iWay infrastructure items completed, in 2011. The original The original in 2011. completed, items infrastructure iWay major of first the on- the of addition included also plan network

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

Turn Trust) - SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council Ana Ana Apatu (186) (U

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Tony Lythgoe (188) Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

concerns respectin of adequate parking. The submitter expresses concerns re proposedthe pathway development and Havelock Road Cycleway process. that theU This work is still ongoing. Officers have not lost sight of the positive elements referred the Town Centre Redevelopment Project back the to Council for review. Environmental Design principle (CPTED) Community the Centre and Town Centre good and Crime Prevention Through HBDHBthe Flaxmere urban development recommendations, access between the U The Trust is option an going forward. development approach are collaborative by nature. Working with the U Flaxmere social development. Both youth Futures and the Council’s youth Council acknowledge officers constructive work the U the of development. young are priority a people the Council’s within overall approach youth to Community Development Officer for Flaxmere. Within this context Flaxmere “togoals: maximise youth In potential”. addition dedicated a Council has adoptedalso the Flaxmere Community Plan This ha Plan. no There provisionis for on street parking any in the phasesof future due theto Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: trips as vehicular trips transfer activeto modes. large trafficlarge flows and minimal the demand. for peak hour tidal flow to and from Havelock North and for a central public project theis stage two ofthis plan with future phases allowing acentral for lane term corridor management which plan was accepted by 2011. Council in This The future usage ofHavelock Road has been covered in Havelock the Road long pedestrian path on the opposite side expected is increased from 20cyclists 2010in to 200 2013.in Construction of cyclea and significant growth cycle in daily pedestriannumbers. and The has cyclecount completion theSince of existingthe footpath between Havelock North Hastings. and conducivenot pedestrians to cyclist who and wish toroad to cross the travel on Havelock Road the is second busiest road thein Hastings district and assuch is demands. been calculated using traffic model transport corridor by the year 2046 should the need arise. These phases have - Turn Turn Trust comments on Flaxmere development and makes reference to

- Turn TrustTurn refers to and these will be consider

Jag (TransportationPannu Manager) Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER initial cycle and pedestrian path there has been 6

s to determine s to currentandfuture traffic

s. Hastings District Properties Ltd

to to further increase active modal

s asone ofits main

edthe in review Attachment 1 - Turn Trust in in Trust Turn Page Page - Turn Turn 45

Attachment 1 Item 6

46 Page

oposed CBD hotel

tion available to rate payers as to to rate payers tion available

6 Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer hrough inhrough of creation jobs an investment and people, OFFICER COMMENTS Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Officer) Financial (Chief Gray Tony Manager) Pannu (Transportation Jag omic activity. This opportunity has now arisen. arisen. now has This opportunity activity. omic

the increase in funding for Economic and Social Development, Council Council Development, Social and for Economic funding in increase the Hastings District Council only maintains and is responsible for this section of the the of section this for responsible is and maintains only Council District Hastings saying a sign is there corridor Road Waitangi legal of the the end At road. Road”. “Private With Officer Comments: Officer from activities Management Resource t the of cos support shifting do notOfficers as of this distribution rates the from would shift tothe the rate General UAGC, current the believe Officers properties. low valued to properties landhigh valued Officer Responsible: Officer Officer Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer Any investment will subject to a detailed business case including the financial financial the including case business to a detailed subject will investment Any from funding sufficient and Council approval by requiring and funding viability partners. credible improved wellbeing. Funding the majority of the cost through the UGAC was was the UGAC through of cost the the majority Funding wellbeing. improved toinvest prepared will be Council that concerned are gravely Farmers Federated up intoto a $5.0m building hotel andnew that it Hastings to is invest prepared informa isno there when a venture suchinto private to left be should enterprise an such that and funded be will it how risk. commercial on taking ratepayers that rather investors Council CBD. a vibrant for initiatives Council’s of part is project Hotel The CBD an attracting including the CBD enhance steps to taken the years over have piece an essential considered hotel is quality international An hotel. international will provide much It time. for some been lacking that has of infrastructure jobs econ and needed continue with the existing 'basket of costs' approach to calculating the UAGC. the UAGC. to calculating approach costs' of 'basket existing the continue with and appropriate. fair is cost of allocation was benefit private a Whilst activities. the of the beneficiaries considered activities, extended from directly benefiting properties to commercial identified t benefits public were there is a there where rates targeted to use continue will Council appropriate. deemed to mechanism and it thedirect to funding is ratepayer benefit an appropriate costs. those recover The submitter urges Council to increase the use of fixed charges via either the the either via charges fixed of use the increase to Council urges submitter The mix funding on the and comments Rate Resource and or the Community UAGC pr the and activities development economic its for development. would permitted maximum to the 30% charges of uniform the level Increasing land valued properties high valued to low rates from of shift distribution the to was thepreference but this discussed previously RRWP The properties. an receive all properties as approach equitable and a fair it is believe Officers UAGC. the by funded services those of benefit equal The submitter raises concerns re the maintenance of Waitangi Road and seeks seeks and Road Waitangi of maintenance the re concerns raises The submitter support. Council The road. legalpublic a is Road Waitangi of (approx.) metres 400 The first Hotel CBD and Development Economic Mechanisms, Rating Waitangi Road Maintenance Maintenance Road Waitangi

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council (HB Federated Farmers) Federated (HB Rhea (196) Dasent Jan Campbell (193) (193) Jan Campbell

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Crispen (205)Ken (Sri Guru Ravidass Temple) Harry Kumar (198) Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

Officer Comments: for purpose’ They condition. for themfor and fully return its to of fund that associated infrastructure good a in ‘fit will be the agreement of KiwiRail and the Government to reopen the rail lin railway line. freight by alternative means and the advantages theto region in maintaining the transportingparticularof economic costs the been in noted, information has This East Coast Rail Line. The submitter provides various information and documentation in respect of East Coast Rail Line direct usercharges). activitycomponent the majority of cost (the however the of is recovered via thecommunitybenefit rural to they and therefore are for rated publicthe good final annual plan document. The refuse transfer station service oneis that ofis reader and should read “refuse transfer station”. This error will be corrected in “refuse collection” description of this line item an is err funds referredthe actually to refuse to contribute transfer station activities. The the commentswith made submission. the in It be however to out pointed needs “refuse collection” when they do not receive this service. Council officers agree submitterThe asks why rate rural payers are required pay to atargeted rate for recycling initiative. The submitter refuse comments funding of onthe andthe collection rural Rura Officer Responsible: Federated Farmers submission around the rates remission policy. RRWP making will be The recommendation to a incouncil to relation the farming areas. The submitter outlines considerations when applying the SUIP principle rural in SUIP by Rating priorities such as the Opera House strengthening. capacity this in decision making process taking into account other investment In Council willaddition take HBRC. PlanAnnual regarding information this. The has therefore been forward to freight on Napierthe partners, considering is investing in the operation of a rail business carrying Hawkes Bay Regional Council (HBRC), in conjunction Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: determination. NoTemple. Offi The submitter requests support for affairs related with the Sri Guru Ravidass l Recyclingl and Refuse

cer comments supplied. This amatteris Councilfor -

Gisborne line.Gisborne A critical component of any such investment MartinJarvis (Waste and Data Services Manager) Jag (TransportationPannu Manager) Agenda Item: Item: Agenda OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER have submissions invited to Drafttheir 2014-15 into accountinto ownits andfinancial investment 6

or and misleading for the the for misleading and or with privatesector Attachment 1 Page Page e and and e

the the 47

Attachment 1 Item 6

48 nal, Page

ion wining architectural practice to move to move practice architectural wining ion n the impressive and nationally recognised recognised nationally and impressive the n 6 Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS projects, Council is approaching these projects in an an in these projects is approaching Council projects, Dennis Morgan (Group Manager Strategy Manager Dennis Morganand (Group Strategy Development) Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Officer) Financial (Chief Gray Tony

of consulting with architecture and urban design consultants on future inner cityinner on future consultants design urban and architecture with of consulting initiatives. Officer Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer bring to the City and community of Hastings. of Hastings. community and the to City bring of the Hastings CBD, and builds o CBD, of the Hastings The Square. in Civic already installation taonga Heretaunga o Pou Nga and cultural a significant create likely will Square of Civic redevelopment educatio innovative, important an as being as well facility tourism the regarding NZIA the by made comments specific the recognise Officers hascontinued the Council the last Over 12 months process. competition design to work closely with thecompetit that due to acknowledge concept. We design winning competition the forward the latest anticipated, originally than longer taken has this process events various continues Council HBOH. th status e of the being of earthquake confirmation the can it what and Square of Civic of a redevelopment importance the to recognise The redevelopment of Civic Square is a key social, cultural and community social, Square cultural and community is of a Civic key Theredevelopment of Because beyond. and the District of Hasting’s, City the for project investment a Hotel, Square, of Civic redevelopment the between relationship the synergetic HBOH and other CBD manner. integrated been already has work considerable Square, Civic regarding Specifically of this The is project aim Square. Civic a redeveloped on a concept for advanced and art theand to gallery addlibrary to current park enhance the tosignificantly to links This place. this of people the of heritage social the express to facilities precinct cultural the is what up make which facilities other and House theOpera to come. for years people our for resource and heritage community Officer Comments: Officer Design and Urban Initiatives CBD Square, Civic importance the and Square of Civic importance the on comments The submitter Square Civic of redevelopment further the for support of submission the acknowledge Officers Square. Civic The submitter considers the hotel development to be outside of the remit of the the of remit the of outside to be development hotel the considers submitter The council to fund. 10. on Page comments to Officer Refer Sale Road Sylvan site. the for competition a design for opportunity an identifies The submitter determination. Council for isThis a matter Responsible: Officer CBD Hotel

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

rre Du Toit (207) (207) Toit Du rre SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council Pie Architects) of Institute (NZ

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

The objectives of the panel were: 2004. TheOperatingPlan. for panel this were Protocols adopted by August Council in environment, recommended as the Landmarks in Commission Development developers achieving in higher amenity outcomes the in District’s resolved instigate to the formation of an Aesthetic Design Panel to assist needthe for Aesthetican Design Panel. In 2003the Landmarks Committee By backgroundway of specifically and comments to response in the made about planning development of and redevelopment projects. Council, recognises the value designthat input brings partof as scoping and Project, and Happy Tav site resource consent. Via the utilisation of these experts William Nelson Park, CBD Hotel proposal, Fitzroy Avenue Sustainable Hous going design process for Civic Square, the redevelopment of Flax rock Library, / external architecture and design experts include but are not limited to, the on Current and recent urban centre projects which have expertise in the fields noted above, many and more. community Council through processes its will continue sourceto and utilise To help facilitate the best possible and highest value outcomes for our name but asmall number are also critical. economics, development, social and economic development, public and safety to architecture. However we also recognise that ex the specialists input to of ofregards the field in urban landscapeand design and Council officers acknowledge support and the comments made by the NZIA with CBD Vibrancy long-term funding plan from Square Civic to alternative projects. Officers note concerns the expressed regarding anyreallocation of committed earthquake strengthening for the HBOH. Civicof Square has slowed pending confirmation as to the extent and cost of investmentan and strategic planning perspective. Pr HBOH, the and likely factors willthat need to be considered, particularly from submitter’s attention back to recent confirmation of the earthquake status of the consultations. Officers ackn With regards the to comments about a lack ofcommunity communication and tangataand whenua representatives. practitioners, including architects, landscape architects, artists, heritage advisors panelThe membership was fromdrawn pool a voluntary of professional • • To assist developers assistthe landowners enhancementin To and of the District’s • • community identity facilitate develop and To new partnerships buildto prideand civic outcomes. voluntary, non- protection and enhanced cityscapes, through the u assistTo thein achievement ofDistrict Plan goals for improved heritage unique built environment

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda regulatory method of achieving enhanced amenity OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER owledge point. this However we the draw

perts the field in property of ogresson redevelopment the

involved input of the Attachment 1 tilisationof a

Page Page built built ing ing 49

- Attachment 1 Item 6

50 Page

y with numerous strategic strategic with numerous y traffic patterns, employment, employment, patterns, traffic been matched with the scale impact of the the of impact scale the with matched been

6 Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer OFFICER COMMENTS Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Manager) Property and (Parks Hosford Colin

rt requirements, means that Officers are finding it difficult to to it difficult finding are Officers that means requirements, rt

mpetencies of an Aesthetic Design Panel can be integrated into this this into integrated be can Panel Design Aesthetic an of mpetencies ficer Comments: ficer to this specific purchase has some merit, it needs to be balanced with the fact the fact with balanced be to it needs merit, some has purchase specific to this arise on rare only and these now that this land opportunities available is comfortabl sits purchase proposed The occasions. an creating by Domain of the to qualities attractive the and addgoals will open space. improved church the for use multiple provide will It church. existing the for requirements activities. church for required not public when wider the and for initiatives to help form a framework for development in the Village. the in for development a framework form to help initiatives work This issues. design urban and landscape infrastructure, trends, commercial most response and Group’s design urban the Isthmus by augmented was Urban Village North the Havelock by Plan a Master into integrated importantly this achieves land Columba’s St the topurchase proposal The theDomain. goal. strategic The level of expertise of input has has input of expertise of level The through arrangements these formalise to is It proposed development. proposed year. this July/August in to Council be reported will which policies Ltd. Urban Perspectives by of 2008, Framework Design to investing public funds on reserve purchase, and a priority of importance importance of and a priority purchase, reserve on funds public to investing car of provision The district. the in needs space public other against assessment questioned. also is plan the within parking ll other park purchase priorities before committing committing before purchasepriorities park all other toconsider desire the While Plan District the with compliance meet to primarily is parking of provision The Of planning level wider of a number undertaken has Council years 10 the last Over reviewed of 2004 Plans Opus the Firstly to centre the town form linkages improve to the desire identified Masterplan This Responsible: Officer North Domain Havelock prior North Havelock for masterplan for a the need on comments The submitter who whilst dedicated to their cause, are not, qualified experts or practicing orpracticing are qualified experts to whilst not, dedicated theirwho cause, meeting the with coupled This and amenity. design of fields thein professionals and repo frequency feedback. this seek Terms the to changes proposing report a prepare Officers that is recommended It and functions the see if to Group, Advisory the Landmarks of of Reference co technical group. is by sought the and fields amenity of design from expert advice Specific applications. consent resource on various group regulatory Council’s While this panel initially proved extremely useful and successful, for various various for successful, and useful extremely proved initially panel this While the Landmarks on more placed been has reliance years past the over reasons, of of representatives up made is not Panel this However, Panel. Advisory Trust, Landmarks of the voluntary members rather practitioners; professional

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council (HB Health District Board) SneeKevin (218) Assn) Business City (Hastings (213) McDadeSusan (Waka Experience) Smith (210) Philip Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

integrated manner. CBD other and HBOH synergeticthe relationship between the redevelopment ofCivic Square, aHotel, investment project for the City ofHasting’s, District the and beyond. Because of The redevelopment key Civic a of is community and Square cultural social, Civic Square. Officers acknowledge the submission of support for the further redevelopment of Civic Square Harm Alcohol undertaken by Council, including the provision of the CCTV network. initiative. reviewthis determine is to future the operations and funding for options the CityThe Assist project is to be reviewed before t City Assist. advocates anfor extended Assist City program and participation in the review of The submitter outlines general support for the suite of inner city initiatives, and CBD Officer Comments: Officer Responsible: Officers acknowledge the recommendation made HBDHB bythe continue to CBD revitalisation and vibrancy community heritage and resource for our people yearsfor come.to tourism facility aswell asbeing an important innovative, educati redevelopmentThe of Civic Square will likely create asignificant cultural and Nga Pou o Heretaunga taonga installation already Civic in Square. Hastings the of CBD, o builds and the Opera House and other facilities which make up what is the cultural precinct facilities to express the social heritage of the people of this place. This links to significantlyto the enhance park current to add library gallery to and the art and advanced conceptfor ona redevelopeda Civic Square. aim project is The this of Specifically regarding Civic Square, considerable work has already been Officer Responsible: submitterThe requests financialassistance support to delivery theWaka of youth Officer Comments: strategies specific refere activities. Officers acknowledge that this is an important community issue and a as social development and youth priority. Annual The Plan lists higher level The submitter requests that alcohol harm reduction is included in the Annual Plan determination. programmes. No Officer comments supplied. is This matter a for Council support and CBD supportand Security

At the same time, officers intend to review the other security activities

nce nce alcoholto harm reduction is captured Council’s in policies and

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda Regulatory Services) and Planning Manager (Group O’Shaughnessy John Development) (GroupStrategyandDennis Morgan Manager projects, Council approachingis theseprojects in an OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER 6 n the impressive and nationally recognised

he he end 2014. of purposeThe of

Attachment 1

Page Page onal, 51

Attachment 1 Item 6

Page

iatives have have iatives Manager) Manager)

All these init these All

A review of the sportsgrounds ofsportsgrounds the review A

nticipated health benefits (amongst (amongst benefits health nticipated

Support for the Havelock North Domain Domain North Havelock the for Support

6 Worth noting is that these projects fall outside outside fall projects these that is noting Worth going Hastings District Council commitment t commitment Council District Hastings going Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer Options for redevelopment of the Windsor Park Park of the Windsor redevelopment for Options strategic options available to manage solid waste. waste. solid to manage available options strategic

OFFICER COMMENTS Jag Pannu (Transportation Manager) (Transportation Jag Pannu Brett Chapman (Water Services Manager) Services (Water Chapman Brett Colin Hosford (Parks Property and Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Manager) Services Data and (Waste Martin Jarvis

rious degrees the importance that health benefits bring to our to our bring benefits health that importance the degrees rious

Inclusion of reference to walking and cycling initiatives and education in in and education initiatives and cycling to walking reference ofInclusion “Safe Healthy and Liveable Communities” Liveable and “Safe Healthy Open space networks are being developed annually as opportunities arise arise opportunities as annually developed being are networks space Open

ical, mental and safety) that can be anticipated when prioritising prioritising when be anticipated can that safety) and ical, mental • • Strategy and is on target to complete in 2015. complete to target and is on Strategy reserves. new and walkways including and sale considers that initiative Council a wider of part are courts netball opportunities. recreation for other streams funding Green Streets Strategy is in draft is in draft Strategy Streets the Green and completed been have and actions needs form. extension is acknowledged. extension Council continues towards completion of the Recreation and Open Space Space Open and Recreation of the completion towards continues Council Officer Responsible: Walking And Cycling regarding: concerns raises Submitter walking and cycling via the iWay project. iWay the via cycling and walking Comments:Officer Strategy Waste Future in to the be included request Health (HBDHB) Board District The Bay Hawke’s of review / HDC NCC joint as a identified been have that they the HBDHB advise can officers Council the review. during consulted be will and process review the in stakeholder Responsible: Officer Comments: Officer Strategy Space Open and Recreation (physical, health benefits the to consideration give to continue will Council investment. project prioritising when safety) and mental Responsible: Officer Water Drinking To supplied. be Responsible: Officer Council’s Strategic Framework, the Hastings City Centre Strategy, HPUDS, the HPUDS, Strategy, Centre City the Hastings Framework, Strategic Council’s frameworks and plans strategies, of associated array the as well as Plan District va to recognise CBD. the and centres urban of our the vibrancy our economy, community, CBD Hastings in the delivered been have which initiatives and projects Recent a their to due prioritised been have that Park and Skate Nelson Park The limited William to not are – included but others) Initiative safety) (CBD Assist The City mental), and (physical Redevelopment mental). and (safety Markets Night CBD the and and personal recreation, and health physical of aspects upon impacted positively health. and mental public safety, on- the to, additional are of, and with CBD revitalisation projects including considering the health benefits benefits health the considering including projects revitalisation CBD with (phys investment. Officer Comments: Officer

SUBMITTER & 3/06/2014

SUBMISSION NUMBER Attachment 1 Attachment Council

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council Officer CommentsAnnual Draft Plan 2014/15 NUMBER SUBMISSION

3/06/2014 SUBMITTER & & SUBMITTER

Officers acknowledge the DHB’s support project. for the iWay Committee meetings for more significant additions. made(which communityis local upof advocates), also and by Council proposedAll routes are considered by the Council’s Cycle Strategy Group potential,State suchHighw as year) or the need addressto safety issues maximize to existing the network submissions from (Chesterhopepublic the Bridge being gooda last example nowis complete, and further planned extensions eitherare asaresult of network modelling (for example the Clive arterial). Most of this original networ provision example (for the Havelock Road identified pathway) routes and by combination of long standing, recognised deficiencies walking in cycling and originallyincluded theproposedRoutes i in include referencea to walking cycling. and stronger community avariety in ofways. Officers believe that this section should simply transportation issues, and believes the iWay project contributes to a Officers agree that the impact of walking and cycling initiatives go beyond Comments:Officer • Provision of greater evidence for proposed routes.

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda OFFICER COMMENTS OFFICER ay crossings. 6

Way network comprised a

Attachment 1 Page Page 53

Attachment 1 Item 6

54 Page

ANNUAL COST $ 4,997.09 $ 1,507.44 $ 3,196.33 $ 9,700.86 Option 3: 6pm close close 6pm 3: Option

Officer Comments Draft Annual Plan 2014/15 Plan Draft Annual Comments Officer

8pm -

6 ANNUAL COST

Option 2: 3 hrs 5 hrs 3 2: Option $ 21,037.97 $ 20,690.18 $ 20,689.14 $ 62,417.28

Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

7pm - ANNUAL COST *

Option 1: 2 hrs 5 hrs 2 1: Option $ 15,229.61 $ 14,934.98 $ 14,885.91 $ 45,050.50

Annual cost

opening option is due to cost of one additional weekly clean (currently only cleaned twice per week)

TWO each days week

- TWO eachdays week ONE ADDITIONAL day each

- -

close at FXL requires use of 1 x casual staff for security

3/06/2014

All casual staff rates calculated on proposed 2014 rates 6pm 6pm close at HNL and HasLib would be permanent staff working on a rostered basis, so other opex costs only are calculated Higher cost of FXL for 2 or 3 hr NOTES Hastings Library calculation takes account of one existing late night (Tuesdays)

budget DAP 14/15 the into put been already has until 7pm opening Library Flaxmere for $15k * Havelock North Library Hastings Library week Flaxmere Library Attachment 1 Attachment

Summary of HDL costs for extended hours extended of for HDLcosts Summary Council

Attachment 1 Item 6 Council 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 SUBJECT: FROM: MEETING DATE: TO: REPORT Ref: File

3/06/2014

14/56 • • • The financial reports in recoverieshavebeen excludedas per direction from a presentation to Council on the financial results. Internal charges and on each cost centre is also included. Council officers willgive further detail in Services, Strategy Development and and Asset Management. Further detail Finance, Community Facilities & Programmes, Planning and Regulatory summaries including Corporate & Customer Services andHuman Resources, This financial report is presented as a Council summary report, six group contributions that are cash items such as depreciation, vested assets and development result. The rating result differs thefrom accounting result in respect of non- year andat year end a report is prepared on the financial as well as the rating The accounting operating financial result is reported onquarterly the during 31 March 2014” be received. Manager dated 3June 2014 titled “Financial Report for the 9 Months ended This and appropriateto present andanticipated futurecircumstances means infrastructure, services andperformance that are efficient and effective a way that is most cost infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory functions in to meet the current and future needs of communities goodfor quality local prescribed by Section 10 of the Local Government Act 2002. That purpose is The Council is required to give effect to the purpose of local government as nine months ended31 March2014 . The purpose of this report is to inform the Council of the financial result for the SUMMARY BACKGROUND

rep

detailed information on groups of cost centres. The financial performance per group of cost centres – information at group level The financial performance per group – level report on all council activities The overall financial performance of the Council –

ort concludes by recommending that the report from the Accounting

COUNCIL MARCH 2014 FOR REPORT FINANCIAL MANAGER ACCOUNTING TUESDAY JUNE 3 2014 JOANNE

not included. – Attachment 1are presented in three layers: effective for households and businesses. Good quality

GUILFORD

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

THE 9 MONTHS ENDED 3 ENDED MONTHS 9 THE these provide of another level

Council. this provides a high

. these provide

Page Page 55 1

Item 7

896. 896. Page Year $ $

Budget Revised Full 1,460,772 101,894,479 100,433,707 he 2014/15

$ YTD 939,922 Variance (296,286) 1,236,208

$ $

3,691,585 75,262,664 71,571,079

YTD Budget

Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

floor not being tenanted. However two new new two However tenanted. being not floor

nd $ $

specific the question of reports before the

4,631,507 sion, a lease, until December 2014. December until a lease, sion, 74,966,378 70,334,871 YTD Actual

This will ensure that complete answers can be given at the meeting meeting the at be given can answers complete that ensure will This

. . tenants have been secured from April 2014. Oceania has signed a 2 a 2 signed has Oceania 2014. April from secured been have tenants the and 2 years, further for a of renewal a right with lease, year Electoral Commis Subsidy revenues from NZTA being below budget by $1,104, by budget below being NZTA from revenues Subsidy a lower due to mainly budget below are funding loan and Subsidies minor The Development. Whakatu the and Safety Minor in spend YTD the however, end, year by budget the up with line to expected is safety t to forward be carried will development Whakatu result. rating the on no impact has This programme. charges Water meter and $124,421 fees connection meter Water budget below are $52,989 Refuse collection $99,897 is below budget below is $99,897 collection Refuse budgeted below $73,572 is House Heretaunga from rental addition In 2 to the due income Landfill $49,492 is below budget below is $49,492 Landfill

• • • • • naged. Until we prepare our year end adjustments including carry forwards forwards carry including end adjustments year our prepare we Until naged. 2012/13

Operating Revenue Operating Expenditure Net Surplus/(Deficit)

* Revised budget includes the Annual budget, Carry Forwards and surplus* and Revised Forwards Annual budget, includes Carry the budget allocationsfinancialfrom 12/13 year CURRENT SITUATION Overall revenue is below budget by $296,286. The items impacting on this on this impacting The items $296,286. by budget below is revenue Overall are: The result is presented against the revised budget. The revised budget budget revised The budget. revised the against presented is result The It budgets. Council on year the during made decisions and changes includes to surplus 2012/13 the of allocation the as such changes incorporates projects budget YTD to favourable $939,922 is performance financial overall Council’s 2014. 31 March ended months nine the for We are on track for a positive rating result. Expenditure remains tightly tightly remains Expenditure result. rating a positive for track on Weare ma be. will result accounting and rating the what know accurately not will we etc., budget YTD the against $296,286 of variance unfavourable an has Revenue a has expenditure Overall Donations. and Grants, Subsidies, due to largely interest to due largely $1,236,208 of budget YTD against variance favourable due to mainly are variances expenditure unfavourable The costs. of consequence a as or schedule of ahead being programmes maintenance budget. of ahead being revenues corresponding on the detail in these reports. these in detail on the Please contact the the contact Please information. summarised contains report financial The writer any on directly meeting. Set out below is a summary of the accounting operating financial result year to to year result financial operating accounting the of a summary is below out Set date. 14/56

3/06/2014

Council 3.4 3.3 3.0 3.1 3.5 File Ref: 2.4 3.2

Item 7 Council Ref: File 3.6 3.7

3/06/2014

14/56

Partially offsetting the unfavourable variances are favourable variances : for

• • • • • to: to: The overall favourable $1,236,208 variance in expenditure is mainly due Debt and Interest Costs further increase of 25 basis points to 3.0% on24April 2014. Some raised the OCR by 25basis points to 2.75% on13 March 2014 anda below budget and lower levels debt of than budgeted. The Reserve Bank YTD budget by $958,646. This is areflection of interest costs rem delays in some other capital projects. Net interest costs are better than a consequence of expenditure on growth projects being deferred and Core Debt remains at

- unfavourable variances Partially offsetting the favourable expenditure variances are roading assets of $726,407. assets, thereby reversing the previously reported over budget result in half year report, officers have reviewed the useful lives of some roading Depreciation was favourable to budget by $532,252. As advised in the comments below in 3.7). Net interest costs being favourable to YTD budget by $958,646 (see unbudgeted variance in expenditure Unbudgeted Grants of $361,024 which are partially offset by an $107,437. Dividends received from LGFA of $22,616 and HB Airport Limited of

$192,948 due to the timing of the operational programme for roads of Asset management costs are above budget by $451,568 mainly o o

this is largely offset by revenue being ahead of budget. Maintenance Group costs are $367,366 above budget but Guardians. unbudgeted expenditure Cityfor Assist and the Skate Park timing of the grant to the Sports Park and the approved Passive Parks costs are $402,110 above budget due to

$55.7m and unchanged from 30 June 2013. This is

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

aining Page Page

Item 7

Page

Jun May Apr 2013/14

Mar Feb

7 Jan 2012/13 Dec Nov

Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Oct Resource Consents Consents Resource Sep Aug 2013/14 Budget Jul 0

200,000 100,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 Dollars

The increase in Building control revenues of $1,624,553 compared to a a to compared $1,624,553 of revenues control Building in increase The Council City Christchurch due to primarily is $1,506,274 of budget YTD budget. of ahead being revenue consent building Areas of concern for Council in the past include resource and building and building resource include past the in for Council concern of Areas in income operations, landfill and station transfer revenues, consent closely being are of activity areas These crematorium. the and cemeteries monitored. revenue with budget YTD behind slightly are revenues consent Resource above is Revenue $378,254. of budget a YTD to compared $362,156 of $66,081. by actuals year’s last commentators are predicting over the next 24 months OCR rises of 2.0% of 2.0% rises OCR 24 months next the over predicting are commentators risk rate interest prudent has Council base. a 5% reaching OCR and the these from protected largely and is place in practices management interest our to through flow will this term long However, rises. rate interest by cost interest our increase will debt in increase 2% A expense. rate rates. on 2% or $1.2m around is consents building for year financial this of months 9 first the in Revenue both ahead with slightly is station transfer budget, YTD ahead of well budget. YTD below crematorium and cemeteries and consents resource

14/56

3/06/2014

3.11 3.8 3.10 3.9 Council File Ref:

Item 7 Council Ref: File 3.12 3.14 3.13

3/06/2014

14/56

The HDC share of the Omarunui Landfill revenue is $49,492 lower than actual result. exclude internal recoveries andcharges which is significantly masking the Revenue and expenditure from the Transfer Station and the Landfill budget. The landfill expenditure is $169,576 below budget due to external contractors) bypassing the transfer station and going direct to the landfill. of waste going to the transfer station as a result of wheelie bins (external to the YTD favourable variance to budget. This is due to reduced volume refuse disposal fees. A reduction in refuse disposal costs has contributed $533,189 with last year’s actuals including the HDC’s share of landfill disposal fee) is $82,290 below budget and below last year’s actuals by expenditure (excluding internal charges for HDC’s share the of Landfill achieve azero rating requirement and is on track that.for Transfer Station tonnages. This cost centre is a user pay funded andtherefore aims to to increased gate charges to allow ETS for and higher than expec above YTD budget by$9,206 and $230,251 above last year’s actuals due The YTD Transfer Station revenue (excluding internal recoveries) is

Dollars 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000

200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 Dollars 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0

0 Building Consents (excluding CCC and CHB) Jul 2013/14 Budget 2013/14 Jul 2013/14 Budget 2013/14 Aug Aug Sep Sep Transfer Station Oct Oct Agenda Item: Item: Agenda Nov

Nov 2012/13 Dec 2012/13 Dec Jan 7 Jan

Feb Feb Mar 2013/14 Mar 2013/14 Apr Apr May May Jun Jun

Page Page ted 59

Item 7

60 Page

Jun May Jun purchased graves graves purchased

Apr May

2013/14 Mar Apr 2013/14 Feb Mar Jan

Feb 7 2012/13 Dec

Jan

Nov Dec 2012/13

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: $5,030

Oct Nov Sep Oct Cemeteries Crematorium & Aug Landfill (HDC (HDC Share) Landfill Sep 2013/14 Budget Jul Aug 0 2013/14 Budget Jul

600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 Dollars 500,000

Parking is ahead by $38,895 by ahead is Parking Library is ahead by $105,793 by ahead is Library Holiday Park is down by down is Park Holiday

3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 4,000,000

Dollars ------

plant hire savings and maintenance being programmed for later in the the in for later programmed being maintenance and savings hire plant year. The year to date net position compared to budget for: budget to compared position net date to year The Cemeteries and Crematorium revenue is tracking $37,841 behind YTD YTD behind $37,841 tracking is revenue Crematorium and Cemeteries figures These year. last time same the behind $12,036 also is and budget - pre from derived revenue $34,000 the include do not lower at currently are Cremations reserves. to been transferred has which net The budget. against $40,989 down revenue with anticipated than levels is $ 23,870 for Cemetery budget to compared 2014 31 March at as position unfavourable. $46,804 is Crematorium and unfavourable

14/56

3/06/2014

3.16 3.15 Council File Ref:

Item 7 Council Ref: File 3.18 3.17 3.19 3.20

3/06/2014

14/56

financial year. This is included in the progress of the budgeted amounts brought forward the from 2012/13 The purpose of the brought forward report is to update the Committee on Brought forwards are approved by Council in September of each year. that have been delayed or being completed in the new financial year. capital projects that are dependent on development progressing, projects Attachment 1. together with avariance analysis significant of items are included in Detailed Council reports, Group summaries andcost centre reports meeting in June. Splash Planet will beprovided at the District Development Committee this has been asuccessful season for Splash Planet. A full report on position is currently ahead of budget by $178,681 and this indicates that and an unfavourable expenditure variance of $46,742. Splash Planet’s net Splash Planet has a favourable YTD net revenue variance of $225,423 attached report willgive guidance to Councillors onthe expenditure. relatively low level expenditure of as at this time. The comments in the with the seasonal nature of capital expenditure is contributing to the Brought Forwards projects lags behind the physical completion of the work. This been spent to 30April 2014. The recording expenditure of on capital projects) and approximately $12.5m ($626,388 for growth projects) has approved byCouncil in 2012/13 was $25,019,044 ($7,585,996 for growth estimated to be completed. The total amount of brought forwards progressing in the year as well as acolumn to indicate when the project is A report has been prepared and includes comments on projects

- I- -

Dog Control is slightlydown by $631 site is ahead by $7,314

Dollars -500,000 -400,000 -300,000 -200,000 -100,000 100,000 200,000 300,000

0 2013/14 Jul Aug Splash PlanetProfit/Loss Sep

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Oct 2012/13 Attachment 2 Attachment Nov Dec 7

Jan 2013/14 Budget 2013/14 Feb . This includes mostly Mar Apr May Jun

together

Page Page

Item 7

62 Page

014. Although the

413 414 - 1 - 13 13-1- - -

7 CG CG

to the earthquake assessments of the the of assessments earthquake the to expenditure is managed effectively and and effectively managed is expenditure

- - Agenda Item: Agenda Item: May2014

- for period year end 31 he impairment. As Council has no building revaluation revaluation building no has Council As he impairment. Report

are aware that the Hawke’s Bay Opera House and Municipal Municipal and House Opera Bay Hawke’s the that aware are

the report of the ManagerAccounting titled “Financial Report for

This report does not raise any issues that are significant in terms of the the of terms in significant are that issues any raise not does report This consultation. require would that Policy Significance Councils Overall Financial Management Financial Overall subsidy in largely down revenue with budgets, the of constraints the within result. rating the on impact not does which income final costings for the earthquake strengthening work are unlikely to be be to unlikely are work strengthening earthquake the for costings final Consultants Accounts. Annual the of completion the after until available be used will This 2104. May during costing indicative an be providing will t as of basis the the of part as recognised be to need will impairment any reserves This Income. Comprehensive of Statement the in surplus/deficit Council’s rating the on no impact have will and adjustment be an accounting will result. focused end year to prior audit interim an completes NZ Audit year Each April in conducted was audit The environment. control the on assessing which, in audit, interim the on update a status provides NZ Audit 2014. control management the overall that found they that reported have they were Council at procedures and controls key systems, environment, which issue significant one identified NZ Audit effectively. operating relating of aware were officers preceding the in (covered buildings Municipal and House Opera paragraph). Councillors to buildings the to strengthen work remedial need significant buildings adjustment an impairment require will This code. building the with comply 2 30 June ended year the for Accounts Annual the in Update Status Audit Audit NZ d and Municipal House Opera Building Bay Hawke’s

SIGNIFICANCE CONSULTATION AND received. be 3/06/2014 dated 2014” 31 March ended 9 months the That 14/56

3/06/2014

Quarterly Report May 2014 - March 2014 Brought Forward Progress 4.1 3.23 3.22 3.21 RECOMMENDATION

Council

Attachments: 1 2 • 4.0

File Ref:

Item 7

Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL

3/06/2014 QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD PERIOD THE FOR REPORT QUARTERLY

ENDED 31 MARCH 2014 MARCH 31 ENDED COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 63

Attachment 1 Item 7

64 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Strategy & Development Detail Report Reports Detail & Programmes Community Facilities Finance Detail Reports Corporate & Customer Services & Human Resources Detail Reports Summary Council Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly Strategic Development Holiday Park Splash Planet HB Opera House Housing Cemeteries & Crematorium Economic & Social Development Libraries Facilities Cultural Activity Centres Various & Halls Pools Swimming Community Services Administration Finance Services Information Systems Support Emergency Management Marketing, i- Hastings Leadership Customer& Business Support Corporate Services Human Resources Administration Buildings

3/06/2014

Site Visitor Centre Visitor Site CommunicationsEvents &

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for

CONTENTS

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 65

Attachment 1 Item 7

66 Page

for period endyear 31 March 2014

Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Quarterly Report May 2014

Rating Area 1 Area Rating 2 Area Rating

Rating 1 Area Rating Rating 2 Area Rating

– –

Control & Compliance & Control

Asset Management Group Administration Group Management Asset Refuse Collection Refuse Transfer Station Transfer Recycling & WasteRecycling & Minimisation Landfill Transportation Transportation Transportation Stormwater Wastewater Effluent Disposal Effluent Plant Treatment Wastewater Water Supply Supply Water Water Supply Supply Water Administration Resource Planning Environmental Services Safety Pool Swimming Building Health Environmental Animal Control Animal Parking Security Patrol & CCTV & Patrol Security 3/06/2014

Planning Detail Regulatory & Reports

Parks Building Services Building Attachment 1 Attachment Council Reports Detail Management Asset

Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

GROUP SUMMARY -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 67

Attachment 1 Item 7

68 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 21,155,041 21,413,248 66,944,847 71,394,708 47,262,483 2012/13 2,632,231 1,051,535 5,255,026 6,699,751 6,633,174 7,273,969 6,969,681 1,792,596 4,178,903 3,470,159 1,530,624 4,449,861 468,140 438,123 33,087 81,785

3/06/2014 - - *** Net of debt repayment, new renewals andloans works, repayment, debt of Net *** Revenue Asset Vested **Includes instruments onfinancial adjustment Tax and valuation Petrol Includes * Operating Expenditure Operating OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING 9 9 Operating Revenue Operating EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL Net Surplus/(Deficit) Net & recoveries charges internal NET OPERATING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) excluding 2013/14 Other Income* Other Rates Income Rates Asset Revenue** Asset Fees & Charges Fees Operational Costs (excluding internal charges & recoveries) charges internal (excluding Costs Operational Subsidies, Grants & Donations Grants Subsidies, Contributions & Other Development Depreciation Management Asset Accounting Losses Accounting Finance Costs Finance Strategy & Development Planning & Regulatory Services Corporate, Customer Services & Human Resources & Human Services Customer Corporate, Community Facilities & Programmes Facilities Community Finance

Corporate, Customer Services & Human Resources & Human Services Customer Corporate, Strategy & Development Finance Asset Management Asset Planning & Regulatory Services & Programmes Facilities Community -

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL OF STATEMENT PERFORMANCE for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Hastings District Council District Hastings 31-March-2014

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda YTD Actual YTD YTD Actual YTD 2013/14 70,334,871 21,274,307 23,465,945 48,279,337 74,966,378 70,334,871 74,966,378 8,238,616 2,820,460 4,631,507 4,631,507 2,529,604 5,464,991 6,289,806 7,274,141 7,649,158 4,245,277 3,757,216 1,678,976 641,188 601,065 997,750 92,873 540 - -

7 Revised Budget Revised

YTD Revised Revised YTD Full Year Year Full Budget 71,571,079 21,806,559 23,014,377 48,279,144 75,262,664 71,571,079 75,262,664 8,845,926 2,728,110 3,691,585 3,691,585 3,488,250 1,085,902 5,507,823 6,648,391 7,160,995 7,786,202 4,011,540 3,761,521 1,720,972 486,242 431,392 70,398 - - -

Variance Variance 1,236,208 1,236,208 (451,568) (296,286) (296,286) (607,309) (358,585) (113,147) YTD YTD YTD YTD 532,252 154,946 169,673 939,921 939,921 958,646 137,044 233,737 92,350 22,475 88,152 42,832 41,996 (4,305) 192 540 - -

100,433,707 101,894,479 100,433,707 101,894,479 29,069,356 32,508,581 64,372,193 10,519,673 12,361,806 11,087,764 Full Year Year Full Full Year Year Full Revised Revised Revised Revised Budget Budget 1,460,772 1,460,772 4,651,000 1,000,000 5,159,483 3,686,695 2,075,101 8,044,246 9,227,996 4,637,990 2,477,986 793,803 582,275 72,240 - - Attachment 1 Budget Budget 103% 129% 317% Spent 54% 73% 72% 48% 68% 73% 82% 67% 77% 68% 81% 68% 81% 66% 75% 74% 70% % of 0% 0% 0% Page Page 9 -324 -180 152 205 121 -30 -14 -46 -57 -79 -14 -31 -52 38% -8% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% % of YTD

69 Vi

Attachment 1 Item 7

70 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly CUSTOMER SERVICES & & SERVICES CUSTOMER

3/06/2014 HUMAN RESOURCES

DETAIL REPORTS DETAIL CORPORATE & -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 71

Attachment 1 Item 7

NOTES 7 8 4 5 6 2 3 9 1 10

72 0% 5% 66% 80% 37% 67% 65% 58% 66% 69% 61% 76% 76% 74% 76% 48% 17% 24% 29% 75% 81% % of -27% -46% Spent 329% Budget Budget Page 8,410 5,275 10,500 706,393 506,893 909,959 944,346 407,541 807,488 415,600 793,803 603,830 298,000 189,000 2,060,878 1,511,218 2,224,818 2,282,940 1,268,293 1,762,804 2,617,597 Budget Revised Revised (1,518,425) 12,858,188 FullYear (12,050,701)

- 1,426 (3,311) (1,093) (4,875) 23,272 32,206 17,186 44,144 24,086 (46,321) (63,867) (29,497) (14,968) (39,875) 237,441 253,230 173,574 126,874 156,371 106,722 154,946 YTD (143,189) (103,137) Variance

- - for period endyear 31 March 2014

10,500 50,000 - 420,735 484,363 846,604 718,509 308,489 486,242 341,447 306,825 762,772 923,046 114,500 486,242 YTD (425,797) (486,297) 1,101,651 8,488,813 1,997,579 1,687,838 Budget (1,188,569) (8,002,571)

7 - 1,426 70,356 34,586 10,125 397,463 530,685 989,793 721,820 309,582 642,614 444,583 311,700 826,639 938,014 641,188 YTD (188,356) (233,067) Actual 1,069,445 8,518,310 1,980,392 1,581,116 (1,014,995) (7,875,696) 2013/14

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Reserve Funding Reserve Human Resources Marketing & Events Corporate Services* Leadership Emergency Management Hastings I-Site Capital Renewals Debt Repayment Subsidies, Grants & Donations Customer Services & Business Support Information System Support* Other Income Administration Buildings Capital Works New Asset Sale Proceeds Fees & Charges Loan Funding TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING EXPENDITURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE N ET C APIT AL NET OPERATIONS (excl internal charges) CAPITAL REVENUE OPERATING REVENUE CORPORATE, CUSTOMER SERVICES & HUMAN RESOURCES SUMMARY REPORT SUMMARY RESOURCES & HUMAN SERVICES CUSTOMER CORPORATE,

- 1,037 21,158 19,938 18,831 342,636 534,142 941,692 764,516 628,213 263,743 469,177 302,833 301,800 625,791 910,602 468,140 YTD (537,584) (498,815) Actual 7,950,077 1,442,505 2,122,027 (7,480,900) (1,124,606) 2012/13 3/06/2014

*Groupings the include follow ing: Corporate Services: support, Democratic Business Support, Corporate Services Land Subdivision System Contingency Fund, Policy, Management Document PC's, Telecommunications, Systems, GIS, Management System Support: Financial Information Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council 3. 1. vs YTD YTD Actuals Actuals 12/13 13/14 Comments Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly CORPORATE, CUSTOMER SERVICES &HUMAN RESOURCES SUMMARY REPORT ikolcl payment call Riskpool same rental House Heretaunga tenanted at that time. that at tenanted this year. this homes. leaky of cover

3/06/2014 time

atya due year last NOTES TO THE COST OF SERVICE STATEMENT This for -

was to for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for 3 is er ad$88,300 paid years h eodforbeing floor second the olne required longer no $60,283 more Operating Expenditure Operating Operating Revenue Operating 31-March-2014 tthe at for for 1. vs YTD YTD Actuals Budgets 13/14 13/14 Comments 5. 4. 3. 2. Agenda Item: Item: Agenda Ltd established been have tenants due budget below $73,572 is rental actual the but figures budget rental House income rental er,adEetrlCmiso ni December until Commission Electoral and years, Offsetting $14,215. by budget 2014. 2014. end of year. in (a) dueto: mainly is This Fees anyb oni ern aig f$53,867, of savings budget. Hearing projects some Council however by mainly $32,206 variance favourable Leadership Operating Expert building Administration (c) 6below) note this however, budget, $121,740. amount Budgeted 2014. budgeted n aaiso 4,3 due $44,437 of Salaries and mainly budget, $11,000 of Services Contracted rates. on impact This & Events (13/8/13 Multifunctional Hastings for apotential Study Council by approved of ahead $33,976 being charges due suppression $31,387 (b) budget over of budget. timing expenses election ne ugtb 5,3 due $57,330 by budget under June 2014. in is ($30,000) project. Control Building the $14,000 of funding additional fees Membership ev.RcrsMngmn Salary and leave Management Records leave. are phased evenly throughout the year. the evenly throughout are phased uligmitnnebtsol eon be should but maintenance building netimn Centre Entertainment utmrsrie rpryincome property services Customer for DHB

to mrec Management Emergency is & 2 7 h n lo o eatd however tenanted, not floor 2nd the funded vce dvic A

years, Charges lcinIcm f$4,6 due $146,963 of Income Election timing hs aorbevariances favourable these fixed costs from is f$30,636 of with term in frciigti noebigJune being income this receiving of in are oe hnbde.Heretaunga budget. than lower for eehn xesso $7,305 of expenses Telephone h 021 upu and surplus 2012/13 the a was utmrServices Customer otat oee h budgets the however contract, HB ih frenewal of right is 1496aedo budget. of ahead $154,946 slightly ae nls er actual years last on based are ( offset Lass aeorerelocation). Racecourse The is for tracking nubdee item unbudgeted an to from to HB vrbde mainly budget over ) yexpenditure(see by budget to Fire timing for staff 061 n an and 30/6/14 Lass April is a for slightly Attachment 1 Control the for is nparental on is Offset fparental of costs a Feasibility for are - aeup made ha of ahead HB Oceania two track further fact funding will to under Lass Page Page new over that the not are fire by by for to 2

Attachment 1 Item 7

74 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Capital Expenditure Capital Capital Revenue 8. 7. 6. 10. 9. Agenda Item: Item: Agenda ugthwvrrevenue however budget The This may or may not all be utilised by year end. year by beutilised all not or may may This advice, expert 1above.note ugtphased budget of grant 2012/13 the on budget from payment. Project part Strategy Digital the budget. to expenditure variance favourable Resources Human of variance unfavourable Events and Marketing Management Emergency The The due $46,321 spent however for spent June. budgeted due budget over $20,850 fund Event budget Personnel be offset by savings. by be offset PC

balance aorbevrac $44,144 variance favourable naorbevrac nldsa expense an includes variance unfavourable to h ln elcmn udadsvnsagainst savings and fund replacement plant the elcmns$1,0 ucae however purchased $119,100 Replacements 7 timing hc was which

is costs aeo ytefloig Events following. the by of made is fupgrade. of in Part anydue mainly EAP slightly May. predicted ftefunding the of n raiainlTraining. Organisational and GIS vrbudget over is to PABX bv budget above - is nesetb $44,000 by underspent pr os $60,224 House Opera for in timing only is ue Marketing June. h pr House. Opera the for prd $34,885 upgrade around for fexpenditure of hsproject this slightly Attachment 1 to is erbut year mainly timing - timing refer Page Page over will for to in is of of - -

Attachment 1 Item 7

76 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 Actual (607,718) YTD 302,884 116,182 302,884 179,908 239,654 306,750 910,602 61,781 15,706 16,604 36,322

3/06/2014 5,924 3,535 6,112 4,012 404 ------OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific

Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Fees & Charges & Fees Personnel Costs Personnel Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Depreciation Administration Costs Administration Other Costs Other Finance Costs Finance Cafeteria Cleaning Operating Management Costs Management Operating Office Furniture & Fittings & Furniture Office HH Non-recoverable - Category 1 - Category HH Non-recoverable HH Consumables Category 3 Category HH Consumables Land & Buildings New Works Buildings Land & HH Recoverable - Category 5 - Category HH Recoverable Seismic Strengthening Seismic Computer & Office Equipment Office & Computer Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Vehicles & Machinery Plant Land & Buildings Renewals Buildings Land & MFD Replacements Heretaunga House Fire Penetrations Fire House Heretaunga -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Administration Buildings 31-March-2014

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 Actual (689,898) YTD 248,116 133,478 248,116 188,858 243,341 297,225 938,014 69,061 19,736 29,593 10,125 65,759 28,656 26,979 17,156 10,125 6,052 3,860 3,730 3,055 - - - - -

7 Budget

(601,652) YTD 321,394 109,858 321,394 177,782 239,775 297,225 923,046 92,606 15,134 12,355 50,000 65,134 5,800 3,623 3,028 4,231 ------

Variance YTD YTD (73,278) (23,619) (73,278) (11,076) (14,968) (16,114) (29,593) (28,656) (26,979) (17,156) (10,125) (88,246) 23,545 15,134 39,875 (3,566) (3,730) (3,055) 8,495 3,028 4,231 (626) (252) - - -

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget 1,268,293 (853,953) 134,522 262,783 414,340 152,048 414,340 259,924 319,700 396,300 131,249 15,134 89,000 25,453 10,231 27,400 11,249 39,000 5,800 7,017 3,028 - - - - - Attachment 1 Budget Spent 281% 153% 104% % of % of 15% 26% 60% 88% 51% 73% 76% 75% 22% 98% 11% 60% 74% 81% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Page Page 9

Attachment 1 Item 7

0.75

78 0% 0% 0% 66% 66% 68% 87% 31% 59% 13% 69% 22% % of 150% Spent Budget Budget Page - - - 5,000 7,600 2,100 11,600 11,587 40,996 94,100 483,430 603,830 (603,830) Budget Revised Revised Full Year

- 329 (245) 1,796 4,012 5,066 1,020 1,020 (5,840) 24,292 23,272 19,426 12,313 YTD Variance

- - - 3,750 1,575 5,357 5,005 for period endyear 31 March 2014

11,587 28,415 67,728 - 420,735 337,320 YTD (420,735) Budget

7 - 993 8,989 3,421 1,820 3,561 1,020 1,020 17,427 55,415 397,463 332,254 YTD (396,443) Actual 2013/14

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Human Resources Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF

Datacom Payroll Organisational Training Finance Costs Depreciation Administration Costs Maintenance & Asset Costs Personnel Costs Services & Accommodation Costs Fees & Charges Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: NET OPERATIONS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE

31 31 - 4,080 2,889 1,452 2,420 3,574 21,185 59,283 342,636 273,016 YTD (342,605) Actual 2012/13 3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council

Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 Actual (936,203) YTD 941,692 678,827 153,284 34,634 34,634 88,299 17,700 10,410 46,812 48,597

3/06/2014 6,980 3,750 3,762 5,489 5,489 - - - TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific CAPITAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET

Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Vehicles & Machinery Plant Risk pool Call pool Risk Shared Services Shared Racecourse Feasibilty Study Feasibilty Racecourse Depreciation Administration Costs Administration Business Continuity Project Continuity Business Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services CEO Projects CEO Sustainable Development Sustainable Other Costs Other Personnel Costs Personnel Fees & Charges & Fees Other Income Other Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Corporate Services 31-March-2014

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 Actual (980,713) YTD 989,793 797,746 22,655 30,636 11,644 32,095 73,691 70,749 3,868 9,080 9,080 ------

7 Budget

(846,604) YTD 846,604 706,430 35,000 35,000 24,938 10,000 33,688 68,196 9,551 3,800 ------

Variance (143,189) (134,109) YTD YTD (40,003) (22,655) (30,636) (91,316) 35,000 35,000 10,000 (7,157) (2,553) (2,093) 9,080 9,080 - - - (68) -

Full Year Year Full (2,053,539) Revised Budget 1,050,550 2,060,878 940,293 35,000 35,000 10,000 30,000 23,500 30,000 50,000 12,735 50,000 40,000 3,800 2,064 5,275 7,339 - Attachment 1 Budget Spent 102% 107% 314% 440% 124% 61% 76% % of % of 91% 85% 48% 48% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7% 0% 0% Page Page

9 79

Attachment 1 Item 7

0.75

80 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 87% 68% 69% 69% 55% 75% 79% 64% 85% % of 201% 201% 108% Spent Budget Budget Page - - - - 4,000 5,000 4,000 4,100 45,725 15,100 15,100 132,300 111,635 121,546 132,358 2,282,940 1,851,010 Budget Revised Revised (2,267,840) Full Year

27 - - (345) 5,000 (3,460) (3,460) (3,460) (7,746) (2,186) (3,583) 18,807 14,872 18,807 (12,621) 125,529 106,722 105,338 YTD Variance

------4,100 5,000 for period endyear 31 March 2014

97,153 11,592 82,062 22,958 87,436 99,269 11,592 - YTD 1,687,838 1,381,022 Budget (1,676,245)

7 - - (27) - 3,460 3,460 4,445 3,460 30,400 94,683 25,143 91,019 84,397 30,400 104,900 YTD Actual 1,581,116 1,275,684 (1,550,716) 2013/14

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 Customer & Business Support & Business Customer COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOSTSERVICE OF Administration Costs Computer & Office Equipment ReplacementsMFD Yellow Pages Promapp Office Furniture & Fittings Finance Costs Personnel Costs Fees & Charges Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals MFD OperatingMFD Costs Maintenance & Asset Costs Services & Accommodation Costs Depreciation NET OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE

- - (20) 6,850 6,850 4,345 21,008 37,294 44,144 96,947 99,987 54,840 19,238 21,008 110,797 YTD Actual 1,442,505 1,157,664 (1,421,497) 2012/13 3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 Actual (761,837) YTD 764,516 541,473 34,245 10,171 51,041 61,491 11,253 89,087

3/06/2014 2,142 2,679 9,072 4,275 3,835 6,464 537 ------OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific EXPENDITURE OPERATING Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET

HDC Maori Joint Committee HDC Maori Joint Depreciation Costs Administration Costs Accommodation & Services Costs Asset & Maintenance Fees & Charges & Fees Personnel Costs Personnel Longterm Plan (LTP) Plan Longterm Expenses Conference & Travel Councillors Annual Report Annual Community Survey Community Re-organisation Costs Re-organisation CulturalIAG Activity Group Advisory International Streamining Web Week Leadership Plan Annual Rural Community Board Community Rural Election Expenses Election Civic Functions Civic Council Hearings Council Other Costs Other Subisidies, Grants & Donations & Grants Subisidies, -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT 31-March-2014 Leadership

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 1,069,445 Actual (916,142) YTD 315,082 153,730 112,746 153,303 229,969 577,099 35,401 38,945 15,616 12,253 19,332 9,958 4,026 8,117 9,828 (427) ------

7 (1,101,651) Budget

1,101,651 YTD 303,537 110,897 200,000 626,768 33,480 39,220 16,879 10,000 12,753 25,145 4,350 3,051 9,511 6,121 ------

Variance YTD YTD 153,730 153,303 185,509 (11,544) (29,969) 25,145 32,206 49,669 (1,921) (2,253) (6,579) (5,608) (1,849) (4,026) (8,117) 1,263 3,051 6,121 (317) (427) 275 ------

Full Year Year Full (1,642,060) Revised Budget 1,762,804 119,400 839,600 640,845 120,744 138,409 120,744 255,000 25,145 54,503 18,750 10,000 12,753 12,682 10,000 52,500 13,687 50,000 10,000 40,000 12,538 5,800 3,051 8,631 - - Attachment 1 Budget Spent 123% 152% 127% 172% 127% % of % of 65% 90% 77% 47% 59% 69% 33% 49% 83% 81% 56% 61% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Page Page 9

Attachment 1 Item 7

0.75

82 73% 76% 80% 87% 62% 67% 61% 96% 81% 80% % of 100% 100% 100% Spent Budget Budget Page 4,200 11,800 25,000 25,000 25,000 24,400 40,385 407,541 163,933 224,821 163,933 101,935 (243,608) Budget Revised Revised Full Year

- - - (515) 7,314 1,482 8,407 8,407 1,557 (1,093) (8,001) 17,667 (13,284) YTD Variance

3,150 8,850 for period endyear 31 March 2014

25,000 25,000 25,000 17,873 79,726 30,640 - 308,489 122,923 168,251 122,923 YTD (185,566) Budget

7 3,665 7,368 25,000 25,000 25,000 16,315 62,059 38,640 309,582 131,331 181,535 131,331 YTD (178,252) Actual 2013/14

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 Hastings I-Site Visitor Centre Visitor I-Site Hastings COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Havelock North Visitors Centre Land & Buildings Works New Finance Costs Depreciation Administration Costs Personnel Costs Services & Accommodation Costs Maintenance & Asset Costs Fees & Charges NET OPERATIONS Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS

- - - 4,400 8,418 11,769 63,882 30,463 263,743 100,457 144,812 100,457 YTD (163,287) Actual 2012/13 3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 Actual (533,642) YTD 534,142 145,944 239,432 124,086 44,447 13,554 30,893 28,370 10,000 25,000 35,000 48,987 20,487

3/06/2014 8,000 1,145 2,722 500 326 500 ------TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific CAPITAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING NET OPERATIONS NET OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL

Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Vehicles & Machinery Plant Office Furniture & Fittings & Furniture Office Events Fund Events Opera House Centenary House Opera Digital Communications Strategy Communications Digital Reputation Monitor Reputation Christmas in Cornwall in park Christmas Enterprise Budgeting Enterprise International Cultures Day Grant Cultures International HB Racing Spring Carnival Spring Racing HB Air Training Corps Training Air Horse of the Year the of Horse FAWC Waiata Maori Music Awards Maori Music Waiata Blossom Festival Blossom My Hastings Tourism Strategies Tourism Generic Communications Generic ulo News letter Outlook Community Link Community Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Finance Costs Finance Other Costs Other Depreciation Personnel Costs Personnel Administration Costs Administration Subisidies, Grants & Donations & Grants Subisidies, Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for

COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Marketing, Communications Events & 31-March-2014

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 Actual (530,685) YTD 530,685 297,815 121,044 24,809 12,476 10,000 20,000 55,377 10,243 44,626 10,136 23,794 16,192 38,038 69,261 4,250 4,250 3,463 4,069 457 ------

7 Budget

(484,363) YTD 484,363 315,444 102,218 50,000 14,543 50,000 8,205 2,025 134 ------

Variance YTD YTD (24,809) (23,495) (12,476) (10,000) (20,000) (19,261) (10,243) (36,421) (10,136) (23,794) (16,192) (46,321) (18,826) (46,321) 17,628 (5,377) (4,250) (4,250) (3,463) (2,043) (323) ------

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget (909,959) 242,886 430,986 909,959 170,483 55,500 40,000 49,000 12,750 12,500 52,400 10,243 48,500 10,505 31,650 40,000 8,500 8,205 5,275 2,700 ------Attachment 1 Budget Spent 100% 100% 100% 544% 132% 151% 33% 62% 66% 75% 40% % of % of 71% 16% 69% 58% 58% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% Page Page

9 83

Attachment 1 Item 7

0.75

84 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 76% 81% 76% 38% 74% 88% 22% 81% 88% 68% 45% 81% 75% 55% 79% 76% 35% 63% % of 786% Spent Budget Budget Page 70 ------8,410 10,000 14,534 16,500 17,391 17,000 82,000 10,000 18,900 60,833 70,000 52,750 78,410 154,810 944,346 197,532 100,000 100,000 298,444 199,000 213,758 (865,936) Budget Revised Revised Full Year

------(480) 5,000 3,882 1,853 3,521 4,260 4,482 6,183 4,515 5,568 4,627 (5,097) (7,503) (3,311) (5,097) 33,243 29,391 34,702 15,020 36,554 (11,093) (42,011) (18,253) YTD Variance

70 ------5,000 8,944 for period endyear 31 March 2014

16,500 17,391 17,000 37,500 10,000 26,802 54,500 48,500 31,770 14,175 26,802 - 128,101 718,509 148,149 222,281 173,964 YTD (691,707) Budget

7 ------550 5,097 5,097 5,485 5,062 1,853 12,979 13,130 12,518 31,317 42,011 61,503 48,932 33,480 27,143 14,175 63,356 135,603 721,820 159,242 240,534 144,572 YTD (658,464) Actual 2013/14

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 Emergency Management Emergency COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Other Costs CD EmergencyCD Comm Centres Maintenance & Asset Costs Depreciation Computer & Office Equipment Protective Clothing Hose Heretaunga VRFF extend - fire station Land & Buildings Works New Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Plant, Machinery & Vehicles Works New Volunteer Awards Recognition Tak aturia HBCDEM Fire Station Maintenance Auxilary Equipment Subisidies, Grants & Donations Fees & Charges Personnel Costs Civil Defence Warning System Other Machinery & Equipment Communication Equipment Fire Suppression External Training Courses Services & Accommodation Costs Administration Costs Finance Costs NET OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATIONS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE

------542 4,442 5,243 4,229 8,130 30,002 22,714 27,957 22,714 12,000 40,189 13,711 42,212 44,060 10,425 30,002 628,213 161,068 148,475 221,431 YTD (598,211) Actual 2012/13 3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (2,115,899) 2,122,027 Actual YTD 944,492 521,309 565,137 156,806 160,223 86,371 34,529 21,250 18,000

3/06/2014 6,128 6,128 4,719 5,000 4,200 3,417 7,269 ------OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific CAPITAL TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET

Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services GIS Hastings Library Minor Equipment Library Hastings Budgeting Enterprise Fees & Charges & Fees Personnel Costs Personnel Software Development Software Private Office Network Office Private Access Remote & Firewall Laptop Replacements Laptop Upgrade PABX Orthophotography GIS (DMS) System Management Document System Information Management Financial Monitor Replacements Monitor PC Replacements PC Scanners Opera House - Digital Strategy - Digital House Opera Replacements Telephone Administration Costs Administration Library Computer System Upgrade System Computer Library Cemetery Hastings Fittings & Furniture Office Wireless solution Wireless Depreciation Costs Asset & Maintenance Computer & Office Equipment Office & Computer -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Information Systems Support 31-March-2014

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 (1,974,384) 1,980,392 Actual YTD 926,862 119,100 409,805 577,246 355,286 355,286 54,105 34,885 60,224 12,374 3,600 6,009 9,628 6,009 6,120 ------

7 (1,994,047) Budget

1,997,579 YTD 117,500 868,208 501,750 561,911 249,258 249,258 60,526 47,588 32,400 3,531 3,531 5,184 ------

Variance (119,100) (106,028) (106,028) YTD YTD 117,500 (58,654) (34,885) (60,224) (15,334) 43,988 32,400 17,186 91,945 19,664 (9,628) (7,190) (6,120) 6,420 2,478 2,478 ------

Full Year Year Full (2,609,976) Revised Budget 2,617,597 1,139,097 1,240,818 1,240,818 669,000 117,500 400,000 150,000 150,000 158,400 705,150 47,588 43,200 88,000 60,000 25,000 47,650 36,800 25,000 47,968 16,350 7,621 7,621 7,500 ------Attachment 1 Budget Spent 126% % of % of 75% 79% 61% 76% 61% 82% 81% 29% 79% 76% 76% 29% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Page Page 9

Attachment 1 Item 7

86 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 FINANCE Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for DETAIL REPORTS DETAIL

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1

Page Page 87

Attachment 1 Item 7

NOTES 1 2

88 0% % of 59% 32% 93% 96% 68% 89% 96% 68% Spent -55% 129% 116% Budget Budget -354% Page - (5,985) 36,000 36,000 10,500 72,240 (41,985) (16,485) 649,240 577,000 2,485,671 2,485,671 Budget Revised Revised (1,836,431) Full Year

- 82,546 17,453 12,159 39,767 51,926 59,685 59,685 22,475 (34,473) (34,473) 105,022 164,707 YTD Variance

- - - - for period endyear 31 March 2014

70,398 - (30,739) (30,739) (30,739) 501,790 431,392 1,752,985 1,752,985 (1,251,195)

YTD Budget YTD

7 - 9,028 12,159 92,873 21,187 34,473 34,473 (13,286) 606,811 513,938 1,693,300 1,693,300 (1,086,489) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF FINANCE SERVICES SUMMARY REPORT SUMMARY SERVICES FINANCE Interest Income Other Income Asset Sale Proceeds Fees & Charges Reserve Funding Reserve Capital Renewals Finance Services* TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE N ET C APIT AL NET OPERATIONS (excl internal charges) CAPITAL REVENUE OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUE TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE

- - - 359 81,785 (30,071) (30,071) (30,071) 466,750 384,606 1,565,967 1,565,967 (1,099,217) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

*Groupings the include follow ing: Services:Finance Services, Finance Collection Rate Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council 1. vs YTD YTD Actuals Actuals 12/13 13/14 Comments Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly oenetFnigAec $266 and ($22,616) Agency Hawkes Funding Government March 2013. March in dividends unbudgeted of receipt income Other

3/06/2014 2013/14 Bay

with Airport is 1932hge hnbde due budget than higher $129,332 odvdnsbigreceived being dividends no NOTES TO THE COST OF SERVICE STATEMENT LTD - FINANCE SERVICES SUMMARY REPORT

$0,3)bigreceived being ($107,437) for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for from Operating Expenditure Operating h Local the Operating Revenue Operating 31-March-2014 to from 31

2. 1. vs YTD YTD Actuals Budgets 13/14 13/14 Comments Agenda Item: Item: Agenda ($34,120) and Postage and Courier costs ($14,352). costs and Courier andPostage ($34,120) to Operation $47,608. by budget below is and income tax Petrol ($22,616) LTD ($107,437). Airport Bay Agency Hawkes dividends Funding unbudgeted Government of receipt income Other oe hnpandContracting planned than lower

costs is are 8,4 ihrta ugtdue budget than higher $82,546 5,8 oe hnbde due budget than lower $59,685 from evc costs service Attachment 1 h Local the from Page Page to

Attachment 1 Item 7

90 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 91

Attachment 1 Item 7

92 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 98% 61% 68% 98% 74% 30% 55% 57% 34% 47% 70% % of 309% 125% 129% Spent Budget Budget Page - - - - 5,000 5,000 35,000 35,000 14,000 95,000 34,113 44,200 27,825 72,240 72,240 42,685 325,000 742,710 1,594,138 2,485,671 Budget Revised Revised (2,413,431) Full Year

- - - - - 5,493 8,532 (9,733) 15,989 61,088 59,685 22,475 17,487 (34,473) (34,473) (10,750) (28,596) (22,165) 212,315 130,154 152,629 YTD Variance

------for period endyear 31 March 2014

70,398 45,000 24,980 32,014 33,150 16,908 70,398 - 243,584 469,050 YTD 1,752,985 1,176,883 Budget (1,682,587)

7 - - - - 9,733 8,377 34,473 34,473 92,873 45,000 28,596 19,487 14,526 55,315 227,595 407,962 130,154 223,027 YTD Actual 1,693,300 1,187,633 (1,470,272) 2013/14

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Finance Services Finance Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF

Interest Income Rating Valuations Services & Accommodation Costs Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Development Policy Amended LTCCP Audit Rating Review Annual Report Other Income Personnel Costs Fees & Charges Annual Report Audit Telecommunications Suspense Maintenance & Asset Costs Administration Costs Depreciation Finance Costs NET OPERATIONS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATINGEXPENDITURE Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE

------359 81,785 52,660 62,310 10,072 30,111 31,311 36,310 82,144 225,400 390,165 YTD Actual 1,565,967 1,067,997 (1,483,823) 2012/13 3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment

Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 93

Attachment 1 Item 7

Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Quarterly Report May 2014 REPORTS

COMMUNITY FACILITIES & PROGRAMMES DETAIL 3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Community Community Facilities Initiatives, Development Economic Safety Cultural & & Assistance: Social Development, Community Gallery, Assistance Art Hastings Facilities: Cultural Centre, Halls, Sports Flaxmere Hastings Centres: CommunityHalls & Activity Other Centre, Indoor RecreationSpace ing: follow include the *Groupings

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (4,964,843) 1,558,714 1,713,345 3,941,876 2,605,832 1,262,218 1,660,655 8,906,719 1,638,064 2,112,919 1,862,458 (892,486) 721,672 197,187 225,000 259,189 154,421 401,109 103,494 346,631 471,683 295,725 744,896 810,231 828,186 342,418 192,936 949,929 27,792

3/06/2014 210 - 34 T PTAL APIT C ET N REVENUE CAPITAL charges) internal (excl OPERATIONS NET REVENUE OPERATING OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUE CAPITAL TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL

Interest Income Interest Fees & Charges & Fees Subsidies, Grants & Donations & Grants Subsidies, Holiday Park Holiday Asset Sale Proceeds Sale Asset Loan Funding Capital New Works Capital Administration Services Community Reserve Funding Community Development & Assistance* Development & Community Splash Planet Splash Subisidies, Grants & Donations & Grants Subisidies, Capital Renewals Capital Debt Repayment Debt Swimming Pools Swimming Halls and Other Activity Centres* Activity andOther Halls Cultural Facilities* Libraries Cemeteries & Crematorium & Cemeteries Housing for the Elderly & General Housing General & Elderly for the Housing HB Opera House Opera HB Housing for the Elderly & General Housing General & Elderly for the Housing Halls and Other Activity Centres* Activity andOther Halls Cemeteries & Crematorium & Cemeteries Splash Planet Splash Holiday Park Holiday Other Activities Other COMMUNITY FACILITIES &PROGRAMMES SUMMARY REPORT -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT 31-March-2014

YTD Actual YTD

2013/14 (1,131,173) (5,312,270) Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2,674,879 1,792,815 2,874,369 4,182,255 4,005,542 1,396,942 1,678,874 9,494,525 1,596,109 1,853,552 1,003,453 1,805,547 791,998 257,363 453,357 187,405 388,357 113,388 414,006 425,005 359,175 960,426 844,554 376,551 201,207 938,343 31,264 12,085 - 35

YTD Budget

(1,177,578) (5,827,256) 3,013,863 1,722,801 3,048,190 3,766,429 4,225,768 1,435,200 1,632,132 9,593,685 1,380,425 2,160,067 1,020,978 1,936,154 7

817,441 272,559 505,316 426,770 108,163 523,407 342,900 892,557 917,457 344,290 187,554 933,828 20,975 34,327 4,908 - - -

Variance (338,984) (173,821) (109,400) YTD YTD 153,078 415,827 220,226 514,986 215,684 420,097 306,515 130,607 (10,289) (25,442) (70,014) (51,959) (46,742) (38,413) (16,275) (67,869) (32,261) (13,653) 12,085 15,197 38,259 99,160 46,404 17,524 72,903 (4,514) 5,225 - 35

12,929,650 Full Year Year Full (1,664,752) (8,285,553) Revised Budget 1,952,050 1,531,435 1,241,533 1,081,749 4,991,021 2,358,231 5,050,486 4,644,098 6,715,238 1,933,206 1,384,849 3,878,107 1,250,185 2,646,323 1,245,038 374,699 640,285 569,026 146,437 815,644 478,900 458,081 262,200 34,900 55,000 (1,534) 6,000 6,108 - Attachment 1 % of Budget of % -12214% 6958% 115% 201% Spent 68% 73% 77% 51% 71% 54% 76% 48% 75% 69% 66% 68% 68% 77% 82% 72% 77% 75% 87% 90% 68% 64% 57% 90% 60% 73% 0% 0% Page Page

Attachment 1 Item 7

in be are a 5 The that Page partly will are insurers Whanau has been will currently at Te report from 86% earlier revenue down already paying Splash Planet. are February 2014. of which full for with a revenue with were fire effect This finalised final payment tenants a somewhat distorted as they are New for period endyear 31 March 2014

are etc. - reserves. Cremations satisfactory season pre-purchased graves a to now at 96% compared costs expected that this unfavourable variance of be

from the funding of the major upgrade at the 7 are will

6% increase come into

is still Housing the for Elderly does not impact on rates. $40,989 against budget. lower levels than anticipated Once all this Flaxmere Community Centre and Library. currently ahead of budget and indications following the destruction by Both revenueexpenditure (variance $215,684 (variance favourable) $46,742 and unfavourable) These figures include $254,000 as It $25,442 can berates reduced by yearthe financial end. year. Occupancy These figures doderived not includetransferred the $34,000 revenue presented. offset an increased rentalto and all existing tenants had House some years ago. Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 3. 4. Comments 13/14 13/14 Budgets Actuals YTD YTD vs 1. 2. two time Quarterly Report May 2014 31-March-2014 $48,984 Whanau Operating Revenue is Te the $254,000 insurance for a NOTES TO THE COST OF SERVICE STATEMENT SERVICE OF COST THE TO NOTES the inclusion of the 13/14 year significant variance between the COMMUNITY FACILITIES & PROGRAMMES SUMMARY REPORT SUMMARY & PROGRAMMES FACILITIES COMMUNITY to in a

cemetery revenue exceeds the same is 3/06/2014

payment House. years due There behind the same time last year. While last year by $36,233 the Crematorium Attachment 1 Attachment 4. 2. Comments 13/14 12/13 Actuals Actuals YTD YTD vs Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 97

Attachment 1 Item 7

98 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Operating Expenditure Operating 10. 9 8. 7. 13 12. 11. Agenda Item: Item: Agenda branch for 6months. branch in there variance expects manager relating $137,010 udd paetsvnsaantexpenditure against savings apparent funded, by bv.There above. Pool revenue budgets. budgets annual the as redevelopment. operational This required Arena Included This that suggest Manager This ugtbtrelates compared but budget under beslightly to area appears this in Expenditure paid wages $32,261. higher by and budget exceeds Expenditure This remaining vacant. remaining 1946due $119,486 from relating $79,466 of trust Group the and months nine after budget against ubro infcn nocsntyet there not invoices however significant $130,607 of of number budget against of portion unspent any this however $36,000 of variance $75,796 total due to Community Centre. Community costs is difference. atiming purely over expenditure, 20 under expenditure. modest reflect endwill year ihrfuel higher (particularly depreciation relates ($31,869) variance favourable the of balance contribute to this variance. this to contribute stolen replacement permanent aig mainly savings ute eue ysm savings some by reduced further March eeu due revenue a

will cost reserves. change prtn oni' pools. Council's operating to cost ruigcontains grouping which due ruigof grouping 7 in

need are in h oiino aae fthis of manager of position the which h break the ahrthan rather etecretyhas currently centre to to centre hsgrouping this costs offset a epnd27 reopened has in hsdbudget. phased h eprr lsn fteFlaxmere the of closing temporary the costs to to is is The e for fee will the to At be h al amn of payment early the for to loa naorbevrac of variance unfavourable an also to yufvual aine against variances unfavourable by etrestructuring meet is in n elcmn fsaltools small of replacement and rsn hsshows this present to help way are forward carried variance in h akof lack the renewals h lsr fteFlaxmere the of closure the to cost April personnel hwn aorbevariances favourable showing relating payments blwinsurance (below Kotui with was h tmcYuhCentre Youth Atomic the the offset will is to a for and nufvual variance unfavourable an ete nldsthe includes centres temporary aorbevrac of variance favourable on along found atossedn the spending cautious for timing be - It plant which h 3,0 shortfall $32,000 the a it $65,000. is This to costs h vrl grouping overall the activity to a April, osntrepresent not does aorbevariance favourable locompounded also ml favourable small tya end. year at etge Green Pettigrew fgat paid grants of & grant Civic will costs. in to a in Attachment 1 e note see a staff machinery), tthe at grant excess) operational The with hand the efunded be favourable was vr ime Overt Square Of until facility HCAG library higher to are such Clive paid Page Page this The the all is 5 a a

Attachment 1 Item 7

100 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Capital Expenditure Capital 14 Agenda Item: Item: Agenda with a budget of $1.3 million ($1.267 million spent YTD). spent million ($1.267 million of $1.3 a budget with project Centre/Library Community Flaxmere the with projects expenditure vrl h aia new capital the Overall

a 8 fthe of 58% ugto 31ilo $.4 spent ($1.445 $3.1million of budget 7

for h year the is 2651bhn the behind $236,501 full er ugtspent. budget years are h upgrade the works n renewals and YTD to Attachment 1 The h pools the YTD) budget major Page Page and 101

Attachment 1 Item 7

102 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (224,911) 165,296 225,000 15,457 23,405 18,559

2,800 2,283 3/06/2014 - - - - 89 89 Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET

Depreciation Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Vehicles & Machinery Plant Office Furniture & Fittings & Furniture Office Rose Sunday Rose Housing for Elderly –Callout Elderly for Housing Personnel Costs Personnel Fees & Charges & Fees Administration Costs Administration -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Community Services Administration 31-March-2014

YTD Actual YTD

2013/14 Agenda Item: Item: Agenda (257,363) 181,517 257,363 16,169 22,012 30,914 27,883 27,883 2,800 6,751 - - - -

YTD Budget

7 (272,559)

185,596 272,559 15,732 44,476 21,400 3,000 5,354 ------

Variance YTD YTD (27,883) (27,883) 22,464 15,197 15,197 (9,514) (1,397) 4,080 (437) 200 - - - -

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget (374,699) 374,699 250,406 20,977 63,666 25,550 23,000 20,000 14,100 3,000 3,165 4,500 - - Attachment 1 % of Budget of % 139% 121% Spent 121% 62% 77% 48% 35% 72% 69% 69% 0% 0% 0% 0% Page Page {& # 103

Attachment 1 Item 7

0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 46% 80% 66% 18% 46% 75% 80% 18% 23% 13% 24% 18% 39% 69% 76% Spent 103% 100% 101% 100% 113% 104 % of Budget Page - 3,510 1,998 9,921 27,500 11,259 19,409 13,058 15,693 80,000 97,851 34,959 309,000 486,851 241,170 353,639 353,639 239,300 218,810 297,288 2,090,000 3,170,020 3,170,020 1,531,435 1,058,820 Budget Revised Revised (1,177,796) Full Year

- (27) - - - - 5,236 9,702 4,853 7,348 (1,108) (1,401) 17,524 57,504 77,731 30,000 13,070 (93,929) (12,704) 281,908 319,229 319,229 YTD (117,124) (116,969) (111,453) (111,453) Variance

- - 3,510 1,998 5,628 9,702 4,902 1,300 13,500 30,000 17,481 80,000 73,388 for period endyear 31 March 2014 231,750 385,138 180,877 108,656 176,829 148,050 176,829 179,475

(844,149) - 1,715,125 1,764,132 1,764,132 1,020,978

YTD Budget YTD 50

- - - - 392 7 6,152 3,510 2,025 2,408 4,411 51,152 65,376 80,000 70,319 74,789 65,376 348,874 502,107 193,581 179,475 (938,077) 1,433,217 1,444,904 1,444,904 1,003,453 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Swimming Pools Swimming Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Flaxmere swimming pool roof Havelock North Pool Flaxmere Pool Clive Pool Land & Buildings Renewals Aquatic Strategy Clive Pool Pool Chemicals & Water Testing Diesel Flaxmere Pool Tri Squad Other Costs Aquatic Centre Depreciation Services & AccommodationCosts Administration Costs Maintenance & Asset Costs Havelock North Pool Personnel Costs Aquatic Centre Fees & Charges Finance Costs NET OPERATIONS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE

------5,000 2,802 2,474 2,474 12,880 80,000 73,387 65,400 350,116 927,912 238,261 151,683 231,750 744,896 536,820 139,874 (742,422) 1,534,168 1,534,168 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (543,115) 259,189 235,127 267,116 162,505 195,857 810,231 78,996 34,204 96,424 61,750 21,375 86,704 25,000 35,530 14,069 15,972

3/06/2014 7,927 7,118 8,021 9,103 1,630 1,903 3,846 - - - - - OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific NET OPERATIONS NET

Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Finance Costs Finance Other Costs Other Fees & Charges & Fees Camberley Community Centre Community Camberley Havelock Nth Community Centre - Operatio Centre Community Nth Havelock Personnel Costs Personnel Regional Stadium Grant (Operational) Grant Stadium Regional Subisidies, Grants & Donations & Grants Subisidies, Sport HB Sport Fun Factory Fun Administration Costs Administration Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Depreciation Land & Buildings New Works Buildings Land & Rural Halls Mtce Fund Mtce Halls Rural Acting Up Acting Marae Development Fund Marae Development Trust House Grant House Trust Other Machinery & Equipment & Machinery Other Computer & Office Equipment Office & Computer Flaxmere Community Centre Upgrade Centre Community Flaxmere Hastings Sports Centre - HVAC Centre Sports Hastings Flaxmere Community Centre AV Equipment AV Centre Community Flaxmere Storage Space Storage -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Halls Various and Activity Centres 31-March-2014 Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

YTD Actual YTD

2013/14 1,267,196 1,267,196 1,267,196 (502,750) 273,078 453,357 238,968 208,841 457,677 135,977 196,951 960,426 62,445 43,020 36,869 30,000 25,000 30,645 17,250 39,502 4,320 9,987 8,134 ------

7 YTD Budget

1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 (387,241) 163,009 505,316 242,973 129,375 505,316 155,749 196,500 892,557 83,715 42,975 65,658 22,500 25,000 38,152 10,000 7,636 7,984 ------

Variance (110,069) (115,509) YTD YTD (51,959) (79,466) (47,639) (67,869) (17,250) (31,517) 21,270 28,790 19,772 32,804 32,804 32,804 (7,500) (2,351) 7,507 1,866 4,005 4,320 (451) (45) ------

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget 1,370,000 1,384,452 1,300,000 1,250,185 (609,901) 101,195 255,337 262,000 237,100 640,285 324,932 172,500 640,285 84,000 57,300 30,000 25,000 50,000 20,000 12,322 73,950 14,452 20,000 14,452 Attachment 1 - - - - - fBd Budg of % Page Page 100% 121% 100% 115% Spent 44% 41% 61% 53% 97% 71% 74% 62% 53% 81% 75% 75% 92% 71% 77% 82% 92% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 105

Attachment 1 Item 7

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 82% 68% 68% 26% 72% 63% 41% 72% 76% 73% 75% 26% 29% 71% 25% 89% 32% Spent 287% 100% 115% 111% 125% 106 % of Budget Page - - - 1,200 5,000 4,000 3,500 6,330 4,000 13,000 10,000 10,000 10,550 26,913 35,700 34,255 25,713 77,333 73,586 65,933 130,000 668,000 655,000 525,000 724,323 463,000 301,406 103,090 1,241,533 Budget Revised Revised (1,214,620) Full Year

(1) - - - - (25) 458 702 (774) (495) 3,449 1,869 2,675 (9,965) (1,087) (2,336) (7,349) (3,314) (1,121) 75,577 16,275 72,903 17,850 34,958 35,573 21,488 (25,773) 141,390 141,390 141,390 YTD Variance

------3,140 3,520 7,793 9,869 3,887 19,285 58,000 19,285 51,942 49,355 26,775 25,691 77,318 for period endyear 31 March 2014 539,565 917,457 347,250 224,130 311,801 311,801 311,801

(898,172) -

YTD Budget YTD 25

- - - - 7 3,449 9,965 1,270 4,607 2,336 7,349 9,410 5,008 18,510 22,426 21,959 30,453 49,851 26,073 25,692 11,106 523,289 844,554 329,400 189,171 103,090 170,411 170,411 170,411 (822,595) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Cultural Facilities Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Services & Accommodation Costs Subisidies, Grants & Donations Regional Collection Fees & Charges Off Site Work shop Personnel Costs Work shop Sundry Supplies (HCAG) Exhibition Materials (HCAG) Civic Square Redevelopment Radio Advertising (HCAG) Mark eting Web / Other (HCAG) Other Advertising (HCAG) Other Machinery & Equipment Digital Equipment Media HCAG Heating, - Ventilation & AC Other Costs Maintenance & Asset Costs Administration Costs Depreciation Finance Costs Creative Hastings Print (HCAG) Media Mark eting Publications (HCAG) Openings (HCAG) Land & Buildings Works New Civic Square Redevelopment NET OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING EXPENDITURE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

- - - - - 3,000 7,535 1,592 1,887 7,760 9,285 17,790 20,790 33,333 69,794 26,528 10,607 65,000 11,242 12,090 14,323 14,323 10,798 14,323 446,490 828,186 326,288 241,356 (807,396) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (1,650,607) 1,862,458 1,251,812 176,088 304,729 304,729 203,455 292,176 120,363 106,685 211,851 16,018 54,798 37,219 12,930 90,891 19,007 13,310 10,062 91,944

3/06/2014 8,694 8,187 3,724 5,872 6,299 1,089 3,284 8,396 (522) - - Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS NET OPERATIONS NET TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL

on dl oks Book Adult Young uirBo s Book Junior Audio Visual Audio Havelock North Library North Havelock Hastings Library Hastings Electronic Resources Electronic Library Processing Costs Processing Library Reference Te Puna Membership Puna Te Finance Costs Finance Administration Costs Administration Stormwater New Works Stormwater dl oks Book Adult Clifford Davey Bequest Clifford Office Furniture & Fittings & Furniture Office AB Smith Bequest Smith AB Flaxmere Library Flaxmere Library Books Library Library Holiday Programme Holiday Library Library Science Subscriptions Science Library Best Seller Collection Seller Best Personnel Costs Personnel Fees & Charges & Fees Depreciation Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Subisidies, Grants & Donations & Grants Subisidies, -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for

COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT 31-March-2014 Libraries Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

YTD Actual YTD

2013/14 (1,618,801) 1,805,547 1,219,839 157,636 268,595 267,825 179,282 291,790 130,713 186,746 10,643 46,094 33,748 71,499 23,685 11,068 12,507 12,371 87,582 75,574 1,838 5,009 2,959 6,487 2,101 7,465 770 899 - 50 42

7 YTD Budget

(1,724,595) 1,936,154 1,260,612 109,523 180,875 315,923 315,923 211,560 294,750 134,626 149,689 211,560 17,111 56,450 37,880 18,506 20,221 13,559 12,187 95,128 11,795 14,142 7,653 1,350 4,159 7,293 2,143 3,747 - - -

Variance YTD YTD 130,607 105,793 (32,278) (24,813) 10,356 16,668 14,100 38,023 23,239 47,328 48,098 40,773 74,115 (3,465) (4,853) 6,469 4,132 2,490 7,546 6,787 1,300 1,200 1,245 1,646 2,960 3,913 7,465 (184) (770) 806 -

Full Year Year Full (2,364,723) Revised Budget 1,688,273 2,646,323 146,759 166,000 246,500 466,500 446,500 211,600 281,600 393,000 185,650 281,600 80,000 24,797 16,000 18,950 25,000 50,000 65,000 18,000 25,000 15,000 20,000 1,800 5,000 8,500 4,000 5,000 Attachment 1 - - fBd Budg of % Page Page Spent 43% 83% 58% 64% 67% 20% 59% 49% 36% 76% 61% 22% 77% 42% 60% 74% 53% 70% 36% 72% 64% 58% 68% 68% 66% 0% 7% 0% 0% 3% 0% 107

Attachment 1 Item 7

108 ## {&DEFA Page 0% 72% 49% 96% 94% 57% 77% 56% 62% 75% 75% 75% 896% Spent 140% 134% 435% 100% 100% 100% % of Budget - 8,810 1,000 12,077 52,235 43,500 45,000 10,000 11,500 45,700 52,235 56,610 467,158 220,560 433,190 193,600 1,029,815 1,952,050 Budget Revised Revised (1,899,816) Full Year

------(7,529) (3,603) 26,459 42,256 38,259 34,311 14,600 (12,242) 467,122 394,553 140,047 428,864 YTD (104,874) Variance

for period endyear 31 March 2014

- - 783 750 3,953 39,037 39,037 43,500 46,100 33,750 10,000 11,500 34,275 725,206 360,205 344,304 161,330 165,420

7 1,435,200 (1,396,164)

YTD Budget YTD 8,311 4,353 73,348 43,500 16,195 31,500 33,750 10,000 11,500 34,275 394,553 467,901 585,159 333,746 449,178 119,074 165,420 (929,041) 1,396,942 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 2013/14

YTD Actual

Quarterly Report May 2014 31-March-2014 Economic and Social Development andEconomic Social COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF

Subisidies, Grants & Donations Services & Accommodation Costs Maintenance & Asset Costs Other Costs Depreciation Fees & Charges Personnel Costs Atomic Youth Centre Hastings City Mark eting Targeted - Rate Blossom Festival Administration Costs Safer Streets Project (Camberley) Citizens Advice Bureau Fiesta of Lights HNth Business Assn General - Rate HNth Business Assn Targeted - Rate

NET OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: - 3/06/2014 3,998 4,424

46,317 22,853 17,545 36,900 10,000 12,125 34,275 421,882 468,199 682,729 161,814 386,400 145,845 165,420 (794,019) 1,262,218 2012/13 Attachment 1 Attachment

YTD Actual

Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 19,650 30,000

3,110 2,870 5,100 3/06/2014 240 ------Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL

Hard Landscaping Trees Computer & Office Equipment Office & Computer Youth Futures Youth Park Assets New Works Youth At Risk At Youth EIT International student International EIT Business HB Food Innovation project Innovation Food HB Business c os okshops Work House Ice Whak atu Community Whanau Ora Whanau Community atu Whak Hastings City Business Association - Night Mark - Night Association Business City Hastings T Charitable Uturn Grant- Development Flaxmere -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 53,750 30,000 22,500 20,652 47,675 2,473 1,500 7,606 3,000 973 - - -

21,227 22,500 ------

(32,523) (30,000) (20,652) (47,675) (2,473) (1,500) (7,606) (3,000) (973) - - - -

75,427 30,000 30,000 26,000 25,000 16,500 ------Attachment 1 100% 29% 18% 71% 75% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Page Page 109

Attachment 1 Item 7

## {&DEFA

110 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 81% 82% 15% 69% 82% 36% 88% 77% 78% 90% 81% 68% 97% 68% 95% -50% Spent 112% 112% Page % of Budget - - - - - 250 6,000 4,000 5,900 4,908 5,100 1,000 25,000 16,000 68,829 97,880 62,190 220,100 211,000 180,000 458,081 573,934 222,282 569,026 115,854 Budget Revised Revised Full Year

- - 180 250 572 (962) (435) 1,707 (1,450) (1,976) (1,694) (1,982) (9,199) (3,208) (4,132) (17,582) (32,261) (37,841) (27,929) (13,067) (38,413) (70,102) YTD (169,719) (168,000) (122,605) Variance

------250 for period endyear 31 March 2014

7,707 6,000 6,000 2,838 4,908 1,707 - (1,462) 13,268 87,387 51,622 73,433 51,856 344,290 431,678 166,004 426,770

YTD Budget YTD

7 - - - - 435 (500) 5,820 1,450 1,976 4,532 5,480 17,582 27,929 15,250 17,285 60,820 76,641 55,988 177,426 174,000 122,605 376,551 393,837 179,071 388,357 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 Cemetaries & Crematorium Cemetaries COST OF SERVICE STATEMENT COST SERVICE OF Other Costs New Beams New Land & Buildings Works New Pre Purchase burial sites Crematorium Earthquak e Strengthening Land & Buildings Renewals Other Machinery & Equipment Resource Consents Computer & Office Equipment Pre Purchase burial sites Administration Costs Subisidies, Grants & Donations Niche Wall Havelock North Cemetery Personnel Costs Fees & Charges Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Medical Referees Depreciation Services & Accommodation Costs Maintenance & Asset Costs TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE Specific Operating Expenditure Projectsincluded above: OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS NET OPERATIONS

- - - - 5,336 1,439 1,651 1,069 4,171 4,765 (1,087) 25,000 51,263 25,276 11,708 63,456 52,361 74,082 41,842 139,408 111,042 342,418 405,873 171,049 401,109 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 528,736 192,936 721,672 721,672 41,759 41,759 19,734 16,824 24,675 77,338 71,496

1,107 6,610 8,272 8,043 5,456 5,671 5,809 9,385 1,645 3/06/2014 875 83 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific CAPITAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING NET OPERATIONS NET TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL

Land & Buildings New Works Buildings Land & Swansea Village Swansea Other Costs Other Finance Costs Finance Depreciation nesnPr Close Park Anderson Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Cameron CourtCameron akhaven Village Park Cambridge Court Cambridge Kereru Heights Kereru Tui Vale Tui Oak leigh Downs leigh Oak Elm Grove Elm Personnel Costs Personnel Fees & Charges & Fees Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Administration Costs Administration -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT 31-March-2014 Housing

YTD Actual YTD

2013/14 Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 590,791 201,207 791,998 791,998 16,964 16,964 27,603 17,083 21,300 80,879 78,050 10,015 1,396 3,009 8,067 8,736 6,858 3,871 9,174 3,654 196 45

YTD Budget

629,886 187,554 817,441 817,441 22,584 17,330 21,300 76,905 62,392 1,259 4,488 7,826 5,874 7,140 5,991 3,863 6,763 8,317 1,310 - - -

Variance YTD YTD (15,658) (16,964) (16,964) (39,095) (13,653) (25,442) (25,442) (5,019) (3,974) (2,862) (4,024) (2,411) 1,479 4,663 1,114 (137) (241) 247 282 - (45) (8)

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget 1,081,749 1,081,749 102,541 101,926 819,549 262,200 31,184 17,647 28,400 12,266 11,451 11,677 3,001 5,977 8,450 7,397 9,555 7,788 3,900 - - - Attachment 1 % of Budget of % 103% Spent 47% 50% 89% 66% 60% 86% 52% 96% 97% 75% 79% 47% 77% 73% 72% 77% 73% 0% 5% 0% 0% Page Page {& # 111

Attachment 1 Item 7

## {&DEFA

112 0% 0% 0% 76% 75% 75% 76% 72% 77% 75% 75% 75% 118% Spent 103% Page % of Budget - - 300 2,538 46,500 46,500 361,900 284,300 596,000 596,000 102,457 102,457 1,245,038 Budget Revised Revised (1,142,581) Full Year

60 - - - 794 794 (458) 1,903 (3,720) (6,020) (4,514) (6,656) (1,545) (8,201) YTD Variance

- - 275 for period endyear 31 March 2014

1,903 - 76,696 76,696 46,500 46,500 271,425 213,225 447,000 933,828 447,000 (857,132)

YTD Budget YTD

7 - - 215 6,656 77,490 77,490 48,045 54,701 277,445 213,225 447,458 938,343 447,000 (860,852) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 HB Opera House HB Opera Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Depreciation Services & Accommodation Costs Finance Costs Other Costs Fees & Charges Maintenance & Asset Costs HB Opera House Annual Grant Administration Costs Office Furniture & Fittings Other Machinery & Equipment NET OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

26 607 3,314 76,506 76,506 11,291 43,528 54,818 274,097 218,400 453,486 949,929 453,030 (873,423) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 1,638,064 1,663,777 1,660,655 806,905 312,390 223,115 128,470 185,759 162,987 190,075 142,958 100,577 126,635 192,944 25,713 26,423 55,496 13,936 87,845 22,675 10,931 48,500 54,928

4,014 3,122 2,087 7,704 2,194 7,189 1,582 3,651 1,902 4,015 6,370 1,809 6,879 2,820 3/06/2014 980 137 - - OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific NET OPERATIONS NET CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL

Subisidies, Grants & Donations & Grants Subisidies, Fees & Charges & Fees Gift Shop Gift Personnel Costs Personnel Water Treatment & Testing & Treatment Water Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Security Staff Security Administration Costs Administration Finance Costs Finance Dry Staff Ride Other Staff Other Depreciation Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Vehicles & Machinery Plant Land & Buildings Renewals Buildings Land & Rentals (Swimwear etc) Rentals Pumps, Wells, Water Reticulation Water Wells, Pumps, Bumper Boats Bumper Formula Fun Racing (Go Carts) (Go Racing Fun Formula Splash Surplus Splash Jungle Jeeps Jungle Merry Go Rounds & Mini Golf Mini Merry & Rounds Go Train Vandalism Hot Pools & Pools & Pools Hot Food & Beverages & Food Asset Management Plan Management Asset Work shop Expenses shop Work Wristband Expenses Wristband Plant, Machinery & Vehicles New Works Vehicles & Machinery Plant, Slides Lifesaving Staff Lifesaving Retail Staff Retail Cleaning Staff Cleaning Land & Buildings New Works Buildings Land & Other Machinery & Equipment & Machinery Other Splash Planet Attractions Planet Splash -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT 31-March-2014 Splash Planet

YTD Actual YTD

2013/14 Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 1,596,109 1,605,848 1,678,874 815,373 301,527 254,193 105,052 197,709 161,253 190,169 172,160 104,764 173,924 (73,026) 22,513 68,292 12,473 94,695 34,323 48,145 73,438 16,720 9,739 5,021 1,298 3,588 6,669 6,178 7,022 2,089 8,539 3,125 6,769 2,694 875 795 - - - - -

YTD Budget

1,380,425 1,380,425 1,632,132 7 (251,707)

780,785 268,520 257,552 128,880 193,396 124,879 188,251 158,995 136,804 21,611 50,875 12,223 81,812 12,000 10,010 35,000 97,687 70,000 22,209 3,000 9,594 1,738 1,786 5,275 5,775 3,510 2,003 5,000 1,774 2,715 5,803 232 - - - - -

Variance YTD YTD 215,684 225,423 178,681 (17,417) (12,883) (13,145) (34,588) (33,007) (46,742) (24,728) (36,374) (13,165) (37,120) 23,828 (7,078) (3,438) (2,021) (4,313) (1,298) (1,802) (1,394) (2,022) (2,462) (1,918) 9,739 3,461 6,886 5,490 3,359 1,738 2,634 1,207 1,774 (902) (250) (403) (967) 626 - - -

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget 1,384,849 1,384,849 1,933,206 (548,357) 140,100 102,150 889,860 299,380 342,005 257,861 100,000 132,600 197,950 166,063 100,000 257,766 20,825 16,000 58,000 86,021 24,000 52,231 70,000 25,940 7,775 8,550 5,803 4,000 9,594 5,550 1,055 5,275 3,665 2,110 5,000 5,000 3,165 2,110 - - - Attachment 1 % of Budget of % 108% 340% 126% 140% 122% 128% 118% 117% 103% 104% 110% 115% 101% 126% Spent 358% 105% 116% 79% 24% 38% 66% 37% 36% 78% 96% 92% 74% 75% 77% 64% 92% 87% 13% 67% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% Page Page {& # 113

Attachment 1 Item 7

## {&DEFA

114 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 77% 90% 74% 77% 79% Spent 104% Page % of Budget - - - - - 14,200 34,900 20,700 146,437 146,437 111,537 Budget Revised Revised Full Year

35 (186) (847) 5,260 5,225 (9,256) (5,030) (41,891) (41,891) (41,891) (10,289) YTD Variance

- - - - - for period endyear 31 March 2014

5,450 - 15,525 20,975 87,188 108,163 108,163

YTD Budget YTD

7 35 186 14,706 41,891 41,891 41,891 16,372 31,264 82,159 113,423 113,388 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Holiday Park Holiday 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF

Services & Accommodation Costs Fees& Charges Maintenance & Asset Costs Land & Buildings Works New Holiday Park Development Reserve Interest Income Depreciation TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE NET OPERATIONS

34 549 8,875 8,875 8,875 11,690 15,553 27,792 75,735 103,528 103,494 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council

Attachment 1 Item 7

Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014 DEVELOPMENT DETAIL DETAIL DEVELOPMENT

STRATEGY & & STRATEGY for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for REPORTS

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 115

Attachment 1 Item 7

NOTES 2 1

116 0% 0% 98% 55% 48% 48% % of 90% 40% 96% 48% Spent 223% 111% Budget Budget Page - - 35,000 29,445 53,500 18,500 10,500 39,945 (13,555) 2,090,756 2,090,756 Budget Revised Revised (2,090,756) Full Year

540 540 (1,613) (2,121) 89,393 21,945 88,853 10,125 88,853 32,069 (31,562) (33,683) YTD Variance

- - - - for period endyear 31 March 2014

18,500 18,500 - (10,166) (28,666) (10,166) 1,097,643 1,097,643 (1,097,643)

YTD Budget YTD

7 540 540 11,779 52,183 20,621 10,125 31,562 21,903 (30,280) 1,008,790 1,008,790 (1,008,250) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF STRATEGY & DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY REPORT SUMMARY & DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Reserve Funding Reserve Capital Works New Strategic Development Asset Sale Proceeds Fees & Charges Capital Renewals TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE N ET C APIT AL CAPITAL REVENUE OPERATING EXPENDITURE NET OPERATIONS (excl internal charges) OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE

73 9,912 7,075 27,189 33,087 27,116 16,986 33,087 (10,203) 1,063,257 1,063,257 (1,030,170) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Strategic Development: Strategic Heritage Projects, & Strategic Strategic Development: Cultural *Groupings the include follow ing: Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Comments 12/13 YTD Actuals vs YTD YTD Actuals Actuals 12/13 13/14 Comments Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT & SUMMARY REPORT NOTES TO THE COST OF SERVICE STATEMENT -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Operating Expenditure Operating Operating Revenue Operating 31-March-2014

1. vs YTD YTD Actuals Budgets 13/14 13/14 Comments Agenda Item: Item: Agenda Strategy contracted services of $28,840. services contracted along $61,537 of $88,853,

& with Development the with two nudrpn year underspend an main is favourable drivers being to Attachment 1 a ugtby budget to vacancy date Page Page in 117

Attachment 1 Item 7

118 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 119

Attachment 1 Item 7

## {&DEFA

120 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 98% 48% 48% % of 68% 66% 21% 90% 71% 23% 26% 11% 54% 88% 11% Spent 182% 111% 100% 111% Budget Budget Page ------5,000 25,000 10,300 10,000 13,800 14,200 35,000 90,375 12,000 18,500 18,500 15,655 53,500 49,000 37,500 60,000 52,750 311,000 918,175 190,000 1,132,426 2,090,756 Budget Revised Revised (2,090,756) Full Year

- (86) - - - 540 591 540 702 (135) (371) 7,178 (9,903) (3,546) (9,737) (7,350) (1,033) (1,847) (2,121) (2,121) 25,311 89,393 81,803 88,853 48,910 37,500 13,103 (10,000) (19,467) (31,562) (29,312) (33,683) YTD Variance

------7,178 7,350 8,664 6,374 5,000 for period endyear 31 March 2014

49,000 37,500 37,119 18,500 18,500 15,000 11,741 18,500 41,702 - 217,631 854,547 1,097,643 (1,097,643)

YTD Budget YTD

90 86 7 ------135 540 540 9,903 6,759 9,737 1,033 1,847 10,000 44,469 20,621 20,621 15,371 12,210 25,841 31,562 11,040 52,183 34,312 28,599 192,320 772,745 1,008,790 (1,008,250) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 Strategic Development Strategic COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF

Haumoana / master Te Awanga Plan Positive aging strategy Heretaunga Plains- Urban Development Strategy Heretaunga St West / Nelson St North Intersect Spatial Plan Development Services & Accommodation Costs Medium Density Strategy Fees & Charges Maintenance & Asset Costs Other Costs Recreation strategy Personnel Costs Strategy Reviews Land & Buildings Works New Pou Project Commercial Services Zoning Coastal Environment Strategy Recreation & Community Policy Administration Costs Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Depreciation Hapu/Maori Engagement Economic data Structure Plan Developments Community Plans CBD Central Mall Study Irongate Road Omahu Industrial Development OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS NET OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

------825 876 323 7,400 4,491 1,885 7,272 9,603 33,087 33,087 17,391 81,256 23,608 27,116 11,723 27,116 15,541 50,686 19,829 15,155 33,492 272,234 750,879 1,063,257 (1,030,170) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment

Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 121

Attachment 1 Item 7

122 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

Quarterly Report May 2014 REPORTS

ASSET MANAGEMENT DETAIL 3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Transportation: Transportation Rating Area 1& Rating 2 Transportation Area Transportation: Treatment ater Plant, Services Supply Water Disposal, Wastew Effluent ater, Wastew ater, Stormw Services: Water Depot, Minimisation, Recycling Stations, Waste Collection Refuse 1& Transfer Rating 2, HDC Area Activities: Refuse (63.68%) Landfill Management:Property Building Services Parks Management: Maintenance Parks, Passive Group, Keep Beautiful Hastings ing: follow include the *Groupings

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly (34,154,244) (17,123,124) 2012/13 18,655,536 43,886,659 24,508,686 3,160,247 1,179,829 1,792,596 6,572,167 3,444,564 5,988,714 6,801,809 1,335,624 2,825,292 3,336,504 9,732,415 4,590,900 4,990,916 1,877,979 4,827,172 7,385,562 7,592,194 171,722 127,584 79,177

3/06/2014 - - T PTAL APIT C ET N REVENUE CAPITAL charges) internal (excl OPERATIONS NET REVENUE OPERATING OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUE CAPITAL TOTAL

Subsidies, Grants & Donations & Grants Subsidies, Asset Sale Proceeds Sale Asset Property Management* Property Development & Other Contributions Other Development & Charges & Fees Refuse Activities* Refuse Water Services* Water Transportation* Capital New Works - Growth New Works Capital Asset Management Administration Management Asset Subsidies, Grants & Donations & Grants Subsidies, Debt Repayment Debt Depreciation Parks Management* Parks Loan Funding Asset Revenue (Vested Assets) Revenue (Vested Asset Capital New Works Capital Reserve Funding Fees & Charges & Fees Capital Renewals Capital Vested Infrastructural Assets Infrastructural Vested -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for ASSET MANAGEMENT SUMMARY REPORT COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT 31-March-2014

YTD Actual YTD

(36,594,874) (11,603,795) Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 18,764,309 46,040,404 2013/14 21,993,366 10,389,571 3,294,830 1,389,068 2,820,460 6,150,701 3,210,705 6,080,439 7,519,862 2,926,007 4,517,356 9,445,530 5,237,535 6,150,014 2,951,006 6,176,142 9,584,238 (144,079) 105,722 995,451 139,106 - -

YTD Budget

(35,983,442) (11,959,390) 10,089,081 19,251,596 46,072,523 25,342,415 13,383,025 10,509,243 7

3,556,942 1,384,607 2,728,110 6,532,139 3,274,720 6,408,030 7,326,914 1,928,761 3,002,429 5,284,076 5,183,567 5,424,226 4,786,879 7,720,844 428,317 116,252 39,391 - -

Variance (2,993,454) (1,835,873) 3,349,049 1,544,703 (611,432) (643,551) (262,113) (381,439) (192,948) (766,719) (725,788) (572,397) YTD YTD 355,595 487,287 925,005 327,591 933,310 (53,968) 66,331 92,350 64,015 76,421 32,119 22,854 (4,460) - -

(15,406,611) (49,380,282) 13,871,238 25,662,739 63,251,520 Full Year Year Full 55,668,766 40,262,155 18,931,938 10,112,379 11,198,439 23,486,420 17,555,008 Revised Budget 1,196,556 3,686,695 4,726,127 4,072,669 4,799,149 1,781,903 9,072,089 8,522,037 7,493,138 6,983,381 8,373,666 1,000,000 3,243,438 1,000,000 155,907 Attachment 1 Budget Spent % of of % 77% 68% 89% 69% 60% 72% 73% 13% 78% 68% 71% 35% 74% 51% 73% 75% 75% 74% 68% -4% 26% 73% 40% 9% 0% 9% 0% Page Page

1 123 NOTES

Attachment 1 Item 7

fee the

124 with Page 31 December containers at $725,788 above $367,366 above to under budget by $49,492 lower than comparison is are are down $99,897 against $134,574 above budget $29,960 under budget. are in used of the payments of the above budget by $9,206 is $402,110 above budget. recycling the lower consumption of by additional revenues of are is are costs costs of bag purchases and the are Park were to timing costs offset the costs is timing to for period endyear 31 March 2014

balanced by reduced expenditure on new - the Sports the Park This mainly due due is management to is share of Landfill revenue to is

7 phasing of thePark Guardian costs budget, plus the unbudgeted Skate water. 30,000 60,0002013 vs units units at the same stage last year. grant This budget. Maintenance Group budget. income connections. Water meter charges $347,173. Passive This Parks Waimarama (pending Waste approval). funding Levy Refuse collection purchase of glass due to higher than expected tonnages. Water Connection$124,421 Fees however the reduced connection budget (excludes share internal HDC of recoveries). Fees and charges $381,439 are below Budget. Refuse collection revenue HDC due budget due tolower than expected bag sales. Transfer station income 1. 4 3 Comments13/14 13/14 Budgets Actuals YTD YTD vs 2. in fee Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Operating Revenue Operating Expenditure Quarterly Report May 2014 an increase the accounting containers at $134,159 below to in is Engineering design $124,468 higher than in under 2012-13 revenue $323,959 less than last $230,251 above 2012-13 $47,200 below last year of bag purchases and the change is are recycling are is ASSET MANAGEMENT SUMMARY REPORT SUMMARY MANAGEMENT ASSET $421,467 less than at the a are $209,239 higher than at the to NOTES TO THE COST OF SERVICE STATEMENT SERVICE OF COST THE TO NOTES are timing the earthquake assessments costs are the material damage premium the to to the wheelie bin refund no longer being balanced by reduced expenditure on new for to costs is due share of Landfill revenue

income connections. Transfer station income due to increased gate charges to allow ETS. for Water meter charges due to reduced water consumption. by $42,533 however the reduced connection year due collected and lower bag sales. Water Connection Fees same stage last2013-14 year mainly due same stage in 2012-13. Refuse collection revenue Refuse collection Property ($47,987), and anwork increase 2012-13 largely due treatment the share of the HDC of Landfill. HDC Fees and charges purchase of glass completed ($225,967). 2012-13 due Waimarama (pending Waste approval). funding Levy 3/06/2014

4 3 2. Comments13/14 12/13 Actuals Actuals YTD YTD vs 1. Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 125

Attachment 1 Item 7

126 to for are Page work increased costs expected to $82,290 below are also lower than is of the operational are $327,591 lower than costs $192,948 higher than Effluent Services being Minimisation savings and maintenance are costs Odour Control and General timing are $169,576 below budget due in lower than budgeted reactive is to hire to the result of the wheelie bins going costs for period endyear 31 March 2014 budget by the end of the financial

costs a - costs to and Waste with

S ervic e 7 budget due Operational programme variance also includes the unbudgeted external plant in line directly to the landfill. budget due to the reduced amount refuse going of to the landfill as $80,804 aboverecycling budget charges to service Martin Place. mainly due $133,187 lower against the budget. Plumeinvestigations modelling haveplanned ($90,000). and alsoStormwater not Wastewater ($43,742) proceededYTD yet process as Transportation budget due Transfer Station expenditure Recycling Landfill expenditure to being programmed later for in the year. Water budget mainly due Maintenance maintenance costs. programme (mainly Sealedmaintenance). pavement and Drainage The the Clifton revetment ($153,000). The be year. Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 6 5. a in

are effect costs Quarterly Report May 2014 funding. Capital Revenue Capital delays increased costs to to NZTA the accounting came into Revetment in $533,189 lower than is which Clifton $718,053 higher than at Minimisation change share of the landfill refuse $113,743 higher than 2012-13 are costs is a ETS to costs HDC's to and Waste

3/06/2014

from Januaryfrom 2013. of $153,000.of in 2013-14. 2013-14 also includes the mainly due result of uncertainty on the level of recycling charges to service Martin Place. the same stage as last year mainly due Transportation the implementation of the 2012-13 programme as $91,713 higher than 2012-13Landfill expenditure due Recycling Transfer Station expenditure 2012-13 due treatment of disposal fees. Attachment 1 Attachment 6 5. Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 127

Attachment 1 Item 7

128 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (5,788,996) 1,035,760 2,308,415 1,182,503 6,027,964 1,037,048 2,971,190 112,167 426,935 116,558 477,216 275,668 319,703 414,150 766,076 489,782 233,342 238,969 26,673 32,597 16,374 44,279 65,504 74,877 30,015

3/06/2014 5,096 7,768 8,895 6,790 5,626 (615) ------Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL

Emergency Reinstatement Emergency Flaxmere Park Flaxmere Te Mata Peak Mata Te Park s Roading s Park Hastings Sk ate Park ate Sk Hastings Northwood Reserve Structures Omahu Road Omahu Services Nelson Park Link ages & Greenspace & ages Link Park Nelson Lyndhurst Development Stage I Stage Development Lyndhurst Aratak i Development i Aratak Hard Landscaping Trees Advance Fees - Investigation & Options R Options & - Investigation Fees Advance Streetscape New Works Streetscape Playgrounds Park Assets Park Asset Renewals Asset Park Soft Landscaping Soft Park Assets New Works Plant, Machinery & Vehicles New Works Vehicles & Machinery Plant, Land & Buildings New Works Buildings Land & Office Furniture & Fittings & Furniture Office Other Machinery & Equipment & Machinery Other Administration Costs Administration Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Vehicles & Machinery Plant Computer & Office Equipment Office & Computer Depreciation Other Costs Other Finance Costs Finance Personnel Costs Personnel Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Fees & Charges & Fees Subisidies, Grants & Donations & Grants Subisidies, -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT 31-March-2014 Parks

YTD Actual YTD

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 (6,915,970) 1,145,886 3,068,920 1,493,766 7,163,335 1,013,321 3,042,239 1,054,218 125,000 207,174 105,838 159,275 104,416 719,699 289,303 995,574 263,005 761,831 245,021 247,366 26,825 69,326 95,239 15,844 33,147 3,539 5,301 6,884 4,760 5,974 2,345 431 590 131 270 720 950 - - -

YTD Budget

7 (6,315,632)

2,538,810 1,266,983 6,481,195 1,056,969 2,982,913 107,000 968,700 263,174 180,000 515,454 165,398 801,678 263,005 724,350 621,940 165,563 165,563 22,000 10,000 95,125 79,750 32,000 14,600 74,000 97,500 30,340 8,000 ------

Variance (177,186) (530,110) (226,782) (204,245) (123,905) (682,140) (193,896) (600,338) (329,868) (139,891) YTD YTD (10,713) (79,525) (37,326) (18,000) (21,239) (15,844) (59,326) 10,000 56,000 91,526 75,584 43,648 79,458 81,802 (4,825) (5,301) (6,884) (2,808) 9,840 4,461 2,345 (431) (590) (131) (270) (720) (950) - - -

Full Year Year Full (9,534,494) Revised Budget 6,499,860 1,408,592 1,950,600 3,280,030 9,782,258 1,937,493 3,952,256 1,228,886 452,000 481,750 134,200 116,000 130,000 170,800 250,000 233,000 968,700 148,000 313,000 689,000 231,764 247,764 281,730 350,674 852,008 10,000 30,500 40,000 15,000 52,350 16,000 5,900 ------Attachment 1 Budget 118% 137% 103% 106% Spent 100% 50% 43% 24% 16% 79% 45% 41% 77% 22% 64% 51% 75% 72% 63% 86% 89% 77% 15% % of of % 47% 73% 73% 0% 0% 2% 6% 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% Page Page {& # 129

Attachment 1 Item 7

## {&DEFA

130 0% 0% 6% 0% 5% 78% 77% 48% % of 45% 86% 90% 75% 69% Spent 190% Budget Budget Page - - 400 1,700 8,350 4,800 999,481 404,174 371,348 985,775 490,000 1,790,253 1,475,775 Budget Revised Revised (1,790,253) Full Year

390 (359) 6,262 1,802 (3,600) 11,944 11,944 13,746 (10,618) (96,616) (24,310) 106,342 YTD (340,184) (364,494) Variance

- - - - 500 400 6,262 for period endyear 31 March 2014

- 844,167 265,958 273,583 337,500 337,500 1,390,870 (1,390,870)

YTD Budget YTD

7 - 110 759 3,600 11,944 11,944 24,310 854,784 362,574 167,240 677,684 701,994 1,389,068 (1,377,124) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Building Services Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Maintenance & Asset Costs Administration Costs Services & Accommodation Costs Subisidies, Grants & Donations Other Costs Personnel Costs Depreciation Finance Costs Land & Buildings Renewals Land & Buildings Works New TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS NET OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above:

- - 178 737 7,373 7,373 3,270 723,318 140,399 315,196 511,465 514,735 1,179,829 (1,172,456) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (2,888,598) 2,342,383 2,895,124 372,203 99,930 10,776 69,832 61,007 73,157

3/06/2014 6,525 6,525 7,985 4,000 4,000 165 - OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL CAPITAL above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific NET OPERATIONS NET

Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Administration Costs Administration Depreciation Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Vehicles & Machinery Plant Fees & Charges & Fees Personnel Costs Personnel Other Costs Other Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Office Furniture & Fittings & Furniture Office Stormwater New Works Stormwater Lyndhurst Development Stage I Stage Development Lyndhurst Maintenance Seals (Sealed Road Surfacing (Sealed Seals Maintenance -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Asset Management Group Administration COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT 31-March-2014

YTD Actual YTD

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 (2,975,241) 2,475,565 2,990,947 336,057 92,632 17,585 64,940 98,939 15,706 98,939 15,706 4,168 - - - -

YTD Budget

7 (3,063,420)

2,520,858 3,077,947 380,420 83,885 17,266 75,519 25,000 14,527 27,000 14,527 2,000 - - - -

Variance YTD YTD (73,939) (71,939) 10,579 45,293 87,000 44,364 88,179 (8,748) (4,168) 1,179 1,179 2,000 (319) - - -

Full Year Year Full (4,144,922) Revised Budget 3,371,212 4,168,004 116,397 536,210 48,850 95,335 25,000 23,082 27,000 23,082 2,000 - - - - Attachment 1 Budget 396% Spent 366% % of of % 68% 73% 80% 63% 36% 68% 68% 72% 72% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Page Page {& # 131

Attachment 1 Item 7

## {&DEFA

132 0% 0% 55% 74% % of 55% 80% 73% 106% Spent 102% Budget Budget Page 97 - - 778,460 778,460 133,798 (454,475) 1,099,040 1,232,935 Budget Revised Revised Full Year

(2) - (43) (99,897) (59,013) (99,897) (75,516) YTD (234,472) (134,574) Variance

97 - - for period endyear 31 March 2014

31,732 - 528,381 742,105 773,935 528,381 (245,553)

YTD Budget YTD

99 43 7 - 428,484 801,118 908,509 428,484 107,249 (480,025) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Refuse Collection Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Other Costs Services & Accommodation Costs Fees & Charges Personnel Costs Maintenance & Asset Costs TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE OPERATING EXPENDITURE NETOPERATIONS Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above:

- 208 1,048 30,554 (31,598) 752,443 752,231 784,041 752,443 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 1,286,978 1,152,444 (496,856) 790,122 790,122 16,765 35,564 73,688

3/06/2014 3,410 4,520 587 - OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific CAPITAL above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET

Finance Costs Finance Depreciation Fees & Charges & Fees Personnel Costs Personnel Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Other Costs Other Costs Asset & Maintenance Administration Costs Administration -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Transfer Stations 31-March-2014

YTD Actual YTD

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 1,020,373 1,020,373 753,789 628,761 266,585 12,821 35,687 59,120 13,472 3,507 420 -

YTD Budget

1,011,167 1,011,167 836,079 703,736 175,088 11,775 35,740 76,810 3,500 4,405 112 -

Variance YTD YTD 17,691 82,290 74,974 91,496 (1,046) (9,067) 9,206 9,206 (308) - 53 (7)

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget 1,168,659 1,349,288 1,349,288 103,430 985,940 180,628 47,654 15,700 10,636 1,800 3,500 - Attachment 1 Budget 100% 127% Spent 148% 76% of % 57% 82% 75% 23% 64% 76% 65% 0% Page Page {& # 133

Attachment 1 Item 7

## {&DEFA

134 0% 0% 0% 0% 83% 85% 74% 63% 25% 74% 83% 60% 94% 16% % of Spent Budget Budget Page - - 352 1,400 86,760 11,469 86,760 26,480 578,457 214,411 210,000 210,000 324,345 (491,697) Budget Revised Revised Full Year

- - - - 177 (830) (878) (8,077) (8,077) 14,382 (88,881) (80,804) (67,299) (26,356) YTD Variance

- - - - - 264 6,062 for period endyear 31 March 2014

72,002 72,002 18,581 - 401,515 133,331 243,277 (329,513)

YTD Budget YTD

87 7 - - - - 878 6,892 4,200 63,925 63,925 482,318 200,629 269,633 (418,393) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 Recycling and Waste Minimisation and Waste Recycling COST OF SERVICE STATEMENT COST SERVICE OF

Depreciation Subisidies, Grants & Donations Services & Accommodation Costs Maintenance & Asset Costs Land & Buildings Works New Other Costs Personnel Costs Fees & Charges Finance Costs Administration Costs NET OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS

25 - - - 182 691 4,840 12,464 390,605 135,244 124,679 237,850 123,988 (265,925) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council

Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 1,170,879 1,574,813 2,745,691 2,745,691 358,167 364,244 359,411 156,621 100,500 556,126 445,317 313,692

3/06/2014 1,244 4,833 1,176 1,379 - Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific CAPITAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific NET OPERATIONS NET TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL

Detail Project Report Project Detail Other Machinery & Equipment & Machinery Other Landfill Valley Development Valley Landfill Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Vehicles & Machinery Plant Landfill Development Landfill Other Costs Other Personnel Costs Personnel Fees & Charges & Fees Administration Costs Administration Finance Costs Finance Depreciation Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT 31-March-2014 Landfill

YTD Actual YTD

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 1,688,556 2,611,532 2,611,532 466,269 922,976 487,411 469,665 142,400 160,349 586,693 510,634 196,900 17,747 89,925 3,395 1,656 -

YTD Budget

1,858,132 2,661,023 2,661,023 854,517 802,891 861,991 859,432 122,937 160,115 558,935 461,920 463,080 89,925 4,915 2,559 1,219 -

Variance YTD YTD 388,247 120,085 169,576 374,579 389,767 266,180 (15,188) (19,462) (49,492) (49,492) (27,757) (48,714) 1,520 (233) (437) - -

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget 1,384,053 2,539,328 1,410,069 1,394,149 3,485,162 3,485,162 215,338 119,900 945,834 163,693 745,247 631,108 662,578 10,096 13,373 1,465 2,547 Attachment 1 Budget 133% 113% Spent 34% 34% 34% 87% 75% 79% 81% 30% 74% 75% % of of % 35% 98% 66% 75% 0% Page Page {& # 135

Attachment 1 Item 7

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 58% 71% 75% 42%

% of 24% 68% 77% 75% 69% 67% 75% 66% 24% 29% 71% 29% 18% 28% 16% 28% 64% 47% 69% 64% 74% 36% 55% 77% 72% 32% Spent Budget Budget 136 ------200 Page 3,060 30,000 66,900 31,000 45,963 80,275 31,000 95,000 714,860 250,000 120,000 242,327 533,021 158,684 638,450 416,500 190,000 270,900 465,000 130,000 2,406,091 3,120,951 1,199,700 4,882,283 6,535,200 1,469,000 2,156,469 1,244,000 1,404,500 1,429,900 1,084,058 Budget Revised Revised (9,545,455) 12,666,405 Full Year 12,536,984

------689 525 (782) (294) 1,025 5,952 6,769 84,403 63,212 90,886 84,520 92,804 80,275 14,876 79,467 26,871 29,630 50,681 12,801 (71,426) (23,112) (94,538) (26,066) (11,951) (14,716) 536,359 178,941 641,177 332,161 504,731 YTD (358,232) 2,064,475 Variance

------200 3,060 6,957 10,000 50,000 80,275 32,158 24,000 58,846 67,254 60,000 196,532 899,775 353,430 106,900 917,275 531,450 268,989 370,681 308,500 173,125 115,900 for period endyear 31 March 2014

1,697,450 1,893,983 3,290,714 4,901,400 9,127,306 1,258,649 1,404,500 1,146,308 7,313,039 (7,233,324) -

YTD Budget YTD ------154 782 294

2,034 9,124 8,165 7 21,951 44,048 31,633 43,688 33,023 60,484 47,199 86,270 173,420 899,775 352,741 617,473 585,114 899,769 440,564 176,185 385,397 229,033 146,254 1,626,024 1,799,444 3,648,946 4,365,041 8,948,365 1,061,788 5,248,563 (7,148,921) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 Transportation - Rating Area 1 Area Rating - Transportation COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Maintenance & Asset Costs Subisidies, Grants & Donations Fees & Charges Finance Costs Services & Accommodation Costs Personnel Costs Depreciation Other Costs Cycleways & Pathways New Roads New CBD Redevelopment Vested Infrastructural Assets New FootpathNew Construction LATM Development Administration Costs Public Transport Infrastructure Street Lighting New - Information & Directional Signs & Kiosks Undergrounding Support Contract Management Capital Projects Minor Safety Improvements State Highway Projects Major Safety Improvements Maintenance Seals (Sealed Surfacing Road Footpath Renewals Seal Extension AWPT Sealed - (Pavement Rehabilitation) Subdivision Support Traffic ServicesTraffic Renewals Structural Component Replacement Reconstruction Projects Kerb & Channel Renewals Advance Fees Investigation - & Options R Street Light Renewals Drainage Renewals Unsealed Metalling Road Associated Improvements OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE NET OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE CAPITAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

77 65

- - - - - 134 505 (122) (444) 1,807 2,515 9,636 1,651 8,785 41,871 38,833 25,100 54,868 68,169 39,169 82,907 166,999 781,125 247,066 226,167 123,787 137,312 243,939 418,116 461,320 322,978 1,375,835 1,542,835 2,809,311 4,876,520 8,510,845 1,128,707 3,641,029 (6,968,011) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page 137

Attachment 1 Item 7

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0%

12% 89% 99% 71% 11% 52% 60% 74% 30% 33% 22% 38% 71% 13% 104% 138 ------Page 10,000 33,500 10,800 10,000 23,000 96,550 31,000 40,000 672,500 850,300 432,000 480,500 236,000 654,831 743,580 155,678 100,000 397,400 255,127

1,157,000 1,493,638

------2,247 1,896 5,142 (1,164) (6,489) 55,130 25,265 12,485 40,000 31,808 10,000 35,000 (30,758) (15,038) (10,340) (11,951) (31,698) 214,278 539,215 228,394

------1,116 25,625 10,800 96,550 40,000 35,873 10,000 35,000 10,000 20,000 296,987 850,300 112,125 480,500 236,000 248,261 990,734 177,000 476,915 for period endyear 31 March 2014

------

5,658 1,164 4,066 7,605 7 23,729 82,709 71,285 21,951 51,698 881,058 127,163 425,370 233,753 258,601 451,519 164,515 248,522

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014 Nelson Street safety Major Charles Street Warren Street Model CommunitiesModel Extension - of Project Victoria Street Mark et-Prospect Townshend StreetTownshend Park North Road Windsor Avenue Model CommunitiesModel Omahu Stage - Road 2 Footpath renewals Lumsden Road Crosses Cycleway Road Whak atu Arterial Subdivision Support Development - Response Northern Arterial Omahu Industrial Development Princess Street Copeland Rd Lyndhurst Development Stage I Duk e Street Irongate Industrial Development CBD Suburban and Developments Aratak i Development Sportspark Development Percival - upgrade Road Nelson Park Link ages &Greenspace Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above:

------789 1,317 4,924 2,454 4,962 6,636 10,194 12,888 24,852 61,440 14,259 21,032 18,066 44,430 477,274 398,759 237,253 281,339 181,226 123,787 3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 123,787 181,226 281,339 237,253 398,759 477,274 44,430 18,066 21,032 14,259 61,440 24,852 12,888 10,194

3/06/2014 6,636 4,962 2,454 4,924 1,317 789 ------Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific

Nelson Park Link ages & Greenspace & ages Link Park Nelson Aratak i Development i Aratak prsak eeomn ecvlRa prd Road upgrade - Percival Development Sportspark Irongate Industrial Development Industrial Irongate u eStreet Duk CBD and Suburban Developments andSuburban CBD Copeland Rd Copeland Lyndhurst Development Stage I Stage Development Lyndhurst Princess Street Princess Omahu Industrial Development Industrial Omahu Northern Arterial Northern Subdivision Support - Development Response - Development Support Subdivision Whak atu Arterial atu Whak Crosses Road Cycleway Crosses Lumsden Road Lumsden Footpath renewals Footpath Omahu Road - Stage 2 Road - Stage Omahu Model Communities Windsor Avenue Windsor aket-Prospect Mark akRoad North Park Townshend Street Warren Street Warren Charles Street Charles Victoria Street Victoria Model Communities - Extension of Project of - Extension Model Communities Nelson Street Major safety Street Nelson -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

248,522 164,515 451,519 258,601 233,753 425,370 881,058 127,163 51,698 21,951 71,285 82,709 23,729 7,605 4,066 1,164 5,658 ------

476,915 177,000 990,734 248,261 236,000 480,500 850,300 296,987 112,125 20,000 10,000 35,000 10,000 35,873 40,000 96,550 10,800 25,625 1,116 ------

228,394 539,215 214,278 (31,698) (11,951) (10,340) (30,758) (15,038) 35,000 10,000 31,808 40,000 12,485 25,265 55,130 (6,489) (1,164) 5,142 1,896 2,247 ------

1,493,638 1,157,000

255,127 100,000 397,400 155,678 743,580 654,831 236,000 480,500 432,000 850,300 672,500 40,000 96,550 31,000 23,000 10,000 10,800 33,500 10,000 Attachment 1 ------Page Page 104% 13% 71% 38% 22% 33% 30% 74% 60% 52% 11% 71% 99% 89% 12% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 139

Attachment 1 Item 7

## {&DEFA

140 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 70% 79% 82% 74% % of 83% 70% 74% 92% 82% 81% 57% 73% 65% 62% 84% Spent 113% 100% 145% 105% Budget Budget Page - - - - - 3,000 5,500 3,000 1,161 23,736 36,500 37,200 219,000 897,000 259,000 247,000 354,500 701,950 400,000 200,527 2,377,058 3,943,514 2,400,794 6,595,100 1,585,265 4,909,942 Budget Revised Revised (8,175,480) 10,576,274 FullYear

- - - - 451 (148) (213) 2,014 (5,500) (4,000) 50,087 86,402 34,057 18,600 (11,946) (83,409) (11,785) (76,171) (31,877) (85,735) 164,380 242,897 YTD (496,463) (204,975) (202,961) (457,972) (293,502) (189,375) Variance

------1,161 for period endyear 31 March 2014

17,802 18,600 34,133 83,431 - 897,000 281,000 185,000 175,656 489,171 281,500 1,859,492 3,065,715 1,877,294 4,946,325 8,047,333 1,200,000 3,611,358 (6,170,039)

YTD Budget YTD

7 - - - - - 213 1,308 5,500 4,000 11,946 19,816 11,785 33,682 654,103 230,913 374,375 259,065 402,769 247,443 169,167 1,654,516 2,901,335 1,674,332 5,404,297 8,340,835 1,276,171 3,643,236 (6,666,502) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 Transportation - Rating Area 2 Area Rating - Transportation COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOSTSERVICE OF

Cycleways & Pathways Other Costs Services & Accommodation Costs Subisidies, Grants & Donations Depreciation Advance Fees Investigation - & Options R Fees & Charges LATM Development Maintenance & Asset Costs AWPT Sealed - (Pavement Rehabilitation) Unsealed Metalling Road Drainage Renewals Associated Improvements Reconstruction Sealed Roads Playgrounds Maintenance Seals (Sealed Surfacing Road Footpath Renewals Wastewater Treatment Plant Ocean Beach Administration Costs Finance Costs Minor Safety Improvements Structural Component Replacement ServicesTraffic Renewals NET OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above:

------259 1,359 7,326 3,090 34,772 30,975 46,343 41,866 98,405 261,770 638,803 284,239 246,340 176,225 3,100,377 1,770,721 1,778,048 4,921,212 8,088,695 1,204,509 3,001,848 (6,310,647) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment

Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (2,650,240) 1,849,711 2,712,928 245,578 573,075 610,602 610,602 107,232 62,688 62,688 29,803 14,762 30,181 23,057 47,426 10,377 93,258 48,878 26,092 88,293 24,040

3/06/2014 1,621 4,750 3,212 8,419 2,249 664 ------TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL CAPITAL above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific NET OPERATIONS NET Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL

Fees & Charges & Fees Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Other Costs Other Depreciation Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Finance Costs Finance Vested Infrastructural Assets Infrastructural Vested Whak atu Industrial Development Industrial atu Whak Stormwater Renewals Stormwater Stormwater New Works Stormwater Te AwangaTe Project Havelock North Streams North Havelock Nelson Park Link ages & Greenspace & ages Link Park Nelson Aratak i Development i Aratak u eStreet Duk New Connections Lyndhurst Development Stage I Stage Development Lyndhurst Water Services Quality Improvements Quality Services Water Omahu Industrial Development Industrial Omahu Irongate Industrial Development Industrial Irongate Copeland Rd Copeland Lyndhurst Development Stage II Stage Development Lyndhurst Native Tree Streets Tree Native akRoad North Park Dam Break Mitigation & Analysis & Mitigation Break Dam Northwood Reserve te aeokStreams Havelock Other Victoria Street Victoria aket-Prospect Mark Warren Street Warren Stormwater Pumpstation Renewals Pumpstation Stormwater Charles Street Charles -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT 31-March-2014 Stormwater

YTD Actual YTD

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 (2,627,853) 1,884,532 2,655,132 337,855 384,424 561,074 566,893 27,279 27,279 34,380 13,940 44,847 62,899 22,100 34,773 81,484 31,773 5,820 7,110 7,062 6,598 5,034 431 ------

YTD Budget

7 (2,916,344)

2,168,998 2,992,767 1,339,442 1,346,942 399,844 384,424 232,500 232,649 102,309 76,423 76,423 29,500 10,000 56,945 39,349 78,454 63,230 20,000 80,000 13,000 87,097 7,500 7,500 411 ------

Variance YTD YTD 284,466 337,635 288,491 778,368 780,048 187,653 197,876 102,309 (49,144) (49,144) (31,773) 56,945 38,918 78,454 61,989 80,000 (4,880) (3,940) (2,100) (7,110) (6,651) 1,680 6,402 5,612 2,466 331 ------

Full Year Year Full (3,875,517) Revised Budget 2,891,998 3,975,517 3,861,793 4,121,793 100,000 100,000 150,000 120,000 113,500 531,454 512,000 512,565 250,000 295,000 310,199 481,586 114,000 29,500 10,000 85,000 65,000 10,000 68,500 14,500 90,000 16,908 34,000 10,000 73,000 ------Attachment 1 Budget 117% 139% Spent 34% 15% 10% 74% 11% 46% 91% 50% 44% % of of % 27% 64% 65% 75% 15% 58% 27% 67% 68% 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Page Page {& # 141

Attachment 1 Item 7

## {&DEFA

142 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 73% 71% 23% % of 93% 71% 72% 75% 16% 37% 23% 98% 48% 21% 76% 15% 43% 16% 16% 49% 131% Spent 131% 159% 102% 101% Budget Budget Page ------2,387 4,000 62,205 20,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 49,400 25,000 713,382 250,000 745,000 121,961 246,400 309,300 385,065 121,961 216,000 468,700 145,000 350,500 188,900 3,051,065 1,926,570 5,227,635 1,540,565 1,023,286 2,528,699 4,317,154 Budget Revised Revised (4,195,192) Full Year

------(158) (636) (362) (531) (1,411) (3,136) (6,148) (9,791) (7,677) (6,134) (7,503) 46,637 30,057 46,637 67,261 88,404 45,947 (14,579) (10,736) 135,041 329,531 592,272 921,802 187,725 157,718 194,084 117,357 235,373 YTD Variance

------2,387 for period endyear 31 March 2014

38,283 25,000 18,726 - 112,729 753,009 535,036 112,729 825,538 115,876 233,000 243,825 309,300 276,315 265,542 211,121 310,449 1,896,524 1,303,614 2,129,153 3,225,240 (3,112,511)

YTD Budget YTD

7 ------158 636 3,799 3,136 6,148 9,791 7,677 45,785 69,929 14,579 45,275 82,231 93,764 75,076 25,531 29,461 159,366 722,952 535,036 159,366 496,007 711,343 249,959 151,582 265,903 1,829,263 1,207,350 3,136,835 (2,977,470) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Wastewater 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Administration Costs Services & Accommodation Costs Finance Costs Fees & Charges Other Costs Maintenance & Asset Costs Depreciation Wastewater Works New Wastewater Renewals Vested Infrastructural Assets Aratak i Development Nelson Park Link ages & Greenspace Victoria Street New ConnectionsNew Pumpstation Projects Irongate Industrial Development Park North Road Busby Hill Omahu Industrial Development Lyndhurst Development Stage II Network Extension Havlock North Catchment Upgrades Wastewater Network Model Warren Street Charles Street Trunk Sewers WW Ops - related Capital Napier Road CapacityNapier Road Upgrade Flow MonitoringFlow Upgrades Planned Renewals Sewer Windsor Avenue Reactive Renewals Sewer TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE NET OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above:

------178 875 3,684 2,317 1,099 6,933 2,124 3,226 51,659 49,563 60,105 79,968 34,292 39,228 10,118 21,246 144,600 680,321 428,925 144,600 232,476 442,468 674,945 109,692 222,951 3,326,227 4,490,993 (4,346,394) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 1,167,500 1,167,500 1,719,758 (552,259) 605,431 459,425 461,241 188,850 100,100 63,992 36,108 64,937 13,845 21,318

3/06/2014 1,833 2,309 670 - - - - OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL CAPITAL above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET

Fees & Charges & Fees Personnel Costs Personnel Wastewater New Works Wastewater Wastewater Renewals Wastewater Wastewater Treatment Plant Resource Consent Resource Plant Treatment Wastewater Frimley Interceptor Sanitary Sewer Sanitary Interceptor Frimley Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Outfall Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Other Costs Other Depreciation Other Machinery & Equipment & Machinery Other Finance Costs Finance Administration Costs Administration Detail Project Report Project Detail Wastewater Treatment Plant Treatment Wastewater rn Sewers Trunk -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Effluent Disposal 31-March-2014

YTD Actual YTD

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 (1,584,355) 1,121,386 1,121,386 2,705,741 1,577,967 334,855 145,608 522,568 376,246 221,850 199,847 395,072 58,747 25,369 14,573 4,108 8,205 2,558 1,470 1,470 443

YTD Budget

7 (1,751,561)

1,199,879 1,199,879 2,951,439 1,578,450 509,177 456,247 500,477 638,542 221,850 550,424 41,247 39,177 12,121 55,000 ------

Variance (144,847) YTD YTD 174,322 310,639 245,698 262,295 155,352 167,205 (17,500) (78,493) (78,493) (22,092) (25,369) (14,573) 30,972 (4,108) (1,470) (1,470) 9,563 (443) 483 -

Full Year Year Full (2,370,991) Revised Budget 1,369,000 1,499,699 1,499,699 3,896,000 1,394,000 3,870,689 2,104,600 3,976,000 553,000 600,000 594,061 864,108 295,800 80,000 12,121 30,000 - - - - Attachment 1 Budget Spent 49% 15% 24% % of of % 75% 88% 44% 75% 75% 21% 73% 75% 70% 67% 10% 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% 0% 9% Page Page {& # 143

Attachment 1 Item 7

## {&DEFA

144 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 75% 75% 75% % of Spent Budget Budget Page - - - - 100,000 100,000 833,700 100,000 1,000,476 1,834,176 Budget Revised Revised (1,834,176) Full Year

(0) ------(904) (904) (904) YTD Variance

------for period endyear 31 March 2014

- 750,357 625,275 1,375,632 (1,375,632)

YTD Budget YTD

7 ------904 750,357 625,275 1,376,536 (1,376,536) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 Wastewater Treatment Plant Treatment Wastewater COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Wastewater Treatment Plant Resource Consent Wastewater Works New Depreciation Finance Costs Administration Costs Wastewater Treatment Plant Maintenance & Asset Costs NET OPERATIONS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS

- - 869 1,194 309,316 309,316 309,316 636,900 969,113 330,150 (969,113) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (2,572,362) 2,099,709 1,465,050 3,055,842 1,088,282 1,210,059 107,195 339,754 634,219 497,714 621,900 483,480 113,667 483,480 16,581 43,589 86,821 99,488 18,859 11,075 19,080

3/06/2014 6,271 2,883 1,099 1,785 3,026 3,438 440 440 690 452 602 ------49 Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL

Windsor Avenue Windsor New Water Source New Water Water Demand Management Demand Water WW - Ops related Capital related - Ops WW New Connections Nelson Street Major safety Street Nelson Consent Compliance Consent Other Costs Other Reservoir Capacity Increase Capacity Reservoir Wastewater Treatment Plant Resource Consent Resource Plant Treatment Wastewater Drink ing Water Compliance Water ing Drink Water Supply New Works Supply Water Water Supply Renewals Supply Water Hydrant, Valve & Watermeter installation Watermeter & Valve Hydrant, Vested Infrastructural Assets Infrastructural Vested Omahu Industrial Development Industrial Omahu Wastewater New Works Wastewater Toby Replacements Toby Havelock Hills Copeland Rd Copeland Irongate Industrial Development Industrial Irongate Princess Street Princess Depreciation Aratak i Development i Aratak Finance Costs Finance Massey Street Massey Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Pumpstation Projects Pumpstation Administration Costs Administration Personnel Costs Personnel Fees & Charges & Fees Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Nelson Park Link ages & Greenspace & ages Link Park Nelson prsak eeomn ecvlRa prd Road upgrade - Percival Development Sportspark Gordon RoadGordon -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Water - Supply Rating Area 1 31-March-2014

YTD Actual YTD

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2013/14 (2,920,195) 1,253,589 3,308,467 1,145,112 1,261,018 276,987 825,087 427,223 750,284 388,272 125,981 388,272 44,823 74,538 81,818 24,298 71,842 21,665 39,757 12,788 6,068 2,524 1,279 5,606 2,006 1,136 1,773 869 ------

YTD Budget

7 (2,796,103)

1,402,664 1,071,296 3,369,942 1,194,316 1,302,332 498,000 156,668 201,698 331,368 750,284 573,840 113,560 573,840 74,584 20,080 58,009 14,000 5,729 1,950 7,000 7,500 995 ------

Variance (124,093) (185,568) (185,568) YTD YTD 498,000 149,075 246,209 (39,094) (22,348) (75,289) (95,855) (64,842) (20,669) (12,788) (12,421) 17,556 18,252 11,994 82,130 61,475 49,204 41,313 (7,233) (6,068) (1,279) (5,606) (1,136) 5,727 (869) ------

Full Year Year Full (3,740,179) Revised Budget 1,555,000 4,525,745 1,592,422 1,803,994 7,924,928 6,386,548 1,288,380 2,147,599 1,000,379 165,000 359,509 166,000 239,300 212,100 592,000 125,000 418,400 250,000 284,000 785,567 117,000 785,567 43,780 10,800 38,400 85,000 10,000 1,950 5,300 ------Attachment 1 1246% Budget 102% 187% 409% 108% Spent 66% 31% 39% 11% 15% 33% 13% 75% 72% 18% 70% 49% % of of % 16% 78% 73% 49% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Page Page {& # 145

Attachment 1 Item 7

## {&DEFA

146 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 32% 89% 85% 55% 14% 41% 75% 98% 75% 48% 55% % of 93% Spent Budget Budget 1063% Page - - - - 200 300 80,000 90,800 70,000 23,348 33,600 27,658 60,004 20,400 27,658 225,665 108,714 265,400 174,600 (198,007) Budget Revised Revised Full Year

- - - - - 6,043 (8,525) (3,189) (3,425) (3,295) (5,920) (3,295) 20,400 (32,075) (28,779) (12,877) (49,579) (25,477) (43,895) (31,018) YTD Variance

------for period endyear 31 March 2014

15,368 20,400 81,535 39,968 39,968 17,302 25,200 18,522 39,154 18,522 - 163,192 (144,669)

YTD Budget YTD

7 - - - - - 8,525 3,189 3,425 64,946 83,863 12,877 70,985 11,260 25,200 15,227 45,074 15,227 191,971 107,012 (176,744) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 Water Supply - Rating Area 2 Area Rating Supply - Water COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF

Consent Compliance WW Ops - related Capital Small Communities Water Demand Management Hydrant, Valve & Watermeter installation Toby Replacements New WaterNew Source Drink ing Water Compliance Other Costs Depreciation Water Supply Renewals Water Supply Works New Maintenance & Asset Costs Finance Costs Fees & Charges Services & Accommodation Costs NET OPERATIONS Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING REVENUE OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE

- - 614 906 3,305 4,727 3,161 9,338 12,241 10,316 56,891 19,312 37,579 25,200 15,046 57,989 15,046 199,130 103,442 (184,084) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment

Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly PLANNING ®ULATORY

3/06/2014

REPORTS DETAIL -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1 Page Page

147

Attachment 1 Item 7

9,329 to

(3,518) YTD 26,972 30,195 41,560 20,170 56,356 29,414 66,373 0 / 3 (32,354) (34,676) (58,656) (14,264)

194,213 203,543 208,805 238,219 219,953 220,040

2013/14 (153,666)

148 NOTES 1 2 3 9 4 5 6 7 8

Page % of 45% 75% 30% 82% 41% 68% 52% 65% 90% 27% 84% 85% 16% 75% 77% 63% 38% 79% 58% 89% Spent 237% Budget Budget 90,469 84,000 22,800 858,769 768,709 295,515 591,815 272,328 652,702 568,702 745,500 257,330 (206,067) 2,051,426 5,159,483 1,862,111 2,460,851 2,243,914 2,632,407 8,276,922 Budget Revised Revised (3,117,439) Full Year

- (721) (6,984) 50,967 33,681 15,197 94,702 23,843 (85,654) (42,136) (28,798) (10,771) 177,886 233,737 257,580 178,557 113,767 124,538 YTD (199,420) (199,575) (214,618) Variance

for period endyear 31 March 2014

- - 54,579 81,592 27,013 17,100 (68,471) 193,200 150,063 563,766 219,736 413,543 132,963 191,626

1,537,774 1,867,023 4,011,540 1,534,778 1,448,712 1,723,714 5,682,330 (1,670,790) 7

YTD Budget YTD 43,808 96,924 17,100 244,167 349,483 605,901 226,720 384,745 195,359 214,618 151,551 117,766 (154,125) 1,715,660 1,900,704 4,245,277 1,535,498 1,648,287 1,545,157 5,658,487 (1,413,211) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 31-March-2014 Quarterly Report May 2014 COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF PLANNING & REGULATORY SERVICES SUMMARY REPORT SUMMARY SERVICES & REGULATORY PLANNING Community Safety Building Consents Regulatory Services Environmental Management Community Safety* Building Control* Regulatory Services* Resource Administration* Asset Sale Proceeds Fees & Charges Environmental Management (excl. Legal Fees)* Capital Works New Reserve Funding Reserve Capital Renewals Environmental Management Legal - Fees* Debt Repayment TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE OPERATING EXPENDITURE N ET C APIT AL CAPITAL REVENUE NET OPERATIONS (excl internal charges) OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE

5,813 (8,184) 34,478 88,352 76,754 17,100 (42,662) 213,972 111,265 549,545 230,239 357,773 (119,449) 1,748,014 1,859,144 4,178,903 1,549,763 1,428,334 1,603,813 5,438,447 (1,259,544) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Resource Administration: Resource Management, Environmental Management, Community Safety Manager Community Management, Environmental Resource Administration: Resource Management, Monitoring & (Consents), Compliance Planning (Policy), Environmental Planning Environmental Management: Environmental Safety Safety: Services, Pool Health SwCommunity Environmental imming Manager Control Building Compliance, Building Control, Building Control: Building TV Circuit Security Closed Patrol, Regulatory Services: Parking, Dogs, Stock & Control Animal *Groupings the include follow ing: Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Comments 12/13 YTD Actuals vs YTD YTD Actuals Actuals 12/13 13/14 Comments Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

PLANNING ®ULATORY SERVICES SUMMARY REPORT NOTES TO THE COST OF SERVICE STATEMENT -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Operating Expenditure Operating Operating Revenue Operating 31-March-2014 4 3. 2. 1. vs YTD YTD Actuals Budgets 13/14 13/14 Comments 7. 6. 5. Agenda Item: Item: Agenda below budget. below $16,098 at Consents Environmental lower with along requirements. with this by driven revenue Services Regulatory received Revenue processed arising $80,304. revenue by compliance and from consent Building due revenue Safety Community Environmental budget revenue below Management Environmental otatdsrie relating services contracted to Health Environmental Management Environmental favourable $178,557 Management Environmental likely to be a higher cost impact in the next quarter. next the in impact cost beahigher to likely 3,8,mil due mainly $33,681, ahead of budget. 9,0 favourable $94,702 centre. cost Health Environmental contracted services . services contracted nocmn cinadohrlrepoet there projects large other and action enforcement monitoring filled. and compliance fines oe ugtsedyear spend budget lower ngigappeals on-going ihrsedo ea die detsn,and advertising, advice, legal on spend higher

oa plctosreceived applications local to ihrpersonnel higher 7 The

ihrlcnigand licencing higher for eoddriver second Christchurch with Policy is to rvnby driven h main the to in to is ugtand budget osn esa $15,458, at fees Consent ugt 9,1 fthis of $90,812 budget, vrpn y$216due $42,136 by overspent a h niomn Court, Environment the to costs is ihrrcvr fcourt of recovery higher City to is ae oee,due However, date. with 5,6 bv budget above $50,967 (excl. iurlcnigalong licensing liquor is - drivers h underspend the LIMs is a Council due from bv ugtby budget above h oiinnow position the ea fees legal is ha fbudget of ahead vacancy ea fees), legal elcieof reflective Fees Attachment 1 to applications lower being is is ncall on $28,798 $97,232 in within Page Page the are to is is is in a 149

Attachment 1 Item 7

150 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly

3/06/2014

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for Capital Expenditure Capital Capital Revenue 8. 10. Agenda Item: Item: Agenda $214,618 funding. this $88,214, of Development, relating Services Regulatory The City the to driver overspend the relating being primary the make up the remaining amount. remaining upthe make for. rgam ni h n fte21/04financial 2013/2014 the of end the until programme for approved year. centre. that programme urin rjc code project guardians

the D Dog HDC Assist naorbecptlnew capital unfavourable Note 7

In City to is a lota there that also diinthere addition oa f$9,0 nugtdexpense unbudgeted $198,000 of total due urin rgam.Cuclhave Council programme. Guardians which the oto eteatrtoso $35,935, of alterations Centre Control Assist will to is h ue tetWs Carpark West Street Queen the an CBD be curderirta budgeted than earlier occurred are n Skate and offset offset within 1955oe budget over $199,575 is is atnsSkate Hastings 4,0 budget $40,000 yteueo reserves of use the by to h pn f$90,469 of spend the h compliance the hsvariance this works Park Attachment 1 Guardians pn of spend for in Page Page Park cost with the the 151

Attachment 1 Item 7

152 Page for period endyear 31 March 2014

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014

3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (230,239) 181,395 230,239 23,167

1,015 1,015 6,642 9,047 9,988 3/06/2014 - - Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific CAPITAL above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET

Depreciation Office Furniture & Fittings & Furniture Office Computer & Office Equipment Office & Computer Personnel Costs Personnel Administration Costs Administration Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Resource AdministrationResource 31-March-2014

YTD Actual YTD

2013/14 (226,720) 183,640 226,720 22,185 Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 1,670 1,670 7,321 5,667 7,907 - - YTD Budget

(219,736)

175,430 219,736 23,925 10,364 3,483 6,534 7 - - - -

Variance YTD YTD (1,670) (1,670) (8,210) (6,984) (2,184) (1,374) (6,984) 1,740 3,043 - -

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget (295,515) 235,615 295,515 31,900 15,500 4,500 8,000 - - - - Budget 126% Spent 70% 47% 99% 78% % of of % 77% 77% 0% 0% 0% 0% Attachment 1 {&DEFAULT_PERIO ## Page Page 153

Attachment 1 Item 7

154 ## {&DEFAULT_PERIOD} Page 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 65% 60% 59% 65% % of 74% 34% 30% 59% 74% 44% 35% 59% Spent 139% 112% Budget Budget - - - 27,100 27,000 13,500 46,000 27,000 30,160 42,947 35,900 11,781 40,000 16,300 591,815 799,019 591,815 460,249 2,718,181 1,829,755 Budget Revised Revised (2,126,366) Full Year

(7) 83 - - - (973) (973) 8,717 5,870 8,764 (8,484) (1,402) 84,779 29,054 (28,798) (28,798) (13,197) (22,743) 244,461 272,903 273,259 YTD Variance

for period endyear 31 March 2014

------13,500 26,000 29,250 10,226 34,298 12,225 27,068 11,781 413,543 513,492 356,552 413,543

1,915,339 1,345,098 (1,501,796) 7

YTD Budget YTD - - - 196 973 973 4,783 20,130 13,197 10,233 25,534 12,142 49,811 13,183 384,745 240,589 271,773 384,745 1,642,080 1,353,582 (1,257,335) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014 31-March-2014 Environmental Planning Environmental COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Services & Accommodation Costs District Plan PublicationDistrict Plan District Plan Review Personnel Costs Fees & Charges Coastal (Hamoana/Te Hazards Awanga) Review District Plan & SOE Monitoring Oil & Gas Symposium CBD Guardians Computer & Office Equipment Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Maintenance & Asset Costs Administration Costs Depreciation Resource Consents Private Plan Processing Change Best Homes NET OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above:

------271 15,134 15,382 12,708 37,844 17,620 74,330 357,773 379,564 282,698 357,773 1,680,567 1,257,779 (1,322,794) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (45,246) 48,018 40,537

2,618 3,443 1,278 2,772 2,772 3/06/2014 142 - - TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific CAPITAL above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL

Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Vehicles & Machinery Plant Depreciation Personnel Costs Personnel Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Administration Costs Administration Fees & Charges & Fees -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Swimming Pool Safety Services 31-March-2014

YTD Actual YTD

2013/14 (49,259) 52,422 40,800 Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 2,578 3,181 5,598 3,163 3,163 265 - - YTD Budget

(43,644) 48,309 40,340 2,666 3,561 1,433 4,665 4,665 7 308 - -

Variance YTD YTD (4,113) (5,616) (4,164) (1,502) (1,502) (460) 380 - - 88 43

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget (63,274) 55,278 69,494 27,000 27,000 3,555 2,150 6,500 2,011 6,220 6,220 Budget 278% Spent 73% 12% 49% 74% 51% % of of % 78% 75% 51% 0% 0% Attachment 1 {&DEFAULT_PERIO ## Page Page 155

Attachment 1 Item 7

156 ## {&DEFAULT_PERIOD} Page 9% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 84% 58% 47% % of 84% 70% 69% 71% 95% 44% -31% 18% 48% 84% Spent 194% Budget Budget - - - - - 20,000 11,000 35,000 32,216 80,494 15,000 58,000 58,000 60,100 54,000 215,814 490,000 546,920 (580,981) 2,051,426 2,051,426 2,632,407 1,756,963 Budget Revised Revised Full Year

- - - (721) 4,109 2,935 1,127 (1,808) (7,087) (8,138) (2,959) 76,728 34,026 39,200 (27,383) (11,300) (16,875) (21,345) (23,867) (16,152) 177,166 177,886 177,886 YTD Variance

for period endyear 31 March 2014

------2,996 45,075 40,500 23,687 19,789 60,370 11,250 28,230 28,230 121,776

1,537,774 1,534,778 1,537,774 1,309,155 7

YTD Budget YTD - - - 1,808 7,087 1,300 7,141 8,138 11,300 16,875 21,345 11,049 47,554 22,748 76,522 25,295 27,103 149,160 180,162 1,715,660 1,535,498 1,715,660 1,232,427 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014 31-March-2014 Building Control & Compliance Control Building COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF

Computer & Office Equipment Services &Accommodation Costs Building Inspection Mobility Project (Tablets) District Plan Review Other Costs Fees & Charges Building Inspection Mobility Project (Tablets) Personnel Costs Quality Assurance Earthquak e Prone Building Policy Accreditation Training Solar Saver Maintenance & Asset Costs Administration Costs Depreciation Structural Leak Homes y Maraek ak aho VRFF Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals NET OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING EXPENDITURE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

- - - - - 400 1,739 (4,799) (4,799) 69,508 16,341 61,253 67,485 30,915 17,391 25,652 20,853 168,162 198,251 1,748,014 1,549,763 1,748,014 1,234,499 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment

Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 (290,328) 211,200 355,781 211,200 121,361 501,528 10,089 90,362 10,852 34,577 34,577

9,531 2,027 2,740 3/06/2014 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET

Depreciation Noise Control Noise Alcohol Regulatory Licensing Agency Licensing Regulatory Alcohol Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Vehicles & Machinery Plant Fees & Charges & Fees Personnel Costs Personnel Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Administration Costs Administration Other Costs Other Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT Environmental Health 31-March-2014

YTD Actual YTD

2013/14 (312,475) 101,862 241,004 379,767 241,004 142,726 553,479 11,263 11,637 22,302 22,302 12,353 Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 7,370 - YTD Budget

(326,922)

188,535 362,150 188,535 136,958 515,457 99,099 23,374 6,398 8,094 1,857 7 - - -

Variance YTD YTD (22,302) (22,302) (17,616) (38,022) 11,737 52,469 52,469 14,447 (2,763) (4,865) (4,259) (5,514) (5,768) -

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget (433,108) 130,000 266,108 266,108 482,251 193,300 699,215 37,700 27,000 27,000 8,531 9,083 6,050 - Budget 136% 122% 132% Spent 78% 31% % of of % 91% 79% 74% 83% 91% 79% 72% 83% 0% Attachment 1 {&DEFAULT_PERIO ## Page Page 157

Attachment 1 Item 7

158 ## {&DEFAULT_PERIOD} Page 0% 0% 0% 0% 94% 72% 48% 94% % of 75% 98% 53% 48% 72% 10% 71% 83% 148% Spent 129% 106% Budget Budget - - - 7,550 2,000 10,170 49,585 46,397 11,554 23,000 40,000 80,000 80,000 721,134 452,819 287,068 150,610 1,008,202 1,008,202 Budget Revised Revised Full Year

71 333 (631) (111) 9,478 1,263 1,436 (1,520) (2,715) (2,542) (4,202) 29,509 26,322 80,000 41,524 (10,109) (10,109) (35,935) (13,100) YTD Variance

for period endyear 31 March 2014

- - - - 3,390 2,000 7,550 30,157 35,440 34,798 10,741 16,582 80,000 80,000 957,474 531,413 426,060 338,327 957,474 108,718

YTD Budget YTD (71) - 4,910 3,834 2,111 6,287 2,542 35,935 48,540 79,209 33,362 14,943 16,249 38,476 947,364 521,935 425,429 341,042 947,364 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014 31-March-2014 Animal Control Animal COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF

Administration Costs Court Issues Personnel Costs Fees & Charges Dog TagsDog National Database Other Machinery & Equipment Land & Buildings Works New Finance Costs Maintenance & Asset Costs Services & Accommodation Costs Depreciation Other Costs Pound Costs Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE NET OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

45 - - 1,962 9,496 2,269 6,397 44,097 62,831 33,874 11,818 12,545 31,906 31,906 938,902 483,413 455,489 328,786 938,902 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council

Attachment 1 Item 7 Council

YTD Actual YTD

Quarterly Report May 2014 2014 May Report Quarterly 2012/13 919,079 195,372 919,079 289,540 572,364 346,715 102,817 53,511 10,403 22,497 38,191 32,123 15,739 21,308

1,043 2,170 2,040 6,284 5,813 5,813 5,813 3/06/2014 480 ------OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING OPERATIONS OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING TOTAL Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Operating Specific TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATING TOTAL NET OPERATIONS NET CAPITAL Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: included Projects Expenditure Capital Specific TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE CAPITAL TOTAL

Maintenance & Asset Costs Asset & Maintenance Administration Costs Administration Depreciation Fees & Charges & Fees or ot aking Park Costs Court Personnel Costs Personnel Court Costs - Registration WOF - Registration Costs Court Police Fee Police Railways Corridor Lease Services & Accommodation Costs Accommodation & Services Other Costs Other Abandoned Vehicles Abandoned Razos Lease (King Street) (King Lease Razos Eastbourne Street Carpark Street Eastbourne Car Park ing Developments ing Car Park a akRefurbishment Car Park Havelock North Park ing Study ing Park North Havelock Office Furniture & Fittings & Furniture Office Other Machinery & Equipment & Machinery Other Hastings Park ing Study ing Park Hastings Land & Buildings New Works Buildings Land & Queen Street West Carpark West Street Queen Park Assets New Works B atnsS t ak- Development Park ate Sk Hastings CBD Radio Telephones Radio Replacement Hand Helds Replacement NCCrakextension HNFC Carpark -

for period year end 31 March 2014 March 31 year end period for COST OF SERVICECOST STATEMENT 31-March-2014 Parking

YTD Actual YTD

2013/14 953,171 205,352 953,171 273,052 562,071 391,100 178,683 178,683 54,603 11,717 16,612 31,829 53,710 19,970 22,405 87,257 88,214 90,469 Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 1,065 2,019 7,651 7,519 3,160 735 ------YTD Budget

908,737 226,889 908,737 248,166 556,532 352,204 53,627 21,525 48,625 39,251 13,370 23,883 10,056 5,625 4,511 2,000 3,000 8,706 7 700 ------

Variance (178,683) (178,683) YTD YTD (14,459) (24,886) (87,257) (88,214) (90,469) 16,796 44,434 21,536 44,434 38,895 (6,599) (6,091) (5,539) (4,519) 4,913 1,478 2,405 3,447 5,546 (976) (35) (19) ------

Full Year Year Full Revised Budget 1,215,072 1,215,072 302,341 552,090 258,130 662,982 367,500 459,969 65,311 60,000 28,700 50,000 25,000 25,000 11,600 90,469 90,469 50,000 7,800 5,000 2,000 3,000 5,000 2,000 8,600 7,500 700 - - - - Budget 107% 101% 251% 100% 106% 150% 105% Spent 198% 21% 53% 80% 90% 66% 37% % of of % 78% 68% 84% 58% 78% 85% 71% 39% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Attachment 1 {&DEFAULT_PERIO ## Page Page 159

Attachment 1 Item 7

160 ## {&DEFAULT_PERIOD} Page 1% 1% 0% 0% 40% 16% 83% % of 99% 75% 123% 118% Spent 115% 151% 123% 463% Budget Budget - 3,800 3,000 3,000 13,000 20,640 57,000 20,640 36,940 27,493 477,994 100,000 393,761 157,000 (457,354) Budget Revised Revised Full Year

- - (644) (644) (192) (6,232) (6,354) (10,904) (16,142) (22,301) (38,443) (21,212) YTD (204,159) (203,515) (158,620) Variance

for period endyear 31 March 2014

- - - - 813 813 2,850 3,000 9,750 24,733 24,733 30,114 20,315 360,766 294,737 (359,953)

YTD Budget YTD - 169 169 192 2,850 13,904 16,142 47,034 63,176 36,468 41,527 15,982 564,281 453,357 (564,112) 2013/14

YTD Actual

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Quarterly Report May 2014 31-March-2014 Security Patrol & CCTV Patrol Security COST OF SERVICE STATEMENTCOST SERVICE OF Finance Costs Other Costs Radio Telephones Plant Machinery & Vehicles Renewals Computer & Office Equipment Fees & Charges Personnel Costs Administration Costs Depreciation Maintenance & Asset Costs Services & Accommodation Costs NET OPERATIONS TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE Specific Capital Expenditure Projects included above: Specific Operating Expenditure Projects included above: CAPITAL OPERATING EXPENDITURE OPERATIONS OPERATING REVENUE

59 - - - - 3,825 3,000 1,163 1,163 13,392 26,165 37,097 372,557 289,018 (371,393) 2012/13 3/06/2014

YTD Actual

Attachment 1 Attachment Council Attachment 1 Item 7 Council Brought Forward Progress Report

3/06/2014

May 2014 May BROUGHT FORWARD PROGRESS REPORT PROGRESS

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 7

Attachment 2 Page Page 161

Attachment 2 Item 7

162 Funding Page May 2014

- Rates Rates Plant replacement Fund/ Loan Date Completion Jun-14 Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Rates Jun-14 Jun-14 Rates May-14 Loan May-14 Rates Jun-14 Rates Jan-00 Rates 2014 -15 Progress Report Report Progress Brought Forward Forward Brought

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 30-Apr-14

Project Progress Report as at at as Progress Report Project Planned investment in key tourism infrastructure will be made in May/June 2014. 0 0 0 0 CD radiosCD engaged a technician and radio repeater upgrade. Have as advice to to provide long our term regional Sigma Consulting Engineers report fire identified upgrades that should be completed compliance to fire improve within Digital strategy consultants commissioned to undertake this work. Completion date May end of 2014. Work to be Centenary planning begun prior had to the Opera House closure. Centenary celebrations will obviously be impacted Backup water supply the for EMO building. Project has been on hold pending staff replacements. Quotes been have Comments 0 Working with Assets HDC looking Team at long term requirements and options costs. vs BROUGHT FORWARD REPORT 25,000 25,000 Revised Revised Brought Forwards) Budget (incl (incl Budget 0 0 Variance 8,500 -8,500 8,500 49,000 -49,000 49,000 30,000 -30,000 60,000 32,000 -32,000 57,000 23,500 -23,500 48,500 49,000 -49,000 49,000 30,000 -30,000 60,000 20,00050,000 -20,000 -50,000 40,000 50,000 100,000 -100,000 100,000 Budget Brought Brought Forward 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,354 109,000 -93,64632,395 151,000 40,000 -7,605 50,000 11,015 107,000 -95,98525,000 142,500 25,000 20,250 39,000 -18,750 39,000 15,354 9,00032,395 6,354 40,000 51,000 -7,605 50,000 11,015 37,000 -25,985 52,500 25,000 25,000 20,250 39,000 -18,750 39,000 YTD Actual TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

Heretaunga VRFF extend - station fire General General Tourism Strategies Digital Communications Strategy Opera House Centenary Web Streamining Re-organisation Costs Havelock North Visitors Centre Software Development Community Survey HeretaungaHouse Fire Penetrations 3/06/2014

HUMAN RESOURCES & FINANCE SERVICES Collection Rate Emergency Management Civil Defence Civil Management Emergency Emergency Management Fire Control Hastings Events Hastings Marketing Hastings I-Site Visitor Centre Leadership Information Systems - FMIS - Information Systems Branch Office Building Heretaunga Office Branch - New House Project Description CORPORATE & CUSTOMER SERVICES Attachment 2 Attachment Council Attachment 2 Item 7 Council Social Development Social Initiatives Safety Community Hastings City Art Gallery Community Centre Flaxmere Halls Hastings Sports Centre Pools Swimming Community Services Administration &PROGRAMMES FACILITIES COMMUNITY Brought Forward Progress Report Youth Futures Youth (Camberley) Project Streets Safer AC & Ventilation - Heating, HCAG Equipment Media Digital Redevelopment Square Civic Equipment AV Centre Community Flaxmere Upgrade Centre Community Flaxmere Development Fund Marae - HVAC Centre Sports Hastings roof pool swimming Flaxmere Strategy Aquatic Centre Aquatic General ReviewRating

3/06/2014

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL -

,5,2 642158241,314,452 1,588,274 66,452 1,654,726 ,5,2 200162761,300,000 1,602,726 52,000 1,654,726 May 2014 May 2,7 2,0 169602,333 -1,629 225,000 223,371 351,108 262,253 19,000 281,253 2,7 6,0 1169742,333 -141,629 365,000 223,371 1,199,864 -219,143 332,520 113,377 351,108 262,253 19,000 281,253 2845705,1 75,427 57,114 5,700 56,610 62,814 12,500 19,000 31,500 73,950 6,103 38,950 45,053 1,156,671 -184,620 283,820 99,200 2845705,1 75,427 57,114 5,700 56,610 62,814 12,500 19,000 31,500 73,950 6,103 38,950 45,053 ,2 120-42815,693 27,500 -14,278 -20,245 21,200 27,500 6,922 7,255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,0 1000130,000 -130,000 130,000 000-00010,000 -10,000 10,000 14,452 -14,452 14,452 20,000 -20,000 20,000 14,000 -14,000 14,000 000-00020,000 -20,000 20,000 14,000 -14,000 14,000

This work is delayed, subject to the completion of the design for civic square. square. for civic design of the completion the to subject delayed, is work This 0 2014. for winter scheduled Pool, upgrade of Frimley proposed for the funding is This for the new site is expected to be late Feb/March 2014. Feb/March belate to expected is newfor site the live" and"go underway is process The design Gallery. Art for the of anew website construction for the funding is This component will be called upon in these two quarters. quarters. two these uponin becalled will component forward carry the that anticipated is It of andQ4 Q3 2014. upin ramp andwill progressing process Design The upgrade of the Community Centre is due for completion in early March. All funding will be fully expended. befully funding will All March. early in duefor completion is Centre The Community upgrade of the Expenditure will occur by end March 2014. endMarch by occur will Expenditure 2014. March mid by becompleted andwill facility upgrade of of the the part as programmed is expenditure This 2014. endMarch by becompleted area will grandstand the to of HVAC Installation 2014. July by becompleted will works Outstanding 2014. July by proceed will expenditure this 2014, March in Council to of areport outcome the to Subject 0 Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 7

u-4Loans Jun-14 Rates Jun-14 Loans Jun-14 Mar-14 u-4Rates Jun-14 Rates Jun-14 Mar-14 Loans Loans Jul-14 Jun-14 Rates Jan-00 u-4Loans Jun-14 Loans Loans Rates Attachment 2 Page Page 163

Attachment 2 Item 7

164 Page May 2014

- HW Abbott Bequest Rates Complete Rates Complete Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Rates Dec-13 Rates Jun-14Jun-14 Rates Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Rates Jun-14 Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Mar-14 Progress Report Report Progress Brought Forward Forward Brought

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Go-cart track replacement. Completed July 13 The funding was funding usedThe to pay the for digital strategy. Work is complete. Contribution the for HBRC brought Solar Scheme forward Saver that has yet to be established. Planned use during development process. LTP 2015-2025 $35,000 allocated to specific business attraction projects, on track completion for by 2014 30 June 4 workshops delivery by planned for 2014 30 June Business HB partnership in place, Food development manager recruitmentunderway, project completion date 30 2014 June Kaiapo structure Road plan development ($26,000) stormwater modelling is progressing, further invoices likely by EOY. development ($50,000). Lyndhurst extension ($25,000) waiting on stormwater modelling Lyndhurst for Stage 2. Maraekakaho Structure Plan ($25,000) subject progressing, to developer but little sign this of happening. AratakiRequired for Extension work. May include management odour assessment, but mushroom being farm Consultantredeveloped. to be engaged toprogress this. District process Plan Review ongoing. Potential carry for forwards to be used to commission work on particular submission responses. Omahu Marae completed, Matahiwi Marae (contract o Heretaunga) not with Taiwhenua completed, Te Marae Nga o Heretauanga hapu development planning partially completed contract ended. Haumoana/Te Awanga stage Master 1 for Plan work commissioned post District Plan submissions Brought forward for additionalBrought for forward consulltancy work regarding issues supply. gravel of Earthquake-prone building assessments (IEP's) to be scheduled the for remainder the of financial year. 0 20,000 -20,000 35,000 25,00037,500 -25,000 -37,500 25,000 37,500 25,000 -25,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 35 49,000 -48,965 49,000 135 5,000 -4,865 5,000 9,737 50,375 -40,638 90,375 3,000 16,5007,606 -13,500 26,000 16,500 -18,394 26,000 8,539 24,000 -15,461 24,000 11,049 39,000 -27,951 60,100 30,358 68,875 -38,517 108,875 32,267 94,300 -62,033 104,850 18,874 130,000 -111,126 525,000 20,680 46,000 -25,320 46,000 18,874 110,000 -91,12611,049 490,000 39,000 -27,951 60,100 20,621 18,50032,812 2,121 126,000 18,500 -93,188 311,000 21,661 26,800 -5,139 37,350 325,403 201,000 124,403 551,249 546,333 30,000 516,333 596,000 855,426 44,000 811,426 987,623 846,887 20,000 826,887 963,623 304,723 155,000 149,723 505,249 546,333 30,000 516,333 596,000 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

Heretaunga Plains- Strategy Development Urban Spatial Plan Development Haumoana Awanga / master Te Plan Positive aging strategy Pou Project Structure Plan Developments Solar Saver Earthquake Prone Building Policy Hapu/Maori Engagement Coastal (Hamoana/Te Hazards Awanga) Review District Plan Review Leaky Homes Ice House Workshops Business HB project Food Innovation InternationalEIT student General Asset Management Plan Inwards Investment Marketing HB Opera House Annual Grant 3/06/2014

Strategic Development Administration - Strategic Culture & Heritage & Culture Strategic Building Compliance STRATEGY & DEVELOPMENT Building Control PLANNING & REGULATORY SERVICES Environmental Policy Economic andEconomic Social Development Splash PlanetSplash HB Opera House Attachment 2 Attachment Council Attachment 2 Item 7 Council PARKS MANAGEMENT PARKS HDC Site Landfill Regional Omarunui Waste Minimisation Recycling Depot 1 Refuse - Area Rating Collection SERVICESWASTE HastingsKeep Beautiful BEAUTIFUL HASTINGS KEEP MANAGEMENT ASSET Projects Strategic Brought Forward Progress Report Arataki Dev: Reserve Rural Purchase Arataki Reserves - Neighbourhood Lyndhurst Road Gateway Omahu - Other Places Special Contribution Cash Trust RSP Depot Park Upgrade Peak Te Mata D & Development A Valley Landfill Survey Waste General Landfill Closed Consents Events Local RemovalGraffiti - HDC Strategy Environment Coastal Reviews Strategy strategy Recreation

3/06/2014

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL -

May 2014 May 0,7 2,5 2856425,750 -218,576 425,750 207,174 1,578,000 250,000 -783,210 -125,000 1,578,000 794,790 250,000 125,000 984,843 102,208 373,547 475,755 203,191 189,452 3,460 192,912 7,5 7,4 0,0 984,843 102,208 373,547 475,755 203,191 189,452 3,460 192,912 6851,0 18599,400 31,845 15,000 46,845 190,000 -95,531 140,000 10,000 44,469 10,000 6851,0 18599,400 31,845 15,000 46,845 627,500 -305,049 392,500 87,451 ,9 170-77543,700 -17,705 21,700 3,995 ,8 8,0 6451689,000 -684,511 689,000 4,489 22,700 -1,705 5,700 3,995 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000-00040,000 35,000 -40,000 38,280 -35,000 40,000 -20,780 35,000 20,780 21,000 -16,000 16,000 60,000 -60,000 60,000 000-00060,000 -60,000 60,000

,0 80016,000 -8,000 8,000 ,0 80016,000 -8,000 8,000 0 10,000 Required to purchase reserves - dependant on development uptake ondevelopment - reserves dependant purchase to Required Required to purchase reserves - dependant on development uptake ondevelopment - reserves dependant purchase to Required check) to - (Bruce RSP the to commitment fund Council's to Required centre visitor Peak Te Mata Proposed the to commitment fund Council's to Required Part funded Ocean Beach alternative route investigation ($15,000). Remaining Coastal Environment Strategy Strategy Environment Coastal Remaining ($15,000). investigation route alternative Beach funded Ocean Part work. consent for required resource as beutilised to ($40,000) Roadbudget andIrongate June 2014. Omahu in council to andduefor submission finalised editting minor complete, but all ($50,000) Strategy Density Medium September. duenow by scope, expanded with with progressing ($50,000) strategy water Waimarama basis. This applies to A & D development and B & C development cost centre areas. centre C cost development & D andB development & A to applies This basis. onayearly spent andamount of timing terms in years move financial between andwill case beviewed aunique to as need always budgets These onsite. right is time when the happenonly andwill beover years will however many this be spent; will landfill of life the for the budget development The total constraints. construction andseasonal used) is space (how quickly tonnages onlandfill dependent is budgets of The these spending capping. andfinal systems capture/destruction gas new liner, involves constructing principally Landfill Omarunui the The at work development year. financial 2014/15 the for 2015in Feb scheduled is survey The next $24K). = $8K (3 x survey the of time the until year forward each andcarried centre cost Minimisation Waste the into loaded is $8K budget annual an work of the To covercost of $24K. the cost abudgeted at ever once years out three carried is survey The waste work. of the bereceived for to some are still invoices however 2013, December in completed physically The was work andadvertising. signage to forward relates carry This 2014. for March/April now scheduled The is work out. now becarried can work beenreceived andthe has work for the quote A out. becarried to needfor work repair the identified site of the inspection An site. Blackbridge the at wall retaining chute loading onthe work repair undertake needto the to forward relates The of $15K carry Contact Energy donation - for Omahu Road landscaping in 2014 in - Road for landscaping Omahu donation Energy Contact for direction. future Council to areport Requires allocation. - insufficient stage for mobile Allocated 12/13 in completed not improvements forRequired Depot SDU contracts strategy forRequired KHB year removal current graffiti in in forRequired increase 2014. on30January paid Blueprint Facilities Strategy/ Recreation andActive Sport for Regional Funding

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 7

Jun-14 Jun-14 Loans Loans Jun-14 Jun-14 u-4Rates Loans Jun-14 Rates Jun-14 Jan-00 Rates Nov-13 a-0Loans Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Rates Nov-13 Rates Rates growth Development Reserve+Loan & Dev: Purchase Arataki growth Wide Commun reserves & Parks Rates Attachment 2 Page Page 165

Attachment 2 Item 7

166 Page May 2014

- Growth Loan Rates\NZTA Subsidy Nelson park reserve SubsidyLoan / NZTA Rates\NZTA Subsidy Loans growth Growth Loan Growth Loan Rates Subsidy /NZTA Rates\NZTA Subsidy Growth funded Growth Loan Nelson Park Reserve Plant replacement fund Loans growth Loans growth Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00Jan-00 Rates Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Jan-00 Jan-00 Jan-00 Rates Jan-00Jan-00 Rates Rates Oct-13 Jul-14Dec-13Jan-00 Rates Rates Jan-00 RatesJul-14 Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 RatesJan-00 Rates Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Jan-00 Jan-00 Rates Mar-14 Nov-13Nov-13Dec-13 Rates Jun-14 Rates Jan-14 May-14 RatesOct-03 Jan-00 Rates Jan-00 Rates Progress Report Report Progress Brought Forward Forward Brought

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 0 0 This is indicated physical for expenditure within Feb/March. This is currently on track. Russell Street Upgrade. Expected completion date 2014 June carry hasThe forward been allocated to projects to be constructed this financial year. monitoringThe the and evaluation for MC will be completed this financial year. 0 0 Required for WilliamRequired for Nelson Park construction Heretaunga Street W Block 200 planning and construction. Expected completion date Dec2014 Budgeted 16/17 for based on the development rate development requirements of Major review planned. Expected completion date May 2014. 0 0 carry hasThe forward been allocated to be spent this financial year. Required for springRequired for planting programme. AratakiRequired for development on Meissener reserve Road 0 0 0 This was carried to allow forward us sufficient funds to commence an AWTMP study in 2015/16. This will again be indicated the as for 2014/15 a Carry forward period. To be re-budgeted for 16/17 be re-budgeted for toTo accommodate Road/ Percival Evenden intersection Road upgrades. Expected completion date 16/17 2nd Foot path and Inset parking Ikanui for and Arbuckle Road waiting Road the for trigger point 80% of development. Should 15/16. be re-budgeted for Arataki Stage Road 2 planning and Design. Expected Completion Date 2014. June Construction dependant on development uptake. Physical Completion is achieved. now Final Project Closure underway and resolution Stage of 4 Post Construction Safety Audit. Predicted to complete within Budget. Prioritisation Study Complete. Consultation currently underway with physical implementationCash Flow updated expected to reflect in planned April/May. activity. This consists multiple of projects in stages various the of project lifecycle. Primarily Designcompleted been works have to date, with Capital installation being carried out February from through to May. Cash Flow has been updated to reflect planned activity. 0 Required to purchase CBD new greenspace as Nelson per Park Referendum GatewayRequired for structures and plantings- awaiting strategy completion and adoption Earmarked to complete bund replenishment at Waimarama. Required to undertake irrigation work that wasput on hold due to parks optimisation study. parksRequired for toiletprogramme works new being Awanga designed Te for Required to purchase dependant reserves - on development uptake first reserves - Required to develop stage work currently underway For toilets upgrades at Keirunga Gardens and Cornwall Park studyThe has to been awarded MWH and is progressing well. Expected completion date is March 2014. draft plan has and theThe final been delivered plan will be completed by March 2014. 0 5,800 Completed. 0 -18 0 7,800 -7,800 7,800 23,000 -23,000 101,784 76,500 -76,500 156,678 31,500 -31,500 63,000 38,60015,000 -38,600 -15,000 38,600 30,525 25,00075,000 -25,00080,000 -75,00056,000 25,000 -80,000 75,000 -56,000 80,000 56,000 156,800 -156,800 255,127 422,000 -422,000 422,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 827 3,900 -3,073 26,350 131 5,900 -5,769 5,900 8,152 8,000 152 8,000 Completed. 5,658 10,800 -5,142 10,800 Completed. 8,0632,500 7,700 6,400 3633,170 -3,9005,782 12,000 7,700 6,400 5,800 -8,830 80,275 5,301 313,000 -307,699 313,000 3,574 5,000 -1,426 10,000 69,938 397,400 -327,462 397,400 45,81824,214 100,000 26,500 -54,18222,93274,248 -2,286 100,00044,048 5,100 77,155 29,000 33,500 17,832 -2,907 15,048 28,100 139,255 49,000 29,740 135,00032,10099,924 -105,260 30,000 95,000 135,000 2,100 4,924 30,000 95,000 68,404 171,000 -102,596 31,00011,697 789,000 -777,303 23,000 17,32095,239 27,000 104,200 -9,680 -8,961 122,000 209,200 407,588 301,750171,265 105,838 135,000 644,831 471,690 36,265407,244 31,000 743,580 397,500 440,690 1,493,638 9,744233,753 623,248 28,000 205,753 236,000 Completed. 115,068 279,000 -163,932 137,600 110,415 75,000 35,415 75,000 1,146,443 650,000 496,443 968,700 2,202,059 3,171,205 -969,146 5,478,991 2,671,640 5,136,630 -2,464,990 5,677,830 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

Sussex Street: Full Length General Francis Hicks Pepper - St Ave Townsen To FreightHeavy Plan Study Accessibility District Transport Strategy Study - AWTMP AWTMP School - Zones Matai Street: Francis Hicks to Gordon St Ave Model Communities Extension - Project of Nelson Street Major safety Windsor Avenue Asset Management Systems PlanningCorridor Study Various Footpaths New Regional Promotion Signs Bus Shelters Various Minor Safety Nelson Park Linkages & Greenspace Lyndhurst Stage Development I Arataki Development Irongate Industrial Development Whakatu Arterial Subdivision Support Response Development - Model Communities Park North Road Sportspark Percival - Development & upgrade Road extension CBD and Suburban Developments Keirunga Toilet New Northwood Reserve Development Northwood Reserve Various Toilets New CBD Hastings Skate Park Development - Waipatiki RMP Implementation PSBU Workshop PSBU Rebranding Ski Park Clive PSBU Office Redevelopment Arataki Subdivision CBD Green Space (NP) Entry Statement Funding AllParks Revegetation inc Protection Dune AllParks Irrigation Upgrading 3/06/2014

TRANSPORTATION Rating Area Transportation 1: PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Attachment 2 Attachment

Council Attachment 2 Item 7

Council Stormwater - Rating Area 2 Stormwater - Rating Area 1 WATER SERVICES 2: Transportation Area Rating Brought Forward Progress Report Warren Street Warren Market-Prospect Streams Havelock Other II Development Stage Lyndhurst Improvements Quality Services Water Analysis & Mitigation Break Dam Native Tree Streets Development Industrial Irongate Development Arataki Streams North Havelock I Development Stage Lyndhurst Te Project Awanga Development Industrial Whakatu Zones - School AWTMP Safety Minor Various Reserve Road to plus & LandPurchase Beach Ocean Arini Rd Stormwater improvements Rd Stormwater Arini Infrastructure Coastal DriveKaranema Rd - Napier Upgrade andAnalysis Modelling Network Aubyn St to Ave: Heretaunga Windsor Alleyway to Pl - Wavell St Wavell Frimley to - Ikanui St Karaitiana Hapuka to Rd - Pakowhai Frimley Renewals Consent Resource Stormwater Schemes InflowSewer -Commun. Prevention

3/06/2014

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL -

May 2014 May 4,0 4001106176,000 131,006 14,000 145,006 0,7 2,5 2,7 125,150 -21,877 124,150 102,273 8,9 ,2,9 201712,219,876 -2,041,701 2,427,095 385,394 1449,0 85690,000 -8,516 90,000 81,484 310,199 -273,176 310,199 45,000 37,023 -153 65,000 45,000 -42,900 44,847 65,000 22,100 84,950 -15,780 111,950 96,170 7802,0 1,0 29,000 200,000 -11,200 -177,991 29,000 200,000 17,800 22,009 13,000 130,000 4,858 -57,340 80,000 6,000 22,660 10,858 9892900-8,9 229,000 -189,191 229,000 39,809 ,9 ,0 ,9 14,500 2,198 4,400 6,598 68,500 -450,379 459,388 9,009 37,200 -3,097 9,200 6,103 ,1 3,0 1828139,700 -138,288 139,700 1,412 320,000 -315,602 320,000 4,398 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,0 1400114,000 -114,000 114,000 262,000 -262,000 262,000 99,569 150,000 -120,000 -150,000 120,000 150,000 698-69816,908 -16,908 16,908 113,500 -63,500 63,500 500-75,000 44,000 75,000 44,000 -44,000 -44,000 44,000 44,000

,0 4004,000 -4,000 4,000 3,000 -3,000 3,000 0 0 School Stream upgrade on hold as property is for sale. Negotiations to continue with new owners when sold. new owners with continue to Negotiations for sale. is property as upgrade onhold Stream School Whakatu. in development land potential To support MWH Alliance have been engaged to carry out design, for construction in summer 2014/15. summer in for construction design, out have carry beenengagedto Alliance MWH 2014/15. summer in for construction and design, investigation out have carry beenengagedto Alliance MWH Works completed in Aug 2013. Aug in completed Works area. coastal Haumoana/Clifton in works Protection Coastal the To support This consists of multiply projects in various stages of the project lifecycle. Primarily Design works have works been Design Primarily lifecycle. project of the various stages in projects of multiply consists This project. Pakowhai Wider specific on-going the into budget surplus Reallocate Corridor Study. Roading Pakowhai the support and works future identify to Area, Pakowhai Wider for the model network develop to stormwater project Specific 2014/15. forplanned summer construction with anddesign, investigation have carryout MWH beenengagedto Terrace. Franklin to Reallocated HBRC. with consent the Global to related SW varyconditions to the HBRC with application adaptive consent current with associated costs Support work underway. modelling sewer currently with associated work sewer, into inflow to related checks field out carry to costs Support works. 2proposed Stage Lyndhurst with line in 2015/16 to Rebudget 2. Stage for Lyndhurst works widening final with conjunction in property onGoode bedrilled New to borehole 2015. May by becompleted to Plans Management Catchment received. information of sampling aresult as on-going andimprovements dependant weather is work sampling On-going Oct by 2014. becomplete to Plans Safety Plans. Safety Dam andproduce assessments dam out carry engagedto MWH Projects. Frimley and Karaitiana to also refers andoverland flows, capacity improve S/W to study catchment Pakowhai' of 'Wider Part 2014. endof May completion Expected forward brought from 2014/15. funds further Extension, Arataki service to new infrastructure with associated Costs erosion. slumping, bank with associated new works require that areas review erosion andidentify out carry engagedto MWH 2014). April completion expected progress, (in model 2stormwater stage Lyndhurst complete to beused to budget Remaining ($20k). Feb in completed culvert Drain of Lyndhurst Installation Rds. andLeyland around Pip/Kuku network and piped opendrains to improvements Drain, for Leyland grate intake the to improvements lagoon, the to new outlets Designing Construction project is underway and to be completed Feb 2014, with a 6 month defect period. defect a6month with 2014, Feb becompleted andto underway is project Construction period. defect a6month with 2014, March becompleted andto underway is project Construction development. Industrial Irongate service to options through Working ontrack. currently is This Feb/March. within expenditure for physical indicated is This Project completed in Dec 2013, with 6 months defect period. defect 6months with 2013, Dec in completed Project Construction project was completed in Feb 2014, with a 6 month defect period. defect a6month with 2014, Feb in completed was project Construction

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 7

u-4Loans Jul-14 Loans Jan-00 u-4Loans Jul-14 Loans Jan-14 e-3Loans Dec-13 Mar-14 Rates Jan-00 Oct-13 u-4Loans Jul-14 Loans Jan-14 Loans Loans Jan-14 Jul-14 Loans Jul-14 Loans Jul-15 Jul-14 Loans Oct-13 Jan-14 Loans May-14 May-14 Rates Jan-00 a-4Loans Jan-14 e-4Loans Feb-14 Loans Rates Loans Rates Loans 100% Growth Funded Growth 100% Funded Growth 100% Funded Growth 84% Attachment 2 Page Page 167

Attachment 2 Item 7

168 Page May 2014

- Loans Loans 100% Growth Funded 20% Growth Funded Loans Loans 50% Growth Funded Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans 100% Growth Funded 100% Growth Funded Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans 100% Growth Funded 100% Growth Funded 100% Growth Funded Loans Progress Report Report Progress Brought Forward Forward Brought

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Construction complete, closeout underway. Works will be completed this financial year. Growth planning work underway Norton deferred Rd Issues and options complete, to paper Council Feb 2014,implementation 2014/15 Breadalbane sewer renewal implementation Feb-April 2014 analysisCCTV underway work planning Feb, relining implementation 4th quarter Investigations completed Network Modelling. Optimisation modelling indicated source a new at Whakatu is not required. Additionalis underway now modelling to incorporate results the from optimisation study with the outcomes the of resource consentingprocess. E.g. withdrawing Flamere from etc. Anderson Park rising main tender closed construction to commence Mar 2014, Pipe Bridges complete,West Fredrick at design St and conditionCCTV assessment analysis underway, renewals strategy development underway, possible 14/15 CF of $60K Link Road Tauroa ($160k) wasThe modelled but wasn't feasible. Alternative options being are investigated, and may incorporate a duplicate main further south in Rd conjunction in Tauroa with the booster new pumpstation at the Tauroa Reservoir. Currently investigating alternative options reservoir within a current development that could be mutually beneficial. E.g. may the developer gift land in exchange easier for access to the infrastructure. Seismic assessments councils of existing reservoirs. Qualified engineers due to unavailable were Christchurch.Possibly a project graduate a new to for manage, and much researching the of work prep involves HDC's existing records which can then be presented to structural consultants pricing. for Additional DMA zones being are modelled zones and new identified. easiest The zones to established been have implemented. Results pressure from reduction they're worth prove pursuing, establishing however zones new are takingnow longer to establish due to unknowns the around status existing of and future sources. E.g. Flaxmerebores, Eastbourne how will operate, the Brookvale Frimley future and how of will be setup. Modelling the of new zones, has temporarily been put on hold pending the outcome the of Hastings water consent, and Brookvale bore investigations. The bulk thisThe of budget is telemetry/radio required for system upgrades, planning is underway implementation likely2014/15 in Priority renewals tender closed 5 Feb 2014 , implementation March 2014 -June LandsdaleTiming Driven. Development commencing final stages now, with works likely to straddle the 2014/15 year. Pending the outcome the of limited notification process. Condition and performance assessments underway possible 14/15 FC $300k 0 Project uptake pending developer deferred Provisional Lyndhurst next stage planning budget Flow monitoring upgrades gear underway. Planning underway implementation to commence in late February Construction complete, closeout underway, unspent budget reallocated to Warren St shortfall Outfall diffuser investigation and planning underway, this portion the of budget will be spent by 2014 June 0 0 596 636 0 0 4,000 -4,000 4,000 44,000 -44,000 94,000 20,000 -20,000 10,000 50,000 -50,000 125,000 204,000 -204,000 284,000 0 0 0 0 0 869 1,555,000 -1,554,131 1,555,000 Development. 596 636 2,744 132,000 -129,256 132,000 2,006 166,0009,782 1,225,000 -163,994 -1,215,218 166,000 2,147,599 Development. 7,922 5,000 2,922 8,000 8,402 553,000 -544,598 553,000 61,413 66,000 -4,587 166,000 40,891 359,500 -318,609 359,509 74,458 193,00074,020 -118,54296,48675,791 50,000 385,065 216,000 468,70054,755 -119,514 24,02026,097 -392,909 645,00029,461 216,000 50,000 53,000 -590,245 468,700 121,40081,192 -26,903 745,000 -91,939 163,000 25,000 139,525 -81,808 163,000 27,278 94,000 -66,722 94,000 13,719 858,500 -844,781 1,540,565 222,575 2,016,000 -1,793,425 2,016,000 186,895 1,369,000 -1,182,105 1,369,000 274,101 25,000 249,101 275,000 239,661 27,000 212,661 236,100 289,487 350,500 -61,013 350,500 1,064,282 3,175,100 -2,110,818 4,341,455 TOTAL TOTAL

New WaterNew Source Water Demand Management Drinking Water Compliance Consent Compliance Pumpstation Projects Arataki Development Irongate Industrial Development Omahu Industrial Development Hills Havelock CapacityReservoir Increase Trunk SewersTrunk Frimley Interceptor Sanitary Sewer Outfall Windsor Avenue Reactive Sewer Renewals Warren Street 21 to - Rd Greenwood McHardy Advanced Investigations Network Extension Park North Road WW Ops - related Capital CapacityNapier Road Upgrade Havlock North Catchment Upgrades Flow Monitoring Upgrades Planned Sewer Renewals Wastewater Network Model Arataki Development Irongate Industrial Development Lyndhurst Stage Development II 3/06/2014

Water Supply - Hastings & Havelock North & Water Hastings Supply- Effluent Disposal Effluent Sewers - Rating Area 1 Area Rating - Sewers Attachment 2 Attachment

Council Attachment 2 Item 7 Council Water Supply - Supply Waipatu Water Water Supply - Paki Paki - Supply Omahu Water - Supply Whakatu Water - Supply Clive Water Awanga & Te - Supply Haumoana Water Water Supply - Waimarama Brought Forward Progress Report Water Demand Management Demand Water Communities Small Station Pump Waipatu Compliance Water Drinking Compliance Water Drinking Compliance Water Drinking Compliance Water Drinking Compliance Water Drinking Source New Water Compliance Consent Compliance Water Drinking Management Demand Water Road Pufflet Support Roading Upgrade New Repeater & Base Telemetry Frimley andPump/ New Bore Rd - To Takapu Orchard 501/409 E St Aubyn ]To St N - Russell St Russell Avenue Windsor

3/06/2014

TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL -

May 2014 May 0,8 4,0 1461370,000 -144,611 349,000 204,389 8,1 ,3,0 379435,971,668 -3,749,483 4,536,000 786,517 5117,0 48970,000 -4,819 70,000 65,181 50,000 3,648 50,000 79,000 53,648 43,780 -45,517 -25,541 130,000 71,000 84,483 45,459 5111000-489150,000 -84,819 150,000 65,181 ,9 200-,0 14,000 -5,405 12,000 6,595 ,9 200-,0 14,000 -5,405 12,000 6,595 20,280 497 4,500 5,000 -3,265 5,497 4,500 1,235 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,0 2800498,000 -298,000 298,000 100,000 -100,000 100,000 3,0 3930544,300 -339,300 339,300 000-00080,000 -80,000 80,000 19,000 -17,000 17,000 35,000 -30,000 30,000 61,500 -56,500 56,500 33,000 -33,000 33,000 700-70019,000 -17,000 17,000 35,000 -30,000 30,000 61,500 -56,500 56,500

,6 7307,360 1,100 -7,360 -1,100 7,360 1,100 10,000 3,300 -5,000 -3,300 5,000 3,300 ,6 8408,460 -8,460 8,460 0 0 of program overShare regional arching completed. Works 2014 Feb starting awarded andworks Contract $43k. revised down to Budget Works completed. completed. Works before the report was completed. was report before the away passed we engagedunfortunately expert The Initial underway. currently is of options andassessment Design which this is required to fund to required is this which bore head the raise to needs if it know will 2016council 1July andby 2015, on1July besubmitted will The PHRMP fund to required is this which bore head the raise to needs if it know will 2015council 1July andby 2014, on1July besubmitted will The PHRMP andconsenting. pursuing worth is new bore location if the confirm will which tests, ofquality water outcome differed the being pending Works andconsenting. pursuing worth is new bore location if the confirm will which tests, ofquality water outcome differed the being pending Works Consent costs, and possible funding to support a wider community water solution water community awider support funding to andpossible costs, Consent favour in Haumoana Road. in 3bores of developing the East anew bore in differ raising to Hoping completed. Works Subject to outcome of community consultation already underway already consultation of community outcome to Subject costs. these offset may funding that CAP Differed possible dueto Funds will be utilised and spent this year. this andspent beutilised will Funds Differed due to possible CAP funding that may offset these costs. these offset may funding that CAP Differed possible dueto Agenda Item: Item: Agenda 7

opeeLoans Complete opeeLoans Complete Loans Loans Loans Loans Loans Attachment 2 Page Page 169

Attachment 2 Item 7

170 Page May 2014

- Progress Report Report Progress Brought Forward Forward Brought

7 Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Yet to be completed 4,200 -4,200 4,200 4,200 -4,200 4,200 13,400 -13,400 20,400 13,400 -13,400 20,400 0 0 0 0 57,773 780,000 -722,227 766,800 57,773 780,000 -722,227 766,800 12,746,875 25,019,044 -12,272,169 37,073,204 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL

ContingencyFund Drinking Water Compliance Upgrade WaipatikiUpgrade Controls & Electrical 3/06/2014

Total Brought forwardsTotal Brought GENERAL Fund Contingency Water Whirinaki Supply - Water Waipatiki Supply - Attachment 2 Attachment Council Attachment 2 Item 7 SUBJECT: FROM: Council 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 MEETING TO: REPORT Ref: File T

3/06/2014

14/502 On 13 May 2014 Council resolved: The Opera House complex is expected to be closed for up to 2 years. House Theatre and as aresult the decision was to made close the facility. In March 2014 Council was aware made of structural concerns with the Opera BACKGROUND reporting House with HBOHL be terminated and that HBOHL be exempted from its This report also recommends that the management agreement for the Opera retained and a reserve becreated savingsfor achieved against budget. 2013/14 liabilities. The report recommends thathecurrentt 2014/15 budget be financial arrangements and include additional funding to meet HBOHL’s Agreement between Council and HBOHL be revised to reflect the current needs of the community. closure of the Opera House facility so to best meet the current and future to investigate the best use of forecast savings generated from the temporary The effective and appropriate to present and anticipated future circumstances. quality means infrastructure, services andperformance that are efficient and a way that is most cost infrastructure, local public services, andperformance of regulatoryfunctions in to meet the current and future needs of communities for good quality local prescribed bySection ofthe 10 LocalGovernment Act 2002. That purposeis The Council is required to give effect to the purpose of local government as Buildings due to earthquake strengthening concerns. This issue arises from the recent closure of the Opera House and Municipal Organisation (CCO) reporting requirements. Hawkes Bay Opera House Limited (HBOHL) its from Council Controlled the termination of the Opera House Management Agreement and exempting closure of the Hawkes Bay Opera House. It will also seek decisions regarding funding requirements andthe use of budgeted savings the from temporary The purpose of this report is to obtain a number of SUMMARY

his report has a number of recommendations including that the Funding

DATE:

objective of this decision relevant to the purpose of Local Government is

decision to cease trading as at 30 June 2014 with the Hastings “That the council support the Hawkes Bay Opera House Limited

requirements as aCCO.

ARRANGEMENTS HAWKES BAY OPERA HOU STRATEGIC FINANCIAL FINANCIAL STRATEGIC TUESDAY JUNE 3 2014 COUNCIL BRUCE ALLANBRUCE

– effective for households and businesses. Good

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

ADVISOR

decisions

SE FUNDING FUNDING SE

from Council on Council from

Page Page

171

Item 8

172

Page h

BOHL to meet liabilities. its $53,000 $557,000 $610,000 2015/2016

counts.

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: $52,000 $579,000 $631,000

2014/2015

the council recommends Hastingsto District Holdings

2015 Funding Agreement between Council and HBOHL is an an is HBOHL and Council between Agreement Funding 2015 District Council Chief Executive to make decisions regarding the the regarding decisions make to Executive Chief Council District Hastings to staff Limited House Opera Bay Hawkes of transfer Council. District That company Limited House Opera Bay Hawkes the that Limited facilities the when for retained be status charitable and structure reopened.” are

uncil has in place two agreements with Hawkes Bay Opera House Limited Limited House Opera Bay Hawkes with agreements two place in has uncil reement that stipulates the funding requirements for HBOHL, what the the what for HBOHL, requirements funding the stipulates that reement Minor Capital Capital Minor Total Grant Operational While HBOHL are forecast to have $43,000 of funds available at year end, end, year at available funds of $43,000 have to forecast are HBOHL While year its meets HBOHL as and August July during be required will funds those a cas leaving therefore $92,000 be to forecast are which end liabilities shortfall of approximately $45,000. The table below outlines the forecast forecast the outlines below table The $45,000. approximately of shortfall Position. Financial of Statement and Performance Financial of Statement 2014/15 Council’s in included been have requirements funding 2014/15 The and to directly charged is expenditure capital minor The Plan. Annual Draft ac Council’s the for through accounted Council also has a Management Agreement with HBOHL which appoints appoints which HBOHL with Agreement Management a has also Council House. Opera the and manage administer occupy, to HBOHL Limited Holdings District Hastings through Council 2011, September In used have HBOHL HBOHL. into equity shareholders of $100,000 invested in invest to security financial the as and assets some purchase to funds these promoter. the with shared was risk and profit the where shows CURRENT SITUATION current HBOHL received, Council from funding operational budgeted all With $110,000 of loss an accounting predicting are 2013/14 for forecasts financial H allow to provided is funding additional any before Co management and Council from arrangements funding down set that (HBOHL) facilities. Opera House for the arrangements - 2012 The ag Given funding. that with associated targets performance the for and is funding appropriate is it 2 years to up for 30 June at trading cease to is HBOHL that in be put Agreement Funding interim and an reviewed is Agreement this that inactive. is HBOHL and closed is facility the while place the identified has and HBOHL Council between Agreement Funding The requirements: funding following 14/502

3/06/2014

Council 3.2 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.1 File Ref: 2.3 2.4 2.5

Item 8

Council 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 Ref: File

3/06/2014

14/502 operational funding requirements from Council between of $158,000 and 2014/15 financial projections for the Opera House cost centre have projected agreement. 2014/15 funding as at 30 June 2014. Council can achieve that by including it in the revised Funding of upto $60,000 is required to meet the current liabilities HBOHL of Board were included and those resolutions were: $ liabilities with current projections of a shortfall of between $50,000 and does not currently have sufficient cash reserves to all meet of its expected Company is solvent andcan meet all of its financial obligations. The Company It is important thefor Directors HBOHL of that they have confidence that the meet its financial commitments and be financially solvent as at 30 June 2014. necessary financial support to the Hawke’sBay Opera House to enable it to Council are being asked The HBOHL Board have received the above information and have noted that costs including staff redundancies. much reduced opportunities to generate income and has incurred additional announcement that the Municipal Building was also to close, HBOHL has had announcement that the Theatre was to close andthe subsequent operating grant against budget would beachieved. Since the February first half year performance and indications were that areduction in Council’s The HBOHL half year report presented to Council in March closure costs have been accounted for. an accounting loss of approximately $110,000 after all staff redundancies and Current 2013/14 financial projections for HBOHL are that they are forecasting 60,000. In the report to Council onMay 13

and liabilities. and and manage cessation of trading and resolve or transfer all obligations It will provide all necessary support (financial and otherwise) to facilita te The HBOH Board seeks the advice of its shareholder that: Equity Net Assets Liabilities Fixed Assets Other Receivables HDC Grant Receivable (additional) Cash on Hand Forecast Statement of Financial Position HDCGrant additional Operating Surplus / (Deficit) before any Depreciation Expenditure HDCGrant) (incl. Income Net Statement of Comprehensive Income

at its meeting on 3June 2014 to provide the

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

8 th

, the resolutions of the HBOHL YTD Forecast

1,267,000 1,160,000 June (110,000) $ 34,000 34,000 92,000 34,000 45,000 43,000 4,000 3,000

reported astrong

Page Page 173

Item 8

174

3,000 Page

610,000 100,000 103,000 $507,000 $

Range

- 2015/2016 3,000 610,000 142,000 145,000

$465,000

3,000 45,000

631,000 110,000 158,000

8 $473,000 $

Range

2014/2015 il.

3,000 60,000

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: 631,000 156,000 219,000 $412,000

is an interim Funding Agreement. It covers a two a two covers It Agreement. Funding an interim is

7 of the Local Government Act allows for the exemption exemption for the allows Act Government Local the of 7 (to be paid directly Attachment 1 (company expenses)

ance and security. It also includes staff costs for two employees who who employees two for costs staff includes also It security. and ance

sed trading and will incur such costs including the Annual Audit, Annual Annual Audit, Annual the including costs such incur and will trading sed The above financial projections assume no change to the rent income income rent the to change no assume projections financial above The Hutchinsons. from Council by received as Attached has Company the that basis on the prepared been has and period year cea funding includes also It returns. Office and Companies Commission Charities liabilities. 2013/14 HBOHL’s meet to required requirement ncil Cou and HBOHL is for between the Agreement Management current The 2015. 30 June to through years 6 of term not are that entities identifies 2002 Act Government Local the of 6 (4) Section under exempted organization an includes which be CCOs, to considered 7. Section Section

The 2014/15 financial projections represent savings against budget of of budget against savings represent projections financial 2014/15 The 2015/16 the against savings further with $473,000 and $412,000 between be will officers that expected is It $507,000. and $465,000 between of budget at requirements funding 2014/15 on update a clearer provide to a position in meeting. the be will company the 2014, 30 June effective trade to ceasing HBOHL With to related expenditure of amount a small have only will and inactive and Office Companies d filing an audit including company, the maintaining for appropriate is it inactivity, this of light In returns. Commission Charities Controlled Council a being from be exempt to HBOHL consider to Council required requirements reporting from the exempt therefore and Organisation Council Intent. of Statement a of provision the including CCO, a being from time. any at exemption an revoke can $219,000. These costs include facility related expenses such as electricity, electricity, as such expenses related facility include costs These $219,000. mainten these of purpose the For Council. to transferred be to assumed are by undertaken previously activities operating all that assumed is it projections, Counc for cost direct be a will HBOHL 14/502

3/06/2014

by Council)by budget Total Opera House Funding Funding HDC Budgeted against Savings Forecast 2013/14 HBOHL Liabilities HBOHL 2013/14 Grant HBOHL Loss Operating

Council 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.14 3.9 3.13 File Ref:

Item 8 Council 6.1 4.5.2 4.5.1 4.5 4.4.2 4.4.1 4.4 4.3.2 4.3.1 4.3 4.2.2 4.2.1 4.2 4.1 4.0 Ref: File 6.0 5.1 5.0 4.6.2 4.6.1 4.6

3/06/2014

14/502 have taken into consideration matters specified in the act which include: and provides alocalfor authority to provide that exemption provided they include in the interim HBOHL Funding Agreement. to provide any additional funding support from the 2014/15 HDC budget and funding to meet these liabilities until July and August, it would beappropriate current forecast cash shortfall of $45,000. Given HBOHL does not require $47,000 of current assets at 30June 2014 with $92,000 of liabilities, leaving a $45,000 and $60,000. The Company is forecast to have approximately before any additional HDC funding and a cashflow shortfall of between The 2013/14 financial forecasts have the company incurring a$110,000 loss Funding 2013/14 Option 2 Option 1 Management Option 2 Option 1 Agreement Funding Option 2 Option 1 Options Funding 2014/15 Option 2 Option 1 Funding 2013/14 which has two options as set out below. This report contains five matters requiringdecisions from Council, each of OPTIONS a new Management Agreement is written. ASSESSMENT OF OPTION the significance policyand require further consultation. The reallocation of budgeted 2014/15 expenditure is not sufficient to trigger AND SULTATION CON SIGNIFICANCE Option 2 Option 1 CCO HBOHLfrom a being Exempt

– – – – – – – – – – – - a) b) Decline to terminate the Management Agreement and request that Approve the termination of the Management Agreement Decline approval Funding for Agreement and request changes Approve updated Funding Agreement Create Reserve savings for Include Do not approveadditional funding Approve using 2014/15 funding available Decline request to exempt HBOHL Approve request to exempt HBOHL

organisation; and the natureand community. authority, the council controlled organisation, and the the costs and benefits, if an exemption is granted, to the local

Agreement 2014/15 savings into the 2014/15 Annual Plan.

S (INCLUDING FINANCI (INCLUDING S scope of the activities provided by the

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

AL IMPLICATIONS)

Page Page

175

Item 8

176

Page

for HBOHL to cease cease to for HBOHL

start the business. This This business. the start th -

costs

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: appoints HBOHL to occupy, administer and and administer occupy, to HBOHL appoints

erred. Create Reserve for Savings Reserve Create Include 2014/15 savings into the 2014/15 Annual Plan. Annual 2014/15 the into savings 2014/15 Include

– –

Recapitalisation of HBOHL on reactivation on HBOHL of Recapitalisation Contributing towards reopening costs reopening towards Contributing Repaying existing Opera House debt House Opera existing Repaying strengthening towards Contributing

4. 3. 1. 2. However given that this is a temporary closure of the Opera House facility any any facility House Opera the of closure temporary a is this that given However Council reopening on and benefit term a short of be would now taken savings kick to funding additional provide to be required would trading and the HDC Chief Executive to make decision on the retention of any any of retention the on decision make to Executive Chief HDC the and trading for the available are $473,000 and $412,000 between of savings staff, 1% approximately of a reduction represent and would year financial 2014/15 on rates. 30 June at as trade to cease will HBOHL Given House. Opera the manage be to Agreement Management the for is option practicable only the 2014 reactivated. is HBOHL and reopened is House Opera the until terminated option is not pref not is option 2 Option Council provides budget against savings for these a reserve of creation The be will savings the for which purpose the regarding flexibility of a degree with to. applied Funding Agreement states clearly which agreement simplified a is agreement funding updated The expenses related facility all that and trading ceased has Company the that going expenses related company few a just with Council by be incurred would generated revenue any that notes also It accounts. company’s the through be will income lease as well as Plaza the and equipment of hire the form all meet to provision a includes Agreement Funding The income. Council once Therefore facility. the of closure the through incurred liabilities 2013/14 will Company the met, been have and commitments liabilities 2013/14 the to funding provide to Council for requirement any that and with trading cease HBOHL. Agreement Management Agreement Management The Given the unfortunate situation that the Board of HBOHL finds itself it, the only only the it, itself finds HBOHL of Board the that situation unfortunate the Given to funding necessary the with HBOHL provide to is Council to available option 2014. 30 June to up incurred liabilities its meet for the be closed to is expected facility House Opera the 2 years the Over to expected are budgets current the against savings process, strengthening savings for these a reserve Creating and $1,031,000. $943,000 be between purpose which for future the in decide to ability the with Council provides stage this at identified Options for. be used can savings operational these include: 2014/15 Funding Options 1 Option 13 May on Council by made decisions the Following 14/502

3/06/2014

5 5 Council 6. 6.6 6.8 6.9 6.10 File Ref: 6.2 6.7 6.3 6.4

Item 8 Council 8.0 7.5 7.4 7.3 7.2 7.1 7.0 6.12 6.11 Ref: File

3/06/2014

14/502 D) C) B) A) O Exemption forHBOHL Exemption CCO RECOMMENDATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS year andannual reporting to the Shareholder. alleviates the company from having to prepare aStatement of Intent and half t as It is also appropriate that Council approve the exemption of HBOHL as a CCO centrally. Opera House facilities come under Council’s umbrella and be managed ceasing to trade as at 30 June 2014. It is appropriate that all operations of the It is appropriate that the Management Agreement beterminated withHBOHL the current status of the organisation and its funding requirements. The revised Funding Agreement is a much simplified version and represents known regarding the extent of the building upgrade and the time required. reserve is to beused for. That will become clearer as more information is point in time there is no requirement Councilfor to decide exactly what the budget is for a reserve to be created and for any savings to beheld. At this The preferred option for the forecast 2014/15 and 2015/16 savings against prudent to make up to $60,000 available to cover any unforeseen items. shortfall. While the current forecast is for a $45,000 cash shortfall, it would be 2014/15 budgeted HBOHL operating grant to fund the The preferred option for the 2013/14 cash shortfall is Council for to use the PREFERRED OPTIONSAN given the level of activity expected over the next 12to 24 months. It would be difficult to provide a meaningful Statement of Intent for 2014/15 time revoke the exemption granted if the company was to reactivate. requirements on this organisation would be unnecessary. Council can at any period the Opera House is closed and imposing the CCO reporting preparation of a Statement of Intent. The Company will beinactive over the reporting requirements set out in the Local Government Act including the Exempting HBOHL from being aCCO would release the company its from

he company will beinactive for approximately 2years. Such an exemption

That Council Council That Agreement. Limited. House Bay Opera Hawkes Agreement with Funding Interim forecast 2013/14cash operating to cover grant the Limited BayHouse Opera Hawkes That Council make up to $60,000 available from the 2014/15 for the Opera House in line with the 2012- of funding $579,000 operational budgeted maintain Council That received. Arrangements House Funding Bay Opera Strategicthe of Financial report the That Advisor

create a Reserve to hold any savings from against D REASONS REASONS shortfall and for this to be included to andin be forthis included theshortfall Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

”

dated dated expected 2013/14

2015 Funding 2015 titled titled 3/06/2014

“ Hawkes Hawkes Page Page

be be 177

Item 8

178 Page

212 - 14 - 2 - 4 -

ef Executive the authority authority the Executive ef 02 -

8 ADM elegated the authority to execute the the execute to authority the elegated

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: this decision that the objective of being the

future use.

Maintaining operating funds budgeted for the OperaHouse facility for a That an interim Funding Agreement bewhile adopted the Opera That Council approves the termination of the Management and Limited House Opera Bay Hawkes between Agreement Hastings District the Council for management the of Opera House with the Chief Executive d documentation. necessary That pursuant Section to 6(4)(i) and Section 7 the of Local is Limited House Opera Bay Hawkes 2002, Act Government exempted a Council from being Controlled Organisation. budget whilebudget House the Opera closed. is has Limited House Opera Bay Hawkes and closed is facility House ceased tradingdelegate and the to Chi signto theagreement. new

With the reasons for reasons the With decisionwill contribute to the Hawkes Opera Bay House in the most financially prudent wayduring the time is the closed facility by: i) G) F) E) 14/502

3/06/2014

Hawkes Opera Bay House Interim Funding Agreement

Council 1 Attachments: File Ref:

Item 8

Council Hawkes Bay Opera House House Opera Bay Hawkes Funding Agreement 2014-

3/06/2014

Hawke’s Bay Opera House Limited House Bay Opera Hawke’s Hastings District InterimAgreement Funding and Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Council 8

2016 Attachment 1 Page Page 17 9

Attachment 1 Item 8

180

Page

Opera House by Hastings Hastings by House Opera

requirements on the Opera House Agenda Item: Agenda Item: AGREEMENT

Hawkes Bay Opera House Interim Funding Funding Agreement Interim House Opera Bay Hawkes going related company expenditure.

2014 the Hawkes Bay Opera House Limited ceased trading trading ceased Limited House Opera Bay Hawkes the 2014

ited (“the Holding Company”) which in turn is a wholly owned owned a wholly is turn in which Company”) Holding (“the ited

AND AND THE HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL Council”) (“the To maximise the use of the Hawke’s Bay Hawke’s the of use the maximise To citizens and the wider community through taking advantage of of advantage taking through community wider and the citizens of Board a via approaches and skills entrepreneurial and innovation management. focussed and Directors the from revenue of generation for the opportunities maximise To of application the through complex House Opera Bay Hawke’s to order in governance professional and focused commercially ratepayers. from required support financial ongoing the minimise for icon an as recognised House Opera Bay Hawke’s the have To Hastings. while Company the for status charitable of advantages the retain To structure. a company of advantages accountability the maintaining expenses. Operational complex House Opera the for expenditure capital Agreed 3/06/2014

(“the Company”) (“the LIMITED HOUSE OPERA BAY HAWKES BETWEEN a) b) c) d) a) b) ompany as agreed through the long term planning process to assist with: assist to process planning term long the through agreed as ompany Attachment 1 Attachment follows: as agreement their record to wish Council the and Company The Council due earthquake to strengthening Theatre and Old Municipal Buildings,to likely be for a period of 2 years. financial 2013/14 meet to place in therefore is agreement funding This responsibilities and on- BACKGROUND the of upgrade the to resources significant committed has Council The ofinternational facility a creating complex House Opera Bay Hawke’s standards. objectives: key following the states Constitution Company The to is Company the Constitution, the in outlined objectives the to Further that excellence of a culture generating community, the to facility the promote pride. civic enhances and Hastings for a showpiece creates and the Council the between into entered being is agreement funding This District of Hastings subsidiary owned a wholly is Company The Company. Holdings Lim subsidiary of the Council. The Company is committed to the objectives stated stated objectives the to committed is The Company of Council. the subsidiary above. listed as proposal of statement the in the to contributions financial certain make to agreed has Council The C On June 30

Attachment 1 Item 8 1. Council 3. 2.

4. Hawkes Bay Opera House House Opera Bay Hawkes 1.5. 1.4. 1.3. 1.6. 1.2. 1.1. 1.7. 1.8. 2.1. 3.1.

3/06/2014

Council’s support Council’s The The 2.1.2. 2.1.1. Opera House Services Council to the Reporting All capita All Council. All Opera House facility related expenditure will beincurred by an expense within the Councils accounts. Depreciation onCouncil owned Opera House assets will beshown as Coun The all liabilities as at 30 June 2014. provide all support to the Company in order for the Company to meet Office andCharities Commission annual returns. Council will also meet company related expenses including Audit Fees and Companies improveme all assets will approve and manage the purchase of the capital from the public capitalfor improvements. The Council as the ownerof The Company will use its charitable status to actively pursue donations The Council will provide on- negotiated through the Councils annual budgeting process. commencing 1July 2014. The level of funding each for year willbe Council agrees to afunding arrangement atwo for year period, the redevelopment of the Opera House facility. The Council is responsible thefor servicingof all borrowingrelating to operating grant. maintained within the Councils accounts and will not form part of the Services, Accounting Services andHuman Resource Support will be Council charges for Asset maintenance and renewals, Information The Company will: Company The While the Company is inactive, it will have noother responsibilities. Company’s other responsibilities Company’s other

company Hastings District Holdings Limited and the Council. Present annual audited accounts thefor Company to its parent incur only such costs that are applicable to the Company Be inactive the for period this of Funding Agreement andwill

l purchases will bemade by Council. cil will maintain ownership of all Opera House assets. nts onbehalftheCompany. of

InterimAgreement Funding

OPERATIVE PART

going financial support to the Company to Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1

Page Page

181

Attachment 1 Item 8

182

Page

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Hawkes Bay Opera House Interim Funding Funding Agreement Interim House Opera Bay Hawkes

has been been terminated. has

General, the Council’s auditor will be responsible for for be responsible will auditor Council’s the General, -

Company

Enter into any transaction or series of linked or related related or linked of series or transaction any into Enter financial the to risk a material constitutes which transactions or Company; the of stability Establish or dispose of any CCO. any of dispose or Establish

uncil staff will maintain appropriate levels of insurance on behalf of of behalf on insurance of levels appropriate maintain will staff uncil .1.1. The Management Agreement for the Opera House between Council Council between House Opera the for Agreement Management The and the or itself (either not does Company the that ensure will Directors The of do any Council, from approval written prior without a CCO), through following: the The Company has been exempted from being a Council Controlled Controlled a Council being from exempted been has Company The as a and closure House’s of Opera the duration for the Organisation Council. to requirements reporting any have not does result The Auditor The Company. the of statements financial the of audit the out carrying Co arrangements insurance current Councils the through Company the Company. the to arrangements those and report months three the Council by be reviewed will Agreement Funding This being HBOHL and reopened being House Opera the to prior reactivated. The Council’s representative will be a person nominated by the Chief Chief the by nominated be a person will representative Council’s The other perform and notices and ports re receive to Council of Executive agreement. this in out set matters 7 Audit and InsuranceAudit Agreements Other requiringEvents theApproval Council of 7.1.2. Review Other 3/06/2014

4.1. 5.1. 5.2. 6.1. 7.1. 8.1. 9.1. Attachment 1 Attachment

Council

5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

Attachment 1 Item 8 SIGNED on the day of 2014 Council Executive Chief Signed by the Chief Executive COUNCIL DISTRICT HASTINGS of THE Chairman Signed by the Chairman of HAWKES BAY OPERA HOUSE LIMITED Hawkes Bay Opera House House Opera Bay Hawkes

3/06/2014

InterimAgreement Funding Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 1

Page Page 183

Attachment 1 Item 8

184 Page

$ 2016. 2016.

3,000 3,000 related

5.0 Funding

Company Company expenses required for

8.0 10.0 4.0

$ $ $

60,000 2013/14 3.0 Funding 579,000 557,000 521,000 510,000 410,000 355,000 297,000 203,000 liabilities

Forecast

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: required for

7.0 LTP Funding 2.0 SCHEDULE 1 Hawkes Bay Opera House Interim Funding Funding Agreement Interim House Opera Bay Hawkes COUNCIL FUNDING SUMMARY - for 2014 funding revised the LTP and 2022

2014/2015 2015/2016

2016 Funding Requirements 2022 LTP OperationalGrant LTP Budget: 2022 3/06/2014

Attachment 1 Attachment

Council 6.0 9.0 1.0 2019 2020 2019 / 2021 2020 / 2022 2021 / - 2014 2014 2015 2014 / 2016 2015 / 2017 2016 / 2018 2017 / 2019 2018 / - 2012 Year The table below outlines the funding plan for the remaining years as forecast forecast as years remaining the for plan funding the outlines below table The - 2012 Council’s in

Attachment 1 Item 8 1.2 Council 2.0 1.1 1.0 SUBJECT: FROM: MEETING DATE: TO: REPORT Ref: File

3/06/2014

14/551 B) A) The relevant HDC - adoption byCouncil. RECOMMENDATION HDC the from The purpose of this report is to put before the Council the recommendation SUMMARY

meeting held held meeting HDC of the - recommendation following The Committee Meeting held on 14 May 2014” be received. from HDC the Maori Joint of“Summary Recommendations titled of Manager Support report Democratic the the That MARAE DEVELOPMENT AND TE MATATINI ANDTE DEVELOPMENT MARAE

A) B) D) D) C)

of the the of objective the that being decision forthis reasons With the Development fund when work needs have been identified. quantum the Marae of review the Council Matatini, onTe planning one work followingyear that Council to Committee HDC the Maori Joint That recommend priorities. and aspirations preparedness for Te Matatini 2017 among other Marae to to contribute as so planning development hapu budget be carried forward to the 2014/15 year to advance Council that $50,000 from the 2013/14 Hapu development to recommends Committee Joint HDC the Maori That to support the event at an appropriate level. appropriate an at event the to support work it that and event cultural economic and significant a as Te Matatini recognize formally it that Council to recommends Committee Joint HDC the Maori That 2017. be undertaking a key host role in Te Matatini Festival relevan with aapproach explores collaborative Council That - COUNCIL 2014 MAORI JOINT COMMITTE RECOMMEND OF SUMMARY M SUPPORT DEMOCRATIC TUESDAY JUNE 3 2014 PALMER RICHARD Maori Joint Committee held on 14 May 2014 14 May2014 Maori Joint Committee recommendation is set out below. decision will contribute to the good quality goodquality to the will local contribute decision

t partners to support marae in the district that will will that district the in marae to support t partners

be adopted: be Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

E MEETING HELD ON 14 ON HELD MEETING E

9 ANAGER

ATIONS FROM THE HDC HDC THE ATIONS FROM

Maori Joint Committee Committee Joint Maori

which requires Page Page

MAY MAY 185

Item 9

186 Page effective for for effective -

. at is most cost most is at

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: way th way

infrastructure a in infrastructure households and business”

14/551

3/06/2014

Council There are no attachments for this report. Attachments: File Ref:

Item 9 Council 2.1 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 SUBJECT: FROM: MEETING DATE: TO: REPORT Ref: File

3/06/2014

14/540 Draft 2014/15 Annual Plan. submissions The purpose of the report is to update Council on the content of the II. I. December 2013 to March 2014 included: adopted by Council in relation to rating policy changes over period the the draft 2014/15 Annual Plan ( those papers. In summary, the changes were set out on pages 12 and13 of effective and appropriate to present and anticipated future circumstances. quality means infrastructure, services andperformance that are efficient and a way that is most cost infrastructure, local public services, andperformance of regulatoryfunctions in of anumber of rating policy changes. Following the recommendation of the RRWP, Council approved consultation BACKGROUND 2014/15 Annual Plan Submissions – This report concludes by recommending to Council to receive the report titled 220,221, and222. Six late submissions were received and these are submissions 215, 217, 219, submissionsThe and thisreport have been separatedease for of reference. ratepayers. of Local Government is to ensure that rating policy is fair a The objective the of proposed rating policy change is relevant to the purpose meet theto prescribed bySection ofthe 10 LocalGovernment Act 2002. That purposeis The Council is required to give effect to the purpose of local government as SUMMARY

that is, or able to be, s to be, able or is, that unit rating of a part ‘any read to modified be Unit Rating of a Parts of Separately Inhabited and definition and the that intention, Used its with consistently accordance enforce in policythe officers more That maps. bycouncil illustrated of way use and level of service that apropertyreceives, and that these are classification within RatingArea 1is based on geographical locality, That the basis for determining a property’s general rate differential

current and future needs of communities for good quality local received onthe proposed rating policy changes set out in the COUNCIL 2014/15ANNUAL PLAN SUBMISSIONS OFFI FINANCIAL CHIEF TUESDAY JUNE 3 2014 TONY GRAY ASHLEY HUMPHREY ASHLEY ADV POLICY FINANCIAL

–

effective for households and businesses. Good eparately used or inhabited by the ratepayer,

Attachment 4) Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Rating Policy dated 3 June 2014.

Attachment 1to 3

CER

ISOR 10

. Specifically the resolutions - RATING POLICY udesincl copies of nd equitable to all

Page Page

187

Item 10

188 Page

Number of submissions Number submissions of

ling, flat, cottage, cottage, flat, ling,

Agenda Item: Agenda Item: accommodation providers such as motels, as motels, such providers accommodation

ation for moreation than for 5 other persons than members going running the of business.

Any additional residentialdwelling, cottage, flat, accommodation visitors or accommodation workers unit that isincapable unable or beingof inhabited. Any additional residentialdwel accommodation visitors or accommodation workers unit that is on a free provided rent an to basis employee because essential it’s opinion in of the Council they must resideunit for the rating on the on- Boarding building a houses used, shall defined as, be designed,capableor intended be to used for residential accommod theof family the of occupiercharge or person in or control of the building. and Economic with associated costs the 65% of That Social Development shall be funded through the Council’s Uniform Annual General Charge on the basis 2. Area Rating for 13.8% and 1 Area Rating for 86.2% of That 35% of the costs associated with Economic and and Economic with associated costs the 35% of That Social Development shall be funded through the Council’s Uniform Annual General Charge on the basis 2. Area Rating for 6.72% and 1 Area Rating for 93.28% of

Policy Change Policy

a) b)

a) b) hotels, backpackers,and and that the following be definition incorporated policy: into rating orby any who mayother person right use have to the or that inhabit agreement’. other or license lease, a tenancy, of virtue by part RemissionsThatSundry Rate under Remission the and Postponement Policy be amended include to the remission fixed of where: charges disposal sewage for urinal / closet water per 0.4 of a differential That child any to applied be shall rates targeted treatment wastewater and centre. care That boarding houses shall treatedasa be commercial activity in line with other commercial That the and Revenue Financing in respect Policy the of funding of Economicand Social Development be amended as follows:

Rating CURRENT SITUATION rating to relation in 83 submissions receiving Council Submissions closed with and submissions rating general be to considered were 2 submissions matters. how illustrates table following The changes. policy rating the to 79 related down: broken were submissions those III. IV. V. VI. • 14/540 • • • • •

3/06/2014

Council 3.0 3.1 File Ref:

Item 10 Council 3.4 3.3 3.2 Ref: File

3/06/2014

14/540 Boarding Houses as commercial activities Charges in relation to child care centres. Sewageand Wastewater Treatment differential Amendments to the sundry remission policy modification to the de consistently across the district and a minor basis unit rating a of part inhabited or used Uniform and targeted rates on aseparately General Rate Differential Classifications in RA1 Two One AreaRating property are as follows: A summary of the number of submissions received by rating area and services are available, per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit. Rate were provided, or $1149 aurbanfor property in Rating1 where Area all the Uniform Annual General Charge andCommunity Resources Management impact was $492 for a Rating Area 2 propertywhere no services other than availability services of and number of additional rating units. The minimum thimpact on prompt public response given the financial impact. The level of financial received was not unexpected as the proposed change was always likely to to 556properties by letter ( more consistently in respect of all uniform and targeted rates. separately used and inhabited part of arating unit andto enforce the policy the proposed change to make a minor modification to the definition of As the table under 3.1 shows, the majority of submissions were in relation to outline of the key points raised in each submission and officer response. found under A high level summary the of submissions received onrating matters can be Total Development Funding Policy for Economic and Social

ose properties directly affected varied depending onlocation, Attachment 5 Attachment Differential Group finition.

Hort/Farming Commercial Residential Residential . The attachment also includes a more detailed

Attachment 91) so the volume of submissions Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

received of submissions Number received

21 24 2 - 81 79 Council wrote Council

1 1 - - -

type of Page Page

189

Item 10

190

Page

- 79 32

Agenda Item: Agenda Item:

or inhabited part of a rating unit, the proposal is is proposal the unit, a rating of part inhabited or coming through the submissions were: submissions the through coming

Commercial Total Lifestyle/Hort/Farming

The additional rating unit (dwelling) is being used by family who were were who family by used is being (dwelling) unit rating additional The unit, family the of part be to considered A perception that they don't receive any benefit from the services the the services the from benefit any receive don't they that perception A funding, were rates additional basis hoc an ad on used is being (dwelling) unit rating additional The unoccupied, currently is or visitors for was part inhabited or used separately of per basis on the Charging site on the occupants of number the recognize not does it as unfair (dwelling), unit rating the of use partial or overall Affordability, services. council of use / impact any to disproportionate Increase

• • • • • • When considering the submissions received, the RRWP should be mindful of of mindful be should RRWP the received, submissions the considering When dynamics, varying with units rating 30,000 over with inevitable is it fact the in own on their living a person example For exist. inequities some that 5 of family a as rates targeted and uniform of level same the pay will Parkvale rates be paying to likely is ratepayer every Additionally Frimley. in living and uniform Applying from. benefit specifically not may they services towards Zealand. New in councils over with consistent is manner this in rates targeted will units rating additional cases most in that believe to reasonable also is It services, council impact or to access have who persons additional to equate exceptions. be some always will there accepted is it although The main underlying themes themes underlying main The consultation. to prior RRWP the by discussed were raised issues the of Most in council of attention the to raised been have that issues common are They charged being currently already are who ratepayers by consultations previous on part inhabited or used a separately of respect in charges rating additional or used separately one only have who ratepayers from and property, their property. on part their inhabited the to modification a minor is there whilst that be reiterated also should It used separately of definition 888 policy. existing the of enforcement consistent a more recommending a of part inhabited or used separately one than more contain that properties policy. the with accordance in charged being already are unit rating

There were very few submissions relating to the other proposed policy policy proposed other the to relating few submissions very were There changes. Council Officers received over 100 phone calls from those ratepayers directly directly ratepayers those from calls 100 phone over received Officers Council some that evident was it received, submissions the From with. consulted be would rates and targeted uniform what misunderstood submitters 1 Area Rating in those 2 and Area Rating the in those particularly impacted, to written were areas those in submitters All areas. urban the of outside 14/540

3/06/2014

Council 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.8 File Ref: 3.9 3.10

Item 10 Council 2 1 Attachments: 7.0 6.1 6.0 5.1 5.0 4.1 4.0 3.11 Ref: File

Clarification Letter Clarification owners property affected to sent Letter Consultation Direct

3/06/2014

14/540 A. their particular instance. This is included in individually to clarify specifically how andwhat rates would be impacted in RECOMMENDATIONS have made submissions onthe proposed rating policy changes. Council after the RRWP has considered the views those of ratepayers who Council’s only option is to receive this report. A further report will be made to PREFERRED OPTION draft Annual Plan. significance policy andhave been consulted on as part of the draft 2014/15 The matters raised in this report are significant in terms of Council’s AND SULTATION CON SIGNIFICANCE considered the views sub of further report providing its recommendation to Council, once it has heard and Council is onlyrequired to receive this report. RRWP The willprovide a OPTIONS recommendationCouncil. to could betakeninto consideration the submitters had presented their submissions to Council, so that their view rating policy changes. The meeting of the RRWP was adjourned until after T he RRWP met on 22 May 2014to consider the submissions received on the

Plan Submissions - Submissions Plan Chief of the report Financial the That Officer

sent to Submitters to sent

Rating Policy mitters.

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

priortheRRPW to makinga final ” dated 3/06/2014 be received.

Attachment 92. FIN FIN 10

- - 04 04 - - 8 8 - - 6 6 - - 14 14

titled “ titled - - 322 321

2014/15 Annual

Page Page

191

Item 10

192

st Page

. lied on a per to per be on a applied

10 .

‘separately used or inhabited parts’. Our parts’. inhabited ‘separately used or Agenda Item: Agenda Item: XX Direct Consultation Letter sent to affected property owners property affected to sent Letter Consultation Direct

. This information includes the the includes This. information ‘separately used or inhabited parts of a rating unit’ on your unit’ on your rating a of inhabited parts used or ‘separately

identified that not all properties are currently being rated in accordance with the the accordancerated with in being currently are properties all that not identified

www.hastingsdc.govt.nz More than one commercial / industrial activity that operates separately and that operates separately / activity commercial industrial than one More I.e. tenants shop of eachindependently other Additional residential dwellings (including granny flats that are capable of being used being used capableflatsthatgranny are residential of Additional dwellings (including independently), or or such as accommodation, visitor activity and commercial residentialA dwelling , Water, Recycling, Refuse and Parking (Havelock North only), North (Havelock Parking Water, and , Refuse Recycling, 3/06/2014

• • • • • Attachment 1 Attachment intent of the policy, and although the proposed policy will be applied consistently from consistently 1 be applied will policy proposed the although the and intent policy, of

July 2014, there is no intention to apply any additional rates additional retrospectively any apply to no intention 2014, there is July

Council and targeted rates you will pay would increase by $XXX increase by pay would will ratesand targeted you 2014/15 is for of rates breakdown proposed more detailed A Council on the Information Database’ from ‘Rating available the website the impacts of the increase and annual the proposed change, district. across the revaluation ntly being assessed as having having assessedYou as are being currently XX there are records indicate has Council this will as revenue totalrates Council’s increasing about not is amendment The proposed properties which rates across result redistribution of a small will in it not However, change. costs. allocation of more equitable result a will in oflevel unifor the estimated it is approach, proposed the adopt property. Council Should Uniform and Targeted Rates: Separately Used or Inhabited Part of a Rating Unit a of UsedInhabited or Part Rates:Separately Targeted Uniform and the reviewing been has Working RatingParty Council’s years Review few Over past the of as part proposed refinements are fair Further and equitable. itis torating ensure policy changes. proposed the impacted is by property your Plan, and Annual the Draft 2014/15 Charge, General Uniform Annual the forsuch as rates policy Council itAt is present of area an within is a property where Rate, and Management Resource Community and service Humphrey Ashley for ask please calling, If 2014 11 April Dear Sir/Madam No: Property Address: Property ‘separately used or inhabited part’ of a rating unit. rating a of part’ inhabited ‘separately used or a where apply chargesabove would the respect of rates in that additional means This containsproperty either:

Attachment 1 Item 10 Council [email protected] Financial Policy Advisor Ashley Humphrey sincerelyYours onme 068715000. specific of impact the the above on proposal your please doproperty, not hesitate to contact ourso records be can updated. Should you require any assistance, or wishfurther discuss to youIf believe information held on the is council records please incorrect, advise in us writing Submissions closeNote: 11May 2014. form. www.myvoicemychoice.co.nz to a submission make to you invite We policywhich your property. could applyto Council District Hastings website. This includes the proposed extension of the remission A copy of the Draftfull Annual Plan is available or request can be on viewed on the DirectConsultation Letter sent to affected property

3/06/2014

or byor downloading and a returning completed submission the proposedthe change. You can do this online at

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda owners 10

Attachment 1 Page Page 193

Attachment 1 Item 10

Page 194 Submitters

Clarification Letter sent to sent Letter Clarification

, which council has previously determined has council previously which , currently serviced for activities such serviced as currently Agenda 10 Item:

it shall only be applied to a property if that property has access ifthat property a property be appliedto it shall only this funds activities such as Civil Defence, Collection, Economic Civil Rate suchfunds as this activities

Some properties will have access to all of those services whilst others will whilst others will services those of access all to have properties will Some

wage Disposal, Wastewater Treatment, Refuse, Recycling and Parking (Havelock ParkingWastewater (Havelock Treatment, and Refuse, Recycling Disposal, wage

59765#001#0018

Uniform Annual General Charge and General Uniformthe to Annual solely related letter your in crease 3/06/2014

Sir / Madam

Attachment 2 Attachment Rating Submission Rating the be put before and will received been that has submission thanksfor your Many Working shortly. Council and Review Party your to speaking your of of ahead points couple just to a clarify thistake to opportunity I wish 11 April dated letter original my clear in been notmay have this apparent itsubmission is as 2014. Council

The in Rate Resource Management and Community basis.part’ inhabited used or ‘separately a per funded on be should to that service. accesssome. to have only not is instance, property In your particular your Water, Se any pay do not to property. your You apply particularrates would these of North),so none thereceive service. not do you to as expected not are costs these and share of and Resource Community & Charge General Annual Uniform the regards to With Management Rate, Development, Regional Tourism, Parks and Reserves, Libraries, Halls, Community Centres, Libraries, Halls, Reserves, Tourism, and Parks Development, Regional or use not may few. You a name to Pools and Swimming and Economic Development Social from directly benefit feel you In that letter, council outlined the range of uniform and targeted uniform rates of that range the thatit outlined letter,In council currently charges This is approach unit’. rating a part of inhabited used or ‘separately each basis of on the and including Auckland, Zealand Napier, around New most consistent council’s with being the are propertiesdistrict within some At present examples. Palmerston as North that inconsistency needs It an is not. whilst others are policy the with charged accordance in thisproposal. reason behind the and addressed to be rate, targeted With any 2014 21 May Dear Humphrey Ashley for ask calling If File Ref

Attachment 2 Item 10 Council [email protected] Advisor PolicyFinancial Ashley Humphrey sincerelyYours or this further require any of the above. clarification Please donot hesitate to Wastewater RecyclingTreatment, Refuse, andParking (Havelock North). in yourstated letter relates to in any way as activitiessuch to Sewage Disposal, Water, apologise I anyfor and confusion caused can assure you none that of increasethe proposed cost the of providing underthem currentthe policy. areas butthese they are theprovided entire community to who all currently pay of ashare Clarification Lettersent Submitters to

3/06/2014

contact contact me by emailor on 068715012 should you wish discuss to

Agenda Item: Item: Agenda

Attachment 2 Page Page 195

Attachment 2 Item 10

Trim File No.: CG-13-1-408 Agenda Item: 13

HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL

COUNCIL MEETING

TUESDAY, 3 JUNE 2014

RECOMMENDATION TO EXCLUDE THE PUBLIC

SECTION 48, LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL INFORMATION AND MEETINGS ACT 1987

THAT the public now be excluded from the following part of the meeting, namely:

14 Hawke's Bay Airport Limited - Appointment of Directors

15 Summary of Recommendations from the Audit and Risk Subcommittee Meeting Held 13 May 2014

The general subject of the matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this Resolution in relation to the matter and the specific grounds under Section 48 (1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this Resolution is as follows:

GENERAL SUBJECT OF EACH REASON FOR PASSING THIS GROUND(S) UNDER MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED RESOLUTION IN RELATION TO SECTION 48(1) FOR THE EACH MATTER, AND PASSING OF EACH PARTICULAR INTERESTS RESOLUTION PROTECTED

14 Hawke's Bay Airport Section 7 (2) (a) Section 48(1)(a)(i) Limited - Appointment of The withholding of the information is Where the Local Authority is Directors necessary to protect the privacy of named or specified in the natural persons, including that of a First Schedule to this Act deceased person. under Section 6 or 7 (except Appointment of Director. Section 7(2)(f)(i)) of this Act. 15 Summary of As stated in the minutes Section 48(1)(a)(i) Recommendations from Where the Local Authority is the Audit and Risk named or specified in the Subcommittee Meeting First Schedule to this Act Held 13 May 2014 under Section 6 or 7 (except Section 7(2)(f)(i)) of this Act.

Council 3/06/2014 Agenda Item: 10 Page 197