Assessment of Grassland Ecosystem Conditions in the Southwestern

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessment of Grassland Ecosystem Conditions in the Southwestern Michele Merola-Zwartjes Chapter 4: Biodiversity, Functional Processes, and the Ecological Consequences of Fragmentation in Southwestern Grasslands What is Biodiversity?_______________ the number of species that occur in a defined area; and (2) species evenness, a measure of the extent to Concern over accelerating extinction rates and loss which the individuals of the different species present of species diversity on a global scale was the subject are equally abundant. Diversity is thus a measure of E.O. Wilson’s seminal volume Biodiversity (Wilson of species richness weighted by relative abundance. 1988). This work essentially transformed the term Technically the most highly diverse communities “biodiversity” into a household word as a short-hand are those with the greatest species richness, each for species diversity—or more simply, the full array component species being equally abundant within the and variety of living organisms on Earth. But the term community. In reality, such a situation is unlikely biodiversity means much more than the complement to occur, as many species (such as top predators) of plant and animal species that one expects to find in are naturally less numerous in the community. some given area. The term now encompasses not only Furthermore, from a management standpoint it is the diversity of species, but their genetic structure, the often the more rare species in the community that interaction of the biotic and abiotic components of the environment at the ecosystem level, and at an even are of interest, rather than the common species that higher level the array of communities and ecosystem tend to dominate weighted indices of diversity. The processes and functions that make up the landscape term “biodiversity,” then, as used by many biologists, or regional level of biological diversity. Such a detailed most often refers to the more simple measure of exploration of biodiversity is beyond the scope of this species richness, and that is how the term is used section. in this discussion. Biodiversity as used here refers In the interest of (relative) brevity, the following to natural or native biodiversity. The distinction is discussion will focus on the more limited definition important because the introduction of exotic plants or of biodiversity, concentrating on the variety of plant animals may technically increase diversity (at least and animal species of the New Mexico and Arizona in the short term) by adding to the overall species grasslands. richness of a given area. However, as discussed later, A few points of clarification on terminology: The introduced species usually interfere with normal com- most common indices of species diversity (such as munity and ecosystem functions at some level and Simpson index, Shannon-Weiner index) are a function often eventually replace the native species, thereby of two parameters: (1) species richness, or quite simply leading to a net loss of native biodiversity. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-135-vol. 1. 2004 49 Why is Biodiversity Important? prevent many species from being successful in this environment, in fact the opposite is true. The highly There are two main schools of thought on this variable precipitation, temperature extremes, and subject. One theory is commonly referred to as the elevational gradients created by the basin and range “rivet hypothesis” (Ehrlich and Ehrlich 1981). This topography have provided numerous opportunities hypothesis proposes that each species plays some small for adaptation and evolution. Small-scale variations but important role in the ecosystem – like the rivets in soils, aspect, and moisture all affect microclimate that collectively hold an airplane together. After some and resource conditions, and this variety of conditions number of species (rivets) are lost, a critical threshold in turn offers a diverse array of niches available for is crossed and the system (plane) rapidly begins to exploitation, resulting in increased floral and faunal disintegrate. The fundamental assumption is that species richness. Species diversity in the Southwest greater diversity (more rivets) results in increased has been further enhanced by its biogeographic history. stability of the system. The flora and fauna of distinctive regions historically The other theory may be called that of “functional isolated during the Pleistocene (for example, Great redundancy.” This idea holds that communities com- Plains, Chihuahuan Desert, Sonoran Desert, Mojave prise a few functional groups of ecologically equivalent Desert, and Great Basin Desert) have converged fol- species, to the effect that several species may be lost lowing glacial retreats, leading to the characterization with little impact because there are several “back-up” of the desert Southwest as a “biological melting pot” species in place that are capable of carrying out the same function in the ecosystem (Walker 1992). (Parmenter and others 1995). For Southwestern grass- Although sources of great debate, there is not lands in particular, biodiversity is further enhanced a great deal of hard data to back up either theory. by the complex, mosaic nature of their distribution. Studies in grasslands to date, however, tend to sup- Grasslands in this region are interspersed with shrubs, port the rivet hypothesis. Grassland plots with greater woodlands, and riparian areas, leading to high species species diversity were found to be more resistant to diversity due to the presence not only of grassland drought and to recover more quickly than less diverse specialists, but also more generalist species from plots (Tilman and Downing 1994). Another grassland adjacent habitats that may utilize the grasslands for experiment showed that plant productivity and soil other purposes (Parmenter and Van Devender 1995). nitrogen utilization both increased significantly as a Highly patchy interspersed habitats, such as sand function of plant species diversity, leading the authors dunes, playa lakes, and lava flows, add to biodiversity to conclude that “the establishment and functioning of by the presence of specialized and/or endemic plant these grassland ecosystems depended on their species and animal species distinctive to these areas (such richness” (Tilman and others 1996:720). as fringe-toed lizards in sand dunes) (Parmenter and How, then, to manage for biodiversity in grassland others 1995). Brown and Kodric-Brown (1995) argue ecosystems? With so little evidence, the assumption of that biodiversity along the Arizona and New Mexico functional redundancy seems somewhat reckless. Even borderlands may be among the greatest on the continent if there is some degree of ecological overlap between due to the biogeographic confluence in this region. species, we have no idea if the “backup” system is as Underlying the considerable biodiversity of the efficient as the primary one (Odum 1992). The most Southwest at the level of species richness is a high prudent course of action in Southwestern grasslands degree of genetic variability. Rangeland plants as a – or any ecosystem—is to ensure the ecological integ- group exhibit high levels of genetic diversity, probably rity of the system by managing for the conservation of due to a combination of adaptation to diverse eco- maximal native biodiversity, or, in the oft-quoted words logical conditions and frequent hybridization between of Aldo Leopold, “to save every cog and wheel”—or, to interfertile species (Nevo and Beiles 1989, Wayne and see the context of his remarks (Leopold 1953): Bazzaz 1991). Modern grassland plants have survived The last word in ignorance is the man who says historical cycles of great climatic variation; high levels of an animal or plant: “What good is it?” If the land of genetic variability have given these plants the mechanism as a whole is good, then every part is good, ability to adapt and persist throughout such oscilla- whether we understand it or not. If the biota, in the course of aeons, has built something we like but do tions (Tausch and others 1993). Genetic diversity is not understand, then who but a fool would discard also high in Southwestern animals, both vertebrates seemingly useless parts? To keep every cog and wheel and invertebrates. Pocket gophers (Geomydiae), for is the first precaution of intelligent tinkering. example, are common mammals in Southwestern grasslands. Although the species often are difficult to Biodiversity in the Southwest________ distinguish visually, they are some of the most geneti- cally variable mammals known; species may differ not Although at first glance it might seem that the only in terms of the alleles represented, but in the climatic extremes of the desert Southwest would numbers of chromosomes carried as well (Parmenter 50 USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-135-vol. 1. 2004 and others 1995, Patton and Sherwood 1983). Despite one considers grasses in terms of their contribution the fact that Southwestern mammals are relatively to range quality, Stubbendieck and others (1986) well known, modern laboratory techniques continue to suggest 94 species of grasses in their list of the 200 identify new species on the basis of genetic differences most important range plants in North America. Some between populations. Within the last few decades of the more common native grasses of the Southwest several new species have been identified in New include several species of gramas (such as black Mexico, including a grasshopper mouse (Onychomys grama [Bouteloua eriopoda], blue grama [B. gracilis], arenicola),
Recommended publications
  • Para Especies Exóticas En México Eragrostis Curvula (Schrad.) Nees, 1841., CONABIO, 2016 1
    Método de Evaluación Rápida de Invasividad (MERI) para especies exóticas en México Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees, 1841., CONABIO, 2016 Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees, 1841 Fuente: Tropical Forages E. curvula , es un pasto de origen africano, que se cultiva como ornamental y para detener la erosión; se establece en las orillas de carreteras y ambientes naturales como las dunas. Se ha utilizado contra la erosión, para la producción de forraje en suelos de baja fertilidad y para resiembra en pastizales semiáriados. Presenta abundante producción de semillas, gran capacidad para producir grandes cantidades de materia orgánica tanto en las raíces como en el follaje (Vibrans, 2009). Es capaz de desplazar a la vegetación natural. Favorece la presencia de incendios (Queensland Government, 2016). Información taxonómica Reino: Plantae Phylum: Magnoliophyta Clase: Liliopsida Orden: Poales Familia: Poaceae Género: Eragrostis Nombre científico: Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees, 1841 Nombre común: Zacate amor seco llorón, zacate llorón, zacate garrapata, amor seco curvado Resultado: 0.5109375 Categoría de invasividad: Muy alto 1 Método de Evaluación Rápida de Invasividad (MERI) para especies exóticas en México Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees, 1841., CONABIO, 2016 Descripción de la especie Hierba perenne, amacollada, de hasta 1.5 m de alto. Tallo a veces ramificado y con raíces en los nudos inferiores, frecuentemente con anillos glandulares. Hojas alternas, dispuestas en 2 hileras sobre el tallo, con las venas paralelas, divididas en 2 porciones, la inferior envuelve al tallo, más corta que el, y la parte superior muy larga, angosta, enrollada (las de las hojas inferiores arqueadas y dirigidas hacia el suelo); entre la vaina y la lámina.
    [Show full text]
  • Modifying Drivers of Competition to Restore Palmer's Agave in Lehmann Lovegrass Dominated Grasslands
    Modifying Drivers of Competition to Restore Palmer's Agave in Lehmann Lovegrass Dominated Grasslands Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Gill, Amy Shamin Citation Gill, Amy Shamin. (2020). Modifying Drivers of Competition to Restore Palmer's Agave in Lehmann Lovegrass Dominated Grasslands (Master's thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA). Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 10:37:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/648602 MODIFYING DRIVERS OF COMPETITION TO RESTORE PALMER’S AGAVE IN LEHMANN LOVEGRASS DOMINATED GRASSLANDS by Amy Shamin Gill ____________________________ Copyright © Amy Shamin Gill 2020 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2020 2 Acknowledgments I would like to sincerely thank my graduate advisor, Dr. Elise S. Gornish & Fulbright Foreign Degree Program for providing the opportunity for me to complete my Master’s in Science degree at the University of Arizona. Especially Dr. Elise S. Gornish, who provided constant support, mentoring, guidance throughout my thesis project. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Jeffrey S. Fehmi and Dr. Mitchel McClaran, for their availability and support along the way. Huge call out to the Fulbright Program, International Institute of Education, National Parks Service, Bat Conservation International, & Ancestral Lands Crew for funding, collaborations, and data collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 4/Friday, January 6, 2017/Proposed
    Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Proposed Rules 1665 Required Determinations PART 17—ENDANGERED AND March 7, 2017. Please note that if you are using the Federal eRulemaking Clarity of the Rule THREATENED WILDLIFE AND PLANTS Portal (see ADDRESSES), the deadline for We are required by Executive Orders ■ 1. The authority citation for part 17 submitting an electronic comment is 12866 and 12988 and by the continues to read as follows: 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on this date. Presidential Memorandum of June 1, Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 1531– We must receive requests for public 1998, to write all rules in plain 1544; 4201–4245, unless otherwise noted. hearings, in writing, at the address language. This means that each rule we ■ 2. Amend § 17.12(h) by removing the shown in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION publish must: entry for ‘‘Eriogonum gypsophilum’’ CONTACT section below by February 21, (1) Be logically organized; 2017. (2) Use the active voice to address from the List of Endangered and readers directly; Threatened Plants. ADDRESSES: Written comments: You may ■ (3) Use clear language rather than 3. Amend § 17.96(a) by removing the submit comments by one of the jargon; critical habitat entry for ‘‘Family following methods: (4) Be divided into short sections and Polygonaceae: Eriogonum gypsophilum (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal sentences; and (Gypsum Wild Buckwheat).’’ eRulemaking Portal: http:// (5) Use lists and tables wherever Dated: December 22, 2016. www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, possible. Daniel M. Ashe, enter FWS–R2–ES–2016–0138, which is If you feel that we have not met these Director, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Eriogonum Visheri A
    Eriogonum visheri A. Nelson (Visher’s buckwheat): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project December 18, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Cir E. Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, December 18). Eriogonum visheri A. Nelson (Visher’s buckwheat): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/eriogonumvisheri.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions listed in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I would also like to thank the North Dakota Parks and Recreation Department, in particular Christine Dirk, and the South Dakota Natural Heritage Program, in particular David Ode, for their generosity in making their records, reports, and photographs available. I thank the Montana Natural Heritage Program, particularly Martin Miller, Mark Gabel of the Black Hills University Herbarium, Robert Tatina of the Dakota Wesleyan University, Christine Niezgoda of the Field Museum of Natural History, Carrie Kiel Academy of Natural Sciences, Dave Dyer of the University of Montana Herbarium, Caleb Morse of the R.L. McGregor Herbarium, Robert Kaul of the C. E. Bessey Herbarium, John La Duke of the University of North Dakota Herbarium, Joe Washington of the Dakota National Grasslands, and Doug Sargent of the Buffalo Gap National Grasslands - Region 2, for the information they provided. I also appreciate the access to files and assistance given to me by Andrew Kratz, Region 2 USDA Forest Service, and Chuck Davis, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Biological Assessment
    RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West Brantley and Avalon Reservoirs Resource Management Plan Amendment FINAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Albuquerque Area Office Albuquerque, New Mexico Eddy County, New Mexico January 2011 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Prepared by: BIO-WEST, Inc. 1063 West 1400 North Logan, Utah 84321-2291 435.752.4202 www.bio-west.com Revised Brantley and Avalon Reservoirs RMPA Final Biological Assessment January 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT BACKGROUND........................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................................................. 1 PROPOSED FEDERAL ACTION ................................................................................................. 4 NEED FOR THE ACTION ........................................................................................................ 5 PURPOSE FOR THE ACTION ................................................................................................. 5 DESCRIPTION
    [Show full text]
  • Plants, Volume 1, Number 1 (August 1979)
    Desert Plants, Volume 1, Number 1 (August 1979) Item Type Article Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 02/10/2021 01:18:53 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/528188 Volume I. Number 1. August 1979 Desert Published by The University of Arizona for the Plants Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum Assisting Nature with Plant Selection4 Larry K. Holzworth Aberrant Sex -Ratios in Jojoba Associated with Environmental Factors 8 Serena L. Cole 'J. G. Lemmon & Wife,' Plant Explorers in Arizona, California, and Nevada12 Frank S. Crosswhite 'Extinct' Wire -Lettuce, Stephanomeria schottii (Compositae), Rediscovered in Arizona after More Than One Hundred Years22 Elinor Lehto Southwestern Indian Sunflowers23 Gary Paul Nabhan Transition from a Bermudagrass Lawn to a Landscape of Rock or Gravel Mulch 27 Charles Sacamano Preliminary Evaluation of Cold- hardiness in Desert Landscaping Plants at Central Arizona College29 William A. Kinnison Effects of the 1978 Freeze on Native Plants of Sonora, Mexico33 Warren D. Jones The Severe Freeze of 1978 -79 in the Southwestern United States37 The National Climate Program Act of 197840 Reviews42 Arboretum Progress46 R. T. McKittrick Volume 1. Number 1. August 1979 Published by The University of Arizona Desert Plants for the Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum The Severe Freeze of 1978 -79 in the Contents Southwestern United States37 Correspondents: Editorial Barrie D. Coate, Saratoga Horticultural Foundation; Dara E. Emery, Santa Barbara Botanic Garden; Louis C. Assisting Nature with Plant Selection 4 Erickson, Botanic Gardens, University of California, River- Larry K. Holzworth, USDA Soil Conservation side; Wayne L.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Vegetation Classification of the Tombstone, Arizona, Vicinity
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF EDMUNDO GARCIA-MOYA for theDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Name) (Degree) ANIMAL SCIENCE in (RANGELAND RESOURCES) presented onfi,?,(2;2-01) / Yj) Qi (Major) (Date) Title: A PRELIMINARY VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION OF THE TOMBSTONE, ARIZONA, VICINITY Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: C. E. Poulton The need for classifying vegetation in a more precise wayis evident.Also, there is a need to provide a hierarchicalclassification scheme that will match changes in image characteristics as one moves through the scales from spaceto conventional aerial photo- graphy.Such refined classifications of vegetation are thefirst steps toward a better understanding of the potentialities andlimitations of a specified area which help in the detection of analogousenvironmental conditions for resource allocation and management purposes.These needs become more urgent as use and competitionfor natural resources and land increases.The first approximation of a classification scheme may meet these needs for a test site inthe Tombstone, Arizona, vicinity.This classification task was accomplished by the use of a "hierarchical- polythetic-agglomerative" package using presence-absence data and standardized cover esti- mates, The following tentative associations and a variant were found upon division of the original data into groups of convenient size to meet the limitations of the programs: Association A (Panicum hirticaule/Tidestromia lanuginosa- Boerhaavia coulteri) la (a variant of Association A) Association B (Rhus microphylla-Dalea formosa)
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall, Soil Type, and Plant Species Functional Types
    South African Journal for Science and Technology ISSN: (Online) 2222-4173, (Print) 0254-3486 Page Page 1 ofi of 15 ii InhoudsopgaweOorspronklike Navorsing Key determinants of long-term compositional variation of the herbaceous layer in a semi-arid African savanna: Rainfall, soil type, and plant species functional types Authors: Management of the grazing resource in semi-arid savanna is dependent on inter-annual Bezuidenhout H1&5, Botha variation in available moisture, which is determined by rainfall, soil type and woody 2 3 J , Ramaswiela T and biomass. Grazing and fire may further influence trends. Understanding the effect of rainfall O’Connor T4 variability requires study over an 18-year quasi-cycle of rainfall with frequent measurement, Affiliations: a constraint which few southern African studies have met. The herbaceous layer and woody 1 South African National vegetation on deep (> 0.6 m) well-drained sands, moderately deep (0.3–0.6 m) well-drained Parks, Scientific Services, Kimberley Office, PO Box sands, moderately deep poorly drained clays, and shallow (< 0.3 m) rocky moderately 110040, Hadison Park, drained sandy loams in the deproclaimed Vaalbos National Park, South Africa, were Kimberley, 8306, South monitored from 1993 to 2015. Woody density and structure differed conspicuously across Africa soil types, but there were no trends noticed over time for the park or for any individual soil 5 Applied Behavioural type. There was also no change in the number of woody species or frequency distribution Ecology and Ecosystem over this survey period. Different functional groups responded differently to rainfall or to Research Unit, UNISA, Private Bag X6, Florida, soil water storage capacity of the soil profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 4/Friday
    Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Proposed Rules 1657 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail including any additional population or hand-delivery to: Public Comments locations, and; Fish and Wildlife Service Processing, Attn: FWS–R2–ES–2016– (3) New information regarding 0119; Division of Policy, Performance, Eriogonum gypsophilum life history, 50 CFR Part 17 and Management Programs; U.S. Fish ecology and habitat use. and Wildlife Service, MS: BPHC; 5275 Please note that submissions merely [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2016–0119; Leesburg Pike; Falls Church, VA stating support for, or opposition to, the FXES11130900000 178 FF09E42000] 220411–3803. action being considered, without We request that you send comments providing supporting information, RIN 1018–BB87 only by the methods described above. although noted, will not be considered in making a determination, as the Act Endangered and Threatened Wildlife We will post all comments on http:// (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) section and Plants; Removing Eriogonum www.regulations.gov. This generally 4(b)(1)(A) directs that determinations as gypsophilum From the Federal List of means that we will post any personal to whether any species is an endangered Endangered and Threatened Plants information you provide us (see Information Requested, below, for more or threatened species must be made AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, information). ‘‘solely on the basis of the best scientific Interior. Copies of Documents: This proposed and commercial data available.’’ Prior to issuing a final rule on this ACTION: Proposed rule and 12-month rule and supporting documents are proposed action, we will consider all petition finding; request for comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Eragr0st1s (Poaceae: Chloridoideae
    ERAGR0ST1S (POACEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE: ERAGROSTIDEAE: ERAGROSTIDINAE) FROM NORTHEASTERN MEXICO Paul M.Peterson JesusValdes-Reyna Department of Botany Departamento de Botdnica National Museum of Natural History Universidad Autonoma Agraria "Antonio Narro" Smithsonian Institution Buenavista, Saltillo Washington, DC 20013-7012, U.S.A. Coahuila 25315, MEXICO [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT A taxonomic treatment of Eragrostis Wolf for northeastern Mexico (Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, and Tamaulipas), is given. Twenty-six species and four varieties or subspecies of Eragrostis are recognized in the study area. Twenty of these species are native to the Flora region and six are introduced and adventive. Keys for determining the species, descriptions, distributions, specimens examined, illus- trations, synonymies, and a brief discussion indicating relationships among all native and adven- tive species of Eragrostis in northeastern Mexico are provided. RESUMEN Se presenta un estudio taxonomico de Eragrostis Wolf para el noreste de Mexico (Coahuila, Nuevo Leon y Tamaulipas). Un total de veintiseis especies y cuatro variedades o subespecies de Eragrostis se reconocen en el area del estudio. Veinte de estas especies son nativas de la flora de la region y seis son introducidas y adventicias. Se incluyen claves para determinar las especies, descripciones, distribuciones, especimenes examinados, ilustraciones, sinonimias, y una discusion breve indicando las relaciones entre todas las especies nativas y adventicias de Eragrostis para el noreste de Mexico. Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, and Tamaulipas or northeastern Mexico covers an area of 291,955 km2 or 15 % of the total land of Mexico. This area includes portions of two natural regions known as the Chihuahuan and Tamaulipan Deserts. These regions are considered a center of origin and diversification of arid and semi-arid plant species (Davila-Aranda et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Maddin Prairie Preserve Grasses/Sedges Plant List 54 Species As of Dec 2016
    Maddin Prairie Preserve Grasses/Sedges Plant List 54 Species as of Dec 2016 Family Name Grasses/Sedges/Cattail Native or Date 1st Observed Warm Season Perrenial Scientific Name Common Name Introduced or Collected Cool Season or Annual Poaceae (Gramineae) Andropogon gerardii big bluestem Native 12/7/2010 Warm Perennial Andropogon hallii Sand Bluestem Native 11/3/2007 Warm Perennial Aristida longespica var.geniculata Slimspike Threeawn Native 8/20/2007 Warm Annual Aristida purpurea Purple Threeawn Native 5/6/2007 Warm Perennial Aristida wrightii Wright's Threeawn Native 8/20/2007, 12/6/10 Warm Perennial Bothriochloa saccharoides Silver Bluestem Native 8/20/2007, 12/6/10 Warn Perennial Bothriochloa barbinodis Cane Bluestem Native 11/3/2007, 12/7/10 Warm Perennial Bouteloua curtipendula Sideoats Grama Native 8/20/2007, 12/6/10 Warm Perennial Bouteloua gracilis Blue Grama Native 11/3/2007, 12/6/2010 Warm Perennial Bouteloua hirsuta Hairy Grama Native 11/3/2007 Warm Perennial Bouteloua rigidiseta Texas grama Native 12/7/2010 Warm Perennial Bouteloua trifida Red Grama Native 11/3/2007 Warm Perennial Bromus unioloides Rescuegrass Introduced 5/6/2007, 12/6/2010 Cool Season Annual Buchloe dactyloides Buffalograss Native 11/3/2007, 12/6/2010 Warm Perennial Cenchrus ciliaris Sandbur Native 8/20/2007, 12/6/10 Warm Annual Chloris cucullata Hooded Windmill Grass Native 8/20/2007, 12/6/2010 Warm Perennial Chloris verticillata Tumble Windmill Grass Native 8/20/2007 Warm Perennial Cynodon dactylon Bermuda Grass Introduced 5/6/2007, 12/7/10 Warm Perennial
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for The
    DRAFT Environmental Assessment for the Renewable (Wind and Solar) Energy, Power Line, and Communication Tower Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take Permit for the Lesser Prairie-Chicken LPC Conservation LLC Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas December 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arlington Ecological Services Field Office 2005 Northeast Green Oaks Boulevard, Suite 140 Arlington, Texas 76006 Estimated Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing this EA: $64,683.00 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RENEWABLE ENERGY, POWER LINE, AND COMMUNICATION TOWER PROPOSED HCP AND ITP FOR LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND ...............................................................1 1.1 Introduction and Background ..................................................................................1 1.1.1 Permit Structure ...........................................................................................3 1.1.2 Plan Area and Permit Area ..........................................................................3 1.2 Regulatory Background ...........................................................................................3 1.2.1 Endangered Species Act ..............................................................................3 1.2.2 National Environmental Policy Act .............................................................4 2 PURPOSE AND NEED .......................................................................................................5 2.1 Purpose
    [Show full text]