COMMUNITY COUNCIL BOUNDARIES RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX 2
COMMUNITY COUNCIL/S WARD/S REPRESENTATION/S CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATION/S
(S1) Cathcart & District and 1, 2 Amend the boundary between Cathcart & Representation raised by GCC Officers. No change; status quo Newlands & Auldhouse District (West) and Newlands/Auldhouse (East) to better align the geographical Alternative representations made by both boundary. CCs with no agreement reached.
(S2) Cathcart & District and 1,7 Old Castle Gardens and Old Castle Gate Representation raised by Mount Florida CC. Implement representation Mount Florida be moved from the Mount Florida boundary to become part of Cathcart & Cathcart & District and Simshill & Old District. Cathcart; no objections received.
(S3) Pollokshaws & 2, 3 Amend the boundary between Representation raised by GCC Officers. No change; status quo Eastwood and Levern & Pollokshaws & Eastwood (West) and District Levern & District (East) to align with Ward Representations made by Pollokshaws & boundaries. Eastwood CC and Levern & District CC are not supportive of the representation.
Alternative representations from 1 resident and 1 Elected Member for in part alignment for Boulevard Development to sit within Pollokshaws & Eastwood CC boundary.
(S4) Levern & District and 3 Amend boundary between Levern & Representation raised by Levern & District Implement representation Darnley & South Park District (south) and Darnley & South Park CC, Ward 3 Elected Member and local Village Village (north) to bring neighbourhood of residents. Parkhouse and area South to City Council boundary within the boundary of Levern & Representation reflects pre-existing District CC. boundaries.
Darnley & South Park Village currently inactive.
(S5) Pollok North and 4 Amend boundary between Pollok North Representation raised by GCC Officers. No change; status quo Mosspark & Corkerhill (East) and Mosspark & Corkerhill (West) to better align the geographical boundary. Closer scrutiny highlights that representation contradicts natural waterway boundary.
COMMUNITY COUNCIL BOUNDARIES RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX 2
COMMUNITY COUNCIL/S WARD/S REPRESENTATION/S CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATION/S
(S6) Mosspark & Corkerhill 4, 6 Include Bellahouston Park within Representation raised by Dumbreck CC. No change; status quo and Craigton and Dumbreck CC boundary Dumbreck Historical representation (2013/14) made or before establishment of Craigton CC.
Amend the boundary to make Craigton CC object to representations. Bellahouston Park a shared area of responsibility for all abutting CCs i.e. Understood that Friends of Bellahouston Dumbreck, Craigton, Mosspark & Park now includes representation / Corkerhill. involvement from abutting CCs.
(S7) South Cardonald & 4, 6 Amend boundary between South Representation raised by South Cardonald & Implement representation Crookston and Craigton Cardonald & Crookston North East and Crookston CC to amend existing boundary. Craigton South West boundary Both CCs have looked at the demographics of “the triangle” and agree to the representation.
(S8) Dumbreck and 6 Amend the boundary between Dumbreck Representation raised by GCC Officers. Implement representation Pollokshields (North East) and Pollokshields (North West) to better align the geographical No objections boundary.
COMMUNITY COUNCIL BOUNDARIES RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX 2
COMMUNITY COUNCIL/S WARD/S REPRESENTATION/S CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATION/S
(NW1) Anderston and 10 Amend the boundary between Anderston Representation raised by GCC Officers in Implement representation Blythswood & Broomielaw (East) and Blythswood & Broomielaw relation to B&B CC boundaries with with regard to Anderston and and Garnethill (West) to better align the geographical Anderston, and Dundasvale boundary area. Blythswood & Broomielaw boundary. boundary Dundasvale Anderston CC and B&B CC; no objections to Dundasvale boundary area is shared proposal which affects their boundaries. No change, status quo with between Garnethill and Townhead & regard to Townhead & Ladywell or alternatively is merged with Dundasvale currently inactive. Ladywell CC boundary Garnethill and/or Townhead & Ladywell. relative to Dundasvale Townhead & Ladywell CC object to any Amend the boundary between Garnethill extension of its boundary into Dundasvale CC No change, status quo with (South) and Blythswood & Broomielaw area. regard to existing boundary (B&B) (North) putting Sauchiehall Street between B&B CC and completely into Garnethill boundary and 2 resident’s objections to any boundary Garnethill CC i.e. expand B&B (North) boundary into change for Townhead & Ladywell CC. Sauchiehall Street Dundasvale to include e.g. Concert Hall; & Buchanan Bus Station; Queen Street B&B CC and Garnethill CC’s proposals with No change, status quo with Station. regard to Sauchiehall street boundary and regard to extending Dundasvale overlap and are broadly similar. boundaries of either B&B CC Garnethill CC proposal to extend its There have been no significant discussions or and Garnethill CC into boundary south into B&B CC boundary agreement between B&B CC and Garnethill Dundasvale at this time area (i.e. Bath Street) and east into CC to date with regard to their similar Dundasvale include e.g. Concert Hall; proposals. NOTE: the 2 Buchanan Bus Station; Queen Street recommendations Station. Garnethill CC had a number of new members immediately above are appointed following its October 2018 based upon (1) Garnethill Contested Election. CC has recently been re- established following a contested election; (2) the need for Garnethill CC new members to be fully inducted on current governance for CCs, before discussions are undertaken; and (3) the absence of any significant discussions/negotiations and/or agreement between B&B and Garnethill CCs in
COMMUNITY COUNCIL BOUNDARIES RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX 2
relation to their representations.
COMMUNITY COUNCIL/S WARD/S REPRESENTATION/S CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATION/S
(NW2) North Kelvin 11 Amend the boundary between North Representation raised by residents and Implement representation Kelvin (North West) and Central Maryhill Ward 15 Elected Member. (South) to include additional area within the boundary of North Kelvin Community No objections Council i.e. Garrioch Drive; Garrioch Quadrant; Garrioch Road; and Garrioch Central Maryhill currently inactive Crescent.
(NW3) Woodside and 11 Amend the boundary between Woodside Representation raised by GCC Officers. Implement representation Woodlands & Park (South East) and Woodlands & Park (North East), to align the boundary to Woodside CC support representation; the reflect the intuitive boundary. section of New City Road sits more intuitively within Woodside CC boundary area.
(NW4) Broomhill and 12 Amend boundary between Broomhill Representation raised by 15 local residents Implement residents’ Thornwood (South) and Thornwood (North) to whose residences (pre 2011 Scheme) sat representation relocate Broomhill Gardens within the within the Broomhill CC boundary – no Broomhill Community Council boundary notification was received by the residents to No change, status quo with area. provide them an opportunity to object to the regard to representation proposal at that time. relating to further Amend boundary further between amendment of boundary Broomhill (South) and Thornwood (North) Broomhill CC and Thornwood CC support between Broomhill CC and to relocate south side of Broomhill Drive resident’s representation. Thornwood CC with associated residences. Further representation made by Broomhill CC to extend boundary to include properties along Broomhill Drive South towards Thornwood Roundabout.
Thornwood CC object to Broomhill CC’s representation as outlined above.
COMMUNITY COUNCIL BOUNDARIES RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX 2
COMMUNITY COUNCIL/S WARD/S REPRESENTATION/S CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATION/S
(NW5) Jordanhill and 12 Amend boundary between Jordanhill CC Representation/s raised by Jordanhill CC No change; status quo Whiteinch (South) and Whiteinch CC (North) to relocate Victoria Park within Jordanhill CC 6 residents support representations boundary or Victoria Park currently sits in its entirety within Whiteinch CC boundary area. Amend the boundary to make Victoria Park a shared area of responsibility for all Whiteinch CC objects to representations
abutting Community Councils. Friends of Victoria Park objects to
representation/s
8 residents object to representations
Thornwood CC objects to representations
Scotstoun CC objects to representations
Elected Member Ward 12 not supportive of representations
Broomhill CC supportive of status quo
(NW6) Drumchapel and 14 To realign boundary to include the Representation raised by Drumchapel CC. No change; status quo Blairdardie & Old industrial sites North & West of Dalsetter Drumchapel Avenue to create a boundary at the North Blairdardie & Old Drumchapel CC object to side of the railway line. representations.
To include the Gt Western Retail Park and 8 residents object to representations. all other industrial units and the remaining vacant / derelict parts of the former Goodyear Tyre Factory site to the boundary of Great Western Road and North / West of the flyover at Duntreath Avenue to better align to the geographical boundary of Drumchapel.
COMMUNITY COUNCIL BOUNDARIES RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX 2
COMMUNITY COUNCIL/S WARD/S REPRESENTATION/S CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATION/S
(NW7) Maryhill & 15, 16 Expand the ‘Shared Area’ for all CCs Representation raised by GCC Officers Implement representation Summerston and Cadder abutting the ‘Shared Area’ south boundary and Lambhill & District and i.e. Maryhill & Summerston, Cadder, Following the 2017 Ward Boundary review Milton Lambhill & District and Milton. this original shared area has more than doubled in geographical size.
COMMUNITY COUNCIL BOUNDARIES RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX 2
COMMUNITY COUNCIL/S WARD/S REPRESENTATION/S CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATION/S
(NE1) Barrowfield & 9, 10, 18, Amend the boundary between Dennistoun Representation raised by GCC Officers. Implement representation to Camlachie, Townhead & 22 (West; South; East) and Townhead & boundary between Ladywell, Gartcraig and Ladywell (East) and Barrowfield & Closer scrutiny of mapping indicates no Dennistoun East and Dennistoun Camlachie (North) and Gartcraig (West) overlap of boundary between Barrowfield & Gartcraig West to better align the geographical boundary Camlachie and Dennistoun. and realign to the Ward boundary. No change; status quo for Townhead & Ladywell CC and 2 residents boundaries to West and objections to any boundary change South of Dennistoun CC
Dennistoun CC objection to boundary changes with exception of Dennistoun East and Gartcraig West
(NE2) Springburn Central 17, 21 Merge Springburn Central and Balgrayhill Representation raised by GCC Officers. Implement representation and Balgrayhill and and Petershill to form Springburn Petershill. Community Council Representation based upon ongoing dialogue with Springburn Central CC and local residents from Balgrayhill and Petershill.
Previous nominations received will be valid if representation is implemented.
Supported by Elected Members
Associate Membership of Springburn Central CC drawn from both inactive CC areas within Petershill & Balgrayhill communities
(NE3) Springburn Central 17, 22 Amend the boundaries between Representation raised by GCC Officers. Implement representation to and Royston and Sighthill Springburn Central (South) and Royston boundary between (North) and Sighthill (North) to realign to No objections Springburn Central and the Ward boundaries. Royston
No change; status quo between Springburn Central and Sighthill
COMMUNITY COUNCIL BOUNDARIES RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX 2
COMMUNITY COUNCIL/S WARD/S REPRESENTATION/S CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATION/S
(NE4) Robroyston and 17, 21 Amend the boundary between Robroyston Representation raised by GCC Officers. Implement representation Molendinar (South East) and Molendinar (North East) to realign to the Ward boundary. No objections
(NE5) Springboig and 18 Merge Springboig and Barlanark to form Representation raised by GCC Officers. Implement representation Barlanark one Community Council; Interest shown from community residents from the two boundary areas but not enough to sustain a Community Council.
The increased area would mirror the current Thriving Places (TP) and it is anticipated that as more local residents become active within TP, that it may generate sufficient numbers to create an active CC in the area.
No objections
(NE6) Easterhouse Central 21 Merge Easterhouse Central and Representation raised by GCC Officers. Implement representation and Easterhouse North Easterhouse North to form one Community Council. Interest shown from community residents from Easterhouse Central but not enough to sustain a Community Council.
The increased area would mirror the current Thriving Places (TP) area and it would be anticipated that as more local residents become aware of or active within TP that it may generate sufficient numbers to create a larger active Community Council in the area.
Supported by Easterhouse North CC
COMMUNITY COUNCIL BOUNDARIES RECOMMENDATIONS APPENDIX 2
COMMUNITY COUNCIL/S WARD/S REPRESENTATION/S CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATION/S
(NE7) Garthamlock & 21 Merge Garthamlock & Craigend and Representation raised by GCC Officers. Implement representation Craigend and Gartloch Gartloch to form one Community Council. Gartloch failed to re-establish following its 2018 Full Election Year call for nominations.
There may be a number of significant development proposals coming forward in the future, for the area of Gartloch; merging Gartloch with its neighbouring community council (Garthamlock & Craigend CC) can ensure the local community continue to have a collective representative voice on Planning Applications.
Supported by Ward 21 Elected Member
Supported by Garthamlock & Craigend CC and the previous Chairperson of the Gartloch CC
(NE8) Sighthill and Royston 22 Merge Sighthill and Royston and Representation raised by GCC Officers. Implement representation and Germiston Germiston to form one Community Council. No formal representations received although interest shown from community residents from the 3 areas, but not enough to sustain individual CCs.
These CCs have been inactive for a considerable period of time.
Only having 2 CC areas in a Ward would not be setting a precedent as Ward 15 has 2 CCs, and one of these is currently inactive.