Link to View Board of Forestry Meeting Available At
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Our Tuesday and Thursday Series of Day Hikes and Rambles, Most Within Two Hours of Lake Oswego
Lake Oswego Parks & Recreation Hikes and Rambles Spring/Summer 2015 Calendar of Hikes/Rambles/Walks Welcome to our Tuesday and Thursday series of day hikes and rambles, most within two hours of Lake Oswego. Information is also available at LO Park & Rec Activities Catalog . To recieve weekly News email send your request to [email protected]. Hikes are for hikers of intermediate ability. Hiking distance is usually between 6 - 10 miles, and usually with an elevation gain/loss between 800 - 2000 ft. Longer hikes, greater elevation gains or unusual trail conditions will be noted in the hike description. Hikes leave at 8:00 a.m., unless otherwise indicated. Rambles are typically shorter, less rugged, and more leisurely paced -- perfect for beginners. Outings are usually 5-7 miles with comfortable elevation gains and good trail conditions. Leaves promptly at 8:30a unless otherwise noted. Meeting Places All hikes and rambles leave from the City of Lake Oswego West End Building (WEB), 4101 Kruse Way, Lake Oswego. Park in the lower parking lot (behind the building) off of Kruse Way. Individual hike or ramble descriptions may include second pickup times and places. (See included places table.) for legend. All mileages indicated are roundtrip. Second Meeting Places Code Meeting Place AWHD Airport Way Home Depot, Exit 24-B off I-205, SW corner of parking lot CFM Clackamas Fred Meyer, Exit 12-A off I-205, north lot near Elmer's End of the Oregon Trail Interpretative Center, Exit 10 off I-205, right on Washington Street to EOT parking lot by covered wagons Jantzen Beach Target,Exit 308 off I-5, left on N Hayden Island, left on N Parker, SE corner JBT Target parking lot L&C Lewis and Clark State Park. -
2012 Summary Report Oregon Department of Forestry Tribal-State Agency Government-To-Government Relations
“Stewardship in Forestry” 2012 Summary Report Oregon Department of Forestry www.oregon.gov/odf Tribal-State Agency Government-to-Government Relations INTRODUCTION During 2012, the Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) continued its involvement and communication with the Tribes as it conducted its business of forestry. This involvement is reflected in agency policy and agreements, training, education, informational materials, and participation in opportunities that further employee government-to-government relations’ knowledge and skills, and in direct consultation, communication, and cooperation. This report will discuss this departmental involvement, on a geographical basis, reporting on both program and district activities. AGENCY-WIDE ACTIVITIES ODF Salem Headquarters Executive Team Contacts: Doug Decker, State Forester, 503-945-7201, [email protected] Paul Bell, Deputy State Forester, 503-945-7205; [email protected] Agency’s Designated Representative Paul Bell, Deputy State Forester, continued as the agency Liaison for Government-to-Government Relations. Annual Government-to-Government Activities and Training Opportunities Paul Bell attended the State Agency Annual Training session on May 10, 2012. Paul and Dave Lorenz, Southern Oregon Area Director, both attended the Tribal Day celebrations at the State Capitol on May 11, 2012. Paul Bell attended and participated in the Annual Tribal Summit in November 2011. Doug Decker, Oregon State Forester, Paul Bell, and Dave Lorenz are all scheduled to attend the Annual Tribal Summit on November 29, 2012. ODF expects to continue participating in these and similar activities as they are available during the remainder of 2012 and throughout 2013. 2012 Summary Report Page 1 of 12 Oregon Department of Forestry Tribal-State Agency Government-to-Government Relations Involvement with the Natural Resources Cluster Group Paul Bell was the designated agency representative for the Natural Resources Cluster Work Group during this reporting time period. -
The WOODLANDER UPDATE
The WOODLANDER UPDATE February 2011 News and Information for-and-about Small Woodland Owners Volume 31 Issue 1 INSIDE OSWA NEWS President’s Message 2 OSWA’s Annual Meeting Date Has Changed OSWA News 3, 8,10-12 The dates for OSWA’s 2011 Annual Meeting have been changed to June 23rd thru Tree Farm News 5 25th hosted by our Baker County Chapter. The meeting will be held in Baker City OR News 4,6-7,9 at the Best Western Sunridge Inn. A block of rooms are being held for our event. Congressman Greg Walden and new Oregon State Forester Doug Decker have been invited. This year’s theme is “Dealing with Changing Realities in Woodland Management”. Our Annual Meeting will be linked this year to the Oregon Tree DATES Farmer of the Year tour on Thursday June 23rd visiting the Harry Merlo woodlands in Union County. The OSWA and Oregon Tree Farm System Board meetings will UPCOMING MEETINGS be held Thursday night in Baker City. 2011 March 3 OSWA Exec Mtg The program on Friday, June 24th will include OSWA’s Annual Membership Meet- ing and speakers on topics relevant to the changes affecting woodlands management March 10 OSWA Board Call on family forests with a focus on the specific challenges east of the Cascade Moun- March 19 Tree School Clack. tains. A forum to facilitate a dialog between speakers and the audience will be used with the following topics planned: April 7 OSWA Exec Mtg April 14 OSWA Board Call New Partnerships - Public and Private April 21 Day at Capital New partnerships are needed to navigate the changing landscapes of forest manage- June 23-25 OSWA Annual Mtg ment. -
The View from Here
The View from Here Figure 1 -- The iconic image of the South Canyon Fire blow-up that will claim the lives of 14 wildland firefighters. Acknowledging our current culture and its shortcomings while using its strengths to lead change. December 2018 The View from Here 1 This collection represents collective insight into how we operate and why we must alter some of our most ingrained practices and perspectives. Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 I Risk ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1. The Illusion of Control ............................................................................................................. 5 2. It’s Going to Happen Again ................................................................................................... 14 3. The Big Lie – Honor the Fallen .............................................................................................. 19 4. The Problem with Zero ......................................................................................................... 26 5. RISK, GAIN, and LOSS – What are We Willing to Accept? .................................................... 29 6. How Do We Know This Job is Dangerous? ............................................................................ 39 II Culture ....................................................................................................................................... -
Download Chapter
Table Of Contents Conservation Toolbox............................................................................................................................... 3 Outreach, Education, and Engagement................................................................................................... 4 Voluntary Conservation Programs......................................................................................................... 16 Conservation in Urban Areas.................................................................................................................. 23 Planning and Regulatory Framework..................................................................................................... 30 General References.................................................................................................................................. 50 Conservation Toolbox Everyone has a role in the successful implementation of the Oregon Conservation Strategy. The Conservation Toolbox provides recommendations to support implementation and suggestions for additional information and assistance. Key components of the Conservation Toolbox include: Outreach, Education, and Engagement Conservation in Urban Areas Oregon’s Existing Planning and Regulatory Framework Voluntary Conservation Programs General References: additional resources outside of the references provided in each section Outreach, Education, and Engagement Connecting people to nature is an important element of successful Conservation Strategy implementation. Acquiring -
Forest Legacy Project Gilchrist Forest Gilchrist, OR, Oregon
Project information last updated: 11/30/2012 10:56 PM Report prepared: 11/30/2012 11:00 PM Forest Legacy Project Gilchrist Forest Gilchrist, OR, Oregon FUNDING HISTORY FY 2014 Forest Legacy Program Funding $3,000,000 FY 2014 Non-Federal Cost Share $5,805,000 FY 2014 Project Costs $8,805,000 FY 2014 Project Acres 25,835 Forest Legacy Funding To Date $0 Total Project Costs $8,805,000 Total Project Acres 25,835 Size Non-Fed Tract Name (ac) Tract Cost FLP Funding Cost Share Status Gilchrist East 25,835 $8,805,000 $3,000,000 $5,805,000 In Review 2014 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The 25,835-acre Gilchrist State Forest parcel, to be protected in FEE, is a keystone property surrounded by three National Forests, a State forest, and BLM lands. The tract will be added to the newly created Gilchrist State Forest and will be managed for sustainable forestry and public recreation, generating significant revenue for Klamath County. The highest priority acquisition for Governor Kitzhaber, it represents a unique and affordable ($341/acre) investment in Oregon's future. Protection would eliminate 40 miles of inholding border for the 2 million acres of adjoining public lands. It will strengthen critical wildlife corridors, protect a large aquifer recharge area for the federally-designated Wild and Scenic View of project from Buell Butte (Photo by Doug Decker (Oregon Deschutes River, and restore a mature Ponderosa State Forester)) pine forest, one of the highest priority habitats in Oregon's Conservation Strategy. Because of its prime location--close to Bend and abundant outdoor recreation--and permissive zoning (with destination resort overlay), this parcel is seriously threatened by parcelization and conversion. -
Celebrating Twenty Years of Conservation Work in the Deschutes Basin
SUMMER 2016 VOL. 10 NO. 2 NEWSLETTER OF THE DESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY A MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TOD HEISLER Artist: Susan Luckey Higdon PHOTO: DRC STAFF Celebrating Twenty Years of Conservation Work in the Deschutes Basin Twenty years ago, a small group of District, flows have increased signifi- irrigation purposes, and upstream people came together with a vision cantly below the district’s pumps. from irrigation diversions, so the of leaving our rivers and streams tools we have used in the past will better than they found them. Bend While these reaches have vastly not be enough to solve this complex was on the precipice of a population improved, we still have work to do. and far-reaching problem. boom, and the Deschutes River and Work like this is only possible The solution to restoring the Upper its tributaries had already been over- through building trust and strong allocated for nearly 100 years. Deschutes River lies in the way we relationships. Working with our use and manage water in Central Since 1996, the Deschutes River partners, the DRC has used flow Oregon. Our century old system will Conservancy has brought stakehold- restoration tools such as piping and not meet the changing demands for ers together across the basin to lining canals, water rights leasing, water in our basin. Cities with grow- restore 200 cubic feet per second and instream transfers to make real ing populations are challenged to (cfs) to our rivers. progress in these reaches. meet future water needs. Increased pressure from drought and litigation What does that look like? 20 years After 20 years, an area that has seen practically no restoration is the have created insecurity for commer- ago, Whychus Creek ran dry two out cial farmers who depend on unreli- of every three summers. -
Methods and Data Appendices for Socioeconomic Monitoring of Nonmetropolitan Communities Following 25 Years of the Northwest Forest Plan (1994–2018)
Methods and data appendices for socioeconomic monitoring of nonmetropolitan communities following 25 years of the Northwest Forest Plan (1994–2018). Supplemental Materials for Grinspoon, E., ed. Northwest Forest Plan—the first 25 years (1994–2018): socioeconomic monitoring results, Chapters 4 & 5. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW- GTR-xxx. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. xx p. Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon Michael R. Coughlan, Amelia Rhodeland, and Heidi Huber-Stearns Appendix A: Additional Methods A.1 Semi-structured Interview and Coding Protocols We used a semi-structured interview protocol with closed and open-ended questions in 10 key areas of interest and specific protocol addendums for agency personnel and timber industry stakeholders. A.1.1 Interview Guide Case study name:_ Case study id: Interview id: Date/time:______/_______ Interviewer: Location: Introduction to the Project Hello! Thank you for meeting with me today. Before we get started I would like to explain the interview process. This interview will be structured differently than an everyday conversation. I will be changing the subject from time to time, and I will not be responding in agreement or disagreement to the things that you are saying. I am going to be as neutral as possible, focusing my comments on letting you know when I understand what you are saying and when I do not, encouraging you to elaborate, or asking follow-up questions. When the Northwest Forest Plan was formally adopted in 1994, the US Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management agreed to monitor changes to the forests they managed, as well as the social and economic characteristics of communities within the plan era. -
Draft North Cascade 2012 Implementation Plan
North Cascade District Implementation Plan June 2012 Table of Contents Page Introduction ____________________________________________________________ 1 District Overview ________________________________________________________ 3 Land Ownership ______________________________________________________ 3 Forest Land Management Classification ____________________________________ 3 Background ________________________________________________________ 3 Major Change to FLMCS _____________________________________________ 4 Current Condition _____________________________________________________ 6 History ___________________________________________________________ 6 Physical Elements _____________________________________________________ 7 Geology and Soils ___________________________________________________ 7 Topography ________________________________________________________ 9 Water ____________________________________________________________ 9 Climate ___________________________________________________________ 9 Natural Disturbance _________________________________________________ 9 Biological Elements __________________________________________________ 10 Vegetation ________________________________________________________ 10 Forest Health _____________________________________________________ 11 Fish and Wildlife __________________________________________________ 11 Human Uses ________________________________________________________ 16 Forest Management ________________________________________________ 16 Roads ___________________________________________________________ -
May 19, 2021 To: Joint Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Natural Resources Sen. Kathleen Taylor and Rep. Jeff Reardon
The League of Women Voters of Oregon is a 101-year-old grassroots nonpartisan political organization that encourages informed and active participation in government. We envision informed Oregonians participating in a fully accessible, responsive, and transparent government to achieve the common good. LWVOR Legislative Action is based on advocacy positions formed through studies and member consensus. The League never supports or opposes any candidate or political party. May 19, 2021 To: Joint Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Natural Resources Sen. Kathleen Taylor and Rep. Jeff Reardon, Co-Chairs Members of the Subcommittee Re: SB 5518 – Dept. of Forestry Budget – Support with Comments The League of Women Voters of the United States believes that natural resources such as forests and the animals and plants living within them should be managed as interrelated parts of life-supporting ecosystems. The League understands the many values of our federal, state and private forest lands. We support the state’s Land Use Goal 4, Forest Lands, and understand that our private industrial forests are among the most productive in the nation. Like our manufacturing and our agricultural industrial lands, our private forest industrial lands must be preserved and protected, but we look forward to seeing adoption of forest practices that recognize our changing climate. We also appreciate the value of all our forests as the source of most Oregonians’ drinking water. We remind the committee of the Department of Forestry’s mission: “To serve the people of Oregon by protecting, managing, and promoting stewardship of Oregon's forests to enhance environmental, economic, and community sustainability.” In reviewing the ODF budgets over the past several budget cycles, we bring to your attention that the department has been understaffed for quite some time. -
Computational Modeling of Extreme Wildland Fire Events
Computational modeling of extreme wildland fire events: a synthesis of scientific understanding with applications to forecasting, land management, and firefighter safety Janice L. Coena,b W. Schroederc S Conwayd L Tarnaye a National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado b Corresponding author. [email protected] c NOAA/NESDIS/OSPO/SPSD, College Park, MD d Conway Conservation Group, Incline Village, NV e USDA Forest Service, Region 5 Remote Sensing Laboratory, McClellan, CA ACCEPTED Journal of Computational Science Formal publication location: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101152 1 Abstract The understanding and prediction of large wildland fire events around the world is a growing interdisciplinary research area advanced rapidly by development and use of computational models. Recent models bidirectionally couple computational fluid dynamics models including weather prediction models with modules containing algorithms representing fire spread and heat release, simulating fire-atmosphere interactions across scales spanning three orders of magnitude. Integrated with weather data and airborne and satellite remote sensing data on wildland fuels and active fire detection, modern coupled weather-fire modeling systems are being used to solve current science problems. Compared to legacy tools, these dynamic computational modeling systems increase cost and complexity but have produced breakthrough insights notably into the mechanisms underlying extreme wildfire events such as fine-scale extreme winds associated with interruptions of the electricity grid and have been configured to forecast a fire's growth, expanding our ability to anticipate how they will unfold. We synthesize case studies of recent extreme events, expanding applications, and the challenges and limitations in our remote sensing systems, fire prediction tools, and meteorological models that add to wildfires' mystery and apparent unpredictability. -
Table of Contents ______INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION
Oregon 2021-23 Agency Request Budget _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... i Certification ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 LEGISLATIVE ACTION HB 5099 A ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 HB 5050 A ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 AGENCY SUMMARY Agency Summary Narrative ................................................................................................................................................................................ 48 Budget Summary Graphics .................................................................................................................................................................................