8 ll t Ch 8 ( 0 rarely is plagiarism involved. When the background knowl- JEAN-BAPTISTE DUMAS (1800-1884): edge is complete, the subsequent discovery is almost inevitable THE VICTOR HUGO OF CHEMISTRY (10). n . Ch t n, S f rd Un v r t f r n nd t Romanticism is the term used to gather together a whole series r nt d r p t v t r t th v n f Ch l of literary and artistic movements of the late 18th to late 19th Ed t n t th 8th t n l M t n f th A r n Ch l centuries. These various movements, which spread through- S t n M h 0- S pt b r 8 out Europe and even to America, had one common element - h t r d l v l bl r f r n r n th n r l the rejection of the traditions and rules of classicism, of the h t r f h tr r E rb r h Ev l t n f Ch tr , "Establishment", as it were. Romanticism produced n ld Y r 2 M t r h t r l Wordsworth, Keats, and Shelley; Goethe and Heine; Hugo and r nd f Ch tr , W l Y r 6 nd A Ihd h Dumas (Alexandre, that is); Pushkin; and Poe. It produced v l p nt f M d rn Ch tr , rp r Y r 64 th Delacroix, Constable, and Turner; Schumann, Chopin and th t r nd Ihd v l r rr ntl v l bl v r Liszt; and, of course, Wagner, who tried to put it all together in r pr nt rt n t n A t r fCh tr 4 l M ll n his musical dramas. The Romantics' emphasis on emotion nd n nd Y r 6 - 0 h r pr h n v th n over reason, and on subjectivity and imagination over objectiv- th th r nd h v r pl t r f r n t th r n l l t r t r ity and intellect, would seem to rule out any inclusion of the v r t f l t v h tt nt n t th 20th nt r nd sciences in these movements. But we know better. We know l t n th n b t d v l p nt ft r W rld W r I Ihd v l that science is not just a collection of facts and techniques; that h th b t v r f th f r t h lf f th 20th nt r nd n l d it is a human endeavor, carried out in the context of a specific p f b bl r ph n t nd pp nd n d v r f th society or culture. We know that scientists are not (or at least l nt r d t v t p nd b l r z n th n not always) one-dimensional, narrowly trained and focused, 2 r nd l nd A Ihd " t r f th n t and cooly objective; but are three-dimensional human beings r h" I , 6 62, - 6 with interests in, and with attitudes affected by, the arts, S l t bl St t , Inn nd n 2 literature, religion, and politics. 4 A Ihd v l p nt f M d rn Ch tr . rp r In that wonderful volume of biographical essays, Gr t Y r 64 Ch pt r 2 nd Ch t , edited by Eduard Farber, there is a short piece on S fr d " v r nd th hl t C nn t n" Jean-Baptiste Dumas and Charles-Adolphe Wurtz, written by A b x, 8 6, -40 nd " h Ch l v l t n n th t r Georges Urbain and first presented to the Société Chimique de f Ch tr " O r . 88 4, 4- 0 France in May of 1934. Urbain gave an unusual and provoca- 6 r t ( t r t C r r n t r . (Of th tive summary of his two subjects when he wrote (1): t r f h n . A d En l h tr n l t n th n b W ll Ell r n rd p bl h d b E tt n Y 6 v n n th br ll nt p r d f r nt th d d n t p t lt n S t fC h l h l ph , 2 l - nfl n th t r f h tr nd W rtz t r t ff M n h t r nd nd n 808 8 0 Al r f r n 4 S nt - v Ch pt r 4 nd 6 8 Ihd r f r n 4 Ch pt r nd 8 Because I knew a bit about Hugo, my first reaction to this . Ib d., Ch pt r nd 20 statement was perhaps a little odd: I wondered whether Wurtz 0 A Ihd " h In v t b l t f S nt f v r " S . had tried to steal Dumas' wife ( Sainte-Beuve did to Hugo). M nthl , 48 6 , 42 -42 I have seen no evidence that this was the case; apparently all that was implied was that Wurtz was a pupil and a friend of Dumas. The parallels between Wurtz and Sainte-Beuve will r. A r n . Ihd r f r E r t n th p rt nt f have to await another paper. But the statement intrigued me. Ch tr f th Un v r t f W n n. M d n, WI 06. In what sense was Dumas the Victor Hugo of chemistry? This h j t p bl h d th b "Ch tr A d fr essay is my attempt to answer that question. ll. A t r f th Ch tr p rt nt t th There are, in fact, a number of parallels in the lives of these Un v r t f W n n n M d n". two men (2,3). First of all, they were almost exact contempo- raries; Dumas was born in July 1800, 19 months before Hugo, and died in April 1884, 13 months before Hugo. Their childhood and adolescence spanned the rise and fall of Napo- leon I. Hugo's father was an officer in Napoleon's army; Dumas at the age of 14 was determined to join the navy, but was ll t Ch 8 ( 0
Establishment, the orthodoxies of their respective fields. Though the Romantic movement in literature had begun in France with Mme. de Stael and Chateaubriand, the official model for poetry and drama was still the pseudo-classicism of Voltaire. Then, in the Preface to his 1827 play Cr ll , Hugo produced an extensive and strongly argued manifesto for romanticism in which he claimed that in the progression of man from the primitive to the civilized modern, romanticism was historically inevitable - a new phase in social evolution. The result was that, suddenly, at the age of 25, Hugo was freely acknowledged as the leader of the Romantics in France. Chemistry, in its modern sense, was a relatively young science in the 1820s; Lavoisier and his followers had set it on its feet only a generation earlier. But, like literature, it had its orthodoxy, its official models, too. In molecular structure. there was the electrochemical dualism of the great Swedish chemist I3erzelius. Briefly, this explained chemical combina- tion by assuming that atoms had electrical polarity. n- pt t Oxygen was the most negative atom, potassium the most positive, with the others falling between. In general, metals prevented by the upheavals of 1814-1815 (Napoleon's abdica- were positive and even when they combined with oxygen, the tion, exile, escape, and Waterloo). oxide showed a residual positive character: Both men showed early signs of brilliance. Hugo's poetry won the recognition of the French Academy when he was just K(+) + 0(-) K20(+) 15; Dumas' name appeared on many journal articles (in phar- macy and physiology) before he was out of his teens. Nonmetals might be positive toward oxygen, but negative Both had wide-ranging talents and interests. Indeed, it can toward metals. Nonmetal oxides always showed negative be argued that neither man's most important work is widely character: known today. To the general public (certainly in the English- speaking world) Hugo is most famous for two novels - tr S(+) + 0(-) —> SO,(-) d r with its hunchbacked bellringer Quasimodo, and M r bl (especially since it has been given a Salts were the result of the combination of positive metallic musical score in a pop soft-rock idiom). But it was Hugo's oxides with negative nonmetallic oxides, but were not neces- plays which established him as the leader of the Romantic sarily neutral: movement in France, and it is his poetry which makes secure his exalted position in French literature. We know of his plays mainly because Verdi chose two of them as the basis for his operas b l tt and rn n became Ern n . The poetry, however, apparently loses too much in translation, since it is almost unknown in English. To the general chemical public of today, Dumas is known for two analytical methods which he developed or refined - one for the determination of molecular weights by vapor density and the other for the determination of nitrogen in organic compounds. Yet he was also a brilliant teacher. He held professorships at the Athanaeum, the Sorbonne, the Ecole Polytechnique, and the Ecole de Médecine (some simultane- ously) and was a prolific writer on many philosophical and scientific subjects. Indeed, it is his work on the theory of organic chemistry which secures his place in the history of chemistry, t r ht n h r t r t p t Both Hugo and Dumas became famous and widely known th A d fr n b th r t r t Mér é in the intellectual circles of their day when they challenged the 10 ll t Ch 8 ( 0
IS0(+ + SO (- —> K2S0•S0 (+ r IC2SO4(+ bl h Eth r n h r f nd ll ( 828