Arxiv:2104.14481V2 [Astro-Ph.CO] 11 Jul 2021 −1 −1 a Simple Heuristic Analytical Derivation for the BTFR of H0 = 75 ± 3.8Km S Mpc [33]

Hints for a gravitational transition in the Tully-Fisher data George Alestas,∗ Ioannis Antoniou,y and Leandros Perivolaropoulosz Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, GR-45110, Ioannina, Greece (Dated: July 13, 2021) We use an up to date compilation of Tully-Fisher data to search for transitions in the evolution of the Tully-Fisher relation. Using an up to date data compilation, we find hints at ≈ 3σ level for a transition at critical distances Dc ' 9Mpc and Dc ' 17Mpc. We split the full sample in two subsamples according to the measured galaxy distance with respect to a splitting distance Dc and identify the likelihood of the best fit slope and intercept of one sample with respect to the best fit corresponding values of the other sample. For Dc ' 9Mpc and Dc ' 17Mpc we find a tension between the two subsamples at a level of ∆χ2 > 17 (3:5σ). Using a Monte-Carlo simulation we demonstrate that this result is robust with respect to random statistical and systematic variations of the galactic distances. If the tension is interpreted as due to a gravitational strength transition, it would imply a shift of the effective gravitational constant to lower values for distances larger than ∆G Dc by G ' −0:1. Such a shift is of the anticipated sign and magnitude but at somewhat lower distance (redshift) than the gravitational transition recently proposed to address the Hubble and ∆G growth tensions ( G ' −0:1 at transition redshift zt . 0:01 (Dc . 40Mpc)). I. INTRODUCTION where Geff is the effective Newton's constant involved in gravitational interactions and S the surface density 2 The Tully{Fisher relation (TFR) [1] has been proposed S ≡ M=R which is expected to be constant [5]. From as an empirical relation that connects the intrinsic opti- eqs. (1.2) and (1.3) it is anticipated that cal luminosity of spiral galaxies with their observed max- −2 −1 imum velocity vrot in the rotation curve as AB ∼ Geff S (1.4) s L = Avrot (1.1) Therefore the BTFR can in principle probe both galaxy formation dynamics (through e.g. S) and possible funda- where s ' 4 is the slope in a logarithmic plot of (1.1) mental constant dynamics (through G ). An interesting and A is a constant (log(A) is the zero point or inter- eff feature of the BTFR is that despite of the above heuristic cept). The constants s and A appear to depend very derivation, it appears to be robust even in cases when the weakly on galaxy properties including the mass to light galaxy sample includes low S and/or varying S galaxies ratio, the observed surface brightness, the galactic pro- [6,7]. In fact no other parameter appears to be signifi- files, HI gas content, size, etc. [2]. They clearly also cant in the BTFR. depend however on the fundamental properties of gravi- The BTFR has been shown to have lower scatter [2, 27, tational interactions as demonstrated below. 28] than the classic stellar TFR and also to be applicable The baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR) is similar for galaxies with stellar masses lower than 109M . It is to eq. (1.1) but connects the galaxy's total baryonic mass also more robust than the classic TFR [29{32] since the (the sum of mass in stars and HI gas) M with the B parameters A (intercept) and s (slope) are very weakly rotation velocity as B dependent on galactic properties such as size and surface s brightness [2]. MB = ABvrot (1.2) The low scatter of the BTFR and its robustness make −4 4 where AB ' 50M km s [3]. This allows to include it useful as a distance indicator for the measurement of gas rich dwarf galaxies which appear in groups and have the Hubble constant H0. A calibration of the BTFR 9 stellar masses below 10 M . using Cepheid and TRGB distances has lead to a value arXiv:2104.14481v2 [astro-ph.CO] 11 Jul 2021 −1 −1 A simple heuristic analytical derivation for the BTFR of H0 = 75 ± 3:8km s Mpc [33]. can be obtained as follows [4]. Consider a star in a circu- This value of H0 is consistent with local measure- lar orbit of radius R around a galactic mass M rotating ments of H0 using SnIa calibrated with Cepheids (H0 = with velocity v. Then 73:2 ± 1:3 km s−1 Mpc−1)[34] but is in tension with the value of H obtained using the early time sound hori- v2 = G M=R =) v4 = (G M=R)2 ∼ MSG2 0 eff eff eff zon standard ruler calibrated using the CMB anisotropy (1.3) spectrum in the context of the standard ΛCDM model −1 −1 (H0 = 67:36 ± 0:54 km s Mpc )[35]. The tension between the CMB and Cepheid calibrators is at a level ∗ [email protected] larger than 4σ and constitutes a major problem for mod- y [email protected] ern cosmologies (for a recent review and approaches see z [email protected] Refs. [36{40]). 2 _ ∆Geff Geff −1 Method G G (yr ) time scale (yr) References eff max eff max Lunar ranging 1:47 × 10−13 24 [8] Solar system 4:6 × 10−14 50 [9, 10] Pulsar timing 3:1 × 10−12 1.5 [11] Strong Lensing 10−2 0.6 [12] Orbits of binary pulsar 1:0 × 10−12 22 [13] Ephemeris of Mercury 4 × 10−14 7 [14] Exoplanetary motion 10−6 4 [15] Hubble diagram SnIa 0.1 1 × 10−11 ∼ 108 [16] Pulsating white-dwarfs 1:8 × 10−10 0 [17] Viking lander ranging 4 × 10−12 6 [18] Helioseismology 1:6 × 10−12 4 × 109 [19] Gravitational waves 8 5 × 10−8 1:3 × 108 [20] Paleontology 0:1 2 × 10−11 4 × 109 [21] Globular clusters 35 × 10−12 ∼ 1010 [22] Binary pulsar masses 4:8 × 10−12 ∼ 1010 [23] Gravitochemical heating 4 × 10−12 ∼ 108 [24] Strong lensing 3 × 10−1 ∼ 1010 [12] Big Bang Nucleosynthesis∗ 0:05 4:5 × 10−12 1:4 × 1010 [25] Anisotropies in CMB∗ 0:095 1:75 × 10−12 1:4 × 1010 [26] TABLE I. Solar system, astrophysical and cosmological constraints on the evolution of the gravitational constant. Methods with star (∗) constrain GN while the rest constrain Geff . The latest and strongest constraints are shown for each method. The Hubble tension may also be viewed as an inconsis- Ref. [47] and other similar studies assume a fixed tency between the value of the standardized SnIa abso- strength of fundamental gravitational interactions and lute magnitude M calibrated using Cepheids in the red- make no attempt to search for sharp features in the evo- shift range 0 < z < 0:01 (distance ladder calibration) lution of the zero point. In addition, they focus on com- and the corresponding M value calibrated using the re- parison of high redshift with low redshift effects without combination sound horizon (inverse distance ladder cali- searching for possible transitions within the low z spiral bration) for 0:01 < z < zrec. Thus, a recently proposed galaxy data. Such transitions if present would be washed class of approaches to the resolution of the Hubble ten- out and hidden from these studies due to averaging ef- sion involves a transition [41, 42] of the standardized in- fects. In the present analysis we search for transition trinsic SnIa luminosity L and absolute magnitude M at effects in the BTFR at z . 0:01 (distances D . 40Mpc) a redshift zt . 0:01 from M = (−19:24 ± 0:037) mag which may be due to either astrophysical mechanisms or for z < zt (as implied by Cepheid calibration) to M = to a rapid transition of the strength of the gravitational (−19:4 ± 0:027) mag for z > zt (as implied by CMB cali- interactions Geff due to fundamental physics. bration of the sound horizon at decoupling) [43]. Such a In many modified gravity theories including scalar ten- transition may occur due to a transition of the strength sor theories the strength of gravitational interactions of the gravitational interactions Geff which modifies the Geff measured in Cavendish type experiments measur- m1 m2 SnIa intrinsic luminosity L by changing the value of the ing force F between masses (F = Geff r2 ), is dis- Chandrasekhar mass. The simplest assumption leads to tinct from the Planck mass corresponding to GN that −3=2 determines the cosmological background expansion rate L ∼ MCh ∼ Geff [44, 45] even though corrections may 2 8πGN be required to the above simplistic approach [46]. (H = 3 ρtot). For example, in scalar tensor theories involving a scalar The weak evolution and scatter of the BTFR can be field φ and a non-minimal coupling F (φ) of the scalar used as a probe of galaxy formation models as well as a field to the Ricci scalar in the Lagrangian, the gravita- probe of possible transitions of fundamental properties of tional interaction strength is [48] gravitational dynamics since the zero point constant AB 2 is inversely proportional to the square of the gravitational 1 2F + 4F;φ constant G. Previous studies investigating the evolution Geff = 2 (1.5) F 2F + 3F;φ of the best fit zero point log AB and slope s of the BTFR have found a mild high z evolution of the zero point from while the Planck mass related GN is z ' 0:9 to z ' 2:3 [47] which was attributed to the galac- 1 tic evolution inducing lower gas fraction at low redshifts GN = (1.6) after comparing with the corresponding evolution of the F stellar TFR (STFR) which ignores the contribution of Most current astrophysical and cosmological con- gas in the galactic masses.

Load more