Player Productivity and Performance: an Econometric Approach to Team Management in Soccer by Guy Benedict Wilkinson a Dissertati

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Player Productivity and Performance: an Econometric Approach to Team Management in Soccer by Guy Benedict Wilkinson a Dissertati Player Productivity and Performance: An Econometric Approach to Team Management in Soccer by Guy Benedict Wilkinson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Sport Management) in the University of Michigan 2017 Doctoral Committee: Professor Stefan Szymanski, Chair Professor Rodney D. Fort Professor Jeffrey A. Smith Assistant Professor Eric M. Schwartz Guy B. Wilkinson [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3623-1914 © Guy B. Wilkinson 2017 DEDICATION To my father and Uncle Jim for taking me to my first Celtic game, and to Henrik Larsson for inspiring me to go to many more. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Professor Stefan Szymanski for taking me on as his doctoral student for the past four years. Without his guidance, I would not have been able to complete my research projects with the high quality I strive for. My thanks also go to my committee members, Professor Rodney Fort, Professor Jeffrey Smith and Assistant Professor Eric Schwartz for their guidance and suggestions throughout the duration of my degree. Finally, I want to thank my family, friends and cohort for helping me adapt to life in America and supporting me through both the good times and the bad. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ........................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... x ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................. xi CHAPTER I – THESIS MOTIVATION ................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 2. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER II – TESTING THE O-RING THEORY USING DATA FROM THE ENGLISH PREMIER LEAGUE ............................................................................................................... 12 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 13 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................. 13 2.1 O-RING THEORY ................................................................................................ 13 2.2 SALARY DISPERSION AND MOTIVATION ................................................... 15 2.3 WAGE PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP ....................................................... 17 3. THEORY ...................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 THE AGGREGATE MODEL ............................................................................... 19 3.2 THE VALUE MATCHING MODEL ................................................................... 20 4. DATA ........................................................................................................................... 23 iv 5. ESTIMATION .............................................................................................................. 27 5.1 EXOGENEITY IN WAGES ................................................................................. 27 5.2 DISPERSION ANALYSIS ................................................................................... 28 5.3 THE EFFICIENCY OF WAGES AND TPI IN PREDICTING RESULTS ......... 29 5.4 OPTIMALITY ....................................................................................................... 30 6. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 33 7. APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................... 35 7.1 LAGRANGIAN DERIVATION ........................................................................... 35 7.2 INDIVIDUAL GAME OPTIMALITY ................................................................. 37 7.3 MODEL ROBUSTNESS ...................................................................................... 38 8. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 41 CHAPTER III – THE IMPACT OF REST PERIODS ON RESULTS IN THE ENGLISH PREMIER LEAGUE ............................................................................................................... 45 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 46 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................. 47 3. THEORY ...................................................................................................................... 49 3.1 PARAMETRIC LINEAR MODELS .................................................................... 51 3.1.1 RELATIVE REST MODEL .......................................................................... 52 3.1.2 MIDWEEK EFFECT MODEL ...................................................................... 52 3.1.3 WEEKEND EFFECT MODEL ..................................................................... 53 4. DATA ........................................................................................................................... 53 5. RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 57 5.1 REGRESSION RESULTS .................................................................................... 57 5.2 PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING................................................................... 65 v 5.3 ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE .................................................. 68 6. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 69 7. APPENDIX B ............................................................................................................... 71 8. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 82 CHAPTER IV – INDIVIDUAL PLAYER CONTRIBUTIONS IN EUROPEAN SOCCER 84 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 85 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................. 86 3. THEORY ...................................................................................................................... 88 4. DATA ........................................................................................................................... 91 5. RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 94 5.1 PREDICTIONS ..................................................................................................... 94 5.2 BETTING ANALYSIS ......................................................................................... 99 5.3 ESTIMATIONS................................................................................................... 100 6. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................... 106 7. APPENDIX C ............................................................................................................. 108 8. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 119 CHAPTER V – THESIS CONCLUSION ............................................................................. 122 1. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................... 122 2. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 126 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Summary statistics of player share values; the proportion of a team's total spending each ranked player accounts for ............................................................................................... 26 Table 2 - Difference in the average proportion of resources allocated to player ranks by teams of different stature (standard error in brackets) ....................................................................... 27 Table 3 - Exogeneity analysis .................................................................................................. 28 Table 4 - Dispersion analysis ................................................................................................... 29 Table 5 - Betting odds comparison .......................................................................................... 30 Table 6 - The impact of results by the starting eleven players. Top 100 best fitting models are included to highlight the player ranks that contribute most to results ..................................... 31 Table 7 - Team and optimal
Recommended publications
  • Chapter Iv Individual Player Contributions in European Soccer
    Guy Wilkinson PhD Thesis (2017) CHAPTER IV INDIVIDUAL PLAYER CONTRIBUTIONS IN EUROPEAN SOCCER ABSTRACT This paper looks at applying new techniques to predict match outcomes in professional soccer. To achieve this models are used which measure the individual contributions of soccer players within their team. Using data from the top 25 European soccer leagues, the individual contribution of players is measured using high dimensional fixed effects models. Nine years of results are used to produce player, team and manager estimates. A further year of results is used to check for predictive accuracy. Since this has useful applications in player scouting the paper will also look at how well the models rank players. The findings show an average prediction rate of 45% with all methods showing similar rankings for player productivity. While the model highlights the most productive players there is a bias towards players who produce and prevent goals directly. This results in more attackers and defenders ranking highly than midfield players. There is potential for these techniques to be used against the betting market as most models produce better performance than many betting firms. Guy Wilkinson PhD Thesis (2017) 1. INTRODUCTION This paper focuses on producing models with a high prediction rate in professional soccer. The main challenge is to produce accurate estimations of player ability, a problem analogous to research on worker productivity. The study of worker productivity is of great value to businesses in almost every industry. Hiring the best workers will improve the overall performance of business and increase profit. It is of great importance for firms to be able to screen potential employees efficiently to determine their value.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence
    Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence Lucia Foster, John Haltiwanger and C.J. Krizan* June 2000 * Respectively, Bureau of the Census; University of Maryland, Bureau of the Census, and NBER; and Fannie Mae and Bureau of the Census. We thank Tomas Dvorak for helpful research assistance. The analyses and results presented in this paper are attributable to the authors and do not necessarily reflect concurrence by the Bureau of the Census. 1 I. Overview Recent research using establishment and firm level data has raised a variety of conceptual and measurement questions regarding our understanding of aggregate productivity growth.1 Several key, related findings are of interest. First, there is large scale, ongoing reallocation of outputs and inputs across individual producers. Second, the pace of this reallocation varies over time (both secularly and cyclically) and across sectors. Third, much of this reallocation reflects within rather than between sector reallocation. Fourth, there are large differentials in the levels and the rates of growth of productivity across establishments within the same sector. The rapid pace of output and input reallocation along with differences in productivity levels and growth rates are the necessary ingredients for the pace of reallocation to play an important role in aggregate (i.e., industry) productivity growth. However, our review of the existing studies indicates that the measured contribution of such reallocation effects varies over time and across sectors and is sensitive to measurement methodology. An important objective of this paper is to sort out the role of these different factors so that we can understand the nature and the magnitude of the contribution of reallocation to aggregate productivity growth.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- TECHNOLOGY Q L M. Muniagurria Econ 464 Microeconomics Handout
    M. Muniagurria Econ 464 Microeconomics Handout (Part 1) I. TECHNOLOGY : Production Function, Marginal Productivity of Inputs, Isoquants (1) Case of One Input: L (Labor): q = f (L) • Let q equal output so the production function relates L to q. (How much output can be produced with a given amount of labor?) • Marginal productivity of labor = MPL is defined as q = Slope of prod. Function L Small changes i.e. The change in output if we change the amount of labor used by a very small amount. • How to find total output (q) if we only have information about the MPL: “In general” q is equal to the area under the MPL curve when there is only one input. Examples: (a) Linear production functions. Possible forms: q = 10 L| MPL = 10 q = ½ L| MPL = ½ q = 4 L| MPL = 4 The production function q = 4L is graphed below. -1- Notice that if we only have diagram 2, we can calculate output for different amounts of labor as the area under MPL: If L = 2 | q = Area below MPL for L Less or equal to 2 = = in Diagram 2 8 Remark: In all the examples in (a) MPL is constant. (b) Production Functions With Decreasing MPL. Remark: Often this is thought as the case of one variable input (Labor = L) and a fixed factor (land or entrepreneurial ability) (2) Case of Two Variable Inputs: q = f (L, K) L (Labor), K (Capital) • Production function relates L & K to q (total output) • Isoquant: Combinations of L & K that can achieve the same q -2- • Marginal Productivities )q MPL ' Small changes )L K constant )q MPK ' Small changes )K L constant )K • MRTS = - Slope of Isoquant = Absolute value of Along Isoquant )L Examples (a) Linear (L & K are perfect substitutes) Possible forms: q = 10 L + 5 K Y MPL = 10 MPK = 5 q = L + K Y MPL = 1 MPK = 1 q = 2L + K Y MPL = 2 MPK = 1 • The production function q = 2 L + K is graphed below.
    [Show full text]
  • L'ingratitude Des Dirigeants Du FC Valence
    Sport / Actualité foot Feghouli n’a même pas eu droit à un adieu à Mestalla L’ingratitude des dirigeants du FC Valence Pourtant, il était une des coqueluches du Mestalla malgré la présence de joueurs de haut niveau à l’image du légendaire Albelda, Evan Banega, Negredo, Parejo et autre Soldado. Mais ce statut n’a pas plaidé en faveur de l’international algérien, Sofiane Feghouli, poussé vers la sortie comme un malpropre. Les dirigeants du FC Valence ont tout simplement été ingrats envers un joueur qui a été très correct durant les six années passées avec Los Ches. En effet, l’Algérien était arrivé à Valence en 2010 en provenance de Grenoble, et petit à petit, il s’est fait une place dans l’effectif valencien, surtout après son retour de prêt à Almeria en 2011. Feghouli a porté le maillot de Valence à 244 reprises, il y a inscrit pas moins de 42 buts et a délivré 38 passes décisives. Des chiffres et une présence qui méritent une meilleure fin. “J'aime beaucoup Feghouli. C’est un joueur de qualité. Il n'y a pas beaucoup de joueurs comme lui”, avait déclaré, récemment, Roberto Ayala, l’un des joueurs emblématiques du CF Valencia au sujet du joueur algérien dans une interview accordée à un journal espagnol. Outre les Espagnols Fernando Gómez (553), Ricardo Arias (501), David Albelda (410), Santiago Cañizares (397), Pep Claramunt (381), Ruben Baraja (361), Carlos Marchena (317), Gaizka Mendieta (305), Manuel Mestre (323), Antonio Puchades (290), l'Espagnol David Villa (273), le Brésilien Waldo (296), l'Argentin Roberto Ayala (251) et l'Italien Amedeo Carboni (245), Feghouli fait partie des joueurs étrangers ayant joué plus de matches sous les couleurs de Valence.
    [Show full text]
  • Tot Per Decidir
    CICLISME VOLTA A CATALUNYA MOTOR FÓRMULA 1 FUTBOL ESPANYOL Alonso confirma Sergio González Tot per decidir que el bloqueig es mulla pel seu de la direcció del avalador, el Garderen guanya l’etapa reina i De Clercq és líder de la general, a 0:21 de Porte seu McLaren va director esportiu (segon) i a 0:28 de Contador (cinquè), quan falten tres etapes per al final provocar l’accident Òscar Perarnau 0,5 EUROS ALBERTO ESTÉVEZ / EFE ANY 14. NÚM. 4780 ANY 14. · www.lesportiudecatalunya.cat · @lesportiucat · www.lesportiudecatalunya.cat MARÇ DEL 2015 · DIVENDRES, 27 DE DIVENDRES, Cacera contra el Barça TONI ROMERO OPINIÓ Paraules al voltant del món MARC NEGRE Laporta, l’obsessió de Bartomeu XAVI TORRES EL BARÇA HONORA LA FIGURA DE SUÑOL 114729-1106676® 2·OPINIÓ L’ESPORTIU. DIVENDRES, 27 DE MARÇ DEL 2015 AVUI FA... Jordi Camps DIARI DE REDACCIÓ Lluís Simon 9-0 Compareu els anys de presó que demana Ruz als últims presidents del Barça i els que demana als últims presidents del PP. PUGEN I BAIXEN 30.000 milions de deute 1990 FUTBOL. El secretari d’Estat per l’Esport Javier Gómez-Navarro va admetre davant la co- missió d’Educació i Cultura del Congrés dels Dipu- tats el fracàs del pla de sanejament del futbol espanyol i va xifrar en 30.000 milions de pessetes el deute dels clubs de futbol professional segons dades de l’última auditoria efectuada a les enti- tats. ■ FOTO: EL 9 El Milan, fora d’Europa JACQUELINE MARTÍN ESPAI SUÑOL PAULA BADOSA CD EUROPA 1991 FUTBOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Oecd Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2005
    OECD COMPENDIUM OF PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS 2005 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: • To achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy. • To contribute to sound economic expansion in member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and • To contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). © OECD 2005 FOREWORD Over the past few years, productivity and economic growth have been an important focus of OECD work.
    [Show full text]
  • Date: 20 January 2016 Opposition: Exeter City
    20 January2016 20 Date: 20 January 2016 Times Telegraph Echo Opposition: Exeter City Guardian Mirror Express & Echo Competition: FA Cup Independent Mail BBC Liverpool's third goal drew even more applause from the Kop. Benteke dribbled upfield, beating tackle after tackle, before checking back, turning and then angling Rising star Ojo sees off Exeter with wonder goal a pass through Exeter's defence to Teixeira, who placed the ball past Olejnik. Liverpool (4-1-4-1): S Mignolet 6 - C Randall 6 (sub: J Flanagan, 51min 6), T Ilori 6, J Liverpool Allen 10, OJO 74, Teixeira 82 3 Exeter City 0 Enrique 6, B Smith 7 - K Stewart 7 - J Ibe 8 (sub: P Chirivella, 79), J Allen 8 (sub: S Liverpool continue to drive down a dual carriageway towards Wembley. In the Ojo, 65 7), C Brannagan 7, J Teixeira 7 - C Benteke 6. Substitutes not used: A semi-finals of the Capital One Cup, they moved into the fourth round of the FA Bogdan, R Kent, J Sinclair, J Maguire. Cup with this ultimately comfortable replay defeat of Exeter City, from Sky Bet Exeter City (4-4-2): B Olejnik 6 - C Ribeiro 6, T Brown 6, J Moore-Taylor 6, C League Two. Liverpool dominated throughout and Jordon Ibe continued to Woodman 6 - A Nicholls 5, M Oakley 5 (sub: D Wheeler, 64 6), D Butterfield 5 enhance his reputation with some pacey, confident attacking, giving Craig (sub: W Hoskins, 46 6), A Davies 5 - C Morrison 4 (sub: T Nichols, 46 6), L Holmes Woodman, Exeter's left back, a difficult evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Silva: Polished Diamond
    CITY v BURNLEY | OFFICIAL MATCHDAY PROGRAMME | 02.01.2017 | £3.00 PROGRAMME | 02.01.2017 BURNLEY | OFFICIAL MATCHDAY SILVA: POLISHED DIAMOND 38008EYEU_UK_TA_MCFC MatDay_210x148w_Jan17_EN_P_Inc_#150.indd 1 21/12/16 8:03 pm CONTENTS 4 The Big Picture 52 Fans: Your Shout 6 Pep Guardiola 54 Fans: Supporters 8 David Silva Club 17 The Chaplain 56 Fans: Junior 19 In Memoriam Cityzens 22 Buzzword 58 Social Wrap 24 Sequences 62 Teams: EDS 28 Showcase 64 Teams: Under-18s 30 Access All Areas 68 Teams: Burnley 36 Short Stay: 74 Stats: Match Tommy Hutchison Details 40 Marc Riley 76 Stats: Roll Call 42 My Turf: 77 Stats: Table Fernando 78 Stats: Fixture List 44 Kevin Cummins 82 Teams: Squads 48 City in the and Offi cials Community Etihad Stadium, Etihad Campus, Manchester M11 3FF Telephone 0161 444 1894 | Website www.mancity.com | Facebook www.facebook.com/mcfcoffi cial | Twitter @mancity Chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak | Chief Executive Offi cer Ferran Soriano | Board of Directors Martin Edelman, Alberto Galassi, John MacBeath, Mohamed Mazrouei, Simon Pearce | Honorary Presidents Eric Alexander, Sir Howard Bernstein, Tony Book, Raymond Donn, Ian Niven MBE, Tudor Thomas | Life President Bernard Halford Manager Pep Guardiola | Assistants Rodolfo Borrell, Manel Estiarte Club Ambassador | Mike Summerbee | Head of Football Administration Andrew Hardman Premier League/Football League (First Tier) Champions 1936/37, 1967/68, 2011/12, 2013/14 HONOURS Runners-up 1903/04, 1920/21, 1976/77, 2012/13, 2014/15 | Division One/Two (Second Tier) Champions 1898/99, 1902/03, 1909/10, 1927/28, 1946/47, 1965/66, 2001/02 Runners-up 1895/96, 1950/51, 1988/89, 1999/00 | Division Two (Third Tier) Play-Off Winners 1998/99 | European Cup-Winners’ Cup Winners 1970 | FA Cup Winners 1904, 1934, 1956, 1969, 2011 Runners-up 1926, 1933, 1955, 1981, 2013 | League Cup Winners 1970, 1976, 2014, 2016 Runners-up 1974 | FA Charity/Community Shield Winners 1937, 1968, 1972, 2012 | FA Youth Cup Winners 1986, 2008 3 THE BIG PICTURE Celebrating what proved to be the winning goal against Arsenal, scored by Raheem Sterling.
    [Show full text]
  • FC Bayern München (Alemania) - I Parte
    Cuadernos de Fútbol Revista de CIHEFE https://www.cihefe.es/cuadernosdefutbol XLVI Liga de Campeones 2000/01: FC Bayern München (Alemania) - I Parte Autor: José del Olmo Cuadernos de fútbol, nº 105, enero 2019. ISSN: 1989-6379 Fecha de recepción: 05-12-2018, Fecha de aceptación: 17-12-2018. URL: https://www.cihefe.es/cuadernosdefutbol/2019/01/xlvi-liga-de-campeones-200001-fc-bayern- munchen-alemania-i-parte/ Resumen Nuevo capítulo sobre la historia de la Liga de Campeones. Análisis pormenorizado de la edición correspondiente a la temporada 2000-01 ganada por el Bayern de Múnich. Palabras clave: Bayern Múnich, estadísticas, futbol, historia, Liga de CampeonesUEFA Abstract Keywords:Champions League, Statistics, Football, History, Bayern Munich, UEFA A new release of our series on the history of the UEFA Champions League. An in-depth analysis of the 2000-01 season, won by Bayern Munich. Date : 1 enero 2019 Participantes: El coeficiente quinquenal 1994-1999 fijaba el reparto de plazas por federaciones: cuatro: Italia, España y Alemania; tres Francia, Holanda e Inglaterra; dos Rusia, Grecia, Portugal, Chequia, Austria, Dinamarca, Croacia, Turquía y Ucrania; uno: Noruega, Bélgica, Suecia, Polonia, Escocia, Rumanía, Hungría, Eslovaquia, Chipre, Georgia, Israel, Eslovenia, Bielorrusia, Finlandia, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Letonia, Islandia, Macedonia, Lituania, Moldavia, Estonia, Armenia, Irlanda del Norte, Gales, Irlanda, Malta, Feroe, Albania, Luxemburgo, Azerbaiyán y Bosnia. No entraban ni Andorra ni San Marino. El Real Madrid, vigente campeón, no se había clasificado entre los dos primeros de la Liga, que fueron RC Deportivo y FC Barcelona. Por eso España pudo contar con un tercer equipo clasificado directamente en la fase de grupos.
    [Show full text]
  • Recopilación
    2005 - 2006 P2425CAT.7 2/1/06 23:15 Página 1 Martes Martes 24 Liga de Estrellas 3 Enero 2006 SPORT SPORT 3 Enero 2006 Liga de Estrellas 25 Mal comienzo de año para el argentino EL MERCADO DE INVIERNO (*) cedidos ALTAS BAJAS INTERESAN Alavés Giovanni (Sao Paulo) Colsa (Atlético), Georgiev Más temas El ‘Conejo’ debió (Slavia Sofía) retirarse del Cerezo respalda a Bianchi Racing entrenamiento al Huertas sale en defensa de Pinilla Athletic Aduriz (Valladolid) Javi González (Ashdod) sufrir un pinchazo Santander (E. Zunzunegui).- El pre- sidente del Racing de Santander, Se someterá a y el técnico pide refuerzos Manuel Huerta, salió ayer en de- fensa de Mauricio Pinilla, nuevo nuevas pruebas Atlético Arizmendi (Deportivo) Rosicky (B. Dortmund), So- moza (Velez) fichaje del conjunto cántabro, y para ver cómo El argentino desmintió la fama que el jugador evoluciona se ha granjeado en sus anterio- asegura que res equipos por tener una vida Damià (Racing) Barça sigue confiando nocturna problemática. “Eso es- Su lesión es un tá pasado. Pero en esta vida contratiempo en su plantilla... no hay que borrar nada, no es bueno. Le tiene que servir a uno para el Sevilla, Betis Tardelli (Sao Paulo), Robert Oliveira ...pero reconoce de experiencia para no volver a parco en ataque (PSV) hacer tonterías. Eso nos lo po- niña nacida hace apenas unas El atacante sólo ha marcado un tanto en lo que va de Liga que habría que demos aplicar todos, yo el pri- semanas”. hacer algún mero”, dijo Manuel Huerta. El Además, Huerta explicó que ges- Cádiz Lobos (Gimnasia y Esgrima), Héctor (Deportivo) presidente del club santanderi- tionan la incorporación de más Fernando Morán (sin equi- fichaje en enero no se mostró convencido de que refuerzos, entre los que podrí- po) el delantero chileno, de 21 años, an figurar el defensa Pablo Alfa- “pasará algunas noches en blan- ro y el argentino Ezequiel Garay, El viernes volverán co, pero por causa de su hija, una del Newell’s Old Boys.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Size, Division of Labor, and Firm Productivity
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MARKET SIZE, DIVISION OF LABOR, AND FIRM PRODUCTIVITY Thomas Chaney Ralph Ossa Working Paper 18243 http://www.nber.org/papers/w18243 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 July 2012 We are grateful to Pol Antras, Holger Breinlich, Alejandro Cunat, Elhanan Helpman, Gianmarco Ottaviano, Henry Overman, Stephen Redding, and Tony Venables. We also thank the editor, Robert W. Staiger, and two anonymous referees, for their thoughtful comments. All remaining errors are ours. This work extends the second chapter of Ossa’s Ph.D. dissertation originally entitled "Trade Liberalization, Outsourcing, and Firm Productivity". The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2012 by Thomas Chaney and Ralph Ossa. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Market Size, Division of Labor, and Firm Productivity Thomas Chaney and Ralph Ossa NBER Working Paper No. 18243 July 2012 JEL No. F10,F12,L22,L25 ABSTRACT We generalize Krugman's (1979) 'new trade' model by allowing for an explicit production chain in which a range of tasks is performed sequentially by a number of specialized teams. We demonstrate that an increase in market size induces a deeper division of labor among these teams which leads to an increase in firm productivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Productivity
    Labour productivity Introduction Labour productivity is an important economic indicator that is closely linked to economic growth, competitiveness, and living standards within an economy. Labour productivity represents the total volume of output (measured in terms of Gross Domestic Product, GDP) produced per unit of labour (measured in terms of the number of employed persons) during a given time reference period. The indicator allows data users to assess GDP-to-labour input levels and growth rates over time, thus providing general information about the efficiency and quality of human capital in the production process for a given economic and social context, including other complementary inputs and innovations used in production Given its usefulness in conveying valuable information on a country’s labour market situation, it was one of the indicators used to measure progress towards the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), under Goal 1 (Eradicate poverty and hunger), and it was included as one of the indicators proposed to measure progress towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), under Goal 8 (Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all). 1 ILOSTAT presents ILO estimates and projections on labour productivity, both in constant 2005 US$ and in constant 2011 international $ in Purchasing Power Parity (PPP).2 Concepts and definitions Productivity represents the amount of output per unit of input. In ILOSTAT’s indicator, output is measured as gross domestic product (GDP) for the aggregate economy expressed at purchasing power parities (PPP) to account for price differences in countries. The GDP represents the monetary value of all goods and services produced within a country over a specified period of time.
    [Show full text]