DOCSLIB.ORG

Solar Power Feed–In Tariffs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solar Power Feed–In Tariffs House of Commons Energy and Climate Change and Environmental Audit Committees Solar Power Feed–in Tariffs Ninth Report of Session 2010–12 of the Energy and Climate Change Committee and Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 of the Environmental Audit Committees Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, and will be available on the Committee websites at www.parliament.uk/eacom and www.parliament.uk/eccom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 14 December 2011 HC 1605 Published on 22 December 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £15.50 The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Joan Walley MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent North) (Chair) Peter Aldous MP (Conservative, Waveney) Richard Benyon MP (Conservative, Newbury) [ex-officio] Neil Carmichael MP (Conservative, Stroud) Martin Caton MP (Labour, Gower) Katy Clark MP (Labour, North Ayrshire and Arran) Zac Goldsmith MP (Conservative, Richmond Park) Mark Lazarowicz MP (Labour/Co-operative, Edinburgh North and Leith) Caroline Lucas MP (Green, Brighton Pavilion) Ian Murray MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Sheryll Murray MP (Conservative, South East Cornwall) Caroline Nokes MP (Conservative, Romsey and Southampton North) Mr Mark Spencer MP (Conservative, Sherwood) Paul Uppal MP (Conservative, Wolverhampton South West) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Simon Wright MP (Liberal Democrat, Norwich South) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Simon Kirby MP (Brighton, Kemp Town) Powers The constitution and powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152 and 152A. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committees are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committees (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/eacom and www.parliament.uk/eccom. A list of Reports of the Committees in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume. The Reports of the Committees, the formal minutes relating to that report, oral evidence taken and some or all written evidence are available in a printed volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Energy and Climate Change Committee are Sarah Hartwell-Naguib (Clerk), Richard Benwell (Second Clerk), Dr Michael H. O’Brien (Committee Specialist), Jenny Bird (Committee Specialist), Francene Graham (Senior Committee Assistant), Jonathan Olivier Wright (Committee Assistant) and Nick Davies (Media Officer). The current staff of the Environmental Audit Committee are Simon Fiander (Clerk), Edward White (Second Clerk), Lee Nicholson (Committee Specialist), Andrew Wallace (Senior Committee Assistant), Jill Herring (Committee Assistant), Edward Bolton (Committee Support Assistant) and Nicholas Davies (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence to the Energy and Climate Change Committee should be addressed to the Clerk of the Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 2569; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] All correspondence to the Environmental Audit Committee should be addressed to the Clerk of the Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6150; the Committee’s email address is [email protected] Solar Power Feed-in Tariffs 1 Contents Report Page 1 Introduction 3 Background 3 Our inquiry 4 2 The proposed changes to the solar PV feed-in tariffs 5 The ‘comprehensive review’ 5 Impact on bill payers 10 The impact on prospective FiTs customers 13 The impact on community schemes 14 Energy efficiency 16 3 The management of the review 20 Spotting the problem 20 The need for better cost control 22 The status of the spending cap mechanism 26 Coordination between departments 28 The utility of the impact assessment 28 Conclusions and recommendations 30 Formal Minutes 34 Witnesses 37 List of printed written evidence 37 List of additional written evidence 37 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 40 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 41 Solar Power Feed-in Tariffs 3 1 Introduction Background 1. Under the Climate Change Act 2008, the UK has a target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 34% by 2020 compared with 1990 levels. The Government’s strategy for meeting that target was recently updated in the Carbon Plan. It also has a target of 15% renewable energy by 2020, to assist in delivering that commitment. The Government’s Renewable Energy Roadmap set out its assessment of the technologies required to help the UK meet that renewable target. Although solar photo-voltaic (PV) is not one of the eight technologies listed in the Roadmap with “the greatest potential” to help meet that target cost-effectively,1 it is nevertheless identified as providing an important contribution. The Government considers that subsidy for renewable energy technologies above a 9p/kWh marginal cost benchmark needs to be justified on non-financial grounds. In the case of solar PV Feed in Tariffs (FiTs), where the majority of tariffs are in excess of this subsidy benchmark, this justification is provided by the fact that the scheme’s aims include a contribution to wider low-carbon goals including allowing individuals an opportunity to engage in the drive for more renewable energy. 2. There is room for debate, therefore, about the role that solar PV should play in the future, to meet our carbon and renewables commitments in the most cost-effective way, particularly at a time of economic difficulty. In this inquiry, however, we have focussed our examination on the reasons and justification for proposed changes in solar PV FiTs announced in October 2011. 3. Feed-in Tariffs (FiTs) were introduced on 1 April 2010, under the Energy Act 2008.2 They provide a payment for the electricity generated from installed renewable energy technology, and a further payment is made for any electricity generated but not used and ‘exported’ to the grid. They provide a guaranteed indexed-linked income for the life of the contract (20 years, or 25 years for solar PV). The amount paid depends on the scale and type of generation: Wind, solar PV, hydro, anaerobic digestion and micro-combined heat and power are all eligible for FiTs. FiTs work alongside the Renewables Obligation, which supports the deployment of large-scale renewable energy generation. Feed-in Tariffs for large-scale renewables are proposed as part of the Electricity Market Reform process. 4. FiTs are not funded by general taxation. Instead, energy companies pay out the tariffs, and recover the cost through their customers’ energy bills. In October 2010 the Spending Review introduced for the first time a budgetary cap for FiTs and other policies funded through consumer energy bills. This levy-funded spending cap reflected the original projections of expenditure on the tariffs, less a further £40 million reduction (about 10%) in 2014-15. 1 DECC, UK Renewable Energy Roadmap, July 2011. This states that the eight technologies (offshore wind, onshore wind, biomass electricity, marine, biomass heat, ground source and air course heat pumps, renewable transport) are capable of delivering more than 90% of the renewable energy needed to meet the 2020 target in a cost-effective and sustainable way. Solar PV, along with hydropower and deep geothermal heat and power are expected to provide the remaining 10%. 2 Energy Act 2008, Sections 41 and 43. 4 Solar Power Feed-in Tariffs 5. In February 2011, the Government announced a comprehensive review of the FiTs in order to deliver these savings.3 The Government gave ‘fast-track’ consideration in early Summer 2011 to tariffs for larger-than-domestic installations (between 50kW and 5MW) and stand-alone solar PV projects (which would be reduced) and anaerobic digestion projects (which would be increased). 6. On 31 October 2011 the Government announced that the comprehensive review would be organised into two phases, and launched a consultation on Phase 1 which would focus on smaller scale solar PV. The consultation document from the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) set out the Government’s grounds for possible changes to the smaller-scale solar PV FiTs scheme, including an unsustainably rapid increase in the rate of solar installations, a 30% reduction in installations costs (with more reductions likely), rising electricity prices and, consequently, a rate of return from the scheme much higher than the 5% return envisaged at the outset.4 The consultation stated that given these developments, the Government “considers that it is imperative that ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copy of 2008122008-Cwells-Regulated
    1 donation information continues on reverse Late reported donation by regulated donees 15 February 2001 - 31 January 2008 (where data is available) Regulated donee Donor organisation Donor forename Donor surname Donor status Address 1 Address 2 Jimmy Hood MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Keith Simpson MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Cheryl Gillan MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Elfyn Llwyd MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Stewart MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Stewart MP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall John Gummer MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Christopher Beazles BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Chris Smith MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Mike Weir MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Tony Worthington MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Ian Davidson MP BAA plc Company 130 Wilton Road Paul Tyler BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Matthew Taylor MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Menzies Campbell MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Archy Kirkwood BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road David Hanson MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Colin Breed MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road David Marshall MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Mark Oaten MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Diana Wallis MEP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall Christopher Ruane MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Tim Loughton MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Robert Wareing MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road Robert Wareing MP Manchester Airport Plc Company PO Box 532 Town Hall John McFall MP BAA Plc Company 130 Wilton Road
    [Show full text]
  • From 'Greenest Government Ever' to 'Get Rid of All the Green Crap': David Cameron, the Conservatives and the Environment
    This is a repository copy of From ‘greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the environment. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/85469/ Version: Submitted Version Article: Carter, Neil Thomas orcid.org/0000-0003-3378-8773 and Clements, Ben (2015) From ‘greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the environment. British Politics. 204–225. ISSN 1746-918X https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.16 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ From ‘Greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the Environment by Neil Carter (University of York) and Ben Clements (University of Leicester) Published in British Politics, early online April 2015. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copy-edit version of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications
    Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications Jessica R. Adolino, Ph. D. Professor of Political Science James Madison University Draft prepared for presentation at the European Studies Association Annual Meeting May 9-12, 2019, Denver, Colorado Please do not cite or distribute without author’s permission. By almost any measure, since the immediate aftermath of the June 16, 2016 Brexit referendum, the British government has been in a state of chaos. The turmoil began with then- Prime Minister David Cameron’s resignation on June 17 and succession by Theresa May within days of the vote. Subsequently, May’s decision to call a snap election in 2017 and the resulting loss of the Conservatives’ parliamentary majority cast doubt on her leadership and further stirred up dissension in her party’s ranks. Perhaps more telling, and the subject of this paper, is the unprecedented number of ministers1—from both senior and junior ranks—that quit the May government over Brexit-related policy disagreements2. Between June 12, 2017 and April 3, 2019, the government witnessed 45 resignations, with high-profile secretaries of state and departmental ministers stepping down to return to the backbenches. Of these, 34 members of her government, including 9 serving in the Cabinet, departed over issues with some aspect of Brexit, ranging from dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Agreement, to disagreements about the proper role of Parliament, to questions about the legitimacy of the entire Brexit process. All told, Theresa May lost more ministers, and at a more rapid pace, than any other prime minister in modern times.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Tobacco, the New Politics, and the Threat to Public Health
    BMJ 2019;365:l2164 doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2164 (Published 15 May 2019) Page 1 of 9 Feature BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.l2164 on 15 May 2019. Downloaded from FEATURE INVESTIGATION Big tobacco, the new politics, and the threat to public health With several Tory leadership contenders sympathetic to its ideology, the Institute of Economic Affairs is closer to power than it has been for decades. In an exclusive investigation, Jonathan Gornall reveals how the organisation is funded by British American Tobacco and has links with senior conservative ministers. After orchestrating a series of attacks on public health initiatives, the IEA may now hold the key to No 10 Jonathan Gornall freelance journalist Suffolk Whatever the eventual consequences of Brexit for the NHS,1 2 industries that stand to gain commercially from its attacks on an article published in the Daily Telegraph in March made it public health initiatives, and it is connected—ideologically, http://www.bmj.com/ clear that an even greater threat to public health in the UK may financially, or both—to no fewer than 25 serving Conservative emerge from the battle for control of the Conservative Party. MPs, including several candidates for May’s job (see box A). In an essay published on 31 March, titled “The next Tory leader The IEA is secretive about its funding sources, but The BMJ must be a bullish libertarian,” the director general of the free can report that the organisation is part funded by British market think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) set American Tobacco.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Appointment Hearing with the Government's Preferred Candidate for Chair of the Committee on Climate Change
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee Pre-appointment hearing with the Government’s preferred candidate for Chair of the Committee on Climate Change Fourth Report of Session 2012–13 Report, together with formal minutes and oral evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 4 September 2012 HC 555 Published on 10 September 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £10.00 The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • UK's WITHDRAWAL from the EU the Prime Minister
    UK’S WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EU The Prime Minister That this House notes the Prime Minister’s statement on Leaving the European Union of 26 February 2019; and further notes that discussions between the UK and the EU are ongoing. Amendment (a) Jeremy Corbyn Keir Starmer Emily Thornberry John McDonnell Valerie Vaz Mr Nicholas Brown Mr Ben BradshawRuth George Line 1, leave out from “House” to end and add “instructs Ministers (a) to negotiate with the EU for changes to the Political Declaration to secure: i. a permanent and comprehensive customs union with the EU; ii. close alignment with the single market underpinned by shared institutions and obligations; iii. dynamic alignment on rights and protections; iv. commitments on participation in EU agencies and funding programmes, including in areas such as the environment, education, and industrial regulation; and v. unambiguous agreement on the detail of future security arrangements, including access to the European Arrest Warrant and vital shared databases; and (b) to introduce primary legislation to give statutory effect to this negotiating mandate.”. As an Amendment to Jeremy Corbyn’s proposed Amendment (a): Sir Vince Cable Tom Brake Jo Swinson Mr Alistair Carmichael Sir Edward Davey Norman Lamb Christine JardineJamie StoneWera HobhouseTim FarronLayla Moran Line 2, leave out from “for” to end and add ”an extension of the period of two years specified in Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union for the purposes of a referendum on whether to exit the European Union under the terms of the negotiated Withdrawal Agreement or stay in membership of the European Union.”.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson Loses Majority in Parliament While Parliament Votes to Delay Brexit U.S.-China Trade Relationshi
    10/1/2019 Trade & Manufacturing Alert - September 2019 | Index September 2019 UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson Loses IN THIS ISSUE Majority In Parliament While Parliament Votes UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson to Delay Brexit Loses Majority In Parliament While Parliament Votes to Delay Brexit Antoinette Bedros On September 3, 2019, the Conservative party in the United U.S.-China Trade Relationship Kingdom (“UK”) lost its majority in Parliament when Phillip Lee, a Begins to Thaw After a Period of Conservative Member of Parliament (“MP”), defected to join the Tension Liberal Democrats. As a result, Prime Minister Boris Johnson lost his ability to secure Britain’s “hard” or “no-deal” exit from the President Macron Threatens to European Union (“EU”) on October 31, 2019, which he has Block EU-Mercosur Deal Over promised to achieve on a number of occasions. More » Brazil’s Failure to Address Amazon Fires U.S.-China Trade Relationship Begins to Thaw Blockchain Continues to Play An Increasingly Important Role in After a Period of Tension Global Trade Seth Atkisson The trade relationship between the United States and China has NEWS OF NOTE continued to be difficult, especially after both countries announced significant new tariffs on each other’s goods in August 2019. President Trump and Japan’s Nonetheless, the relationship may be improving, with both countries Prime Minister Abe Announce announcing trade concessions this week and agreeing to resume U.S.-Japan Agreement in Principle trade talks in October 2019. More » on Agricultural and Digital Trade Two New Commissioners Join the President Macron Threatens to Block EU- U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit of Political Engagement 11
    HSAudit2014_9mmSpine_Layout 1 15/04/2014 15:47 Page 1 UK Data Archive Study Number 7577 - Audit of Political Engagement 11, 2013 AUDIT OF Audit of Political POLITICAL Audit of Political Engagement 11 ENGAGEMENT Engagement 11 The 2014 Report on the accountability 11 The 2014 Report and conduct of MPs with a focus on the accountability and conduct of MPs The Audit of Political Engagement is the only annual health check on our democratic system. Now in its 11th year, each Audit measures the ‘political pulse’ of the nation, providing a unique benchmark to gauge public opinion across Great Britain with regard to politics and the political process. This year’s report explores public attitudes to politics and compares them with the Audit results at the same stage before the 2005 and 2010 general elections. It also looks at public attitudes to the forthcoming European parliamentary elections, and examines the complexity of public attitudes to voting. In addition to the key indicators of political engagement, the report looks in greater detail at the efficacy of Parliament in carrying out some of its core functions, and issues pertaining to the conduct and behaviour of MPs, including at Prime Minister’s Questions. The report concludes with an analysis of a range of options for holding politicians more effectively to account between general elections. The Hansard Society is an independent, non-partisan political research and education organisation, working in the UK and around the world to promote democracy and strengthen parliaments. THE 2014 www.hansardsociety.org.uk
    [Show full text]
  • Judgment Tim Yeo -V- Times Newspaper
    Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 2853 (QB) Case No: HQ14D01146 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 20/08/2014 Before : MR JUSTICE WARBY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : TIM YEO MP Claimant - and - TIMES NEWSPAPERS LIMITED Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Matthew Nicklin QC and Victoria Jolliffe (instructed by Carter-Ruck Solicitors) for the Claimant Gavin Millar QC (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the Defendant Hearing date: 30 July 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ............................. MR JUSTICE WARBY MR JUSTICE WARBY Yeo v Times Approved Judgment Mr Justice Warby: 1. In this libel action the Claimant, Tim Yeo MP (“Mr Yeo”), sues the Defendant, Times Newspapers Ltd (“TNL”), in respect of articles on the front and inside pages of the issue of the The Sunday Times for Sunday 9 June 2013, a further article published in the issue for Sunday 23 June 2013, and online publication of those articles since the dates of print publication in June 2013. 2. The claim form was issued on 19 March 2014. On 2 May 2014 a Defence was served. As yet, no Reply has been served. That step has been deferred pending determination of the two main applications issued on 15 July 2014 which arise for determination at this, the first Case Management Conference in the action. The first of these is an application by TNL for an order that the case be tried with a Jury.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Ministers' Interests
    LIST OF MINISTERS’ INTERESTS CABINET OFFICE DECEMBER 2017 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Prime Minister 5 Attorney General’s Office 6 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy 7 Cabinet Office 11 Department for Communities and Local Government 10 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 11 Ministry of Defence 13 Department for Education 14 Department of Exiting the European Union 16 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 17 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 19 Department of Health 21 Home Office 22 Department for International Development 23 Department for International Trade 24 Ministry of Justice 25 Northern Ireland Office 26 Office of the Advocate General for Scotland 27 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons 28 Office of the Leader of the House of Lords 29 Scotland Office 30 Department for Transport 31 HM Treasury 33 Wales Office 34 Department for Work and Pensions 35 Government Whips – Commons 36 Government Whips – Lords 40 2 INTRODUCTION Ministerial Code Under the terms of the Ministerial Code, Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between their Ministerial position and their private interests, financial or otherwise. On appointment to each new office, Ministers must provide their Permanent Secretary with a list, in writing, of all relevant interests known to them, which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. Individual declarations, and a note of any action taken in respect of individual interests, are then passed to the Cabinet Office Propriety and Ethics team and the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests to confirm they are content with the action taken or to provide further advice as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inner Workings of British Political Parties the Interaction of Organisational Structures and Their Impact on Political Behaviours
    REPORT The Inner Workings of British Political Parties The Interaction of Organisational Structures and their Impact on Political Behaviours Ben Westerman About the Author Ben Westerman is a Research Fellow at the Constitution Society specialising in the internal anthropology of political parties. He also works as an adviser on the implications of Brexit for a number of large organisations and policy makers across sectors. He has previously worked for the Labour Party, on the Remain campaign and in Parliament. He holds degrees from Bristol University and King’s College, London. The Inner Workings of British Political Parties: The Interaction of Organisational Structures and their Impact on Political Behaviours Introduction Since June 2016, British politics has entered isn’t working’,3 ‘Bollocks to Brexit’,4 or ‘New Labour into an unprecedented period of volatility and New Danger’5 to get a sense of the tribalism this fragmentation as the decision to leave the European system has engendered. Moreover, for almost Union has ushered in a fundamental realignment a century, this antiquated system has enforced of the UK’s major political groupings. With the the domination of the Conservative and Labour nation bracing itself for its fourth major electoral Parties. Ninety-five years since Ramsay MacDonald event in five years, it remains to be seen how and to became the first Labour Prime Minister, no other what degree this realignment will take place under party has successfully formed a government the highly specific conditions of a majoritarian (national governments notwithstanding), and every electoral system. The general election of winter government since Attlee’s 1945 administration has 2019 may well come to be seen as a definitive point been formed by either the Conservative or Labour in British political history.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Bill (HL Bill 30 of 2013–2014)
    Energy Bill (HL Bill 30 of 2013–2014) The Energy Bill is intended to establish a framework for delivering secure, affordable and low-carbon energy. This Library Note provides background information for the second reading of the Bill in the House of Lords on 18 June 2013. It summarises the report stage and third reading in the House of Commons on 3–4 June 2013, where debate focused on setting a decarbonisation target for the electricity sector, electricity market reform and consumer protection. The Note is intended to be read in conjunction with two House of Commons Library Research Papers, Energy Bill (RP 12/79, 13 December 2012) which sets out the background to the Bill, and Energy Bill: Committee Stage Report (RP 13/19, 12 March 2013) which summarises the debates during the Commons second reading and committee stage. Nicola Newson 13 June 2013 LLN 2013/013 House of Lords Library Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of the House of Lords and their personal staff, to provide impartial, politically balanced briefing on subjects likely to be of interest to Members of the Lords. Authors are available to discuss the contents of the Notes with the Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Any comments on Library Notes should be sent to the Head of Research Services, House of Lords Library, London SW1A 0PW or emailed to [email protected]. Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Commons Report Stage—Day One ....................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Contracts for Difference (CFDs) and Investment Contracts ................................................
    [Show full text]