TurkJBiol 25(2001)103-111 © TÜB‹TAK

IdentificationandEvaluationofClinically Significantbrasiliensis,Nocardiafarcinica andNocardiaotitidiscaviarum StrainsUsing PyrolysisMassSpectrometry(PyMS)

KamilIfiIK,Ergin KAR‹PTAfi,NevzatfiAH‹N Ondokuzmay›sUniversity,FacultyofArtsandScience,DepartmentofBiology, 55139,Kurupelit,Samsun-TURKEY Alan C.WARD,MichealGOODFELLOW NewcastleUniversity,MedicalSchool,MicrobiologyDept.,NewcastleuponTyne-U.K.

Received:02.09.1999

Abstract: Outofatotalofthirty-nine Nocardia strains,eightspeciesof N.brasiliensis,seventeen speciesofN.farcinica andfourteenspeciesofN.otitidiscaviarum wereidentifiedusingPyrolysismass spectrometry.N428,N477 N.brasiliensis ;N669,N233 N.farcinica ;andN231,N232 N. otitidiscaviarum duplicatedstrainswereclusteredintheirowngroups.Strainsbelongingto Nocardia brasiliensis,Nocardiafarcinica and Nocardiaotitidiscaviarum formeddistinctpyrogroups correspondingtoclustersdefinedinthenumericalstudy.ItcanbeconcludedthatPyMSprovidesa rapidandreproduciblemethodofevaluatingthetaxonomicsignificanceof Nocadia species.

KeyWords:Nocardia,PyMS,

KlinikÖnemiOlanNocardiabrasiliensis,Nocardiafarcinica veNocardia otitidiscaviarum’unPirolizisKütleSpektrometrisiKullan›lmas›yla ‹dentifikasyonuveDe¤erlendirilmesi

Özet: SekizNocardiabrasiliensis,onyediNocardiafarcinica veondörtNocardiaotitidiscaviarumolmak üzeretoplamotuzdokuz Nocardia sufluPiroliziskütlespektrometrimetodukullan›laraktan›mland›. Nocardiabrasiliensis ’denN428,N477; Nocardiafarcinica ’danN669,N223ve Nocardia otitidiscaviarum’danN231veN232nolutestedilenduplikatsufllarilgiligruplar›ylakümelendiler. Nocardiabrasiliensis,Nocardiafarcinica ve Nocardiaotitidiscaviarum aitsufllar,numerikçal›flmada belirlenenkümelerebenzer,aç›kbirflekildepyrogroupoluflturdular.Buradan Nocardia örneklerinin taksonomiköneminide¤erlendirmedePyMS’inh›zl›veüretkenbirteknikoldu¤uneticesine var›lmaktad›r.

AnahtarSözcükler: Nocardia,PyMS,Taksonomi

103 IdentificationandEvaluationofClinicallySignificant Nocardiabrasiliensis,Nocardiafarcinica andNocardia otitidiscaviarum StrainsUsingPyrolysisMassSpectrometry(PyMS)

Introduction Nocardia areaerobic,catalase-positiveactinomycetesthatformextensivelybranched rudimentary,substratehypheaoftenfragmented insitu orformedintoarod-liketococcoid shapewiththeeffectofmechanicaldisruptionandnon-motileelements.Membersofthegenus haveapeptidoglycancomposedofN-acetylglucosamine,D-alanine,L-alanineandD-glutamic acidwith meso A2pmasthediaminoacid,muramicacidintheN-glycolatedform,fattyacid profilesshowingmajoramountsofstraightchain,unsaturatedandtuberculosticacids(1)and mycolicacidswith40to60carbonsanduptothreedoublebonds(2). Nocardiae arealso responsibleforawiderangeofanimaldiseases(3). Nocardiaasteroides isthemostcommon causalagent,followedbyNocardiafarcinica,Nocardiabrasiliensis andNocardiaotitidiscaviarum (4).Thesemaycauseabortion,mycetoma,aswellaspulmonaryandsystemic(5). Numeroustaxonomicstudieshaveestablishedtheheterogeneityof Nocardia througha varietyofmethods,includingnumericaltaxonomy(6,7),DNArelatedness(8),phagesensitivity (9),immunology(10),antimicrobialsusceptibility(11)andmolecularfingerprinting(12,13). Thereisaneedforanextensivepolyphasictaxonomystudyofthegenus Nocardia to determinetherelationshipbetweennewerspeciesandthemoreestablishedtaxa.Animproved classificationofthegenusshouldhelphighlightcharactersthatmightbeusedinthe identificationofclinicallysignificantNocardiae.

MaterialsandMethods Teststrains: Thirty-ninerepresentativesof N.brasiliensis , N.farcinica and N. otitidiscaviarum wereexamined.Thelistandhistoriesofteststrainsusedinthisstudyarein Table1.SixduplicatesamplesfromN428,N477( N.brasiliensis);N669,N233( N.farcinica); andN231,N232( N.otitidiscaviarum)wereusedtodeterminationthereproducibilityofthe system.Allofthestrainsweremaintainedasfrozenglycerolstocksolution. Growthconditions: Glycerolstockcultureswereusedtoinoculatesterilepolyvinyl membranefilters(0.45µm,47mmdiameter;Millipore)placedoverdriedGYEA(GlucoseYeast ExtractAgar)plates(14).Duplicatedpreparationswereincubatedfor5daysat30°Candthe growthobtainedwasusedtoinoculateafurthersetofplateswhichwereincubatedunderthe sameconditions. Pyrolysismassspectrometry: Pyrolysisfoilsandtubes(HorizonInstrumentsLtd.)were putinacetoneandthendriedovernight.Singlefoilswereinsertedwithflamedforcepsorsterile plasticloopsintopyrolysistubessothatthefoilprotrudedabout6mmfromthemouth.For eachstrain,smallamountsofbiomass( ca.50µgwetweight)werescrapedfromthegrowth ontheMilliporefiltersanduniformlysmearedontotheprotrudingfoils.Theinoculatedfoils wereplacedinan80°Covenfor15minutestodrythebiomass.Foranalysis,thefoilswere tampedintotubeswithaflamedstainlesssteeltool(gagua)to10mmfromthemouth.Viton

104 K.IfiIK,E.KAR‹PTAfi,N.fiAH‹N,A.C.WARD,M.GOODFELLOW

Table1. Sourceandhistoriesoftheteststrainsexaminedusingpyrolysismassspectrometry.

Lab.number Species Source

N318T N.brasiliensis R.E.Gordon,IMRU845;J.D.SchneidauJr.,381;A.Batista,631;IP337[Goodfellow(1971),cluster5; Orchard&Goodfellow(1980),subcluster4B;Hookey(1983),cluster33( N.brasiliensis)] N1159T N.brasiliensis NCTC11294;ATCC19296 N14 N.brasiliensis R.E.Gordon,IMRU744;A.Gonzáles-Ochoa,409;ATCC19295;NCTC10300[Goodfellow(1971)cluster5; Hookey(1983)singlemembercluster] N428d N.brasiliensis R.E.Gordon,IMRU1336;M.P.Lechevalier,L-36( Nocardia sp.),soil N467 N.brasiliensis M.Magnusson,FarchaLaboratory,FortLamy,Chad,IP708;bovinefarcy N474 N.brasiliensis AGonzáles-Ochoa,4212;mycetoma,ankle N477d N.brasiliensis A.Gonzáles-Ochoa,4204;mycetomaheel;K.P.Schaal,N219 N1148 N.brasiliensis K.P.Schaal,N224;M.Goodfellow,N530;L.Ajello45-247-71 N898T N.farcinica M.Tsukamura,ChubuChestHospital,Obu,Aichi-chen474,Japan,23102(R-3318);ATCC3318; R.E.Gordon[Orchard&Goodfellow(1980),subcluster1A;Hookey(1983),cluster28( N.farcinica )] N233d N.farcinica R.J.Olds,DepartmentofPathology,UniversityofCambridge,CN470; N.asteroides;cow’smilk [(Goodfellow(1971),subgroup1B;Orchard&Goodfellow(1980),cluster11)] N669d N.farcinica S.G.Bradley,MAC300[Orchard&Goodfellow(1980),cluster9( N.asteroides);Hookey(1983), cluster28(N.farcinica)] N671 N.farcinica S.G.Bradley,VAC330;M.Tsukamura,E7549;K.P.Schaal,N202;ATCC3318[Orchard&Goodfellow (1980),cluster11] N687 N.farcinica K.P.Schaal,N;strainBerlin[Orchard&Goodfellow(1980),cluster11;Hookey(1983),cluster28] N690 N.farcinica K.P.Schaal,N5;strainKarlsruhe[Orchard&Goodfellow(1980),cluster11] N701 N.farcinica M.Ridell,InstituteofMedicalMicrobiology,UniversityofGothenburg,Sweden,N67;M.Magnusson, 753(N.asteroides ATCC3399)[Orchard&Goodfellow(1980),cluster11] N702 N.farcinica M.Ridell,N74;M.Magnusson,751; N.farcinica IP744;bovinefarcy,FarchaLaboratory,FortLamy, Chad[Orchard&Goodfellow(1980),cluster11] N703 N.farcinica M.Ridell,N76;M.Magnusson,750; N.farcinica,IP740;bovinefarcy,FarchaLaboratory,FortLamy, Chad[Orchard&Goodfellow(1980),cluster11] N704 N.farcinica M.Ridell,N118;M.Magnusson,645;ATCC6864;NCTC1935;rabbitinSumatra[Orchard& Goodfellow(1980),cluster11] N705 N.farcinica M.Ridell,N119;M.Magnusson,884;isolatedfromacaseofnocardiosisinSweden[Orchard& Goodfellow(1980),cluster11] N707 N.farcinica M.Ridell,N125;M.Magnusson,878[Orchard&Goodfellow(1980),cluster11] N894 N.farcinica M.Tsukamura,M205(23087);IUesaka;N.M.McClung;S.McMillan;K.P.Schaal,N62, [Hookey(1983),cluster28] N896 N.farcinica M.Tsukamura,R784,23098;R.E.Gordon;J.Lacey,A6[Hookey(1983),cluster28( N.farcinica)] N899 N.farcinica M.Tsukamura,M-300;I.Uesaka;N.M.McClung[Hookey(1983),cluster28( N.farcinica)] N906 N.farcinica K.P.Schaal,N57[Streptomycessp.];ATCC1474[Hookey(1983),cluster28( N.farcinica)] N1136 N.farcinica K.P.Schaal,subgroupB;S.A.Waksman, N.asteroides;ATCC3308 N1158T N.otitidiscaviarum NCTC19349;ATCC14629;R.E.Gordon;infectedmiddleearofguineapig N231 N.otitidiscaviarum R.J.Olds,CN749;isolatedfromadachshund(K.P.Schaal,N206) N232 N.otitidiscaviarum R.J.Olds,CN751,isolatedfromacorgi(K.P.Schaal,N207) N313 N.otitidiscaviarum I.P751;K.P.Schaal,N208 N314 N.otitidiscaviarum I.P771;K.P.Schaal,N209 N430 N.otitidiscaviarum R.E.Gordon,IMRU1370;lungofdog N432 N.otitidiscaviarum R.E.Gordon,IMRU416 N940 N.otitidiscaviarum M.Ridell,N55;R.E.Bönicke,SN5602 N941 N.otitidiscaviarum M.Ridell,N89;R.E.Gordon,416 N942 N.otitidiscaviarum M.Ridell,N90;R.E.Gordon,424 N943 N.otitidiscaviarum M.Ridell,N91;R.E.Gordon,737 N944 N.otitidiscaviarum M.Ridell,N92;R.E.Gordon,1316 N945 N.otitidiscaviarum M.Ridell,N93;R.E.Gordon,1370;SET N1142 N.otitidiscaviarum K.P.Schaal,N210;M.Goodfellow,N369;TsukamuraR-1315

T,Typestrains.;d,duplicatestrains.Abbreviations:ATCC,AmericanTypeCultureCollection,12301ParklawnDrive,Rockville,Md.,USA; IMRU,Instituteof Microbiology,RutgersStateUniversity,NewBrunswick,N.J.,USA.; IP,InstitutPasteur,RueduDr.Roux,Paris,France;and NCTC,NationalCollectionof TypeCultures,CentralPublicHealthLaboratory,London,UK.

105 IdentificationandEvaluationofClinicallySignificant Nocardiabrasiliensis,Nocardiafarcinica andNocardia otitidiscaviarum StrainsUsingPyrolysisMassSpectrometry(PyMS)

O-ringswereplacedonthetubeswhichwerethenloadedontothepyrolysismassspectrometry carouselinbatchesof150.Thesampleswerepreparedintriplicate. PyrolysiswascarriedoutusingaHorizonInstrumentsPyMS400Xmassspectrometer(15). Priortotheanalysis,theinletheaterwassetat160°Candtheheatedtubeloaderwassetat 120°C.Theassembledtubeswereloadedsequentiallyintothepyrolysischamberbyarobotic arm.Curie-pointpyrolysiswascarriedoutat530°Cfor2.4secondsundervacuum;the pyrolysisrisetimewas0.6s.Thevolatilepyrolysisproductswereionisedbycollisionwitha crossingbeamoflow-energy(20eV)electronsandtheionsseparatedinaquadruplemass spectrometerthatscannedthepyrolysateat0.35-secondintervals.Integratedioncountsat unitmassintervalsfrom11to400wererecordedonharddisctogetherwiththepyrolysis sequencenumberandtotalioncountforeachsample. Dataanalysis: TherawdatawasprocessedandanalysedusingthePYMENUprogram (HorizonInstrumentsLtd.)andtheGENSTATVstatisticalpackage(16),whichwererunonan IBMPC.Normaliseddatasetswereanalysedbyprincipalcomponentsanalysis.Plotsofthefirst twoorthreeprincipalcomponentswereproducedasplotsofthespectralscores,thepositions ofthepyrolysisspectraontheprincipalcomponentaxes.Aplotofthemassloadingsforthe axesprovidedinformationaboutthecontributionofmassestotheprincipalcomponentaxes. Canonicalvariateanalysesofalloftheprincipalcomponentsaccountingformorethan0.5% ofthetotalvariancewascarriedouttogiveacombinedprincipalcomponent-canonicalvariate analysis(PC-CVA).ThedatafromPC-CVAwereplottedasMahalonobisdistances.The Mahalonobis(17)distancematrixwasstandardisedbydividingthemaximuminter-group distance.ItwastreatedasanordinaryEuclideandistanceandthenconvertedtoasimilarity matrix(18).Thevaluesinthesimilaritymatrixwereexaminedusingunweightedpairgrouping method(UPGMA)withanarithmeticaveragesalgorithm(19).

ResultsandDiscussion Eight Nocardiabrasiliensis ,seventeen Nocardiafarcinica andfourteen Nocardia otitidiscaviarum strains,includingduplicatedcultures,wereanalysedusingCurie-pointpyrolysis massspectrometry.Excellentagreementwasfoundbetweentheresultsofthetriplicate analysesofalloftheteststrains.Itwasalsoencouragingthatmostoftheduplicatedcultures weregroupedadjacenttooneanother,withtheexceptionof Nocardiafarcinica strainN669 (Figure1). SometypicalpyrolysismassspectraareshowninFigure2.Itisevidentfromthese representativedatathatmostofthespectrafallwithinthemassrangingfrom51to140(m/z) withonlyverylowintensityionsfoundabovethismassrange.Itisalsoclearfromthese pyrogramsthatthespectraarequalitativelysimilar. Therepresentative Nocardiabrasiliensis,Nocardiaotitidiscaviarum andNocardiafarcinica strainsweresharplydistinguishedfromoneanotherwiththeexceptionof Nocardiafarcinica

106 K.IfiIK,E.KAR‹PTAfi,N.fiAH‹N,A.C.WARD,M.GOODFELLOW strainN701,whichwasobservedseparatefrombutadjacentto Nocardiaotitidiscaviarum (Figure1).Thesamerelationshipswereseenwhenthedatawerepresentedinathree-

Figure1. Dendrogramrepresentingrelationshipsfoundbetweenrepresentativesofsome Nocardia speciesarebased onpyrolysismassspectraldata.ThedendrogramisbasedonsimilarityvaluesderivedfromMahalanobis distancesandtheclusteringahcievedusingtheunweightedpairgroupmethodwitharithmeticaverages algorithm. d,duplicatedstrains;T,typestrain

107 IdentificationandEvaluationofClinicallySignificant Nocardiabrasiliensis,Nocardiafarcinica andNocardia otitidiscaviarum StrainsUsingPyrolysisMassSpectrometry(PyMS) Normalised ion intensity (%) Normalised ion intensity (%) Normalised ion intensity (%)

Figure2. Pyrolysismassspectraderivedfromtheanalysisof Nocardiabrasiliensis N318T,NocardiafarcinicaN898T and Nocardiaotitidiscaviarum N1158T.

108 K.IfiIK,E.KAR‹PTAfi,N.fiAH‹N,A.C.WARD,M.GOODFELLOW dimensionalmodelbasedontheprincipalcomponentscanonicalvariatesanalyses,though,in thiscase,Nocardiafarcinica strainN701wasobservedtogetherwiththeotherstrainsbearing thesamename(Figure3).Itwasveryencouraginginthepresentinvestigationthatthe Nocardiabrasiliensis,Nocardiafarcinica andNocardiaotitidiscaviarum strainsformeddistinct pyrogroupscorrespondingtoclustersdefinedinthenumericalstudy.

N705 N894

N313

N1136 T N944 N1158 N687 N671 N707 N906 N899 d N896 N1142 N704 N669 N945 N942 N690 d N430 N703 N943 N232 T N432 d N898 N941 d d N233 N231 N428 N428 d N702 N477 N314 N474 N467 N701 N477 T N318 T N1159 N14 N940

N1148

Nocardia brasiliensis

Nocardia farcinica

Nocardia otitidiscaviarum

Figure3. Ordinationplotalongthefirstthreeprincipalcomponentcanonicalvariatesaxesshowingthemeanposi- tionoftheNocardiabrasiliensis,Nocardiafarcinica andNocardiaotitidiscaviarum strainsbasedonpyroly- sismassspectraldata.Thefirstthreecanonicalvariatesaccountfor72%ofthetotalvariationfound betweenthestrains. d,duplicatedstrain;T,typestrain.

109 IdentificationandEvaluationofClinicallySignificant Nocardiabrasiliensis,Nocardiafarcinica andNocardia otitidiscaviarum StrainsUsingPyrolysisMassSpectrometry(PyMS)

Theseresultsarealsoinagreementwiththoseofprevioustaxonomicstudies(6,20,21, 22,7,23).Thegoodagreementfoundbetweenthepyrolysismassspectrometricand numericaltaxonomicdataisinlinewiththeresultsofearlierstudiesonactinomadurae(24), rhodococci(25)andstreptomycetes(26,27). Ingeneral,thisPyMSmayprovetobeavaluablemethodofevaluating Nocardiaspecies.It hasalreadybeenmentionedthatrapid,reliableandcost-effectivemethodsareneededtoeffect theclassification,identificationandtypingofmicro-organisms.Curie-pointpyrolysismass specrtometryisbeingincreasinglyusedforsuchpurposesasitallowsrapidautomated acquisitionofdata-derivedorganismcomponentsandrequiresminimalsamplepreparation(28, 29,30).Thesystemcanbeusedtoevaluatetaxonomicstructuresderivedfromtheapplication ofotherproceduresandtoselectrepresentativestrainsfortaxonomicanalysesthatrequire bothtime-consumingandlaboriousmethods.Itcanbeconcludedfromthepresentinvestigation thattheuseofPyMSprovidesaneffectiveprocedureforseparatingrepresentativesofNocardia species.

References 1. Kroppenstedt,R.M.Fattyacidandmenaquinoneanalysisofactinomycetesandrelatedorganisms,InChemical MethodsinBacterialSystematics.EditedbyGoodfellow,M.&Minnikin,D.E.,1sted.1985,AcademicPress: London,pp.173-199. 2. Goodfellow,M.,Minnikin,D.E.,Todd,C.,Alderson,G.,Minnikin,S.M.andCollins,M.D.Numericalandchemical classificationofNocardiaamarae.JournalofGeneralMicrobiology128:1283-1297,1982. 3. Beaman,B.L.andSugar,A.M. Nocardia innaturallyacquiredandexperimentalinfectionsinanimals.Journalof Hygiene(London)91:393-419,1983. 4. Schaal,K.P.andLee,H.-J.,Actinomyceteinfectionsinhumans-areview.Gene,115:201-211,1992. 5. Beaman,B.L.andBeaman,L. Nocardia species:host-parasiterelationships.ClinicalMicrobiologicalReviews,7: 213-64,1994. 6. Goodfellow,M.Numericaltaxonomyofsomenocardioformbac-teria.JournalofGeneralMicrobiology,69:33- 80,1971. 7. Orchard,V.A.andGoodfellow,M.Numericalclassificationofsomenamedstrainsof Nocardiaasteroides and relatedisolatesfromsoil.JournalofGeneralMicrobiology,118:295-312,1980. 8. Bradley,S.G.andMordarski,M.Associationofpolydeoxyribnucleotidesofdeoxyribonucleicacidsfrom nocardioform.In:TheBiologyoftheNocardiae,.EditedbyGoodfellow,M.;Brownell,G.H.&Serrano, 1976,J.A.AcademicPress,London,pp.310-336. 9. Pulverer,G.,Schütt-Gerowitt,H.andSchaal,K.P.Bacteriophagesof Nocardiaasteroides.MedicalMicrobiology Immunology,161:113-22,1975. 10. Ridell,M.Immunodiffusionstudiesof , Nocardia,and Rhodococcus fortaxonomicpurposes. ZentralblattfürBakteriologie.Supplement,11:235-241,1981. 11. Wallace,R.J.,O'Brien,R.,Glassroth,J.,Raleigh,J.andDutt,A.Diagnosisandtreatmentofdiseasecausedby non-tuberculousmycobacteria.AmericanReviewofRespiratoryDiseases,142:940-953,1990.

110 K.IfiIK,E.KAR‹PTAfi,N.fiAH‹N,A.C.WARD,M.GOODFELLOW

12. Patterson,J.E.,Chapin-Robertson,K.,Waycott,S.,Farrel,P.,McGeer,A.,McNeil,M.M.andEdberg,S.C. Pseudoepidemicof Nocardiaasteroides associatedwithamycobacterialculturesystem.JournalofClinical Microbiology,30:1357-1360,1992. 13. Laurent,F.,Carlotti,A.,Boiron,P.,Villard,J.andFreney,J.Ribotyping:atoolfortaxonomyandidentificationof theNocardiaasteroides complexspecies.JournalofClinicalMicrobiology,34:1079-82,1996. 14. Gordon,R.E.andMihm,J.M.Identificationof Nocardiacaviae (Erikson)nov.comb.AnnalsoftheNewYork AcademyofSciences,98:628-636,1962. 15. Aries,R.E.,GutteridgeC.S.andOttleyT.W.Evaluationofalow-cost,automatedpyrolysismassspectrometer. JournalofAnalyticalandAppliedPyrolysis,9:81-88,1986. 16. Nelder,J.C.GENSTATReferenceManual.ScientificandSocialServiceProgramLibrary.1979,Universityof Edinburgh,Edingurgh. 17. Mahalanobis,P.C.Onthegeneraliseddistanceinstatistics.ProceedingsoftheNationalInstituteofScienceof India,2:49-55,1936. 18. Gutteridge,C.S.,Vallis,L.andMacFie,H.J.H.Numericalmethodsintheclassificationofmicroorganismsby pyrolysismassspectrometry.In:Computer-AssistedBacterialSystematics,EditedbyM.Goodfellow,D.Jones,and F.G.Priest.1985,AcademicPress:London,pp.369-401. 19. Sneath,P.H.A.andSokal,R.R.NumericalTaxonomy:ThePrinciplesandPracticeofNumericalClassification. W.1973,H.Freeman,Baltimore,562. 20. Tsukamura,M.NumericaltaxonomyofthegenusNocardia.JournalofGeneralMicrobiology56,265-287,1969. 21. Kurup,P.V.andSchmitt,J.A.Numericaltaxonomyof Nocardia.CanadianJournalMicrobiology19:1035-1048, 1973. 22. Schaal,K.P.andReutersberg,H.Numericaltaxonomyof Nocardiaasteroides .ZentralblattfürBakteriologie, Parasitenkunde,InfektionskrankheitenundHygiene.1.Abteilung,Supplement6:53-62,1978. 23. Yano,I.,Imaeda,T.andTsukamura,M.Characterizationof Nocardianova.InternationalJournalofSystematic Bacteriology,40:170-174,1990. 24. Trujillo,M.E.andGoodfellow,M.Polyphasictaxonomicstudyofclinicallysignificantactinomaduraeincludingthe descriptionofActinomaduralatinasp.nov.ZentralblattfurBakteriologie,285:212-233,1997. 25. Colquhoun,J.A.,Mexon,J.,Goodfellow,M.,Ward,A.C.,Horikoshi,K.andBull,A.T.Novelrhodococciand othermycolataactinomycetesfromthedeepsea.AntonievanLeewenhoek,1998(inpress). 26. Ferguson,E.V.,Sanglier,J.-J.,Ward,A.C.andGoodfellew,M.Evaluationof Streptomyces species-groupsby pyrolysismassspectrometry.ZentralblattfürBakteriologie,285:169-181,1997. 27. Atalan,E.,Manfio,G.P.,Ward,A.C.,Kroppenstedt,R.M.andGoodfellow,M.Biosystematicstudiesonnovel Streptomyces fromsoil.Microbiology,1998(inpress). 28. Magee,J.G.Whole-organismfingerprinting.In:HandbookofNewBacterialSystematics,.EditedbyM. GoodfellowandA.G.O'Donnell.1993,AcademicPress:London,pp.383-427. 29. Magee,J.G.Analyticalfingerprintingmethods.In:ChemicalMethodsinProkaryoticSystematics.EditedbyM. GoodfellowandA.G.O'Donnell.1994,JohnWileyandSonsLtd.:London,pp.523-553. 30. Goodfellow,M.,Freeman,R.andSisson,P.R.Curie-pointpyrolysismassspectrometryasatoolinclinical microbiology.ZentralblattfürBakteriologie,285:133-156,1997.

111