INDIAN BUREAU OF MINES MINERALS DEVELOPMEMT AND REGULATION DIVISION MCDR INSPECTION REPORT regional office

Mine file No : KNT/RCH/AU/1/BNG Mine code : 27KAR16001 (i) Name of the Inspecting : P005( ) C.PARAMESHWARAN Officer and ID No. (ii) Designation : Deputy Controller Mines (iii) Accompaning mine : Shri. Shanthakumar, Mines Manager & Dr.P. sanguramath Official with Designation (iv) Date of Inspection : 17/11/2015 (v) Prev.inspection date : 01/09/2014

PART-I : GENERAL INFORMATION 1. (a) Mine Name : HUTTI (b) Registration NO. : (c) Category : A Fully Mechanised (d) Type of Working : Underground (e) Postal address State : District : Village : HUTTI Taluka : LINGSUGUR Post office : HUTTI Pin Code : FAX No. : 08537-275054 E-mail : [email protected] Phone : 08537-275025 (f) Police Station : HUTTI (g) First opening date : 19/12/1978 (h) Weekly day of rest : SUN 2. Address for : At & Po- HUTTI, correspondance Tq- Lingasugur, Dist- Raichur KARNATAKA - 584 115

3. (a) Lease Number : KAR0589 (b) Lease area : 528.1 (c) Period of lease : 30 (d) Date of Expiry : 19/12/2008

4. Mineral worked : GOLD Main SILVER Associated PAGE : 2

5. Name and Address of the Lessee : HUTTI GOLD MINES COMPANY LTD At & Po- Hutti Tq-Lingsugur 584 115 RAICHUR KARNATAKA Phone:08537-275025 FAX :08537-275054

Owner : HUTTI GOLD MINES COMPANY LTD Shri A.K.Monnappa, IAS, MD 3rd Floor, KHB Shopping Complex, National Games Village, Koramangala BANGALORE KARNATAKA Phone: 080-25710501, 2 FAX :

Agent : PRAKASH At & Po- HUTTI Tq-Lingsugur RAICHUR KARNATAKA Phone: 08537-275034 FAX : 08537-275054 Mining Engineer Name : PRAKASH,Full Time Qualification : B. Tech. Mining, 1st Class Appointment/ : 15/11/2011 Termination date

Geologist Name : PRABHAKAR.SANGURMATH,Full Time Qualification : M.Sc(AG), Ph.D Appointment/ : 01/04/1996 Termination date

Manager Name : SHANTH KUMAR Qualification : Dip. in Mining, First Class Appointment/ : 08/12/2011 Termination date

6. Date of approval of Mining : Existing rule 11 MCDR1988 01/12/1993 Plan/Scheme of Mining Mining Scheme rule 12 MCDR1988 13/04/2000 Mining Scheme rule 12 MCDR1988 11/09/2003 Renewal under rule 24 MCR1960 18/08/2008 Mining Scheme rule 12 MCDR1988 13/02/2014 PAGE : 3

PART - II : OBSERVATION/COMMENTS OF INSPECTING OFFICERS

Exploration :

Sl.No. Item Proposals Actual work Remarks

1a Backlog of For the year (upto 2008-09 to 2012- both inhouse & previous year 2008-09 to 13, 13250m in U/g contract division 2012-2013. diamond drilling=7751m were carried out Proposals was achived. and shortage made for the 18870m in surface happened, due to year 2013-14 DD=10056m achived.). various problems. to 2015-16. 1b Exploration over As per the as per the 2008-09 to 15.50 Million lease area for last approved 2012-13 out come of tonnes at 5.47 g/t geological axis 1 document, exploration additional average grade or 2 Oakleys reef, ore/ reserve established established. middle reef, under UNFC category as Zone-1, follows. 1100m, 950m, village reef, 1050m, 250m, 800m & 650m strike ( respectively pertaining H/W) reef , to above reefs. grades Strike ( F/w) from 4.20g/t to 8.51g/t reef. . Out which middle reef & Strike (H/w given better higher grade. 1c Exploration Both contract accordingly, both few hundreds of Agencies and division & contract & in house meters were felt Expenditure in inhouse people undertaken the shortage to the lakh rupees people for major explorations. targetted during the year drilling drilling. 1d Balance area to yes proposed For the 2014-15=18 nos. all the be explored to in the drilling exploration information bring Geological present through pertaining to the axis in 1 or 2 approved outsourcing=3865.85m, year 2014-15. document from u/g by core drilling=15 2013-14 to nos holes=743.30m and 2017-18 also 25 nos of holes respectively. through outsourcing=3230.70m & two nos. trenches at surface=289.75m3 as per the annual returns 2014- 15. PAGE : 4

1e Balance reserve as per but as pe the annual asper the returns as on 01/04/20 1.4.2013=94,5 returns 2014-15=9.39 2014-15. The bore 2,010 tonnes million tonnes. at details furnished at 5.31g/t. 5.34g/t( 111 catgory as for the year 2014- respectively. per UNFC) and 0.59+7.23 15 only. But for million tonnes of the for the year resources at 4.58 & 2015-16, no 4.83g/t gold.( as per intimation given UNFC-332 & 333) by the company in Form-J, which ought to, without that, the bore holes drilled as per the proposals, given by the company as 1554m in S/f & 2700m in U/g for the year 2015-16, found to be not authentic, hence the violation was issued. 1f General remarks as per the For the 2014-15=18 nos. over all of inspecting approved drilling exploration staisfactory. officers on document and through geology, the annual outsourcing=3865.85m, exploration etc returns the u/g by core drilling=15 details are nos holes=743.30m and furnished on also 25 nos of holes geology & through exploration outsourcing=3230.70m & are found to two nos. trenches at be surface=289.75m3 as per satisfactory. the annual returns 2014- 15.

Development :

Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks PAGE : 5

2a Location of underground at As reported by the mine as reported in 14- development different manager, that the 15 AR. w.r.t.lease area levels as per present level the approved development during the scheme of year 2015-16 is in mining. Strike reef-(SR) in 24th & 25th level.Zone-I reef in 24 to 26th level, in middle reef- 24th & 26th level and in Oakleys 20th, 22nd, 24th to 26th level respectively. as per the 2014-15 driving=2829.70m, x-cut/ f/w drives in barren rock=2261.49m, winzing=2.5m, raising=441.43m & shaft sinking=64m and stope preparation=2784.36m respectively. 2b Separate benches not work pertaining u/g all the activities in topsoil, applicable, levels in barren rock/ are as per the u/g overburden and since it is along the ore body are proposals and work minerals (Rule U/g mine. under progress. is progress 15) accordingly. 2c Stripping ratio not applicable very megre quantity in very megre or ore to OB comparison to ROM & percentage of ore ratio waste. recovery of gold to waste rtio. is less 0.25 tones, for producing 4-5lakhs of ROM. 2d Quantity of not applicable not applicable, since it nil topsoil entirely different u/g generation in m3 operations. 2e Quantity of not nil nil overburden applicable. generation in m3

2f General remarks this is an u/g all underground method based on the of inspecting gold mine, of workings. the approved document, officers on comparing to boundary pillars are the underground development of open cast this maintained as per the work is in pit w.r.t. type entirely requirments of the state progress to the of deposit etc different one. Govt. for 528.35 ha. satisfaction.

Exploitation:

Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks PAGE : 6

3a Number of pit 2013-14 to for 2014-15=2829.70m, x- As recd from the proposed for 2015-16=10592m cuts+f/w manager Mines. production of development drives=2261.49m, in ore & winzing=2.5m, waste, sub raising=441.43m & shaft level sinking=64m NS Stope development Preparation=2784, along the respectively. for 2015- ore=1050m 16,, In SR H/w-8th level development & to 11th level in A incidental ore Block., 15-17 level-GE32 from the block, 20-22 level in FE deveopment=267 32block. in VR-6-8th 42m for 3 yrs. level in 2-block, In Z-1 stope reef-15-17 level BE 29- production is 30 C Block, In middle 16,37,000t for reef-14-16, in M7-2 three yrs. block, 18-20 GE52 A- block, 20-22 level CE41- 42 in Central shaft. In Oakleys reef-17-19=43 '7P block. 3b Quantity of ROM For the year from development & stope short fall in the mineral 2014- for the year =406508t at tonnage aswell as production 15=553768t, 4.32g/t. and for the in gold. proposed 2015- year 2015-16= 524607t( 16=561588t( gold budget=1550838g, includes actual is 1244190g incidental respectively. ore+stope production)at 4.7g/t of ore. 3c Recovery of for production complete ROM will be only after the sailable/usable of ROM processed and the gold processing, the mineral from ROM will be extracted. as final gold will be production per the year 2014-15= extracted, which for feed of 468735t of is out of control ore and extracted of manual forces. 1290.26kgs of gold at 3.04g/t. Tailings as waste is 468735t at 0.29g/t loosed in the mill tailings. 3d Quantity of 3383+6306+1357 13364t of waste hoisted for the current mineral reject 1t of waste for the year 2014-15. year yet to generation proposed to recive. develop for the year 2013- 14 to 2015-16 3e Grade of mineral not proposed nil nil rejects for the generation and complete threshold value scheme of declared. mining. PAGE : 7

3f Quantity of sub not proposed. nil all the ore grade mineral hoisted from the generation. U/g mine will be sent to beneficiation plant at Main Hutti mines plant for final processing. 3g Grade of sub not nil nil grade mineral applicable. generation 3h Manual / mechanical mechanical yes mechanical Mechanised method adopted for segregating from ROM 3i Any analysis or proposed to yes proposed for not treated as beneficiation beneficiate blending with hutti ore such for the year, study proposed along with ore & the Mangalur ore and since the mangalur and carried out of low grade will treated. mine is not for sub grade from mangalur operating. mineral and rejects. 3j Provision of yes provision yes all the above areas yes, drilling & drilling and made for involves drilling & blasting is must blasting in drilling & blasting, without which for any mineral benches blasting in no activity will be developement or the drives, x- possible. for progress. cuts, winze, shaft and the stopes. 3k Provision of yes provision wagon drills for yes those mining made. drilling holes, LHD Cum machineries are machineries in LPDT combination for u/g low mineral benches machines used in profile areas. trackless area in u/g and surafce., alos hopper loaders into tubs, etc. are used. 3l Whether height al these all the items of work yes it is of benches in pertains to pertains to underground undertaken in overburden and Underground has been approved in the underground as per mineral suitable levela and scheme of mining the underground for method of stopes, winze document. pattern or the mining proposed and shaft. method of in MP/SOM workings. 3m Total area complete area all the work carried out yes nothing on covered under comes in below the ground. other surface, only in excavation/pits underground, things are underground. nothing in infrastructures. surface as such for excavations. PAGE : 8

3n Ore to OB ratio 1:0.062 and within the proposed one yes as it is. for the pit/mine for five years during the year. average for five years is 1:0.047 3o Total area put 246.44 ha 260.38 at the end of almost to the in use under begining of five years period, i.e. extent. different heads the five years 2017-18. at the end of period. year 3p Production of 2011- 2011-12=560216 as reported by the ROM mineral 12=554500t 2012-13=599090t lessee company. during the last 2012- 2013-14=374764t five year period 13=575500t 2014-15=468735t as applicable 2013- 2015-16=524607t 14=548386t 2014- 15=553768t 2015- 16=561588t 3q General remarks yes proposed as per the approved as per the of inspecting for scheme of mining work is proposals are officers on underground in progress going, some are method of mining gold mining not. etc.

Solid Waste Management - Dumping:

Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks

4a Separate dumping Not proposed Whatever the waste is no top soil, OB, of topsoil, OB as such , it excavated during the rejects & waste and mineral is u/g mine, course of mining in u/g, like black rock rejects (Rule accordingly, will be analysed and will be dealt 32,33) waste rock sent to mill/ plant for separtely to will be beneficiation and waste surface or for hoisted will be taken to some support purposes. separetely and useful purposes or the ore will stacked in the waste be hoisted yard. separetely, since ore is precious. 4b Location of No proposal as proposal to waste/ black yes as above. topsoil, OB and such for top rock handled separetely mineral reject soil, OB etc. to surface and the ore dumps will be taken to plant for processing. 4c Number of dumps all the dumps waste rock/ mill yes all the dumps within lease within the tailings are placed in will be kept area and outside lease area for the ear marked place within the lease. of lease area waste, mill with necessary tailings. protections. PAGE : 9

4d Location of as per the all the dumps are on yes as it is. dumps w.r.t. approved surface & workings are ultimate pit document. in u/g. limit (Rule 16) 4e Number of active one for mill one for mill tailings & 1+1 waste and and alive dumps. tailings & one one for dumping black tailings. for waste/ rock. black rock 4f Number of dead phased wise accordingly, phased wise yes doing phased dumps. tailing dumps approximately 100m x wise and are making 100m or 150m size area afforestation on dead in one they spread the mill that & making side & taings and moving to dead, so that, advancing other places. further dumping other side. will not be possible. 4g Number of dumps 39.08 ha same 39.08 ha is same as above. established. indicated in continued in the next the begining five years. of the proposals. 4h Whether yes proposed as the dump is provided with dry Retaining wall on the dead advancing, leaving such rock type wall or garland drain dump side. area, other areas will allaround. all along dumps be constructed with are there. retaining wall. 4i Length of yes proposed it is being constructed yes under Retaining wall to construct and in progress. progress. or garland drain dry wall all all along dumps around and some garland drain. 4j Number of yes proposed Atleast three around the yes around the settling ponds tailings. tailngs some of the settlings ponds provided. 4k Specific provided and Absolutely there is not satisfactory on comments of maintained on much problem, because the surface. inspecting surface. waste from the mill is officer on waste coming out as mill dump management tailngs and directed to the locations in the phased dump area and controlled manually.

Solid Waste Management - Backfilling:

Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks PAGE : 10

5a Status of part proposed for all the underground filling will be or full fillings and workings in the form of generally takes extraction of back filling( stopes are filled back place after the mineral from filling as per the approved extraction of ore mined out area stopes- voids proposals in the from the stopes as before starting created after documents. some stopes per the stope backfilling. extraction of are not filled, will be blocks. ore body in left open, if it is open underground). stopes, where the strata condition is competent. 5b Area under yes proposal In 2014-15= in SRF 13 yes as per the backfilling of made in the inter-10 L JE34=36340t approval & mined out area approved stowing, MR-18L GE9- proposals were document. 34600t stowing, MR- carried out in the 19LEE47-4550t stowing, mined out area. MR-20L Ge51-10770t stowing, OR 19L AE39- 2320t stowing( total 88580t), 2015-16= in Oakleys reef=level 17- 19, in level Middle R=17-18,( OR 19L AE39- 61640t stowing, MR-19L EE47 16060t stowing, OR 20L BE41-4520t stowing, SR 11L HE31-14920t stowing, OR 17L AW37- 3320t-stowing=total 100460t) 5c Concurrent use in u/g no such Only thing is whaterevr all the above item of topsoil for provision of development will be of opertaion will restoration or top soil, remauns as it is, but be in open pit rehabilitation restoration, the stopes if any will mine & in u/g will of mineral out rehabilitaion. be back filled, if it be different. area (Rule 32) found weak starta or left open if is competent with approval of competent authority, i.e NIRM. 5d Total area not applicable alll the stopes have very rarely 100%, fully reclaimed in u/g, only chance to go for other wise as and partly. complete filling or in advised by NIRM, rehabilitated part( atleast 60% of the Govt. of opening created. agency to decide. 5e General remarks proposals accordingly, in phased As per the DGMS, of inspecting given based on manner, in sequentially will carry out officers on u/g workings. it will be taken as it their inspection backfilling and warrants for the safety to monitor. reclamation etc. of the people.

Progressive Mine Clousre Plan:

Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks PAGE : 11

6a Whether Annual Not submitted other than the stoping/ other than this no report on PMCP for the year filling after the stope other PMCP work in submitted on 2014-15. is mined out from the this mine. time and respective levels and correctly. Rule the shafts. 23 E(2). 6b Area available phased manner yes in phased manner it yes phased manner for of is under progress. work is in rehabilitation rehabilitation progress. (ha) . , one after the other as per the approved scheme of mining. 6c afforestation proposed on yes in the mill tailings yes only on done (ha). surface. areas, where the surface as per the particular level of proposals made/ fillings is over and in envisaged in the other area of colony, approved document. offices, schools, etc. 6d No. of saplings proposed for proposed for 2014- plantation are planted during 2014-15=5000 15=10250 at 80% carried out in the year nos. survival. many places on 2015-16=7000 2015-16=3250nos. surface. nos. 6e Cumulative no not proposed. not submitted to furnish Though they are .of plants doing, but not submitted to the office. 6f Any other method In U/g it is only through stowing for No chance for of only through permanent backfilling. surface. rehabilitation back filling through stowing and not other wise. 6g Cost incurred on not furnished. Company is taking care only from surface watch and care on surface & u/g no such and not from u/g. during the year provision, it will be managed from surface. 6h Compliance on yes as per the yes it is followed and what is reported reclamation and approval in the report reced for the by the lessee rehabilitation the document, 2014-15=5 stopes in company. by backfilling phased manner hutti mines and 5 stopes (i) Voids it is for the year 2015-16 available for followed. respectively. backfilling ( Lx B x D 6i Compliance on yes in u/g mill tailngs are used not in surface reclamation and only and not for for stopes filling working. rehabilitation in surface, as when required to be by backfilling however, filled. (ii) Voids tailings are filled by waste taking to / tailings tailing ponds. PAGE : 12

6j Compliance on on surface yes only for surface not for u/g reclamation and mill tailings workings. workings. rehabilitation area, by backfilling afforestation (iii)Afforestati are done in on on backfilled phased manner, area but not in u/g workings. 6k Compliance on water u/g water need to be yes for use in reclamation and reservoir in pumped out to surface plant for rehabilitation surface and for the use in processing & for by backfilling not in beneficiation plant. other purposes. (iv) underground, Rehabilitation U/g water is by making water pumped out reservoir reqularly to surface for usage in the plant. 6l Compliance on nil nil nil reclamation and rehabilitation by backfilling (v)any other specific means. 6m Compliance of company has nothing in u/g such nil rehabilitation its own plan work, but in surface. of waste land on this within lease matters. (i)afforestation 6n Compliance of whatever yes whatever company yes purely company rehabilitation company feels discretion in this discretion. of waste land necessary to matter. within lease do so, they (ii)Area undertake. rehabilitation (ha) 6o Compliance of niln nil nil rehabilitation of waste land within lease (iii)Method of rehabilitation 6p Compliance of not submitted not submitted. violation to be environmental report to issued. monitoring (core furnish zone and buffer zone) 6q General remarks Not submitted hence violation is yes to be of inspecting for the year issued. appropriate. officers on PMCP 2014-15 to compliance and know more progressive details. closure operations etc. PAGE : 13

Mineral Conservation:

Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks

7a ROM Mineral proposed to whatever ore prodcued all the materials dispatch or work in u/g to from the above places are hoisted from grade-wise produce from will be sent to surface u/g only and sorting within the drives, through skips/ bucket/ sorted at u/g lease area stopes, winzes and from there it will itself through & raise. go to beneficiation regular sampling plant for processing. analysis carried waste will be as reject out will be sent waste yard departmentally. for any miscellaneous purposes. 7b Method of grade- mechanically mechanical method. yes mechanically, wise mineral and analysis before that sorting i.e. of samplings finalises through manual or through samplings. mechanical. manual. 7c Different grade waste rock and ROM will be hoisted to sampling and of mineral ROM as ore surface and pure waste analysing the same sorted out at from above will be sorted and and segrates the mines. 2g/t and brought out. ore and the waste. anything found less than that will be taken in the waste side. 7d Any yes proposed all the ore of ROM is there was a beneficiation for pass through proposal to treat process at mines beneficiation. beneficiation, other the low grade like . wise the waste is subgrade with identified. mangalur ore by blending, which is under consideration. 7e General remarks yes proposals for the year 2014-15, it 0.88g/t is reduced of inspecting are is reported like this, from the officer on satisfactory. from development 35322t production to Mineral @ 3.5g/t, hosited at hoisting is the conservation and 34700t @ 3.51g/t, big questions. beneficiation similarly from the stope issues is 371186t at 4.40g/t, hoisted 434018t at 3.43g/t. and in total 406508t produced at 4.32g/t. Hoisted 468718t at 3.44g/t. with difference of 0.88g/t is reduced.

Environment:

Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks PAGE : 14

8a Separate removal not hoisting of waste rock yes only ROM & and utilization appliacble, and the ROM as ore gold. waste rock. of topsoil (Rule since it is 32) u/g mine. 8b Concurrent use not nil nil or storage of applicable. topsoil 8c Separate dumps proposed for yes only waste rock and due to out of for overburden, ROM, waste the ROM is hoisted from control from the waste rock, rock the mine and any ore mill plant, less rejects and above 2g/t is treated in than 1g/t gold is fines (Rule 33) the plant for extraction goes away in the of gold through mill tailings. beneficiation with all care without any waste. with all that, some gold is passed out through mill tailings. 8d Use of yes some waste yes some are used and yes some wwaste overburden, rock suitable some are hoisted to complete black waste rock, for back surface. rock, without any rejects and filling in the ore used for fines dumps for stoped out filling in the restoring the area is used voids like stopes. land to its and some are original use hoisted to the surface. 8e Phased not applicable some part of the area is yes some of the restoration, in surface, envisaged to restore and competent rock, reclamation and except in other area were left as where no support rehabilitation underground. it is. required. Weak of lands area need to be affected by supported. mining operations (Pits, dumps etc) 8f Baseline Not care is taken for yes only for information on applicable. surface by the surface, it is existence of department, but u/g always takes care plantation and nothing. by the company. additional plantation done (Rule 41) 8g Survival rate not applicale. on surface 70-80% and nil not in U/g. 8h Water sprinkling not nil nil on roads to applicable. control airborne dust PAGE : 15

8i General remarks u/g workings company taking care both yes company is of inspecting are taken care u/g and surface. taking care officer on to maintaimn regularly to aesthetic beauty the aesthetic maintain the in and around beauty. aesthetic beauty mines area similarly in in and around and surface below the underground.

Compliance of Rule 45:

Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks

9a Status of AR recd for information were yes the grade of submission of the year 2014- furnished to the the gold reported Monthly and 15. Monthly satisfaction, except in varies from 4.4g/t Annual returns returns are part-part-VI., on to 3.43g/t. recd production of gold from upto.,Dec.2015 stope to hoisting varies . As per the from 4.40g/t to 3.43g/t. format, all the parts were attended appropriately. 9b Scrutiny of Shri Shri Shanthakumar, yes other officers Annual return Shanthakumar, Mining engineer cum Mine were present for information Mining manager,present during during the on Mining engineer cum the inspection & Dr. P. inspections. Engineer, Mine manager, sanguramath as Geologist Geologist and Dr. P. in charge.In addition to Manager sanguramath as that other geologist and Geologist in mining engineer were charge. present for the mining operations. 9c Scrutiny of total area is what is reported is yes satisfactory. Annual return on 528.35 ha, corect, since the mining land use pattern surface rights work is mainly for area under obtained is concentrated in pits, reclaimed 334.18 ha. out underground and other area, dumps etc. of which 37 ha processing work and mill is for waste tailings are in surface. disposals. occupied by plant, buildings, colony, roads etc. is 9d Scrutiny of 10250nos of yes as reported , same yes as it is. Annual return on plantation could be seen in the afforestation during the mining area. year 2014-15 with 80% survival. PAGE : 16

9e Scrutiny of mineral almost zero grade or complete waste. Annual return on rejcets is nil some times very mineral reject but in negligible less than generation underground it 1g/t ore. (Grade and is given as quantity) 2261.49 meter, taken from cross cuts/ foot wall drives in barren rock( i.e waste rock). 9f Scrutiny of Opening stock the production from Violation on this Annual return on is 1134t at stopes and grade and the issues to the ROM stock and/or 1.61g/t, hoisted quantity and the management/ agent graded ore production was grade is not tallying. to clarify this 35322t at Again the closing stock issues. 3.5g/t and grade is very much high hoisting as 7.65g/t. quantity is given as 34700t at 3.51g/t and clossing stock is 1756t at 2.01g/t. similarly from stopes (OS)- 145663t at 3.36g/t, the corresponding production is 371186t at 4.40g/t and hoisted production is 434018t at 3.43g/t and closing stock quantity is 82831t at 7.65g/t. PAGE : 17

9g Scrutiny of 1214905.53gram the cost pertains to the the cost was Annual return on s at 99.99 year 2014-15 at that varying from sale value, Ex. grade,= time the cost was period to period. Mine price and 33409.87 prevailed. production cost lakhs. ex-mine price of the ore produced rs. per unit: 6730.20/MT. Mining cost for extraction is Rs. rs. 4437.10/MT and ore processing cost Rs. 2293.10/MT.so cost per metric ronne was Rs. 7106.72. 9h Scrutiny of the value of as per the company nil Annual return on fixed asets is position. fixed assets given as (Rs.000 )1353650, in respect of mine, beneficiation plant, mine, work shop, power, water installation. 9k Scrutiny of various all the machineries yes pertains to Annual return on machineries pertains to underground underground mining details operations. workings are machineries furnished satisfactory. separately in annexures for 4 pages. PAGE : 18

Details of violations observed during current inspection and compliance position of violation pointed out

Violation observed Show couse position Rule NO. Issued on Compliance on Rule NO. Issued on Compliance on

Rule 23E(2) 20/04/2016

Rule 45(1) 20/04/2016

Rule 13(1) 20/04/2016

Date : (C.PARAMESHWARAN)

Indian Bureau of Mines