Planning Application and Environmental Statement Further Information Report Has Therefore Been Prepared in Response to the Request from Plymouth City Council

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Planning Application and Environmental Statement Further Information Report Has Therefore Been Prepared in Response to the Request from Plymouth City Council MVV Environment Devonport Ltd Energy from Waste Combined Heat and Power Facility North Yard, Devonport A.1 Introduction and Executive Summary A.1 Background A.1.1 Through a competitive tendering process, MVV Environment Devonport Limited (MVV) was awarded the South West Devon Waste Partnership’s (SWDWP) residual waste treatment and disposal contract. The SWDWP is a collaboration that has been established between Plymouth City Council, Torbay Council and Devon County Council to provide a long term solution to deal with waste from the southwest Devon area which is left over after re-use, recycling and composting. A.1.2 MVV's proposal is to construct and operate an Energy from Waste (EfW) facility, incorporating Combined Heat and Power (CHP) technology, on land currently situated in the north east of Her Majesty's Naval Base (HMNB) Devonport, Plymouth. If the development goes ahead the land would be taken out of the HMNB secure perimeter for the duration of the contract. The facility, referred to in this report as the EfW CHP facility, will have capacity to process under certain conditions up to 265,000 tonnes per annum of waste although it is expected that actual tonnages will be lower as waste composition changes or recycling activity increases over time. Under current expectations the tonnage of waste which will be processed will be in the order of 245,000 tonnes per annum. The waste will be combusted and the heat will be used to generate steam. The steam will drive a steam turbine and generate renewable electricity for use at the facility, to supply Devonport Dockyard and HMNB, and for export to the grid. Steam will also be extracted from the turbine and fed into the Devonport Dockyard and HMNB steam network to be used for heating purposes. A.1.3 The EfW CHP facility project is subject to an environmental impact assessment (EIA). The EIA procedure is set out in the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 (SI No 293) (as amended). The EIA procedure requires the developer to undertake certain environmental studies and compile an Environmental Statement (ES) describing the likely significant effects of the proposed development on the environment and proposed measures to mitigate these effects. Scott Wilson Limited was employed by MVV as planning and environmental consultants for this project in March 2009. The Scott Wilson Group has since been acquired by the URS Corporation, so Scott Wilson Limited has changed its name to URS Scott Wilson Limited. URS Scott Wilson Limited prepared the planning application and supporting documents, including the ES, and submitted them on MVV's behalf to Plymouth City Council on 23 May 2011 (planning application reference 11/00750/FUL). A.1.4 URS Scott Wilson is a registrant to the EIA Quality Mark scheme run by the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment. A: Introduction September 2011 A-1 MVV Environment Devonport Ltd Energy from Waste Combined Heat and Power Facility North Yard, Devonport A.2 Requirement for Further Information A.2.1 The EIA process is continuing during the period of the planning application's consideration, taking into account the ES, and the views of Plymouth City Council officers as the Waste Planning Authority, statutory and non-statutory consultees, and the public. On 1 July 2011, Plymouth City Council wrote to URS Scott Wilson Limited requesting that further information be submitted. The request was made under the provisions of Regulation 19 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 1. A detailed list of specific requests for further information was provided but in summary further information is required in respect of the following matters: • Adequacy of the alternatives studied and reason for the choice. • Adequacy of the data required to identify and assess the main impacts. • Adequacy of the measures envisaged to mitigate significant adverse effects. A.2.2 This Planning Application and Environmental Statement Further Information report has therefore been prepared in response to the request from Plymouth City Council. It is divided into the following sections: A. Introduction B. Planning Application Drawings Further Information C. Planning Application Supporting Statement Further Information D. Environmental Statement Further Information E. Response to Letters of Representation A.2.3 A ‘map’ correlating the Regulation 19 request for further information and the location of the corresponding information in this report can be found below in Section A.4. A.2.4 This Further Information report is a supplement to the documents submitted with the planning application in May 2011 and should be read in conjunction with them; where no amendments are made in this Further Information report, the original text in the May 2011 documents remains valid. It provides both further information and clarifications on information already submitted. A.2.5 This Further Information report can be viewed on the MVV website at: www.mvv- environment.co.uk . A.2.6 A hard copy can be purchased at a cost of £75.00. Electronic copies can be purchased at a cost of £5.00. Cheques should be made out to MVV Environment Devonport Ltd. Copies are available from: Ian Roach URS Scott Wilson 3rd Floor, Mayflower House Armada Way 1 These Regulations have now been replaced with the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011 (SI No. 1824) which came into force on 24 August 2011. The Further Information is therefore submitted under Regulation 22 of the EIA Regulations 2011, which ‘replaces’ Regulation 19 under the EIA Regulations 1999. A: Introduction September 2011 A-2 MVV Environment Devonport Ltd Energy from Waste Combined Heat and Power Facility North Yard, Devonport Plymouth PL1 1LD A.2.7 Copies are also available for viewing by the public in the Department of Development of Plymouth City Council at the following address: Plymouth Civic Centre Plymouth PL1 2AA A.2.8 The offices are open Monday to Friday, between 08:30 and 17:00. A.2.9 Comments can be made to Plymouth City Council at the address above. A.3 Executive Summary Planning Application Drawings A.3.1 Following consultation responses received from the Environment Agency the following Planning Application Drawings have been revised: • PA 19a Site Access Right Turn Option Revision B • PA 19b Site Access Long Section Revision A • PA 21 Drainage Layout Plan Revision E • PA 17 Landscape Masterplan Revision R A.3.2 The following additional Planning Application Drawing has also been provided, again in response to a consultation response from the Environment Agency: • PA 21-1 Drainage Layout Plan – Bull Point Access Road Detail Planning Application Supporting Statement Planning Application Supporting Statement A.3.3 Amendments have been made to the text of the Planning Application Supporting Statement, predominantly to reflect clarifications and further information relating to the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (ES Chapter 8), the Statement of Community Involvement, the Climate Change and Sustainability Statement and the Energy, Economy, Employment and Education Benefits Statement. Design and Access Statement A.3.4 The Landscape Masterplan (Drawing PA17 Revision P) which was appended to the Design and Access Statement has been amended as a result of minor amendments to site access road and site drainage details, so it is now replaced by Drawing PA17 Revision R Statement of Community Involvement A.3.5 Additional information regarding the publicity of the submission of the planning application, the round of public exhibitions held after the submission of the planning application, and the A: Introduction September 2011 A-3 MVV Environment Devonport Ltd Energy from Waste Combined Heat and Power Facility North Yard, Devonport community benefits has been provided. An Addendum to the Statement of Community Involvement has been produced and provides details of the public exhibitions held after submission of the planning application. Climate Change and Sustainability Statement A.3.6 Further information has been prepared to demonstrate the compatibility of the proposed EfW CHP facility with climate change and carbon management targets and policies of Plymouth City Council and its Local Strategic Partnership members, providing evidence of the fit between the proposed development and city-wide corporate policy regarding sustainable development. A.3.7 The substantial carbon off-set and climate change benefits of this high efficiency, EfW CHP facility have been identified, demonstrating their sustainability credentials in comparison to the current residual municipal waste management solution (disposal to landfill). Although not directly comparable because of the different methodologies and units used, the annual saving would represent roughly a 5% annual saving for Plymouth’s carbon footprint. This would be a significant contribution towards the current reduction targets set out in corporate policy, in particular the 20% greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction target for 2013 and 60% GHG emissions target for 2020 (although the EfW CHP facility is not expected to be fully operational until 2015). A.3.8 MVV’s commitment to carbon footprint monitoring and a continuous improvement programme to reduce GHG emissions on a rolling basis reflect Plymouth City Council’s own commitment to carbon management auditing, reporting and pledge to achieve year on year reductions. There is a direct match between the sustainable procurement principles adopted by Plymouth City Council and the exemplary levels of service delivery which MVV will deliver over the lifetime of the facility. Energy, Economy, Employment and Education Statement A.3.9 Further information has been provided to address Plymouth City Councils request for additional information on the energy, economy, employment and education benefits. A.3.10 The principal energy benefits are: • The provision of electricity and steam to the Dockyard under the Energy Supply Agreement. • EfW CHP facility efficiency – the facility will operate at a 49% net efficiency at maximum CHP output.
Recommended publications
  • Naval Dockyards Society
    20TH CENTURY NAVAL DOCKYARDS: DEVONPORT AND PORTSMOUTH CHARACTERISATION REPORT Naval Dockyards Society Devonport Dockyard Portsmouth Dockyard Title page picture acknowledgements Top left: Devonport HM Dockyard 1951 (TNA, WORK 69/19), courtesy The National Archives. Top right: J270/09/64. Photograph of Outmuster at Portsmouth Unicorn Gate (23 Oct 1964). Reproduced by permission of Historic England. Bottom left: Devonport NAAFI (TNA, CM 20/80 September 1979), courtesy The National Archives. Bottom right: Portsmouth Round Tower (1843–48, 1868, 3/262) from the north, with the adjoining rich red brick Offices (1979, 3/261). A. Coats 2013. Reproduced with the permission of the MoD. Commissioned by The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England of 1 Waterhouse Square, 138-142 Holborn, London, EC1N 2ST, ‘English Heritage’, known after 1 April 2015 as Historic England. Part of the NATIONAL HERITAGE PROTECTION COMMISSIONS PROGRAMME PROJECT NAME: 20th Century Naval Dockyards Devonport and Portsmouth (4A3.203) Project Number 6265 dated 7 December 2012 Fund Name: ARCH Contractor: 9865 Naval Dockyards Society, 44 Lindley Avenue, Southsea, PO4 9NU Jonathan Coad Project adviser Dr Ann Coats Editor, project manager and Portsmouth researcher Dr David Davies Editor and reviewer, project executive and Portsmouth researcher Dr David Evans Devonport researcher David Jenkins Project finance officer Professor Ray Riley Portsmouth researcher Sponsored by the National Museum of the Royal Navy Published by The Naval Dockyards Society 44 Lindley Avenue, Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO4 9NU, England navaldockyards.org First published 2015 Copyright © The Naval Dockyards Society 2015 The Contractor grants to English Heritage a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, perpetual, irrevocable and royalty-free licence to use, copy, reproduce, adapt, modify, enhance, create derivative works and/or commercially exploit the Materials for any purpose required by Historic England.
    [Show full text]
  • SW OHNA Appendix 2 Devon
    NHS ENGLAND AND NHS IMPROVEMENT ORAL HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT SOUTH WEST OF ENGLAND January 2021 APPENDIX 2 DEVON STP ANALYSIS www.ottawaystrategic.co.uk NHS England and NHS Improvement Oral Health Needs Assessment South West of England January 2021 Appendix 2 Devon OHNA STP Appendix Contents 1 Summary of highlighted oral health needs and priorities .......................................... 3 Highlighted oral health needs ............................................................................ 3 Key Priorities .................................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 9 3 Demographics ...................................................................................................... 9 4 Risks and determinants of poor oral health ............................................................ 14 5 Transport and Communications in Devon ............................................................... 20 6 National Dental Epidemiology Research Findings .................................................... 22 7 Oral Health Services ............................................................................................. 24 Access to Dental Care ...................................................................................... 26 Other primary care services .............................................................................. 31 Unplanned dental care ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Devonport Characterisation Study
    DEVONPORT CHARACTERISATION STUDY & MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS JULY 2006 CONTENTS Introduction 7 Methodology 9 Policy Context 9 The Regeneration Context 11 Urban Morphology 12 Chronological Overview of the Historical Development 12 of Devonport • Pre 1690 – Before Plymouth Dock (Devonport) 12 • 1691-c1750 – Founding of the Naval Dockyard and Morice 13 Yard • The mid 18th – mid 19th centuries: from Sail to Steam 17 • Devonport Dockyard - 1800 onwards 18 • Development of the civilian town 19 o Map Regression 19 o The Early Town 24 o The Dock Lines 25 o Mount Wise 26 o Towards the 20th century: Development of North 26 Yard and changes to military requirements o Post War Devonport 27 Characterisation 28 • Geology 29 • Topography 30 • Figure Ground 31 • Building Ages 32 • Building Heights 33 2 • Landuse / Activity 34 • General Townscape Analysis 35 • Statutory Protection 36 • Buildings of Townscape Merit 37 • Buildings at Risk 38 Archaeological Significance and Potential 39 • Introduction 39 • Sites and Areas of Significant Archaeological Potential 39 • Areas of Uncertain Archaeological Potential 42 • Areas of Limited Archaeological Potential 42 • Quarried Areas 43 Character Areas 44 • Waterfront (Richmond Walk to Mutton Cove) 45 o Location and Topography o Historic Origins and Development o Activity: Prevailing or Former Uses o General Townscape Character and Movement o Architectural and Historic Qualities of Buildings o Local Details: Building Materials o Public Realm / Spaces o Negative / Neutral Factors o Summary of Significance • Mount Wise
    [Show full text]
  • SGR Newsletter Winter 2017 Issue 45 • £3.50
    19393_SGRIssue45_S4422 10/02/2017 15:17 Page 1 SGR Newsletter Winter 2017 Issue 45 • £3.50 Science in the Trump-May era Contents © SGR SGR News ...............................................2 A few words from the Director.....................2 Nuclear disarmament activities .....................3 Science4Society Week ................................3 Peaceworker...............................................3 Tom Kibble 1932 - 2016.............................4 Derek Sugden 1924 - 2015 ........................5 Feature articles.......................................6 Could Trident be hacked? ............................6 Get it from the Sun: expanding renewable electricity....................................................7 Universities, democracy and science............9 Stuart Parkinson, SGR, outlines key challenges But things are even worse. The new Secretary for to progressive science from the Trump and May Education is Betsy DeVos – a religious hardliner who Britain’s nuclear addiction?........................11 governments. reportedly does not believe in evolution. The damage The landmine ban: 20 years on .................13 she could do to standards of US science teaching are It would be safe to say that no one predicted that both enormous. Fracking and public health.........................15 Donald Trump and Theresa May would become Arms and fossil fuel industries in schools: leaders of their respective nations in 2016. But now One funder of research, however, is likely to benefit they have, what does this mean for the funding and considerably from the Trump presidency: the military. US undermining the next generation?..............17 management of science and technology within their military R&D spending is already huge – amounting to Devonport and nuclear submarines: what are countries – and how much of their agendas are more than 50% of the total federal science budget, shared? including a large fraction for the ‘modernisation’ of the risks? .................................................18 nuclear weapons – but Trump has promised even more.
    [Show full text]
  • Plymouth Report 2019
    ...one of Europe’s most vibrant waterfront cities where an HOTEL outstanding quality of life is enjoyed by everyone... SCHOOL PLYMOUTH REPORT How How fast many jobs How many new is the I wonder what homes were built in broadband Plymouth’s current are there in Plymouth? Plymouth last year? speed in population is? Plymouth? How many DATA students Plymouth are there in Plymouth? How How many many veterans live in Plymouth Plymouth? children are living in poverty? OFFICIAL CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 4 Executive Summary 5 2. LIVING 11 2.1 Plymouth Geographies 12 2.2 Population 13 2.3 Resident Insight 21 2.4 Deprivation, Poverty and Hardship 24 2.5 Crime and Community Safety 27 2.6 Education 29 2.7 The Enviornment 32 3. HEALTHY 33 3.1 Life Expectancy and Health Inequalities 35 3.2 Maternal and Child Health 37 3.3 Mental Health and Wellbeing 38 3.4 Dementia 39 3.5 Lifestyle Behaviours 40 3.6 Obesity 42 3.7 Long Term Conditions 43 3.8 Vulnerable Groups 44 3.9 Mortality 48 OFFICIAL 4. GROWING 50 4.1 The Economy 51 FOCUS ON 63 5. INFRASTRUCTURE 64 5.1 Housing 66 5.2 Digital Connectivity 74 5.3 Natural Capital 75 5.4 Transport 75 6. INTERNATIONAL 84 6.1 Universities and Research 85 6.2 International Exports 87 6.3 Social Enterprises 87 6.4 Tourism and Visitors 88 6.5 Culture 89 FOCUS ON 91 7. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES 93 7.1 Housing 94 7.2 The Productivity Challenge 96 7.3 Inclusive Growth 96 7.4 Strategic Connectivity 97 7.5 Unhealthy Lives 97 APPENDIX A 98 APPENDIX B 99 APPENDIX C 99 OFFICIAL INTRODUCTION 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Allotments and Alternative Food Networks: the Case of Plymouth, UK
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2013 Allotments and alternative food networks: the case of Plymouth, UK Miller, Wendy M http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/2874 University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Allotments and alternative food networks: the case of Plymouth, UK Wendy M Miller Thesis in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science and Technology Plymouth University Drake Circus Plymouth PL4 8AA December 2013 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. Allotments and alternative food networks: the case of Plymouth, UK Wendy Miller Abstract Alternative food networks (AFNs) are the focus of an ‘explosive growth’ of research in Europe (Goodman 2004), and the term covers a wide range of activities, from food banks, community gardens, and farmers’ markets, to community supported or organic agriculture. However, there is an impasse in differing positions over whether AFNs represent an exclusionary place-based ‘quality turn’ (Ilbery and Kneafsey 2000), or whether they contribute to inclusive local communities, sustainability and food security (Tregear 2011, Kirwan and Maye 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Dockyard, Naval Base and Town: the Social and Political Dynamics of Plymouth 1800 to 1950 Introduction
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Arts and Humanities School of Society and Culture 2017 Dockyard, Naval Base and Town: The social and political dynamics of plymouth 1800-1950 Bennett, GH http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10135 Ludwig All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Dockyard, Naval Base and Town: The Social and Political Dynamics of Plymouth 1800 to 1950 Introduction The influence of the military on human geography is a long established factor in the development of towns and cities. As B.K. Prasad has identified ‘the first cities were, in effect, war machines built within walls for defense and organised for battle and conquest’.1 In the British context Roman Army fortresses provided a focus for the development of the earliest towns in England such as Colchester, Exeter, York and Chester. There has, though, been very little academic work on the role of the Royal Navy in shaping some of the port cities of the United Kingdom. This constitutes a gap in both British urban history and our understandings of the Royal Navy within the national and local contexts. Lawton and Lee’s 2002 study Population and Society in Western European Port Cities c.1650-1939 has at least established some important lines of inquiry using a series of case studies including Portsmouth.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Reviews of Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Road and Street Design-Based Interventions Aimed at Reducing Unintentional Injuries in Children
    PUIC Road: Review of effectiveness and cost effectiveness – Main report 24th June 2009 INTERVENTIONS TO PREVENT UNINTENTIONAL INJURY IN CHILDREN ON THE ROAD Report 1: Systematic reviews of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of road and street design-based interventions aimed at reducing unintentional injuries in children COMMISSIONED BY: NICE Centre for Public Health Excellence PRODUCED BY: Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth. AUTHORS: Kate Ashton, Associate Research Fellow, PenTAG Tiffany Moxham, Information Specialist, PenTAG Julie Frier, Specialist Registrar in Public Health, PenTAG Gabriel Rogers, Research Fellow, PenTAG Ruth Garside, Senior Research Fellow, PenTAG Rob Anderson, Senior Lecturer, PenTAG CORRESPONDENCE TO: Kate Ashton PenTAG, Noy Scott House, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW [email protected] PUIC on the Road: Review of effectiveness About the Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG) The Peninsula Technology Assessment Group is part of the Institute of Health Service Research at the Peninsula Medical School. PenTAG was established in 2000 and carries out independent Health Technology Assessments for the UK HTA Programme, systematic reviews and economic analyses for the NICE (Technology Appraisal and Centre for Public Health Excellence) and systematic reviews as part of the Cochrane Collaboration Heart Group, as well as for other local and national decision-makers. The group is multi- disciplinary and draws on individuals’ backgrounds in public health, health services research, computing and decision analysis, systematic reviewing, statistics and health economics. The Peninsula Medical School is a school within the Universities of Plymouth and Exeter. The Institute of Health Research is made up of discrete but methodologically related research groups, among which Health Technology Assessment is a strong and recurring theme.
    [Show full text]
  • Plymouth Oral Health Needs Assessment (2019)
    OFFICIAL PLYMOUTH ORAL HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT 2019 Author: Office of the Director of Public Health, Plymouth City Council Date: December 2019 (v1.1) This document is produced as part of Plymouth’s Joint Strategic Needs Assessment. OFFICIAL Document information Document status Final Carol Harman (PCC), Zoe Allen (UoP & PHE), Robert Nelder Author (PCC) and Robert Witton (PDSE, UoP & PHE) Document version 1.1 Original document date December 2019 Amendment record Version Date Reason(s) for change Pages affected Update and clarification of number of patients 1.0 17 January 2020 treated and the amount of appointments attended 79 to 82 per PDSE DEF, academic year 2018/19. Office of the Director of Public Health Plymouth City Council Windsor House Plymouth PL6 5UF Tel: 01752 307346 [email protected] Date: December 2019 (v1.1) Prepared by: Carol Harman For queries relating to this document please contact: [email protected] Acknowledgements: We are grateful to those colleagues and partners that have contributed to this report. In particular, thanks are expressed to Claire Roberts and Elaine Knight (Plymouth Community Dental Services Ltd), Sue Casey (UHP NHS Trust), Di Dymond (Livewell Southwest), Reena Patel (PHE), Laura Juett (PCC), Sarah McFarlane (NHSE) and Tony Gravett (Healthwatch Plymouth). We are also grateful to PHE and NHS England for provision of data used to inform this report. © Office of the Director of Public Health 2019 2 OFFICIAL Contents 1. Executive summary .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]