The Evolutionary and Ecological History of the Fish Fauna of Therio Lerma.Basin, Mexico \

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Evolutionary and Ecological History of the Fish Fauna of Therio Lerma.Basin, Mexico \ THE EVOLUTIONARY AND ECOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE FISH FAUNA OF THERIO LERMA.BASIN, MEXICO \ by Michael Leonalfd Smith A dissertation sUbmitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Zoology) in. The University of Michigan . 1980 Doctoral Committee: Professor Robert Rush Miller -Assistant Professor Susan Soltau Kilham Associate Professor Gerald R. Smith Associate Professor Bruce H. Wilkinsdin RULES REGARDING THE USE OF MICROFILMED DISSERTATIONS MicroWlmed or bound copies of 'doctoral-dissertations submitted to The University of Michigan and made available through University Micro- films International or The University of Michigan are open -for inspection, but they are to.b u ed only with due regard for the rights of the author.. Extensive copying of th dissertation or publication of material in excess of standard copyright limiAs, whether or not the dissertation has been • copyrighted, must have been approved by the author as well as by the Dean of the Graduate School. Proper, credit must be given to the author if "any material frO"-m„, the dissertation is used in subsequent written or published • work. • . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS am grateful to . Drs. Susan Soltau Kilham, Rohlert Rush Miller, Qerald R. Smith and Bruce H. Wilkinson for service on my doctoral clOmMittee and improvement of my dissertation and to John Vandermeer for p-articipAion in my oral examination. Dr. Miller has provided me with much more than academic guidance; he Has taken considerable care to see that I was provided with financial/aupport while I Was a graduate student. My.graduate education would not have been possible without his •stippor€. I am grateful to Dr. Miller for various. research ' experiences including many field trips and to him 'arid Dr. Smith for opportunities to collaborate with them. It is also appropriate to thank Dr. Karl F. Lagler who enriched my background' in tropical and marine environment!s. Dr. Reeve M. Bailey has given advic'e on nomenclature. • The staff and students of the nuseum.of Zoology have Ilped me ing many ways. Peggy Lubahn, Mark Orser1„: and Kan a Steelqurst gave advice regarding layout, graphics, drawing and photography. Ellie Baker,.Koon and Marvel Parrington have proce'ssed much material and. helped me keep track of things .in general. When I was a • beginnin graduate student groping for ideas, Clyde Barbour provided inspiration. I have benefitted from discussions with him and Betty Lou Brett, Barry Chernoff, Julian Humphries, Dolores Kingston and Phil Yant.- Ken Nicholls provided help in many aspects of . production. Keary Campbell made the photographs in figures S, 7, 13, 18, 22 and 23. For assistance in the field I thank BarrysChernoff, Robie Howard ZUlian. an Humphries, Ellie Baker Koon, Edie Marsh Robert Miller, David Sbltt and,BrUce Turner. I especially acknowledge Ellie whose aLlity to pick tiny bones from a screen . iias greatly added to knowledge of 'Mexican fossil fishes. I thank Frances H. Miller for help.,in preparation for fied trips and , 'advice on logistiCS:' - This dissertation was enhanCed by teaching and research appointments in the Division of Biological Sciences and research appointments under NSF grants 015829 and '01109 to R.R. Miller. A Scott Tuner Award in carth Scidnce supported field .work. I acknowledge the cooperation of T. Downs and C. Swift,* Natural History Mtiseum of Los. Aneles County, in making material and notes available for studl',. W.I. Follett graciously allowed me to take over study of material in which he had a prior interest. - Special thanks are due to Drs. Jorge Carranza Fraser, iv Instituto Nacion'al de Pesca, and'Ismael Ferrusquia- Villafranca, instituto Nacional de Geologla, for arranging permission to conduct field work in.Mexico. Field work was conducted under permit numbers 3616 and 6243. , • PREFACr "Lack one lacks- both, and the-unseen is proYed by the seen, Till 'that becomes unseen, • and receives proof in its turn." -Walt Whitman, 1855 Leaves of-Grass -- -- An underlyina rationale.of this study is'that living organisms cannot 1;-e fully understood without reference to inferred past events. The basic'operational principle of- paleoecology is that an understanding of the ecology of fossil organisms can be derived from kndwledge of living plants and animals, but the converse may also be true. It'should be possible to interpret many Ciaaracteristics of present biotas from' the fossil record. teatures of \ biotas, which we regard as - characteristic and which may have been recorded for a few hundred years, may seem , 0 • • , very fixed, but "the fossil record may suggest\that they are only passing phases which would not even be 'recorded in the rocks" .(Ager, 1963). Paleontological data should be of interest to , ecologists as a source of DerspeCtisves not otherwise, available. For example, paleontological data Occasionally provide insight into situations which have no modern analogues, such as revegetation of large, newly deglaciated recions far from seed sources. The most vi general perspective of paleontological data is that of - time. Ecological topics are dynamic and irivolv". history which interplays with the present. Many ecological studies co id achie-7 a historical perspective by extension into past. Nonetheless, ecologists ' often hesitate to tilize paleontological data. Factors contributing to thi situation include the uncertainties. of fossil ta'xonomy, the difficulties of working with fragmentary remains; and the tendency toward compartmentali'zation in science.- The third of these - factors may be the most' effective today; recent work (reviewed, for example, by Miller, 1965;; Taylor, 1965: Cooe,.,.l97OY has reduced the importance of the others. This study is concerned with ,a fish fauna. It 1 delves into the fossil history of the fauna not so much to learn what fish indicate about the past as to ledrn what the past can tell about fish. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS'' DEDICATION- .............................. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS - ...... , . iii PREFACE ............................................ vi LIST OF- TABLES . xi LIST OF. FIGURES .................................... CHAPTER 'I. INTRODUCTI N - ... 1 Fossil Fish Collections and Localities Comparative Material Terminology and Abbreviations Theoretical Considerations Evolutionary Paleoetology Identification of Fossils — Paleontology of the Present Synthesis S • . II. GEOLOGY OF THE FOSSIL LOCALITIES . 28 Tectonic Setting Regional Geolog . The Western Mesa Central The Chapala Formation The -Atotonilco-Zatoalco Basin Santa Rosa. III. FOSSIL FISHES OF THE LERMA RIVER BASIN . 49 Family 'Salmonidae // Genus Rhabdofario Cope Rhabdofario rugosus n. unidentified aalmonid TaMily Catostomidae. Genus Moxostoma Rafinesque. Moxostoma cf 1. robustum species group Moxostoma ammophilum,n. sp.' viii - Family Cyprinidae Genus Yuriria Jordan.and Snyder YTIPITTg.alta 7 (Jordan). Yuriria elliana n. sp. Gents Algansea Girard , Algansea .tincella'(Valenciennes) Algansea milleri n. Algansea popoche (Jordan and Snyder) Family Ictaluridae Genus Ictalurus Rafinesque Ictalurus.spodius n. sp. Ictalurus dugesi Bean • Family Goodeidae Genus Tapatia Alvarez and Arriola Tapatia occidentalis Alvarezi and Arriofa 'Genus Ameca Miller and Fitzsimons Ameca splendens Miller and. Fitzsimons Genus Chapalichthys Meek Chapalichthys encaustus (Jordan arid Snyder) •, • 'Genus Alloophorus Hubbs and Turner Alloophorus robustus (Bean)* Genus Goodea Jordan Goodva cf. C: atripinnis Jordan Genus Xenotoca Hubbs and:Turne Xenotoca sp. Goodeidae, incertae sedis Family Atherinidae Genus Chirostoma Swainson .Chirostoma cf. C. lucids Boulenger Chirostoma cf. C prome as Jordan and Snyder Chirostoma sp. • Chirostoma, indeterminate species Family Centrarchidae. Genus Micropterus1Lacepede Micropterus -relictus Cavender and - Smith IV. DISCUSSION 150 Zbogeographic. Affinities of the Lerma4aun - Faunistic Assemblages-. Bioge6graphic Tracks . Pacific Coastal Track -WestPrn Mountp.An Track • Lerma-Rid Gralla4,Track Endemic Groups, Sequence of. Tracks Paleohydrography of the Western Mesa Central Climatic History BIBLIOGRAPHY S 179 4 • s dt, LIST OF TABLES 1. Generic groupirigs within the,family.Goodeidae based on the ovarian and trophotaenial characteristics of Hubbs and Turner (1939) ...................... 104 2. .Zoogeographic affinities of fossil fishes ot the western Mesa Central. 152 3. Matrix showing geographical occurrences of fossil fishes 'and their relatives in western Central Mexico. ......... 167 z xi 1.• LIST OF FIGURES 1. The Lerma-Santi go- river system of Central Mexico . • •• ........... 2. Fossil fish localities in the western Mesa Central... 1 .• .. 6 3. Physiographic regions of Mexico ................ 32 4. Localities in the Chapala basin ................ 37 - 5. .Bones of Rhabdofario rugo'sus n. sp. ............ 53 6. catter diagram of maxillae of Mexican Moxostoma 59 * •7. Bones, of Mexican Moxostoma .................... 62 8... Bones. t of Moxostoma from Jocotepec Quarry . 64. 9. Pharyngeal arches of Yuriiia .................. 71 10. Dentaries of Yuriria .......................... 73 ' 11. Cyprinid buries from Jocotepec Quarry .......... 20 .12. Dentaries of Algahsea .......................... 87 13. Skulls of ICtalurus from the Chapala basin . 95' 14. Bones of Ictalurus ............................ 97 15. Palatopterygoid arch of Goodea atripinnis. 106. 16. Two types of jaws and jaw suspension in the Goodeidae ...................................... 109 17. Comparison of articular-angulars of Characodon and
Recommended publications
  • Morphological and Genetic Comparative
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 79: 373- 383, 2008 Morphological and genetic comparative analyses of populations of Zoogoneticus quitzeoensis (Cyprinodontiformes:Goodeidae) from Central Mexico, with description of a new species Análisis comparativo morfológico y genético de diferentes poblaciones de Zoogoneticus quitzeoensis (Cyprinodontiformes:Goodeidae) del Centro de México, con la descripción de una especie nueva Domínguez-Domínguez Omar1*, Pérez-Rodríguez Rodolfo1 and Doadrio Ignacio2 1Laboratorio de Biología Acuática, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Fuente de las Rosas 65, Fraccionamiento Fuentes de Morelia, 58088 Morelia, Michoacán, México 2Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, España. *Correspondent: [email protected] Abstract. A genetic and morphometric study of populations of Zoogoneticus quitzeoensis (Bean, 1898) from the Lerma and Ameca basins and Cuitzeo, Zacapu and Chapala Lakes in Central Mexico was conducted. For the genetic analysis, 7 populations were sampled and 2 monophyletic groups were identifi ed with a genetic difference of DHKY= 3.4% (3-3.8%), one being the populations from the lower Lerma basin, Ameca and Chapala Lake, and the other populations from Zacapu and Cuitzeo Lakes. For the morphometric analysis, 4 populations were sampled and 2 morphotypes identifi ed, 1 from La Luz Spring in the lower Lerma basin and the other from Zacapu and Cuitzeo Lakes drainages. Using these 2 sources of evidence, the population from La Luz is regarded as a new species Zoogoneticus purhepechus sp. nov. _The new species differs from its sister species Zoogoneticus quitzeoensis_ in having a shorter preorbital distance (Prol/SL x = 0.056, SD = 0.01), longer dorsal fi n base length (DFL/SL x = 0.18, SD = 0.03) and 13-14 rays in the dorsal fi n.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Placenta Drives a Shift in Sexual Selection in Livebearing Fish
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature13451 The evolution of the placenta drives a shift in sexual selection in livebearing fish B. J. A. Pollux1,2, R. W. Meredith1,3, M. S. Springer1, T. Garland1 & D. N. Reznick1 The evolution of the placenta from a non-placental ancestor causes a species produce large, ‘costly’ (that is, fully provisioned) eggs5,6, gaining shift of maternal investment from pre- to post-fertilization, creating most reproductive benefits by carefully selecting suitable mates based a venue for parent–offspring conflicts during pregnancy1–4. Theory on phenotype or behaviour2. These females, however, run the risk of mat- predicts that the rise of these conflicts should drive a shift from a ing with genetically inferior (for example, closely related or dishonestly reliance on pre-copulatory female mate choice to polyandry in conjunc- signalling) males, because genetically incompatible males are generally tion with post-zygotic mechanisms of sexual selection2. This hypoth- not discernable at the phenotypic level10. Placental females may reduce esis has not yet been empirically tested. Here we apply comparative these risks by producing tiny, inexpensive eggs and creating large mixed- methods to test a key prediction of this hypothesis, which is that the paternity litters by mating with multiple males. They may then rely on evolution of placentation is associated with reduced pre-copulatory the expression of the paternal genomes to induce differential patterns of female mate choice. We exploit a unique quality of the livebearing fish post-zygotic maternal investment among the embryos and, in extreme family Poeciliidae: placentas have repeatedly evolved or been lost, cases, divert resources from genetically defective (incompatible) to viable creating diversity among closely related lineages in the presence or embryos1–4,6,11.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Endangered Mexican Goodeid Livebearers: the Critical Role of the Aquarium Hobbyist
    Conserving Endangered Mexican Goodeid Livebearers: The Critical Role of the Aquarium Hobbyist Ameca splendens Dr. John Lyons University of Wisconsin Zoological Museum Outline 1) Who are the Goodeids? - Taxonomic definitions - Evolutionary relationships 2) Mexican Goodeid biology - Life history - Habitats 3) Mexican Goodeid status and conservation - Impacts and threats - Some dire statistics 4) How YOU, the hobbyist, can help - Captive maintenance - Involvement in ALA and GWG Lago Zirahuén, Michoacán, Mexico 1) Who are the Goodeids? A family of fishes (Goodeidae; aka “Splitfins”) in the order Cyprinodontiformes, with two subfamilies: Goodeinae Empetrichthyinae ~ 40 species (~ 87 ESU’s) 4 species (8 ESU’s) Central Mexico Southwestern USA Livebearers Egg Layers Skiffia lermae Crenichthys baileyi Current Goodeid Distribution Family ~ 16.5 million years old; subfamilies split 5-10 million years ago Durango Puerto Vallarta Mexico City In Mexico, a generalized Goodeid ancestor Fossilized Tapatia occidentalis, Barranca de Santa Rosa, Jalisco; from Pliocene Epoch, at least 2.6 million years ago gave rise to a rich modern fauna Goodeid Evolutionary Relationships Cyprinodontiformes Goodeidae (Tooth Carps): Profundulidae Family Tree Cyprinodontidae1 Fundulidae Poeciliidae Valenciidae Cyprinodontidae2 Are Goodeids and Rivulidae Poeciliids merely Nothobranchidae livebearing killies? Aplocheilidae (or vice versa)? 2) Mexican Goodeid Biology - Small (maximum size 1.5” to 7”; most ~ 2.5”) - Short-lived (mature in 1 year, max age 3-5 years) - Livebearers
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Splitfin (Ameca Splendens) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Butterfly Splitfin (Ameca splendens) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, January 2013 Revised, January 2018 Web Version, 8/27/2018 Photo: Ameca splendens. Source: Getty Images. Available: https://rmpbs.pbslearningmedia.org/resource/128605480-endangered-species/butterfly-goodeid- ameca-splendens/#.Wld1X7enGUk. (January 2018). 1 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Fuller (2018): “This species is confined to a very small area, the Río Ameca basin, on the Pacific Slope of western Mexico (Miller and Fitzsimons 1971).” From Goodeid Working Group (2018): “This species comes from the Pacific Slope and inhabits the Río Ameca and its tributary, the Río Teuchitlán in Jalisco. More habitats in the ichthyological [sic] closely connected Sayula valley have been detected quite recently.” Status in the United States From Fuller (2018): “Reported from Nevada. Records are more than 25 years old and the current status is not known to us. One individual was taken in November 1981 (museum specimen) and another in August 1983 from Rodgers Spring, Nevada (Courtenay and Deacon 1983, Deacon and Williams 1984). Others were seen and not collected (Courtenay, personal communication).” From Goodeid Working Group (2018): “Miller reported, that on 6 May 1982, this species was collected in Roger's Spring, Clark County, Nevada, (pers. comm. to Miller by P.J. Unmack) where it is now extirpated. It had been exposed there with several other exotic species (Deacon [and Williams] 1984).” From FAO (2018): “Status of the introduced species in the wild: Probably not established.” From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Raised commercially in Florida, U.S.A.” Means of Introductions in the United States From Fuller (2018): “Probably an aquarium release.” Remarks From Fuller (2018): “Synonyms and Other Names: butterfly goodeid.” 2 From Goodeid Working Group (2018): “Some hybridisation attempts have been undertaken with the Butterfly Splitfin to solve its relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Species of the Genus Xenotoca Hubbs and Turner, 1939 (Teleostei, Goodeidae) from Central-Western Mexico
    Zootaxa 4189 (1): 081–098 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4189.1.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9BF8660A-4817-4EEA-853F-5856D1B8F6FA Two new species of the genus Xenotoca Hubbs and Turner, 1939 (Teleostei, Goodeidae) from central-western Mexico OMAR DOMÍNGUEZ-DOMÍNGUEZ1,3, DULCE MARÍA BERNAL-ZUÑIGA1 & KYLE R. PILLER2 1Laboratorio de Biología Acuática, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Edificio “R” planta baja, Ciudad Universitaria, Morelia, Michoacán, México 2Department of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA, 70402, USA 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The subfamily Goodeinae (Goodeidae) is one of the most representative and well-studied group of fishes from central Mexico, with around 18 genera and 40 species. Recent phylogenetic studies have documented a high degree of genetic diversity and divergences among populations, suggesting that the diversity of the group may be underestimated. The spe- cies Xenotoca eiseni has had several taxonomic changes since its description. Xenotoca eiseni is considered a widespread species along the Central Pacific Coastal drainages of Mexico, inhabiting six independent drainages. Recent molecular phylogenetic studies suggest that X. eiseni is a species complex, represented by at least three independent evolutionary lineages. We carried out a meristic and morphometric study in order to evaluate the morphological differences among these genetically divergent populations and describe two new species. The new species of goodeines, Xenotoca doadrioi and X. lyonsi, are described from the Etzatlan endorheic drainage and upper Coahuayana basin respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Newsletter
    2020 ANNUAL NEWSLETTER Biological Sciences Happy Holidays from Biological Sciences at Western Michigan University. TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Chair Page 2 Condolences - Emeriti Professors Page 3 , Molecular & Cellular Biology Page 4 Faculty Research Continues Page 5 & 6 Finding a New Way Page 7 We present you with the 2020 Biological Sciences Newsletter. It has been an eventful year and we want to Gene Convene share some of the highlights from the ever changing ways of Page 8 teaching and research. We hope you will feel part of our Students present department as you read. research Page 9 Re-imagine Labs 1 2 3 Page 10 Grants & Publications 2020 Page 11 A YEAR OF CHANGE DEPARTMENT ACTIVE, LEADING THE WAY TO Support the & FLEXIBILITY DESPITE PANDEMIC THE NEW NORMAL Department Page 15 1 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY 2020 NEWSLETTER Letter from the Chair Dear Friends and Alumni of the Department of Biological Sciences, We have had an unprecedented year and yet the department has thrived throughout the challenges. Our undergraduate programs include about 700 students and the graduate program holds 68 students. We are among the largest departments at WMU. Life in the department was normal and very active until March when the state declared a shelter in place. Classes turned 100% remote with a 3-day notice. No one was allowed on campus so research came to a screeching halt. All doors were locked for 5 weeks. There were only a few people allowed inside to maintain living things – animals, plants, etc. In May, they required “return to research plans” from anyone wanting to return to research labs.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Endohelminth Parasites of the Freshwater Fish Zoogoneticus
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Martínez-Aquino, Andrés; Hernández-Mena, David Iván; Pérez-Rodríguez, Rodolfo; Aguilar-Aguilar, Rogelio; Pérez-Ponce de León, Gerardo Endohelminth parasites of the freshwater fish Zoogoneticus purhepechus (Cyprinodontiformes: Goodeidae) from two springs in the Lower Lerma River, Mexico Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 82, núm. 4, diciembre, 2011, pp. 1132-1137 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42520885007 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 82: 1132-1137, 2011 Endohelminth parasites of the freshwater fish Zoogoneticus purhepechus (Cyprinodontiformes: Goodeidae) from two springs in the Lower Lerma River, Mexico Endohelmintos parásitos del pez dulceacuícola Zoogoneticus purhepechus (Cyprinodontiformes: Goodeidae) en dos manantiales de la cuenca del río Lerma bajo, México Andrés Martínez-Aquino1,3, David Iván Hernández-Mena1,3, Rodolfo Pérez-Rodríguez1,3, Rogelio Aguilar- Aguilar2 and Gerardo Pérez-Ponce de León1 1Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado postal 70-153, 04510 México, D.F., Mexico. 2Departamento de Biología Comparada, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado postal 70-399, 04510 México, D.F., Mexico. 3Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. [email protected] Abstract. In order to establish the helminthological record of the viviparous fish species Zoogoneticus purhepechus, 72 individuals were collected from 2 localities, La Luz spring (n= 45) and Los Negritos spring (n= 27), both in the lower Lerma River, in Michoacán state, Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extinction of the Catarina Pupfish Megupsilon Aporus and the Implications for the Conservation of Freshwater Fish in Mexico
    The extinction of the Catarina pupfish Megupsilon aporus and the implications for the conservation of freshwater fish in Mexico A RCADIO V ALDÉS G ONZÁLEZ,LOURDES M ARTÍNEZ E STÉVEZ M A .ELENA Á NGELES V ILLEDA and G ERARDO C EBALLOS Abstract Extinctions are occurring at an unprecedented ; Régnier et al., ). Since the start of the st century it rate as a consequence of human activities. Vertebrates con- has become clear that population depletion and extinction stitute the best-known group of animals, and thus the group of both freshwater and marine fishes is a severe and wide- for which there are more accurate estimates of extinctions. spread problem (e.g. Ricciardi & Rasmussen, ; Myers Among them, freshwater fishes are particularly threatened &Worm,; Olden et al., ; Burkhead, ). and many species are declining. Here we report the extinc- Extinction of freshwater fishes has been relatively well tion of an endemic freshwater fish of Mexico, the Catarina documented in North America (e.g. Miller et al., ; pupfish Megupsilon aporus, the sole species of the genus Burkhead, ). A compilation of the conservation status Megupsilon. We present a synopsis of the discovery and de- of freshwater fishes in Mexico has revealed that species scription of the species, the threats to, and degradation of, its have become extinct in the wild or have been extirpated habitat, and the efforts to maintain the species in captivity from the country, and . (% of all species in before it became extinct in . The loss of the Catarina Mexico) are facing extinction (IUCN, ; Ceballos et al., pupfish has evolutionary and ecological implications, and b; Table ).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Systematics of Characodon: Phylogeny Based on a Nuclear Locus Joshua Mccausland University of North Georgia
    University of North Georgia Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository Honors Theses Honors Program 1-2014 Molecular systematics of Characodon: Phylogeny based on a nuclear locus Joshua McCausland University of North Georgia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/honors_theses Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation McCausland, Joshua, "Molecular systematics of Characodon: Phylogeny based on a nuclear locus" (2014). Honors Theses. 2. https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/honors_theses/2 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. Joshua McCausland Molecular systematics of Characodon: Phylogeny based on a nuclear locus A Thesis Presented to the Honors Faculty of the University of North Georgia by Joshua McCausland Dahlonega, GA January 2014 Characodon Systematics Accepted by the Honors Faculty of the University of North Georgia in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the title of Honors Program Graduate Thesis Committee: Characodon Systematics Abstract Characodon is a genus of livebearing fishes whose two extant species (C. lateralis and C. audax) inhabit localities along the Río Mezquital of Durango, Mexico. This lineage of Goodeidae (Cyprinodontiformes) is critical to study because of its biogeographic and phylogenetic positions within the group, and both species are of conservation concern. A recent mitochondrial DNA analysis contradicts the published taxonomy, and suggests that Characodon has diverged into northern and southern populations. This, coupled with the observation that the morphological characteristics used in the original species descriptions might be flawed, has led me to study the phylogenetic relationships among populations using a third kind of evidence, nuclear DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-01 Catalog of Fishes. Online Version: (2016): 72 Records
    2016-01 Catalog of Fishes. Online Version: (2016): 72 records http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp. Genera and Species of Goodeidae W. N. Eschmeyer, R. Fricke, R. van der Laan (eds) albivallis, Crenichthys baileyi Williams [J. E.] & Wilde [G. R.] 1981:489, Fig. 7 [Southwestern Naturalist v. 25 (no. 4); ref. 8991] Preston Big Spring, White Pine County, Nevada, U.S.A. Holotype: UMMZ 203332. Paratypes: UMMZ 203333 (1, allotype); UNLV F-952 (28). •Synonym of Crenichthys baileyi (Gilbert 1893), but a valid subspecies albivallis Williams & Wilde 1981 as described -- (Fuller et al. 1999:322 [ref. 25838], Lazara 2001:71 [ref. 25711], Scoppettone & Rissler 2002:82 [ref. 25956], Scharpf 2007:27 [ref. 30398], Minckley & Marsh 2009:243 [ref. 31114], Page & Burr 2011:452 [ref. 31215]). Current status: Synonym of Crenichthys baileyi (Gilbert 1893). Goodeidae: Empetrichthyinae. Distribution: Springs in White Pine County, Nevada, U.S.A. [subspecies Albivallis]. Habitat: freshwater. atripinnis, Goodea Jordan [D. S.] 1880:299 [Proceedings of the United States National Museum v. 2 (no. 94); ref. 2382] Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico. Lectotype: USNM 23137. Paralectotypes: USNM 23137 (many). Lectotype established (as figured specimen) in caption to Pl. 114, p. 3257 in Jordan & Evermann 1900 [ref. 2446] if figured specimen is identifiable. •Valid as Goodea atripinnis Jordan 1880 -- (Espinosa Pérez et al. 1993:41 [ref. 22290], Nelson et al. 2004:107 [ref. 27807], Miller 2006:281 [ref. 28615], Scharpf 2007:28 [ref. 30398], Miranda et al. 2010:185 [ref. 31345], Page et al. 2013:104 [ref. 32708]). Current status: Valid as Goodea atripinnis Jordan 1880. Goodeidae: Goodeinae.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State Museum
    BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Volume 5 Number 4 MIDDLE-AMERICAN POECILIID FISHES OF THE GENUS XIPHOPHORUS Donn Eric Rosen fR \/853 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Gainesville 1960 The numbers of THE BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, are published at irregular intervals. Volumes contain about 300 pages and are not necessarily completed in any one calendar year. OLIVER L. AUSTIN, JR., Editor WILLIAM J. RIEMER, Managing Editor All communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publication should be addressed to the Curator of Biological Sciences, Florida State Museum, Seagle Building, Gainesville, Florida. Manuscripts should be sent to the Editor of the B ULLETIN, Flint Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Published 14 June 1960 Price for this issue $2.80 MIDDLE-AMERICAN POECILIID FISHES OF THE GENUS XIPHOPHORUS DONN ERIC ROSEN 1 SYNOPSiS. Drawing upon information from the present studies of the com« parative and functional morphology, distribution, and ecology of the forms of Xiphophorus (Cyprinodontiformes: R6eciliidae) and those made during the last ' quarter of a century on their. genetics, cytology, embryology, endocrinology, and ethology, the species are classified and arranged to indicate their probable phylo- genetic relationships. Their evolution and zoogeography are considered in rela- tion to a proposed center of adaptive radiation -on Mexico's Atlantic coastal plain. Five new forms are, described: X. varidtus evelynae, new subspecies; X, milleri, new specie-s; X. montezumae cortezi, new subspecies; X. pygmaeus 'nigrensis, new ' subspecies; X. heHeri aluarezi, new subspecies. To the memory of MYR6N GORDON, 1899-1959 for his quarter century of contributibns- to the biology of this and other groups of fishes.
    [Show full text]