Generational Health Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Generational Health Review Better Choices Better Health Final Report of the South Australian Generational Health Review April 2003 Select in toolbar NAVIGATION TIPS for navigation Clicking on the Table of Contents entries will take you to the relevant section Clicking on footnotes will direct you to the footnote listing ... ... then clicking on the same footnote will take you back Clicking on table and figure references will direct you to the appropriate diagram Selecting Hyperlinks will direct you to that web address Please note – links may expire over time Generational Health Review ING Building Level 4 45 Pirie Street ADELAIDE SA 5000 PO Box 347 Rundle Mall Post Office ADELAIDE SA 5000 Hotline: 1800 090 800 Facsimile: 8207 1621 The Hon Lea Stevens, MP Minister for Health GPO Box 2000 ADELAIDE SA 5001 Dear Minister It is with pleasure that I submit to you the Generational Health Review’s report on South Australia’s public health system. The report provides the framework to meet the health needs of South Australians today and into the next generation. Significant systemic reform is recommended. I am confident that implementation of the Report’s recommendations will continue to improve the health status of all South Australian and ensure a safe, efficient and effective health care system into the future. I wish you success in the report’s implementation. JOHN MENADUE AO CHAIR GENERATIONAL HEALTH REVIEW April 2003 Website: www.dhs.sa.gov.au/generational-health-review E-mail: [email protected] BetterChoices BetterHealth i FOREWORD The Government appointed this review because it correctly recognised the need for change in Health in South Australia. What I have seen and heard over the last nine months across the state has convinced me that the case for change is even stronger than I expected, or perhaps even more than the government anticipated. In chairing this review, several impressions or events stood out. The first was the scepticism we encountered that ours might be just another review that went the same way as others over the past 30 years — nowhere — because vested interests and ‘playing politics’ with health beat back necessary changes. Health is so political. That is why we have actively promoted public understanding and support for changes in this review. We have tried to make it an open and inclusive process. Change can only be achieved if there is a broad constituency of support. That constituency carries with it a moral authority. This report offers not only the potential for a long- term sustainable health service but also, perhaps even more importantly, it can enhance public confidence in open and inclusive public processes. What has to be done is pretty clear. There are really few surprises in this report. Not just in South Australia, but in other states and overseas, the importance of primary care being the foundation of a strong health service is widely accepted. Health takes 24% of the state budget. Getting efficiency and equity in health is important, not only for the health of South Australians but also for the state’s economic future, as is well set out in its Economic Plan. It is clearly unsustainable for South Australia, with 12% lower per capita incomes than the rest of Australia, to spend 4% more on health with no discernibly better health outcomes. The great strength of the South Australian health system is the dedication of thousands of very professional people. The other side of that coin, however, is that many of the people have worked in the health system all their lives and are reluctant to change. They know no other system. That is why the workforce is compartmentalised in training and operations, and why restrictive work practices, demarcation and denial of career opportunities, particularly for nurses, abound. Building in new people, new ideas, new attitudes, particularly in implementation and change management, is essential. The second striking impression I gained was the implicit view in some quarters that SA has unlimited health dollars. So we have continual pressure and demands on the system for better equipment, more drugs, more beds and more surgery. These pressures and services are all defensible and probably beneficial on their own merits, but they can be and often are at the expense of Aboriginal health, mental health and early intervention to help children who are the subject of abuse. These are the areas that the community gives priority to — if and when it is consulted. Even if the government doubled the numbers of hospital beds they would quickly be filled, with further demands for new beds. Hospitals are like the family refrigerator — they will always be full, regardless of whether the refrigerator is large or small. Priorities have to be set and choices made. So often, at present, the powerful in the health service pre-empt the dollars. ii BetterChoices BetterHealth We all have different views and values on where priorities should lie. What we need is transparency and real community participation that has all interests and views represented at the table when health dollars are allocated. We can’t have all we want in health or in education or in transport. Governments need to persuade the community to this view. It should not be hard, for we know that the health budget is like the family budget — with limited incomes, choices have to be made. If governments ignore this critical issue, they will always be on the defensive over every new demand. It is also unreasonable for hard-pressed and dedicated staff to be subject to unrelenting demands and pressures, when the real problem is a lack of frankness as to what the health system can reasonably be expected to provide. Australians are great hospital users, about 50% above Canadian rates and 30% above USA rates. South Australia is even more hospital-centric with hospital utilisation 15% above the national average. South Australia spends 67% of its health budget on hospitals. Many patients could be better treated outside hospitals — those with chronic illness, the mentally ill, and the aged — if the services were available. The autonomy and dignity of patients is best secured when they are treated in the home or as close to their home as possible. That is where our report clearly points — to primary care in the community. Thirdly, we were consistently reminded of poor ‘governance’, with over 70 statutory hospital and health unit boards in SA looking after their own territory. That is what the legislation says they should do. They are expected to manage and promote their own services, often at the expense of an integrated health service. Governance is a ‘crunch’ issue where, in my view, good public policy and sectional interests collide. It results in duplication and fragmentation of care. Many clinicians also told us that the present governance arrangements result in serious concerns about quality and standards. With good governance and funding distributed on a population basis, we will be in a strong position to remove wasteful duplication and make better decisions about the whole spectrum of health care — how much of our health dollar should go to hospitals and how much to primary care, mental health, Aboriginal health and family health. Otherwise primary care and public health will remain the poor relation. We will keep buying expensive ambulances for the bottom of the cliff when we should be building stronger handrails at the top. But good regional governance structures alone will not be sufficient. There will also need to be wise decisions about the people governments appoint to regional boards and the respective responsibilities and accountabilities not only of boards, but ministers and CEs. Fourthly, it became clear to me that present governance arrangements are a real barrier to effective community participation. Many boards represent the interests of the people within the health unit — but not necessarily the community. Yet community participation is essential so that good choices are made at state, community and personal level. Fewer boards must be associated with greater community participation. Relevant information must be shared and processes established so that the community can really participate in decisions — whether more health dollars should be spent on equipment or early intervention to protect children; or more surgery at the expense of the transport of Aborigines to a health unit; or keeping an obstetrics unit open in an area of declining population at the expense of care for the aged. We are proposing a substantial improvement in community participation in the health system. Every service or business needs to be continually called back to its main purpose — in the case of South Australia’s public health service, it is surely to serve the health needs of the whole population rather than the medicalised and institutional focus it presently has. BetterChoices BetterHealth iii Finally, the most searing part of my work in this review was meeting with Aboriginal people. An Aboriginal woman elder said to me that ‘in talking to our young people about health, they say to me, “what is the point of being healthy”’. I will never forget that. Their prospects are so bleak and their self-esteem so low. Spirits need binding as much as bodies. We have a national emergency in Aboriginal health. If all Australians had the same health status as Aboriginal people we would rank 140 in the world, alongside Bangladesh. It is a disgraceful story. I don’t think it is because most people don’t care. I think it is because we don’t know what to do. We must not lose heart and hope. It is in that spirit that we recommend the State Government review the level of investment in programs addressing the quality of life of Aboriginal people and changes in the way services are delivered, with greater emphasis on community, kinship, family and social connectedness.
Recommended publications
  • NOTICE PAPER ( No
    2495 2004-2005-2006 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NOTICE PAPER (www.aph.gov.au/house/info/notpaper) No. 134 MONDAY, 30 OCTOBER 2006 The House meets at 12.30 p.m. BUSINESS ACCORDED PRIORITY FOR THIS SITTING, PURSUANT TO STANDING ORDER 222 COMMITTEE AND DELEGATION REPORTS Presentation and statements 1 PUBLIC ACCOUNTS AND AUDIT—JOINT COMMITTEE: Annual Report 2005-2006. (Statements to conclude by 12.40 p.m.) PRIVATE MEMBERS’ BUSINESS Notices 1 MR ALBANESE: To present a Bill for an Act to amend the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975 to provide for an extension of the boundaries of the Great Barrier Reef Region. (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (Protecting the Great Barrier Reef from Oil Drilling and Exploration) Amendment Bill 2006). (Notice given 11 October 2006. Time allowed—5 minutes.) †2 MS BIRD: To move—That the House: (1) recognises the damaging impact upon Australian working women as a result of the federal Government’s WorkChoices legislation; (2) recognises in particular the contribution Australian women make to workplaces and households across the country; (3) takes immediate action to restore employment protection for women in the workforce; (4) takes particular action to provide employment protection to women adversely affected by the WorkChoices legislation; and (5) notes the Howard Government’s agenda to reduce employment conditions and employment security for women in the workforce. (Notice given 16 October 2006 Time allowed—30 minutes.) †3 MR M. D. FERGUSON: To move—That the House (1) notes as unacceptable Australia having eight different, and often inconsistent, sets of school curriculum; (2) calls on the Commonwealth to work cooperatively with the State and Territory governments for greater consistency in both school curricula and standards for every Australian school student; and (3) supports initiatives which will improve the education standards and accountability of educational authorities across the country, both government and non-government.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives
    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA House of Representatives Hansard WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016 CORRECTIONS This is a PROOF ISSUE. Suggested corrections for the Official Hansard and Bound Volumes should be lodged in writing with Hansard DPS as soon as possible but not later than: Wednesday, 17 February 2016 Facsimile: Senate (02) 6277 2977 House of Representatives (02) 6277 2944 Federation Chamber (02) 6277 2944 BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PROOF INTERNET The Votes and Proceedings for the House of Representatives are available at http://www.aph.gov.au/house/info/votes Proof and Official Hansards for the House of Representatives, the Senate and committee hearings are available at http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard For searching purposes use http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au SITTING DAYS—2016 Month Date February 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 22 23, 24, 25, 29 March 1, 2, 3, 15, 16, 17 May 10, 11, 12, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31 June 1, 2, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 29,30 August 23, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31 September 1, 19, 20, 21, 22 October 10, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20 November 7, 8, 9, 10, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 30 December 1 RADIO BROADCASTS Broadcasts of proceedings of the Parliament can be heard on ABC NewsRadio in the capital cities on: ADELAIDE 972AM BRISBANE 936AM CANBERRA 103.9FM DARWIN 102.5FM HOBART 747AM MELBOURNE 1026AM PERTH 585AM SYDNEY 630AM For information regarding frequencies in other locations please visit http://www.abc.net.au/newsradio/listen/frequencies.htm FORTY-FOURTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—EIGHTh PERIOD Governor-General His Excellency General the Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond-Tweed Family History Society
    Richmond-Tweed Family History Society Inc - Catalogue Call No Title Author Nv-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Aston Nv-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Ballarat Nn-15Y 1984 Electoral roll : Division of Banks Nn-14Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Barton Nt-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bass Nv-3Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Batman Nv-4Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bendigo Nn-12Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Berowra Nn-11Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Blaxland Ns-4Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Boothby Nq-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bowman Nt-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Braddon Nn-16Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bradfield Nw-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Brand Nq-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Brisbane Nv-5Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bruce Nv-6Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Burke Nv-7Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Calwell Nw-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Canning Nq-3Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Capricornia Nv-8Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Casey Nn-17Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Charlton Nn-23Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Chifley Nv-9Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Chisholm 06 October 2012 Page 1 of 167 Call No Title Author Nn-22Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cook Nv-10Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Corangamite Nv-11Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Corio Nw-3Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cowan Nn-21Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cowper Nn-20Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cunningham
    [Show full text]
  • PRETTY, Walter Arthur PRG 390 Special List Series 10 ______
    ________________________________________________________________________ PRETTY, Walter Arthur PRG 390 Special List Series 10 _______________________________________________________________________ Miscellaneous photographs 1. Japanese seaplanes on beach prior to Beaufort bomber attack. 1944. 2. Australian-built Beaufort crashed S-W Pacific Region. 1944. 3. 'As above but rear view. 4. Wreck of Beaufort Bomber. 1944. 5. Aerial view of Coffs Harbour, RAAF station. 1944. 6. Mariner's Cottage, Goolwa. 1977. 7. Mariner's Cottage, Goolwa. 1977. 8. "Little Scotland", Goolwa. 1977. 9. "Little Scotland", Goolwa. 1977. 10. Original Goolwa hospital building. 1977. 11. Original Goolwa hospital building. 1977. 12. William Younghusband's house, Admiral Terrace, Goolwa. 1977. 13. Railway Station now post office, Goolwa. 1977. 14. Old Bakehouse, Cadell Street, Goolwa. 1977. 15. Thomas Goode's store, Cadell Street, Goolwa. 1977. 16. National Trust Museum, Goolwa. 1977. 17. Goolwa Hotel, 1977. 18. Corio Hotel, Goolwa. 1977. 19. Soldier's Memorial Gardens, Goolwa. 1977. 20. Soldier's Memorial Gardens, Goolwa. 1977. 21. War Memorial, Goolwa. 1977. 22. Flagpole, Neighbour Reserve, Goolwa. 1977. 23. Murray River Queen at Goolwa Wharf. 1977. 24. Murray River Queen at Goolwa Wharf. 1977. 25. Goolwa-Hindmarsh Island ferry. 1977. 26. Goolwa-Hindmarsh Island ferry. 1977. 27. Figurehead of Mozambique at Goolwa Hotel. 1977. 28. Common effluent scheme works depot, Goolwa. 1977. 29. Walter Charles Pretty in World War I uniform. 30. Charles John Pretty in World War I uniform. 31. Elizabeth Grove Under 9 Soccer Team at Orgona Park Elizabeth. 1981. 32. As above. 33. Elizabeth Grove Green Under 10 Soccer Team at Ramsay Park Elizabeth West. 1982. 34. As above. 35. Elizabeth Grove supporters at the premiership game at Ramsay Park.
    [Show full text]
  • PARLIAMENT of the COMMONWEALTH of AUSTRALIA 795P—Parliamentary Paper No. 35 Brought up and Ordered to Be Printed 15 April 1969
    PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 795P—parliamentary Paper No. 35 Brought up and ordered to be printed 15 April 1969 COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE CANBERRA: 1969 PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 7959—Parliamentary Paper No. 35 Brought up and ordered to be printed 15 April 1969 COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE CANBERRA: 1969 PERSONNEL OF THE COMMITTEE Mr A. I. Allan Mr R. N. Bonnett Mr G. M. Bryant Mr F. Courtnay M. D. Cross D. S. Jessop SIGNS: Mr Nixon (Minister for the Interior) moved, by leave— (1) That a Select Committee be appointed to consider and report upon— (a) the criteria which should be adopted in naming Electoral Divisions; and (b) whether the Distribution Commissioners should attach names to Divisions at the time of publishing their proposals or whether some other person or persons should attach the names and, if some other person or persons, when. (2) That the Committee consist of seven members, four to be appointed by the Prime Minister and three to be appointed by the Leader of the Opposition. (3) That every appointment of a member of the Committee be forth- with notified in writing to the Speaker. (4) That the Chairman be appointed by the Prime Minister. (5) That the Chairman have a deliberate vote and, in the event of an equality of votes, also have a casting vote. (6) That the Committee have power to send for persons, papers and records. (1) That the Committee report to the House as soon as possible. (8) That the foregoing provisions of this resolution, so far as they are inconsistent with the Standing Orders, have effect notwithstanding anything contained in the Standing Orders.
    [Show full text]
  • •J53 3 4 067 031 98 3884 1977
    •J53 3 4 067 031 98 3884 1977 University of Queensland Presented to Tfie Fryer IVIemorial Library of Australian Literature to' University. o.f....Oue.eBs.l.and....Press THE GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA This title is published in a series on the Governments of the Australian States and Territories under the general editorship of Colin A. Hughes, Professorial Fellow of Political Science at the Australian National University in Canberra. Previous titles The Government of Victoria: Jean Holmes, University of Melbourne The Government of Tasmania: W. A. Townsley Forthcoming titles The Government of the Australian Capital Territory RUTH ATKINS The Government of New South Wales R. S. PARKER The Government of Queensland COLIN A. HUGHES THE GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Dean Jaensch UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND PRESS -7 ©University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia, Queensland, 1977 This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process with­ out written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher. Typeset by Academy Press Pty. Ltd., Brisbane Printed and bound by Silex Enterprise & Printing Co., Hong Kong Distributed in the United Kingdom, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Caribbean by Prentice-Hall International International Book Distributors Ltd., 66 Wood Lane End, Hemel Hempstead, Herts., England National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-publication data Jaensch, Dean Harold. The government of South Australia. (Governments of Australian states and territories). Index. ISBN 0 7022 1352 7 ISBN 0 7022 1353 5 Paperback. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Categories (98KB PDF)
    4 ADELAIDE the rate of homelessness, as well as local intelligence about what is happening ‘on the ground’ in order to match services with expressed need. 4.2 GEOGRAPHICAL CATEGORIES There are a number of ways of approaching a geographical analysis. The Australian Bureau of Statistics uses the Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) for the collection and dissemination of geographically organised statistics (ABS 2006c). The ASGC provides seven interrelated classification structures which are designed for different practical purposes. This report uses the ‘Main Structure’ which covers the whole of Australia without gaps or overlaps. The Main Structure comprises five hierarchical levels: census districts, statistical local areas, statistical subdivisions, statistical divisions, and states and territories. This analysis uses statistical divisions and statistical subdivisions as the main geographical categories, because patterns can be identified more easily if larger geographical categories are used. In each state and territory, the capital city is treated as a statistical division which includes the greater metropolitan area and any anticipated growth corridors for at least the next 20 years. The statistical division ‘represents the city in a wider sense’ (ABS 2006c, p. 15). Statistical divisions outside of the capital cities are ‘relatively homogeneous region(s) characterised by identifiable … links between the inhabitants and between the economic units within the region, under the unifying influence of one or more major towns or cities’ (ABS 2006c, p. 15). South Australia is divided into seven statistical divisions (excluding off-shore and migratory areas). They are Adelaide, Outer Adelaide, Yorke and Lower North, Murray Lands, South East, Eyre and Northern. The seven statistical divisions are divided into 20 subdivisions.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Homelessness and Electoral Participation
    An Exploration of Homelessness and Electoral Participation A report prepared for the Australian Electoral Commission by Veronica Coram, Jonathon Louth, Lisa Hill, Selina Tually & Ian Goodwin-Smith 1 “That was one of the main things for me, being homeless, you know, the politicians knowing that okay, we are constituents, you know, members of society, the homeless are actually coming out to vote, that my vote matters as much as those people who are working.“ - 30 year old, Male participant on the importance of voting Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) and the specialist homelessness services which engaged so meaningfully with this project. This research was made possible by the assistance of the Hutt St Centre, Baptist Care SA and Neami National Street to Home. The research team greatly appreciates the assistance provided by these organisations in recruiting participants and facilitating data collection on their premises. Input into the research plan and research instruments provided by key staff within these organisations was also vital. We especially extend our gratitude to project team members Ms Susan Geraghty (AEC), Mr Jaimie Holland (Hutt St Centre), Mr Craig McGlone (Baptist Care SA), and Mr Peter Hall (Neami). We also extend thanks to all of the participants for their contribution to this research. This research project was funded by the Australian Electoral Commission. Acknowledgement of Country The researchers acknowledge the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of this nation. We acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land on which we conducted this research. We pay our respects to ancestors and Elders, past and present.
    [Show full text]
  • State Upper Houses in Australia
    NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE State Upper Houses in Australia by Gareth Griffith and Sharath Srinivasan Background Paper No 1/2001 RELATED PUBLICATIONS C The Legislative Council of New South Wales: Past, Present and Future by B Page, NSW Parliamentary Library Background Paper No 1/1990 C Electing the New South Wales Legislative Council 1978 to 1995: Past Results and Future Prospects by A Green, NSW Parliamentary Library Background Paper No 2/1995 C NSW Legislative Council Elections 1995 by A Green, NSW Parliamentary Library Background Paper No 2/1996 C Egan v Chadwick and Other Recent Developments in the Powers of Elected Upper Houses by G Griffith, NSW Parliamentary Library Briefing Paper No 15/1999 C NSW Legislative Council Elections 1999 by A Green, NSW Parliamentary Library Background Paper No 2/2000 ISSN 1325-5142 ISBN 0 7313 1690 8 April 2001 8 2001 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, with the prior written consent from the Librarian, New South Wales Parliamentary Library, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Dr David Clune, Manager....................................................... (02) 9230 2484 Dr Gareth Griffith, Senior Research Officer, Politics and Government / Law .............................................. (02) 9230 2356 Ms Rachel Simpson, Research Officer, Law.......................... (02) 9230 3085 Mr Stewart Smith, Research Officer, Environment................ (02) 9230 2798 Mr John Wilkinson, Research Officer, Economics ...............
    [Show full text]
  • Murasu ISSN 1837-6460 Remembering Mulivaaikal 2009 May 2011 Volume 3, Issue 5
    Australian Tamil Congress Murasu ISSN 1837-6460 Remembering Mulivaaikal 2009 May 2011 Volume 3, Issue 5 Remembering Sri Lanka’s Slaughtered Faces by Roy Ratnavel ceded by the seismic wave that was felt as we lay on the ground. Any Tamil who lived in Sri Lanka knows how personal For me, the fear I remember most clearly was feeling the the month of May is. In sum: May will be etched in Tam- ground shocks from a stick of bombs, each one getting ils‟ memory as the month where Sri Lankan military most closer and more intense, and then the relief when the effectively demonstrated their ability and their desire to next shock came from the other side and the intensities kill Tamils in the blood-lands of Vanni. This wound will began to decay. Many homes and lives were destroyed on stay raw forever. a daily basis by the Sri Lankan terror apparatus. But some This is a moment for Tamils to soberly reflect on how we nights, surprisingly I have slept through it all. value life and what meaning we attach to death. This mo- At school, the teacher would sometimes ask us to stand ment is ripe for celebration, a celebration of the lives of and observe a moment of silence for the souls of my innocent people killed in May 2009 and those who were classmates who had been killed in a recent raid. Often we caught in the crossfire of decade old war on Tamils in Sri heard of number of people dead in the recent raid.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2018 Proposed Redistribution of South Australia Into Electoral Divisions
    Proposed redistribution of South Australia into electoral divisions APRIL 2018 Report of the Redistribution Committee for South Australia Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Feedback and enquiries Feedback on this report is welcome and should be directed to the contact officer. Contact officer National Redistributions Manager Roll Management and Community Engagement Branch Australian Electoral Commission 50 Marcus Clarke Street Canberra ACT 2600 Locked Bag 4007 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone: 02 6271 4411 Fax: 02 6215 9999 Email: [email protected] AEC website www.aec.gov.au Accessible services Visit the AEC website for telephone interpreter services in other languages. Readers who are deaf or have a hearing or speech impairment can contact the AEC through the National Relay Service (NRS): – TTY users phone 133 677 and ask for 13 23 26 – Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 and ask for 13 23 26 – Internet relay users connect to the NRS and ask for 13 23 26 ISBN: 978-1-921427-61-9 © Commonwealth of Australia 2018 © South Australia 2018 The report should be cited as Redistribution Committee for South Australia, Proposed redistribution of South Australia into electoral divisions. 18_0992 The Redistribution Committee for South Australia (the Redistribution Committee) has undertaken a proposed redistribution of South Australia. In developing the redistribution proposal, the Redistribution Committee has satisfied itself that the proposed electoral divisions meet the requirements of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Electoral Act). The Redistribution Committee commends its redistribution proposal for South Australia. This report is prepared to fulfil the requirements of sections 66 and 67 of the Electoral Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Party of Australia (SA Division) 14 Pages
    Suggestion 211 Liberal Party of Australia (SA Division) 14 pages South Australian secretariat Phone (08) 8237 6504 Fax (02) 6293 7663 Email [email protected] Liberal Party of Australia (SA Division) Redistribution Committee for South Australia Australian Electoral Commission GPO Box 344 Adelaide SA 5001 Dear Committee Members, I submit a Suggestions Submission on behalf of the Liberal Party of Australia (South Australian Division). Our Suggestions Submission comprises of the following: 1. A written submission with a summary of suggestions, commentary on the methodology we have used in formulating them, the suggestions in detail as summarised by mapping software tracking movements between divisions. We would like to take the opportunity to thank the Commission’s staff for their assistance to date. Yours sincerely, Sascha Meldrum State Director 2 OVERVIEW This Suggestions Submission is made in response to the Australian Electoral Commissioner’s invitation to members of the public to submit written suggestions about the redistribution of federal electoral boundaries in South Australia. The Liberal Party acknowledges that South Australia will decrease its representation from 11 to 10 Federal Electoral Divisions. We note that in making the proposed redistribution, the Redistribution Committee is required by the Act to: 1. Ensure the number of electors in each proposed electoral division must not deviate by more than 10 per cent above or below the current enrolment quota. The current enrolment quota for South Australia was determined by the Electoral Commissioner to be 119,503. 2. As far as practicable, the Redistribution Committee will ensure that the number of electors enrolled in each electoral division at 20 January 2022 (the projection time) will not deviate by more than 3.5 per cent above or below the projected enrolment quota of 122,731.
    [Show full text]