<<

Greenscapes

The Green Infrastructure Element February 2009

envision The Comprehensive Plan for Lancaster County, Lancaster County Photos from the Cover... The Conewago Potholes in the near the village of Falmouth is one of several State-designated Outstanding Scenic Geological Features in Lancaster County. (Photo courtesy of PA Dutch Convention & Visitors Bureau.)

Shade trees like these in Denver Borough are good examples of “urban greening.”

Tree planting volunteers helping to restore Jacob’s Creek in East Hempfield Township. (Photo courtesy of Lancaster County Conservation District.)

Bike rider’s enjoying an early fall ride on a section of Manheim Township’s extensive bike path system. Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction 1.1 What is Green Infrastructure? ...... 3 1.2 The Challenge...... 9 1.3 Purpose of Greenscapes and Relationship to the Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan ...... 9 1.4 Planning Process ...... 12 1.5 Contents of the Plan...... 14

2.0 Existing Conditions and Trends 2.1 Green Infrastructure Context...... 19 2.1.1 Regional Context...... 19 2.1.2 Land Use Context...... 20 2.2 Green Infrastructure Resources ...... 22 2.2.1 Landform ...... 23 2.2.2 Water and Air ...... 26 2.2.3 Biodiversity...... 33 2.2.4 Potential Restoration Areas ...... 43 2.2.5 Threats to Green Infrastructure Resources...... 45 2.3 Parks and Recreation...... 47 2.3.1 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Roles and Responsibilities...... 48 Table of Contents 2.3.2 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Planning...... 51 2.3.3 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Inventory...... 54 2.3.4 Parkland Standards ...... 60

3.0 Strategic Vision 3.1 The Vision: Lancaster County’s Natural Life Support System...... 69 3.2 The Concept: Lancaster County’s Green Infrastructure System ...... 70 3.3 The Structure: Green Infrastructure System Components ...... 75 3.3.1 Hubs and Greenways...... 76 3.3.2 Nodes and Links...... 82 3.3.3 Landscapes...... 83

4.0 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies 4.1 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies...... 87 4.1.1 Preservation...... 87 4.1.2 Conservation...... 88 4.1.3 Restoration ...... 88 4.1.4 Recreation...... 89 4.2 Tools...... 90 4.2.1 Policy and Planning Tools...... 91 4.2.2 Regulatory Tools...... 97 4.2.3 Capital Investment Tools...... 101 4.2.4 Outreach and Partnership Tools...... 108

5.0 Action Plan 5.1 Action Plan...... 121 5.1.1 Initiative 1: Education and Communications ...... 123 5.1.2 Initiative 2: Technical Assistance...... 123 5.1.3 Initiative 3: Funding...... 124 5.1.4 Initiative 4: Capital Planning and Development ...... 127 5.1.5 Initiative 5: Partnership...... 132 Continued to next page

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element iii 5.2 Roles and Responsibilities ...... 135 5.2.1 Public Sector...... 136 5.2.2 Semi-Public/Institutional Sector ...... 136 5.2.3 Private Nonprofit Sector ...... 137 5.2.4 Private for Profit Sector...... 138 5.2.5 Citizen Groups and Individuals...... 139 5.3 Plan Monitoring ...... 139

Appendices Appendix A. Green Infrastructure Planning Case Studies ...... 143 Appendix B. Parks and Recreation Background Data...... 149 Appendix C. Proposed Trails...... 165

List of Maps 1. Regional Context ...... 19 2. Lancaster County Physiography ...... 20 3. Existing Land Use...... 21 4. Growth Management Framework...... 22 5. Natural Vegetation ...... 23 6. Steep Slopes and Highly Erodible Soils ...... 25 7. Unique Geological Formations...... 25 8. Hydrology...... 26 9. Watersheds...... 27 10. Surface Water Quality...... 29 11. Impaired Streams ...... 30 12. Natural Heritage Areas Site Index...... 35 13. Natural Heritage Areas (Core Habitat & Supporting Landscapes)...... 36 14. Important Bird and Mammal Areas...... 37 15. Forest Blocks (Ranked by Size)...... 38

16. Forest Blocks (100 Acres or Greater)...... 38 Table of Contents of Table 17. Interior Forests...... 39 18. Interior Forests (Ranked by Size)...... 40 19. Natural Communities Quality ...... 41 20. Natural Gems and Priority Focus Areas...... 42 21. Priority Habitat Restoration Areas...... 43 22. Potential Forest Corridors ...... 44 23. Potential Agricultural Conversion Lands ...... 45 24. Existing Parks, Open Space and Trails ...... 57 25. Municipal Parkland Acreage/Standard Analysis...... 62 26. Preservation Areas...... 71 27. Conservation Areas...... 72 28. Restoration Areas ...... 73 29. Recreation Areas...... 74 30. Green Infrastructure Concept...... 75 31. Green Infrastructure Hubs and Greenways...... 76 32. Northern Lancaster County Groundwater Study Area...... 95 Continued to next page

iv Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element List of Tables 1-1 Benefits of Green Infrastructure...... 4 2-1 Lancaster County Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Land Inventory ...... 55 2-2 Regional Parks Managed by Lancaster County...... 55 2-3 Existing Regional Trails in Lancaster County...... 59 2-4 Lancaster County Conservancy Nature Preserves...... 60 2-5 Lancaster County Population Trends ...... 61 2-6 Lancaster County Population Forecasts...... 61 2-7 Regional Parkland Needs Based on Standard...... 63 2-8 Municipal Parkland Need Based on Standard...... 63 4-1 Green Infrastructure Tools...... 112 5-1 Action Table...... 122 5-2 Proposed Trails ...... 128

Table of Contents

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element v

Acknowledgements

RESOLUTION NO. 5 OF 2009

On motion of Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Lehman;

WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners charged the Lancaster County Planning Commission with developing a Comprehensive Plan for the County; and

WHEREAS, The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the importance of a healthy natural environment to the quality of life of residents in Lancaster County; and

WHEREAS, The Lancaster County Planning Commission appointed a fifteen member Task Force to assist in the development of Greenscapes: The Draft Green Infrastructure Element of the Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan; and

WHEREAS, Greenscapes provides a framework for coordinated action by all sectors of the community to create a healthy and sustainable green infrastructure system; and

WHEREAS, The Lancaster County Planning Commission has distributed the Draft Green Infrastructure Element to all segments of the community, as required by the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code; and

WHEREAS, The Lancaster County Planning Commission and the Green Infrastructure Task Force sought extensive public involvement and comment on the draft plan; and

WHEREAS, The Lancaster County Planning Commission has considered and incorporated all appropriate comments into the Draft Green Infrastructure Element; and

WHEREAS, The Lancaster County Planning Commission, at its regularly scheduled meeting on February 2, 2009, recommended that the Lancaster County Board of Commissioners adopt Greenscapes as an official element of the Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA That the Board hereby adopts Greenscapes as an official element of the Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan.

Motion passed unanimously.

I, Andrea McCue, Chief Clerk to the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, do hereby affirm that the above resolution was passed unanimously by the Lancaster County Board of Commissioners on the 25th day of February, 2009.

ATTEST:

______Andrea McCue Chief Clerk County of Lancaster Date: February 25, 2009 2/25/09

Prepared by Sally Just Lancaster County Planning Commission Department of Conservation & Natural Resources Lancaster County Green Infrastructure Project Matthew Knepper Committee Agricultural Preserve Board Matt Kofroth Consultants Lancaster County Conservation District Rettew Associates Jim Laird Lancaster, PA Private Consultant Wallace, Roberts & Todd Mike McKinne Philadelphia, PA Lancaster County Bird Club Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program - Derek Reese Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Hazlett, Burt & Watson, Inc. Eastern Office, Middletown, PA Andy Weaver Lancaster County Engineers Office Lancaster County Board of Project Team

Commissioners Acknowledgements Dennis P. Stuckey, Chairman Lancaster County Planning Commission Staff Scott Martin, Vice Chairman Long-Range and Heritage Planning Division Craig Lehman Scott W. Standish Director for Long-Range and Heritage Planning Lancaster County Planning Michael A. Domin Commission Principal Planner Dennis R. Groff, Chairperson Eli Yearick Ray D’Agostino, Vice Chairperson Heritage Planner Noelle B. Fortna, Secretary Donna J. Hahn Virginia K. Brady Administrative Secretary Mark Hiester Leo S. Lutz Lancaster County Printing Department Timothy J. Roschel Lynn M. Stiles James R. Cowhey, AICP Executive Director Graphic Designer Green Infrastructure Project Committee This project was funded in part by a grant from the Keystone Recreation Park and Charles E. Douts, Jr., Chair West Hempfield Township Conservation Fund, under the administration of the Department of Conservation and John Ahlfeld Lancaster Inter-Municipal Committee Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Bill Ebel Solid Waste Management Authority Board Pat Fasano Comprehensive Land Studies Rocky Gleason Western PA Conservancy Ralph Goodno Lancaster County Conservancy Mark Gutshall Landstudies, Inc. Jim Hackett Lancaster County Parks Department

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element xi

Introduction

Key Message

Lancaster County has a rich legacy of natural resources that has allowed its inhabitants to thrive for centuries. While it is known that Native Americans modified the environment to suit their needs, the period since European settlement has witnessed an unprecedented alteration of the natural landscape to accommodate a growing population. Activities such as agriculture, the construction of roads and other infrastructure, and – most recently – suburban and rural development have all contributed to the degradation of the County’s natural resources. While many of these changes have significantly impacted our air and water, fragmented native habitats, and resulted in the loss of plant and animal species, the County’s landscape still retains a number of important natural resources. The extensive network of rivers and streams, the wooded slopes of the Pennsylvania Highlands (Furnace Hills and Welsh Mountain), and the spectacular Susquehanna River gorge are a few examples of the County’s natural heritage that helps define the County’s identity and quality of life. Woodlands, stream corridors, open spaces, and other “green” resources are an integral part of the landscape throughout the County’s rural and urban areas and perform essential and irreplace- able “life support” functions for residents.

Greenscapes: The Green Infrastructure Element of the Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan defines a vision, goals and objectives, strategies, and tools to preserve, conserve, restore, and en- Introduction hance natural resources through the establishment of a countywide, integrated green infrastructure system. It highlights the importance of protecting large blocks of contiguous land and improving connectivity as it aims to establish a network of natural areas, conservation lands, and working landscapes. Greenscapes provides a blueprint for accommodating appropriate growth and develop- ment while preserving the region’s most valuable natural resources, native species, cultural assets and agricultural economy.

The green infrastructure system created by applying the strategies and tools contained in Green- scapes will provide a framework for sustainable growth and economic vitality in Urban Growth Ar- eas, for agriculture and other compatible uses in rural areas, and for outdoor recreation and related activities such as walking, biking or paddling throughout the County.

1.1 What Is Green Infrastructure? parks; and public and private working lands of conservation value - such as forests, farms, and Green infrastructure has been defined as: ranches. It also incorporates outdoor recreation …the Nation’s natural life support system – a and trail networks.1 strategically planned and managed network of wilderness, parks, greenways, conservation ease- Gray infrastructure consists of ments, and working lands with conservation engineered and built systems that value that supports native species, maintains support community functions, for natural ecological processes, sustains air and example: roads; sewer and water water resources, and contributes to the health facilities; gas pipelines and electrical and quality of life for America’s communities transmission lines; and communication and people. towers.

The Green Infrastructure network encompasses a wide range of landscape elements, including: Green infrastructure differs from gray infrastruc- natural areas - such as wetlands, woodlands, ture in many ways, yet both are essential to a waterways, and wildlife habitat; public and healthy, viable community. Gray infrastructure is private conservation lands - such as nature 1 GreenInfrastructure.net, sponsored by the Con- preserves, wildlife corridors, greenways, and servation Fund and USDA Forest Service

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 3 Table 1-1. Benefits of Green Infrastructure Environmental Quality • Preserves natural resources, such as floodplains, steep slopes, and wetlands • Recharges and protects the quality of surface and ground waters • Provides natural stormwater management services, including flood protection, erosion control, and pollution reduction • Reduces energy use and captures carbon dioxide, thus helping to counteract global climate change • Conserves native communities and provides habitat for plant and animal species of concern Community Health • Cleanses the air we breathe and the water we drink • Promotes outdoor recreation and exercise through activities such as walking, biking and paddling • Brings people into contact with nature, providing important psychological benefits Sustainable Economy • Strengthens the economy through improved quality of life, increased property values, and in- creased economic activity • Conserves resources that support the economy -- Hunting, fishing, paddling and other forms of outdoor recreation -- Tourism -- Rural land uses such as agriculture, forestry, and resource extraction • Reduces costs associated with engineered “gray infrastructure” systems (stormwater, wastewater, etc.)

Introduction the man-made substructure that supports societal linating crops, regulating climate, capturing and functions such as communications, movement, storing excess carbon in the atmosphere, reduc- and commerce. Green infrastructure – natu- ing storm and flood damage, and maintaining ral resources such as streams and waterways; groundwater aquifers. The woodlands, wetlands, wetlands and floodplains; woodlands, etc. – is and waterways that comprise the County’s green the substructure that supports life itself. Both are infrastructure also provide marketable goods and equally important to the physical and economic assets such as forest products, fish and wildlife, health of a community. Table 1-1 summarizes the outdoor recreation, and scenic views. All of these many benefits that green infrastructure provides benefits contribute to the health, quality of life, for the economic, social, and overall well-being and economic prosperity of County’s residents. of our community. There is a tendency to think of green infrastruc- ture in purely aesthetic terms or as something Benefits of Green Infrastructure that is only appreciated by those who work or recreate in the outdoors. But the fact is that As illustrated in Table 1-1, green infrastructure green infrastructure touches the lives of every provides numerous benefits, functions, and val- resident, every day. Those involved in farming ues that address environmental, social, and eco- and timbering rely on the County’s good soils nomic needs – the three foundations of a sustain- and moderate climate to grow crops and harvest able community. A green infrastructure system trees for their livelihoods. Those living and work- helps to protect, enhance, and restore the natural ing in the County’s urban areas rely on green functions and services of an ecosystem. These infrastructure to provide fresh drinking water, “ecosystem services” include cleaning the air, fil- clean air to breath, and places to recreate. Green tering and cooling water, recycling nutrients, pol- infrastructure is also critical to the perpetuation

4 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element of the County’s native plant and animal com- Reducing the Impacts of Flooding: The conver- munities and to the survival of plant and animal sion of natural lands to urban and suburban uses species of concern. directly impacts the degree and extent of flooding that occurs during and after large storm events. The following is a summary of just a few of the Impervious surfaces such as roads, driveways, functions and benefits of green infrastructure: parking lots, and rooftops prevent the infiltration of rain water. The resulting runoff is typically Cleaning the Water: Clean water is essential for directed to storm drains or facilities that may a healthy community, a vibrant economy and the or may not retain the water before discharg- continued existence of the County’s native plants ing it into the nearest waterway, where it can and animals. Urban and suburban development result in flooding that may destroy property and adds pollutants such as excess nitrogen and phos- erode stream banks. Historic communities are phorus, oil, grease, and heavy metals to local wa- frequently affected the most by flooding due to terways from parking lots, roads, and lawns. Also, their frequent locations on or near major water- agricultural runoff contributes excess nutrients ways. Flooding problems tend to worsen over and pesticides to adjacent streams, contaminates time as land is developed from its natural state ground water, and degrades drinking water sup- to development and more impervious surface is plies. Excess nutrients (and other contaminants) created. in the County’s waterways are a major concern for both local residents and those concerned about the Green infrastructure can reduce flooding in Introduction health of the . several ways. Natural lands such as forests absorb rainfall and recharge groundwater aquifers, Green strips of vegetation, such as forests and thereby reducing the severity of runoff during grasses adjacent to stream banks and floodplains large storm events. Forests absorb water at a (referred to as riparian buffers), are an effective rate nearly ten times that of lawn, helping to means of reducing the amount of nutrients, maintain groundwater levels for water supply sediments, and pesticides that enter surface wells and providing base flow for streams dur- waters. Riparian buffers slow water runoff so that ing dry periods. In suburban and urban areas, contaminants can be filtered and absorbed by trees intercept and absorb rainwater, reducing plants and microbes in the soil. In addition, by the amount of water that is channeled through anchoring soils with their roots, stream buffers streets and gutters. Researchers have found that stabilize soils along stream banks and steep slopes evergreens, conifers, and trees in full leaf can where soils are highly erodible. Stream sediments intercept up to 36% of the rainfall that falls on can impact fish and invertebrate populations and them. Floodplains and wetlands store water as habitats, alter stream channels, and reduce water it overflows the stream bank. Friction caused by quality. Also, the shade provided by riparian trees trees, shrubs, and other vegetation in these areas can significantly reduce the effect of summer also helps reduce the velocity of water flow. temperatures on streams and waterways. Cold water, which holds higher levels of dissolved oxy- gen, is critical to the health of certain fish, such as brook trout, invertebrates, plants, and other aquatic organisms.

Wetlands are another green infrastructure re- source that has the ability to cleanse water before it enters a stream or river. Wetlands reduce the velocity of water flowing through them so that sediment can settle out and native plant species can absorb or break down various pollutants. Pervious sidewalks like these at Warwick Township’s municipal office help reduce storm water runoff by allowing rainwater to be absorbed into the ground.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 5 In urban areas where there are large amounts of effect of acid rain on the ability of trees to absorb impervious surfaces, green infrastructure such as nutrients and necessary trace elements). In addi- street trees and urban forests, and “green inter- tion, there is scientific evidence that air pollution ventions” such as green roofs, natural drainage contributes to the global concerns of ozone swales, porous pavement, rain barrels, tree box depletion and climate change, which is a major filters and rain gardens can absorb, cleanse and threat to life on the planet as we know it. hold storm water. This function is particularly important in older urban communities that have Although air quality is a complex and challeng- combined sanitary/stormwater sewers. Large ing issue that requires action at the regional and storm events often overload these antiquated national levels, there are a number of steps that systems, sending untreated wastewater directly can be taken locally to help improve the quality into local waterways. In areas with separate of the air we breathe. Green infrastructure can storm sewers, green infrastructure also acts as a play a significant role in this effort. “biological filter” that helps cleanse urban runoff before it is discharged to waterways. Simply planting and conserving trees can im- prove air quality. The leaves and needles of trees Cleaning the Air: Air quality is a major factor in have surface areas that absorb pollutants such human illnesses ranging from cardiovascular dis- as carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen ease to cancer to respiratory ailments. Automo- oxide and, in turn, release oxygen. They also trap biles, fossil fuel plants, factories, and other point particles in the air and tropospheric (ground-lev- sources of air pollution are the primary culprits el) ozone that can be harmful to humans, plants, contributing to the County’s poor air quality. and animals. The air purification functions of Air quality has a significant impact on the health trees are particularly important in urban areas of local ecosystems as well. Impaired air quality where air pollution is often more concentrated. creates stresses on forests, either directly (e.g., ozone damage to leaves) or indirectly (e.g., the In addition, since the automobile is one of the largest sources of pollution, reducing the depen- dence on the car to travel can effectively improve

Introduction air quality. One method of accomplishing this is to encourage the development of pedestrian and bike-friendly communities. Building side- walks, mixing land uses, and building compact communities are all effective means of enabling people to walk or bike to school, work, or shop. Connecting different land uses with trails not only provides people with direct access to open space to recreate; it also provides people with an alternative to the use of their automobile for short trips.

Conserving Energy: The term “heat island” refers to urban air temperatures that are higher than nearby rural areas. Because buildings, roads and other structures retain heat, rural areas cool off faster at night than cities. Some cities have air temperatures up to 10°F warmer than the surrounding countryside. Heat islands form as cities replace natural land cover with pavement,

Trees help clean the air by absorbing pollutants buildings, and other gray infrastructure. These and releasing oxygen. A mature leafy tree changes contribute to higher urban temperatures produces as much oxygen in one season as 10 in a number of ways: people inhale in a year.

6 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element • The removal of trees and vegetation minimiz- mobile species are restricted to the fragments es the natural cooling effects of shading and available to them. Small fragments of habitat evaporation of water from soil and leaves. can only support small populations of plants • Large buildings and narrow streets reduce air and animals. Minor fluctuations in climate, flow and heat air trapped between them. food resources, disease, or other factors to which • Heat from vehicles, buildings, and air condi- larger populations can adapt may be devastating tioners add warmth to their surroundings. to these smaller, isolated populations. Therefore, habitat fragmentation is a significant cause of These higher temperatures amplify smog and air species extinction. pollution, threaten the lives of urban residents during extreme heat events, and contribute to Corridors or ribbons of green infrastructure higher energy costs and other quality of life through the landscape are critical elements of an impacts. effective ecosystem conservation strategy. When combined with a system of green infrastruc- Infusing green infrastructure into urban areas ture hubs, these ribbons of open space, often through the planting of trees and other vegeta- referred to as “greenways,” can help preserve rare, tion is a simple and effective way to reduce the threatened, and endangered plant and animal urban heat island effect and decrease local air communities as well as providing outdoor recre- temperatures during hot periods. A mature tree ational opportunities. Connecting isolated habi- can effectively cool the air and shade buildings tat patches through greenways enables certain Introduction and hard surfaces, thus reducing the amount of animal species to migrate between the patches heat absorbed throughout the day. Other ways and mix with other populations of the same to reduce the heat island effect include installing species. This strengthens the overall gene pool of cool or vegetated green roofs and switching to the species and its ability to withstand otherwise lighter colored, heat-reflecting paving materials. catastrophic events such as outbreaks of disease. In addition, by placing trees, shrubs, and other vegetation in the right locations, a homeowner can reduce the energy required to keep homes Economic Benefits of Green and surrounding areas comfortable during winter Infrastructure and summer. Trees can reduce summer tempera- tures by shading roofs from the afternoon sun. The 2004-2005 “i-Tree” study in Minneapolis Deciduous trees provide summer shade and then by the USDA Forest Service found that the shed their leaves in the fall, allowing sunlight to City’s public street trees provide at least $24.9 filter through their bare branches in winter to million in quantifiable annual benefits (about help warm the home. The cost savings provided $150 per household), including annual energy by green infrastructure can be significant in a savings of more than $6.8 million, reduced time of increasing fossil fuel costs. stormwater runoff benefits equal to $9.1 million in savings, and aesthetic and property value Conserving Native Plant and Animal Diver- increases of at least $7.1 million. These figures sity: When land is cleared of its native vegetation do not account for other benefits such as noise for uses such as agriculture, road construction, and air pollution reduction. and development, plant and animal habitat is typically broken up into small isolated islands Minneapolis Tree Advisory Commission Annual or patches. This process, known as “habitat Report, 2006 fragmentation,” has a significant impact on the biological diversity of a community such as Strengthening the Economy: Green infrastruc- Lancaster County, where agriculture and land de- ture yields important fiscal benefits for citizens, velopment have dramatically reduced the amount businesses, and government. For instance, it has of available habitat for native plants and animals. been shown that green space can increase the re- Mobile species such as birds and mammals can sale value of a home. Statistics from the National retreat into the remaining patches of habitat and Homebuilders Association show that residential may use more than one fragment; however, less properties realize a 10 to 20 percent gain in value

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 7 Agricultural Land and Green Infrastructure

Approximately 342,000 acres or 54% of the Lancaster County landscape is currently in ag- ricultural use. Though agriculture has impacted Lancaster County’s native plant and animal communities, farmland should be considered an important green infrastructure resource that adds value to ecosystem processes and functions such as groundwater recharge and habitat for certain Studies show that consumers spend up to 13% species. While these benefits merit consideration more at shops near green landscapes. in Greenscapes, the primary focus of the Plan is when they are close to green space; this premium preserving natural lands such as the habitat of can increase to 25 percent when homes are sur- plant and animal species of concern and conserv- rounded by trees. While this is perhaps the most ing semi-natural land and water resources such direct economic benefit for the private citizen, as riparian corridors and passive recreation areas. the incorporation of green infrastructure can save Lancaster County has a longstanding tradition homeowners money in other ways. For example, of protecting its farmland through effective ag- careful landscaping can reduce cooling and heat- ricultural zoning ordinances that limit non-farm ing costs by 30 percent. Shade trees can prevent development in rural areas as well as a purchase direct sunlight from heating up exterior walls and of development rights (PDR) program that has roofs and reflected light from conveying heat into permanently preserved approximately 80,000 a house from the ground or other surfaces. And acres of farmland, more than any other program by reducing wind velocity, a tree slows air leakage in the nation. Also, farmland preservation spe- from a house. With energy cost on the rise, these cialists in the County are exploring new methods simple changes can save homeowners money of making the agricultural preservation program and reduce carbon emissions from energy use for more effective and efficient while Balance, the

Introduction cooling and heating as well. Growth Management Element of the County Comprehensive Plan, defines new directions to In addition to benefiting individual homeowners, strengthen the agricultural economy as part of a green infrastructure makes important contribu- comprehensive Rural Strategy. tions to the local economy. Studies show that consumers will pay a greater than 10 percent Because of the above efforts, Greenscapes does premium when they shop next to greenspace not directly address farmland preservation. compared to what they pay for the same products Nevertheless, farmland has an important role to in other shopping areas. Promoting greenspace play in implementing Greenscapes – especially attracts new businesses to communities and cre- in efforts to enhance surface water quality by ates new revenue sources from tourism. Other establishing riparian buffers and to connect iso- important economic contributions made by lated patches of habitat by developing greenway green infrastructure include sustainable resource corridors for species migration. extraction activities such as forestry and fre- quently overlooked “free” ecosystem services such as crop pollination. In addition, green infrastruc- ture is increasingly being used for purposes such as flood control and stormwater management, often times at a fraction of the cost of traditional engineered solutions.

8 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element rural residents and water drawn from wells to supply public drinking water systems. Growth tracking reports prepared by the Lancaster County Planning Commission (LCPC) indicate that land development in rural areas is consum- ing significant amounts of prime farmland, fragmenting forestland, and negatively impact- ing natural habitat areas. A number of plant and animal species have been identified as rare, threatened, or endangered (species of concern). Air quality is also a major concern. The American Poor agricultural practices have contributed to Lung Association report, State of the Air: 2008 Lancaster County’s surface and ground water quality problems. (covering data from 2004 through 2006) ranks Lancaster County as being the eighth worst of 31 Pennsylvania counties for which ground-level 1.2 The Challenge ozone data were collected, and 115th worst out of 680 counties across the U. S In the broadest sense, green infrastructure and the ecological functions and services it provides These are a few of the major issues Lancaster are essential to the survival of all life. Green in- County will need to address in creating a healthy Introduction frastructure provides life-sustaining benefits, such and sustainable green infrastructure system. as cleansing the air we breathe and the water we Additional information on the health of the drink, that have largely been taken for granted. County’s green infrastructure resources and When natural lands are converted to develop- threats to those resources is presented in Chapter ment, the hidden costs of losing the ecosystem 2.0 of the plan. services they provide are almost never accounted for in the marketplace. The loss of these services often results in damages that take a heavy toll on 1.3 Purpose of Greenscapes and human health, as well as on the survival of native Relationship to the Lancaster plant and animal communities. Remedying these County Comprehensive Plan problems after the fact is difficult and costly and the realization that ecosystem services must be afforded greater consideration is growing. More- Need for and Purpose of the Plan over, in an era characterized by environmental trends such as natural resource depletion, global The Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code warming, and species extinction, there is increas- (MPC) mandates that county comprehensive ing recognition that green infrastructure is a key plans include provisions for the protection of to a sustainable future. natural and historic resources. First passed by the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 1968, the Although Lancaster County has never formally MPC is the Commonwealth’s “enabling” legisla- prepared a green infrastructure plan or a com- tion for municipal governments. It outlines the prehensive assessment of the health of its natural structure through which municipalities create resource base in the past, stresses on the County’s and enforce planning and zoning regulations. green infrastructure are readily apparent. For The MPC has been amended many times since example, a significant number of the County’s its creation. One of the most sweeping changes surface waters are severely degraded by sediment occurred in 2000, when the MPC began requir- and nutrients. Eroded stream banks with sparse ing county and municipal comprehensive plans riparian vegetation are common in the County’s to include provisions for the protection of natu- urban and agricultural landscapes. High nitrates ral and historic resources. are frequently detected in the drinking water of As an element of the Lancaster County Compre- hensive Plan, Greenscapes fulfills the mandate of

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 9 the MPC to specify provisions to protect natural The following are the major components of the resource lands. It defines a system of green infra- Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan together structure lands – natural areas, green spaces, and with explanations of how they relate to Green- greenway connections – within the County and scapes: identifies strategies and tools that can be used by Lancaster County and others to preserve and en- hance the system. The system includes both natu- Policy Element (ReVisions) ral resources (e.g., forestlands, habitat for plant and animal species of concern, and river and Adopted in 1999, the Policy Element contains stream corridors) and “green” features integrated the vision and goals of the Lancaster County into human settlement patterns (e.g., parks, Comprehensive Plan. Prepared with extensive community gardens, and the urban tree canopy). public input, this element is designed to show the The plan provides a framework for coordinated interconnectedness between different planning action by the public, nonprofit, institutional, and issues. It identifies six Key Focus Areas, or issues private sectors to create a healthy and sustainable that county residents feel are worthy of special at- green infrastructure system. tention based on the public input. They are:

Greenscapes is an element of Envision Lancaster • Protect and preserve our natural and cultural County, the Lancaster County Comprehen- heritage sive Plan. It replaces and updates the Lancaster • Revitalize our urban communities County Regional Open Space Plan, which was • Develop livable communities adopted in August 1992 as an element of the • Create a sustainable economy Comprehensive Plan. The 1992 plan defined a • Celebrate, invest in, and mobilize the talents countywide open space system consisting of a of our human resources regional park system, a natural heritage preserva- • Promote strong leadership, awareness, re- tion system, and a greenway system. This plan sponsibility, and involvement in community incorporates the three open space components issues from the 1992 plan into a more comprehensive

Introduction green infrastructure system consisting of hubs, While not all of the Key Focus Areas previously greenways, nodes, and links (see Section 3.3 for mentioned can be implemented through Green- definitions of these structural elements of the scapes, some are directly relevant. The following system). In doing so, it provides guidance to Key Focus Areas and Policies from ReVisons municipalities in meeting local outdoor recre- are directly related to the implementation of ation needs, to Lancaster County in complet- Greenscapes. ing the regional park system, and to Lancaster County and various partners in developing a Key Focus Area #1: Protect and preserve our countywide greenway trail system. To meet the natural and cultural heritage. important goal of promoting biodiversity, it Policies for this focus area related to Greenscapes also incorporates information from the updated include: Natural Heritage Inventory of Lancaster County, • Preserve, protect, enhance, and restore the Pennsylvania which was compiled and written County’s native plant and animal diversity by the Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program and functioning natural systems (PNHP) in 2008. The Natural Heritage Inven- • Protect and improve the quality of our air tory of Lancaster County is a document that • Protect, conserve, and improve surface and builds on the original Natural Areas Inventory groundwater resources for human and non- (NAI) of Lancaster County completed in 1990 human use by the Pennsylvania Science Office of the Nature Conservancy. This inventory identifies habitat for Protecting plant and animal species of conern; plant and animal species of concern and other ensuring clean air to breathe and clean water for key ecological resources that should be preserved public consumption; and preserving the County’s as part of the green infrastructure system. treasured natural places, such as the Susquehanna

10 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element River gorge, are all objectives consistent with the that is in harmony with our distinct historic, purposes of Greenscapes. cultural, and natural heritage.

Key Focus Area #2: Revitalize our urban com- A clean, healthy natural environment can help munities. attract new businesses and retain existing ones, Policies for this focus area related to Greenscapes as well as provide opportunities for growth in include: the local economy through heritage development • Establish cohesive, safe, and violence-free and ecotourism. neighborhoods and a clean, healthy physical environment. Growth Management Element (Balance) The Growth Management Element of the Lan- Community gardens, neighborhood parks, caster County Comprehensive Plan was adopted high-profile public green spaces, and other green in 2006 as an update to the 1997 Growth Man- infrastructure components make urban environ- agement Plan. It translates the vision and goals ments more attractive and livable places, bring of the Policy Element into an overall framework neighbors together, and enhance the quality of and targets strategies for managing growth and life in urban areas. land preservation in Lancaster County. It is divided into three primary components – an Key Focus Area #3: Develop livable communities. Urban Growth Area Strategy, Rural Strategy, and Policies for this focus area related to Greenscapes Implementation Strategy – as follows: Introduction include: • Develop aesthetically pleasing, intercon- Urban Growth Area Strategy: The overall goal nected transportation systems that encourage of the Urban Growth Area (UGA) Strategy is to walking, biking, and public transit, and focus growth in areas where infrastructure and discourage high speed traffic. services presently exist or are anticipated in the • Develop a permanently preserved open space future. Key objectives include increasing the system that provides a diversity of publicly countywide proportion, density, and intensity of accessible open space resources in the form new development within UGAs; placing a new of town squares, greenways, parks, and natu- emphasis on compatible reinvestment, infill, and ral areas. redevelopment; improving the character of new • Encourage existing communities to establish development; increasing housing choice and a central focus that combines commercial, affordability; and increasing employment oppor- civic, cultural, and recreational uses. tunities. Of particular relevance for Greenscapes • Minimize the impact that large-scale devel- is policy direction to integrate open space and opment has on the environment and charac- natural resources into UGA development pat- ter of existing communities. terns and to promote opportunities for walking and biking. Infusing green infrastructure into existing com- munities and carefully planning open space Rural Strategy: The Rural Strategy is designed systems in new developments are methods to to maintain the resources and traditional ties help ensure that all our communities are healthy, to the land that define Lancaster County’s rural livable environments in which to live, learn, character. The strategy centers on Designated work, and play. Rural Areas, including Agricultural Areas, Agri- cultural with Natural Areas, and Natural Areas, Key Focus Area #4: Create a sustainable within which rural resources, character, and economy. way-of-life are to be sustained and incompatible Policies for this focus area related to Greenscapes development precluded. Natural Areas corre- include: spond to major natural resource hubs identified in Greenscapes (see Chapter 3.0). Agricultural • Develop tourism facilities that improve the with Natural Areas highlight the importance of economic vitality of the County in a manner

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 11 maintaining the integrity of green infrastructure (with their year of adoption by the Lancaster resources such as steep slopes and stream cor- County Board of Commissioners) include: ridors in agricultural landscapes. A key goal of the Growth Management Element is to reduce • Cultural Heritage (2006) non-rural development outside of Urban Growth • Housing (2006) Areas and direct it to Rural Centers (areas of • Tourism (2006) existing development such as villages and cross- • Transportation (2008) roads communities). • Water Resources (1996) • Open Space (1992) (superseded by Green- Implementation Strategy: The Implementa- scapes) tion Strategy is designed to provide municipali- ties and the County with the tools needed to The County is currently in the process of prepar- effectively implement the Urban Growth Area ing an Economic Development Plan and updat- and Rural Strategies. It includes a County Action ing theWater Resource Element, which will focus and Funding Program to facilitate assistance and on on the water resource issues directly related collaboration with municipalities, communities, to the implementation Balance—the County’s and nonprofit groups; a Smart Growth Toolbox Growth Management Plan. comprised of policy, regulatory and capital in- vestment tools available to implement the Urban The Comprehensive Plan functional elements are Growth Area and Rural Strategies; and a Moni- designed to work together to support balanced toring Program to measure progress made in growth and preservation through policies and implementing the Update. Much of the proposed strategies to strengthen and sustain Lancaster funding strategy, tools, and monitoring program County’s urban and rural communities, its are directly relevant to Greenscapes. Both the diverse economy, its choice of housing types strategies and tools presented in Chapter 4.0 and and affordability, and its natural and cultural the action plan and plan monitoring program heritage. The Cultural Heritage, Tourism, and presented in Chapter 5.0 build on and adapt the Water and Wastewater Elements are linked to Growth Management Element recommendations the Green Infrastructure Element by policies to

Introduction to focus on green infrastructure. conserve components of the County’s natural heritage. While less directly related to Green- Functional Elements scapes, the Housing and Transportation Elements Functional elements are specialized planning define strategies for housing and transporta- documents that address specific topical areas of tion improvements that need to be coordinated concern, such as green infrastructure. As these with strategies to maintain and enhance green plans are completed they are adopted as official infrastructure. In addition, the Transportation amendments to the Lancaster County Compre- Element update provides opportunities to better hensive Plan. The current functional elements integrate green infrastructure functions such as bicycle and pedestrian mobility into the County’s transportation system.

1.4 Planning Process

Greenscapes was prepared by the Lancaster County Planning Commission working with a consultant team comprised of RETTEW Associ- ates, Inc. and Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC. Mapping, analysis, and assessments provided by the Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program “Greenscapes” is one of six officially adopted were integral to the development of the Plan. In functional elements of the Lancaster County addition, a Task Force comprised of representa- Comprehensive Plan. tives of County departments, other agencies and

12 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element organizations, businesses, and citizen groups with an interest in green infrastructure issues met regularly to provide input. The Task Force provided advice, policy direction, coordination, and technical assistance throughout the planning process. The process consisted of the following major steps:

1. Project Initiation: This step defined expectations and outcomes for the plan- ning process and introduced the project team to relevant plans, initiatives, and Break out sessions were held at the public event to gather input from interested citizens on priority data. Research was conducted on green focus areas for Greenscapes. infrastructure initiatives from around the nation and their potential application to Lancaster County. Environmental Resources 2. Background Information: This step • Stream valleys and waterways involved an assessment of existing condi- • Forested lands tions, trends, and initiatives affecting • Groundwater Lancaster County’s green infrastructure • Agricultural lands Introduction resources. It also included community • Native plants and animals/habitats/natu- input via a public workshop and focus ral communities group meetings with key green infra- structure stakeholders. Park and Recreation Needs 3. Vision Statement: In this step a strategic • Walking/biking trails vision of Lancaster County’s future green • Parks closer to population centers infrastructure system was formulated. • Low-Grade line / Rail to Trail 4. Plan Development: In this step the • More and better public access to streams complete Greenscapes was developed, and rivers (water trails) including an action plan and tools for • Connectivity with transit implementation. Treasured Places Public input in step 2 played a key role in in- • Critical lands adjacent to other protected forming the development of the strategic vision lands to prevent fragmentation and action plan. The results of this input are • Susquehanna River Corridor, including summarized below: islands • Classify all waterways as important resources Public Meeting • Agriculture is fully developed lands – soil is resource A public meeting to present the concept of green • Low grade corridor infrastructure and solicit input into development of Greenscapes was conducted in February 2007. Urban Green Infrastructure As part of this meeting, four breakout groups • Green streets, rain gardens, and green were facilitated to develop ideas on the following roofs/solar topics: environmental resources; park and recre- • Turn an urban street into pedestrian cor- ation needs; treasured resources; and urban green ridor, greenbelt infrastructure. The participants were also given • Pedestrian network – art walks (some- an opportunity to indicate which ideas they felt thing along river, through city, too) were most important. The following were the five • Old cemeteries designed for living, also highest rated ideas/comments by each group: relight them, etc. • More substantial landscape pockets

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 13 Focus Groups • Chapter 4.0 defines goals, objectives, and strategies for the green infrastructure In May 2007 four focus group sessions were con- system based on the four primary func- ducted to seek further input into development tions of the system: of Greenscapes. Three of the groups consisted -- Preservation of exceptional natural of persons with special interests or affiliations resources; related to rural green infrastructure, urban green -- Conservation or stewardship of infrastructure, and parks and recreation. The important natural resources and the fourth group included members of the Green In- essential life support services they frastructure Task Force to review and discuss the provide; results of the previous sessions. The focus group -- Restoration of natural resource results provided valuable input to development systems and ecological connections; of the plan goals, objectives, and strategies for and implementation. Some of these themes included: -- Recreation and improved commu- nity health. • Establish stream buffers It also identifies specific tools in four • Develop model natural resource ordi- broad categories – policy and planning, nances regulation, capital investment, and • Assist municipalities and property own- education and outreach –that can be ers with tree planting and maintenance used by a variety of partners to realize • Build connections for people to parks the goals, objectives, and strategies. • Focus on connections as the next phase • Chapter 5.0 lays out a framework for of County park development action by Lancaster County and partners • Determine roles and responsibilities in the public and private sectors to implement the plan. This framework includes: 1.5 Contents of the Plan -- An action plan consisting of five key initiatives – communications,

Introduction Greenscapes includes the following sections: technical assistance, funding, capital • Chapter 2.0 describes existing conditions planning and development, and and trends affecting green infrastructure partnership – and supporting prior- in Lancaster County, including: ity actions. Included is a proposed -- Regional and land use context Lancaster County Green Infra- -- Green infrastructure resources (land- structure Coalition, a network of form, water and air, plant and ani- existing agencies, organizations, and mal communities, threats to those groups to coordinate initiatives and resources, and potential restoration projects related to green infrastruc- areas) ture. -- Parks and recreation -- A definition of roles and respon- • Chapter 3.0 articulates a strategic vision sibilities of the public and private for green infrastructure as Lancaster sector partners in creating a healthy County’s natural life support system. It and sustainable green infrastructure describes the benefits to be provided by system this system, along with its major struc- -- A process for monitoring progress tural components – hubs and green- in implementing the plan, includ- ways at the countywide scale, nodes and ing a system of green infrastructure links at a more localized scale, and the indicators urban, suburban, and rural landscapes The appendices include additional background within which these components are information for Greenscapes, including “best located. practice” case studies of green infrastructure

14 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element initiatives from around the country and support- 2. Conserve natural resources and services ing data for the parks and recreation analysis in throughout Lancaster County’s urban, Chapter 2.0. suburban, and rural landscapes. A. Maintain the ecological integrity of envi- Greenscapes lays out a framework and blueprint ronmentally sensitive lands. for action by the entire community to create a B. Promote land management practices that comprehensive, integrated green infrastructure result in the conservation and sustain- system. This system is important not only to able use of renewable natural resources. sustaining the natural systems and functions on C. Increase the understanding and aware- which life depends, but also to achieving goals ness of citizens and elected officials of such as improved community health, sustainable the social, economic, and environmental economic development, and a high quality of life importance of natural resource conserva- for all Lancastrians. By implementing the actions tion. and using the tools defined in this plan, we can help ensure that future generations will enjoy all 3. Restore ecological connections and natural of the benefits provided by green infrastructure – resource systems throughout Lancaster Lancaster County’s natural life support system. County’s urban, suburban, and rural areas. A. Restore the County’s natural environ- ment and its ecological functions. Goals and Objectives B. Incorporate green elements throughout Introduction the built environment to improve the The goals and objectives presented in Green- environmental quality of urban and scapes outline what should be accomplished suburban development. during the life of the plan. The four goals listed C. Enhance the quality and ensure the below establish the principal directions that quantity of surface and groundwater re- should be followed in order to implement the sources needed to sustain healthy aquatic vision for the green infrastructure system. The ecosystems, drinking water supply, and objectives beneath each of the goals describe, in water-based recreation activities. more detail, the intent of the goals. The strategies D. Enhance the County’s air quality and tools presented in Chapter 4.0 further detail through reforestation and tree planting. how the objectives will be implemented to meet the goals of the plan. By implementing the four 4. Enhance the quality-of-life of residents goals, Lancaster County can protect, preserve, through the provision of a diversity of eas- restore, and enhance the natural environment ily accessible outdoor recreation opportu- that supports life sustaining functions and di- nities and experiences. rectly relates to the quality of life of the citizens A. Protect large open spaces for passive of Lancaster County. outdoor recreational opportunities such as hiking, biking, paddling, wildlife 1. Preserve Lancaster County’s exceptional viewing, outdoor learning, and the tradi- natural resources. tional pastimes of hunting and fishing. A. Secure the future of the County’s natural B. Provide a diversity of close-to-home, heritage by defining, identifying, and active recreation opportunities within permanently protecting its most impor- Designated Growth Areas. tant natural and treasured resources. C. Create a countywide network of open/ B. Ensure the long term viability of the green spaces and connections between County’s biological diversity by main- them. taining, enhancing, and restoring habitat D. Improve community health by providing for plant and animal species of concern convenient, accessible opportunities for and greenway connections between outdoor recreation and exercise. them.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 15

Existing Conditions

2.1 Green Infrastructure Context Lancaster County, the Piedmont Upland Sec- tion consists of broad, rolling hills dissected by valleys. This part of the County supports 2.1.1 Regional Context agricultural uses interspersed with forested cover along the valley slopes. In the central portion of Lancaster County is located in southeastern Lancaster County, the Piedmont Lowland Sec- Pennsylvania approximately 40 miles west of tion (also called the Lancaster Plain) consists of Philadelphia (Figure 1). The County is about broad valleys separated by low ridges. In this area 950 square miles in size and had an estimated the underlying limestone has weathered into a population of 494,486 in 2006. Like most of gentle, rolling plain with rich soils that are ideal southeastern Pennsylvania, Lancaster County’s both for agriculture and for development. As a native, largely forested cover has been extensively result, the Lancaster Plain supports the County’s altered by centuries of human use. The County’s most extensive farming and its largest urban and physiographic features – its underlying bedrock, suburban settlements. topography, and soils – have greatly influenced the ways humans have used the land. Figure 2 shows The northernmost part of Lancaster County the physiographic sections of Lancaster County is characterized by rolling hills and valleys Existing Conditions based upon underlying geologic formations. that developed on more erosion-resistant red sedimentary rock, with some of the hills reach- As shown on Figure 2, Lancaster County is lo- ing 1,000 feet or more in height. In geologic cated within a large plateau region referred to by terms, this area of the County is referred to as geologists as the Piedmont Province – one of the the Gettysburg-Newark Lowland Section of the 13 physiographic provinces of the Appalachian Piedmont Province. Because its steep topography Highlands, which extends through the eastern and thin, erosion-prone soils are less suitable for United States and Canada from Georgia to New agriculture and urban development, this area has Brunswick. The Piedmont Province is divided much of the remaining forest lands in Lancaster into two distinct sub-areas called the Upland and County. Lowland Sections. Located primarily in southern

Figure 1 - Regional Context

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 19 Figure 2 - Lancaster County Physiography

Lancaster County’s regional context includes two 2.1.2 Land Use and Demographic much larger, multi-state ecological landscapes: Context the Highlands Region and the Susquehanna Riv-

Existing Conditions Existing er Corridor. The northern and northeastern edges Existing Land Use of the County (the Gettysburg-Newark Lowland The predominant land use in Lancaster County Section and Welsh Mountain within the Pied- is agriculture. Approximately 54% of land in the mont Upland Section) are part of the Highlands County is in some form of agricultural use (Fig- Region, which consists of forested mountains ure 3). While agricultural land itself is generally and hills extending from northwestern Connecti- considered a green infrastructure resource, it can cut through New York, New Jersey, and Pennsyl- have a negative impact on other natural resourc- vania to the state line. The ecological es--particularly water quality. Other “developed” importance of the Highlands Region was recog- land uses – residential, commercial, industrial, nized by the federal Highlands Conservation Act and the like – comprise a significant proportion of 2004. The Susquehanna River Corridor, which (18%) of the County’s land area. These uses are forms the western border of Lancaster County concentrated in the central Lancaster region with York County, is a segment of the east coast’s extending outward along major road corridors, longest river. The Susquehanna River flows from including US 30, US 222, and PA 283. They New York through Pennsylvania and Maryland too add to the pressure on the ecology and the to the Chesapeake Bay, one of the world’s great natural resource systems in the County. estuaries. In Pennsylvania, the Highlands and the Susquehanna have been designated by the De- Only 17% of Lancaster County’s landscape partment of Conservation and Natural Resources is forested. These natural lands are highly as two of only five “Mega-Greenways” within the fragmented by the other land uses mentioned Commonwealth. previously. The largest concentrations of natural

20 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Figure 3 - Existing Land Use

Existing Conditions

land cover are located in areas with steep slopes location, attractive urban and rural landscapes, or shallow soils such as the Furnace Hills, Welsh and the high quality of life enjoyed by residents. Mountains, and the Susquehanna River Gorge. These areas remain in their natural state primarily Lancaster County growth management strategy– due to their poor suitability for agriculture or most recently defined in the 2006 Growth Man- land development purposes. Natural vegetation agement Update (see Section 1.3)–is designed to is also found along river and stream corridors, accommodate development in a manner that pre- particularly in southern Lancaster County, where serves the characteristics that define the County’s stream valleys are steeper and less suitable for unique “sense of place” which distinguishes it agricultural uses. from other communities. This program targets most new growth to occur in designated Urban Demographics Growth Areas around the County’s 18 boroughs Lancaster County has been one of the fastest and the City of Lancaster. A lesser amount of growing counties in Pennsylvania during the last development is to be directed to designated Vil- several decades. From 1980 to 2000 the County’s lage Growth Areas and other rural centers as an population grew from 362,346 to 470,658, an alternative to rural sprawl. Development within increase of 30%. The U.S. Census estimate for designated Growth Areas is to occur in more 2006 was 494,486, an additional 5% increase. compact forms with mixed uses and the physical The Planning Commission projects that the characteristics and functions of a traditional town county’s population will increase to approxi- or neighborhood. Land outside of designated mately 585,500 citizens by 2030--18% greater Growth Areas is to retain its rural character and than the 2006 population estimate. This popula- identity through the use of tools and techniques tion growth is indicative of the County’s strong to preserve agriculture, natural resources, and economy, low unemployment, prime geographic cultural heritage. The Growth Management

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 21 Figure 4 - Growth Management Framework

Framework Map (Figure 4) provides a spatial and slopes; groundwater, surface waters, and the representation of the Urban Growth Area and air we breathe; and vegetation and wildlife. These Rural Strategies as a guide for more detailed resources have been analyzed and mapped where

Existing Conditions Existing planning and implementation at the multi-mu- appropriate to provide a basis for defining the nicipal and municipal levels. The framework rec- framework of a green infrastructure system for ognizes the importance of green infrastructure in Lancaster County. The results of this analysis are the overall land use pattern of Lancaster County summarized in the following sections: by designating much of the County’s land area as Natural Areas (scenic, recreational, and natural • Section 2.2.1 addresses the locations of resource areas) or Agricultural with Natural Areas selected resources related to the County’s (agriculture mixed with a significant proportion physiography, including steep slopes, highly of environmentally sensitive resources). erodible soils, and unique geological forma- tions. • Section 2.2.2 addresses surface water hydrol- 2.2 Green Infrastructure ogy, surface water quality based on an analy- Resources sis of riparian (river and streamside) buffers, and air quality. The definition of green infrastructure as the • Section 2.2.3 addresses Lancaster County’s “nation’s natural life support system”1 covers biodiversity – its natural plant and animal a wide range of natural resources, including communities. Topics addressed include Lancaster County’s underlying bedrock, soils, vegetated cover types; Natural Heritage 1 Greeninfrastructure.net, sponsored by the Con- Areas (habitat for plant and animal species of servation Fund and USDA Forest Service (see Section 1.1 concern); areas designated as Important Bird for a complete definition). Areas (IBAs) and Important Mammal Areas

22 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element (IMAs); the quality (biological integrity) of 2.2.1 Landform forests and other natural communities; and “Natural Gems” designated by the Lancaster Natural Vegetation County Conservancy. Natural vegetation consists of plant communities • Section 2.2.4 discusses several types of defined broadly as assemblages of plant popula- resources that could potentially become part tions that share a common environment; interact of Lancaster County’s green infrastructure with each other, with animal populations, and system if restored through actions such as with the physical environment; and are not ac- reforestation. tively managed by humans. The extent of natural • Section 2.2.5 provides an overview of major vegetation in Lancaster County has been greatly threats to Lancaster County’s green infra- reduced by agriculture, urban development, structure resources. gray infrastructure, and other human activities. Figure 5 shows the County’s remaining natural Portions of this analysis are derived from the vegetation classified according to structural cover work conducted by the Pennsylvania Natu- type. This information was derived from GIS ral Heritage Program in completing the 2008 land coverage data based on satellite photogra- Update to the Natural Heritage Inventory of phy provided by the Lancaster County Planning Existing Conditions Lancaster County. Commission. The County’s different cover types include herbaceous (typically abandoned agricultural fields that are being colonized by natural vegetation, but also including some high quality natural communities); shrub/brush; mixed cover (a mixture of grasses, shrubs, and or

Figure 5 - Natural Vegetation

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 23 The Value of Early Successional Habitat

“Early successional habitat” refers to land in an early stage of recovery from natural or man-made disturbance. It is typically dominated by a dense, shrubby groundcover and fast-growing saplings of shade-intolerant tree species. Given time, the process of natural succession will turn these areas into mature forests. Early successional habitat includes the shrub/brush and mixed cover types shown on Figure 5.

This natural cover type provides critical habitat for a variety of species. A study by the University of Missouri on the breeding habitat of song birds found that while most nesting requirements are met in mature forests, early successional cover may provide a greater abundance of food and shelter and that some forest birds actually breed in this habitat. While early successional and shrub-dominated habitats were widely distributed throughout the United States prior to European colonization, they are increasingly rare today due to development, abandonment of agricultural lands, and natural succession. To maximize value for a diversity of wildlife, land management plans should create and maintain early successional habitats along with large, unbroken forest tracts.

trees), and several types of forests. Forest types depend on high quality water conditions are include deciduous forest (primarily hardwoods particularly sensitive to sedimentation. Protect- such as oaks, maples, and ash), coniferous forest ing steep slopes and highly erodible soils pre- (dominated by softwoods such as pines and hem- vents flooding and other problems due to slope locks), and mixed forest (a mix of deciduous and instability. Steep slopes also provide aesthetically coniferous species such as maples, oaks, white pleasing open spaces and habitat for native plant pines, and ash). and animal species. Slope is measured by percentage calculated as No two locally occurring examples of the general the ratio of the vertical rise in elevation to the cover types shown on Figure 5 are identical horizontal distance of the slope. Slopes above in their species composition or their physical 15% are generally considered steep and require environment and thus more detailed fieldwork precautionary measures when natural cover is is necessary to characterize specific community removed for other land uses. Slopes above 25% types. Nevertheless, Figure 5 provides a general are generally considered severe and unsuitable for

Existing Conditions Existing representation of the distribution of the County’s both agriculture and land development. natural vegetation. Forests are by far the most common cover type and represent Lancaster The central portion of Lancaster County is domi- County’s predominant vegetated cover prior to nated by the rolling hills of the Lancaster Plain European settlement and widespread clearing with slopes that typically do not exceed 15% and for agriculture and other purposes. Forest cover rarely exceed 25%. By contrast, the Southern is most prevalent in areas with hilly and steep Uplands region is a landscape of more extreme topography around the periphery of the County slopes; here, 15% and 25% are not uncommon. and along stream corridors in the southern part Steep slopes are also common in the northern of the County. Additional information on forest and northeastern edges of the County, including size and quality is provided below in the sections Furnace Hills, Bowmansville Hills, and Welsh entitled “Forest Blocks” and “Interior Forests.” Mountain.

Steep Slopes and Highly Erodible Soils Figure 6 illustrates areas within Lancaster Steep slopes and soils that are prone to erosion County that have slopes between 15% and 25% are sensitive environmental resources that should and above 25%. Also shown on Figure 6 are be considered for inclusion in the green infra- highly erodible soils based on the USDA Natural structure system. Construction in these areas dis- Resources Conservation Service’s (NRCS) soil turbs fragile land and can exacerbate soil erosion classification system. Class VI soils are defined as on hillsides and increase soil sediment deposited having severe limitations that make them gener- in streams and waterways. Aquatic species that ally unsuitable for cultivation. Class VII soils

24 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Figure 6 - Steep Slopes and Highly Erodible Soils

Existing Conditions

Figure 7 - Unique Geological Formations

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 25 are defined as having very severe limitations that 2.2.2 Water and Air make them unsuitable for cultivation. Hydrology Unique Geological Formations Figure 8 depicts hydrological (water) resources Unique geological formations are natural resourc- in Lancaster County, including the network of es that have been identified as areas of geological rivers, streams, and water bodies; wetlands and significance in Pennsylvania. These resources are 100-year floodplain areas associated with these typically scenic and offer opportunities to learn surface waters; and hydric soils (soils character- about the natural history of the county and state. ized by wet conditions). These resources provide The 24 sites identified in Lancaster County are numerous benefits for the community, such derived from Outstanding Scenic Geological as groundwater recharge, public water supply, Features of Pennsylvania, which was published habitat for plants and animals, wildlife migratory by the Pennsylvania Geological Survey in two corridors, and opportunities for recreation and volumes. education. Rivers and streams with adjoining riparian vegetation can function as key con- As shown on Figure 7, the majority of these nectors in a countywide green infrastructure features are located on the western side of Lan- system. However, much of the native vegetation caster County. A significant number of sites are along the County’s rivers and streams has been clustered in the lower Susquehanna River gorge. removed for agriculture and urban development, Many of the unique geological formations are resulting in serious water quality impacts (see related to the bedrock outcroppings – referred to discussion of Surface Water Quality below). as the Conowingo Islands – in the river. As shown on Figure 9, Lancaster County is di- vided into 20 different watersheds, each of which drains to a separate river or stream system within

Figure 8 - Hydrology Existing Conditions Existing

26 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Conowingo Islands

The rocky islands scattered throughout Susquehanna River in southern Lancaster County are col- lectively known as the Conowingo Islands. Both geologically and ecologically important, as well as a scenic resource, they are one of the Susquehanna’s most remarkable natural features.

The Conowingo Islands consist of more than 30 islands stretching 3.5 miles downstream of Holt- wood Dam. They range in size from small rock outcroppings to 65-acre Upper Bear Island. The islands are rugged and feature high cliffs separated by narrow channels. Some islands have gigantic potholes, a few of which are 10 to 20 feet in diameter and equally as deep. Other islands have ma- ture forests, ponds, and marshes. Wolf Island consists of eight enormous rocks, one of which rises 60 feet above the water.

Unlike the river’s alluvial islands, which are formed from deposits of sediment, these islands consist of bedrock. They were carved by the Susquehanna’s swift current as it cut into the hard schist bed- rock on the river bottom. The islands contain an impressive array of native plants that have adapted to the river’s fluctuating water level. Botanists have identified more than 540 different plant species. Existing Conditions They are also home to otters, beavers, mink, deer, raccoon, and fish-eating birds such as the osprey and bald eagles.

Figure 9 - Watersheds

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 27 the County. Ultimately, nearly all of the County’s of Lancaster County. Based on this analysis, the surface waters drain to the Susquehanna River, segments are ranked according to their potential the major tributary to the Chesapeake Bay. cumulative effect on water quality. Variables used in this analysis include: Surface Water Quality • Percent of riparian buffer in agriculture While some of Lancaster County’s watercourses • Percent of riparian buffer in urban uses are characterized by excellent water quality, • Percent of riparian buffer undeveloped particularly in headwater areas with significant (forested area, wetlands, etc.) forested cover, the quality of other rivers and • Percent of total upstream watershed in streams has been severely impacted by agriculture agriculture and urban development. Approximately 689 • Percent of total upstream watershed in miles of the County’s watercourses are on the list urban uses of impaired waters compiled by the Pennsylvania • Percent of total upstream watershed un- Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) developed (forested area, wetlands, etc.) as required by Section 303(d) of the Clean Water • Number of upstream road crossings Act, and more may be added in the future. • Number of upstream point sources of pollution Riparian buffers – the lands directly adjacent to streams, creeks, and rivers – have a direct The Stream Scores were then sorted from best influence on the quality of water and the habitat to lowest quality, resulting in four categories of it supports. To help characterize the quality of potential water quality: the County’s watercourses, each riparian buffer segment with the exception of the Susquehanna 1. Best Potential Water Quality River was analyzed by the Pennsylvania Natural 2. Second-Best Potential Water Quality Heritage Program in conjunction with the 3. Second-Lowest Potential Water Quality 2008 Update to the Natural Heritage Inventory 4. Lowest Potential Water Quality

Pennsylvania Water Resources Plan

Lancastrians rely on clean and abundant sources of water for everyday functions such as drinking, cooking, and bathing; recreational activities like fishing, swimming and boating; and economic

Existing Conditions Existing activities such as agriculture, energy production, and industrial and commercial uses. Clean water and reliable flows are also vital to the county’s green infrastructure--especially its indigenous aquatic community.

To ensure that Pennsylvanians always have a safe and reliable supply of water for these activities, the state is currently updating its water plan. Guided by the enactment of PA Act 220, several key components of the new water plan include surface and groundwater inventories, assessments and projections of existing and future demand, identification of potential conflicts between projected uses and availability, and review and evaluation of existing statutes, regulations, policies, agreements and programs.

The new legislation calls for designating Critical Water Planning Areas (CWPA) or areas where demands on the resource exceed, or threaten to exceed, availability. Once identified, Critical Area Resource Action (CARA) plans will be developed for each CWPA. These plans will include assess- ments of water uses, availability and quality, conflicts among users, the identification of alternatives to assure supply as well as considerations of storm water and floodplain issues. The state water plan will also focus on strengthening water conservation planning activities including technical and financial incentives for awareness and promotion of water conservation applications, devices, and designs by builders, businesses and municipalities. The use of low impact stormwater design such as bioswales, green roofs, and porous paving treatments is also encouraged.

28 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element The categories are referred to as “potential” be- Agriculture, Water Quality, and the Chesa- cause they are based on GIS-derived data, which peake Bay is subject to error. These categories should guide Agriculture is the dominant form of land use planning efforts and aid in the decision-making in Lancaster County by far. Approximately process, but should not be substituted for on-site 5,225 farms use about two-thirds of the land in stream assessments. In general, Categories 1 and the County (approximately 342,000 acres) to 2 should receive the highest and second-highest produce over $3.2 billion worth of agricultural priorities for preservation and conservation mea- products each year. The County is the most sures, while Categories 4 and 3 should receive productive non-irrigated county in the United the highest and second-highest priorities for States. Lancaster County farmers generate three restoration. times the income per acre of the average Pennsyl- vania farmer. Figure 10 shows the distribution of rivers and streams in Lancaster County based on this cat- The County’s agricultural production is intense. egorization. Waterways with the best potential A 2006 report by the Lancaster County Conser- water quality are generally located in southern, vation District, the “Lancaster County Conserva- northern, and northeastern parts of the County, tion District County Implementation Plan,” Existing Conditions where they tend to correspond with significant states that the average farm in Lancaster County natural features such as Furnace Hills, Welsh is less than 100 acres in size and only 10% of the Mountain, and the Susquehanna River Gorge. farms are 500 acres or greater. The report further Waterways with the worst potential water quality states that poultry and dairy sales will continue are concentrated in central Lancaster County as- to increase while swine and cash crops decline. sociated with agricultural and urban uses. More animals mean more manure to dispose of and, because of rural sprawl; there is less and less land to apply this manure to. These excess nutri-

Figure 10 - Surface Water Quality

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 29 ents are one of the greatest single threats to the While agriculture is the primary culprit, the built Chesapeake Bay that exists today (see text box on environment of the County also is a significant page 46). contributor to surface water pollution. Virtually every resident and business in Lancaster County Agriculture has negatively impacted the quality of produces nutrients that can eventually reach the the County’s surface and ground water. Pennsyl- Bay. The vast majority of nutrients reach the vania DEP data indicates that approximately 689 Bay through point sources such as wastewater miles of the 1,365 miles of streams in Lancaster treatment plants, storm drains, and industrial fa- County are considered “Impaired” (Figure 11). cilities. Although many of these point sources re- Agricultural sources (sediment and nutrients) lease treated water, this water often still contains have been identified as a source of impairment large amounts of nutrients that are discharged for over 650 (or 95%) of the impaired streams in into local streams and rivers, eventually reaching the County. The vast majority of agriculturally the Bay. impacted stream segments are in the Conestoga watershed. In addition, testing for municipal Urban and suburban development adds nutrients (Act 537) sewage disposal plans indicates that to local waterways though chemical laden runoff the groundwater in most of county’s agricultural from fertilized lawns, roads and streets, and park- communities has high levels of nitrates. Add to ing lots. Rural development adds nitrates to the this the problem of “legacy sediments” (see text groundwater through septic systems. Air pollu- box on next page), as well as the fact that 98% of tion from vehicles, industries, gas-powered lawn surface water draining from the County flows to tools and other emitting sources also contribute the Chesapeake, and it is easy to see why Lancaster nutrients to the Bay and its tributaries. Nitrogen County is the target of conservation efforts to released into the air eventually falls back down improve the health of the Bay. onto the land or water.

Figure 11 - Impaired Streams Existing Conditions Existing

30 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element With Lancaster County’s steady population off-road vehicles) point sources (power plants, growth and strong economy, focusing solely on waste incinerators, manufacturing facilities, agriculture alone will not resolve the excess nutri- etc.) and area sources (dry cleaners, gas stations, ent problem confronting the Chesapeake Bay. auto body shops, etc.). The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments required the U.S. Environmental Air Quality Protection Agency (EPA) to establish national air Air is an essential natural resource necessary to quality standards for six pollutants: carbon mon- sustain life that is often taken for granted. Lan- oxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ground-level ozone, caster County’s air quality is impacted by harm- particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide. Lancaster ful emissions from mobile sources (on-road and County’s air quality exceeds the standards for

Legacy Sediments

Much of the effort to restore the health of the Chesapeake Bay has centered on reducing sediments and nutrients entering the Bay from its largest tributaries. Because the Susquehanna River provides over 50% of the fresh water to the Bay, its watershed, and the quality of water emanating from it,

has been the focus of attention since clean up efforts were initiated in the mid-1970s. Lancaster Existing Conditions County’s agricultural landscape has been identified as a major contributor to the high nutrient and sediment loads of the Susquehanna River and has become a focal point in the debate about efforts to save the Chesapeake Bay. However, agriculture is not solely to blame for the Bay’s water quality problems. Recent groundbreaking work by two professors at Franklin & Marshall College, Dorothy Merritts and Robert Walter, suggests that many of the problems experienced in the waterways of the County’s agricultural landscape can be traced back to the way agricultural products were pro- cessed prior to the 20th century. This work was featured on the cover of the January 2008 issue of Science Magazine.

Before the advent of modern manufacturing and transportation, agricultural products and other goods were transported by horse and wagon to local mills for processing. Poor roads and transport vehicles made it necessary for mills to be located close to agricultural producers. Approximately 400 mills were built to process goods produced in rural areas; it has been estimated that Lancaster County streams averaged a dam every two miles. Because mills used water to power machinery, they had to be located next to a stream or river. Each mill had a dam with a large impoundment or “pond” behind it, from which water was drawn to power the equipment. Stream or river sediments settled out when the water slowed down upon reaching the dam. Unfortunately, poor farming prac- tices and widespread clear cutting of forests caused tremendous amounts of sediment to wash down local waterways into mill ponds.

While most of the County’s mills and their associated dams and ponds have disappeared from the landscape, the sediment deposited centuries ago behind these dams still remain. In some areas, the accumulated materials, often referred to as “Legacy Sediments”, are 20 feet deep over the stream’s original floodplain. According to Dorothy Merritts and Bob Walter of F&M, as the mill structures disappeared from the County’s landscape, the water that once flowed over the dams began cut- ting narrow channels down through the sediment accumulated on top of the original floodplain. Initially, the amount of sediment eroded was relatively small and the banks remained intact as the stream dug deeper. But when the stream cuts through the sediments into the coarse gravel of the original floodplain, the gravel quickly erodes, undercutting the steep bank above and sending tons of nutrient-laden sediment into the stream and on to the Chesapeake Bay.

Studies are now underway to identify the tallest stream banks that are actively eroding and target them for floodplain restoration actions. However, experts warn that efforts to restore the health of the Chesapeake Bay will only succeed if actions to manage soil erosion and excess nutrients gener- ated by farms are taken simultaneously with legacy sediment restoration efforts.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 31 Cool Cities

The Cool Cities movement was launched by Mayor Greg Nickles of Seattle on February 16, 2005, the same day the Kyoto Protocol became law for the 141 countries that had ratified it. Mayor Nick- les’s US Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement, the heart of the Cool Cities movement, asks may- ors from across the country to ensure that their cities meet or exceed the standards set forth by the Kyoto Protocol. Each city is left to determine the best strategy for their citizens; examples include hybrid fleet vehicles, the use of “green energy” in power grids, green (LEED-certified) buildings, and simpler steps such as energy efficient lighting.

Mayor Rick Gray signed the US Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement on November 13, 2007, adding Lancaster City to the list of over 800 cities that have pledged to reduce their own contribu- tion of global warming pollutants. Currently the City is working to equip traffic lights with energy efficient LED bulbs and is conducting an energy audit of all municipal buildings in an effort to reduce energy costs and increase efficiency.

five of these pollutants (carbon monoxide, lead, Global warming – the measurable increase in nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and sulfur dioxide) and average air temperatures near the earth’s surface is worse than the standard for small particulate since the beginning of the 20th century, a trend matter (PM2.5). In the past Lancaster County that is projected to continue in the future – is was not able to meet the standard for ozone. another air quality issue of concern. As sum- However, that situation improved in recent years marized in the 2007 Report by the Intergovern- due in part to emissions testing of vehicles reg- mental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), there istered in the County. In July of 2007, the EPA is widespread consensus among scientists that approved a re-designation of Lancaster County most of the observed temperature increases are from a marginal nonattainment area to an attain- the result of elevated concentrations of so-called ment area for ozone as a result of our improving greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, and air quality. However, in 2008 EPA announced nitrous oxide) as a result of human activities. tougher ground-level ozone limits nationwide that will put the County’s air back into nonat- Green infrastructure resources are impacted by

Existing Conditions Existing tainment. air pollutants and can also contribute to improv- ing air quality. The adverse effects of acid rain – In addition, the American Lung Association caused by sulfur dioxide and other air pollutants report, State of the Air: 2008 (covering data from from sources such as power plants and industry 2004 through 2006) ranks Lancaster County – on surface waters and forests have been well as being the eighth worst of 31 Pennsylvania documented. The smog created by ozone can counties for which ground-level ozone data were damage forests and crops. Conversely, trees and collected, and 115th worst out of 680 counties other vegetation remove many pollutants from across the U.S. For daily fine particle pollution the atmosphere, including nitrogen dioxide, levels, Lancaster County ranked 10th worst of sulfur dioxide, ozone, carbon monoxide, and 21 Pennsylvania counties and 65th worst of 591 particulate matter of ten microns or less, by counties nationwide. Most startling, for annual absorbing them through leaf and plant surfaces. average fine particle pollution levels, Lancaster As an example, the Urban Ecosystem Analysis County tied with Beaver and York Counties for conducted by the USDA Forest Service found 2nd worst of 18 Pennsylvania counties (behind that trees in a 775,000-acre study area within only Allegheny County), and tied with Beaver metropolitan Atlanta removed approximately and York for 20th worst of 518 counties in the 19 million pounds of air pollutants annually, country for this measure of this pollutant. equivalent to $47 million in value.2 Trees and 2 The dollar value of the tons of pollutants re- moved was calculated based on “externality” costs or costs to society that are not reflected in marketplace activity.

32 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Agriculture and Global Warming

Agriculture can both reduce and increase global warming. According to the Summer 2007 issue of American Farmland, the newsletter of the American Farmland Trust, conservation practices on farms such as no-till cultivation, new tree plantings, rotational grass-based livestock grazing, and vegetative buffers along streams can capture and store carbon in the soil. Conversely, a report authored by Professor Pete Smith of the University of Aberdeen for Greenpeace describes ways “in- dustrial” farming can contribute to global warming, primarily as a result of fertilizer overuse, land clearance, soil degradation, and intensive animal farming. Entitled Cool Farming: Climate Impacts of Agriculture and Mitigation Potential, the report identifies a variety of practical solutions that farmers can implement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. other vegetation also remove carbon dioxide (i.e., species whose natural occurrence and geo- from the atmosphere, thus helping to counteract graphic distribution are restricted). global warming. Natural Heritage Areas Although Figure 12 indicates that the richness Existing Conditions 2.2.3 Biodiversity of Lancaster County’s biological diversity is a mere fragment of what it was prior to European Biodiversity refers to the variety of life in a settlement, pockets of high quality habitats har- habitat, region, or even globally. This natural boring fragile plant and animal species still exist variation includes everything from microscopic today. These areas are termed “Natural Heritage organisms through plant and animal species up Areas” and are documented in the 2008 Update to and including humans. Generally, biodiversity to the Natural Heritage Inventory of Lancaster varies with latitude with the regions of greatest County by the Pennsylvania Natural Heritage variation located around the equator and the Program. Natural Heritage Areas are habitats number of species progressively diminishing as that contain plant or animal species considered one approaches the poles. On a regional scale rare, threatened or endangered (referred to as biodiversity depends on four factors: climate, “species of concern”) at the state or federal levels. altitude, soils, and species richness (the total Natural Heritage Areas can also be high quality number of native plant and animal species occur- natural communities, which are those considered ring in an area). Unfortunately, the fourth factor to be uncommon or among the best of their type – species richness – has been greatly impacted by within the state. humans over time. Figure 13 shows Natural Heritage Areas in Historically, Pennsylvania was home to numer- Lancaster County categorized as either “spe- ous species that can no longer be found in the cies of concern core habitat” or “supporting Commonwealth. Gray wolves, eastern cougars, landscapes.” Designation on the map is simply wolverines, bison, and moose were all once a convenient method of labeling habitat areas of inhabitants of the Commonwealth that have “species of concern” that occur singly or overlap long since disappeared due to habitat loss and with adjacent habitats. The designations are over hunting. Today, habitat loss is the single used primarily as a framework for discussion of greatest threat to Lancaster County’s biodiversity. the various natural features that occur within a One of the principal benefits of a healthy green particular area. The differences between the two infrastructure system is to maintain connectivity designations are based on susceptibility to habitat between habitat areas, thus helping to ensure that disturbance, as follows: our natural heritage and its associated biodiver- sity persist for the benefit of future generations. • Species of concern core habitat are the Key objectives are to maintain and enhance total actual and adjacent similar habitat of species richness as well as habitat for species of individual species of concern (plants and/ concern that are “endemic” to Lancaster County or animals considered rare, threatened or endangered at state or federal levels),

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 33 Serpentine Barrens

Unknown to many residents, southern Lancaster County is home to a landscape found in few plac- es on Earth. When European settlers first arrived, they described the scrubby land in the southern part of the County as “barren” because of its inability to support crops. Characterized by thin soils, stunted trees and prairie grasses, the barrens were a unique feature on the forested frontier.

The cause of this distinctive landscape lies a few inches below the shallow soil. Here the bedrock is Serpentinite, a green metamorphic rock formed millions of years ago that contains an abundance of heavy metals that are toxic to most species of plants. Certain plants, however, have adapted to this harsh living environment and thrive in the nutrient poor soils. Many of these plants grow nowhere else in the world.

The nutrient poor soils combined with periodic natural and human-induced fires have kept adja- cent forest vegetation from colonizing the Serpentine Barrens, which today support rare and en- dangered species. Native flowering species such as round-leaved fame-flower, the prairie dropseed, and the serpentine aster can be found in the barrens. This unique ecology also provides habitat for numerous species of insects that are not normally found in Pennsylvania.

exemplary natural communities, or areas Important Bird and Mammal Areas3 with exceptional native diversity. This An Important Bird Area or IBA is a site that is level of mapping delineates essential habi- part of a global network of places recognized tat that cannot absorb significant levels of for their outstanding value to bird conservation. habitat-disturbing activity, such as land IBAs are sites that provide essential habitat for development, without substantial impact one or more species of breeding, wintering, and/ to the elements of concern. or migrating birds. Sites range in size from a few acres to thousands of acres, but typically are dis- • Supporting landscapes are the areas crete areas with different ecological characteristics necessary to maintain vital ecologi- from the surrounding landscape. IBAs include cal processes or secondary habitat that both a Core Area and a Support Area. could be impacted by certain types of

Existing Conditions Existing habitat-disturbing activities. There are The IBA program was started in Europe in the significant overlaps of the Supporting 1980s by BirdLife International a global coalition Natural Landscapes, creating larger of partner organizations in over 100 countries. areas or corridors that could become The National Audubon Society is the U.S. Part- part of the framework of a countywide ner Designate of BirdLife International and ad- green infrastructure system. Many of the ministers the IBA program in the United States. Supporting Landscape areas coincide to the upstream watersheds of species of Similar to the Important Bird Area program, the concern core habitat. Activities that oc- Important Mammal Area Project (IMAP) is a cur within the upstream portions of the program administered by an alliance of sports- watershed can have a significant impact men, conservation organizations, wildlife profes- on the core habitat. sionals, and scientists. The program is funded though the Wildlife Conservation and Restora- The 2008 Natural Heritage Inventory of Lan- tion Account, a federal program administered caster County should be consulted for individual in Pennsylvania by the PA Game Commission. Natural Heritage Area descriptions and specific The primary purpose of the IMAP program is management recommendations for each site. to help ensure the future of Pennsylvania's wild 3 Note: The following information is adapted from the Audubon Pennsylvania IBA website (Audubon 2002). Additional information can be found at http://pa.audubon. org/iba/.

34 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Figure 12 - Natural Heritage Areas Site Index

Existing Conditions

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 35

Figure 13 - Natural Heritage Areas Existing Conditions Existing

36 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Figure 14 - Important Bird and Mammal Areas

Existing Conditions

mammals, including both game and non-game • The Susquehanna River Corridor from species. Although particular attention is given Columbia Borough south to the Mary- to species of special concern, the program also land border focuses on habitats that have high mammalian • Muddy Run Reservoir diversity. • The Serpentine Barrens in the southern part of the County Both IBAs and IMAs may include lands in public • The Octoraro Reservoir or private ownership, or both, and the lands may • The Middle Creek Wildlife Management or may not be protected or permanently pre- Area in the northern part of the County served. The IMA and IBA designation does not preclude or limit land owners from undertaking Forest Blocks any activity on the property. It simply denotes Most of Lancaster County’s original forest cover the importance of the site and can influence the has been lost to other land uses such agriculture planning and decision-making process for habitat or development. The remaining forests are, for preservation efforts. Sites accessible to the general the most part, fragmented into relatively small public, whether publicly or privately owned, patches that are scattered across the landscape. provide excellent outdoor learning opportunities Often, these lands have remained forested be- as well as attraction for eco-tourist interested in cause they are unsuitable for agriculture or other wildlife watching. land uses.

The locations of IMA and IBA sites in Lancaster In general terms, a large contiguous area or County are shown on Figure 14. Many of the “block” of forest has a higher conservation value sites overlap; indicating that quality habitat for than several smaller, fragmented pieces. This is mammals is also good for birds (and vice versa). due, in part, to the larger blocks having a greater There are five primary concentrations of IMAs proportion of forest “interior” (see below). Some and IBAs in the County:

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 37 Figure 15 - Forest Blocks Ranked by Size

Figure 16 - Forest Blocks 100 Acres or Greater Existing Conditions Existing

38 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element species strongly prefer this type of habitat as op- Interior Forests posed to areas closer to the forest edge. To inform Interior forests provide important habitat that efforts to conserve the County’s natural biodi- is preferred by certain native plant and animal versity and to preserve the best quality habitat species that require conditions that are absent for native plant and animal species, the largest of in non-forest ecosystems. These habitats are these fragmented forest patches were identified in relatively rare and easily disturbed. When the the planning process. land adjacent to an intact forest is cleared, the area at the edge is exposed to sunlight and wind Forest blocks were initially identified using 2000 that penetrates the forest, dries out the interior, Penn State land cover data derived from satellite and changes the air temperature, light intensity, imagery. Aerial photographs were used to identify and soil moisture. These conditions are much additional fragmenting features, such as roads, different from the habitat conditions found in an railroads, utility rights-of-way, and development, undisturbed forest and affect the forest ecosystem which were incorporated into the analysis. As for some distance in from the edge. shown on Figure 15, the resulting forest blocks were grouped into several size classes: less than As shown on Figure 17, the natural occurrence 100 acres, 100 to 250 acres, 250 to 500 acres and of interior forests has been much reduced in Existing Conditions greater than 500 acres. Figure 16 shows forest Lancaster County. For the purpose of this analy- blocks that are greater than 100 acres in size. sis, interior forests were defined as forest areas The analysis revealed that Lancaster County’s (patches) located at least 100 meters in from largest forest blocks are found in the Furnace the woodland edge or from any human-created Hills, along the County’s northern border with opening such as a field, road, railway line, or util- Lebanon County, in the Bowmansville Hills area ity right-of-way. Similar to the analysis of forest in the northeast, and on Welsh Mountain. blocks, the largest interior forests in Lancaster

Figure 17 - Interior Forests

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 39 Figure 18 - Interior Forests Ranked by Size

County are concentrated in the Furnace Hills, and which interact with each other, with animal Bowmansville Hills, Welsh Mountain, and a populations, and with the physical environment. small area on Texter Mountain in the northern The location and abundance of natural commu- part of the County. nities are determined by environmental factors such as climate, geology, land form, soils, and In addition to determining the distribution of hydrology interacting with natural disturbance interior forest throughout the County, interior events, such as fires, droughts, and floods, to

Existing Conditions Existing forest patches were ranked according to size shape the landscape. Human activities have also with larger patches considered more valuable had a profound impact on the county’s natural than smaller patches (Figure 18). Forest patches communities. The highest quality natural com- smaller than five acres were dropped from the munities are deemed most significant because analysis, as they are likely too small to be suitable of their undisturbed condition. Natural com- habitat for forest interior species. munities were delineated by the Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program based on a review of In addition to size, the shape of a patch of 2005 aerial photographs, followed by targeted interior forest also has impacts the quality of the “ground-truthing.” Terrestrial & Palustrine Plant habitat. A patch of interior forest that is long Communities of Pennsylvania by Jean Fike, pub- and narrow may have the same area as an interior lished by the Pennsylvania DCNR in 1999, was forest patch that is more compact and circular in consulted in this analysis. All areas were ranked shape, but the latter will have a smaller perimeter based on natural habitat quality. The results of to area ratio, thus providing more interior habitat this analysis are shown on Figure 19. that is buffered from edge effects. Habitats identified as a “natural community” Natural Communities Quality Analysis were assigned the number value 3 (the highest A natural community is an assemblage of differ- rank). These were regarded as essentially naturally ent plant species that live together in a common occurring communities with little evidence of in- area at a particular time and in a specific habitat, vasion by introduced species. Those habitat types identified as a natural community with a negative

40 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Figure 19 - Natural Communities Quality

Existing Conditions

The Importance of Native Plants

The relationship between plants and insects is an important part of the food chain that sustains the diversity of animal species in our area. Lancaster County’s native plants evolved over millions of years in response to the local climate and soil conditions. Insects co-evolve with native plants and most have highly specific preferences for certain plant species as food. Research shows that native insect populations cannot be sustained by most non-native plants. Thus, the loss of native plants impacts the availability of certain beneficial insects that many birds and other animals rely on as a food source.

Many non-native plant species arrived here from other continents as ornamental garden plants that escaped and propagated in the wild. While many of these introduced species, such as the dandelion, are harmless, numerous others compete with our native species for resources and habitat. Since these non-native competitors often lack population checks such as predators, they can easily gain a foothold in disturbed habitats. Frequently, the native plants cannot compete with these introduced species, resulting in the degradation of healthy ecosystems.

There are numerous ways that individuals can help preserve our native plant communities. The first, and most important, is to refrain from disturbing or taking native plants from their natural habitat. If such a disruption is unavoidable, the replanting of native species is strongly encouraged. The principle of planting native species applies to home gardens as well; because many of the non- native plants currently in Pennsylvania originated in gardens, planting only native species eliminates this concern. Moreover, native plants provide food and habitat for native insects. Rare native plant species could be propagated for introduction into “backyard restoration” areas, thus increasing biodiversity throughout Lancaster County.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 41 influence (e.g., some presence of invasive species) Barrens and the Conowingo Islands as the most were given a rank of 2. At the low end of the significant Natural Heritage Areas in the County. scale, those habitats considered to be in an early This is due to the high numbers of species of stage of succession and recovering from recent concern documented at these locations as well past disturbances such as farming or timber har- as the relative degree of state and global rarity of vesting were ranked 1. Modified successional for- each species. est, a habitat type common in Lancaster County, was also identified as low quality habitat. This Natural Gems type of forest typically has regenerated after a Natural Gems are priority natural resource areas period of disturbance such as farming, pasture, identified by the Lancaster County Conservancy grazing, or repeated logging. Such forests typi- that are the focus of the Conservancy’s preser- cally contain a high proportion of invasive and vation efforts. Natural Gems were identified introduced plants and therefore are considered through a sophisticated GIS analysis process low-quality natural communities. using a rating system based on seven important environmental attributes. These attributes are All of the species of concern core habitats are listed below along with the highest and lowest of critically important for the long-term viability the five possible ratings for each attribute. of the native plant and animal species they harbor. However, Figure 19 illustrates the relative • Water bodies (highest rating where importance of the individual core habitat areas rated “Exceptional Value” and/or wild by integrating the number, quality, and rarity trout waters; lowest rating if no water of the species of concern in each area. Darker resources present) areas shown on the map represents concentra- • Wetland (highest rating for wetland tions of species of concern or “hotspots.” This listed in the Pennsylvania Natural Diver- analysis clearly portrays the State Line Serpentine sity Inventory (PNDI); lowest rating if no wetland present)

Figure 20 - Natural Gems and Priority Focus Areas Existing Conditions Existing

42 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element • Forestland (highest rating if greater than focus areas for preservation at the landscape level. 200 acres; lowest rating if smaller than The evaluation process is a dynamic process that one acre) is ongoing using the Natural Gem rating system • Grassland (highest rating for grassland as a tool. listed in the PNDI; lowest rating if no grassland present) The locations of the Natural Gems and prior- • Geological Features (highest rating for ity focus areas are shown on Figure 20. They sites with rare features, fossil beds, caves, are generally located in peripheral areas of the and/or cliff communities; lowest rating if County that support much of the remaining nothing to observe) intact natural habitat, with a heavy concentration • Plants (highest rating if more than three of sites along the lower Susquehanna River gorge. state-listed species of concern present; While the Conservancy does not rely solely on lowest rating if no plant community or the Natural Gems to guide its preservation ef- species of concern present) forts, it is an important tool it uses to assist in • Animals (highest rating if more than two decision-making when tracts of land become state-listed species of concern present; available for acquisition. lowest rating if no habitat or species of Existing Conditions concern present) • Adjacency to other preserved tracts 2.2.4 Potential Restoration Areas (highest rating if adjacent to other Conservancy tracts; lowest rating if not The analysis of Lancaster County’s natural com- adjacent to other preserved tracts) munities reveals that they have been greatly altered and fragmented by human activities over Through this analysis, the Conservancy identified time. Therefore, creating a healthy, functioning 65 parcels in the County with the high-quality green infrastructure system requires not only natural resource attributes it wishes to preserve. preservation of the remaining examples of the Clusters of these parcels were targeted as priority County’s natural habitat, but also restoration

Figure 21 - Priority Habitat Resoration Areas

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 43 of natural communities in suitable locations is important to create an interconnected green throughout the County. infrastructure system. These corridors facilitate species movement and migration that is other- Priority Habitat Restoration Areas wise impossible through urban and agricultural Figure 21 combines several resource factors landscapes. Figure 22 illustrates the best potential that are indicators of the need and potential for areas for the establishment of forest corridors habitat restoration. These factors include slopes through the County. This map was created by greater than 25%, the 100- and 500-year flood- evaluating existing forest blocks as the basis for plain, stream quality based on the riparian buffer creating connections that avoid urban develop- analysis, forest block size, and habitat quality. ment and incorporate the greatest amount of High quality habitats were excluded as not need- existing forestland. Steep slopes, poor soils, and ing immediate attention, as were resource areas riparian corridors were preferentially included deemed too expensive or impractical to restore. in the potential forest corridors. Where existing Based on this analysis, the priority restoration forests, steep slopes, poor soils, and riparian cor- areas shown on Figure 21 contain degraded habi- ridors were unavailable the next most direct path tat that still presents the possibility of substantial was chosen. Based on this analysis, the thicker, restoration. Examples of priority restoration darker lines shown on Figure 22 indicate areas habitats include non-forested areas separating where more work will be required to restore the large forest blocks; streams with partial, but not forest corridor. Existing forests are not shown on contiguous, forested riparian buffers; and steep the map. slopes lacking adequate forest cover to prevent erosion. Potential Agricultural Conversion Lands The majority of the Lancaster County landscape Potential Forest Corridors is well-suited for agricultural uses; approximately Establishing (or reestablishing) contiguous forest 75% of the County has soils classified as prime corridors around and through Lancaster County

Figure 22 - Potential Forest Corridors Existing Conditions Existing

44 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Figure 23 - Potential Agricultural Conversion Lands

Existing Conditions

farmland (NRCS Class I and II) or of statewide to farmers who convert agricultural lands to a importance (NRCS Class III). However, certain more natural state. While these programs have areas located outside of the Lancaster Plain primarily focused on reestablishing wetland and have topography and soil conditions that are grassland habitat, they could also be applied to susceptible to severe soil erosion. Farming these steeply sloping, highly erodible lands. areas without impacting the water quality of local streams and waterways is difficult. Therefore, it may be appropriate to convert some of these 2.2.5 Threats to Green Infrastructure agricultural areas back to a natural land cover. Resources Restoration of these lands could improve stream water quality and provide habitat for native plant Threats to Lancaster County’s Green Infrastruc- and animal species. ture are many and varied, ranging from the direct and indirect impacts of development to Figure 23 illustrates areas in Lancaster County agricultural practices to global trends such as cli- that are being farmed on slopes exceeding 25% mate change and invasive species. The following or on lands with highly erodible soils. These areas provides an overview of key threats: should be evaluated to determine if conversion to natural cover such as early successional habitat 1. Development: Scattered, large-lot develop- would be appropriate. Existing programs offering ment outside of Designated Growth Areas is financial assistance to farmers who are willing to consuming a significant amount of land and take this course of action on appropriate lands fragmenting green infrastructure resources. are available. For example, the U.S. Department Projections of future population growth in of Agriculture’s Conservation Reserve Program the County and the amount of land zoned (CRP) and Conservation Reserve Enhancement for large residential lots (typically 1-2 acres) Program (CREP) provide financial assistance in rural areas suggest the potential for

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 45 Nutrients and the Health of the Chesapeake Bay

Excess nutrients are harmful to aquatic environments. Elevated levels of nitrogen and phosphorus, two types of nutrients, are the main cause of the Bay’s poor water quality and loss of aquatic habitats.

Nutrient runoff from urban, suburban, and rural areas fuel the growth of algae blooms that rob the Chesapeake Bay’s aquatic life of sunlight and dissolved oxygen. Such blooms on the surface of the water prevent the sun’s rays from reaching underwater bay grasses growing at the bottom. Without sunlight, bay grasses cannot grow and provide food and habitat for blue crabs, waterfowl, and juve- nile fish. Excess algae that are not consumed by the Bay’s algae-eating organisms eventually die and sink to the bottom, where they decompose in a process that leaves bottom waters with little or no dissolved oxygen for crabs, oysters and other bottom-dwelling species.

continuing impacts on green infrastructure positive environmental benefits such as resources, including: aquifer recharge and stopovers for wildlife • Impacts on natural/native communi- migration. Nevertheless, agricultural prac- ties (habitat loss, fragmentation, and tices have caused negative impacts on green degradation) infrastructure resources, beginning with the • Water quality impacts (impacts of on- historic removal of native vegetation to ac- site sewage disposal on groundwater; commodate farming. These impacts include: erosion and sedimentation from con- • Impacts on natural/native communi- struction activities; stormwater runoff ties (habitat loss, fragmentation, and from impervious surfaces; and other degradation) forms of pollution such as chemical • Water quality impacts (pollution from fertilizers and pesticides) animal wastes and other agricultural • Water supply impacts (effects of imper- practices; removal of riparian buffers; vious surfaces on groundwater recharge; erosion and sedimentation, including implications of groundwater withdrawal contribution to legacy sediments) for carrying capacity) The impacts of agriculture on surface water qual- 2. Gray Infrastructure Systems: The major ity are further described in Section 2.2.2.

Existing Conditions Existing “gray” infrastructure systems that affect green infrastructure resources are transportation 4. Outdoor Recreational Uses: While recre- (primarily roads), wastewater treatment, and ation is a generally compatible, beneficial stormwater drainage. These systems result in function of green infrastructure, it is possible both direct and indirect resource impacts. for the level of usage to exceed carrying Indirect impacts result when roadway, sewer, capacity, resulting in resource degradation. water, and similar improvements promote Examples of this potential threat include urban development that impacts green infra- unregulated ATV use in native habitat areas structure resources. Direct impacts caused by and heavy mountain biking and equestrian gray infrastructure construction are similar use in the Susquehanna River Corridor. to urban development and include impacts on natural/native communities, water quality 5. Other Land Uses: Chemical pollution (fer- impacts (effluent discharges, combined sewer tilizers and pesticides) from golf courses and overflows, etc.), and water supply impacts. residential yards and inappropriate forestry practices (e.g., clear cutting within riparian 3. Agriculture: Agriculture is the largest single buffers) are examples of threats to green land use in Lancaster County, covering infrastructure resources associated with other approximately 54% of the County’s land land uses. area. Farming is central to the County’s heritage and identity, maintains land and soil resources in productive uses, and provides

46 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 6. Legacy Sediments: As described in Section Plan, established standards, policies, and strate- 2.2.2, legacy sediments are materials that gies designed to guide the County and munici- accumulated behind historic dams and today palities in meeting citizens’ needs for parks and cover the historic floodplains of many of the recreation at the countywide and municipal lev- County’s waterways to depths of up to 20 feet. els. This plan updates the 1992 plan by address- Erosion of these sediments is a serious threat ing parks, recreation, and open space as part of to the water quality of rivers and streams and countywide green infrastructure system. Balance, ultimately to the Chesapeake Bay. the 2006 Update to the Growth Management Element of the Comprehensive Plan, provides 7. Large-Scale Environmental Trends: These important context for the role of parks and open include the impacts of invasive species (and space in the County’s overall land use framework. deer) and the long-term effects of global Guiding growth to Designated Growth Areas climate change on natural communities. (DGAs) and having it occur in a more compact form—a basic premise of both the Urban Growth Area and Rural Strategies contained in 2.3 Parks and Recreation Balance – requires that residents of these areas have less private “back yard” space in order to Existing Conditions Community recreation is a major function achieve other goals, particularly farmland preser- performed by the green infrastructure system. vation in rural areas. However, in order to ensure The opportunity to experience high quality that quality of life is not reduced for those living natural resources in the outdoor environment is in DGAs, public open spaces need to be carefully a fundamental part of a community’s quality of planned and incorporated into land use and life. Perhaps nowhere is this more true than in development patterns so that residents have easy Lancaster County, where gently rolling farmland, access to “close-to-home” outdoor recreational meandering streams, thick canopied forests, and opportunities. In addition, guiding growth to other resources blend together to form a land- DGAs provides public agencies and private land scape of unparalleled beauty. This open space is trusts the opportunity to preserve the most sensi- essential to community character and a primary tive natural resource areas (generally located in attraction for people who live, work, and visit rural parts of the County) before they are lost to Lancaster County. large-lot residential or other forms of develop- ment. Ideally, more developed parks and active Although Lancaster County is seemingly blessed recreational facilities inside DGAs and passive, with an abundance of open space, in actual- natural resource-based open spaces outside of ity very little of it is publicly accessible. While DGAs should be connected through a network approximately 54% of the County’s land area of publicly accessible hiking and biking trails. is in agricultural use – including some 80,000 The following text provides background informa- acres that have been permanently preserved by tion and standards for the provision of parks, the County Agricultural Preserve Board and the recreation, and open space in Lancaster County. nonprofit organization Lancaster Farmland Trust It is divided into the following sections: – this land is not open to the public for outdoor recreational purposes. In total, only about four • Section 2.3.1 defines general roles and percent of the County’s land area is available to responsibilities for the provision of parks, the public for outdoor recreational use. Continu- recreation, and open space in Lancaster ing growth and development is magnifying this County. problem by changing the character of Lancaster • Section 2.3.2 addresses parks, recreation, County, making it increasingly more difficult for and open space planning in Lancaster Coun- residents to enjoy the outdoors and appreciate ty at the state, county, and regional levels. the County’s bountiful natural resources. • Section 2.3.3 provides an inventory of exist- ing parks, recreation, and open space lands The Lancaster County Regional Open Space in Lancaster County. Plan, adopted by the County in 1992 as an ele- • Section 2.3.4 establishes standards for the ment of the Lancaster County Comprehensive provision of publicly accessible parks and

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 47 usually exceeds the resources available at both the county and municipal levels.

Three Pennsylvania agencies provide public open space in Lancaster County. The Pennsylvania Game Commission manages wildlife resources and provides opportunities on portions of their land holdings for public hunting, trapping, hik- ing, and other recreational activities. The Depart- ment of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) Bureau of State Parks manages the Neighborhood and Community parks are important Commonwealth’s state parks, including one park to the quality-of-life of residents in traditional in Lancaster County. The Pennsylvania Fish and urban communities and growing suburban areas. Boat Commission manages the Commonwealth’s aquatic resources, enforces regulations, and pro- open space lands at the countywide and vides access points for fishing and motorized and municipal levels. non-motorized boating access.

Additional policy direction and recommenda- In relation to Lancaster County’s green infra- tions for the provision of parks, recreation, and structure, the Commonwealth’s primary role is to open space as part of a countywide green infra- maintain large open space areas that preserve im- structure system are integrated into Chapters 3.0, portant natural resources and entire ecosystems. 4.0, and 5.0. Chapter 3.0 establishes an overall Many of the areas owned and managed by state recreation goal as one of the primary functions agencies contain the headwaters to the County’s of the green infrastructure system. Chapter 4.0 largest waterways, forests that cleanse the air and defines objectives, strategies, and tools in support protect water quality, and habitat for plant and of the recreation goal. Chapter 5.0 recommends animal species of concern. The location of these actions by Lancaster County and its partners to lands is determined primarily by natural resource provide for the outdoor recreational needs of quality rather than by proximity to urban popu- Lancastrians. lations. While state game lands and preserves provide extensive opportunities for outdoor

Existing Conditions Existing recreation, they are typically undeveloped with 2.3.1 Parks, Recreation, and Open little or no active recreational facilities. Space Roles and Responsibilities Lancaster County Meeting the parks and recreation needs of The primary role of Lancaster County is to ac- Lancaster County residents is a collaborative quire, preserve, and manage lands with natural responsibility in which all levels of government resources of countywide significance. This re- as well as the nonprofit and private sectors have sponsibility is met through the provision of pri- important roles to play. The following text pro- marily passive outdoor recreation opportunities vides a brief overview of the general purpose and in regional parks and regional trails. Regional activities of the entities involved in parks, recre- parks are generally natural resource-based, range ation, and open space preservation in Lancaster from 400 to 800 acres in size, and are located County. within a 10-mile radius of every resident of the County. Regional parks have limited developed Commonwealth of Pennsylvania recreational facilities, which can include parking The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania preserves lots, restrooms, picnic tables, hiking trails, boat- natural, cultural, and historic resources of ing access, and interpretive signage. Regional statewide significance. These resources are often parks may also incorporate historic and/or located within large landholdings that transcend cultural resources. While most regional parks municipal – and often county – boundaries. serve primarily a passive recreational function, Therefore, the management of these resources Buchmiller and Central Parks provide both

48 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element active and passive recreational opportunities for residents of Lancaster City and the larger central Lancaster County area.

In addition to regional parks, the County also manages regional trails that provide opportuni- ties for hiking and biking. Regional trails tran- scend municipal boundaries and typically follow linear features such as a stream or river, ridgeline, abandoned rail line, canal towpath, or utility corridor.

Inter-Municipal Organizations Inter-municipal organizations include regional planning bodies, task forces, and councils of Councils of Government (or COGs) such as the governments. The primary role of these organiza- Lancaster Intermunicpal Committee (LIMC) play tions is to improve coordination, efficiency, and an important role in coordinating regional parks Existing Conditions functionality among participating local govern- and trail planning activities. ments. They are often in the best position to implement greenway and trail systems because Ephrata Recreation Center, Greater Elizabeth- of the need to coordinate greenway preservation town Area Recreation Services (GEARS), Hemp- and development across multiple properties that field Area Recreation Commission, Lancaster often transcend municipal borders. An excellent Recreation Commission, Lititz Recreation Com- example is the Lancaster Inter-Municipal Com- mission, Manheim Central Parks and Recreation mittee’s (LIMC) coordination of the proposed Department, and the Southern End Community Conestoga Greenway. Association (SECA). These and other recreational providers are part of the Lancaster County Recre- LIMC is a council of governments comprised of ation and Parks Alliance, which promotes sharing 13 municipalities in central Lancaster County. of responsibilities to manage recreation resources LIMC’s 1999 Conestoga Greenways River Cor- across municipal boundaries. ridor Conservation Plan proposed a greenway system along the , Little Con- Local Municipalities and School Districts estoga Creek, and the West Branch of the Little The primary role of local municipalities and Conestoga Creek in the multi-jurisdictional area school districts is to provide “close-to-home” covered by LIMC. The affected municipalities recreational opportunities for Lancastrians. They have implemented ordinance language to sup- have the major responsibility to provide active port greenway dedication consistent with the recreation facilities available to residents of the plan; however; gaps in the proposed system still municipalities. Public schools are often close to remain. The recent “Growing Together” Compre- residential areas and have a variety of recreational hensive Plan for the LIMC area reaffirms the goal facilities, such as playgrounds and athletic fields, of establishing the greenway system and includes that can greatly enhance local park and recre- recommendations to bridge disconnected green- ational systems. Where possible, school districts way segments. should work with municipalities to develop joint school/park complexes and other facilities, pro- Another important role of inter-municipal orga- grams, and events in DGAs. nizations is the sharing of park and recreational facility management, maintenance, and program- Municipalities can help improve access to parks ming in order to increase efficiency and reduce by creating local recreational trail networks. Trail the costs of providing services at the local level. connections to parks are particularly useful for Examples of county recreational organizations children that typically have to rely on parents to that are sharing resources on a regional level in- drive them to recreational facilities. Trails are also clude the Conestoga Valley Community Center, popular destinations for adults who use them for

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 49 PPL Corporation recently announced plans to transfer approximately 3,500 acres of publicly accessible lands with valuable natural resources in the Susquehanna River Gorge to the Lancaster County Conservancy to protect in perpetuity. This type of cooperation between semi-public and private nonprofit partners should be encour- aged as a way to protect the County’s significant natural resources.

Semi-public agencies such as water authori- The primary role of municipalities in the provision ties can also help preserve important natural of outdoor recreation is active recreation experiences in neighborhood and community park resources. The Lancaster County Conservancy settings. Leacock Township Park is an example is cooperating with Lancaster County to secure of a municipally-owned neighborhood park that protection of approximately 800 acres of land provides a diversity of recreation experiences for owned by the New Holland Water Authority on nearby residents. Welsh Mountain adjacent to the Money Rocks walking, jogging, or biking. Trails can connect County Park. This is another example of how residential neighborhoods to a variety of destina- public, semi-public, and nonprofit partners can tions besides parks, such as shopping areas, work work together to protect the County’s natural places, community centers, libraries, and places resources. of worship. Local trail systems can be developed in a variety of locations, for example along Private Nonprofit Sector streams and rivers in urban communities, along The private nonprofit sector includes land con- abandoned rail lines in suburban communities, servation trusts such as the Lancaster County and along ridgelines in rural parts of the County. Conservancy, watershed and other environmental organizations, and citizen groups focused on Municipalities also have an important role to outdoor recreation, such as trail organizations play in protecting natural resources at the local and recreation clubs. These organizations have level. Natural resource protection ordinances and an important role to play in meeting the outdoor acquisition of land or development rights are ex- recreation needs of county residents. The Lan-

Existing Conditions Existing amples of the tools available to municipalities to caster County Conservancy has a long history of protect important resources (see Chapter 4.0). As natural resource protection through the acquisi- previously mentioned, greenway and trail dedica- tion of land or easements. As demonstrated by tion provisions have been incorporated into some the examples provided above, it is making signifi- municipal ordinances. cant contributions to the large-scale preserva- tion of natural resources in the County through Semi-Public Sector collaborative partnerships with other entities. The semi-public sector refers to private entities that provide open space that is open to the public Although the Lancaster County Conservancy for outdoor recreation use. These include power- and other land trusts focus on protecting high generating utilities – Exelon, PECO Energy, quality natural resources, their lands are often Pennsylvania Power and Light (PPL), and Safe open to the public for uses such as hiking, bik- Harbor Water Power Corporation – and water ing, fishing, hunting, and wildlife observation. authorities such as the New Holland Borough Because the location of the lands depends on the Authority. These entities play a significant role quality of the natural resources protected, they in maintaining or impacting the County’s open are largely found in isolated, less populated areas space and natural resources. For example, the around the periphery of the County. Natural pre- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) serves such as Tucquan Glenn and Fishing Creek requires that electric utilities provide the public are almost exclusively oriented towards passive with recreational opportunities as a condition recreation. Since the intent of such preserves is to of licensing. To help meet this requirement, protect the natural resources within them, there

50 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element opportunities, perform important environmental functions such as stormwater management, and increase the value of the development.

Another component of the private, for-profit sector, recreational businesses provide recreational facilities or programs that are not traditionally offered by local municipalities based on land availability or fiscal considerations. Such facilities include golf courses, fitness centers, ice hockey rinks, etc. The Lancaster County Conservancy plays an important role in the provision of outdoor recreation by preserving natural lands like those found along Tucquan Glen in Martic Township. 2.3.2 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Planning is typically little or no recreational facility devel- opment with the exception of signage, crushed Planning for the provision of parks, recreation, Existing Conditions stone parking lots, and trails. and open space planning in Lancaster County is ongoing at multiple scales and levels of govern- Watershed organizations such as the Cocalico ment. These various efforts provide important Creek Watershed Association, context for the parks and recreation component Watershed Association, Watershed of Greenscapes and are summarized below. Alliance, Little Conestoga Watershed Alliance, and Octoraro Watershed Association contribute Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to maintaining and restoring the health of the Pennsylvania’s Recreation Plan 2004-2008: County’s waterways and advocate for natural re- Published in 2004 as the fifth update to the source and open space preservation. Recreational 1967 Statewide Outdoor Recreation Plan, this and trail clubs are also important advocates for document is the Commonwealth’s official policy preserving the County’s outdoor recreational document identifying statewide recreational resources and help to maintain trails and other issues, needs, policies, and capital investment facilities through volunteer activities. priorities. It is required to maintain eligibility to receive monies from the federal Land and Water Private For-Profit Sector Conservation Fund. The 2004 Plan established The private for-profit sector includes Lancaster three major priorities for action: County’s business and development community. Developers provide close-to-home recreational • Funding: Increase funding for planning, facilities, trails, or greenways in their projects and acquisition, development, and reha- developments. New development projects should bilitation of natural, cultural, historic, help to “build community” by incorporating and recreation resources, facilities, and parks, water access, and recreational facilities programs in order to enhance quality that are accessible to local residents via walking of life and meet the growing needs of or biking. Trails should be incorporated into the Pennsylvanians. design of every development to create intercon- • Healthy and Livable Communities: nected park and trail systems throughout the Create more healthy and livable com- community. munities that will more successfully serve the recreational needs of those who live, Developers also play an important role in pro- work, and play within them. tecting natural resources by limiting impacts on waterways, steep slopes, woodlands, and other important natural resources in development proj- ects. These resources can be utilized as positive design features that provide passive recreational

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 51 • Capacity Building: Build more capacity The Regional Open Space Plan also established at all levels, through partnerships and the following standards for the provision of innovative ways of doing business, to regional (county) parkland and local (municipal) empower stakeholders in meeting recre- parkland in Lancaster County: ation needs. • Provide a minimum of 5 acres of Pennsylvania’s Greenways – An Action Plan for county-owned regional parkland per Creating Communities: Adopted in 2001, this 1,000 residents. plan defines a coordinated and strategic approach • Provide a minimum of 10 acres of mu- to establishing a network of greenways through- nicipal parkland per 1,000 residents. out Pennsylvania. It establishes the following vision for Pennsylvania’s greenways: The County has implemented several of the key regional park recommendations of the 1992 Plan Pennsylvania and its many partners will devel- by acquiring an additional 929 acres in three re- op an outstanding network of greenways across gional park sites: Speedwell Forge, Money Rocks the Commonwealth, creating an asset highly (Welsh Mountain), and the Theodore A. Parker valued by Pennsylvanians and enhancing the III Natural Area (Stewart Run and Upper West quality of life for all. This network of greenways Branch of ). Also, Silver Mine will connect Pennsylvania’s open space, natural Park, identified as a potential regional park site landscape features, scenic, cultural, historic by the 1992 Plan, has been acquired by Pequea and recreational sites, and urban and rural Township. Other regional park sites proposed by communities. Greenways will become one of the the 1992 Plan have not been implemented, in- Commonwealth’s most powerful tools to achieve cluding Bowmansville Hills, Adamstown Ridge, sustainable growth and livable communities. Lower West Branch of Octoraro Creek, Wooded Ridgeway West of Octoraro Creek, and Shearers This network is envisioned as consisting of Creek. “hubs” (parks, forests, game lands, lakes, towns, and other destinations) and greenway “spokes” Less progress has been made in establishing (connecting corridors such as land and water the greenway network proposed in the 1992 trails, natural corridors, etc.). The spokes include Regional Open Space than in implementing the greenways of statewide significance, as well as regional park recommendations. Accomplish-

Existing Conditions Existing local and regional greenway networks. Greenways ments include completion of major segments of of statewide significance identified in Lancaster the proposed Conestoga North and South Trails, County include the Susquehanna Greenway, water and land trails along the Susquehanna Lower Susquehanna River Water Trail, the Horse- River, the Middle Creek and Segloch Run Inter- shoe Trail, and the Conestoga Trail. Municipal Greenway, and portions of other inter-municipal greenways. The Susquehanna Lancaster County River Water Trail, a federally designated National As previously noted, the Lancaster County Recreation Trail, extends along the length of the Regional Open Space Plan (1992) has provided Susquehanna River in Lancaster and York Coun- policy guidance for the provision of parks, recre- ties. A comprehensive water trail paddler’s guide ation, and open space in the County. This plan has been developed for non-motorized watercraft proposed establishment of a regional open space and 21 interpretive panels installed at key access system comprised of three major components: points to inform visitors about the rich heritage a countywide regional park system, a county- of the river. wide natural heritage preservation system, and a countywide greenway system. The plan provided Regional Comprehensive Plans and Recreation recommendations for acquiring regional park- Plans lands, preserving high quality natural areas as A number of multi-municipal comprehensive natural heritage preserves, and preserving nine and recreation plans have been completed for regional and sixteen inter-municipal greenways various parts of the County. Themes common to throughout the County.

52 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element The plans express the need to reduce conflicts between motorized and non-motorized traffic and to increase non-motorized movement op- portunities by means of trails, greenways, bike routes, bike lanes, and other systems.

Other Special Studies A number of other studies have been developed that are relevant to planning for parks, recre- ation, and open space in Lancaster County. Before After These studies are summarized below. Converting abandoned rail lines like this one in Ephrata Borough provides recreation for residents Pennsylvania Highlands Conservation Atlas: as well as an alternative means of travel. The Highlands is a large landscape of forested all or most of these plans as they relate to parks, mountains and hills that extends from north- recreation, and open space planning include: western Connecticut through New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania to the Maryland state Existing Conditions • In general, the plans express the desire line. The northern and northeastern edges of to protect, preserve, and enhance natural Lancaster County are part of the Highlands resources, including but not limited region. The Highlands Conservation Act, signed to floodplains, wetlands, streams and by President Bush in 2004, is designed to assist stream banks, forested areas, agricultural the four states in conserving land and natural soils, and wildlife habitats, through con- resources in the Highlands region through servation and education initiatives. federal assistance for land conservation projects. • The plans support coordination of In 2006 the Highlands Coalition, in cooperation recreational facilities and programs at with the Appalachian Mountain Club and Trust a regional level. There is a movement for Public Land, released the Pennsylvania High- to provide and maintain a regionally lands Conservation Atlas. This study identifies connected system of active and passive high-priority conservation areas, including the recreation opportunities. Some of the Furnace Hills and Welsh Mountain in Lancaster plans advocate coordinating a regional County, where outstanding natural resource parks system with open space conserva- values coincide with stakeholder priorities for tion efforts. greenways, trails, and open space preservation. • Regions that are anchored by boroughs and older urban areas express a need Susquehanna Greenway Strategic Action Plan: for aesthetic improvements (e.g., urban Led by a coalition of public and private agencies greening) and increased pedestrian and and organizations called the Susquehanna Green- bicycle connectivity between cultural, way Partnership, the purpose of the Susquehanna business, artistic, and historic destina- Greenway is to link and protect natural, cultural, tions. historic, and recreational resources along the • Although most of the regional plans 500-mile long Susquehanna River corridor in allude to preservation and enhancement Pennsylvania. The Action Plan was completed of streams and waterways, Lancaster in 2005 to provide a guide for implementing Inter-Municipal Commitee’s Growing the greenway focused on the first three years Together: A Comprehensive Plan for of operation. The greenway is divided into six Central Lancaster County, PA is the only “reaches” in Pennsylvania from the New York to one that specifically discusses recreation Maryland borders. Lancaster and York Coun- “along and in the waterways.” ties comprises most of the Lower Susquehanna Reach, which extends from Harrisburg to the Pennsylvania/Maryland border and also includes

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 53 portions of Perry, Dauphin, and Cumberland Counties. Greenscapes incorporates the goals and objectives of the Susquehanna Greenway Strategic Action Plan.

Horse-Shoe Trail Preservation Plan: The Horse-Shoe Trail is a 140-mile multi-use trail that runs from the Valley Forge National Park to the north of Harrisburg, PA. The Horse-Shoe Trail in Lancaster County

was proposed by the 1992 Regional Open Space Inc. Lancaster Newspapers, Plan as a regional trail from Shearers Creek in Developing a recreation trail along the abandoned Penn Township to the Berks County line in East Enola Railroad Branch is an opportunity to provide both recreation for area residents and interpret Cocalico Township. Most of this greenway exists the heritage of the County. as an informal trail system but is unprotected; development pressures have forced some pieces to be abandoned or relocated along rural roads. an effort to construct a 1.3-mile trail along the In 2001, the trail was severed in Dauphin Conestoga River in the Sunnyside peninsula area County, with no linkage around the closure. In that will provide a direct link to the County’s 2002 the Horse-Shoe Trail was declared an En- Central Park. dangered Hiking Trail by the Keystone Trail As- sociation. The developed Atglen-Susquehanna Trail Master Plan a preservation plan for the Horse-Shoe Trail but Report: The Atglen-Susquehanna Trail is a re- there has been little progress to date in protect- gional greenway proposed by the 1992 Lancaster ing Lancaster County segments of the trail from County Regional Open Space Plan that would development pressures. extend from the Susquehanna River east through the Borough of Quarryville to the border of The Conestoga Greenways – A River Corridor Chester County just south of the Borough of Conservation Plan: This plan establishes strate- Christiana. The 1992 plan identified this line as gies for cooperation among municipal govern- the best opportunity for the County to acquire ments, non-profit organizations, businesses, a multi-use, long distance passive recreation trail

Existing Conditions Existing and landowners to protect and preserve the through two distinctive Lancaster County land- environmental quality, scenic attributes, and rec- scapes: the forested River Hills and the Plain Sect reation and transportation opportunities of the farmland. In 2008, Norfolk Southern transferred Conestoga River, , and ownership of the abandoned rail corridor to the the West Branch of the Little Conestoga Creek.4 adjacent municipalities. The Conestoga River was identified as a Regional Greenway in the 1992 Lancaster County Re- gional Open Space Plan. The Conestoga Green- 2.3.3 Parks, Recreation, and Open ways study has promoted regional collaboration Space Inventory amongst the LIMC municipalities to establish greenway connections, for example by setting This section provides an inventory of exist- aside portions of the greenway system through ing parks, open space, and trails in Lancaster the development review and approval process. As County. Existing parks, open spaces, and trails previously noted, greenway implementation was are shown in Figure 24 at a countywide scale. reinforced by the recently adopted LIMC Grow- The total acreage of state, county, municipal, ing Together Comprehensive Plan. In 2007, school district and nonprofit (Lancaster County the Lancaster County Conservancy coordinated Conservancy) lands is summarized in Table 2-1. Information for this inventory was compiled 4 The Conestoga Greenways: A River Corridor Conservation Plan, Lancaster Inter-Municipal Committee from county tax parcel information, munici- (LIMC), Land Ethics, Inc., and Derck & Edson Associates, pal comprehensive plans, municipal park and LLP, 1999 recreation plans, and nonprofit sources. It should

54 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Table 2-1. Lancaster County Parks, natural settings that preserve natural, cultural, Recreation, and Open Space Land and historic resources. The Pennsylvania Game Inventory Commission manages nearly 9,500 acres of game Ownership Type Acres lands within Lancaster County, the majority of which is located in the Furnace Hills along Public the northern edge of the County. These lands Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 9,700 are managed for their natural habitat value but (parks, game lands, forests) hunting, fishing, hiking, and similar activities are Lancaster County (regional parks) 1,974 encouraged. Municipalities (active and passive 2,813 recreational lands) Located in southern Lancaster County, the 224-acre is Lancaster School district facilities 1,653 County’s only state park. It is located on a wood- Subtotal – Public Parks and Open 16,140 ed plateau overlooking the Susquehanna River in Space Lands Drumore Township. Private Lancaster County Conservancy (fee 2,081 The PA Fish & Boat Commission (PA F&BC) Existing Conditions simple ownership) also owns a small amount of land in Lancaster Lancaster County Conservancy 1,082 County and has lease arrangements with several (easements) entities for public fishing and boating access. A full inventory of this land and other publicly Subtotal – Private Non-Profit Parks 3,163 accessible waterway access points is not currently and Open Space Lands available but should be conducted by the Plan- Total Public and Private Parks and 19,303 ning Commission in the near future. Open Space Lands Note: Inventory does not include private com- Lancaster County Park and Open Space Lands mercial recreational facilities. Lancaster County’s regional park resources are managed by the Department of Parks and Rec- be noted that the inventory is in a constant state reation (DPR). DPR was established to preserve of change and that information is not provided and manage significant tracts of land and water for some important open space holdings, most for recreation and conservation of scenic, histori- notably the utility company lands, that are not cal, geological, and ecologically significant areas necessarily permanently protected. for the enjoyment of Lancaster County residents. DPR oversees six regional parks (Table 2-2). In addition to the six regional parks, DPR manages Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Park and two linear (rail-trail) parks (see Table 2-3): Open Space Lands State lands provide opportunities for outdoor recreation and environmental education in

Table 2-2. Regional Parks Managed by Lancaster County Property Location Size Buchmiller Park West Lampeter Township 79 acres Central Park West Lampeter Township and City of Lancaster 544 acre Chickies Rock Park West Hempfield and East Donegal Townships (between 422 acres Columbia and Marietta Boroughs) Money Rocks Park Caernarvon, East Earl, and Salisbury Townships 381 acres Speedwell Forge Park Elizabeth and Penn Townships 415 acres Theodore A. Parker III Colerain Township 133 acres Natural Area

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 55 • The 5.5-mile Conewago Recreation Trail runs parallel to the from Route 230 to the Lebanon County line. • The 2.3-mile Lancaster Junction Rec- reation Trail runs from the Lancaster County Public Safety Training Center next to Route 283 to the hamlet of Lan- caster Junction.

The regional parks provide primarily pas- sive recreational and environmental education Small, close-to-home recreation facilities that adults and kids can easily access by walking opportunities for users with the exception of or biking are important components of a well- Buchmiller Park and Central Park, which pro- rounded park system. vide active recreational facilities to support the recreational needs of the residents of Lancaster City and the larger central Lancaster County 372 bridge across the Susquehanna River. It is area. They contain some of the County’s most maintained by the Lancaster Hiking Club. As notable natural features, such as Chickies Rock, previously noted, the Conewago and Lancaster a scenic overlook above the Susquehanna River Junction Trails are owned by Lancaster County in Chickies Rock Park, and Money Rocks, a rock and maintained by the Lancaster County Depart- outcropping in Money Rocks Park in the eastern ment of Parks and Recreation. The Northwest part of the County. River Trail is a regional trail that extends along the Susquehanna River through five northwest Lan- DPR maintains the regional parks and trails, caster County municipalities. Of the five existing provides security, and offers recreational and regional trails, only the two owned by Lancaster environmental programs to residents. Park main- County are permanently protected for recreational tenance responsibilities include the inspection of use in their entirety. The Horse-Shoe and Cones- facilities, routine maintenance, and undertak- toga Trails are particularly vulnerable to impacts ing minor park improvements and repairs. The from development or other private uses. parks are patrolled by a staff of park rangers led by the Chief Ranger. Rangers are responsible In addition to the existing land-based trails listed

Existing Conditions Existing for law enforcement and general security and in Table 2-3, water trails have been designated also provide information and education to park along the Susquehanna and Conestoga Rivers in visitors. Environmental education opportunities Lancaster County. are available to residents through the Lancaster County Environmental Center in Central Park. Municipal Parkland Central Park is the main hub of the County’s Most Lancaster County municipalities, with the regional park network, housing the DPR main exception of some of the more rural townships, office, maintenance facility, and park ranger own parkland and provide outdoor recreation headquarters. opportunities for the benefit of their residents. The range and diversity of park facilities at the Existing Regional Trails local level varies widely depending upon the Existing regional trails in Lancaster County are demographic makeup, size, and character of the shown in Table 2.3. Maintained by the Horse- municipality. In urban communities, such as Shoe Trail Club, the Horse-Shoe Trail is part of the City of Lancaster and Columbia Borough, a 140-mile long hiking and equestrian trail that where neighborhoods are more compact with runs from Valley Forge Park in Chester County higher overall densities and vacant land is rare, to the Appalachian Trail in Dauphin County. neighborhood parks, plazas, and similar small The Conestoga Trail traverses most of the length resources are the most common elements of the of Lancaster County and connects the Horse- park system. Larger community parks are more Shoe Trail to the north with the Mason-Dixon common in rural townships, such as Brecknock trail to the south via a sidewalk on a the PA Rt. Township, where more land is available and most

56 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Figure 24 - Existing Parks, Open Space, and Trails

Existing Conditions

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 57

Chickies Rock Park

At 422 acres, Chickies Rock County Park is the second largest park in the Lancaster County park system. From the mid-1800s until the turn of the 20th century, the land between Marietta and Co- lumbia was a beehive of industrial activity area where eight anthracite iron furnaces produced pig iron for eastern markets. After the local decline of the iron industry, natural vegetation gradually reclaimed the area, although some of the ruins of the furnaces remain. The park itself derives its name from a distinctive outcrop of Cambrian quartzite overlooking the Susquehanna River. From the summit of Chickies Rock visitors can enjoy to a magnificent view of York County, Marietta, and the rural land- scape of northwestern Lancaster County. homeowners have large private yards. Suburban Boroughs. There has been a trend in recent years communities with larger tax bases and available of closure of such schools in favor of consolida- land, such as East Hempfield, Manheim, and tion on larger “campuses” located outside of Warwick Townships, are most likely to have a traditional urban and village areas. A complete wider range neighborhood parks, community listing of school district lands is provided in Ap- parks, and trails (see Section 2.3.4 for definitions pendix B. Existing Conditions of different types of parks). A complete listing of municipal parks is provided in Appendix B. Lancaster County Conservancy The mission of the Lancaster County Conser- School District Recreational Lands vancy is to maintain carefully selected examples Lancaster County’s school districts provide valu- of the County’s natural heritage in their natural able open space and recreational facilities such state. The Conservancy maintains properties as playing fields, playgrounds, swimming pools, throughout Lancaster County that are open and gymnasiums. In many rural communi- to the public for passive recreational purposes. ties school districts are the major provider of The Conservancy currently owns approximately recreational facilities for residents. While schools 2,081 acres of land in 25 different nature pre- represent an important community recreational serves or sanctuaries throughout the County. A resource, availability can be a problem because list of these preserves is provided in Table 2-4. school-related activities have the top priority in Many of the preserves the Conservancy has tar- scheduling. Generally, school properties located geted over the past decade are those specifically in urban settings provide less acreage than those identified in the 1992 Lancaster County Region- in suburban and rural areas. Nevertheless, the al Open Space Plan. This table does not include open space provided by these school properties the planned purchase of the Holtwood Environ- is a critically important resource for the high- mental Preserve, approximately 3,500 acres of density neighborhoods of Lancaster City and the land in the Susquehanna River Gorge, from the

Table 2-3. Existing Regional Trails in Lancaster County Trail Location Length Protection Status Horse-Shoe Trail East Cocalico, West Cocalico, Clay, Elizabeth, & 24.3 mi. 48% Penn Townships Conestoga Trail Penn, Warwick, Ephrata, West Earl, Mannheim, 58.7 mi. 13% Upper Leacock, East Lampeter, West Lampeter, Pequea, Conestoga, & Martic Townships; Lancaster City Conewago Trail Mount Joy Township 5.5 mi. 100% Lancaster Junction Trail East Hempfield Township 2.3 mi. 100% Northwest River Trail Columbia & Marietta Boroughs; West 13.6 mi. 93% Hempfield, East Donegal, & Conoy Townships

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 59 Table 2-4. Lancaster County Conservancy Nature Preserves Property Location Acres Alexander-King Nature Preserve Little Britain Township 24 Bellaire Woods Nature Preserve Mount Joy Township 38 Bell’s Run Nature Preserve Colerain Township 10 Boyer Nature Preserve Manor Township 10 Ferncliffe Wildflower and Wildlife Preserve Drumore Township 65 Fishing Creek Nature Preserve Drumore Township 171 Fishing Creek North Nature Preserve Drumore Township 71 Greider’s Run Nature Preserve Lancaster Township 2 Holly Pointe Conservation Area Lancaster City 2 Homewood Run Nature Preserve Paradise Township 39 House Rock Nature Preserve Martic Township 95 Kelly’s Run Nature Preserve Martic Township 55 Rannels-Kettle Run Nature Preserve Elizabeth Township 91 Ray’s Wood Nature Preserve Providence Township 58 Reed Run Nature Preserve Martic Township 149 Rock Springs Nature Preserve Fulton Township 176 Shiprock Woods Nature Preserve West Lampeter Township 37 Steinman Run Nature Preserve Martic Township 264 Trout Run Nature Preserve Martic Township 194 Tucquan Glen Nature Preserve Martic Township 361 Turkey Hill Trail Manor Township 25 Upper Hopewell Forge Wildlife Sanctuary Elizabeth Township 8 Windoph Landing Nature Preserve Lancaster Township 22 Wissler Run Nature Preserve Drumore Township 18 Existing Conditions Existing Wilhelm Tract W. Cocalico Township 96 PPL Corporation or conservation easements held by the Conservancy on private landholdings. As noted in Section 2.2.3, the Conservancy focuses its land preservation activities on “Natural Gems” identified through GIS analysis.

2.3.4 Parkland Standards

As previously noted, the 1992 Regional Open Space Plan established the following standards for the provision of county and regional parkland in Lancaster County:

Kelly’s Run in Martic Township is just one of 25 nature preserves the Lancaster County Conservancy owns throughout the county.

60 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Table 2-5. Lancaster County Population Trends County Planning Commission’s projections of additional popula- 700,000 tion growth through 2030. 600,000

500,000 Tables 2-7 and 2-8 present the deficits in regional and municipal 400,000 Population Forecast parkland, respectively based on the Historic Population 300,000 County’s population in 2000 and projections through 2030. Figure 200,000 25 shows municipalities that have a 100,000 surplus or deficit of parkland based

0 on 2006 population estimates.

0 0 0 0 0 0 te 0 0 0 5 6 7 8 9 0 a 1 2 3 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 im 2 2 2 st E 5 0 0 2 The regional park standard of 5 acres per 1,000 residents to be Source: US Census, Lancaster County Planning Commission met by Lancaster County does not include special use parks such as Existing Conditions • Provide a minimum of 5 acres of trails and nature preserves. Regional park loca- county-owned regional parkland per tions are based on both the presence of natural 1,000 residents. resources and on an even distribution throughout • Provide a minimum of 10 acres of mu- the County, and the goal of providing a regional nicipal parkland per 1,000 residents. park within a 10-mile radius of every resident should be maintained. Specific recommendations A comparative review of current national stan- for acquiring additional regional parkland are dards and standards used in counties adjacent to provided in Chapter 5.0. Lancaster County was conducted to determine whether these standards should be continued or The overall goal of providing 10 acres of mu- modified (see Appendix B for a review of stan- nicipal parkland per 1,000 residents should dards in adjacent counties). Based on this review, be tailored to the differing local needs and Greenscapes reaffirms the standards defined circumstances of urban, suburban, and rural in the 1992 Regional Open Space Plan while municipalities. Urban communities should focus recommending that the municipal standard be on close-to-home recreational opportunities such applied in a flexible manner appropriate to differ- as neighborhood parks and, where feasible, com- ing circumstances in urban, suburban, and rural munity parks. Since these communities have less municipalities. available land and higher development densities, smaller parks and non-traditional types of open Based on the standards there is a deficiency of space such as vest-pocket parks, urban trails, regional and municipal parkland in Lancaster community gardens, green streets, and green County that will grow as the population increases roofs should be emphasized. Suburban com- unless action is taken to acquire additional munities are in the best position to create diverse parkland. Tables 2-5 and 2-6 present: 1) historic park systems. They typically have the strongest population trends from 1950 through 2006 tax bases and available open land to create a (U.S. Census estimate); and 2) the Lancaster system of close-to-home parks and recreational

Table 2-6. Lancaster County Population Forecasts

2000 2010 2020 2030

Population Population % Change, 2000-2010 Population % Change, 2010-2020 Population % Change, 2020-2030 Total Forecasted Change, 2000-2030 % Change, 2000-2030 470,658 509,720 8.30 548,979 7.70 585,487 6.65 114,829 24.40 Source: Lancaster County Planning Commission

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 61 Figure 25 - Municipal Parkland Analysis

facilities that include neighborhood parks, com- National Recreation and Parks Association’s munity parks, and local trail networks. Because (NRPA) Park, Recreation, and Open Space rural communities contain lower population Guidelines and tailored to meet the needs and densities and ample private open space on large circumstances of Lancaster County. This clas- residential lots, less emphasis should be placed sification system is provided for general guidance on neighborhood parks and more on developing purposes. community parks close to villages or other popu- lation centers. School district recreational facili- • Mini-Parks: A Mini-park is a small park

Existing Conditions Existing ties that are open for public use can be counted area typically 2,500 square feet to one towards meeting a portion of the 10 acres/1,000 acre in size and serving residents living residents standard. However, municipalities within a radius of less than ¼ mile. should recognize that school recreation lands are Mini-parks should be located within not permanently protected and can be lost if the Designated Growth Areas (DGAs) and school district closes the school and sells the land preferably in dense mixed-use areas and buildings. accessible to residents, shoppers, and workers. Pedestrian access from the In general, neighborhood and community surrounding area is necessary because parks are considered community facilities and, parking is often non-existent. Mini- therefore, should be located within officially parks address limited, isolated, or unique Designated Growth Areas. Locating parks inside recreational needs. Many are owned by Designated Growth Areas makes them easily private businesses but open to the gen- accessible to the greatest number of residents. It eral public for use. Examples include tot also limits interference and conflicts with neigh- lot/play structures, community gardens, boring agricultural operations. courtyards, sitting areas, picnic areas, or landscaped public use plazas in a down- Park and Open Space Types town. Steinman Park and Triangle Park The following discussion of different types of in Lancaster City are examples of mini- parks and open spaces is derived from the parks in Lancaster County include.

62 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Table 2-7. Regional Parkland Needs Based on Standard Lancaster County Parkland Required @ 5 Parkland Deficit/Surplus @ 5 Acres / Year Population Acres / 1,000 population 1,000 population 2000 470,658 2,353 (379) 2010 509,720 2,548 (574) 2020 548,979 2,744 (770) 2030 585,487 2,927 (953) Source: U.S. Census, Lancaster County Planning Commission population projections

Table 2-8. Municipal Parkland Needs Based on Standard Year Lancaster County Parkland Required @ 10 Parkland Deficit/Surplus @ 10 Acres Population Acres / 1,000 population / 1,000 population 2000 470,658 4,706 (1,894)

2010 509,720 5,097 (2,285) Existing Conditions 2020 548,979 5,489 (2,677) 2030 585,487 5,854 (3,042) Source: U.S. Census, Lancaster County Planning Commission population projections

• Neighborhood Parks: A Neighborhood • Community Parks: A Community Park is generally 1.5 acres or greater in Park is larger than Neighborhood Park, size and provide close-to-home public usually containing between 20 and 50 areas for playgrounds, passive recreation, acres. Community parks are designed and limited recreational programming. to provide opportunities for active and Active recreational facilities such as ball structured recreation activities as well as fields and basketball courts are intended informal exercise and passive recreation. for informal and unstructured play activ- They can also preserve significant natu- ity. Neighborhood parks should strive ral, historic, and cultural landscapes. to balance active and passive recreation Community parks usually serve two or activities geared toward a variety of age more neighborhoods and have a 2-mile and user groups. They have a service ra- service radius. Community parks should dius of ½-mile, uninterrupted by physi- be located as close to population centers cal barriers. Ideally, neighborhood parks as possible and preferably within Des- should be located within Designated ignated Growth Areas (DGAs). While Growth Areas (DGAs) and integrated pedestrian and bike access should be a into compact residential neighborhoods. goal, a significant number of people will They should connect to other park arrive by car. Therefore, adequate park- system components, such as trails, and ing should be provided. Communities have limited parking. Recreation land should avoid locating community parks associated with elementary schools in in active farming areas to minimize the urban communities often functions as impact on agricultural activities. Ideally, neighborhood parks for older neighbor- trails should connect the community hoods. Examples of neighborhood parks park to a larger community trail system in Lancaster County include Willow or greenway. Examples of community Street Elementary School in West Lam- parks in Lancaster County include peter Township; Falcon Ridge Park in Rapho Township Community Park; West Hempfield Township; and Rotary SICO Park in Mount Joy Borough; and Park in Columbia Borough. Paradise Township Memorial Park.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 63 state game lands and state forests, mu- nicipal watersheds, and nature preserves. The objective is to preserve entire work- ing ecosystems, high quality natural resources, stream headwaters, aquifer recharge areas, reservoirs, and highly scenic landscapes. Some natural resource extraction activities may be compatible with the natural resource and recreation- al objectives of these parks. Regional City of Lancaster City Reserves provide primarily passive rec- reational opportunities, such as nature The soon-to-be redeveloped 6th Ward Park study, picnicking, hunting, hiking and in the City of Lancaster is good example of a biking, swimming, camping, etc. The neighborhood park that serves a high density location of these parks is dependent residential area. upon the location of the resource to be • School-Parks: Primary and secondary protected. The size of these parks can school properties can provide recre- vary; however, most include thousands ational facilities that fulfill the functions of acres. of neighborhood or community parks. In general, schools located close to • Natural Heritage Areas: A Natural population centers will receive more use Heritage Area is an open space resource than those located in locations accessible that contains environmentally unique only by car. In addition, combining or fragile natural resources, plant or municipal and school district resources animal species or communities of special can leverage recreational opportunities concern or exceptional quality, or highly available to the community. Establishing scenic natural features. The location a clearly defined joint-use agreement be- of natural areas is solely dependent tween the agencies is critical to making upon the location of the resource to be the school-park relationship workable. protected. Their size can vary; however, they typically range from ten acres to a

Existing Conditions Existing • Special Resource Parks: This park type few hundred acres, depending upon the covers a broad range of public parks and extent of the resource to be protected. single-purpose uses. Examples include arboretums, archeological sites, unique geological formations, historic resources, and heritage and cultural parks. The primary purpose of these parks is to highlight or celebrate a significant natural, cultural, or historic resource (or event) worthy of protection. The location of these parks is dependent upon the location of the resource to be highlighted. The size of special resource parks is variable and dependent on the land area necessary to protect the central feature highlighted in the park.

• Regional Reserves: A Regional Reserve Converting abandoned rail lines into parks like is a large land area set aside for preser- the Northwest Corridor Linear Park in the City of vation of significant natural features, Lancaster can help municipalities create a diverse ecosystems, and scenic character, such as parks and open space system.

64 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element • Greenway Trails: A Greenway Trail is a linear corridor of open space that follows natural or man-made features that pro- vide for passive recreation opportunities. They can connect neighborhoods, urban communities, and other open spaces and provide for non-motorized travel between these resources. Different land and water-based travel modes accom- modated by greenways include hiking, walking, jogging, bicycling, in-line skating, cross-country skiing, horseback riding, canoeing, etc. Greenway trails can include bike paths and multi-use trails along existing right-of-ways, util- ity corridors, and abandoned railroad lines. Many greenway trails are located Existing Conditions along waterways and support floodplain management, water quality enhance- ment, and fish/wildlife habitat protec- tion. Greenway trails vary in scale from narrow ribbons along railroad corridors (20 feet wide) to riparian corridors along waterways (200 feet wide or greater) to major wildlife corridors (1,000-foot width to allow for migration).

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 65

Strategic Vision

3.1 The Vision: Lancaster vitality and quality of life of county residents has County’s Natural Life Support been established. Imagine that… System • Scenic natural landscapes, high quality Lancaster County’s green infrastructure – land, river and stream corridors, habitat for water, air, and the plant and animal species they native plant and animal species, and support – is vital to the health and well being other elements of Lancaster County’s of Lancastrians. As described in Chapter 1.0, natural heritage have been protected, the benefits provided by these resources are restored, and managed for ecological vast, ranging from ecological services such as health in a comprehensive, connected cleaning the air and water, controlling flood- system extending throughout the ing, and conserving native plant and animal County. diversity, to monetary benefits such as increasing property values, reducing energy consumption, • Green infrastructure is an integral part and generating economic activity. However, the of the County’s urban, suburban, and County’s once abundant natural resources have rural communities, as reflected in ele- been greatly altered by human activity, resulting ments such as a flourishing tree canopy; in extensive negative impacts such as the loss and green streets, roofs, and parking courts; Strategic Vision fragmentation of natural habitat and degraded air conveniently located parks and open and water quality (see Chapter 2.0). spaces; and community gardens and backyard habitat areas. Greenscapes seeks to reverse this long-term trend through comprehensive action to maintain, • Lancastrians walk and bike to work, restore, and enhance green infrastructure as shop, and recreate using safe and attrac- Lancaster County’s essential natural life support tive streets, paths, and greenway trails system. This system is envisioned as: that provide seamless connections within urban and suburban communities and A network of natural areas, green spaces, from these communities to rural destina- and greenways in rural, suburban, and tions such as county parks. urban areas that sustains ecological functions and values and provides a broad array of ben- • Productive and sustainable agricultural efits for the people of Lancaster County and lands are managed to conserve natural the surrounding region, including: resources, such as buffers of riparian • Environmental Quality: Natural re- vegetation along rivers and streams with source protection and the perpetuation exceptional water quality. of native plant and animal species. • Community Health: Water and air • Holistic approaches such as green build- quality, recreation, and mobility (walk- ings, biological stormwater and wastewa- ing and biking as integral parts of the ter treatment systems, and community- transportation system). wide tree plantings are used to conserve • A Sustainable Economy: Resource- energy, improve air and water quality, based economic activity, increased offset carbon emissions, and avoids the property values, energy conservation, financial and environmental costs of and reduced costs of engineered “gray conventional engineering solutions. infrastructure.” • Ecotourism – the sustainable enjoyment What does this vision mean for Lancaster and use of green infrastructure resources County looking forward ten to twenty years and by visitors – contributes to the economic beyond? Imagine a future in which a healthy, prosperity of Lancaster County’s com- interconnected network of natural and human munities. ecosystems that contributes to the economic

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 69 • Governmental officials and agencies, composite layer on Figure 26, these resources institutions, nonprofit organizations, are the highest priorities for preservation as businesses, and citizens of all ages and part of the green infrastructure system. backgrounds appreciate, take pride in, and provide support for maintaining • Goal 2: Conservation and enhancing Lancaster County’s green Conserve natural resources and services infrastructure system. Instilled in school throughout Lancaster County’s urban, subur- children from an early age, the essential ban, and rural landscapes. value of green infrastructure as the The patchwork of natural resources that County’s natural life support system is threads its way throughout the County’s central to community life and discourse. urban, suburban, and rural landscapes performs a variety of important ecologi- • A conservation ethic and culture of cal functions. While the quality of these stewardship of natural resources has resources is not as high as those addressed been embraced by Lancastrians, who by the Preservation goal, the functions they understand the importance of green provide are essential to the health of our infrastructure to quality of life, commu- natural environment and to the quality nity health, and a sustainable economy. of our lives. Conserving these resources through wise use and management is critical to sustaining the ecological functions they 3.2 The Concept: Lancaster provide. Important natural resources (other County’s Green Infrastructure than the exceptional ones addressed by Goal System 1) include wetlands, 100-year floodplain areas, steep slopes and highly erodible soils, What will Lancaster County’s green infrastruc- medium-quality streams and riparian buf- ture look like when this vision is achieved? A fers, medium quality natural communities, physical concept of the proposed green infra- species of concern supporting habitat, forest structure system has been developed at a county- blocks less than 100 acres in size, and other wide scale based on the resource mapping and natural vegetation. Described in Chapter 2.0 analysis described in Chapter 2.0. The concept is and shown as a composite layer on Figure Strategic Vision Strategic a spatial depiction of resources that correspond 27, these resources should be managed to to the four primary system goals more fully de- maintain their ecological functions and natu- scribed in Chapter 4.0: Preservation, Conserva- ral carrying capacity. Important groundwater tion, Restoration, and Recreation. and wellhead protection zones also fall under the Conservation category but are not shown • Goal 1: Preservation on Figure 27. Preserve Lancaster County’s exceptional natural resources. • Goal 3: Restoration Lancaster County is fortunate to have a Restore ecological connections and natural number and variety of high quality natural resource systems throughout Lancaster County’s resources worthy of preservation. These areas urban, suburban, and rural areas. should be preserved, in perpetuity, as part The extent of degraded natural resources of the foundation of the County’s green in- throughout Lancaster County’s urban, frastructure system. The exceptional natural suburban, and rural landscapes is widespread resources that should be preserved include and readily apparent, even to the casual ob- the highest quality streams and riparian server. Sediment-laden stream water, ozone areas, unique geologic features, natural gems, alerts, and fish consumption warnings are all species of concern core habitat, the highest indicators of a highly stressed natural envi- quality natural communities, interior forests, ronment. Healing the landscape from three forest blocks greater than 100 acres in size, centuries of abuse will take both patience and important bird and mammal areas. and perseverance. Degraded natural resource Described in Chapter 2.0 and shown as a areas that provide opportunities for ecologi-

70 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Figure 26 - Preservation Areas

Strategic Vision

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 71

Figure 27 - Conservation Areas Strategic Vision Strategic

72 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Figure 28 - Restoration Areas

Strategic Vision

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 73

Figure 29 - Recreation Areas Strategic Vision Strategic

74 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Figure 30 - Lancaster County Green Infrastructure Concept Map

Strategic Vision

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 75

Figure 31 - Hubs and Greenways Strategic Vision Strategic

76 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element cal restoration include low quality streams Figure 30 combines the four categories of re- and riparian buffers, low quality natural sources identified above into a complete green communities, priority restoration habitat infrastructure system concept map depicting areas, and areas that could be potentially exceptional natural resources to be preserved, established as forest corridors. Efforts to heal natural resources to be conserved, degraded natu- the County’s landscapes should focus on ral resources to be restored, and existing and pro- these areas, which are described in Chapter posed publicly accessible recreational resources. 2.0 and shown as a composite layer on Fig- ure 28. It should be noted that incorporation of green elements such as street trees, parks 3.3 The Structure: Green and gardens, green roofs, etc. into the built Infrastructure System environment is an important aspect of the Components restoration goal that cannot be mapped at a countywide scale and thus is not illustrated The green infrastructure system is not intended on Figure 28. to be separate and isolated from land uses such as residential or commercial development and agri- • Goal 4: Recreation culture, but rather to be integrated into the fabric

Enhance the quality-of-life of residents through of the County in multiple forms and at multiple Strategic Vision the provision of a diversity of easily accessible scales. In addition to the spatial array of resource outdoor recreation opportunities and experiences. types shown in Figure 31, this system can be The availability of quality outdoor recreation conceptualized in terms of four basic structural experiences is paramount to a high quality components or “building blocks”: of life for Lancastrians. The County’s open space resources – whether resource-based, • Hubs passive recreational opportunities on lands • Greenways owned by the Commonwealth of Penn- • Nodes sylvania, Lancaster County, and Lancaster • Links County Conservancy or active recreational opportunities on municipal and school The largest scale components of the system, hubs district lands – should be thought of as a and greenways establish the countywide frame- system or network that needs to be carefully work for the green infrastructure system. Figure planned and connected throughout the land- 31 shows the locations of these major system scape. These outdoor recreational resources components in diagrammatic fashion, general- include trails; state, county, and municipal ized from the Green Infrastructure Concept parks; and other types of recreation and open Map. Nodes and links are smaller components space lands such as school district facilities, of the system (e.g., small parks or woodlots; local state game lands, land owned by the Lancast- trails or stream corridors) found at the inter- er County Conservancy, and lands managed mediate to local scales throughout the County. by utility companies as natural open space. They should be identified and mapped at the These various types of resources are described multi-municipal and municipal levels within the in Chapter 2.0 and shown as a composite countywide framework set by Greenscapes. layer on Figure 29. Figure 29 illustrates a countywide trail system consisting of exist- Given the intent to integrate the green infrastruc- ing and proposed trails. The proposed trail ture system into the overall fabric of Lancaster segments are described in detail in Appendix County, its four basic structural components – C. While only existing county and municipal hubs, greenways, nodes, and links – need to be parks are shown on Figure 29, additional considered not only as individual elements, but parkland should be added to the system also in relation to the larger context in which through county and municipal actions to they occur. Therefore, a fifth structural compo- meet the standards of 5 acres of regional nent of the green infrastructure system has been (county) parkland and 10 acres of municipal identified: landscapes are the broad patterns of parkland per 1,000 residents. human settlement and use within which hubs,

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 75 greenways, nodes, and links are located. Hubs and greenways, nodes and links, and landscapes are described in more detail below in Sections 3.3.1, 3.3.2, and 3.3.3, respectively.

3.3.1 Hubs and Greenways

Hubs Hubs are large areas that contain Lancaster County’s greatest concentrations of the excep- tional natural resources illustrated on Figure 31, Connecting various ecological components in along with support or buffer areas that directly the landscape will help rare, threatened, and endangered species survive by enabling them to contribute to the health of these resources. migrate and diversify the gene pool. Hubs are mostly located around the periphery of the County, where they extend into adjacent streams originating from the forested hills are counties. While their primary value and func- of high quality, but become quickly degraded as tion is to preserve natural resources and provide they progress through downstream agricultural ecological services, hubs can also support passive and urban landscapes. Preservation of high qual- recreational activities (e.g., hiking, nature ob- ity creeks and restoration of floodplain and wet- servation, hunting, and fishing) and sustainable land habitats on all lower quality creeks should resource-based economic activities (e.g., sustain- be a priority activity within this hub. In addition, able forestry). These activities should be managed the connectivity of natural habitats, especially to maintain natural carrying capacity and avoid intact forests and riparian corridors, should be impacts on sensitive resources (e.g., species of preserved and enhanced. concern habitat). The following green infrastruc- ture hubs (listed alphabetically) are shown on Brandywine River Headwater Flats: This hub Figure 31: is located primarily in Chester County, but encompasses similar habitat in eastern Lancaster Bowmansville Hills Forests: The forested hills County where the streams draining south from Strategic Vision Strategic and rich stream valleys of this northeast hub Welsh Mountain meander across the relatively straddle the border of Lancaster and Berks Coun- flat valley of the watershed. There ties and include numerous interior forest blocks. are no major parks or regional preserves in The area hosts the 598 acre State Game Lands this area of the county. The predominantly 52. Creeks originating in the forested landscape agricultural landscape also contains considerable feed the Conestoga River and in forested habitats, primarily in Chester County. Lancaster County as well as the The forests and other natural environments pro- in Berks County. The floodplains and wetlands vide essential habitat for many native plants and associated with the many streams that meander animals as well as a key connection in a potential through the hub provide important habitat for migratory pathway from the Bowmansville Hills numerous native plant and animal species. These Forests though Welsh Mountain to the Octoraro species include species of concern located in ten Creek Headwaters Hub. The meandering stream Natural Heritage Areas identified in the 2007 floodplains also provide essential habitat for Lancaster County Natural Heritage Inventory several species of concern in six Natural Heritage Update.1 Many of these species are shared with Areas extending into Chester County. Riparian or occur completely within Berks County. The restoration of floodplain and wetland habitats should be a priority activity within this hub. 1 Natural Heritage Areas support species of concern (plants and/or animals considered rare, threatened or Furnace Hills Forests: The northern expanse endangered at state or federal levels) that occur singly or in overlapping or adjacent habitats. (Pennsylvania Natural of woodlands between Lancaster and Lebanon Heritage Program, A Natural Heritage Inventory of Lan- Counties referred to as the Furnace Hills con- caster County, Pennsylvania, Update 2007.) tains the largest expanse of forested habitats and

76 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element most significant interior forest blocks remaining the Lancaster County side remains mostly in in Lancaster. The area also contains the largest active agricultural production. Floodplains with amount of natural lands preserved in the county. native vegetation provide habitat for a variety Approximately 8,500 acres of natural lands, com- of plants and animals as well as a potential prised primarily of state game lands, have been natural migratory pathway from Chester County permanently protected in this hub. The hub also through Welsh Mountain south to Maryland. contains the 415 acre Speedwell forge County Riparian restoration of floodplain and wetland Park. This area provides substantial habitat and habitats should be a priority activity within this potential migratory pathways for a wide variety hub. Very little of the natural landscape has been of native plants and animals, including a number preserved in this hub. The County’s Ted Parker of species of concern in ten Natural Heritage Ar- III Natural Area and State Game Lands 136 are eas. The nearly uninterrupted forested landscape the only two areas of significant size that have provides a link to similar habitats in Lebanon been preserved. and Berks Counties. In portions of the forest, the lack of understory recruitment of native trees Serpentine Barrens: This southern hub supports and shrubs and a visible browse line suggests that a mixture of agricultural and rural residential action needs to be taken to reduce the deer herd. uses with scattered woodlots and outcrops of

Invasive species of shrubs and trees dominate the serpentine bedrock that are among the most Strategic Vision understory in other locations, indicating a need globally important habitats in Pennsylvania. The for silvicultural restoration to improve future serpentine habitats are part of a series of ter- forest stands. restrial habitat “islands” (isolated patches of bed- rock) located in southern Lancaster and Chester The Furnace Hills Forest hub encompasses a por- Counties and adjacent areas of Maryland that tion of a critical aquifer recharge area in northern should be thought of as a single system. They Lancaster County that was evaluated by the contain a very high concentration of plant and Susquehanna River Basin in partnership with the insect species of concern found in ten Natural Lancaster County Conservation District.2 In- Heritage Areas identified in the 2007 Lancaster cluded in this hub are the headwaters of Chiques County Natural Heritage Inventory Update. The Creek, Cocalico Creek and Middle Creek, which Lancaster County Conservancy’s Rock Springs provide essential habitat for common native spe- Nature Preserve is the only natural area perma- cies as well as several species of concern. The Fur- nently preserved within this hub. nace Hills Forests Hub supports a large concen- tration of the highest quality streams in Lancaster The plants that characterize the serpentine barren County. However, the water quality of these habitats are adapted to the dry, nutrient poor streams decreases as they traverse agricultural and soils and periodic fire events and require active urban landscapes towards the Susquehanna River. management (e.g., prescribed burns) to prevent Riparian restoration of floodplain and wetland succession to woodlands. Protection of the core habitats should be a priority activity within the habitat areas and management of the surround- southern portion of this hub. ing landscape context is needed to ensure the future of these globally rare habitats. Natural cor- Octoraro Creek Headwaters: Octoraro Creek ridors between the barrens should be established forms the boundary between Lancaster and to allow genetic flow between isolated species Chester Counties. Many branches of the creek populations. The landscape context may be best meander across wide floodplains that have been maintained in an agricultural or rural setting. used for pasture and hay crops. Portions of the Residential development near or between the floodplain have been revegetated by character- barrens should be strongly discouraged. istic floodplain plant communities – primarily on the Chester County side of the creek – while Susquehanna River Gorge: This large hub in the southwest part of the county is known locally as 2 Robert E. Edwards and Robert D. Pody, North- ern Lancaster County Groundwater Study: A Resource the “River Hills.” It includes the area along the Evaluation of the Manheim-Lititz and Ephrata Area Susquehanna River between the mouth of the Groundwater Basins, September 21, 2005 Conestoga River at Safe Harbor and the Mary-

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 77 land border. Because it is characterized by steep, habitat is within the river or its floodplain and hilly topography and is mostly unsuitable for associated islands, which support a wide variety agricultural uses, this area has retained much of of native plants and animals including several its natural forested character despite being repeat- species of concern. The Susquehanna River is edly logged in the past. It contains 16 Natural subject to extreme seasonal water level fluctua- Heritage Areas with numerous species of concern tions; the natural disturbances of flooding and and also provides a wide natural habitat corridor drying, along with seasonal ice scour, help main- that provides a vital link in the regional migra- tain the unique habitats associated with the river. tory pathway. Many of the cool, moist ravines The natural disturbance cycle also creates condi- provide habitat for an impressive suite of spring tions favorable for the establishment of invasive wildflowers, drawing tourists to Shenks Ferry and species of plants, which frequently dominate the other destinations during the peak spring bloom- shoreline of the river. ing season. Numerous species of concern also occur within the forested habitats of the ravines. There are several large parks in this hub that The streams flowing though the forested ravines have helped secure the protection of natural of this area are considered to have some of the resources in the riparian areas of this corridor. most intact riparian buffers in Lancaster County. Chickies Rock County Park (422 acres) in West Hempfield and Riverfront Park (238 acres) in In addition to the Susquehanna River Gorge’s East Donegal are two of the largest parks in forested ravines, the river, its floodplain, and this hub. The Northwest River Trail--a narrow associated islands provide ample habitat for a linear corridor of open space from Marietta to wide array of native plants and animals. The the Dauphin County line—has been protected deep water behind Holtwood Dam is a popular for the development of a 14-mile multipurpose recreational boating area. The Susquehanna River recreation trail that generally follows the route of below Holtwood Dam is one of Pennsylvania’s the historic PA Mainline Canal. most unusual and picturesque riverine landscapes with islands and exposed bedrock that support Recently improved fish ladders on the three many plant species that are uncommon in Penn- major dams on the Susquehanna River in Lan- sylvania. caster County have helped to alleviate formerly impassable barriers to migratory fishes that live Strategic Vision Strategic This hub contains a number of nature preserves in salt water and migrate to freshwater habitats to owned by the Lancaster County Conservancy spawn. However, the American eel, which lives in and a large passive park owned by Martic Town- fresh water but breeds in the ocean, has not ben- ship. However, unlike the Furnace Hill Hub, the efited from the current fish ladder designs. The preserves are smaller and scattered through- American eel may be an important link in the out the landscape. There are also several large utility owned parks in this hub. While open to the public, these areas are not permanently protected.

Upper Susquehanna River: The Upper Susque- hanna River Hub includes the section of the Susquehanna River between the Dauphin Coun- ty border at Conewago Creek and the mouth of the Conestoga River at . Sec- tions of the river are popular recreational boating destinations due to the deep water created by the The American Eel--once a staple of Native York Haven and Safe Harbor dams. This area Americans and early settlers in Lancaster County- also contains many significant riverine habitats, -no longer exists in the aquatic habitat of the including eight Natural Heritage Areas, and Susquehanna River due to a number of factors functions as an important migratory corridor for including the presence of hydroelectric dams blocking traditional migratory routes. many birds and fish. Most of the existing natural

78 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element lifecycle of several native freshwater mussel spe- • Aquatic ecosystem services such as shad- cies, so an improvement in eel migratory routes ing, cooling, and providing food (leaf may help improve freshwater mussel populations litter) for organisms as well. • Scenic value • Recreational and educational opportunities Welsh Mountain: The hilly topography of the Welsh Mountains in eastern Lancaster County The functions and benefits of individual green- supports extensive forests with several significant ways vary based upon context. For example, the interior forest blocks. The forested landscape primary function of the largest greenways with provides essential habitat and migratory potential the greatest concentration of natural resources is for a wide variety of native plants and animals, to preserve those resources and provide ecological including several species of concern located in services. These greenways should be as wide as a Natural Heritage Area identified in the 2008 possible to protect natural resources, provide in- Lancaster County Natural Heritage Inventory terior habitat for species of concern such as neo- Update. Streams draining from Welsh Mountain tropical songbirds, and support plant and animal flow to the Conestoga River, Mill Creek, and migration. Like the County’s green infrastructure Pequea Creek. Most of Welsh Mountain is rela- hubs (with which they overlap), they can support tively undisturbed forest; however, several roads passive recreational activities managed to main- Strategic Vision and numerous rural residences fragment the tree tain natural carrying capacity and avoid impacts canopy. The hub includes Lancaster County’s 381 on sensitive resources. acre Money Rocks Park. Over 800 acres of ad- ditional natural lands owned by the New Holland At the other end of the spectrum, greenways in Borough Authority as watershed protection for Designated Growth Areas are typically limited in the New Holland Reservoir are currently being width due to surrounding development. Where acquired by the Lancaster County Conservancy. possible, they should integrate ecological and recreational values through riparian buffers that Greenways protect water quality and wetlands while accom- Greenways are linear “ribbons” that provide the modating multi-use trails accessible to the sur- major, countywide connections in the County’s rounding population. Conversely, public access green infrastructure system. They run between to greenways in working agricultural landscapes and through green infrastructure hubs and should be limited, although linear resources connect the hubs to the interior of Lancaster such as rail trails that can accommodate public County and its major population centers, as well access without interfering with the agricultural as to greenways in adjacent counties. Greenways economy and way of life of the adjacent farm generally correspond to major river and stream community should be permitted. In general, corridors (including adjoining natural resource greenways in these areas should be managed to areas such as floodplain, riparian vegetation, reestablish natural riparian buffers and reduce the and steep slopes), although they may also follow water quality impacts of agricultural practices. upland features such as ridgelines. While greenways can provide multiple benefits, Greenways provide a variety of benefits, such as: the proposed network of primary greenways • Protection of water quality (filtering shown on Figure 31 has been divided into three sediment, nutrients, and pollutants from categories based upon primary function: runoff) • Streambank stabilization (erosion pro- • Ecological Greenways provide critical tection during high water events) habitat corridors for the movement of • Storage of floodwaters plant and animal species. • Habitat for aquatic and terrestrial organ- • Conservation Greenways promote the isms (including species of concern) protection and restoration of riparian • Migration pathways for native plants and habitat along river and stream corridors, animals (including species of concern) particularly in agricultural areas and

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 79 What is a Riparian Buffer?

A riparian buffer is the area adjacent to a stream bank that is inhabited by native trees, shrubs, and other types of vegetation. Riparian buffers offer countless benefits to the adjacent stream, the qual- ity of water in the stream, and the aquatic species living in it. For example, riparian buffers help to improve water quality by filtering pollutants such as pesticides, sediment, nitrogen, and phosphorus contained in runoff from agricultural land. The roots of riparian vegetation hold soil in place, prevent- ing stream bank erosion and sediment from entering the stream. Riparian buffers are most productive when they are allowed to grow freely with native vegetation, creating valuable wildlife habitat. They also provide areas for streams to overflow their banks during times of high water. This recharges groundwater and reduces the potential for flooding downstream by allowing the high water to dis- sipate naturally.

areas with urban or suburban develop- the vegetation located in the narrow area between ment. Public access is typically restricted. the river bank and the railroad tracks that parallel • Recreational Greenways promote pub- the river. Therefore, in their present condition lic access and use along linear features they provide little opportunity for the migration such as major river corridors, abandoned of native species that rely on upland habitat. By rail lines, and canal towpaths. contrast, the Susquehanna River provides an ex- cellent migration corridor for species that can use Several greenways in Lancaster County have been the aquatic habitat, and the Susquehanna River designated as “Major Greenways” by the Pennsyl- Gorge Hub to the south contains ample habitat vania Department of Environmental Conserva- for resident and migrating species. Expanding tion (DCNR) and are included in the County’s the upland natural habitat along the length of greenway network.3 These greenways are the the Susquehanna River between the Conewago Susquehanna Greenway, the Lower Susquehanna Creek and the Conestoga River should be con- River Water Trail, the Horseshoe Trail, and the sidered a restoration priority to help improve a Conestoga Trail. The Susquehanna Greenway vital link in this important regional migratory and Lower Susquehanna River Water Trail are pathway. The expanded greenway would also part of a statewide greenway extending along the provide outdoor recreational opportunities and Strategic Vision Strategic Susquehanna River from New York to Maryland, connect municipalities along the river through where it connects to a greenway initiative in existing and proposed trails. It is a key linkage in Maryland. The Horseshoe Trail and Conestoga the state-designated Susquehanna Greenway. Trail provide important recreational connections from adjacent counties through the interior of Greenway: The Chiques Creek Lancaster County. Greenway follows Chiques Creek from Man- heim Borough to the Susquehanna River. This The following greenways (listed alphabetically) proposed Conservation Greenway currently are shown on Figure 31: has only fragments of natural habitat along the creek, its floodplain, and associated uplands. The Central Susquehanna Forested Greenway/Up- many branches and tributaries of Chiques Creek per Susquehanna Forested Greenway: These originate in the Furnace Hills, where they are proposed Ecological Greenways comprise the considered among the best quality streams in the terrestrial (upland) corridor associated with the County, but the water quality decreases as Upper Susquehanna River Hub described above. Chiques Creek flows towards the Susquehanna Because the lands have been largely converted River. Restoration of floodplain, wetland, and to agricultural, urban, and suburban uses, they upland forest habitats should be a priority activ- currently have minimal natural habitat outside of ity along the entire length of Chiques Creek. The restored habitat would help provide suitable 3 As defined by DCNR, a Major Greenway is 50 habitat for plants and animals, improve the water miles or more in length, passes through two or more coun- quality of Chiques Creek, and provide a natural ties, and is recognized in an official planning document.

80 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element connection between the Furnace Hills and the Susquehanna River though a predominantly agricultural and urban landscape.

Cocalico Creek Greenway: The Cocalico Creek Greenway is a key linkage connecting the Fur- nace Hills Forests and Bowmansville Hills Forests Hubs to the Conestoga River Greenway and Susquehanna River. This proposed Conservation Greenway could incorporate undeveloped and underutilized land in around Ephrata Borough and surrounding suburban areas, including the Linear open spaces (or Greenways) such as this Cocalico Creek floodplain. Cocalico Creek and along the Pequea Creek, serve as habitat for migratory animal species; filters stormwater its associated floodplain and upland areas cur- before it enters the stream; and provides open rently have only fragments of natural habitat. space for recreation. Riparian restoration would provide additional habitat for plants and animals, improve water restoration could also provide an opportunity quality, and create a local migratory corridor to expand recreational opportunities associated Strategic Vision though a predominantly agricultural and urban with the existing trail, serving communities along landscape. Recreational opportunities could be the length of the Conestoga River, as compat- provided for local communities, as compatible ible with establishing viable natural habitat. The with establishing viable natural habitat. Conestoga Greenways River Corridor Conserva- tion Plan, published by the Lancaster Inter- Conestoga River Greenway: The Conestoga Municipal Committee (LIMC) in 1999, provides River is a proposed Conservation Greenway that strategies to develop greenways along sections is also a state-designated “Major Greenway” con- of the Conestoga River, Little Conestoga Creek, taining Lancaster County’s longest continuous and the West Branch of the Little Conestoga trail, the Conestoga Trail. The greenway includes Creek in central Lancaster County. numerous fragments of natural habitat along its length from its headwaters in the Bowmansville Conewago Creek Greenway: The Conewago Hills Forests Hub to the confluence with the Creek Greenway is a proposed Ecological Green- Susquehanna River. These fragments include way located between the Pennsylvania Turnpike forested uplands where the creek is flanked by and the Susquehanna River. The creek, stream steep slopes and wide floodplain areas that occur banks, and adjacent vegetated upland areas intermittently along the meandering course of provide habitat for a variety of native plants and the river. The Conestoga River passes though animals, including several species of concern southern Lancaster City, creating a potential located in two Natural Heritage Areas. The barrier for animals using the river corridor as a greenway contains numerous patches of natural migratory pathway. Upstream and downstream habitat, including several blocks of interior forest of Lancaster City, the surrounding landscape that form a “stepping stone” connection between consists primarily of agriculture, rural residential the Furnace Hills Forests and the Upper Susque- development, and newer suburban development. hanna River Hubs. Most of the forested habitat By combining preservation of the remaining frag- of this greenway occurs on thin soils over diabase ments with restoration of additional floodplain, bedrock that are not suitable for agricultural wetland, and upland forest areas along the river uses, so much of the area has remained forested. and its tributaries, the Conestoga River could The Conewago Creek floodplain contains lesser become a significant habitat corridor through amounts of natural habitat and should be consid- Lancaster County to the Susquehanna. This ered a priority for riparian restoration. restoration would provide additional habitat for plants and animals, improve water quality, and Lititz Run Greenway: The Lititz Run Greenway create a migratory corridor though the predomi- is a proposed Conservation Greenway that fol- nantly agricultural and urban landscape. Habitat lows the stream corridor and incorporates its

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 81 tributaries to the northeast. The headwaters of and upland forest habitats should be a priority Lititz Run are primarily agricultural lands in the activity along the entire length of Mill Creek and northwest part of the watershed. One species of its tributaries to improve water quality and create concern has been documented at the cave open- a significant habitat corridor across the County. ings of a spring that emanates from limestone bedrock in a park in Lititz Borough. The water- Mine Ridge Greenway: The Mine Ridge Green- shed incorporates all of Lititz Borough and the way is a proposed Ecological Greenway that surrounding designated growth area in Warwick follows a ridgeline of undulating hills that runs Township. The much-heralded Lititz Run has east-west across the southern part of Lancaster been the focus of a public-private restoration County and supports a significant series of up- initiative for the past 20-years. Stream restora- land forested habitats. The hilly topography and tion initiatives in the corridor include riparian thin soils over quartzite bedrock are the likely buffers, dam removal, agricultural best manage- factors that have kept the land out of agricultural ment practices BMPs), floodplain restoration production. Despite several significant interrup- (including legacy sediment removal), and several tions, particularly in the vicinity of Route 222, wetland rehabilitation projects. Continued the forested ridgeline makes a natural migratory focus on BMPs, in the headwaters of the water- pathway between the Lancaster / Chester county shed, urban greening efforts in the designated line and the Susquehanna River. Restoration growth area, and floodplain restoration will help of natural habitats along the floodplains of Big continue the significant gains in water quality Beaver Creek and Little Beaver Creek could help already achieved. provide the missing connections. By combin- ing preservation of the forested ridgeline with Mill Creek Greenway: Mill Creek is a proposed restoration of floodplain and wetland habitats, Conservation Greenway connecting the Welsh Mine Ridge could become a significant habitat Mountain Hub with the Conestoga River connector across southern Lancaster County. Greenway and the Susquehanna. Like the other potential greenways, Mill Creek flows through a landscape dominated by agriculture, rural 3.3.2 Nodes and Links residences, and suburban developments and currently has only scattered fragments of natural The hubs and greenways are the largest compo- Strategic Vision Strategic habitats. With a combination of preservation nents of Lancaster County’s green infrastructure of the fragments remaining and restoration of system and can be mapped at a countywide scale. floodplain, wetland and upland forest habitats, Other existing and potential components of the Mill Creek could become a significant habitat system exist at a more local scale throughout connector through the county to the Susque- rural, suburban, and urban parts of the County, hanna River. Restoration of floodplain, wetland where they can be identified and mapped through municipal and multi-municipal plan- ning efforts within the countywide framework set by Greenscapes. They take a variety of forms and can perform a variety of functions, but are gener- ally classified as nodes (local green infrastructure resources) and links (linear green infrastructure connections).

Nodes range from localized and sometimes isolated occurrences of natural resources (e.g., woodland, wetlands, steep slope areas with natu- ral vegetation, and species of concern habitat) to “managed” landscape features in more urban Trails can provide educational opportunities if they are paired with interpretive resources, such settings (e.g., parks, other “green” open spaces, as this wayside panel along the Heritage Path in and vegetated stormwater management areas). Chickies Rock County Park. Nodes can provide a variety of benefits, such as

82 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element water and air quality improvement, stormwater • Canopy trees that intercept rainwater, management, wildlife habitat, and recreation. improve air quality, and cool the tem- While they can occur as isolated sites within perature surrounding agricultural or urban landscapes, • Safe connections for bicyclists and their value to the green infrastructure system is pedestrians enhanced when they are connected by greenways or links. Hedgerows – linear strips of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants along field borders – are an Links are smaller scale, linear components of example of a link in rural parts of Lancaster the green infrastructure system that include both County. Hedgerows provide wildlife habitat, re- natural features (e.g., small stream corridors) and duce stormwater runoff and soil erosion, decrease man-made feature (e.g., trails within rights-of- wind damage, and provide opportunities for way). Similar to nodes they provide a variety of diversified income from farming operations. benefits ranging from water quality protection and stormwater management to recreation, with an emphasis on connectivity. A promising type of 3.3.3 Landscapes green infrastructure link for Lancaster County’s urban and suburban areas is the “green street,” Landscape is a word with rich and varied mean- Strategic Vision a concept that has been developed in cities such ings. The traditional definition of the term relates as Portland and Seattle. Green streets typically to its visual or scenic qualities (e.g., “an expanse integrate the following: of scenery that can be seen in a single view”). Another definition relates to natural elements • Stormwater management such as such as landforms or rivers that characterize a re- vegetated swales and bioretention areas gion. Two such regional landscapes designated by within the right-of-way, thus reducing multi-state or state programs occur in Lancaster the need for piped infrastructure County:

What is a Landscape?

A Landscape is generally defined as a geographic region where the interaction of people and nature over time has produced an area of recognizable character with distinct aesthetic, ecological, and cul- tural values. The relationship of people and the land and natural resources they use to sustain them shapes the landscape and, in turn, the landscape shapes the people living in it--their settlement pat- terns, buildings, livelihoods, products, cultural practices and beliefs. Therefore, landscapes encompass the past and the present and include both tangible and intangible heritage elements. These landscapes can range from those that are primarily natural in character to those that have an emphasis in cultural distinctiveness.

While it is nearly impossible to find a landscape in today’s world that hasn’t had some human influ- ence, there are still places that are very rich in biodiversity and other natural values. Here in Lancaster County, the Susquehanna River Gorge, the Furnace Hills, and the Welsh Mountains all exhibit this type of character. These are working landscapes that still contain a high level of biological diversity and important natural, cultural, and recreational resources. Other areas of the County illustrate a more dominant cultural influence on the landscape, such as the Mill Creek Valley in eastern Lancaster County where the Amish and Plain Sect communities practice their agrarian way of life.

The landscapes of present day Lancaster County are appreciated by residents and millions of visitors alike each year. These landscapes have been inherited from the past and reveal the relationships that people have had with their surroundings over time. As stewards of these living working landscapes, it is this generation’s responsibility to help conserve and preserve these dynamic and highly complex resources for the future as models of sustainable land use and development.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 83 • The Furnace Hills Forests and Welsh While the Highlands and the Susquehanna Mountains Hubs are part of the High- River Corridor are major resources that provide lands Region, a large geographic area of a regional context for a significant part of forested mountains and hills extending Lancaster County’s green infrastructure, a more from northwestern Connecticut through holistic definition of landscape is needed that New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania applies across the County. For the purposes of to the Maryland state line. The High- Greenscapes, landscapes are defined as the broad lands was recognized by the Highlands physical patterns of human settlement, land use, Conservation Act, signed by President and resource conservation within which the core Bush in 2004. components of the green infrastructure system – hubs, greenways, nodes, and links – occur. At • The Susquehanna River Corridor in the broadest level, these landscapes are the Urban Lancaster County, which includes the and Village Growth Areas and the Rural Areas Susquehanna River Gorge and Upper defined by the Growth Management Element of Susquehanna River Hubs, is part of the the Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan. The Susquehanna Greenway designated by Growth Management Framework Map further the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. breaks down Rural Areas into three designations It is also part of a river system that (Agricultural Areas, Agricultural with Natural originates in upstate New York, flows Areas, and Natural Areas) based on mapping of through Pennsylvania and Maryland, key resource and land use factors. and empties into the Chesapeake Bay, one of the world’s great estuaries. Achieving the vision of a healthy green infra- The Highlands and the Susquehanna have been structure system in Lancaster County depends designated by the Pennsylvania Department of not only on establishing the core hubs, green- Conservation and Natural Resources as two of ways, nodes, and links, but also on managing only five “Mega-Greenways” within the Com- the surrounding urban and rural landscapes to monwealth. In addition, the lower Susquehanna sustain green infrastructure functions and values. River corridor has recently been recognized by This means taking action at the landscape level DCNR as a Conservation Landscape Initiative to preserve and enhance the core components Strategic Vision Strategic (CLI). The CLI recognition is given to land- (e.g., riparian reforestation along stream corridor scapes with state-significant natural resources greenways and links in urban or agricultural and character. The CLI designation is a holistic landscapes to improve water quality). It also planning approach that enables DCNR to focus means integrating green infrastructure directly both technical and financial resources in specific into the landscape fabric. In rural areas, this regions to preserve the characteristics that make could mean approaches such as sustainable them distinct. forestry or agriculture and improving wildlife habitat on farmland. In urban areas, it could mean approaches such as green roofs, canopy tree plantings, and backyard habitat.

84 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Goals, Objectives, and Strategies

4.1 Goals, Objectives, and age that needs to be preserved based on Figure Strategies 30 (93,371 acres). By meeting this benchmark in 2028, 18% of the Lancaster County will be The goals, objectives, and strategies presented in permanently protected in open space. Given the this section provide a framework for action to increase in the availability of open space fund- achieve the strategic vision set forth in Chapter ing in the last few years, the growing interest 3.0. They address the four fundamental purposes in the use innovative open space development of Lancaster County’s green infrastructure system design techniques and the increase collaboration defined in Section 3.2: amongst public and private entities, this bench- mark is achievable. • Preservation of exceptional natural

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies resources Objectives • Conservation or stewardship of impor- 1A. Secure the future of the County’s natural tant natural resources and the essential heritage by defining, identifying, and life support services they provide permanently protecting its most impor- • Restoration of natural resource systems tant natural and treasured resources. and ecological connections 1B. Ensure the long term viability of the • Recreation and improved community County’s biological diversity by main- health taining, enhancing, and restoring species of concern habitats and greenway con- Section 4.2 identifies specific tools that can be used nections between them. to carry out the goals, objectives, and strategies. Strategies • Maintain an up-to-date inventory of species of concern habitat and other 4.1.1 Preservation high quality natural areas in Lancaster County. Goal 1: Preserve Lancaster County’s exception- • Utilize the inventory in policy, planning, al natural resources. and regulatory initiatives and decision- Exceptional natural resources include the best making at the countywide, regional, and remaining examples of Lancaster County’s municipal levels. natural heritage and should be preserved as the • Permanently protect high quality areas foundation of the green infrastructure system. identified in the inventory through ac- Examples include small stream headwaters spe- quisition or easements targeted towards cies of concern core habitat and high quality eliminating “gaps” and encouraging the forests identified in the Pennsylvania Natural contiguity and connectivity of lands Heritage Program’s 2008 Update of the Natural with ecologically significant habitats, Heritage Inventory of Lancaster County, PA species of concern, and other outstand- and “natural gems” identified by the Lancaster ing natural communities. County Conservancy Long Range Protection • Work with landowners to develop site- Plan. These resources require the highest degree specific management plans to maintain of protection and management as necessary to and restore the integrity of high quality ensure their continued existence and eliminate natural heritage areas (e.g., rare species disruptive influences. habitats such as bog turtle wetland sites and serpentine barrens). In order to achieve the goal of preserving the • Conduct outreach to citizens and of- County’s exceptional natural resources over the ficials on the importance of preserving next 20 years, an average of 4,675 acres of open Lancaster County’s exceptional natural space will have to be protected each year. This resources. benchmark was determined by taking a 20 year planning timeframe against the total land acre-

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 87 4.1.2 Conservation countywide, regional, and municipal levels. Goal 2: Conserve natural resources and ser- • Provide information and technical as- vices throughout Lancaster County’s urban, sistance to landowners to encourage suburban, and rural landscapes. conservation (e.g., sustainable forestry or Important natural resources such as river and agricultural practices that maintain the stream corridors, floodplains, wetlands, wood- integrity of streams, forests, steep slopes, lands, and steep slopes are located throughout and other natural resources). rural, suburban, and urban parts of Lancaster • Provide information and incentives County. “Conservation” refers to the manage- to developers to encourage site design ment of these resources to maintain their eco- practices that reduce impervious surfac- logical functions and natural carrying capacity. ing and conserve open space and natural For example, existing natural vegetation should resources. be maintained on steep slopes and in riparian/ • Conduct outreach to citizens and of- floodplain areas to prevent erosion, protect water ficials on the importance of conserving quality, and minimize flooding. In many cases, Lancaster County’s natural resources. active restoration is needed to reestablish natural resource functions such as water quality protec- tion (e.g., by planting native vegetation along 4.1.3 Restoration rivers and streams). Restoration is addressed separately under Goal 3 below. Goal 3: Restore ecological connections and natural resource systems throughout Lancaster Objectives County’s urban, suburban, and rural areas. 2A. Maintain the ecological integrity of envi- Much of the improvement in the quality of the ronmentally sensitive lands. County’s air and water resources, plant and ani- 2B. Promote land management practices that mal habitats, and overall community health will result in the conservation and sustain- come as a result of efforts to heal the landscape able use of renewable natural resources. through environmental restoration initiatives. A 2C. Increase the understanding and aware- prime example is the need for river and stream ness of citizens and elected officials of restoration in agricultural and rural areas to the social, economic, and environmental improve water quality. Some of the best opportu- importance of natural resource conserva- nities for environmental improvement are found tion. in urban and suburban communities where green infrastructure features can be woven into the Strategies built fabric to provide environmental services • Protect river and stream corridors, such as energy conservation and improved air

floodplains, wetlands, forested areas, steep Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, slopes, and other natural resources through municipal zoning and subdivision regula- tions and conservation easements. • Conserve natural resources, including environmentally sensitive lands within Designated Growth Areas (DGAs), through municipal regulations and incentives and better site design practices in new development. Lancaster County Conservation District • Conserve groundwater resources through actions to protect groundwater quality Before After and quantity within critical aquifer Restoring buried floodplains and riparian areas, recharge areas. like this along Swarr Run in East Hempfield • Address natural resource conservation Township, can improve both water quality and in policy and planning initiatives at the habitat for native plants and animal species.

88 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element and water quality. Reestablishing migratory as tree plantings, natural stormwater connections between species of concern habitats; management practices (e.g. “rain gar- installing livestock fencing and establishing ripar- dens”), green streets, green roofs, and en- ian buffers along waterways in agricultural areas; vironmental restoration (e.g., degraded restoring floodplains through the removal of so- stream corridors, vacant properties, and called “legacy sediments” that have accumulated remnant natural areas). over the past two centuries; and planting shade • Enact municipal regulations and incen- trees in dense urban neighborhoods are just a few tives (street tree or parking lot planting examples of restoration actions that can be taken requirements, sustainable stormwater to mitigate human impacts on the environment. management requirements, etc.) to pro- mote incorporation of green infrastruc-

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies Objectives ture into new developments. 3A. Restore Lancaster County’s natural envi- • Promote water quality restoration and ronment and its ecological functions. reduction of pollutant loads to surface 3B. Incorporate green elements throughout and ground waters through regional the built environment to improve the policy, planning, and implementation environmental quality of urban and initiatives (watershed planning, nutri- suburban development. ent trading, etc.), with the objective of 3C. Enhance the quality and ensure the meeting or exceeding all applicable water quantity of surface and groundwater re- quality standards. sources needed to sustain healthy aquatic • Encourage restoration of native habitats ecosystems, drinking water supply, and on large institutional campuses (schools, water-based recreation activities. hospitals, etc.) and business/industrial 3D. Improve Lancaster County’s air quality parks as an alternative to non-native through reforestation and planting. lawns and landscape plantings that require intensive maintenance. Strategies • Conduct outreach and provide technical • Work with farmers and other landown- assistance to citizens, officials, landown- ers to establish riparian buffers of native ers, and developers on ways to restore vegetation along river and stream cor- natural resources and integrate green ridors throughout Lancaster County. infrastructure into existing and new • Encourage all home and business owners development. throughout the County to landscape with native plants. • Provide information and technical as- 4.1.4 Recreation sistance to landowners to encourage restoration through measures such as in- Goal 4: Enhance the quality-of-life of residents vasive species control, reforestation, and through the provision of a diversity of easily ecological restoration (reestablishment of accessible outdoor recreation opportunities native plant and animal communities). and experiences. • Promote the propagation and reintro- This goal embodies the Latin origin of the word duction of rare native plant species into recreation: “restoration to health.” It promotes landscapes throughout the County in outdoor recreation, walking, biking, and pad- order to increase biodiversity (e.g., into dling and their roles in supporting healthy “backyard restoration” areas) lifestyles as key benefits provided by the green • Target restoration of natural resources infrastructure system. Recreational opportunities towards enhancing the ecological integ- for citizens are needed at scales ranging from a rity of identified hubs and the greenway countywide system of regional parks and green- corridors that connect them. way trails to close-to-home parks, sidewalks, • Integrate green infrastructure into paths, and trails serving urban and suburban development patterns in urban and communities. These opportunities will not only suburban areas through measures such improve quality of life and community health,

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 89 but also contribute to improved air quality and 4.2 Tools reduced carbon emissions by encouraging walk- ing and biking as alternatives to automobile use. Concerted and coordinated action over time by a wide spectrum of stakeholders – ranging from Objectives governmental agencies to nonprofit land trusts to 4A. Protect large open spaces for passive private businesses, landowners, and citizens – is outdoor recreational opportunities such needed to realize the goals, objectives, and strate- as hiking, biking, paddling, wildlife gies identified in Section 4.1. This section of the viewing, outdoor learning, and the tradi- plan identifies tools that can be used by these tional pastimes of hunting and fishing. different entities to create the green infrastructure 4B. Provide a diversity of close-to-home, system. Chapter 5.0 lays out an action plan for active recreation opportunities within applying the tools, including action steps to be Designated Growth Areas (DGAs). taken by the County; direction regarding fund- 4C. Create a countywide network of open/ ing, organization and management; and moni- green spaces and connections between toring of progress in plan implementation. them. 4D. Improve community health by providing The tools are divided into four broad categories: convenient, accessible opportunities for 1. Policy and Planning: Address green infra- outdoor recreation and exercise. structure as a fundamental element of policy and planning initiatives at the regional, Strategies county, multi-municipal, and municipal • Complete the Lancaster County regional levels. park system and prepare management 2. Regulation: Address the green infrastructure plans for individual parks that provide goals of preservation, conservation, restora- for passive recreation while maintaining tion, and recreation in municipal develop- and restoring natural resources. ment regulations and incentives. • Encourage the Commonwealth of Penn- 3. Capital Investment: Establish green infra- sylvania, power companies, and other structure system components through public landowners to manage large open spaces and private sector financial investment. to accommodate passive recreation and 4. Outreach and Partnerships: Provide infor- natural resource preservation. mation and technical assistance to the public • Provide active recreation within Desig- and involve landowners and other citizens in nated Growth Areas through planning, creating the green infrastructure system. regulations, capital investment, and partnerships at regional and munici- A priority tool(s) is recommended for each pal levels, with the goal of providing a category, followed by additional tools listed in

alphabetical order. Information provided for each Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, minimum of 10 acres of community and neighborhood level parkland per 1,000 tool includes a description, how the tool can be residents. applied to Lancaster County’s green infrastruc- • Develop a countywide greenway trail ture, and examples of current applications inside system linking urban and suburban or outside of Lancaster County where applicable. communities to regional parks and open The tools can be integrated with tools from space resources. other Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan • Develop pedestrian and bicycling net- elements, including the “Smart Growth Toolbox” works (sidewalks, trails, designated bike developed for the Growth Management Element. routes, etc.) at the countywide, multi- A summary table identifying the goals (preserva- municipal, and local levels. tion, conservation, restoration, and/or recreation) • Provide information and conduct and the growth management strategies (Urban outreach to Lancaster County citizens Growth Area Strategy and/or Rural Strategy) that on the importance of and availability of apply to each tool is provided at the end of the recreational resources in the County. chapter.

90 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 4.2.1 Policy and Planning Tools

Purpose Address green infrastructure as a fundamental element of policy and planning initiatives at the regional, county, multi-municipal, and municipal levels.

Major policy and planning initiatives include regional plans (e.g., the Pennsylvania Highlands Conservation Area initiative), the Lancaster

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies County Comprehensive Plan and its functional Restoring green infrastructure resources like elements (including Greenscapes), multi-munic- this stream segment along the Pequea Creek in southern Lancaster County will require policy and ipal comprehensive plans (e.g., LIMC Growing planning initiatives at all levels of government. Together), and functional plans (e.g., parks and recreation plans), also at the multi-municipal and municipal levels. Many of these plans address Priority Policy and Planning Tool green infrastructure concepts in some fashion. • I-A Green Infrastructure Planning For example, the Growth Management Element Description: Municipal and multi-munic- of the Comprehensive Plan addresses “Treasured ipal plans that define green infrastructure Resources” as a key issue area, including: resources and strategies at the local level.

• Environmentally sensitive resources… Green Infrastructure Application: Green preserved a part of a network of open infrastructure planning is an emerging space and parks within Urban Growth concept nationwide. This plan is one of the Areas. (River and) stream corridors first applications of the concept by a county can provide an organizing physical as a comprehensive plan element. Following framework for a countywide greenway/ the model used by the LCPC to encour- blueway network. (Urban Growth Area age preparation of regional comprehensive Strategy, p. 4-19) plans by municipalities, municipal and • Healthy and functioning natural lands multi-municipal green infrastructure plans and systems, including water resources are proposed as the priority policy and (surface and groundwater), natural planning tool to implement the plan. Just habitat areas, and associated outdoor as the County’s Policy Plan and Growth recreational opportunities. (Rural Strat- Management Element provide guidance for egy, p. 5-24) municipal and multi-municipal comprehen- sive plans, the Green Infrastructure Element Previous county, multi-municipal, and municipal of the Comprehensive Plan establishes an planning efforts have not, however, addressed overall framework for preparation of multi- green infrastructure resources, functions, and municipal and municipal green infrastruc- benefits as a holistic system. Rather, they have ture plans. typically addressed topics such as land use, transportation, and parks and recreation in a Three basic steps should be used to develop piecemeal manner without considering their these plans: broader implications for green infrastructure. 1. Inventory existing green infrastructure The policy and planning tools are intended to resources in the municipality or munici- integrate the green infrastructure system concept palities. into policy and planning initiatives at the county, 2. Evaluate the degree of protection af- multi-municipal, and municipal levels. forded to existing green infrastructure resources by regulation or ownership.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 91 3. Develop strategies to protect, enhance, preservation over a long-range (20-30 year) and restore green infrastructure resources time horizon. and functions within the community. Green Infrastructure Application: Compre- In Lancaster City and the boroughs, green hensive plans by Lancaster County munici- infrastructure plans can be used to promote palities are typically prepared with funding “greening” of the urban environment. and technical assistance by the Lancaster Preparation of municipal and multi-mu- County Planning Commission (LCPC). Us- nicipal green infrastructure plans should ing the County’s Green Infrastructure Plan as be supported by funding and technical as- a framework, the LCPC should educate local sistance from the County and could be tied citizens and officials on the meaning and im- to a green infrastructure grant program for portance of green infrastructure and promote project implementation (see Chapter 5.0). incorporation of green infrastructure goals, objectives, and strategies into comprehensive Example: There are no existing examples of planning efforts. green infrastructure plans at the municipal or multi-municipal levels. Example: “Growing Together,” the Central Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan Other Policy and Planning Tools prepared by the Lancaster Inter-Municipal • I-B Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Committee (LIMC). Description: A plan that defines a network to accommodate bicycle and/or pedestrian • I-D Greenway/Open Space Plan travel for recreation, commuting to work, Description: A plan that identifies strate- and other purposes. Bicycle networks can gies for the preservation and development include on-street bike lanes and off-street of a greenway corridor or larger open space paths. Pedestrian networks can include system in the context of the land use and sidewalks integrated with the street system development pattern of a municipality or a as well as off-street trails. Both bicycle and region. pedestrian travel can be accommodated on multi-use paths or trails. Green Infrastructure Application: Green- ways and open spaces are key components Green Infrastructure Application: Mobility of green infrastructure. Greenway and open is a key benefit provided by green infrastruc- space plans can be used as tools to promote ture. Bicycle and pedestrian planning can implementation of the green infrastructure be used as a tool to implement the green system identified in this plan at the regional, infrastructure system, particularly when multi-municipal, and municipal levels. How-

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, conceived holistically in the context of ever, priority should be given to preparation multiple functions that can be performed of more comprehensive and integrated green by connections such as greenway trails and infrastructure plans. “green streets.” Example: Conestoga Greenways: A River Example: Lancaster County has a county- Corridor Conservation Plan. wide Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan and a map/guide to bicycling, walking, • I-E Heritage Byways and transit in the County. Description: A new program initiated by LCPC to designate county roads with special • I-C Comprehensive Plan significance as “Lancaster County Heritage Description: An adopted municipal or Byways.” This program is intended to pro- multi-municipal document designed for use mote protection of roads that have “intrinsic in decision-making by officials and citizens qualities” (i.e., significant archaeological, to guide future growth, development, and cultural, historic, natural, recreational, and/ or scenic resources).

92 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element What is a Landscape Conservation Plan?

Over the last few decades, there has been a growing recognition by national and international pres- ervation organizations that a new approach to landscape conservation is necessary if to protect large, special landscapes for future generations. This new approach recognizes that the cultural and natural values of people and landscapes are inextricably linked and their future protection will depend on sustaining people’s relationship to the land and its resources. It is now understood that stewardship of special landscapes and their associated resources is both an individual and a community responsibility. Since these landscapes typically encompass a mosaic of public, private and non-profit land ownership patterns, it follows that their future protection will be based on our ability to foster stewardship by those that own and/or live on the land, putting conservation in the hands of the people most affected by it. Goals, Objectives, and Strategies

A Landscape Conservation Plan, then, is a community-based approach to defining and implementing key strategies that will promote the future protection of these distinctive areas. Such a plan recognizes the multitude of landownership patterns, land use regulations, and land management practices that exist within in large-scale landscapes and fosters a coordinated and community-based collaborative approach to the future stewardship and protection of these special places. Landscape Conservation Plans are intended to guide future decisions and provide appropriate tools for the public, private and non-profit sectors to manage change in a way that contributes to a landscape’s distinctive identity rather than detract from it.

The Lower Susquehanna River Corridor in Lancaster and York counties was chosen as the prototype for the development of a conservation plan to achieve these goals and serve as a model for other large natural or cultural landscapes within the region.

Green Infrastructure Application: The Example: East Lampeter Township, Leacock Heritage Byways Program is modeled in part Township, and Salisbury Township have after but is separate from state and federal expressed strong interest in studying the fea- byways programs, which emphasize “scenic” sibility of designating Old Philadelphia Pike roadway qualities. It can be used to promote a Heritage Byway. preservation and conservation of green infrastructure resources along roadways in • I-F Landscape Conservation Plan Lancaster County. The program recognizes Description: A plan for a large-scale land- two types of byways: scape that is defined by natural elements • Tourism Development Byways combine such as a common landform or a river val- resource preservation and conservation ley. Multi-state and multi-county regional with heritage tourism marketing and landscapes in Lancaster County include the promotion. Susquehanna River Corridor and the High- • Preservation Byways focus on resource lands Region. preservation and conservation and will not be marketed to visitors. Green Infrastructure Application: Natural landscapes such as Welsh Mountain and the The five-step designation process includes Furnace Hills (both part of the Highlands preparation of a Corridor Management Plan Region) and the Susquehanna River Gorge that includes procedures, controls, opera- are the largest and most intact components tional practices, and administrative tools to of Lancaster County’s green infrastructure protect and enhance the byway. system. These landscapes are experiencing ecological fragmentation and erosion of scenic character due to scattered rural de-

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 93 velopment. Regional landscape plans can be Green Infrastructure Application: In the used as a tool to involve a range of partners past, transportation plans have often been in developing and implementing strategies to damaging to green infrastructure resources protect these important resources. because they emphasized mobility for au- tomobiles at the expense of other values. Example: Lancaster and York Counties are However, transportation planning can be in the process of preparing a Susquehanna used to promote green infrastructure goals River Corridor Master Plan as a model for through approaches such as encouraging the large-scale landscape conservation planning. use of alternative transportation modes and context-sensitive design that reduces impacts • I-G Official Map on natural resources. Description: An official document adopted by a municipality that maps existing and Example: The Lancaster County Planning proposed streets, pedestrian easements, open Commission maintains a transportation ele- space, and other public lands or easements. ment of the Lancaster County Comprehen- The adopted map officially reserves the land sive Plan. for future public purpose. • I-J Water Resources Plan Green Infrastructure Application: Official Description: A plan to protect ground and maps can be used to officially designate and surface waters, typically as they provide for reserve components of the green infrastruc- drinking water supply. Watershed plans that ture system at the municipal level. address stormwater and surface water man- agement are addressed separately below. Example: Manor Township Official Map. Green Infrastructure Application: Pro- • I-H Park and Recreation Plan tecting water quality and safeguarding the Description: A plan that identifies strategies quantity of Lancaster County’s water supply to meet the needs of current and future resi- are important functions performed by a dents of a municipality or group of munici- healthy green infrastructure system. The palities for parks and recreation facilities. need for planning to ensure a sufficient, sus- tainable, and safe drinking water supply will Green Infrastructure Application: Parks increase in importance as Lancaster County and outdoor recreation facilities are key com- continues to grow. Water resources plans can ponents of the green infrastructure system in be used to identify important areas that re- urban and suburban areas. Providing these charge the County’s drinking water supplies facilities is the responsibility of municipali- – referred to as critical aquifer recharge areas

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, ties and other local entities. Greenscapes – and develop strategies for their protection. establishes an overall framework and guid- ance for more detailed parks and recreation Example: The Northern Lancaster County planning at the municipal and multi-munic- Groundwater Study is a groundwater ipal levels. resources evaluation of a Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) prepared by the Example: Eastern Lancaster County Region Susquehanna River Basin Commission (Fig- Recreation, Park, and Open Space Plan. ure 32).

• I-I Transportation Plan • I-K Watershed Plan Description: A plan defining capital im- Description: A plan intended to provide a provements and other actions to be taken framework for action to both restore water to develop a transportation system at the quality in impaired waters and to protect countywide, multi-municipal, or municipal water quality in other waters threatened by levels. Transportation can also be addressed as an element of a comprehensive plan.

94 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Figure 32 - Northern Lancaster County Groundwater Study Area

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies

Northern Lancaster Groundwater Study

Changes in watershed hydrology can impact the availability of groundwater for municipal, domestic, industrial, and agricultural uses. New development, for example, can have small, incremental impacts on the environment that cumulatively result in adverse hydrologic changes. For example, in areas where residents depend on wells for their drinking water, scattered development can deplete under- ground aquifers and by increasing impervious surfaces and reducing water infiltration.

In northern Lancaster County, meeting current and future water supply needs has been a concern for local officials for over a decade. The area has been designated a potentially stressed area (PSA) by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) with regard to water supply. Increased water supply demand and stormwater runoff have exacerbated problems in the PSA. From 1990 to 2000, the growth rate of the northern part of the county exceeded the County’s overall growth rate of 11.3 percent. In fact, one particular northern township experienced 33.2 percent growth during this time period.

In an effort to determine if the aquifer underlying northern Lancaster County could sustain these anticipated demands, a predictive water study was conducted (Figure 32). When allocated water use in 2000 was compared to the sustainable limit, the 50-square-mile carbonate area in northern Lan- caster County had already reached 46 percent of the sustainable limit. Two sub-basins of this area, the Manheim/Lititz groundwater basin and the Ephrata area groundwater basin, were 70 percent and 34 percent of the sustainable limit, respectively.

The study provided important information on water demand, water availability and the location of important water features. Local decision makers, in partnership with water resource managers, have used this information to educate the public on the importance of stormwater infiltration, the protec- tion of aquifer recharge areas, conservation measures, and planning for growth.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 95 point source and non-point source pollution. • Pennsylvania Act 167 of 1978 requires The plan may cover an entire watershed or a counties to prepare watershed scale storm- portion of the watershed. Objectives may ad- water management plans for watersheds in dress issues such as stormwater management, the county. Act 167 plans must provide agricultural best management practices, and for management of large storm events, aquatic habitat restoration. Watershed orga- groundwater recharge, and water quality nizations and local, state or federal agencies impacts from development sites. In addition, all may play a part in watershed planning. the Pennsylvania Department of Environ- mental Protection (DEP) has mandated Green Infrastructure Application: Water- that these plans must also address TMDLs shed plans may include specific recommen- (Total Maximum Daily Load) under the dations for improving the health of river and U.S. Clean Water Act. Act 167 plans have stream corridors, the primary connections in been prepared for four of Lancaster County’s Lancaster County’s green infrastructure sys- twelve designated watersheds: Mill Creek, tem. Therefore, watershed plans can be used Conestoga River, Little Conestoga Creek, as a tool to implement Greenscapes. and Cocalico Creek. Lancaster County is in the process of developing Act 167 plans for Examples: Lancaster County Conservancy’s the remaining watersheds. Fishing Creek Watershed Plan • Lititz Run Watershed: A Community Im- proving Its Water Quality was published in March 1999 to “assist the local community, business owners, teachers, planners and elected officials in developing an understand- ing of the Lititz Run and an ability to view the watershed as a whole, instead of a series of independent political jurisdictions.” The plan includes a watershed inventory, an analysis of the watershed, and recommenda- tions for protecting watershed. • Mill Creek Watershed Implementation Plan, prepared by the Lancaster County Conserva- tion District in June 2006, addresses the problems of excess nutrients and sedimen- tation and prioritizes projects within the watershed.

• Chiques Creek Watershed Assessment: Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, Channel Stability Assessment and Stream Restoration Prioritization, prepared for the Chiques Creek Watershed Association in July 2002, assesses the overall condition of the study area and makes recommendations for restoration. Lancaster County Conservancy The Fishing Creek Watershed Plan prepared by the Lancaster County Conservancy is an excellent example of a comprehensive approach to surface and ground water resource management.

96 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 4.2.2 Regulatory Tools Section 4.2.1 above as the priority policy and planning tool. They could also be delineated Purpose as resource conservation areas in compre- Address the green infrastructure goals of hensive plans and on official maps, two preservation, conservation, restoration, and other important policy and planning tools. recreation in municipal development regula- Given the high priority placed by citizens tions and incentives. and initiatives such as the Chesapeake Bay Program on maintaining and improving the Regulations are used by municipalities to imple- water quality of rivers and streams, require- ment comprehensive plans and growth manage- ments for riparian buffers/setbacks to be ment initiatives. In Lancaster County municipal maintained in natural vegetation should be a

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies regulations have addressed conservation of agri- basic component of the ordinance. cultural rather than natural resources as a priority through approaches such as agricultural zoning The overlay district would not necessarily and Transfer of Development Rights (TDR, an prohibit all development within green in- innovative approach that is beginning to be used frastructure resource areas. Instead, it could in some townships). While it is extremely impor- identify performance standards that allow tant to continue regulatory protection of agricul- limited development while maintaining the tural lands, the use of regulations and incentives integrity and carrying capacity of resources to protect and promote green infrastructure in such as steep slopes or floodplain. It could both rural areas and Urban Growth Areas should also be combined with approaches such as be strengthened. While the responsibility for conservation subdivision design that protects enacting regulations rests with municipalities, the resource areas while concentrating develop- LCPC has a key role to play in providing techni- ment in more suitable portions of the site. cal support. The LCPC could promote use of this tool by developing a model infrastructure overlay Priority Regulatory Tool ordinance and standards. • II-A Green Infrastructure Overlay District Description: A zoning district that desig- Example: Loudon County, VA’s General nates green infrastructure resources within Plan defines green infrastructure resources a municipality and identifies performance (called “primary conservation areas”) to be standards to conserve them. Overlay districts protected through zoning overlay districts apply as additional requirements beyond the and performance standards (e.g., for steep underlying use-based zoning districts. slopes). The overlays include the River and Stream Corridor Overlay District, Moun- Green Infrastructure Application: Regula- tainside Development Overlay District, and tions to protect environmental resources Limestone Conglomerate Overlay District. typically are overlay districts that focus on a single type of resource (e.g., floodplains, Other Regulatory Tools steep slopes, woodlands, etc.). This approach • II-B Conservation Zoning is addressed below under natural resource Description: A zoning district with large protection ordinances. As an alternative to minimum lot sizes designed to preserve sen- focusing on single resource types in separate sitive environmental features such as wooded ordinances, green infrastructure overlay hillsides. districts that address environmental resourc- Green Infrastructure Application: Effec- es in a more integrated manner are proposed tive conservation zoning can be used like as the priority regulatory tool to implement agricultural zoning to protect the integrity the green infrastructure system. of landscapes characterized by a preponder- ance of valuable natural resources (rather The resources comprising the district could than farmland). It is particularly applicable be identified on a municipal or multi-munic- to areas of the green infrastructure system ipal basis through Greenscapess proposed in identified as “hubs.” In practice, existing

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 97 conservation zoning in Lancaster County standards address techniques such as green typically allows two to three acre residential roofs, reduced site disturbance/conservation lots, which promotes “rural sprawl” and of existing vegetation, and natural means results in the fragmentation of natural of stormwater management (see also “Low resources. Larger minimum lot sizes (similar Impact Development” under Stormwater to effective agricultural zoning) would more Management Ordinances). While LEED is effectively protect these resources. a voluntary program, some jurisdictions are beginning to incorporate its rating system Example: East Earl Township adopted one or other “green” standards/incentives into unit per 50 acre conservation zoning in the building codes and ordinances. Welsh Mountain area in 2006. Green Infrastructure Application: LEED or • II-C Conservation Subdivision Design similar standards for sustainable building and Ordinance site development can be used to integrate Description: A residential development green infrastructure functions and benefits design concept to preserve open space and (e.g., energy conservation and mitigation of valuable natural resource areas by concentrat- the urban heat effect) into urban landscapes ing homes on a portion of the property and in particular. Design standards for plant maintaining the remainder as open space in materials should promote the use of native perpetuity. The open space may be owned rather than non-native or invasive species. and maintained by a homeowners’ associa- tion, held by a private nonprofit organization Examples: Arlington County (VA), Babylon (e.g., the Lancaster County Conservancy), or (NY), Cranford (NJ), Nashville (TN), dedicated for public ownership and access. Pittsburgh (PA), and Portsmouth (VA) are examples of jurisdictions that have density Green Infrastructure Application: Conser- bonuses, expedited permitting, or other vation subdivisions can be used to perma- forms of regulatory incentives for LEED- nently protect natural resource areas at no certified buildings. cost to the municipality while accommodat- ing development in suitable locations. This • II-E Landscape Ordinance approach may not be appropriate in rural Description: An ordinance establishing re- parts of Lancaster County where it could quirements for the planting of trees, shrubs, promote scattered development and create and other vegetation in new developments. conflicts between agricultural and residential Landscape ordinances can also address pres- uses. However, it has potential in Designated ervation of existing trees and vegetation (see Growth Areas to promote development that also tree protection ordinance under natural

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, maintains natural resources and provides resource protection ordinances below). connections in the green infrastructure sys- tem in the form of greenways and linkages. Green Infrastructure Application: Land- scape ordinances can be used to integrate Example: Lancaster Township Open Space green infrastructure into new developments Development zoning overlay section. in the form of existing vegetation and new plantings that provide benefits such as clean- • II-D Green Infrastructure Design Stan- er air and water, stormwater retention, cooler dards air temperatures, and aesthetic improve- Description: Standards for the use of green ments. Typical standards address issues such infrastructure elements in the built environ- as protection of natural vegetation, plant ment. The U.S. Green Building Council’s installation standards and requirements, Leadership in Energy and Environmental plant material standards and recommended Design (LEED), a national rating system for species, stormwater retention and recharge, developing high-performance, sustainable and maintenance. Species recommendations buildings, is the best known. The LEED should promote the use of native plants that

98 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element provide wildlife habitat and have reduced • II-G Parkland Dedication Ordinance maintenance requirements (mowing, irriga- Description: An ordinance requiring tion, application of chemicals, etc.). developers to meet the recreational needs generated by new developments, either Example: Pequea Township Zoning Ordi- through dedication of parkland within the nance landscaping requirements. development or by contributing to a fund for use by the municipality in developing • II-F Natural Resource Protection Ordi- parks and recreational facilities outside of the nances development. Description: An “overlay” ordinance that define standards beyond existing zoning Green Infrastructure Application: Parkland

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies requirements to protect a specific natural dedication ordinances can be used as a tool resource type. It differs from the Green In- to fulfill one of the functions of the green in- frastructure Overlay District recommended frastructure system, meeting recreation needs as a priority regulatory tool above in that it at the local/municipal level (Objective 4B). addresses resource types in isolation rather Parkland, trails, and waterway access points than in a comprehensive, integrated manner. created as a result of parkland dedication Natural resources addressed by these ordi- ordinances can function as nodes and links nances include: in the system. • Floodplain Protection Ordinance: Re- stricts development within or near the Example: West Lampeter Township. 100-year floodplain and floodway. • Habitat Protection Ordinance: Restricts • II-H Scenic Corridor Overlay District development in or near natural habitat Description: An ordinance that protects areas. views of landscapes identified as having • Riparian Corridor Ordinance: Estab- special scenic value through application of lishes buffers from rivers and streams, design standards, setbacks, buffers, etc. Typi- limiting development and requiring cally applied to roadway corridors; can also maintenance of natural vegetation. apply to trails • Steep Slope Protection Ordinance: Re- stricts development on steep slopes (e.g., Green Infrastructure Application: Scenic 15% or 25% and above). corridor overlay districts can be used to help • Tree Protection Ordinance: Restricts maintain the visual quality of large-scale removal of trees above a specified size, green infrastructure system components (i.e., often including mitigation (replanting) hubs and landscapes). requirements. • Wetlands: Precludes development in designated wetland areas.

Green Infrastructure Application: Natural resource protection ordinances can be used to help maintain the integrity of green infra- structure resources by reducing the impacts of new development. As noted above, green infrastructure overlay districts that address multiple natural resources and functions in an integrated manner are proposed as the John Haldeman John priority regulatory tool. Rapho Township Community Park is a good example of the use of a mandatory dedication Example: Marlborough Township, Mont- ordinance by a municipality to provide close-to- gomery County, Pa. home recreation for new residents in an area targeted for residential growth.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 99 Wellhead Protection

Our lifestyle and economy depends on the availability of clean water, yet clean water is a resource that is often taken for granted. This is particularly true with respect to groundwater. While groundwater is more difficult to contaminate than surface water, inappropriate land uses around wellhead recharge areas can significantly affect the quantity and quality of groundwater resources. For this reason the Pennsylvania DEP requires municipalities to regulate land uses within 100 to 400 feet of new or expanded municipal wellheads. While this requirement provides protection for public water supply sources, the protection of private wells is largely in the hands of the private users.

Regardless of whether well water is drawn from a public or private source, green infrastructure can be an effective way of protecting its quality. Natural vegetation around a wellhead area not only helps to assure that the well receives adequate recharge, the vegetation can intercept contaminants and excess nutrients before they reach the water table.

Example: The City of Austin, TX adopted • Subdivision standards that incorporate an overlay zone with standards to protect smaller lot sizes and reduced setback re- views from several “hill country” roadways in quirements to minimize total impervious the western part of the city. area, reduce construction costs, conserve natural areas, provide community rec- • II-I Site Design Standards reational space, and promote watershed Description: Standards governing the design protection. and layout of streets, parking areas, lots, and other elements of new developments. Example: West Lampeter Township TND Ordinance. Green Infrastructure Application: Conven- tional site design standards can negatively • II-J Stormwater Management Ordinance impact green infrastructure resources by Description: An ordinance designed to requiring excessively long and wide streets, minimize the impacts of new developments large parking areas, and lot layouts that on water quantity (flooding) and quality. consume natural areas. As an alternative, Such ordinances typically require use of municipalities can enact site design standards Best Management Practices (BMPs), such for new development that reduce impervi- as on-site retention and infiltration basins, ous cover and associated impacts on green vegetated swales and open spaces, pervious infrastructure resources; increase the amount pavement, and reduction of the development of land maintained as natural areas or other footprint.

open space; and use pervious areas for more Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, effective stormwater treatment. Examples of Green Infrastructure Application: Storm- possible standards include: water management ordinances can promote • Residential street layouts designed to integration of green infrastructure features minimize total street length, pavement and functions into the pattern of develop- width, and the number of cul-de-sacs ment in urban and suburban landscapes, • Parking lot standards that minimize particularly if used to implement an in- excessive parking space construction and novative approach known as Low Impact provide for compact car spaces, smaller Development (LID). LID is designed to stall dimensions, efficient parking lanes, mimic a site's predevelopment hydrology by and use of pervious materials in spillover using design techniques that infiltrate, filter, parking areas where possible store, evaporate, and detain runoff close to its source. With this approach the function- ing green infrastructure system can include

100 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element not only open spaces, but also elements of are allowed to develop their properties at the built environment such as rooftops, a higher density than would be permitted streetscapes, parking lots, sidewalks, and under the existing zoning. medians. Green Infrastructure Application: To date Example: Lancaster County has developed a TDRs have been used in Lancaster County model Stormwater Management Ordinance to protect agricultural lands. They also have for use by municipalities. The Pennsylvania the potential to protect components of the Stormwater Best Management Practices green infrastructure system, for example Manual, released by DEP’s Bureau of Wa- hubs and environmentally sensitive resource tershed Management in 2007, identifies areas, by providing for the transfer of devel-

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies stormwater management practices to protect opment rights to more suitable locations, water quality, enhance water availability, and such as designated growth areas. reduce flooding that can be incorporated into local ordinances. Examples: Warwick and West Hempfield Townships have had the most active TDR • II-K Subdivision Ordinance ordinances in Lancaster County to date. Description: An ordinance that establishes Since 1991, Warwick’s program has success- requirements for the design and layout of fully preserved nine farms totaling more than lots, buildings, streets, and infrastructure 790 acres through the transfer of develop- within a new development. While its use is ment rights to a Campus Industrial Zone. often rather narrowly prescribed, the subdivi- sion ordinance can be used to achieve green • II-M Wellhead Protection Ordinance infrastructure objectives such as dedication Description: An ordinance that imposes of natural resource areas as open space and restrictions on land uses and activities to establishment of connections. protect the groundwater recharge area imme- diately surrounding a public drinking water Green Infrastructure Application: Section supply well. 610 of the Lancaster County Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance contains Green Infrastructure Application: Like specifications for the dedication of open air and surface water quality, groundwater space and trails as part of residential land quality is part of the “natural life support developments. Trail dedication can include services” provided by the green infrastructure segments of existing trails such as the Horse- system. Wellhead protection ordinances can Shoe and Conestoga Trails that are currently be used as a tool to prevent degradation of unprotected. Subdivision ordinances can also this important resource by human activities prescribe standards for sidewalks and con- at the landscape level. nected street systems, thus promoting a more walkable environment in developed areas. Example: Warwick Township Wellhead Protection Areas. Example: Lancaster County Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. 4.2.3 Capital Investment Tools • II-L Transfer of Development Rights Purpose (TDR) Establish green infrastructure system compo- Description: An ordinance that allows nents through public and private sector finan- owners of property zoned for low-density cial investment. development, agriculture, or conservation (sending areas) to sell development rights to Whereas policy/planning and regulatory tools owners of properties in designated receiving to promote green infrastructure have a relatively areas (e.g., Designated Growth Areas). The specific focus on municipalities with support by owners purchasing the development rights Lancaster County, capital investment tools can

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 101 be used by a variety of public and private sector green infrastructure nodes and links in urban entities in diverse ways to create the green infra- and suburban landscapes. Potential land for structure system. Examples include governmental acquisition by the County or other entities or nonprofit purchase of land or development should be prioritized based on environmen- rights; public capital improvements such as parks tal resource value (e.g., species of concern and trails; and public/private partnerships or habitat; “Natural Gems” identified by the private investments such as environmental resto- Lancaster County Conservancy) and func- ration projects and green buildings. tion in the green infrastructure system (e.g., meeting recreation needs or providing key Most of Lancaster County’s natural resources nodes or greenway connections in Urban are located on lands that are privately owned Growth Areas). Direct county acquisition and potentially subject to development in the efforts should focus on 1) expanding the re- future (see Section 2.2.5). Therefore, two capital gional park system to achieve the minimum investment tools – land acquisition and purchase standard of 5 acres/1,000 residents and 2) of development rights – are identified as priori- helping to create the greenway trail system ties to secure permanent protection of valuable (see Chapter 5.0, Actions 4-1 and 4-2). In natural lands. It should also be noted that there addition, the County should continue to is tremendous potential to leverage private sector support land acquisition by municipalities, investment to preserve, create, and restore green the Lancaster County Conservancy, and oth- infrastructure through incentives, partnerships, ers through grants for projects that meet the and market-based approaches. As one example, defined priorities (e.g., preserving important the PPL Corporation is selling approximately natural resource lands or providing for local 3,500 acres along the Susquehanna River to the recreation needs based on the standard of 10 Lancaster County Conservancy for $5 million acres/1,000 residents). and then donating the $5 million back to the Conservancy as part of a sustainable endowment Example: Lancaster County Natural Lands fund to be used to maintain the land for natural Preservation Fund: A $1,000,000 challenge resource conservation and public enjoyment. grant from the Lancaster County Board of Market mechanisms such as nutrient trading Commissioners to the Lancaster County can be used to promote the restoration goal of Conservancy to purchase natural lands open Greenscapes, particularly in relation to water to the general public for recreational use. resources. Another example is the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture’s Resource Enhance- Priority Capital Investment Tool ment and Protection Program (REAP), which • III-B Purchase of Development Rights provides tax credits to farmers who implement Description: Acquisition of the right to agricultural best management practices (see Out- develop the land, thus maintaining private

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, reach and Partnership tools below). ownership while requiring the landowner and his/her successors to keep the property Priority Capital Investment Tool in open space uses in perpetuity. • III-A Land Acquisition Description: Fee simple purchase of land by Green Infrastructure Application: Purchase a public entity or private land conservation of Development Rights (PDR) has been suc- trust for the purpose of securing its perma- cessfully used to protect working farmland nent protection. in Lancaster County. The County should consider instituting a similar program for Green Infrastructure Application: Fee green infrastructure lands to supplement the simple land acquisition can be accomplished existing PDR program. This program would through a combination of state, county, allow privately owned lands to be used for municipal, and private land trust actions. sustainable forestry or similar activities while Acquisition efforts should focus not only prohibiting development or other uses that on valuable resources in rural areas, but also would damage its natural resource value. It on opportunities to maintain and establish could be tied to a new Forest Security Area

102 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element initiative developed by the County to imple- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Examples ment the Forest Legacy Program (see Section include: 4.2.4, Outreach and Partnerships). • Green Streets: Typical of our nation, Lan- caster County’s road system is designed Example: The Lancaster County Agricultural to move automobile traffic with little Preserve Board administers the County’s consideration of other potential func- PDR program for farmland. tions. Designed to promote multiple values such as stormwater treatment Other Capital Investment Tools and alternatives to automobile use, • III-C Agricultural Best Management “green streets” incorporate features such Practices as canopy trees, vegetated stormwater

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies Description: Operational investments by management areas, and connectivity for farmers to reduce impacts on natural re- pedestrians and bicyclists. Green streets sources. Examples include restoration of the could be developed in Urban Growth floodplain and the establishment of riparian Areas as links in the green infrastructure buffers and measures to control runoff from system. Extended into rural areas, they animal concentration areas. could provide connections from Urban Growth Areas to destinations such as Green Infrastructure Application: Agricul- county regional parks, particularly for tural best management practices can be used bicycle travel. to address one of Lancaster County’s primary • Parking Lots: Parking lots designed as threats to green infrastructure: the water large expanses of pavement have a num- quality impacts of farming operations. ber of damaging environmental impacts, including decreased groundwater re- Example: The Pennsylvania Department of charge and increased stormwater runoff; Agriculture’s Resource Enhancement and contamination of the stormwater runoff Protection Program (REAP) provides tax by oil and other fluids leaking from credits to farmers who implement agricul- parked vehicles; and heat island effects tural best management practices. Examples caused by the absorption of sunlight by of eligible investments include development pavement. However, parking lots can of a nutrient management plan, erosion be designed to mitigate these impacts and sedimentation control plan, and/or and even function as components of the conservation plan; control of runoff from green infrastructure system by incorpo- animal concentration areas/barnyards; instal- rating features such as vegetated infiltra- lation of stream bank fencing and vegetated tion strips, permeable pavement in low riparian buffers; manure storage systems and traffic areas, subsurface stormwater stor- alternative manure treatment practices; and remediation of legacy sediments.

• III-D Capital Improvements Description: Public construction projects such as parks, streets, and other infrastruc- ture improvements. Such projects are typical- ly incorporated into a capital improvement program, a plan adopted by a municipality that schedules planned capital expenditures over a multi-year period.

Green Infrastructure Application: Compo- Incorporating green infrastructure interventions such as these biofilters at the Warwick Township nents of the green infrastructure system can Municipal Office, into traditional capital be created by capital improvements made by improvement projects can be an effective means municipalities, Lancaster County, and the of improving the quality of storm water runoff.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 103 age, and tree plantings to provide shade rounding neighborhood and (according and prevent the heat island effect. to national standards) are typically five • Parks: Parks are important nodes within to ten acres in size. Community parks the green infrastructure system. Meeting provide recreational opportunities at a citizens’ needs for parks and recreational community-wide rather than a neigh- facilities at the local level is the respon- borhood scale and are typically 20 acres sibility of municipalities and school or more in size. School-parks integrate districts. These needs should be defined recreational and social opportunities in municipal and multi-municipal park on school properties and can fulfill the and recreation plans using the standard functions of neighborhood or commu- of a minimum of 10 acres of parkland nity parks. per 1,000 residents as a guide. Parkland • Stormwater Management Facilities: acquisition and development projects Capital investments in new stormwater should be included in municipal capital management facilities can contribute to improvements programs. Municipalities green infrastructure by incorporating experiencing significant growth can use features such as retention and infiltration parkland dedication ordinances to meet basins, vegetated open spaces, and swales park and recreation needs generated by to absorb runoff. Such features can also new development. In addition, munici- be “retrofitted” into existing stormwater palities can work with school districts to management facilities. Wherever pos- meet needs through citizen recreational sible, stormwater management facilities use of school properties. should be designed to address regional (watershed-wide) rather than individual Types of local parks include “mini” or site needs through non-structural solu- “vest pocket” parks, neighborhood parks, tions that are integrated into the green community parks, and school-parks. infrastructure system (e.g., jointly Typically less than one acre in size, mini owned/managed wetland detention areas or vest pocket parks provide opportuni- that are landscaped with native plants ties for informal recreation, community and provide public open space). gathering, and green space that can be • Trails: Trails are key connections in the particularly beneficial in urban environ- green infrastructure system for pedestri- ments such as Lancaster City and the ans, bicyclists, and paddlers. Figure 29 boroughs. Neighborhood parks provide delineates a proposed countywide trail a recreational and social focus for a sur- system following selected greenway cor- ridors. Segments of this system can be implemented by Lancaster County, mu-

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, nicipalities, and the state. Trail linkages can also be developed at the local level by municipalities, for example along stream or right-of-way corridors in Ur- ban Growth Areas. Trails following river and stream corridors should be designed to maintain a buffer area of natural vegetation (25’ to 50’ recommended as a target) between the trail and the stream bank. Examples: Lancaster County Conservancy’s Fishing Creek • The Warwick Township Riparian Park Nature Preserve is an example of a successful public/private-non profit partnership that includes a wetlands area, warm season preserves important natural resources while grass meadow, in-stream habitat struc- providing passive recreational opportunities such tures, and a walking trail that winds as hiking. through this natural area. The park was

104 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element designed to provide a "living classroom" • III-F Context-Sensitive Solutions for for local school students and Lancaster Roadway Design County residents. Description: Planning and design of trans- • Another initiative worthy of note is portation facilities that addresses environ- Chicago’s “Green Alley” project. The mental, scenic, and historic values along with Green Alley project involves replacing mobility, safety, and economics. old macadam alleys with new perme- able concrete. The permeable concrete Green Infrastructure Application: Trans- allows rain water to penetrate the soil, portation improvements can result in major where microbes clean automobile and negative impacts on natural resources and fertilizer contaminants and return it to ecological functions. A concept that is

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies Lake Michigan through groundwater gaining in acceptance by PennDOT and recharge. The permeable concrete is also other state departments of transportation, lighter in color and absorbs less heat, context-sensitive solutions are designed to thereby reducing the heat island effect adapt conventional engineering approaches on urban air temperatures. to local conditions. They can be used mini- mize the impacts of roadway, bridge, and • III-E Carbon Offsets other transportation construction projects Description: Reduction of carbon emis- on resources such as streams, woodlands, and sions into the atmosphere in one location scenic landscapes. to compensate for emissions in another location caused by a home, office, commute, Example: The Longenecker Road Bridge travel, or other activities that use energy and over Little Chickies Creek in East Donegal generate carbon. Tree plantings (referred to Township, Rapho Township, and Mount as “carbon sequestration”) and investments Joy Borough is a bridge replacement project in renewable energy are examples of carbon designed to be compatible with the historic, offset projects. environmental, and agricultural setting.

Green Infrastructure Application: Carbon • III-G Environmental Restoration offsets could be used as a tool to encourage Description: Restoration of natural resources businesses and citizens to invest in green and functions through actions such as plant- infrastructure projects such as tree plantings ing of native vegetation or removal of sources in urban areas and reforestation of marginal of human disturbance. It is closely related to agricultural lands that have been taken out of the concept of ecological restoration, which production (e.g., in steep slope areas). is defined by the Society for Ecological Restoration as “the process of assisting the Example: The Home Depot, the world's recovery of an ecosystem that has been de- largest home improvement retailer, entered graded, damaged, or destroyed.” Examples of into an agreement with Conservation Fund different types of environmental restoration to offset all carbon emissions created in 2006 include: by the company's Atlanta headquarters and • Dam Removal: Removal of derelict or a portion of emissions created by associates dangerous dams and remediation of dam commuting to work and traveling on busi- sites to restore the natural waterway. ness. Home Depot is funding the planting of • Floodplain Restoration: Removal of ac- thousands of trees on nearly 130 acres across cumulated “legacy sediments” and other metro Atlanta as part of The Conservation actions to restore the natural floodplain Fund's “Go Zero” program. interaction of groundwater, stream base flow, and root systems. • Native Plantings: Planting of native plant species in disturbed areas to restore natural ecosystem functions and provide wildlife habitat. This could include

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 105 propagation and planting of rare plant • III-H Green Buildings/Green Roofs species in backyards and other restora- Description: Environmentally sustainable tion areas, thus increasing biodiversity design of buildings and sites, including ele- throughout Lancaster County. ments such as energy efficient and recycled • Invasive Species Removal: Removal of materials, water conservation, solar energy, non-native plant species that have prolif- porous pavement, and native landscaping. erated in natural areas and displaced the The U.S. Green Building Council’s Leader- originally occurring species. ship in Energy and Environmental Design • Riparian Forest Plantings: Planting of na- (LEED) rating program provides for certifi- tive tree species along rivers and streams cation of buildings that achieve high levels of to restore native habitat and functions environmental performance. such as filtering of sediments and pollut- ants from runoff. Green Infrastructure Application: Green • Streambank Fencing: Fencing on agri- building features such as green roofs, veg- cultural lands to prevent livestock from etated stormwater management features damaging riparian (river and stream) (e.g., swales and bioretention areas), and na- corridors. tive landscaping can function as components • Streambank Stabilization: Techniques of the green infrastructure system in urban such as bioengineering (use of live plant and suburban landscapes. Green building materials) and structural reinforcement technology can be implemented through to stabilize eroding stream banks. both private and public investment (e.g., • Wetland Restoration: Reestablishment corporate office buildings or new municipal of wetland ecosystems that have been facilities). removed or degraded by human activity. Example: The Lancaster County Roof Green Infrastructure Application: Environ- Greening Project is facilitating the instal- mental restoration can be used in a variety lation of approximately 79,000 square feet of contexts throughout Lancaster County to of green roofs on seven buildings in various re-establish or enhance components of the urban areas in the County. green infrastructure system. It can be used on publicly-owned lands, by farmers and • III-I Nutrient Trading landowners to promote green infrastructure Description: Nutrient trading is an approach functions on private lands, and by busi- to maintaining and improving water quality nesses to meet environmental requirements using market mechanisms to reduce nutri- or take advantage of incentive programs. ent and sediment loads in a watershed. The It also lends itself to use by citizen groups Pennsylvania DEP has developed a nutrient

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, and volunteers (e.g., watershed associa- trading program to help meet federal re- tions) with technical assistance and support quirements under the U.S. Clean Water Act by funding agencies. Given the importance and the Chesapeake 2000 Agreement. This placed by citizens and initiatives such as the agreement calls for Pennsylvania and other Chesapeake Bay Program on maintaining states within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and improving the water quality of rivers to reduce nutrient and sediment loading to and streams, riparian restoration projects the Susquehanna River and other bay tribu- should be a high priority. taries, with the goal of removing the nation’s largest estuary from the Clean Water Act’s Example: The Lititz Run Watershed Alli- list of impaired waters by 2010. The nutri- ance has undertaken environmental restora- ent trading program is a voluntary program tion projects throughout the Lititz Run under which parties that reduce the amount watershed. of nitrogen, phosphorus, and/or sediments they generate beyond baseline environmental obligations can sell the resulting credits to other parties. For example, credits can be

106 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element sold from farming operations that reduce contribution to quality of life, “urban green- nutrients generated by manure or chemical ing” increases property values and stimulates fertilizer application below specified thresh- investment in urban areas. A study by the olds to municipal sewage treatment plants to Wharton School of the University of Penn- meet effluent discharge requirements under sylvania found that cleaning and greening Pennsylvania’s Sewage Facilities (Act 537) of vacant lots in Philadelphia can increase Program. adjacent property values by as much as 30%, planting a tree within 50 feet of a house can Green Infrastructure Application: Nutrient increase its value by about 9%, and locating trading can be used to address one of the a house within ¼ mile of a park can increase key green infrastructure issues in Lancaster’s its value by 10%.

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies County: the poor quality of many of the county’s surface waters due to urban and Example: The Pennsylvania Horticultural rural (primarily agricultural) runoff. It is Society’s Philadelphia Green® is the na- a relatively low cost method that leverages tion’s most comprehensive urban greening market forces and private sector investment program. Working in partnership with to accomplish water quality improvement. neighborhood residents, community orga- As an example of a specific application, farms nizations, and city agencies, the program may receive credits for establishing perma- supports the development and ongoing nent vegetated buffers 50’ or more in width maintenance of community gardens, neigh- along stream corridors. borhood parks, and public green spaces as a community building tool. Examples: • Mount Joy Borough is pursuing a • III-K Urban Greening project to reduce nutrient loads through Description: Planting of trees and other implementation of best management vegetation (preferably native species) to practices on farms and other community reinforce the urban tree canopy and “green” projects to offset requirements at the the urban environment in places such as Borough’s wastewater treatment facility. streetscapes, parks and other public spaces, • Pfizer Pharmaceuticals generated pollut- and private spaces such as residential yards. ant reduction credits for transfer to the Borough of Lititz through restoration of Green Infrastructure Application: The a 1,300-foot segment of Santo Domingo urban tree canopy performs vital functions Creek. such as air quality, stormwater management, climate control, carbon sequestration, and • III-J Property Recycling aesthetics. However, urban tree canopies Description: Reuse of vacant, previously across the country are being eroded by de- developed properties to promote urban velopment and environmental stressors such revitalization. Can include Brownfield’s as limited root space, conflicts with overhead (properties with known or suspected hazard- utility wires, and disease. Proper tree plant- ous substances, pollutants, or contaminants), ings and maintenance by municipalities, Greyfields (obsolete commercial properties businesses, and individual landowners with extensive surface parking), and vacant can help to reverse this trend in Lancaster lots in urban neighborhoods. County and integrate a type of green in- frastructure into the urban landscape. Tree Green Infrastructure Application: Property plantings can also be used as an implement- recycling can be used to establish parks, ing mechanism for carbon offset programs. community gardens, and other forms of Shrub and groundcover plantings and green infrastructure in urban environments. community gardens are other ways to infuse Studies have shown that, in addition to its green infrastructure into the urban fabric. Guidance needs to be provided regarding

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 107 appropriate species (including native plants), planting conditions, and resources needed for ongoing maintenance.

Examples: • Philadelphia Green® (see Property Recy- cling above). • PA DCNR’s TreeVitalize Program is a new initiative to help facilitate the plant- ing of trees in urban areas to increase the shade tree canopy cover and to P2/E2 Roundtable PAEP encourage riparian buffer planting along Technical assistance provided by the Lancaster waterways in rural areas to enhance County Planning Commission has helped spur an interest in “green roof” building in the City of water quality. The 50% matching grant Lancaster. program essentially pays for the cost of purchasing trees for planting in both creating the green infrastructure system. Several urban and rural areas. The urban or of the tools involve public communications, for “Metro” component of the program has example: educational programs and materials and a “Tree Tender” training element for a Lancaster County green infrastructure website. citizen volunteers to help care for shade Others – for example, conservation easements, trees after planting. In 2008, Lancaster limited development plans, and wildlife habitat County was chosen as one of three pilot management plans – entail cooperative partner- projects to implement the program. The ships between public or nonprofit organizations County will be working with the City and private landowners. of Lancaster and the county’s eighteen boroughs to increase the shade tree cover Priority Outreach and Partnership Tools in the urban centers, and the Conserva- • IV-A Green Infrastructure Technical tion District to encourage streamside Assistance plantings in the rural landscape. Description: Programs providing technical • The Tree City USA® program provides assistance to individuals and groups involved direction, technical assistance, public in implementing the green infrastructure attention, and national recognition for system. Examples include assistance to mu- urban and community forestry programs nicipalities in developing green infrastruc- in thousands of municipalities across the ture plans and regulations; grant writing country. This program is sponsored by The assistance to groups such as watershed Arbor Day Foundation in cooperation organizations; and assistance to landowners

on green infrastructure issues related to their Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, with the USDA Forest Service and the National Association of State Foresters. properties.

Green Infrastructure Application: Success- 4.2.4 Outreach and Partnership Tools ful implementation of Greenscapes depends on building the capacity of the Lancaster Purpose County community – citizens, landowners, Provide information and technical assistance businesses, volunteer groups, etc. – to sustain to the public and involve landowners and other and create green infrastructure in many citizens in creating the green infrastructure contexts. Technical assistance is designed system. to leverage the resources and improve the capabilities of these various entities to apply The outreach and partnership tools are designed the strategies and tools identified in the plan. to be used to convey the importance of the Different organizations can provide techni- County’s green infrastructure to citizens, busi- cal assistance related to their missions and nesses, and landowners and to engage them in areas of expertise. For example, building on

108 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element its soil and water conservation mission, the Other Outreach and Partnership Tools Lancaster County Conservation District can • IV-C Conservation Easement Donation promote green infrastructure through land Description: Voluntary dedication of the management practices on private lands. The development rights on privately owned lands Lancaster County Conservancy can provide to a public entity or qualified private land assistance to landowners on tools such as conservation organization. While the land- conservation easements to protect green owner maintains ownership of the property, infrastructure resources. The LCPC can the land must remain in open space uses in provide assistance to municipalities in green perpetuity. infrastructure planning and regulatory ap- proaches to establishing green infrastructure. Green Infrastructure Application: While

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies acquisition of land and development rights is Example: Lancaster County Conservation identified in Section 4.2.3 above as the prior- District’s agricultural best management ity capital investment tool for implementa- practices and watershed technical assistance tion of the green infrastructure system, it can programs. realistically meet only a portion of the need for protection. Conservation easements can • IV-B Environmental Advisory Council be used to preserve valuable green infrastruc- Description: An appointed group of three to ture resources without incurring the costs seven citizens that advises the local planning of acquisition of land or development rights commission, park and recreation board and while providing tax benefits for landowners. elected officials on the protection, conserva- They are particularly appropriate to maintain tion, management, promotion and use of green infrastructure in areas where public natural resources within the jurisdiction. access is not a priority (although they can al- Municipalities and groups of municipalities low for such access with the agreement of the are authorized to establish Environmental property owner). While conservation ease- Advisory Council (EACs) by Act 177 of ments can be held by public entities, they are 1996 (originally Act 148 of 1973). more typically implemented through legal agreements between landowners and private Green Infrastructure Application: EACs land conservation trusts. can play the primary role in promoting the concept of an integrated green infrastructure Example: The Lancaster County Conser- system at the municipal and multi-municipal vancy accepts donations of conservation levels. EAC members could receive training easements on high quality wildlife habitat. from the LCPC on green infrastructure and the Green Infrastructure Element of the • IV-D Cooperative Weed Management Area County’s Comprehensive Plan. Description: A partnership of organizations, interested groups, and landowners to manage Example: There are over 100 EACs in noxious weeds or invasive plants in a defined Pennsylvania. Greenscapes proposes that area characterized by a common geography, new EACs be established throughout the weed problem, community, climate, political County to lead implementation of the plan boundary, and/or land use pattern. at the local level and to serve as a conduit of green infrastructure information and Green Infrastructure Application: Coopera- resources from the County. The Pennsylvania tive Weed Management Areas (CWMAs) can Environmental Council has published The be used to mobilize resources to reduce the EAC Handbook: A Guide for Pennsylvania’s threats posed by non-native invasive plant Environmental Advisory Councils (http:// species on the integrity of native ecosystems. eacnetwork.org/pdf/EACHB.pdf). Headed by a steering committee representing landowners and natural resource managers in the area, CWMAs typically operate under a comprehensive plan addressing the manage-

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 109 ment or prevention of one or more noxious and conserve working forests. The Forest weeds or invasive plants. CWMAs have been Legacy Program is administered in Pennsyl- most common in the western United States but vania by the Department of Conservation are forming in the Midwest and East as well. and Natural Resources (DCNR) – Bureau of Forestry. Example: The Long Island Weed Manage- ment Area is a group of 18 public and Green Infrastructure Application: The private partners formed to reduce invasive Forest Legacy program can be used to work species threats on public and other conserva- with landowners to promote conservation of tion lands across Long Island. forests in Lancaster County through the use of mechanisms such as conservation ease- • IV-E Educational Programs ments and sustainable forestry practices. Its Description: Programs and supporting mate- goals include maintaining traditional forestry rials used to teach the public about green uses following best management practices; infrastructure concepts and tools. Examples maintaining the productivity of forests for include classes and workshops, a speakers future generations; conserving significant bureau, demonstration projects, brochures, tracts of contiguous forest and reducing for- information papers, and videos. est parcelization; conserving water resources and important habitats for plants, fish, and Green Infrastructure Application: Educa- wildlife; and restoring degraded forest eco- tional programs and materials can be tailored systems. to address specific green infrastructure topics and to reach particular audiences, for The Forest Legacy Program could be tailored example: for use in Lancaster County through initia- • Students (model curricula, “living class- tion of Forest Security Areas, a proposed new rooms,” etc.) concept that would be modeled after Penn- • Homeowners (backyard habitat, tree sylvania’s Agricultural Security Areas (ASA) planting and maintenance in urban program. The ASA program is designed to areas, fertilizer management, etc.) promote more permanent and viable farming • Farmers (streambank stabilization/live- operations over the long term by strengthen- stock fencing, wildlife habitat manage- ing the farming community’s “sense of secu- ment, etc.) rity” in land use and the right to farm. Ag- • Developers (information on LEED/ ricultural security areas are created by local green building, etc.) municipalities in cooperation with individual •

This tool supports and overlaps with the Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, priority Education and Outreach tool, Green Infrastructure Technical Assistance (see above). In addition, educational programs could be featured and educational materials provided electronically on a green infrastruc- ture website (see below).

Example: Lancaster County Conservation District’s Conservation Education Program.

• IV-F Forest Legacy Program Description: A U.S. Department of Agri- The Federal Forest Legacy program is a tool that culture program that provides support and can be used to preserve large tracts of woodland technical assistance to landowners to protect like those along the Susquehanna River, through the purchase of conservation easements from private landowners.

110 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element landowners who agree to collectively place at Example: The Conservation Fund maintains least 250 acres in the ASA. Participation in a national website devoted to green infra- an ASA is a prerequisite for participation in structure (www.greeninfrastructure.net). Lancaster County’s Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) program for agricultural lands. • IV-I Limited Development Forest Security Areas would be a voluntary Description: A plan that provides for low- program operating in a similar fashion to the impact development in suitable portions of ASA program by encouraging landowners to the property to meet the financial objectives adopt sustainable, long-term management of the landowner while permanently protect- practices for forestlands. They could be tied ing areas with valuable natural resources to a PDR program similar to the County’s through a conservation easement.

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies current program for agricultural lands. Green Infrastructure Application: Similar Example: Adams County is an approved to conservation easements, limited develop- Forest Legacy Area under the DCNR ment plans can be used to preserve valuable program. The Lancaster County Conser- natural resources without incurring the costs vancy is a designated Forest Legacy sponsor of acquisition of land or development rights. in Lancaster County. There are no existing This approach is particularly well suited examples of Forest Security Areas. for application by private land conserva- tion trusts with expertise in land planning, • IV-G Green Infrastructure Award Program resource conservation, and estate planning. Description: A program recognizing out- standing examples of green infrastructure in Example: Brandywine Conservancy’s Envi- Lancaster County. ronmental Management Center in Chester County assists landowners in conservation Green Infrastructure Application: The planning, including limited development plans. LCPC currently sponsors an annual Smart Growth Leadership Awards program, which • IV-J Wildlife Habitat Management Plan recognizes planning activities and projects Description: A plan to improve wildlife that foster smart growth. A Green Infrastruc- habitat on a privately owned property. The ture Award could be instituted as an adjunct plan typically addresses existing habitat con- to or special category under the Leadership ditions, landowner objectives, and recom- Awards Program. It would increase public mended management actions and practices awareness of the value of green infrastructure to improve conditions for the desired types and its relationship to smart growth. of wildlife.

Example: Lancaster County Smart Growth Leadership Awards Program.

• IV-H Green Infrastructure Website Description: A website dedicated to Lan- caster County’s green infrastructure.

Green Infrastructure Application: A green infrastructure website could be hosted on the Lancaster County website with links to the websites of other public and private agencies involved in green infrastructure. It would include information on green infrastruc- Limited development is a planning tool that can be used to preserve important natural lands ture, the Green Infrastructure Element of by clustering all the housing units of a building the County Comprehensive Plan, and how site in one area of the tract and preserving the citizens can participate. remaining portion.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 111 Green Infrastructure Application: Wildlife Priorities include restoring declining or habitat management plans can reinforce the important native wildlife habitats; pro- value of green infrastructure and enhance tecting, restoring, developing or enhanc- green infrastructure functions on privately ing wildlife habitat of at-risk species; and owned lands. They can be used in a variety reducing invasive species impacts. of contexts, including farms, forests and • Established in 2004, the Pennsylvania other natural resource lands, and urban/ Game Commission’s Private Landowner suburban backyards, as well as to maintain Assistance Program has helped numer- or restore habitat for threatened and endan- ous landowners develop habitat manage- gered species. ment plans through technical assistance provided by program biologists. This Examples: Various programs provide as- program focuses on maintaining habitat sistance to develop and implement wildlife for bird or mammal species of concern habitat management plans, including: through recommendations to create, pre- • The federal Natural Resources Conserva- serve, and enhance wildlife habitat. tion Services’ Wildlife Habitat Incentives • The National Wildlife Federation offers Program provides technical and cost- a Certified Wildlife Habitat program for share assistance to improve fish and wild- landowners. life habitat, primarily on private lands.

Table 4-1. Green Infrastructure Tools Tool Description Applicable Applicable Growth Goal(s) Management Strategy Policy and Planning I-A Green Municipal and multi-municipal plans that Preservation Urban Growth Area Infrastructure define green infrastructure resources and Conservation Rural Planning strategies for establishing an integrated Restoration (Priority) infrastructure system at the local level. Recreation I-B Bicycle and A plan that defines a network to Recreation Urban Growth Area Pedestrian Plan accommodate bicycle and/or pedestrian Rural travel within a community. I-C Comprehensive An adopted municipal or multi-municipal Preservation Urban Growth Area Plan document designed for use in decision- Conservation Rural making by officials and citizens to Restoration

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, guide future growth, development, and Recreation preservation over a long-range (20-30 year) time horizon. I-D Greenway/Open A plan that identifies strategies for the Preservation Urban Growth Area Space Plan preservation and development of a Conservation Rural greenway corridor or larger open space Restoration system in the context of the land use and Recreation development pattern of a municipality or a region. I-E Heritage Byways A new program initiated by LCPC to Preservation Rural designate county roads with special Conservation archaeological, cultural, historic, natural, recreational, and/or scenic significance as “Lancaster County Heritage Byways.”

112 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Tool Description Applicable Applicable Growth Goal(s) Management Strategy I-F Landscape A plan for a large-scale landscape that Preservation Urban Growth Area Conservation is defined by natural elements such as a Conservation Rural Plan common landform or a river valley. Restoration I-G Official Map An official document adopted by a Preservation Urban Growth Area municipality that maps existing and Conservation Rural proposed streets, pedestrian easements, Recreation open space, and other public lands or easements and reserves the land for future

public purpose. Goals, Objectives, and Strategies I-H Park and A plan that identifies strategies to meet the Recreation Urban Growth Area Recreation Plan needs of current and future residents of a municipality or group of municipalities for parks and recreation facilities. I-I Transportation A plan defining capital improvements Preservation Urban Growth Area Plan and other actions to be taken to develop a Conservation Rural transportation system at the countywide, Recreation multi-municipal, or municipal levels. I-J Water Resources A plan to ensure a sufficient, sustainable, Conservation Urban Growth Area Plan and safe water supply. Rural I-K Watershed Plan A plan intended to provide a framework Conservation Urban Growth Area for action to both restore water quality Restoration Rural in impaired waters and to protect water quality in other waters threatened by point source and non-point source pollution. II-A Green A zoning district that designates green Preservation Urban Growth Area Infrastructure infrastructure resources within a Conservation Rural Overlay District municipality and identifies performance (Priority) standards to conserve them. II-B Conservation A zoning district with large minimum Conservation Rural Zoning lot sizes designed to preserve sensitive environmental features such as wooded hillsides. II-C Conservation A residential development designed to Conservation Rural Subdivision preserve open space and valuable natural Design resource areas by concentrating homes on Ordinance a portion of the property and maintaining the remainder as open space in perpetuity. II-D Green Standards for the use of green Conservation Urban Growth Area Infrastructure infrastructure elements in the built Restoration Design environment (e.g., the U.S. Green Standards Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating system for developing high-performance, sustainable buildings). II-E Landscape An ordinance establishing requirements Conservation Urban Growth Area Ordinance for the planting of trees, shrubs, and Restoration other vegetation in new developments. Landscape ordinances can also address preservation of existing trees and vegetation.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 113 Tool Description Applicable Applicable Growth Goal(s) Management Strategy II-F Natural An “overlay” ordinance that defines Conservation Urban Growth Area Resource standards beyond existing zoning Rural Protection requirements to protect a specific natural Ordinances resource type (e.g., floodplains, wildlife habitat, riparian corridors, steep slopes, trees, and wetlands). II-G Parkland An ordinance requiring developers to meet Recreation Urban Growth Area Dedication the recreational needs generated by new Ordinance developments, either through dedication of parkland within the development or by contributing to a fund dedicated for park and recreational facility development. II-H Scenic Corridor An ordinance that protects views of Conservation Rural Overlay District landscapes identified as having special scenic value through application of design standards, setbacks, buffers, etc. Typically applied to roadway corridors. II-I Site Design Standards governing the design and layout Conservation Urban Growth Area Standards of streets, parking areas, lots, and other Restoration elements of new developments. II-J Stormwater An ordinance designed to minimize the Conservation Urban Growth Area Management impacts of new developments on water Ordinance quantity (flooding) and quality through the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs. II-K Subdivision An ordinance that establishes requirements Conservation Urban Growth Area Ordinance for the design and layout of lots, buildings, streets, and infrastructure within a new development. Can be used to achieve green infrastructure objectives such as dedication of natural resource areas as open space. II-L Transfer of An ordinance that allows owners Preservation Rural Development of property zoned for low-density Conservation Rights development, agriculture, or conservation (sending areas) to sell development rights Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, to owners of properties in designated receiving areas (e.g., Designated Growth Areas). II-M Wellhead An ordinance that imposes restrictions Conservation Rural Protection on land uses and activities to protect the Ordinance groundwater recharge area immediately surrounding a public drinking water supply well. Capital Investment III-A Land Fee simple purchase of land by a public Preservation Urban Growth Area Acquisition entity or private land conservation trust Conservation Rural (Priority) for the purpose of securing its permanent Recreation protection.

114 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Tool Description Applicable Applicable Growth Goal(s) Management Strategy III-B Purchase of Acquisition of the right to develop the Preservation Rural Development land, thus maintaining private ownership Conservation Rights (Priority) while requiring the landowner and his/her successors to keep the property in open space uses in perpetuity. III-C Agricultural Best Operational investments by farmers to Conservation Rural Management reduce impacts on natural resources, such Restoration Practices as establishment of riparian buffers and

measures to control runoff from animal Goals, Objectives, and Strategies concentration areas. III-D Capital Public construction projects such as Restoration Urban Growth Area Improvements parks, streets, and other infrastructure Recreation Rural improvements that are incorporated into a municipal capital improvement program. III-E Carbon Offsets Reduction of carbon emissions into the Restoration Urban Growth Area atmosphere (e.g., through tree planting Rural or renewable energy investments) to compensate for emissions caused by a home, office, commute, travel, or other activities that use energy and generate carbon. III-F Context- Planning and design of transportation Preservation Urban Growth Area Sensitive facilities that addresses environmental, Conservation Rural Solutions for scenic, and historic values along with Roadway Design mobility, safety, and economics. III-G Environmental Restoration of natural resources and Restoration Urban Growth Area Restoration functions through actions such as planting Rural of native vegetation or removal of sources of human disturbance. Examples include dam removal, floodplain restoration, habitat plantings, invasive species removal, riparian forest plantings, streambank fencing, streambank stabilization, and wetland restoration. III-H Green Building/ Environmentally sustainable design of Restoration Urban Growth Area Green Roofs buildings and sites, including elements such as energy efficient and recycled materials, water conservation, solar energy, porous pavement, and native landscaping. III-I Nutrient Trading An approach to maintaining and Restoration Rural improving water quality using market mechanisms to reduce nutrient and sediment loads in a watershed.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 115 Tool Description Applicable Applicable Growth Goal(s) Management Strategy III-J Property Reuse of vacant, previously developed Restoration Urban Growth Area Recycling properties to promote urban revitalization. Can include brownfields (properties with known or suspected hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants), greyfields (obsolete commercial properties with extensive surface parking), and vacant lots in urban neighborhoods. III-K Urban Greening Planting of trees and other vegetation Restoration Urban Growth Area (preferably native species) to reinforce the urban tree canopy and “green” the urban environment in places such as streetscapes, alleys, parks and other public spaces, and private spaces such as residential yards. Outreach and Partnership IV-A Green Programs providing technical assistance Preservation Urban Growth Area Infrastructure to individuals and groups involved in Conservation Rural Technical implementing the green infrastructure Restoration Assistance system. Examples include assistance Recreation (Priority) to municipalities in developing green infrastructure plans and regulations; grant writing assistance to groups such as watershed organizations; and assistance to private landowners. IV-B Environmental An appointed citizens group of three Preservation Urban Growth Area Advisory to seven citizens that advises municipal Conservation Rural Council officials on the protection, conservation, Restoration (Priority) management, promotion and use of natural resources within the jurisdiction; can be established at the municipal or multi-municipal level. IV-C Conservation Voluntary dedication of the development Preservation Rural Easement rights on privately owned lands to a Conservation Donation public entity or qualified private land conservation organization. While the

Goals, Objectives, and Strategies and Objectives, Goals, landowner maintains ownership of the property, the land must remain in open space uses in perpetuity. IV-D Cooperative A partnership of organizations, interested Restoration Urban Growth Area Weed groups, and landowners to manage Rural Management noxious weeds or invasive plants in a Area defined area characterized by a common geography, weed problem, community, climate, political boundary, and/or land use pattern.

116 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Tool Description Applicable Applicable Growth Goal(s) Management Strategy IV-E Educational Programs and supporting materials used to Programs teach the public about green infrastructure concepts and tools. Examples include classes and workshops, a speakers bureau, demonstration projects, brochures, information papers, and videos. IV-F Forest Legacy A U.S. Department of Agriculture Conservation Rural Program program, administered in Pennsylvania

by the DCNR Bureau of Forestry, that Goals, Objectives, and Strategies provides support and technical assistance to landowners to protect and conserve working forests. IV-G Green A proposed program recognizing Preservation Urban Growth Area Infrastructure outstanding examples of green Conservation Rural Award Program infrastructure in Lancaster County. Restoration Recreation IV-H Green A website dedicated to Lancaster County’s Preservation Urban Growth Area Infrastructure green infrastructure. Conservation Rural Website Restoration Recreation IV-I Limited A plan that provides for low-impact Preservation Rural Development development in suitable portions of the Conservation property to meet the financial objectives of the landowner while permanently protecting areas with valuable natural resources through a conservation easement. IV-J Wildlife Habitat A plan to improve wildlife habitat on a Conservation Urban Growth Area Management privately owned property. Restoration Rural Plan

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 117

Action Plan

Lancaster County’s green infrastructure – its efforts to protect and restore riparian buffers, a essential natural life support system – has been key priority of Greenscapes that is not otherwise extensively impacted by human activities for directly addressed by the initiatives. over two centuries. These impacts are particularly evident in the small remaining amount of intact • Roles and Responsibilities: Section 5.2 de- forestlands and other natural communities; the fines the roles and responsibilities of public poor water quality of many rivers and streams; and private sector partners in implementing and the lack of “green” elements in much of the the plan. County’s urban environment. Without prompt action to reverse this situation, the condition • Monitoring: Section 5.3 outlines a process of Lancaster County’s green infrastructure will for monitoring progress in implementing worsen as development pressures continue and the plan, including indicators or measures global environmental trends such as climate of success that build on the Lancaster Com- change intensify. Chapter 4.0 describes strategies munity Indicators Project. and tools that can be used to protect and enhance green infrastructure resources, functions, and values. Some of the tools are currently applied 5.1 Action Plan to a greater or lesser extent in Lancaster County, while others are new concepts for the County. As noted, the Action Plan consists of five key ini-

Action Plan This chapter lays out an action framework for use tiatives and “catalytic” actions for each initiative. of the tools by Lancaster County and partners in Designed to mobilize and focus the energy and the public and private sectors to achieve the four resources of the County and its partners towards goals of preserving, conserving, and restoring implementation, the actions are categorized ac- green infrastructure and providing for the recre- cording to timeframe: ational needs of county residents. The framework includes three major sections: • The short-term timeframe is within one year of plan adoption. • Action Plan: Section 5.1 identifies five key • The mid-term timeframe is within two initiatives with supporting priority actions to four years of plan adoption. to implement Greenscapes. The five initia- • The long-term timeframe is more than tives are: four years from plan adoption. -- Education and Communications • Ongoing actions are to be carried out as -- Technical Assistance continuing programs. -- Funding -- Capital Planning and Development Four of the initiatives – communications, techni- -- Partnership cal assistance, funding, and capital development – are proposed to be led by Lancaster County The actions initiatives are designed to act as with the support of partners. The fifth initiative “catalysts” for future action across the Lan- is designed to leverage the County’s efforts and caster County community to create the green broaden participation in implementing the green infrastructure system. In addition to Lancaster infrastructure system through establishment of County, the Lancaster County Green Infrastruc- a coordinating network of existing agencies and ture Coalition, a proposed network of existing organizations, referred to as the Green Infra- agencies, organizations, and groups involved in structure Coalition. The proposed actions for green infrastructure issues, is expected to play a each initiative are summarized in Table 5-1 and key role in leading and coordinating implemen- described in the following text. Existing entities tation of the initiatives and associated actions. that will play a leading role in implementation Action 5-2 below establishes an overall action are identified for each action. As noted, the agenda for the Coalition tied to the initiatives. proposed Lancaster County Green Infrastructure This agenda includes developing a more detailed Coalition is expected to coordinate and leverage action plan to coordinate and expand existing the work of these entities through partnerships.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 121 Table 5-1. Action Table Action Timeframe Responsible Party Initiative 1: Education and Communication 1-1. Greenscapes Outreach / Short-term (plan roll-out) Lancaster County and Education Ongoing (communications partners campaign) 1-2. Green Infrastructure Short-term (website Lancaster County Website development) Long-term (website maintenance) 1-3. Green Infrastructure Ongoing (awards / events Lancaster County Events programs) Initiative 2: Technical Assistance 2-1. Green Infrastructure Short-term (development of Lancaster County (program Municipal Planning program parameters) development) Program Ongoing (development of full Municipalities program) (implementation) 2-2. Model Green Short-term (model development) Lancaster County (model Infrastructure Overlay development) District Municipalities (implementation) Initiative 3: Funding 3-1. County Green Ongoing Lancaster County Infrastructure Funding Program 3-2. Coordination of Other Ongoing Lancaster County and

Action Plan Action Funding Programs partners Initiative 4: Capital Planning and Development 4-1. Completion of County Mid to Long-Term Lancaster County Regional Park System 4-2. County Greenway Trail Mid to Long-Term Lancaster County and System Development partners 4-3. Green Infrastructure Mid-term (standards Lancaster County Design Standards development) Ongoing (standards application) Initiative 5: Partnership 5-1. Green Infrastructure Short-term Lancaster County Summit Conservancy / Lancaster County 5-2. Lancaster County Green Short-term (establishment of Lancaster County Infrastructure Coalition coalition) / Ongoing Conservancy and partners 5-3. Lancaster County Mid-term Lancaster County Environmental Advisory Conservancy / Lancaster Council County Green Infrastructure Coalition 5-4. Friends of Lancaster Mid-term Lancaster County working County Regional Parks with citizens

122 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 5.1.1 Initiative 1: Education and citizens can participate. The website should Communications be updated periodically to provide news on green infrastructure and progress made in Green infrastructure is a relatively new concept implementing the plan. that is not widely known by the general public. Therefore, an immediate focus of the County’s Timeframe: Short-term (website develop- implementation efforts should be to educate and ment) / Ongoing (website maintenance) communicate the importance of green infrastruc- ture and Greenscapes to the public, municipali- • Action 1-3: Green Infrastructure Events ties, and others who will play vital roles in its Description: The LCPC currently sponsors implementation. a Speakers Bureau, conferences, and annual Smart Growth Leadership Awards through • Action 1-1: Green Infrastructure Plan its Envision Lancaster County program. Outreach/Education Green infrastructure should be integrated Description: Beginning with “plan roll-out” into this program on an ongoing basis. and adoption of Greenscapes, the LCPC Green infrastructure events could include should initiate a campaign to publicize the invited speakers and an awards program rec- new Comprehensive Plan element through ognizing outstanding achievements in green the media and meetings with municipalities infrastructure in Lancaster County.

Action Plan and groups throughout Lancaster County. This campaign should clearly communicate Timeframe: Ongoing (awards/events in simple, non-technical terms what green programs) infrastructure is, why it is vitally important to the health and well-being of Lancastri- ans and what can be done to establish a 5.1.2 Initiative 2: Technical Assistance healthy green infrastructure system in rural and urban areas. It should provide concrete Technical assistance is the priority education and examples of actions that communities and outreach tool identified in Section 4.2.4 of the citizens can take – for example, “greening” plan. The LCPC should focus its efforts in this streets, yards, and school grounds in urban area on educating municipalities regarding green areas; restoring vegetation along streams in infrastructure issues and helping them to develop agricultural areas; and protecting Lancaster plans and regulations that promote green infra- County’s remaining natural heritage in rural structure. The proposed Green Infrastructure areas. The ongoing effort should be designed Coalition (Action Initiative 5) will define other to provide information to and educate technical assistance programs to be carried out by citizens regarding green infrastructure issues a variety of public and nonprofit partners. This using a variety of media (see also Actions 1-2 may include an additional role(s) for Lancaster and 1-3 below). County.

Timeframe: Short-term (plan roll-out) / • Action 2-1: Green Infrastructure Munici- Ongoing (communications campaign) pal Planning Program Description: Municipal and multi-munici- • Action 1-2: Green Infrastructure Website pal green infrastructure plans are identified Description: To support the plan outreach as the priority policy and planning tool for effort (Action 1-1) and provide information plan implementation in Section 4.2.1. To and updates on green infrastructure on an promote use of this tool, the LCPC should ongoing basis, the LCPC should develop develop guidance for the contents of local and maintain a green infrastructure section green infrastructure plans and the process to of its existing website. This website should be used to prepare them. These plans should include information on green infrastructure focus strategically on 1) existing green infra- (including links to other green infrastructure structure resources and the degree to which internet resources), Greenscapes, and how they are currently protected and 2) key im-

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 123 plementation actions such as new regulations the multi-municipal and municipal levels. and capital projects. A municipality or group Similar to the relationship of Balance – of municipalities should be sought to pre- the Growth Management Element of the pare the first green infrastructure plan with Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan technical assistance and funding provided by – to the County’s growth management the County. Over time this program could program, multi-municipal plans are seen be integrated with the LCPC’s technical as- as the primary vehicle for developing green sistance program for regional comprehensive infrastructure policies, strategies, and actions plans. Municipalities should be encouraged that are tailored to the conditions of differ- to establish Environmental Advisory Coun- ent geographic sub-areas within the County cils to build capacity for green infrastructure (Action 2-1). Beyond multi-municipal plans, plan development and implementation. however, there is a need to develop landscape In addition to developing a green infrastruc- conservation plans for large-scale regions de- ture planning program, the LCPC should fined by natural features such as a common work with municipalities to integrate green landform or river valley (see Chapter 4, Tool infrastructure elements and concepts into I-F). Such regions transcend jurisdictional traditional comprehensive and parks, open boundaries such as municipalities, multi-mu- space, and recreation plans. nicipal planning areas, counties, and (in the case of the Susquehanna River Corridor and Timeframe: Short-term (development of Highlands Region) even states. The LCPC program parameters, selection of initial proj- has selected the Susquehanna River Corridor ect) / Ongoing (development of full program in Lancaster and York Counties for develop- and integration with regional comprehensive ment of a landscape conservation plan that planning program) can serve as a model for development of other large-scale regional conservation plans. • Action 2-2: Model Green Infrastructure Overlay District Timeframe: Short-term (Susquehanna River Description: Similar to municipal and Corridor Master Plan) / Mid to Long-Term

multi-municipal green infrastructure plans, (other regional landscape conservation plans) Action Plan Action Section 4.2.2 identifies green infrastructure overlay districts as the priority regulatory tool for plan implementation. To promote 5.1.3 Initiative 3: Funding use of this tool, the LCPC should develop a model district and guidance for municipali- Funding is a key to building capacity for suc- ties to adapt it to local resource conditions. cessful plan implementation. Lancaster County The district language should address the has limited fiscal resources compared to the level range of natural resources that occur in of need for financial assistance to municipalities Lancaster County, such as stream corridors and others to carry out the policies and recom- (with buffer requirements), floodplain, steep mendations of its Comprehensive Plan elements. slopes, woodlands, and habitat for species Nevertheless, given the critical importance of of concern. The overlay district should be green infrastructure to the County’s future, designed for use as an implementing action the County should reevaluate and restructure for municipal and multi-municipal green its existing funding programs to address green infrastructure plans. infrastructure as a key objective. The County can also use Greenscapes to leverage funding from Timeframe: Short-term other sources (e.g., state and federal programs) for green infrastructure projects. In addition, • Action 2-3: Regional Landscape Conserva- the Green Infrastructure Coalition (Action Initia- tion Plans tive 5) can help to define a broad-based funding Description: Greenscapes is intended strategy that draws on the resources of public and as a framework for application of green private sector partners. infrastructure concepts in more detail at

124 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element wetlands, waterways, and rare species habitats in the County. • Purchase of Development Rights Program: Provides funding for conservation ease- ments on agricultural lands through purchase of development rights from farmers. • Municipal Transportation Grants Pro- gram: Provides funding to municipalities to implement transportation related Lancaster County Conservancy tools, such as official maps, access man- Grant funding from the State and County was agement plans, corridor planning and used by to the Lancaster County Conservancy to design standards, and pedestrian and purchase land in Martic Township to create the Steinman Run Nature Preserve. bicycle paths. • Urban Enhancement Fund: Provides Because Greenscapes is an element of the funding to urban municipalities to Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan, this implement economic, community, and initiative focuses on the commitment of fund- neighborhood development projects. ing by the County with the assistance of state • Targeted Brownfield Assessment Program:

Action Plan and federal funding sources. However, it should Provides assistance with conducting en- be noted that great potential exists to leverage vironmental assessments of brownfields- financial resources from a variety of public, non- Brownfield’s and developing clean-up profit, and for-profit sources to create the green plans (if needed). infrastructure system. For example, private busi- • Green Infrastructure Fund: A new nesses can be engaged in funding environmental proposed program that would fund conservation and restoration activities through parkland acquisition as well as green market-based approaches and incentives (e.g., infrastructure enhancement projects. conserving and enhancing water-based resources to meet federal and state program require- While the proposed Green Infrastructure ments). Municipalities can also commit funding Fund is specifically targeted towards green to address local green infrastructure priorities; infrastructure projects, all of these programs numerous Pennsylvania communities in counties can be used to fund projects or acquisitions such as Bucks, Chester, and Northampton have that support green infrastructure. The Coun- approved bond referenda to acquire open space. ty should examine each program to ensure Other public and nonprofit funding sources can that green infrastructure is included as a key also be exploredare available, such as foundation evaluation criterion. A priority could be to grants and Earned Income Taxes.1 fund model projects that demonstrate green infrastructure solutions (e.g., a model “green • Action 3-1: County Green Infrastructure street” through the Municipal Transportation Funding Program Grants Program) and generate momentum Description: The County has several fund- for further actions. Funding should be bal- ing programs to assist in implementation anced to address green infrastructure in both of Comprehensive Plan policies and recom- urban and rural areas. mendations. These programs include: • Natural Lands Preservation Fund: Timeframe: Ongoing Provides funding for preservation of high priority, unprotected woodlands, • Action 3-2: Coordination of Other Fund- ing Programs Description: A number of federal and state 1 Earned Income Taxes (typically 0.25% of earned income) have been used by a number of Pennsylvania mu- programs can be used to fund actions to nicipalities, including adjacent Honey Brook Township in implement the green infrastructure system. Chester County, to fund open space acquisition. The LCPC should act as a clearinghouse

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 125 of information on these programs and as a catalyst for their application to projects in Lancaster County. Examples of these pro- grams include: Federal Programs: • Chesapeake Bay Small Watershed Grants Program (administered by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation in partner- ship with the Chesapeake Bay Program; primarily funded by the Environmental Protection Agency’s Chesapeake Bay Program office) • Clean Water Act Section 319 Nonpoint Source Management Program • Clean Water State Revolving Fund • Groundwork USA (pilot program of the National Park Service Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program in cooperation with the Environmental Protecton Agency Brownfields Program) • Highlands Conservation Act of 2004 (authorizes $100 million over 10 years Funding from the State’s new “TreeVitalize” to be spent on land conservation part- program can help urban areas like Denver nership projects in the four Highlands Borough plant more shade trees along public States of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New rights-of-way. York, and Connecticut) • National Resources Conservation Servic- • Department of Transportation es Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (PENNDOT) Transportation Enhance-

• USDA Conservation Reserve Program ment Grants Action Plan Action (CRP) and Conservation Reserve En- hancement Program (CREP) It should be noted that in addition to govern- Pennsylvania Programs: mental funding programs, significant important • Department of Agricultural Resource financial contributions can be made by the Enhancement and Protection Program private sector sources (businesses, nonprofit (REAP – provides tax credits to farm- organizations and foundations, citizens, etc.) to ers who implement best management creatinge the green infrastructure system. These practices) sources can significantly augment and leverage • Department of Conservation and Natu- federal, state, and local governmental funding ral Resources (DCNR) Community programs. An annual “green infrastructure Conservation Partnership Program funding workshop” should be considered to dis- -- Community Grants seminate information to local municipalities and -- River Conservation Grants organizations on funding sources available for -- Pennsylvania Rails to Trails Grants green infrastructure initiatives and projects. State -- Rails-to-Trails Grants agencies such as the Departments of Conserva- -- Land Trusts Grants tion and Natural Resources (DCNR) and Envi- -- Heritage Parks Grants ronmental Protection (DEP) should participate • Department of Environmental Protec- in the workshop. tion (DEP) Growing Greener Watershed Grants Timeframe: Ongoing • DEP Stormwater Management Planning and Implementation Grants

126 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 5.1.4 Initiative 4: Capital Planning and Achieving these two targets would add a to- Development tal of 776 acres to the County’s regional park system, meeting the 5 acres/1,000 residents This initiative addresses priorities for capital in- standard for the projected 2020 population. vestment by Lancaster County to implement the The County should evaluate the feasibility of green infrastructure system. Regional parks and acquiring specific properties in the vicinity of greenways are key components of the system and the two parks based on current land use and public input in the planning process identified ownership patterns. The Green Infrastructure trail connections as a top priority for implemen- Concept Map (Figure 29) can be used to tation. Therefore, the County should focus green help prioritize lands for acquisition based on infrastructure capital planning and development natural resource value. Additional land could on completion of the regional park system and be targeted in the vicinity of Speedwell Forge creation of a countywide greenway trail system. Park if sufficient land is not available in the In addition, it should develop standards for in- vicinity of the two other parks (and also to tegrating green infrastructure into county capital help meet the standard for the projected projects, as well for managing existing facilities 2030 population). County regional parkland and properties. can be supplemented by preservation actions taken by other entities (e.g., the Lancaster • Action 4-1: County Regional Park System County Conservancy’s planned acquisition

Action Plan Description: This Green Infrastructure of watershed lands on Welsh Mountain from Plan reaffirms the standard of 5 acres of New Holland Borough). county regional parkland per 1,000 residents originally established in the 1992 Regional In addition to completing the regional park Open Space Plan (see Section 2.4). Based on system, the County needs to prepare man- the 2006 U.S. Census estimate of 494,486 agement plans designed to integrate green county residents, this standard amounts to infrastructure into the system. These plans approximately 2,472 acres, 498 acres more should define how the preservation, con- than the present county park system acreage servation, restoration, and recreation goals of 1,974 acres. The additional acreage needed and objectives established in Chapter 4.0 will increase to 771 acres and 953 acres, re- are to be applied to each park. This process spectively, if the 5 acres/1,000 residents stan- has begun with the preparation of master dard is to be met for the County’s projected plans for Buchmiller and Central Parks in population of 548,979 in 2020 and 585,487 Lancaster City, but needs to be expanded to in 2030. Acquisition efforts should focus on address regional parks in rural parts of the expanding existing regional parks as initially County with larger concentrations of natural proposed in the 1992 Regional Open Space resources. The plans should also explore Plan rather than establishing new regional how the regional parks can be connected to parks. Priorities include: a countywide greenway trail system (Action • Money Rocks Park: Set a target of ac- 4-2). As a long-term goal, leases on farmland quiring an additional 481 acres to bring within the parks should be terminated and the total size of the park to 878 acres, the land restored as green infrastructure. consistent with the combined acreage proposed by the 1992 Plan for Money Timeframe: Mid to Long-Term Rocks and Bowmansville Hills Park (the latter of which was never implemented). • Action 4-2: County Greenway Trail System • Theodore A. Parker III Natural Area: Description: Figure 29 illustrates a county- Set a target of acquiring an additional wide system of existing and proposed 275 acres to bring the total acreage of trails. This system is designed to connect county parkland to 412 acres as proposed the County’s population centers, green in the 1992 Plan for Stewart Run and the infrastructure hubs, and major regional land- Upper West Branch of Octoraro Creek. scapes (the Highlands and the Susquehanna River Corridor). The proposed trail segments

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 127 Table 5-2. Proposed Trails Proposed Trail Location 1. Conestoga Trail Extension Along Susquehanna River from Norman Wood Bridge to (South) the Maryland border 2. Southern End Transmission Follows PECO utility corridor from the Susquehanna River Corridor Trail to Octoraro Creek 3. Octoraro Creek Trail/Octoraro Along Octoraro Creek from Atglen-Susquehanna Trail to Creek Water Trail MD border/Rt. 272 bridge to MD border. 4. Atglen-Susquehanna Trail Follows abandoned Enola Branch rail line from the Susque- hanna River east to Chester County border 5. Turkey Hill Trail Extension Along the Susquehanna River from existing Turkey Hill Trail south to Safe Harbor Dam 6. Washington Boro Trail Along the Susquehanna from Turkey Hill section of Atglen-Susquehanna Trail north to River Park in Columbia Borough 7. Northwest River Trail Exten- Chickies Rock County Park to River Park in Columbia sion (Rt. 441 Columbia Relo- Borough cation Project) 8. Manheim Region Rail Trail Existing Lancaster Junction Trail north to Lebanon County border 9. Manheim-Lititz Rail Trail Manheim Borough to Lititz Borough 10. Warwick-Ephrata Trail Existing Warwick Rail Trail in Warwick Township to exist- ing Ephrata Rail Trail in Denver Borough 11. Denver Borough Trail Exten- Warwick-Ephrata Rail Trail to existing Horseshoe Trail

sion Action Plan Action 12. Elizabethtown Spur Elizabethtown Borough to existing Conewago Recreation Trail 13. Conestoga Greenway Manheim Township to Susquehanna River 14. Conewago Trail Extension Existing Conewago Recreation Trail to the Susquehanna River 15. Reading & Columbia Trail Eastern edge of Columbia Borough to Grubb Lake Park 16. New Holland Trail Money Rocks County Park to PA 23 Corridor 17. Lancaster Junction Trail Exten- Existing Lancaster Junction Trail south to Grubb Lake Park sion (South) 18. Lancaster Junction Trail Exten- Existing Lancaster Junction Trail north to Manheim Bor- sion (North) ough 19. Little Chiques Trail Mount Joy Borough to Chickies Rock County Park / Northwest Trail 20. Pequea Creek Water Trail Proposed water trail runs from Silver Mine Park to PPL Pequea Boat Access

are listed in Table 5-2 and described in more implement the greenway trail system over a detail in Appendix C. The County should period of years. develop and implement a phased program to Timeframe: Mid to Long-Term

128 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element The Highlands Trail

The Highlands Trail is a multi-state, long distance recreation trail that stretches from eastern Pennsyl- vania through New Jersey and New York to northwestern Connecticut. The trail currently traverses the New York Highlands and most of New Jersey Highlands, totaling over 130 miles. The Pennsylva- nia (PA) Highlands Trail Network will extend the Highlands Trail into the PA Highlands.

The PA Highlands Trail Network will focus on linking existing trails to create system of connected trails and new trail segments. Loop and spur trails will also be part of the network in order to create connections to parks and natural areas and nearby cities and towns. The PA Highlands Trail Network is a collaborative effort between non-profit organizations, public agencies, counties and municipalities, private foundations and other interested groups.

In Lancaster County, the PA Highlands Trail will follow the Horse-Shoe Trail, Conewago Recreation Trail, and its proposed extension to the Susquehanna River at the village of Falmouth in Conoy Town- ship. From there, it will travel south along the Northwest River Trail. Once it reaches Columbia Bor- ough, the Highlands Trail will cross the old Rt. 462 (Columbia-Wrightsville) Bridge. In Wrightsville, the trail will head north on the existing Mason-Dixon Trail.

Action Plan Priority Trail Projects the Susquehanna River to the Chester The following trail projects are considered top County border. The proposed trail is priorities over the next decade. They vary in divided into two major sections; the length and type, are geographically distributed 5-mile Turkey Hill section and the 23- throughout the county’s landscape, and offer a mile Main Branch. diversity of outdoor recreation experiences for the trail user. These projects are all regional in Status - The ownership of the Main scope and are either actively being implemented Branch of the rail corridor was trans- now or are in the initial planning stages. ferred from Norfolk-Southern to the six municipalities in southern Lancaster While these projects are considered priorities, it County (Providence Township owns the does not mean other trail projects cannot move section in Quarryville Boroughs) in July to the forefront of the community’s priority 2008. Most of the municipalities along shortlist. Nor does it mean that other trail proj- the corridor have expressed some inter- ects should not be worked on by municipal and est, albeit varying, in the development non-profit partners. It simply means that all of of a recreation trail along the corridor. the projects on the list have recent activity, some The ownership of the Turkey Hill section degree of local support and an above average remains with Norfolk-Southern. How- chance of succeeding. ever, Manor Township has expressed strong interest in acquiring this section A brief description of each priority trail project, from the railroad company and has initi- along with its status and the next steps are pro- ated negotiations. vided below. For more detailed information on each trail project, see the Proposed Trails section Next Steps – The controversy surround- in Appendix C. ing this project as well as the immense scope of the project and the high cost • Atglen-Susquehanna Trail associated with the development of the trail are major stumbling blocks to the Description - The proposed 28-mile development of the full 28 miles. How- Atglen-Susquehanna Trail (AST) would ever, successful completion of a single utilize the abandoned Enola Branch section of the rail-trail may spur interest railroad corridor in western and south- from other municipalities and momen- ern Lancaster County, running from tum for the project. The County Plan-

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 129 ning Commission staff should work with until it reaches the PA Fish & Boat all the municipalities along the corridor Commission boat launch in the village to identify the section most likely to be of Falmouth in Conoy Township. constructed first and provide assistance to ensure its success. Status – A feasibility study conducted for the project was completed in 2003. • Turkey Hill Trail Extension Most of the Northwest River Trail cor- ridor is now in public or quasi-public Description – The existing hiking trail ownership and an informal path exists currently ends at an overlook at the top along much of the proposed trail route. of Turkey Hill. The proposed trail ex- Because the trail has multiple owners, tension in the river hills is approximately the development of individual trail 6 miles in length running from the segments varies in each municipality. southern terminus of the existing Turkey However, there are on-going planning Hill Trail to Safe Harbor Dam. Potential and/or engineering activities throughout loop trails off the main stem could con- the entire corridor and construction of a nect with the Turkey Hill Trail section of 3.5-mile section of the trail in Marietta, the Atglen Susquehanna Trail. East Donegal, and Conoy is soon to be underway. Status - The Lancaster County Con- servancy is working with two major Next Steps – Trail planning and construc- landholders along the corridor (PPL tion design activities for individual and the Lancaster County Solid Waste segments are underway in almost all the Management Authority) to designate municipalities along the corridor. How- an acceptable trail route. Since the trail ever, one section in need of attention is corridor involves some of the lands to be the area from the Marietta boat launch sold to the Conservancy as part of the to the Decatur Street trailhead in Mari- Holtwood Dam relicensing permit, the etta Borough. County Planning staff

route identification has been temporarily should provide technical assistance to Action Plan Action put on hold. Marietta Borough to initiate the design phase of this trail segment. Next Steps – The Conservancy anticipates the effort to establish the trail extension • Warwick-Ephrata Rail Trail will be reinitiated following the transfer of the PPL lands in late 2008/eary 2009. Description – The proposed 5-mile Warwick-Ephrata Rail Trail would run • Northwest River Trail from the western edge of Warwick Township to Denver Borough. The trail Description – The Northwest River Trail would begin at the eastern terminus of is a 14-mile recreational trail being the existing Warwick Rail Trail and head developed by five municipalities, the due east along the abandoned Reading County Parks Department, and the & Columbia Railroad Line. The trail Lancaster County Solid Waste Manage- would follow the rail corridor through ment Authority. The trail parallels the Warwick Township and into Akron Susquehanna River for its entire length; Borough. From Akron Borough, the trail generally following the route of the would connect with the southern ter- abandoned historic PA Mainline Canal minus of the existing Ephrata Rail Trail towpath. The trail begins in Columbia in Ephrata Borough. The trail would Borough’s River Park and heads north- follow the existing Ephrata Rail Trail to west along the eastern bank of the river its northern terminus and then continue into Ephrata Township. The trail would

130 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element follow the rail corridor through Ephrata Township to the southern terminus of the proposed Denver Borough Trail Extension.

Status – The municipalities along the corridor completed a feasibility study for the proposed trail project in 2006. Two sections of the trail already exist in War- wick Township and Ephrata Borough. Portions of the abandoned rail corridor were recently purchased by Warwick The proposed 10-mile Octoraro Creek Water Township, Akron Borough, and Ephrata Trail would be the third designated water trail in Township. The municipalities are work- Lancaster County. ing with other landowners along the corridor to secure easements and other ment plan in 2009 for the property that rights-of-way to complete the trail. addresses all these issues in a comprehen- sive manner. Next Steps – The municipalities should

Action Plan continue to work with landowners to In addition, there is potential for the secure all sections of the trail. Secured development of numerous other water sections that are connected to the exist- trails in the county. Possible water ing trail segments could be developed trail segments could be developed for with grant funding assistance from the the Mill, Conewago, Little Conestoga, County of Lancaster and DCNR. Cocalico, and others. All of these water trail opportunities should be evaluated • Octoraro Creek Water Trail and prioritized in the near future.

Description – The proposed water trail • Pequea Creek Water Trail would run approximately 10-miles in length from the Kirk’s Mill Bridge (Rt. Description – The proposed water trail 272 bridge) over Octoraro Creek, south would run from Silver Mine Park in to the Broad Creek boat launch just Pequea Township to the PPL Boat Ac- below of the Maryland border. The cess at the confluence of the Susquehan- water in this stream segment is clear and na River—a distance of approximately typically deep enough in the spring for 7.7–miles. paddlers to work their way down the scenic ravine into Maryland. Status – No discussions have occurred on the creation of the water trail at this Status – The Lancaster County Con- time. ervancy has recently acquired the land owned by the Chester Water Authority Next Steps – A meeting between County along the Octoraro Creek on both sides. Planning, Pequea Township, PPL, and the PA Fish & Boat Commission should Next Steps – Development of a water occur in the near future to see if there trail along the creek and management is sufficient support for the creation of of the riparian corridor for both habitat the water trail. If there is a consensus and passive recreation uses will require to move forward, the County Planning careful land planning. The Conservancy Commission should seek funding for the should initiate preparation of a manage- project through DCNR and the Chesa- peake Bay Gateways Program.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 131 In addition to these new high priority trail proj- and invasive species control should be ap- ects, the permanent protection of the County’s plied to county regional parks. existing regional trails—the Conestoga and Horse Shoe—should be considered high priority Timeframe: Mid-Term (development of initiatives. These informal, historic recreation standards) / Ongoing (application of stan- trails are largely unprotected and are constantly dards) threatened by encroaching rural development. Many segments of these trails have been forced onto existing roadways; making it neither safe 5.1.5 Initiative 5: Partnership nor attractive for hikers and equestrians. While Lancaster County will play a major role in Both the Conestoga and Horse Shoe Trail have leading implementation of Greenscapes, many support organizations that coordinate volunteer other entities will through their own efforts make activities to help maintain these hiking paths. important contributions. These entities can be The County Planning Commission should coor- grouped into five major categories, as follows: dinate with these organizations to assist them in • Public Sector securing the protection of these trail routes with -- Municipalities perpetual trail easements. The Mason-Dixon -- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Trail, which parallels the Susquehanna River in (DCNR, DEP, PA F&BC, etc.) York County, is similar to the regional trails in • Semi-Public/Institutional Sector Lancaster County. Efforts to coordinate with -- Lancaster County Conservation York County Planning and the Lancaster York District Heritage Region should be initiated to ensure -- School districts the protection of all the informal long-distance -- Sewer and water authorities recreational trails that serve the residents of this -- Universities (e.g., Millersville Uni- region. versity’s role in providing environ- mental monitoring services for the Lancaster County Roof Greening

• Action 4-3: Green Infrastructure Design Project) Action Plan Action Standards -- Utility and infrastructure companies Description: Jurisdictions across the country (PPL, Safe Harbor Water Power are adopting LEED or similar standards for Corporation, Norfolk Southern, their capital projects. In keeping with the Amtrak, Conrail) overall goal of integrating green infrastruc- • Private Nonprofit Sector ture into the built environment, Lancaster -- Lancaster County Conservancy County should develop standards for apply- -- Outdoor recreation groups ing green building techniques, sustainable stormwater management practices, natural landscaping, and similar approaches into the design, renovation, and maintenance of county-owned capital projects, facilities, and properties. These standards could be devel- oped in collaboration with Lancaster City as the County’s major urban community. One or more projects could be developed as models for action by governmental and institutional entities throughout Lancaster

County. Region Heritage York Lancaster The Safe Harbor Water Power Company In addition to the standards for projects and maintains the bird habitat at the Conejohela facilities in urban contexts, management Flats--one of the most significant migratory bird habitats in all of Pennsylvania. strategies such as native habitat restoration

132 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element -- Watershed organizations member can play in creating the green infra- -- Urban community development structure system. Coalition working groups organizations could be formed to address special topics, -- Foundations for example development of educational • Private For-Profit Sector materials and technical assistance programs -- Development community to be carried out by members or fundraising -- Business/corporate community from corporate or foundation sources for • Citizen groups and individuals green infrastructure projects. The Lancaster -- Landowners County Conservancy has offered to facilitate -- Environmental and Smart Growth and coordinate this coalition. Organizations (e.g., LAND, Coali- tion for Smart Growth, etc.) An action agenda comprised of the following seven work programs is proposed to focus The roles and responsibilities of these various and prioritize the efforts of the Green Infra- entities in achieving the vision of a healthy and structure Coalition: sustainable green infrastructure system are out- 1. Riparian Buffer Action Plan lined below in Section 5.2. 2. Green Infrastructure Communications 3. Municipal Assistance Action Initiative 5 is designed to coordinate the 4. Green Infrastructure Funding

Action Plan efforts of these diverse entities (including the 5. Regional Parks and Trails System County) in a broad-based partnership – referred 6. Regional Landscape Conservation Plans to as the Lancaster County Green Infrastructure 7. Green Infrastructure Monitoring System Coalition – to create a healthy, sustainable green infrastructure system. It is proposed that this ini- Riparian Buffer Action Plan: Degraded tiative begin with a Green Infrastructure Summit. stream quality is one of the primary threats to green infrastructure in Lancaster County. • Action 5-1: Green Infrastructure Summit To address this threat, a key priority of the Description: The Green Infrastructure Sum- Green Infrastructure Coalition should be mit is proposed as a one-day event involving to develop and implement a more detailed representatives of the various organizations action plan promoting 1) restoration of and interests identified above. It should be floodplains and buffers of natural vegetation coordinated with the initial plan outreach along the streams that have been heavily activities (Action 1-1). The summit agenda impacted by urban and agricultural uses and should address Greenscapes, green infrastruc- 2) preservation of existing buffers along high ture programs and initiatives in Lancaster quality streams elsewhere in the County. This County in the context of the plan’s recom- program is intended to coordinate and build mendations, and formation of the Lancaster on current riparian restoration initiatives County Green Infrastructure Coalition. (.e.g., the Lancaster County Conservation District’s technical assistance program and Timeframe: Short-term the work of watershed organizations such as the Lititz Run Watershed Alliance). It should • Action 5-2: Lancaster County Green Infra- identify opportunities to target use of tools structure Coalition identified in Chapter 4.0 to achieve riparian Description: The Lancaster County Green buffer preservation, conservation, and resto- Infrastructure Coalition is envisioned as a ration. Examples of these tools include: network of existing agencies, organizations, • II-A. Green Infrastructure Overlay and groups that would meet on a regular District basis to discuss and coordinate initiatives • II-F. Natural Resource Protection and projects related to green infrastructure. Ordinance The overall mission of the coalition should • II-J. Stormwater Management be to create synergies, leverage resources, and Ordinance define the most effective role each coalition • III-A. Land Acquisition

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 133 • III-C. Agricultural Best Management Green Infrastructure Funding: Adequate Practices funding for green infrastructure initiatives • III-G. Environmental Restoration and projects is key to the success of Green- • IV-C. Conservation Easement Donation scapes. Coordination and dissemination of information on green infrastructure funding The action plan should identify indicators to sources should be a Coalition priority. This be used to track the health of riparian buffers should include 1) restructuring Lancaster throughout Lancaster County as part of a County municipal grant programs to sup- green infrastructure monitoring system (see port projects such as “green streets”, urban below). For example, miles of stream buffers “greening” projects, riparian restoration, etc. restored or protected by landowners and (Action 3-1) and 2) providing informa- organizations throughout the County could tion and assistance on the range of available be compiled and tracked on an ongoing basis programs, including an annual “green infra- as an indicator of progress. structure funding workshop” (Action 3-2). In addition to governmental grant programs, Green Infrastructure Communications private sources of funding (nonprofits, busi- Program: Initiative 1 above calls for develop- nesses, citizen contributions, etc.) should be ment of an education, outreach, and com- identified as part of the green infrastructure munications program to citizens, municipali- funding program. ties, landowners, and others with a stake in Lancaster County’s green infrastructure. Regional Parks and Trails System: Actions Developing and implementing a clear, 4-1 and 4-2 address completion of the simple, and compelling green infrastructure county regional park system and develop- communications program through means ment of a countywide greenway trail system, such as media outreach, educational materi- respectively. While Lancaster County will als, a website, and speakers’ events should be have the primary responsibility for comple- an immediate priority of the Green Infra- tion of the regional park system, the Green structure Coalition. Infrastructure Coalition can provide support

in this effort. The Coalition can also play a Action Plan Action Municipal Assistance: Municipalities have key role in bringing together and coordinat- a critical role to play in creating the green ing the many entities – municipalities, state infrastructure system through actions such as agencies, private citizens’ groups, etc. – that green infrastructure planning, enactment of will need to participate in creating the green- regulations, and commitment of local fund- way trail system. ing and resources. Therefore, outreach and technical assistance to municipalities should Regional Landscape Conservation Plans: be another key priority of the Green Infra- Similar to its role in coordinating develop- structure Coalition. This program should ment of a countywide greenway trail system, build on and expand the Lancaster County the Coalition can help promote development Planning Commission’s existing municipal of large-scale landscape conservation plans planning program to more directly address that transcend jurisdictional (municipal, green infrastructure issues (Action 2-1). De- multi-municipal, and county) boundaries velopment of model green infrastructure and (see Action 2-3 and Chapter 4, Tool I-F). related ordinances for use by municipalities The LCPC has initiated preparation of the should be a short-term priority (Action 2-2). Susquehanna River Corridor Master Plan Over time, assistance can be coordinated in Lancaster and York Counties as a model through Environmental Advisory Councils regional landscape conservation plan. established by municipalities in accordance with Action 2-1. Green Infrastructure Monitoring System: Use of quantitative indicators to measure progress is a key component of plan imple- mentation (see Section 5.3). Building on the

134 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Lancaster Community Indicators Project (Measure up Lancaster!), the Green Infra- structure Coalition should take the lead in establishomg and monitoring indicators tied to plan goals, objectives, and strategies (e.g., riparian buffer restoration).

Timeframe: Short-term (establishment of Lancaster County Green Infrastructure Co- alition) / Ongoing (work programs)

• Action 5-3: Lancaster County Environ- Establishing Environmental Advisory Committees mental Advisory Council (EACs) at the local municipal level is an important step towards implementing many of the Description: Environmental Advisory recommendations in Greenscapes. Councils (EACs) are expected to play a key role in implementing Greenscapes at the • Action 5-4: Friends of Lancaster County municipal and multi-municipal levels. Estab- Regional Parks lishment of a countywide EAC is proposed to serve as an “umbrella” organization for Description: “Friends of Parks” organiza-

Action Plan local and regional EACs and to advise the tions are nonprofit citizens’ groups that Lancaster County Board of Commissioners provide support and resources for county on environmental and green infrastructure and municipal park systems, as well as issues. Neighboring Berks County estab- individual parks. Friends of Parks organiza- lished an EAC in 2004, with the following tions can raise significant funds for parkland mission: acquisition, development, and maintenance The Berks County Environmental Advisory through charitable donations and also sup- Council serves an advisory role to the Berks port park projects and programs through County Commissioners and its citizens volunteer activities. As an example, the In- with the understanding that all people dianapolis Parks Foundation (Indy Parks) has have a right to clean air, pure water, and donated more than $7.5 million to the city’s the preservation of natural, scenic, historic parks since its inception in 1991. Lancaster and esthetic values of the environment. The County should explore interest in establish- EAC seeks to improve the environmental ing such a foundation among citizens and welfare of Berks County. Its purpose is to businesses in the County. Such an organiza- provide leadership in objectively review- tion could eventually provide significant sup- ing environmental issues and to provide port to the County’s regional park system. guidance to the County regarding envi- ronmental matters within Berks County Timeframe: Mid-term and the region. The EAC is committed to making Berks County a better place in which to live, and to the preservation of 5.2 Roles and Responsibilities our resources for future generations. (http:// co.berks.pa.us/eac/site/default.asp) A wide variety of organizations, groups, busi- nesses, and individuals will contribute to achiev- The Lancaster County Green Infrastructure ing the vision of a healthy and sustainable green Coalition established per Action 5-2 could infrastructure system. The following outlines the assume the role of the Lancaster County roles and responsibilities of the major players Environmental Advisory Council, with the who will be involved in this effort. The proposed Lancaster County Conservancy playing a Lancaster County Green Infrastructure Coalition key role. will help to coordinate and build partnerships among these diverse entities. Timeframe: Mid-term

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 135 5.2.1 Public Sector (e.g., “urban greening” projects in Lan- caster City and the boroughs) Lancaster County • Pursue opportunities to increase water- • Lead countywide green infrastructure way access for non-motorized boaters. planning and outreach efforts • Promote communication and collabora- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania tion on green infrastructure between • Provide funding and technical support different stakeholder groups, including for green infrastructure planning and de- establishment of the Lancaster County velopment projects in Lancaster County Green Infrastructure Coalition • Pursue opportunities to expand state • Provide technical assistance to munici- park and game lands to protect green palities in developing green infrastruc- infrastructure resources ture plans and regulations • Manage state park and game lands to • Provide funding assistance for urban and reinforce green infrastructure functions rural green infrastructure projects to mu- and values such as natural resource nicipalities and nonprofit organizations preservation and provision of compatible • Expand the county regional park system recreation opportunities to achieve the minimum standard of 5 • Provide funding and technical support acres of parkland per 1,000 residents for development of the countywide • Lead planning and development of a greenway trail network with a focus on countywide greenway trail system connections that are part of the state • Manage the regional park system and greenway system other county properties to reinforce • Implement context-sensitive solu- green infrastructure functions and values tions that respect green infrastructure • Pursue opportunities to increase water- resources in the planning and design of way access for non-motorized boaters. transportation improvements • Encourage non-structural green infra- Municipalities structure solutions to environmental

• Prepare municipal and multi-municipal problems rather than relying on conven- Action Plan Action green infrastructure plans tional engineered “gray infrastructure” • Enact ordinances to conserve green • Pursue opportunities to increase infrastructure resources waterway access for motorized and non- • Establish Environmental Advisory motorized boaters. Councils (EACs) to coordinate green infrastructure planning at the municipal and multi-municipal levels 5.2.2 Semi-Public/Institutional Sector • Meet local recreational needs through the provision of “mini,” neighborhood, Lancaster County Conservation District and community parks that meet or ex- • Work with landowners to establish ripar- ceed the minimum standard of 10 acres ian buffers on degraded waterways in of parkland per 1,000 residents rural/agricultural areas • Develop local greenway/trail systems • Expand efforts to establish riparian buf- • Incorporate green infrastructure into fers in urban and suburban areas local infrastructure improvements (e.g., • Focus on restoration of streams and multi-functional stormwater manage- floodplains damaged by legacy sediments ment solutions, context-sensitive road- as a top priority way design, provision for bicycle and • Provide technical assistance to farmers pedestrian connections) and other landowners in managing prop- • Lead implementation of other green infrastructure projects at the local level

136 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element erties to reinforce green infrastructure • Work with the County and municipali- functions and values, including wetland ties to protect groundwater resources restoration, maintenance or restoration of rare species habitat, agricultural best Utility and Infrastructure Companies management practices, etc. • Continue to manage lands along the • Coordinate and provide technical assis- Susquehanna River to preserve natural tance to the County’s watershed organi- resources and provide for compatible zations in developing and implementing public recreation (PPL, Safe Harbor watershed initiatives that monitor, pro- Water Power Corporation) tect, and enhance green infrastructure • Participate in developing a greenway trail along the Susquehanna River (Nor- School Districts folk Southern, PPL, Safe Harbor Water • Work with municipalities to meet local Power Corporation) recreation needs through the provision • Participate in rail-to-trail projects where of “school-parks” safety/liability issues can be addressed • Promote awareness of the importance (Norfolk Southern, Amtrak, Conrail) of green infrastructure through school • Restore habitat for species of concern curricula, programs, and projects (e.g., (e.g., fish passages for shad and Ameri- student involvement in wildlife habitat can eel)

Action Plan improvement projects) • Incorporate green infrastructure into • Incorporate green infrastructure into “gray infrastructure” repair, replacement, school campuses and development projects • Work with municipalities (especially boroughs) to save recreation land associ- ated with elementary schools when the 5.2.3 Private Nonprofit Sector decision to close them has been made. Lancaster County Conservancy Sewer and Water Authorities • Continue to protect valuable natural • Coordinate provision of public water resource lands through acquisition and and sewer service with growth manage- by accepting donations of land and ease- ment strategies such as Urban Growth ments, focusing on “Natural Gems” as a Areas high priority • Implement wastewater treatment and • Preserve and restore core habitat, sup- public water supply solutions that mini- porting landscapes, and migratory cor- mize impacts on green infrastructure ridors for species of concern resources • Provide technical assistance to landown- ers in preserving and managing private lands to maintain and restore natural resource values (e.g., conservation ease- ments, limited development options, natural habitat management, etc.) • Provide passive outdoor recreational opportunities compatible with resource protection • Participate in education and outreach efforts on the importance of green infra- structure • Advocate/promote green infrastructure By focusing on Natural Heritage Areas like the at multiple levels, including urban and Rock Springs Serpentine Barrens in Fulton Township, the Lancaster County Conservancy will suburban as well as rural areas help preserve the county’s remaining biological diversity.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 137 Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators

In 2001, the USDA Forest Service asked Baltimore County officials to participate in a project called “Linking Communities to the Montréal Process Criteria and Indicators.” The Montréal Process is an international effort to develop measures of the sustainability of temporal and boreal forest resources. Experts from 12 countries that represent 90% of the world’s temperate and boreal forests defined seven categories of critical ecological, economic, and social issues that needed to be addressed. The categories or “criteria” have a series of “indicators” associated with them to assess progress toward sustainable forest management.

Because many of the decisions that affect forest management in the US are made at the local level, the Forest Service wanted to determine if criteria and indicators developed at the international level could be applied by local communities to encourage more sustainable management of forest resources. Baltimore County was selected to test the indicators’ usefulness in an urban forest area because of its location in the greater Baltimore-Washington DC metropolitan area. The use of the Montréal Process criteria and indicators is credited as a significant factor in the success of Baltimore County’s Forest Sustainability Project. It provided both a structure for organizing complex forest issues into a manage- able long-range picture and served as a catalyst for bringing people and organizations with diverse viewpoints together.

• Provide leadership in the Green Infra- 5.2.4 Private for Profit Sector structure Coalition • Lead development of a network of Development Community municipal Environmental Advisory • Incorporate green infrastructure into Councils (EACs) developments (e.g., provision of local • Pursue opportunities to increase water- recreational lands and trails, establish- way access for non-motorized boaters. ment of buffers adjacent to streams, protection of natural resources such as

Urban Community Development forestlands, wetlands, and rare species Action Plan Action Organizations habitat through approaches such as con- • Implement urban greening/green infra- servation development, green building structure projects (e.g., pocket parks, techniques) community gardens, canopy tree plant- • Participate in education and outreach ef- ings) forts on green infrastructure in recogni- • Involve the urban community in green tion of its importance to Smart Growth infrastructure projects, including youths • Pursue opportunities to increase water- through training/life skills programs way access for non-motorized boaters.

Foundations Business/Corporate Community • Provide funding for green infrastructure • Implement LEED or other green build- projects (e.g., urban greening projects by ing standards and techniques in develop- community development organizations) ment projects • Sponsor research on the benefits of green • Pursue market-based approaches to infrastructure and indicators of progress environmental restoration, particularly in creating the green infrastructure related to water resource protection and system enhancement • Incorporate green infrastructure into commercial, office, and industrial parks • Participate in green infrastructure educa- tion and outreach efforts

138 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element • Support green infrastructure projects 5.3 Plan Monitoring through charitable contributions and employee involvement Greenscapes is not intended as a fixed or static document, but rather as one that will evolve over time as action to establish a countywide, integrat- 5.2.5 Citizen Groups and Individuals ed green infrastructure system moves forward on many fronts. To ensure the success of the plan, Watershed Groups it is important to establish an ongoing process • Develop multi-objective watershed for monitoring progress in implementing the management plans that apply green proposed strategies, tools, and action initiatives. infrastructure concepts This process should include: • Implement watershed-based green infra- structure projects (e.g., riparian restora- • Development of annual work programs de- tion, water quality improvements) fining specific projects and tasks to be carried • Help maintain watershed-based green out over the next year, including responsible infrastructure projects, especially during parties and resource commitments required; the first several years • Establishment of statistical indicators for use • Build grassroots citizen awareness of the in measuring progress towards achieving the importance of green infrastructure plan goals and objectives; and

Action Plan • Reviews on at least an annual basis to mea- Outdoor Recreation Groups (hiking, hunting, sure and assess progress and to make adjust- paddling, and fishing clubs, etc.) ments to the annual work programs, using • Participate in greenway trail, stream res- the indicators as a measure of progress. toration, and other projects that provide for compatible recreational uses of green As previously noted, the Lancaster Green Infra- infrastructure resources structure Coalition should lead thetake on the • Build grassroots citizen awareness of the responsibility for plan monitoring as part of its importance of green infrastructure role in leading the overall implementation effort. • Assist in trail maintenance The Lancaster Community Indicators Project – Property Owners and Other Citizens Measure up Lancaster! – provides a starting point • Preserve and restore green infrastructure for identifying green infrastructure indicators. • Permanently protect natural resources on The following indicators from this project are your land (e.g., by donating a conserva- most relevant to green infrastructure: tion easement) • Develop and implement wildlife habitat • Air Quality: management plans -- Total number of days annually that • Use native plant materials, including the reach “Code Orange” levels for ground potential reintroduction of rare species level ozone • Join an organization such as a watershed -- Total number of days annually that group to promote green infrastructure reach “Code Red” levels for ground level • Become a spokesperson for green infra- ozone structure in your community • Protection and Preservation of Open Space: -- Total acres of parkland and open space permanently preserved -- Municipalities meeting or exceeding standards for publicly-owned parkland (i.e., a minimum of 10 acres of local parkland per 1,000 residents)

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 139 • Water Quality: • Percentage of tree canopy cover in urban -- Percentage of county stream miles communities (Lancaster County, boroughs) listed as “Impaired,” “High Quality” • LEED certified buildings and green roofs or “Exceptional Value,” or “Meeting constructed Designated Use” designations by the • Percentage of core habitat for species of Pennsylvania DEP concern as defined by the Lancaster County Natural Heritage Inventory preserved Examples of additional indicators that could • Miles of streams and rivers restored with be used to measure progress in implementing best management practices such as riparian Greenscapes include: plantings and fencing

• Acreage/percentage of exceptional natural The proposed Lancaster County Green Infra- resource lands (as delineated on Figure 26) structure Coalition, supported by the LCPC, with permanent protection could take the lead in developing the indicators, • Progress in achieving the minimum standard monitoring progress, and preparing an annual of 5 acres of county regional parkland per Green Infrastructure report. Private founda- 1,000 residents tions could play a role in supporting research on • Miles of greenway and waterway trails green infrastructure indicators. The report would developed describe progress made during the previous year, • Watershed plans prepared measure where the green infrastructure system • Municipal green infrastructure plans pre- stands in relation to the indicators, and identify pared priority actions for the upcoming year. Appendix A

Green Infrastructure Planning Advisory Board. The recommendations are then Case Studies provided to the Planning Board and incorporated into capital budgeting. The Maryland-National Although green infrastructure planning is a rela- Capital Park and Planning Commission is cur- tively new area of focus, there are a number of rently preparing a county-wide Greenscapes that examples from across the country of communi- will complement the Legacy Open Space Master ties taking a leadership role in planning for green Plan. infrastructure. The following are a few case study examples of green infrastructure initiatives from Metro Greenways Program Twin Cities, Min- throughout the country. nesota The Twin Cities Metro Greenways program GreenPrint State of Maryland was launched in 1998 in response to Metro Maryland provides some of the best examples Greenprint, a citizen’s report that called for of Green Infrastructure planning, including the stronger efforts to protect nature in the face of statewide GreenPrint Program and recent Green- urban growth. Administered by the Minnesota scapess for Talbot and Prince Georges Counties. Department of Natural Resources, the program The GreenPrint Program used satellite imaging works with communities to preserve and restore and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) anal- their natural heritage. Metro Greenways has ysis to map Green Hubs – largely intact natural launched efforts to protect more than 3,000 acres areas typically hundreds to thousands of acres in of sensitive natural areas. It has provided techni- Appendix A size that are vital to maintaining the State’s eco- cal help to numerous local units of government logical health – and Green Links – linear rem- and worked with communities to inventory nants of natural lands such as stream valleys and natural resources and develop stewardship plans mountain ridges that serve as “habitat highways.” affecting more than 600,000 acres. In the past The County plans define more detailed Green four years, Metro Greenways has awarded nearly Infrastructure networks at the county scale, along $1 million in matching grants to communities with strategies for their protection. to undertake resource inventories and develop plans for preserving and managing their natural Legacy Open Space Plan Montgomery Coun- infrastructure. The program has also committed ty, Maryland $9 million to protect some of the region’s best In response to the belief that open space and remaining natural areas and open spaces. This quality of life are linked, the Montgomery money has leveraged an additional $25 million County Planning Board and County Council in other funds. Thirty-eight projects totaling over developed a Legacy Open Space Functional 3,000 acres have been approved for protection Master Plan in 2000 “…to preserve the County’s though acquisition and conservation easements. most significant open space resources as a means By working in this fashion with local government to protect the County’s environment, quality of and non-profit organizations, Metro Greenways life, and economic vitality.” The Legacy Open is facilitating a broader conservation partnership Space program is a multi-million dollar program that will help meet the challenges of resource that expands on the existing park system with a protection in an area of rapid growth. public/private initiative to protect thousands of acres of important open space lands and heritage EPA’s Southeastern Ecological Framework resources throughout Montgomery County. The Southeastern Ecological Framework Project The goals of the program are: (1) Protection of is a GIS-based analysis to identify ecologically environmentally sensitive natural resources, (2) significant areas and connectivity in the southeast protection of water supplies, (3) conservation of region of the US. The project began in 1998 heritage resources, (4) protection of greenway and was completed in 2001 by the University of links, (5) protection of farmland and rural open Florida GeoPlan Center and sponsored by the space resources, and (6) protection of urban open US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Re- spaces. The Master Plan identifies target sites for gion 4. EPA Region 4 continues to use this data protection and priorities are determined based to facilitate EPA programs and to work with state on several criteria, which are recommended to an and federal agencies and local groups to make

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 143 sound conservation decisions. The projects goals statewide system of greenways and trails. The and objectives are as follows: plan proposes connecting ecologically significant sites through a system of cultural and historic • Identify primary ecological areas that are trails. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center protected by some type of conservation or developed a GIS database of information to ecosystem management program identify opportunity areas. The results of this • Identify a green infrastructure network that effort include a series of maps defining trails and connects these primary ecological areas conservation areas to guide future open space • Identify the important ecological character- acquisition and preservation efforts throughout istics of the ecological areas and connecting the state. green infrastructure • Develop an understanding of the spatial scale Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan Pima issues involved in analyzing the ecologi- County, Arizona cal connectivity at local, state and regional In 1998 the Pima County Board of Supervisors scales, and initiated discussions on land use planning and • Develop protocol for dissemination of the conservation that resulted in the preparation of information. a conservation plan for the Sonoran Desert. The area covered in the Sonoran Desert Conservation This analysis was conducted using landscape Plan includes 5.9 million acres located in Pima ecology principles and Geographic Information County, Arizona which includes the Tucson met- Systems (GIS) tools. The products of this study ropolitan area. It includes two major eco-regions can be used by local, state and federal agencies known as the Sky Islands and the Sonoran Des- in developing a regional atlas of environmental ert. The conservation planning effort addresses issues and conflicts and threats to the natural the problems of declining natural resources and ecosystems caused by human environmental im- the loss of cultural identity in one of the fastest pacts. State, local and private entities can utilize growing parts of the country. The Plan is an in- the information to address various environmental novative and far reaching blueprint for growing resource allocation issues. in an intelligent and graceful manner in Pima

Appendix A Appendix County. The Plan is designed to benefit the natu- Florida Greenways and Trails Plan ral systems and residents of Pima County and to In 1991, two private conservation organizations, save the best lands and most precious resources 1000 Friends of Florida and The Conservation for future generations to enjoy. The goals of the Fund, initiated a state-wide greenways project to plan are to: address the loss of natural habitat and ecological lands throughout the state. The outcome of the • Protect biological diversity and endangered 1991 effort was the formation of the Florida species Greenways Commission, established by the • Protect critical riparian areas Governor, which later resulted in the Florida • Preserve cultural and historic resources Greenways Coordinating Council. This public- • Ensure viability of ranching private group recommended that Florida create • Connect open space and preserves into a statewide system of greenways that would linked system link natural areas and open spaces, conserving native landscapes and ecosystems and offering The planning process for the development and recreational opportunities across the state. This implementation of the vision engaged a broad green infrastructure was to connect residents and diverse group of stakeholders. The plan has and visitors to the state’s natural and cultural successfully connected land use regulations with heritage, enhance their sense of place, and enrich the ecological network design. The County is their quality of life. The Greenways Coordinat- currently developing an ecological Monitoring ing Council worked with Florida Department Program to identify a set of indicators that can of Environmental Protection to develop a 5-year determine if the biological goal of the Sonoran implementation plan. The University of Florida Desert Conservation Plan is being achieved and GeoPlan Center developed the mapping for a

144 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element to provide information to managers to help them infrastructure across the three-state region. In take more informed management actions. 2002, the Center for Neighborhood Technology and Openlands formed a partnership to address Talbot County Green Infrastructure Plan Tal- the need for better information about the green bot County, Maryland infrastructure in the 14-county region. The best In 2004, Talbot County, MD, which is centrally available data was compiled from more than 60 located on Maryland’s Eastern Shore of the Ches- local, state, and federal agencies, as well as private apeake Bay, completed a county-wide Green In- land trusts and conservation groups. Collectively, frastructure Plan. Talbot County is characterized the green infrastructure detailed on the map by fragile system of islands and peninsulas that represents more than 175 layers of data. The make up almost 600 miles of coastline border- layers include publicly owned lands, existing and ing the Bay and its multiple inlets. Greenscapes proposed greenways, waterways, trails, and other identifies critical areas for conservation, estab- natural areas and open spaces. lishes priorities for protection, and recommends implementation strategies and funding. The Philadelphia Green Plan focuses on ecologically important resource Started in 1974, Philadelphia Green is a program areas (woodlands, high quality wildlife habitat), of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society that highly productive working landscapes (farmland supports the development and ongoing care of and forestland) and critical areas for the protec- community gardens, neighborhood parks and tion of aquatic resources (wetlands, sensitive high-profile public green spaces in Philadelphia. Appendix A shoreline areas, riparian corridors, floodplains). Working in partnership with neighborhood Greenscapes was developed in coordination with residents, community organizations and city the County’s updated Comprehensive Plan in agencies, the program uses greening as a com- order to reflect the community’s values, future vi- munity building tool. It educates and empowers sion, and local interests. Greenscapes is intended people to make the city a more attractive and to help public, private, and non-profit entities livable place through horticulture. Support preserve natural resources, ensure the economic for the program comes from proceeds from the viability of working landscapes and manage annual Philadelphia Flower Show along with development in a way that preserves the natural foundations, corporations, government agencies, resources and character of the County. and individuals. The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society’s Green City Strategy calls for significant Natural Connections improvements to the city’s open spaces as a In 2000, Openlands, a non-profit conservation means of attracting new residents and invest- organization, convened a conference to address ment. It also addresses the problem of vacant natural resource protection in the tri-state region land and promotes a citywide vacant land green- of northeastern Illinois, northwestern Indiana, ing and management system. The City of Phila- and southeastern Wisconsin. The conference’s delphia has formally adopted the Green City objectives were to identify the green infrastruc- Strategy as the cornerstone of its anti-blight cam- ture that connects the three states, assess the paign, known as the Neighborhood Transforma- threats to these resources and the status of efforts tion Initiative. PHS views greening as an integral to protect them, and define an agenda for the way to bring urban neighbors together and create future. Conference participants identified ob- a higher quality of life throughout the city. Its stacles to protecting natural resources that cross Philadelphia Green program organizes residents state lines and strategies for overcoming them. and local groups to maintain parks, plant and The conference attendees identified the lack maintain tree-lined streets, and transform vacant of information about natural resources across lots into community gardens and open spaces. jurisdictional lines was a major obstacle to co- operative efforts to protect these resources. They Lessons Learned agreed that one of the most important ways to The case study review revealed a number of im- help interstate and regional conservation efforts portant lessons for successful green infrastructure would be to create a map and regional database planning. The process of developing a natural that provided foundational information on green resource inventory is an important tool, but

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 145 without public support and stable leadership the plan will remain just that. An organized method for public participation and input to build a constituency to advocate for green infrastructure should be considered at the outset of every plan- ning effort. Green Infrastructure planning re- quires a long term commitment and strong lead- ership to ensure the plan’s implementation. The goals of assembling contiguous natural resources lands and linking them with green corridors are two common themes of most programs. In addition, conservation planning requires regular updates and re-prioritization based on new data. In many cases, the ecological resources that green infrastructure planning targets for preserva- tion transcends municipal, county, and even statewide boundaries. Planning and implementa- tion requires considerable coordination among different public, private, and non-profit groups; sometimes at a regional scale.

Appendix A Appendix

146 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Appendix B

Parks and Recreation Background Data

This appendix contains miscellaneous background information in support of the parks and recreation analysis presented in Section 2.3 of the Plan. Table 5.1 presents municipal parkland and school dis- trict properties for each municipality in Lancaster County. It is followed by a comparison of the park- land standards adopted in Lancaster County’s 1993 Regional Open Space Plan to parkland standards used in adjacent counties.

Table B-1. Lancaster County Municipal Parklands and School District Properties, by Municipality

Municipality Property Owner Acres Adamstown Borough Adamstown Memorial Park Adamstown Borough 0.6 Adamstown Pool and Grove Adamstown Borough 18.8 Adamstown Elementary School Cocalico School District 4.6 24.0 Akron Borough

Appendix B Broad Street Park Akron Borough 3.4 Lloyd H. Roland Memorial Park Akron Borough 86.0 Akron Elementary Ephrata Area School District 7.5 96.9 Bart Township None Brecknock Township Brubaker Park Brecknock Township 88.4 Brecknock Elementary Eastern Lancaster County 9.8 School District 98.2 Caernarvon Township Poole Forge Caernarvon Township 21.8 21.8 Christiana Borough Christiana Elementary School Christiana Borough 5.8 Clay Township Hopeland Community Park Clay Township 4.5 Snyder Community Park Clay Township 5.9 Clay Elementary Ephrata Area School District 7.7 18.1 Colerain Township Kirkwood Community Park Colerain Township 5.4 Bart-Colerain Elementary Solanco School District 7 12.4 Columbia Borough Makle Park Columbia Borough 3.0

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 149 Municipality Property Owner Acres Rotary Park Columbia Borough 1.6 Columbia High School Columbia School District 25.3 Park Elementary Columbia School District 0.9 Taylor Elementary Columbia School District 0.8 31.6 Conestoga Township Conestoga Park Conestoga Township 6.1 Conestoga Elementary Penn Manor School District 4.9 11.0 Conoy Township Bainbridge Playground Conoy Township 0.8 Conoy Canal Park Conoy Township 49.5 Conoy Creek Park Conoy Township 33.8 Conoy Township Park Conoy Township 6.7 Krieder Tract Park Conoy Township 38.1 Bainbridge Elementary Elizabethtown Area School 3.3 District 132.2 Denver Borough Bon view Estates Linear Park Denver Borough 12.3 Denver Memorial Park Denver Borough 6.8 Denver Community Pool Denver Borough 5.0 North Fourth Street Playground Denver Borough 1.5

Cocalico School District Campus Cocalico School District 92.0 Appendix B Appendix 117.6 Drumore Township Drumore Township Community Drumore Township 30.7 Park Drumore Elementary School Solanco School District 4.6 35.3 Earl Township New Holland Elementary Eastern Lancaster County 6.3 School District East Cocalico Township East Cocalico Township Office Land East Cocalico Township 12.7 Fishing Creek Park East Cocalico Township 10.8 Old Homestead Park East Cocalico Township 9.2 Reamstown Memorial Park East Cocalico Township 15.5 Township Land East Cocalico Township 25.4 Reamstown Elementary Cocalico School District 8.3 81.9 East Donegal Township Front Street Park (Charles Property) East Donegal Township 45.9

150 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Municipality Property Owner Acres Legion Park East Donegal Township 4.7 Lloyd H. Fuhrman Park East Donegal Township 17.9 Longwood Square East Donegal Township 6.1 R & J Memorial Baseball Field East Donegal Township & 7.7 Mount Joy Borough Riverfront Park East Donegal Township 241.6 Donegal High School Donegal School District 23.1 Maytown Elementary Donegal School District 4.4 Seiler Elementary Donegal School District 1.8 353.2 East Drumore Township Solanco High School Solanco School District 30.7 East Earl Township Blue Ball Elementary Eastern Lancaster County 4.4 School District East Hempfield Township

Appendix B Amos R. Herr Park East Hempfield Township 54.6 East Hempfield Open Space East Hempfield Township 24.7 Nissley Road Property East Hempfield Township 17.0 Noel S. Dorwart Memorial Park East Hempfield Township 9.9 Nolt Road Property East Hempfield Township 51.7 Wheatland Hills Park East Hempfield Township 11.9 Centerville Elementary & Junior Hempfield School District 39.2 High School Hempfield Senior High School Hempfield School District 86.9 Landisville Elementary Hempfield School District 3.4 Roherstown Elementary Hempfield School District 8.4 307.7 East Lampeter Township Flory Park East Lampeter Township 43.8 Hobson Road Park East Lampeter Township 26.6 Lafayette Park East Lampeter Township 8.2 Conestoga Valley Senior High School Conestoga Valley School 66.6 District J. E. Fritz Elementary Conestoga Valley School 5.2 District Smoketown Elementary Conestoga Valley School 8.6 District 159.0 East Petersburg Borough East Petersburg Fitness Park East Petersburg Borough 5.3 East Petersburg Borough Pool East Petersburg Borough 8.5 East Petersburg Civic Grounds & East Petersburg Borough 39.2 Community Park The Commons East Petersburg Borough 0.1

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 151 Municipality Property Owner Acres East Petersburg Elementary Hempfield School District 26.5 79.6 Eden Township George A. Smith Middle School Solanco School District 24.3 Elizabeth Township Elizabeth Township Community Elizabeth Township 9.7 Park Elizabethtown Borough Elizabethtown Borough Community Elizabethtown Borough 20.8 Park Hickory Lane Park Elizabethtown Borough 12.7 Poplar Street Park Elizabethtown Borough 9.3 East High Street Elementary School Elizabethtown Area School 23 District Elizabethtown Area High School & Elizabethtown Area School 17.2 Middle School District Fairgrounds Elizabethtown Area School 23 District Mill Road Elementary School Elizabethtown Area School 7.5 District 113.5 Ephrata Borough Bethany Park Estates Ephrata Borough 3.9 Edgewater Meadow Park Ephrata Borough 5.7 Ephrata Borough Community Park Ephrata Borough 16.5

Appendix B Appendix Ephrata Rail Trail Ephrata Borough 7.2 Ephrata Recreation Center Ephrata Borough 5.7 Heatherwood Park Ephrata Borough 19.5 Irene Avenue Park Ephrata Borough 14.6 Lincoln Heights Outdoor Recreation Ephrata Borough 15.0 Area Lincoln Heights Playground Ephrata Borough 0.9 Martin Avenue Mall Ephrata Borough 0.2 Mountain Land Ephrata Borough 18.3 Moyer's Meadow Ephrata Borough 12.6 Open Space Ephrata Borough 10.4 Pioneer View Playground Ephrata Borough 0.5 Redcay Playground Ephrata Borough 0.4 Sycamore Park Ephrata Borough 1.3 Ephrata Junior High Ephrata Area School District 38.1 Ephrata Senior High School Ephrata Area School District 17.5 Fulton Elementary Ephrata Area School District 16.7 Highland Elementary Ephrata Area School District 3.2 Lincoln Elementary Ephrata Area School District 2.9 Washington Elementary Ephrata Area School District 0.47

152 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Municipality Property Owner Acres 211.6 Ephrata Township Eastbrooke Ephrata Township 0.6 Ephrata Township Community Park Ephrata Township 51.0 Nissely Acres Ephrata Township 18.0 Bergstrasse Elementary Ephrata Area School District 4.7 74.3 Fulton Township Clermont Elementary & Swift Solanco School District 29.8 Middle Sch. Fulton Elementary School Solanco School District 2.4 32.2 City of Lancaster Binns Park City of Lancaster 0.8 Blanche Nevin Memorial Park City of Lancaster 0.1

Brandon Park City of Lancaster 18.1 Appendix B Buchanan Park City of Lancaster 21.4 Camba Park City of Lancaster 0.1 Case Commons City of Lancaster 0.1 Conestoga Creek Park City of Lancaster 12.7 Conestoga Pines City of Lancaster 71.3 Conlin Field/Farnum Playground City of Lancaster 3.9 Crystal Park City of Lancaster 0.8 Ewel/Gantz Playground City of Lancaster 0.1 Joe Jackson Tot Lot City of Lancaster 0.3 Hands Woods City of Lancaster 9.0 Holly Pointe Park City of Lancaster 10.0 Lancaster Square City of Lancaster 10.7 Long's Park City of Lancaster 69.8 Musser Park City of Lancaster 3.1 North Market Street Kids Park City of Lancaster 0.1 Northwest Corridor Linear Park City of Lancaster 2.6 Penn Square City of Lancaster 0.6 Penn Avenue Totlot City of Lancaster 1.1 Reservoir Park City of Lancaster 9.0 Rodney Park City of Lancaster 0.7 Rotary Park City of Lancaster 0.2 Sixth Ward Park City of Lancaster 3.1 South Duke Street Mall City of Lancaster 3.9 South End Park City of Lancaster 1.0 Carter/McRae Elementary Lancaster City School District 0.8 Edward Hand Jr. High & Washing- Lancaster City School District 18.2 ton Elem.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 153 Municipality Property Owner Acres George Ross Elementary Lancaster City School District 0.8 Hamilton Elementary Lancaster City School District 16.2 J W. Price Elementary School Lancaster City School District 2.3 Lafayette Elementary Lancaster City School District 8.5 Lancaster City School District Lancaster City School District 43.0 Campus M. L. King Junior Elementary Lancaster City School District 4.0 Reigart Elementary School Lancaster City School District 0.5 Reynolds Junior High School Lancaster City School District 0.8 Robert Fulton Elementary Lancaster City School District 0.7 Wharton Elementary Lancaster City School District 1.4 351.8 Lancaster Township Hamilton Park Playground Lancaster Township 1.5 Maple Grove Community Park Lancaster Township 6.6 Elizabeth Martin Elementary Lancaster City School District 18.6 James Buchanan Elementary Lancaster City School District 1.1 Lancaster Community Park Lancaster City School District - 29.0 Leased to Lancaster Twp T. H. Burrowes Elementary Lancaster City School District 3.5 Wheatland Junior High Lancaster City School District 32.5 Penn Manor Comet Field Penn Manor School District 33.8 126.6 Leacock Township Appendix B Appendix Leacock Township Park Leacock Township 5.5 Leacock Elementary Pequea Valley School District 1.4 Pequea Valley High School & Inter- Pequea Valley School District 33.0 mediate 39.9 Lititz Borough Lititz Lions Playground Lititz Borough 1.4 Lititz Springs Swimming Pool Lititz Borough 12.7 Locust Street Park Lititz Borough 4.8 Sixth Street Linear Park Lititz Borough 5.8 Warwick Township Linear Park Lititz Borough 2.0 John Bonfield Elementary School Warwick School District 28.6 Kissel Hill Elementary Warwick School District 10.9 Lititz Elementary Warwick School District 1.6 Warwick High School Warwick School District 14.3 Warwick Middle School Warwick School District 19.9 102.0 Little Britain Township Little Britain Township Park Little Britain Township 10.2 Little Britain Elementary Solanco School District 11.7

154 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Municipality Property Owner Acres 21.9 Manheim Borough Hollinger Field Manheim Borough 1.2 Logan Park Manheim Borough 40.9 Mummu Park Manheim Borough & Rapho 8.7 Township Memorial Park Manheim Borough 48.2 Swan Park Manheim Borough 1.0 H. C. Burgard Elementary Manheim Central School 2.0 District Manheim Central Junior High Manheim Central School 1.0 District Manheim Central Senior High Manheim Central School 13.3 District Stiegel Elementary Manheim Central School 0.7 District 117.0 Appendix B Manheim Township Bucher Park Manheim Township 8.2 Jaycee Park Manheim Township 2.4 Landis Woods Manheim Township 68.7 Manheim Township Community Manheim Township 33.9 Park Municipal Park Manheim Township 19.5 Overlook Community Campus Manheim Township 184.7 Perelman Park at Binkley's Mill Manheim Township 5.7 Reidenbaugh Park Manheim Township and School 11.4 District Shaeffer Park Manheim Township 3.8 Skyline Park Manheim Township 8.0 Stauffer Park Manheim Township and 16.8 Stauffer Park Trustees Stonehenge Greenway Manheim Township 8.5 Stoner Park Manheim Township 19.9 Brecht Elementary Manheim Township School 21.0 District C. Shaeffer Elementary School Manheim Township School 4.2 District Caleb W. Bucher Elementary Manheim Township School 2.8 District Manheim Township Middle School Manheim Township School 30.6 District Manheim Township High School Manheim Township School 25.9 District Reidenbaugh Elementary Manheim Township School 9.2 District

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 155 Municipality Property Owner Acres William E. Nitrauer Elementary Manheim Township School 12.7 District SDoL Campus Lancaster City School District 37.4 535.3 Manor Township Central Manor Elementary-PM Manor Township 5.1 Jointure John G. Herr Park Manor Township 23.1 Manor Twp Municipal Office Manor Township 5.5 Manor Township Municipal Park Manor Township 31.1 Martin E. Grieder Park Manor Township 16.2 Springdale Park Manor Township 31.1 Stonemill Greenway Manor Township 3.5 Woods Edge Park Manor Township 30.9 Ann Letort Elementary Penn Manor School District 7.4 Hambright Elementary Penn Manor School District 3.0 Manor Middle School Penn Manor School District 48.7 205.6 Marietta Borough Chestnut Street Park Marietta Borough 1.8 Flanagan Park Marietta Borough 1.1 Front Street Park (Charles Property) Marietta Borough 41.1 Front Street (Tract Two) Park Marietta Borough 1.5 Marietta Tot Lot Marietta Borough 1.3 Appendix B Appendix Penncast Tot Lot Marietta Borough 0.6 War Memorial Park Marietta Borough 10.8 Riverview Elementary Donegal School District 7.2 65.4 Martic Township Martic Township Park Martic Township 378.6 Martic Elementary School Penn Manor School District 5.7 Marticville Middle School Penn Manor School District 20.4 404.7 Millersville Borough Millersville Borough Park Millersville Borough 22.2 Eshelmen Elementary Penn Manor School District 10.9 Penn Manor Comet Field Penn Manor School District 4.5 Penn Manor High School Penn Manor School District 12.5 50.1 Mount Joy Borough Borough Park Mount Joy Borough 9.2 Florin Park Mount Joy Borough 0.8 Memorial Park Mount Joy Borough 1.3

156 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Municipality Property Owner Acres Westview Park Mount Joy Borough 2.1 Grandview Park Mount Joy Borough 12.3 Washington Elementary Donegal School District 1.1 Donegal Springs Road Park Mount Joy Borough .08 The Lakes Park Mount Joy Borough 7 33.9 Mount Joy Township Wolgemuth Park Mount Joy Township 10.1 Fairview Elementary Elizabethtown Area School 7.1 District 17.2 Mountville Borough Froelich Park Mountville Borough 25.1 Lockard Park Mountville Borough 2.6 Mountville Borough Park Mountville Borough 8.3

Spring Hill Park Mountville Borough 6.1 Appendix B VFW Memorial Park Mountville Borough 1.9 Mountville Elementary School Hempfield School District 10.7 54.7 New Holland Borough Groff Memorial Park New Holland Borough 2.2 Garden Spot High School Eastern Lancaster County 31.6 School District 33.6 Paradise Township Paradise Township Memorial Park Paradise Township 29.5 Paradise Elementary Pequea Valley School District 4.9 34.4 Penn Township Kauffman's Park Penn Township 8.3 Baron Fields Manheim Central School 32.8 District Doe Run Elementary School Manheim Central School 20.8 District Fairland Elementary Manheim Central School 5.2 District White Oak Elementary School Manheim Central School 3.7 District 70.8 Pequea Township Silver Mine Park Pequea Township 144.0 Pequea Elementary Penn Manor School District 5.5 149.5 Providence Township

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 157 Municipality Property Owner Acres Providence Township Park Providence Township 0.2 New Providence Elementary Solanco School District 27.2 27.4 Quarryville Borough Huffnagle Park Quarryville Borough 3.0 Memorial Park Quarryville Borough 12.7 Quarryville Elementary Solanco School District 2.1 17.8 Rapho Township Rapho Township Community Park Rapho Township 30.8 Mastersonville Elementary Manheim Central School 3.5 District Sporting Hill Elementary Manheim Central School 3.9 District Elm Tree Elementary School Manheim Central School 4.6 District 42.8 Sadsbury Township None Salisbury Township Salisbury Township Community Park Salisbury Township 22.7 Welsh Mountain Park Salisbury Township 13.3 Salisbury Elementary School Pequea Valley School District 11.3 47.3

Appendix B Appendix Strasburg Borough Strasburg Community Park Strasburg Borough 12.3 Strasburg Pond Strasburg Borough 2.4 Strasburg Elementary Lampeter-Strasburg School 1.5 District 16.2 Strasburg Township None Terre Hill Borough Terre Hill Borough Community Park Terre Hill Borough 9.3 Upper Leacock Township Leola Community Park & Pool Upper Leacock Township 19.4 Mascot Park Upper Leacock Township 0.4 Olde Leacock Village Park Upper Leacock Township 1.9 Upper Leacock Offices Upper Leacock Township 9.1 Leola Elementary Conestoga Valley School 9.3 District 49.4 Warwick Township Lititz Run Riparian Park Warwick Township 0.8

158 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element Municipality Property Owner Acres Lititz/Warwick Trailway Warwick Township 2.6 Warwick Township Linear Park Warwick Township 41.5 Warwick Township Lions Park Warwick Township 7.5 Warwick Township Municipal Cam- Warwick Township 18.4 pus Park John Bonfield Elementary School Warwick School District 11.5 John S. Beck Elementary Warwick School District 3.4 Warwick Middle School Campus Warwick School District 50.7 136.4 West Cocalico Township Chapel Gate Park West Cocalico Township 13.1 Schoeneck Park West Cocalico Township 12.2 West Cocalico Township Park West Cocalico Township 8.0 Schoeneck Elementary Cocalico School District 3.0 36.3

West Donegal Township Appendix B Newville Park West Donegal Township 0.8 Rheems Athletic Association Field West Donegal Township 5.2 West Donegal Township Civic Park West Donegal Township 12.1 Rheems Elementary School Elizabethtown Area School 6.5 District 24.6 West Earl Township Neidermyer Park West Earl Township 10.5 West Earl Municipal Building West Earl Township 6.4 Brownstown Elementary School Eastern Lancaster County 9.6 School District 26.5 West Hempfield Township Grubb Lake Park Mountville Borough 51.2 Bridge Valley Park West Hempfield Township 3.4 Cedar Bluff Park West Hempfield Township 2.0 Eagle View Park West Hempfield Township 3.7 Fairview Park West Hempfield Township 60.5 Silver Spring Park West Hempfield Township 10.7 West Hempfield Township Building West Hempfield Township 1.4 Park Farmdale Elementary Hempfield School District 14.9 147.8 West Lampeter Township Applecroft Neighborhood Park West Lampeter Township 1.1 Mill Creek Park West Lampeter Township 12.7 Northeast Neighborhood West Lampeter Township 3.5 Passive Open Space West Lampeter Township 3.8

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 159 Municipality Property Owner Acres Silver Lane Park West Lampeter Township 7.6 West Lampeter Municipal Building West Lampeter Township 5.5 West Lampeter Township Commu- West Lampeter Township 50.2 nity Park Windy Hill Park West Lampeter Township 4.1 Lampeter-Strasburg Campus Lampeter-Strasburg School 123.6 District Willow Street Elementary Lampeter-Strasburg School 4.6 District 216.7

Comparison of Lancaster County deemed to have an acreage deficiency based on Standards to Adjacent Counties this standard.1

The 1992 Regional Open Space Plan established Chester County: Chester County evaluated the following standards for the provision of coun- each municipality on an individual basis using ty and regional parkland in Lancaster County: the 10.5 acre per 1,000 population standard. In Linking Landscapes: A Plan for the Protected • Provide a minimum of 5 acres of county- Open Space Network in Chester County, PA owned regional parkland per 1,000 residents. Chester County recommends that 5,000 acres of • Provide a minimum of 10 acres of municipal open space should be protected each year. This parkland per 1,000 residents. benchmark was developed after an extensive evaluation which determined that approximately A comparative review of current national stan- 3,000 acres of open space was protected by land dards and standards used in counties adjacent to trusts, municipalities, agricultural easements and Lancaster County was conducted to determine homeowner associations each year over the last

Appendix B Appendix whether these standards should be continued or twenty years. Given the increase in open space modified. The following summarizes the results funding in the last few years, it was determined of the review of standards of adjacent counties. that an increase to 5,000 per year would be reasonable.2 Lancaster County is surrounded by Berks, Chester, Dauphin, Lebanon, and York Counties. Dauphin County: The County is in the process All of these counties have established standards of updating its 1974 Parks and Recreation Plan. for the evaluation of their park and recreation However, the 1974 Plan utilizes the NRPA stan- systems within planning documents. Review dard of 10.5 acres of local public parkland for of these planning documents and standards every 1,000 persons. The 1974 Plan does indicate can provide valuable input in determining the that each municipality should evaluate whether it standards to be used in Lancaster County. All five has adequate park and recreation facilities within of the adjacent counties employ the traditional or nearby to serve the needs of its residents, and acres per 1,000 population guideline established pursue satisfying both the existing and future by the National Recreation and Park Associa- shortfalls.3 tion (NRPA) but each utilizes a different base acreage standard. The following summarizes each Lebanon County: The recently adopted Lebanon county’s standard: County Comprehensive Plan notes that few municipalities were actively pursuing parkland Berks County: The December 2007, Berks 1 Berks County Greenway, Parks, and Recreation County Greenway, Parks, and Recreation Plan Plan, Berks County Planning Department, Action Plan 2 Linking Landscapes: A Plan for the Protected breaks the County into five sub regions, each Open Space Network in Chester County, PA Executive of which was evaluated using a 6.25 acres per Summary, Chester County Planning Commission, page 17 1,000 population standard. Three regions were 3 1974 Dauphin County Park and Recreation Plan

160 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element acquisition. Parkland owned by the municipali- inventory of existing parks and publicly-accessi- ties and the county totaled 820 acres, which ble open space, as well as an analysis of the im- equates to approximately 6.82 acres per 1,000 portant natural resources in the County. Using residents. The prevailing nationwide standard for GIS analysis, the Plan identified eight open space park and recreation land over the past 30 years is focus areas richest in natural features. The eight 10.5 acres per 1,000 residents. Consequently, the focus areas encompass a total of 88,771 acres and December 2007 Lebanon County Comprehen- approximately two-thirds of the total land area sive Plan established a goal of a minimum of 15 within the focus areas is undeveloped. The open acres of parkland per 1,000 residents in Lebanon space preservation benchmark set forth in the County.4 York County Plan is to preserve or protect 2,500 acres of open space annually; 15% of which is York County: The York County Open Space and targeted to the open space areas. In the first year Greenways Plan was adopted in December 2006. of implementation, York County reported a total It focuses on the protection of the County’s ecol- of 2,923 acres of land preserved/protected. York ogy and natural resources. The Plan includes an County has a diversity of natural features that are 4 Lebanon County Comprehensive Plan, December precious and should be protected. 2007, Recreation Plan, Gannett Fleming, RETTEW Associ- ates, Inc, YSM, Toole Recreation Planning

Appendix B

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 161

Appendix C

Proposed Trails pass through the county-owned Ted Parker Nature Preserve, State Game Lands No. 136, Greenscapes proposes that the following trail and the Alexander-King Nature Preserve. segments be developed as part of a countywide greenway trail network. The proposed locations Octoraro Creek Water Trail: The Lancaster of the trails are shown on Figure 29 (see Chapter County Conservancy’s recent acquisition of 3.0). land along both sides of the Octoraro Creek in Lancaster and Chester counties provides 1. Conestoga Trail Extension (South): This an opportunity to create a new 10-mile proposed trail is just over 9 miles and would water trail in the region. From the Kirk’s extend the existing Conestoga Trail from the Mill Bridge (Rt. 272 Bridge) over Octoraro Norman Wood Bridge in Martic Township, Creek, south to the Broad Creek boat launch south along the shoreline of the Susque- just below the Maryland border, the water hanna River to the Maryland border. The is clear and typically deep enough in the trail would cross a variety of highly scenic spring for paddlers to work their way down natural areas including House Rock; Tuc- the scenic ravine into Maryland. This seg- quan Glenn; Kelly’s Run; Pinnacle Overlook; ment is a popular destination for fisherman Muddy Run; Susquehannock State Park; and and is one of the cleanest streams segments Fishing Creek. The trail could be extended in all of Lancaster County. Establishing a in the future to Port Deposit and the Chesa- water trail along this watercourse could focus Appendix C peake Bay. improvements to enhance access and use of the corridor by others. Coordination with 2. Southern End Transmission Corridor the Pennsylvanian Fish & Boat Commission Trail: This proposed 14-mile trail would and the Chesapeake Bay Gateways Program connect the Conestoga Trail to the Octoraro would help ensure that the water trail is eli- Creek Trail. It would follow the PECO En- gible to receive grant funds in the future for ergy utility corridor that runs in an east-west recreational enhancements. direction between the Susquehanna River and Octoraro Creek. The trail would connect with the Conestoga Trail at the Norman 4. Atglen-Susquehanna Trail: The proposed Wood Bridge, and with the Octoraro Creek 28-mile Atglen-Susquehanna Trail (AST) Trail at a point just south of the Rt. 272 would utilize the abandoned Enola Branch Bridge. The trail would traverse the rolling railroad corridor in western and southern topography of southern Lancaster County, Lancaster County, running from the Susque- passing through farm fields and small forest hanna River to the Chester County border. patches. The proposed trail is divided into two major sections, the Turkey Hill section and the 3. Octoraro Creek Trail: This proposed trail Main Branch. is approximately 21.5 miles and would run from the proposed Atglen-Susquehanna The Turkey Hill Section of the AST would Trail south to the Maryland border. It would run in a north-south direction along the connect with the Atglen-Susquehanna Trail abandoned rail corridor that parallels the at a point east of the Borough of Quarryville. Susquehanna River. Approximately five miles The trail would run south along Bowery Run long, it would begin at Creswell Station at to its confluence with the West Branch of the base of Turkey Hill and extend south to the Octoraro Creek, and continue on until it Brenner Hollow Road in Conestoga Town- connects with the main stem of the Octoraro ship. The northern end of the Turkey Hill Creek at the Octoraro Reservoir. The trail section at Creswell Station would intersect would follow the natural drainage pattern with the southern end point of the proposed of the landscape and would run parallel Washington Boro Trail. to water along its entire length. It would

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 165 The Main Branch of the AST would connect ing north from Creswell Station, the trail with the southern end point of the proposed would parallel the Susquehanna River, run Turkey Hill Trail at Brenner Hollow Road. through the village of Washington Boro, and This section runs approximately 23 miles in end at River Park in Columbia. River Park an east-west direction along the abandoned would be a major trailhead for a number of railroad corridor. Proceeding east from regional trails converging in Columbia. The Brenner Hollow Road, it would run through Washington Boro Trail could potentially uti- the Borough of Quarryville. From Quar- lize the inactive section of the Enola rail line ryville, the route continues east, running par- (if it were to be abandoned in the future), or allel to Rt. 372, until it reaches the Chester the wide shoulder of the rail corridor along County boundary just south of the Borough River Road. The proposed trail section offers of Christiana. Here, the potential to connect expansive views of a broad section of the to the Chester Valley Corridor exists. river, as well as connections to the Blue Rock Heritage Center, the public boat launch The two sections of the trail would offer us- in Washington Boro, the Conejohela Flats ers a contrast in southern Lancaster County Important Bird Area, and the recreational landscapes. The Turkey Hill section along the facilities available at River Park. Susquehanna River offers spectacular views of the water and the forested valley walls of 7. Northwest River Trail Extension (Rt. the river gorge. On the west side of the Main 441 Columbia Relocation Project): This Branch, trail users would experience a steeply proposed 1-mile trail would run from rolling, heavily vegetated landscape with Chickies Rock County Park to River Park restricted views due to the thick tree cover in Columbia Borough. Heading south from and the deep cuts of the former rail line. The the rail tunnel at Chickies Rock Park, the trail would then proceed through the built proposed trail would extend south to River environment of Quarryville Borough, where Park, skirting the Norfolk-Southern rail yard local businesses could benefit by provid- in Columbia by utilizing an abandoned rail ing needed retail services to trail users. The siding and the shoulder of the proposed Rt.

Appendix C Appendix eastern side of the proposed trail overlooks 441 Relocation Project. River Park would gently rolling farmland, offering broad views then become the southern terminus and of the landscape. trailhead of the Northwest River Trail. While not the most aesthetically pleasing proposed 5. Turkey Hill Trail Extension: This proposed trail section, it nonetheless would bring trail extension is approximately 6 miles people to Columbia to utilize the facilities at in length and it runs from the southern River Park, purchase supplies and services in terminus of the existing Turkey Hill Trail the downtown, and explore the history and to the Safe Harbor Dam. The existing trail heritage of the Borough. currently ends at an overlook at the top of Turkey Hill. The trail would proceed south 8. Manheim Region Rail Trail: The proposed from Turkey Hill, running parallel to the 8-mile Manheim Region Rail Trail would Susquehanna River to the Safe Harbor Dam run from the northern terminus of the exist- access road where there is an opportunity ing Lancaster Junction Trail to the border of to connect to the Turkey Hill Trail section Lebanon County, where it would connect of the proposed AST. Views of the River to the Horseshoe Trail. The proposed trail and access to the recreation facilities at Safe begins at Lancaster Junction and runs north Harbor are among the amenities that would through Veterans Memorial Park in Man- be offered by this trail extension. heim Borough. The trail would then head due north along the abandoned Manheim/ 6. Washington Boro Trail: This proposed 4.5- Cornwall Branch of the former Reading mile trail would run from the northern ter- & Columbia Railroad. The proposed trail minus of the Turkey Hill section of the AST parallels Chiques Creek for most of its route, to River Park in Columbia Borough. Head- passing through the rural agricultural land-

166 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element scape of northern Lancaster County, under northeast direction to Denver Borough. The the PA Turnpike, and into the Furnace Hills. trail would continue through the east side The trail would then enter Lebanon County of Denver Borough until it connects to the and connect to the Horseshoe Trail a short Horseshoe Trail at its northern end point. distance north of the county line. An alternative route and/or loop route may be possible utilizing an existing utility right- 9. Manheim-Lititz Rail Trail: The proposed of-way located just west of Denver Borough. 5-mile Manheim-Lititz Rail Trail runs from After crossing the Lancaster-Berks County Manheim Borough to Lititz Borough. The boundary, the trail could connect with trail would begin at the eastern edge of Spring Township’s proposed West Side Trail Manheim Borough where it intersects the along the Lancaster Northern Railway. Like proposed Manheim Region Rail Trail. The the proposed Warwick-Ephrata Trail, this trail would then head due east along the trail offers both recreational potential and rail line connecting Manheim and Lititz. alternative transportation opportunities for The trail would pass Warwick High School area commuters and students. and Lititz Springs Park on the west side of Lititz, leaving the east side of the Borough to 12. Elizabethtown Spur: This proposed 1-mile connect to the proposed Warwick-Ephrata trail would run from Elizabethtown Borough Rail Trail. The connection between the two to the Existing Conewago Recreation Trail. boroughs would have the added benefit of The proposed trail would connect to Eliza- Appendix C providing an alternative transportation route bethtown via Lancaster County Conservan- for area commuters. cy-owned land located east of the Borough along Mount Gretna Road. From there the 10. Warwick-Ephrata Trail: The proposed trail would head north through the Conser- 5-mile Warwick-Ephrata Rail Trail would vancy land and connect to the Conewago run from the western edge of Warwick Recreation Trail north of Beverly Road. This Township to Denver Borough. The trail spur would enable trail users to stop and ex- would begin at the eastern terminus of the plore Elizabethtown Borough, purchase sup- existing Warwick Rail Trail and head due east plies, and utilize facilities located downtown. along the abandoned Reading & Columbia It would also provide borough residents with Railroad Line. The trail would follow the rail bike and pedestrian access to the Conewago corridor through Warwick Township and Trail. into Akron Borough. From Akron Borough, the trail would connect with the southern 13. Conestoga Greenway: This proposed 9-mile terminus of the existing Ephrata Rail Trail trail runs from the northeastern edge of in Ephrata Borough. The trail would follow Manheim Township to the Susquehanna the existing Ephrata Rail Trail to its northern River. Beginning at the confluence of the terminus and then continue into Ephrata Cocalico Creek and the Conestoga River Township. The trail would follow the rail in northeastern Manheim Township, the corridor through Ephrata Township to the proposed trail would extend southwest along southern terminus of the proposed Denver the Conestoga River. The trail would utilize Borough Trail Extension. This proposed trail portions of the existing Conestoga Trail, as offers great recreational potential as well as well as existing open spaces such as Lancaster alternative transportation opportunities for County Central Park, Buchmiller Park, and area commuters and students. Safe Harbor Park. The trail would traverse numerous municipalities along its route to 11. Denver Borough Trail Extension: This the Susquehanna River. A link with the Tur- proposed 7-mile trail would run from the key Hill section of the Atglen-Susquehanna northern terminus of the Warwick-Ephrata Trail near the Safe Harbor Dam may be Rail Trail to the existing Horseshoe Trail. possible. The trail would begin at the northern edge of Ephrata Township and proceed in a

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 167 14. Conewago Trail Extension: This proposed County regional park and a potential longer 6.5-mile trail runs from the western ter- distance biking opportunity at the Goat Path. minus of the existing Conewago Trail to the Susquehanna River. Beginning at the A potential 2-mile extension of the trail in intersection of the Conewago Trail and Rt. the future could be created by proceed- 230 northwest of Elizabethtown Borough, ing east out of Money Rocks County Park, the proposed trail would travel in a south- crossing the county boundary into Chester west direction, following the Conewago County, and connecting with the proposed Creek through West Donegal and Conoy in Honey Brook. Townships. The trail would terminate at the Susquehanna River in northwest Conoy 17. Lancaster Junction Trail Extension Township near the village of Falmouth. Here (South): This proposed 3-mile trail would the trail would connect with the existing run from the southern terminus of the Conoy Canal section of the Northwest River Lancaster Junction Trail at the County Trail. A possible link north, crossing the Emergency Training Center to Grubb Lake Conewago Creek into Dauphin County, Park. The proposed trail would head south could extend the trail along the Susquehanna from the Emergency Training Center, cross River to Middletown Borough. under Rt. 283, and continue along the rail corridor, passing Hempfield High School 15. Reading & Columbia Trail: This proposed and crossing over Rt. 23 at Silver Spring. The 2.5-mile trail runs from eastern edge of trail would then proceed to Grubb Lake Park Columbia Borough to Grubb Lake Park. and connect with the northern terminus of Beginning at Glatfelter Park in Columbia the proposed Shawnee Run trail. Borough, the trail would extend in a north- east direction along the abandoned Reading 18. Lancaster Junction Trail Extension & Columbia Railroad line. The trail would (North): This proposed 2.5-mile trail would follow the abandoned rail corridor through run from the village of Lancaster Junction West Hempfield Township until it reaches to Manheim Borough. The proposed trail

Appendix C Appendix Grubb Lake Park. An extension of the trail would begin at the northern terminus of the to the north would connect with the south- existing Lancaster Junction Trail and head ern terminus of the proposed southern ex- north along the railroad corridor, paralleling tension of the Lancaster Junction Trail. The Chiques Creek most of the way. The trail trail could include interpretative informa- would enter Manheim Borough from the tion regarding the connection between the south, converging with the proposed Man- iron ore quarry (Grubb Lake) and the iron heim Region Rail Trail and the proposed furnaces and rolling mills along the Susque- Manheim–Lititz Rail Trail. Manheim Bor- hanna River in Chickies Rock County Park. ough is in a position to benefit economically should the creation of these three proposed 16. New Holland Trail: This proposed 6.5-mile trails come to fruition. trail runs from Money Rocks County Park west to the eastern terminus of the PA Rt. 23 19. Little Chiques Trail: This proposed 4.5-mile Corridor, commonly referred to as the “Goat trail would connect the Borough of Mount Path.” The proposed trail would head west Joy to Chickies Rock County Park and the from Money Rocks County Park along the Northwest River Trail. The proposed trail abandoned railroad corridor at the northern would begin at Sico Park in Mount Joy and edge of the park. The proposed trail would head south along . continue along this corridor, through New The confluence of Little Chiques Creek Holland Borough, and on to the eastern and Chiques Creek is located just north terminus of the Goat Path near Rt. 772. The of PA Route 23. From this point the trail proposed trail would provide a direct alterna- would continue south following Chiques tive transportation connection between a Creek to connect to Chickies Rock Park.

168 Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element The trail would continue along the creek through Chickies Rock Park, terminating at the Northwest River Trail and the proposed Chiques Creek Bike/Pedestrian Bridge planned for construction in 2011.

20. Pequea Creek Water Trail: The proposed 7.7-mile water trail would run from Silver Mine Park in Pequea Township to the PPL Boat Access at the confluence of the Susque- hanna River. This stretch of waterway is a popular tubing and paddling area. It offers a scenic journey through pastoral and wooded landscapes, and passes historic Sickmans Mill, State Game Lands No. 288, and PPL’s Pequea Creek Recreation Area. Having a public access point for both the ingress and egress to the water, along with available camping sites along the corridor, make this a particularly attractive water trail segment. Appendix C There may be a possibility of extending the trail above Sliver Mine Park if there is inter- est from the upstream communities.

Greenscapes — The Green Infrastructure Element 169

Lancaster County Planning Commission 150 North Queen Street • Suite #320 • Lancaster, PA • (717) 299-8333 www.co.lancaster.pa.us/planning