Improving the Allocation and Execution of Army Facility Sustainment Funding

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Improving the Allocation and Execution of Army Facility Sustainment Funding C O R P O R A T I O N ELLEN M. PINT, BETH E. LACHMAN, KATHERINE ANANIA, CONNOR P. JACKSON Improving the Allocation and Execution of Army Facility Sustainment Funding RR-3240_8.5x11_v4.indd All Pages 4/14/20 4:00 PM For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR3240 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0352-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Ridgway Hall, Fort Benning, Georgia Photo by Beth E. Lachman Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled IMCOM Installation Facility Sustainment Improvement sponsored by the Commanding General, U.S. Army Installation Management Command (IMCOM). The purpose of this project was to identify strategies to improve the allocation of facility sustainment, restoration, and modern- ization (SRM) funding to maximize the benefits to installations within the resources allotted. This research was conducted within RAND Arroyo Center’s Forces and Logistics Program. RAND Arroyo Center, part of the RAND Corporation, is a federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) sponsored by the United States Army. RAND operates under a “Federal-Wide Assurance” (FWA00003425) and complies with the Code of Federal Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects Under United States Law (45 CFR 46), also known as “the Common Rule,” as well as with the implementation guidance set forth in DoD Instruction 3216.02. As applicable, this compliance includes reviews and approvals by RAND’s Institutional Review Board (the Human Subjects Protection Committee) and by the U.S. Army. The views of sources utilized in this study are solely their own and do not represent the official policy or position of DoD or the U.S. Government. iii Contents Preface ........................................................................................................... iii Figures ........................................................................................................... ix Tables ............................................................................................................ xi Summary .......................................................................................................xiii Acknowledgments ............................................................................................ xix Abbreviations .................................................................................................. xxi CHAPTER ONE Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Background and Purpose ....................................................................................... 1 Research Approach ............................................................................................... 2 Information Technology Systems Involved in Facility Sustainment ....................................... 4 General Fund Enterprise Business System Real Property ................................................. 4 The Installation Status Report for Infrastructure .......................................................... 5 Sustainment Management Systems .......................................................................... 5 Computerized Maintenance Management Systems ....................................................... 5 The Organization of This Report .............................................................................. 6 CHAPTER TWO Insights from Installation Visits and Interviews .......................................................... 7 Recent Trends in Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization Funding ............................... 8 Installation-Level Processes for Allocation of Facility Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization Funding ...................................................................................10 Challenges in Making the Best Use of Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization Funding .....12 Shortage of Directorate of Public Works Staff ............................................................12 Difficulties Using the General Fund Enterprise Business System ......................................14 Other Factors That Erode Buying Power ..................................................................15 Practices to Improve the Use of Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization Funding .............16 Process Improvements ........................................................................................16 Prioritization of Sustainment Projects ......................................................................17 Alternative Sources of Funding .............................................................................17 Conclusions ......................................................................................................19 v vi Improving the Allocation and Execution of Army Facility Sustainment Funding CHAPTER THREE Insights from Installation Status Report Data Analysis ...............................................21 Examples of Installation Status Report for Infrastructure Data .......................................... 22 Facility Transition Rates ...................................................................................... 27 Conclusions ......................................................................................................28 CHAPTER FOUR Insights from the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Services ..............................31 Relevant Office of the Secretary of Defense Activities Related to Installation Facility Sustainment .......................................................................................31 Office of the Secretary of Defense Policies ................................................................31 Insights from the Office of the Secretary of Defense Real Property Reform Management Group Activities ......................................................................................... 34 Defense Business Board Examination Regarding Real Property Management .......................35 Navy Installation Facility Sustainment Practices .......................................................... 36 Navy Risk-Based Targeted Facilities Investment Strategy .............................................. 36 Navy Uses of Software Tools to Help with Facility Sustainment .......................................41 U.S. Marine Corps Installation Facility Sustainment Practices ...........................................41 The U.S. Marine Corps Forces Reserve ................................................................... 42 Air Force Installation Facility Sustainment Practices ...................................................... 42 A Centralized Process: The Comprehensive Asset Management Plan ................................ 43 The Decentralized Process Is Based on Installation Execution Plans ................................. 46 The Air Force Category Management Program ...........................................................47 Army Reserve Component Facility Sustainment Practices.................................................47 Army National Guard ........................................................................................47 U.S. Army Reserve ............................................................................................49 The Proposed Army Mission Dependency Index .......................................................... 50 Conclusions ......................................................................................................52 CHAPTER FIVE Insights from Facility Management Trends, Practices, and Research ...............................55 The Facility Management Framework .......................................................................55 Facility Management Strategies .............................................................................. 56 Comparison with Army Policies Regarding Facilities Management Strategies ....................... 60 Facilities Management Performance Metrics ................................................................61 Facilities Maintenance Prioritization Tools ..................................................................63 Facilities Management Research Trends .................................................................... 64 Conclusions
Recommended publications
  • ACC Contracting Command Update
    UNCLASSIFIED ACC Contracting Command Update MG Ted Harrison Commanding General Agile – Proficient – Trusted UNCLASSIFIED 3 Jun 15 U.S. Army Commands (ACOMs) 1 Army Materiel Command 2 UNCLASSIFIED # of Personnel ACC Organizational Structure Auth / On Board Mil – 1,129/ 1,062 Civ – 5,386 / 5,029 Assistant Secretary of the Army for (does not include ACTEDS Interns) Army Materiel Acquisition, Logistics *As of 2 MAR 2015 Command & Technology Army Contracting Command (ACC) Huntsville, AL Army Contracting Command Army Contracting Command Mission & Installation Expeditionary Aberdeen Proving Ground New Jersey Contracting Contracting APG. MD Picatinny Arsenal, NJ Command (ECC) Command (MICC) Huntsville, AL Fort Sam Houston, TX 408th CSB USARCENT 411th CSB USFK 412th CSB* USARNORTH Shaw AFB, SC Yongsan, ROK Army Contracting Command Army Contracting Command JBSA, TX Redstone Rock Island Huntsville, AL Rock Island, IL 409th CSB USAREUR 413th CSB USARPAC 418th CSB* III Corps Kaiserslautern, GE Fort Shafter, HI Fort Hood, TX 410th CSB USARSOUTH 414th CSB USARAF Army Contracting Command Army Contracting Command 419th CSB* XVIII Corps JBSA, TX Vicenza, Italy Orlando Warren Fort Bragg, NC Orlando,FL Warren, MI Field Directorate Office Fort Eustis, VA OPM-SANG HCA Only *ECC CSB OPCON to MICC Contracting Center MICC Contracting Offices Riyadh, SA at 34 installations 4 UNCLASSIFIED ACC/ECC Worldwide Footprint ACC Operates in 108 locations worldwide 5 UNCLASSIFIED ACC Transformation • Goal is to operate more efficiently within mandated resource levels • Looking
    [Show full text]
  • Listing of US Army Components FOIA Contacts, 2014
    Description of document: Listing of US Army components FOIA contacts, 2014 Requested date: 28-December-2013 Released date: 23-January-2014 Posted date: 27-January-2014 Source of document: U.S. Army Freedom of Information Office Casey Building, Suite 150 ATTN: AAHS-RDF 7701 Telegraph Road Alexandria, VA 22315-3905 US Army online FOIA Request Form The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY 9301 CHAPEK ROAD FORT BELVOIR 22060-5527 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF 23 January 2014 CHIEF ATTORNEY & LEGAL SERVICES Emailed This letter is in response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated 28 December 2013 in which you requested a listing of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratvocate Ccinsight
    Stratvocate ccInsight Customers DoD Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Contract Management Agency / DCMA AQ Defense Contract Management Agency / DCMA General Dynamics Defense Systems (Pittsfield) Defense Contract Management Agency / DCMA Hartford Defense Contract Management Agency / DCMA Lockheed Martin Sunnyvale Defense Contract Management Agency / Defense Contract Management Agency East (DCMAE) Top Level / DCMA NSSO Lockheed Martin, Mitchel Field, NY Defense Information Systems Agency DISA PLD-Washington D.C. / White House Communications Agency Procurement Directorate / DITCO-Europe Procurement Directorate / DITCO-NCR Procurement Directorate / DITCO-NCR PL64 Special Projects Procurement Directorate / DITCO-Pacific Procurement Directorate / DITCO-Scott Procurement Directorate / DITCO-Scott JITC Defense Logistics Agency DLA Acquisition Locations / Defense Media Center DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Aviation DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Aviation - BSM DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Aviation - Huntsville DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Aviation - Philadelphia Detachment DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office - Battle Creek DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office - Columbus DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office - Energy DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office - Philadelphia DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA Contracting Services Office - Philadelphia - BSM DLA Acquisition Locations / DLA
    [Show full text]
  • National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018
    1 115TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115–200 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON H.R. 2810 together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] JULY 6, 2017.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:45 Jul 07, 2017 Jkt 026108 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\HR\OC\HR200.XXX HR200 congress.#13 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:45 Jul 07, 2017 Jkt 026108 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\HR200.XXX HR200 1 115TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115–200 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON H.R. 2810 together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] JULY 6, 2017.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 26–108 WASHINGTON : 2017 VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:45 Jul 07, 2017 Jkt 026108 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR200.XXX HR200 congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS WILLIAM M. ‘‘MAC’’ THORNBERRY, Texas, Chairman WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina ADAM SMITH, Washington JOE WILSON, South Carolina ROBERT A.
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-21-8, Army Modernization
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters October 2020 ARMY MODERNIZATION Army Should Improve Use of Alternative Agreements and Approaches by Enhancing Oversight and Communication of Lessons Learned GAO-21-8 October 2020 ARMY MODERNIZATION Army Should Improve Use of Alternative Agreements and Approaches by Enhancing Oversight and Highlights of GAO-21-8, a report to Communication of Lessons Learned congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The Army annually invests billions of In its effort to modernize weapon systems capabilities, the Army increasingly dollars in science and technology uses alternative agreements instead of Federal Acquisition Regulation-based projects to support weapon systems contracts for research and development and has expanded the use of alternative modernization. These projects often approaches that engage industry and academia. The Army’s use of these involve the use of alternative agreements and approaches provides flexibilities and reduces barriers to agreements outside the Federal creating new partnerships. One type of alternative agreement—other Acquisition Regulation. The Army also transactions for prototype projects, which help evaluate the feasibility or utility of uses alternative approaches to reduce a technology—has driven the recent expansion in the overall use of alternative barriers to partnerships with industry agreements to support Army modernization (see figure). and academia. In doing so, the Army has lessons learned available to it about, for example, the type of Army Alternative Agreement Obligations, Fiscal Years 2017-2019 alternative agreement to use or how to better execute an alternative approach. GAO was asked to review the Army’s alternative agreements and approaches for modernization.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Small Business Specialists Directory
    Army Small Business Directory Last updated: 6/21/2010 Contents Command Associate Directors .............................................................................................. 2 AMC Subordinate Small Business Offices ............................................................................ 3 ACC Mission Installation Contracting Command (MICC) ................................................... 4 ACC Other ............................................................................................................................. 8 ACE Division Offices ............................................................................................................ 9 ACE District Offices ............................................................................................................ 11 1 DEPARTMENT OF ARMY Offices of Small Business Programs Command Associate Directors AMC HQ US Army Materiel Command Ms. Nancy Small Ms. Mary Moore 7612 Cardinal Road Commercial: 256-450-9026 Phone: 256-450-9036 Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898 DSN 645 [email protected] http://www.amc.army.mil/amc/smlbus Fax: 256-450-9001 ACOM [email protected] ACE Army Corps of Engineers Ms. Jackie Robinson-Burnette Deputy? GAO Building, 3rd Floor, Rm 3A60 Commercial: 202-761-8789 441 G Street, NW Jackie.L.Robinson- Washington, DC 20314-1000 [email protected] DRU http://www.hq.usace.army.mil/hqsb/ INSCOM U. S. Army Intelligence & Security Command Ms. Harriett L. Burton Deputy? 8825 Beulah Street Commercial: 703-428-4533 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5246 DSN 328 http://www.inscom.army.mil Fax: 703-428-4885 DRU [email protected] MEDCOM US Army Medical Command Mr. Dan Shackelford Ms. Nancy Villarreal 2107 17th Street, Suite 70 Commercial: 210-221-4267 [email protected] Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-5070 DSN: 471 210-295-4415 http://sb.amedd.army.mil Fax: 210-221-4082 Michael Anderson (Contractor) [email protected] 210-221-4267 Or [email protected] DRU [email protected] rmy.mil MRMC U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association of the United States Army's Institute of Land Warfare
    BIOGRAPHY General Carter F. Ham, U.S. Army, Retired General Ham is the president and chief executive officer of the Association of the United States Army. He is an experienced leader who has led at every level from platoon to geographic combatant command. He is also a member of a very small group of Army senior leaders who have risen from private to four-star general. General Ham served as an enlisted infantryman in the 82nd Airborne Division before attending John Carroll University in Cleveland, Ohio. Graduating in 1976 as a distinguished military graduate, his service has taken him to Italy, Germany, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Macedonia, Qatar, Iraq and, uniquely among Army leaders, to over 40 African countries in addition to a number of diverse assignments within the United States. He commanded the First Infantry Division, the legendary Big Red One, before assuming duties as director for operations on the Joint Staff at the Pentagon where he oversaw all global operations. His first four-star command was as commanding general, U.S. Army Europe. Then in 2011, he became just the second commander of United States Africa Command where he led all U.S. military activities on the African continent ranging from combat operations in Libya to hostage rescue operations in Somalia as well as training and security assistance activities across 54 complex and diverse African nations. General Ham retired in June of 2013 after nearly 38 years of service. Immediately prior to joining the staff at AUSA, he served as the chairman of the National Commission on the Future of the Army, an eight-member panel tasked by the Congress with making recommendations on the size, force structure and capabilities of the Total Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Bios
    BIOGRAPHY General Carter F. Ham, U.S. Army, Retired General Ham is the president and chief executive officer of the Association of the United States Army. He is an experienced leader who has led at every level from platoon to geographic combatant command. He is also a member of a very small group of Army senior leaders who have risen from private to four-star general. General Ham served as an enlisted infantryman in the 82nd Airborne Division before attending John Carroll University in Cleveland, Ohio. Graduating in 1976 as a distinguished military graduate, his service has taken him to Italy, Germany, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Macedonia, Qatar, Iraq and, uniquely among Army leaders, to over 40 African countries in addition to a number of diverse assignments within the United States. He commanded the First Infantry Division, the legendary Big Red One, before assuming duties as director for operations on the Joint Staff at the Pentagon where he oversaw all global operations. His first four-star command was as commanding general, U.S. Army Europe. Then in 2011, he became just the second commander of United States Africa Command where he led all U.S. military activities on the African continent ranging from combat operations in Libya to hostage rescue operations in Somalia as well as training and security assistance activities across 54 complex and diverse African nations. General Ham retired in June of 2013 after nearly 38 years of service. Immediately prior to joining the staff at AUSA, he served as the chairman of the National Commission on the Future of the Army, an eight-member panel tasked by the Congress with making recommendations on the size, force structure and capabilities of the Total Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Small Business Directory Last Updated: 7/17/2012
    Army Small Business Directory Last updated: 7/17/2012 Contents Command Associate Directors .............................................................................................. 2 AMC Subordinate Small Business Offices ............................................................................ 3 ACC Mission Installation Contracting Command (MICC) ................................................... 4 ACC Other ............................................................................................................................. 7 ACE Division Offices ............................................................................................................ 8 ACE District Offices ............................................................................................................ 10 1 DEPARTMENT OF ARMY Offices of Small Business Programs Command Associate Directors AMC HQ US Army Materiel Command Ms. Nancy Small Mr. Lance Wiltshire 4400 Martin Road Commercial: 256-450-7953 Ms. Mary Moore Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5000 DSN 645 Ms. Amanda Linville http://www.army.mil/amc Fax: 256-450-8805 Commercial: 256-450-7956 ACOM [email protected] FAX: 256-450-8805 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ACE Army Corps of Engineers Ms. Jackie Robinson-Burnette Ms. Emilce Hessler GAO Building, 3rd Floor, Rm 3A60 Commercial: 202-761-8789 Phone: 202-761-0732 441 G Street, NW Jackie.L.Robinson- [email protected]. Washington, DC 20314-1000 [email protected] mil DRU http://www.hq.usace.army.mil/hqsb/
    [Show full text]
  • Army Lawyer, Issue 2, 2020
    U.S. Army Judge Advocate General’s Corps Issue 2 • 2020 Interoperability 40 Breaking Quarantine 44 Back to the Future 68 Peacetime Partners 86 U.S. Army SGT Tykisha Teal, a transport operator with the 1229th Transportation Company, Maryland Army National Guard, speaks to a JAG Corps representative at the MDNG’s joint reception, staging, onward movement and integration station at the Dundalk Readiness Center in Dundalk, Maryland. (Credit: SGT Elizabeth Scott/U.S. Army National Guard) Table of Contents Editorial Board Issue 2 • 2020 Captain Nicole Ulrich Departments Editor-in-Chief, The Army Lawyer 40 A Foreign Perspective on Legal Interoperability Court Is Assembled By Lieutenant Colonel Paddy Larkin and Captain Pearl K. Sandys Mr. Jan Bartels Editor-in-Chief, Military Law Review 2 Transatlantic Partnership British Army Legal Services Major Courtney M. Cohen and the U.S. Army Judge Closing Argument Director, Professional Communications Program Advocate General’s Corps 97 Preparing the JAG Corps for By Major General Alexander Taylor Lieutenant Colonel Jess B. Roberts an Uncertain Tomorrow Vice Chair, Administrative and The Strategic Initiatives Process Civil Law Department 4 News & Notes By Colonel Peter Hayden, Lieutenant Colonel Josh Berry, and Major Justin Barnes Lieutenant Colonel Keirsten H. Kennedy Azimuth Check Chair, Administrative and Civil Law Department 7 The Power of Deliberate Mr. Fred L. Borch III Leader Presence Features Regimental Historian and Archivist By Colonel Jerrett W. Dunlap Jr. No. 1 Lieutenant Colonel Megan S. Wakefield Lore of the Corps Chief, Strategic Communications 44 Breaking Quarantine Using Article 84 to Chief Warrant Officer Two Matthew M. Casey 9 Members of the Regiment Combat COVID-19 Strategic Communications Officer Interred in Arlington By Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Douvas, National Cemetery By Fred L.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements for ASC Army Sustainment Command
    UNCLASSIFIED Army Sustainment Command Requirements for ASC June 3, 2015 Ms. Bobbie Russell Deputy to the Executive Director for Contract Management June 3, 2015 UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED 1 UNCLASSIFIED ASC SERVICES CONTRACT SNAPSHOT Support logistics operations worldwide • Approximately 300 active services contracts • Cumulative value approximately $1B annually • Mix of firm fixed price and cost reimbursable contract vehicles General Categories of Services Contracts • Material maintenance (military and commercial vehicles and equipment) • Supply and storage (parts, materials, clothing, equipment, ammunition) • Transportation (Localized transportation of goods and personal property movements) • Laundry & dry cleaning • Full Food Service and Dining Facility Attendant • Technical professional services • IT and logistics automation support Actively integrate small business, state licensing agencies, and non-profit agencies In support of federal Better Buying Power initiatives, ASC is reviewing all services acquisition strategies, contract lengths, standardizing performance work statements, and quality surveillance plans within the command. NOTE: Does not include LOGCAP June 3, 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 2 UNCLASSIFIED ARMY CONTRACTING AGENCIES SUPPORTING ASC Army Contracting Command Contracting Centers: Supports AMC's life cycle management commands • Army Contracting Command - Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD; Army Contracting Command - New Jersey; Army Contracting Command – Redstone, AL; Army Contracting Command - Rock Island, IL; Army Contracting
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2021-4 12-30 July 2021 National Defense University
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2021-4 12-30 July 2021 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Lieutenant General Mike Plehn is the 17th President of the National Defense University. As President of NDU, he oversees its five component colleges that offer graduate-level degrees and certifications in joint professional military education to over 2,000 U.S. military officers, civilian government officials, international military officers and industry partners annually. Raised in an Army family, he graduated from Miami Southridge Senior High School in 1983 and attended the U.S. Air Force Academy Preparatory School in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy with Military Distinction and a degree in Astronautical Engineering in 1988. He is a Distinguished Graduate of Squadron Officer School as well as the College of Naval Command and Staff, where he received a Master’s Degree with Highest Distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies. He also holds a Master of Airpower Art and Science degree from the School of Advanced Airpower Studies, as well as a Master of Aerospace Science degree from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Lt Gen Plehn has extensive experience in joint, interagency, and special operations, including: Middle East Policy in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, and four tours at the Combatant Command level to include U.S. European Command, U.S. Central Command, and twice at U.S. Southern Command, where he was most recently the Military Deputy Commander. He also served on the Air Staff in Strategy and Policy and as the speechwriter to the Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force.
    [Show full text]