Easter 2010 Termcard
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Lobby in Transition: What the 2009 Mps’ Expenses Scandal Revealed About the Changing Relationship Between Politicians and the Westminster Lobby?
City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Gaber, I. (2013). The Lobby in transition: what the 2009 MPs’ expenses scandal revealed about the changing relationship between politicians and the Westminster Lobby?. Media History, 19(1), pp. 45-58. doi: 10.1080/13688804.2012.752962 This is the published version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/18258/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2012.752962 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Media History ISSN: 1368-8804 (Print) 1469-9729 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cmeh20 THE LOBBY IN TRANSITION Ivor Gaber To cite this article: Ivor Gaber (2013) THE LOBBY IN TRANSITION, Media History, 19:1, 45-58, DOI: 10.1080/13688804.2012.752962 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2012.752962 © 2013 Taylor & Francis Published online: 11 Jan 2013. -
Anti-Semitism?
'p IsnlaWklmnicf" ,4MONS[ER CRthL T'HEHOLOCAUS r.rHE HOL ANTI..ZIONISM IN GREAT BRITAIN AND BEYOND A "Respectable" Anti-Semitism? ALVIN H. ROSENFELD THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE The American Jewish Committee protects the rights and freedoms of Jews the world over; combats bigotry and anti-Semitism and promotes human rights for all; works for the securityofIsraeland deepened understanding between Americans and Israelis; advocates public policy positions rooted in American democratic values and the perspectives of the Jewish heritage; and enhances the cre- ative vitality of the Jewish people. Founded in 1906, itis the pioneer human-relations agency in the United States. To learn more about how the American Jewish Committee fightshatred and anti-Semitism,visit our website at www.ajc.org and see related publications on the inside back cover. ANTI-ZIONISM IN GREAT BRITAIN AND BEYOND: A "Respectable" Anti-Semitism? ALVIN H. ROSENFELD THEAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A number of friends and colleagues read earlier versions of this essay and suggested ways to improve it. 'While they are not responsible for any shortcomings still present, I am certain the final version is better for their efforts. I would like to thank the following: Edward Alexan- der, Tamar Benjamin, Paul Bogdanor, Todd Endelman, Harry Geduld, Barbara Krawcowicz, Vivian Liska, Daniel Nichols, Gale Nichols, Aron Rodrigue, Erna Rosenfeld, Gavriel Rosenfeld, Natania Rosenfeld, Sidney Rosenfeld, Roger Temam, and Leona Toker. Alvin Rosenfeld Foiuwoiu Two popular national magazines have recently carried cover stories exploring "The New Face of Anti-Semitism" and "The New Anti- Semitism." One would think that a hatred as old and long-lasting as anti-Semitism could hardly be described as "new." Yet this protean virus has reared its head again, in its most recent incarnation, as a pattern of discourse that poses "merely" as criticism of Israel, but in reality propagates classic hatred and distrust of Jews. -
Speakers of the House of Commons
Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426. -
Stapylton Final Version
1 THE PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OF FREEDOM FROM ARREST, 1603–1629 Keith A. T. Stapylton UCL Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Page 2 DECLARATION I, Keith Anthony Thomas Stapylton, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed Page 3 ABSTRACT This thesis considers the English parliamentary privilege of freedom from arrest (and other legal processes), 1603-1629. Although it is under-represented in the historiography, the early Stuart Commons cherished this particular privilege as much as they valued freedom of speech. Previously one of the privileges requested from the monarch at the start of a parliament, by the seventeenth century freedom from arrest was increasingly claimed as an ‘ancient’, ‘undoubted’ right that secured the attendance of members, and safeguarded their honour, dignity, property, and ‘necessary’ servants. Uncertainty over the status and operation of the privilege was a major contemporary issue, and this prompted key questions for research. First, did ill definition of the constitutional relationship between the crown and its prerogatives, and parliament and its privileges, lead to tensions, increasingly polemical attitudes, and a questioning of the royal prerogative? Where did sovereignty now lie? Second, was it important to maximise the scope of the privilege, if parliament was to carry out its business properly? Did ad hoc management of individual privilege cases nevertheless have the cumulative effect of enhancing the authority and confidence of the Commons? Third, to what extent was the exploitation or abuse of privilege an unintended consequence of the strengthening of the Commons’ authority in matters of privilege? Such matters are not treated discretely, but are embedded within chapters that follow a thematic, broadly chronological approach. -
Corpus Christi College the Pelican Record
CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE THE PELICAN RECORD Vol. LII December 2016 i The Pelican Record Editor: Mark Whittow Design and Printing: Lynx DPM Published by Corpus Christi College, Oxford 2016 Website: http://www.ccc.ox.ac.uk Email: [email protected] The editor would like to thank Rachel Pearson, Julian Reid, Joanna Snelling, Sara Watson and David Wilson. Front cover: Detail of the restored woodwork in the College Chapel. Back cover: The Chapel after the restoration work. Both photographs: Nicholas Read ii The Pelican Record CONTENTS President’s Report .................................................................................... 3 Carol Service 2015 Judith Maltby.................................................................................................... 12 Claymond’s Dole Mark Whittow .................................................................................................. 16 The Hallifax Bowl Richard Foster .................................................................................................. 20 Poisoning, Cannibalism and Victorian England in the Arctic: The Discovery of HMS Erebus Cheryl Randall ................................................................................................. 25 An MCR/SCR Seminar: “An Uneasy Partnership?: Science and Law” Liz Fisher .......................................................................................................... 32 Rubbage in the Garden David Leake ..................................................................................................... -
Britain's Love Affair with Refugees - Past but Not Present?
Truly, Madly, Deeply: Britain's Love Affair With Refugees - Past but not Present? TONY KUSHNER Abstract Britain's response to the recent refugee crisis is marked by its paucity. This article explores how constructions of the past have been instrumentalised by both those defending government policies and those demanding that more should be let in. The focus is on child refugees and the comparisons drawn (and rejected) to the Kindertransport. Through discussion in parliament, the media, cultural productions and amongst ordinary people, it shows the importance of 'history' and how references to the Second World War and the Holocaust have tended to help justify rather than query the exclusion of today's refugees and thereby providing a very different example to Germany. Keywords Refugees; Kindertransport; Holocaust; Britain; Germany; Second World War; Syria; parliament; media; Mass-Observation; history. In Anthony Minghella's Truly, Madly, Deeply (1991), a film that passionately fights back against the selfishness and bigotry that typified the excesses of Thatcherism and instead posits a 'liberal humanism',1 Juliet Stevenson's character cannot bring herself to love again until she has - with his permission - let go of the ghost of her soulmate and husband (Alan Rickman) who has died prematurely and suddenly. The film works not only because of the romantic chemistry between Stevenson and Rickman, but through the commitment of Minghella (son of an Isle of Wight Italian origin ice cream maker),2 and the two lead actors (much of the detail was improvised) to a different Britain - one that welcomes diversity and rediscovers compassion.3 It is exemplified by its portrayal of refugees whose talents and skills are ignored by the host society but maintain their dignity and decency. -
Cambridge Le Mobilises Against Cuts Near Grange NOAH B
News p5 Features p16 My Degree p14 University Press adopts We talk to some Straight from the horse’s a giant panda cub. overactive freshers about mouth: an architect prepares Rejoicing ensues. their experiences for Saturday’s revels FRIDAY 19TH NOVEMBER 2010 THE INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER SINCE 1947 ISSUE NO 730 | VARSITY.CO.UK Student assaulted Cambridge le mobilises against cuts near Grange NOAH B. KATZ Road area ABTIN SADEGHI A female Wolfson student was assaulted at around midnight on Tuesday at the junction of Sidgwick Avenue and Grange Road. The attacker was described as a dark-haired male, wearing a leather jacket. Based on the description given, it has been suggested that the same attacker may have assaulted a Robinson student last Thursday morning on Adams Road. The Senior Tutor at Wolfson Col- lege, Dr Jane McLarty said that “neither student was hurt and noth- ing was stolen” but they “were both very upsetting incidents for the women concerned.” According to a Wolfson College student said that “Cambridge was a very safe city overall, but some Businesses and banks to be targeted as student activists claim “it is just the beginning” areas feel really deserted, particu- larly at night. things are really heating up. We fl ags and music. But we will stop and panel will consist of an “academic “The recent assaults have made TRISTAN DUNN & NATASHA PESARAN have had a lot of new faces at meet- protest outside every locale which training session in how to go about me much more wary and vigilant Following national protests last ings and new names added to our has a stake in what’s going on. -
Andrea-Levy-Special-Issue-FINAL.Pdf
ENTERTEXT Special Issue on Andrea Levy Issue 9, 2012 Guest Editor: Wendy Knepper In memory of Cosmo (1993-2010) A cat who lived happily in Toronto, Berlin, and London ‘I’ve never seen him so upset. He really loves that cat. He’s going to miss her. He said he’d never have another one because you just get attached to them and they die. I think she’s dead, Ange–went somewhere to die. But I didn’t say that to yer dad. He’s too upset. He loves that cat. I hope he finds her.’ —Andrea Levy, Never Far from Nowhere Table of Contents Introduction: Andrea Levy’s Dislocating Narratives 1 Wendy Knepper The Familiar Made Strange: The Relationship between the Home and Identity in 14 Andrea Levy’s Fiction Jo Pready Crossing Over: Postmemory and the Postcolonial Imaginary in Andrea Levy’s 31 Small Island and Fruit of the Lemon Claudia Marquis “Telling Her a Story”: Remembering Trauma in Andrea Levy’s Writing 53 Ole Laursen Identity as Cultural Production in Andrea Levy’s Small Island 69 Alicia E. Ellis Women Writers and the Windrush Generation: A Contextual Reading of Beryl 84 Gilroy’s In Praise of Love and Children and Andrea Levy’s Small Island Sandra Courtman Representations of Ageing and Black British Identity in Andrea Levy’s Every Light 105 in the House Burnin’ and Joan Riley’s Waiting in the Twilight Charlotte Beyer Stranger in the Empire: Language and Identity in the ‘Mother Country’ 122 Ann Murphy A Written Song: Andrea Levy’s Neo-Slave Narrative 135 Maria Helena Lima Coloured 154 Mohanalakshmi Rajakumar Letter to Motherwell 162 Rhona Hammond Contributors 169 Andrea Levy’s Dislocating Narratives1 Wendy Knepper This special issue on Andrea Levy (1956- ), the first of its kind, considers the author’s contribution to contemporary literature by exploring how her narratives represent the politics of place2 as well as the dislocations associated with empire, migration, and social transformation. -
How Labour Wins Mapping the Routes to the Next Majority
Fabian Review www.fabians.org.uk Spring 2012 HOW LABOUR WINS Mapping the routes to the next majority The quarterly magazine of the Fabian Society Volume 124 no 1 £4.95 THE FABIAN SUMMER CONFERENCE Featuring a Q&A with Ed Miliband LABOUR'S next majority 30th June, 10am doors open for an 11am start finishing at around 5pm Millbank Media Centre, Ground Floor, Millbank Tower, 21–24 Millbank, London, SW1P 4QP Tickets for members and concessions are just £10 (£15 for non-members with six months free membership) Come and join the Fabians for our Summer Conference featuring a Question and Answer session with Ed Miliband. Debate Labour’s electoral strategy and put forward your take on some of the ideas we’ve explored in this issue of the Fabian Review. To book your tickets head to www.fabians.org.uk or call 020 7227 4900 EDITORIAL Image: Adrian Teal Age-old lessons Andrew Harrop asks if ongoing public support for pensioner benefits offers the left a way out of its welfare impasse If the polls are to be believed, benefits for pensioners (of which the the poorest get more – which the coali- cutting welfare is very popular. YouGov much-castigated winter fuel payment tion is busy unpicking though its tax reports that fewer than a third of and free bus pass make up just a tiny credit cuts. Labour voters and just 3 per cent of fraction). On top there is a generous A shared system, where every family Conservatives oppose it. This places the means-tested system which has done is a recipient, could open the way for left in a terrible bind, not least because much to reduce pensioner poverty. -
Fence En Français
FENCE, UN RESEAU INTERNATIONAL DE COLLABORATION D’AUTEURS ET METTEURS EN SCENE AU SERVICE DU THEATRE 1 SOMMAIRE Jonathan METH, directeur/coordinateur du réseau FENCE (biographie) p.3 Sélection et présentation de 10 compagnies coproductrices de FENCE p. 6 Présentation d’une sélection de 35 auteurs/metteurs en scène/interprètes p. 10 parmi les 170 membres actifs de FENCE Liste non exhaustive de compagnies rattachées à des participants de FENCE p.28 Autres connections internationale des membres de FENCE p. 29 Présentation de WONDERLAND, prochain grand projet de FENCE p. 30 2 JONATHAN METH /DIRECTEUR Nationalité Britannique 51 ans Expérience professionnelle 2003 – 2013 : Directeur et fondateur, The Fence L’association FENCE (réseau international d’auteurs et de metteurs en scène de théâtre) Fence est un réseau international de créateurs de théâtre (écrivains, dramaturges, metteurs en scène et directeurs de théâtre à travers l’Europe et au-delà). À l’origine Fence a fut lancée en 2003 sous l’impulsion d’un partenariat entre Writernet (UK), Le British Council et Creative Renewal, et en association avec IETM, réseau international pour les arts du spectacle, afin d’explorer la pratique de l’écriture dramatique contemporaine dans différents contextes culturels européens. Depuis le réseau s’est développé avec succès et compte aujourd’hui plus de 170 écrivains de théâtre et opérateurs culturels provenant de plus de 40 pays différents. Ils organisent régulièrement des rencontres comme à Budapest, Graz, Belgrade, Tampere, Utrecht/Amsterdam, Leeds, Istanbul, Timisoara, Glasgow, Guadeloupe, Paris/Bondy, Rabat et Toscan/Rome entre autres. Les activités du group ce génèrent de façon organique a travers le réseau entier, réunissant traditionnellement des groupes composés de 2 a 6 personnes. -
Give and Take: How Conservatives Think About Welfare
How conservatives think about w elfare Ryan Shorthouse and David Kirkby GIVE AND TAKE How conservatives think about welfare Ryan Shorthouse and David Kirkby The moral right of the authors has been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. Bright Blue is an independent think tank and pressure group for liberal conservatism. Bright Blue takes complete responsibility for the views expressed in this publication, and these do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. Director: Ryan Shorthouse Chair: Matthew d’Ancona Members of the board: Diane Banks, Philip Clarke, Alexandra Jezeph, Rachel Johnson First published in Great Britain in 2014 by Bright Blue Campaign ISBN: 978-1-911128-02-1 www.brightblue.org.uk Copyright © Bright Blue Campaign, 2014 Contents About the authors 4 Acknowledgements 5 Executive summary 6 1 Introduction 19 2 Methodology 29 3 How conservatives think about benefit claimants 34 4 How conservatives think about the purpose of welfare 53 5 How conservatives think about the sources of welfare 66 6 Variation amongst conservatives 81 7 Policies to improve the welfare system 96 Annex one: Roundtable attendee list 112 Annex two: Polling questions 113 Annex three: Questions and metrics used for social and economic conservative classification 121 About the authors Ryan Shorthouse Ryan is the Founder and Director of Bright Blue. -
New Pressures on Old Ethics: a Question of Confidentiality
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Oxford University Journalist Fellowship Paper New Pressures on Old Ethics: a question of confidentiality By Kellie Mayo Executive Producer, Insiders, ABC Television Trinity Term 2013 Sponsor: Australian Broadcasting Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Acknowledgements Chapter 1: The issues and implications for journalists of using politicians as sources I: It takes two to tango II: Just add source Chapter 2: The media and MPs in Britain: what we learned from Leveson Chapter 3: Mood swing: the post-Leveson environment Conclusions Bibliography ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The seven years I have worked at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s political program Insiders have flown by. They’ve been marked by uncertainty about the evolving media landscape, a seemingly ever faster news cycle (or cyclone as others have taken to calling it) and unprecedented developments on the domestic political scene including four changes of prime minister. In those circumstances, it feels important to take time out now and again to think more deeply about the way we cover politics. Such opportunities are rare but I am fortunate that the ABC considers they are worthwhile. So I thank the ABC and Tina Osman for this chance to study at the Reuters Institute under the fellowship arrangement established by the corporation’s former Chairman, Donald McDonald. My thanks also to the RISJ staff for making this such a valuable experience. This paper is a small part of a much wider opportunity to discuss and debate journalism and to learn from colleagues and industry figures from around the world. I’m particularly grateful to the Head of the Journalism Fellowship program James Painter and to my supervisor Professor Robert Picard for their help, along with Dr David Levy, John Lloyd, Tim Suter, Alex Reid, Tanya Vale, Kate Hanneford-Smith and Rebecca Edwards.