DOCSLIB.ORG

EAS Best Practices Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EAS Best Practices Guide Emergency An Emergency Alert System Best Practices Guide – Version 1.0 Alert System The EAS Best Practices Guide was created in partnership with EAS Participants to support incremental improvements by providing basic guidelines for EAS operation and maintenance. The Emergency Alert System (EAS) is a under all conditions the President can EXECUTIVE public alert and warning system that communicate with the American people.” leverages the communications assets of SUMMARY EAS Participants including terrestrial As part of larger efforts to strengthen the broadcasters, cable television systems, nation’s preparedness and resiliency, wireless cable systems, satellite digital FEMA and the Federal Communications Contents audio radio service (SDARS) providers, Commission (FCC) announced that they direct broadcast satellite (DBS) services will conduct the first nationwide test of Intent and Purpose and wireline video service providers to the Emergency Alert System on Why an EAS Best Practices allow the President of the United States November 9, 2011. Similar to the way Guide? the capability to address the American local emergency alert system tests are public during a national emergency. This conducted, the Nationwide EAS Test will Description of the EAS system must be available under all involve television stations (including A brief EAS history and digital television, cable, satellite audio description conditions. The system is also used by State and local authorities to deliver and television services) and broadcast Originating EAS Messages important emergency information, such radio stations across the U.S. and several Guidelines for originating as AMBER alerts. The National Weather U.S. territories. effective alerts Service (NWS) regularly uses the system to disseminate emergency weather alerts The EAS has never been tested on a EAS Plans and advisories. national level, and conducting this test is Best Practices for planning an opportunity to assess the system’s and monitoring In 2006, Executive Order 13407 (E.O. capabilities at all levels. The Test plays a 13407), established that it “is the policy of key role in determining if the public is Installation and Configuration the United States to have an effective, able to receive timely and critical “Back to Basics” ideas for reliable, integrated, flexible, and emergency information as part of a larger installation and operation comprehensive system to alert and warn effort to assess national preparedness for all hazards. Sample Diagrams the American people in situations of war, Sample diagrams for terrorist attack, natural disaster, or other FEMA operates and maintains the reference hazards to public safety and well-being (public alert and warning system), taking national-level EAS; conducts tests and appropriate account of the functions, exercises, and ensures the national-level capabilities, and needs of the private EAS keeps pace with emerging technologies. [email protected] sector and of all levels of government in www.fema.gov/emergency/ipaws our Federal system, and to ensure that An Emergency Alert System Best Practices Guide – Version 1.0 Intent and Purpose Emergency Alert System Intent and Purpose FEMA understands that improving the EAS at all A series of meetings, conferences, workshops, levels will take time. FEMA, the FCC and NOAA’s webinars, virtual roundtables, and websites have vision for improving the EAS is incremental. been supporting open and frank discussion on Although the Test will use an Emergency Action improving this important alert and warning tool. Notification (EAN) code and will not include EAS Many practical ideas have been exchanged as origination by State, County, territorial or tribal many communities begin to revisit the EAS. authorities, it is important that we also make improvements at other levels. This first version of the EAS Best Practices Guide is designed to assist EAS message originators, disseminators, and other participants with the basics of operating and managing the EAS. This Guide can also be leveraged to provide a framework for training personnel on the use and operation of the EAS at all levels of origination and distribution. The success of the EAS is dependent upon strong partnerships between EAS originators and alert disseminators. It is also important that Federal agencies work closely in cooperation with State, A number of EAS tests and exercises have been local, territorial, and tribal governments. This is conducted to better inform the process of the approach FEMA, the FCC and NOAA has taken effectively testing the EAS and to identify areas for to revive the EAS dialogue and seek improvements. improvement. In the near future, the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) will be added to the EAS FEMA is working with the FCC and NOAA to to support more effective transport and communicate, educate, and inform EAS distribution of alert messages. It is important that participants, emergency management agencies and the EAS is ready to support these improvements. organizations, and the public of the importance of the EAS, and the need to improve the system. Efforts are underway to promote partnerships with the EAS community continue an ongoing The Guide will be frequently dialogue and promote activities that support updated to reflect lessons incremental improvements to the system. learned from ongoing EAS tests and exercises, as well as reflect This EAS Best Practices guide seeks to document continued dialogue and EAS challenges, ideas, and technical solutions to engagement with EAS support a better understanding and more effective Participants. Due to the cooperative nature of this use of the EAS. The Guide will be frequently document, we strongly urge the updated to reflect lessons learned from EAS Community to offer their ongoing EAS tests and exercises, as well as observations and solutions to reflect continued dialogue and engagement enhance the Guide with diverse with EAS Participants. perspectives. 2 An Emergency Alert System Best Practices Guide – Version 1.0 Brief Description and History of the EAS Emergency Alert System A Brief History The Emergency Alert System (EAS) leverages the Primary Entry Points are broadcast stations capabilities of participating analog and digital located throughout the country with a direct radio, television, cable, satellite, and wireline connection to FEMA and resilient transmission providers working in concert to distribute alert and capabilities. These stations provide the initial warning messages to the public. The alert broadcast of a Presidential EAS message. FEMA is messages can be originated by emergency increasing the number of PEP facilities to provide management authorities at all levels of government direct coverage to at least 90% of the American to warn the public of imminent emergencies. public. The EAS was created in 1994. It is the latest in a Even in today’s world of seamless technology and series of alert and warning systems that began with portable communications devices, the Government the Control of Electromagnetic Radiation maintains a system of radio stations to support (CONELRAD) program, established by President public alert and warning (A&W). In addition to the Harry Truman in 1951. The CONELRAD was PEP System’s primary role to broadcast and relay replaced in 1963 by the Emergency Broadcast the President’s message in a dire emergency, PEP System (EBS), which remained in place until 1994. stations are designed with a much higher-level of The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) resiliency. These “hardened” radio stations created the EAS in 1994 and began enforcing provide the nation with last-resort mass requirements that mandated that all broadcast communications capabilities under all conditions, stations have EAS equipment installed by 1997. In as required by the President of the United States. 2001, cable systems were required to have EAS equipment installed to override all program Broadcast radio receivers are ubiquitous. These channels with a national-level EAS message, also radio receivers can receive one or more of the known as an Emergency Action Notification (EAN). approximately 14,355 full power radio stations broadcasting throughout the country. Over-the-air The Primary Entry Point (PEP) concept first radio broadcasts are one-way, omni-directional surfaced in the mid-1980s. transmissions. In the aftermath of a national, catastrophic event, alerting authorities can leverage operational area capabilities to transmit crucial information to the public through as many methods as possible. However, broadcast radio may be the most effective method since it is possible that terrestrial Internet Protocol (IP) networks and other pathways could be inoperable, especially at “last-mile” delivery to the public. Prolonged power outages are expected in most catastrophic scenarios, negatively affecting IP networks and other communications. The national EAS program provides the nation with an unparalleled, survivable communications network, available under the direst conditions. 3 An Emergency Alert System Best Practices Guide – Version 1.0 Originating EAS Messages Emergency Alert System Originating EAS Messages Best Practices The EAS can be a valuable and tool to disseminate information to the public in emergency situations. This tool provides emergency managers direct access to radio and television broadcasters, cable, and wireline operators, and other media. Cooperation is essential between alerting authorities and originators and EAS Participants to ensure this tool is used
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lesson 1 Key-Terms Meanings: Internet Connectivity Principles
    Lesson 1 Key-Terms Meanings: Internet Connectivity Principles Chapter-4 L01: "Internet of Things " , Raj Kamal, 2017 1 Publs.: McGraw-Hill Education Header Words • Header words are placed as per the actions required at succeeding stages during communication from Application layer • Each header word at a layer consists of one or more header fields • The header fields specify the actions as per the protocol used Chapter-4 L01: "Internet of Things " , Raj Kamal, 2017 2 Publs.: McGraw-Hill Education Header fields • Fields specify a set of parameters encoded in a header • Parameters and their encoding as per the protocol used at that layer • For example, fourth word header field for 32-bit Source IP address in network layer using IP Chapter-4 L01: "Internet of Things " , Raj Kamal, 2017 3 Publs.: McGraw-Hill Education Protocol Header Field Example • Header field means bits in a header word placed at appropriate bit place, for example, place between bit 0 and bit 31 when a word has 32-bits. • First word fields b31-b16 for IP packet length in bytes, b15-b4 Service type and precedence and b3-b0 for IP version • Chapter-4 L01: "Internet of Things " , Raj Kamal, 2017 4 Publs.: McGraw-Hill Education IP Header • Header fields consist of parameters and their encodings which are as per the IP protocol • An internet layer protocol at a source or destination in TCP/IP suite of protocols Chapter-4 L01: "Internet of Things " , Raj Kamal, 2017 5 Publs.: McGraw-Hill Education TCP Header • Header fields consist of parameters and their encoding which are as
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Mobile EAS?
    Statement on Behalf of The Mobile Emergency Alert System (M-EAS) By John M. Lawson, Senior Advisor to M-EAS Submitted to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management In Support of HR 3300: The FEMA Reauthorization Act of 2013 October 31, 2013 On behalf of the developers of the Mobile Emergency Alert System, we are submitting this statement regarding HR 3300, the FEMA Reauthorization Act of 2013. We strongly support the continued development of the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS), and we applaud the provisions in HR 3300 for establishing requirements that address the remaining gaps and vulnerabilities of the system. We respectfully request your careful consideration of the capabilities offered by the Mobile Emergency Alert System in achieving our common goal of modernizing IPAWS. What is Mobile EAS? The Mobile Emergency Alert System (Mobile EAS or M-EAS) is a next-generation, dual use, public alert and warning system for a mobile, 21st Century America. M-EAS utilizes the backbone of the nation’s existing television broadcasting infrastructure and the new technology of Mobile DTV. By using terrestrial broadcasting, M-EAS can deliver rich media content to an unlimited number of mobile phones or other devices without overloading the network. This means high reliability and mass, instantaneous distribution, which is especially crucial in emergency events when cellular networks may be unavailable. M-EAS was developed by LG Electronics and its Zenith R&D Lab, PBS, Harris Broadcast, and Roundbox. M-EAS is built to the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) and is designed for seamless incorporation into the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System.
    [Show full text]
  • ITU Guidelines for National Emergency Telecommunication Plans
    Thematic reports ITUPublications ITU Guidelines for national emergency telecommunication plans International Telecommunication Union Telecommunication Development Bureau Place des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland ISBN: 978-92-61-29961-3 9 7 8 9 2 6 1 2 9 9 6 1 3 Published in Switzerland Geneva, 2019 ITU Guidelines for national emergency telecommunication plans Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) expert Juan Manuel Roldan, President of Luxon Consulting Group, LLC, and research assistant Felipe Ordoñez, under the direction of the Environment and Emergency Telecommunications Division (EET), within the Digital Networks and Society Department of the Telecommunication Development Bureau (BDT). ITU would like to warmly thank those who contributed to the public consultation for their constructive and fruitful comments for the revisions of the guidelines, in particular, the GVF group represented by David Meltzer, Dulip Tillekeratne from GSMA, Cecil Ameil from SES, Ria Sen from ETC, Joseph Burton from, U.S. Department of State, José Toscano from Intelsat, Aarti Holla from ESOA, Jennifer Manner from EchoStar, and ITU experts Eliot Christian and Don Wallace. ISBN 978-92-61-31311-1 (Paper version) 978-92-61-31321-0 (Electronic version) 978-92-61-31331-9 (EPUB version) 978-92-61-31341-8 (Mobi version) Please consider the environment before printing this report. © ITU 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is licensed to the public through a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial- Share Alike 3.0 IGO license (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Radio Communications Standards for Emergency Responders
    A GUIDE TO RADIO COMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS FOR EMERGENCY RESPONDERS Prepared Under United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the European Commission Humanitarian Office (ECHO) Through the Disaster Preparedness Programme (DIPECHO) Regional Initiative in Disaster Risk Reduction March, 2010 Maputo - Mozambique GUIDE TO RADIO COMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS FOR EMERGENCY RESPONDERS GUIDE TO RADIO COMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS FOR EMERGENCY RESPONDERS Table of Contents Introductory Remarks and Acknowledgments 5 Communication Operations and Procedures 6 1. Communications in Emergencies ...................................6 The Role of the Radio Telephone Operator (RTO)...........................7 Description of Duties ..............................................................................7 Radio Operator Logs................................................................................9 Radio Logs..................................................................................................9 Programming Radios............................................................................10 Care of Equipment and Operator Maintenance...........................10 Solar Panels..............................................................................................10 Types of Radios.......................................................................................11 The HF Digital E-mail.............................................................................12 Improved Communication Technologies......................................12
    [Show full text]
  • ESF 2 Communications
    Floyd County Emergency Operations Plan ESF # 2 - 1 Emergency Support Function # 2 – Communications ESF Coordinator Floyd County 911 Coordinator or designee Primary Agencies Floyd County Emergency Management Secondary/Support Agencies Floyd County Sheriff’s Office Amateur Radio Citizens Telephone Introduction Purpose: Communications supports public safety and other county agencies by maintaining continuity of information and telecommunication equipment and other technical resources. ESF #2 uses available communication resources to respond to an incident by: • Alerting and warning the community of a threatened or actual emergency; • Continuing to communicate with the community through a variety of media to inform of protective actions; and • Provide guidance, when appropriate, to help save lives and protect property; This ESF describes the locality’s emergency communications/notification and warning system. The locality will coordinate with the Virginia Emergency Operations Center (VEOC) should additional assistance and resources be required. Scope: ESF # 2 works to accurately and efficiently transfer information during an incident. ESF #2 also: • Informs the community of a threatened or actual emergency, in coordination with ESF #15; • Ensures Floyd County has the ability to notify the community of a disaster or emergency; • Provides for the technology associated with the representation, transfer, interpretation, and processing of data among people, places, and machine; and • Supports Floyd County with the restoration, emission or reception of signs, signals, writing images, and sounds or intelligence of any nature by wire, radio, optical, or other electromagnetic systems. Policies: The following policies are reviewed and revised as necessary: • The Emergency Communications Center (ECC) operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and serves as the 911 center and the locality’s warning point.
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless Emergency Alerts Mobile Penetration Strategy
    WIRELESS EMERGENCY ALERTS MOBILE PENETRATION STRATEGY August 2013 Task Lead Daniel Gonzales Task Staff Edward Balkovich Brian Jackson Jan Osburg Andrew Parker Evan Saltzman Ricardo Sanchez Shoshana Shelton Chuck Stelzner Dulani Woods Henry H. Willis Director, Homeland Security and Defense Center National Defense Research Institute Jack Riley Vice President and Director, National Security Research Division Director, National Defense Research Institute Acknowledgments The National Defense Research Institute, a division of the RAND Corporation, performed this analysis for the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate. The NDRI team extends its deep appreciation to members of the emergency response and wireless communications communities for their cooperation, information, and feedback; their contributions are the foundation of this report. Further, the NDRI team offers its gratitude to the emergency responders whose dedication and commitment ensure the safety of our families, our communities, and our nation. This report is a tribute to their service. In addition, we would like to extend our appreciation for constructive peer reviews provided by Marvin Sirbu of Carnegie Mellon University and by David Senty. NDRI Publication Number: PR-594-OSD iii Preface The objective of this analysis, performed for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Science and Technology Directorate, was to independently assess the coverage and penetration of the Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) system, and to offer recommendations to improve the availability, coverage, and penetration of WEA to the U.S. public. The intended audience of this report is U.S. government decision makers; commercial mobile service providers; mobile wireless device manufacturers; and federal, state, local, and tribal alert originators.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Matter of the Emergency Alert System – State Participation in State Emergency Communications Committees (SECCS) TABLE of CONTENTS I
    INTERGOVERNMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE to the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ADVISORY RECOMMENDATION No: 2019-4 In the Matter of the Emergency Alert System – State Participation in State Emergency Communications Committees (SECCS) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 3 II. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................ 3 A. Structure and Membership of SECCs in States, Territories and Tribal Areas ................................. 4 1. Arizona ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Texas ......................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Puerto Rico ................................................................................................................................ 5 4. Tribal Lands .............................................................................................................................. 5 B. Challenge - False Emergency Alerts ................................................................................................ 6 III. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 7 A. General Recommendations .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unit – 1 Overview of Optical Fiber Communication
    www.getmyuni.com Optical Fiber Communication 10EC72 Unit – 1 Overview of Optical Fiber communication 1. Historical Development Fiber optics deals with study of propagation of light through transparent dielectric waveguides. The fiber optics are used for transmission of data from point to point location. Fiber optic systems currently used most extensively as the transmission line between terrestrial hardwired systems. The carrier frequencies used in conventional systems had the limitations in handling the volume and rate of the data transmission. The greater the carrier frequency larger the available bandwidth and information carrying capacity. First generation The first generation of light wave systems uses GaAs semiconductor laser and operating region was near 0.8 μm. Other specifications of this generation are as under: i) Bit rate : 45 Mb/s ii) Repeater spacing : 10 km Second generation i) Bit rate: 100 Mb/s to 1.7 Gb/s ii) Repeater spacing: 50 km iii) Operation wavelength: 1.3 μm iv) Semiconductor: In GaAsP Third generation i) Bit rate : 10 Gb/s ii) Repeater spacing: 100 km iii) Operating wavelength: 1.55 μm Fourth generation Fourth generation uses WDM technique. i) Bit rate: 10 Tb/s ii) Repeater spacing: > 10,000 km Iii) Operating wavelength: 1.45 to 1.62 μm Page 5 www.getmyuni.com Optical Fiber Communication 10EC72 Fifth generation Fifth generation uses Roman amplification technique and optical solitiors. i) Bit rate: 40 - 160 Gb/s ii) Repeater spacing: 24000 km - 35000 km iii) Operating wavelength: 1.53 to 1.57 μm Need of fiber optic communication Fiber optic communication system has emerged as most important communication system.
    [Show full text]
  • 6712-01 Federal Communications Commission
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/02/2021 and available online at 6712-01 federalregister.gov/d/2021-14206, and on govinfo.gov FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [FRS 33845; DA 21-593] Alert Reporting System Available for Filing of State Emergency Alert System Plans AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (Commission or FCC) announces that its Alert Reporting System (ARS) is now open for the filing of State Emergency Alert System (EAS) Plans. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Munson, Attorney Advisor, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, at (202) 418-2921, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Public Notice (DA 21- 593), released May 25, 2021, announcing that the ARS, adopted in the State EAS Plan Order, PS Docket No. 15–94, FCC 18–39, adopted on March 28, 2018, released on April 10, 2018, and published at 83 FR 37750 (August 2, 2018), is now fully operational and available to receive State EAS Plan filings. The EAS is a national public warning system used by state, local, federal, Tribal and territorial alert originators to deliver emergency alerts to the public. The ARS is an online filing system for the filing of State EAS Plans by State Emergency Communications Committees (SECCs). State EAS Plans must describe state and local EAS operations and contain guidelines that must be followed to activate the EAS. In the State EAS Plan Order, in addition to adopting the ARS,
    [Show full text]
  • Usenet News HOWTO
    Usenet News HOWTO Shuvam Misra (usenet at starcomsoftware dot com) Revision History Revision 2.1 2002−08−20 Revised by: sm New sections on Security and Software History, lots of other small additions and cleanup Revision 2.0 2002−07−30 Revised by: sm Rewritten by new authors at Starcom Software Revision 1.4 1995−11−29 Revised by: vs Original document; authored by Vince Skahan. Usenet News HOWTO Table of Contents 1. What is the Usenet?........................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Discussion groups.............................................................................................................................1 1.2. How it works, loosely speaking........................................................................................................1 1.3. About sizes, volumes, and so on.......................................................................................................2 2. Principles of Operation...................................................................................................................................4 2.1. Newsgroups and articles...................................................................................................................4 2.2. Of readers and servers.......................................................................................................................6 2.3. Newsfeeds.........................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Cisco Unified Border Element H.323-To-SIP Internetworking Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS Release 12.4T Iii
    Cisco Unified Border Element H.323-to- SIP Internetworking Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS Release 12.4T Americas Headquarters Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134-1706 USA http://www.cisco.com Tel: 408 526-4000 800 553-NETS (6387) Fax: 408 527-0883 THE SPECIFICATIONS AND INFORMATION REGARDING THE PRODUCTS IN THIS MANUAL ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. ALL STATEMENTS, INFORMATION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS MANUAL ARE BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE BUT ARE PRESENTED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. USERS MUST TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR APPLICATION OF ANY PRODUCTS. THE SOFTWARE LICENSE AND LIMITED WARRANTY FOR THE ACCOMPANYING PRODUCT ARE SET FORTH IN THE INFORMATION PACKET THAT SHIPPED WITH THE PRODUCT AND ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO LOCATE THE SOFTWARE LICENSE OR LIMITED WARRANTY, CONTACT YOUR CISCO REPRESENTATIVE FOR A COPY. The Cisco implementation of TCP header compression is an adaptation of a program developed by the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) as part of UCB’s public domain version of the UNIX operating system. All rights reserved. Copyright © 1981, Regents of the University of California. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER WARRANTY HEREIN, ALL DOCUMENT FILES AND SOFTWARE OF THESE SUPPLIERS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS” WITH ALL FAULTS. CISCO AND THE ABOVE-NAMED SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THOSE OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT OR ARISING FROM A COURSE OF DEALING, USAGE, OR TRADE PRACTICE. IN NO EVENT SHALL CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS OR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO DATA ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THIS MANUAL, EVEN IF CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
    [Show full text]
  • AMBER Alert Notifications
    TEXAS AMBER, BLUE, SILVER, ENDANGERED MISSING PERSONS, CAMO AND CLEAR ALERT PROGRAMS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS RELATED TO CELL PHONE, TELEVISION AND RADIO NOTIFICATIONS Cell Phones – Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) What is the Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) system? ANSWER: Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) are part of a national public safety system that allows customers with WEA‐capable mobile devices to receive notifications of local and state emergencies. Phones must be WEA‐capable and powered on to receive an alert. WEAs have a unique sound and vibration so that all recipients, including those with disabilities, receive notification of the situation. 1. Presidential Alerts – Alerts issued by the President or a designee. 2. Emergency Alerts – Issued by National Weather Service (NWS) and Public Safety officials during severe natural or manufactured disasters in which an imminent threat to life or property exists (e.g., tornadoes or dangerous flooding). 3. Public Safety Alerts ‐ Issued by authorized Emergency Managers as an essential public safety advisory. These alert types may include Public Safety advisory messages such as "shelter in place" or "boil water" warnings. 4. AMBER and Blue Alerts – AMBER Alerts are issued by law enforcement as part of the search for a missing or abducted child, while Blue Alerts occur in situations where a law enforcement officer may be in danger and there is an attempt to find the suspect. During an alert, WEA capable devices will receive a text‐like message, vibration and an audible tone. WEA notifications involve technologies designed to avoid network congestion, with the ability to target specific geographical areas. Why am I receiving alerts on my wireless device, when I did not subscribe? ANSWER: All WEA capable wireless devices are automatically “opted‐in” from factories.
    [Show full text]