Winding Cypress Listed Species Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Winding Cypress Listed Species Management Plan WINDING CYPRESS LISTED SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN September 2013 Prepared For: DiVosta Homes, L.P. 24311 Walden Center Drive, Suite 300 Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 (239) 495-4800 Prepared By: Passarella & Associates, Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274-0067 Project No. 12PGI2160 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Preserve Areas ................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 Eastern Indigo Snake Habitat Management Plan .............................................................. 1 3.1 Biology ................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Habitat Management Plan ...................................................................................... 2 4.0. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Habitat Management Plan ........................................................ 3 4.1 Biology ................................................................................................................... 4 4.2 Habitat Management Plan ...................................................................................... 4 5.0 Florida Black Bear Habitat Management Plan .................................................................. 5 5.1 Biology ................................................................................................................... 5 5.2 Habitat Management Plan ...................................................................................... 5 6.0 References .......................................................................................................................... 6 i LIST OF APPENDICES Page Appendix A. Project Location Map ......................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B. Aerial with Preserve Areas Map ........................................................................ B-1 Appendix C. Eastern Indigo Snake Informational Pamphlet .................................................. C-1 Appendix D. Florida Black Bear Informational Pamphlet ...................................................... D-1 ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION This habitat management plan has been prepared for the purpose of addressing the conservation of potential Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), and Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) habitat on the Winding Cypress project (Project). The Winding Cypress project site is located in Sections 26 and 35, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 2 and 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (Appendix A). This habitat management plan has been prepared to comply with South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permitting requirements. 2.0 PRESERVE AREAS The Project’s preserve areas will be maintained in accordance with the Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring/Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of SFWMD Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Application No. 130502-5). The preserve areas will be managed to provide habitat for listed species. An aerial depicting the locations of the preserve areas is provided as Appendix B. The Project has been designed to minimize impacts to the listed species that have been identified on the property. The on-site preserves have been designed to connect to off-site preserves and the Picayune Strand State Forest in order to retain connectivity of wildlife habitat. The Project’s preserve areas total 583.01± acres, which following mitigation activities will be comprised of 491.23± acres of wetlands and 91.78± acres of uplands. The wetland habitats consist mostly of cypress and pine/cypress communities with hydric pine, mixed wetland forest, and marsh communities to a lesser extent. The upland habitats consist of shrub, palmetto prairie, pine flatwoods, pine, live oak, cabbage palm, and mixed hardwood- conifer communities. The preserve areas will be managed for listed species based on habitat type, and current listed species utilization. The wetland and upland preserves, excluding reserved right-of-ways and access easements, will be placed in a conservation easement granted to the SFWMD. The total preserve area to be placed under conservation easement is 583.01± acres. 3.0. EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN The Eastern indigo snake has not been observed on-site; however, the following plan outlines the protection guidelines that will be implemented for the Eastern indigo snake during clearing operations for the Project. The plan provides educational material and guidelines for construction personnel to follow in case they encounter an Eastern indigo snake. The plan has been prepared following the guidelines established by the U.S. Fish and 1 Wildlife Service (USFWS) for the protection of the Eastern indigo snake. The Eastern indigo snake is listed as threatened by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and the USFWS. 3.1 Biology The Eastern indigo is a large, non-venomous, glossy black snake with smooth iridescent scales. The chin and throat may be rusty or white-blotched. The juvenile snakes are similar to the adults, but may be lighter and exhibit a blotched dorsal pattern. Adults can grow to lengths over eight feet. The Eastern indigo might be confused with the black racer (Coluber constrictor), but the black racer exhibits a white or brown throat and is smaller and lighter in build. The Eastern indigo snake inhabits a range of habitat types including pine flatwoods and wet prairies. Individuals are wide ranging and may utilize an area of 250 acres or more. Eastern indigo snakes are known to shelter in gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows. The Eastern indigo snake is diurnal (active only during the daytime) and will actively search for prey. Prey may include frogs, snakes, birds, and small mammals. Very little is known of the reproduction of this species in the wild. Breeding is believed to occur during the winter and early spring months with up to 11 large white eggs being deposited in late spring and early summer. The Eastern indigo snake is a federally threatened species and is listed by the Endangered Species Act (Act). It is unlawful for anyone to injure, harm, harass, or kill this species. Persons who knowingly violate provisions of the Act, that afford this species protection, may be subject to fine and/or imprisonment. Only the Project’s qualified biologists may come in contact with or relocate an Eastern indigo snake. 3.2 Habitat Management Plan The preserve areas will be maintained per the Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring/ Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of SFWMD ERP Application No. 130502-5), and will provide habitat for the Eastern indigo snake. Informational Posters Informational posters will be placed in a conspicuous location at the construction office and construction entrances to the Project. The poster will provide background information on identification, habits, and protection of the Eastern indigo snake. The poster will state actions to take if an Eastern indigo snake is sighted and provide the names and telephone numbers of contact persons. A copy of the informational poster will be forwarded to the USFWS for review prior to commencement of clearing activities. 2 Informational Pamphlets Informational pamphlets will be made available to individuals in charge of the clearing operation for distribution to all construction crew. The pamphlet will provide background information on identification, habits, and protection of the Eastern indigo snake. The pamphlet will state actions to take if an Eastern indigo snake is sighted and provide the names and telephone numbers of contact persons. A copy of the informational pamphlet will be forwarded to the USFWS for review prior to commencement of clearing activities (Appendix C). Actions to take if a live or injured Eastern indigo snake is sighted during construction activity: 1. Cease construction activity 2. Promptly notify the Project’s biologist: Passarella & Associates, Inc. Phone: (239) 274-0067 3. Allow the snake sufficient time to move away from construction activity before resuming construction. Actions to take if a dead Eastern indigo snake is sighted during construction activity: 1. Promptly notify the Project’s biologist: Passarella & Associates, Inc. Phone: (239) 274-0067 2. Seal the remains in an airtight plastic bag and place on ice. 3. The Project’s biologist will contact the following agency personnel for proper disposal: Permitting Agent U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1339 20th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone: (772) 562-3909 4.0 BIG CYPRESS FOX SQUIRREL HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN The following habitat management plan has been prepared for the purpose of addressing the conservation of Big Cypress fox squirrel habitat on the Project and outlines the protection guidelines that will be implemented for the Big Cypress fox squirrel prior to, during, and after construction of the Project. The Big Cypress fox squirrel is listed as threatened by the FWCC. There is no federal listing for the Big Cypress fox squirrel in Florida. 3 4.1 Biology The Big Cypress fox squirrel lives and breeds in varied habitats in Southwest Florida including cypress swamps, pine flatwoods, tropical hardwood forests, live oak woods, mangrove forests, and suburban habitats, including golf courses, city
Recommended publications
  • 2015 Disease Summary
    SUMMARY OF DISEASES AFFECTING MICHIGAN WILDLIFE 2015 ABSCESS Abdominal Eastern Fox Squirrel, Trumpeter Swan, Wild Turkey Airsac Canada Goose Articular White-tailed Deer Cranial White-tailed Deer Dermal White-tailed Deer Hepatic White-tailed Deer, Red-tailed Hawk, Wild Turkey Intramuscular White-tailed Deer Muscular Moose, White-tailed Deer, Wild Turkey Ocular White-tailed Deer Pulmonary Granulomatous Focal White-tailed Deer Unspecified White-tailed Deer, Raccoon, Canada Goose Skeletal Mourning Dove Subcutaneous White-tailed Deer, Raccoon, Eastern Fox Squirrel, Mute Swan Thoracic White-tailed Deer Unspecified White-tailed Deer ADHESION Pleural White-tailed Deer 1 AIRSACCULITIS Egg Yolk Canada Goose Fibrinous Chronic Bald Eagle, Red-tailed Hawk, Canada Goose, Mallard, Wild Turkey Mycotic Trumpeter Swan, Canada Goose Necrotic Caseous Chronic Bald Eagle Unspecified Chronic Bald Eagle, Peregrine Falcon, Mute Swan, Redhead, Wild Turkey, Mallard, Mourning Dove Unspecified Snowy Owl, Common Raven, Rock Dove Unspecified Snowy Owl, Merlin, Wild Turkey, American Crow Urate Red-tailed Hawk ANOMALY Congenital White-tailed Deer ARTHROSIS Inflammatory Cooper's Hawk ASCITES Hemorrhagic White-tailed Deer, Red Fox, Beaver ASPERGILLOSIS Airsac American Robin Cranial American Robin Pulmonary Trumpeter Swan, Blue Jay 2 ASPERGILLOSIS (CONTINUED ) Splenic American Robin Unspecified Red-tailed Hawk, Snowy Owl, Trumpeter Swan, Canada Goose, Common Loon, Ring- billed Gull, American Crow, Blue Jay, European Starling BLINDNESS White-tailed Deer BOTULISM Type C Mallard
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Riley Hunting Guide
    FORT RILEY HUNTING GUIDE The Fort Riley Military Reservation is located in northeast Kansas between Manhattan and Junction City. About 71,000 of the installation's 101,000 acres are managed for multiple-use, including wildlife management. Hunting is allowed on Fort Riley when compatible with the post's primary mission of military training. Fort Riley has a diverse and abundant wildlife resource, which is a product of the post's good habitat conditions. Native tall-grass prairie is well interspersed with riparian and upland woodlands and shrublands creating diverse habitat conditions. Coupled with this native habitat is almost 1,600 acres of land leased for agricultural crop production on the installation's perimeter boundary. Another 700 acres of wildlife food plots, ranging in size from 1/2 to 15 acres, are planted in the interior of the Post each year. Nine principal game species are available to the Fort Riley hunter: bobwhite quail, ring-necked pheasant, greater prairie-chicken, mourning dove, wild turkey, white-tailed deer, elk, cottontail rabbit and fox squirrel. In addition to these species, good populations of raccoon, bobcat and coyote exist on Post. Waterfowl hunting opportunities can be fantastic along the rivers when the ponds and shallow water wetland areas start freezing over, as well as most Central Flyway "puddle" ducks can be found on Fort Riley's numerous ponds and lakes during the fall migration. REGULATIONS On Fort Riley, all State of Kansas and federal hunting regulations (bag limits, season lengths, hunting hours, methods of take, etc.) are in force unless otherwise noted in the Fort Riley Hunting and Fishing Regulations, FR Reg.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of Natural History
    p m r- r-' ME FYF-11 - - T r r.- 1. 4,6*. of the FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBCAT, BLACK BEAR, AND FLORIDA PANTHER IN SOUTH FLORIDA David Steffen Maehr Volume 40, No. 1, pf 1-176 1997 == 46 1ms 34 i " 4 '· 0?1~ I. Al' Ai: *'%, R' I.' I / Em/-.Ail-%- .1/9" . -_____- UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY am published at irregular intervals Volumes contain about 300 pages and are not necessarily completed in any one calendar year. JOHN F. EISENBERG, EDITOR RICHARD FRANZ CO-EDIWR RHODA J. BRYANT, A£ANAGING EMOR Communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publications and all manuscripts should be addressed to: Managing Editor. Bulletin; Florida Museum of Natural Histoty, University of Florida P. O. Box 117800, Gainesville FL 32611-7800; US.A This journal is printed on recycled paper. ISSN: 0071-6154 CODEN: BF 5BAS Publication date: October 1, 1997 Price: $ 10.00 Frontispiece: Female Florida panther #32 treed by hounds in a laurel oak at the site of her first capture on the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge in central Collier County, 3 February 1989. Photograph by David S. Maehr. THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBCAT, BLACK BEAR, AND FLORIDA PANTHER IN SOUTH FLORIDA David Steffen Maehri ABSTRACT Comparisons of food habits, habitat use, and movements revealed a low probability for competitive interactions among bobcat (Lynx ndia). Florida panther (Puma concotor cooi 1 and black bear (Urns amencanus) in South Florida. All three species preferred upland forests but ©onsumed different foods and utilized the landscape in ways that resulted in ecological separation.
    [Show full text]
  • Human-Black Bear Conflict a Review of the Most Common Management Practices
    HUMAN-BLACK BEAR CONFLICT A REVIEW OF THE MOST COMMON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES A black bear in Lake Tahoe, NV. Photo courtesy Urbanbearfootage.com 1 A black bear patrols downtown Carson City, NV. Photo courtesy Heiko De Groot 2 Authors Carl W. Lackey (Nevada Department of Wildlife) Stewart W. Breck (USDA-WS-National Wildlife Research Center) Brian Wakeling (Nevada Department of Wildlife; Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies) Bryant White (Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies) 3 Table of Contents Preface Acknowledgements Introduction . The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation and human-bear conflicts . “I Hold the Smoking Gun” by Chris Parmeter Status of the American Black Bear . Historic and Current distribution . Population estimates and human-bear conflict data Status of Human-Black Bear Conflict . Quantifying Conflict . Definition of Terms Associated with Human-Bear Management Methods to Address Human-Bear Conflicts . Public Education . Law and Ordinance Enforcement . Exclusionary Methods . Capture and Release . Aversive Conditioning . Repellents . Damage Compensation Programs . Supplemental & Diversionary Feeding . Depredation (Kill) Permits . Management Bears (Agency Kill) . Privatized Conflict Management Population Management . Regulated Hunting and Trapping . Control of Non-Hunting Mortality . Fertility Control . Habitat Management . No Intervention Agency Policy Literature Cited 4 Abstract Most human-black bear (Ursus americanus) conflict occurs when people make anthropogenic foods (that is, foods of human origin like trash, dog food, domestic poultry, or fruit trees) available to bears. Bears change their behavior to take advantage of these resources and in the process may damage property or cause public safety concerns. Managers are often forced to focus efforts on reactive non-lethal and lethal bear management techniques to solve immediate problems, which do little to address root causes of human-bear conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Ecology of Black Bears in the Okefenokee-Osceola Ecosystem
    Final Report to Study Cooperators Population Ecology of Black Bears in the Okefenokee-Osceola Ecosystem Prepared by: Steven Dobey1, Darrin V. Masters2, Brian K. Scheick2, Joseph D. Clark3, Michael R. Pelton1, and Mel Sunquist2 September 30, 2002 1 Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee 2 Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida 3 USGS, Southern Appalachian Field Laboratory, University of Tennessee ii Population Ecology of Black Bears in the Okefenokee-Osceola Ecosystem Abstract: We studied black bears (Ursus americanus) on 2 study areas in the Okefenokee-Osceola ecosystem in north Florida and southeast Georgia from 1995–1999 to determine population characteristics (size, density, relative abundance, distribution, sex and age structure, mortality rates, natality, and recruitment) and habitat needs. We captured 205 different black bears (124M: 81F) 345 times from June 1995 to September 1998. Overall, adult bears on Osceola were 19% heavier than those on Okefenokee (t = 2.96, df = 148, P = 0.0036). We obtained 13,573 radiolocations from 87 (16M:71F) individual bears during the period of study. Seventeen mortalities of radiocollared bears were documented on Okefenokee, with hunting mortality accounting for 70.6% of these deaths. We documented only 2 (8%) mortalities of radiocollared females from Osceola; both were illegally killed. Annual survival rates for radiocollared females were lower on Okefenokee ( x = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.80–0.93) than on Osceola ( x = 0.97, 95% CI = 2 0.92–1.00; 0.05 = 3.98, 1 df, P = 0.0460). Overall, 67 bears (51M:16F) were taken by hunters on the Okefenokee study area from 1995–1999.
    [Show full text]
  • El Dorado Wildlife Area Newsletter 11-20-2014
    El Dorado Wildlife Area News Area News – Fall 2014 2014/2015 Hunting Outlook: Upland Birds: The fall hunting outlook for quail on the area is fair. Hunters should see quail numbers that are again increased as compared to last fall. Quail production in recent years (2007-2010) was believed to have been hampered by heavy rains, cool temperatures, and significant flooding during the critical reproductive months of May, June, and July. The 2011 and 2012 reproductive seasons however were notably different. Rather than too much moisture and associated cool temperatures, both years were marked with record breaking excessive heat and drought. Quail production during those years is believed to have suffered as well. More moderate weather conditions in 2013 and 2014 are believed to have resulted in improved production, as several coveys were observed or reported early this fall, but current quail populations remain below levels observed during 2005 and 2006 when quail populations were very good. Within most habitat areas, natural vegetation and area crops should provide good food and cover conditions for wildlife, including quail, and should help to sustain breeding populations into next spring. The wildlife area lies outside the primary range of ring-necked pheasant. Hunters occasionally encounter pheasants on the area, but numbers are low. Male bobwhite. Waterfowl: The fall hunting outlook for waterfowl on the area is fair. Waterfowl populations are reported to remain strong following another good production year within breeding habitats to the north. Habitat conditions however here are not nearly as strong as those experienced last year. Abundant precipitation and a slight flood in June kept lake levels full, or nearly so, for much of the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2002 Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest Steven T. Dobey University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Dobey, Steven T., "Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2002. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4533 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Steven T. Dobey entitled "Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Wildlife and Fisheries Science. Michael R. Pelton, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gary McCracken, Lisa Muller, Joseph Clark Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Steven T.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Black Bears in Mississippi
    Conservation and Management of Black Bears in Mississippi Prepared by: Brad W. Young Black Bear Biologist Mississippi Museum of Natural Science Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks August, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..........................................................................................................................1 JUSTIFICATION ..........................................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................3 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ....................................................................................................................5 CONSERVATION STATUS ..........................................................................................................................7 State Status ..............................................................................................................................................7 Federal Status ..........................................................................................................................................7 BLACK BEAR ECOLOGY ..........................................................................................................................8 Physical Description ................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Consequences of Habitat Fragmentation and Loss: the Case of the Florida Black Bear (Ursus Americanus floridanus)
    Conserv Genet (2007) 8:455–464 DOI 10.1007/s10592-006-9184-z ORIGINAL PAPER Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation and loss: the case of the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) Jeremy D. Dixon Æ Madan K. Oli Æ Michael C. Wooten Æ Thomas H. Eason Æ J. Walter McCown Æ Mark W. Cunningham Received: 23 November 2005 / Accepted: 28 June 2006 / Published online: 28 September 2006 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Abstract Habitat loss and fragmentation can influ- genetically distinct populations. There was no isola- ence the genetic structure of biological populations. tion-by-distance relationship among Florida black bear We studied the genetic consequences of habitat frag- populations, likely because of barriers to gene flow mentation in Florida black bear (Ursus americanus created by habitat fragmentation and other anthropo- floridanus) populations. Genetic samples were col- genic disturbances. These factors resulted in genetic lected from 339 bears, representing nine populations. differentiation among populations, even those that Bears were genotyped for 12 microsatellite loci to were geographically close. Population assignment tests estimate genetic variation and to characterize genetic indicated that most individuals were genetically as- structure. None of the nine study populations deviated signed to the population where they were sampled. from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Genetic variation, Habitat fragmentation and anthropogenic barriers to quantified by mean expected heterozygosity (HE), movement appear to have limited the dispersal capa- ranged from 0.27 to 0.71 and was substantially lower in bilities of the Florida black bear, thereby reducing smaller and less connected populations. High levels of gene flow among populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasion, Damage, and Control Options for Eastern Fox Squirrels
    Invasion, Damage, and Control Options for Eastern Fox Squirrels Sara K. Krause, Douglas A. Kelt, and Dirk H. Van Vuren Dept. of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, California ABSTRACT: Fox squirrels are an emerging urban, suburban, and agricultural vertebrate pest in California. They cause a diversity of damage to vegetation and property. Multiple introductions of fox squirrels into California have led to a rapid expansion of their range in the state. Fox squirrels at the University of California, Davis increased from none to an estimated 1,609 between 2001 and 2009. Damage due to the dense population of fox squirrels is increasing. There are several population control options available, but social considerations may limit the viable options to non-lethal methods. This paper provides an overview of the impacts of the introduced fox squirrel in California and on the University of California, Davis campus. KEY WORDS: damage, efficacy, fox squirrel, GonaCon™, Sciurus niger, wildlife birth control, wildlife contraception Proc. 24th Vertebr. Pest Conf. (R. M. Timm and K. A. Fagerstone, Eds.) Published at Univ. of Calif., Davis. 2010. Pp. 29-31. INTRODUCTION km/year (King 2004). In the San Francisco Bay area, we Fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) are found throughout the have seen them in nearly all city and county parks, United States in urban, suburban, rural, and wild areas. educational campuses, open space preserves, state parks, They are native to the eastern and southern United States, and national recreation areas. Populations within as well as some areas of the southwestern United States. California occur along the coast from Sonoma County to They have been introduced to many areas of the western San Diego County, and inland from Lake and El Dorado United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Squirrels There Is Undoubtedly No Other Animal That Has Developed Such a Love-Hate Relationship Around Our Homes and Gardens As That of Tree Squirrels
    Tree Squirrels There is undoubtedly no other animal that has developed such a love-hate relationship around our homes and gardens as that of tree squirrels. The eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) and fox squirrel (Sciurus niger) are the two species of tree squirrels found in Louisiana. Depending upon your locality, there are two subspecies of gray squirrels and three subspecies of fox squirrels that can be encountered in our state. The nominate race of the eastern gray squirrel occurs in the northwestern por- tion of Louisiana while the darker subspecies know as S. c. fuliginosus occurs in our more southern par- ishes. Throughout the central and northern parishes, specimens tend to show intermediate color charac- teristics between the two subspecies. Eastern gray eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) squirrels regardless of their origin are often referred to as simply gray or cat squirrels. S. n. ludovicianus. These animals are characterized as the largest of all subspecies with a massive skull The three subspecies of fox squirrels found in and slightly paler coloration than the more eastern our state vary drastically in size and color. The subspecies. The bottomland hardwood forests of the western one-third of Louisiana is occupied by Tensas, Mississippi, and Atchafalaya floodplains in the eastern and central-southern portions of the state are home to the smaller, darker subspecies S. n. sub- auratus. Melanistic or black individuals are so com- mon in this subspecies that in local populations, they often outnumber the normal color phase. Areas east of the Mississippi River into the Florida parishes are home to the well-marked race of fox squirrels known as S.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Account for Eastern Fox Squirrel
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group EASTERN FOX SQUIRREL Sciurus niger Family: SCIURIDAE Order: RODENTIA Class: MAMMALIA M078 Written by: G. Hoefler, J. Harris Reviewed by: H. Shellhammer Edited by: R. Duke, S. Granholm CWHR Staff 2013 DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY The eastern fox squirrel is an introduced species with many localized populations in urban areas and nearby rural settings. Reported from San Mateo, Merced, and Ventura cos. (Ingles 1965, Wolf and Roest 1971), and Santa Clara and Santa Cruz cos. (Gilroy 1980). Also believed to occur in Ventura and Los Angeles cos., and from Yolo, Napa and Sonoma cos. south to San Benito, Fresno and Monterey cos., west of the Sierra Nevada foothills. The eastern fox squirrel is common in urban and orchard-vineyard habitats, and in eucalyptus groves. Individuals are moving into the edges of valley foothill riparian, redwood, and valley foothill hardwood habitats in Santa Cruz Co. (Gilroy 1980), and possibly elsewhere. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: The eastern fox squirrel eats acorns and a wide variety of other nuts, fruits, and seeds. In Ventura Co., eats wild and domestic agricultural nuts and fruits in summer, eucalyptus seeds in winter (Wolf and Roest 1971, Flyger and Gates 1982). Cover: Uses trees for cover, keeping the tree between squirrel and predator or disturbance. Often remains motionless in order to avoid detection (Flyger and Gates 1982). Reproduction: Uses tree cavity; hollow spheres of leaves also constructed on tree limbs or in the crotches of trees, 8-20 m (26-66 ft) above the ground.
    [Show full text]