DOCSLIB.ORG

E17760v180p0991public10lu

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

E1776 REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA v18 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION WORKS FOR LUDA YANA DAM Public Disclosure Authorized LUDA YANA DAM Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Sofia, May 2009, Final Document Luda Yana Dam EIAS CONTENTS І. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 1 ІІ. LEGISLATIVE AND POLITICAL SYSTEM AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONAL DIAGRAM ............................................................................................. 6 ІІІ. OVERVIEW OF LUDA YANA DAM PROJECT ..................................................................... 7 ІV. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS AND FACTORS ............................12 4.1. AIR ....................................................................................................................................12 4.1.1 Climate ....................................................................................................................12 4.1.2 Air Quality ...............................................................................................................18 4.2. WATER ............................................................................................................................18 Surface water .....................................................................................................................18 Ground water .....................................................................................................................20 4.3 GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT .....................................................................................21 4.5. WASTE .............................................................................................................................24 4.6. HARMFUL PHYSICAL FACTORS – NOISE ...................................................................24 4.7. FLORA ..............................................................................................................................24 4.8. FAUNA ...............................................................................................................................26 4.8.1 Ichthyofauna ............................................................................................................26 4.8.2 Herpetofauna (Amphibians and Reptiles)..................................................................26 4.8.3 Mammal Fauna ........................................................................................................27 4.8.4 Ornitofauna ..............................................................................................................30 4.9. LANDSCAPE .......................................................................................................................33 4.10. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH FACTORS...............................33 4.11. CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL HERITAGE ........................................................................34 V. EVALUATION OF THE EXPECTED ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS RELATED TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LUDA YANA DAM .....................................34 5.1. AIR ....................................................................................................................................34 5.1.1 Climate ......................................................................................................................34 5.1.2 Air Quality ...............................................................................................................34 5.2. WATER .............................................................................................................................37 Surface water .....................................................................................................................37 Groundwater ......................................................................................................................43 5.3. GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT .....................................................................................43 5.4. SOILS ................................................................................................................................44 5.5. WASTE .............................................................................................................................45 5.6. HARMFUL PHYSICAL FACTORS ..................................................................................47 5.7. PLANTS ............................................................................................................................48 Luda Yana Dam EIAS 5.8. ANIMALS .........................................................................................................................48 5.8.1. Ichthyofauna ............................................................................................................49 5.8.2 Herpetofauna (Amphibians and reptiles) ...................................................................50 5.8.3. Mammal Fauna ........................................................................................................50 5.8.4. Ornithofauna ............................................................................................................50 5.9. LANDSCAPE ....................................................................................................................51 5.10. HEALTH FACTOR AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE .................................................................52 5.11. SAFETY OF THE LUDA YANA DAM ......................................................................................53 5.12. TRANSBORDER EFFECT .......................................................................................................58 5.13. SOCIAL IMPACT ..................................................................................................................59 VІ. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ...........................................................................................59 VІІ. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................................................................62 VII.A. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PLAN ...........................................................................62 VІІ.B ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN ...........................................................................64 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS ................................................................................................................66 APPENDICES 1. Annex 1 TOR for EIA 2. Annex 2 Environmental Mitigation Plan 3. Annex 3 Environmental Monitoring Plan 4. Annex 4 Methodologies and Sources Used and quoted in the Environment Impact Assessment Statement 5. Annex 5 Wastes classification 6. Regulations 7. Topographic map 8. Diagram of Panagurishte Water Supply Complex 9. Luda Yana dam map 1:1 000 10. Sredna gora Protected Area Map 11. Forest map including Luda Yana dam 1:10 000 12. Cross section of Luda Yana dam wall 1:500 13. Photos 14. List of Luda Yana Dam designs 15. Opinions and minutes of meetings held in Panagurishte municipality, and VIK EOOD Panagurishte in 2007 –2009. 16. Protocols of laboratory analysis of water Luda Yana Dam EIAS ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS AIM Archaeological Institute and Museum BAN Bulgarian Academy of Sciences BD Basin Directorate VIK Water supply and sewerage company EU European Union EEC Expert Environmental Council EPA Environmental Protection Act EEA Environmental Executive Agency IWI Institute on Water Issues IPP Institute for research and design MRDPW Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works MOEW Ministry of Environment and Water EIA Environmental Impact Assessment NGO Non Government Organizations ALV Admissible limit values DWTP Drinking water treatment plant RIEW Regional Inspectorate of Environment and Water RIHSC Regional Inspectorate on Health Safety and Control WSS Water supply system CMS Central measuring station KOPS Committee for Environmental Protection BCA Bulletin for Construction and Architecture UF University of Forestry UASG University of Construction, Architecture and Geodesy MS Methodologies and Sources Luda Yana Dam EIAS І. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND The Environmental Impact Assessment report (EIA) on the completion of construction works for Luda Yana Dam has been developed following the submission of the Environmental Due Diligence Report (EDD) prepared in 2007 by the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works (MRDPW) to meet the World Bank policy requirements on Environmental Assessment. This document is part of the documentation required for approval of the World Bank assistance requested by the Government of Bulgaria (GoB) to finance activities related to municipal infrastructure development through completion of the Luda Yana water supply dam. This EIA report has been developed to meet the Bank requirements as stated in the ToR (Annex I) and to comply with the effective environmental legislation in the Republic of Bulgaria (RB). OVERVIEW OF THE LEGISLATIVE AND PPOLITICAL SYSTEM AND ORGANIZATIONAL DIAGRAM REFERRING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Environmental protection is a country policy priority. Depending on the classification of infrastructure projects they can be either subject to a mandatory EIA or subject to assessment of the need for an EIA. Luda Yana dam, which has a total capacity of 19,94×106 m3 would be subject to a mandatory
Recommended publications
  • Coleoptera and Lepidoptera (Insecta) Diversity in the Central Part of Sredna Gora Mountains (Bulgaria)

    Coleoptera and Lepidoptera (Insecta) Diversity in the Central Part of Sredna Gora Mountains (Bulgaria)

    BULLETIN OF THE ENTOMOLOGICALENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALTAMALTA (2019) Vol. 10 : 75–95 DOI: 10.17387/BULLENTSOCMALTA.2019.09 Coleoptera and Lepidoptera (Insecta) diversity in the central part of Sredna Gora Mountains (Bulgaria) Rumyana KOSTOVA1*, Rostislav BEKCHIEV2 & Stoyan BESHKOV2 ABSTRACT.ABSTRACT. Despite the proximity of Sredna Gora Mountains to Sofia, the insect assemblages of this region are poorly studied. As a result of two studies carried out as a part of an Environmental Impact Assessment in the Natura 2000 Protected Areas: Sredna Gora and Popintsi, a rich diversity of insects was discovered, with 107 saproxylic and epigeobiont Coleoptera species and 355 Lepidoptera species recorded. This research was conducted during a short one-season field study in the surrounding areas of the town of Panagyurishte and Oborishte Village. Special attention was paid to protected species and their conservation status. Of the Coleoptera recorded, 22 species were of conservation significance. Forty-five Lepidoptera species of conservation importance were also recorded. KEY WORDS.WORDS. Saproxylic beetles, epigeobiont beetles, Macrolepidoptera, Natura 2000 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION The Sredna Gora Mountains are situated in the central part of Bulgaria, parallel to the Stara Planina Mountains The Sredna chain. Gora TheyMountains are insufficiently are situated instudied the central with partregard of toBulgaria, their invertebrate parallel to theassemblages. Stara Planina Mountains chain. They are insufficiently studied with regard to their invertebrate assemblages. There is lack of information about the beetles from Sredna Gora Mountains in the region of the Panagyurishte There is lack townof information and Oborishte about village. the beetles Most offrom the Srednaprevious Gora data Mountains is old and foundin the inregion catalogues, of the mentioningPanagyurishte the town mountain and Oborishte without distinct village.
  • Geoarchaeological Monuments of Ancient Mining in Sredna Gora Mountain

    Geoarchaeological Monuments of Ancient Mining in Sredna Gora Mountain

    Geoarchaeology and Archaeomineralogy (Eds. R. I. Kostov, B. Gaydarska, M. Gurova). 2008. Proceedings of the International Conference, 29-30 October 2008 Sofia, Publishing House “St. Ivan Rilski”, Sofia, 258-262. GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENTS OF ANCIENT MINING IN SREDNA GORA MOUNTAIN Todor Nenov LK “Mladost” bl. 84A, 1797 Sofia ABSTRACT. In Sredna Gora Mountain are preserved thousand of monuments and traces of ore production from the Prehistoric period, the Antiquity period and the Medieval period. These are mine pits, quarries, shafts, underground passages, wastes and miners’ tools and facilities, which often have been interpreted one-sidedly in a historical (archaeological) aspect. Gold-bearing, copper gold-bearing, copper and iron ores have been exploited. The material traces of mining activity are represented by geoarchaeological monuments, which require complex approach and research methods. Introduction Information about the prehistoric and antique ore production The cult and economic character of a number of rock in Bulgaria, and more precisely, in the Srednogorie Region, phenomena can not be doubted. Such are ancient sacred and can be found in a number of publications (Skorpil, 1882; 1884; cult places, sacrificial sites and food storages, which are to be 1888; Karaoglanov, 1924; Radoslavov, 1934; Peev, 1975; found at many places around and in the natural heights of 1980; 1990; Georgiev, 1978; 1987; Cernykh, Raduncheva, Sredna Gora Mountain. Such are some of the rock cauldrons 1972; Cernykh, 1978; Kovachev, 1994; Nenov, 1994; 1997; in the Panagyurishte (“Kazanite”) and Stara Zagora Avdev, 2005; Nenov, Nenov, 2008a; 2008b). Certain data on (“Kazaneto” near the Village Kazanka and “Kazana” near the mining activities are given in the records of travelers, in village Kolena) area.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    ABBREVIATED LAND ACQUISITION PLAN FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF LUDA YANA DAM, Public Disclosure Authorized PANAGYURISHTE MUNICIPALITY, BULGARIA 1. INTRODUCTION This Abbreviated Land Acquisition Plan (ALAP) has been prepared by the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Works (MRDPW) of the Republic of Bulgaria to outline the actions undertaken for the acquisition of land required for the construction of the Luda Public Disclosure Authorized Yana dam and its ancillary components (i.e. dam wall, reservoir, water tower, wastewater pipe, main outlet discharge, spillway, potable water treatment plant (PWTP), “sanitary zone”, etc), including the associated infrastructure – water supply pipelines and relocation of electrical lines in the Municipality of Panagyurishte, Pazardijk region. The completion of this project is part of the Municipal Infrastructure Development Project (MIDP), implemented by the MRDPW with a credit facility of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. This ALAP has been drafted in conformity with the requirements of the applicable Bulgarian Public Disclosure Authorized laws and the requirements of the MDIP’s Land Acquisition Policy Framework (LAPF) dated March 2009, which is in line with the World Bank Operational Policy (ОP) 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement. The LAPF includes an analysis of the applicable legal framework, valuation criteria, entitlement matrix, stakeholder engagement and grievance mechanism, among other details. This Land Acquisition Plan complements and builds on the findings of the Social Due Diligence (November 2007)1 which describes the historical land acquisition under the construction of Luda Yana dam which started prior to the World Bank involvement in the on- going Municipal Infrastructure Development Project (MIDP).
  • List of Beneficiaries Under Operational Programme Environment

    List of Beneficiaries Under Operational Programme Environment

    Last update 13.07. 2011 EUROPEAN UNION OPPORTUNITIES FOR BETTER LIFE EUROPEAN REGIONAL LIST OF BENEFICIARIES DEVELOPMENT FUND COHESION FUND OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME ENVIRONMENT 2007 – 2013 Year of Total Allocation/ Amounts Amounts Paid № Name of the Beneficiary Name and Number of the Procedure Project proposal No Name of the Operation Year of Committed at the End of Final (BGN) the Operation Payment (BGN) BG161PO005/08/3.0/01/05 Balgarka Natural Park Protection and restoration of Restoration of habitats and biodiversity 1 58301-4-424 2009 836 759.92 Directorate biodiversity in the Republic of on the territory of Nature Park Balgarka Bulgaria BG161PO005/09/3.2/02/10 Balgarka Natural Park Development of Bulgarka Natural Park 2 Development of Bulgarka Natural DIR-593210-1-5 2010 1 975 462.00 Directorate Management Plan Park Management Plan BG161PO005/09/3.2/03/11 Belasitsa Natural Park Development of Belasitsa Natural Park 3 Development of Belasitsa Natural DIR-593211-1-6 2010 1 161 974.68 Directorate Management Plan Park Management Plan Protection of the wild goat and the BG161PO005/08/3.0/01/05 brown bear in Bulgaria (outside the Bulgarian Biodiversity Protection and restoration of territory of national and nature parks 4 58301-75-495 2009 578 832.00 Foundation biodiversity in the Republic of and reserves) through the Bulgaria implementation of components of the action plans of the two species BG161PO005/08/3.0/01/05 Bulgarian Society for Protection and restoration of Protection of vultures in East Rodopi 5 58301-62-482 2009 95 000.00 the
  • Annexes to Rural Development Programme

    Annexes to Rural Development Programme

    ANNEXES TO RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (2007-2013) TABLE OF CONTENTS Annex 1 ...........................................................................................................................................4 Information on the Consultation Process ........................................................................................4 Annex 2 .........................................................................................................................................13 Organisations and Institutions Invited to the Monitoring Committee of the Implementation of the Rural Development Programme 2007-2013 .................................................................................13 Annex 3 .........................................................................................................................................16 Baseline, Output, Result and Impact Indicators............................................................................16 Annex 4 .........................................................................................................................................29 Annexes to the Axis 1 Measures...................................................................................................29 Attachment 1 (Measure 121 Modernisation of Agricultural Holding) .........................................30 List of Newly Introduced Community Standards .........................................................................30 Attachment 2 (Measure 123 Adding value of agricultural and forestry
  • Last Update: 13.04.2021

    Last Update: 13.04.2021

    Last update: 13.04.2021 BHS WCA Name QTH Locator Place BLAGOEVGRAD - BL BL-01 LZ-00069 SAMUILOVA FORTRESS 41°23’41” 23°01’45” KN11MJ KLIYUCH BL-02 LZ-00070 KREPOST KHERAKLEA SINTICA 41°27'06" 23°15'47" KN11PK RUPITE BL-03 LZ-00071 KREPOST MELNIK DESPOT-SLAVOVA 41°31’10” 23°23’28” KN11QM MELNIK BL-04 LZ-00072 KREPOST SVETI DIMITAR 41°30’20” 23°53’09” KN11WM HADZHI DIMOVO BL-05 LZ-00119 KREPOST DESUDAVA 41°33’59” 23°16’50” KN11PN SANDANSKI BL-06 LZ-00120 KREPOST PETRITSA 41°23’02” 23°12’06” KN11OJ PETRICH BL-07 LZ-00121 KREPOST KALYATA 42°00’13” 23°38’21” KN12TA YAKORUDA BL-08 LZ-00122 SITAN KALE 41°48’03” 23°27’00” KN11RT BANSKO BL-09 LZ-00123 MOMINA KULA 41°33’22” 23°42’33” KN11UN GOTSE DELCHEV BL-10 LZ-00124 KREPOST 41°36’55” 23°11’16” KN11OO MIKREVO BL-11 LZ-00175 NICOPOLIS ad NESTUM 41°35’42” 23°47’48” KN11VO GARMEN BL-12 LZ-00230 FORTIFIED RILA MONASTERY 42°08'00" 23°20'25" KN12QD RILA BL-13 LZ-00231 HRELYO TOWER 42°08'00" 23°20'25" KN12QD RILA BL-14 LZ-00242 FORTIFIED ROZHEN MONASTERY 41°31'50" 23°25'35" KN11RM MELNIK BL-15 LZ-00291 ROMAN BRIDGE 41°32'06" 23°57'01" KN11XM BOGOLIN BL-16 LZ-00292 ROMAN BRIDGE 41°37'53" 23°58'06" KN11XP PLETENA BL-17 LZ-00293 ROMAN BRIDGE 41°37'23" 23°57'08" KN11XO DOLEN BL-18 LZ-00294 ROMAN BRIDGE 41°33'57" 23°55'49" KN11XN KRIBUL BL-19 LZ-00295 OLD BRIDGE 41°33'16" 23°42'21" KN11UN DELCHEVO BL-20 LZ-00251 DOBRINISHTE FORTRESS 41°49’15” 23°33’46” KN11ST DOBRINISHTE BL-21 LZ-00296 CLOCK TOWER - 1867 42°01'30" 23°06'10" KN12NA BLAGOEVGRAD BL-22 LZ-00252 ELIOS FORTRESS 41°51'12" 23°35'30" KN11TU ELESHNITSA
  • Results of the Collection of Data from the Water Supply and Sewerage Companies Document in the Country

    Results of the Collection of Data from the Water Supply and Sewerage Companies Document in the Country

    BGENERGY-1.001-0001 "Feasibility study of the use of hydroenergy potential of Grant Contract existing water supply systems and increasing the potential of existing small hydroelectric power plants in water supply systems” Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency and Energy Security Program, financed under Financed by the Financial Mechanism of the European Economic Area 2014-2021. Beneficiary name Sustainable Energy Development Agency (SEDA) Donor project Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), Norway partner Collection of data from the Water Supply and Sewerage Companies in the ACTIVITY 3 Country According to the Identified Check-List Name of the Results of the collection of data from the Water Supply and Sewerage Companies document in the country Date: 15 September 2020 Date of last 12 October 2020 revision: 1 CONTENTS: I. Description of the activities .............................................................................................................. 3 II. List of WSS companies that were approached with information requests ......................................... 3 III. Summary of facts.............................................................................................................................. 3 IV. List of parameters ............................................................................................................................ 4 V. Identified potential companies for ascertainment of facts ................................................................ 4 Appendix 1: List of the
  • Our Projects

    Our Projects

    Feasibility studies of two small-medium multipurpose storage reservoirs of Norera and Borenga in Kenya and Tanzania respectively in the Mara River Basin Country Kenya-Tanzania Name of client Nile Basin Initiative / Nile Equatorial Lakes Subsidiary Action Program Dates (start/end) 2013-2014 The specific objectives of the Consultancy Services Contract were: Water resources analysis of the transboundary Mara catchment, incl. hydrological analysis and sediment modeling to estimate inflows, soil erosion, reservoir and sediment yields at the proposed dam sites. Analysis for water resources demands for various purposes such as irrigation, domestic and livestock water supplies, and environmental flows requirements projected to year 2035. A reservoir simulation model for each dam site to ensure that different combinations of multipurpose uses and project scenarios can be studied in order to arrive at the optimum solution. Preliminary designs for the two dams. Major features of design consideration include: foundation treatment, abutment stability, seepage conditions, stability of slopes adjacent to control structure, approach channels and stilling basins, stability of reservoir slopes, and ability of the reservoir to retain the stored water. For this purpose topographical surveying and geological, geophysical and geotechnical investigations are performed. Preliminary Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIA), compliant with international standards and environmental and social requirements of National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA), Kenya, and the National Environmental Management Council (NEMC), Tanzania, as well as with the World Bank’s safeguard/policies. A preliminary Environmental and Social Impact analysis includes a preliminary Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) report and Public Participation Strategy report. Institutional analysis aiding in the definition of suitable institutional setups and arrangements for project implementation including mechanisms to implement nationally while maintaining transboundary dimensions.