Myanmar Constitutional Reform Symposium Pack
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Śāntiniketan and Modern Southeast Asian
Artl@s Bulletin Volume 5 Article 2 Issue 2 South - South Axes of Global Art 2016 Śāntiniketan and Modern Southeast Asian Art: From Rabindranath Tagore to Bagyi Aung Soe and Beyond YIN KER School of Art, Design & Media, Nanyang Technological University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/artlas Part of the Art Education Commons, Art Practice Commons, Asian Art and Architecture Commons, Modern Art and Architecture Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, Other International and Area Studies Commons, and the South and Southeast Asian Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation KER, YIN. "Śāntiniketan and Modern Southeast Asian Art: From Rabindranath Tagore to Bagyi Aung Soe and Beyond." Artl@s Bulletin 5, no. 2 (2016): Article 2. This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. This is an Open Access journal. This means that it uses a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. Readers may freely read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles. This journal is covered under the CC BY-NC-ND license. South-South Śāntiniketan and Modern Southeast Asian Art: From Rabindranath Tagore to Bagyi Aung Soe and Beyond Yin Ker * Nanyang Technological University Abstract Through the example of Bagyi Aung Soe, Myanmar’s leader of modern art in the twentieth century, this essay examines the potential of Śāntiniketan’s pentatonic pedagogical program embodying Rabindranath Tagore’s universalist and humanist vision of an autonomous modernity in revitalizing the prevailing unilateral and nation- centric narrative of modern Southeast Asian art. -
Gallery Exhibitions: Solo Show Phyoe Kyi: the Other Side 5 April 2014 ~ 25 May 2014
GALLERY EXHIBITIONS: SOLO SHOW PHYOE KYI: THE OTHER SIDE 5 APRIL 2014 ~ 25 MAY 2014 PHYOE KYI: THE OTHER SIDE Text by Nathalie Johnston TS1 Yangon’s frst contemporary Myanmar art exhibition featured work by accomplished artist Phyoe Kyi, a resident of Taunggyi in Shan State and one of few contemporary artists in the country who work with new media such as video, design, and silkscreen. His work reflects part of the energy TS1 wants to embrace in Yangon and Myanmar in general: a devotion to the future possibilities of a place and the artists who look beyond traditional ways of seeing to create innovative responses to the present. This was Phyoe Kyi’s frst solo exhibition in Yangon since 2001. His work invites the viewer not only into the physical space where his work was displayed, but also into the story of how he came to this place in time. This series I Never Sleep Without takes the viewer from Phyoe Kyi’s own childhood through to adulthood, touching on all the dreams of meditation, envy, greed, sympathy and more. It is a complex journey through the life of artist and nature, mother and son, performance and print. Phyoe Kyi struggled to arrive at this conceptual place: his other side. The title The Other Side was inspired by a Burmese song about a boy who never chose the right path. Nurtured to be what our elders perceive to be good, we are raised in a nest of perfect moments, meant to make us great. And yet, inside each of us is the uncontrollable desire for the sin: the admiration of what the world around us perceives to be evil. -
Opinion on the Balance of Powers in the Constitution
Strasbourg, 18 June 2013 CDL-AD(2013)018 Opinion No. 695 / 2012 Engl./Fr. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE BALANCE OF POWERS IN THE CONSTITUTION AND THE LEGISLATION OF THE PRINCIPALITY OF MONACO Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 95th Plenary Session (Venice, 14-15 June 2013) on the basis of comments by Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (Substitute Member, Belgium) Mr Jorgen Steen SORENSEN (Member, Denmark) Mr Laszlo TROCSANYI (Substitute Member, Hungary) Mr Ben VERMEULEN (Member, Netherlands) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2013)018 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 II. Scope of the opinion ............................................................................................................ 3 III. European standards on democracy and the rule of law ................................................... 4 A. International principles on democracy .............................................................................. 4 Separation and balance of powers ...................................................................................... 5 Legislative power and autonomy ......................................................................................... 6 Accountability ..................................................................................................................... -
Paweł Kubacki1 the Scope of the Head of State's Liability Based On
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego ---------ISSN 2082-1212--------- DOI 10.15804/ppk.2017.06.08 ---------Nr 6 (40)/2017--------- Paweł Kubacki1 The Scope of the Head of State’s Liability Based on the Example of the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Principality of Monaco Keywords: head of state; constitutional liability; Prince of Monaco; Prince of Liechtenstein Słowa kluczowe: głowa państwa, odpowiedzialność konstytucyjna, Książe Monako, Książe Lichtnsteinu Summary The subject of this article is the character and meaning of the head of state’s liability. The author notices that this institution is an important factor that determines the systemic and legal position of the supreme body in the country, and adopting different solutions in this matter may make the position of heads of state significantly different, even if they seem to have a similar character. This relation has been shown on the example of regu- lations of liability of the heads of state in Monaco and Liechtenstein. In both countries, there is an almost identical manner of appointing to the office of a head of state and the scope of their authorities. However, the matter of liability has been regulated in a com- pletely different way in these two countries. Streszczenie Zakres odpowiedzialności głowy państwa na przykładzie Księstwa Liechtensteinu i Księstwa Monako Przedmiotem niniejszego artykułu jest charakter i znaczenie odpowiedzialności konstytu- cyjnej głowy państwa. Autor zauważa, że instytucja ta jest ważnym czynnikiem, który 1 Author is a Doctoral Student in the Chair of Constitutional Law of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Lodz. E-mail: [email protected]. 128 PRZEGLĄD PRAWA KONSTYTUCYJNEGO 2017/6 determinuje systemową i prawną pozycję najwyższego organu w państwie, a przyjęcie różnych rozwiązań w tej kwestii może znacząco zmienić stanowisko głów państw, nawet jeśli wydają się one mieć podobny charakter. -
Monaco's Constitution of 1962 with Amendments Through 2002
PDF generated: 14 Apr 2014, 20:51 constituteproject.org Monaco's Constitution of 1962 with Amendments through 2002 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 14 Apr 2014, 20:51 Chapter I The Principality - The Public Powers Art 1 The Principality of Monaco is a sovereign and independent State within the framework of the general principles of international law and of the particular conventions with France. The territory of the Principality is unalienable. Art 2 The principle of government is the hereditary and constitutional monarchy. The Principality is a State under the rule of law, committed to fundamental freedoms and rights. Art 3 The executive power is exercised by the highest authority of the Prince. The Prince's persona is inviolable. Art 4 The legislative power is jointly exercised by the Prince and the National Council. Art 5 The judiciary power is exercised by the courts and tribunals. Art 6 The separation of the administrative, legislative and judiciary functions is guaranteed. Art 7 The Prince's standard consists of the coat of arms of the House of Grimaldi upon a white ground. The National Flag consists of two equal stripes, red and white, arranged horizontally, the red in the upper part, the white in the lower part. The use of these standard and flag is governed by the provisions of the sovereign ordinance dated April 4th, 1881. Art 8 The French language is the official language of the State. Art 9 The Catholic, Apostolic and Roman religion is the religion of the State. -
Celebrity Privacy and the Development of the Judicial Concept of Proportionality
Celebrity privacy and the development of the judicial concept of proportionality: How English law has balanced the rights to protection and interference Robin Callender Smith Queen Mary University of London Centre for Commercial Law Studies Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Date submitted: 11 August 2014 Examined by viva 6 November 2014 External examiner: Professor Ian Lloyd (Southampton University) Internal examiner: Dr. Andrew Scott (London School of Economics) Passed without corrections Statement of Originality I, Robin Callender Smith, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Robin Callender Smith 11 August 2014 2 Details of collaboration and publications R Callender Smith, Press Law (Sweet & Maxwell 1978). -
B COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 194/2008 of 25 February 2008 Renewing and Strengthening the Restrictive Measures in Respect of B
2008R0194 — EN — 16.05.2012 — 010.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 194/2008 of 25 February 2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar and repealing Regulation (EC) No 817/2006 (OJ L 66, 10.3.2008, p. 1) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Regulation (EC) No 385/2008 of 29 April 2008 L 116 5 30.4.2008 ►M2 Commission Regulation (EC) No 353/2009 of 28 April 2009 L 108 20 29.4.2009 ►M3 Commission Regulation (EC) No 747/2009 of 14 August 2009 L 212 10 15.8.2009 ►M4 Commission Regulation (EU) No 1267/2009 of 18 December 2009 L 339 24 22.12.2009 ►M5 Council Regulation (EU) No 408/2010 of 11 May 2010 L 118 5 12.5.2010 ►M6 Commission Regulation (EU) No 411/2010 of 10 May 2010 L 118 10 12.5.2010 ►M7 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 383/2011 of 18 April L 103 8 19.4.2011 2011 ►M8 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 891/2011 of 1 L 230 1 7.9.2011 September 2011 ►M9 Council Regulation (EU) No 1083/2011 of 27 October 2011 L 281 1 28.10.2011 ►M10 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1345/2011 of 19 December L 338 19 21.12.2011 2011 ►M11 Council Regulation (EU) No 409/2012 of 14 May 2012 L 126 1 15.5.2012 Corrected by: ►C1 Corrigendum, OJ L 198, 26.7.2008, p. -
Global Constitutionalism. an Introduction to the Comparative Study of Constitutional Preambles: Europe
Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) 10(3):238-250, setembro-dezembro 2018 Unisinos - doi: 10.4013/rechtd.2018.103.02 Global Constitutionalism. An introduction to the comparative study of Constitutional preambles: Europe Constitucionalismo global. Uma introdução ao estudo comparativo dos preâmbulos constitucionais: Europa Arnaldo Sampaio de Moraes Godoy Centro Universitário de Brasília, Brasil [email protected] Abstract The paper approaches European constitutional preambles with the aim of unveiling several semblances and dissemblances among them. It upholds the argument that Constitutional preambles are legal texts that exist irrespective of actual political and economic conditions on a particular state. In the main, there are some common places in the context of its language structures, primarily as for the use of the Enlight- enment legacy, as well as History and an imbibed form of patriotism. Keywords: global constitutionalism, constitutional preambles, Europe. Resumo O ensaio trata dos preâmbulos das constituições europeias com o objetivo de des- cortinar semelhanças e dissemelhanças entre os vários textos. Sustenta o argumento de que preâmbulos constitucionais são textos jurídicos que existem não obstante a realidade política e econômica dos respectivos Estados. No núcleo, há nos preâmbu- los alguns lugares comuns, no contexto de suas estruturas linguísticas, especialmente quanto ao legado do iluminismo, bem como quanto ao uso da História, a par de uma intrínseca forma de patriotismo. Palavras-chave: constitucionalismo global, preâmbulos constitucionais, Europa. 1 Centro Universitário de Brasília. SEPN 707/907, s/n, Asa Norte, 70700-075, Brasília, DF, Brasil. Este é um artigo de acesso aberto, licenciado por Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), sendo permitidas reprodução, adaptação e distribuição desde que o autor e a fonte originais sejam creditados. -
Human Rights Council the Economic Interests of the Myanmar Military
A/HRC/42/CRP.3 5 August 2019 English only Human Rights Council Forty-second session 9–27 September 2019 Agenda item 4 Human Rights situations that require the Council’s attention The economic interests of the Myanmar military Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar An earlier version of this repot, released on 5 August 2019, misindentified details related to a number of companies and individuals. They have been corrected in this version of the report, and are outlined in “Update from the UN Independent International Fact- Finding Mission on Myanmar on its report on “The economic interests of Myanmar’s military”, available on the Mission’s website at https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/MyanmarFFM/Pages/EconomicInterestsMyanmarMilitary.aspx GE. A/HRC/42/CRP.3 Contents Page I. Executive summary and key recommendations ............................................................................... 3 II. Mandate, methodology, international legal and policy framework .................................................. 6 A. Mandate ................................................................................................................................... 6 B. Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 7 C. International legal and policy framework ................................................................................ 8 III. Mapping Tatmadaw economic structures and interests ................................................................... -
巴基昂梭(1923-1990): 自主藝術現代性之策略 Page
Bagyi Aung Soe (1923-1990): Strategies for an Autonomous & Compassionate Artistic Modernity 巴基昂梭(1923-1990): 自主藝術現代性之策略 page. 7 Bagyi Aung Soe (1923-1990): Strategies for an Autonomous & Compassionate Artistic Modernity 巴基昂梭(1923-1990): 自主藝術現代性之策略 Yin KER 郭映思 Assistant Professor, Nanyang Technological University, School of Art, Design & Media 南洋理工大學設計與媒體學院助理教授 現代美術學報—32 Southeast Asia and Taiwan: Modernity and Postcolonial Manifestations in Visual Art page. 8 東南亞與台灣:視覺藝術的現代性與後殖民表現 Abstract Following “The Question of the Emergence of Modern Burmese Art: Kin Maung (Bank) (1908-1983) and Bagyi Aung Soe (1924-1990)” (2014) on the unevenness and plurality of the modern in twentieth-century painting in Myanmar, this essay expands on Aung Soe’s assimilation and innovation of “true modernism” as defined by Rabindranath Tagore (1861- 1941) in reaction to imperialism and colonization, and as implemented by Nandalal Bose (1882-1966) in the pedagogical program of the Viśva-Bhāratī University in Śāntiniketan. Through a selection of Aung Soe’s works and writings from the 1950s to the 1980s, it investigates the strategies he adopted to formulate an artistic modernity aligned with Tagore’s vision of absolute autonomy. The first part probes his constructs of the “modern,” “art” and “artist” that paved the way to a Burmese and modern pictorial idiom founded upon a diversity of artistic traditions in conjunction with ancient spiritual technology. The second part examines how Buddhist thought, practice and imagery next provided him with the means to create “the most advanced of modern art” that is the sum of “all the traditions of the world,” and the final part addresses the implications of this singular conception of artistic modernity with respect to his legacy. -
Conjugating Legacies: Fua Haribhitak (1910–1993) & Bagyi Aung Soe
Conjugating Legacies: Fua Haribhitak (1910–1993) & Bagyi Aung Soe (1923–1990), From Śāntiniketan to Bangkok & Yangon Sirintorn HARIBHITAK & Yin KER “Everywhere, at every national/cultural site, modernity is not one but many; modernity is not new, but old and familiar; modernity is incomplete and necessarily so.” ((Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar, “On Alternative Modernities,” Public Culture 11 (1999), 18.)) Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar In the region that became “Southeast Asia” in the Second World War, Rabindranath Tagore (1861–1941), Asia’s first Nobel laureate in 1913, was regarded as a beacon. Wherever he traveled in present-day Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia during the 1920s, he was warmly welcomed. ((On Tagore in Southeast Asia, see Swapna Bhattacharya, “Rabindranath Tagore in Myanmar and His Perception of Southeast Asia-India Relations,” in Interrogating History: Essays for Hermann Kulke, ed. Matin Brandtner and Shishir Kumar Panda (New Delhi: Manohar, 2006), 213-229; Arun Das Gupta, “Rabindranath Tagore in Indonesia: An Experiment in Bridge-Building,” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 158 (2002): 451- 477; Chi P. Pham, “The Rise and the Fall of Rabindranath Tagore in Vietnam” (M.A. diss., University of California, 2012); Veena Sikiri, “Rabindranath Tagore Visits Malaya,” in India and Malaysia: Intertwined Strands (New Delhi: Manohar: 2013), 276-287; Rabindranath Tagore, Letters from Java: Rabindranath Tagore’s Tour of South-East Asia 1927, ed. Supriya Roy (Kolkata: Kumkum Bhattacharya, Viśva-Bhāratī, 2010).)) The Viśva- Bhāratī University in Śāntiniketan, Bengal, which he established as an ashram in 1901 in reaction against the British colonial system of education, was the Mecca of intellectuals and artists from across Asia and beyond. -
Report on Constituency Delineation and Seat Allocation
Strasbourg, 12 December 2017 CDL-AD(2017)034 Study No. 873 / 2017 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) REPORT ON CONSTITUENCY DELINEATION AND SEAT ALLOCATION Adopted by the Council for Democratic Elections at its 60th meeting (Venice, 7 December 2017) and by the Venice Commission at its 113th Plenary Session (Venice, 8-9 December 2017) on the basis of comments by Mr Richard BARRETT (Member, Ireland) Ms Sarah CLEVELAND (Member, United States of America) Ms Tanja KARAKAMISHEVA-JOVANOVSKA (Member, “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”) Mr Oliver KASK (Member, Estonia) Lord Richard BALFE (Expert, United Kingdom) Ms Leontine LOEBER (Expert, the Netherlands) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2017)034 - 2 - Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 II. Framework of constituency delineation and seat allocation ................................ 3 A. Principles ................................................................................................................... 3 1. Substantive guarantees ....................................................................................... 4 2. Procedural guarantees ........................................................................................ 5 B. Types of constituencies ............................................................................................. 6 1. Nationwide