DOCSLIB.ORG

The Strategy of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Strategy of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society DIRECT ENFORCEMENT ON THE HIGH SEAS: THE STRATEGY OF THE SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics and International Studies Teale Nevada Phelps Bondaroff Clare College University of Cambridge November 2013 SUMMARY This study examines the anti-whaling strategy of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS). Despite being relatively small and resource poor, this confrontational marine conservation organization has been successful in frustrating Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean through the use of what it describes as ‘aggressive non-violent direct action.’ Adopting an inductive approach, the study uses participant observation and process tracing in order to uncover those mechanisms which make the SSCS strategy effective. In understanding this strategy, which is unlike any other described in the transnational environmental activism literature, the study seeks to add to our understanding of the role and power of non-state actors in international affairs. A close examination reveals that the organization is engaging in a strategy which can be described as ‘direct enforcement’ (DE) – whereby it seeks to enforce existing marine conservation laws. The SSCS supports its claims as an enforcement organization through the use of legal language, symbols and imagery. It also selects targets which can be accused of violating the law, and gathers evidence to support these accusations. Once it has identified such a target, the SSCS interferes with the operations and attempts to prevent illegal and environmentally harmful activities, and to directly increase the target’s costs of operation. This study explores some of the mechanisms upon which DE relies. Aggressive intervention exposes activists to potential retaliation from targets and states. Several mechanisms reduce potential retaliation. First, activists are protected by the principle of unclean hands: targets do not wish to draw attention to their own wrongdoings by indicting activists. Second, activists surround themselves and their actions in a complex web of international laws, which tends to deter state prosecution, because states generally wish to avoid complications or potentially embarrassing international incidents. By actively enforcing laws where states lack capacity and/or political will to do so, DE enhances the compliance pull of international laws. Through the use of DE, activists also exert powerful legal leverage against states. Eschewing traditional activist approaches such as the ‘mobilization of shame,’ DE not only criticizes states for their failure to live up to their international obligations and commitments, but supports these claims with confrontational actions which cannot be ignored. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS – SUMMARY SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS – SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS – DETAILED ................................................................................................ 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND PREFACE ............................................................................................. 8 LIST OF ABREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS USED .......................................................................... 10 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................ 13 CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 2 – CONVENTIONAL INGO/TAG STRATEGIES........................................................... 34 CHAPTER 3 – METHODOLOGY AND RESEARCH DESIGN ............................................................. 62 CHAPTER 4 – HISTORY OF WHALING AND THE ANTI-WHALING CAMPAIGN ............................ 83 CHAPTER 5 – OBSERVATIONS OF SSCS OPERATIONS .............................................................. 105 CHAPTER 6 – UNCONVENTIONAL STRATEGIES IN IR – DIRECT ACTION ................................. 158 CHAPTER 7 – DIRECT ENFORCEMENT ....................................................................................... 170 CHAPTER 8 – ISSUE SELECTION AND DIRECT ENFORCEMENT IN OTHER CAMPAIGNS ........... 186 CHAPTER 9 – CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 198 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................... 205 APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................ 225 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS – DETAILED SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS – SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS – DETAILED ................................................................................................ 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND PREFACE ............................................................................................. 8 LIST OF ABREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS USED .......................................................................... 10 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................ 13 CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 14 1.1 - Action in the Southern Ocean ..................................................................................... 14 1.2 - The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society .................................................................... 14 1.3 - Non-State Actors in International Relations ............................................................... 16 1.4 - The Puzzle of the SSCS .............................................................................................. 18 1.5 - Review of Sea Shepherd Literature............................................................................. 21 1.5.1 - Academic Sources ......................................................................................... 21 1.5.2 - Primary Sources ............................................................................................. 27 1.5.3 - Media Sources ............................................................................................... 29 1.6 - Clarification of Terms ................................................................................................. 29 1.7 - Outline of Study .......................................................................................................... 31 CHAPTER 2 – CONVENTIONAL INGO/TAG STRATEGIES........................................................... 34 2.1 - NGOs and TAGs Defined ........................................................................................... 34 2.1.1 - Transnational Civil Society and NGOs ......................................................... 34 2.1.2 - TAGs and TANs Defined .............................................................................. 35 2.2 - The Expansion of INGOs and TAGs in International Relations................................. 37 2.2.1 - Growing Role of NSAs in IR ........................................................................ 37 2.2.2 - Determining Relevance and Measuring Influence ........................................ 38 2.2.3 - INGO and TAG Legitimacy .......................................................................... 41 2.2.4 - Why Go Transnational? ................................................................................. 42 2.3 - INGO and TAG Strategy ............................................................................................ 44 2.3.1 - Insider-Outsider Politics and Venue Shopping ............................................. 46 2.3.2 - Typologies of Action ..................................................................................... 48 2.3.2.1 - Information Politics ......................................................................... 49 2.3.2.2 - Symbolic Politics ............................................................................. 50 2.3.2.3 - Leverage Politics .............................................................................. 53 2.3.2.4 - Accountability Politics ..................................................................... 55 2.4 - Issue Selection ............................................................................................................. 57 2.5 - Sea Shepherd’s Challenge to the INGO/TAG Literature ............................................ 60 CHAPTER 3 – METHODOLOGY AND RESEARCH DESIGN ............................................................. 62 3.1 - The Case Study ........................................................................................................... 62 3.1.1 - Case Selection................................................................................................ 62 4 3.1.2 - Single Case Study .......................................................................................... 64 3.2 - Discerning SSCS Strategy..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Japan Vows to Keep Whale Hunt After Activist Clash 21 February 2013, by Kyoko Hasegawa
    Japan vows to keep whale hunt after activist clash 21 February 2013, by Kyoko Hasegawa earlier this month lost a battle at the US Supreme Court over an order to steer clear of Japan's whaling fleet—accused the Japanese side of deliberately colliding with its vessels. Sea Shepherd captain Paul Watson told the Australian Associated Press news agency that the whalers were refuelling at sea in an area where such activities are prohibited by an Antarctic treaty. "I feel that this is the end of it," he was quoted as saying, pointing to the 18 days remaining in the short whaling season and deriding the Japanese fleet's moves as "like a case of road rage". This handout picture taken by Japan's Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR) on February 20, 2013 shows the environmental group's ship Sea Shepherd (L) steering its bow between an oil supply ship (R) and Japan's whaling ship Nisshin Maru (not pictured), in the Southern Ocean. Japan vowed to continue its whale hunt after the clashes. Japan vowed to continue its whale hunt in the Southern Ocean after clashes with the militant conservationist Sea Shepherd group, which claimed Tokyo had been forced to end the mission. "We are keeping our whaling programme," an official at Japan's Fisheries Agency told AFP on This picture taken by Japan's Institute of Cetacean Thursday, denying a report that Japan was forced Research (ICR) on February 20, 2013 shows the to suspend its whale hunt after collisions with boats environmental group ship Sea Shepherd sandwiched crewed by anti-whaling campaigners.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Restrictions and PVC Free Policies Worldwide
    PVC-Free Future: A Review of Restrictions and PVC free Policies Worldwide A list compiled by Greenpeace International 9th edition, June 2003 © Greenpeace International, June 2003 Keizersgracht 176 1016 DW Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: +31 20 523 6222 Fax: +31 20 523 6200 Web site: www.greenpeace.org/~toxics If your organisation has restricted the use of Chlorine/PVC or has a Chlorine/PVC-free policy and you would like to be included on this list, please send details to the Greenpeace International Toxics Campaign 1 Contents 1. Political......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 International Agreements on Hazardous Substances............................. 4 Mediterranean........................................................................................................... 4 North-East Atlantic (OSPAR & North Sea Conference)..................................... 4 International Joint Commission - USA/Canada................................................... 6 United Nations Council on Environment and Development (UNCED)............ 7 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).............................................. 7 UNEP – global action on Persistent Organic Pollutants..................................... 7 UNIDO........................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 National PVC & Chlorine Restrictions and Other Initiatives: A-Z.......10 Argentina..................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Pirates in the Southern Ocean?
    PiratesPirates inin thethe SouthernSouthern Ocean?Ocean? TheThe SouthernSouthern OceanOcean clashesclashes betweenbetween thethe SeaSea ShepherdShepherd ConservationConservation SocietySociety andand thethe JapaneseJapanese whalingwhaling fleetfleet Donald R. Rothwell, ANU College of Law, ANU OutlineOutline •• ContextContext ––TheThe AntarcticAntarctic TreatyTreaty SystemSystem ––WhalingWhaling ConventionConvention •• HistoryHistory ofof protestprotest clashesclashes •• EventsEvents ofof 20102010 •• ResponseResponse andand LegalLegal FrameworkFramework TheThe AntarcticAntarctic TreatyTreaty SystemSystem Commences with 1959 Antarctic Treaty •• Key features – Freedom of scientific research – Setting aside of sovereignty disputes – Demilitarisation of the continent – Extends north to 60o South •• Included all of the seven claimant States plus other interested States – USA; USSR; Japan; Belgium; South Africa •• Extended to encompass other States – India, China, Germany, Italy – 46 in total CountriesCountries withwith AntarcticAntarctic claimsclaims •• AustraliaAustralia (Australian(Australian AntarcticAntarctic Territory)Territory) •• NewNew ZealandZealand (Ross(Ross Dependency)Dependency) •• UnitedUnited KingdomKingdom •• FranceFrance •• ChileChile •• ArgentinaArgentina •• NorwayNorway TheThe AntarcticAntarctic TreatyTreaty SystemSystem ExpandedExpanded toto addressaddress environmentalenvironmental andand resourceresource issuesissues •• 19641964 AgreedAgreed MeasuresMeasures •• 19721972 SealsSeals ConventionConvention (CCAS)(CCAS) •• 19801980
    [Show full text]
  • National Progress Reports Japan – 2020 & 2019
    NAMMCO/28/NPR/JP-2020-2019 NAMMCO ANNUAL MEETING 28 22-25 March 2021 Online MEETING OF THE COUNCIL DOCUMENT NPR/ NATIONAL PROGRESS REPORTS JAPAN – 2020 & 2019 JP-2020-2019 Submitted by Japan Action requested For information Japan ProgRep. Large Cetacean/2020 Japan. Progress report on large cetacean research, April 2019 to March 2020 COMPILED BY SATOKO INOUE Institute of Cetacean Research, 4-5 Toyomi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0055, Japan This document summarizes the data and samples of large cetacean, which were collected by the Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR), National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries (NRIFSF) and Fisheries Agency of Japan (FAJ) from April 2019 to March 2020 and austral summer season 2019/20. Sighting data for abundance estimates of large cetaceans were collected in the western North Pacific, the Gulf of Alaska and the Antarctic during systematic sighting surveys. During the surveys, photo-id, biopsy and satellite tracking experiments on large cetaceans were also conducted. A large number of biological data and samples were collected during the last surveys of the New Scientific Whale Research Program in the western North Pacific (NEWREP-NP) and commercial whaling in Japan’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Species and figures of bycatch and stranding of large cetaceans are based on the reports of prefecture governments to the FAJ, which compile reports from individual fishermen, fishery cooperative associations and the general public. Data and samples collected are being analyzed for contributing to the stock assessment and management of large cetaceans in the North Pacific. 1. SIGHTING DATA Dedicated sighting survey under the program Japanese Abundance and Stock structure Surveys in the Antarctic (JASS-A) in the Southern Ocean in the austral summer season 2019/20 (vessel: Yushin-Maru No.2).
    [Show full text]
  • Contested Meanings and Narratives Surrounding Animal Advocacy
    Wars of Images and Representations 211 WARS OF IMAGES AND REPRESENTATIONS: CONTESTED MEANINGS AND NARRATIVES SURROUNDING ANIMAL ADVOCACY Brian M. Lowe Introduction: Advocacy and Conflict The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS), created in 1977 by Paul Watson (a co-founder of the environmental group Greenpeace), has pur- sued a strategy of direct action—non-violent engagements including phys- ical interference and obstruction—in a variety of campaigns on behalf of oceanic nonhuman animals, especially marine mammals such as whales and seals. The recent campaigns of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society in the waters surrounding Antarctica (what Hiroshi Hatanaka, the director general of Japan’s Institute of Cetacean Research termed “the Southern Ocean”)1 (have gained public attention in the United States primarily through information (on websites and press releases) circulated through the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and through the Animal Planet television series Whale Wars (which completed broadcasting its fifth season in August 2012). This television series features the SSCS deploying ocean-going vessels, (named after publicly recognized animal advocates including Farley Mowat, Steve Irwin, and Cleveland Armory, in order to challenge commercial whaling. As noted by Heller in his 2007 account of being aboard the Farley Mowat, Watson succinctly summarizes the Sea Shepherd strategy as “sink ships, but don’t break laws.” The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society legitimizes its actions through appeals to international law and the scientific community in order to convince broad audiences that their actions are defending both marine life and the legal statutes against callous disregard and indifference towards law. Watson justifies the Sea Shepherd’s actions: that commercial whal- ing—especially in international oceanic sanctuaries—is illegal, and there- fore actions undertaken to disrupt such hunts are legally sanctioned.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Schedule Chart (8 1/2 X 14 In
    Time Room 1. Room 2. Room 3. Room 4. Moffett Center Moffett Center Moffett Center Moffett Center 9:00 April 10, 2010 SUNY Cortland, Moffett Center Registration Sarat Colling - Elizabeth Green – Ashley Mosgrove 9:30 Introduction Anthony J. Nocella, II Welcoming Andrew Fitz-Gibbon and Mechthild Nagel 10:00 – Academic Facilitator: Jackie Riehle Animals and Facilitator: Ronald Pleban Species Facilitator: Doreen Nieves Social Facilitator: Ashley Mosgrove 11:20 Repression Book Cultural Inclusion Movement Talk (AK Press, 1. The Carceral Society: From the Practices 1 Animal Subjects in 1. The Politics of Inclusion: A Feminist Strategy and 1. DIY Media and the Animal Rights 2010) Prison Tower to the Ivory Tower Anthropological Perspective Space to Critique Speciesism Tactic Analysis Movement: Talk - Action = Nothing Mechthild Nagel and Caroline Alessandro Arrigoni Jenny Grubbs Dylan Powell Kaltefleiter 2. An American Imperial Project: 2. Transcending Species: A Feminist 2. The Influential Activist: Using the 2. Regimes of Normalcy in the The Role of Animal Bodies in the Re-examination of Oppression Science of Persuasion to Open Minds Academy: The Experiences of Smithsonian-Theodore Roosevelt Jeni Haines and Win Campaigns Disabled Faculty African Expedition, 1909-1910. Nick Cooney Liat Ben-Moshe Laura Shields 3. The Reasonableness of Sentimentality 3. The Role of Direct Action in The 3. Adelphi Recovers „The 3. Conservation perspectives: Andrew Fitz-Gibbon Animal Rights Movement Lengthening View International wildlife priorities, Carol Glasser Ali Zaidi individual animals, and wildlife management strategies in Kenya Stella Capoccia 11:30- Species Facilitator: Jackie Riehle Animal Facilitator: Anastasia Yarbrough Animal Facilitator: Brittani Mannix Animal Facilitator: Andrew Fitz-Gibbon 1:00 Relationships Exploitation Exploitation Exploitation and Domination 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Until One Has Loved an Animal, a Part of One's Soul Remains Unawakened
    THEOSOPHICAL ORDER OF SERVICE, USA SPRING 2014 Until one has loved an animal, a part of one’s soul remains unawakened. —ANATOLE FRANCE For the Love of Life Contents Spring 2014 THEOSOPHICAL ORDER OF SERVICE, USA Editor Ananya S. Rajan 2 From the President’s Desk Designer Lindsay Freeman By Nancy Secrest OfficErs anD BOarD Of DirEctOrs 4 The Reason Why By RAdha Burnier President Nancy Secrest secretary Ananya S. Rajan 5 An Inside Look at Animals treasurer Betty Bland An Interview with Robyn Finseth Board Members Tim Boyd By Nancy Secrest Kathy Gann Jon Knebel Jeanne Proulx 9 To Ziggy with Love Honorary By AnanyA S. Rajan Board Members Joseph Gullo Miles Standish 12 Meet the Girls Contact information for the Theosophical By AnanyA S. Rajan Order of Service in the United States: Mailing address Theosophical Order 14 On Service Animals of Service 1926 N. Main St By Nancy Secrest Wheaton, IL 60187 send donations by 19 Do Animals Have Rights? check to: P.O. Box 1080 By Morry Secrest Wakefield, NC 27588 Phone 630-668-1571 ext. 332 22 Beagle Freedom Project E-mail [email protected] By Kathy Gann Website www.theoservice.org To leave a name for the Healing network: 23 Happy Birthday Jane 800-838-2197. For animal healing contact us at 25 Where the Wild Things Are [email protected] By AnanyA S. Rajan For more information about the TOS around the world, go to http://international. theoservice.org/ 28 Scholarship Recipients Disclaimer On the cOvEr: Articles and material in this publication do not necessarily Friends for Lifetimes--Bella with Tarra roam the grounds at reflect the opinions of the Theosophical Order of Service or The Elephant Sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Report: Fukushima Fallout | Greenpeace
    Fukushima Fallout Nuclear business makes people pay and suffer February 2013 Contents Executive summary 4 Chapter 1: 10 Fukushima two years later: Lives still in limbo by Dr David McNeill Chapter 2: 22 Summary and analysis of international nuclear liability by Antony Froggatt Chapter 3: 38 The nuclear power plant supply chain by Professor Stephen Thomas For more information contact: [email protected] Written by: Antony Froggatt, Dr David McNeill, Prof Stephen Thomas and Dr Rianne Teule Edited by: Brian Blomme, Steve Erwood, Nina Schulz, Dr Rianne Teule Acknowledgements: Jan Beranek, Kristin Casper, Jan Haverkamp, Yasushi Higashizawa, Greg McNevin, Jim Riccio, Ayako Sekine, Shawn-Patrick Stensil, Kazue Suzuki, Hisayo Takada, Aslihan Tumer Art Direction/Design by: Sue Cowell/Atomo Design Cover image: Empty roads run through the southeastern part of Kawamata, as most residents were evacuated due to radioactive contamination.© Robert Knoth / Greenpeace JN 444 Published February 2013 by Greenpeace International Ottho Heldringstraat 5, 1066 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel: +31 20 7182000 greenpeace.org Image: Kindergarten toys, waiting for Greenpeace to carry out radiation level testing. 2 Fukushima Fallout Nuclear business makes people pay and suffer © NORIKO HAYASHI / G © NORIKO HAYASHI REENPEACE Governments have created a system that protects the benefits of companies while those who suffer from nuclear disasters end up paying the costs.. Fukushima Fallout Nuclear business makes people pay and suffer 3 © DigitaLGLOBE / WWW.digitaLGLOBE.COM Aerial view 2011 disaster. Daiichi nuclear of the Fukushima plant following the Image: Nuclear business makes people pay and suffer Fukushima Fallout 4 for its failures. evades responsibility evades responsibility The nuclear industry executive summary executive summary Executive summary From the beginning of the use of nuclear power to produce electricity 60 years ago, the nuclear industry has been protected from paying the full costs of its failures.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Shepherd Buys Anti-Whaling Ship from Japan Marine Conservation Group Acquires Ship from Unsuspecting Japanese Authorities Through US Firm
    Sea Shepherd buys anti-whaling ship from Japan Marine conservation group acquires ship from unsuspecting Japanese authorities through US firm Justin McCurry in Tokyo guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 11 December 2012 05.32 EST The marine conservation group Sea Shepherd has scored a propaganda victory over Japan after it emerged it had bought its newest anti-whaling vessel from the Japanese government, apparently without its knowledge. The $2m dollar vessel, which previously belonged to the country's meteorological agency, was bought from unsuspecting Japanese authorities by a US company, re-registered in the Pacific island of Tuvalu as the New Atlantis, and delivered to Australia by a Japanese crew. The ship, which was unveiled on Tuesday in Hobart, was reflagged to Australia and named after Sam Simon, the founding producer of The Simpsons TV series and a prominent animal rights campaigner. It is the newest addition to a fleet of four Sea Shepherd vessels that is expected to pursue Japan's whalers soon after they leave for the Antarctic later this month. "We have four ships, one helicopter, drones and more than 120 volunteer crew from around the world ready to defend majestic whales from the illegal operations of the Japanese whaling fleet," said Sea Shepherd's founder, Paul Watson. Watson will join this season's campaign, called Operation Zero Tolerance, despite jumping bail in Germany after being placed on an Interpol wanted list for allegedly endangering a fishing vessel crew in 2002. To compound Japan's embarrassment, the 184ft vessel was previously moored in Shimonoseki, home to the country's Antarctic whaling fleet, after being retired by the meteorological agency in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Dec 2016 Pulse N2
    N2.DEC 2016 PULSE N2. DEC 2016 PULSE LOGISTICS BREXIT COLOMBIA WEBSITE TAKING THE PULSE MORE QUESTIONS THE POWER FEED.JERONIMOMARTINS.COM OF BUSINESS THAN ANSWERS OF SUPER BEANS CHECKING THE PULSE. The starting point for the second issue of Feed was inspired by the United Nations defining 2016 as the International Year of Pulses, an effort regarding sustainable food production and nutrition. INDEX. We took the notion of “Pulses” and approached this magazine with a broader concept of what it can mean: food itself, but also beat, rhythm, pace, time and emotions. SLOWFOOD 14.19 PULSES 64.73 WORLD HEARTBEAT PULSES MAP SUPER HEROES BEANS 28.31 A map that provides much needed clarity 96.103 104.113 on such questions as: which country is the 2016 is the International Year of Pulses, THE PULSE OF BUSINESS Celebrating three decades of heart If iron deficiency is the most common The bustle of a company is provided by its many delivery elements as it is largest producer, importer and exporter an initiative dedicated to the promotion transplantation, this piece focuses on the and widespread nutritional disorder in the the key to product mobility. In this section, it is showcased the circulatory of pulses in the world? And do we eat more of legumes. Can these superfoods stories of real life heroes: the doctors that world, then Colombia is taking measures system of Jerónimo Martins’ food distribution business. of them than our ancestors? be an overlooked ingredient in a healthy lifestyle? We gather a nutritionist, performed the first ever heart transplants to respond to this issue: by cultivating two a horticulture expert and an actress – difficult, hard and long surgeries – new species of superbeans that enhance to discuss this over a meal.
    [Show full text]
  • AN ENERGY REVOLUTION for the 21ST CENTURY to Tackle Climate Change, Renewable Energy Technologies, Like Wind, Can Be Embraced by Adopting a DE Pathway
    DECENTRALISING POWER: AN ENERGY REVOLUTION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY To tackle climate change, renewable energy technologies, like wind, can be embraced by adopting a DE pathway. ©Greenpeace/Weckenmann. Cover: Solar thermal installation. ©Langrock/Zenit/Greenpeace. Canonbury Villas London N1 2PN www.greenpeace.org.uk t: +44 (0)20 7865 8100 DECENTRALISING POWER: 1 AN ENERGY REVOLUTION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY FOREWORD KEN LIVINGSTONE, MAYOR OF LONDON I am delighted to have been asked by Greenpeace to contribute a foreword to this timely report. Climate change has now become the problem the world cannot ignore. Addressing future global warming, and adapting to it now, will require making fundamental changes to the way we live. How we produce, distribute and use energy is key to this. My London Energy Strategy set out how decentralised electricity generation could deliver huge CO2 reductions in London by enabling the convergence of heat and power generation, leading to massive growth in renewable energy production, and providing the cornerstone of a renewable hydrogen energy economy. Decentralised energy allows the financial costs and energy losses associated with the long-distance national transmission system to be reduced and savings passed on to consumers. Bringing energy production closer to people’s lives helps in our efforts to promote energy efficiency. Security of supply can be ©Liane Harris. improved, with power blackouts reduced. The UK could take the opportunity to develop expertise and technologies, leading the developed world, and facilitating the developing world’s path to a sustainable energy future. In London the opportunities for decentralised energy supply range from solar panels on Londoners’ homes, to adapting existing full-sized power stations to more efficient combined heat and power systems supplying thousands of businesses and residential buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilancio 2018
    SEA SHEPHERD ITALIA ONLUS BILANCIO SOCIALE 2018 DIFENDERE CONSERVARE PROTEGGERE “Se gli oceani muoiono moriamo anche noi” Capitano Paul Watson SEA SHEPHERD ITALIA ONLUS 2 BILANCIO SOCIALE 2018 INDICE LA NOSTRA MISSION ...................................... 6 LA NOSTRA STORIA ......................................... 9 LA FLOTTA DI NETTUNO ............................... 56 CAMPAGNE GLOBALI ..................................... 60 SEA SHEPHERD DIVE .................................... 71 RACCOLTA FONDI ............................................. 72 SEA SHEPHERD GLOBAL ............................. 74 SEA SHEPHERD ITALIA.................................. 76 CAMPAGNE ITALIANE .................................... 84 ATTIVITÀ DI SSIO ............................................... 96 MEDIA communication .......................... 108 BILANCIO SOCIALE .......................................... 112 FONTI DI FINANZIAMENTO ......................... 119 SEA SHEPHERD ITALIA ONLUS 4 BILANCIO SOCIALE 2018 AAIU TENERET INA MARECI LE NAVI SOSTENENENDO SEA SHEPHERD, PUOI AIUTARCI A TENERE IN MARE LE NAVI E GLI EQUIPAGGI DI VOLONTARI, CHE OGNI GIORNO DIFENDONO LA VITA NEI NOSTRI OCEANI. economico necessario: • Donazione mensile (DAC) • Donazione tramite PayPal • 5x1000 • Versamento postale • Sea Shepherd Italia Onlus Via Rosso di San Secondo, 7 - 20134 Milano [email protected] http://www.seashepherd.it/aiutaci/ Codice Fiscale: 97560620151 LA NOSTRA MISSION SEA SHEPHERD ITALIA ONLUS 6 BILANCIO SOCIALE 2018 CHI SIAMO IL NOSTRO APPROCCIO Costituita
    [Show full text]