DOCSLIB.ORG

Managing Multinational Infrastructure: an Analysis of European Union Institutional Structures and Best Practice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Managing Multinational Infrastructure: an Analysis of European Union Institutional Structures and Best Practice A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics van der Geest, Willem; Núñez-Ferrer, Jorge Working Paper Managing multinational infrastructure: An analysis of European Union institutional structures and best practice ADBI Working Paper, No. 296 Provided in Cooperation with: Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo Suggested Citation: van der Geest, Willem; Núñez-Ferrer, Jorge (2011) : Managing multinational infrastructure: An analysis of European Union institutional structures and best practice, ADBI Working Paper, No. 296, Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/53709 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu ADBI Working Paper Series Managing Multinational Infrastructure: An Analysis of European Union Institutional Structures and Best Practice Willem van der Geest and Jorge Núñez-Ferrer No. 296 July 2011 Asian Development Bank Institute Willem van der Geest is presently trade policy advisor, Ministry of Economy, Republic of Armenia and Jorge Núñez-Ferrer is an independent consultant and senior associate researcher with the Centre for European Policy Studies. This is a revised version of a background paper prepared for ADB/ADBI's Flagship study on Infrastructure and Regional Cooperation and the book ”Infrastructure for a Seamless Asia”. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Suggested citation: Van der Geest, W., and J. Nunez-Ferrer. 2011. Managing Multinational Infrastructure: An Analysis of European Union Institutional Structures and Best Practice. ADBI Working Paper 296. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: http://www.adbi.org/working- paper/2011/07/15/4645.managing.multinational.infrastructure.eu/ Please contact the author(s) for information about this paper. Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Asian Development Bank Institute Kasumigaseki Building 8F 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-6008, Japan Tel: +81-3-3593-5500 Fax: +81-3-3593-5571 URL: www.adbi.org E-mail: [email protected] © 2011 Asian Development Bank Institute ADBI Working Paper 296 Van der Geest and Núñez-Ferrer Abstract Creating the framework for cross-border infrastructure cooperation often requires the active role of a third party, an “honest broker”, to forge convergence of interests. It is often argued that “deep” European Union (EU)-style integration is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for successful cross-border infrastructural cooperation. The EU institutions, in particular the European Commission and the European Investment Bank (EIB), have performed such a facilitating and enabling role, though not without encountering challenges along the way. However, this paper argues that the EU experience underscores the vital importance of national governments and good governance in the context of cross-border multinational infrastructure. Hence, the authors argue that “deep” EU-style integration is an enabling but not a strictly necessary condition for successful implementation of cross-border infrastructure projects. The authors take issue with the myth that transnational cross-border infrastructure cooperation is the result of supra-national decision-making at the EU level. For a particular cross-border infrastructure project to succeed requires tri-partite and multilateral initiatives. These may take the form of “coordinators” (akin to the European Coordinators for TEN-T projects) or special-purpose state-owned companies alongside the Asian (and/or other) Development Banks as co-owners. The second myth which this paper seeks to address is that the management of trans- national and cross-border infrastructure is primarily supra-national. Although additional co- financing may be sought from the European Community budget and/or the European Investment Bank, these resources always complement national budgetary allocations and private funding. Contingent liabilities always remain at the national and sub-national levels and never at the supra-national EU level. The implications for management of cross-border multinational infrastructure in Asia, where the framework for regional cooperation is not yet well articulated, are to some extent positive. Within the Asian context, the need for an honest broker can be fulfilled by multi- lateral institutions such as the Asian Development Bank and the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UN ESCAP). They can appoint “coordinators” drawing on the growing pool of top-level decision makers in Asia. Most importantly, these initiatives can be realized within the present-day context of Asia’s “shallow” integration. JEL Classification: F36, H54, O19 ADBI Working Paper 296 Van der Geest and Núñez-Ferrer Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 2. The Evolution of Multinational Infrastructure in the EU’s History ................................ 3 2.1 Origins and Priorities of the EU ........................................................................ 3 2.2 Emergence and principles of EU regional policy .............................................. 5 2.3 The creation of specific Trans-European Networks .......................................... 6 3. TEN-T, From a Sluggish Start to a Central Policy ...................................................... 8 3.1 Decision-making and management of Trans-European Networks .................... 8 3.2 The European Coordinators ........................................................................... 12 3.3 Financial aspects of TEN-T infrastructure ...................................................... 23 3.4 Project appraisal ............................................................................................ 24 3.5 Mini case study of multinational infrastructure: Thalys International ............... 25 4. The TEN-E Development ......................................................................................... 28 4.1 The first liberalization package ....................................................................... 28 4.2 The second liberalization package ................................................................. 29 4.3 The third liberalization package ..................................................................... 29 4.4 Infrastructure and electricity exchange markets ............................................. 30 5. The E-TEN............................................................................................................... 34 6. Conclusions and Lessons from the EU .................................................................... 34 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 36 Appendix: Advancement in the completion of the TEN-T .................................................... 38 ADBI Working Paper 296 Van der Geest and Núñez-Ferrer 1. INTRODUCTION The European Union (EU) has accumulated much of its power in an ad hoc and pragmatic way. This pragmatism was found in the earliest statements by one of its founders, Jean Monnet, who famously argued that the “union between individuals or communities is not natural; it can only be the result of an intellectual process … having as a starting point … the need for change. Its driving force must be the common interests between individuals or communities”. This “neo-functionalist” thinking prompted the well-known Schuman declaration that “Europe … will be built through concrete achievements which first create a de facto solidarity”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Historical Development of European Integration
    FACT SHEETS ON THE EUROPEAN UNION The historical development of European integration PE 618.969 1. The First Treaties.....................................................................................................3 2. Developments up to the Single European Act.........................................................6 3. The Maastricht and Amsterdam Treaties...............................................................10 4. The Treaty of Nice and the Convention on the Future of Europe..........................14 5. The Treaty of Lisbon..............................................................................................18 EN - 18/06/2018 ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This leaflet contains a compilation of Fact Sheets provided by Parliament’s Policy Departments and Economic Governance Support Unit on the relevant policy area. The Fact Sheets are updated regularly and published on the website of the European Parliament: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets ABOUT THE PUBLISHER Author of the publication: European Parliament Department responsible: Unit for Coordination of Editorial and Communication Activities E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript completed in June, 2018 © European Union, 2018 DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice
    [Show full text]
  • Eu Legislation
    EU LEGISLATION The European Union is based on the rule of law. This means that everything that it does is derived from treaties, which are agreed on voluntarily and democratically by all Member States. Previously signed treaties have been changed and updated to keep up with developments in society. The main treaties are the following: Treaty of Lisbon The Treaty of Lisbon was signed on 13 December 2007. It will have to be ratified by all 27 Member States before it can enter into force, which is hoped to be before the next European Parliament elections in June 2009. Its main objectives are to make the EU more democratic, meeting the European citizens’ expectations for high standards of accountability, openness, transparency and participation; and to make the EU more efficient and able to tackle today's global challenges such as climate change, security and sustainable development. The agreement on the Treaty of Lisbon followed the discussion about a constitution. A "Treaty establishing a constitution for Europe" was adopted by the Heads of State and Government at the Brussels European Council on 17 and 18 June 2004 and signed in Rome on 29 October 2004, but it was never ratified. Treaty of Nice The Treaty of Nice, signed on 26 February 2001, entered into force on 1 February 2003. It dealt mostly with reforming the institutions so that the Union could function efficiently after its enlargement to 25 Member States. The Treaty of Nice, the former Treaty of the EU and the Treaty of the EC have been merged into one consolidated version.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Research BOSTON COLLEGE LAW LIBRARY
    LEGAL RESEARCH GUIDE #9 European Union Research BOSTON COLLEGE LAW LIBRARY INTRODUCTION Post-World War II Europe The European Union has its origins in the period following the end of World War II in 1945. Faced with political and economic uncertainty, many nations in western Europe began to consider the possibilities of increased cooperation as a means of improving economic performance and providing increased security. The Organization for European Economic Cooperation was created in 1948 as a multinational agency to assist in the administration of the Marshall Plan for the reconstruction of western Europe. Further multinational cooperation was fostered by the Council of Europe, a consultative organization established in 1949 to promote common action in economic, social, cultural, scientific, legal and administrative matters. Beginnings of a Common Market The evolution of the European Union itself began in 1951 with the Treaty Establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (“ECSC”), 261 UNTS 140 (1951). This treaty provided a “common market” for the coal and steel industries of France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg, with regulations for pricing, transportation, competition, employment, and the abolition of subsidies. When the ECSC proved successful, attention focused on the creation of a “common market” for other sectors of the economy and for further economic integration. Ministers of the six ECSC countries negotiated and concluded two treaties, signed at Rome in March, 1957. The Treaty of Rome, 298 UNTS 11 (1957), established the European Economic Community and the EURATOM Treaty, 298 UNTS 167 (1957), created the European Atomic Energy Community. Both of these organizations officially came into existence on January 1, 1958.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 March 1948 Brussels Treaty (UK, France, Benelux Mutual Defense Agreement); Es- Tablishes Western European Union 9 May 1950 Fr
    17 March 1948 Brussels Treaty (UK, France, Benelux mutual defense agreement); es- tablishes Western European Union 9 May 1950 French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman proposes West European com- mon market in coal and steel. 18 April 1951 Paris Treaty establishes European Coal and Steel Community, effective for 50 years from 25 Jul 1952 (France, West Germany, Italy, Benelux) 7 May 1952 European Defense Community treaty signed in Paris. 10 September 1952 Luxembourg Resolution: Foreign Ministers of the Six ask members of the ECSC Common Assembly to draw up a draft European Political Community Treaty by 10 March 1953. 10 March 1953 Draft EPC Treaty adopted by ad hoc Assembly in Strasbourg. 19 March 1953 Bundestag ratifies EDC Treaty. 30 August 1954 French Assembly rejects EDC Treaty. Treaties 1-3 June 1955 Messina conference of foreign ministers; Messina resolution establishes Intergovernmental Committee under direction of Paul-Henri Spaak to prepare framework for broader economic integration. 3 February 1956 Benelux Treaty of Economic Union signed, the Hague (Note: the date 3 February 1958 is widely cited, but the Benelux web site indicates 3 February 1956; http://www.benelux.be/fr/bnl/bnl_frame.htm) 25 March 1957 Treaties of Rome (EEC, Euratom) signed; EC6, same membership as ECSC 20 November 1959 European Free Trade Association Treaty signed in Stockholm, with effect from 1 January 1960 (Austria, Denmark, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, UK) 1 8 April 1965 Treaty of Brussels,(theMerger Treaty) merges European Commu- nities, with effect from 1 July 1967; Committee of Permanent Represen- tatives. 17 & 28 February, 1986 Single European Act adopted, at Luxembourg summit, with effect from 1 July 1987: promote internal market, basis for European Political Cooperation 7 February 1992 Treaty on European Union (Maastricht Treaty) signed, with effect from 2 November 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech by Pierre Werner on the Merger of the Executives (1966)
    Speech by Pierre Werner on the merger of the executives (1966) Caption: During a speech made in 1966, Luxembourg Prime Minister Pierre Werner comments on the merging of the executives and the location of certain institutions in Luxembourg. Source: Bulletin de documentation. dir. de publ. Service Information et Presse-Ministère d'Etat. 30.06.1966, n° 8; 22e année. Luxembourg. "Discours de son excellence Monsieur Pierre Werner, Président du Gouvernement, ministre des Affaires étrangères", auteur:Werner, Pierre , p. 19-21. Copyright: (c) Translation CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/speech_by_pierre_werner_on_the_merger_of_the_executiv es_1966-en-3b0fc5b1-a3dd-4be5-bb84-cbdc1feb163e.html Last updated: 10/08/2016 1/4 Speech by His Excellency Mr Pierre Werner, Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs At the time when I referred to the Merger Treaty in the Chamber, during my statement on foreign policy in January, the Communities were still in a state of deep crisis, and it seemed then that approval of this Treaty did not rank as a priority objective. Since that debate, however, the process of European cooperation has, most fortunately, made good progress, and that has confirmed the Luxembourg Government’s positive attitude to this Treaty. Indeed, you will remember that, in late January, the representatives of the six governments met in Luxembourg after an interruption of more than six months in Community activities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Institutions and Bodies of the European Union
    The institutions and bodies of the European Union Source: CVCE. European NAvigator. Raquel Valls, Cédric Sangaletti. Copyright: (c) CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/the_institutions_and_bodies_of_the_european_union-en- d9b5fe9c-280b-4c6b-a2c4-a0a039434060.html Last updated: 08/07/2016 1/4 The institutions and bodies of the European Union The development of the Community institutions and advisory bodies Of the seven institutions of the European Union (EU) formally recognised as such since the Treaty of Lisbon (European Parliament, European Council, Council, European Commission, Court of Justice of the EU, European Central Bank, Court of Auditors), four have their origin in the founding treaties of the Communities. They are the Commission, the Council, Parliament (originally known as the Assembly) and the Court of Justice. These four basic institutions are, moreover, the only ones which have a general power of decision-making which determines the development of all the Union’s activities. Often referred to as the ‘decision-making triangle’, the Commission, the Council and Parliament adopt the Community’s legal acts. The Court of Justice, the Community’s legal body, adopts judicial decisions (in particular, judgments and opinions) which determine the development of the Community legal system. The Community’s institutions have always been assisted by advisory bodies. From its inception in 1952, the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) had four institutions — High Authority, Special Council of Ministers, Common Assembly, Court of Justice — and an advisory body to assist the High Authority, the ECSC Consultative Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Developments up to the Single European Act
    DEVELOPMENTS UP TO THE SINGLE EUROPEAN ACT The main developments of the early Treaties are related to the creation of Community own resources, the reinforcement of the budgetary powers of Parliament, election of MEPs by direct universal suffrage and the setting-up of the European Monetary System (EMS). The entry into force of the Single European Act in 1986, which substantially altered the Treaty of Rome, bolstered the notion of integration by creating a large internal market. MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE FIRST STAGE OF INTEGRATION Article 8 of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC), also known as the Treaty of Rome, provided for the completion of a common market over a transitional period of 12 years, in three stages, ending on 31 December 1969. Its first aim, the customs union, was completed more quickly than expected. The transitional period for enlarging quotas and phasing out internal customs ended as early as 1 July 1968. Even so, at the end of the transitional period there were still major obstacles to freedom of movement. By then, the EEC had adopted a common external tariff for trade with non-EEC countries. Creating a ‘Green Europe’ was another major project for European integration. The first regulations on the common agricultural policy (CAP) were adopted and the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund was set up in 1962. FIRST TREATY AMENDMENTS A. Improvements to the institutions The first institutional change came about with the Merger Treaty of 8 April 1965, which merged the executive bodies. This took effect in 1967, setting up a single Council and Commission of the European Communities (the European Coal and Steel Community, the EEC and the European Atomic Energy Community) and introducing the principle of a single budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Powers of the European Commission
    Powers of the European Commission Source: CVCE. European NAvigator. Susana Muñoz. Copyright: (c) CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/powers_of_the_european_commission-en-ff77f690- ab02-42a8-8a59-bcf8da9601c4.html Last updated: 31/08/2016 1/4 Powers of the European Commission Powers before 1967 Within the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the High Authority enjoyed general responsibilities. It was the only ECSC institution to do so; all the other institutions had clearly defined responsibilities. The High Authority was responsible for ensuring that the objectives set out in the Treaty were attained (Article 8 of the ECSC Treaty). It was responsible for the setting up and the proper functioning of the common market in coal and steel. It also had to oversee, in general terms, the proper functioning of the Community with due regard to the Treaty. The establishment of the common market The High Authority was responsible for ensuring that ECSC objectives were attained, in other words, that a common market was established and that it functioned smoothly on the basis of a number of general principles, such as respect for free competition. The common market in coal, iron ore and scrap metal was created on 10 February 1953 and became operative on 1 May the same year. The responsibilities of the High Authority may be described as follows: – The High Authority was an expert.
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing the Power of the Supernational EU Entity Against the Sovereignty of Its Independent Member Nations
    Pace International Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1 Summer 1997 Article 3 June 1997 The Dilemma of the European Union: Balancing the Power of the Supernational EU Entity against the Sovereignty of Its Independent Member Nations Barbara Crutchfield George Paul L. Frantz Jutta Birmele Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr Recommended Citation Barbara Crutchfield George, Paul L. Frantz, and Jutta Birmele, The Dilemma of the European Union: Balancing the Power of the Supernational EU Entity against the Sovereignty of Its Independent Member Nations, 9 Pace Int'l L. Rev. 111 (1997) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr/vol9/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace International Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DILEMMA OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: BALANCING THE POWER OF THE SUPRANATIONAL EU ENTITY AGAINST THE SOVEREIGNTY OF ITS INDEPENDENT MEMBER NATIONS Barbara Crutchfield Georget Paul L. Frantztt Jutta Birmelettt INTRODUCTION The European Union (EU)1 has a legal and political struc- ture unique in the world because it is composed of fifteen sover- eign nations2 bound together by a series of treaties 3 into a t Professor, Department of Finance, Real Estate and Law, College of Busi- ness Administration, California State University, Long Beach tt Adjunct Professor, Department of Finance, Real Estate and Law, College of Business Administration, California State University, Long Beach. ttt Professor, Department of Romance, German, Russian Languages and Liter- ature, College of Liberal Arts, California State University, Long Beach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dilemma of the European Union
    Pace International Law Review Volume 9 Article 3 Issue 1 Summer 1997 June 1997 The Dilemma of the European Union: Balancing the Power of the Supernational EU Entity against the Sovereignty of Its Independent Member Nations Barbara Crutchfield George Paul L. Frantz Jutta Birmele Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr Recommended Citation Barbara Crutchfield George, Paul L. Frantz, and Jutta Birmele, The Dilemma of the European Union: Balancing the Power of the Supernational EU Entity against the Sovereignty of Its Independent Member Nations, 9 Pace Int'l L. Rev. 111 (1997) Available at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr/vol9/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace International Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DILEMMA OF THE EUROPEAN UNION: BALANCING THE POWER OF THE SUPRANATIONAL EU ENTITY AGAINST THE SOVEREIGNTY OF ITS INDEPENDENT MEMBER NATIONS Barbara Crutchfield Georget Paul L. Frantztt Jutta Birmelettt INTRODUCTION The European Union (EU)1 has a legal and political struc- ture unique in the world because it is composed of fifteen sover- eign nations2 bound together by a series of treaties 3 into a t Professor, Department of Finance, Real Estate and Law, College of Busi- ness Administration, California State University, Long Beach tt Adjunct Professor, Department of Finance, Real Estate and Law, College of Business Administration, California State University, Long Beach. ttt Professor, Department of Romance, German, Russian Languages and Liter- ature, College of Liberal Arts, California State University, Long Beach.
    [Show full text]
  • European Integration in the 1980S: on the Way to Maastricht
    N. Piers Ludlow European integration in the 1980s: on the way to Maastricht Article (Submitted version) (Pre-refereed) Original citation: Ludlow, N. Piers (2013) European integration in the 1980s: on the way to Maastricht. Journal of European integration history © 2012 European Union Liaison Committee of Historians This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46854/ Available in LSE Research Online: October 2012 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the journal article, before the peer review process. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. For more research by LSE authors go to LSE Research Online European integration in the 1980s: on the way to Maastricht? N. Piers Ludlow The Maastricht Treaty emerged out of one of the most tumultuous periods of recent European history. In the course of the two years preceding the December 1991 European Council at which the intergovernmental negotiations were concluded and the treaty text finalised, the whole international context of the European Community had been transformed most notably by the end of the Cold War, the disappearance of the Iron Curtain and the unification of Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) – Structures and Tools
    Briefing September 2017 European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) – Structures and tools SUMMARY Euratom was created in 1957 to further European integration and tackle energy shortages through the peaceful use of nuclear power. It has the same members as the European Union and is governed by the Commission and Council, operating under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Euratom regulates the European civil nuclear industry, which produces almost 30 % of energy in the EU. Euratom's work safeguards nuclear materials and technology, facilitates investment, research and development, and ensures equal access to nuclear supplies, as well as the correct disposal of nuclear waste and the safety of operations. Its main instruments are the Euratom Supply Agency, and its research and nuclear safeguard activities. Notably, Euratom is involved in developing atomic fusion technology which has the potential of delivering abundant sustainable energy in the future. In March 2017, the United Kingdom officially notified the EU of its intention to withdraw from the Union and the Euratom Community. In the context of the negotiations which commenced in June 2017, the Commission has published a position paper outlining the main principles of the EU position concerning Euratom. Possible impacts on both Euratom and the UK nuclear industry are yet to be determined. In this briefing: Brief history Euratom's goals and tasks Main instruments United Kingdom withdrawal from the EU Main references EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Marcin Szczepański Members' Research Service PE 608.665 EN EPRS European Atomic Energy Community Brief history The European Atomic Energy Community was Nuclear energy in Europe created in 1957 with the signature of the Euratom Nuclear power is released by a process Treaty by six founding countries (Belgium, France, called nuclear fission, in which uranium is Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands).
    [Show full text]