Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences Jaap Bos

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences Jaap Bos Jaap Bos Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences Jaap Bos Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences Jaap Bos Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands With contributions by Toon van Meijl Friso Hoeneveld Radboud University Utrecht University Nijmegen, The Netherlands Utrecht, The Netherlands Dorota Lepianka Naomi van Steenbergen Utrecht University Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands Utrecht, The Netherlands Ruud Abma Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands ISBN 978-3-030-48414-9 ISBN 978-3-030-48415-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG. The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Acknowledgements I am grateful to Ruud Abma and Toon van Meijl for providing me with insightful case studies (included in Chaps. 5 and 6, respectively) and to Naomi van Steenbergen, Friso Hoeneveld and Dorota Lepianka for co-authoring three chapters (Chaps. 2, 3 and 10). Versions of this book and of separate chapters have been the subject of discus- sion over the past few years. We would like to thank those who took the time to read and criticize parts of this book and, perhaps more importantly, encouraged us to continue. A big thank you to Paul Baar, Nienke Boesveld, Susan Branje, Gerrit- Bartus Dielissen, Vincent Duindam, Arjan Eijkelestam, Catrin Finkenauer, Belinda Hibbel, Marcel Hoogenboom, Mariëtte van den Hoven, Jorg Huijding, Cha-Hsuan Liu, Jeroen Janssen, Willem Koops, Karin van Look, Susan te Pas, Isabella Spaans, Jacqueline Tenkink-de Jong, Bert Theunissen, Maykel Verkuyten, Christiane de Waele and John de Wit. We are grateful to Springer who took it upon themselves to publish this work in open access format. In particular, we thank Floor Oosting and Myriam Poort for encouraging us to pursue this project. Two reviewers, who provided detailed com- ments and critiques to the manuscript, are to be thanked for their many valuable suggestions and comments. For granting permission to quote from their ethics guideline, we thank Bronwyn Blackwood from the University of Virginia and Muriel Kaptein from Erasmus University for permission to use samples from their Ethical Dilemma Game. For permission to use his cartoon, we are grateful to John Clark. Thank you Ype Driessen for allowing to use your photo cartoon. For permission to his graph of the Masicampo and Lalande data, we are indebted to Larry Wasserman. Finally, there have been numerous students who have read earlier versions of chapters and were kind enough to comment on them. In particular, we would like to thank Stefan Gaillard, Emma Heling, Doortje Mennen, Janique Oudbier, Aldith Pasveer, Aris Spanoudis, Lianne Straver and Tim de Vries for their critique and comments. A shout out to Carys Sterling, who was kind enough to read the video introduc- tions to the chapters. v vi Acknowledgements Special thanks to David Skogerboe for his efforts editing the full manuscript and ensuring it crossed the finish line in style. His improvement saved us from countless errors and mistakes and made this book a much smoother read. For all remaining errors, great and small, the blame falls entirely on me (JB). Every effort has been made to trace the copyright holders and obtain permission to reproduce material included in this book. Contents 1 Introduction ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 References �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 Part I Perspectives 2 Science . 9 2.1 Introduction . 10 2.1.1 Our Moral Duty . 10 2.1.2 Understanding of Ethics �������������������������������������������������������� 10 2.2 Science ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 12 2.2.1 The Beginning . 12 2.2.2 A Very Brief History of the Social Sciences . 13 2.3 Knowledge ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 16 2.3.1 The Role of Universities . 16 2.3.2 Knowledge Construction ������������������������������������������������������ 18 2.3.3 Risk and Reflexivity �������������������������������������������������������������� 18 2.4 Ethos . 20 2.4.1 Science’s Ethos . 20 2.4.2 Ethos or Arena? . 21 2.5 Conclusions . 23 2.5.1 Summary . 23 2.5.2 Discussion . 23 Case Study: Max Weber and the Calling of Science ���������������������������������� 24 Assignment ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 26 Suggested Reading . 27 References �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 27 3 Perspectives . 29 3.1 Introduction . 30 3.1.1 Worst Case Scenario . 30 3.1.2 What Are Ethics? ������������������������������������������������������������������ 31 3.1.3 Three Cases . 32 vii viii Contents 3.2 Conceptualizing Research Ethics ������������������������������������������������������ 36 3.2.1 Responsible Research Conduct . 36 3.2.2 Research Ethics and Integrity . 36 3.2.3 Research Ethics and Professional Ethics ������������������������������ 38 3.3 Codes of Conduct ������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 39 3.3.1 Guiding Principles ���������������������������������������������������������������� 39 3.3.2 Key Imperatives �������������������������������������������������������������������� 41 3.4 Fundamental Dilemmas and Ethical Theories ���������������������������������� 42 3.4.1 The Need for Ethical Reflection . 42 3.4.2 Deontology Versus Consequentialism ���������������������������������� 43 3.4.3 Virtue Ethics. 45 3.4.4 Ready-made Solutions? �������������������������������������������������������� 45 3.5 Conclusions . 45 3.5.1 Summary . 45 3.5.2 Discussion . 46 Case Study: The Ethics in Suicide Prevention Research . 46 Assignment ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 49 Suggested Reading . 49 References �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 50 Part II Ethics and Misconduct 4 Plagiarism . 55 4.1 Introduction . 56 4.1.1 The Unoriginal Sin ���������������������������������������������������������������� 56 4.2 Plagiarius’ Crime ������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 57 4.2.1 A Working Definition ������������������������������������������������������������ 57 4.2.2 Why Is Plagiarism a Problem? ���������������������������������������������� 58 4.2.3 What Does Appropriation Entail? . 59 4.2.4 The Question of Authorship �������������������������������������������������� 59 4.2.5 When Do Intentions Come into Play? ���������������������������������� 60 4.3 Copy-Paste Much Eh? . 61 4.3.1 Patch-Writing ������������������������������������������������������������������������ 61 4.3.2 Translations as Plagiarism ���������������������������������������������������� 62 4.3.3 Self-Plagiarism ���������������������������������������������������������������������� 62 4.4 In Other Words or in the Words of Others? . 63 4.4.1 Stealing into Print . 63 4.4.2 Authorship . 64 4.4.3 Two Cases . 65 4.4.4 Priority Disputes . 66 4.5 When Do Intentions Come into Play? ���������������������������������������������� 68 4.5.1 Intentions Matter . 68 4.5.2 Plain Sloppiness or Culpable Carelessness? . 69 Contents ix 4.6 Factors That Facilitate Plagiarism . 71 4.6.1 Factors . 71 4.6.2 Experience . 71 4.6.3 Externalization ���������������������������������������������������������������������� 71 4.6.4 Pressure to Perform . 72 4.6.5 Availability ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 72 4.6.6 Faulty Teachers
Recommended publications
  • The Impact of External Whistleblowers on Uncovering Corruption: a Comparative Study
    The Impact of External Whistleblowers on Uncovering Corruption: A Comparative Study Carmen Apaza PhD Candidate of Public Administration and Policy School of Public Affairs American University [email protected] Yongjin Chang PhD Candidate of Public Administration and Policy School of Public Affairs American University [email protected] Work in progress – please do not cite Paper to be presented to Ethics and Integrity of Governance European Group of Public Administration Rotherdam, Netherlands September, 2008 The Impact of External Whistleblowers on Uncovering Corruption: A Comparative Study Carmen Apaza & Yongjin Chang1 Abstract Through an original comparative framework as well as archival and pattern matching research methodology, this paper analyzes two important whistleblowing cases in Peru and South Korea. The study finds strong evidence to conclude that external whistlebowing is effective, mass media is a valuable tool for external whistleblowers, powerful allies and strong evidences are crucial factors for making whistle-blowing process easier, and external whistle- blowing works out even in the absence of sufficient legal protection. Nevertheless external whistleblowers experience severe retaliation when there is no proper legal protection. The findings of this study suggest that whistle-blowing is a crucial instrument to improve government accountability and transparency. Hence, it should be considered beyond national boundaries. 1 Both authors are equally contributed to write this paper. 2 Introduction Whistleblowing can be defined as a disclosure of information by an employee or contractor who alleges willful misconduct carried out by an individual or group of individuals within an organiztion (Figg 2000). A whistleblower is a valuable information source that the government or the public cannot get from any oversight systems, because they are insiders of the organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies in Research Misconduct and Human Subjects
    Rules of the Road for those Conducting Federally Funded or Regulated Research: Case Studies in Research Misconduct and Human Subjects April 2, 2019 University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore, MD Robert P. Charrow General Counsel United States Department of Health and Human Services Introduction The materials that follow address three areas-misconduct in science, human subjects and privacy, and financial conflicts of interest. To help illustrate the application of the rules that pertain in each area, a number of hypothetical case studies are presented. You should read and be prepared to discuss each case study during the April 2 lecture. The government regulates research under two authorities. First, it regulates research that it funds. How much does the federal government spend annually on research? See Table 2. Second, a federal agency can regulate research on products that fall within its jurisdiction. Thus, by way of example, the Food and Drug Administration asserts jurisdiction over clinical drug trials even though those trials are privately funded. 1. Misconduct A. What is Research Misconduct? The Public Health Service ("PHS"), which includes NIH, defines "research misconduct" as follows: Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. (a) Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them. (b) Falsification is manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record. (c) Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating the History of Science Into Broader Discussions of Research Integrity and Fraud
    HOS0010.1177/0073275320952268History of ScienceRoberts et al. 952268research-article2020 Introduction HOS History of Science 2020, Vol. 58(4) 354 –368 Integrating the history © The Author(s) 2020 of science into broader https://doi.org/10.1177/0073275320952268Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions discussions of research DOI: 10.1177/0073275320952268 integrity and fraud journals.sagepub.com/home/hos Lissa L. Roberts University of Twente, Netherlands H. Otto Sibum Uppsala University, Sweden Cyrus C. M. Mody Maastricht University, Netherlands Abstract This introductory article frames our special issue in terms of how historicizing research integrity and fraud can benefit current discussions of scientific conduct and the need to improve public trust in science. Keywords Research integrity, fraud, scientific conduct, scientific values, public trust Writing about research integrity and fraud in the midst of the Covid-19 crisis carries an extra sense of urgency. Voices of reason tell us to trust the experts, echoing both the (idealized) scientific method and Ronald Reagan’s response to Soviet promises regard- ing nuclear disarmament: “trust, but verify.” Great advice, but how easy is it really to identify trustworthy experts? Is the boundary between healthy skepticism and manufac- tured doubt a simple matter of distinguishing between valid laboratory and publishing protocols on one side and political, economic, or personal interests on the other? Should we follow those who rely on the Mertonian distinction between norm-bound
    [Show full text]
  • Essential & Lifesaving Research?
    Animal Experiments: Essential & Lifesaving Research? BULLETIN Have your concerns about animal experiments been dismissed by others? Amazingly, only 62% of the general public are even aware that animals are used in experimental research in Australia these days. And the general consensus is that with animals ‘protected’ by legislation, codes of practice and ethics committees, only essential and life saving research is being conducted, and it’s all very humane, with laboratory animals kept in luxury housing with lots of environmental enrichment. Surely, the graphic images and tales throughout history no longer occur cage with bandages around his eyes and a sonar device attached to his head today..? that emitted a high-pitched screech every few minutes. He was clinging to a device, covered in towelling, apparently intended to serve as a surrogate From the Archives… mother. In the mid nineteenth century, French physiologist Claude Bernard con- vinced the scientific community that if a disease could not be replicated By looking at these old examples we can see how unscrupulous we have in animals it could not exist. It became understood amongst scientists that been to animals in the past, often just to satisfy our curiosity - but things animal experimentation could provide both money and reputation. are supposedly different today. Question any company that conducts animal testing and they will always assure you that animals are only used when He is quoted as saying: “The physiologist is not an ordinary man: He is a absolutely essential and there is no other alternative. Researchers follow a scientist, possessed and absorbed by the scientific idea that he pursues.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education Reform: Getting the Incentives Right
    Higher Education Reform: Getting the Incentives Right CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis CHEPS Van Stolkweg 14 University of Twente P.O. Box 80510 P.O. Box 217 2508 GM The Hague, The Netherlands 7500 AE Enschede, the Netherlands ISBN 90 5833 065 6 2 Contents Contents Preface 9 Introduction 11 1 The Dutch higher education system 15 1.1 Binary system 15 1.2 Formal tasks 16 1.3Types of institutions 16 1.4 Funding structure 17 1.5 Public expenditures on higher education 19 1.6 Tuition fee policies 21 1.7 Student support system 23 1.8 Admission policies 24 1.9 Quality control 25 1.10 Enrollment 26 Annex:Public funding of higher education in the Netherlands, performance-based models 29 2 Economics of higher education 35 2.1 Why do people attend higher education? 35 2.1.1 The human capital approach 35 2.1.2 The signalling approach 36 2.1.3How high are the financial and non-financial returns to higher education? 36 2.2 Why public support of higher education? 38 2.2.1 Human capital spillovers 38 2.2.2 Capital market constraints 39 2.2.3Risk 40 2.2.4 Imperfect information and transparency 41 2.2.5 Income redistribution 42 2.2.6 Tax distortions 42 2.3How to fund higher education? 42 2.3.1 Student support 43 2.3.2 Funding of higher education institutions 43 2.4 Public versus private provision of higher education 44 2.5 Should the higher education sector be deregulated? 45 2.6 Why combine education and research in universities? 46 5 Higher Education Reform: Getting the Incentives Right 2.7 Why and when should research be publicly funded?
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletter the Newsletter
    THETHE NEWSLETTERNEWSLETTER DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Number 62 Autumn 2013 GREETINGS FROM THE CHAIR The evolution of history departments—like the wider development of human history itself—is an ongoing process of change across time; and, as always, the UNC History Department has steadily evolved over this past year. We worked in a context of political upheavals, which included new educational priorities in the statewide UNC system as well as legislative proposals for more reductions in the UNC budget; and we were affected by internal University upheavals, which included a long-unfolding athletic/academic scandal and the appointments of both a new chancellor and provost. Drawing on a famous generalization about historical realities, it might well be said that we make our own history in Chapel Hill, but not under conditions that we have chosen for ourselves. Despite the always-changing context in which we work, there are enduring continuities in our Department’s commitment to historical education and our distinguished departmental achievements. Our faculty continue to publish outstanding books and articles, our classes draw large, diverse enrollments, our graduate programs attract hundreds of talented applicants, our current graduate students constantly win competitive awards for their research and teaching, and our History major regularly attracts many of the best undergraduates in UNC’s College of Arts and Sciences. These continuities provide a strong foundation for new initiatives and new responses to our changing contexts. In this past year, for example, we explored how historians can expand their engagement with public audiences and communities by pursuing imaginative historical work in non-academic institutions and by extending their research or teaching into the rapidly developing “digital humanities.” The UNC-CH History Department, in short, continues to change and to uphold its traditional high standards as new generations of faculty and students gradually transform our departmental community.
    [Show full text]
  • “Dysrationalia” Among University Students: the Role of Cognitive
    “Dysrationalia” among university students: The role of cognitive abilities, different aspects of rational thought and self-control in explaining epistemically suspect beliefs Erceg, Nikola; Galić, Zvonimir; Bubić, Andreja Source / Izvornik: Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 2019, 15, 159 - 175 Journal article, Published version Rad u časopisu, Objavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF) https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1696 Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:131:942674 Rights / Prava: Attribution 4.0 International Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-29 Repository / Repozitorij: ODRAZ - open repository of the University of Zagreb Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Europe's Journal of Psychology ejop.psychopen.eu | 1841-0413 Research Reports “Dysrationalia” Among University Students: The Role of Cognitive Abilities, Different Aspects of Rational Thought and Self-Control in Explaining Epistemically Suspect Beliefs Nikola Erceg* a, Zvonimir Galić a, Andreja Bubić b [a] Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. [b] Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, Split, Croatia. Abstract The aim of the study was to investigate the role that cognitive abilities, rational thinking abilities, cognitive styles and self-control play in explaining the endorsement of epistemically suspect beliefs among university students. A total of 159 students participated in the study. We found that different aspects of rational thought (i.e. rational thinking abilities and cognitive styles) and self-control, but not intelligence, significantly predicted the endorsement of epistemically suspect beliefs. Based on these findings, it may be suggested that intelligence and rational thinking, although related, represent two fundamentally different constructs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carnage of Substandard Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Call for Quality Katrina a Bramstedt ‍ 1,2
    Brief report J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2020-106494 on 1 October 2020. Downloaded from The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality Katrina A Bramstedt 1,2 1Luxembourg Agency for ABSTRACT issued (tables 2 and 3).ii The source of most of these Research Integrity, Esch- sur- Worldwide there are currently over 1200 research studies incidents is Asia (n=19; 57.6%), with China the Alzette, Luxembourg 2 largest Asian subgroup (n=11; 57.9%). For three Bond University Faculty of being performed on the topic of COVID-19. Many of Health Sciences and Medicine, these involve children and adults over age 65 years. papers, the reason for the removal is unknown; Gold Coast, Queensland, There are also numerous studies testing investigational however, for the others, a range of problems Australia vaccines on healthy volunteers. No research team exist, including data falsification, methodological is exempt from the pressures and speed at which concerns, and concerns about interpretation of data Correspondence to COVID-19 research is occurring. And this can increase and conclusions, as well as authorship and research Professor Katrina A Bramstedt, participant privacy issues (table 4). To date, there Bond University Faculty of the risk of honest error as well as misconduct. To date, Health Sciences and Medicine, 33 papers have been identified as unsuitable for public have been no identified reports of plagiarism or Gold Coast, Queensland, use and either retracted, withdrawn, or noted with data fabrication. Another paper, a preprint from the Australia; concern. Asia is the source of most of these manuscripts USA about COVID-19 antibody seroprevalence, has txbioethics@ yahoo.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming Autistic: How Do Late Diagnosed Autistic People
    Becoming Autistic: How do Late Diagnosed Autistic People Assigned Female at Birth Understand, Discuss and Create their Gender Identity through the Discourses of Autism? Emily Violet Maddox Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Sociology and Social Policy September 2019 1 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................... 5 ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................................................. 8 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 TERMINOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................ 14 1.3 OUTLINE OF CHAPTERS ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistence of Fad Interventions in the Face of Negative Scientific Evidence: Facilitated Communication for Autism As a Case Example
    Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention ISSN: 1748-9539 (Print) 1748-9547 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tebc20 The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example Scott O. Lilienfeld, Julia Marshall, James T. Todd & Howard C. Shane To cite this article: Scott O. Lilienfeld, Julia Marshall, James T. Todd & Howard C. Shane (2014) The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example, Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8:2, 62-101, DOI: 10.1080/17489539.2014.976332 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2014.976332 Published online: 02 Feb 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 5252 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tebc20 Download by: [University of Lethbridge] Date: 05 October 2015, At: 05:52 Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2014 Vol. 8, No. 2, 62–101, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2014.976332 EBP Advancement Corner The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example Scott O. Lilienfeld1, Julia Marshall1, James T. Todd2 & Howard C. Shane3 1Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA, 3Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA ................................................................................................................................................. Abstract Communication disorder and mental health professionals may assume that once novel clinical techniques have been refuted by research, they will be promptly abandoned.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhythm and Timing in Autism: Learning to Dance
    REVIEW ARTICLE published: 19 April 2013 INTEGRATIVE NEUROSCIENCE doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00027 Rhythm and timing in autism: learning to dance Pat Amos* Training and Private Consultation, Ardmore, PA, USA Edited by: In recent years, a significant body of research has focused on challenges to neural Anne M. Donnellan, University of connectivity as a key to understanding autism. In contrast to attempts to identify a Wisconsin-Madison, University of single static, primarily brain-based deficit, children and adults diagnosed with autism are San Diego, USA increasingly perceived as out of sync with their internal and external environments in Reviewed by: Elizabeth B. Torres, Rutgers dynamic ways that must also involve operations of the peripheral nervous systems. The University, USA noisiness that seems to occur in both directions of neural flow may help explain challenges Trevor McDonald, Education to movement and sensing, and ultimately to entrainment with circadian rhythms and social Associates Inc., USA interactions across the autism spectrum, profound differences in the rhythm and timing of *Correspondence: movement have been tracked to infancy. Difficulties with self-synchrony inhibit praxis, and Pat Amos, 635 Ardmore Avenue, Ardmore, PA 19003-1831, USA. can disrupt the “dance of relationship” through which caregiver and child build meaning. e-mail: [email protected] Different sensory aspects of a situation may fail to match up; ultimately, intentions and actions themselves may be uncoupled. This uncoupling may help explain the expressions of alienation from the actions of one’s body which recur in the autobiographical autism literature. Multi-modal/cross-modal coordination of different types of sensory information into coherent events may be difficult to achieve because amodal properties (e.g., rhythm and tempo) that help unite perceptions are unreliable.
    [Show full text]
  • Achieving a High Level of Protection from Pesticides in Europe: Problems with the Current Risk Assessment Procedure and Solutions
    https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.18 . Achieving a High Level of Protection from Pesticides in Europe: Problems with the Current Risk Assessment Procedure and Solutions Claire ROBINSON* , Christopher J. PORTIER**, Aleksandra ČAVOŠKI***, Robin MESNAGE****, Apolline ROGER*****, Peter CLAUSING******, Paul WHALEY*******, Hans MUILERMAN******** and https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Angeliki LYSSIMACHOU********* The regulation of pesticides in the European Union (EU) relies on a network of hard law (legislation and implementing acts) and soft law (non-legally binding guidance documents and administrative and scientific practices). Both hard and soft laws govern how risk assessments are conducted, but a significant role is left to the latter. Europe’s pesticide regulation is one of the most stringent in the world. Its stated objectives are to ensure an independent, objective and transparent assessment of pesticides and achieve a high level of protection for health and environment. However, a growing body of evidence shows that pesticides that have passed through this process and are authorised for use may harm , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at humans, animals and the environment. The authors of the current paper – experts in toxicology, law and policy – identified shortcomings in the authorisation process, focusing on the EU assessment of the pesticide active substance glyphosate. The shortcomings mostly consist of failures to implement the hard or soft laws. But in some instances the law itself is responsible, as some provisions can only fail to achieve its objectives. Ways to improve the system are proposed, requiring changes in hard and soft laws as well as in administrative 30 Sep 2021 at 13:44:58 and scientific practices.
    [Show full text]