(Pdf) Download
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Infrared Spectroscopy of Nearby Radio Active Elliptical Galaxies
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 203:14 (11pp), 2012 November doi:10.1088/0067-0049/203/1/14 C 2012. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY OF NEARBY RADIO ACTIVE ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES Jeremy Mould1,2,9, Tristan Reynolds3, Tony Readhead4, David Floyd5, Buell Jannuzi6, Garret Cotter7, Laura Ferrarese8, Keith Matthews4, David Atlee6, and Michael Brown5 1 Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing Swinburne University, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia; [email protected] 2 ARC Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) 3 School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic 3100, Australia 4 Palomar Observatory, California Institute of Technology 249-17, Pasadena, CA 91125 5 School of Physics, Monash University, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia 6 Steward Observatory, University of Arizona (formerly at NOAO), Tucson, AZ 85719 7 Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Denys, Oxford, Keble Road, OX13RH, UK 8 Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics Herzberg, Saanich Road, Victoria V8X4M6, Canada Received 2012 June 6; accepted 2012 September 26; published 2012 November 1 ABSTRACT In preparation for a study of their circumnuclear gas we have surveyed 60% of a complete sample of elliptical galaxies within 75 Mpc that are radio sources. Some 20% of our nuclear spectra have infrared emission lines, mostly Paschen lines, Brackett γ , and [Fe ii]. We consider the influence of radio power and black hole mass in relation to the spectra. Access to the spectra is provided here as a community resource. Key words: galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD – galaxies: nuclei – infrared: general – radio continuum: galaxies ∼ 1. INTRODUCTION 30% of the most massive galaxies are radio continuum sources (e.g., Fabbiano et al. -
Lemmings &Ndash; I. the Emerlin Legacy Survey of Nearby Galaxies. 1.5-Ghz Parsec-Scale Radio Structures and Cores
MNRAS 476, 3478–3522 (2018) doi:10.1093/mnras/sty342 Advance Access publication 2018 February 9 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/476/3/3478/4848304 by Southampton Oceanography Centre National Oceanographic Library user on 12 May 2020 LeMMINGs – I. The eMERLIN legacy survey of nearby galaxies. 1.5-GHz parsec-scale radio structures and cores R. D. Baldi,1‹ D. R. A. Williams,1 I. M. McHardy,1 R. J. Beswick,2 M. K. Argo,2,3 B. T. Dullo,4 J. H. Knapen,5,6 E. Brinks,7 T. W. B. Muxlow,2 S. Aalto,8 A. Alberdi,9 G. J. Bendo,2,10 S. Corbel,11,12 R. Evans,13 D. M. Fenech,14 D. A. Green,15 H.-R. Klockner,¨ 16 E. Kording,¨ 17 P. Kharb, 18 T. J. Maccarone,19 I. Mart´ı-Vidal,8 C. G. Mundell,20 F. Panessa,21 A. B. Peck,22 M. A. Perez-Torres,´ 9 D. J. Saikia,18 P. Saikia,17,23 F. Shankar,1 R. E. Spencer,2 I. R. Stevens,24 P. Uttley25 and J. Westcott7 Affiliations are listed at the end of the paper Accepted 2018 February 2. Received 2018 January 19; in original form 2018 January 19 ABSTRACT We present the first data release of high-resolution (≤0.2 arcsec) 1.5-GHz radio images of 103 nearby galaxies from the Palomar sample, observed with the eMERLIN array, as part of the LeMMINGs survey. This sample includes galaxies which are active (low-ionization nuclear emission-line regions [LINER] and Seyfert) and quiescent (H II galaxies and absorption line galaxies, ALGs), which are reclassified based upon revised emission-line diagrams. -
Messier Objects
Messier Objects From the Stocker Astroscience Center at Florida International University Miami Florida The Messier Project Main contributors: • Daniel Puentes • Steven Revesz • Bobby Martinez Charles Messier • Gabriel Salazar • Riya Gandhi • Dr. James Webb – Director, Stocker Astroscience center • All images reduced and combined using MIRA image processing software. (Mirametrics) What are Messier Objects? • Messier objects are a list of astronomical sources compiled by Charles Messier, an 18th and early 19th century astronomer. He created a list of distracting objects to avoid while comet hunting. This list now contains over 110 objects, many of which are the most famous astronomical bodies known. The list contains planetary nebula, star clusters, and other galaxies. - Bobby Martinez The Telescope The telescope used to take these images is an Astronomical Consultants and Equipment (ACE) 24- inch (0.61-meter) Ritchey-Chretien reflecting telescope. It has a focal ratio of F6.2 and is supported on a structure independent of the building that houses it. It is equipped with a Finger Lakes 1kx1k CCD camera cooled to -30o C at the Cassegrain focus. It is equipped with dual filter wheels, the first containing UBVRI scientific filters and the second RGBL color filters. Messier 1 Found 6,500 light years away in the constellation of Taurus, the Crab Nebula (known as M1) is a supernova remnant. The original supernova that formed the crab nebula was observed by Chinese, Japanese and Arab astronomers in 1054 AD as an incredibly bright “Guest star” which was visible for over twenty-two months. The supernova that produced the Crab Nebula is thought to have been an evolved star roughly ten times more massive than the Sun. -
Appendix A: the HRS+ Members
Appendix A: The HRS+ Members 207 Table A.1: The general properties of galaxies comprising the HRS+ sample. Each column contains: (1) the HRS+ identification 208 number; (2) an alternative name taken from either the New General Catalogue (NGC; Dreyer, 1888), the Catalogue of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies (CGCG; Zwicky et al., 1961), Uppsala General Catalogue (UGC; Nilson, 1973), the Virgo Cluster Catalogue (VCC; Binggeli et al., 1985), and the Index Catalogue (IC; Dreyer, 1908); (3) J2000 right ascension, from NED; (4) J2000 declination, from NED; (5) distance; (6) the morphological classification from NED; (7) total 2MASS K band magnitude −2 (Skrutskie et al., 2006); (8) the optical isophotal distance D25 (25 mag arcsec ); (9) the heliocentric radial velocity from NED; (10) the cluster or cloud membership; and (11) the galactic extinction Schlegel et al., 1998. ◦ ′ ′′ −1 HRS+ Alt.Name R.A.(hms) Dec.( ) D (Mpc) Type KStot D25 (′) V (km s ) Member AB (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) 1 CGCG 123-035 10 17 39.66 +22 48 35.9 15.7 Pec 11.59 1.00 1175 Leo Cl. 0.13 2 UGC 5588 10 20 57.13 +25 21 53.4 17.2 S? 11.03 0.52 1291 Leo Cl. 0.10 3 NGC 3226 10 23 27.01 +19 53 54.7 15.3 E2:pec;LINER;Sy3 8.57 3.16 1169 Leo Cl. 0.10 4 NGC 3227 10 23 30.58 +19 51 54.2 15.4 SAB(s)pec;Sy1.5 7.64 5.37 1148 Leo Cl. -
SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES and THEIR HOST SPHEROIDS III. the MBH − Nsph CORRELATION
The Astrophysical Journal, 821:88 (8pp), 2016 April 20 doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/88 © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES AND THEIR HOST SPHEROIDS. III. THE MBH–nsph CORRELATION Giulia A. D. Savorgnan Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia; [email protected] Received 2015 December 6; accepted 2016 March 6; published 2016 April 13 ABSTRACT The Sérsic R1 n model is the best approximation known to date for describing the light distribution of stellar spheroidal and disk components, with the Sérsic index n providing a direct measure of the central radial concentration of stars. The Sérsic index of a galaxy’s spheroidal component, nsph, has been shown to tightly correlate with the mass of the central supermassive black hole, MBH.TheMnBH– sph correlation is also expected from other two well known scaling relations involving the spheroid luminosity, Lsph:theLsph–n sph and the MLBH– sph. Obtaining an accurate estimate of the spheroid Sérsic index requires a careful modeling of a galaxy’s light distribution and some studies have failed to recover a statistically significant MnBH– sph correlation. With the aim of re-investigating the MnBH– sph and other black hole mass scaling relations, we performed a detailed (i.e., bulge, disks, bars, spiral arms, rings, halo, nucleus, etc.) decomposition of 66 galaxies, with directly measured black hole masses, that had been imaged at 3.6 μm with Spitzer.Inthispaper,the third of this series, we present an analysis of the Lsph–n sph and MnBH– sph diagrams. -
Guide Du Ciel Profond
Guide du ciel profond Olivier PETIT 8 mai 2004 2 Introduction hjjdfhgf ghjfghfd fg hdfjgdf gfdhfdk dfkgfd fghfkg fdkg fhdkg fkg kfghfhk Table des mati`eres I Objets par constellation 21 1 Androm`ede (And) Andromeda 23 1.1 Messier 31 (La grande Galaxie d'Androm`ede) . 25 1.2 Messier 32 . 27 1.3 Messier 110 . 29 1.4 NGC 404 . 31 1.5 NGC 752 . 33 1.6 NGC 891 . 35 1.7 NGC 7640 . 37 1.8 NGC 7662 (La boule de neige bleue) . 39 2 La Machine pneumatique (Ant) Antlia 41 2.1 NGC 2997 . 43 3 le Verseau (Aqr) Aquarius 45 3.1 Messier 2 . 47 3.2 Messier 72 . 49 3.3 Messier 73 . 51 3.4 NGC 7009 (La n¶ebuleuse Saturne) . 53 3.5 NGC 7293 (La n¶ebuleuse de l'h¶elice) . 56 3.6 NGC 7492 . 58 3.7 NGC 7606 . 60 3.8 Cederblad 211 (N¶ebuleuse de R Aquarii) . 62 4 l'Aigle (Aql) Aquila 63 4.1 NGC 6709 . 65 4.2 NGC 6741 . 67 4.3 NGC 6751 (La n¶ebuleuse de l’œil flou) . 69 4.4 NGC 6760 . 71 4.5 NGC 6781 (Le nid de l'Aigle ) . 73 TABLE DES MATIERES` 5 4.6 NGC 6790 . 75 4.7 NGC 6804 . 77 4.8 Barnard 142-143 (La tani`ere noire) . 79 5 le B¶elier (Ari) Aries 81 5.1 NGC 772 . 83 6 le Cocher (Aur) Auriga 85 6.1 Messier 36 . 87 6.2 Messier 37 . 89 6.3 Messier 38 . -
Gone Without a Bang: an Archival HST Survey for Disappearing Massive Stars
MNRAS 453, 2885–2900 (2015) doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1809 Gone without a bang: an archival HST survey for disappearing massive stars Thomas M. Reynolds,1,2‹ Morgan Fraser1 and Gerard Gilmore1 1Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK 2Tuorla Observatory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, Vais¨ al¨ antie¨ 20, FI-21500 Piikkio,¨ Finland Downloaded from Accepted 2015 August 4. Received 2015 July 16; in original form 2015 May 27 ABSTRACT It has been argued that a substantial fraction of massive stars may end their lives without http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/ an optically bright supernova (SN), but rather collapse to form a black hole. Such an event would not be detected by current SN surveys, which are focused on finding bright transients. Kochanek et al. proposed a novel survey for such events, using repeated observations of nearby galaxies to search for the disappearance of a massive star. We present such a survey, using the first systematic analysis of archival Hubble Space Telescope images of nearby galaxies with the aim of identifying evolved massive stars which have disappeared, without an accompanying optically bright SN. We consider a sample of 15 galaxies, with at least three epochs of Hubble Space Telescope imaging taken between 1994 and 2013. Within this data, we find one candidate at CERN - European Organization for Nuclear Research on September 15, 2016 which is consistent with a 25–30 M yellow supergiant which has undergone an optically dark core-collapse. Key words: stars: evolution – stars: massive – supernovae: general. plosion, and Type IIL (Linear) SNe which have a steady decline 1 INTRODUCTION in luminosity from peak. -
A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short). -
OBSERVING BASICS by GUY MACKIE
OBSERVING BASICS by GUY MACKIE Observing Reports The colorful and detailed photographs we see of celestial objects are not at all like the ubiquitous "fuzzy blobs" we see at the eyepiece. Nevertheless, you are freezing your buns off and loosing much needed sleep for work, the next day so why not make a description of your observations that will make the hunt worthwhile. Here are some suggestions to fill the empty spaces in your logbook and to imprint the observing experience more deeply in your memory. The Basics Your website www.m51.ca has a downloadable log sheet template that is just super, but you can also make up one for yourself or customize the website version to your own needs. The main things to start your report should be the circumstances under which you observed: Observing Location Time (of observing session and of the observation of each object) Optics (type of instrument, eyepiece, filters, power of magnification) Transparency (page 56 of the Observers Handbook) Seeing (for me this is a subjective rating of the atmospheric stability based on Planet features and double star observations) It is good to know the field of view (FOV) of each of your eyepieces in minutes of degree, then you can estimate the approximate size of the object. The sketchpad I use has the FOV for every eyepiece I use taped to the back, a handy reference. To calculate your field of view there are websites that will punch out the both the magnification and the FOV for most eyepieces. You can do it yourself: With any motor drives turned off, place a star near the celestial equator just outside the field of view in the eyepiece so that it will drift across the middle of the field of view. -
Lemmings. I. the Emerlin Legacy Survey of Nearby Galaxies. 1.5-Ghz Parsec-Scale Radio Structures and Cores
MNRAS 000,1{44 (2018) Preprint 8 February 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 LeMMINGs. I. The eMERLIN legacy survey of nearby galaxies. 1.5-GHz parsec-scale radio structures and cores R. D. Baldi1?, D. R. A. Williams1, I. M. McHardy1, R. J. Beswick2, M. K. Argo2;3, B. T. Dullo4, J. H. Knapen5;6, E. Brinks7, T. W. B. Muxlow2, S. Aalto8, A. Alberdi9, G. J. Bendo2;10, S. Corbel11;12, R. Evans13, D. M. Fenech14, D. A. Green15, H.-R. Kl¨ockner16, E. K¨ording17, P. Kharb18, T. J. Maccarone19, I. Mart´ı-Vidal8, C. G. Mundell20, F. Panessa21, A. B. Peck22, M. A. P´erez-Torres9, D. J. Saikia18, P. Saikia17;23, F. Shankar1, R. E. Spencer2, I. R. Stevens24, P. Uttley25 and J. Westcott7 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK 2 Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK 3 Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK 4 Departamento de Astrofisica y Ciencias de la Atmosfera, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain 5 Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, Via Lactea S/N, E-38205, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 6 Departamento de Astrofisica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38206, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 7 Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK 8 Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, 43992 Onsala, Sweden 9 Instituto de Astrofisica de Andaluc´ıa(IAA, CSIC); Glorieta de la Astronom´ıa s/n, 18008-Granada, Spain 10 ALMA Regional Centre Node, UK 11 Laboratoire AIM (CEA/IRFU - CNRS/INSU - Universit´eParis Diderot), CEA DSM/IRFU/SAp, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France 12 Station de Radioastronomie de Nan¸cay, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Univ. -
Classification of Galaxies Using Fractal Dimensions
UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1999 Classification of galaxies using fractal dimensions Sandip G Thanki University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Thanki, Sandip G, "Classification of galaxies using fractal dimensions" (1999). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 1050. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/8msa-x9b8 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. -
TSP 2004 Telescope Observing Program
THE TEXAS STAR PARTY 2004 TELESCOPE OBSERVING CLUB BY JOHN WAGONER TEXAS ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF DALLAS RULES AND REGULATIONS Welcome to the Texas Star Party's Telescope Observing Club. The purpose of this club is not to test your observing skills by throwing the toughest objects at you that are hard to see under any conditions, but to give you an opportunity to observe 25 showcase objects under the ideal conditions of these pristine West Texas skies, thus displaying them to their best advantage. This year we have planned a program called “Starlight, Starbright”. The rules are simple. Just observe the 25 objects listed. That's it. Any size telescope can be used. All observations must be made at the Texas Star Party to qualify. All objects are within range of small (6”) to medium sized (10”) telescopes, and are available for observation between 10:00PM and 3:00AM any time during the TSP. Each person completing this list will receive an official Texas Star Party Telescope Observing Club lapel pin. These pins are not sold at the TSP and can only be acquired by completing the program, so wear them proudly. To receive your pin, turn in your observations to John Wagoner - TSP Observing Chairman any time during the Texas Star Party. I will be at the outside door leading into the TSP Meeting Hall each day between 1:00 PM and 2:30 PM. If you finish the list the last night of TSP, or I am not available to give you your pin, just mail your observations to me at 1409 Sequoia Dr., Plano, Tx.